Following publication of this article [1], the authors requested correction to address errors in the assembly of Figs 4A, 5A, 5B and 6E by providing replacement image panels and underlying data.
During editorial follow up on these issues, it came to the attention of the PLOS Genetics Editors that the nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines used in the in vitro and in vivo experiments reported in Figs 4–6 have been reported elsewhere to be possibly contaminated or misidentified (S18 and S26 are subclones of CNE-2; 6-10B and 5-8F are subclones of SUNE-1; see ICLAC Register of Misidentified Cell Lines (iclac.org/databases/cross-contaminations/) [2], Cellosaurus (https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/) [3] and [4–6]). One of the corresponding authors has provided cell line authentication reports dated 18 September 2017 for cell lines S18 and S26, including short tandem repeat (STR) profiles (S1 File); however, the PLOS Genetics Editors consider that the data provided do not fully resolve the concerns.
The following figure corrections are based on information provided by one of the corresponding authors regarding errors in Figs 4, 5, and 6:
Errors were made in the assembly of Figs 4A, 5A-B, and 6E, resulting in the incorporation of incorrect representative images in these figures.
In the originally published Fig 4A, the S26 shNK2 panel is incorrect. The flow cytometry data for this experiment underwent a second analysis because of a software issue encountered during the first analysis. The incorrect panel was included during figure assembly by mistake and shows the exported dot plot from the first analysis of S26 shNK1. Here the authors provide a revised Fig 4 using the correct S26 shNK2 panel from the original experiment. Dot plots for all of the replicates (n = 3) underlying Fig 4A are provided as Supporting Information S2 File. The raw.fcs files underlying the representative dot plot panels in Fig 4A are provided as Supporting Information S3 File.
In the originally published Fig 5A, there is an error in the p value for the comparison between S26 and S18. The correct p value is <0.01.
In the originally published Fig 5B, there is a region of overlap between the Invasion panels for shNK1 and shNK2. The shNK2 panel is incorrect and was included during figure assembly by mistake. Here the authors provide a revised Fig 5 using the correct shNK2 Invasion panel from the original experiment. The underlying image files for all replicates (n = 3) for Fig 5B are provided as Supporting Information S4 File.
There are errors in the figure legend for Fig 6. Units of drug concentration are incorrectly reported as mM for Fig 6D. The correct unit is µM. Additionally for Fig 6E, the number of replicates is incorrectly reported as n = 3. The correct number of replicates for this experiment is n = 4.
In the originally published Fig 6E, there is a region of overlap between the Migration panels for NK+3060 and NK+JSH. The Migration NK+JSH panel is incorrect and was included during figure assembly by mistake. Here the authors provide a revised Fig 6 using the correct Migration NK+JSH panel from the original experiment and a corrected figure legend to address the above issues. The underlying image files for all replicates (n = 4) for Fig 6E are provided as Supporting Information S5 File.
The quantitative data underlying the charts in Figs 4A, 5A, 5B and 6E are provided as Supporting Information S6 File.
The corresponding author has additionally clarified that the Fig 2A cancer NKILA ISH panel and the Fig 2B NPC stage I NKILA ISH panel are both correct and use the same image showing a representative example of Stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Methodological information for the flow cytometry experiments was not provided in the original article. Additional information is provided as follows:
Apoptosis was performed by using Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (eBioscience). Cells were dissociated by 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and harvested by centrifugation at 300g for 5min. And then cell pellets were resuspended in 200ul binding buffer containing 5ul Annexin V antibody and incubated for 15min at room temperature. After that, cells were washed and resuspended in 200ul binding buffer containing 5ul propidium and analyzed by flow cytometry.
An evaluation of the revised figures by a member of the PLOS Genetics Editorial Board determined that the corrected figures and the accompanying replicate dot plots, and microscopy image files, support the reported results of the article. However, in light of the cell line concerns, the PLOS Genetics Editors issue this Expression of Concern to alert readers to the use of cell lines previously reported to be misidentified/contaminated, which may affect whether the findings are representative of nasopharyngeal carcinoma biology.
Supporting information
References
- 1.Zhang W, Guo Q, Liu G, Zheng F, Chen J, Huang D, et al. (2019) NKILA represses nasopharyngeal carcinoma carcinogenesis and metastasis by NF-κB pathway inhibition. PLoS Genet 15(8): e1008325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Capes-Davis A, Theodosopoulos G, Atkin I, Drexler HG, Kohara A, MacLeod RA, et al. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(1):1–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bairoch A. The Cellosaurus, a Cell-Line Knowledge Resource. J Biomol Tech. 2018;29(2):25–38. doi: 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chan SY‐Y, Choy K‐W, Tsao S‐W, Tao Q, Tang T, Chung GT‐Y and Lo K‐W (2008), Authentication of nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor lines. Int. J. Cancer, 122: 2169–2171. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strong MJ, Baddoo M, Nanbo A, Xu M, Puetter A, Lin Z. Comprehensive High-Throughput RNA Sequencing Analysis Reveals Contamination of Multiple Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Lines with HeLa Cell Genomes. J Virol. 2014; 88 (18) 10696–10704; doi: 10.1128/JVI.01457-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ye F, Chen C, Qin J, Liu J, Zheng C. Genetic profiling reveals an alarming rate of cross-contamination among human cell lines used in China. FASEB J. 2015; 29 (10) 4268–4272; doi: 10.1096/fj.14-266718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.