Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S):
To assess through literature case analysis how advances in lymphatic imaging, interventional radiology, and lymphatic vascular microsurgery illuminate and improve the lymphatic-flow status in select patients with Noonan Syndrome (NS) who have undergone surgical intervention as a part of their comprehensive and individualized treatment plan. Also, to illustrate the spectrum of lymphatic complications that can occur in this patient population when lymphatic flow through abnormal vasculature is surgically disrupted.
METHODS:
A literature review was performed by searching “Noonan AND Lymphatic AND Imaging” in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria for this study were 1) diagnosis and clinical description of at least one original patient with Noonan syndrome, 2) imaging figures depicting lymphatic structure/function OR description of lymphatic imaging findings when a figure is not present, and 3) documentation of either lymphatic surgical intervention or lymphatic complications resulting from other procedures. Patient cases were first grouped by documented surgical intervention type, then clinical outcomes and lymphatic imaging results were compared.
RESULTS:
A total of 18 patient cases from 10 eligible publications were included in our review. Lymphatic imaging findings across all patients included lymphatic vessel dysplasia along with flow disruption (n=16), thoracic duct malformations (n=12), dermal lymphatic reflux (n=7), and dilated lymphatic vessels (n=4). Lympho-venous anastomosis (n=4) resulted in rapid improvement of patient symptoms and signs. New onset-lymphatic manifestations noted over 10–20 years for 2 of these patients were chylothorax (n=1), erysipelas (n=1), and gradual-onset non-chylous scrotal lymphorrhea (n=1). Targeted endovascular lymphatic disruption via sclerosis, embolization, or ablation (n=8) results were mixed depending upon the degree of central lymphatic involvement and included resolution of symptoms (n=1), post-operative abdominal hemorrhage (n=1), stable condition or minor improvement (n=5), and death (n=2). Large lymphatic-vessel ligation or accidental incision (n=6) occurred during thoracotomy (n=4), scrotoplasty (n=1) and inguinal lymph node biopsy (n=1). These resulted in post-operative onset of new onset-regional lymphatic reflux (n=5), chylothorax (n=4), death (n=3), or persistent/unchanged symptoms (n=1).
CONCLUSIONS:
Imaging of the central lymphatics enabled characterization of lymphatic developmental features and guided operative management of lymphatic vascular defects in patients with Noonan syndrome. This review of the literature suggests that surgical preservation or enhancement of central lymphatic return in patients with Noonan syndrome may improve interventional outcomes, while disruption of central lymph flow has significant potential to cause severe post-operative complications and worsening of the patient’s clinical condition.
Keywords: Noonan Syndrome, Lymphatic Imaging, Lympho-Venous Anastomosis, Congenital Lymphatic Dysplasia, Thoracic Duct Decompression
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY
A literature review of 18 Noonan syndrome patients who underwent either lympho-venous anastomosis or targeted disruption of abnormal peripheral lymphatics showed significant post-operative improvement when lymphatic imaging could demonstrate enhanced lympho-venous return. Preserving central lymphatic flow is essential for favorable interventional outcomes in Noonan syndrome patients with lymphatic manifestations.
Introduction:
Noonan Syndrome (NS) is an autosomal dominant congenital genetic disease resulting from mutations in genes of the RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathway1. This disease occurs with an estimated frequency of 1:1000–2500 live births across all ethnicities in both males and females2. Clinically, NS patients present with a phenotype similar to Turner Syndrome with classic features such as webbed neck, low palpebral fissures, low set ears, pectus sternal deformity, widely spaced nipples, barrel-shaped chest, and scoliosis2.
Complications associated with NS include (but are not limited to) congenital heart disease, pulmonary lymphangiectasia renal/urological structural abnormalities, bleeding disorders, increased risk of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, hearing/visual abnormalities, lymphatic vascular malformations, and fistulous chylous reflux complications such as chylothorax and protein-losing enteropathy1,2,3.
Although NS treatment appears to be an area of increasing interest across the literature, only a limited number of publications address lymphatic-specific etiologies of many NS syndromic sequelae, and there is infrequent discussion about the fundamental role of lymphatic imaging findings during treatment planning and follow-up4. Even fewer publications specifically address how these imaging findings relate to the surgical management of the unique lymphatic vascular complications observed in this patient population. There is also a deficit in the literature regarding post-operative lymphatic sequelae due to imaging-confirmed disruptions in congenitally abnormal lymphatic vasculature.
In this review of the literature, we address these deficits by evaluating all known published reports of NS patients who underwent lymphatic imaging and lymphatic surgery as part of their comprehensive management plan, as well as the cases of NS patients who experienced iatrogenic lymphatic sequelae from other procedures. We correlate the lymphatic outcomes of documented surgical interventions with the available pre- and post- operative lymphatic imaging findings. Comparison between planned lympho-vascular intervention and iatrogenic disruption groups helps to further illustrate the relationship between lymphatic flow status and the spectrum of possible NS surgical outcomes. This also expands the relevance of our findings to include providers who participate in non-lymphovascular surgical management of NS patients.
Methods:
We first used the PubMed database to find all the studies included in this literature review. We searched “Noonan AND Lymphatic AND Imaging,” which yielded 40 results. This database search term was the only one used, search parameters covered all time periods and included all publication types, last accessed September 22, 2021. Inclusion criteria for this study were 1) Diagnosis and clinical description of at least one original patient with NS, 2) Imaging figures depicting lymphatic structure/function OR description of imaging findings when a figure is not present, and 3) Documentation of either lymphatic surgical intervention or lymphatic complications resulting from other surgeries. Eligibility for inclusion in this publication was determined by manually reading/reviewing each article resulting from our database search. The “references” section of each article was also manually reviewed to identify other eligible articles that may not have resulted from our PubMed search. Of the 40 original PubMed papers that appeared on our search, 12 met our inclusion criteria as described above.
We then excluded publications featuring ultrasound (US) diagnosis of NS in utero since available research suggests fetal US findings do not correlate with post-natal patient outcomes or potential disease severity5. To our knowledge, novel US modalities for lymphatic visualization such as high-frequency ultrasound have not been used as an evaluation method for NS patients at the time of this publication. We did not exclude studies based on patient age, gender, or genotype as long as there were no karyotype abnormalities as would be expected in patients with Turner syndrome. Of the 12 papers that met our inclusion criteria, 2 were excluded based on the discussed exclusion criteria.
Using the criteria mentioned above, 10 publications from our PubMed search were eligible for inclusion in our review, reporting 18 individual patient cases. These patients were grouped into one of three lymphatic surgical categories: Ligation/Incision, Targeted Intravascular Disruption, and Lympho-Venous Anastomosis. Lymphatic imaging results, patterns of clinical findings, and available interventional outcomes were then compared among the 18 NS patients as Table 1 and with greater detail as Supplemental Table 1.
Table 1:
Patient Study Set (year of publication) Ref | No. Operatively Managed Patients | Case Profiles | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Clinical Manifestations | Lymphatic Imaging/Diagnostics | Surgical/Interventional Management | Documented Outcomes | ||
Study 1 (1978)13 | 1 | Chylothorax, failure to thrive | CXR, Autopsy | Ligation of thoracic lymph vessels | Death |
Study 2 (1980)14 | 1 | Perineal/genital lymphedema | C-LAG | Inguinal lymph node biopsy | New onset lymphatic symptoms |
Study 3 (1980)15 | 2 | Cardiac defects (n=2) | CXR | Cardiac surgery | New onset lymphatic symptoms (n=2) |
*Study 4 (1998) 7 | 1* | Chylous ascites; lymphedema; genital lymphorrhea | MRL, LAS, C-LAG | Abdominal LVA | Marked improvement |
Study 5 (2016)4 | 2 | Lymphedema (n=2); genital lymphorrhea (n=1) | LAS | Thoracic duct ligation (n=1), Scrotoplasty (n=1) | Death (n=1); Improvement with some persistent symptoms (n=1) |
Study 6 (2019)16 | 1 | Lymphedema, lymphocutaneous fistulae, chylocolporrhea | C-LAG, CT, LAS | Lymphatic lipidiol embolization | Resolution without recurrence at 12 months (n=1) |
Study 7 (2019)8 | 7 | Chylothorax (n=6); ascites (n=3) | C-LAG (n=7), MRL (n=6), dc-MRL (n=5) | Lymphatic embolization (n=6), LVA (n=1) | Death (n=2), Stable or Improved (n=4), Resolution (LVA, n=1) |
Study 8 (2020)17 | 1 | Cardiac defects; chylothorax | ICG, dc-MRL | Thoracic duct ligation, two cardiac surgeries | Death |
*Study 9 (2021) 6 | 2* | Lymphedema, ascites, genital lymphorrhea, lymphocutaneous fistula | CT, MRL, LAS, CXR | Inguinal LVA (n=1), lymphatic doxycycline sclerosis (n=1) | Improvement 20-yr post op (LVA, n=1), Stable (n=1) |
Study 10 (2021) 9 | 1 | Acute Chylothorax and Pulmonary Insufficiency | C-LAG, dc-MRL | LVA (thoracic duct) | Fluid overload (immediate), Resolution (1-year) |
CXR= Chest X-Ray; C-LAG = Conventional Oil-Contrast Lymphangiography; CT = Computerized Tomography; MRL = T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Lymphography; dc-MRL = Dynamic-Contrast (T1-Weighted) Magnetic Resonance Lymphography; LAS = Lymphoscintigraphy; ICG = Indocyanin Green Lymphography; LVA = Lympho-Venous Anastomosis
Review of the Literature and Surgical Outcomes:
A total of 18 NS patients underwent both lymphatic imaging and surgical management relevant to the patient’s lymphatic status. Imaging modality utilization included chest X-ray (n=4), conventional oil contrast lymphangiography (n=11), lymphoscintigraphy (n=4), CT lymphangiography (n=2), Indocyanin Green Lymphography (n=1), MRL (n=8), and dc-MRL (n=7). Twelve patients underwent lymphatic imaging with more than one modality (67%) while six patients were imaged using only one modality (33%). Imaging findings across all patients included lymphatic vessel dysplasia along with flow disruption (n=16), thoracic duct malformations (n=12), dermal lymphatic reflux (n=7), and dilated lymphatic vessels (n=4). As an aside, gene mutations were identified for eight patients. Mutations in PTPN11 (n=7) were most commonly noted, and KRAS (n=1) was also identified, while ten patients were unspecified. Examples of lymphatic anomalies seen either pre- or post-op included lymphedema (n=9), chylothorax (n=12), genital lymphorrhea (n=6), chylous ascites (n=6), and lymphocutaneous fistula (n=3). A comprehensive list of our findings is included as Supplemental Table I.
Six patients had surgical incision or ligation of lymphatic vessels during surgical procedures such as thoracotomy (n=4), scrotoplasty (n=1) and inguinal node biopsy (n=1). These resulted in post-operative onset of new lymphatic reflux issues (n=5), chylothorax (n=4), death (n=3), and persistent or unchanged symptoms (n=1). Authors frequently attributed these post-operative complications to iatrogenic disruptions in lymphatic flow.
Eight patients underwent targeted lymphatic endovascular ablation, embolization, or sclerosis planned with lymphatic imaging. Post-operative results noted were resolution of symptoms (n=1), post-operative abdominal hemorrhage (n=1), stable condition or minor improvement (n=5), and death (n=2). Procedures targeting peripheral lymphatic vessels which did not obstruct central lymphatic flow were not associated with significant complications, while the sequelae of central lymphatic occlusion were severe. To elaborate on our prior publication, the patient who experienced post-operative hemorrhage was patient 1 (P1)6. Initial imaging and LVA procedure for P1 were published by Howarth and Glovicski in 19987. Due to gradual recurrence of genital swelling and leakage over 12 years, P1 was evaluated with LAS, MRL, and CT imaging leading us to pursue interventional lymphatic sclerosis using doxycycline if communication could be demonstrated intra-operatively between left lower pelvic lymphatics and the scrotum. No communication with the scrotum was demonstrable, and the procedure was discontinued. Several hours after the procedure was discontinued, P1 was returned to the angiography suite for abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage requiring two packed red blood cell transfusions. A left superior gluteal artery embolization was performed using micro coils, after which no further bleeding occurred. The patient’s condition stabilized, and he was discharged home after three days in the hospital.
Four patients underwent LVA to address lymphatic dysfunction. Resolution of acute symptoms was evident in all four patients. Long-term improvement was documented for three of these, while the fourth (published by Biko et al.)8 was presumably lost to follow-up, as they were transferred in stable condition to a local community hospital for continuation of medical and dietary management8. One-year follow-up for the recently published case by Othman et al.9 indicated return to baseline, increased exercise tolerance, and resolution of pulmonary lymphangiectasia and chylothorax without recurrence9. Follow-up between 10–20 years for our Patients 1 and 3 as previously published6 observed new or recurring lymphatic reflux manifestations including chylothorax (n=1) and erysipelas (n=1) for Patient 3, and gradual-onset non-chylous scrotal lymphorrhea (n=1) for Patient 1. These findings support a continued need for regular clinical follow-up and possible follow-up surgery in NS patients who undergo LVA.
Discussion/Conclusions:
Lymphatic involvement in NS pathogenesis first began to receive attention in 1974 after the publication of a case series by Minkin et. al.10, which characterized and analyzed the congenital lymphedema observed in many NS patients10. Clinical lymphedema severity is graded by most experts on a scale of 0-III, with grade-III representing the most severe cases (elephantiasis) and grade-0 being asymptomatic or very early stage11. NS patients in the literature frequently exhibit primary and secondary lymphedema and undergo multiple combinations of both conservative and invasive treatments. Since the time of Minkin et al.’s publication, numerous imaging genetic and clinical studies have pointed toward congenitally acquired lymphatic dysfunction/dysplasia as the etiological root for many of the symptoms and signs observed in patients with NS1,4,8,12.
Imaging of the lymphatic system has evolved rapidly over the past several decades. Widely available imaging methods include conventional oil-contrast lymphography (LAG), CT lymphography (CTL), nuclear imaging methods such as lymphoscintigraphy (LAS) and single-proton emission computerized tomography (SPECT), and various magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) modalities. We have previously suggested that early evaluation with lymphatic imaging should be performed for NS patients as a guide to individualized treatment regardless of a patient’s initial clinical manifestation6. Conservative management strategies for NS-associated lymphatic dysfunction include medium/light-chain triglyceride diets, compression garments, and manual lymph drainage massage therapy. Published lymphatic surgical methods for NS include lymphatic vessel ligation, targeted endovascular disruption (embolization, sclerosis, ablation, etc.) and lympho-venous anastomosis (LVA). Good patient outcomes have previously been associated with achievement of improved lymphatic flow, and imaging of the lymphatic system has been shown in many cases to be fundamental to therapeutic planning and success4,6,8.
Early imaging of the lymphatic system remains an imperative tool to guide individualized NS patient management through operative as well as non-operative methods. As noted by Biko et al.8 and demonstrated by Othman et al.9, we propose that surgical intervention in this population is most likely to achieve clinical success when lymphatic flow and central circulatory reentry of lymph into the venous system are preserved8,9. We observe that when NS lymphatic manifestations are more peripheral such as with abnormal fistulas, targeted lymphatic disruption may be of benefit as long as central lymphatic flow is preserved. Significant post-operative improvement was noted for all four patients who underwent LVA, although we still recommend that patients be followed closely by their physicians for signs of new or recurrent lymphatic problems. Additionally, surgeons and interventionalists who perform otherwise routine procedures on a patient with NS should take into account the prevalence of lymphatic vascular anomalies that put the patient at risk of lymphatic disruption or dysfunction. This awareness may help increase the utilization of pre-operative lymphatic imaging in these patients and decrease the chance of complications secondary to iatrogenic central lymphatic flow disruptions.
It is important to note that lymphatic surgery in NS patients has not been widely researched, and the generalizability of these conclusions is limited by the small number of published studies in this area. Future studies should continue to be oriented toward characterization of NS clinical manifestations, lymphatic imaging results, and long-term post-operative outcomes.
Supplementary Material
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS.
Type of research:
Systematic review of the literature
Key Findings:
Lymphatic imaging and surgical management was utilized for 18 Noonan Syndrome patients with lymphatic manifestations. Lympho-venous anastomosis (n=4) improved symptoms in 100% of cases, targeted lymphatic intravascular disruption (n=8) improved or maintained symptoms in 75%, and central lymphatic disruption via ligation/incision (n=6) resulted in iatrogenic complications in 100% of cases.
Take home Message:
Preservation or enhancement of central lymphatic return via lymphatic imaging-guided intervention such as lympho-venous anastomosis results in improved clinical outcomes for patients with Noonan Syndrome.
Acknowledgements:
The present study was supported in part by funds from the NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R25HL108837 to TC and T35HL007479 to CV) and intra- mural Translational Imaging Program Projects Stimulus Funds to MHW.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Presentation Information: This study was presented in the “Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema (III)” oral presentation session of the 2021 28th International Society of Lymphology: World Congress of Lymphology in Athens, Greece, Sept 20–24, 2021
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure:
The authors declare no existence of competing financial interests.
References
- 1).Morcaldi G, Bellini T, Rossi C, Maghnie M, Boccardo F, Bonioli E, Bellini C. LYMPHODYSPLASIA AND KRAS MUTATION: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW. Lymphology 2015. Sep;48(3):121–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2).Prendiville TW, Gauvreau K, Tworog-Dube E, Patkin L, Kucherlapati RS, Roberts AE, Lacro RV. Cardiovascular disease in Noonan syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2014. Jul;99(7):629–34. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3).George CD, Patton MA, el Sawi M, Sharland M, Adam EJ. Abdominal ultrasound in Noonan syndrome: a study of 44 patients. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23(4):316–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02010926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4).Joyce S, Gordon K, Brice G, Ostergaard P, Nagaraja R, Short J, et al. The lymphatic phenotype in Noonan and Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2016. May;24(5):690–6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5).Gaudineau A, Doray B, Schaefer E, Sananès N, Fritz G, Kohler M, et al. Postnatal phenotype according to prenatal ultrasound features of Noonan syndrome: a retrospective study of 28 cases. Prenat Diagn 2013. Mar;33(3):238–41. doi: 10.1002/pd.4051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6).Cox T, Vance C, Daley S, Papendieck C, McGregor H, Kuo PH, et al. Imaging of lymphatic dysplasia in Noonan syndrome: Case studies and historical atlas. Lymphology 2021;54(1):23–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7).Howarth D, Gloviczki P. Lymphoscintigraphy and lymphangiography of lymphangiectasia. J Nucl Med 1998. Sep;39(9):1635–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8).Biko DM, Reisen B, Otero HJ et al. Imaging of central lymphatic abnormalities in Noonan syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 49, 586–592 (2019). 10.1007/s00247-018-04337-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9).Othman S, Azoury SC, DiBardino D, Adams DM, Itkin M, Kovach SJ. Respiratory Failure in Noonan Syndrome Treated by Microsurgical Thoracic Duct-Venous Anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2021. Jun 8:S0003–4975(21)00997–8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10).Minkin W, Frank SB, Wolman SR, Cohen HJ. Lymphedema in Noonan’s syndrome. Int J Dermatol 1974. Jul-Aug;13(3):179–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1974.tb01788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11).Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2020;53(1):3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12).Bellini C, Mazzella M, Campisi C, Taddei G, Mosca F, Tomà P, et al. Multimodal imaging in the congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia-congenital chylothorax-hydrops fetalis continuum. Lymphology 2004. Mar;37(1):22–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13).Lanning P, Similä S, Suramo I, Paavilainen T. Lymphatic abnormalities in Noonan’s syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 1978. Jun 19;7(2):106–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00975679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14).Hoeffel JC, Juncker P, Remy J. Lymphatic vessels dysplasia in Noonan’s syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980. Feb;134(2):399–401. doi: 10.2214/ajr.134.2.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15).Hernandez RJ, Stern AM, Rosenthal A. Pulmonary lymphangiectasis in Noonan syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980. Jan;134(1):75–80. doi: 10.2214/ajr.134.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16).Yamamoto M, Kondo H, Shigeru F, Inui S, Mihara M, Hara H, et al. Intranodal Lymphatic Embolization for Chylocolporrhea Caused by Chylous Reflux Syndrome in Noonan Syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019. May;30(5):769–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17).Pham KT, Balaguru D, Tammisetti VS, Guevara CJ, Rasmussen JC, Zvavanjanja RC, et al. Multimodality lymphatic imaging of postoperative chylothorax in an infant with Noonan syndrome: a case report. Eur J Med Res 2020. Nov 4;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00455-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.