Abstract
Federated Learning (FL), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are the most trending and exciting technology in the intelligent healthcare field. Traditionally, the healthcare system works based on centralized agents sharing their raw data. Therefore, huge vulnerabilities and challenges are still existing in this system. However, integrating with AI, the system would be multiple agent collaborators who are capable of communicating with their desired host efficiently. Again, FL is another interesting feature, which works decentralized manner; it maintains the communication based on a model in the preferred system without transferring the raw data. The combination of FL, AI, and XAI techniques can be capable of minimizing several limitations and challenges in the healthcare system. This paper presents a complete analysis of FL using AI for smart healthcare applications. Initially, we discuss contemporary concepts of emerging technologies such as FL, AI, XAI, and the healthcare system. We integrate and classify the FL-AI with healthcare technologies in different domains. Further, we address the existing problems, including security, privacy, stability, and reliability in the healthcare field. In addition, we guide the readers to solving strategies of healthcare using FL and AI. Finally, we address extensive research areas as well as future potential prospects regarding FL-based AI research in the healthcare management system.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Explainable AI, Federated learning, Smart healthcare, IoT, Security, Data management
Introduction
The Internet-of-Medical-Things (IoMT) revolution brought comprehensive changes in the way medical facilities operate by uplifting the quality of services [1]. IoMT devices with the ability to sense and transmit health updates of an individual, are extensively used to gather healthcare data. This information is then processed using artificial intelligence [2] to materialize a variety of healthcare applications which includes distant monitoring of patient and prognosis of diseases. Deep Learning (DL) approaches, for example, have shown potential in biomedical image analysis for earlier identification of acute illnesses by managing enormous volumes of relevant data to improve healthcare efficiency [3]. Dong et al. [4] suggested a detailed analysis based on blockchain-based FL to discuss the issue of privacy concerns using datasets to identify the current state of this problem. The study suggested that blockchain-based FL has developed significantly over the last five years, and the technology is now being applied to the fields of IoT and smart healthcare applications, such as recording patient health data, medical image analysis, to study data related to analysis of cancer related illness, and relevant economic data. Smart healthcare systems have typically focused on centralized AI capabilities stored in the cloud for learning and data analytics [5–7]. Due to raw data transfer, this centralized approach is inefficient in terms of communication latency and cannot achieve high network scalability. More specifically in e-healthcare, personal data are subjected to regulations like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of the United States (HIPPA) [8]. Furthermore, a centralized AI system may be considered unacceptable in future healthcare systems, and instead must be disseminated throughout a large-scale IoMT network. As a result, switching to distributed AI approaches at the network edge for scalable and privacy-preserving intelligent healthcare applications is critical.
Federated Learning, a new distributed interactive AI concept, is especially promising for smart healthcare since it allows numerous clients (such as Hospitals) to participate on AI training whilst maintaining data privacy. As a result, the authors investigated the application of FL in smart healthcare extensively [9]. To begin, we will discuss current breakthroughs in FL, as well as the reasons and prerequisites for adopting FL in smart healthcare. The authors have presented a state-of-the-art overview of FL’s developing applications in major healthcare areas such as COVID-19 detection, medical data recording, distant monitoring of patients, and biomedical image analysis. In a recent research, FL was recommended for usage in a number of IoT actions, including e-healthcare and intelligent transportation system, among others. FL, for instance, has made e-health services more accessible by allowing machine learning (ML) modeling despite the absence of health data [10]. Health data owners, such as hospitals, can avoid exchanging healthcare information by employing FL. Rather, healthcare personnel can locally train the model and then share the parameters to the accumulator for data compilation. Federated Learning has presented itself as a viable method for implementing economic, innovative healthcare systems while ensuring privacy [11–15]. FL allows training of AI models through averaging of local updates from numerous healthcare facilities and smart devices, such as IoMT, despite the lack of local data.
On the other hand, AI has been used in a wide range of disciplines, which includes the IoT, machine vision, natural language processing, and robotics, as a result of fast spreading of AI technologies. More specifically, researchers have attempted to use AI to boost scientific analysis and analyse potential remedies, hence improving the overall efficacy of the healthcare industry [16, 17]. The advantages that AI can bring to medicine have been predicted for decades. The role of AI in biomedical engineering has even been reviewed [18]. AI and its applications in healthcare have recently made considerable strides [19]. Medical facilities with an attempt towards becoming further individualized, with a predictive instinct, preventative measures, and participatory behavior, can approach AI to assist in this endeavor. Determined from the achievements so far, we predict that AI will pursue further evolution and grow as a powerful device for future healthcare.
Many studies have been undertaken to study FL based AI related issues, including healthcare, as a result of recent advancements in the field. The publications in [9], for example, provide the basic FL idea and its supporting protocols, as well as the technical hurdles of FL design and implementation. [20] covers the security and privacy challenges in FL systems, as well as potential methods for assessing harmful threats in FL networks. The authors of [21] investigates issues in FL base AI implementation like as communication expenses, resource distribution, and security concerns. In [22] researchers looks at the junction of FL-AI and the IoT by providing a review of technical challenges in FL schemes which includes sparsification, security, and extensibility, as well as a concise analysis of FL-based AI technologies in IoT [23]. Furthermore, in [24] the authors provided a review of FL applications in industrial IoT, with an emphasis on the features and basics of FL, with little mention of FL use in healthcare. Another research [25] focuses on the technological challenges and needs of adopting FL-based AI approaches in the future of digital health. The most recent advancements in FL, for instance FL aware of resources, safe and reliable FL, the potential of privacy-boosted FL, stimulus-aware FL, and tailored FL has yet to be extensively investigated.
Despite these attempts, as far as we know, no established research provides complete overview of FL-based AI uses in the sphere of smart healthcare. Furthermore, the available literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of FL’s use in new healthcare applications. These disadvantages motivated the authors to carry out an in-depth examination regarding the usage of FL-based AI techniques in the healthcare realm. We investigate the most updated FL-AI concepts in smart healthcare. Following that, we give a splitting analysis regarding the novel FL-based AI applications in smart healthcare, including Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) management, distant monitoring of health, biomedical image analytics, and identification of COVID-19 traits [89]. Poll results are also shared so that readers may have a better grasp of how FL can be employed in smart healthcare. Our research intends to give a bibliometric analysis of characteristics such as authors, nations, citations, and keywords to help academics and practitioners plan future research. Finally, future prospects and research problems in FL-smart healthcare are discussed. Also, we will suggest and analyze a dominating framework of variables in this topic.
Major contributions and organization of the survey
This work discusses different leading technologies–FL, AI, XAI, and intelligent healthcare. In detail, we share a state-of-the-art analysis about their concepts, taxonomies & motivations, addressing issues and solutions and further applications. We also describe some integration’s of these technologies to better support applications in various areas. To this end, the survey’s main contributions are outlined here:
We provide a cutting edge outline on FL-based AI in the area of healthcare, initially with basic concepts regarding FL, AI key concepts, XAI features, and a detailed discussion of smart healthcare efficiency.
We present the lately advanced FL-AI taxonomies and emerging AI-FL integration’s and motivations applicable to intelligent healthcare applications.
We address some technical challenges in the existing system and then directly solve the issues using vast technologies–including FL, AI, and XAI in the healthcare applications.
Finally, we analyse the issues of different applications and direct further research towards FL-AI in innovative healthcare areas.
This study is the only potential and informative survey that integrates all the considered technologies to the best of our knowledge. Some of the notations are listed in Table 1. The rest of this survey is organized as follows: Section 2 represents a conceptual overview regarding FL, AI, and e-healthcare individually. Sections 3 offers the motivations behind the FL-AI-healthcare, FL-healthcare, and AI-healthcare integration’s, also providing taxonomies of these components. Further, the addressing different issues and solutions of these issues have been presented in Sect. 4. After that, Sect. 5 focuses on the current research challenges and future directions of the study. Finally, we conclude the survey in Sect. 6.
Table 1.
List of common abbreviations with description
Keys | Description |
---|---|
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
AUC | Area Under the ROC Curve |
BC | Blockchain |
COVID-19 | Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
DT | Decision Tree |
DoS | Denial of Service |
DL | Deep Learning |
EHR | Electronic Health Records |
FL | Federated Learning |
HCU | Healthcare Control Unit |
HM | Healthcare Management |
HPW | Healthcare Provider’s Wallet |
IoMT | Internet of Medical Things |
IoT | Internet of Things |
IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
IP | Internet Protocol |
KNN | K-nearest Neighbors |
LPU | Local Processing Unit |
LR | Logistic Regression |
ML | Machine Learning |
M2M | Machine to Machine |
P2P | Peer to Peer |
PCA | Patient Centric Agent |
PDA | Personal Digital Assistants |
PM | Patient Management |
QoS | Quality of Services |
SC | Smart Contact |
SDP | Sensor Data Provider |
SH | Smart Healthcare |
SVM | Support Vector Machine |
WIoT | Wireless Internet of Things |
WSN | Wireless Sensor Networks |
XAI | Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
FL, AI, and healthcare: state-of-the-art
This segment presents advanced concepts regarding Federated Learning, artificial intelligence, and e-healthcare properly. In FL segments include various aspects of developments, the necessity of FL, different features of FL in 2.1. Further, we introduce AI technology and cover the parameters of various characteristics and usefulness in 2.2. We discuss diverse concepts and issues of healthcare technology in 2.3. We also present the related works regarding Federated Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), and Healthcare in the Table 2.
Table 2.
Related surveys/works regarding FL, AI and Healthcare. The works are grouped based on the related technology and reported in chronological order within each group
Related works | Year | Technology | Main focus |
---|---|---|---|
Rey et al. [26] | 2021 | FL | N-BaIoT, modeling of network traffic of several IoT devices infected by virus attacks, has been employed to assess the proposed algorithm. |
Li et al. [27] | 2021 | A case study that can assist the design of a Federated Learning System, including aspects and research perspectives. | |
Rahman et al. [28] | 2021 | Issues related to the design of a Federated Learning based system. | |
Zhang et al. [29] | 2021 | Survey on FL based application areas. | |
Pham et al. [24] | 2021 | Integration of FL and IIoT. | |
Nguyen et al. [9] | 2021 | Integration of FL and Blockchain technology for intelligent and secured system. | |
Khan et al. [22] | 2021 | Recent advancements include advancements in the security and privacy era. The difficulties and taxonomy of FL were then examined. | |
Kulkarni et al. [30] | 2020 | Methods of personalization for FL approaches. | |
Lim et al. [21] | 2020 | The use of FL in mobile edge networks, as well as their challenges and future directions. | |
Jigan et al. [31] | 2020 | Opportunities of Federated Learning for smart city infrastructures. | |
Shen et al. [32] | 2020 | Federated Learning for data security and privacy perspective. | |
Chen et al. [33] | 2020 | Explored the convergence time of Federated Learning when deployed across a real-world wireless network. | |
Shlezinger et al. [34] | 2020 | Attempted to tackle emerging challenges using tools from quantization theory. | |
Chen et al. [35] | 2020 | Issue to train FL model for a wireless network is detailed. | |
Wrabel et al. [36] | 2021 | AI & XAI | The use of AI algorithms to track targets using radar. |
Wu et al. [37] | 2021 | AI for visualization of data. | |
Markus et al. [38] | 2021 | Explainable AI for the field of the health care system to create a trustworthy system. | |
Korica et al. [39] | 2021 | Opportunities, Gaps and Challenges and a Novel Way to Look at the Problem Space in healthcare. | |
Chakrobartty et al. [40] | 2021 | A systematic review of the methods and techniques of explainable AI within the medical domain. | |
Riboni et al. [41] | 2021 | Explainable AI in Pervasive Healthcare: Open Challenges and Research Directions. | |
Duell et al. [42] | 2021 | A Comparison of Explanations Given by Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods on Analysing Electronic Health Records. | |
Coppola et al. [43] | 2021 | Utilizing AI technologies in the radiology department to reduce error rates and studying radiologist attitudes regarding AI adaption. | |
Hansen et al. [44] | 2021 | AI for IIoT (Small and Medium SMEs). | |
Dhuri et al. [45] | 2020 | Made an academy to an intelligent place. | |
Laird et al. [46] | 2020 | Highlights various applications and opportunities of SM multimodal data, latest advancements, current challenges, and future directions for the crisis informatics. | |
Zhang et al. [47] | 2020 | Assists radiologists and physicians in performing a quick diagnosis, especially when the health system is overloaded. | |
Cubric et al. [48] | 2020 | This review covered AI adoption across various business sectors–healthcare, information technology, energy, agriculture. | |
Rasheed et al. [49] | 2020 | Leveraging the techniques of artificial intelligence in order to predict the infection rate as well as the mortality rate to assist the health workers. | |
Tung et al. [50] | 2020 | AI model for the development of the quality of the river water. | |
Wu et al. [51] | 2020 | Enhancement of security of IoT by utilizing the methods of IoT. | |
Zhou et al. [52] | 2020 | Collaboration of AI and database system. | |
Mohanta et al. [53] | 2020 | Issues and solutions towards IoT security using ML, AI and blockchain methods. | |
Hossain et al. [54] | 2020 | Explainable AI and Mass Surveillance System-Based Healthcare Framework to Combat COVID-I9 Like Pandemics. | |
Amann et al. [55] | 2020 | A comprehensive assessment of the role of explainability in medical AI and makes an ethical evaluation. | |
Pawar et al. [56] | 2020 | XAI is discussed as a technique that can used in the analysis and diagnosis of health data by AI-based systems. | |
Alshqaqi et al. [57] | 2022 | Healthcare | Opportunities of IoT for healthcare industry. |
Kashani et al. [58] | 2021 | This study aims to identify, compare systematically, and classify existing investigations taxonomically in the Healthcare IoT (HIoT) systems. | |
Kaye et al. [59] | 2021 | The economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health care facilities and systems: international perspectives. | |
Jaiswal et al. [60] | 2021 | Healthcare system by leveraging IoT associated issues, applications and threats. | |
Li et al. [61] | 2021 | ML methods for the health care data analysis. | |
Murthy et al. [62] | 2021 | Patient monitoring system by leveraging IoT methods. | |
Muhammad et al. [1] | 2021 | IoMT and related issues, types, challenges and possibilities. | |
Jabeen et al. [63] | 2021 | IoMT security in WBAN. | |
Philip et al. [64] | 2021 | Application of DL in the sphere of IoMT. | |
Chew et al. [65] | 2020 | Studied medical personnel to find the relation between psychological results and physical patterns. | |
Greenberge et al. [66] | 2020 | Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. | |
Amin et al. [67] | 2020 | The improvement of edge computing environments for the healthcare system is identified. | |
Hathaliya et al. [68] | 2020 | Security and related concerns in present healthcare 4.0 system. | |
Qadri et al. [69] | 2020 | Future healthcare systems as seen through the lens of recently developed technologies. | |
Alemdar et al. [70] | 2010 | Minimizes the complex healthcare system for nurses and assists the critically ill and elderly to lead an independent life. | |
Zhu et al. [71] | 2021 | FL-AI-XAI | The transition from FL to federated neural architecture have been discussed in this work. |
Yang et al. [72] | 2021 | Explained several privacy preserved solutions using FL and machine learning or artificial intelligence techniques. | |
Truong et al. [73] | 2021 | Privacy ensuring methods in Federated Learning. | |
Zeng et al. [74] | 2021 | A detailed survey of FL motivational strategies. | |
Guberovic et al. [75] | 2021 | Federated Learning for intelligent system. | |
Tonellotto et al. [76] | 2021 | Recurrent NN model for FL for prediction of time series. | |
Xianjia et al. [77] | 2021 | Federated Learning for robotics and AI. | |
Ghassemi et al. [78] | 2021 | An overview of current explainability techniques and highlight how various failure cases can cause problems for decision making for individual patients. | |
Shaban et al. [79] | 2021 | Explainability and Interpretability: Keys to Deep Medicine. | |
Raunak et al. [80] | 2021 | From real-time systems to human-in-the-loop fault detection, the articles here have looked into AI explanation from varying perspectives and for multiple groups of audience. | |
Deshpande et al. [81] | 2021 | A Brief Bibliometric Survey of Explainable AI in Medical Field. | |
Giuste et al. [82] | 2021 | The use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) during the pandemic and how it’s use could overcome barriers to real-world success. | |
Xu et al. [83] | 2021 | FL-Healthcare | Provides great promise to connect the fragmented healthcare data sources with privacy preservation. |
Jatain et al. [84] | 2021 | Aimed to reveal the technological foundation called blockchain and its usability in healthcare services. | |
Nguyen et al. [9] | 2021 | Improved healthcare through coordination of hospitals to execute AI training in the absence of shared local data. | |
Zhang et al. [29] | 2021 | Characteristics, challenges and application area of FL. | |
Blanco et al. [85] | 2021 | Survey on addressing security concerns using Federated Learning. | |
Rieke et al. [25] | 2020 | Discussed threats and potential remedies by leveraging FL in the healthcare sector. | |
Lim et al. [86] | 2020 | FL for intelligent healthcare system for contract design. | |
Grama et al. [87] | 2020 | Aggregation process for healthcare system to preserve privacy. | |
Sharma et al. [88] | 2020 | Intending to address the totality of Federated Learning with a complete vulnerability assessment. |
Fundamentals of federated learning
Federated Learning is essentially a machine learning (ML) algorithm which allows for collective learning of a distributed model while preserving the data composed on their devices. FL that has been shown in Fig. 1, it allows for equipping ML models with decentralized data and at the same time protects user confidential data by design. FL as a shared ML model is gaining increased popularity in situations where user’s data privacy is vital [90]. In FL, local data is used to train clients using a distributed approach. The scenario involves training decentralized clients or nodes using local data and sharing system parameters. Accumulation of system or model parameters creates a global model using a server [72]. In practice, the user does not need to share their private data using FL. Rather, users drill the network locally and share the model to a central body known as the server. However, it is essential in FL for each user to effectually and feasibly transmit it’s learned model through the server. The server in FL aggregates the local data into a global network through an iterative process [91]. Fig. 1 represents the training process of the federated machine learning. Following are the steps used in this figure.
Every device will have a local copy of our centralized machine learning application, which users will be able to access whenever they need it.
The model will now gradually learn and train itself based on the data provided by the user, allowing it to become smarter over time.
The devices then send the training results from the local copy of the machine learning program back to the central server.
The same thing happens when you run the program on many devices, each of which has a local copy of it. The results will be compiled in a centralized server, but no user data will be included this time.
The centralized cloud server now uses the pooled training data to update its centralized machine learning model, which is considerably superior to the prior version.
Users update the program with the better model produced from their data while the development team upgrades the model to a newer version.
The FL is a distributed processing system built on AI, Blockchain, and machine learning algorithms at its core. The terms distributed machine learning and federated machine learning are not interchangeable. In Federated Learning, the information supplied to the server by each participant resembles no original data, rather a trained sub-model. Simultaneously, Federated Learning permits asynchronous transmission, which reduces requirements for communication purposes [92]. On this foundation, the federated machine learning formula may be revised as follows:
1 |
where, k denotes number of clients, is the weight value of the client, and the decentralized multiuser ,,....,) scenario is used for Federated Learning. The current user’s dataset (,,....,) is available to each client user.
Fig. 1.
Federated Learning and its Training Process
FL: Key design aspects
For constructing intelligent and privacy-enhanced IoT systems, the notion of Federated Learning has recently been presented. The major steps in the FL-smart healthcare process are as follows:
Initialization of system and client selection: The aggregation mainframe chooses an analytic task, such as automated biomedical imaging or detection of any motion, as well as further needs like objective categorization, and learning parameters and rates. Furthermore, the endpoint chooses a number of users to engage in FL method.
- Local Training and Updates: As soon as the dataset of learning users has been identified, the network delivers an preliminary model to the clients, together with an initial global gradient, to start the distributed training. Each user teaches a local model adopting its personal data and estimates its model update. The scenario is such as, after configuring the training, the server creates a novel model, i.e., , and sends it to the users to begin distributed training. Employing its own data , each client k drills a local model and assesses an update by mitigating a loss function :
For various FL algorithms, the loss function might be different [93]. The loss function of a linear regression Federated Learning model may be described as: with a set of input output pairings . Then, for aggregate, each client k transmits its estimated update to the server.2 - Aggregation and Download of Models: Following the gathering of all updates from the specified clients, the server uses an aggregation mechanism to combine them. For example, in Google’s Federated Averaging (FedAvg) technique [94], where the gradient parameters of local models are averaged element-wise with weights proportionate to the sizes of the client datasets, we may employ the model averaging strategy. The server then generates a new version of the global model and broadcasts it to all clients as the foundation for future local model updates in the next learning round. A real scenario is, the server combines all model changes from local clients and calculates a new version of the global model as follows:
by figuring out how to solve the following optimization problem:3
subject to (C1): = =...== The accuracy of the FL method, for example, the accuracy of an FL-based object classification task [35], is reflected by the loss function . Furthermore, the constraint (C1) assures that after each training round, all users and central server have identical training model for Federated Learning problem. Following the model’s derivation, the server transmits the new global update to all users, allowing them to optimize their trained models in the subsequent training round. The iteration of the process proceeds until the loss function congregates or the requisite precision is attained.4
Federated Learning method can be deployed to deliver numerous appealing benefits to develop smart healthcare based on the revolutionary operating idea, as mentioned below:
Enhancement of Data Privacy: In FL, local data are not required for training. This is used to train other machine learning algorithms by combining numerous local datasets and not transferring data. Local Machine Learning (ML) models are trained on local heterogeneous datasets during training. The model parameters are shared between these local data centers on a regular basis. Many models encrypt these parameters before sending them. Data samples from the local area are not shared. This increases data security and protection. In addition, a shared global model is created. As a result, risk of personal data being leaked to an external source is reduced, and privacy is ensured. FL offers security features which creates an excellent alternative for designing smart and secured IoT devices, especially in light of increasingly severe data privacy protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [95, 96].
A Reasonable Balance of Accuracy and Utility: FL is capable of providing a suitable balance between precision and usefulness, as well as privacy enhancement, as compared to traditional centralized learning. Furthermore, FL training keeps the model generalizability while sacrificing nominal accuracy. As a result of FL’s distributed learning characteristic, the smart healthcare system’s scalability may be improved.
Health Data Training at a Low Cost: FL can assist to mitigate communication expenses, such as data lag and power transmission, associated with transfer of raw data by avoiding the offloading of large data volumes to the server [97]. Because model gradients are typically much smaller than their actual datasets, FL can be deployed to mitigate communication expenses, such as delay and power dispatch associated with communication of local data. As a result, FL saves a significant amount of network bandwidth and reduces the risk of network congestion in large healthcare networks.
Why needed FL?
The ever growing number of IoT resources together with relevant applications means the requirement of processing large amount of data [98, 99]. The availability of big data analytics and computation methods such as machine learning and deep learning has enabled users to achieve effective data management. Artificial Intelligence applications is being successfully deployed to counter the issues related to optimized resource management, efficient selection of antenna in wireless systems and several other areas of communication networks. The traditional AI models usually necessitates the users to share individual information to a master network for learning purposes. A key concern with such techniques is the privacy of users sensitive information. FL is highly effective in areas where decision making is based on substantial data scattered over a wide range of training nodes at the same time addressing privacy and security concern [100]. Machine learning models are developed using data collected from several sources to allow for prediction. Regardless, as a result of bandwidth issues, security and storage facility, raw data transmission to a centralized location becomes unrealistic. FL acts a distributed learning model to ensure optimal learning, efficient utilization of collected raw data and transmission to a centralized place. FL also plays a significant role in advancement of smart cities as detailed by authors in [101]. Policy makers in urban smart cities can utilize FL to transmit the sensitive information gathered from IoT devices for effective management of priority assets. The framework in FL allows the users to access data without gaining personal information regarding other clients. Eventually, the updated global model constructed by the server is distributed to all clients [21]. The clients then download the new updated global model and utilize cloud distribution to understand interference on their individual devices.
Different features of FL
Federated Learning approach is a concept introduced by google to allow on-device learning and security of sensitive data [93]. FL has the benefit of distributed data processing and improved privacy factors. FL is suggested as means of training a ML model in [91] which does not require accumulation of all user’s data sample. In [26], authors have investigated the deployment of FL to detect malware in IoT devices. Researchers in [34] detailed the advantages of coupling vector quantization with FL to generate an efficient decentralized training model. Federated Learning also offers a platform to allow distributed analysis in the industrial IoT sector [102]. The issues of executing FL over a wireless network is studied by authors in [35]. Another key feature of FL is the ability of the server to organize the training model and analyze the contribution of every participant [103]. FL is also being applied to the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) by researchers to develop efficient and robust models while preserving sensitive data. Several other features of FL include its application in healthcare and medicine sectors as discussed in [12, 83]. Electronic healthcare records from multiple data sources (several hospitals) require joint data access and uploading of data to a single database.
However, due to reasons such as privacy concerns of each institution, it is quite challenging to materialize such expectations without guaranteeing security issues. FL is a highly effective method to gather EHR data from hospitals to provide a knowledge-sharing platform without the need of sharing personal data, all while preserving the privacy [104, 105]. FL in healthcare is used to detect similarity in the patient in [106] and is used for predictive modeling as detailed in [107, 108]. Authors in [109] converted electronic health records data into readable phenotypes by using a tensor factorization model to analyze data in an FL framework. A Federated Learning framework to analyze brain structural relationships for diseases is studied in [110]. Researchers in [111] used FL based predictive modeling on EHR data to analyze the advantages of early treatment of patients. In [112], FL was deployed towards a predictive analysis to estimate prolonged stay period of patients and in-hospital mortality across a number of medical facilities. Two-stage federated Natural Language Processing (NLP) to detect patients and phenotyping from EHR data for obesity and comorbidities from several medical facilities is studied in [113]. Novel Federated Learning framework for smart wearables for activity recognition and data aggregation is studied in [114, 115]. Model-centric, cross-device, horizontal, cross-silo, vertical, data-centric, reinforcement, and other types of Federated Learning exist. The three primary forms of Federated Learning are–horizontal FL, vertical FL, and federated transfer learning. Horizontal FL uses data with the similar trait space across all devices, suggesting that Client A and Client B are using the same features. To train a global model, vertical Federated Learning incorporates multiple datasets from distinct feature areas. Finally, federated transfer learning is vertical Federated Learning that uses a pre-trained model that has been learnt on a comparable dataset to tackle a different challenge. Assume the global model is after an assignment is completed, and associated learning model is after data aggregation. In general, the global model remains operational owing to parameter exchange and aggregation operations. Throughout the whole learning process of the global model’s output, there will be a loss of accuracy. The performance of falls short of that of the aggregate model . After stating the output of the global model on test set as , and the output of the aggregate model on the test set as , to quantify this difference. The model’s loss accuracy [116] is defined as:
5 |
where delta is a positive integer. However, because the primary criterion of FL is privacy protection, the aggregation model cannot be realized in practice.
Artificial intelligence concepts
AI–features
Smart devices with measuring sensors are on the rise [117]. All these devices mean an exponential amount of generated datasets with an intense opportunity to learn from intelligent systems. With the increased level of data, a system has the potential to increase its accuracy. Artificial Intelligence can be termed as the simulative approach by computers in a way such that it can be considered as intelligent by humans. There are several features of AI, including knowledge-gathering, problem-solving abilities, predicting, learning, and implementing with the capability to reason, manipulate and move. AI enables the ability to detect the fault and evaluate without the presence of an expert. An AI system has the ability to solve complex problems in an automated and accelerated manner. It has been generally used to optimize conventional technologies involving data-driven strategies. AI has subclasses such as machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. ML is essentially an operation of artificial intelligence that permits a machine to train and grow without being preprogrammed based on experience.
Supervised Learning: This type of machine learning employs labeled samples and applies what it has learned in the past to a fresh dataset. This will necessitate knowing the algorithm’s outputs and having the information required to train the model labeled with the accurate reactions. The algorithm correlates its actual performance to the correct output depending upon these responses, and if erroneous, it trains from these response and improves its effectiveness [118].
Unsupervised Learning: Such a method of learning is used with information that was not labeled previously. No correlations among input and output for the model. This particular type of learning is more complex and utilized less as compared to supervised learning. When opposed to supervised learning, unsupervised learning allows the user to accomplish more complex processing tasks. These algorithms include–clustering, anomaly detection, neural networks, etc [118].
Semi-supervised Learning: This type of learning lies in between supervised and unsupervised learning. This method of training is deployed in the event of a combined issue which requires both supervised and unsupervised learning. Data with labels are used in supervised learning, while data without labels are used in unsupervised learning, but data with and without labels is used in semi-supervised learning. The model will learn from tagged data and then apply its knowledge and patterns to unlabeled data [118].
Reinforcement Learning: In order to teach the algorithm, this method of learning deployed a performance - based compensation technique. The trained model will be compensated for accurate output and condemned for erroneous performance in this method of learning, so it will be trained to optimise result and at the same time minimize consequence. The primary goal of health-related AI applications is to investigate correlations between treatment or preventative strategies and patient outcomes [119]. Diagnoses of disease, to create protocol for treatment, innovation in developing medicine and potential cure, and monitoring of patient are fields in healthcare where AI is used. Even though AI’s usage in healthcare is steadily rising, it is now focused on a few ailments, like cancer categorization, nervous system disease, and cardiovascular disease.
How does AI works?
AI can gather information from several sources and perform a task, solve critical problems or make a decision without any human instructions [120]. AI can potentially replace humans by working in wide-scale activities in the realm of industry, retail, finance, and healthcare with considerable impacts on system performance and efficiency [121] that depicted in Fig. 5. The most common AI applications in healthcare may be split into 4 groups. Among these groups, the first three classes are meant to sort large data effectively and enable rapid passage towards data to deal with challenges in healthcare facilities. These applications includes contents like assistance for the elderly and physically disabled, natural language processing methods, and basic research.
Artificial Intelligence for Living Assistance: In order to assist aged and physically disabled individual, automated systems coupled with intelligent robots can significantly elevate standard of life. Recently, [122] released an outline of intelligent home with capabilities for patients with loss of autonomy, as well as smart models developed on sensory devices over wireless networks, data collection, and AI. NNs may be trained to detect human facial expressions as commands using certain image-processing processes. Furthermore, facial expression analysis-based human-machine interfaces (HMIs) enable persons with impairments to operate wheelchairs and robot support devices without the need to use a console or relevant sensors [123]. In, smart communication architecture (SCA), solutions for Ambient Aided Living (AAL) were created to permit AI to interpret data from various communication networks. Sensors capture information about the surroundings and individual activity in this scenario, which is subsequently evaluated via cloud computing or edge intelligence [124].
AI in biomedical information processing: Natural language processing (NLP) used for medical applications has progressed significantly. Biological question answering (BioQA) aims to discover swift and correct responses to queries by users from a massive database. As such, NLP systems can be predicted to seek replies that are resourceful [125]. Initially, biological queries must be divided into several categories to achieve relevant information from reactions. For accuracy over 90%, ML can be categorize biological queries into 4 main kinds [126]. Then, using a smart biomedical document gathering process, parts of the details containing biomedical queries may be efficiently retrieved. AI has the ability to perform these work as accurately as an expert assessor to enhance efficiency and accuracy.
AI in bio-medicine: AI offers untapped potential as a strong tool in biological research [127], in addition to acting as a eDoctor for illness diagnosis, management, and prognosis. AI has the potential to boost reviewing and indexing of research papers in biological research and development works throughout the world. Moreover, through a semantic graph-based AI technique, researchers may effectively accomplish the complex work of outlining the literature on a specific topic [128]. Furthermore, for a significantly large research article, AI can equip biomedical researchers with searching and ranking of literature. This allows researchers to enhance scientific conception, which are critical aspects in the area of biomedical research.
Fig. 5.
Use case of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare System
Explainable AI (XAI) concepts and features
XAI refers to approaches and techniques for using artificial intelligence in such a way that the solution’s outcomes are understandable by humans. It contrasts with the “black box” concept in machine learning, when even the designers are unable to explain why an AI made a particular decision. XAI could be an example of the social right to explanation in action. Even if there is no legal right or regulatory obligation, XAI can improve a product or service’s user experience by assisting end-users in trusting that the AI is making good decisions.
The goal of XAI in this manner is to explain what has been done, what is being done now, and what will be done next, as well as to reveal the knowledge on which the actions are based. These features allow you to (i) evaluate what you already know, (ii) dispute what you already know, and (iii) produce new assumptions.
Properties of XAI: Transparency, Interoperability, and Explainability all work as an interface between human and AI systems. They consist of AI systems that are both accurate and understandable by humans [129]. Although the semantic implications of these phrases are identical, they confer distinct levels of AI that are acceptable to humans. For further information, the ontology and taxonomy of XAI can be seen here at a high level:
Transparent Model: K-nearest neighbors (kNN), decision trees, rule-based learning, Bayesian networks, and are examples of typical transparent models. Although transparency as a feature does not guarantee thet a model will be easily explainable, the decisions made by these models are frequently transparent. [130]
Opaque Model: Random forest, neural networks, Support Vector Machine (SVMs), and other opaque models are common. These models are not transparent, despite the fact that they frequently reach excellent accuracy. [131]
Model-agnostic: XAI techniques that are model-agnostic are created with the goal of being widely applicable. As a result, they must be flexible enough to operate purely on the basis of matching a model’s input to its outputs rather than relying on the model’s intrinsic architecture. [132]
Model specific: Model-specific XAI techniques frequently take advantage of prior knowledge of a particular model and try to bring transparency to a specific type of one or more models.
Explanation by simplification: We can identify alternatives to the original models that explain the prediction we’re interested in by simplifying a model via approximation. For example, we can build a linear model or a decision tree around a model’s predictions, then use the resulting model to explain the more sophisticated one.
Explanation by feature relevance: This is analogous to the concept of simplicity. After all possible combinations have been explored, this form of XAI technique seeks to evaluate a feature based on its average expected marginal contribution to the model’s choice.
Visual explanation: This type of XAI strategy is built around visualization. As a result, the data visualization approaches can be used to interpret the prediction or judgment made based on the input data.
Local explanation: Local explanations replicate the model in a small area, usually around a single instance of interest, and provide information about how the model works when it encounters inputs comparable to the one we’re interested in describing.
Advancement of XAI: Despite the benefits of intelligent systems, the XAI research initiative raises concerns about giving them too much power without the ability to explain the decision-making process that lies beneath such complex systems to domain experts (e.g., doctors, lawyers, financial experts, etc.) in terms and in a format that they can understand. This not only aids in comprehending specific decisions made by such systems but also pushes researchers to develop more human-like (anthropomorphic) solutions, as well as encouraging further research and understanding of the brain as a natural information processing phenomena.
Because of the growing relevance of this topic, NIST published Four Rules of XAI in August 2020, which describe the following key principles [133] that an AI must follow in order to be designated a XAI:
Explanation: According to this principle, an AI system must provide proof, support, or explanation for each decision it makes.
Meaningful: According to this principle, the AI system’s explanation must be clear and meaningful to its consumers. Because diverse groups of users may have varied wants and experiences, the AI system’s explanation must be fine-tuned to fit each group’s unique traits and needs.
Accuracy: this principle states that the AI system’s explanation must correctly reflect the system’s processes.
Knowledge limits: according to this theory, AI systems must recognize circumstances in which they were not designed to operate and, as a result, their answers may not be credible.
e-Healthcare system
e-healthcare may be characterized as providing constant healthcare assistance to patients through technical tools and techniques such as information and communication technology, cellular technology, medical support, and wireless facilities [134]. Electronic health records, scientific journals, and similar archive on the internet, visual, and audio consultation with doctor, or internet-based process to connect with medical personal, give feedback to doctors, transfer test results, and so on are examples of e-health systems that can revolutionize the healthcare services they provide. The e-healthcare system may give general support on a larger scale, such as management assistance, healthcare service delivery, and so on, as well as specialized help, such as citizen health data [135]. The provision of health care via the internet and technology is carried out by combining existing tools and assuring the quality of the services supplied [136]. The spread of the contagious coronavirus is an issue that needs immediate attention. With the advent of new variant of coronavirus, medical personnel are facing an enormous challenge to address the health issues of the infected individual. The complexities of COVID-19 coupled with scarce resources and rising healthcare cost has encouraged many to access remote health management services using computer or similar devices [137–140]. IoT plays a fundamental act in achieving automated distant health care services. IoT and smart devices are used to transfer the health data of a patient to the cloud server to access health information of an individual [141]. The IoT and its application for healthcare management services can be divided into three steps [142]: i) gain access to the location of a patient or healthcare staff ii) to identify and authenticate an individual, and iii) to automate data collection using sensory devices. Electronic health records (EHR), decision based support systems, online consulting, and telemedicine are a wide range of components related to eHealth. Computers play a vital role to deliver therapeutic session to patients. EHR data of patients serves as the base for prescriptions originated using computers, which offer several benefits, such as linkages to software that emphasizes medication. Two key features in eHealth have ethical implications for the handling of EHRs. The first is professional, whereas the second is technical. The technical issue is promptly resolved. Assuming that there is a fiduciary physician-patient connection in eHealth, the ethical obligations for the treatment of patient data in general and EHRs in particular that arise from the fiduciary relationship in standard health care also apply in eHealth [143]. The novel coronavirus develops pneumonia like symptoms with an individual suffering from respiratory diseases. The prognosis of a patient infected with COVID-19 related illness is limited with high mortality [144, 145]. The implementation of AI in healthcare sectors [47, 146] have created an urge amongst researchers to pursue innovative methods to develop e-healthcare systems. Authors in [47], have developed an AI based system to differentiate between pneumonia of a coronavirus infected patient from that of common pneumonia traits. AI based algorithm is used in [147] for earlier detection of kidney related illness amongst diabetic individual. Researchers in [148] utilized AI to provide specific diagnosis and treatment for patients.
FL-AI is possible to deliver numerous appealing benefits to promote smart healthcare, as mentioned below, based on the innovative operational concept:
Improvements to Data Privacy: Only local updates are needed by the central network for AI training in the FL-AI-based smart healthcare system, while raw data is stored at medical facilities or equipment. This approach limits the danger of personal user data being leaked to an external source, ensuring better level of client security [149].
A Reasonable Balance of Accuracy and Utility: FL-AI is capable of providing a suitable balance among accuracy and usefulness, as well as privacy enhancement, as compared to traditional centralized learning. Furthermore, FL training keeps the model generalizability while sacrificing nominal accuracy. As a result of FL’s distributed learning characteristic, the smart healthcare system’s scalability may be improved.
Health Data Training at a Low Cost: FL-AI may assist decrease communication costs, like latency and transmit power, associated with raw data transfer by evading the dumping of large data to the central network because model gradients are often considerably less in size than their real datasets [97]. As a result, FL saves a significant amount of network bandwidth and reduces the risk of network congestion in large healthcare networks.
e-Health is a broad word that encompasses the integration of healthcare and technology to serve individuals better and save healthcare expenditures. Some industrialized nations that have been adopting health-related activities have consistently prioritized eHealth [150]. However, implementing eHealth has the potential to enhance the whole health care system in both developed and developing nations. eHealth is referred to as an end-to-end method that may be used in any situation.
Taxonomies and motivations of integrating FL with AI in healthcare system
In this section, we make a group of unique taxonomy architectural views based on FL-AI and FL-AI-healthcare in 3.1. On the other hand, we provide the integration benefits among the FL, AI, and intelligent healthcare technologies in 3.2.
Taxonomies of FL with AI in healthcare
Federated Learning, a distributed collaborative AI model, is specifically appealing for intelligent healthcare since it allows different clients (for example, hospitals) to collaborate on AI training without the need to share local data. As a result, we have put together a detailed analysis on FL’s application in advanced healthcare. To begin, we introduce the current breakthroughs in FL, as well as the reasons and prerequisites for adopting FL in smart healthcare [31, 157]. Following that, the latest FL ideas for intelligent healthcare are reviewed, which includes FL for resource management, FL aware of security concerns, incentive FL, and tailored FL. Following that, we present a cutting edge overview of FL’s developing applications in major healthcare areas such as data management, distant health monitoring, biomedical image analytics, and so on [9, 158, 159].
The proposed taxonomy for Federated Learning (FL) with Artificial Intelligence (AI) is shown in Fig. 2, and the taxonomy for FL with AI techniques in healthcare is shown in Fig. 3. We showed numerous AI and machine learning algorithms based on learning, reasoning, and discovering in these taxonomies. We divided the privacy level as well as the communication architecture. Different FL-based algorithms were also examined. Furthermore, the development of FL-AI techniques in healthcare, the applications of Smart technologies in healthcare have been systematically analyzed, and the security and privacy concerns, as well as medical issues have been portrayed. In the suggested taxonomy, we thoroughly examined the healthcare sector with the interconnection of FL-AI [4, 83, 160].
Fig. 2.
Taxonomies of Federated Learning with AI
Fig. 3.
FL-AI with Healthcare Overview
Integrating of FL with AI in healthcare
FL-healthcare integration
The current world is focused on data analytics, particularly in the medical sector. Healthcare data, including prescription information and supplies, patient data, healthcare professional information, and affiliated organizations responsible for insurance or other financial-related transactions, has become increasingly important for data analysis. However, the data on the healthcare sector is dispersed. They are not in the same format, and the data is susceptible in nature, as it includes information from the medical industry. The most sensitive of them are insurance sector data, which cannot be transmitted from one sector to another. Without data transfer, processing with traditional learning and training methodologies is impossible, resulting in a significant gap in data analysis.
As a result of the integration of Federated Learning with healthcare data informatics, the analysis of extremely sensitive data has become significantly more efficient, this integration scenario shown in Fig. 4. In this situation, data is not transported from source to destination in order to merge or generate a dataset for analysis; rather, the local client trains their model with their data and connects with other clients via the server bypassing only the results. As a result, the data remain secure at their origin, and the network, gains access to the server’s training results. This integration will benefit both suppliers, such as the organization in charge of producing and supplying the necessary equipment to a hospital, and users of the application, such as the general public. As the linking sectors are vast in this era, and data production is also vast, it is difficult to identify malicious users among the thousands of connected clients; therefore, by leveraging the benefits of FL, the clients’ data is preserved safely with their own model, and data leakage is prevented to avoid any malicious data modification in the system. Moreover, we present the overview of current analysis based on Federated Learning in healthcare in Table 3 There are various applications in the healthcare sector where FL integration will increase the overall effectiveness of the process analysis:
FL can assist to improve the security and privacy of medical industry data analysis and prediction by incorporating a data protection system [25, 161, 162] .
FL has also allowed predictive modelling depending on several sources, from which physicians can access extra information about the potential threats and advantages of providing earlier treatment to patients [163].
Among the many applications of FL-based healthcare models for prediction, similarity among different patients is one [164].
Medicine resistance or therapy against various diseases, as well as survival rates or explanations, can be examined with strong privacy towards sensitive data [165].
Hospital mortality prediction, duration of stay, or rather the rate of admission can also be examined using FL-based models for the proper management of some critical care units in the hospital while protecting the privacy of in-hospital data [161, 166].
Fig. 4.
Federated Learning with Healthcare
Table 3.
Overview of recent works analysis on FL in Healthcare
Ref. | Key Technologies | Techniques | Applications | Contributions | Drawbacks and Challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chen et al. [115] (2020) | Federated Learning, homomorphic encryption | Data aggregation using FL and smart wearables | Deployment of FL framework in smartphones for activity recognition and data collection while maintaining privacy concerns | Novel framework to introduce FL with smart wearable devices for model training using transfer of information | Future applications to study specific diseases requires attention. |
Sharma et al. [108] (2019) | Federated Learning, predictive model of in-hospital mortality | Distributed training and privacy-preserving framework using vital signs data | To predict in-hospital mortality while maintaining data privacy | Identification of challenges and advantages of FL in healthcare predictive modelling and addressing critical issues related to privacy and ownership are addressed | The study requires further analysis with hyper-parameters. |
Huang et al. [105] (2019) | Federated machine learning | FL-based machine learning algorithm and distributed data clustering while maintaining data privacy | To predict the mortality and duration of hospital staying period using electronic health record | Improved efficiency of decentralized FL Machine learning for performing a clinical task using EHR | The work could be further extended to perform prediction for other clinical tasks for distributed data over several institutions. |
Silva et al. [110] (2019) | Federated Learning, ENIGMA shape tool | Analysis of distributed biomedical data using Federated framework | Fl framework to gain secured access and meta-analysis of medical datasets concealing patient information | Successful application towards the study of subcortical brain changes in multicentric cohorts | The proposed framework requires implementation on a large scale imaging genetic datasets. |
Boughorbel et al. [111] (2019) | Federated framework, Base Neural Network RETAIN | Training of the recurrent neural network model of hospital data in FL environment, data interpretation using RETAIN | EHR data analysis to predict the preterm birth | To analyze the potential threats and benefits of earlier treatment of hospitalized patient | Application on larger dataset and designation of rejection criterion needs to be addressed. |
Pfohl et al. [112] (2019) | Federated averaging, differentially private stochastic gradient descent | Federated averaging technique towards distributed optimization | Use of e-ICU collaborative research datasets to gain insight towards an extended period of stay and in-hospital mortality | To present a comparison of efficacy between FL and centralized and local setting | The method used needs comparison with other approaches to understand its efficacy. |
Liu et al. [113] (2019) | Federated natural language processing | NLP technologies and phenotyping for increased efficiency of reviewing clinical data | To study patient representation and EHR data for individuals with obesity and comorbidities from several hospitals | To facilitate a learning healthcare system to extract critical information for research, and improved diagnosis | The algorithm performance matrices requires further comparison with results achieved from other relevant datasets. |
Lee et al. [106] (2018) | Federated Learning, MIMIC-III database, homomorphic encryption | Novel algorithm to learn context-specific codes | Similarity index for patients across several institutions | Patient identification using unique Hash codes | The work did not represent temporal effect, optimal parameter determination for decay factor and projection dimension is not considered, real-life application for ICD code requires attention. |
Brisimi et al. [107] (2018) | Federated database, predictive modelling for heart disease | Federated Learning framework with iterative cluster primal-dual splitting (cPDS) algorithm for analyzing large scale sparse support vector machine issue in a distributed manner | To ensure data privacy and allow collaboration between multiple entities without exchanging sensitive user data | Faster convergence with limited communication, to gain insight to key features necessary to predict hospitalization | Real-time measurement considering time-varying graphs for cPDS analysis is not taken into account. |
Kim et al. [109] (2017) | Federated Learning framework, data analysis | Federated Tensor factorization model to convert EHR data into phenotypes | Data analysis in an FL environment by converting e-medical dataset into computational phenotyping | Secured data exchange using real medical datasets while maintaining security concern | The research was limited to small scale dataset. |
AI-healthcare integration
As discussed in the preceding section, data from many sectors have risen considerably in the current context. Traditional or statistically based prediction for the medical sector is problematic with the expanding amount of data because it involves human data collection. There is a significant demand for automation throughout the data gathering, processing, and result creation processes. Again, a system that can receive information from multiple sources and perform a task, solve crucial problems, or make a decision without human intervention would be extremely valuable to the healthcare business. In the world of healthcare, the word artificial intelligence plays a very important and critical function in interpreting the human thinking process through the computer employing many efficient AI-based algorithms to make the difficult examination easy for healthcare professionals [167]. That is, making sensible use of machines that draw key conclusions based on data fed to them as input. The objective of integrating AI in the healthcare sector is to blend numerous aspects that may influence a specific decision and produce a proper evaluation of the result offered by the AI model using ML or DL. In general, AI models are useful for making key decisions such as ICU surveillance, mortality prediction, proper usage of hospital resources, drug inspection and reaction, and so on. By using the AI method and the vast amount of data created by the healthcare industry, such as the EHR, the remedy and conclusion may be formed efficiently for future reference of the doctors or clinicians [168]. In addition, we present the overview of recent work analysis based on Artificial Intelligence in healthcare in Table 4.
Table 4.
Overview of recent works analysis on AI in Healthcare
Ref. | Key Technologies | Techniques | Applications | Contributions | Drawbacks and challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sarker et al. [151] (2021) | AI, Robotics, Autonomous mechanism | AI dependent system for detecting COVID-19 using chest X-ray images | Quick verdict of COVID-19 detection using X-ray. | Assist healthcare professionals to take decision fast and provide results within short period of time | Handling sensitive data is difficult, and protecting it from hackers necessitates greater caution. |
Saheb et al. [152] (2021) | AI, Robotics and ethics | Analysis (Cluster-based) of ethical difficulties in the merging of AI with healthcare | To detect deficits in existing survey to create an efficient and ethical AI-based model for tackling problems in the healthcare sector. | Identification of gaps in current academic papers in the sense of ethical sides. | The investigation of these types of ethical dilemmas requires the participation of professionals from several sectors, such as healthcare professionals, lawyers, and engineers with a background in computer science. |
Kumar et al. [153] | FL, AI, Deep learning | Deep learning and FL based model to detect COVID-19 | To mitigate the problem of scarcity and reliability of testing kits primary diagnosis of COVID -19 from pre-trained model. | Proposed a system that aggregates information from several sources and drills a global DL model with the help of FL based on blockchain. | The sample collection and gaining popularity of the system is challenging. |
Cavasotto et al. [154] (2021) | AI, DL, ML | The use of powerful AI-based algorithms for pharmaceutical research | Discovery of new drugs from the analysis of the biomedical patterns leveraging advanced AI based methods. | Drug discovery and analysis of drugs on human | Data in this scenario is particularly sensitive, and combining data from many sources is problematic because the data might be manipulated along the route, resulting in erroneous conclusions. |
Hildebrand et al. [155] (2021) | AI, DL, ML | machine learning and AI for analyzing the MSI for cancer patient | Prediction of immunotherapy response | Detection of Microsatellite Instability for patients with Colorectal cancer | Collecting samples from many sources and assembling them in a single location required extreme vigilance in order to keep them safe from intruder attack. |
Zhang et al. [47] (2020) | AI, Computed Tomography database, python scikit-learn library | Using AI framework to analyze CT images of coronavirus infected patients | Quick diagnosis to differentiate between common pneumonia from coronavirus related pneumonia in overburdened healthcare facilities | To detect a critically ill patient with COVID positive traits | Improved accuracy with larger datasets for a long period is required. |
Romero et al. [148] (2020) | AI framework | AI-based Clinical decision support system | To achieve an improved level of glucose control in patients with diabetes | To conduct a survey about the experience with AI-based system in medical facilities | The proposed system requires improvement in terms of providing recommendation to patients. |
Rong et al. [156] (2020) | Artificial intelligence, ML algorithm, Wearable device, Digital signal processor | Patient monitoring using ML algorithm. Use of sensory device to generate electrical stimulation when necessary | Assist patients with disabled sensation to notify regarding the need to empty bladder or abnormal urinary bladder control | To develop an effective monitoring device to measure the volume and pressure of the urinary tract and send necessary feedback | Result validation using clinical trials remains unattended. |
Ravizza et al. [147] (2019) | AI, Roche/IBM algorithm, IBM Explorys database | Health and medical supported key features selection with data-driven strategy | Early prediction of severe kidney diseases for diabetic patients | Comparison of algorithms extracted from real-world data | The work requires additional testing with the larger dataset. |
Kim et al. [109] (2017) | Federated Learning framework, data analysis | Federated Tensor factorization model to convert EHR data into phenotypes | Data analysis in an FL environment by converting e-medical data set into computational phenotype | Secured data exchange using real medical datasets while maintaining security concern | The research was limited to small scale dataset. |
Recently, explainable AI (XAI) has been gaining popularity in cyber-physical systems such as smart healthcare. Cancer identification from MRI pictures is a critical problem in the medical field. However, with an effective cancer detection process, the chance of survival may increase because the cure is achievable at an early stage of cancer. With sophisticated XAI, the reason for the diagnosis of a certain cancer is apparent and visible to the system’s user [169]. The XAI intends to reveal the internal mathematical calculations used to solve the black box known as the AI. Thus, by using this method during the diagnosis phase, clinicians can benefit from the use of XAI technologies [170]. There are several sectors where AI is integrated with healthcare like–
The agent-based AI can interact with humans and provide comfort based on the needs of the patients. This can be useful when the patient is elderly and requires close monitoring and care. Patients with chronic diseases, in particular, require frequent monitoring of certain tests such as heart rate, blood sugar levels, and so on. All of this is simply obtained with the AI-based agent [171].
Another significant responsibility in the medical field is assessing medication effects and forecasting how a drug will affect a human being. One essential method in this scenario is the combination of AI with computer-based medication creation and analysis [172, 173].
The benefits of AI integration in the healthcare sector are enormous which is shown in Fig. 5. Though it has various concerns, such as control over AI-based devices, it must be handled with extreme caution or it can be destructive to a nation. In this regard, the security of these systems must be powerful enough to withstand any form of intruder attack or to take appropriate steps to raise the alarm when any inappropriate data tampering occurs in the system.
FL-AI integration
The system with autonomous control is incorporating more and more real-time data aggregation as new technologies evolve. Intelligent systems were elevated to a new level owing to the ML and DL models. The data produced by each IoT sensor has increased exponentially with the IoT-based system, and the cloud storage system has made data storage easier in many ways. However, collecting data and feeding it to a model with advanced DL to develop an AI-based model is a very important and delicate operation. If data is altered from source to destination by an attacker, the forecast will be inaccurate, and because this method deals with highly sensitive data, the security of the data will be compromised. In the above scenario, there are a variety of methods for ensuring data security, one of which is FL integration. It produces a model and transmits a replica of the model to each local client instead of transferring data from the local machine to the central server. With their own local data, the client trains the model and transfers the new parameters or weight to the central server. During the whole process, no data must be exchanged; only the result must be transferred from clients to the central network. At the server, the local training outcomes are averaged, and the revised weights are then relayed back to all clients connected to the server. There is no need to transfer data because the raw data is kept in the local area, and thus data security may be assured. The integration benefits of FL and AI covers a huge area. For example;
FL-based mechanism aggregation at the edge may be beneficial because the volumes of information gained from nodes are quite high in rate using such approaches [174].
Device heterogeneity can be preserved in a safe data training and evaluation environment [175].
The FL with AI is more powerful thanks to its raw data protection method and local and global privacy levels [176].
Integration of an FL-based AI model can result in a more energy-efficient solution [177, 178].
Addressing and defending challenges on FL with AI in healthcare system
This section is the most strong side compared to the other survey. However, firstly, we discuss the existing problems and issues–security, privacy, reliability, confidentiality, scalability, etc. in 4.1. In addition, we present the different solutions strategies that have been shown in Fig. 6 based on the proposed techniques–FL, AI, healthcare in 4.2. Furthermore, we summarize the overview of Federated Learning with AI in Healthcare as well as the key applications area, challenges, and solution in Table 5.
Fig. 6.
Challenges and Solution Scenarios of Federated Learning
Table 5.
Overview of Federated Learning with AI in Healthcare Research covered with key applications area, challenges, and solution
Works | Applications fields | Addressing challenges | Proposed solution |
---|---|---|---|
Xu et al. [83] | EHR, prediction mortality, Biomedical | - Statistical | Review of several present solution leveraging Federated Learning. |
- System | |||
- Privacy issues | |||
Brisimi et al. [107] | Heart disease related learning mechanism | - Sparse SVM issue | Proposed an architecture cPDS that can differentiate the mentality of patient those who wanted to be hospitalized and those who don’t. |
- Issue of raw data exchange | |||
Passerat et al. [179] | Privacy preserved audit section | - Privacy issue | Blockchain and Federated Learning-based solution to preserve privacy in the network without knowing the identities. |
- Data access policy issue | |||
- Security issue | |||
Silva et al. [180] | Federated Learning method for brain image data | - There is no FL based production ready approach | A software base client and central module for learning process for the real-world scenario. |
Chen et al. [115] | FL based healthcare system for Parkinson’s disease | - User data aggregation from different sources is difficult | A system capable to provide precise and individualized healthcare whilst also maintaining data privacy and security, according to wearable activity detection trials and a genuine Parkinson’s. |
- Cloud system may fail in case of personalization | |||
Wu et al. [181] | In house health monitoring system | - Increasing rate of elderly people | A technique based on FL and CNN for monitoring elderly patients with chronic diseases who are unable to walk about regularly. |
- Independent living style of people above 60 years | |||
Choudhury et al. [182] | Prediction of medication responses | - Healthcare data sensitive in nature | A model to predict the effect of drug reaction in human. |
Lack of existing work on real world scenario. | |||
Ma et al. [183] | Healthcare Informative, Data Distributive | - Data distributed across multiple edge nodes | Provide necessary design changes towards flexibility of hybrid electronics which can join the quality performing electrical attributes of traditional electronics with the capability of stretching. |
Pershad et al. [184] | Patient-physician relationships, Technology, Public health | - Social media platform Twitter for spreading healthcare information include significant amount of misleading information | Examined the practice of using Twitter in delivering quality healthcare and information on medicine and particularly search the potential of Twitter to share data on treatments and research to improve care. |
- Difficult to verify plausibility of source | |||
Kim et al. [185] | Machine learning, Federated Learning, blockchain | - Complex architecture | Analyzed a latency model of FL dependent on blockchain and represent the optimal block generation rate by taking into account communication and computing delay. |
Miotto et al. [186] | Deep learning, healthcare, biomedical informatics, genomics EHR | - Complex, high dimensional, heterogeneous biomedical data | Suggested development of comprehensive and purposeful explicable scheme to reduce the gap between DL models and human understanding ability. |
- Difficult to gain knowledge from complex data. | |||
Wiens et al. [187] | Machine Learning, Healthcare | - Privacy issue | Present special considerations for those healthcare epidemiologists who want to use/apply ML. |
- Data transformation of infectious disease | |||
Kumar et al. [153] | Data Sharing while preserving security, DL, FL, Blockchain | - Shortage of test kit of COVID-19 | Proposed a novel architecture to gather relevant data from several sources and teaches a global DL model using FL based on blockchain. |
- Quick spread of the virus | |||
-Issues to differentiate between negative and positive cases of COVID-19 | |||
Nguyen et al. [9] | FL, Blockchain, Edge Computing, IoT. | - Volume of data | To increase the security features and accessibility of implementing FL, Blockchain for realizing decentralized learning through FL without requiring central network. |
- Privacy of data | |||
Holbl et al. [188] | Blockchain, Consensus, Distributed systems, Healthcare Informative | - Encryption method | To realise the potential of blockchain technology and to focus on the obstacles and possible contributions of blockchain based research in healthcare industry. |
- Complex framework | |||
Pokhrel et al. [189] | Vehicle Machine Learning, Federated Learning, Blockchain. | - Complex framework | Proposed a FL method based on blockchain algorithm for security-aware and effective communication in vehicles, in which ML model updates are shared and authenticated in a decentralized manner. |
- Privacy of data | |||
Mcghin et al. [190] | Blockchain, Healthcare Industry, Authentication, IoT, Wireless, Vulnerabilities | - Research gap in the area of blockchain based solutions. | A significant quantity of research methods are detailed in this research. |
Lu et al. [191] | Data Sharing, Permissioned Blockchain, Federated Learning, Privacy-preserved Industrial IoT | - Data leakage | Proposed a blockchain based secured data sharing method for several users. Formulated the data sharing problem into a ML issue by introducing FL equipped with security features. |
- Data privacy and security | |||
Greenberg et al. [66] | Healthcare, Machine Learning | - Unprecendented sutuation | Management of obstacles faced by medical personal mentally during coronavirus pandemic situation. |
- Difficult to take decision and work under extreme pressures | |||
Kaye et al. [59] | Healthcare, Medical Informative. | - ICU crisis in the time of need | Analysis of impact of coronavirus pandemic on the financial situation of healthcare facilities |
Alemdar et al. [70] | Healthcare, HIOT. | - Different format of data in the healthcare sector | Minimizes the complex healthcare system for healthcare officials and assists the disabled and aged to lead an autonomous life. |
- Data security and privacy. | |||
Xi et al. [192] | Healthcare, Federate Learning | - Problem with data having different feature | An adequate backdoor detection process based on FL by carrying out comprehensive analysis over two ML objectives to display that the methods achieve high precision and well protected from multi-attacker’s settings. |
Long et al. [193] | Healthcare, Federate Learning, Bio-informative. | - Data with different feature | Analysis on FL to permit the enhancement of an open health ecosystem with the help of AI. Current obstacles and potential remedies for FL are discussed. |
- Data security and privacy | |||
Yu et al. [16] | AI, Healthcare, Federate Learning. | - Complex model | Outlining of current developments in AI technologies and applications in healthcare sector, identification of potential challenges for future developments for AI in healthcare. Summarized the impact of AI in healthcare from economic, legal and social perspective. |
- Data leakage | |||
- Ethical issue. | |||
Esteva et al. [194] | AI, Healthcare, Federate Learning, Computer Vision, NLP. | - Difficult to train the NLP model | A thorough analysis of computer vision on biomedical image analytics, and description of the use of NLP in areas such as EHR data. |
- Require massive data to build efficient model | |||
- Data collection | |||
Xu et al. [195] | Federate Learning, AI, Medical Data. | - Data security | Provided a descriptive solution regarding the privacy preservation of patients with depression, implementation of FL to analyze and diagnose depression. |
- Data Leakage | |||
- Ethical issue regarding data sharing | |||
Lu et al. [196] | Healthcare, Federate Learning, Distributive learning. | - Communication cost and delay | A detailed analysis to improve the communication efficiency using distributed FL over a graph, wherein the algorithm enacts local updates for multiple iterations to permit communications among several nodes. |
- Networking issues | |||
- Interruption in the communication setup |
Existing challenges in healthcare system
Security and privacy concern
The current healthcare system relies on the internet to transfer data and other sensitive information. The Internet of Medical Things, or IoMT, is this term. It has drawn significant attention in the twenty-first century since it can carry information from one portion to another in a concise period of time and at a very low cost. However, along with the benefits, there are also drawbacks. One of the most serious topics is security, and privacy [197]. This type of healthcare solution includes data transfer, mobile application usage, telemedicine, and accessing the information of the healthcare remotely. In the IoT-based healthcare system, several attacks can hamper the total loss of the system. Preference, side-channel attack [198], data duplication using the tag, physical hampering of the sensor devices, or sensor tracking are some of the attacks that may cause issues in the perception layer [199]. Then, some attacks from the intruder can access the information sent from the hardware system by directly attacking at the decryption point or by weakening the authentication procedure such as Eavesdropping attack, reply attack, MITM attack, rouge attack, DoS attack, DDoS attack and these type of attack causes to hamper the network layer of the IoMT [200].
Reliability problem
Following the aforementioned security concerns, the current healthcare system’s reliability has also become a source of concern. By embracing session hijacking in the existing smart healthcare system, an attacker can take control of the session as well as the data being transferred in that session, potentially causing a major problem for the entire system. The intruder can then gain access to the IoT network using a side script. When a faulty SQL code is injected into the database, it can jeopardize the system’s vital information [201]. Packet interception can also impact the loss of information which is in the form of identity while a user tries to authenticate or log in. An intruder can encrypt the personal data of a healthcare system user via a ransomware assault. As a result, these attack possibilities raise a question of trustworthiness. For instance, when intruders are capable of encrypting compassionate information from a system, the question of whether the system is reliable or safe to transfer data through remains open [202].
Confidentiality issues
Existing healthcare solutions necessitate the relocation and merging of data from multiple nodes to provide a long-term solution. However, because the data being moved is very sensitive, this data migration creates a confidentiality concern [203]. Another issue in IoT-based systems is heterogeneity. Because the sensors are from diverse vendors, the system’s anonymity isn’t always guaranteed. Furthermore, securing data security while transferring susceptible data from one node to another remains a difficult task [204]. However, in order to produce information, the data must travel from one end to the other. The transit of data or sensitive information causes security breaches, which, in turn, causes a confidentiality problem in an IoMT-based system [205].
Scalability problem
In today’s healthcare systems, a huge number of inbound and outbound networks must be managed. As a result, there is a problem with supporting a large number of high-speed wireless systems without causing system speed degradation [206]. However, with the current growing number of networked devices, ensuring speed, quality, and cheap cost at the same time is becoming increasingly difficult. With the growth in data traffic, the network’s bandwidth is once again challenged [207]. Furthermore, the network’s architecture has scalability challenges due to its hybrid nature, including several providers’ devices. Another challenging task is to manage several devices remotely and without any loss in time or management. Because in this type of framework, there is a need to integrate devices along with their data and information coming from different aspects [208].
Solving the existing challenges using FL with AI in the healthcare system
Role of FL
To execute learning tasks in something like a decentralized environment, where one central server controls the global learning procedure and numerous devices train local models with their own data [21] is the process known as the Federated Learning process. FL can be used in a variety of settings, including healthcare and education. Models based on machine learning logic necessitate a huge quantity of information to train the model from various parts of the system, such as hospital data in the healthcare sector. The healthcare industry handles a lot of sensitive data that, if tampered with, could bring the entire system down. In this case, FL devised a privacy-preserving approach that does not require the transfer of sensitive data from the source, instead of training local models with their own data and then sharing results with the global network [209]. As a result, this strategy can protect the privacy of patient information by using an iterative process in which model parameters are constantly exchanged and modified, but raw data is not disclosed. As a result, to preserve the security and privacy of the hospital system, FL provides a privacy-preserving method while also providing the benefits of machine learning models to solve numerous difficulties related to healthcare systems [193, 210].
Role of FL with AI
The new breed of AI is called Federated Learning, and it is based on a decentralized training and learning mechanism. A new AI model architecture that can be spread over a large number of devices without knowing personal user data. This technique assures user privacy and data security because it does not access raw data [21]. The demand for user privacy has evolved in tandem with the advent of artificial intelligence. The FL, which sits at the intersection of AI-cloud and AI-user equipment, plays a key role in bringing the UE and cloud together to create a significantly more secure and robust system than earlier architectures. Again, due to FL’s properties, imbalanced and non-IID information can be handled appropriately, ensuring that the AI system’s performance is not limited and that a large device in multiple contexts may be trained with their local data and local model without difficulty [211].
Role of FL with XAI in healthcare
Although AI in a federated context can address the concerns described previously, deep learning has an explainability difficulty. Because deep learning algorithms are typically black-box models, there is no acceptable explanation for a given prediction. Deep learning in healthcare is limited due to this ambiguity. Explainability is vital in healthcare since we need to explain why a given prediction for sample input is made to persuade a clinical healthcare practitioner and a patient. Humans can understand and describe how an AI system reached a decision using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) [212]. Artificial intelligence approaches such as deep learning with the integration of FL have recently played a revolutionary role in healthcare, particularly in terms of diagnosis and surgery. In these fields, these strategies have been proven to be beneficial. Some deep-learning-based diagnosis jobs are even more accurate than human medical specialists. The deep learning model’s black-box character, on the other hand, hinders its explainability and practical application in medicine.
Amoroso et al. provided an XAI framework for breast cancer therapeutics in their paper [213]. The experiment findings showed that the framework could outline an essential clinical feature for the patient and design oncological medicines using the clustering and dimension reduction method. Dindorf et al. proposed an explainable disease in a spinal posture-dependent classifier [214]. EI-Sappagh et al. suggested an RF model for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression and diagnosis in [215]. The fuzzy rule-based system could also generate natural language forms to assist patients and physicians in comprehending the AI model. Peng et al. established an XAI framework to help doctors predict the prognosis of hepatitis patients in [216]. In this work, the authors compare intrinsic XAI approaches like logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and kNN to complicated models like SVM, XGBoost, and RF. The authors also used the SHAP, LIME, and partial dependence plots (PDPs) post-hoc approaches. Sarp et al. proposed a CNN-based model for chronic wound categorization in [170], after which they used the XAI approach LIME to explain the CNN-based model. Rucco et al. introduced an XAI program to diagnose glioblastoma in [217], which combined topological and textural characteristics. Table 6 presents overviews of different datasets used in FL, AI, XAI, and Healthcare.
Table 6.
Overviews of Different Datasets used in FL, AI, XAI, and Healthcare
Works & Year | Data Sets Used | Application area | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Sets Discussion | FL | AI | XAI | Healthcare | ||
Raza et al. [218] (2022) | Arrhythmia database from Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) | ECG-based prediction to identify arrhythmia using clean and noisy data. | ||||
Anand et al. [219] (2022) | ECG signals from the PTB-XL dataset, which is freely accessible & arrhythmia dataset | X | To assist clinicials for the easy diagnosis of cardiac arrest symptoms. | |||
Shukla et al. [220] (2022) | 3DIRCAD datasets | X | X | Predicting Liver Cancer. | ||
Kobylinska et al. [221] (2022) | Domestic Lung Cancer Database | X | Accessing risk of lung cancer. | |||
Thomsen et al. [222] (2022) | Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database and Statistics Denmark (Private Data) | X | Colorectal cancer screening. | |||
Kerkouche et. al. [223] (2021) | Premier healthcare database | X | To predict mortality rate of patients. | |||
Flores et. al. [224] (2021) | Chest xray image from Mass General Brigham | X | To predict COVID-19 cases from chest xray analysis. | |||
Jimenez et. al. [225] (2021) | Hologic, Siemens Dataet | X | To detect breast cancer or tumor. | |||
Barbiero et al. [226] (2021) | CUB data set | X | X | Method of logical explanation (Entropy-based). | ||
Rao et al. [227] (2021) | 3MR & Benzene (Single-rationale), Mutagenicity & Liver (Multiple-rationales) , hERG & CYP450 (Property cliff) | X | X | To predict properties of molecule. | ||
Vaid et al. [228] (2020) | Mount Sinai Brooklyn, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Morningside, Mount Sinai Queens, and Mount Sinai West Hospital COVID-19 patients data | X | X | Mortality prediction for patients with COVID-19. | ||
Dang et.al. [229] (2020) | eICU synergetic Database | X | X | To Predict the likelihood of a patient’s death, particularly in ICU circumstances. | ||
Vaid et.al. [228] (2020) | New York City Hospital dataset (COVID-19) | X | X | COVID-19 patient mortality prediction. | ||
McKinney et al. [230] (2020) | Northwestern Medicine OPTIMAM database (Licensed) | X | X | To detect breast cancer. | ||
Halling-Brown et al. [231] (2020) | NIDDK (Diabetes dataset), Dataset from heart study of Framingham, Wisconsin dataset (breast cancer) | X | X | To predict clinical diseases (Diabetic, breast cancer). |
Analysis of performance metrics
To give a manual describing different binary classification assessment metrics, we use examples of metrics and evaluations collected from a number of published papers, including top AI algorithms used in FL. Note that, we do not comment on the quality of these studies; rather, we use them to demonstrate how different measures provide diverse interpretations of an AI model’s quality. A mixture model can be used to explain binary classification problems, with the overall data distribution modeled as:
6 |
where X represents data samples, denotes the positive/negative class distributions, and the parameter of the positive class, calculated as , with the total number of positive/negative class data samples. The four entries in the confusion matrix are the key parameters for determining the metrics for a binary classifier which are discussed below.
7 |
True Positive (TP): The number of accurately categorized positive samples is referred to as the true positive.
True Negative (TN): The number of correctly categorized negative samples is known as the true negative.
False Positive (FP): The number of samples incorrectly categorized as positive is known as the false positive rate.
False Negative (FN): The number of samples incorrectly categorized as negative is referred to as false negatives.
The following measures are used to assess the performance of leading AI algorithms or models used in FL:
- Accuracy (ACC): The ratio of correctly identified samples to the total number of samples in the evaluation dataset is the accuracy. This metric is one of the most often utilized in medical applications of machine learning. The accuracy ranges from [0, 1], with 1 representing properly predicting all positive and negative samples and 0 representing successfully predicting none of the positive or negative samples.
8 Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC): AUC is a metric that combines effectiveness throughout all categorization criteria. The AUC indicates the percentage of correctly categorized positive samples. Rather of measuring absolute values, it assesses how well predictions are ordered. It assesses the accuracy of the model’s predictions regardless of the categorization level used.
- Specificity (SPEC): The specificity indicates the percentage of correctly categorized negative samples. It’s measured as the proportion of correctly categorized negative samples to all negative samples. The specificity is limited to [0, 1], where 1 denotes flawless negative class prediction and 0 denotes inaccurate negative class sample prediction.
9 - Sensitivity/Recall (REC): The recall, also known as the sensitivity or True Positive Rate (TPR), is the ratio between correctly classified positive samples and all samples assigned to the positive class, and it is calculated as the ratio between correctly classified positive samples and all samples assigned to the positive class. The recall is limited to [0, 1], with 1 representing perfect positive class prediction and 0 representing inaccurate positive class sample prediction. This statistic is also considered one of the most significant in healthcare, as it is desirable to overlook as few good cases as possible, resulting in a high recall.
10 - Precision (PREC): Precision is calculated as the ratio between correctly identified samples and all samples assigned to that class, and it indicates the proportion of recovered samples that are relevant. The precision is limited to [0, 1], with 1 representing all accurately predicted samples in the class and 0 representing no valid predictions in the class.
where C stands for “class” and can be either positive (P) or negative (N) in binary classification (N).11
However in Table 7 the results of several research which have been discussed throughout this article in terms of accuracy and AUC have been shown and also depicted graphically in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8, respectively. In the graph the X axis represents the studies that achieved the scores and the Y axis represents the performance score in percentage. Inside every bar the data that have been considered in the work is indicated and on the top of every data bar the method used have been shown.
Table 7.
The Results of Several Research Discussed in this Article in terms of Accuracy and AUC
Works | Datasets | Methods | Accuracy | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chang et al. [232] | Pima Indians diabetes Database | BlockFL | 0.84 | NA |
Islam et al. [233] | Abalone dataset | Random forest | 0.97 | NA |
KNN | 0.94 | NA | ||
Naïve Bayes | 0.98 | NA | ||
Wine dataset | Random Forest | 0.99 | NA | |
KNN | 0.91 | NA | ||
Naïve Bayes | 0.98 | NA | ||
Vaid et al. [228] | MSB Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL(Lasso) | NA | 0.802 |
MSH Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL(Lasso) | NA | 0.773 | |
MSM Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL(Lasso) | NA | 0.776 | |
MSQ Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL(Lasso) | NA | 0.693 | |
MSW Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL(Lasso) | NA | 0.805 | |
MSB Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with out Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.827 | |
MSH Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with out Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.801 | |
MSM Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with out Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.796 | |
MSQ Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with out Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.822 | |
MSW Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with out Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.834 | |
MSB Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.812 | |
MSH Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.767 | |
MSM Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.785 | |
MSQ Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.822 | |
MSW Hospital Dataset (NYC) | FL with Noise(MLP) | NA | 0.83 | |
Flores et al. [224] | Hologic | FL | NA | 0.78 |
GE | FL | NA | 0.65 | |
Siemens | FL | NA | 0.83 | |
Hologic | Fed-CL | NA | 0.8 | |
GE | Fed-CL | NA | 0.63 | |
Siemens | Fed-CL | NA | 0.61 | |
Hologic | Fed-Align | NA | 0.79 | |
GE | Fed-Align | NA | 0.69 | |
Siemens | Fed-Align | NA | 0.85 | |
Hologic | Fed-Align-CL | NA | 0.84 | |
GE | Fed-Align-CL | NA | 0.7 | |
Siemens | Fed-Align-CL | NA | 0.83 | |
Shukla et al. [220] | CT scan images from 398 individuals | Unet | 0.94 | NA |
Anand et al. [219] | PTB-XL of ECG signals | ST-CNN-GAP-5 | NA | 0.934 |
ECG dataset of arrhythmia patients | ST-CNN-GAP-6 | 0.95 | 0.99 | |
Rucco et al. [217] | The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) | VGG16 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
Peng et al. [216] | Hepatitis classification dataset from UCI | Random Forest | 0.919 | |
El-Sappagh et al. [215] | Alzheimer’s Disease Real dataset | Random Forest | 87.76 | 0.953 |
Fig. 7.
Results analysis of different research in terms of Accuracy (%)
Fig. 8.
Results analysis of different research in terms of AUC (%)
Open issues and future direction
We cover this section on the additional issues as open discussion and guide some matters for further discussion in 5.1 and 5.2, respectively. We also present the existing work analysis of FL-AI with Healthcare based on central idea, applications, approaches, open issues and further opportunities in the Table 8.
Table 8.
Existing work analysis of FL-AI with Healthcare based on Central Idea, Applications & Approaches, and Open Issues and Further Opportunities
Authors | Approaches | Central idea | Applications | Open issues and further opportunities |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ma et al. [183] | Revolutionizing the transformation of traditional healthcare to digital healthcare. | Electronics solution to many issues in healthcare sector | Healthcare Informative, Data Distributive. | Provide flexible hybrid electronics with structural design routes that can integrate high-performance electrical qualities. |
Pershad et al. [184] | Threats regarding the use of Twitter for healthcare data include significant amount of misleading information. | The importance of use of social media as a source of information for research, study and gathering knowledge. | Understanding between the patient and healthcare official, Technology coupled with public health | They explored the potential of Twitter in the sphere of healthcare and medicine and particularly aim towards improve care for the patients. |
Kim et al. [185] | Proposes a blockchained Federated Learning (BlockFL). | Enables on-device machine learning without any centralized training data or coordination by utilizing a consensus mechanism in blockchain. | On-device machine learning, Federated Learning, blockchain, latency | Analyze a model of blockchain based FL and characterize the block generation rate by taking into account delays in communication and consensus. |
Miotto et al. [186] | Access of information and technical insights from complex biomedical information acts as a critical issue to revolutionize health care. | Suggestions towards DL approaches to be the driving force for translating large biomedical information for uplifting healthcare | Deep learning, health care, biomedical informatics, translational bioinformatics, genomics electronic health records | Suggestion towards development of meaningful schemes to close the gap between DL models and human understand ability. |
Wiens et al. [187] | Application of ML to change patient risk stratification in the area of medicine, and particularly for contagious diseases | ML towards the study of methods for identification of patterns in data | Machine Learning, Healthcare. | Presented distinctive evidence for healthcare workers towards the use of ML. |
Kumar et al. [153] | Propose a data normalization technique that deals with data heterogeneity because the data is acquired from several hospitals with various types of Computed Tomography (CT) scanners. | Issue of diagnosis of coronavirus due to the scarcity and reliability issue of testing kits | COVID-19, Privacy-Preserved Data Sharing, Deep Learning, Federated-Learning, Blockchain | Proposed an architecture to gather data from several sources and drills a global deep learning model using FL based on FL. |
Nguyen et al. [9] | Addressed the requirements for a more patient-centric reach for healthcare facilities and to improve the precision of EHR. | Potential application of blockchain in healthcare industry | Blockchain, Consensus, Distributed systems, Healthcare Informative. | The research focuses towards the applications of blockchain in healthcare industry. |
Holbl et al. [188] | A mathematical algorithm to display the features of controllable network and blockchain based FL parameters to record its effect on system performance | Application of FL in the realm of vehicle communication medium that is effective. | Vehicle Machine Learning, Federated Learning, Blockchain. | Proposed an independent blockchain based FL architecture for preserving privacy and implement effective vehicular communication networking. |
Pokhrel et al. [189] | As outlined in this survey paper, many cryptocurrencies studies are currently being investigated. | Scientists in academic and industrial have begun to investigate applications aimed toward healthcare use, based on the existing blockchain technology. | Blockchain, Healthcare Industry, Authentication, IoT, Wireless, Vulnerabilities, Survey. | As this study paper points out, many healthcare applications have particular requirements that are not addressed by many of the blockchain trials now being investigated. This report also discusses a number of potential research opportunities. |
Mcghin et al. [190] | Incorporate Federated Learning within the blockchain network consensus process so that the consensus computing activity may also be used for federated training. | Data providers face significant challenges in sharing their data through wireless networks due to security and privacy concerns (e.g., data leakage). | Data Sharing, Permissioned Blockchain, Federated Learning, Privacy-preserved, Industrial IoT | They start by creating a secure data sharing architecture for distributed multiple parties using blockchain technology. The data sharing challenge is thus transformed into a machine learning problem. |
Lu et al. [191] | Suffer from moral harm or mental health issues. | The covid-19 outbreak is going to place healthcare professionals all across the world in an unprecedented scenario, forcing them to make hard judgments while working under great pressure. | Healthcare, Machine Learning. | Handling the symptoms of depression that healthcare professionals face during the covid-19 disease outbreak. |
Greenberg et al. [66] | Factors for Delivering Safe Post surgical and Critical Care in the Event of a Medical Emergency | The difficulties that healthcare facilities across the world have encountered are mostly the result of a lack of preparedness. COVID-19 highlighted these weaknesses, leading healthcare organizations all across the world to take action. | Healthcare, Medical Informative. | International Perspectives on the Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Facilities and Systems. |
Alemdar et al. [70] | Provide numerous cutting-edge examples, as well as design factors such as adaptability, conventionality, efficiency, reliability, and productivity, as well as a full analysis of the benefits and limitations of these systems. | With continuous monitoring, pervasive healthcare systems give extensive relevant information and alerting mechanisms against unusual circumstances. | Healthcare, HIoT. | Reduces the complexity of the healthcare system for providers and enables severely ill and elderly people to live independently. |
Yu et al. [16] | Optometric physician and computer engineers are collaborating to test and deploy an automated image categorization system that will scan millions of diabetic patients’ retinal pictures. | AI is influencing medical practice in a positive way. Thanks to recent advancements in digitized data collection, machine learning, and computing infrastructure, AI applications are moving into domains that were previously thought to be only the domain of human expertise. | AI, Healthcare, Federate Learning. | They explore recent breakthroughs in AI technology and their biomedical applications, as well as the future challenges that medical AI systems will confront, and also the financial, ethical, and sociological implications of AI in healthcare. |
Esteva et al. [194] | Standardized deep learning models for genomics are reviewed, as well as reinforcement learning in the context of robotic-assisted surgery. | Deep learning techniques for healthcare presented, with a focus on computer vision, NLP, reinforcement learning, and generalized methodologies. | AI, Healthcare, Federate Learning, Computer Vision, NLP. | They explain the applicability of NLP to fields such as EHR data, and they explore computer vision mostly in terms of medical imaging. |
Open issues
Federated Learning is a continuous process where a model keeps updating over time. That’s why different challenges and problems were brought out with further developments. The issues are open to the researchers so that they could be solved efficiently within a short time. Since the whole procedure runs over the internet, privacy and security are always a major concern in this field, especially when it comes to competent health care systems. The health-related data is susceptible compared to the others. In this regard, people are utilizing various technologies into the health care systems such as SDN, Blockchain, etc [234, 235]. However, it is an advanced machine learning method that needs large datasets [233, 236]. A suitable dataset is essential for such problems. It is not so easy to manage such datasets for medical cases, which is a demerit for this field. Also, the datasets are not present at the user end, where the distributed training would be performed as a minor update of the global model. Apart from this, the performance obtained from the health data is not satisfactory because the domain of the information is not the same and also contains outliers into the data points. Processing the health data and training machine learning models is expensive and time-consuming. Efficient methodologies are still critical to find out.
However, to upgrade the performances of such systems in the field of medication, researchers are trying to apply novel methods and technologies. Increasing the security of the healthcare systems remains the vital concern of the personnel. The patient’s personal and sensitive data needs to be processed to develop smart healthcare systems. To make them more reasonable and available everywhere, the Internet of Medical Things is being used. So, the security could be given utilizing SDN, Blockchain, NFV, etc [237, 238]. In this era of artificial intelligence, we can use data augmentation to imitate the existing datasets to prepare more data since Federated Learning requires a vast amount of data. More data analysis needs to be performed to find out an optimal training time and maximum performance. The generalization power of the current machine learning models is not satisfactory when it comes to the medical sector. Some melioration of CNN could be designed and tested in this context. The cost analysis for the models should be performed using some statistical methods before applying them to the field.
Future directions
Role of FL in data science
Data generation in all industries is extensive with the increasing usage of IoT-based methods in the current system. This is the data scientist’s current challenge. One of the most important is to ensure data security, and the sensors that are associated with the IoT-based mechanism have less memory. They do, however, generate a massive amount of data for every nanosecond. As a result, storing or transferring these data in a short period of time is both difficult and critical [239]. The benefit of utilizing FL in this scenario is that the data storing mechanism is avoided and distributed among multiple clients, and because the data is trained locally on each client, the security of individual data is ensured [240].
AI with blockchain in security
Artificial Intelligence is the most potent agent for any applications areas. Sometimes AI acts as a communicator bridge of real-life applications. On the other Blockchain is a provider of distributed ledger for any vulnerable components [241]. BC also offers a temporary ledger for performing security and confidentiality parameters efficiently. AI applications need a secured platform to continue its activities in the applications environments. BC easily collaborates with AI and shows their better performance for the desired system. In the BC environment, AI agents are solely attached during communications. Combined, they produce a highly protected environment that can continue their services to the current and future users incredibly [242, 243].
Controlling robots using FL-AI
In today’s modern technological environment, robots are used in numerous sectors to relieve humans of many dangerous tasks. Again, AI-based agents have a very efficient processing capability and can handle heterogeneous data transactions. Furthermore, with the modern cloud storage system, effective data and information storage with very high memory storage in the cloud system is conceivable. Continuous learning and training are now possible because of the ability to retrieve data from numerous sources in a short period of time. In today’s Industry 4.0 era, the implications of autonomous agents have grown. Robots are used in a variety of industries, including hospitals, educational institutions, the military, and even several hotels. However, because training an agent necessitates the collection of large amounts of data from many sources, it is vital to provide secure data collection for training. In this regard, FL is a well-suited solution since the key demanding task, data transfer, is forbidden in this scenario, ensuring data privacy while maintaining the autonomy system’s efficiency [244].
FL with big data analytic
The primary idea behind Big Data is that must-have data volume, velocity, and variety. The basic job in extensive data analysis is to collect data from various sources and generate a dataset with a diversity of data from various sources. With the development of wireless networking resources such as 5G or even 6G, as well as IoT and Industry 4.0, this has become easier. All of these developments aid in data collection and in a real-time environment. The industrial sector collects and generates big data from a variety of sources, including heterogeneous sources. This technique is difficult because when data flows from source to destination, it can be manipulated by an intruder or hacked in the middle, resulting in a violation of critical user data privacy. FL is a new breed of AI technology in which the ML models are locally trained using the data of the local system. Continuous training is ensured by using the source data, as are the significant data criteria. As a result, data privacy is also ensured, and there is no need to transmit sensitive user data from one location to another [245].
FL with blockchain in industry 5.0 applications
The future IR 5.0 is designed with the primary goal of connecting smart machines and the general public. The usage of IoT devices allows for the collection of data even in remote regions, and with the gathered information, communication may be established without any additional effort on the approach is the data collected from the IoT devices and transferred to the owner. However, the acquired data is raw and may not be in the suitable format for the computer to understand the nature of the data. This is when the ML algorithm’s AI is put to use. The essential computations are carried out using AI algorithms, and the resultant analysis is promptly processed using edge computing. But, there is a challenge of protecting sensitive data from the attack of the intruder. As the transmission of data from device to device, there is a possibility of attack at the nodes of the data hub be attacked by intruders. In this case, FL and blockchain can be a possible solution where the data of each side is collected, trained, and processed on each local place, and the result is passed to the server. The initial parameters then passed through the blocks of the blockchain technology for secure transmission [246, 247].
Applying FL-blockchain for accessing medical data
An essential issue is examining medical disease or medical sector data from the healthcare system. However, medical data is extremely sensitive, and any changes could result in a massive loss for the entire system. In this case, Federate learning combined with the blockchain mechanism can produce a secure yet efficient model for the smart healthcare system that benefits from sophisticated learning and training algorithms while without transferring sensitive data to the network. For the secure aggregation, the initial parameters, number of rounds, and the keys, which is the public one of all clients, are collected in the secured blockchain. While an alternate block is generated after the verification procedure is completed, the parameters are obtained by the clients or the local models. Thus the medical data through the blockchain and Federated Learning security is ensured, and an efficient model can be assured [232].
FL with healthcare in smartindustrial IoT
With the increasing use of IoT devices, it is being employed by various industries, including education, healthcare, data science, data analysis, and so on. In the era of smart IIoT, the necessary data for analysis, such as MRI images, test samples of a specific disease, information of a patient staying in the hospital, or even data of hospital staff or hospital management, is easily gathered and sent to a central server for further processing in the healthcare system with the help of IoT [248]. However, as these technologies have advanced, collecting data has become the main draw for attackers. As a result, while these data are being sent from source to destination, an attacker can simply gain access to them and take over the system. In this regard, FL may be a viable solution because it keeps data safe on the local machine while processing tasks are performed at each client. The output is then sent back to the central server for additional examination using a secure scenario.
AI-FL in smart healthcare using big data
There is a high demand for standardization throughout the data collection, processing, and result generation processes. Again, a platform that can gather information from numerous sources and perform a task, solve critical problems, or make a decision without the need for human participation would be tremendously beneficial to the healthcare industry. In healthcare, AI performs a vital and crucial role in understanding the human thinking process through the computer using various effective AI-based algorithms to make complex examinations easier for healthcare professionals [83]. Data aggregation using FL and smart wearables with AI benefits to create an intelligent and secured system, predicting mortality and length of hospital stay period using electronic health records where the FL model assists the secure data collection and building a brilliant AI model and predicting mortality and length of hospital stay period using electronic health records where the FL model helps the secure data collection and building an intelligent AI model.
Conclusion
The recent progress in healthcare has designed a keen interest in the research community as well as FL to integrate AI in the desired networks. This survey comprehensively mines the immense information regarding emerging topics–FL, AI, XAI, and e-Healthcare. Moreover, we discuss in details the cutting edge developments of FL and AI in intelligent healthcare applications. The FL-AI, FL-Healthcare, and AI-Healthcare have been incorporated with each other significantly. Also, we address different issues–security, privacy, reliability, scalability, and confidentiality using our mentioned terms. Although we have studied both FL and AI-XAI techniques for the healthcare system and categorized them into different types of solutions, however, healthcare is not limited to only AI and FL techniques. Still, various problems and challenges that need to be addressed. The following study analyses the progress of security, state-of-the-art discussion, benefits of integration, taxonomies, and open issues have been presented. Additionally, we have offered several future research guidance in this regard.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/34), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Biographies
Anichur Rahman
received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (MBSTU), Tangail, Bangladesh in 2017 and 2020 respectively. Currently, he is working as a Lecturer at Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (NITER), Constituent Institute of the University of Dhaka, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh since January 2020 to present. His research interests include Internet of Things (IoT), AI, Blockchain (BC), Software Defined Networking (SDN), Image Processing, Machine Learning, 5G, Industry 4.0, and Data Science.
Md. Sazzad Hossain
received the B.Sc. (Engg.) in Computer Science and Engineering from the Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh, in 2008 and the M.Sc. (Engg.) in Computer Science and Engineering from the same university in 2014. He also received his second M.Sc. (Engg.) in Industrial Engineering and Management from Kanagawa University in 2017, Japan and the Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the same university in 2021. In 2010, he joined as a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh. Now he is an associate professor of Computer Science and Engineering in the same institute. His current research interests include Soft Computing Methods, Human Computer Interaction, System Optimization, and Human Factors.
Ghulam Muhammad
(Senior Member, IEEE) is a professor in the Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences at King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Prof. Ghulam received his Ph.D. degree in Electronic and Information Engineering from Toyohashi University and Technology, Japan in 2006, M.S. degree from the same university in 2003. He received his B.S. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1997. He was a recipient of the Japan Society for Promotion and Science (JSPS) fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. His research interests include signal processing, machine learning, IoTs, medical signal and image analysis, AI, and biometrics. Prof. Ghulam has authored and co-authored more than 300 publications including IEEE / ACM / Springer / Elsevier journals, and flagship conference papers. He owns two U.S. patents. He received the best faculty award of Computer Engineering department at KSU during 2014-2015. He has supervised more than 15 Ph.D. and Master Theses. Prof. Ghulam is involved in many research projects as a principal investigator (approximate amount of 0.75 million US dollars) and a co-principal investigator (approximate amount of 1.8 million US dollars).
Dipanjali Kundu
received the B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET), Bangladesh in 2018. Currently, she is working as a Lecturer at Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (NITER), Constituent Institute of the University of Dhaka, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh since January 2020 to present. Her research interests include Machine Learning, Human Computer Interaction, Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain (BC), Software Defined Networking (SDN) 5G, Industry 4.0 and Robotics.
Tanoy Debnath
received the B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (MBSTU), Tangail, Bangladesh in 2020. Currently, he is working as a Lecturer at Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), Green University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from October 2021 to the present. The main interests of his research are Machine Learning, Computer Vision, IoT, Blockchain, and Data Science.
Muaz Rahman
received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Dhaka, Bangladesh in 2014 and the M.Sc. (Engg.) from the Curtin University, Australia in 2017. Currently, he is working as a Lecturer at Electrical and Electronic Engineering, National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (NITER), Constituent Institute of the University of Dhaka, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh since January 2020 to the present. The main interests of his research are Machine Learning, AI, Smart Grid, Hybrid Renewable Energy System, Energy Storage, Energy Management Strategie, Blockchain, and Data Science.
MD Saikat Islam Khan
received the B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (MBSTU), Tangail, Bangladesh in 2020. His research interests are Machine Learning, Computer Vision, Bioinformatics. He is also into some emerging technologies like IoT, SDN and Blockchain.
Prayag Tiwari
(Member, IEEE) received his Master Degree from the National University of Science and Technology "MISiS", Moscow, Russia. He is currently working as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Aalto University. Previously, he was working as a Marie Curie Researcher and Ph.D. student at the University of Padova, Italy. He has several publications in top journals and conferences including NN, IPM, FGCS, JCP, ASOC, NCAA, IJCV, IEEE TFS, IEEE TII, IEEE IOTJ, ACM TOIT, IJIS, CIKM, SIGIR, AAAI, etc. His research interests include Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning, Information Retrieval, Health Informatics, and IoT.
Shahab S. Band
(Senior Member, IEEE) received the M.Sc. degree in artificial intelligence from Iran, and the Ph.D. degree in computer science from the University of Malaya (UM), Malaysia, in 2014. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor with the Department of Computer Science, Iran University of Science and Technology. He also severed as a Senior Lecturer with UM, Malaysia, and with Islamic Azad University, Iran. He participated in many research programs within the Center of Big Data Analysis, IUST and IAU. He has been associated with young researchers and elite club, since 2009. He supervised or co-supervised undergraduate and postgraduate students (master’s and Ph.D.) by research and training. He has also authored, or coauthored papers published in IF journals and attended to high-rank A and B conferences. He is an Associate Editor, a Guest Editor, and a Reviewer of high-quality journals and conferences. He is a professional member of the ACM.
Author contributions
AR, GM, SH, TD, and SS designed the study. AR, DK, MR, and TD wrote the manuscript; AR, SIK, MR, GM and DK collected data. GM, AR, SH, TD, DK, and PT edited the manuscript; SS, AR, PT and DK carried out the analyses. AR, SIK, and TD generated all figures and tables. All authors have read and approved the final version of the paper.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial and non-financial interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Anichur Rahman, Email: anis_cse@niter.edu.bd.
Md. Sazzad Hossain, Email: sazzad@mbstu.ac.bd.
Ghulam Muhammad, Email: ghulam@ksu.edu.sa.
Dipanjali Kundu, Email: dipanjali_kundu@niter.edu.bd.
Tanoy Debnath, Email: tanoy@cse.green.edu.bd.
Muaz Rahman, Email: rahman.muaz@gmail.com.
Md. Saikat Islam Khan, Email: saikat.cse@diu.ac.
Prayag Tiwari, Email: prayag.tiwari@aalto.fi.
Shahab S. Band, Email: shamshirbands@yuntech.edu.tw
References
- 1.Muhammad G, Alshehri F, Karray F, El Saddik A, Alsulaiman M, Falk TH. A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems. Information Fusion. 2021;76:355–375. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nguyen DC, Cheng P, Ding M, Lopez-Perez D, Pathirana PN, Li J, Seneviratne A, Li Y, Poor HV. Enabling ai in future wireless networks: a data life cycle perspective. IEEE Commun Sur Tutorials. 2020;23(1):553–595. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.3024783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shickel B, Tighe PJ, Bihorac A, Rashidi P. Deep ehr: a survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record (ehr) analysis. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informat. 2017;22(5):1589–1604. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2767063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li, D., Luo, Z., Cao, B.: Blockchain-based federated learning methodologies in smart environments. Cluster Computing pp. 1–15 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Rahman, A., Islam, M.J., Saikat Islam Khan, M., Kabir, S., Pritom, A.I., Razaul Karim, M.: Block-sdotcloud: Enhancing security of cloud storage through blockchain-based sdn in iot network. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI), pp. 1–6 (2020). 10.1109/STI50764.2020.9350419
- 6.Islam, M.J., Rahman, A., Kabir, S., Khatun, A., Pritom, A., Chowdhury, M.: Sdot-nfv: A distributed sdn based security system with iot for smart city environments. GUB Journal of Science and Engineering 7, 27–35 (2021) 10.3329/gubjse.v7i0.54015. https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/GUBJSE/article/view/54015
- 7.Hossen R, Whaiduzzaman M, Uddin MN, Islam M, Faruqui N, Barros A, Sookhak M, Mahi M, Nayeen J, et al. Bdps: An efficient spark-based big data processing scheme for cloud fog-iot orchestration. Information. 2021;12(12):517. doi: 10.3390/info12120517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng VS, Hung PC. Health insurance portability and accountability act (hippa) compliant access control model for web services. Int. J. Healthcare Informat. Sys. Informatics (IJHISI) 2006;1(1):22–39. doi: 10.4018/jhisi.2006010102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nguyen, D.C., Pham, Q.V., Pathirana, P.N., Ding, M., Seneviratne, A., Lin, Z., Dobre, O.A., Hwang, W.J.: Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08834 (2021)
- 10.Sheller, M.J., Reina, G.A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., Bakas, S.: Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. In: International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pp. 92–104. Springer (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Warnat-Herresthal S, Schultze H, Shastry KL, Manamohan S, Mukherjee S, Garg V, Sarveswara R, Händler K, Pickkers P, Aziz NA, et al. Swarm learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning. Nature. 2021;594(7862):265–270. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sheller MJ, Edwards B, Reina GA, Martin J, Pati S, Kotrotsou A, Milchenko M, Xu W, Marcus D, Colen RR, et al. Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaissis G, Ziller A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Ryffel T, Usynin D, Trask A, Lima I, Mancuso J, Jungmann F, Steinborn MM, et al. End-to-end privacy preserving deep learning on multi-institutional medical imaging. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2021;3(6):473–484. doi: 10.1038/s42256-021-00337-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaissis GA, Makowski MR, Rückert D, Braren RF. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020;2(6):305–311. doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rahman, A., Islam, M.J., Sunny, F.A., Nasir, M.K.: Distblocksdn: A distributed secure blockchain based sdn-iot architecture with nfv implementation for smart cities. In: 2019 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Technology (ICIET), pp. 1–6 (2019). 10.1109/ICIET48527.2019.9290627
- 16.Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018;2(10):719–731. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peng Y, Zhang Y, Wang L. Guest editorial: Artificial intelligence in biomedical engineering and informatics: An introduction and review. Artificial Intell. Med. 2010;48(2–3):71–73. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gupta, D., Kayode, O., Bhatt, S., Gupta, M., Tosun, A.S.: Hierarchical federated learning based anomaly detection using digital twins for smart healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12241 (2021)
- 19.Arikumar K, Prathiba SB, Alazab M, Gadekallu TR, Pandya S, Khan JM, Moorthy RS. Fl-pmi: Federated learning-based person movement identification through wearable devices in smart healthcare systems. Sensors. 2022;22(4):1377. doi: 10.3390/s22041377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mothukuri V, Parizi RM, Pouriyeh S, Huang Y, Dehghantanha A, Srivastava G. A survey on security and privacy of federated learning. Future Generat. Comput. Sys. 2021;115:619–640. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lim WYB, Luong NC, Hoang DT, Jiao Y, Liang YC, Yang Q, Niyato D, Miao C. Federated learning in mobile edge networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials. 2020;22(3):2031–2063. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2986024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khan, L.U., Saad, W., Han, Z., Hossain, E., Hong, C.S.: Federated learning for internet of things: Recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2021)
- 23.Islam MJ, Rahman A, Kabir S, Karim MR, Acharjee UK, Nasir MK, Band SS, Sookhak M, Wu S. Blockchain-sdn based energy-aware and distributed secure architecture for iots in smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things J. 2021 doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3100797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pham, Q.V., Dev, K., Maddikunta, P.K.R., Gadekallu, T.R., Huynh-The, T., et al.: Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00798 (2021)
- 25.Rieke N, Hancox J, Li W, Milletari F, Roth HR, Albarqouni S, Bakas S, Galtier MN, Landman BA, Maier-Hein K, et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2020;3(1):1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rey, V., Sánchez, P.M.S., Celdrán, A.H., Bovet, G., Jaggi, M.: Federated learning for malware detection in iot devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09994 (2021)
- 27.Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., He, B.: A survey on federated learning systems: vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2021)
- 28.Rahman KJ, Ahmed F, Akhter N, Hasan M, Amin R, Aziz KE, Islam AM, Mukta MSH, Islam AN. Challenges, applications and design aspects of federated learning: A survey. IEEE Access. 2021;9:124682–124700. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang C, Xie Y, Bai H, Yu B, Li W, Gao Y. A survey on federated learning. Knowledge-Based Sys. 2021;216:106775. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kulkarni, V., Kulkarni, M., Pant, A.: Survey of personalization techniques for federated learning. In: 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4), pp. 794–797. IEEE (2020)
- 31.Jiang JC, Kantarci B, Oktug S, Soyata T. Federated learning in smart city sensing: Challenges and opportunities. Sensors. 2020;20(21):6230. doi: 10.3390/s20216230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shen S, Zhu T, Wu D, Wang W, Zhou W. From distributed machine learning to federated learning: In the view of data privacy and security. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen M, Poor HV, Saad W, Cui S. Convergence time optimization for federated learning over wireless networks. IEEE Transac. Wireless Commun. 2020;20(4):2457–2471. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2020.3042530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shlezinger, N., Chen, M., Eldar, Y.C., Poor, H.V., Cui, S.: Federated learning with quantization constraints. In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8851–8855. IEEE (2020)
- 35.Chen M, Yang Z, Saad W, Yin C, Poor HV, Cui S. A joint learning and communications framework for federated learning over wireless networks. IEEE Transac. Wireless Commun. 2020;20(1):269–283. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2020.3024629. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wrabel A, Graef R, Brosch T. A survey of artificial intelligence approaches for target surveillance with radar sensors. IEEE Aerospace Elec. Sys. Mag. 2021;36(7):26–43. doi: 10.1109/MAES.2021.3065069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu, A., Wang, Y., Shu, X., Moritz, D., Cui, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Qu, H.: Ai4vis: Survey on artificial intelligence approaches for data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2021) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Markus AF, Kors JA, Rijnbeek PR. The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. J. Biomed. Informat. 2021;113:103655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Korica, P., Gayar, N.E., Pang, W.: Explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Opportunities, gaps and challenges and a novel way to look at the problem space. In: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, pp. 333–342. Springer (2021)
- 40.Chakrobartty, S., El-Gayar, O.: Explainable artificial intelligence in the medical domain: A systematic review (2021)
- 41.Riboni, D.: Keynote: Explainable ai in pervasive healthcare: Open challenges and research directions. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops), pp. 1–1. IEEE (2021)
- 42.Duell, J., Fan, X., Burnett, B., Aarts, G., Zhou, S.M.: A comparison of explanations given by explainable artificial intelligence methods on analysing electronic health records. In: 2021 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2021)
- 43.Coppola F, Faggioni L, Regge D, Giovagnoni A, Golfieri R, Bibbolino C, Miele V, Neri E, Grassi R. Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey. La Radiologia Medica. 2021;126(1):63–71. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01205-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hansen EB, Bøgh S. Artificial intelligence and internet of things in small and medium-sized enterprises: A survey. J. Manufact. Syst. 2021;58:362–372. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dhuri U, Jain N. Teaching assessment tool: using ai and secure techniques. Int. J. Education Manag. Eng. 2020;6(08):12–21. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Imran, M., Ofli, F., Caragea, D., Torralba, A.: Using ai and social media multimodal content for disaster response and management: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions (2020)
- 47.Zhang K, Liu X, Shen J, Li Z, Sang Y, Wu X, Zha Y, Liang W, Wang C, Wang K, et al. Clinically applicable ai system for accurate diagnosis, quantitative measurements, and prognosis of covid-19 pneumonia using computed tomography. Cell. 2020;181(6):1423–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cubric M. Drivers, barriers and social considerations for ai adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technol Soc. 2020;62:101257. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rasheed, J., Jamil, A., Hameed, A.A., Aftab, U., Aftab, J., Shah, S.A., Draheim, D.: A survey on artificial intelligence approaches in supporting frontline workers and decision makers for covid-19 pandemic. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals p. 110337 (2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Tung TM, Yaseen ZM, et al. A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. J. Hydrol. 2020;585:124670. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu H, Han H, Wang X, Sun S. Research on artificial intelligence enhancing internet of things security: A survey. Ieee Access. 2020;8:153826–153848. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou, X., Chai, C., Li, G., Sun, J.: Database meets artificial intelligence: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020)
- 53.Mohanta BK, Jena D, Satapathy U, Patnaik S. Survey on iot security: Challenges and solution using machine learning, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. Internet of Things. 2020;11:100227. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2020.100227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hossain MS, Muhammad G, Guizani N. Explainable ai and mass surveillance system-based healthcare framework to combat covid-i9 like pandemics. IEEE Network. 2020;34(4):126–132. doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai VI. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inf Decision Making. 2020;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pawar, U., O’Shea, D., Rea, S., O’Reilly, R.: Incorporating explainable artificial intelligence (xai) to aid the understanding of machine learning in the healthcare domain. In: AICS, pp. 169–180 (2020)
- 57.Alshqaqi, S.A., Al-Khulaidi, A.A., Al-mutawkkil, A.Y., Zayed, M.M.: A survey in iot for healthcare applications. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 229–241. Springer (2022)
- 58.Kashani MH, Madanipour M, Nikravan M, Asghari P, Mahdipour E. A systematic review of iot in healthcare: Applications, techniques, and trends. J Net Comput Appl. 2021;192:103164. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kaye AD, Okeagu CN, Pham AD, Silva RA, Hurley JJ, Arron BL, Sarfraz N, Lee HN, Ghali GE, Gamble JW, et al. Economic impact of covid-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Practice & Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2021;35(3):293–306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jaiswal, K., Anand, V.: A survey on iot-based healthcare system: Potential applications, issues, and challenges. In: Advances in Biomedical Engineering and Technology, pp. 459–471. Springer (2021)
- 61.Li, W., Chai, Y., Khan, F., Jan, S.R.U., Verma, S., Menon, V.G., Li, X., et al.: A comprehensive survey on machine learning-based big data analytics for iot-enabled smart healthcare system. Mobile Networks and Applications pp. 1–19 (2021)
- 62.Murthy, B.S., Peddoju, S.K.: Iot-based patient health monitoring: A comprehensive survey. ICT Analysis and Applications pp. 349–356 (2021)
- 63.Jabeen, T., Ashraf, H., Ullah, A.: A survey on healthcare data security in wireless body area networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing pp. 1–14 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Philip, J.M., Durga, S., Esther, D.: Deep learning application in iot health care: A survey. In: Intelligence in Big Data Technologies—Beyond the Hype, pp. 199–208. Springer (2021)
- 65.Chew NW, Lee GK, Tan BY, Jing M, Goh Y, Ngiam NJ, Yeo LL, Ahmad A, Khan FA, Shanmugam GN, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during covid-19 outbreak. Brain, Behavior, Immunity. 2020;88:559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Greenberg, N., Docherty, M., Gnanapragasam, S., Wessely, S.: Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. bmj 368 (2020) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 67.Amin SU, Hossain MS. Edge intelligence and internet of things in healthcare: A survey. IEEE Access. 2020;9:45–59. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hathaliya JJ, Tanwar S. An exhaustive survey on security and privacy issues in healthcare 4.0. Comp. Commun. 2020;153:311–335. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Qadri YA, Nauman A, Zikria YB, Vasilakos AV, Kim SW. The future of healthcare internet of things: a survey of emerging technologies. IEEE Commun. Sur. & Tutorials. 2020;22(2):1121–1167. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2973314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Alemdar H, Ersoy C. Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Comput. Net. 2010;54(15):2688–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhu H, Zhang H, Jin Y. From federated learning to federated neural architecture search: a survey. Complex Intell. Sys. 2021;7(2):639–657. doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00247-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang Q, Liu Y, Chen T, Tong Y. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2019;10(2):1–19. doi: 10.1145/3298981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Truong N, Sun K, Wang S, Guitton F, Guo Y. Privacy preservation in federated learning: An insightful survey from the gdpr perspective. Computers & Security. 2021;110:102402. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zeng, R., Zeng, C., Wang, X., Li, B., Chu, X.: A comprehensive survey of incentive mechanism for federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15406 (2021)
- 75.Guberović, E., Lipić, T., Čavrak, I.: Dew intelligence: Federated learning perspective. In: 2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pp. 1819–1824. IEEE (2021)
- 76.Tonellotto N, Gotta A, Nardini FM, Gadler D, Silvestri F. Neural network quantization in federated learning at the edge. Informat. Sci. 2021;575:417–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Xianjia, Y., Queralta, J.P., Heikkonen, J., Westerlund, T.: An overview of federated learning at the edge and distributed ledger technologies for robotic and autonomous systems. arXiv e-prints pp. arXiv–2104 (2021)
- 78.Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health. 2021;3(11):e745–e750. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Buckeridge, D.L.: Explainability and interpretability: keys to deep medicine. In: Explainable AI in Healthcare and Medicine, pp. 1–10. Springer (2021)
- 80.Raunak M, Kuhn R. Explainable artificial intelligence and machine learning. Computer. 2021;54(10):25–27. doi: 10.1109/MC.2021.3099041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Deshpande, N.M., Gite, S.S.: A brief bibliometric survey of explainable ai in medical field. Lib. Philo. Pract pp. 1–27 (2021)
- 82.Giuste, F., Shi, W., Zhu, Y., Naren, T., Isgut, M., Sha, Y., Tong, L., Gupte, M., Wang, M.D.: Explainable artificial intelligence methods in combating pandemics: A systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.12705 (2021) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 83.Xu J, Glicksberg BS, Su C, Walker P, Bian J, Wang F. Federated learning for healthcare informatics. J. Healthcare Informat. Res. 2021;5(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s41666-020-00082-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jatain, D., Singh, V., Dahiya, N.: A contemplative perspective on federated machine learning: Taxonomy, threats & vulnerability assessment and challenges. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences (2021)
- 85.Blanco-Justicia A, Domingo-Ferrer J, Martínez S, Sánchez D, Flanagan A, Tan KE. Achieving security and privacy in federated learning systems: Survey, research challenges and future directions. Eng. Appl. Artificial Intell. 2021;106:104468. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lim, W.Y.B., Garg, S., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D., Leung, C., Miao, C., Guizani, M.: Dynamic contract design for federated learning in smart healthcare applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2020)
- 87.Grama, M., Musat, M., Muñoz-González, L., Passerat-Palmbach, J., Rueckert, D., Alansary, A.: Robust aggregation for adaptive privacy preserving federated learning in healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08294 (2020)
- 88.Sharma, A., Bahl, S., Bagha, A.K., Javaid, M., Shukla, D.K., Haleem, A.: Blockchain technology and its applications to combat covid-19 pandemic. Research on Biomedical Engineering pp. 1–8 (2020)
- 89.Khan, S.I., Shahrior, A., Karim, R., Hasan, M., Rahman, A.: Multinet: A deep neural network approach for detecting breast cancer through multi-scale feature fusion. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences (2021)
- 90.McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial intelligence and statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)
- 91.Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečnỳ, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H.B., et al.: Towards federated learning at scale: System design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046 (2019)
- 92.Shokri, R., Shmatikov, V.: Privacy-preserving deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pp. 1310–1321 (2015)
- 93.Konečnỳ, J., McMahan, H.B., Yu, F.X., Richtárik, P., Suresh, A.T., Bacon, D.: Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016)
- 94.Ye D, Yu R, Pan M, Han Z. Federated learning in vehicular edge computing: A selective model aggregation approach. IEEE Access. 2020;8:23920–23935. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Voigt, P., Von dem Bussche, A.: The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr). A Practical Guide, 1st Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing 10, 3152676 (2017)
- 96.Khan, M.S.I., Rahman, A., Islam, S., Nasir, M.K., Band, S.S., Mosavi, A.: Iot and wsn based effluent treatment plant monitoring system. EasyChair Preprint no. 5023 (EasyChair, 2021)
- 97.Khan LU, Pandey SR, Tran NH, Saad W, Han Z, Nguyen MN, Hong CS. Federated learning for edge networks: Resource optimization and incentive mechanism. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2020;58(10):88–93. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Rahman A, Nasir MK, Rahman Z, Mosavi A, Shahab S, Minaei-Bidgoli B. Distblockbuilding: A distributed blockchain-based sdn-iot network for smart building management. IEEE Access. 2020;8:140008–140018. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Rahman A, Islam MJ, Rahman Z, Reza MM, Anwar A, Mahmud MP, Nasir MK, Noor RM. Distb-condo: Distributed blockchain-based iot-sdn model for smart condominium. IEEE Access. 2020;8:209594–209609. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Shaheen M, Farooq MS, Umer T, Kim BS. Applications of federated learning; taxonomy, challenges, and research trends. Electronics. 2022;11(4):670. doi: 10.3390/electronics11040670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zheng, Z., Zhou, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, B., Li, K.: Applications of federated learning in smart cities: recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges. Connection Science pp. 1–28 (2021)
- 102.Chen, Z., Tian, P., Liao, W., Yu, W.: Zero knowledge clustering based adversarial mitigation in heterogeneous federated learning. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (2020)
- 103.Smith V, Forte S, Chenxin M, Takáč M, Jordan MI, Jaggi M. Cocoa: A general framework for communication-efficient distributed optimization. J. Machine Learning Res. 2018;18:230. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Gruendner J, Schwachhofer T, Sippl P, Wolf N, Erpenbeck M, Gulden C, Kapsner LA, Zierk J, Mate S, Stürzl M, et al. Ketos: Clinical decision support and machine learning as a service-a training and deployment platform based on docker, omop-cdm, and fhir web services. PloS One. 2019;14(10):e0223010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Huang L, Shea AL, Qian H, Masurkar A, Deng H, Liu D. Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records. J. Biomed Informat. 2019;99:103291. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lee J, Sun J, Wang F, Wang S, Jun CH, Jiang X. Privacy-preserving patient similarity learning in a federated environment: development and analysis. JMIR Med. Informat. 2018;6(2):e7744. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Brisimi TS, Chen R, Mela T, Olshevsky A, Paschalidis IC, Shi W. Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records. Int. J. Med. Informat. 2018;112:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sharma, P., Shamout, F.E., Clifton, D.A.: Preserving patient privacy while training a predictive model of in-hospital mortality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00354 (2019)
- 109.Kim, Y., Sun, J., Yu, H., Jiang, X.: Federated tensor factorization for computational phenotyping. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 887–895 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Silva, S., Gutman, B.A., Romero, E., Thompson, P.M., Altmann, A., Lorenzi, M.: Federated learning in distributed medical databases: Meta-analysis of large-scale subcortical brain data. In: 2019 IEEE 16th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2019), pp. 270–274. IEEE (2019)
- 111.Boughorbel, S., Jarray, F., Venugopal, N., Moosa, S., Elhadi, H., Makhlouf, M.: Federated uncertainty-aware learning for distributed hospital ehr data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12191 (2019)
- 112.Pfohl, S.R., Dai, A.M., Heller, K.: Federated and differentially private learning for electronic health records. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05861 (2019)
- 113.Liu, D., Dligach, D., Miller, T.: Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning. In: Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting, vol. 2019, p. 283. NIH Public Access (2019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 114.Debnath, T., Reza, M.M., Rahman, A., Beheshti, A., Band, S.S., Alinejad-Rokny, H.: Four-layer ConvNet to facial emotion recognition with minimal epochs and the significance of data diversity. Scientific Reports 12(1), 6991 (2022) 10.1038/S41598-022-11173-0. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-11173-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 115.Chen Y, Qin X, Wang J, Yu C, Gao W. Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2020;35(4):83–93. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2020.2988604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Yang Q, Liu Y. Federated learning: the last on kilometer of artificial intelligence. J. Intelligent Sys. 2020;15(1):183–186. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Helbing, D., Frey, B.S., Gigerenzer, G., Hafen, E., Hagner, M., Hofstetter, Y., Van Den Hoven, J., Zicari, R.V., Zwitter, A.: Will democracy survive big data and artificial intelligence? In: Towards digital enlightenment, pp. 73–98. Springer (2019)
- 118.Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., Wang, Y.: Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and vascular neurology 2(4) (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 119.Coiera E. Guide to medical informatics, the internet and telemedicine. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Siri, siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? on the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons. 2019;62(1):15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 121.López-Robles JR, Otegi-Olaso JR, Gómez IP, Cobo MJ. 30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review. Int. J. Informat. Manag. 2019;48:22–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Dahmani, K., Tahiri, A., Habert, O., Elmeftouhi, Y.: An intelligent model of home support for people with loss of autonomy: A novel approach. In: 2016 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), pp. 182–185. IEEE (2016)
- 123.Rabhi Y, Mrabet M, Fnaiech F. A facial expression controlled wheelchair for people with disabilities. Comput. Methods Program. Biomed. 2018;165:89–105. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Hasan, M., Rahman, A., Islam, M.J.: Distb-cvs: A distributed secure blockchain based online certificate verification system from bangladesh perspective. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology (ICAICT), pp. 460–465 (2020). 10.1109/ICAICT51780.2020.9333523
- 125.Abacha AB, Zweigenbaum P. Means: A medical question-answering system combining nlp techniques and semantic web technologies. Informat. Proc. Manag. 2015;51(5):570–594. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Sarrouti M, El Alaoui SO. A machine learning-based method for question type classification in biomedical question answering. Method. Informat. Med. 2017;56(03):209–216. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Handelman G, Kok H, Chandra R, Razavi A, Lee M, Asadi H. ed octor: machine learning and the future of medicine. J. Int. Med. 2018;284(6):603–619. doi: 10.1111/joim.12822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Plaza L, Díaz A, Gervás P. A semantic graph-based approach to biomedical summarisation. Artificial intell. Med. 2011;53(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gilpin, L.H., Bau, D., Yuan, B.Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M., Kagal, L.: Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In: 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), pp. 80–89. IEEE (2018)
- 130.Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai) IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–52160. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Angelov PP, Soares EA, Jiang R, Arnold NI, Atkinson PM. Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2021;11(5):e1424. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Dieber, J., Kirrane, S.: Why model why? assessing the strengths and limitations of lime. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00093 (2020)
- 133.Phillips PJ, Hahn CA, Fontana PC, Broniatowski DA, Przybocki MA. Four principles of explainable artificial intelligence. Maryland: Gaithersburg; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hoque MR, Mazmum MFA, Bao Y, et al. e-health in bangladesh: current status, challenges, and future direction. Int. Technol. Manag. Rev. 2014;4(2):87–96. doi: 10.2991/itmr.2014.4.2.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Muhammad G, Rahman SKMM, Alelaiwi A, Alamri A. Smart health solution integrating iot and cloud: a case study of voice pathology monitoring. IEEE Commun. Magazine. 2017;55(1):69–73. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600425CM. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Garrett L, Chowdhury AMR, Pablos-Méndez A. All for universal health coverage. The Lancet. 2009;374(9697):1294–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61503-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Rahman, A., Chakraborty, C., Anwar, A., Karim, M., Islam, M., Kundu, D., Rahman, Z., Band, S.S., et al.: Sdn–iot empowered intelligent framework for industry 4.0 applications during covid-19 pandemic. Cluster Computing pp. 1–18 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 138.Muhammad G, Hossain MS. Covid-19 and non-covid-19 classification using multi-layers fusion from lung ultrasound images. Information Fusion. 2021;72:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Hossain, M.J., Wadud, M.A.H., Rahman, A., Ferdous, J., Alam, M.S., Amir Ul Haque Bhuiyan, T.M., Mridha, M.F.: A secured patient’s online data monitoring through blockchain: An intelligent way to store lifetime medical records. In: 2021 International Conference on Science Contemporary Technologies (ICSCT), pp. 1–6 (2021). 10.1109/ICSCT53883.2021.9642537
- 140.Masud M, Gaba GS, Alqahtani S, Muhammad G, Gupta B, Kumar P, Ghoneim A. A lightweight and robust secure key establishment protocol for internet of medical things in covid-19 patients care. IEEE Internet of Things J. 2021;8(21):15694–15703. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3047662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Asghari P, Rahmani AM, Javadi HHS. Internet of things applications: A systematic review. Comp. Net. 2019;148:241–261. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Tsiounia, K., Dimitrioglou, N., Kardaras, D., Barbounaki, S.: A process modelling and analytic hierarchy process approach to investigate the potential of the iot in health services. In: World Congress On Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018, pp. 381–386. Springer (2019)
- 143.Kluge EHW. Informed consent and the security of the electronic health record (ehr): some policy considerations. Int. J. Med. Informat. 2004;73(3):229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Muhammad G, Alqahtani S, Alelaiwi A. Pandemic management for diseases similar to covid-19 using deep learning and 5g communications. IEEE Network. 2021;35(3):21–26. doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Muhammad G, Hossain MS. Deep learning-based edge-centric covid-19 like pandemic screening and diagnosis system within b5g framework using blockchain. IEEE Network. 2021;35(28):74–81. doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Esmaeilzadeh P. Use of ai-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers’ perspectives. BMC Med. Informat. Decision Making. 2020;20(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01191-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Ravizza S, Huschto T, Adamov A, Böhm L, Büsser A, Flöther FF, Hinzmann R, König H, McAhren SM, Robertson DH, et al. Predicting the early risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes using real-world data. Nat. Med. 2019;25(1):57–59. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Romero-Brufau S, Wyatt KD, Boyum P, Mickelson M, Moore M, Cognetta-Rieke C. A lesson in implementation: a pre-post study of providers’ experience with artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. Int. J. Med. Informat. 2020;137:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Zhao Y, Zhao J, Jiang L, Tan R, Niyato D, Li Z, Lyu L, Liu Y. Privacy-preserving blockchain-based federated learning for iot devices. IEEE Internet of Things J. 2020;8(3):1817–1829. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3017377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Zaman SB. Importance of learning the public health leadership. Public Health of Indonesia. 2017;3(1):1–3. doi: 10.36685/phi.v3i1.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Sarker S, Jamal L, Ahmed SF, Irtisam N. Robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare during covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Robotics and autonomous systems. 2021;146:103902. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2021.103902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Saheb T, Saheb T, Carpenter DO. Mapping research strands of ethics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric and content analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021;135:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Kumar, R., Khan, A.A., Kumar, J., Zakria, A., Golilarz, N.A., Zhang, S., Ting, Y., Zheng, C., Wang, W.: Blockchain-federated-learning and deep learning models for covid-19 detection using ct imaging. IEEE Sensors Journal (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 154.Cavasotto CN, Di Filippo JI. Artificial intelligence in the early stages of drug discovery. Archives Biochem. Biophys. 2021;698:108730. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Hildebrand LA, Pierce CJ, Dennis M, Paracha M, Maoz A. Artificial intelligence for histology-based detection of microsatellite instability and prediction of response to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(3):391. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Rong G, Mendez A, Assi EB, Zhao B, Sawan M. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and prediction case studies. Engineering. 2020;6(3):291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Shyu CR, Putra KT, Chen HC, Tsai YY, Hossain K, Jiang W, Shae ZY, et al. A systematic review of federated learning in the healthcare area: From the perspective of data properties and applications. Appl. Sci. 2021;11(23):11191. doi: 10.3390/app112311191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Pooyandeh M, Sohn I. Edge network optimization based on ai techniques: A survey. Electronics. 2021;10(22):2830. doi: 10.3390/electronics10222830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Li, Q., Wen, Z., He, B.: Federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. (2019)
- 160.Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., He, B.: A survey on federated learning systems: vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09693 (2019)
- 161.Liu B, Wang L, Liu M. Lifelong federated reinforcement learning: a learning architecture for navigation in cloud robotic systems. IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett. 2019;4(4):4555–4562. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2931179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Liu Y, Yuan X, Xiong Z, Kang J, Wang X, Niyato D. Federated learning for 6g communications: Challenges, methods, and future directions. China Commun. 2020;17(9):105–118. doi: 10.23919/JCC.2020.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Caldas, S., Duddu, S.M.K., Wu, P., Li, T., Konečnỳ, J., McMahan, H.B., Smith, V., Talwalkar, A.: Leaf: A benchmark for federated settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01097 (2018)
- 164.Bakopoulou, E., Tillman, B., Markopoulou, A.: A federated learning approach for mobile packet classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13113 (2019)
- 165.Liu Y, James J, Kang J, Niyato D, Zhang S. Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: A federated learning approach. IEEE Internet of Things J. 2020;7(8):7751–7763. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2991401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Chen, M., Yang, Z., Saad, W., Yin, C., Poor, H.V., Cui, S.: Performance optimization of federated learning over wireless networks. In: 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)
- 167.Muhammad G, Alhussein M. Convergence of artificial intelligence and internet of things in smart healthcare: A case study of voice pathology detection. IEEE Access. 2021;9:89198–89209. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Alshehri F, Muhammad G. A comprehensive survey of the internet of things (iot) and edge computing in healthcare. IEEE Access. 2020;9:3660–3678. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Muhammad G, Hossain MS, Guizani N. Explainable ai and mass surveillance system-based healthcare framework to combat covid-19 like pandemics. IEEE Network. 2020;34(4):126–132. doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Sarp S, Kuzlu M, Wilson E, Cali U, Guler O. The enlightening role of explainable artificial intelligence in chronic wound classification. Electronics. 2021;10(12):1406. doi: 10.3390/electronics10121406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Long, Q.x., Deng, H.j., Chen, J., Hu, J., Liu, B.z., Liao, P., Lin, Y., Yu, L.h., Mo, Z., Xu, Y.y., et al.: Antibody responses to sars-cov-2 in covid-19 patients: the perspective application of serological tests in clinical practice. MedRxiv (2020)
- 172.Mukhopadhyay, S., Brylinski, M., Bess, A., Berglind, F., Galliano, C., McGrew, P.F.: Deepdrug: Applying ai for the advancement of drug discovery. In: 2022 14th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), pp. 667–674. IEEE (2022)
- 173.Qureshi, R., Zou, B., Alam, T., Wu, J., Lee, V., Yan, H.: Computational methods for the analysis and prediction of egfr-mutated lung cancer drug resistance: Recent advances in drug design, challenges and future prospects. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (2022) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 174.Wang S, Tuor T, Salonidis T, Leung KK, Makaya C, He T, Chan K. Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Commun. 2019;37(6):1205–1221. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2019.2904348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Lu Y, Huang X, Dai Y, Maharjan S, Zhang Y. Differentially private asynchronous federated learning for mobile edge computing in urban informatics. IEEE Transac. Indus. Informat. 2019;16(3):2134–2143. doi: 10.1109/TII.2019.2942179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Lu X, Liao Y, Lio P, Hui P. Privacy-preserving asynchronous federated learning mechanism for edge network computing. IEEE Access. 2020;8:48970–48981. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Lu Y, Huang X, Zhang K, Maharjan S, Zhang Y. Communication-efficient federated learning for digital twin edge networks in industrial iot. IEEE Transac. Indus. Informat. 2020;17(8):5709–5718. doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3010798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Zeng, Q., Du, Y., Huang, K., Leung, K.K.: Energy-efficient radio resource allocation for federated edge learning. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)
- 179.Passerat-Palmbach, J., Farnan, T., Miller, R., Gross, M.S., Flannery, H.L., Gleim, B.: A blockchain-orchestrated federated learning architecture for healthcare consortia. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12603 (2019)
- 180.Silva, S., Altmann, A., Gutman, B., Lorenzi, M.: Fed-biomed: A general open-source frontend framework for federated learning in healthcare. In: Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer, and Distributed and Collaborative Learning, pp. 201–210. Springer (2020)
- 181.Wu, Q., Chen, X., Zhou, Z., Zhang, J.: Fedhome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2020)
- 182.Choudhury, O., Park, Y., Salonidis, T., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Sylla, I., et al.: Predicting adverse drug reactions on distributed health data using federated learning. In: AMIA Annual symposium proceedings, vol. 2019, p. 313. American Medical Informatics Association (2019) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 183.Ma Y, Zhang Y, Cai S, Han Z, Liu X, Wang F, Cao Y, Wang Z, Li H, Chen Y, et al. Flexible hybrid electronics for digital healthcare. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(15):1902062. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Pershad Y, Hangge PT, Albadawi H, Oklu R. Social medicine: Twitter in healthcare. J. Clin. Med. 2018;7(6):121. doi: 10.3390/jcm7060121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Kim H, Park J, Bennis M, Kim SL. Blockchained on-device federated learning. IEEE Communications Lett. 2019;24(6):1279–1283. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2921755. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformat. 2018;19(6):1236–1246. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Wiens J, Shenoy ES. Machine learning for healthcare: on the verge of a major shift in healthcare epidemiology. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018;66(1):149–153. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Hölbl M, Kompara M, Kamišalić A, Nemec Zlatolas L. A systematic review of the use of blockchain in healthcare. Symmetry. 2018;10(10):470. doi: 10.3390/sym10100470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Pokhrel SR, Choi J. Federated learning with blockchain for autonomous vehicles: Analysis and design challenges. IEEE Transac. Commun. 2020;68(8):4734–4746. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2020.2990686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 190.McGhin T, Choo KKR, Liu CZ, He D. Blockchain in healthcare applications: Research challenges and opportunities. J. Net. Comput. Appl. 2019;135:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.02.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Lu Y, Huang X, Dai Y, Maharjan S, Zhang Y. Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial iot. IEEE Transac. Industrial Informat. 2019;16(6):4177–4186. doi: 10.1109/TII.2019.2942190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Xi, B., Li, S., Li, J., Liu, H., Liu, H., Zhu, H.: Batfl: Backdoor detection on federated learning in e-health. In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 29th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQOS), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2021)
- 193.Long, G., Shen, T., Tan, Y., Gerrard, L., Clarke, A., Jiang, J.: Federated learning for privacy-preserving open innovation future on digital health. In: Humanity Driven AI, pp. 113–133. Springer (2022)
- 194.Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, Kuleshov V, DePristo M, Chou K, Cui C, Corrado G, Thrun S, Dean J. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat. Med. 2019;25(1):24–29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Xu, X., Peng, H., Sun, L., Bhuiyan, M.Z.A., Liu, L., He, L.: Fedmood: Federated learning on mobile health data for mood detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09342 (2021)
- 196.Lu, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y.: Decentralized federated learning for electronic health records. In: 2020 54th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2020)
- 197.Hatzivasilis, G., Soultatos, O., Ioannidis, S., Verikoukis, C., Demetriou, G., Tsatsoulis, C.: Review of security and privacy for the internet of medical things (iomt). In: 2019 15th international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems (DCOSS), pp. 457–464. IEEE (2019)
- 198.Shayshab Azad, K.M., Hossain, N., Islam, M.J., Rahman, A., Kabir, S.: Preventive determination and avoidance of ddos attack with sdn over the iot networks. In: 2021 International Conference on Automation, Control and Mechatronics for Industry 4.0 (ACMI), pp. 1–6 (2021). 10.1109/ACMI53878.2021.9528133
- 199.Kumar, R., Tripathi, R.: Towards design and implementation of security and privacy framework for internet of medical things (iomt) by leveraging blockchain and ipfs technology. The Journal of Supercomputing pp. 1–40 (2021)
- 200.Papaioannou, M., Karageorgou, M., Mantas, G., Sucasas, V., Essop, I., Rodriguez, J., Lymberopoulos, D.: A survey on security threats and countermeasures in internet of medical things (iomt). Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies p. e4049 (2020)
- 201.Aman AHM, Hassan WH, Sameen S, Attarbashi ZS, Alizadeh M, Latiff LA. Iomt amid covid-19 pandemic: Application, architecture, technology, and security. J. Net. Comput. Appl. 2021;174:102886. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Al-Masri, E.: An edge-based resource allocation optimization for the internet of medical things (iomt). In: 2021 IEEE 3rd Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS), pp. 143–147. IEEE (2021)
- 203.Rahman, M., Jahankhani, H.: Security vulnerabilities in existing security mechanisms for iomt and potential solutions for mitigating cyber-attacks. In: Information Security Technologies for Controlling Pandemics, pp. 307–334. Springer (2021)
- 204.Salim MM, Kim I, Doniyor U, Lee C, Park JH. Homomorphic encryption based privacy-preservation for iomt. Appl. Sci. 2021;11(18):8757. doi: 10.3390/app11188757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Jeyavel, J., Parameswaran, T., Mannan, J.M., Hariharan, U.: Security vulnerabilities and intelligent solutions for iomt systems. In: Internet of Medical Things, pp. 175–194. Springer (2021)
- 206.Muhammad G, Hossain MS, Kumar N. Eeg-based pathology detection for home health monitoring. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Commun. 2021;39(2):603–610. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2020.3020654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Hussain F, Abbas SG, Shah GA, Pires IM, Fayyaz UU, Shahzad F, Garcia NM, Zdravevski E. A framework for malicious traffic detection in iot healthcare environment. Sensors. 2021;21(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/s21093025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Ullah A, Azeem M, Ashraf H, Alaboudi AA, Humayun M, Jhanjhi N. Secure healthcare data aggregation and transmission in iot–a survey. IEEE Access. 2021;9:16849–16865. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Vaid A, Jaladanki SK, Xu J, Teng S, Kumar A, Lee S, Somani S, Paranjpe I, De Freitas JK, Wanyan T, et al. Federated learning of electronic health records to improve mortality prediction in hospitalized patients with covid-19: Machine learning approach. JMIR medical informatics. 2021;9(1):e24207. doi: 10.2196/24207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Pokhrel, S.R., Choi, J.: A decentralized federated learning approach for connected autonomous vehicles. In: 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)
- 211.Wang X, Han Y, Wang C, Zhao Q, Chen X, Chen M. In-edge ai: Intelligentizing mobile edge computing, caching and communication by federated learning. IEEE Network. 2019;33(5):156–165. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2019.1800286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Gunning D, Aha D. Darpa’s explainable artificial intelligence (xai) program. AI magazine. 2019;40(2):44–58. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Amoroso N, Pomarico D, Fanizzi A, Didonna V, Giotta F, La Forgia D, Latorre A, Monaco A, Pantaleo E, Petruzzellis N, et al. A roadmap towards breast cancer therapies supported by explainable artificial intelligence. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(11):4881. doi: 10.3390/app11114881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Dindorf C, Konradi J, Wolf C, Taetz B, Bleser G, Huthwelker J, Werthmann F, Bartaguiz E, Kniepert J, Drees P, et al. Classification and automated interpretation of spinal posture data using a pathology-independent classifier and explainable artificial intelligence (xai) Sensors. 2021;21(18):6323. doi: 10.3390/s21186323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.El-Sappagh S, Alonso JM, Islam S, Sultan AM, Kwak KS. A multilayer multimodal detection and prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence for alzheimer’s disease. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):1–26. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82098-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Peng J, Zou K, Zhou M, Teng Y, Zhu X, Zhang F, Xu J. An explainable artificial intelligence framework for the deterioration risk prediction of hepatitis patients. Journal of Medical Systems. 2021;45(5):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01736-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Rucco M, Viticchi G, Falsetti L. Towards personalized diagnosis of glioblastoma in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair) by topological interpretable machine learning. Mathematics. 2020;8(5):770. doi: 10.3390/math8050770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Raza A, Tran KP, Koehl L, Li S. Designing ecg monitoring healthcare system with federated transfer learning and explainable ai. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2022;236:107763. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107763. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Anand A, Kadian T, Shetty MK, Gupta A. Explainable ai decision model for ecg data of cardiac disorders. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2022;75:103584. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Shukla, P.K., Zakariah, M., Hatamleh, W.A., Tarazi, H., Tiwari, B.: Ai-driven novel approach for liver cancer screening and prediction using cascaded fully convolutional neural network. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2022 (2022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 221.Kobylińska K, Orłowski T, Adamek M, Biecek P. Explainable machine learning for lung cancer screening models. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(4):1926. doi: 10.3390/app12041926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Thomsen, M.K., Pedersen, L., Erichsen, R., Lash, T.L., Sørensen, H.T., Mikkelsen, E.M.: Risk-stratified selection to colonoscopy in fit colorectal cancer screening: development and temporal validation of a prediction model. British Journal of Cancer pp. 1–7 (2022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 223.Kerkouche, R., Acs, G., Castelluccia, C., Genevès, P.: Privacy-preserving and bandwidth-efficient federated learning: An application to in-hospital mortality prediction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, pp. 25–35 (2021)
- 224.Flores, M., Dayan, I., Roth, H., Zhong, A., Harouni, A., Gentili, A., Abidin, A., Liu, A., Costa, A., Wood, B., et al.: Federated learning used for predicting outcomes in sars-cov-2 patients. Research Square (2021)
- 225.Jiménez-Sánchez, A., Tardy, M., Ballester, M.A.G., Mateus, D., Piella, G.: Memory-aware curriculum federated learning for breast cancer classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02504 (2021) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 226.Barbiero, P., Ciravegna, G., Giannini, F., Lió, P., Gori, M., Melacci, S.: Entropy-based logic explanations of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.06804 (2021)
- 227.Rao, J., Zheng, S., Yang, Y.: Quantitative evaluation of explainable graph neural networks for molecular property prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04119 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 228.Vaid, A., Jaladanki, S.K., Xu, J., Teng, S., Kumar, A., Lee, S., Somani, S., Paranjpe, I., De Freitas, J.K., Wanyan, T., et al.: Federated learning of electronic health records improves mortality prediction in patients hospitalized with covid-19. medRxiv (2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 229.Dang, T.K., Tan, K.C., Choo, M., Lim, N., Weng, J., Feng, M.: Building icu in-hospital mortality prediction model with federated learning. In: Federated Learning, pp. 255–268. Springer (2020)
- 230.McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, Back T, Chesus M, Corrado GS, Darzi A, et al. International evaluation of an ai system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89–94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Halling-Brown, M.D., Warren, L.M., Ward, D., Lewis, E., Mackenzie, A., Wallis, M.G., Wilkinson, L.S., Given-Wilson, R.M., McAvinchey, R., Young, K.C.: Optimam mammography image database: a large-scale resource of mammography images and clinical data. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 3(1), e200103 (2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 232.Chang, Y., Fang, C., Sun, W.: A blockchain-based federated learning method for smart healthcare. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2021 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 233.Islam, S., Sara, U., Kawsar, A., Rahman, A., Kundu, D., Dipta, D.D., Karim, A.R., Hasan, M.: Sgbba: An efficient method for prediction system in machine learning using imbalance dataset. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 12(3) (2021)
- 234.Rahman, A., Sara, U., Kundu, D., Islam, S., Islam, M.J., Hasan, M., Rahman, Z., Nasir, M.K.: Distb-sdoindustry: Enhancing security in industry 4.0 services based on distributed blockchain through software defined networking-iot enabled architecture. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 11(9) (2020)
- 235.Rahman A, Islam MJ, Montieri A, Nasir MK, Reza MM, Band SS, Pescape A, Hasan M, Sookhak M, Mosavi A. Smartblock-sdn: An optimized blockchain-sdn framework for resource management in iot. IEEE Access. 2021;9:28361–28376. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Hasan, M., Rahman, A., Karim, M.R., Khan, M.S.I., Islam, M.J.: Normalized approach to find optimal number of topics in latent dirichlet allocation (lda). In: Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, pp. 341–354. Springer (2021)
- 237.Rahman, A., Islam, M.J., Karim, M.R., Kundu, D., Kabir, S.: An intelligent vaccine distribution process in covid-19 pandemic through blockchain-sdn framework from bangladesh perspective. In: 2021 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (ICECIT), pp. 1–4 (2021). 10.1109/ICECIT54077.2021.9641303
- 238.Rahman A, Rahman M, Kundu D, Karim MR, Band SS, Sookhak M. Study on iot for sars-cov-2 with healthcare: present and future perspective. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2021;18(6):9697–9726. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Zhang K, Song X, Zhang C, Yu S. Challenges and future directions of secure federated learning: a survey. Frontiers of computer science. 2022;16(5):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11704-021-0598-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Ahmed U, Srivastava G, Lin JCW. Reliable customer analysis using federated learning and exploring deep-attention edge intelligence. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2022;127:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.08.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Gulati, P., Sharma, A., Bhasin, K., Azad, C.: Approaches of blockchain with ai: Challenges & future direction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Computing & Communications (ICICC) (2020)
- 242.Rajawat, A.S., Bedi, P., Goyal, S., Shaw, R.N., Ghosh, A., Aggarwal, S.: Ai and blockchain for healthcare data security in smart cities. In: AI and IoT for Smart City Applications, pp. 185–198. Springer (2022)
- 243.Latif SA, Wen FBX, Iwendi C, Li-li FW, Mohsin SM, Han Z, Band SS. Ai-empowered, blockchain and sdn integrated security architecture for iot network of cyber physical systems. Computer Communications. 2022;181:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.09.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Xianjia, Y., Queralta, J.P., Heikkonen, J., Westerlund, T.: Federated learning in robotic and autonomous systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10141 (2021)
- 245.Xu W, Fang W, Ding Y, Zou M, Xiong N. Accelerating federated learning for iot in big data analytics with pruning, quantization and selective updating. IEEE Access. 2021;9:38457–38466. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Xu, L., Zhou, X., Tao, Y., Yu, X., Yu, M., Khan, F.: Af relaying secrecy performance prediction for 6g mobile communication networks in industry 5.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2021)
- 247.Chander, B., Pal, S., De, D., Buyya, R.: Artificial intelligence-based internet of things for industry 5.0. In: Artificial Intelligence-based Internet of Things Systems, pp. 3–45. Springer (2022)
- 248.Rahman MA, Hossain MS, Islam MS, Rajeh NA, Muhammad G. Secure and provenance enhanced internet of health things framework: A blockchain managed federated learning approach. IEEE Access. 2020;8:205071–205087. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]