Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2022 Aug 15;6:333. Originally published 2021 Dec 7. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17345.2

Case Report: Adult Onset Still’s Disease after vaccination against Covid-19

Ujjwol Risal 1,a, Anup Subedee 1, Raju Pangeni 2, Rakshya Pandey 2, Suravi Pandey 1, Sudeep Adhikari 3, Buddha Basnyat 4
PMCID: PMC9396110  PMID: 36072554

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

Manuscript has been revised as per the comments given by the authors. Language editing has been done. Few more details have been added for increasing clarity. Importantly, the AEFI causality form has been uploaded as supplementary file as per the reviewer's suggestion.

Abstract

Vaccination against the virus responsible for COVID-19 has become key in preventing mortality and morbidity related to the infection. Studies have shown that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. However, there are concerns regarding serious adverse events of some vaccines, although they are fortunately rare. Here, we report a case of a 47-year-old female from Kathmandu who presented with high grade fever, dry cough and erythematous rash a week after exposure to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. She had hepatosplenomegaly, persistent leucocytosis, anaemia and thrombocytosis along with markedly raised inflammatory markers. Her tests for infectious causes and haematological malignancies were negative and she showed no response to multiple antibiotics. Finally, she had a dramatic response to steroids with disappearance of fever and normalization of other laboratory parameters. Hence, she was diagnosed with Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD). She was under methotrexate and prednisolone tapering dose and doing well as of the time of writing. The trigger for the disease was hypothesized to be the vaccine because of the strong temporal association.

Keywords: Covid-19 vaccination, AOSD

Introduction

COVID-19 is a major pandemic currently affecting the whole world, and Nepal is no exception. As of 31 st March 2022, a total of 978,402 people had been infected and 11951 people have already lost their lives in Nepal 1 . However, various vaccines have been tested and made available which are highly effective in preventing both the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease 2 . However, there are concerns regarding adverse events following vaccination 3 . Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD) is a multisystem auto-inflammatory disease characterized by high grade fever, inflammatory arthritis, and an evanescent rash. It is associated with profound systemic inflammation marked by high inflammatory markers, leucocytosis and high ferritin levels. The diagnosis is made clinically after ruling out other aetiologies 4 . We describe a case of AOSD following administration of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine in Nepal. AOSD is a rare autoinflammatory disease and diagnosis of this case itself is a challenge, especially in a country like Nepal, where rheumatology is a budding speciality. This case follows only two other similar reported cases after vaccination against COVID-19 5, 6 .

Case presentation

A 47-year-old female from Kathmandu, Nepal, non-smoker presented in April 2021 to the out-patient department of a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, with a history of intermittent fever and sore throat for nine days. After three days of fever, she developed itchy erythematous rashes bilaterally involving thighs, legs and hands, especially during the spiking of fever. She had received the first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine seven days prior to the onset of fever. She had no notable past medical and family history. When she presented to us, she was already on two antibiotics, namely levofloxacin 750 mg and azithromycin 500 mg, once daily for a couple of days from a local medical shop. Upon examination, her temperature was 38.55 0 C, and had erythematous rashes over bilateral legs and hands ( Figure 1). The remaining systemic examination found no further anomalies. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was negative. The initial laboratory investigations ( Table 1) showed anaemia with neutrophilic leucocytosis and thrombocytosis, raised C-reactive protein (CRP), markedly raised ferritin, and mild hepatitis. Ultrasound of the abdomen showed hepatosplenomegaly. She was admitted with intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g once daily and oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily. Blood and urine cultures were performed, which later revealed no growth. Serological tests for dengue, scrub typhus, leptospirosis and malaria were negative. There was no response to antibiotics after 72 hours. Further investigations were performed considering possible non-infectious causes of fever. Her antinuclear antibody (ANA) was weakly positive with a fine speckled pattern. Rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were negative. Her bone marrow cytology was normal. On the fourth day of her admission, she also developed pain and swelling of her left elbow. On examination, the elbow joint was warm and tender with restriction of movement. At this time, AOSD was considered as the most probable diagnosis since she fulfilled three major and three minor criteria as defined by Yamaguchi 7 . She was then started on prednisolone at 1 mg/kg (60 mg) once daily, with continuation of the ongoing antibiotics. After starting prednisolone, she had no further episodes of fever. Her joint pain improved, and she experienced no further rash. Thus the final diagnosis of AOSD was made based on the classification criteria and a dramatic response to the steroid 7 . Methotrexate 7.5 mg per week was started. The antibiotics were stopped on the seventh day, and she was discharged with prednisolone and methotrexate. She is under regular follow-up for her condition at the time of writing this report. During her latest follow-up in September 2021, she was afebrile and had no other symptoms. She is currently receiving prednisolone 10 mg daily and methotrexate 15 mg per week. She has not received any further dose of the vaccination.

Figure 1. Erythematous macular rash involving right thigh of the patient.

Figure 1.

Table 1. Laboratory investigations of the patient.

Laboratory parameters Normal
range
2021 April
2 (day of
admission)
2021 April 4
(second day
of admission)
2021 April
6 (fourth
day- steroid
started)
2021 April
7 (one day
after starting
steroid)
2021
September 9
(last follow-up)
Hemoglobin (gm/dl) 12.1- 15.1 9.3 9.2 9.8 9 12.5
White cell count(/mm 3) 4500- 11000 17050 18100 24300 16150 7700
Neutrophil percentage 55- 70 86 89 91 86 57
Platelets(/mm 3) 150000- 450000 471000 687000 1400000 956000 213000
C-Reactive Protein(mg/dL) 0.8- 1.0 150 >150 >150 108 0.8
Serum Ferritin(ng/ml) 24- 336 2914.6
Aspartate transaminase(IU/L) 5- 40 218 28
Alanine transaminase(IU/L) 7- 55 194 73

Discussion

Vaccination against COVID-19 has become the most effective way to curb the current pandemic and its effects on activities worldwide 2 As of the time of writing this report, several vaccines had undergone trials and been given approval to be rolled out in several countries. Minor side effects after vaccination are fairly common; however, there have been some concerns regarding rare but serious adverse events of some vaccines 3 . For example, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis has been described in some patients who have received the Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine 8 . Likewise, several cases of thrombosis have developed following vaccination with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine 9 . Autoimmune diseases themselves are rare, and those developing following vaccination are even rarer. Recently some cases of autoimmune diseases following COVID-19 vaccination have been described 1012 .

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare auto-inflammatory disorder characterized by a high spiking fever, arthralgia (with or without synovitis), maculo-papular salmon-pink evanescent skin rash, striking leucocytosis with neutrophilia 4 . There is no definitive confirmatory test for AOSD, but there are a few sets of clinical criteria which are used in the diagnosis 7 . In one study in France, the incidence of the disease was found to be 0.16 per 100,000 in the population 13 . The aetiology of the disease is unknown. Various genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in the causation of the disease, but there is no definite evidence. The pathogenesis involves activation of the innate immune system with subsequent cytokine overproduction, especially interleukins IL-1β, IL-18, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ 4 Several infectious agents have been postulated to trigger the disease in genetically predisposed individuals. It has been proposed that the interplay between host genetic factors, autoimmune mechanisms, and antigens could trigger AOSD 4, 14, 15 . There have been some case reports of AOSD following a COVID-19 infection in patients who had recently recovered from the illness 16, 17 . However, only one case of AOSD has been reported following vaccination with the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna), and one after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine 5, 6 . There are two possible ways the vaccine could have triggered the disease; one is through the release of various cytokines by the spike protein and the other is the activation of immune system by the adenovirus vector used in the vaccine. It is well-known from various studies that COVID-19 infection causes a release of various cytokines and multi-organ failure (secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). The main cytokines with elevated levels in this condition are IL-1 and IL-6, which are the same cytokines that are activated in AOSD, which points towards a similar mechanism of immune activation 18 . As in AOSD, IL-1 and IL-6 blockade has been successful in the management of patients with severe COVID-19 infection 19 . The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is based on a replication-incompetent chimpanzee adenovirus vector that expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 20 . Many cases of viral infections, including by adenoviruses, have been reported to trigger AOSD 4 . It is possible that the adenovirus vector used in the vaccine could have triggered the same mechanism as that triggered by the native virus. However, the level of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein IgG in the serum could not be performed which could have shown some light regarding the possible pathogenesis in our patient. Whatever the pathogenesis, the strong temporal association between the vaccination and the onset of symptoms made us suspect the vaccine to be the trigger, although it could be mere coincidence. Further studies are needed to prove the causation.

Conclusions

AOSD is a rare disease that has been associated with environmental triggers in genetically susceptible hosts. Vaccination against COVID-19 could be a potential trigger for its development for which further studies are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. reliefweb.int. [online] 2022 March 31 [cited 2022 March 31]; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization: [online] 2021 Sep 15 [cited 2021 sep 15] 2021. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Menni C, Klaser K, May A, et al. : Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(7):939–949. 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00224-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wang MY, Jia JC, Yang CD, et al. : Pathogenesis, disease course, and prognosis of adult-onset Still's disease: an update and review. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(23):2856–2864. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Magliulo D, Narayan S, Ue F, et al. : Adult-onset Still's disease after mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(10):e680–e682. 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00219-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Leone F, Cerasuolo PG, Bosello SL, et al. : Adult-onset Still's disease following COVID-19 vaccination. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(10):e678–e680. 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00218-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yamaguchi M, Ohta A, Tsunematsu T, et al. : Preliminary criteria for classification of adult Still's disease. J Rheumatol. 1992;19(3):424–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. See I, Su JR, Lale A, et al. : US Case Reports of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia After Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination, March 2 to April 21, 2021. JAMA. 2021;325(24):2448–2456. 10.1001/jama.2021.7517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE, et al. : Thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2092–101. 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tarawneh O, Tarawneh H: Immune thrombocytopenia in a 22-year-old post Covid-19 vaccine. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(5):E133–E134. 10.1002/ajh.26106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bril F, Al Diffalha S, Dean M, et al. : Autoimmune hepatitis developing after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine: Causality or casualty? J Hepatol. 2021;75(1):222–224. 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Baimukhamedov C, Makhmudov S, Botabekova A: Seropositive rheumatoid arthritis after vaccination against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(11):1440–1441. 10.1111/1756-185X.14220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Magadur-Joly G, Billaud E, Barrier JH, et al. : Epidemiology of adult Still's disease: estimate of the incidence by a retrospective study in west France. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54(7):587–90. 10.1136/ard.54.7.587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Govoni M, Bortoluzzi A, Rossi D, et al. : How I treat patients with adult onset Still's disease in clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(10):1016–23. 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Perez C, Artola V: Adult Still's disease associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(6):e105–6. 10.1086/319342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bamidis AD, Koehler P, Di Cristanziano V: First manifestation of adult-onset Still's disease after COVID-19. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(5):e319–e321. 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00072-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Alshablan A, Jabbad R, Tayeb S: Diagnosis of adult onset Still's disease in a patient who has recovered from coronavirus-19. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2021;14:1179547621996306. 10.1177/1179547621996306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. : COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cavalli G, Larcher A, Tomelleri A: Interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 inhibition compared with standard management in patients with COVID-19 and hyperinflammation: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(4):e253–e261. 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00012-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Folegatti PM, Ewer KJ, Aley PK, et al. : Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):467–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Aug 22. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.19936.r51988

Reviewer response for version 2

Sankha S Chakrabarti 1

Acceptable, but I could not access the supplementary file of causality assessment. Please ensure it is added.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Geriatric pharmacovigilance, Geriatric neuropsychiatry, COVID-19 (vaccines)

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Mar 21. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.19175.r49106

Reviewer response for version 1

Sankha S Chakrabarti 1

This is an interesting and well managed case.

  1. Kindly update the case and death numbers in Nepal to March 2022 figures

  2. English language editing is much needed to improve clarity, in the Abstract, Introduction and Case Presentation parts.

  3. Use the word hepatitis instead of transaminitis.

  4. Use bone marrow cytology (or histopathological examination of bone marrow biopsy sample) whichever is suitable, instead of histopathological bone marrow examination.

  5. Please mention the consideration made by the authors while starting high dose steroid. What etiology or condition did they have in mind at the time?

  6. Along with the autoimmune thrombocytopenia and hepatitis referenced by the authors (refs 10,11) after COVID-19 vaccination, cases of the related condition rheumatoid arthritis after COVID-19 vaccination may also be mentioned as pathogenesis is broadly linked to Still's disease.

  7. The authors discuss two main pathogenetic hypotheses. These may be split clearly in the written text for clarity (adenoviral vector induced and inflammatory cytokines induced). The direct toxicity of Spike protein or cross-reactive antibodies may be mentioned as alternative pathogenetic models. Currently, this is a bit mixed up.

  8. Causality assessment file as per old version (not new version) WHO scale for adverse events following immunization must be provided as supplementary material and the causality classification done accordingly- Definite or Probable or Possible, etc.

  9. Optional but would be good- If possible the authors should mention whether the patient received the second dose also, and the SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike IgG level in serum. High levels may be linked to adverse events. Even if not done, I would advise authors to perform this on a follow-up visit for their own knowledge. 

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Geriatric pharmacovigilance, Geriatric neuropsychiatry, COVID-19 (vaccines)

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Aug 10.
Sudeep Adhikari 1

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your constructive comments that have certainly helped improved the manuscript. 

Below are point by point responses to your comments.

  1. Kindly update the case and death numbers in Nepal to March 2022 figures
    1. Answer- Case and death numbers have been updated.
  2. English language editing is much needed to improve clarity, in the Abstract, Introduction and Case Presentation parts.
    1. Answer- Revised as per the suggestion.
  3. Use the word hepatitis instead of transaminitis.
    1. Answer- Hepatitis has been used.
  4. Use bone marrow cytology (or histopathological examination of bone marrow biopsy sample) whichever is suitable, instead of histopathological bone marrow examination.
    1. Answer- Bone marrow cytology has been used.
  5. Please mention the consideration made by the authors while starting high dose steroid. What etiology or condition did they have in mind at the time?
    1. Answer- The diagnosis of AOSD as per the Yamaguchi criteria was considered prior to giving high dose steroids.
  6. Along with the autoimmune thrombocytopenia and hepatitis referenced by the authors (refs 10,11) after COVID-19 vaccination, cases of the related condition rheumatoid arthritis after COVID-19 vaccination may also be mentioned as pathogenesis is broadly linked to Still's disease.
    1. Answer- Another article describing the development of seropositive RA has been added in the reference 12.
  7. The authors discuss two main pathogenetic hypotheses. These may be split clearly in the written text for clarity (adenoviral vector induced and inflammatory cytokines induced). The direct toxicity of Spike protein or cross-reactive antibodies may be mentioned as alternative pathogenetic models. Currently, this is a bit mixed up.
    1. Answer- Revised as per the suggestion.
  8. Causality assessment file as per old version (not new version) WHO scale for adverse events following immunization must be provided as supplementary material and the causality classification done accordingly- Definite or Probable or Possible, etc.
    1. Answer- Causality assessment file has been added as supplementary material.
  9. Optional but would be good- If possible the authors should mention whether the patient received the second dose also, and the SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike IgG level in serum. High levels may be linked to adverse events. Even if not done, I would advise authors to perform this on a follow-up visit for their own knowledge. 
    1. Answer- The patient did not receive the second dose of the vaccine. And the serum level of the anti-spike protein IgG was not performed as it was unavailable.
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Jan 31. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.19175.r48155

Reviewer response for version 1

Amita Aggarwal 1

The authors describe a case of AOSD following COVID-19 vaccination. Though rheumatic disease flare is a known complication of vaccination, development of new disease is less common. AOSD has been reported earlier with COVID-19 as well as with vaccination. 

This case highlights that if you have persistent fever, leucocytosis thrombocytosis rash and arthritis and no infectious agent or autoantibodies are negative AOSD should be considered.

AOSD is a diagnosis of exclusion thus it should be emphasized that common diseases must be excluded before prescribing steroids.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Rheumatology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Aug 10.
Sudeep Adhikari 1

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your feedback to this manuscript.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES