In the published article, there was an error caused by incorrect writing. A correction has been made to the Abstract of Section. This sentence previously stated:
“… however, the patients in the ESMS-mPNL group had significantly longer operation times than those in the non-ESMS-mPNL subgroup, along with marked reductions in irrigation fluid absorption, blood loss, haemoglobin loss, 12 h postoperative VAS score, mean hospitalization time, and return to work time.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“… however, the patients in the ESMS-mPNL group had significantly longer irrigation times than those in the non-ESMS-mPNL subgroup, along with marked reductions in irrigation fluid, blood loss, haemoglobin loss, 12 h postoperative VAS score, mean hospitalization time, and return to work time.”
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Table 4] as published. [Caused by incorrect writing].
The corrected [Table 4] and its caption **[Comparison of operative data and complications for Non-ESMS-mPNL vs ESMS-mPNL groups.] appear below.
Table 4.
Comparison of operative data and complications for Non-ESMS-mPNL vs ESMS-mPNL groups.
| Data | Non-ESMS-mPNL (n = 46) | ESMS-mPNL (n = 46) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time (min.), mean ± SD | 66.1 ± 6.2 | 68.2 ± 5.6 | 0.090 |
| Irrigation time (min) | 42.2 ± 14.1 | 52.0 ± 18.3 | 0.005 |
| Volume of irrigation fluid (ml) | 1651.9 ± 631.4 | 1245.6 ± 548.2 | 0.001 |
| Volume of fluid absorbed (ml) | 712 ± 95 | 502 ± 102 | <0.001 |
| Blood loss (ml) | 142.1 ± 93.54 | 82.2 ± 41.2 | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin loss (mg/dl) | 1.21 ± 0.78 | 1.02 ± 0.63 | 0.044 |
| VAS score postop 12 h | 1.95 ± 0.56 | 1.66 ± 0.42 | 0.005 |
| Complications rate | |||
| Clavien 1 | 2 (4.8) | 2 (3.2) | 0.996 |
| Clavien 2 | – | – | |
| Clavien 3 | – | – | |
| Clavien 4 | – | – | |
| Mean hospitalization time (hour), mean ± SD | 53.82 ± 13.48 | 47.31 ± 12.04 | 0.017 |
| Stone-free rate (1. month) | 41 (89.1) | 42 (90.3) | 0.731 |
| CIRF rate (%) | 2 (4.3) | 1 (2.2) | 0.125 |
| Return to work time (day), mean ± SD | 12.06 ± 3.21 | 9.87 ± 2.76 | 0.001 |
| Tubeless procedure (%) | 18 (39.1) | 16 (34.8) | 0.670 |
In the published article, there were some errors caused by incorrect writing.
A correction has been made to the Results of Section. This sentence previously stated:
“[A longer irrigation time (52.0 ± 18.3 vs. 42.2 ± 14.1 min) and a larger volume of absorbed fluid (712 ± 95 vs. 502 ± 102 ml) were observed in the patients in the ESMS-mPNL group compared with those in the non-ESMS-mPNL group (P = 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively).]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[A longer irrigation time (52.0 ± 18.3 vs. 42.2 ± 14.1 min) and a smaller volume of absorbed fluid (502 ± 102 vs. 712 ± 95 ml) were observed in the patients in the ESMS-mPNL group compared with those in the non-ESMS-mPNL group (P = 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively).]”
Two corrections have been made to the Discussion of Section. This sentence previously stated:
“[The ESMS-mPNL group had a significantly longer irrigation time and a larger volume of fluid absorbed than the non-ESMS-mPNL group (but these values were clinically comparable),]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[The ESMS-mPNL group had a significantly longer irrigation time and a smaller volume of fluid absorbed than the non-ESMS-mPNL group (but these values were clinically comparable),]”
This sentence previously stated:
“[The volume of fluid absorbed during ESMS-mPNL increased significantly compared to the non-ESMS-mPNL group, and the endoscopic surgical monitoring system might promote better fluid absorption during ESMS-mPNL than during non-ESMS-mPNL.]”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“[The volume of fluid absorbed during ESMS-mPNL decreased significantly compared to the non-ESMS-mPNL group, and the endoscopic surgical monitoring system might promote better fluid absorption during ESMS-mPNL than during non-ESMS-mPNL.]”
We apologize for this mistake and declare that this correction will not change the scientific conclusion of this article. The original article has been updated.