Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2022 May 11:jiac193. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac193

The Potential Confounders Hiding in a United States Cohort About Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection During Pregnancy

Pei-Yun Shih 1,a, Ying-Hsiang Chou 2,3,a, James Cheng-Chung Wei 4,5,6,
PMCID: PMC9384014  PMID: 35543484

to the editor—With great interest, we read the article by Regan et al [1]. In their cohort study, the authors investigated the association between prenatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support previous studies that suggest maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection harms fetal health. However, there are some issues that should be discussed.

First, SARS-CoV-2 infection may not be the only risk factor of adverse pregnancy outcomes after adjustment in this cohort. This study was based on de-identified administrative claims and electronic health records data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse [2]. However, some confounders recorded in electronic health records data were not considered in this study, such as parity. A comparative study showed that primary cesarean delivery contributes to the increasing rate of patients’ refusal to undergo vaginal delivery, thus inducing the secondary or repeat cesarean delivery [3]. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2–infected pregnancy complicated with high-risk gestational factors should be considered when evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. For example, previous studies indicated that maternal obesity is linked to a greater risk of preterm birth [4]. As a result, we suggest that importing the known residual confounders into the adjusted model would improve the precision of this study.

Second, personal factors were effect modifiers for the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and clinician-initiated events, including induced abortion, cesarean delivery, and clinician-initiated preterm birth. The administrative codes cannot reflect the exact condition. The preference of patients may influence the decisions of the doctors [3]. On the other hand, doctors may execute clinician-initiated events for COVID-19 patients for other reasons than SARS-CoV-2 infection. The personal factors were residual confounders to the outcomes. Owing to the large infected-to-uninfected ratio in this study, we propose that matching the infected and uninfected cases by time-dependent propensity score matching can minimize the impact of the residual confounders [5]. After sequential matching with time-dependent propensity score, the effect of exposure can be identified by the Cox regression model used in this cohort.

Contributor Information

Pei-Yun Shih, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Ying-Hsiang Chou, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

James Cheng-Chung Wei, Department of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Note

Potential conflicts of interest . All authors: No potential conflicts of interest.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1. Regan AK, Arah OA, Fell DB, Sullivan SG. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and associated perinatal health outcomes: a national US cohort study. J Infect Dis 2022; 225:759–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. OptumLabs . OptumLabs and OptumLabs Data Warehouse descriptions and citation. Eden Prairie, MN: OptumLabs, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Diejomaoh MFE, Al-Jassar W, Bello Z, Karunakaran K, Mohammed A. The relevance of the second cesarean delivery in the reduction of institutional cesarean delivery rates. Med Princ Pract 2018; 27:555–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev 2015; 16:621–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang Z, Li X, Wu X, Qiu H, Shi H; AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group. Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES