Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Jun 22;30(4):536. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13035

Erratum

PMCID: PMC9394601  PMID: 35731189

Erratum to: “Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus,” by Eriksson E, Liu PY, Schultz GS, Martins‐Green MM, Tanaka R, Weir D, Gould LJ, Armstrong DG, Gibbons GW, Wolcott R, Olutoye OO, Kirsner RS, Gurtner GC, Wound Rep Reg. 2022;30(2):156–171. doi:10.1111/wrr.12994

In the above mentioned article, on page 161 under section 5.3, in the sentence “For example, the TI for hypochlorous acid is typically much higher than the TI for sodium hypochlorite or for hydrogen peroxide for key bacterial pathogens.” the reference citation was incorrectly published as 41 instead of 47. The sentence shoud read as follows:

For example, the TI for hypochlorous acid is typically much higher than the TI for sodium hypochlorite or for hydrogen peroxide for key bacterial pathogens.47


Articles from Wound Repair and Regeneration are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES