In the “Spectral data modeling” subsection of the “Results” section, there is an error in the fifth sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: “Combining laser and sedimentation methods in Set2 improved the clay predictions with R2 values of 0.80–0.85.”
In Fig 4, incorrect titles were used on the left-hand side to correspond to the values of the Mean ilr differences. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
Fig 4.
There are errors in Table 2. Please see the correct Table 2 here.
Table 2. Comparison of methods (method1 minus method2) using paired t-test and confidence intervals (p ≤ 0.05).
| Target variable | Method1 | Method2 | p.value | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Carbon | Clay,Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation 2-point peroxide | ns | 38 |
| [Carbon | Clay,Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Laser 0 min | **** | 46 |
| [Carbon | Clay,Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Laser 2 min | **** | 106 |
| [Carbon | Clay,Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point No peroxide | **** | 763 |
| [Carbon | Clay,Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point peroxide | **** | 206 |
| [Clay | Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation 2-point peroxide | ** | 38 |
| [Clay | Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Laser 0 min | **** | 46 |
| [Clay | Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | **** | **** | 106 |
| [Clay | Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point No peroxide | **** | 763 |
| [Clay | Silt,Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point peroxide | ns | 206 |
| [Silt | Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation 2-point peroxide | ns | 38 |
| [Silt | Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Laser 0 min | **** | 46 |
| [Silt | Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Laser 2 min | * | 106 |
| [Silt | Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point No peroxide | ** | 763 |
| [Silt | Sand] | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sedimentation multi-point peroxide | * | 206 |
| Sand | Sedimentation 2-point No peroxide | Sieving | * | 746 |
| Sand | Sedimentation 2-point peroxide | Sieving | ns | 26 |
| Sand | Laser 0 min | Sieving | **** | 34 |
| Sand | Laser 2 min | Sieving | * | 77 |
| Sand | Sedimentation multi-point No peroxide | Sieving | ns | 358 |
| Sand | Sedimentation multi-point peroxide | Sieving | **** | 84 |
ns: non-significant (> 0.05),
*: significant at p ≤ 0.05,
**: significant at p ≤ 0.01,
***: significant at p ≤ 0.005,
****: significant at p ≤ 0.001,
N: Sample size.
Reference
- 1.Parent EJ, Parent SÉ, Parent LE (2021) Determining soil particle-size distribution from infrared spectra using machine learning predictions: Methodology and modeling. PLOS ONE 16(7): e0233242. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233242 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

