Abstract
Despite the diversity of reactions catalyzed by 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nonheme iron (Fe/2OG) enzymes identified in recent years, only a limited number of these enzymes have been investigated in mechanistic detail. In particular, several Fe/2OG-dependent enzymes capable of catalyzing isocyanide formation have been reported. While the glycine moiety has been identified as a biosynthon for the isocyanide group, how the actual conversion is effected remains obscure. To elucidate the catalytic mechanism, we characterized two previously unidentified (AecA and AmcA) along with two known (ScoE and SfaA) Fe/2OG-dependent enzymes that catalyze N≡C triple bond installation using synthesized substrate analogues and potential intermediates. Our results indicate that isocyanide formation likely entails a two-step sequence involving an imine intermediate that undergoes decarboxylation-assisted desaturation to yield the isocyanide product. Results obtained from the in vitro experiments are further supported by mutagenesis, the product-bound enzyme structure, and in silico analysis.
Keywords: isocyanide, oxygenase, natural product, reaction mechanism, desaturation, C–N bond formation
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Natural product biosynthetic pathways are frequently characterized by reactions that result in the functionalization of unactivated C–H bonds.1,2 Because the Lewis acid/base chemistry common to most enzymes is insufficient for these types of transformations, metalloenzymes typically supporting radical intermediates are often employed. The utilization of heme- and nonheme-iron metalloenzymes to effect functional group installation via C–H bond activation represents a widely adapted strategy among natural product biosynthetic pathways.1,2 Representative examples catalyzed by 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nonheme iron (Fe/2OG) enzymes include aziridine installation, endoperoxidation, epoxidation, halogenation, hydroxylation, and olefination.1,3–5 In spite of the discoveries of these enzymatic transformations, only a few reactions, such as halogenation and epoxidation, whose mechanisms are closely related to hydroxylation have been incorporated into synthetic applications.6–8
To underpin the chemical principles and to unleash the potential of Fe/2OG enzymes, it is pivotal to elucidate reaction mechanisms of those chemically challenging, but useful, reactions. In this regard, Fe/2OG enzyme-catalyzed N≡C triple bond formation represents an important yet understudied transformation. The isocyanide, i.e., isonitrile, group is a zwitterion that contains a unique N≡C triple bond connection. The reactive isocyanide moiety has been extensively studied and used as an important synthetic equivalent in organic synthesis.9–12 While these functional groups are also widespread among natural products,13–21 there is relatively little information available regarding their biosynthesis. On the basis of the biosynthetic gene cluster analysis, however, several Fe/2OG enzymes have been proposed to catalyze isocyanide group formation in isocyanide lipopeptides (Figure 1A and Figure S19).22,23 Analogous to other Fe/2OG enzymes, an iron(IV)-oxo species, the conserved key intermediate of these enzymes, has been implicated in triggering hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to initiate isocyanide formation.24 However, the intermediate product and the subsequent steps that lead to N≡C triple bond installation have yet to be determined.
Figure 1.
(A) Representative examples of isocyanide-containing lipopeptide and polyketide natural products. A conserved strategy involving Fe/2OG enzymes has been proposed to install the N≡C group from glycine in these compounds. (B) The conversion of the glycine moiety into isocyanide is catalyzed by an Fe/2OG enzyme in each pathway, including AecA (for aerocyanidin), AmcA (for amycomicin), ScoE (for INLP), and SfaA (for SF2768). The overall reaction is a two-step process in which the first reaction includes an iron(IV)-oxo species-triggered hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to produce the carboxyaldimine intermediate (3). In the second reaction, two possible routes can be envisioned. The reaction may proceed through a HAT at the vinyl C—H position of 3 followed by decarboxylation. Alternatively, a pathway involving an oxygen atom transfer (OAT), ring-opening, dehydration, and decarboxylation is also conceivable. Notably, an in silico analysis suggests that the pathway involving HAT is favorable. Under in vitro conditions, 6 is produced as a side-product. (C) Carboxyaldimine 3 readily decomposes to 8 and glyoxylate (as the hydrate form) which can be detected by 1H and 13C NMR, respectively.
In this work, two previously unidentified (AecA and AmcA) along with two known (ScoE and SfaA) Fe/2OG isocyanide synthases catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of carboxyaldimines (e.g., 3) to form isocyanides (e.g., 4) are investigated and led to formulation of a conserved reaction pathway responsible for isocyanide group installation. As illustrated in Figure 1B, following the formation of the iron(IV)-oxo species with concomitant reduction of O2 by 2OG, catalysis likely proceeds through aldimine oxidation via HAT from the sp2-hybridized imine carbon of 3. The resulting imidoyl radical may then be further oxidized via single electron transfer followed by decarboxylation to yield the isocyanide 4. Alternatively, inspired by a recent discovery that an olefin group can effectively redirect the reactivity of leucine 5-hydroxylase from hydroxylation to epoxidation,8 the oxidation of 3 may alternatively proceed via oxygen atom transfer (OAT) followed by ring-opening, dehydration, and decarboxylation to afford 4 (3 → 7 → 4, Figure 1B). Compared with synthetic approaches and other enzymatic approaches used to install isocyanide groups,25–29 the Fe/2OG enzyme-catalyzed formation of isocyanide functionalities is unique and may be useful in engineering new synthetic biological approaches for the introduction of isocyanide synthons.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In Vitro Reconstitution of Two Annotated Fe/2OG Enzymes, AecA and AmcA, in Aerocyanidin and Amycomicin Biosynthesis.
Several Fe/2OG enzymes including ScoE, SfaA, and Sav607 encoded by isocyanide-containing lipopeptide biosynthetic gene clusters have been identified to catalyze isocyanide group installation using 1 as the substrate.22–24,30,31 In an attempt to probe the possible occurrence of a conserved mechanistic paradigm for N≡C triple bond formation, we began our study to investigate the reaction of two annotated Fe/2OG enzymes, AecA and AmcA, found in the polyketide antibiotics aerocyanidin and amycomicin biosynthetic pathways, respectively.32,33
The likely involvement of these Fe/2OG enzymes in the construction of the isocyanide group is suggested by their gene sequence homology to those of ScoE, SfaA, and Sav607.32 To verify their catalytic functions, the aecA and amcA genes were heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli, and AecA and AmcA were isolated as N-His6-tagged proteins. Subsequent experiments showed that, under in vitro conditions, both of them can catalyze isocyanide formation (4) using 1 as the substrate at the expense of O2 and 2OG (Figure S1). Specifically, reaction solutions containing reconstituted enzyme, 2OG, and 1 with final concentrations of 0.1 mM reconstituted enzyme, 2.5 mM 2OG, and 1 mM 1 (200 μL in 100 mM Tris-HCl (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride), pH 7.5) were exposed to air at 4 °C. The reactions were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LC-MS). These results are consistent with other Fe/2OG isocyanide forming enzymes found in isocyanide-containing lipopeptides29,34 and set the stage to test our hypothesis that AecA and AmcA may utilize an approach similar to the previously identified Fe/2OG enzymes to effect N≡C triple bond formation. Namely, a conserved process may be employed to forge the isocyanide group by these homologous enzymes in isocyanide-containing lipopeptide and polyketide natural products.
Identification of an Imine as a Common Intermediate en Route to Isocyanide Formation.
It has been well-documented that Fe/2OG enzyme-catalyzed hydroxylation is initiated by the formation of an Fe(IV)-oxo species which abstracts a hydrogen atom (HAT) from the substrate.35 The resulting radical then reacts with Fe(III)–OH to complete the hydroxylation.5,36 The latter step is also known as oxygen-rebound.37 Although an Fe(IV)-oxo has been identified as the key species to initiate HAT in isocyanide formation,24 it remains to be determined how the oxygen-rebound is assimilated to effect isocyanide formation.24,34 Alternatively, based on a computational analysis,38,39 it has been proposed that carboxyaldimine (3) produced during the first reaction may serve as the intermediate substrate to trigger isocyanide formation (3 → 4). To establish the reaction mechanism and to investigate whether a conserved pathway is evolved in the biosynthesis of isocyanide-containing lipopeptides and polyketides, we chemically synthesized 3 and tested it with SfaA, the previously characterized isocyanide forming enzyme involved in lipopeptide SF2768 formation,23,40 and AecA/AmcA identified in this study.
During the first few attempts under the conditions of pH 7 (100 mM Tris-HCl), the formation of the product (4) could only be occasionally detected by LC-MS. To seek for possible causes of the inconsistent results, the stability of 3 was monitored by 1H NMR. A solution containing freshly prepared 3 dissolved in phosphate buffer (50 mM 3 and 100 mM KPi, pH = 6.0 or 8.0) was subjected to 1H NMR analysis. It was found that, under slightly acidic conditions (pH 6.0), ~70% of 3 was degraded within 6 min to an amine (8) which was assigned by a comparison with the synthetic standard (Figure S2). Upon changing the buffer pH from 6 to 8, the stability of 3 was increased by ~2–3 fold. These observations suggested that the early inconsistent results may be ascribed to the instability of the substrate under the in vitro assay conditions in which 3 undergoes hemiaminal formation followed by decomposition to produce 8 and glyoxylate (3 → 2 → 8, Figure 1C). To minimize such a complication, we opted to freshly prepare 3 prior to each in vitro assay and carried out the enzymatic reactions at pH 8. Indeed, significant isocyanide (4) formation from 3 was consistently detected in the AecA, AmcA, and SfaA reactions (Figure 2A). While we cannot rule out the possibility that 3 can be hydrolyzed to 2 which is then used in 4 formation (i.e., 3 → 2 → 4), the detection of 8, but not 2 in the studies of 3 degradation (Figure S2), indicates that 2 is unlikely an onward intermediate as it readily decomposes to 8 and glyoxylate. Instead, these findings provide experimental evidence supporting the intermediacy of imine (3), which may be derived from 2, and its role as the common intermediate en route to N≡C triple formation (i.e., 2 → 3 → 4, see Figure 1B) in Fe/2OG isocyanide synthases.
Figure 2.
(A) LC-MS analysis of the AmcA, AecA, and SfaA catalyzed reactions. Using 3 as the substrate, AmcA, AecA, and SfaA can all effect isocyanide (4) formation. In the absence of 2OG, no obvious production of 4 can be detected. (B) Optical absorption spectra showing the binding of 1 and 3 to the SfaA/Amc·Fe(II)·2OG complex. Difference absorption spectra reflecting the binding of 2OG (20 mM) to the Sfa·Fe(II) complex (1 mM SfaA and 1 mM Fe2+) are shown as a gray solid line. In the presence of 1 (20 mM) and 3 (20 mM), the corresponding spectra are shown as red and blue solid lines, respectively. In addition, difference spectra reflecting the binding of 2OG (20 mM) to the AmcA·Fe(II) complex (1 mM AmcA and 1 mM Fe2+) in the presence of 1 (20 mM) and 3 (20 mM) are displayed as red and blue dashed lines, respectively.
In addition, the intermediacy of 3 is also corroborated by the observation of the binding of 3 in the active site of these enzymes. For the majority of Fe/2OG enzymes, the bidentate binding of 2OG to the Fe(II) center leads to generation of a weak optical absorption band (ε ~ 100–200 M−1 cm−1) centered around 500–550 nm.35,41,42 This optical feature results from the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) of Fe(II) and 2OG in the enzyme active site. Sample solutions containing reconstituted enzyme, 2OG, substrate (1 or 3) with final concentrations of 1 mM of reconstituted enzyme, 20 mM 2OG, and 2 mM of substrate (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) were prepared in a glovebox. The solutions were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min before optical absorption measurements. The difference spectra shown in Figure 2 were generated by subtracting the spectra of the enzyme·Fe(II)·2OG·substrate complex from the spectra of enzyme·Fe(II)·2OG. An addition of primary substrate to the enzyme·Fe(II)·2OG ternary complex slightly increases the intensity and changes the overall shape of the MLCT band. This optical feature has been used to assess the binding of the substrate in several Fe/2OG enzymes.42–44 In here, upon an addition of 2OG to the SfaA·Fe(II) complex, a weak and broad MLCT band centered at ~530 nm was developed (Figure 2B). An addition of the native substrate (1) significantly increases the intensity of this band, which is now centered at ~540 nm along with two new features at 490 and 600 nm. In comparison, an addition of 3 also increases the intensity of the MLCT band of the SfaA·Fe(II)·2OG complex with the concomitant development of two similar absorption shoulders. Analogously, adding 1 and 3 into the AmcA·Fe(II)·2OG ternary complex resulted in similar changes (Figure 2B). Although the optical features induced by 3 are not as prominent as those of 1, this observation clearly demonstrates that both 1 and 3 can bind to the iron center in the active site of SfaA and AmcA and induce a change of the MLCT band.
Mutagenesis Studies Suggest That a Conserved Strategy Is Employed by Fe/2OG Enzymes to Effect Isocyanide Formation.
Previously, the structures of ScoE bound with substrate (1) and the hydroxylation product (2) have been reported by us and others.24,34,45 Based on those crystallographic data, several residues including Y101, K193, G128, Y96, Y135, and R310 were identified to interact with 1 and 2. Specifically, Y96 shows a hydrogen-bonding interaction with the nitrogen atom of 1 and 2 with a distance of 2.6 and 2.5 Å, respectively. Moreover, Y101, together with G128 and K193, interacts with the C6-carboxylate of 1 and 2 (Figure S3). A sequence alignment analysis reveals that Y96 and Y101 in ScoE are conserved in isocyanide forming enzymes including AecA, AmcA, Sav607, ScoE, and SfaA (Figure S4). Hence, Y66/Y71 in SfaA and Y63/Y68 in AecA which correspond to Y96/Y101 in ScoE were selected for mutagenesis studies. In vitro assays using 1 as the substrate to investigate the roles of the Y66F and Y71F variants in SfaA along with the Y63F and Y68F variants in AecA showed that none of them can catalyze 4 and 6 formation. These findings are consistent with the previous studies performed with ScoE45 and suggest that these conserved tyrosine residues are important for isocyanide formation.
To further delineate their possible functions, in situ 13C NMR assays using [5-13C]-1 as the substrate were conducted. Solutions containing reconstituted enzymes, 2OG and [5-13C]-1 with a final concentration of 0.2 mM reconstituted enzyme, 5 mM 2OG, and 1 mM substrate were prepared (600 μL, in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5). The reaction mixtures were left at 4 °C for 14 h. After overnight incubation, 30 μL of d6-DMSO was added to the solution prior to a 13C NMR measurement. Both SfaA variants produce a species with a 13C NMR peak at δ = 91 ppm in the presence of 2OG and O2 (Figure S5). In comparison with the substrate ([5-13C]-1, δ = 45 ppm), the chemical shift change (45 → 91 ppm) could originate from formation of 2. However, it may also result from glyoxylate (as the hydrate form) which can be produced through the decomposition of 3 or 2. Attempts to chemically synthesize 2 were unsuccessful. Those unsuccessful attempts are probably associated with the instability of the hemiaminal. Thus, we opted to take the 13C NMR spectra of glyoxylate to verify the origin of this peak. 13C NMR spectra of glyoxylate dissolved in 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and Tris buffer were recorded (10 mM glyoxylate in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 or 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.5). As expected, two peaks associated with the carboxylate and the carbonyl (as the hydrate form) carbons of glyoxylate (δ = 172 and 89 ppm) were observed in HEPES and also in Tris (Figure S6). On the other hand, dissolving glyoxylate in Tris buffer shows two additional peaks (δ = 175 and 91 ppm), which are associated with the cyclized hemiaminal adduct between glyoxylate and Tris (Figure S6). Notably, the peak at 91 ppm has a C–H coupling constant of 163 Hz (observed under C–H coupling mode). The 13C chemical shift and the C–H coupling constant of the peak at 91 ppm assigned to the glyoxylate-Tris adduct are the same as those observed in the enzymatic reactions (Figures S5 and S6). While we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the C5 of 2 might have a chemical shift and C–H coupling constant identical to those of the glyoxylate-Tris adduct, these results indicate that the peak produced in the enzymatic reactions most likely represents glyoxylate. Taken together, our observations demonstrate the importance of the conserved tyrosine residues in isocyanide formation, as no production of 4 was noted in the tyrosine mutants, and thus again suggest that a conserved strategy is likely employed by these Fe/2OG enzymes to effect isocyanide biosynthesis. Furthermore, an observation of 2 in the ScoE active site24 and production of glyoxylate as the only product using the SfaA Y66F variant suggest that the conserved tyrosine, e.g., Y96 in ScoE, could potentially serve as the general base to facilitate the formation of 3 from 2. In the absence of this tyrosine, e.g., Y96 in ScoE, Y66 in SfaA, and Y63 in AecA, only glyoxylate instead of the isocyanide product (4) is formed based on the 13C NMR results. In these cases, glyoxylate formation is not derived from 3, but from 2 directly.
Capture of the New Product in the Enzyme Active Site.
With the goal of observing possible intermediate- and product-bound protein structures, we separately incubated SfaA and ScoE with 1 and 4 and carried out the structural characterizations by X-ray crystallography. Although cocrystallization attempts using 4 were unsuccessful, we were able to trap a previously unidentified product (6) in the active site by exposing the ScoE·Fe·1·2OG complex to O2. ScoE (10 mg/mL) was mixed with 3.0 mM 2OG and 4.5 mM 1 in the buffer that contains 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 3 mM dithiothreitol. The solution was kept on ice, exposed to oxygen for 30 min, and mixed with the reservoir solutions. Crystals appeared after 3–4 days at 16 °C. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of ScoE in complex with 6 using molecule replacement. A superposition of the 1.99 Å resolution ScoE structure with the published structure of substrate-bound ScoE (PDB ID: 6L6X)24 shows that these structures are highly similar with a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 0.130 Å for 269 Cα atoms (Figure S3). Importantly, the ScoE·Fe·6 complex reveals the formation of 6 in which the C5–O bond has a distance of 1.2 Å (Figure 3). While Å cannot be used as the substrate to afford 4 as demonstrated in the previous studies,24 trapping 6 in the ScoE active site suggests that 6 is produced during the reaction.
Figure 3.
Active sites of ScoE. (A) Active sites of ScoE with 1 colored in gray, PDB ID: 6L6X. (B) Active sites of ScoE with 6 colored in forest green, PDB ID: 7SCP. 2Fo-Fc (gray mesh, contoured at 1.0 σ) electron density map for 1 and 6. Dashed lines illustrate hydrogen-bonding interactions or a salt bridge involving the compound and residues (less than 3.0 Å). The active site residues are shown in wheat-colored stick format, and iron is shown as an orange sphere.
Identification of the Multiple Reaction Products in Situ Suggests Plausible Pathways of Isocyanide Formation.
To confirm 6 as the reaction product, we carried out in situ NMR assays of SfaA and AmcA employing [5-13C]-1 as the substrate following the procedure used in the studies of SfaA variants. As shown in Figure 4A, two peaks (δ = 152 and 166 ppm) were discernible in the presence of O2 and 2OG. One peak (δ = 152 ppm) is associated with the formation of 4 in which the broad feature is characteristic of the N≡C moiety. The other peak (δ = 166 ppm) was confirmed to arise from 6 by spiking the synthetic standard of 6 into the reaction mixture (Figure 4A). The capture of 6 in the active site of ScoE and in the reactions of SfaA and AmcA demonstrates that 6 is an enzymatic product. We also carried out an 18O-isotope tracer experiment using 18O2 and H218O. A reaction mixture containing 50 μM AecA, 4 mM ascorbic acid, 5 mM 2OG, 0.8 mM Fe(II), and 1 mM 1 (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) was prepared anaerobically. The reaction was initiated by introducing 18O2 using a balloon. For the H218O experiment, an 18O-containing buffer solution was used with a volumetric ratio of H218O and H216O of ~75 to 25. As shown in Figure 4B, an incorporation of molecular oxygen into the C5 carbonyl oxygen of 6 was observed. This observation weighs against the pathway that includes 2, derived from decomposition of 3, as an onward intermediate: in this case, a water molecule should have been incorporated into 6 (3 → 2 → 6). In contrast, the result of the 18O-isotope tracer experiment supports the pathway 3 → 3′ ʒ 5 → 6.
Figure 4.
(A) 13C NMR spectra of SfaA and AmcA catalyzed reactions using [5-13C]-1 demonstrate the formation of 4 and 6 with the 13C chemical shifts of 152 (red) and 166 (blue) ppm, respectively. The peak at 166 pm overlaps with the carbonyl carbon of synthetic 6. (B) An LC-MS analysis of the AecA reaction under various conditions (18O2 vs H218O) demonstrates the incorporation of the molecular oxygen (O2) into 6 (m/z: 174.1 → 176.1).
The production of 6 may arise from 3 as described above Alternatively, it could result from a side-reaction, e.g., 1 → 2 → 6. When 3 was used as the substrate, both AmcA and AecA could effectively produce 4 and 6 (Figure 2A and Figure S7). Thus, both 1 and 3 can lead to 4 and 6 production. Along with the 1H NMR studies suggesting that 2 is unstable under the given conditions (pH 6–8) (Figure S2), these observations suggest possible reaction pathways for isocyanide installation. As depicted in Figure 1B, subsequent to carboxyaldimine (3) formation, HAT of the vinyl C–H results in radical species 3′. The reaction may then proceed through electron-transfer coupled decarboxylation (3′ → 4) or hydroxyl rebound/tautomerization (3′ → 5 → 6) to afford 4 and 6, respectively. Alternatively, inspired by a recent discovery that an olefin group can redirect the reactivity of an Fe/2OG enzyme from hydroxylation to epoxidation,8 an oxygen atom transfer from the Fe(IV)-oxo species onto the imine moiety of 3 leads to an oxaziridine (7) which may undergo ring-opening, dehydration, and decarboxylation to generate 4. In contrast, a proton removal of 7 could prompt the opening of the oxaziridine followed by tautomerization to afford 6. Importantly, our calculations (vide infra) suggest that OAT is energetically unfavorable, and a strong base is required to facilitate the deprotonation of 7, thus disfavoring the latter pathway. While the mechanistic details of the conversion of 3 to 6 are still varied, the above results are at least consistent with 3 as a common intermediate to produce 4 and 6.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Calculations Suggest a Plausible Reaction Mechanism for Isocyanide Formation.
To gain further insight into the plausible mechanism of 4 and 6 formation, combined molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations were carried out (Figure 5 and Figure S8). To set up the system for MD simulation, the protonation states of titratable residues (His, Glu, Asp) were assigned based on the pKa values predicted by PROPKA46 and a visual inspection of local H-bonding networks. The general AMBER force field (GAFF47) was used for the substrate (3) while the partial atomic charges were quantified by the RESP method,48 using the HF/6-31G* level of theory. The protein structure (PDB ID: 7SCP) is used for this study. The system was minimized using the combined steepest descent and conjugate gradient method. All QM/MM calculations were performed using ChemShell,49 combining Turbomole50 as the QM code and DL_PPLY51 as the MM code. As demonstrated in several Fe/2OG enzyme QM/MM calculations,52–59 the second sphere residues may also play important roles. Y96, Y101, G128, Y135, and R310 are thus included in QM computations. As suggested by the QM(UB3LYP/B1)/MM-optimized geometries of key species involved in the reaction (Figure 5C), the vinyl C—H of 3 is well-positioned to the presumptive Fe(IV)=O species, suggesting that 3 can undergo a HAT to form a radical intermediate (3′) through the σ-pathway which has been suggested in Fe/2OG enzymes60–63 and agrees with de Visser’s study.39 On the other hand, that HAT undergoes the π-pathway is suggested by Liu’s QM/MM study.38 Our calculations show that this HAT step has an energy barrier of 9.9 kcal/mol which is similar to the previous studies on ScoE.38,39 Subsequently, the reaction can proceed through either a radical-induced C—C cleavage (decarboxylation) or an oxygen-rebound with energy barriers of 10.5 and 11.5 kcal/mol, respectively (3′ → TS3′ and 3′ → TS3′b). The similar energy barriers between C—C cleavage and oxygen-rebound suggest that these two pathways are competitive, but the decarboxylation pathway is slightly favored. Such a finding is in line with our experiments and Liu’s studies.38 However, the decarboxylation is found to be a preferred pathway in de Visser’s studies.39 During the decarboxylation, our calculation suggests that the resulting Fe(III)—OH species may act as an electron sink to facilitate CO2 departure. Notably, the energy barrier of the OH-rebound is slightly higher than the calculated values of several Fe/2OG hydroxylases.64,65 It might be partially associated with the hydrogen-bonding network among Fe(III)—OH, Arg310, and a water molecule. In addition, the conversion of 5 to 6 was also evaluated using the hybrid cluster-continuum model in which the reverse keto–enol tautomerization is kinetically and thermodynamically favorable (Figure S9). The calculation result is consistent with the experimental observations. Notably, although using an olefin as a chemical handle to direct the reaction from HAT to OAT has been reported previously,8 the pathway involving an OAT step is energetically unfavorable (Figure S10); thus, we did not carry out further calculations.
Figure 5.
(A) Plausible reaction pathways and intermediates leading to 4 and 6 formation. (B) QM(UB3LYP/B2)/MM relative energies (kcal/ mol) for 4 and 5 formation from 3. The zero point energy (ZPE) and dispersion corrections are included in the relative energies. The spin densities are listed in Table S1. (C) QM(UB3LYP/B1)/MM-optimized geometries of 3 and 3′. The distances between atoms listed in this figure are given in Å. Other geometries are shown in Figure S8. (D) Isosurface of spin density (green) for the imidoyl radical of 3′.
Using an Fe(IV)=O species to cleave a Csp2—H bond is rare. In comparison with a typical olefin moiety that does not include neighboring groups, we speculate that the imine moiety and the carboxylate group of 3 may stabilize the resulting radical and thus lower the targeted C—H bond strength. Herein, we calculate the C—H bond strength of ethene (CH2=CH2) and 3 to delineate the possible influence of the nitrogen atom and the carboxyl group. Our QM calculations show that the Csp2—H bond strength is 108.6 kcal/mol for ethene which is consistent with the reported value.66,67 On the other hand, the Csp2—H bond strength of 3 is only 87.1 kcal/mol. Specifically, the resulting substrate radical can be delocalized onto the neighboring N atom and the carboxylate group (Figure 5D) and as such stabilizes the imidoyl radical.
CONCLUSION
The reactivity of two annotated Fe/2OG enzymes responsible for isocyanide formation in aerocyanidin and amycomicin was established. AecA and AmcA are new members of the increasingly recognized subgroup of Fe/2OG enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of glycine to isocyanide and CO2. Furthermore, using a multifaceted approach including protein X-ray structure, mechanistic probe design, in situ NMR, and computational analysis, a plausible pathway performed by a group of Fe/2OG enzymes to enable isocyanide installation was revealed. This four-electron oxidation takes place in a two-step sequence in which the first reaction results in the oxidation of the glycine moiety of the substrate to a carboxyaldimine (1 → 3). This reaction begins with hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) followed by hydroxyl rebound (e.g., 1 → 2) as inferred from the observation of an Fe(IV)-oxo species and 2 in the active site of ScoE.24 This led to the proposal that the resulting carbinolamine (2) can undergo subsequent dehydration to yield the carboxyaldimine 3. The present results demonstrate that the Fe/2OG isocyanide synthases can indeed catalyze oxidative decarboxylation of 3 to afford isocyanide 4 in the presence of molecular oxygen and 2OG. While the details of the isocyanide formation using 3 remain to be fully elucidated, the carboxyaldimine 3 also undergoes a side-reaction to afford 6, which can be observed in the enzyme active site in crystallo. An observation of O2 incorporation onto 6 suggests that a hydroxyl rebound step following HAT from 3 might take place (3 → 3′ → 5 → 6), which is supported by computation models. While a pathway involving an OAT step cannot be ruled out, it is proposed that 3′ represents a bifurcation point in the catalytic cycle. Whereas single electron transfer and decarboxylation yield the isocyanide (3′ → 4), susceptibility to hydroxyl rebound can result in partitioning to the formation of 6 (3′ → 5 → 6).
Using an imine group generated in the first reaction to stabilize the resulting radical species and to further direct the reactivity from OH-rebound to decarboxylation exemplifies an elegant approach employed by Fe/2OG enzymes to forge N≡C triple bond formation. Our study not only demonstrates that this conserved strategy is employed in isocyanide-containing lipopeptide and polyketide natural products but also establishes the plausible reaction pathway to effect isocyanide group formation. Furthermore, these findings imply a common mechanistic paradigm for the Fe/2OG enzyme-catalyzed N≡C triple bond formation and may introduce a new synthetic biological strategy for the preparation of the isocyanide group.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM127588 to W.-c.C. and Y.G., and GM040541 to H.-w.L.), the Welch Foundation (F-1511 to H.-w.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 22122305 to B.W.), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0901900 to J.Z.). We thank Prof. Jon Clardy at Harvard University for helpful discussions and support. We also thank the staff of the beamline BL17U1 of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for help in data collection.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.1c04869.
Experimental details and supporting figures and tables including reaction pathways, LC-MS chromatograms, NMR spectra, crystal structures, amino acid sequence alignments, Gibbs energy profiles, and SDS-PAGE analysis (PDF)
Accession Codes
The protein structure (PDB ID: 7SCP) has been deposited to the Protein Data Bank.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Tzu-Yu Chen, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Ziyang Zheng, Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Xuan Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Jinfeng Chen, State Key Laboratory of Bio-Organic and Natural Products Chemistry, Center for Excellence in Molecular Synthesis, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lide Cha, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Yijie Tang, Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Yisong Guo, Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Jiahai Zhou, State Key Laboratory of Bio-Organic and Natural Products Chemistry, Center for Excellence in Molecular Synthesis, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Quantitative Engineering Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Binju Wang, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Hung-wen Liu, Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States; Division of Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Wei-chen Chang, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
REFERENCES
- (1).Thibodeaux CJ; Chang W.-c.; Liu H.-w. Enzymatic Chemistry of Cyclopropane, Epoxide, and Aziridine Biosynthesis. Chem. Rev 2012, 112, 1681–1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Tang MC; Zou Y; Watanabe K; Walsh CT; Tang Y Oxidative Cyclization in Natural Product Biosynthesis. Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 5226–5333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Islam MS; Leissing TM; Chowdhury R; Hopkinson RJ; Schofield CJ 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenases. Annu. Rev. Biochem 2018, 87, 585–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Bollinger JM Jr; Chang W.-c.; Matthews ML; Martinie RJ; Boal AK; Krebs C CHAPTER 3. Mechanisms of 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenases: The Hydroxylation Paradigm and Beyond. 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenases 2015, 95–122. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Gao SS; Naowarojna N; Cheng R; Liu X; Liu P Recent Examples of Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Mononuclear Non-Haem Iron Enzymes in Natural Product Biosyntheses. Nat. Prod. Rep 2018, 35, 792–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Hayashi T; Ligibel M; Sager E; Voss M; Hunziker J; Schroer K; Snajdrova R; Buller R Evolved Aliphatic Halogenases Enable Regiocomplementary C-H Functionalization of a Pharmaceutically Relevant Compound. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 18535–18539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Duewel S; Schmermund L; Faber T; Harms K; Srinivasan V; Meggers E; Hoebenreich S Directed Evolution of an FeII-Dependent Halogenase for Asymmetric C(sp3)-H Chlorination. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 1272–1277. [Google Scholar]
- (8).Cha L; Milikisiyants S; Davidson M; Xue S; Smirnova T; Smirnov A; Guo Y; Chang W.-c. Alternative Reactivity of Leucine 5-Hydroxylase Using an Olefin-Containing Substrate to Construct a Substituted Piperidine Ring. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 1961–1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Dömling A; Ugi I Multicomponent Reactions with Isocyanides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2000, 39, 3168–3210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Wilson RM; Stockdill JL; Wu X; Li X; Vadola PA; Park PK; Wang P; Danishefsky SJ A Fascinating Journey into History: Exploration of the World of Isonitriles en route to Complex Amides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2012, 51, 2834–2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Giustiniano M; Basso A; Mercalli V; Massarotti A; Novellino E; Tron GC; Zhu J To each his own: isonitriles for all flavors. Functionalized isocyanides as valuable tools in organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 1295–1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Knorn M; Lutsker E; Reiser O Isonitriles as Supporting and Non-Innocent Ligands in Metal Catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev 2020, 49, 7730–7752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Rothe W Das neue Antibiotikum Xanthocillin. Dtsch med Wochenschr 1954, 79, 1080–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Cafieri F; Fattorusso E; Magno S; Santacroce C; Sica D Isolation and Structure of Axisonitrile-1 and Axisothiocyanate-1 Two Unusual Sesquiterpenoids from Marine Sponge Axinella Cannabina. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 4259–4262. [Google Scholar]
- (15).Gloer JB; Poch GK; Short DM; Mccloskey DV Structure of Brassicicolin A: A Novel Isocyanide Antibiotic from the Phylloplane Fungus Alternaria Brassicicola. J. Org. Chem 1988, 53, 3758–3761. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Manzo E; Ciavatta ML; Gavagnin M; Mollo E; Guo YW; Cimino G Isocyanide Terpene Metabolites of Phyllidiella pustulosa, a Nudibranch from the South China Sea. J. Nat. Prod 2004, 67, 1701–1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Brady SF; Bauer JD; Clarke-Pearson MF; Daniels R Natural Products from isnA-Containing Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Recovered from the Genomes of Cultured and Uncultured Bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 12102–12103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Emsermann J; Kauhl U; Opatz T Marine Isonitriles and Their Related Compounds. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Hohlman RM; Sherman DH Recent Advances in Hapalindole-Type Cyanobacterial Alkaloids: Biosynthesis, Synthesis, and Biological Activity. Nat. Prod. Rep 2021, 38, 1567–1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Bhat V; Dave A; MacKay JA; Rawal VH The Chemistry of Hapalindoles, Fischerindoles, Ambiguines, and Welwitindolinones. Alkaloids Chem. Biol 2014, 73, 65–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Hillwig ML; Zhu Q; Liu X Biosynthesis of Ambiguine Indole Alkaloids in Cyanobacterium Fischerella ambigua. ACS Chem. Biol 2014, 9, 372–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Harris NC; Sato M; Herman NA; Twigg F; Cai W; Liu J; Zhu X; Downey J; Khalaf R; Martin J; Koshino H; Zhang W Biosynthesis of Isonitrile Lipopeptides by Conserved Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase Gene Clusters in Actinobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2017, 114, 7025–7030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Wang L; Zhu M; Zhang Q; Zhang X; Yang P; Liu Z; Deng Y; Zhu Y; Huang X; Han L; Li S; He J Diisonitrile Natural Product SF2768 Functions As a Chalkophore That Mediates Copper Acquisition in Streptomyces thioluteus. ACS Chem. Biol 2017, 12, 3067–3075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Chen TY; Chen J; Tang Y; Zhou J; Guo Y; Chang W.-c. Pathway from N-Alkylglycine to Alkylisonitrile Catalyzed by Iron(II) and 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenases. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 59, 7367–7371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Periasamy MP; Walborsky HM Isocyanides in Organic Synthesis. A Review. Org. Prep. Proced. Int 1979, 11, 293–311. [Google Scholar]
- (26).Scheuer PJ Isocyanides and Cyanides as Natural Products. Acc. Chem. Res 1992, 25, 433–439. [Google Scholar]
- (27).Bode ML; Gravestock D; Rousseau AL Synthesis, Reactions and Uses of Isocyanides in Organic Synthesis. An Update. Org. Prep. Proced. Int 2016, 48, 89–221. [Google Scholar]
- (28).Massarotti A; Brunelli F; Aprile S; Giustiniano M; Tron GC Medicinal Chemistry of Isocyanides. Chem. Rev 2021, 121, 10742–10788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Chen TY; Chen JF; Tang YJ; Zhou JH; Guo YS; Chang W.-c. Current Understanding toward Isonitrile Group Biosynthesis and Mechanism. Chin. J. Chem 2021, 39, 463–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Chisuga T; Miyanaga A; Kudo F; Eguchi T Structural Analysis of the Dual-Function Thioesterase SAV606 Unravels the Mechanism of Michael Addition of Glycine to An Alpha,Beta-Unsaturated Thioester. J. Biol. Chem 2017, 292, 10926–10937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Omura S; Ikeda H; Ishikawa J; Hanamoto A; Takahashi C; Shinose M; Takahashi Y; Horikawa H; Nakazawa H; Osonoe T; Kikuchi H; Shiba T; Sakaki Y; Hattori M Genome Sequence of an Industrial Microorganism Streptomyces avermitilis: Deducing the Ability of Producing Secondary Metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A 2001, 98, 12215–12220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Pishchany G; Mevers E; Ndousse-Fetter S; Horvath DJ Jr.; Paludo CR; Silva-Junior EA; Koren S; Skaar EP; Clardy J; Kolter R Amycomicin is a Potent and Specific Antibiotic Discovered with a Targeted Interaction Screen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2018, 115, 10124–10129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Parker WL; Rathnum ML; Johnson JH; Wells JS; Principe PA; Sykes RB Aerocyanidin, A New Antibiotic Produced by Chromobacterium Violaceum. J. Antibiot 1988, 41, 454–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Harris NC; Born DA; Cai W; Huang Y; Martin J; Khalaf R; Drennan CL; Zhang W Isonitrile Formation by a Non-Heme Iron(II)-Dependent Oxidase/Decarboxylase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 9707–9710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Price JC; Barr EW; Tirupati B; Bollinger JM Jr.; Krebs C The First Direct Characterization of a High-Valent Iron Intermediate in the Reaction of an Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase: A High-Spin FeIV Complex in Taurine/Alpha-Ketoglutarate Dioxygenase (TauD) from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 7497–7508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Martinez S; Hausinger RP Catalytic Mechanisms of Fe(II)- and 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenases. J. Biol. Chem 2015, 290, 20702–20711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Huang X; Groves JT Beyond Ferryl-Mediated Hydroxylation: 40 Years of the Rebound Mechanism and C-H Activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2017, 22, 185–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Li H; Liu YJ Mechanistic Investigation of Isonitrile Formation Catalyzed by the Nonheme Iron/alpha-KG-Dependent Decarboxylase (ScoE). ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 2942–2957. [Google Scholar]
- (39).Ali HS; Ghafoor S; de Visser SP Density Functional Theory Study into the Reaction Mechanism of Isonitrile Biosynthesis by the Nonheme Iron Enzyme ScoE. Top. Catal 2021, in press. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-021-01460-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Zhu M; Wang L; He J Chemical Diversification Based on Substrate Promiscuity of a Standalone Adenylation Domain in a Reconstituted NRPS System. ACS Chem. Biol 2019, 14, 256–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Pavel EG; Zhou J; Busby RW; Gunsior M; Townsend CA; Solomon EI Circular Dichroism and Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectroscopic Studies of the Non-Heme Ferrous Active Site in Clavaminate Synthase and its Interaction with Alpha-Ketoglutarate Cosubstrate. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 743–753. [Google Scholar]
- (42).Ryle MJ; Padmakumar R; Hausinger RP Stopped-Flow Kinetic analysis of Escherichia coli Taurine/Alpha-Ketoglutarate Dioxygenase: Interactions with Alpha-Ketoglutarate, Taurine, and Oxygen. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 15278–15286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Martinez S; Hausinger RP Biochemical and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Non-Heme Fe(II)- and 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Ethylene-Forming Enzyme from Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 5989–5999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Martinez S; Hausinger RP Correction to Biochemical and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Non-Heme Fe(II)- and 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Ethylene-Forming Enzyme from Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 3158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Jonnalagadda R; Del Rio Flores A; Cai W; Mehmood R; Narayanamoorthy M; Ren C; Zaragoza JPT; Kulik HJ; Zhang W; Drennan CL Biochemical and Crystallographic Investigations Into Isonitrile Formation by a Non-Heme Iron-Dependent Oxidase/ Decarboxylase. J. Biol. Chem 2021, 296, 100231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Li H; Robertson AD; Jensen JH Very Fast Empirical Prediction and Rationalization of Protein pKa Values. Proteins 2005, 61, 704–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Wang JM; Wolf RM; Caldwell JW; Kollman PA; Case DA Development and Testing of a General Amber Force Field. J. Comput. Chem 2004, 25, 1157–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Bayly CI; Cieplak P; Cornell WD; Kollman PA A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges: the RESP Model. J. Phys. Chem 1993, 97, 10269–10280. [Google Scholar]
- (49).Sherwood P; de Vries AH; Guest MF; Schreckenbach G; Catlow CRA; French SA; Sokol AA; Bromley ST; Thiel W; Turner AJ; Billeter S; Terstegen F; Thiel S; Kendrick J; Rogers SC; Casci J; Watson M; King F; Karlsen E; Sj×voll M; Fahmi A; Schäfer A; Lennartz C QUASI: A General Purpose Implementation of the QM/MM Approach and Its Application to Problems in Catalysis. J. Mol. Struc. (THEOCHEM) 2003, 632, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- (50).Ahlrichs R; Bar M; Haser M; Horn H; Kolmel C Electronic Structure Calculations on Workstation Computers: The Program System Turbomole. Chem. Phys. Lett 1989, 162, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
- (51).Smith W; Forester TR DL_POLY_2.0: A General-Purpose Parallel Molecular Dynamics Simulation Package. J. Mol. Graphics. 1996, 14, 136–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Godfrey E; Porro CS; de Visser SP Comparative Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM) and Density Functional Theory Calculations on the Oxo-Iron Species of Taurine/ Alpha-Ketoglutarate Dioxygenase. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 2464–2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Borowski T; Noack H; Radon M; Zych K; Siegbahn PE Mechanism of Selective Halogenation by SyrB2: A Computational Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 12887–12898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Huang J; Li CS; Wang BJ; Sharon DA; Wu W; Shaik S Selective Chlorination of Substrates by the Halogenase SyrB2 Is Controlled by the Protein According to a Combined Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Molecular Dynamics Study. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2694–2704. [Google Scholar]
- (55).Alvarez-Barcia S; Kastner J Atom Tunneling in the Hydroxylation Process of Taurine/alpha-Ketoglutarate Dioxygenase Identified by Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 5347–5354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Timmins A; Saint-Andre M; de Visser SP Understanding How Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase Structure Steers a Ferryl Oxidant toward Scission of a Strong C-H Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 9855–9866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Ramanan R; Chaturvedi SS; Lehnert N; Schofield CJ; Karabencheva-Christova TG; Christov CZ Catalysis by the JmjC Histone Demethylase KDM4A Integrates Substrate Dynamics, Correlated Motions and Molecular Orbital Control. Chem. Sci 11, 9950–9961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Han SB; Ali HS; de Visser SP Glutarate Hydroxylation by the Carbon Starvation-Induced Protein D: A Computational Study into the Stereo- and Regioselectivities of the Reaction. Inorg. Chem 60, 4800–4815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Ali HS; Henchman RH; Warwicker J; de Visser SP How Do Electrostatic Perturbations of the Protein Affect the Bifurcation Pathways of Substrate Hydroxylation versus Desaturation in the Nonheme Iron-Dependent Viomycin Biosynthesis Enzyme? J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 1720–1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Borowski T; Bassan A; Siegbahn PEM Mechanism of Dioxygen Activation in 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Enzymes: A Hybrid DFT Study. Chem. Eur. J 2004, 10, 1031–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Ye S; Neese F Nonheme Oxo-Iron(IV) Intermediates form an Oxyl Radical upon Approaching the C-H Bond Activation Transition State. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A 2011, 108, 1228–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Srnec M; Wong SD; Matthews ML; Krebs C; Bollinger JM; Solomon EI Electronic Structure of the Ferryl Intermediate in the alpha-Ketoglutarate Dependent Non-Heme Iron Halogenase SyrB2: Contributions to H Atom Abstraction Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 5110–5122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Chaturvedi SS; Ramanan R; Hu J; Hausinger RP; Christov CZ Atomic and Electronic Structure Determinants Distinguish between Ethylene Formation and L-Arginine Hydroxylation Reaction Mechanisms in the Ethylene-Forming Enzyme. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 1578–1592. [Google Scholar]
- (64).Usharani D; Janardanan D; Shaik S Does the TauD Enzyme Always Hydroxylate Alkanes, while an Analogous Synthetic Non-Heme Reagent Always Desaturates Them? J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 176–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (65).Zeb N; Rashid MH; Mubarak MQE; Ghafoor S; de Visser SP Flavonol Biosynthesis by Nonheme Iron Dioxygenases: A Computational Study into the Structure and Mechanism. J. Inorg. Biochem 2019, 198, 110728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Shiromaru H; Achiba Y; Kimura K; Lee YT Determination of the C-H Bond-Dissociation Energies of Ethylene and Acetylene by Observation of the Threshold Energies of H+ Formation by Synchrotron Radiation. J. Phys. Chem 1987, 91, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
- (67).Ervin KM; Gronert S; Barlow SE; Gilles MK; Harrison AG; Bierbaum VM; Depuy CH; Lineberger WC; Ellison GB Bond Strengths of Ethylene and Acetylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1990, 112, 5750–5759. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.