Abstract
Fetal Inflammatory Response Syndrome (FIRS) is strongly associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality, and can be classified as type I or type II. Clinically, FIRS type I and type II are considered as distinct syndromes; yet, the molecular underpinnings of these fetal inflammatory responses are not well understood due to their low prevalence and the difficulty of post-delivery diagnosis. Herein, we performed RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of human cord blood samples from preterm neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and FIRS type II. We found that FIRS type I was characterized by upregulation of host immune responses, including neutrophil and monocyte function, together with a pro-inflammatory cytokine storm and a downregulation of T-cell processes. In contrast, FIRS type II comprised a mild chronic inflammatory response involving perturbation of HLA transcripts, suggestive of fetal semi-allograft rejection. Integrating single-cell RNAseq-derived signatures with bulk transcriptomic data confirmed that FIRS type I immune responses were mainly driven by monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Lastly, tissue- and cell-specific signatures derived from the BioGPS Gene Atlas further corroborated the role of myeloid cells originating from the bone marrow in FIRS type I. Collectively, these data provide evidence that FIRS type I and FIRS type II are driven by distinct immune mechanisms: while the former involves the innate limb of immunity consistent with host defense, the latter resembles a state of semi-allograft rejection. These findings shed light on the fetal immune responses caused by infection or alloreactivity that can lead to deleterious consequences in neonatal life.
Keywords: Chorioamnionitis, Cord Blood, Infection, Inflammation, Funisitis, RNA sequencing
INTRODUCTION
Infection of the amniotic cavity, also known as microbial-induced intra-amniotic inflammation, is caused by ascending invasion of bacteria from the lower genital tract into amniotic fluid (1, 2). Intra-amniotic infection is associated with multiple obstetrical complications, such as spontaneous preterm labor (3–8), preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (pPROM) (9, 10), cervical insufficiency or short cervix (11, 12), idiopathic vaginal bleeding (13), and both histological (14) and clinical (15) chorioamnionitis, among others. Moreover, intra-amniotic infection is associated with maternal morbidity (16) as well as neonatal morbidity and mortality (17–19). The latter are thought to be induced by bacteria invading the amniotic cavity that, in turn, can trigger a fetal systemic inflammatory response characterized by activation of the innate immune system (20–22), a condition that has been termed Fetal Inflammatory Response Syndrome (FIRS) given its similarity with the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) observed in adults (23). FIRS resulting from intra-amniotic infection, referred to as FIRS type I, is defined by elevated umbilical cord blood (hereafter referred to as cord blood) concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 together with the presence of fetal acute inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (i.e. funisitis) (23–28). Investigations of the cord blood from neonates with FIRS type I demonstrated increased innate immune activation and oxidative burst compared to those without this syndrome (29), and microarray analysis revealed altered expression of specific inflammatory genes (30). Yet, the immunological processes taking place in FIRS type I are still under investigation.
More recently, a different and rarer type of FIRS was identified in fetuses born to mothers who presented chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta (i.e. chronic chorioamnionitis, plasma cell deciduitis, and chronic villitis) (31), which was characterized by elevated concentrations of the chemokine CXCL10 in the fetal cord blood plasma (31). This distinct fetal inflammatory response, termed FIRS type II, was proposed to occur as a result of maternal anti-fetal rejection rather than intra-amniotic infection (21, 31). Indeed, microarray analysis of cord blood from neonates with FIRS type II demonstrated that multiple acute inflammatory genes were unaltered or decreased compared to those without FIRS (31). Furthermore, the comparison of microarray results from neonates with FIRS type II and FIRS type I suggested that the inflammatory responses occurring in these syndromes are divergent (31). Yet, the immune pathways driving FIRS type II, and how these differ from FIRS type I, are still poorly understood.
Recently, RNA sequencing (RNAseq) has been utilized to shed light on the immunological mechanisms of intra-amniotic infection in the innate immune cells from amniotic fluid (32) as well as the extraplacental chorioamniotic membranes (33). Furthermore, single-cell RNAseq has revealed the maternal and fetal cellular landscape of the placental tissues in preterm and term parturition (34). However, such cutting-edge techniques have not been applied to the research of FIRS. To fill this gap in knowledge, in the current study we performed RNAseq of cord blood samples from preterm neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and FIRS type II. Specifically, we first investigated differential gene expression to reveal immunological processes enriched in FIRS type I and FIRS type II as well as differences between these syndromes. We further utilized established single-cell RNAseq signatures to deconvolve our bulk RNAseq data and determine the contribution of specific immune cell subsets to the immune responses observed in FIRS type I and FIRS type II. Lastly, we utilized the BioGPS Gene Atlas to evaluate the changes in tissue- and cell-specific signatures that occur in FIRS type I. Our findings elucidate the distinct molecular signatures underlying the inflammatory responses of FIRS type I and FIRS type II.
METHODS
Human subjects and clinical specimens
Umbilical cord blood samples were retrospectively obtained from the Biological Bank of the Perinatology Research Branch, an intramural program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Wayne State University (Detroit, MI, USA), and the Detroit Medical Center (Detroit, MI, USA). The collection and use of human materials for research purposes were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. All participating women provided written informed consent prior to sample collection. The study included umbilical cord blood samples from neonates born to women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes. Study groups included samples from preterm neonates: (a) with Fetal Inflammatory Response Syndrome (FIRS) Type I (n = 11) (see Clinical Definitions below); (b) with FIRS Type II (n = 6); and (c) without a fetal inflammatory response (n = 22) as controls (No FIRS). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups are shown in Table I. Women with pPROM, multiple gestations, or those who had a fetus with chromosomal and/or sonographic abnormalities were excluded. Maternal and neonatal data were obtained by retrospective clinical chart review.
Table I.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study groups
| No FIRS (n=22) |
FIRS type I (n=11) |
FIRS type II (n=6) |
p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years; median [IQR])a | 23 (20.5–25) | 23 (22–35) | 21.5 (21–27.3) | 0.5 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2; median [IQR])a | 24.8 (20.2–27.6)c | 24.8 (21.6–29.4)c | 24 (23.4–25.1) | 0.7 |
| Primiparityb | 13.6% (3/22) | 9.1% (1/11) | 16.7% (1/6) | 1.0 |
| Race/ethnicityb | 0.9 | |||
| African-American | 81.8% (18/22) | 81.8% (9/11) | 83.3% (5/6) | |
| White | 9.1% (2/22) | 9.1% (1/11) | 0% (0/6) | |
| Other | 9.1% (2/22) | 9.1% (1/11) | 16.7% (1/6) | |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks; median [IQR])a | 35.6 (33.7–36.2) | 29.3 (27.2–33.4) | 34.8 (33.3–36.6) | <0.001 |
| Cesarean sectionb | 13.6% (3/22) | 36.4% (4/11) | 16.7% (1/6) | 0.3 |
| Birthweight (grams; median [IQR])a | 2532.5 (2210–2759) | 1170 (1075–2153) | 2270 (2026–2679) | <0.001 |
| Apgar score at 1 min (median [IQR])a | 8 (8–8) | 5 (2.5–7.5) | 8 (7.3–8.8) | 0.009 |
| Apgar score at 5 min (median [IQR])a | 9 (9–9) | 7 (5.5–8.5) | 9 (8.3–9) | <0.001 |
| Acute maternal inflammatory responseb | ||||
| Stage 1 (Early acute subchorionitis or chorionitis) | 0% (0/22) | 0% (0/10)c | 16.7% (1/6) | 0.2 |
| Stage 2 (Acute chorioamnionitis) | 0% (0/22) | 50% (5/10)c | 0% (0/6) | <0.001 |
| Stage 3 (Necrotizing chorioamnionitis) | 0% (0/22) | 50% (5/10)c | 0% (0/6) | <0.001 |
| Acute fetal inflammatory responseb | ||||
| Stage 1 (Chorionic vasculitis or umbilical phlebitis) | 0% (0/22) | 0% (0/10)c | 16.7% (1/6) | 0.06 |
| Stage 2 (Umbilical arteritis) | 0% (0/22) | 80% (8/10)c | 0% (0/6) | <0.001 |
| Stage 3 (Necrotizing funisitis) | 0% (0/22) | 20% (2/10)c | 0% (0/6) | 0.09 |
| Chronic maternal inflammatory responseb | ||||
| Chronic deciduitis | 0% (0/22) | 36.4% (4/11) | 100% (6/6) | <0.001 |
| Chronic villitis | 0% (0/22) | 0% (0/11) | 50% (3/6) | 0.002 |
| Chronic chorioamnionitis | 0% (0/22) | 0% (0/11) | 66.7% (4/6) | <0.001 |
Data are given as median (interquartile range, IQR) and percentage (n/N).
Kruskal-Wallis/One-Way ANOVA test with multiple comparison
Fisher’s exact test
One missing datum
Clinical definitions
Preterm labor was defined as the presence of regular uterine contractions occurring at a frequency of at least two every 10 minutes associated with cervical change, followed by delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation. FIRS type I was defined by an umbilical cord blood IL-6 concentration >11 pg/mL, and the presence of acute funisitis (see placental histopathology examination below). FIRS type II was defined by an umbilical cord blood CXCL10 concentration >75th percentile (82.34 pg/mL) (31), the presence of chronic placental inflammation (see placental histopathology examination below), and an umbilical cord blood IL-6 concentration <11 pg/mL.
Placental histopathological examination
Histopathological examination of the placenta was performed by perinatal pathologists blinded to clinical diagnoses and obstetrical outcomes according to standardized Perinatology Research Branch protocols. Acute inflammatory lesions of the placenta (maternal inflammatory response), defined as the invasion of maternal neutrophils, were diagnosed according to established criteria, including staging and grading (28). Severity is reported as stages, where Stage 1 indicates early acute subchorionitis or chorionitis, Stage 2 indicates acute chorioamnionitis, and Stage 3 indicates necrotizing chorioamnionitis (28). Early acute subchorionitis or chorionitis (Stage 1) may not be representative of infection but rather the inflammatory processes associated with labor (35); therefore, only Stages 2 and 3 were considered as acute histologic chorioamnionitis. Chronic placental inflammation was defined upon observation of one or more findings of chronic chorioamnionitis, chronic villitis, and chronic deciduitis diagnosed according to previously established criteria (36).
Fetal inflammatory responses were histologically evaluated by the presence and severity of acute lesions (i.e. neutrophil invasion) into the umbilical cord (funisitis) or chorionic plate (chorionic vasculitis) (26, 28). Severity is reported as stages, where Stage 1 indicates umbilical phlebitis and/or chorionic vasculitis (mild inflammation), Stage 2 indicates umbilical arteritis (severe inflammation), and Stage 3 indicates necrotizing funisitis (total inflammation and necrosis in the umbilical cord) (28). Stages 2 and 3 are considered as acute funisitis.
Determination of umbilical cord blood cytokines and chemokines
The umbilical cord blood plasma was assessed for concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF, and IL-8 using sensitive and specific V-PLEX immunoassays (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CXCL10 was assessed using the Human CXCL10/IP-10 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA sequencing
RNA was isolated from umbilical cord blood collected in PAXgene tubes using the PAXgene Blood miRNA Kit (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentrations were measured on a Trinean DropSense96 spectrophotometer (Trinean, Pleasanton, CA) and the RNA quality assessed using the Agilent 2200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The RNAseq library was prepared using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Paired-end sequence reads of 100 base pair length were generated using the HiSeq2500 sequencer (Illumina). RNAseq was performed at the Applied Genomics Technological Center (AGTC) of Wayne State University (https://genomesciencescore.wayne.edu/).
RNAseq data analysis
Paired-end RNASeq FASTQ files were aligned with Salmon (37) in mapping mode using a transcriptome index prepared from Homo sapiens genome assembly GRCh38 (hg38), release 101 published by Ensembl. Transcripts Per Million (TPM) count data were used to test for differential expression based on negative binomial models implemented in the DESeq2 (38) package from Bioconductor (39). Gestational age at delivery was included as a covariate in the models to adjust for potential confounding effects. Genes with a minimum fold change of 1.25-fold and an adjusted p-value of <0.1 were considered as differentially expressed. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from each comparison were used as input in iPathwayGuide (ADVAITA Bioinformatics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (40–42) to determine the significantly impacted pathways. Volcano plots were used to display the evidence of differential expression for each comparison. iPathwayGuide pathway annotations were derived from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, release 96.0+/11–21, November 2020 (43, 44). The top ten most significantly enriched GO biological processes in strictly upregulated or downregulated genes are also shown. Predicted upstream regulators based on differential expression results were inferred using iPathwayGuide based on regulatory network definitions from BioGRID (45, 46) and iPathwayGuide’s proprietary knowledge base. Tissue-specific genes (tissue signatures) were defined as those with median expression >30 times higher in a given tissue than the median expression of all other tissues described in the BioGPS Human U133A/GNF1H Gene Atlas (47, 48) (http://www.biogps.org). Read count data were adjusted to remove the effect of gestational age at delivery based on the effects of gestational age in the control (No FIRS) group, and then counts were used to compute Z-scores averaged across tissue signatures to compare the groups. Boxplots of the average Z-scores in each group were drawn for comparisons that resulted in significant differences. Similar analyses were performed using single-cell signatures derived from Tsang et al. 2017 (49).
Principal component analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) (50) of bulk RNAseq gene expression data was performed using a subset of cell type-specific genes derived from single-cell RNAseq studies. Briefly, we extracted the genes from prior reports (34, 51–53) to create a binary matrix G indicating which gene (column) is present in each cell type (row) for each of the following immune cell types: B-cell, Eosinophil, Erythroid, Macrophage-1, Macrophage-2, Monocyte, Neutrophil, NK-cell, Progenitor, and T-Cell. The cell type binary matrix G and the bulk RNAseq data matrix B were multiplied together to create a cell signature matrix C=GB, where each row represents cell type metagenes and each column a study sample from which bulk RNAseq data was obtained. Next, PCA was performed on this matrix C using the “prcomp()” function from the “stats” R package to extract the top two principal components (PC) and to identify the cell signatures with the strongest contribution to PC1 and PC2 (PCA loading analysis). A t-test was performed to compare each study group based on PC1 and PC2, and p-values were adjusted using Bonferroni’s method (54). The R package “factoextra” (55) was used to visualize the study sample distribution within PC1/PC2 as well as the correlations between cell type signatures and PC1/PC2. This procedure was performed twice using two different B matrices: i) using the bulk gene expression matrix without any adjustment, and ii) after adjusting the gene expression matrix by the gestational age at delivery.
Statistical analysis of the patient demographics
GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was utilized to conduct statistical analyses of patient demographic characteristics and cytokine data. The Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc multiple comparisons were used to compare continuous variables based on the normality of the distribution of the groups. The Fisher’s exact test was used for nominal variables. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare cytokine concentrations and tissue signature Z-scores between groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Clinical and Demographics Characteristics of the Study Groups
A total of 39 umbilical cord blood samples were collected from neonates born to women with spontaneous preterm labor and intact membranes who delivered preterm. Among these neonates, 11 were diagnosed with FIRS type I (see clinical definitions, Methods section), six were diagnosed with FIRS type II (see clinical definitions, Methods section), and the remaining 22 neonates without FIRS or acute placental inflammation served as controls (No FIRS) (Table I). Neonates with FIRS type I were delivered at an earlier gestational age than those with FIRS type II or without FIRS; therefore, count data were adjusted for this covariate. The birthweight and Apgar score at one and five minutes were consistently lower in FIRS type I compared to the other study groups (Table I). As the FIRS type I diagnosis included the presence of acute fetal and maternal inflammatory responses, such parameters were significantly higher in neonates with FIRS type I than the other study groups. Moreover, as the FIRS type II diagnosis included the presence of chronic maternal inflammatory response, such lesions were significantly more prevalent in neonates with FIRS type II than the other study groups. No differences in maternal age, body mass index, primiparity, race, or mode of delivery were found among the study groups (Table I).
FIRS type I involves the upregulation of host immune responses
To determine the inflammatory and transcriptomic differences between neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and those without FIRS, we evaluated the cord blood plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators and performed RNAseq of cord blood samples (Fig. 1A). In addition to the expected increase in IL-6 concentrations, higher levels of IL-8, CXCL10, IL-1β, and TNF were detected in neonates with FIRS type I compared to those without FIRS (Fig. 1B), which is consistent with the severe acute inflammatory nature of this syndrome. In line with these high levels of inflammatory mediators, RNAseq analysis revealed 1,385 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the cord blood of neonates with FIRS type I compared to those without FIRS, with 955 being upregulated (red dots) and 430 downregulated (blue dots) as shown in the volcano plot (Fig. 1C). Notably, gene expression changes in FIRS type I were highly correlated with those previously reported using microarrays (30); yet, the larger sample size and increased sensitivity of RNAseq allowed us to identify twice as many DEGs as previously reported (Supplemental Fig. 1A&B). The DEGs were then analyzed to determine impacted Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database pathways. Among the 149 pathways with significant enrichment, “T cell receptor signaling pathway”, “Th17 differentiation”, and “Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation” were among the top 10 (Fig. 1D), suggesting that T-cell responses are affected in neonates with FIRS type I. Next, such DEGs were utilized to perform upstream regulator analysis to predict the activation or inhibition of specific upstream molecules. Upstream regulators predicted as activated included cytoskeletal and chromosomal genes, whereas upstream regulators predicted as inhibited were mainly related to cell proliferation (Fig. 1E). The gene ontology (GO) biological processes that were enriched among genes upregulated in neonates with FIRS type I included host response terms such as “neutrophil degranulation”, “defense response to other organism”, “phagocytosis”, “Fc-gamma receptor signaling pathway”, “Fc receptor mediated stimulatory signaling pathway”, and “regulation of interleukin-8 production” (Fig. 1F). In contrast, downregulated genes were enriched for terms related to adaptive immunity such as “adaptive immune response”, “T cell receptor signaling pathway”, “T cell differentiation”, “T cell costimulation”, and “positive regulation of lymphocyte proliferation” (Fig. 1G). These results demonstrate that the transcriptome of FIRS type I is characterized by the upregulation of host innate immune processes, indicative of acute inflammation, together with suppressed T-cell responses.
Fig. 1. FIRS type I involves the upregulation of host immune responses.

(A) Experimental design showing the transcriptomic comparison between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I (n = 11) and those without FIRS (n = 22). (B) Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, CXCL10, IL-1β, and TNF in the cord blood of neonates with FIRS type I (red dots) or No FIRS (blue dots). Data are presented as box plots where midlines indicate medians, boxes indicate interquartile range, and whiskers indicate minimum/maximum range. P-values were obtained using Mann-Whitney U-tests. **** p < 0.0001 (C) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and No FIRS. Red dots indicate upregulation and blue dots indicate downregulation. (D) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway impact analysis evidence showing significantly enriched pathways based on DEGs from the cord blood of neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and No FIRS. (E) Predicted activated and inhibited upstream regulators of DEGs in cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and No FIRS. (F, G) Gene ontology (GO) analysis using genes significantly upregulated (F) or downregulated (G) in cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I compared to that of No FIRS. The top ten most significantly enriched biological processes are shown. NS = not significant.
FIRS type II is suggestive of fetal semi-allograft rejection
Fetal inflammatory response type II has been proposed to occur in the context of a distinct maternal-fetal reaction that resembles maternal anti-fetal graft-versus-host disease (36, 56). Therefore, we next evaluated the cord blood inflammatory response and transcriptome in neonates with FIRS type II (Fig. 2A). The acute inflammation that characterizes FIRS type I is absent in neonates with FIRS type II, as indicated by the similar levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, and TNF compared to those without FIRS (Fig. 2B). Consistently, only 40 DEGs were identified in neonates with FIRS type II compared to those without FIRS, with three being upregulated and 37 being downregulated (Fig. 2C). Notably, several HLA genes were identified among these DEGs, namely HLA-F, HLA-C, and HLA-DRA, with the first being upregulated and the latter two downregulated (Fig. 2C). Based on these three transcripts, multiple KEGG pathways were identified as enriched, including “graft-versus-host disease”, “allograft rejection”, and “antigen processing and presentation” as well as several viral response-related pathways (Fig. 2D). Therefore, the transcriptome of FIRS type II is characterized by a mild state of systemic inflammation that is suggestive of fetal semi-allograft rejection.
Fig. 2. FIRS type II is suggestive of fetal semi-allograft rejection.

(A) Experimental design showing the transcriptomic comparison between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type II (n = 6) and those without FIRS (n = 22). (B) Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, CXCL10, IL-1β, and TNF in the cord blood of neonates with FIRS type II (orange dots) or No FIRS (blue dots). Data are presented as box plots where midlines indicate medians, boxes indicate interquartile range, and whiskers indicate minimum/maximum range. P-values were obtained using Mann-Whitney U-tests. **** p < 0.0001 (C) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type II and No FIRS. Red dots indicate upregulation and blue dots indicate downregulation. (D) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway impact analysis evidence plot showing gene over-representation evidence (pORA) and total pathway accumulation evidence (pAcc) based on differential expression between cord blood from neonates with FIRS type II and No FIRS. Significantly impacted pathways are shown as red dots.
FIRS type I and FIRS type II involve distinct immunological processes
Neonates with FIRS type I displayed a distinct inflammatory profile and transcriptome in the cord blood compared to No FIRS neonates, whereas neonates with FIRS type II demonstrated subtle yet specific changes. Thus, we next directly compared FIRS type I and FIRS type II to further unravel the differences between these two syndromes (Fig. 3A). The plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, and TNF were increased in neonates with FIRS type I compared to those with FIRS type II, highlighting the acute inflammatory nature of the former (Supplemental Fig. 2). Interestingly, only 130 DEGs were identified, likely due to the lower sample size for this comparison as well as potentially shared immune processes between FIRS type I and FIRS type II (Fig. 3B). Among these DEGs, pathways such as “allograft rejection”, “graft-versus-host disease”, “antigen processing and presentation”, “Th17 cell differentiation”, and “Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation” were enriched (Fig. 3C), emphasizing that a key difference between FIRS type I and FIRS type II is the regulation of T-cell responses. Upstream regulators predicted as activated in FIRS type I included multiple G-protein-related molecules (e.g. GNAI3, GNAO1, GNAZ, RGS1, and GNAI2), potentially indicating increased transmembrane signaling, whereas predicted inhibited regulators included several molecules involved in T-cell function such as CCL5, TNFSF4, PTPR, and CIITA (Fig. 3D). Lastly, we performed GO analysis of only upregulated or downregulated DEGs to allow a closer look into the specific processes associated with FIRS type I or FIRS type II. Among the upregulated DEGs (i.e. increased in FIRS type I), notable enriched processes included “negative regulation of chronic inflammatory response” and “monocyte activation”, although these did not reach significance (Fig. 3E). Notably, downregulated DEGs (i.e. increased in FIRS type II) showed enrichment of “adaptive immune response”, “negative regulation of natural killer cell cytokine production”, and “regulation of interleukin-4 production” (Fig. 3F). Other biological processes such as “peptide antigen assembly with MHC class II protein complex”, “negative regulation of interferon-gamma production”, “interferon-gamma-mediated signaling pathway”, and “negative regulation of B cell activation” were also enriched among downregulated DEGs, although not significantly (Fig. 3F). These observations demonstrate key differences between the immune responses involved in FIRS type I and FIRS type II that could point to the proposed divergent etiologies of these two syndromes.
Fig. 3. FIRS type I and FIRS type II involve distinct immunological processes.

(A) Experimental design showing the transcriptomic comparison between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I (n = 11) and those with FIRS type II (n = 6). (B) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and those with FIRS type II. Red dots indicate upregulation and blue dots indicate downregulation. (C) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway impact analysis evidence showing significantly enriched pathways based on DEGs from the cord blood of neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and those with FIRS type II. (D) Predicted activated and inhibited upstream regulators of DEGs in cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I and those with FIRS type II. (E, F) Gene ontology (GO) analysis using genes significantly upregulated (E) or downregulated (F) in cord blood from neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I compared to those with FIRS type II. The top ten most significantly enriched biological processes are shown. NS = not significant.
Single-cell RNAseq-derived signatures reveal the contribution of specific immune cell types in FIRS type I
Given the observed differences in the transcriptomes of FIRS type I and FIRS type II, we next performed principal component analysis (PCA) of single-cell gene expression signatures to further reveal the relationship among the three groups in a multi-dimensional gene expression space. Such analysis showed that the FIRS type I transcriptome was distinct from that of FIRS type II or No FIRS according to the second principal component (PC2) (Fig. 4A). Consistently, the PCA plot demonstrated that the transcriptome of FIRS type I clustered separately from that of FIRS type II or No FIRS, an effect that was driven by PC2 (Fig. 4B). However, the transcriptome of FIRS type II was indistinguishable from that of No FIRS (Fig. 4A&B). PCA loading analysis showed that the FIRS type I immune responses that aligned with PC2 were mainly driven by myeloid cells such as monocytes, macrophages (macrophage-1 and macrophage-2), and to a lesser extent by neutrophils, together with a decrease in T cells and NK cells (Fig. 4C). Hence, the immune responses in FIRS type I are associated with the innate limb of immunity, whereas FIRS type II may be more closely related to adaptive immunity.
Fig. 4. Single-cell RNAseq-derived signatures in FIRS type I and FIRS type II.

(A) Experimental design showing the principal component analysis of single-cell RNAseq-derived signatures performed using the cord blood transcriptomes of neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I (n = 11), those with FIRS type II (n = 6), and those without FIRS (n = 22). The table shows the results of the pairwise comparisons of principal component (PC) 1 and PC2 between study groups. Comparisons were performed using t-tests, and p-values were adjusted using Bonferroni’s method. (B) PCA plot showing the distribution of cord blood transcriptomes from those with FIRS type I, FIRS type II, and No FIRS according to PC1 and PC2. (C) PCA loading vector plot showing the individual contribution (contrib) and correlation of immune cell signatures with PC1 (Dim1) and PC2 (Dim2). Vector length and color indicate contribution, whereas vector direction indicates correlation with PC1 and PC2.
We sought to determine the effect of gestational age on the immune responses implicated in FIRS type I and FIRS type II. Therefore, the PCA and loading analysis were repeated using RNAseq data without adjustment for gestational age. The monocyte cell signature remained the primary driver of the FIRS type I immune response (Supplemental Fig. 3A&B). Yet, both FIRS type II and No FIRS were associated with erythroid cell signature loading aligned with PC1, indicating that the function of these immune cells is affected by gestational age (Supplemental Fig. 3A&B).
FIRS type I comprises cell- and tissue-specific RNAseq signatures
Lastly, we utilized cell- and tissue-specific signatures derived from the BioGPS Gene Atlas and overlaid these with our bulk RNAseq data to further explore the cord blood transcriptome in FIRS type I (Fig. 5A). In line with our previous findings, a monocyte cell signature was identified as being upregulated in neonates with FIRS type I compared to No FIRS (Fig. 5B), as were signatures for CD14+ monocytes and CD33+ myeloid cells (Supplemental Fig. 4A&B). Notably, a dendritic cell signature was found to be downregulated in FIRS type I compared to No FIRS neonates (Fig. 5C), which may be linked to the lack of antigen presentation T-cell responses observed in this syndrome. In addition, tissue-specific signatures corresponding to bone marrow and whole blood were also upregulated in neonates with FIRS type I (Supplemental Fig. 4C&D). The increased bone marrow signature may reflect accelerated hematopoietic processes in this compartment leading to elevated myeloid cells, particularly monocytes, in the cord blood, while the whole blood signature may be indicative of the general upregulation of systemic immune and cellular metabolic processes occurring in FIRS type I.
Fig. 5. FIRS type I comprises cell- and tissue-specific RNAseq signatures.

(A) Experimental design showing tissue-specific RNAseq signatures derived from the BioGPS Gene Atlas (http://www.biogps.org) in neonates diagnosed with FIRS type I (n = 11) and those without FIRS (n = 22). (B) Box plot showing the Z-scores of the monocyte cell signature in neonates with FIRS type I and No FIRS. (C) Box plot showing the Z-scores of the dendritic cell signature in neonates with FIRS type I and No FIRS. Data are presented as box plots where midlines indicate medians, boxes indicate interquartile range, and whiskers indicate minimum/maximum range. P-values were obtained using Mann-Whitney U-tests.
DISCUSSION
Intra-amniotic infection is strongly associated with obstetrical complications including spontaneous preterm labor and birth (3–5, 7), clinical chorioamnionitis (15), sepsis (57), and hemorrhage (57), of which the latter two can lead to maternal death (58, 59). In severe cases, intra-amniotic infection can result in an exaggerated inflammatory response in the fetus - FIRS type I (23). Herein, we first found that neonates with FIRS type I display upregulation of host innate immune responses that are largely associated with neutrophils and monocytes.
Neutrophils act as the first line of defense against invading pathogens by performing phagocytosis, degranulation, release of anti-microbial molecules, cytokine production, and forming neutrophil extracellular traps or NETs as a last resort (60). Prior studies have shown that fetal neutrophils present in the amniotic cavity carry out phagocytosis of bacteria commonly associated with intra-amniotic infection (e.g. Ureaplasma spp., G. vaginalis, group B streptococcus, and E. coli) (61), degranulate (62–64), release pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF, IL-1β, and MIP-1β) (65, 66), and form NETs (66–68). In the cord blood, neutrophils can also perform phagocytosis (69) and release NETs (67), albeit at a reduced capacity. This impairment at least partially results from the presence of inhibitory molecules such as neonatal NET-inhibitory factor (nNIF) (70), potentially as a means of controlling aberrant inflammatory responses. Microarray analyses similarly indicated downregulated chemotactic and phagocytic processes in cord blood neutrophils from term neonates (71). Yet, transcriptomic investigation of fetal neutrophils using RNAseq indicated that these innate immune cells do not drastically differ from maternal neutrophils (32), and thus their functional impairment may be a result of the microenvironment (e.g. the fetal circulation) rather than intrinsic deficiencies. Regardless, cord blood neutrophils display higher basal levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (iROS) production in fetuses with FIRS type I compared to those without this syndrome (29).
Monocytes are traditionally considered as a primary source of inflammatory mediators (72), but are also highly plastic and their effector functions depend on the microenvironment (73–75). During bacterial infection, monocytes can also act as professional phagocytes (76, 77) and may participate in antigen presentation (78). In the amniotic cavity, fetal monocytes are primary responders to bacterial infection and display upregulation of cytokine signaling, including the IL-6 and IL-1β pathways (32, 65, 66, 79). Furthermore, fetal monocytes are highly abundant in the umbilical cord and chorionic vessels from cases of intra-amniotic infection (i.e. funisitis and chorionic vasculitis), and may therefore migrate from these tissues into the amniotic cavity (79). In the cord blood, monocytes carry out effector functions such as phagocytosis (80, 81), cytokine release (82–85), and antigen presentation (86) that are comparable to adult peripheral monocytes (81, 84). However, differences in functionality between fetal and adult monocytes have also been documented (81–83, 85–87), further supporting the influence of the microenvironment on their activity. In women with preterm delivery whose placentas displayed funisitis, cord blood monocytes are elevated (88) and exhibit increased iROS production (29). Moreover, we recently proposed that fetal monocytes are also capable of orchestrating cellular trafficking in the amniotic cavity, contributing to the inflammatory milieu taking place during local infection (32).
In the fetus, the primary niche for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is the liver, which is also a major source of monocytes (89, 90). Yet, HSCs and monocytes are also found in the bone marrow by the second trimester of pregnancy (91–94). Therefore, the upregulated bone marrow signature described in the current study may indicate altered or accelerated hematopoiesis in neonates with FIRS type I, leading to elevated myeloid lineage cells and monocytes in the circulation. This phenomenon could be explained by the hyper-inflammatory state taking place in neonates with FIRS type I (21, 23, 30), similar to that observed in adults with SIRS. Such a state of inflammation could activate bone marrow hematopoiesis, given that under high-stress conditions this process can be altered by cytokines or microbial products to accommodate the demand for myeloid cells (i.e. emergency myelopoiesis) (95, 96). Future mechanistic studies may explore the contribution of emergency myelopoiesis to the systemic inflammation taking place in neonates with FIRS type I.
Notably, in the current study neonates with FIRS type I displayed downregulation of T-cell processes. One potential explanation for this phenomenon could be thymic involution, which is frequently observed in neonates with acute illness (97). Importantly, thymic involution has also been described in fetuses exposed to intra-amniotic infection (98–102) and can be utilized as a sonographic marker of FIRS type I (98, 102). Consistently, fetuses of mothers with histological chorioamnionitis and neonates who died of sepsis within 48 hours of life both displayed reduced thymus volume, decreased corticomedullary ratio, significant depletion of thymocytes, and altered architecture between the thymic parenchyma and interstitial tissue (103). Animal studies have also shown that endotoxin-induced intra-amniotic inflammation was associated with a reduced fetal thymus-to-body weight ratio (104) and thymic corticomedullary ratio (105) accompanied by decreased numbers of FoxP3+ cells (104–106), CD8+ cells (107), and MHC-II+ cells (107) in the thymic cortex as well as increased cellular apoptosis (105) and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (105) in the fetal thymus. Furthermore, reduced lymphocyte numbers and increased cortisol concentrations were observed in the cord blood of fetal lambs (104). The latter finding, which reflects the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, suggests that one of the possible mechanisms of thymic involution in FIRS type I is through the activation of this axis by elevated cord blood pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations. Indeed, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF are effective stimulators of the HPA axis (108, 109). Moreover, the postnatal administration of IL-1 in rats was associated with adrenal gland enlargement, higher plasma concentrations of corticosterone, and increased thymic involution compared to controls (110). Yet, whether such HPA axis activation and thymic involution are associated with the transcriptomic changes observed in neonates with FIRS type I herein requires further investigation.
Herein, we found that neonates with FIRS Type II displayed enrichment of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) processes, which is consistent with prior studies (31, 56, 111). The hallmark characteristic of FIRS type II is elevated levels of CXCL10 in the fetal circulation in the absence of elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, IL-8, and TNF) (31), as reported in this study. Similarly, systemic CXCL10 concentrations are increased in cases of GVHD (112–115) and allograft rejection (e.g. heart, kidney, lung, etc.) (116–124). CXCL10 is primarily a T-cell chemokine that induces the migration of lymphocytes to sites of inflammation (125), mediates the induction of apoptosis, and regulates cell growth and proliferation as well as angiogenesis through the CXCR3 receptor (126); thus, this chemokine is implicated in the cellular mechanisms of allograft rejection. Specifically, CXCL10, together with the other CXCR3 ligands CXCL9 and CXCL11, is hypothesized to modulate maternal anti-fetal rejection (127–129). Alternatively, the elevated cord blood CXCL10 levels in FIRS type II might indicate a fetal response towards the mother. In line with this reasoning, previous reports have shown that fetal T cells are responsive towards maternal alloantigens (130–133) and dysregulation of this process could lead to disease, including preterm birth (132). Indeed, we have shown that fetal T cells are activated in a subset of women with spontaneous preterm labor in the absence of acute intra-amniotic inflammation (134). Moreover, the intra-amniotic injection of activated neonatal T cells resulted in preterm birth in mice (134). Together, these findings represent a novel mechanism of disease in which the fetus drives the premature process of labor (134). Yet, whether such a process is implicated in the pathophysiology of FIRS type II requires additional research.
We found that neonates with FIRS type II displayed increased expression of HLA-F together with decreased expression of HLA-C and HLA-DRA. HLA-F is a non-classical MHC-I molecule that can bind activating and inhibitory receptors on NK cells and other subsets, and may also present antigen to T cells (135, 136). HLA-F is expressed by extravillous trophoblasts (137) and its reduced expression is associated with pregnancy complications (136, 138), suggesting that dysregulation of this molecule is involved in the chronic inflammatory process that characterizes FIRS type II. Unlike HLA-F, HLA-C and HLA-DRA are associated with immunological tolerance (139–143) and therefore the downregulation of these molecules may represent a pathological state in neonates with FIRS type II. Yet, the involvement of these HLA molecules in the pathophysiology of FIRS type II requires further investigation.
An interesting observation from the current study was that an erythroid cell signature was highly affected by gestational age. Nucleated erythrocyte precursors or erythroid cells have been proposed to play a role in neonatal immunity (144–146). More recently, CD71+ erythroid cells were shown to display immunomodulatory functions in the cord blood from humans and mice (147, 148), although their effectiveness in this regard has also been questioned (149). Such nucleated erythroid cells tend to diminish with gestational age (150) and continue to decrease during the neonatal period (151). Yet, cord blood CD71+ erythroid cells may also be involved in the pathophysiology of spontaneous preterm labor, as neonates born to women with this obstetrical syndrome displayed reduced proportions of these cells compared to neonates delivered preterm due to medical indications (150). Thus, CD71+ erythroid cells may not strongly contribute to the pathophysiology of FIRS type I or FIRS type II.
A limitation of the current study is the absence of functional and immunophenotyping assays of cord blood immune cells to confirm the transcriptomic findings obtained using RNAseq. Yet, it is worth mentioning that the samples included in this study were collected over a period of several years, given the difficulty of obtaining cord blood samples from preterm neonates. In addition, the above determinations would require freshly collected samples, which does not fit with the current study design since the diagnosis of FIRS is performed after histological evaluation of the placenta and determination of cord blood cytokine concentrations.
In summary, we found that FIRS type I was characterized by upregulation of host immune responses, including neutrophil and monocyte functions, together with a pro-inflammatory cytokine storm and a downregulation of T-cell processes. In contrast, FIRS type II comprised a mild chronic inflammatory response involving perturbation of HLA transcripts, suggestive of fetal semi-allograft rejection. By using single-cell RNAseq-derived signatures and PCA loading analysis, we further implicated monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils in the immune responses of FIRS type I. Lastly, tissue- and cell-specific signatures derived from BioGPS Gene Atlas further corroborated the role of myeloid cells originating from the bone marrow in FIRS type I. Taken together, these findings shed light on the fetal immune responses caused by infection or alloreactivity that can lead to deleterious consequences in neonatal life.
Supplementary Material
Key Points.
FIRS type I and type II are driven by distinct immune mechanisms
FIRS type I involves host immune responses driven by neutrophils and monocytes
FIRS type II includes chronic responses suggesting fetal semi-allograft rejection
Acknowledgements
We thank the physicians and nurses from the Center for Advanced Obstetrical Care and Research and the Intrapartum Unit for their help in collecting human samples. The authors also thank the staff members of the PRB Clinical Laboratory and the PRB Histology/Pathology Unit for the processing and examination of the pathological sections.
1This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS); and, in part, with Federal funds from NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C. R.R. has contributed to this work as part of his official duties as an employee of the United States Federal Government. This research was also supported by the Wayne State University Perinatal Initiative in Maternal, Perinatal and Child Health. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest Statement
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The majority of the data underlying this article are available in the article. The RNAseq data generated herein were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; accession number GSE176127).
REFERENCES
- 1.Vornhagen J, Quach P, Boldenow E, Merillat S, Whidbey C, Ngo LY, Adams Waldorf KM, and Rajagopal L. 2016. Bacterial Hyaluronidase Promotes Ascending GBS Infection and Preterm Birth. mBio 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, Winters AD, Jung E, Shaman M, Bieda J, Panaitescu B, Pacora P, Erez O, Greenberg JM, Ahmad MM, Hsu CD, and Theis KR. 2019. Evidence that intra-amniotic infections are often the result of an ascending invasion - a molecular microbiological study. J Perinat Med 47: 915–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, and Hobbins JC. 1989. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161: 817–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hillier SL, Witkin SS, Krohn MA, Watts DH, Kiviat NB, and Eschenbach DA. 1993. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol 81: 941–948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, and Jun JK. 2001. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185: 1130–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Korzeniewski SJ, Chaemsaithong P, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, and Yeo L. 2014. Prevalence and clinical significance of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol 72: 458–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Combs CA, Gravett M, Garite TJ, Hickok DE, Lapidus J, Porreco R, Rael J, Grove T, Morgan TK, Clewell W, Miller H, Luthy D, Pereira L, Nageotte M, Robilio PA, Fortunato S, Simhan H, Baxter JK, Amon E, Franco A, Trofatter K, and Heyborne K. 2014. Amniotic fluid infection, inflammation, and colonization in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210: 125.e121–125.e115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Romero R, Dey SK, and Fisher SJ. 2014. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science 345: 760–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kacerovsky M, Pliskova L, Bolehovska R, Musilova I, Hornychova H, Tambor V, and Jacobsson B. 2011. The microbial load with genital mycoplasmas correlates with the degree of histologic chorioamnionitis in preterm PROM. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205: 213 e211–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, and Kim YM. 2015. Sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28: 1394–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Romero R, Gonzalez R, Sepulveda W, Brandt F, Ramirez M, Sorokin Y, Mazor M, Treadwell MC, and Cotton DB. 1992. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 1086–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee SE, Romero R, Park CW, Jun JK, and Yoon BH. 2008. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 633.e631–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gómez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, and González R. 2005. Idiopathic vaginal bleeding during pregnancy as the only clinical manifestation of intrauterine infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 18: 31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Romero R, Salafia CM, Athanassiadis AP, Hanaoka S, Mazor M, Sepulveda W, and Bracken MB. 1992. The relationship between acute inflammatory lesions of the preterm placenta and amniotic fluid microbiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 1382–1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Romero R, Miranda J, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Martinez A, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, and Kim YM. 2015. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. J Perinat Med 43: 19–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Caritis SN, O’Sullivan MJ, Wapner RJ, Meis PJ, Miodovnik M, Sorokin Y, Moawad AH, Mabie W, Conway D, Gabbe SG, and Spong CY. 2004. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson CT, Farzin A, and Burd I. 2014. Current management and long-term outcomes following chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 41: 649–669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oh KJ, Park JY, Lee J, Hong JS, Romero R, and Yoon BH. 2018. The combined exposure to intra-amniotic inflammation and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome increases the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates. J Perinat Med 46: 9–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Randis TM, Rice MM, Myatt L, Tita ATN, Leveno KJ, Reddy UM, Varner MW, Thorp JM, Mercer BM, Dinsmoor MJ, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Tolosa JE, Saade G, and Sorokin Y. 2018. Incidence of early-onset sepsis in infants born to women with clinical chorioamnionitis. J Perinat Med 46: 926–933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kallapur SG, Presicce P, Rueda CM, Jobe AH, and Chougnet CA. 2014. Fetal immune response to chorioamnionitis. Semin Reprod Med 32: 56–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, Diaz-Primera R, Marin-Concha J, Para R, Lopez AM, Pacora P, Gomez-Lopez N, Yoon BH, Kim CJ, Berry SM, and Hsu CD. 2020. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: the origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 25: 101146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Greenfield KG, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS, and Knoop KA. 2021. Sepsis, Cytokine Storms, and Immunopathology: The Divide between Neonates and Adults. Immunohorizons 5: 512–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gomez R, Romero R, Ghezzi F, Yoon BH, Mazor M, and Berry SM. 1998. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179: 194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Kim M, Oh SY, Kim CJ, and Jun JK. 2000. The relationship among inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (funisitis), umbilical cord plasma interleukin 6 concentration, amniotic fluid infection, and neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1124–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Naccasha N, Hinson R, Montag A, Ismail M, Bentz L, and Mittendorf R. 2001. Association between funisitis and elevated interleukin-6 in cord blood. Obstet Gynecol 97: 220–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pacora P, Chaiworapongsa T, Maymon E, Kim YM, Gomez R, Yoon BH, Ghezzi F, Berry SM, Qureshi F, Jacques SM, Kim JC, Kadar N, and Romero R. 2002. Funisitis and chorionic vasculitis: the histological counterpart of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 11: 18–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andrys C, Drahosova M, Hornychova H, Tambor V, Musilova I, Tosner J, Flidrova E, and Kacerovsky M. 2010. Umbilical cord blood concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-8 in pregnancy complicated by preterm premature rupture of the membranes and histological chorioamnionitis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 31: 857–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, and Kim YM. 2015. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213: S29–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim SK, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Mazaki-Tovi S, Mittal P, Erez O, Vaisbuch E, Gotsch F, Pacora P, Yeo L, Gervasi MT, Lamont RF, Yoon BH, and Hassan SS. 2009. Evidence of changes in the immunophenotype and metabolic characteristics (intracellular reactive oxygen radicals) of fetal, but not maternal, monocytes and granulocytes in the fetal inflammatory response syndrome. J Perinat Med 37: 543–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Madsen-Bouterse SA, Romero R, Tarca AL, Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Kim CJ, Kim JS, Edwin SS, Gomez R, and Draghici S. 2010. The transcriptome of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Am J Reprod Immunol 63: 73–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee J, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, Tarca AL, Xu Y, Chiang PJ, Kusanovic JP, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Yoon BH, Than NG, and Kim CJ. 2013. Characterization of the fetal blood transcriptome and proteome in maternal anti-fetal rejection: evidence of a distinct and novel type of human fetal systemic inflammatory response. Am J Reprod Immunol 70: 265–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Varrey A, Leng Y, Miller D, Done B, Xu Y, Bhatti G, Motomura K, Gershater M, Pique-Regi R, and Tarca AL. 2020. RNA Sequencing Reveals Diverse Functions of Amniotic Fluid Neutrophils and Monocytes/Macrophages in Intra-Amniotic Infection. J Innate Immun: 1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Motomura K, Romero R, Galaz J, Tarca AL, Done B, Xu Y, Leng Y, Garcia-Flores V, Arenas-Hernandez M, Theis KR, Gershater M, Jung E, Hsu CD, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2021. RNA sequencing reveals distinct immune responses in the chorioamniotic membranes of women with preterm labor and microbial or sterile intra-amniotic inflammation. Infect Immun [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pique-Regi R, Romero R, Tarca AL, Sendler ED, Xu Y, Garcia-Flores V, Leng Y, Luca F, Hassan SS, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2019. Single cell transcriptional signatures of the human placenta in term and preterm parturition. Elife 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Romero R, Kim YM, Pacora P, Kim CJ, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Jaiman S, Bhatti G, Kim JS, Qureshi F, Jacques SM, Jung EJ, Yeo L, Panaitescu B, Maymon E, Hassan SS, Hsu CD, and Erez O. 2018. The frequency and type of placental histologic lesions in term pregnancies with normal outcome. J Perinat Med 46: 613–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, and Kim JS. 2015. Chronic inflammation of the placenta: definition, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213: S53–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, and Kingsford C. 2017. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods 14: 417–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Love MI, Huber W, and Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15: 550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, and Zhang J. 2004. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL, Amin K, Done A, Voichita C, Georgescu C, and Romero R. 2007. A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res 17: 1537–1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Khatri P, Draghici S, Tarca AL, Hassan SS, and Romero R. 2007. A system biology approach for the steady-state analysis of gene signaling networks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Rueda L, Mery D, and Kittler J, eds. Springer, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tarca AL, Draghici S, Khatri P, Hassan SS, Mittal P, Kim JS, Kim CJ, Kusanovic JP, and Romero R. 2009. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics 25: 75–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kanehisa M, and Goto S. 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, and Tanabe M. 2012. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D109–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, and Tyers M. 2006. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D535–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Oughtred R, Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Rust J, Boucher L, Chang C, Kolas N, O’Donnell L, Leung G, McAdam R, Zhang F, Dolma S, Willems A, Coulombe-Huntington J, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Dolinski K, and Tyers M. 2019. The BioGRID interaction database: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res 47: D529–d541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, Lapp H, Ching KA, Block D, Zhang J, Soden R, Hayakawa M, Kreiman G, Cooke MP, Walker JR, and Hogenesch JB. 2004. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6062–6067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu C, Jin X, Tsueng G, Afrasiabi C, and Su AI. 2016. BioGPS: building your own mash-up of gene annotations and expression profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 44: D313–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tsang JCH, Vong JSL, Ji L, Poon LCY, Jiang P, Lui KO, Ni YB, To KF, Cheng YKY, Chiu RWK, and Lo YMD. 2017. Integrative single-cell and cell-free plasma RNA transcriptomics elucidates placental cellular dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E7786–E7795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wold S, Esbensen K, and Geladi P. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2: 37–52. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhao Y, Li X, Zhao W, Wang J, Yu J, Wan Z, Gao K, Yi G, Wang X, Fan B, Wu Q, Chen B, Xie F, Wu J, Zhang W, Chen F, Yang H, Wang J, Xu X, Li B, Liu S, Hou Y, and Liu X. 2019. Single-cell transcriptomic landscape of nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood. Gigascience 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang P, Zhao Y, Zhong J, Zhang X, Liu Q, Qiu X, Chen S, Yan H, Hillyer C, Mohandas N, Pan X, and Xu X. 2020. Putative regulators for the continuum of erythroid differentiation revealed by single-cell transcriptome of human BM and UCB cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117: 12868–12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ranzoni AM, Tangherloni A, Berest I, Riva SG, Myers B, Strzelecka PM, Xu J, Panada E, Mohorianu I, Zaugg JB, and Cvejic A. 2020. Integrative Single-Cell RNA-Seq and ATAC-Seq Analysis of Human Developmental Hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hochberg Y 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75: 800–802. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kassambara A, and Mundt F. 2017. factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. 1.0.6 ed [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim CJ, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Yoo W, Dong Z, Topping V, Gotsch F, Yoon BH, Chi JG, and Kim JS. 2010. The frequency, clinical significance, and pathological features of chronic chorioamnionitis: a lesion associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Mod Pathol 23: 1000–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Caritis SN, O’Sullivan MJ, Wapner RJ, Meis PJ, Miodovnik M, Sorokin Y, Moawad AH, Mabie W, Conway D, Gabbe SG, Spong CY, H. National Institute of Child, and M.-F. M. U. N. Human Development. 2004. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, and Alkema L. 2014. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2: e323–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Edwards SE, Grobman WA, Lappen JR, Winter C, Fox R, Lenguerrand E, and Draycott T. 2015. Modified obstetric early warning scoring systems (MOEWS): validating the diagnostic performance for severe sepsis in women with chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212: 536.e531–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kolaczkowska E, and Kubes P. 2013. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 159–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Garcia-Flores V, Xu Y, Leng Y, Alhousseini A, Hassan SS, and Panaitescu B. 2017. Amniotic fluid neutrophils can phagocytize bacteria: A mechanism for microbial killing in the amniotic cavity. Am J Reprod Immunol 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Edwin S, Rathnasabapathy C, Gomez R, Bujold E, Camacho N, Kim YM, Hassan S, Blackwell S, Whitty J, Berman S, Redman M, Yoon BH, and Sorokin Y. 2003. Antimicrobial peptides in amniotic fluid: defensins, calprotectin and bacterial/permeability-increasing protein in patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intra-amniotic inflammation, preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13: 2–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gravett MG, Novy MJ, Rosenfeld RG, Reddy AP, Jacob T, Turner M, McCormack A, Lapidus JA, Hitti J, Eschenbach DA, Roberts CT Jr., and Nagalla SR. 2004. Diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection by proteomic profiling and identification of novel biomarkers. JAMA 292: 462–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Erez O, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Moser A, Tam S, Leszyk J, Master SR, Juhasz P, Pacora P, Ogge G, Gomez R, Yoon BH, Yeo L, Hassan SS, and Rogers WT. 2010. Isobaric labeling and tandem mass spectrometry: a novel approach for profiling and quantifying proteins differentially expressed in amniotic fluid in preterm labor with and without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23: 261–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Martinez-Varea A, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Ahmed AI, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yeo L, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Cher B, Hassan SS, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2017. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VII: the amniotic fluid cellular immune response. J Perinat Med 45: 523–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Galaz J, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Slutsky R, Levenson D, Hsu CD, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2020. Cellular immune responses in amniotic fluid of women with preterm clinical chorioamnionitis. Inflamm Res 69: 203–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Unkel R, Shaman M, Jacques SM, Panaitescu B, Garcia-Flores V, and Hassan SS. 2017. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Amniotic Cavity of Women with Intra-Amniotic Infection: A New Mechanism of Host Defense. Reprod Sci 24: 1139–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Leng Y, Garcia-Flores V, Xu Y, Miller D, and Hassan SS. 2017. Neutrophil extracellular traps in acute chorioamnionitis: A mechanism of host defense. Am J Reprod Immunol 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Prosser A, Hibbert J, Strunk T, Kok CH, Simmer K, Richmond P, Burgner D, and Currie A. 2013. Phagocytosis of neonatal pathogens by peripheral blood neutrophils and monocytes from newborn preterm and term infants. Pediatr Res 74: 503–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yost CC, Schwertz H, Cody MJ, Wallace JA, Campbell RA, Vieira-de-Abreu A, Araujo CV, Schubert S, Harris ES, Rowley JW, Rondina MT, Fulcher JM, Koening CL, Weyrich AS, and Zimmerman GA. 2016. Neonatal NET-inhibitory factor and related peptides inhibit neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Clin Invest 126: 3783–3798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mathias B, Mira JC, Rehfuss JP, Rincon JC, Ungaro R, Nacionales DC, Lopez MC, Baker HV, Moldawer LL, and Larson SD. 2017. LPS Stimulation of Cord Blood Reveals a Newborn-Specific Neutrophil Transcriptomic Response and Cytokine Production. Shock 47: 606–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Serbina NV, Jia T, Hohl TM, and Pamer EG. 2008. Monocyte-mediated defense against microbial pathogens. Annu Rev Immunol 26: 421–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gordon S, and Martinez FO. 2010. Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity 32: 593–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xue J, Schmidt SV, Sander J, Draffehn A, Krebs W, Quester I, De Nardo D, Gohel TD, Emde M, Schmidleithner L, Ganesan H, Nino-Castro A, Mallmann MR, Labzin L, Theis H, Kraut M, Beyer M, Latz E, Freeman TC, Ulas T, and Schultze JL. 2014. Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity 40: 274–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Xu Y, Romero R, Miller D, Kadam L, Mial TN, Plazyo O, Garcia-Flores V, Hassan SS, Xu Z, Tarca AL, Drewlo S, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2016. An M1-like Macrophage Polarization in Decidual Tissue during Spontaneous Preterm Labor That Is Attenuated by Rosiglitazone Treatment. J Immunol 196: 2476–2491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nagl M, Kacani L, Mullauer B, Lemberger EM, Stoiber H, Sprinzl GM, Schennach H, and Dierich MP. 2002. Phagocytosis and killing of bacteria by professional phagocytes and dendritic cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 1165–1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dale DC, Boxer L, and Liles WC. 2008. The phagocytes: neutrophils and monocytes. Blood 112: 935–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jakubzick CV, Randolph GJ, and Henson PM. 2017. Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions. Nat Rev Immunol 17: 349–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Leng Y, Xu Y, Slutsky R, Levenson D, Pacora P, Jung E, Panaitescu B, and Hsu CD. 2019. The origin of amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages in women with intra-amniotic inflammation or infection. J Perinat Med 47: 822–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Marodi L, Leijh PC, and van Furth R. 1984. Characteristics and functional capacities of human cord blood granulocytes and monocytes. Pediatr Res 18: 1127–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gille C, Leiber A, Mundle I, Spring B, Abele H, Spellerberg B, Hartmann H, Poets Ch F, and Orlikowsky TW. 2009. Phagocytosis and postphagocytic reaction of cord blood and adult blood monocyte after infection with green fluorescent protein-labeled Escherichia coli and group B Streptococci. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 76: 271–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Brichard B, Varis I, Latinne D, Deneys V, de Bruyere M, Leveugle P, and Cornu G. 2001. Intracellular cytokine profile of cord and adult blood monocytes. Bone Marrow Transplant 27: 1081–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jiang H, Van De Ven C, Satwani P, Baxi LV, and Cairo MS. 2004. Differential gene expression patterns by oligonucleotide microarray of basal versus lipopolysaccharide-activated monocytes from cord blood versus adult peripheral blood. J Immunol 172: 5870–5879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sohlberg E, Saghafian-Hedengren S, Bremme K, and Sverremark-Ekström E. 2011. Cord blood monocyte subsets are similar to adult and show potent peptidoglycan-stimulated cytokine responses. Immunology 133: 41–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dreschers S, Ohl K, Lehrke M, Mollmann J, Denecke B, Costa I, Vogl T, Viemann D, Roth J, Orlikowsky T, and Tenbrock K. 2019. Impaired cellular energy metabolism in cord blood macrophages contributes to abortive response toward inflammatory threats. Nat Commun 10: 1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jiang Q, Azuma E, Tanaka M, Kobayashi M, Hirayama M, Kumamoto T, Iwamoto S, Yamamoto H, Nakashima K, Sakurai M, and Komada Y. 2001. Differential responsiveness of cord and adult blood monocytes to hepatocyte growth factor. Clin Exp Immunol 125: 222–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hebra A, Strange P, Egbert JM, Ali M, Mullinax A, and Buchanan E. 2001. Intracellular cytokine production by fetal and adult monocytes. J Pediatr Surg 36: 1321–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kim EN, Kim CJ, Park JW, and Yoon BH. 2015. Acute funisitis is associated with distinct changes in fetal hematologic profile. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28: 588–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Migliaccio G, Migliaccio AR, Petti S, Mavilio F, Russo G, Lazzaro D, Testa U, Marinucci M, and Peschle C. 1986. Human embryonic hemopoiesis. Kinetics of progenitors and precursors underlying the yolk sac----liver transition. J Clin Invest 78: 51–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wolf AA, Yanez A, Barman PK, and Goodridge HS. 2019. The Ontogeny of Monocyte Subsets. Front Immunol 10: 1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Charbord P, Tavian M, Humeau L, and Péault B. 1996. Early ontogeny of the human marrow from long bones: an immunohistochemical study of hematopoiesis and its microenvironment. Blood 87: 4109–4119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Golfier F, Bárcena A, Harrison MR, and Muench MO. 2000. Fetal bone marrow as a source of stem cells for in utero or postnatal transplantation. Br J Haematol 109: 173–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Holt PG, and Jones CA. 2000. The development of the immune system during pregnancy and early life. Allergy 55: 688–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Krow-Lucal ER, Kim CC, Burt TD, and McCune JM. 2014. Distinct functional programming of human fetal and adult monocytes. Blood 123: 1897–1904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Yanez A, Goodridge HS, Gozalbo D, and Gil ML. 2013. TLRs control hematopoiesis during infection. Eur J Immunol 43: 2526–2533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Manz MG, and Boettcher S. 2014. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 302–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Glavina-Durdov M, Springer O, Capkun V, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Rozic D, and Barle M. 2003. The grade of acute thymus involution in neonates correlates with the duration of acute illness and with the percentage of lymphocytes in peripheral blood smear. Pathological study. Biol Neonate 83: 229–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Di Naro E, Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Uccella S, D’Addario V, and Loverro G. 2006. Fetal thymic involution: a sonographic marker of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 153–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yinon Y, Zalel Y, Weisz B, Mazaki-Tovi S, Sivan E, Schiff E, and Achiron R. 2007. Fetal thymus size as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29: 639–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.El-Haieg DO, Zidan AA, and El-Nemr MM. 2008. The relationship between sonographic fetal thymus size and the components of the systemic fetal inflammatory response syndrome in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Bjog 115: 836–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Musilova I, Hornychova H, Kostal M, Jacobsson B, and Kacerovsky M. 2013. Ultrasound measurement of the transverse diameter of the fetal thymus in pregnancies complicated by the preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Clin Ultrasound 41: 283–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sciaky-Tamir Y, Hershkovitz R, Mazor M, Shelef I, and Erez O. 2015. The use of imaging technology in the assessment of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome-imaging of the fetal thymus. Prenat Diagn 35: 413–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Toti P, De Felice C, Stumpo M, Schurfeld K, Di Leo L, Vatti R, Bianciardi G, Buonocore G, Seemayer TA, and Luzi P. 2000. Acute thymic involution in fetuses and neonates with chorioamnionitis. Hum Pathol 31: 1121–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kunzmann S, Glogger K, Been JV, Kallapur SG, Nitsos I, Moss TJ, Speer CP, Newnham JP, Jobe AH, and Kramer BW. 2010. Thymic changes after chorioamnionitis induced by intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202: 476 e471–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kuypers E, Wolfs TG, Collins JJ, Jellema RK, Newnham JP, Kemp MW, Kallapur SG, Jobe AH, and Kramer BW. 2013. Intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide exposure changes cell populations and structure of the ovine fetal thymus. Reprod Sci 20: 946–956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Rueda CM, Presicce P, Jackson CM, Miller LA, Kallapur SG, Jobe AH, and Chougnet CA. 2016. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Chorioamnionitis Promotes IL-1-Dependent Inflammatory FOXP3+ CD4+ T Cells in the Fetal Rhesus Macaque. J Immunol 196: 3706–3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Melville JM, Bischof RJ, Meeusen EN, Westover AJ, and Moss TJ. 2012. Changes in fetal thymic immune cell populations in a sheep model of intrauterine inflammation. Reprod Sci 19: 740–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chrousos GP 1995. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med 332: 1351–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Haeryfar SM, and Berczi I. 2001. The thymus and the acute phase response. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 47: 145–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Plagemann A, Staudt A, Gotz F, Malz U, Rohde W, Rake A, and Dorner G. 1998. Long-term Effects of Early Postnatally Administered Interleukin-1-beta on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis in Rats. Endocr Regul 32: 77–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Lee J, Romero R, Xu Y, Kim JS, Topping V, Yoo W, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Yoon BH, and Kim CJ. 2011. A signature of maternal anti-fetal rejection in spontaneous preterm birth: chronic chorioamnionitis, anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, and C4d. PLoS One 6: e16806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Campbell JD, Gangur V, Simons FE, and HayGlass KT. 2004. Allergic humans are hyporesponsive to a CXCR3 ligand-mediated Th1 immunity-promoting loop. Faseb j 18: 329–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Tan J, and Zhou G. 2005. Chemokine receptors and transplantation. Cell Mol Immunol 2: 343–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Wysocki CA, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Blazar BR, and Serody JS. 2005. Leukocyte migration and graft-versus-host disease. Blood 105: 4191–4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Romagnani P, and Crescioli C. 2012. CXCL10: a candidate biomarker in transplantation. Clin Chim Acta 413: 1364–1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Agostini C, Calabrese F, Rea F, Facco M, Tosoni A, Loy M, Binotto G, Valente M, Trentin L, and Semenzato G. 2001. Cxcr3 and its ligand CXCL10 are expressed by inflammatory cells infiltrating lung allografts and mediate chemotaxis of T cells at sites of rejection. Am J Pathol 158: 1703–1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Melter M, Exeni A, Reinders ME, Fang JC, McMahon G, Ganz P, Hancock WW, and Briscoe DM. 2001. Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligand IP-10 during human cardiac allograft rejection. Circulation 104: 2558–2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Segerer S, Cui Y, Eitner F, Goodpaster T, Hudkins KL, Mack M, Cartron JP, Colin Y, Schlondorff D, and Alpers CE. 2001. Expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors during human renal transplant rejection. Am J Kidney Dis 37: 518–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Belperio JA, Keane MP, Burdick MD, Lynch JP 3rd, Xue YY, Li K, Ross DJ, and Strieter RM. 2002. Critical role for CXCR3 chemokine biology in the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. J Immunol 169: 1037–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Fahmy NM, Yamani MH, Starling RC, Ratliff NB, Young JB, McCarthy PM, Feng J, Novick AC, and Fairchild RL. 2003. Chemokine and receptor-gene expression during early and late acute rejection episodes in human cardiac allografts. Transplantation 75: 2044–2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lazzeri E, Rotondi M, Mazzinghi B, Lasagni L, Buonamano A, Rosati A, Pradella F, Fossombroni V, La Villa G, Gacci M, Bertoni E, Serio M, Salvadori M, and Romagnani P. 2005. High CXCL10 expression in rejected kidneys and predictive role of pretransplant serum CXCL10 for acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation 79: 1215–1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Crescioli C, Buonamano A, Scolletta S, Sottili M, Francalanci M, Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Lisi G, Pradella F, Serio M, Romagnani P, and Maccherini M. 2009. Predictive role of pretransplant serum CXCL10 for cardiac acute rejection. Transplantation 87: 249–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hoffman SA, Wang L, Shah CV, Ahya VN, Pochettino A, Olthoff K, Shaked A, Wille K, Lama VN, Milstone A, Ware LB, Orens J, Weinacker A, Demissie E, Bellamy S, Kawut SM, Hancock WW, and Christie JD. 2009. Plasma cytokines and chemokines in primary graft dysfunction post-lung transplantation. Am J Transplant 9: 389–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lo DJ, Weaver TA, Kleiner DE, Mannon RB, Jacobson LM, Becker BN, Swanson SJ, Hale DA, and Kirk AD. 2011. Chemokines and their receptors in human renal allotransplantation. Transplantation 91: 70–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Loetscher M, Gerber B, Loetscher P, Jones SA, Piali L, Clark-Lewis I, Baggiolini M, and Moser B. 1996. Chemokine receptor specific for IP10 and mig: structure, function, and expression in activated T-lymphocytes. J Exp Med 184: 963–969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Liu M, Guo S, Hibbert JM, Jain V, Singh N, Wilson NO, and Stiles JK. 2011. CXCL10/IP-10 in infectious diseases pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 22: 121–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Karjalainen MK, Ojaniemi M, Haapalainen AM, Mahlman M, Salminen A, Huusko JM, Maatta TA, Kaukola T, Anttonen J, Ulvila J, Haataja R, Teramo K, Kingsmore SF, Palotie A, Muglia LJ, Ramet M, and Hallman M. 2015. CXCR3 Polymorphism and Expression Associate with Spontaneous Preterm Birth. J Immunol 195: 2187–2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Docheva N, Dong Z, Kim CJ, Kim YM, Kim JS, Qureshi F, Jacques SM, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Erez O, and Korzeniewski SJ. 2017. CXCL10 and IL-6: Markers of two different forms of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Maymon E, Romero R, Bhatti G, Chaemsaithong P, Gomez-Lopez N, Panaitescu B, Chaiyasit N, Pacora P, Dong Z, Hassan SS, and Erez O. 2018. Chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta are associated with an up-regulation of amniotic fluid CXCR3: A marker of allograft rejection. J Perinat Med 46: 123–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Moretta A, Locatelli F, Mingrat G, Rondini G, Montagna D, Comoli P, Gandossini S, Montini E, Labirio M, and Maccario R. 1999. Characterisation of CTL directed towards non-inherited maternal alloantigens in human cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 24: 1161–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Mommaas B, Stegehuis-Kamp JA, van Halteren AG, Kester M, Enczmann J, Wernet P, Kogler G, Mutis T, Brand A, and Goulmy E. 2005. Cord blood comprises antigen-experienced T cells specific for maternal minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1. Blood 105: 1823–1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Frascoli M, Coniglio L, Witt R, Jeanty C, Fleck-Derderian S, Myers DE, Lee TH, Keating S, Busch MP, Norris PJ, Tang Q, Cruz G, Barcellos LF, Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, and MacKenzie TC. 2018. Alloreactive fetal T cells promote uterine contractility in preterm labor via IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. Sci Transl Med 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kwok J, Chu P, Ong C, Law HK, Ip P, Chan GCF, and Lu L. 2019. Role of Regulatory T Cells in Noninherited Maternal Antigen-Related Tolerance in Cord Blood: An in Vitro Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 25: 424–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Arenas-Hernandez M, Garcia-Flores V, Panaitescu B, Galaz J, Hsu CD, Para R, and Berry SM. 2019. Fetal T Cell Activation in the Amniotic Cavity during Preterm Labor: A Potential Mechanism for a Subset of Idiopathic Preterm Birth. J Immunol 203: 1793–1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Dulberger CL, McMurtrey CP, Holzemer A, Neu KE, Liu V, Steinbach AM, Garcia-Beltran WF, Sulak M, Jabri B, Lynch VJ, Altfeld M, Hildebrand WH, and Adams EJ. 2017. Human Leukocyte Antigen F Presents Peptides and Regulates Immunity through Interactions with NK Cell Receptors. Immunity 46: 1018–1029 e1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Persson G, Jorgensen N, Nilsson LL, Andersen LHJ, and Hviid TVF. 2020. A role for both HLA-F and HLA-G in reproduction and during pregnancy? Hum Immunol 81: 127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hackmon R, Pinnaduwage L, Zhang J, Lye SJ, Geraghty DE, and Dunk CE. 2017. Definitive class I human leukocyte antigen expression in gestational placentation: HLA-F, HLA-E, HLA-C, and HLA-G in extravillous trophoblast invasion on placentation, pregnancy, and parturition. Am J Reprod Immunol 77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Burrows CK, Kosova G, Herman C, Patterson K, Hartmann KE, Velez Edwards DR, Stephenson MD, Lynch VJ, and Ober C. 2016. Expression Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Studies in Mid-secretory Phase Endometrial Cells Identifies HLA-F and TAP2 as Fecundability-Associated Genes. PLoS Genet 12: e1005858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Fainboim L, Navarrete C, and Festenstein H. 1980. Precursor and effector phenotypes of activated human T lymphocytes. Nature 288: 391–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Fukui Y, Yamamoto K, Yokoyama N, Iwanaga T, Kurashima C, Esaki Y, Kimura A, Akashi T, Hirokawa K, and Sasazuki T. 1993. Restricted expression of transgenic HLA-DRA gene in thymic epithelial cells and its role in acquisition of T cell tolerance to self-superantigens and processed DR alpha-derived peptide. Eur J Immunol 23: 1678–1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Baecher-Allan C, Wolf E, and Hafler DA. 2006. MHC class II expression identifies functionally distinct human regulatory T cells. J Immunol 176: 4622–4631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Ashley CW, and Baecher-Allan C. 2009. Cutting Edge: Responder T cells regulate human DR+ effector regulatory T cell activity via granzyme B. J Immunol 183: 4843–4847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Papuchova H, Meissner TB, Li Q, Strominger JL, and Tilburgs T. 2019. The Dual Role of HLA-C in Tolerance and Immunity at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Front Immunol 10: 2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Pavia CS, and Stites DP. 1979. Immunosuppressive activity of murine newborn spleen cells. I. Selective inhibition of in vitro lymphocyte activation. Cell Immunol 42: 48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Norton MT, Fortner KA, Bizargity P, and Bonney EA. 2009. Pregnancy alters the proliferation and apoptosis of mouse splenic erythroid lineage cells and leukocytes. Biol Reprod 81: 457–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Rincon MR, Oppenheimer K, and Bonney EA. 2012. Selective accumulation of Th2-skewing immature erythroid cells in developing neonatal mouse spleen. Int J Biol Sci 8: 719–730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Elahi S, Ertelt JM, Kinder JM, Jiang TT, Zhang X, Xin L, Chaturvedi V, Strong BS, Qualls JE, Steinbrecher KA, Kalfa TA, Shaaban AF, and Way SS. 2013. Immunosuppressive CD71+ erythroid cells compromise neonatal host defence against infection. Nature 504: 158–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Miller D, Romero R, Unkel R, Xu Y, Vadillo-Ortega F, Hassan SS, and Gomez-Lopez N. 2018. CD71+ erythroid cells from neonates born to women with preterm labor regulate cytokine and cellular responses. J Leukoc Biol 103: 761–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Wynn JL, Scumpia PO, Stocks BT, Romano-Keeler J, Alrifai MW, Liu JH, Kim AS, Alford CE, Matta P, Weitkamp JH, and Moore DJ. 2015. Neonatal CD71+ Erythroid Cells Do Not Modify Murine Sepsis Mortality. J Immunol 195: 1064–1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Unkel R, M. T C, Frascoli M, and Hassan SS. 2016. Umbilical cord CD71+ erythroid cells are reduced in neonates born to women in spontaneous preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol 76: 280–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hermansen MC 2001. Nucleated red blood cells in the fetus and newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 84: F211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The majority of the data underlying this article are available in the article. The RNAseq data generated herein were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; accession number GSE176127).
