Skip to main content
JAAOS Global Research & Reviews logoLink to JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
. 2022 Aug 12;6(8):e22.00125. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00125

Total Knee Arthroplasty After Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: Reduction in Prolonged Opioid Use Without Increased Postsurgical Complications

Seth Stake 1, Amil R Agarwal 1,, Stefan Coombs 1, Jordan S Cohen 1, Gregory J Golladay 1, Joshua C Campbell 1, Savyasachi C Thakkar 1
PMCID: PMC9377675  PMID: 35960987

Introduction:

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an increasingly used nonsurgical treatment modality for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. Previous studies have demonstrated this to be an effective and safe method to decrease pain and increase functionality in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year postoperative complication rates and rates of prolonged postoperative opioid usage between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after previous GNRFA and those undergoing TKA alone.

Methods:

Patients who underwent primary TKA after prior GNRFA (GNRFA-TKA) of the ipsilateral knee were identified in a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2019. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted comparing those with prior GNRFA and those without. Outcomes of interest included prolonged postoperative opioid usage, 2-year revision rates, and 90-day medical complications. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software provided by the PearlDiver Database.

Results:

In total, 675 patients in the GNRFA-TKA cohort were compared with a control cohort of 255,351 patients. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation-total knee arthroplasty patientshad lower odds of prolonged opioid use postoperatively (OR: 0.478; 95%: 0.409 to 0.559; P < 0.001). No notable difference was observed in the 2-year surgical outcomes between cohorts. Patients in the GNRFA-TKA cohort had lower odds of requiring a blood transfusion and having postoperative anemia, all arrhythmias, and urinary infections compared with primary TKA control patients.

Conclusion:

Preoperative GNRFA leads to a lower rate of prolonged postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing TKA, without an increased risk of complications. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings of this database study.


Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the procedure of choice for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) that has failed nonsurgical treatment,1,2 and most patients are satisfied with their outcomes.3 Nonsurgical interventions, including weight loss, medication, therapeutic exercise, and possibly corticosteroid injection, are recommended for knee OA4,5 to ameliorate symptoms and to facilitate recovery after surgery.

Other modalities such as electrical stimulation and ultrasonography can be administered for knee OA; however, the evidence is not strongly in favor of these options. More recently, genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) has gained popularity in the management of both preoperative and postoperative knee pain. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is a two-step procedure that involves a diagnostic extra-articular lidocaine block, followed by targeted thermal ablation to the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular sensory nerve branches of the knee.6 In the most recent American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for nonsurgical management of knee OA, treatments classified as denervation therapy received a limited recommendation as a nonsurgical treatment modality for patients with symptomatic OA.5

Recent studies have sought to define the effectiveness of GNRFA and to compare it with other nonarthroplasty treatments for knee osteoarthritis. A high-quality, double-blind, sham-controlled study showed that cryoneurolysis targeting the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve resulted in reduced pain and improved osteoarthritis symptoms.7 Other studies have demonstrated RFA to be an effective modality to decrease pain and increase functionality in patients with OA.811 In addition, two RCTs comparing intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids with GNRFA have shown favorable pain and function scores for ablation within the first three months and persisting to at least 6 months.12,13 The evidence for RFA is well summarized in a recent systematic review, which concluded that RFA has superior results to NSAIDs and IA corticosteroids with no serious adverse events reported.2

Although GNRFA is an increasingly used effective modality to temporize OA symptoms, it has not been shown to slow the degenerative process. Thus, patients with severe OA who have previously undergone GNRFA may progress to TKA. There is currently a paucity of literature on adverse events and outcomes associated with TKA after previous GNRFA (GNRFA-TKA). Although limited to studies with small patient cohorts of less than 100 patients, two prospective trials have not found benefit for RFA in controlling pain after TKA.14,17 However, adverse postoperative complications were not compared across cohorts in these studies. Other nonsurgical modalities, such as IA corticosteroid injections, have been correlated with a time-dependent increased risk for postoperative complications after TKA.16 It is important to identify procedure-related TKA risks so that patients undergoing GNRFA-TKA can be properly counseled. The purpose of this study was to compare (1) two-year postoperative complication and revision rates and (2) the rate of prolonged opioid use between patients undergoing GNRFA-TKA and those undergoing primary TKA without previous nerve ablation using a national all-payer claims database. Time interval between GNRFA and TKA was also noted because intra-articular steroid injection timing has been related to TKA complications.16 We hypothesized that GNRFA-TKA patients would have no difference in complication and revision rates as well as a reduced incidence of prolonged opioid use compared with primary TKA control patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the PearlDiver Patients Records Database (www.pearldiverinc.com). The Mariner data set was used in this study and includes all-payer claims data from 2010 to 2019. The data set is unique in that it longitudinally follows patients based on distinct patient identifiers, minimizing loss to follow-up in the system. Patients who underwent primary TKA were identified using International Classification of Diseases 10 procedure codes (ICD-10). Patients who underwent primary TKA for diagnoses other than osteoarthritis were excluded from this study. Records of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were queried to identify those who underwent GNRFA before TKA. Patients who underwent GNRFA were identified using the CPT code 64640. The Mariner data set of PearlDiver does not have CPT modifiers to control for laterality. To confirm that GNRFA and TKA were conducted on the ipsilateral side, ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used. An ICD-10 diagnosis code of OA with controlled laterality was associated with the CPT code for GNRFA. Only those with GNRFA before TKA and with matching laterality were included in our GNRFA-TKA cohort.

Exclusion and Inclusion Criteria

Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years at the time of TKA, had a staged or simultaneous bilateral TKA within our follow-up period, or had a postoperative nerve ablation procedure. Staged/bilateral TKAs were excluded to control for laterality of the revision outcomes. Patients were included if they underwent TKA for OA and had a follow-up of 2 years within the Mariner data set. Patients without two years of follow-up, as determined using the patient manifest, were excluded and were assumed to be either lost to follow-up or to have had their procedure after 2017 and thus did not have 2 years of follow-up by the end of our study period. Owing to the limitations of ICD-10 code availability and the requirement for 2-year follow-up data, this study ultimately included patients who underwent TKA from 2015 to 2017.

Demographics and Outcome Variables

Demographic characteristics collected included age, sex, and the Elixhauser comorbidities for each cohort.17 Preoperative opioid use was defined as having had an opioid medication prescription filled at least once within one year before TKA. The primary outcomes for this study were 2-year surgical outcomes (all-cause revision, revision for periprosthetic joint infection [PJI], revision for loosening, and manipulation under anesthesia [MUA]) and postoperative prolonged opioid use. Prolonged opioid use was defined as continued opioid use, prescribed in the postoperative period, within the 3- to 6-month postoperative window after TKA. By three months postoperatively, most patients without preoperative opioid use no longer require opioids for the management of their postoperative TKA pain.18 Opioid use was tracked only through 6 months postoperatively to prevent any overlap from any future procedures that required postoperative opioid prescriptions or other unrelated sources of pain. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmissions and various 90-day medical complications including surgical site infections, postoperative anemia, bleeding complications/transfusions, other infectious complications, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and death.

Statistical Analysis

Univariate analysis using the R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) provided by PearlDiver was used to analyze any differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, and outcomes. This was conducted using chi square tests for categorical variables and Student t-tests for continuous variables where appropriate. To mitigate confounding variables and covariates, all demographic variables and comorbidities with P-values less than 0.2 on univariate analysis were included as independent variables for each multivariable analysis. All outcomes and complications with P-values less than 0.2 were included as dependent variables for separate multivariable analyses. Using the PearlDiver software, logistic regression was conducted for multivariable analysis of the indicated variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 was used as the level of significance. For confidentiality purposes, PearlDiver does not permit the reporting of count data less than 11. Any count data with a patient number less than 11 was reported as <11, but the appropriate percentage was reported.

Results

A total of 255,910 patients who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis were included in this study. Of these patients, 675 underwent GNRFA before TKA (GNRFA-TKA) and 255,351 did not undergo GNRFA before TKA. For those who underwent a prior GNRFA, the average time between GNRFA and TKA was 96.39 days (SD: 91.23).

Demographics and Comorbidities

Those with prior GNRFA were older (P < 0.001); more likely to be smokers (P < 0.001); and more likely to have congestive heart failure (P = 0.038), arrhythmias (P< 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (P < 0.001), neurological disorders (P = 0.002), chronic pulmonary disease (P = 0.005), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.017), hypothyroidism (P = 0.039), liver disease (P = 0.044), collagen vascular disorders (P < 0.001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (P < 0.001), blood loss anemia (P = 0.011), iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.004), drug abuse (P < 0.001), psychoses (P < 0.001), depression (P < 0.001), obesity (P < 0.001), and preoperative opioid use (P < 0.001) when compared with those without prior GNRFA (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographics and Comorbidities of Nerve Ablation Before TKA and Control-TKA

Category Total GNRFA-TKA Control-TKA
Number Number Percent Number Percent P
Total 255,910 675 255,351 <0.001
Age
 <50 - <11 1.19 23,817 20.02
 50-59 51,303 174 25.78 51,129 34.01
 60-69 87,103 260 38.52 86,843 36.64
 70-80 93,795 233 34.52 93,562 20.02
Sex
 Male 94,359 236 34.96 94,123 36.86 0.593
 Female 161,666 439 65.04 161,227 63.14 0.593
CHF 37,705 119 17.63 37,586 14.72 0.038
Arrhythmias 102,908 314 46.52 102,594 40.18 <0.001
Valvular disease 58,306 173 25.63 58,133 22.77 0.084
Pulmonary circulatory disorders 21,140 57 8.44 21,083 8.26 0.915
PVD 58,591 203 30.07 58,388 22.87 <0.001
HTN 182,699 492 72.89 182,207 71.36 0.402
Paralysis 5,469 16 2.37 5,453 2.14 0.773
Other neurological disorders 19.156 72 10.67 19,084 7.47 0.002
CPD 92,974 281 41.63 92,693 36.30 0.005
Diabetes mellitus 96,941 286 42.37 96,655 37.85 0.017
Hypothyroidism 79,535 235 34.81 79,300 31.06 0.039
CKD 47,298 135 20.00 47,163 18.47 0.33
Liver disease 41,419 136 20.15 41,283 16.17 0.006
PUD 7,469 29 4.30 7,440 2.91 0.044
CVD 47,639 246 36.44 47,393 18.56 <0.001
Coagulopathy 19,406 60 8.89 19,346 7.58 0.225
Fluid and electrolyte disorders 87,382 273 40.44 87,109 34.11 <0.001
Blood loss anemia 13,532 51 7.56 13,481 5.28 0.011
Deficiency anemia 45,361 149 22.07 45,212 17.71 0.004
Alcohol abuse <11 1.04 2778 1.09 1.000
Drug abuse 19,708 127 18.81 19,581 7.67 <0.001
Psychoses 7,632 38 5.63 7,594 2.97 <0.001
Depression 100,202 330 48.89 99,872 39.11 <0.001
Smoking 43,889 150 22.22 43,739 17.13 <0.001
Obesity 122,019 398 58.96 121,621 47.63 <0.001
Preoperative opioid use 108,007 325 48.15 107,682 42.17 0.002

CHF = congestive heart failure, CKD = chronic kidney disease, CPD = chronic pulmonary disease, CVD = collagen vascular diseases, GNRFA = genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation, HTN = hypertension, PUD = peptic ulcer disease, PVD = peripheral vascular disease, TKA = total knee arthroplasty

Significance at P < 0.05 is presented in bold.

Univariate Postoperative Complications and Revisions

The GNRFA-TKA cohort had significantly lower prolonged opioid usage (50.81% versus 56.29%; P = 0.005), postoperative anemia (3.70% versus 13.70%; P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (5.78% versus 8.29%; P = 0.022), blood transfusion requirement (1.04% versus 2.24%; P = 0.047), and urinary tract infection (3.85% versus 8.47%; P < 0.001) when compared with those without prior GNRFA (Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariate Postoperative Outcomes and Complications of Nerve Ablation Before TKA and Control-TKA

Category Total GNRFA-TKA Control-TKA
Number Number Percent Number Percent P
Total 255,910 675 255,351 -
 Prolonged opioid use 144,080 343 50.81 143,737 56.29 0.005
2-yr outcomes
 All-cause revision 6279 16 2.37 6263 2.45 0.989
 PJI-indicated revision <11 1.19 1990 0.78 0.328
 Loosening-indicated revision <11 0.59 1653 0.65 1.000
 MUA 8,477 19 2.81 8,458 3.31 0.539
90-day complications
 SSI 4,716 11 1.63 4,705 1.84 0.789
 Renal failure 10,355 18 2.67 10,337 4.05 0.085
 Anemia 35,010 25 3.70 34,985 13.70 <0.001
 Arrhythmia with afib 21,218 39 5.78 21,179 8.29 0.022
 Arrhythmia without afib 10,291 13 1.93 10,278 4.03 0.007
 Bleeding complication <11 0.89 1,634 0.64 0.57
 Blood transfusion <11 1.04 5,730 2.24 0.047
 Pneumonia 5,934 14 2.07 5,920 2.32 0.769
 Stroke <11 1.04 2,867 1.12 0.978
 Death 34 0 0.00 34 0.01 1
 DVT <11 0.44 3,559 1.39 0.053
 Heart failure 14,250 35 5.19 14,215 5.57 0.728
 Pulmonary embolism <11 1.19 3,864 1.51 0.59
 Respiratory complication <11 0.15 1,965 0.77 0.104
 Sepsis 11 1.63 4,470 1.75 0.927
 UTI 21,651 26 3.85 21,625 8.47 <0.001

Afib = atrial fibrillation, DVT = deep vein thrombosis, GNRFA = genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation, MUA = manipulation under anesthesia, PJI = periprosthetic joint infection, SSI = surgical site infection, TKA = total knee arthroplasty, UTI = urinary tract infection

Significance at P < 0.05 is presented in bold.

Multivariable Postoperative Complications and Revisions

The GNRFA-TKA cohort had significantly lower odds of prolonged opioid usage (OR: 0.478; 95%: 0.409 to 0.559; P < 0.001), postoperative anemia (OR: 0.170; 95%: 0.111 to 0.249; P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.517; 95%: 0.366 to 0.731; P < 0.001), arrhythmias without atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.274; 95%: 0.157 to 0.478; P = 0.005), blood transfusion requirement (OR: 0.338; 95%: 0.144 to 0.662; P < 0.001), and urinary tract infection incidence (OR: 0.250; 95%: 0.166 to 0.366; P < 0.001) when compared with those without prior GNRFA (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariable Postoperative Outcomes and Complications of Nerve Ablation Before TKA and Control-TKA

Category Total GNRFA-TKA Control-TKA
Odds Ratio 95% CI P
Anemia 0.170 0.111-0.249 <0.001
Atrial fibrillation 0.517 0.366-0.731 <0.001
Arrhythmia without atrial fibrillation 0.274 0.157-0.478 <0.001
Blood transfusion 0.338 0.144-0.662 0.005
UTI 0.250 0.166-0.366 <0.001
Prolonged opioid use 0.478 0.409-0.559 <0.001

GNRFA = genicular nerve radiofrequency, TKA = total knee arthroplasty, UTI = urinary tract infection.

Ablation significance at P < 0.05 is presented in bold.

Discussion

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis using a national all-payers claims database comparing patients who were treated with genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation before TKA (GNRFA-TKA) with primary TKA control patients. Prolonged postoperative opioid use was found to be markedly lower in GNRFA-TKA patients, although markedly more of these patients had filled an opioid prescription within one year preoperatively compared with control patients. No differences were observed in the primary two-year outcomes (all-cause revision, revision for infection, revision for loosening, and MUA) between patients who underwent prior GNRFA and those who did not. Regarding the secondary outcome of 90-day postoperative complications, GNRFA-TKA patients had lower rates of blood transfusions, anemia, arrhythmias, and urinary tract infections compared with control patients. No other notable differences were observed in other surgical outcomes between cohorts. The association between GNFRA and these statistically significant variables is uncertain. However, the baseline characteristics of the GNFRA cohort suggest that these patients might have been predicted to be at higher risk of complications.

In the era of the current opioid epidemic, there has been a call for alternative nonopioid treatment options for knee OA.2,19 GNRFA has demonstrated notable efficacy and safety in the nonsurgical management of knee OA.12,13,20,24 Cooled radiofrequency thermal ablation is an FDA-approved treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe knee pain caused by OA. High-quality RCTs have shown favorable outcomes with GNRFA knees when compared with IA HA, IA corticosteroids, standard oral nonopioid analgesics, and sham procedures.13,20,22,24 At this time, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines endorse limited evidence in favor of denervation procedures for knee OA.5 However, the effect of these procedures on complications and pain after TKA remains poorly understood.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is generally regarded as a safe procedure, with complications occurring rarely and including hypoesthesia, numbness, septic arthritis, and pes anserine injury.2528 No study to date has investigated the difference in postoperative complications in TKA patients who had previously undergone GNRFA versus patients who had not undergone GNRFA. We hypothesized that GNRFA-TKA patients would have similar rates of 2-year complications and a lower incidence of prolonged opioid use compared with primary TKA control patients.

This study found no increased rate of MUA or revisions, including revision for loosening or infection, at 2 years postoperatively in patients who underwent prior GNRFA. On average, GNFRA preceded TKA by 96.39 days, but the standard deviation was 91.23 days, suggesting that some patients may have had the procedure as part of a preemptive analgesic modality in the perioperative period. This is an important finding of our study because a previous study has shown a time-dependent increased risk of postoperative infection in patients who undergo TKA within 3 months of prior steroid injection.29 GNRFA does not seem to pose the same increased infection risk.

Our study found decreased odds of anemia, postoperative blood transfusions, arrhythmias, and urinary tract infections in patients who underwent GNFRA before TKA. These differences in postoperative complications are not clear, although several factors may be contributory. Given that the GNRFA patients had some increased comorbid factors and GNFRA requires specialized expertise, equipment, and resources, it is possible that the GNFRA cohort may have had their surgery at a tertiary care or specialty facility. These centers may have been more likely to routinely use evidence-based blood management programs including increased use of preoperative optimization protocols, appropriate transfusion thresholds, neuraxial anesthesia, and TXA administration in this patient cohort, strategies which have been shown to decrease blood loss and risk of transfusion.30 In addition, patients with defined pathways at tertiary centers may be better optimized for weight loss, smoking cessation, and perioperative interventions. Although not included in this multivariable analysis, high-volume centers have been reported to have improved complications after total knee arthroplasty procedures.31,32 Laucis et al31 identified that the odds ratio for complications in low-volume hospitals compared with very high-volume hospitals was 1.327 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.40; P < 0.0001).

Predicting and preventing prolonged opioid use in total knee arthroplasty patients has been a focus of recent studies, with the most important risk factor of prolonged use being preoperative use.33,34 Although GNRFA has consistently been shown to be effective, resulting in improvement in WOMAC scores for pain stiffness and function, previous published results have been variable and less favorable regarding its effectiveness on opioid consumption.11,35,36 In a randomized clinical trial comparing GNRFA with hyaluronic acid injection for chronic knee pain, Chen et al demonstrated a decreased total daily dose of nonopioid medications after 6 months in the cooled GNRFA group but were unable to measure any trends in opioid consumption.2 Notably, less than 10 patients in each arm of this study were on opioid medications, which limited the study's power to detect differences in this outcome.2 In a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of GNRFA 2 to 6 weeks before elective TKA on postoperative pain outcomes, they noted no measurable effect on postoperative opioid use, analgesia use, or function in the 48 hours after surgery.15 In addition, in that study, there was a low incidence of preoperative opioid use and nearly complete opioid weaning by 6 months in all patients, regardless of the treatment group.15 As noted by the authors, the trends in opioid use in that trial may have reflected prescribing patterns of physicians rather than patient preferences.15 By comparison, opioid usage both before and after TKA was much higher in this database study, which increases the generalizability of our findings. Patients who underwent GNRFA before TKA had a markedly lower rate of prolonged postoperative opioid use after multivariable analysis (OR 0.478; 95% CI 0.409 to 0.559). This suggests that there may be long-lasting analgesic effects of GNRFA, persisting into the postoperative period. Notably, preoperative opioid use was shown to be markedly more frequent in patients who underwent GNRFA before TKA.

There are several limitations to our study. Retrospective analysis of a claims database relies on coding accuracy, which may be prone to error. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is a novel nonsurgical treatment option requiring specialized expertise and equipment, which may create selection bias. However, the study group had higher rates of comorbid conditions, which partly mitigates this potential bias. The cohort receiving GNFRA may more likely have had care provided at tertiary-level centers or as part of a comprehensive arthroplasty program. These centers are more likely to medically optimize patients in anticipation for a total knee arthroplasty potentially leading to a decreased PJI rate in the GNRFA patient cohort. Another limitation in this study is the lack of uniformity in the GNRFA procedures. We acknowledge that there are substantial variations in the mode of ablation (cold vs conventional), techniques (variations in nerves targeted), and selection criteria for this treatment modality. Although this study specified the nerve ablation procedure to be indicated for knee OA, it relied on the use of CPT 64640, which nonspecifically encompasses all the earlier mentioned techniques. Another limitation is that the study design could not consider any differences in the postoperative analgesic protocol after TKA in both groups, including whether multimodal therapy including anti-inflammatory medications, acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids were used. Finally, the study design did not account for institutional differences in opioid prescribing practices after surgery.

Conclusion

GNFRA before TKA is associated with a lower risk of prolonged opioid use, without an increased risk of complications, including PJI. Future prospective randomized controlled cohort studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Footnotes

None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Stake, Agarwal, Dr. Coombs, Dr. Cohen, Dr. Campbell, Dr. Golladay, and Dr. Thakkar.

Contributor Information

Seth Stake, Email: sethstake@gmail.com.

Stefan Coombs, Email: stefan.coombs87@gmail.com.

Jordan S. Cohen, Email: jordan.stanley.cohen@gmail.com.

Gregory J. Golladay, Email: gregorygolladay@gmail.com.

Joshua C. Campbell, Email: jocampbell@mfa.gwu.edu.

Savyasachi C. Thakkar, Email: savyasachithakkar@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Solomon DH, et al. : Number of persons with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US: Impact of race and ethnicity, age, sex, and obesity. Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:1743-1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, et al. : Cooled radiofrequency ablation compared with a single injection of hyaluronic acid for chronic knee pain. J Bone Joint Surg 2020;102:1501-1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L: Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: A report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:262-267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Concoff A, Rosen J, Fu F, et al. : A comparison of treatment effects for nonsurgical therapies and the minimum clinically important difference in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. JBJS Rev 2019;7:e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Non-Arthroplasty) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline, ed 3. 2021. https://www.aaos.org/oak3cpg. Accessed November 1, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kidd VD, Strum SR, Strum DS, Shah J: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for painful knee arthritis: The why and the how. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2019;9:e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, et al. : Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017;25:1247-1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, et al. : Twelve-month analgesia and rescue, by cooled radiofrequency ablation treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain: Results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, cross-over trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bellini M, Barbieri M: Cooled radiofrequency system relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: The first case-series. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015;47:30-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jamison DE, Cohen SP: Radiofrequency techniques to treat chronic knee pain: A comprehensive review of anatomy, effectiveness, treatment parameters, and patient selection. J Pain Res 2018;11:1879-1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kapural L, Lee N, Neal K, Burchell M: Long-term retrospective assessment of clinical efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of the knee using a cooled radiofrequency system. Pain Physician 2019;22:489-494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePhalma M, et al. : Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover clinical trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation with corticosteroid injection in the management of knee pain from osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:84-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sarı S, Aydın ON, Turan Y, Özlülerden P, Efe U, Kurt Ömürlü İ: Which one is more effective for the clinical treatment of chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis: Radiofrequency neurotomy of the genicular nerves or intra-articular injection? Int J Rheum Dis 2018;21:1772-1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mishra P, Edwards D, Huntoon M, et al. : Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021;46:752-756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Walega D, McCormick Z, Manning D, Avram M: Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves prior to total knee replacement has no effect on postoperative pain outcomes: A prospective randomized sham-controlled trial with 6-month follow-up. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Elkins JM, et al. : The John N. Insall award: Do intraarticular injections increase the risk of infection after TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:45-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM: Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:8-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Westermann RW, Duchman KR, Glass NA, Callaghan JJ: Opioid use after total knee arthroplasty: Trends and risk factors for prolonged use. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:2390-2394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wallace IJ, Worthington S, Felson DT, et al. : Knee osteoarthritis has doubled in prevalence since the mid-20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017;114:9332-9336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El-Hakeim EH, Elawamy A, Kamel EZ, et al. : Fluoroscopic guided radiofrequency of genicular nerves for pain alleviation in chronic knee osteoarthritis: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician 2018;21:169-177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao L, Shu F, Xu C, et al. : Highly selective peripheral nerve radio frequency ablation for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Exp Ther Med 2018;16:3973-3977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, et al. : Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2011;152:481-487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shen WS, Xu XQ, Zhai NN, Zhou ZS, Shao J, Yu YH: Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in relieving refractory pain of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Ther 2017;24:e693-e700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ray D, Goswami S, Dasgupta S, Ray S, Basu S: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection versus RF ablation of genicular nerve for knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized, open-label, clinical study. Indian J Pain 2018;32:36-39. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Santana Pineda MM, Vanlinthout LE, Moreno Martín A, Van Zundert J, Rodriguez Huertas F, Novalbos Ruiz JP: Analgesic effect and functional improvement caused by radiofrequency treatment of genicular nerves in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee until 1 year following treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:62-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahmed A, Arora D: Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of knee for relief of intractable pain from knee osteoarthritis: A case series. Br J Pain 2018;12:145-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Conger A, McCormick ZL, Henrie AM: Pes anserine tendon injury resulting from cooled radiofrequency ablation of the inferior medial genicular nerve. PM R 2019;11:1244-1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khanna A, Knox N, Sekhri N: Septic arthritis following radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves. Pain Med (United States) 2019;20:1454-1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Luetkemeyer LM, Browne JA: Does timing of previous intra-articular steroid injection affect the post-operative rate of infection in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2015;30:1879-1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu Q, Peng H, Zhou GJ, Yin D: Perioperative blood management strategies for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Surg 2018;10:8-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laucis NC, Chowdhury M, Dasgupta A, Bhattacharyya T: Trend toward high-volume hospitals and the influence on complications in knee and hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:707-712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ricciardi BF, Liu AY, Qiu B, Myers TG, Thirukumaran CP: What is the association between hospital volume and complications after revision total Joint arthroplasty: A large-database study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:1221-1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Politzer CS, Kildow BJ, Goltz DE, Green CL, Bolognesi MP, Seyler TM: Trends in opioid utilization before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:S147-S153.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zywiel MG, Stroh DA, Lee SY, Bonutti PM, Mont MA: Chronic opioid use prior to total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1988-1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reddy RD, McCormick ZL, Marshall B, Mattie R, Walega DR. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis pain: A protocol for patient selection and case series. Anesthesiol Pain Med 2016;6:e39696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen AF, Mullen K, Casambre F, Visvabharathy V, Brown GA: Thermal nerve radiofrequency ablation for the nonsurgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;29:387-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAOS Global Research & Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES