Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
editorial
. 2022 Sep;112(9):1280–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306992

Barriers Push People into Seeking Abortion Care Later in Pregnancy

Ushma D Upadhyay 1,
PMCID: PMC9382185  PMID: 35969829

In 2013, we published one of the first articles from the Turnaway Study, in which we estimated that 4000 pregnant people were denied an abortion each year because they presented for care beyond the facility’s gestational limit (see p. 1305 of this issue). We found the most common reasons for being delayed in seeking an abortion were having to raise money for travel and procedure costs and not recognizing the pregnancy earlier.

BARRIERS EXPECTED TO INCREASE

On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court officially reversed the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, declaring that the constitutional right to abortion no longer exists. This decision allows states to ban abortion at any point in pregnancy or altogether. In April 2013, when our Turnaway article was published, seven states banned abortion at 22 weeks, and one state banned abortion at 20 weeks.

This year, up to half of states could ban abortion altogether (Figure 1), and about 100 000 people will be essentially “turned away” from receiving care in their own states,1 leaving them to seek this essential health care service in other states. It is projected that only one fourth of people needing abortion care will be able to travel out of state. For the rest, travel and procedure costs and other logistical barriers will be insurmountable—particularly for people with disabilities, adolescents, incarcerated people, immigrants, those with young children, and those living on low incomes.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Abortion Status and Number of Abortion-Providing Facilities That Offer Abortion Care After 20 Weeks of Pregnancy

LEGAL, DISTANCE, AND COST BARRIERS ARE OFTEN INSURMOUNTABLE

By increasing the hurdles to getting an abortion, people are pushed into seeking abortion care later in pregnancy (p. 1297).2 In our recent prospective study, pregnant people considering abortion living 50 miles or more from the closest abortion facility were significantly more likely to still be pregnant and either resigned to continuing the pregnancy or still seeking an abortion 4 weeks later.3

Raising the funds to pay for an abortion can lead to further delays and create a cycle of increasing cost and delay. One Turnaway participant explained why she could not go to another clinic after being denied an abortion at first: “It was probably travel costs, procedure costs, not knowing who I would have to come with me on the 4-day adventure. I was at the point that there was no guarantee wherever I went.”1

The number of facilities that offer later abortion care has been declining. Although the total number of facilities increased over 2017 to 2021, the regions with fewer facilities experienced even more clinic loss.4 Before the Supreme Court decision, the United States had 790 publicly advertising abortion facilities, and only 17% (137) offered care after 20 weeks of pregnancy.5 As states continue to ban abortion, we expect that only 104 facilities nationwide will offer abortion care after 20 weeks of pregnancy, with the vast majority in the Northeast and West (Figure 1).

SELF-MANAGED ABORTION IS FRAUGHT WITH LEGAL RISK

Some pregnant people who want an abortion but cannot travel will attempt to self-manage their abortions. In 2013, abortion medications mifepristone and misoprostol were not as easily available. Today, we have virtual abortion facilities that offer abortion care through telehealth and mail in the 21 states where it is legal.4 We also have online sites, such as Aid Access, that will mail abortion medications to patients even in states that ban abortion or delivery of medication by mail.6 However, these medications are most effective when used in the first 11 weeks of pregnancy. The medications ship from abroad and can take up to two weeks to arrive, delaying care. This approach also subjects pregnant people, particularly people of color whose behavior is more often monitored, to risk of criminalization. Given how safe abortion pills are, people can use them on their own. But people have a right to the care and comfort that comes from having a provider support them, regardless of their state of residence.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks Chris Ahlbach, MD, and Rosalyn Schroeder, MPH, MSc, for data analysis and map development. The author also thanks Elizabeth Nash for historical policy data.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

See also Abortion, pp. 12731317.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 2022https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/193084/20210920175559884_19-1392bsacEconomists.pdf. Accessed [Date].
  • 2.Upadhyay UD, McCook AA, Bennett AH, Cartwright AF, Roberts SCM. State abortion policies and Medicaid coverage of abortion are associated with pregnancy outcomes among individuals seeking abortion recruited using Google Ads: a national cohort study. Soc Sci Med. 2021;274:113747. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pleasants EA, Cartwright AF, Upadhyay UD. seeking abortion online. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2212065. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schroeder R, Muñoz I, Kaller S, Berglas N, Stewart C, Upadhyay U.2022.
  • 5. Ahlbach C, Muñoz I, Kaller S, Cook C, Upadhyay UD. Contraception. . 2022;109:85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Aiken AR, Upadhyay UD. BMJ. . 2022;377:o1393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES