Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Apr 5;234(5):1901–1902. doi: 10.1111/nph.18106

Corrigendum

Matin Miryeganeh , Ferdinand Marlétaz, Daria Gavriouchkina, Hidetoshi Saze
PMCID: PMC9394624  PMID: 35383924

New Phytologist (2022), doi: 10.1111/nph.17738.

Since its publication, the authors of Miryeganeh et al. (2022) have identified some errors in their paper. A species name is incorrectly presented: Kandelia ovobata on p. 2099, and within Figs 1(b) and 5(c) should read Kandelia obovata. In addition, in the legend to Fig. 5, the description of the Blast identity colours is incorrect. The correct text should read: Blast identity (%) is indicated by ribbons (sense orientation, yellow to orange; reverse orientation, light blue to blue). The correct Figs 1 and 5 are shown below.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) A cladogram of plant species including Bruguiera gymnorhiza. (b) Synteny blocks between B. gymnorhiza and Kandelia obovata (yellow ribbons), and B. gymnorhiza and Rhizophora apiculata (light blue ribbons) genomes. Scaffolds/contigs longer than 5 Mb were used for the analysis. Scaffold/contig numbers are indicated.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a) Browser view of the BURP gene cluster in the scaffold39 of the Bruguiera gymnorhiza genome. Tracks: top to bottom; cytosine methylation levels (0 to 1) in Watson and Crick strands in CG (blue), CHG (light blue), and CHH (pink) contexts (H can be A, or C, or T) of indicated conditions, CHH hyper‐differentially methylated regions (DMRs; orange), RNA‐sequencing tracks (count per million (CPM; 0 to 40)), repeats (orange), gene model (black), and heat maps showing differences in expression (log2 fold changes) of genes, including BURP genes (Bruguiera gymnorhiza BURP‐domain containing protein, BgBDCs; red). g80 and g81 in scaffold39 were originally annotated as two separate genes, while from the protein sequences they were likely from one BURP gene‐coding sequences, and only expression of g81 is shown. (b) Boxplots showing cytosine methylation levels of the BURP gene cluster, from 800 201 to 1076 600 of scaffold39, averaged in 100‐bp windows. P‐values by Brunner–Munzel test are indicated. ns, not significant (P > 0.05). Thick horizonal bars in the boxes indicate median values, box limits are upper and lower quartiles, and whiskers represent 91.5 interquartile ranges. (c) A synteny of the BURP gene cluster between B. gymnorhiza (scaffold39: 790 000–1100 000) and Kandelia obovata (Contig1: 6360 000–6560 000, reverse orientation). BURP genes are shown in red. BLAST identity (%) is indicated by ribbons (sense orientation, yellow to orange; reverse orientation, light blue to blue).

We apologize to our readers for these mistakes.

Contributor Information

Matin Miryeganeh, Email: matin.miryeganeh@oist.jp.

Hidetoshi Saze, Email: hidetoshi.saze@oist.jp.

Reference

  1. Miryeganeh M, Marlétaz F, Gavriouchkina D, Saze H. 2022. De novo genome assembly and in natura epigenomics reveal salinity‐induced DNA methylation in the mangrove tree Bruguiera gymnorhiza . New Phytologist 233: 2094–2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The New Phytologist are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES