Abstract
α-Azidoketones are valuable and versatile building blocks in the synthesis of various bioactive small molecules. Herein, we describe an environmentally friendly and efficient electrochemical vicinal oxyazidation protocol of α-arylvinyl acetates to afford diverse α-azidoketones in good yields without the use of a stoichiometric amount of chemical oxidant. A range of functionality is shown to be compatible with this transformation, and further applications are demonstrated.
Keywords: azide, azidoketone, electrosynthesis, enol acetate, radical
Introduction
Organoazides play important roles in pharmaceutical, bioorthogonal chemistry, and many other interdisciplinary research areas [1–3]. Among them, azidoketones are also very versatile building blocks in organic synthesis, pharmaceutical, and materials science [4–6]. Therefore, the development of a green, efficient, and sustainable protocol for the synthesis of azidoketones is of great significance [7–9].
Retrosynthetically, the nucleophilic substitution of α-bromoketones by sodium azide [10] and oxidation of the azido alcohols [11] are among the most straightforward methods to generate azidoketones. Remarkably, photoredox [12] and electrochemical [13] oxyazidation of vinylarenes are also becoming competent synthetic approaches. Besides vinylarenes, vinyl acetates are potentially versatile precursors for the anticipated vicinal oxyazidation.
For instance, Singh and co-workers have reported a manganese dioxide-catalyzed radical azidation of enol acetates to afford the corresponding azidoketones using dioxygen as the oxidant (Scheme 1A) [14]. The adoption of electrosynthesis in green and sustainable redox transformations has been experiencing a dynamic renaissance [15–22] not only because it employs the passage of charge instead of chemical oxidants or reductants but also offers opportunities for the precise control of reactivity by "dialing-in" the specific potential on demand [23–25].
Scheme 1.
From vinyl acetates to α-azidoketones.
Specifically, the electrochemical oxyfunctionalization of vinyl acetates has been developed to afford the corresponding α-fluorinated [26], -arylated [27], and -sulfenylated [28] ketones (Scheme 1B). In addition, electrochemical azidation [29–33] has also become a robust and reliable synthetic tool to incorporate azido functionality [34–35] into diverse organic frameworks. Herein, we report that the electrochemical oxyfunctionalization strategy could be well applied to the synthesis of α-azidoketone using readily available α-arylvinyl acetates, and azidotrimethylsilane (Scheme 1C).
Results and Discussion
The constant cell potential electrolysis (Ecell = 2.3 V, carbon cloth anode, and Pt cathode) of 1-phenylvinyl acetate (1) with azidotrimethylsilane was performed and the desired α-azidoketone (2) was obtained in 68% yield (Table 1, entry 1, for details of the reaction optimization see Supporting Information File 1). The cyclic voltammetry studies showed while there was no obvious oxidation peak for TMSN3, 1-phenylvinyl acetate (1) exhibits two oxidation peaks. The first peak (Ep/2 = 1.51 V vs Fc+/0) was assigned to be the oxidation of the vinyl acetate moiety. The control experiment demonstrated that there was no conversion without an electric current (Table 1, entry 2). In addition, in the absence of the electrolyte only a low yield of the desired product was obtained (Table 1, entry 3). The use of n-Bu4NPF6 was crucial because lower yields were generally obtained with other electrolytes, such as n-Bu4NOAc or n-Bu4NBF4 (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). Note that the yield decreased without the addition of water suggesting water may facilitate the formation of the azidoketone (Table 1, entry 6). Interestingly, the H218O labeling experiment confirmed that there was no 18O incorporation in the obtained α-azidoketone (2, for details see Supporting Information File 1). Therefore, the oxygen source of the newly formed carbonyl moiety may originate directly from the vinyl acetate. This conclusion is also consistent with the fact that even in the absence of water, the desired α-azidoketone was still obtained.
Table 1.
Optimization of reaction conditions.a
| ||
|
| ||
| Entry | Variation from the standard reaction conditions | Yield (%) |
|
| ||
| 1 | none | 65 (68)b |
| 2 | no current | n.d. |
| 3 | without electrolyte | 9 |
| 4 | n-Bu4NOAc instead of n-Bu4NPF6 | 12 |
| 5 | n-Bu4NBF4 instead of n-Bu4NPF6 | 35 |
| 6 | without H2O | 34 |
aReaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), TMSN3 (1.0 mmol), n-Bu4NPF6 (0.5 mmol), H2O (2.5 mmol), MeCN (5 mL), carbon cloth anode, platinum cathode, undivided cell, Ecell = 2.3 V, room temperature, 6 h, yields were determined using 1H NMR with dibromomethane as the internal standard. bIsolated yield.
Under the optimal conditions, the substrate scope of this electrochemical oxyazidation reaction was investigated (Scheme 2). Enol acetates derived from various alkyl-substituted phenylacetones were generally well tolerated (3–9, 40–76% yields). The relatively low yield of the isopropyl-substituted one (7) was attributed to the competing oxidation of the isopropylbenzene moiety [31,36], which was consistent with its relative low oxidation potential (Eonset = 1.68 V vs Fc+/0). Other electron-donating substituents, such as the OMe (10–12), OPh (13), and OAc (14) were also well tolerated.
Scheme 2.
Substrate scope. Reaction conditions: α-arylvinyl acetate (0.5 mmol), TMSN3 (1.0 mmol), n-Bu4NPF6 (0.5 mmol), H2O (2.5 mmol), MeCN (5 mL), carbon cloth anode, platinum cathode, undivided cell, Ecell = 2.3 V, room temperature, 6 h. a2 h.
However, halogenated substrates, including fluoro (15), chloro (16), and bromo (17), proceeded with the anticipated reactivity less efficiently (30–48% yields). The presence of other electron-withdrawing groups, such as CO2Me (18) and OCF3 (19), exhibited similar negative effects on the reaction yields. Naphthalene (20), thiophene (21), benzothiophene (22), and benzofuran (23) were all amenable in this transformation. In addition, various linear- (24, 25) and cyclic enol acetates (26, 27) also readily underwent the anticipated oxyazidation. Unfortunately, the current protocol was not applicable to the oxyazidation of enol acetate deriving from aliphatic ketones, such as cyclohexanone (see Supporting Information File 1 for details). As illustrated in Scheme 3, the synthetic utility of α-azidoketone was further evaluated [37–38]. Click reaction between 2-azido-1-phenylethan-1-one (2) and ethisterone (28) [39–41] readily afforded the target triazole product (29) in 84% yield. Upon treatment with piperidinium acetate and ethyl 3-(2-formylphenyl)acrylate (30), α-azidoketone (2) was transformed into isoquinoline product (31) in 58% yield [42].
Scheme 3.
Derivatization of α-azidoketone 2.
Based on our reaction results and the known literature [13–14], a possible mechanism is proposed (Scheme 4). The enol acetate A first undergoes anodic oxidation to form a radical cation intermediate B, which is then intercepted by azidotrimethylsilane to afford the benzyl radical C. Subsequently, this radical is further anodically oxidized to its oxocarbenium ion intermediate D, which finally reacts with water to form the desired product E. According to our 18O labeling experiment, the oxygen source of the newly installed carbonyl group probably originates from the vinyl acetate, not from H2O.
Scheme 4.
Proposed mechanism.
Conclusion
In summary, we have developed an environmentally friendly and efficient electrochemical oxyazidation of α-arylvinyl acetates to access diverse vicinal α-azidoketones. The protocol employs the experimentally simple undivided electrochemical cell and tolerates a broad substrate scope. The obtained α-azidoketones have been shown to be versatile building blocks for the preparation of biologically relevant heterocycles.
Supporting Information
Experimental procedures, characterization data, copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
This article is part of the thematic issue "Molecular and macromolecular electrochemistry: synthesis, mechanism, and redox properties".
Funding Statement
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22071025, 21901041), State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University (202008), Hundred-Talent Project of Fujian (50012742), and Fuzhou University (510841) is gratefully acknowledged.
Contributor Information
Tao Shen, Email: shentao199102@aliyun.com.
Ke-Yin Ye, Email: kyye@fzu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Sletten E M, Bertozzi C R. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:666–676. doi: 10.1021/ar200148z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li J, Chen P R. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12(3):129–137. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prescher J A, Bertozzi C R. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:13–21. doi: 10.1038/nchembio0605-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kádár Z, Frank É, Schneider G, Molnár J, Zupkó I, Kóti J, Schönecker B, Wölfling J. ARKIVOC. 2012;(3):279–296. doi: 10.3998/ark.5550190.0013.320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brusis T, Grofe H J, Förster D, Weuta H. Infection (Munich, Ger) 1977;5:26–31. doi: 10.1007/bf01639106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao R, Chen B-C, Bednarz M S, Wang B, Skoumbourdis A P, Sundeen J E, Dhar T G M, Iwanowicz E J, Balasubramanian B, Barrish J C. ARKIVOC. 2007;(12):36–42. doi: 10.3998/ark.5550190.0008.c03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Erythropel H C, Zimmerman J B, de Winter T M, Petitjean L, Melnikov F, Lam C H, Lounsbury A W, Mellor K E, Janković N Z, Tu Q, et al. Green Chem. 2018;20:1929–1961. doi: 10.1039/c8gc00482j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frontana-Uribe B A, Little R D, Ibanez J G, Palma A, Vasquez-Medrano R. Green Chem. 2010;12:2099–2119. doi: 10.1039/c0gc00382d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim Y, Li C-J. Green Synth Catal. 2020;1:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2020.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Patonay T, Hoffman R V. J Org Chem. 1994;59:2902–2905. doi: 10.1021/jo00089a043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang B, Lu Z. ACS Catal. 2017;7:8362–8365. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hossain A, Vidyasagar A, Eichinger C, Lankes C, Phan J, Rehbein J, Reiser O. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2018;57:8288–8292. doi: 10.1002/anie.201801678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ye Z, Zhu R, Wang F, Jiang H, Zhang F. Org Lett. 2021;23:8240–8245. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Panday P, Garg P, Singh A. Asian J Org Chem. 2018;7(1):111–115. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201700508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran P S. Chem Rev. 2017;117:13230–13319. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kingston C, Palkowitz M D, Takahira Y, Vantourout J C, Peters B K, Kawamata Y, Baran P S. Acc Chem Res. 2020;53:72–83. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Francke R, Little R D. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:2492–2521. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60464k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoshida J-i, Shimizu A, Hayashi R. Chem Rev. 2018;118(9):4702–4730. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiong P, Xu H-C. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:3339–3350. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiao K-J, Xing Y-K, Yang Q-L, Qiu H, Mei T-S. Acc Chem Res. 2020;53:300–310. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Novaes L F T, Liu J, Shen Y, Lu L, Meinhardt J M, Lin S. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:7941–8002. doi: 10.1039/d1cs00223f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shi S-H, Liang Y, Jiao N. Chem Rev. 2021;121(1):485–505. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aoyama M, Fukuhara T, Hara S. J Org Chem. 2008;73:4186–4189. doi: 10.1021/jo8004759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lam K, Markó I E. Org Lett. 2009;11:2752–2755. doi: 10.1021/ol900828x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yu Y, Jiang Y, Wu S, Shi Z, Wu J, Yuan Y, Ye K. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;33(4):2009–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vil’ V A, Merkulova V M, Ilovaisky A I, Paveliev S A, Nikishin G I, Terent’ev A O. Org Lett. 2021;23(13):5107–5112. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c01643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.de Souza A A N, Bartolomeu A d A, Brocksom T J, Noël T, de Oliveira K T. J Org Chem. 2022;87(9):5856–5865. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou P, Liu Y, Xu Y, Wang D. Org Chem Front. 2022;9:2215–2219. doi: 10.1039/d1qo01765a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu J, Dou Y, Guillot R, Kouklovsky C, Vincent G. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:2832–2837. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Meyer T H, Samanta R C, Del Vecchio A, Ackermann L. Chem Sci. 2021;12:2890–2897. doi: 10.1039/d0sc05924b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Niu L, Jiang C, Liang Y, Liu D, Bu F, Shi R, Chen H, Chowdhury A D, Lei A. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:17693–17702. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c08437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Siu J C, Parry J B, Lin S. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:2825–2831. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fu N, Sauer G S, Saha A, Loo A, Lin S. Science. 2017;357:575–579. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wu K, Liang Y, Jiao N. Molecules. 2016;21:352. doi: 10.3390/molecules21030352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ge L, Chiou M-F, Li Y, Bao H. Green Synth Catal. 2020;1:86–120. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2020.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharma A, Hartwig J F. Nature. 2015;517(7536):600–604. doi: 10.1038/nature14127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bangalore P K, Vagolu S K, Bollikanda R K, Veeragoni D K, Choudante P C, Misra S, Sriram D, Sridhar B, Kantevari S. J Nat Prod. 2020;83:26–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lv G, Qiu L, Li K, Liu Q, Li X, Peng Y, Wang S, Lin J. New J Chem. 2019;43:3419–3427. doi: 10.1039/c8nj04159h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Buil M L, Esteruelas M A, Garcés K, Oñate E. Organometallics. 2009;28:5691–5696. doi: 10.1021/om900647a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Levine P M, Lee E, Greenfield A, Bonneau R, Logan S K, Garabedian M J, Kirshenbaum K. ACS Chem Biol. 2012;7:1693–1701. doi: 10.1021/cb300332w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Levine P M, Imberg K, Garabedian M J, Kirshenbaum K. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6912–6915. doi: 10.1021/ja300170n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Prasad B, Phanindrudu M, Tiwari D K, Kamal A. J Org Chem. 2019;84:12334–12343. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Experimental procedures, characterization data, copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra.




