Skip to main content
Karger Author's Choice logoLink to Karger Author's Choice
. 2021 Dec 8;238(4):677–687. doi: 10.1159/000520297

Trichoscopic Signs in Dermatomyositis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Systemic Sclerosis: A Comparative Study of 150 Patients

Kumutnart Chanprapaph a, Preeyachat Limtong a, Pintip Ngamjanyaporn b, Poonkiat Suchonwanit a,*
PMCID: PMC9393826  PMID: 34879369

Abstract

Background

Hair and scalp involvement is prevalent in connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Trichoscopic features may provide a diagnostic implementation and enable differentiation among CTDs; however, a direct comparison of these signs among CTD patients is lacking.

Objectives

To compare trichoscopic findings in dermatomyositis (DM), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) as well as determine their distinctive features and associations with disease activity.

Methods

Trichoscopic photographs were taken from DM, SLE, and SSc patients and further evaluated for hair shaft and scalp surface abnormalities. Data regarding patients' clinical manifestations, laboratory results, and disease activity were analyzed.

Results

One hundred fifty participants, consisting of 30 DM, 60 SLE, and 60 SSc patients, were included. Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation, brown scattered pigmentation, and white patches were exclusive findings in DM, SLE, and SSc, respectively (p < 0.001). A multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that DM demonstrated higher odds for having microaneurysmal blood vessels than SLE and SSc (odds ratio [OR] = 22.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73–285.13, p = 0.017, and OR = 15.34, 95% CI = 1.36–177.59, p = 0.029, respectively). Polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic network suggested SSc over SLE (OR = 12.83, 95% CI = 1.35–121.98, p = 0.026), while avascular areas were more pronounced in SSc than DM and SLE (OR = 43.24, 95% CI = 5.17–361.67, p = 0.001, and OR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.01–0.24, p = 0.001, respectively). In a quantile regression analysis, perifollicular red-brown pigmentation, reduction in hair diameter, and the absence of thin arborizing vessels were linked to higher disease activity in DM, SLE, and SSc, respectively (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Trichoscopy is a valuable tool possessing diagnostic and prognostic values for CTDs. Specific trichoscopic features allow adequate distinction between DM, SLE, and SSc and may help identify active disease.

Keywords: Alopecia, Connective tissue diseases, Dermoscopy, Scleroderma, Systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

Hair and scalp changes are common in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and negatively impact the patients' quality of life, yet they remain largely underrecognized [1, 2]. Scalp abnormalities in dermatomyositis (DM) have variable frequency (28–82%), with scaly erythematous pruritic eruption being the most common manifestation [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Alopecia in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be scarring or nonscarring with prevalence ranging from 17 to 85% [5, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Localized scleroderma (e.g., morphea) involving the scalp has been well described; however, information on scalp abnormalities for the generalized form is sparse [1].

The distinction among CTDs can be difficult in patients with skin-predominant disease and has been anchored on the presence of pathognomonic features. However, widely recognized pathognomonic/characteristic cutaneous findings in DM, SLE, and systemic sclerosis (SSc) have been documented in approximately one third to three fourths of these cases [12, 13, 14, 15]. Trichoscopy is a noninvasive device widely used on various hair and scalp disorders [16, 17, 18]. Trichoscopic abnormalities can be presented in CTD patients even without visible signs; therefore, information on their distinctive features may be of great value for those with a diagnostic dilemma.

Although trichoscopy may provide diagnostic clues for CTDs, only a few studies have exhibited this information [7, 19, 20]. A direct comparison of the trichoscopic findings among the most common CTDs, namely DM, SLE, and SSc, and their relations to the disease activity is lacking. This study aims to evaluate and compare trichoscopic findings among DM, SLE, and SSc patients without noticeable scalp lesions, as well as determine their association with the disease activity.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

This is a cross-sectional, analytic study approved by the Mahidol University Institutional Review Board for Ethics in Human Research (MURA2018/589). The study was conducted following the Helsinki Declaration, and written informed consent was obtained from patients before enrollment.

Study Participants

We enrolled patients from Rheumatology and Dermatology Clinics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18 years with the diagnosis of DM according to the classification of Bohan and Peter [21] and/or Sontheimer [22] and/or the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2017 classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [23], or SLE defined by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 Criteria [24] and/or the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria [25], or SSc as stated according to the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc [26]. Exclusion criteria were overlapping autoimmune diseases, scarring alopecia, other hair and scalp disorders, systemic conditions or using medications affecting hair growth cycle/color, and hair dying in the past month.

Data Collection

Baseline patient characteristics (i.e., age, disease onset/duration, gender, cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations) and laboratory results were recorded. The disease activity was assessed by using physician global activity, Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method (CAT-BM) activity score [27], and Manual Muscle Test (MMT) for DM [28]. The SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score was used for SLE [29], and the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) was applied for SSc [30].

We performed trichoscopic examination using a DermLite DL4 dermoscope (3Gen Inc., San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA) with minimal pressure, and photographs were taken from multiple areas of the scalp by one investigator. Trichoscopic evaluation was made on two aspects comprising the hair shaft and scalp surface. Hair shaft changes included decreased hair number (single-hair follicles >20% of follicles), decreased hair diameter (diameter diversity >20% of hair), and hair shaft hypopigmentation (hypopigmentation ≥20% of hair) [7, 31]. Scalp changes comprising black dots, yellow dots, white dots, white patches, brown honeycomb pigmentation, brown scattered pigmentation, peripilar sign, follicular red dots, follicular red-brown pigmentation (red-brown macule around the hair follicle), and blue-gray pigmentation (speckled or target pattern), were noted. Scales were identified as perifollicular and/or interfollicular scales.

We further assessed for vascular abnormalities using a videodermoscope (Dino-Lite Pro; AnMo Electronics Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan). Characteristics of arborizing vessels were described as thin arborizing blood vessels (vessel diameter thinner than that of terminal hair shafts), prominent arborizing blood vessels (thin vessels forming a vascular network), and thick arborizing blood vessels (vessel diameter larger than that of terminal hair shafts) [19, 32, 33]. Other distinctive vascular patterns, including microaneurysmal blood vessel (linear, serpentine, or tortuous dilated capillary with an ectatic portion resembling an aneurysm), dotted vessels, hairpin vessels, and polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic network (PVTN; different pattern of vessels forming a network of telangiectasia), were documented [20, 32]. Finally, avascular areas (whitish areas of fibrosis with the absence of blood vessels) were evaluated [20]. All trichoscopic photographs taken were assessed by one blinded hair specialist.

Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 (Stata Corp. LLC, College Station, TX, USA). The sample size was estimated based on data from previous studies regarding trichoscopy of CTDs, and a minimum of 26 subjects per group was required [7, 19, 20]. Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages. Continuous variables were demonstrated in mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR). Analysis of variance, χ2, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare variables between groups as appropriate. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of having a disease of interest and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Quantile regression analysis was performed to determine the association between trichoscopic signs and disease activity. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of Trichoscopic Features among CTDs

One hundred fifty participants, comprising 30 DM, 60 SLE, and 60 SSc patients, were included. Their demographics are demonstrated in Table 1. Characteristic trichoscopic changes of DM, SLE, and SSc are illustrated in Figures 1, 2, 3, respectively. Hair shaft hypopigmentation was observed in both DM and SLE, but not in SSc, with a significant difference in favor of SLE (p < 0.001). Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation, brown scattered pigmentation, and white patches were exclusive findings in DM, SLE, and SSc, respectively (all p < 0.001). Blue-gray speckled pigmentation was found more frequently in both DM and SLE than SSc (p = 0.014). Perifollicular and interfollicular scales were seen more often in DM compared to both SLE and SSc (p = 0.004 and p = 0.031, respectively).

Table 1.

Demographic data and comparison of trichoscopic findings among patients with dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis

Variables DM (n = 30) SLE (n = 60) SSc (n = 60) p value
Age (mean ± SD), years 52.0±16.2 36.7±14.4 53.8±12.8 n.a.
Sex, n (%) n.a.
 Male 8 (26.7) 2 (3.3) 10 (16.7)
 Female 22 (73.3) 58 (96.7) 50 (83.3)
Age of disease onset (mean ± SD), years 48.2±15.8 27.0±12.9 45.0±13.9 n.a.
Median duration of disease (IQR), months 36 (7–60) 90 (24–204) 96 (36–144) n.a.
Trichoscopic findings, n (%)
 Hair shaft findings
  Decrease in number 9 (30) 20 (33.3) 25 (41.7) 0.475
  Decrease in diameter 1 (3.3) 10 (16.7) 10 (16.7) 0.101
  Hair shaft hypopigmentation 3 (10) 18 (30.0) 0 (0) <0.001*
 Follicular opening and dots
  Black dots 2 (6.7) 2 (3.3) 1 (1.7) 0.487
  White dots 17 (56.7) 29 (48.3) 45 (75.0) 0.009*
 Perifollicular and interfollicular scalp surface
  Brown peripilar sign 5 (16.7) 1 (1.7) 0 (0) 0.001*
  Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation 10 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) <0.001*
  Brown honeycomb pigmentation 24 (80.0) 46 (76.7) 51 (85.0) 0.506
  Brown scattered pigmentation 0 (0) 9 (15.0) 0 (0) <0.001*
  Blue-gray speckled pigmentation 12 (40.0) 17 (28.3) 2 (3.3) 0.014*
  Salt and pepper appearance 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (5.0) 0.061
  White patches 0 (0) 0 (0) 25 (41.7) <0.001*
  Perifollicular scales 20 (66.7) 23 (38.3) 18 (30.0) 0.004*
  Interfollicular scales 13 (43.3) 20 (33.3) 11 (18.3) 0.031*
 Vascular findings
  Dotted vessels 8 (26.7) 13 (21.7) 0 (0) <0.001*
  Thin arborizing vessels 29 (96.7) 60 (100) 55 (91.7) 0.027*
  Prominent arborizing vessels 7 (23.3) 31 (51.7) 22 (36.7) 0.026*
  Thick arborizing vessels 16 (53.3) 22 (36.7) 31 (51.7) 0.169
  Microaneurysmal blood vessels 5 (16.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) <0.001*
  Polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic network 0 (0) 0 (0) 12 (20.0) <0.001*
  Perifollicular location of aberrant vessels 4 (13.3) 1 (1.7) 0 (0) 0.006*
  Interfollicular location of aberrant vessels 27 (90.0) 60 (100) 54 (90.0) 0.008*
  Avascular areas 0 (0) 0 (0) 32 (53.3) <0.001*

DM, dermatomyositis; IQR, interquartile range; n.a., not applicable; SD, standard deviation; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

*

Statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Trichoscopic features of patients with dermatomyositis. a Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation and scales. ×40. b High magnification of perifollicular red-brown pigmentation showing tortuous blood vessels and brown macules at perifollicular areas. ×120. c Dilated aberrant blood vessels. ×20. d Aneurysmal blood vessels defined as linear, serpentine, or tortuous dilated capillary with an ectatic portion resembling an aneurysm. ×200.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Trichoscopic features of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. a Hair shaft changes including decreased hair number, decreased diameter, and hypopigmented hair shafts. ×20. b Scalp changes consisting of black and white dots, brown scattered pigmentation, and blue-gray speckled pigmentation. ×20. c Prominent arborizing blood vessels forming a vascular network at interfollicular areas. ×120. d Thick arborizing blood vessels. ×20.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Trichoscopic features of patients with systemic sclerosis: variable hair shaft and scalp changes including decreased hair number and diameter, avascular areas (a), and white patches (b). ×40. c Polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic network defined as a different pattern of vessels forming a network of vascular telangiectasia. ×40. d High magnification of polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic network. ×80.

Microaneurysmal vessels were exclusive for DM, while the PVTN and avascular areas were distinctive signs of SSc patients. Dotted vessels were more predominant in both DM and SLE than SSc (p < 0.001). Thin arborizing vessels forming prominent arborized vascular networks were prevalent in SLE (p = 0.026). Any vascular abnormalities located interfollicularly were more prominent in SLE (p = 0.008), while perifollicular changes favored DM (p = 0.006). Trichoscopic findings of all groups are summarized in Table 1.

Diagnostic Value of Trichoscopic Features for CTDs

Table 2 demonstrates the diagnostic value of trichoscopy among the three CTDs determined by multinomial logistic regression analysis. For hair shaft features, DM had lower odds for decreased hair diameter than both SLE and SSc (OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01–0.72, p = 0.027, and OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01–0.82, p = 0.034, respectively). Hair shaft hypopigmentation revealed lower odds for both DM and SSc than SLE (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.93, p = 0.042, and OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01–0.33, p = 0.003, respectively).

Table 2.

Multinomial logistic regression analysis of trichoscopic findings in patients with dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis

Trichoscopic findings DM versus SLEa
SSc versus SLEa
DM versus SSca
OR 95% CI p valueb OR 95% CI p valueb OR 95% CI p valueb
Hair shaft findings
 Decrease in number 0.41 0.12–1.38 0.152 0.72 0.28–1.83 0.492 0.57 0.20–1.62 0.293
 Decrease in diameter 0.06 0.01–0.72 0.027* 0.72 0.20–2.56 0.617 0.08 0.01–0.82 0.034
 Hair shaft hypopigmentation 0.15 0.02–0.93 0.042* 0.04 0.01–0.33 0.003* 4.15 0.37–45.46 0.244
Follicular opening and dots
 Black dots 1.06 0.08–13.48 0.963 0.28 0.01–4.97 0.385 3.80 0.31–45.79 0.294
 White dots 0.82 0.27–2.47 0.730 2.28 0.91–5.64 0.076 0.36 0.13–0.99 0.049
Perifollicular and interfollicular scalp surface
 Brown peripilar sign 5.10 0.31–82.88 0.252 0.41 0.01–9.36 0.577 12.40 0.19–129.10 0.035
 Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation 20.61 1.71–249.16 0.017 0.78 0.03–16.08 0.872 26.41 2.68–259.86 0.005
 Brown honeycomb pigmentation 0.59 0.15–2.24 0.442 0.96 0.30–2.96 0.938 0.62 0.17–2.15 0.452
 Brown scattered pigmentation 0.10 0.01–1.71 0.112 0.05 0.01–0.66 0.023 2.01 0.10–40.73 0.648
 Blue-gray speckled pigmentation 0.79 0.23–2.66 0.705 0.22 0.06–0.71 0.012 3.59 1.16–11.11 0.026
 Salt and pepper appearance 0.34 0.01–13.18 0.561 0.50 0.02–10.11 0.650 0.68 0.05–8.53 0.764
 White patches 1.04 0.05–20.94 0.979 25.73 3.02–218.98 0.003 0.04 0.01–0.35 0.004
 Perifollicular scales 3.50 1.09–11.22 0.032 0.74 0.28–1.95 0.548 4.70 1.67–13.24 0.003
 Interfollicular scales 2.23 0.69–7.13 0.176 0.51 0.17–1.46 0.213 4.35 1.46–12.94 0.008
Vascular findings
 Dotted vessels 1.28 0.31–5.17 0.731 0.08 0.01–0.74 0.027 15.50 1.72–139.73 0.015
 Thin arborizing vessels 0.54 0.02–12.12 0.701 0.16 0.01–1.74 0.131 3.49 0.35–33.97 0.282
 Prominent arborizing vessels 0.33 0.10–1.05 0.063 0.57 0.23–1.38 0.215 0.58 0.20–1.66 0.311
 Thick arborizing vessels 1.26 0.42–3.78 0.678 1.13 0.42–2.99 0.805 1.42 0.29–6.84 0.662
 Microaneurysmal blood vessels 22.22 1.73–285.13 0.017 1.45 0.07–26.41 0.803 15.34 1.36–177.59 0.029
 Polymorphic vessels forming a
 telangiectatic network 3.32 0.15–69.23 0.439 12.83 1.35–121.98 0.026 0.26 0.02–2.28 0.224
 Avascular areas 1.22 0.06–23.88 0.898 43.24 5.17–361.67 0.001 0.03 0.01–0.24 0.001

CI, confidence interval; DM, dermatomyositis; OR, odds ratio; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis. Statistically significant at p < 0.05.

a

Reference category of pairwise comparison.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, age of disease onset, and duration of disease.

Scalp surface features revealed higher odds of perifollicular red-brown pigmentation for DM over SLE and SSc (OR = 20.61, 95% CI = 1.71–249.16, p = 0.017, and OR = 26.41, 95% CI = 2.68–259.86, p = 0.005, respectively). Brown scattered pigmentation favored SLE over SSc (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.66, p = 0.023). Blue-gray speckled pigmentation supported both DM and SLE over SSc (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.16–11.11, p = 0.026, and OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06–0.71, p = 0.012, respectively). White patch demonstrated a stronger association for SSc compared to other CTDs (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01–0.35, p = 0.004, and OR = 25.73, 95% CI = 3.02–218.98, p = 0.003, respectively). The presence of scales favored DM over both SLE and SSc. While perifollicular scales were more predominant in DM than both SLE and SSc (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.09–11.22, p = 0.032, and OR = 4.70, 95% CI = 1.67–13.24, p = 0.003, respectively), interfollicular scales possessed higher odds for DM than SSc only (OR = 4.35, 95% CI = 1.46–12.94, p = 0.008).

Regarding microvascular abnormalities, DM demonstrated higher odds for microaneurysmal blood vessels than SLE and SSc (OR = 22.22, 95% CI = 1.73–285.13, p = 0.017, and OR = 15.34, 95% CI = 1.36–177.59, p = 0.029, respectively). Dotted vessels favored both DM and SLE over SSc (OR = 15.50, 95% CI = 1.72–139.73, p = 0.015, and OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01–0.74, p = 0.027, respectively). PVTN suggested SSc over SLE (OR = 12.83, 95% CI = 1.35–121.98, p = 0.026), while the presence of avascular areas was more predominant in SSc than DM and SLE (OR = 43.24, 95% CI = 5.17–361.67, p = 0.001, and OR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.01–0.24, p = 0.001, respectively).

Association between Trichoscopic Features and Disease Activity

In quantile regression analysis, perifollicular red-brown pigmentation was linked to higher physician global activity (coefficient = 40, 95% CI = 10.40–69.60, p = 0.01) and CAT-BM activity (coefficient = 3, 95% CI = 0.04–5.96, p = 0.047) scores in DM patients; however, no significant association was demonstrated in the MMT score. For SLE, decreased hair diameter was linked to a higher SLEDAI-2K score (coefficient = 5, 95% CI = 2.21–7.79, p = 0.001), while the absence of thin arborizing vessels was related to a higher mRSS score (coefficient = −11, 95% CI = −19.71 to 2.29, p = 0.014) in SSc (Table 3).

Table 3.

Quantile regression analysis of trichoscopic findings in patients with dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis

Disease Disease activity score Correlations with disease activity
p value
coefficient 95% CI
DM Physician global activity score Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation 40 10.40–69.60 0.010

CAT-BM activity score
Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation
3 0.04–5.96 0.047

SLE SLEDAI-2K score Decrease in hair diameter 5 2.21–7.79 0.001

SSc mRSS score
Thin arborizing vessels
−11 −19.71 to −2.29 0.014

CAT-BM, Cutaneous Assessment Tool − Binary Method; CI, confidence interval; DM, dermatomyositis; IQR, inter-quartile range; mRSS, modified Rodnan Skin Score; OR, odds ratio; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis. Statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Discussion

The present study provides new insights into trichoscopic values of patients with DM, SLE, and SSc. To our knowledge, we are the first to compare trichoscopic features among these conditions. We have identified distinctive findings on the hair shaft and scalp surface that can adequately differentiate among them. A combination of findings may contribute to their distinction. Moreover, trichoscopic features may provide prognostic implementations. Table 4 displays trichoscopic signs that can be useful to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of DM, SLE, and SSc.

Table 4.

Comparison of trichoscopic clues for the diagnosis of dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis

Trichoscopic findings DM SLE SSc
Hair shaft findings Decreased hair density and diameter Prominent hair shaft hypopigmentationa Decreased hair density and diameter Decreased hair density and diameter

Scalp surface findings Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation3 Blue-gray speckled pigmentation Prominent perifollicular scales Prominent interfollicular scales Brown scattered pigmentationa Blue-gray speckled pigmentation White patchesa

Vascular findings Microaneurysmal blood vesselsa
Thick arborizing vessels
Perifollicular location of aberrant vessels
Prominent arborizing blood vessels
Thick arborizing vessels
Interfollicular location of aberrant vessels
Polymorphic vessels forming a telangiectatic networka Avascular areaa Thick arborizing vessels

Features related to higher disease activity Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation Decreased hair diameter Absence of thin arborizing vessels

DM, dermatomyositis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

a

The most specific sign in differentiating from the others.

In DM, although hair shaft changes were subtle, many characteristic scalp surface features were predominant. Perifollicular red-brown macules were distinctive and exclusive for DM (Fig. 1a, b). Blue-gray speckled pigmentation was demonstrated in almost half of the patients. Scales were presented in nearly three fourths of the cases and the perifollicular location favored DM over other CTDs. Our findings were roughly in line with the literature [7]. Under the microscope, blue-gray speckled pigmentation signifies melanophages in the papillary dermis caused by the typical interface dermatitis. Vascular ectasia, endothelial damage, and perifollicular inflammation admixed with features of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation may represent the characteristic perifollicular red-brown pigmentation [6, 34]. Scalp DM shows changes in the stratum corneum (e.g., focal parakeratosis) accounting for the scales presented on trichoscopy [6]. Essentially, we have demonstrated that scalp DM possesses abnormalities outside the follicles and preferentially on the perifollicular areas. Our findings correspond to a recent histological study revealing that the follicular architecture is virtually preserved in DM. The minimal follicular insult may also explain minor hair shaft changes observed on trichoscopy in DM patients.

In SLE, Suchonwanit et al. [19] have documented that trichoscopy can provide diagnostic implementation, as their distinctive findings were absent or minimally presented in the normal scalp. The present study confirms the value of trichoscopy beyond that of SLE diagnosis and that characteristic features could be accounted for to differentiate SLE from its mimickers. Typical trichoscopic findings for SLE were hair shaft changes (decreased hair density/diameter, and hair shaft hypopigmentation) (Fig. 2a) and scalp changes (brown scattered and blue-gray speckled pigmentation) (Fig. 2b). Unlike DM, pathology involving follicular architecture (decrement of follicular counts and terminal-to-vellus hair ratio) is remarkable in SLE [35]. Hair shaft alterations could indicate damaged hair matrix cells resulting in defective hair shaft formation and melanogenesis [8, 19, 36]. SLE commonly involves nonfollicular structures as well. Histologically, nonscarring alopecia in SLE demonstrates epidermal atrophy and interface dermatitis along the dermoepidermal junction/follicular epithelium which correspond to brown scattered and blue-gray speckled pigmentation on trichoscopy, respectively [10, 35].

SSc involves complex interrelations between the immunological, vascular, and fibrotic elements, resulting in chronic and progressive tissue fibrosis [37]. SSc has long been considered to have no specific scalp and/or trichoscopic changes [38]. However, our study has demonstrated several trichoscopic abnormalities that corresponded well to SSc pathophysiology and were highly suggestive of SSc. Thick homogenized sclerotic collagen bundles in the dermis may compromise the follicular architecture leading to hair size reduction and diffuse hair loss (Fig. 3a) [38]. White patches located between normally arranged follicular units are a visible sign of fibrosis and microcirculation insufficiency in SSc (Fig. 3b) [20]. Unlike DM and SLE, SSc does not possess melanophages as a consequence of interface changes; therefore, the absence of blue-gray speckled pigmentation was anticipated.

The scalp is a well-vascularized structure, and microvascular injury plays a role in the pathophysiology of CTDs. Therefore, vascular abnormalities were universally observed on trichoscopy in over 90% of all three conditions. Disease-specific microvascular pathology may lead to pattern-specific findings and enables trichoscopic distinction among CTDs. In DM, microvascular pathology is mediated by the humeral process, leading to vascular depletion, hypoxia, and myofiber necrosis. Subsequently, local angiogenesis occurs as a compensation process [34, 39, 40]. Angiogenic factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenin) may involve in the pathogenesis of DM and correspond to thick arborizing and microaneurysmal blood vessels presented on trichoscopy (Fig. 1c, d) [34, 39, 40, 41]. Moreover, the perifollicular location of these aberrant vessels favors DM over both SLE and SSc. In SLE, arborizing blood vessels of the scalp were mostly located interfollicularly and were prominent in size (Fig. 2c, d). Angiogenesis in SLE is induced by raised circulating angiogenic cytokines as well [42]. Despite the shared angiogenetic process, different levels of microvascular injury may lead to phenotypic variation between DM and SLE. Crowson and Magro [34] demonstrated that, compared to SLE, DM lesions showed greater endothelial injury, vascular ectasia, and vascular fibrin deposit. Likewise, we have observed that trichoscopic microvascular features were more aberrant in patients with DM than SLE.

Endothelial injury is the initial vascular insult in SSc, remarkably demonstrating endothelial cell apoptosis, vasoconstriction, and vasculopathy [43]. Tissue hypoxia and fibrosis may parallel the predominant avascular areas and the absence/decrement of normal trichoscopic vascular structures. Angiogenesis also appears in SSc as compensation to chronic hypoxia, but the process may be defective and dysregulated and could evolve towards various forms of neovascularization. The characteristic trichoscopic finding, the PVTN (Fig. 3c, d), has also been described by Jasso-Olivares et al. [7] and may be a consequence of defective angiogenesis in SSc. Nevertheless, future studies on pathomechanism, biomarkers, and their effects on different morphology and pattern of vascular abnormalities in CTDs are warranted.

We are the first to identify the association between trichoscopic features and validated tools in measuring disease activity in DM and SSc. Our data affirm that decreased hair diameter paralleled a higher SLEDAI-2K score and may be related to an inflammatory process damaging the hair matrix cells in patients with SLE [19]. The presence of perifollicular red-brown macules indicated higher physician global activity and CAT-BM scores in DM, reflecting both microvascular changes and scalp inflammation. Increased levels of type 1 interferon, a group of cytokines accountable for inflammatory responses and vascular changes, were associated with higher disease activity in both DM and SLE [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49]. We have also demonstrated that the absence of thin arborizing blood vessels was linked to a higher mRSS score in SSc. As a well-vascularized structure, thin arborizing vessels are a common trichoscopic finding in the normal scalp [19]; once progressive rarefaction of microvessels occurs in SSc, extensive tissue fibrosis becomes apparent. Loss of vascular structures can be further linked to progressive skin thickening measured via the mRSS score [15]. Nevertheless, further large prospective studies are required to verify these findings.

The limitation of our study includes its cross-sectional, single-center nature, which allowed no follow-up period and restricted the study population to Southeast Asians. Additionally, our sample size was relatively small.

Conclusion

Careful attention to specific trichoscopic features enables distinction between DM, SLE, and SSc. Decreased hair diameter was suggestive for SLE and SSc, while hair shaft hypopigmentation indicated SLE. Perifollicular red-brown macules, brown scattered pigmentation, and white patches were exclusive for DM, SLE, and SSc, respectively. Blue-gray speckled pigmentation supported DM and SLE, while scales favored DM. Microaneurysmal vessels and avascular areas were restricted to DM and SSc, respectively. Certain trichoscopic changes hold prognostic values for CTDs. Perifollicular red-brown pigmentation, reduction in hair diameter, and the absence of thin arborizing vessels were linked to higher disease activity in DM, SLE, and SSc, respectively.

Key Message

Trichoscopic examination provides diagnostic and prognostic values for dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis.

Statement of Ethics

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Mahidol University Institutional Review Board for Ethics in Human Research (MURA2018/589). The study was conducted following the Helsinki Declaration, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient before enrollment to participate in the study and to publish their clinical data and images.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

The authors received no financial support for this research.

Author Contributions

K. Chanprapaph and P. Suchonwanit designed and conceptualized the study. K. Chanprapaph, P. Limtong, and P. Suchonwanit performed the data collection. K. Chanprapaph, P. Limtong, P. Ngamjanyaporn, and P. Suchonwanit contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the results. K. Chanprapaph, P. Limtong, and P. Suchonwanit contributed to manuscript writing.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr. Adam M. Huber for allowing us to use the Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Methods (CAT-BM) for evaluating dermatomyositis disease activity in this project.

References

  • 1.Cassano N, Amerio P, D'Ovidio R, Vena GA. Hair disorders associated with autoimmune connective tissue diseases. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Oct;149((5)):555–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferraz LB, Almeida FA, Vasconcellos MR, Faccina AS, Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB. The impact of lupus erythematosus cutaneous on the quality of life: the Brazilian-Portuguese version of DLQI. Qual Life Res. 2006 Apr;15((3)):565–70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-2638-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kasteler JS, Callen JP. Scalp involvement in dermatomyositis. Often overlooked or misdiagnosed. JAMA. 1994 Dec;272((24)):1939–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tilstra JS, Prevost N, Khera P, English JC., 3rd Scalp dermatomyositis revisited. Arch Dermatol. 2009 Sep;145((9)):1062–3. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moghadam-Kia S, Franks AG., Jr. Autoimmune disease and hair loss. Dermatol Clin. 2013 Jan;31((1)):75–91. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jasso-Olivares J, Diaz-Gonzalez JM, Miteva M. Horizontal and vertical sections of scalp biopsy specimens from dermatomyositis patients with scalp involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jun;78((6)):1178–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jasso-Olivares JC, Tosti A, Miteva M, Domínguez-Cherit J, Díaz-González JM. Clinical and dermoscopic features of the scalp in 31 patients with dermatomyositis. Skin Appendage Disord. 2017 Aug;3((3)):119–24. doi: 10.1159/000464469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Udompanich S, Chanprapaph K, Suchonwanit P. Hair and scalp changes in cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Oct;19((5)):679–94. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0363-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yun SJ, Lee JW, Yoon HJ, Lee SS, Kim SY, Lee JB, et al. Cross-sectional study of hair loss patterns in 122 Korean systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a frequent finding of non-scarring patch alopecia. J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;34((7)):451–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gong Y, Ye Y, Zhao Y, Caulloo S, Chen X, Zhang B, et al. Severe diffuse non-scarring hair loss in systemic lupus erythematosus − clinical and histopathological analysis of four cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 May;27((5)):651–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chanprapaph K, Ploydaeng M, Pakornphadungsit K, Mekwilaiphan T, Vachiramon V, Kanokrungsee S. The behavior, attitude, and knowledge towards photoprotection in patients with cutaneous/systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study with 526 patients and healthy controls. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;19((9)):1201–10. doi: 10.1039/d0pp00073f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Da Silva DM, Patel B, Werth VP. Dermatomyositis: a diagnostic dilemma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Aug;79((2)):371–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chanprapaph K, Tankunakorn J, Suchonwanit P, Rutnin S. Dermatologic manifestations, histologic features and disease progression among cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes: a prospective observational study in Asians. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2021 Feb;11((1)):131–47. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00471-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chanprapaph K, Tubtieng I, Pratumchat N, Thadanipon K, Rattanakaemakorn P, Suchonwanit P. Cutaneous, systemic features and laboratory characteristics of late- versus adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in 1,006 Thai patients. Lupus. 2021 Apr;30((5)):785–94. doi: 10.1177/0961203321991920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferreli C, Gasparini G, Parodi A, Cozzani E, Rongioletti F, Atzori L. Cutaneous manifestations of scleroderma and scleroderma-like disorders: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2017 Dec;53((3)):306–36. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8625-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: a practical overview. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2016 Dec;6((4)):471–507. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0141-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miteva M, Tosti A. Hair and scalp dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Nov;67((5)):1040–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chanprapaph K, Mahasaksiri T, Kositkuljorn C, Leerunyakul K, Suchonwanit P. Prevalence and risk factors associated with the occurrence of autoimmune diseases in patients with alopecia areata. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:4881–91. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S331579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suchonwanit P, Udompanich S, Thadanipon K, Chanprapaph K. Trichoscopic signs in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study with 109 patients and 305 healthy controls. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Apr;33((4)):774–80. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kwiatkowska M, Rakowska A, Walecka I, Rudnicka L. The diagnostic value of trichoscopy in systemic sclerosis. J Dermatol Case Rep. 2016 Nov;10((2)):21–5. doi: 10.3315/jdcr.2016.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1975 Feb;292((7)):344–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502132920706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sontheimer RD. Dermatomyositis: an overview of recent progress with emphasis on dermatologic aspects. Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jul;20((3)):387–408. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(02)00021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, Visser M, et al. 2017 European League against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76((12)):1955–64. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64((8)):2677–86. doi: 10.1002/art.34473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. 2019 European League against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Sep;71((9)):1400–12. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72((11)):1747–55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huber AM, Lachenbruch PA, Dugan EM, Miller FW, Rider LG. Alternative scoring of the Cutaneous Assessment Tool in juvenile dermatomyositis: results using abbreviated formats. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar;59((3)):352–6. doi: 10.1002/art.23313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rider LG, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Erman B, Bayat N, Lachenbruch PA, et al. 2016 ACR-EULAR adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis and juvenile dermatomyositis response criteria − methodological aspects. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017 Nov;56((11)):1884–93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29((2)):288–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khanna D, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Allanore Y, Baron M, Czirjak L, et al. Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2((1)):11–8. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rakowska A, Rudnicka L. Normal values in trichoscopy. In: Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A, editors. Atlas of trichoscopy: dermoscopy in hair and scalp disease. London: Springer; 2012. pp. 111–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rakowska A, Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Kurzeja M. Blood vessels. In: Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A, editors. Atlas of trichoscopy: dermoscopy in hair and scalp disease. London: Springer; 2012. pp. 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rakowska A, Slowinska M, Kowalska-Oledzka E, Warszawik O, Czuwara J, Olszewska M, et al. Trichoscopy of cicatricial alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Jun;11((6)):753–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Crowson AN, Magro CM. The role of microvascular injury in the pathogenesis of cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis. Hum Pathol. 1996 Jan;27((1)):15–9. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90132-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chanprapaph K, Udompanich S, Visessiri Y, Ngamjanyaporn P, Suchonwanit P. Nonscarring alopecia in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study with trichoscopic, histopathologic, and immunopathologic analyses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec;81((6)):1319–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Seyahi E, Seyahi N, Fresko I, Kuyumcu M, Yazici H. Hair diameter in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2006;15((5)):282–4. doi: 10.1191/0961203306lu2303oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stern EP, Denton CP. The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Aug;41((3)):367–82. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nanda S, De Bedout V, Miteva M. Alopecia as a systemic disease. Clin Dermatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;37((6)):618–28. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dalakas MC. Inflammatory muscle diseases. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372((18)):1734–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1402225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miossi R, de Souza FHC, Shinjo SK. Nailfold capillary changes in adult new-onset dermatomyositis: a prospective cross-sectional study. Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;38((9)):2319–26. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04537-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chanprapaph K, Fakprapai W, Limtong P, Suchonwanit P. Nailfold capillaroscopy with USB digital microscopy in connective tissue diseases: a comparative study of 245 patients and healthy controls. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:683900. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.683900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu J, Wang X, Yang X, Yan Q, Wang S, Han W. Investigating the role of angiogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015 May;24((6)):621–7. doi: 10.1177/0961203314556293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cutolo M, Soldano S, Smith V. Pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis: current understanding and new insights. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019 Jul;15((7)):753–64. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1614915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baechler EC, Bauer JW, Slattery CA, Ortmann WA, Espe KJ, Novitzke J, et al. An interferon signature in the peripheral blood of dermatomyositis patients is associated with disease activity. Mol Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;13((1–2)):59–68. doi: 10.2119/2006-00085.Baechler. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Walsh RJ, Kong SW, Yao Y, Jallal B, Kiener PA, Pinkus JL, et al. Type I interferon-inducible gene expression in blood is present and reflects disease activity in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Nov;56((11)):3784–92. doi: 10.1002/art.22928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huard C, Gullà SV, Bennett DV, Coyle AJ, Vleugels RA, Greenberg SA. Correlation of cutaneous disease activity with type 1 interferon gene signature and interferon β in dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2017 May;176((5)):1224–30. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Greenberg SA. Dermatomyositis and type 1 interferons. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010 Jun;12((3)):198–203. doi: 10.1007/s11926-010-0101-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wenzel J, Zahn S, Bieber T, Tüting T. Type I interferon-associated cytotoxic inflammation in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol Res. 2009 Jan;301((1)):83–6. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0892-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ono N, Kai K, Maruyama A, Sakai M, Sadanaga Y, Koarada S, et al. The relationship between type 1 IFN and vasculopathy in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019 May 1;58((5)):786–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES