Skip to main content
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology logoLink to Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
. 2022 Jul 13;7(4):1078–1086. doi: 10.1002/lio2.865

Healthcare disparities for the development of airway stenosis from the medical intensive care unit

Clayton Prakash Burruss 1, Robin B Pappal 2, Michael A Witt 1, Christopher Harryman 1, Syed Z Ali 3, Matthew L Bush 2, Mark A Fritz 2,
PMCID: PMC9392386  PMID: 36000059

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis

To identify sociodemographic factors associated with the development of airway stenosis (AS) among intubated medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

A retrospective review of adult MICU intubated patients from 2013 to 2019 at a single academic institution was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression examined associations between the development of AS and subsite abnormalities such as posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), subglottic stenosis (SGS), tracheal stenosis (TS), vocal fold immobility (VFI), and posterior glottic granuloma (PGG) with age, body mass index (BMI), height, weight, race, ethnicity, sex, rurality, Appalachian status, length of admission, distance to hospital, and median household income.

Results

Of an overall sample of 6603 MICU patients, 449 intubated patients were included in the study, and 204 patients were found to have AS. AS was statistically associated with decreased driving distance to the hospital and increases in BMI. PGS was statistically associated with increases in age. TS was statistically associated with increases in admission duration and not having residence status in Appalachia. VFI was statistically associated with decreases in driving distance to the hospital and not having residence status in Appalachia. Additionally, black patients had a higher odds of developing VFI compared to Caucasian patients.

Conclusion

AS is associated with sociodemographic factors such as age, BMI, shorter distance to hospital, admission duration, and no Appalachian status. These data demonstrate the need to further investigate the impact of social determinants of health on airway pathology and outcomes.

Level of evidence

4.

Keywords: airway stenosis, glottic stenosis, healthcare access, healthcare disparities, tracheal stenosis

1. INTRODUCTION

There is a continuously growing body of evidence that sociodemographic factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and rurality can affect overall health outcomes. 1 Previously, a number of these social determinants of health have been associated with affecting outcomes of various otolaryngological pathologies. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 However, only one study to date has assessed the impact of sociodemographic factors on the development of airway stenosis (AS). 6

AS, or laryngotracheal stenosis, is a spectrum of disorders defined as a narrowing of the upper airway between the larynx and/or trachea proximal to the bronchial bifurcation. Subtypes of AS include posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), subglottic stenosis (SGS), tracheal stenosis (TS), vocal fold immobility (VFI), and posterior glottic granuloma (PGG). AS presents a significant clinical concern, both due to the multidisciplinary treatment required and possible complications varying from recurrent stridor to respiratory arrest. 7 , 8 Several etiologies have been implicated with AS, but the most common associations include post‐tracheostomy AS and post‐intubation AS, with incidences varying from 3% to 31%. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 Additional causes include autoimmune, infectious, neoplastic, and idiopathic. 15 AS not only impedes patient health and wellness, but it can also place a considerable financial burden on the patient. 16 Previous studies have estimated the annual cost of AS maintenance to be between $4000 and $8500, depending on etiology. 17

Previously, diabetes, race, education status, duration of intubation, tobacco use, and obesity were independently identified as sociodemographic risk factors associated with the development with or diagnosis of AS, 6 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 18 but no study has comprehensively assessed sociodemographic and modifiable factors that may contribute to AS subtypes in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Although tracheostomies and intubations present a risk for AS, they are often necessary procedures in an intensive care setting. Therefore, recognizing aspects of patient care associated with AS is imperative to understand the etiology of AS and improve the public health infrastructure to minimize airway complications. Based upon previous literature which analyzes sociodemographic factors associated with AS, we hypothesized that the specific factors analyzed in this study would be associated with frequency of developing AS subtypes based on stenosis etiology.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board (IRB) at the University of Kentucky approved this study (IRB #52662). The University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) was used to query clinical data from the electronic medical record. A retrospective chart review was conducted using CPT codes (31,500, 31,603, 31,605, 31,622, 31,600, 43,246) for intubation, bronchoscopy, tracheostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or emergency intubation between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2019. ICD10 codes (J38.6, J.38.3, J38.00‐J38.02, J38.7, J95) for LS, “other disorders of the larynx, including PGG”, VFI (J38.00 is unspecified laterality, J38.01 is unilateral, J38.02 is bilateral), “other diseases of the larynx”, and “intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of the respiratory system” were utilized, respectively. Likewise, ICD9 codes (478.74, 478.5, 478.3, 478.79, J59) were utilized for the same variables listed above, respectively. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years old identified at the University of Kentucky who were intubated during admission to the MICU and had a complete record of endotracheal/tracheostomy tube size, airway procedures, sociodemographic data, and medical diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were a prior history of tracheostomy or tracheal stent, intubation at an outside hospital, history of airway dilation, history of head and neck cancer, less than 18 years of age, and use of anticoagulants. A sample of 6603 medical records was available based on CPT codes alone. After medical record review, we identified a sample of 440 patients with a complete record of endotracheal/tracheostomy tube size, airway procedures, sociodemographic data, and medical diagnosis. Sociodemographic data collected included: age, BMI, height, weight, race, ethnicity, sex, zip‐code, distance to hospital, and median household income. Clinical data included: length of admission, admission service, airway and complication subtype, and additional comorbidities. Data were compiled in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA).

Rural status was determined by the Beale codes from the 2013 U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural–Urban Continuum Coding (RUCC) system. 19 The Beale code system provides a single‐digit numeric continuum ranging from 1 to 9 with one denoting a metro population of 1 million or more, and nine denoting a rural county or a county that does not neighbor a metropolitan area with less than 2500 residents. Patients were further stratified based on whether or not their county belongs to the Appalachian region as denoted by the Appalachian Regional Commission. 20 Driving distance to the medical center was approximated using Google Maps (3.47.3, Mountain View, CA, USA). Median household income for a given zip‐code region was obtained from the American Community Survey database from 2019 published by the United States Census Bureau. 21

Counts and percentages were recorded for each variable. Dichotomous variables were compared using Chi‐squared testing for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate comparison. Continuous or categorical variables were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. A p value of .05 or greater was considered statistically significant. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were recorded for univariate and multivariate analysis. Both univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to predict associated risk factors. Results were considered statistically significant if the resulting p value was less than .05. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 12.1 (College Station, TX, USA).

3. RESULTS

The 266 (4.0%) of the 6603 patients who were intubated developed some form of AS. Of these 266 patients, 204 (3.1%) were over the age of 18 and, therefore, met inclusion criteria. Of the 204 patients that developed AS, 70 (15.6%) developed PGS, 48 (10.7%) developed SGS, 122 (27.2%) developed TS, 16 (3.6%) developed VFI, and 14 (3.1%) developed PGG. 49 (10.9%) patients developed multiple forms of AS. Table 1 details the demographic data of the patients who developed AS. 52% of the patients who developed AS were male, and the average age of patients who developed AS was 54.5 (SD 15.9 year) years old.

TABLE 1.

Demographics for patients developing airway stenosis and stenosis subtypes

Controls Airway stenosis Posterior glottic stenosis Subglottic stenosis Tracheal stenosis Vocal fold immobility Posterior glottic granuloma
n = 245 n = 204 n = 70 n = 48 n = 122 n = 16 n = 14
Variable N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Sex
Male 102 (41.6) 106 (52.0) 35 (50.0) 27 (56.3) 64 (52.5) 6 (37.5) 4 (28.6)
Female 143 (58.4) 98 (48.0) 35 (50.0) 21 (43.8) 58 (47.5) 10 (62.5) 10 (71.4)
Total 245 (100) 204 (100) 70 (100) 48 (100.0) 122 (100) 16 (100) 14 (100)
Age (year)
25% 41 (−) 43 (−) 48 (−) 39 (−) 43 (−) 42.5 (−) 39 (−)
50% 54 (−) 56 (−) 58 (−) 53 (−) 55.5 (−) 52.5 (−) 50.5 (−)
75% 63 (−) 65 (−) 70 (−) 60 (−) 64 (−) 60 (−) 63 (−)
Race
White 221 (90.9) 190 (93.1) 66 (94.3) 42 (87.5) 112 (91.8) 11 (68.8) 13 (92.9)
Black 22 (9.05) 13 (6.37) 3 (4.29) 6 (12.5) 10 (8.20) 5 (31.3) 1 (7.14)
American Indian/Alaskan 0 (0) 1 (0.49) 1 (1.43) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Ethnicity
Hispanic 5 (2.04) 1 (0.49) 0 (0) 1 (2.08) 1 (0.82) 1 (6.25) 0 (0)
Non‐Hispanic 221 (90.2) 198 (97.1) 69 (98.6) 47 (97.9) 120 (98.4) 15 (93.8) 14 (100)
Not reported 19 (7.76) 5 (2.45) 1 (1.43) 0 (0) 1 (0.82) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Multivariate analysis factors for patients who developed AS are described in Table 2. The average BMI of patients who developed AS was 31.5 (SD 12.0), and the average height was 169 cm (SD 12.1 cm). The average duration of admission for patients who developed AS was 25.1 days (SD 25.4 days). Based on the RUCC codes, 161 (79%) of all patients who developed AS were from rural communities as denoted by a RUCC code greater than 3. Similarly, 48.5% of patients who developed AS were from Appalachian communities. The mean driving distance to the University of Kentucky Medical Center was 54.8 miles (SD 47.2 miles). The average regional income for patients who developed AS was $41,783 (SD $15,546).

TABLE 2.

Multivariate analysis factors affecting airway stenosis and stenosis subtypes

Variable Airway stenosis Posterior glottic stenosis Subglottic stenosis Tracheal stenosis Vocal fold immobility Posterior glottic granuloma
n = 204 n = 70 n = 48 n = 122 n = 16 n = 14
BMI
25% 22.7 22.3 24.6 23.2 28.3 22.1
50% 29.0 29.0 29.9 29.3 30.6 28.9
75% 36.6 35.1 38.3 37.3 42.1 40.6
Height (cm)
25% 157 160 157 157 159 164
50% 168 1703 166 168 169 179
75% 178 178 178 180 183 187
Weight (kg)
25% 66 65 66 68 75 69
50% 83 80 85 86 85 94
75% 107 101 112 111 117 123
Length of admission (days)
25% 8.8 6.0 10.0 10.0 9.8 8.5
50% 18.0 14.0 18.5 20.5 15.0 22.5
75% 33.3 25.0 32.3 36.5 22.3 33.8
Rural–urban continuum codes
1–3 87 27 23 56 9 6
4–6 52 24 12 26 4 5
7–9 65 19 13 40 3 3
Appalachian status
Yes 99 41 21 52 4 4
No 105 29 27 70 12 10
Distance to hospital (mi)
25% 12.7 17.4 9.4 10.0 9.4 11.9
50% 39.2 45.9 32.7 34.0 20.0 32.7
75% 91.8 87.4 87.9 93.2 35.7 35.8
Median household income ($)
25% $ 30,071 $ 28,948 $ 34,229 $ 30,071 $ 34,740 $ 32,300
50% $ 38,323 $ 38,590 $ 39,975 $ 38,323 $ 47,714 $ 45,652
75% $ 51,093 $ 50,152 $ 51,494 $ 51,093 $ 59,536 $ 51,068

Both univariate and multivariate analysis results are shown in Table 3. Univariate analysis was utilized to analyze factors directly associated with social determinants of health, specifically, BMI, race, ethnicity, rurality, Appalachian status, distance to the hospital, and median household income. On univariate analysis, patients had a 2.2% higher odds of developing AS for every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): [1.00–1.01]; p = .019). BMI was not, however, statistically correlated with any subtypes of AS on univariate analysis. Black patients demonstrated an increased risk of developing VFI (OR: 6.06; 95% CI: [1.98–18.6]; p = .002) compared to Caucasian patients. Race was not statistically correlated with the development of any other forms of AS on univariate analysis. Similarly, associations between ethnicity and AS subtypes were not statistically significant. Although rurality did not demonstrate any statistically significant associations with AS on univariate analysis, patients from Appalachian regions were less likely to be diagnosed with both TS (OR: 0.549; 95% CI: [0.360–0.836]; p = .005) and VFI (OR: 0.278; 95% CI: [0.088–0.876]; p = .03) compared to patients that did not live in Appalachia. Similarly, patients who lived closer to the University of Kentucky Medical Center were more likely to be diagnosed with AS (OR: 0.996; 95% CI: [0.992–0.999]; p = .02) and VFI (OR: 0.980; 95% CI: [0.964–0.996]; p = .01) on univariate analysis. Median household income was not statistically associated with the development of AS.

TABLE 3.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the development of airway stenosis and stenosis subtypes

Airway stenosis Posterior glottic stenosis Subglottic stenosis Tracheal stenosis Vocal fold immobility Posterior glottic granuloma
n = 204 n = 70 n = 48 n = 122 n = 16 n = 14
Variable OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Age
Univariate
Multivariate 1.01 (1.00–1.02) .16 1.03 (1.01–1.04) .006 0.993 (0.975–1.01) .45 0.996 (0.983–1.01) .58 1.00 (0.97–1.03) .96 0.995 (0.961–1.03) .75
BMI
Univariate 1.02 (1.00–1.01) .02 1.02 (0.993–1.04) .17 1.02 (0.990–1.04) .24 1.02 (0.971–1.01) .25 1.03 (0.991–1.07) .14 1.01 (0.965–1.06) .67
Multivariate 0.962 (0.845–1.10) .56 0.911 (0.776–1.07) .25 0.907 (0.760–1.08) .28 0.987 (0.863–1.13) .85 0.927 (0.685–1.25) .62 0.751 (0.496–1.14) .18
Height (cm)
Univariate
Multivariate 0.971 (0.917–1.03) .32 0.954 (0.886–1.03) .20 0.945 (0.871–1.03) .17 0.992 (0.933–1.06) .81 0.944 (0.814–1.10) .45 0.941 (0.802–1.10) .45
Weight (kg)
Univariate
Multivariate 1.02 (0.975–1.07) .37 1.04 (0.983–1.10) .17 1.04 (0.978–1.11) .21 1.01 (0.962–1.06) .71 1.04 (0.939–1.15) .46 1.10 (0.968–1.25) .14
Length of admission (days)
Univariate
Multivariate 1.01 (1.00–1.02) .07 0.998 (0.989–1.01) .65 1.00 (0.991–1.01) .87 1.01 (1.00–1.02) .03 0.984 (0.950–1.02) .37 1.00 (0.984–1.02) .84
Race
Univariate 0.687 (0.337–1.40) .30 0.490 (0.146–1.65) .25 1.81 (0.713–4.63) .21 1.07 (0.497–2.29) .87 6.06 (1.98–18.6) .002 0.900 (0.114–7.09) .92
Multivariate 0.535 (0.249–1.15) .11 0.504 (0.143–1.77) .29 1.60 (0.601–4.25) .35 0.773 (0.344–1.74) .53 6.07 (1.56–23.6) .009 0.444 (0.047–4.20) .48
Male gender
Univariate
Multivariate 1.27 (0.71–2.30) .42 0.978 (0.427–2.24) .96 1.33 (0.538–3.28) .54 1.45 (0.755–2.77) .27 0.727 (0.160–3.30) .68 0.970 (0.150–6.27) .10
Ethnicity
Univariate 0.223 (0.026–1.93) .17 1.58 (0.181–13.8) .68 0.498 (0.058–4.31) .53 5.38 (0.592–49.0) .14
Multivariate 0.190 (0.021–1.68) .14 1.56 (0.166–14.7) .70 0.511 (0.057–4.61) .55 4.75 (0.422–53.4) .21
Rurality (RUCC codes 1–9)
Univariate 0.956 (0.889–1.03) .22 0.970 (0.878–1.07) .55 0.929 (0.824–1.05) .22 0.954 (0.879–0.104) .26 0.836 (0.675–1.04) .10 0.919 (0.742–1.14) .44
Multivariate 1.02 (0.904–1.16) .72 0.884 (0.743–1.05) .17 1.05 (0.859–1.28) .65 1.08 (0.949–1.24) .23 1.34 (0.898–2.01) .15 1.11 (0.800–1.55) .52
Appalachian status
Univariate 0.695 (0.479–1.01) .06 1.28 (0.763–2.14) .35 0.646 (0.354–1.18) .16 0.549 (0.360–0.836) .005 0.278 (0.088–0.876) .03 0.337 (0.104–1.09) .07
Multivariate 0.625 (0.344–1.14) .12 2.13 (0.951–4.79) .07 0.830 (0.321–2.15) .70 0.369 (0.191–0.713) .003 0.750 (0.126–4.45) .75 0.231 (0.043–1.25) .09
Distance to hospital (mi)
Univariate 0.996 (0.992–0.999) .02 0.998 (0.993–1.00) .32 0.995 (0.988–1.00) .10 0.996 (0.992–1.00) .06 0.980 (0.964–0.996) .01 0.990 (0.977–1.00) .14
Multivariate 0.996 (0.991–1.00) .07 0.995 (0.987–1.00) .19 1.00 (0.987–1.00) .28 0.998 (0.993–1.00) .34 0.978 (0.949–1.01) .15 0.994 (0.976–1.01) .55
Median household income ($)
Univariate 1.00 (0.999–1.00) .85 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .49 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .35 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .71 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .09 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .84
Multivariate 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .70 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .38 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .43 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .65 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .12 1.00 (1.00–1.00) .42

Note: Statistically significant results have been bolded with the p values italicized.

A multivariate sociodemographic model was utilized to analyze a variety of factors and the association with AS and AS subtypes. In brief, every one‐year increase in age was associated with a 3% increase in odds of developing PGS (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: [1.01–1.04]; p = .006). Additionally, for every one‐day increase in length of admission, patients had a 1% increase in odds of developing TS (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: [1.00–1.02]; p = .03). Similar to the results on univariate analysis, black patients had an increased odds of developing VFI (OR: 6.07; 95% CI: [1.56–23.6]; p = .009) compared to Caucasian patients. Patients had a 63% lower odds of being diagnosed with TS if they lived in Appalachian regions (OR: 0.369; 95% CI: [0.191–0.713]; p = .003) compared to patients from non‐Appalachian regions. Weight, height, sex, ethnicity, rurality, driving distance to the University of Kentucky Medical Center, and median household income were not statistically associated with the development of AS on multivariate analysis.

4. DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates potential sociodemographic factors that may contribute to the development of AS and AS subtypes in an ICU setting. Although one study to date has analyzed social determinants of health that may contribute to generalized laryngotracheal stenosis, 6 this is the first study to additionally look at stenosis subtypes and their association with rural status, Appalachian status, and distance to the medical center. Factors associated with the development of AS varied by subtype.

Increased age was positively associated with the development of the PGS subtype (p = .006). However, previous studies have reported statistically insignificant higher incidences of both PGS and SGS among younger patients. 22 , 23 Although contradicting information exists regarding this result, research has demonstrated functional and anatomical differences of the airway that develop with age that increase susceptibility to airway compromise. 24 , 25 In the context of healthcare disparities, the elderly's anatomical predisposition to the development of airway pathology may be a future consideration when monitoring patients after a tracheostomy or intubation.

Obesity is a well‐documented comorbidity associated with the development of AS. 1 , 6 , 13 , 26 However, past research has attributed these results to various factors with the most common being an increase in endotracheal tube size for obese patients. In this study, increases in BMI across all weight classes were moderately associated with the development of generalized AS on univariate analysis (p = .02). Although there may exist an increasing prevalence of AS among obese patients due to differing treatment modalities, these results indicate that any increase in BMI may increase susceptibility to AS. Additionally, in this study, increases in BMI were not statistically associated with increases in intubation/tracheostomy tube size on simple linear regression (p = .16). However, this result may vary from past literature due to the influence of BMI being analyzed continuously. Future work on this topic is, therefore, required to determine the exact association between BMI and AS.

Length of admission was positively associated with TS on multivariate analysis (p = .03). Increased duration of admission not only produces a significant financial burden for patients, 27 but these results indicate that prolonged intubation may lead to worse healthcare outcomes in the future. However, length of admission was additionally statistically associated with a number of airway comorbidities that may have necessitated prolonged airway interventions or prolonged length of stay such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = .03), obstructive sleep apnea (p < .001), bronchitis (p < .001), and pneumonia (p < .001) on multiple logistic regression. Healthcare disparities relating to the development and treatment of airway diseases have been well documented in the past. 28

This study additionally demonstrated an increased odds of black patients developing VFI on univariate analysis (p = .002) and multivariate analysis (p = .009) compared to Caucasian patients. AS has previously been demonstrated to be more prevalent among black children due to their increased risk of being born prematurely or undergoing endotracheal intubation. 18 However, in the context of our study, all patients were older than 18 and, therefore, had anatomically developed airways; additionally, previous tracheostomy placement was an exclusion criterion. VFI has also been shown to be more common among black patients in the context of laryngeal cancer due to decreased laryngeal preservation with chemoradiation. 29 There are several explanations for this finding between race and AS incidence. First, researchers have previously recommended prolonged observation and follow‐up on patients after prolonged tracheostomy to reduce the risk of AS; however, previous studies have demonstrated racial differences in post‐discharge utilization of healthcare after trauma. 30 Secondly, sociodemographic factors such as insurance quality, access to care, healthcare literacy, and transportation may influence a patient's decision to seek care, and these barriers are increasingly prevalent among black communities. 31 , 32 , 33 Because of the small sample size in the VFI subgroup, the result may be statistically obscured and should be scrutinized appropriately. However, the outcome does align with previously demonstrated disparities among the black community and, therefore, warrants future analysis by healthcare providers. One unique observation was the association of race with the development of VFI and the lack thereof in the other AS subcategories. A possible explanation is the neurogenic etiology of VFI's leading to vocal fold paralysis. Previous studies have demonstrated an increase rate of VFI among black and Hispanic patients due to an increased incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve bifurcations in this population. 34 , 35 This variation has been linked to increased rates of VFI if a branch is considered to be the entire nerve, resulting in increased risk to the additional branch(es). 36 The VFI cohort was selected specifically from the MICU to reduce procedure or trauma‐related injuries to the airway, but not all procedures can be excluded that put the recurrent laryngeal nerve at risk. Alternatively, it is known that the endotracheal tube and intubation itself can lead to paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. 37

Similar to many rural populations in the United States, patients from Appalachian communities have demonstrated numerous barriers to healthcare. 38 , 39 Of note, these obstacles exist within an otolaryngology setting and have previously been demonstrated to impede access to care. 3 , 40 In this study, Appalachian populations demonstrated decreased odds of developing TS on both univariate analysis (p = .005) and multivariate analysis (p = .003) in addition to decreased odds of developing VFI on univariate analysis (p = .03). However, we initially hypothesized that Appalachian populations would demonstrate increased incidences of AS due to their higher association with comorbidities such as obesity, 41 increased use of tobacco products, 42 and an increased incidence of general airway disease. 43 These results seem to elucidate an additional barrier to healthcare for the Appalachian population, namely that they are less likely to present for reevaluation and be diagnosed with AS compared to non‐Appalachian patients. Distance to the hospital has previously been a demonstrated barrier to timely otolaryngology diagnosis for Appalachian populations. 3 In this study, patients from Appalachian and non‐Appalachian communities had a mean distance to the hospital of 90.0 miles (SD 45.2) and 30.3 miles (SD 61.4), respectively. Additionally, patients from both rural and Appalachian communities have been shown to perceive their communities as not lacking in access to healthcare. Wilson et al. appropriately point out that healthcare utilization must be contextualized based on the given community to assess perceptions and cultural factors that may influence a patient's decision to seek care. 44 Similarly, these results seen in Appalachia are supported by the decreased odds of developing AS and VFI as driving distance to the hospital increases. Patients had a 4.4% lower odds of being diagnosed with AS for every 10‐mile increase in driving distance to the hospital (p = .02) and a 20% lower odds of being diagnosed with VFI for every 10‐mile increase in driving distance to the hospital (p = .01) on univariate analysis. Although increased facilities and medical infrastructure may be necessary to improve the delivery of otolaryngology care, future research should look to determine possible cultural differences or perceptions of health and wellness to explain why certain populations may delay seeking care.

There are limitations to this study that may impede the generalizability of the results. The generalizability of this study is somewhat limited to a MICU patient population that is rural by majority and seeks medical assistance from a large tertiary medical facility. Primarily, the small sample size increases the possibility of error and decreases the overall power of the study. The nature of a retrospective cohort study also introduces inherent limitations that may limit this study's ability to highlight any causal relationship. However, this information may be used to inform more rigorous studies in the future. Moreover, the utilization of zip‐code information to localize patients to a region introduces possible errors by analyzing the patient in the context of their geographic group and not as an individual with patient‐specific information. Although this method is less problematic when used to determine patients' rural status and Appalachian status, a possible error is introduced when approximating household income and driving distance to the hospital. Nonetheless, this information helped identify specific at‐risk groups based on the geographic location that may rationalize future research on the effect of sociodemographic factors on the development of AS. Finally, this study is limited by the fact that we do not include in the univariate and multivariate models every factor associated with the development of AS in the literature. This study, however, sought to specifically analyze sociodemographic factors and physical factors that may contribute to the development AS and expand upon the known contributing factors. Future studies should both incorporate these variables in additional analysis and gather more patient‐specific data to expand knowledge on the topic and improve patient outcomes while minimizing harm in at‐risk populations.

5. CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic factors may contribute to the development of stenosis after intubation or tracheostomy placement. Associated risk factors include age, BMI, length of admission, race, Appalachian status, and distance to the medical center. Recognition of high‐risk patient populations may help improve overall otolaryngological outcomes and reduce the development of adverse complications in the future.

FUNDING INFORMATION

The project described was supported by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through grant number UL1TR001998. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funding organizations had no input into the content of this manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Matthew L. Bush is a consultant for MED‐EL and Stryker and has received research funding from Advanced Bionics (unrelated to this research). There are no conflicts of interests with the content of this manuscript. The authors have no other financial relationships or conflicts of interest to disclose pertaining to the manuscript. Matthew L. Bush, associate editor of the journal, had no role in the editorial review of or decision to publish this article.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge the late Dr. Kunwar Prasad Bhatnagar, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology at the University of Louisville School of Medicine, and grandfather of author Clayton P. Burruss, for his intellectual guidance and support throughout the research process.

Burruss CP, Pappal RB, Witt MA, et al. Healthcare disparities for the development of airway stenosis from the medical intensive care unit. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2022;7(4):1078‐1086. doi: 10.1002/lio2.865

Funding information NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant/Award Number: UL1TR001998

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bird Y, Lemstra M, Rogers M, Moraros J. The relationship between socioeconomic status/income and prevalence of diabetes and associated conditions: a cross‐sectional population‐based study in Saskatchewan, Canada. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:93. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0237-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barnett M, Hixon B, Okwiri N, et al. Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1187‐1194. doi: 10.1002/lary.26234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bush ML, Hardin B, Rayle C, Lester C, Studts CR, Shinn JB. Rural barriers to early diagnosis and treatment of infant hearing loss in Appalachia. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(1):93‐98. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bush ML, Kaufman MR, McNulty BN. Disparities in access to pediatric hearing healthcare. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;25(5):359‐364. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Urban MJ, Wojcik C, Eggerstedt M, Jagasia AJ. Rural‐urban disparities in otolaryngology: the state of Illinois. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(1):E70‐E75. doi: 10.1002/lary.28652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dang S, Shinn J, Campbell B, Garrett G, Wootten C, Gelbard A. The impact of social determinants of health on laryngotracheal stenosis development and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(4):1000‐1006. doi: 10.1002/lary.28208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hanlon K, Boesch RP, Jacobs I. Subglottic stenosis. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2018;48(4):129‐135. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2018.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Almanzar A, Danckers M. Laryngotracheal stenosis. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554561/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kastanos N, Miró RE, Perez AM, Mir AX, Agustí‐Vidal A. Laryngotracheal injury due to endotracheal intubation: incidence, evolution, and predisposing factors. A prospective long‐term study. Crit Care med. 1983;11(5):362‐367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dane TEB, King EG. A prospective study of complications after tracheostomy for assisted ventilation. Chest. 1975;67(4):398‐404. doi: 10.1378/chest.67.4.398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stauffer JL, Olson DE, Petty TL. Complications and consequences of endotracheal intubation and tracheotomy: a prospective study of 150 critically ill adult patients. Am J med. 1981;70(1):65‐76. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90413-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Norwood S, Vallina VL, Short K, Saigusa M, Fernandez LG, McLarty JW. Incidence of tracheal stenosis and other late complications after percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232(2):233‐241. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li M, Yiu Y, Merrill T, Yildiz V, de Silva B, Matrka L. Risk factors for posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(4):698‐704. doi: 10.1177/0194599818794456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wu X, Su ZZ, Hu LJ, et al. Analysis of the risk factors causing tracheal stenosis after tracheotomy for mechanical ventilation in 560 patients. Zhonghua Er bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;42(11):839‐842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gelbard A, Francis DO, Sandulache VC, Simmons JC, Donovan DT, Ongkasuwan J. Causes and consequences of adult laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(5):1137‐1143. doi: 10.1002/lary.24956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bibas BJ, Cardoso PFG, Salati M, et al. Health‐related quality of life evaluation in patients with non‐surgical benign tracheal stenosis. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(8):4782‐4788. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yin LX, Padula WV, Gadkaree S, et al. Health care costs and cost‐effectiveness in laryngotracheal stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(4):679‐686. doi: 10.1177/0194599818815068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Johnson RF, Isaiah A. Laryngeal stenosis among hospitalized children: results from a nationwide cross‐sectional survey. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018;3(3):244‐248. doi: 10.1002/lio2.153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes . USDA Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. 2021. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx
  • 20. Kentucky . Appalachian Counties Served by ARC. Appalachian Regional Commission, 2021. https://www.arc.gov/appalachian-counties-served-by-arc/
  • 21. U.S. Census Bureau . American Community Survey ‐ Median Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2019 Inflation‐Adjusted Dollars). 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?t=Income%20and%20Earnings&g=0400000US21%24860000&y=2019&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S1903&hidePreview=true
  • 22. Collins AM, Chorath K, Simpson CB. Subglottic stenosis: An evaluation of an elderly treatment‐seeking population. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(5):1155‐1158. doi: 10.1002/lary.27495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hillel AT, Karatayli‐Ozgursoy S, Samad I, et al. Predictors of posterior glottic stenosis: a multi‐institutional case‐control study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(3):257‐263. doi: 10.1177/0003489415608867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hiramatsu T, Kataoka H, Osaki M, Hagino H. Effect of aging on oral and swallowing function after meal consumption. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:229‐235. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S75211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Johnson KN, Botros DB, Groban L, Bryan YF. Anatomic and physiopathologic changes affecting the airway of the elderly patient: implications for geriatric‐focused airway management. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1925‐1934. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S93796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Halum SL, Ting JY, Plowman EK, et al. A multi‐institutional analysis of tracheotomy complications. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(1):38‐45. doi: 10.1002/lary.22364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Di Fusco M, Shea KM, Lin J, et al. Health outcomes and economic burden of hospitalized COVID‐19 patients in the United States. J med Econ. 2021;24(1):308‐317. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1886109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Gaffney AW, Himmelstein DU, Christiani DC, Woolhandler S. Socioeconomic inequality in respiratory health in the US from 1959 to 2018. JAMA Intern med. 2021;181(7):968‐976. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Hou WH, Daly ME, Lee NY, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Chen AM. Racial disparities in the use of voice preservation therapy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(7):644‐649. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chun Fat S, Herrera‐Escobar JP, Seshadri AJ, et al. Racial disparities in post‐discharge healthcare utilization after trauma. Am J Surg. 2019;218(5):842‐846. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Wallston KA, et al. Health literacy explains racial disparities in diabetes medication adherence. J Health Commun. 2011;16(sup3):268‐278. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013;38(5):976‐993. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lillie‐Blanton M, Hoffman C. The role of health insurance coverage in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in health care. Health Aff. 2005;24(2):398‐408. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Fontenot TE, Randolph GW, Friedlander PL, Masoodi H, Yola IM, Kandil E. Gender, race, and electrophysiologic characteristics of the branched recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(10):2433‐2437. doi: 10.1002/lary.24631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Plowman EK, Chheda N, Anderson A, et al. Vocal fold mobility impairment after cardiovascular surgery: incidence, risk factors, and sequela. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(1):53‐60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Beneragama T, Serpell JW. Extralaryngeal bifurcation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: a common variation. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(10):928‐931. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03899.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Shin YH, An DA, Choi WJ, Kim YH. Unilateral vocal cord paralysis following a short period of endotracheal intubation anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65(4):357‐358. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Shell R, Tudiver F. Barriers to cancer screening by rural Appalachian primary care providers. J Rural Health. 2004;20(4):368‐373. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00051.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Elnicki DM, Morris DK, Shockcor WT. Patient‐perceived barriers to preventive health care among indigent, rural Appalachian patients. Arch Intern med. 1995;155(4):421‐424. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040097012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bush ML, Osetinsky M, Shinn JB, et al. Assessment of Appalachian region pediatric hearing healthcare disparities and delays. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):1713‐1717. doi: 10.1002/lary.24588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Holben DH, Pheley AM. Diabetes risk and obesity in food‐insecure households in rural Appalachian Ohio. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(3):A82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Schoenberg NE, Huang B, Seshadri S, Tucker TC. Trends in cigarette smoking and obesity in Appalachian Kentucky. South med J. 2015;108(3):170‐177. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Stellefson M, Wang MQ, Balanay JAG, Wu R, Paige SR. Latent health risk classes associated with poor physical and mental outcomes in workers with COPD from central Appalachian U.S. states. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2020;17(18):6798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wilson SL, Kratzke C, Hoxmeier J. Predictors of access to healthcare: what matters to rural Appalachians? Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4(6):23‐35. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n6p23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES