Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2022 Apr 27:jiac158. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac158

Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and COVID-19 Booster Vaccination

Suvichada Assawakosri 1,2, Sitthichai Kanokudom 1,2, Nungruthai Suntronwong 1, Jiratchaya Puenpa 1, Thaneeya Duangchinda 3, Warangkana Chantima 4,5, Pattarakul Pakchotanon 3, Juthathip Mongkolsapaya 6,7, Nasamon Wanlapakorn 1, Sittisak Honsawek 2, Yong Poovorawan 1,8,✉
PMCID: PMC9383713  PMID: 35481828

to the editor—In reply to the correspondence from Tjan et al [1] regarding the heterologous booster in healthy adults previously immunized with 2 doses of CoronaVac [2], the additional knowledge on immunogenicity of the booster (third dose) with BNT162b2 in BNT162b2-primed individuals against the BA.2 omicron variant will help promote the vaccine uptake and coverage in the midst of a surge in BA.2 omicron worldwide.

As of February 2022, the omicron variant was further classified into 4 main sublineages, BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3. Moreover, an epidemiological surveillance on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) showed that BA.2 sublineages have become the dominant variant globally [3]. In Thailand, the BA.2 sublineages have been detected since the end of January 2022. The proportion of BA.2 sublineages rapidly increased and accounted for more than 90% of positive cases reported in March 2022 [Puenpa J et al. unpublished]. Potent serum neutralizing antibody (nAbs) against BA.1 was observed after the heterologous booster in individuals previously immunized with 2 doses of CoronaVac [2]. Considering the waning immunity after primary series vaccination and the high transmissibility and potential immune escape of BA.2 sublineage, we further determined the immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 booster against BA.1 and BA.2 in AZD1222-primed individuals using the 50% focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT50) as previously described [2].

Participants were 20 healthy Thai adults aged 18 years and older (mean age 50.66 years, SD 12.95 years) who received 2 doses of AZD1222 vaccination and had no previous or current COVID-19 infection. The participants received mRNA-1273 as a booster (third dose) vaccine at 5–7 months after the second dose of AZD1222. Blood samples were collected at 28 days after the booster. In accordance with the results previously reported by Tjan et al and Yu et al [1, 4] Undetectable (titer < 20) nAbs against both BA.1 and BA.2 were observed among most participants before the booster. At 28 days after the booster the geometric mean titer of nAbs significantly increased from 16.6 (95% confidence interval CI], 13.2–21.0) and 11.0 (95% CI, 9.6–12.6) to 548 (95% CI, 415–723) and 324 (95% CI, 214–492) against BA.1 and BA.2, respectively. The results demonstrated that after the mRNA booster, the nAbs titers against BA.2 were slightly lower than those against BA.1 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Neutralizing antibody titers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) against BA.1 and BA.2 omicron variants at prebooster and 28 days postbooster. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 was measured using the 50% focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT50). Each data point represents an individual who received mRNA-1273 as a booster dose. Error bars indicate geometric mean titer and 95% confidence interval. Values below the limit of detection (titer < 20) were substituted with a titer of 10.

These preliminary results indicate that the heterologous booster with mRNA vaccine in AZD1222-primed individuals could induce a robust antibody response that can cross-neutralize both BA.1 and BA.2 omicron variants.

Notes

Acknowledgments. We thank the staff of the Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology and all the participants for helping and supporting this project; and the Ministry of Public Health, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, and Zullig Pharma for providing the vaccines for this study.

Financial support. This work was supported by the Health Systems Research Institute, National Research Council of Thailand; Chulalongkorn University (Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology and Second Century Fund); King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital; and the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (grant number P2051613 to T. D.).

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References


Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES