Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Jan 23:2022.08.04.22278274. Originally published 2022 Aug 5. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2022.08.04.22278274

Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Design and Implementation of a Digital Site-less Clinical Study of Serial Rapid Antigen Testing to Identify Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Apurv Soni, Carly Herbert, Caitlin Pretz, Pamela Stamegna, Andreas Filippaios, Qiming Shi, Thejas Suvarna, Emma Harman, Summer Schrader, Chris Nowak, Eric Schramm, Vik Kheterpal, Stephanie Behar, Seanan Tarrant, Julia Ferranto, Nathaniel Hafer, Matthew Robinson, Chad Achenbach, Robert L Murphy, Yukari C Manabe, Laura Gibson, Bruce Barton, Laurel O’Connor, Nisha Fahey, Elizabeth Orvek, Peter Lazar, Didem Ayturk, Steven Wong, Adrian Zai, Lisa Cashman, Lokinendi V Rao, Katherine Luzuriaga, Stephenie Lemon, Allison Blodgett, Elizabeth Trippe, Mary Barcus, Brittany Goldberg, Kristian Roth, Timothy Stenzel, William Heetderks, John Broach, David McManus
PMCID: PMC9387154  PMID: 35982663

Abstract

Background

Rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 with Emergency Use Authorization generally include a condition of authorization to evaluate the test’s performance in asymptomatic individuals when used serially.

Objective

To describe a novel study design to generate regulatory-quality data to evaluate serial use of Ag-RDT in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus among asymptomatic individuals.

Design

Prospective cohort study using a decentralized approach. Participants were asked to test using Ag-RDT and molecular comparators every 48 hours for 15 days.

Setting

Participants throughout the mainland United States were enrolled through a digital platform between October 18, 2021 and February 15, 2022. Ag-RDTs were completed at home, and molecular comparators were shipped to a central laboratory.

Participants

Individuals over 2 years old from across the U.S. with no reported COVID-19 symptoms in the 14 days prior to study enrollment were eligible to enroll in this study.

Measurements

Enrollment demographics, geographic distribution, and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are reported.

Key Results

A total of 7,361 participants enrolled in the study, and 492 participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 154 who were asymptomatic and tested negative to start the study. This exceeded the initial enrollment goals of 60 positive participants. We enrolled participants from 44 U.S. states, and geographic distribution of participants shifted in accordance with the changing COVID-19 prevalence nationwide.

Limitations

New, complex workflows required significant operational and data team support. Conclusions: The digital site-less approach employed in the ‘Test Us At Home’ study enabled rapid, efficient, and rigorous evaluation of rapid diagnostics for COVID-19, and can be adapted across research disciplines to optimize study enrollment and accessibility.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES