Abstract

Escherichia coli is one of the most widely utilized hosts for recombinant protein production, including that of membrane proteins (MPs). We have recently engineered a specialized E. coli strain for enhanced recombinant MP production, termed SuptoxR. By appropriately co-expressing the effector gene rraA, SuptoxR can suppress the high toxicity, which is frequently observed during the MP-overexpression process, and, at the same time, enhance significantly the cellular accumulation of membrane-incorporated and properly folded recombinant MP. The combination of these two beneficial effects results in dramatically enhanced volumetric yields for various prokaryotic and eukaryotic MPs. Here, we engineered second-generation SuptoxR strains with further improved properties, so that they can achieve even higher levels of recombinant MP production. We searched for naturally occurring RraA variants with similar or improved MP toxicity-suppressing and production-promoting effects to that of the native E. coli RraA of the original SuptoxR strain. We found that the RraA proteins from Proteus mirabilis and Providencia stuartii can be even more potent enhancers of MP productivity than the E. coli RraA. By exploiting these two newly identified RraAs, we constructed two second-generation SuptoxR strains, termed SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2, whose MP-production capabilities often surpass those of the original SuptoxR significantly. SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2 are expected to become widely useful expression hosts for recombinant MP production in bacteria.
Keywords: Escherichia coli, SuptoxR, RraA, membrane protein, recombinant production, toxicity
Introduction
Membrane proteins (MPs) are the molecules responsible for the execution of numerous important functions in all living cells and organisms, such as nutrient import, maintenance of structural integrity, signaling and others.1 Their great significance is well reflected by the fact that they are encoded by 20–30% of the genes in every living organism.2 Furthermore, they constitute 30–50% of the targets of the marketed drugs and the ones currently in clinical development.3
Despite their enormous significance, our knowledge about the biochemical and structural properties of MPs is very much limited compared to that of soluble proteins. The difficulties in acquiring significant amounts of properly folded isolated protein, their frequent instability when extracted from their native membranes and solubilized in detergent micelles, and the increased complexity of the procedures required for their biochemical and biophysical characterization are some of the main factors, which have prevented faster development of this research area.4,5
Regarding the acquisition of isolated MPs at sufficient quantities for biochemical and biophysical analyses, this is typically done by recombinant overexpression in homologous or heterologous hosts, such as bacteria, yeasts, mammalian cells, insect cells, or transgenic animals.6 Among these systems, and as it is the case also for soluble proteins, the bacterium Escherichia coli is among the most frequently utilized MP production hosts, primarily due to its speed, easiness, low cost, and capability for isotopic protein labeling.2,7 Indeed, approximately 20% of all MP structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank have utilized MP material, which had been produced recombinantly in E. coli.8 Despite these successes, however, recombinant MP production in E. coli and in other bacteria usually suffers from poor cellular accumulation and severe toxicity for the expression host.2 MP-associated host toxicity, in particular, is a very frequently observed side effect of recombinant MP production and can lead to full growth arrest, very low levels of final biomass even under optimized conditions, and minute volumetric protein yields.9−11
In a previous work, we had searched for single E. coli genes, which can efficiently suppress the host toxicity associated with the MP overexpression process in bacteria. Following a genome-wide screen, one of the potent suppressors we identified was rraA, the gene encoding for the protein RraA, which functions as an inhibitor of the mRNA-degrading activity of the E. coli RNase E.12 Based on this, we constructed the engineered E. coli strain SuptoxR, which upon overexpression of rraA, is capable of achieving significantly higher levels of final biomass and of producing dramatically increased yields for various recombinant MPs of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin.12,13
In the present work, we aimed at constructing second-generation SuptoxR strains, which can achieve even higher levels of recombinant MP production. For this, we mined the genomes of various rraA-encoding bacteria and plants to search for naturally occurring RraA variants with similar or improved MP toxicity-suppressing and production-promoting effects to that of the native E. coli RraA of the original SuptoxR strain. Through this process, we identified two RraA proteins from the bacteria Proteus mirabilis and Providencia stuartii, which can be even more potent enhancers of MP productivity than the E. coli RraA. By utilizing these two newly identified RraAs, we constructed two second-generation SuptoxR strains, termed SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2, whose MP-production capabilities often surpass those of the original SuptoxR significantly. Based on these results, we anticipate that SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2 will become widely useful expression hosts for recombinant MP production in bacteria.
Results and Discussion
Various RraA Proteins from Bacteria and Plants can Efficiently Suppress MP-Induced Toxicity and Enhance MP Production when Co-Expressed in E. coli
The toxicity-suppressing and MP-production-promoting effects of SuptoxR are based on the overexpression of the E. colirraA gene from the vector pSuptoxR under the control of the araBAD promoter and its inducer l(+)-arabinose12−14 (Figure 1; Supporting Information Table S1). RraA (regulator of ribonuclease activity A) acts as an inhibitor of the mRNA-degrading activity of RNase E, and it has been found previously that rraA can affect the levels of more than 2000 different mRNAs when overexpressed in E. coli.15 In a prior work, we demonstrated that the beneficial effects of RraA on recombinant MP production are mediated by the action of RNase E.14
Figure 1.
Characteristics of the first- and second-generation specialized E. coli strains for recombinant MP production SuptoxR, SuptoxR2.1, and SuptoxR2.2. The toxicity-suppressing and cellular production-promoting capabilities of SuptoxR, SuptoxR2.1, and SuptoxR2.2 are based on the overexpression of the E. colirraA (EcrraA), the Proteus mirabilisrraA (PmrraA), and the Providencia stuartiirraA (PsrraA), respectively. EcrraA, PmrraA, and PsrraA are overexpressed from the vectors pSuptoxR, pSuptoxR2.1, and pSuptoxR2.2, respectively, under the control of the araBAD promoter and its inducer l(+)-arabinose.
With the ultimate goal of constructing second-generation SuptoxR strains with further improved properties, we searched for naturally occurring RraA variants with similar or improved MP toxicity-suppressing and production-promoting effects to that of the native E. coli RraA of the original SuptoxR strain. Apart from E. coli, homologous RraA sequences are encoded in the genomes of various archaea, proteobacteria, and plants.15 Based on this, we first mined the genomes of rraA-encoding bacteria and plants and selected a broad panel of RraA homologues with high (>85%), intermediate (65–85%), and lower (<65%) levels of sequence similarity to the E. coli RraA of SuptoxR (Table 1). Because there is very little information available about the function of RraA proteins and their structure–function relationships, our choice of RraA variants was based solely on sequence diversity criteria. Among the selected variants, the highest sequence variability was detected in the N- and C-terminal regions, where also significant differences in sequence lengths were observed (Supporting Information Figure S1). It is interesting to note that all the selected sequences, irrespective of their level of homology and of their bacterial or plant origin, share several absolutely conserved motifs throughout their length (Supporting Information Figure S1). Despite these striking similarities, there is no information currently available about how these highly conserved residues affect RraA functionality.
Table 1. Natural RraA Protein Variants Selected for Investigation in This Study.
| organism | length (aminoacids) | sequence Identity to SuptoxR RraA (%) | sequence similarity to SuptoxR RraA (%) | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escherichia coli | 162 | 100 | 100 | Genomic cDNA (Gialama et al.12) |
| Salmonella enterica | 162 | 96.9 | 98.8 | Genomic cDNA (Pullinger et al.36) |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 162 | 93.8 | 99.4 | Genomic cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Enterobacter gergoviae | 162 | 91.4 | 98.8 | Genomic cDNA(kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Enterobacter cloacae | 162 | 93.2 | 99.4 | Genomic cDNA(kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Serratia marcescens | 162 | 89.5 | 95.7 | Genomic cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Proteus mirabilis | 173 | 77.5 | 87.3 | Genomic cDNA (Jones et al.37) |
| Providencia stuartii | 174 | 77.0 | 85.1 | Genomic cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | 143 | 45.1 | 62.3 | Genomic cDNA(kindly provided by Dr. V. Miriagou) |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 167 | 40.5 | 61.3 | Synthetic gene (Genscript Corp.) |
| Malus domestica | 166 | 41.7 | 59.5 | Genomic cDNA (This work) |
We cloned the selected rraA genes into the original pSuptoxR vector in place of the E. colirraA and tested the effect of their overexpression on MP-induced toxicity and MP productivity by using the human bradykinin receptor 2 (BR2), a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily (Table 2), as a model of a highly toxic recombinant MP as we have described previously.12,16 To facilitate the rapid monitoring of the relative accumulation levels of membrane-incorporated MP, we used a C-terminal BR2 fusion with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). This choice was made because the fluorescence of E. coli cells expressing MP-GFP fusions has been found to correlate well with the amount of membrane-integrated recombinant MP17 and has been utilized extensively for these purposes by our group12,14,18−22 and many others.23−28 It is known that E. coli cells producing MP-GFP fusions do not always accumulate exclusively intact MP-GFP fusion, but sometimes yield truncated forms corresponding to cleaved GFP or other products of proteolysis as well,14,28 and thus, this assay is not typically used for absolute MP quantification. However, whole cell fluorescence of E. coli cells producing MP-GFP fusions is widely utilized as a facile metric for comparing relative MP productivities under different conditions and has been used extensively by various groups for determining optimal conditions and for identifying factors enhancing recombinant MP productivity.12,14,18−22
Table 2. Membrane Proteins Used in This Study.
| Membrane protein | Organism | Function | Number of TM helices | Topology | Mass (kDa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR2 | Homo sapiens | Bradykinin receptor 2 (GPCR) | 7 | Nout–Cin | 44.5 |
| CB1 | Homo sapiens | Central cannabinoid receptor (GPCR) | 7 | Nout–Cin | 52.9 |
| CB2 | Homo sapiens | Peripheral cannabinoid receptor (GPCR) | 7 | Nout–Cin | 39.7 |
| CLRN1 | Homo sapiens | Clarin-1—Member of the tetraspanin family | 4 | Nin–Cin | 25.7 |
| MscL | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Large conductance mechanosensitive channel | 2 | Nin–Cin | 16.0 |
| MdfA | Escherichia coli | Multidrug efflux transporter | 12 | Nin–Cin | 44.3 |
| HtdR | Haloterrigena turkmenica | Deltarhodopsin | 7 | Nout–Cin | 27.1 |
The potential toxicity-suppressing effects of the selected RraA proteins were evaluated by recording the final growth levels of E. coli MC1061 cells producing BR2-GFP, in the presence or absence of rraA overexpression, as measurements of the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the bacterial cultures upon completion of the MP overexpression process. We observed that, apart from Enterobacter cloacae and Malus domestica, co-expression of all the other rraA genes resulted in 45–165% increases in final OD600 values, thus indicating significantly reduced levels of BR2-induced toxicity in these cultures (Figure 2a). Then, BR2 accumulation on an individual cell basis upon co-expression of the selected rraA genes was monitored by measuring BR2-GFP fluorescence using flow cytometry. We observed that most of the selected RraA variants were also capable of enhancing cellular BR2-GFP fluorescence, thus indicating increased relative cellular productivity of membrane-embedded BR2 (Figure 2b). The combination of the suppressed MP-induced toxicity and the enhanced BR2-GFP productivity on an individual cell basis (Figure 2a,b) resulted in greatly enhanced levels of relative volumetric BR2-GFP fluorescence, that is, the bulk BR2-GFP fluorescence of equal-volume bacterial cultures, for the majority of the co-expressed rraA genes (Figure 2c). Apart from the E. cloacae, M. domestica, and Acinetobacter baumanniirraA genes, whose co-expression resulted in only modest or negligible increases, all other overexpressed rraA genes yielded 3-to17-fold higher levels of volumetric BR2-GFP fluorescence (Figure 2c). Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE)/Western blot analysis of clarified cell lysates confirmed that this enhanced BR2-GFP fluorescence upon co-expression of the selected rraA genes occurs due to increased BR2 accumulation (Figure 2d).
Figure 2.
Co-expression of various RraA homologues from bacteria and plants results in suppressed BR2-induced toxicity and enhanced accumulation of membrane-embedded BR2 at levels similar to or higher than those of the E. coli RraA of SuptoxR. (a) (left) Effect of the overexpression of different rraA genes from bacteria and plants on the growth of E. coli MC1061 cells producing BR2-GFP. OD600: optical density at 600 nm at the end of the BR2-GFP overexpression process; (right) percentage of increase in the OD values from Figure 2a (left) compared to wild-type E. coli. ΔOD (%): [(OD with rraA co-expression—OD without effector)/OD without effector] × 100. (b) Individual fluorescence of E. coli MC1061 cells producing BR2-GFP in the absence (no effector) and presence of rraA overexpression as measured by flow cytometry. (c) (left) Bulk fluorescence of E. coli MC1061 cells producing BR2-GFP in the absence (no effector) and presence of rraA overexpression corresponding to equal culture volumes; (right) percentage of increase in GFP fluorescence compared to SuptoxR. Δ[Relative GFP fluorescence] (%): [(GFP fluorescence with rraA co-expression from each organism—GFP fluorescence with E. colirraA co-expression)/GFP fluorescence with E. colirraA co-expression]x100. (d) SDS–PAGE analysis and visualization of the produced fusion by in-gel fluorescence and western blotting using an N-terminal anti-FLAG or C-terminal anti-GFP and anti-polyHis antibodies. In (a,c), the reported values correspond to the mean value from at least three independent experiments, each one performed in replica triplicates ± s.e.m. a denotes a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) with the “no effector” sample, while b denotes a statistically significant difference with the “E. coli” sample.
We observed that the accumulation levels of the different RraA variants in the E. coli cytoplasm significantly affected the efficiency of rraA co-expression in promoting MP productivity. More specifically, the rraA genes from E. cloacae, M. domestica, and A. baumannii, which exhibited poor or no MP-production-promoting activity, yielded barely detectable or undetectable levels of RraA accumulation as revealed by western blotting. On the contrary, all other rraA genes, whose co-expression resulted in enhanced MP productivity, were also found to enable the accumulation of the corresponding RraA variants at significant levels (Figure 2d, left). Codon optimization of the co-expressed rraA genes and other expression modifications could enhance the observed MP-production-promoting effects for some of the selected RraAs, which accumulated at very low or undetectable levels. Such an effect was recorded in the case of the Arabidopsis thalianarraA, which was the only codon-optimized variant tested here (Table 1). Thus, due to the observed variability in the accumulation levels of the tested RraA variants and in the absence of knowledge about how their co-expression affects the transcriptome profile of E. coli cells, we cannot compare directly the efficiency of the different RraA variants tested here in a quantitative manner. By monitoring the effects of rraA co-expression on the suppression of MP-induced toxicity and on the enhancement of MP productivity, however, we can identify RraA variants with MP toxicity-suppressing and production-promoting effects similar to that of the native E. coli RraA of the original SuptoxR strain, such as the ones from P. mirabilis, P. stuartii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter gergoviae, and A. thaliana, which is one of the main goals of the present study.
MP Production-Promoting Effects of the RraA Proteins from P. mirabilis and P. stuartii can Frequently Surpass Those of the E. coli RraA
Very interestingly, among the natural RraA variants, which were found to function as efficient enhancers of recombinant BR2 production, the potency of some of them was found to be on par with that of the native E. coli RraA of SuptoxR (EcRraA) or even higher (Figure 2a–c). Among them, the RraAs from P. mirabilis (PmRraA) and P. stuartii (PsRraA) were the most active and their potency surpassed that of the native EcRraA of SuptoxR with statistical significance both in terms of toxicity suppression (52 and 24% higher final OD600, respectively) and productivity (280 and 35% higher specific productivity, and 110 and 18% higher volumetric productivity, respectively) (Figure 2a–c). To investigate the folding quality of the overproduced MP in the presence of the most potent effector, PmRraA, we analyzed BR2-GFP production in isolated total membranes by semi-denaturing SDS–PAGE and in-gel fluorescence. Previous studies have shown that in-gel fluorescence provides a quantitative measure of the amount of properly folded protein for bacterially overexpressed MP–GFP fusions.29 Our analyses demonstrated that co-expression of PmRraA results not only in enhanced accumulation of total membrane-incorporated protein but also produces significantly increased levels of well-folded recombinant MP (Figure 2d, right). A fluorescence size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC)30 analysis of BR2-GFP in the presence of PmRraA co-expression similarly revealed overexpressed recombinant MP, which is in reasonably well-folded form (Supporting Information Figure S2), especially when considering how difficult of a target BR2 is for recombinant production in bacteria.16
To examine whether the recorded effects for the different rraA genes tested are specific for BR2 or can be observed for other MPs as well, we evaluated the effect of their co-expression on the toxicity and volumetric fluorescence for six additional recombinant MPs of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin, which are characterized by different sizes, number of trans-membrane helices, topologies, and biochemical properties: the human central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), the human tetraspan-like MP clarin-1 (CLRN1), the E. coli multidrug transporter MdfA, the large mechano-sensitive ion channel (MscL) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and the deltarhodopsin from the archaeon Haloterrigena turkmenica (HtdR) (Table 2). Overexpression of CLRN1-GFP, CB1-GFP, and CB2-GFP, in the absence and presence of the selected rraA variants, resulted in effects similar to those observed with BR2, that is, the rraA genes from P. mirabilis, P. stuartii, K. pneumoniae, E. gergoviae, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella enterica, and A. thaliana were again the most efficient suppressors of MP-induced toxicity and enhancers of volumetric MP-GFP fluorescence, thus indicating increased productivity for all three proteins tested. Among them, PmRraA was again the most efficient and its capabilities surpassed those of the EcRraA of SuptoxR both in terms of toxicity suppression (10–60% higher final OD600) and volumetric fluorescence (suggesting 30–60% higher volumetric productivity) (Figure 3a–c).
Figure 3.
Co-expression of various RraA homologues from bacteria and plants results in suppressed MP-induced toxicity and enhanced accumulation of membrane-embedded protein at levels similar to or higher than those of the E. coli RraA of SuptoxR for a number of recombinant MPs with different characteristics. (a) (top left) Effect of the overexpression of different rraA genes on the growth of E. coli MC1061 cells producing CLRN1-GFP. OD600: optical density at the end of the CLRN1-GFP overexpression process; (top middle) fluorescence of E. coli MC1061 cells producing CLRN1-GFP in the absence (no effector) and presence of rraA overexpression corresponding to equal culture volumes; (top right) percentage of increase in the CLRN1-GFP fluorescence compared to SuptoxR. Δ[Relative GFP fluorescence] (%): [(GFP fluorescence with rraA co-expression from each organism—GFP fluorescence with E. colirraA co-expression)/GFP fluorescence with E. colirraA co-expression] × 100; (bottom) individual fluorescence of E. coli MC1061 cells producing CLRN1-GFP in the absence (no effector) and presence of rraA overexpression as measured by flow cytometry. (b) As in (a) for CB1-GFP. (c) As in (a) for CB2-GFP. (d) (left) Pellets of E. coli MC1061 cells producing HtdR in the presence of 10 μM all-trans-retinal in the absence (no effector) and presence of rraA overexpression derived from equal culture volumes. Purple coloring indicates the production of well-folded and functional HtdR. (right) Relative absorbance at 550 nm of DDM-extracted HtdR acquired from selected cell lysates from Figure 3c, left. (e) Diagram summarizing the effects of co-expression of the different rraA genes evaluated on the volumetric productivity of all the recombinant MPs tested in the present work, compared to the E. colirraA of the original SuptoxR strain. A red square denotes an increase compared to the E. colirraA of the original SuptoxR strain, while a white square denotes either no effect or decrease. A crossed square indicates that the particular test has not been performed. The reported values correspond to the mean value from at least three independent experiments each one performed in replica triplicates ± s.e.m. a denotes a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) with the “no effector” sample, while b denotes a statistically significant difference with the “E. coli” sample.
HtdR is a light-driven outward proton pump, which can bind the chromophore all-trans-retinal and acquire a characteristic purple color with an absorption maximum at ∼550 nm when properly folded.31 Microbial rhodopsins, such as HtdR, have proven to be invaluable tools for optogenetic regulation applications.32 Furthermore, monitoring the levels of their characteristic purple coloring is a very convenient reporter of functional MP production.13,21,22,33 When HtdR was overexpressed along with each one of the five RraA variants, which were found as the most efficient production enhancers in the previous three cases (E. coli, P. mirabilis, P. stuartii, E. gergoviae, and A. thaliana), we observed that, apart from the A. thaliana RraA, all other variants were efficient in enhancing the levels of well-folded, functional HtdR compared to wild-type E. coli (Figure 3d, left). Among them, PsRraA was the most potent one and yielded levels of functional HtdR, which surpassed those of the EcRraA of SuptoxR (Figure 3d).
Finally, we evaluated the effect of the overexpression of the five best-performing rraA genes mentioned above on MdfA-GFP and MscL-GFP cytotoxicity and production. We observed, once again, that all five effectors were capable of enhancing recombinant MP volumetric fluorescence compared to wild-type E. coli (Supporting Information Figure S3). For MdfA, the E. gergoviae and the P. stuartii RraAs were found to be the most efficient effectors, while for MscL, the A. thaliana and P. stuartii RraAs yielded the highest volumetric productivity enhancements (Supporting Information Figure S3). In our previous studies, we have shown that SuptoxR-produced MscL is correctly folded and adopts a symmetric pentameric arrangement in the closed conformation that is in structural agreement with the solved crystal structure of this channel (PDB 2OAR).13
Construction of the Second-Generation Strains SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2
Among the naturally occurring RraA proteins found to act as suppressors of MP-induced toxicity and enhancers of recombinant MP production and after taking into account the expression tests for all seven recombinant MPs we studied, PmRraA and PsRraA were the effectors that proved to have improved performance compared to the EcRraA of SuptoxR in most cases (Figure 3e). Based on this, we constructed two second-generation SuptoxR strains, termed SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2, which overexpress the PmRraA and the PsRraA under the control of the araBAD promoter, respectively (Figure 1). Which SuptoxR2.X strain was optimal, depended on the particular MP target being produced: for all human MPs tested here, PmRraA was the most potent effector, while for the prokaryotic MPs, PsRraA typically yielded the largest or one of the largest increases in total and/or functional MP production. PmRraA and PsRraA are not necessarily the best MP-production-promoting effectors for all MP targets for recombinant production, and thus, it is likely that for other MPs, RraA proteins other than PmRraA and PsRraA from our collection or from other organisms not investigated here, may be optimal.
To evaluate the yields of purified recombinant MP, which can be achieved with our second-generation SuptoxR strains, we produced polyhistidine-tagged versions of HtdR in SuptoxR2.2. SuptoxR2.2 accumulated significantly enhanced levels of final bacterial biomass (Figure 4a), as well as total and detergent-extractable functional HtdR compared to both wild-type E. coli and the original SuptoxR (Figure 4a). HtdR overexpressed in wild-type E. coli, SuptoxR, and SuptoxR2.2 under identical conditions was solubilized using n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (DDM) from total membrane fractions and was isolated using a two-step purification process, which included immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) and SEC. The yield of isolated HtdR from SuptoxR2.2 was increased by >400% compared to wild-type E. coli and by >100% compared to the original SuptoxR and calculated to result in ∼5 mg of pure protein per L of shake flask culture. SDS–PAGE analysis of the SEC peaks corresponding to isolated HtdR revealed primarily a band exhibiting electrophoretic mobility with an apparent molecular mass of ∼19 kDa, which corresponds to the monomeric protein (Figure 4b and Supporting Information Figure S4; detergent-extracted MPs frequently run faster on SDS–PAGE than expected according to their molecular weight16), while protein dimers and trimers were also visible by SDS–PAGE and western blotting, albeit to significantly lower levels. At the same time, the isolated protein exhibited the characteristic purple color of well-folded and functional HtdR (Figure 4a). When combined, these analyses demonstrate that our second-generation SuptoxR strains can provide isolated recombinant MP of high purity and quality, which are sufficient for biochemical and structural characterization purposes.
Figure 4.
Second-generation E. coli SuptoxR strains produce significantly enhanced amounts of isolated functional recombinant MP. (a) Photographs of purple-colored bacterial cell pellets, lysates, detergent extracts, and purified protein derived from equal culture volumes of i MC1061 (wild type), SuptoxR, and SuptoxR2.2 cells producing HtdR in the presence of 10 μM all-trans-retinal. (b) SDS–PAGE analysis of the isolated HtdR from (a) and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. MW: molecular weight marker. The numbers indicate the corresponding molecular masses in kDa.
RraA was discovered in 2003 as a protein factor with the ability to inhibit the mRNA-degrading activity of RNase E, and it was found that rraA overexpression can affect the levels of more than 2000 different mRNAs in E. coli.15 A number of these mRNAs were found to encode proteins, which are associated with cell envelope biosynthesis and anaerobic metabolism.15 Interestingly, compromised cell envelope integrity and impaired formation of respiratory chain complexes in the cytoplasmic membrane have been found previously to be prominent consequences of MP overexpression.9 In our prior work, we have demonstrated that the beneficial effects of RraA on recombinant MP production are mediated by the action of RNase E.14 Based on this, we have hypothesized that RraA suppresses MP-induced toxicity and promotes MP accumulation by an indirect manner that involves stabilization of the mRNA and the subsequent increase of the cellular abundance of certain MP-productivity-promoting factors, possibly involved in cell envelope biosynthesis and/or (an)aerobic metabolism. We have favored the notion that these are multiple factors that function synergistically rather than one individual effector since, in the latter case, the single effector is expected to have been identified in our initial screen for suppressor of MP-induced toxicity, where RraA was initially selected.12 Since it is currently unknown exactly how RraA interacts with RNase E, it is very difficult to predict how different sequence variations in RraA affect RNase E inhibition and, consequently, how the transcriptomic profile of E. coli changes upon overexpression of different RraA variants. Thus, we can only speculate that the different RraA variants investigated here, when overexpressed and produced at substantial levels, can interact with the E. coli RNase E in a slightly different way in each case, thus resulting in a slightly altered transcriptomic profile, where the hypothesized MP-promoting factors mentioned above are found in different relative abundances. The fact that different RraA variants appear to be optimal for different MPs may be suggesting that a fine balance between the optimal levels of the RraA-associated MP-promoting factors and the maximal levels of production for different recombinant MPs exist.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that various RraA proteins from bacteria and plants can efficiently suppress MP-induced toxicity and enhance MP production when co-expressed in E. coli. More importantly, certain natural variants of the EcRraA, such as the ones from P. mirabilis and P. stuartii, can frequently outperform the MP-enhancing capabilities of the EcRraA of our original SuptoxR strain. By using these enhanced-performance variants from P. mirabilis and P. stuartii, we have constructed two second-generation E. coli SuptoxR strains, termed SuptoxR2.1 and SuptoxR2.2, respectively, and we have found that, either SuptoxR2.1 or SuptoxR2.2 or both, can often achieve even further increased accumulation of well-folded recombinant MPs compared to the original SuptoxR strain. Finally, we have demonstrated that the use of the new SuptoxR2.X strains enables the production of recombinant MPs of quality and quantity suitable for functional and structural studies. Thus, we anticipate that SuptoxR2.X will become broadly utilized expression hosts for recombinant MP production in bacteria.
Materials and Methods
Identification and Selection of Natural RraA Variants
The search for RraA proteins from proteobacteria and plants was performed using NCBI BLASTp,34 following a search for protein sequences similar to the E. coli RraA. The selection of specific organisms as sources of RraA proteins was based on the different levels of sequence similarity/identity.
Expression Vector Construction
All enzymes for cloning of recombinant DNA were purchased from New England Biolabs. The construction of the expression vectors pASKBR2-EGFP, pASKMdfA-EGFP, and pSuptoxR (pBAD33RraA) has been previously described.12 pASKCLRN1-EGFP was constructed by replacing the BDKRB2 gene (encoding for BR2) in the pASKBR2-EGFP vector with the CLRN1 gene (Addgene NM_174878.2) using the restriction enzymes XbaI and BamHI. For the construction of the vectors pBAD33RraAP. mirabilis (pSuptoxR2.1), pBAD33RraAP. stuartii (pSuptoxR2.2), pBAD33RraAK. pneumoniae, pBAD33RraAE. gergoviae, pBAD33RraAE. cloacae, pBAD33RraAS. marcescencens, pBAD33RraAA. baumanii, pBAD33RraAS. enterica, and pBAD33RraAM. dometica, the corresponding rraA genes were amplified using sequence-specific DNA primers and the genomic DNA of each organism as the template. pBAD33RraAA. thaliana was constructed using a codon-optimized synthetic gene (Genscript Corp). Each forward primer contained an XbaI site, an optimized Shine-Dalgarno sequence (AGGAGGAAACG), and a start codon, while each reverse primer contained a 6xHis tag, a stop codon, and a HindIII site. The resulting PCR products were cloned into the pBAD33 vector,35 which was digested with the same restriction enzymes. The correct sequences for all constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
MP Overexpression
E. coli MC1061 cells freshly transformed with the appropriate vectors were used for all protein production experiments. Liquid Luria–Bertani (LB) cultures containing the appropriate combination of antibiotics (100 μg/mL ampicillin, 40 μg/mL chloramphenicol) were inoculated from single bacterial colonies and incubated overnight at 37 °C. These cultures were used with a 1:50 dilution to inoculate fresh LB cultures containing 0.2% arabinose and were grown at 30 °C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.3–0.5 with shaking. The temperature was then decreased to 25 °C and after a temperature equilibration period of 10–20 min, MP expression was induced by the addition of 0.2 μg/mL of anhydrotetracycline (aTc; Sigma) overnight.
Membrane Isolation
Total membrane fractions were isolated from 1 L LB cultures. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (4000 g for 10 min) and resuspended in 10 mL of cold lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 15% glycerol, 2 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.5). The cells were lysed by brief sonication steps on ice and the resulting lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was then subjected to ultracentifugation on a Beckman 70Ti rotor at 42,000 rpm (130,000 g) for 1 h at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was finally resuspended in 5 mL of cold lysis buffer and homogenized.
Western Blot and In-Gel Fluorescence Analysis
Proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE in 12% gels under fully denaturing conditions (boiling of the samples for 10 min prior to loading) or semi-denaturing conditions (no boiling of the samples prior to loading). In-gel fluorescence was analyzed on a UVP ChemiDoc-It2 imaging system equipped with a cooled CCD camera and a GFP filter, after exposure for about 3 s, following SDS–PAGE analysis under semi-denaturing conditions. For Western blot analysis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Merck) for 45 min at 12 V on a semi-dry blotter (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20 (TBST) overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with TBST, they were incubated with the appropriate antibody dilution in TBST containing 0.5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk at room temperature for 1 h. Specifically, the utilized antibodies were a mouse monoclonal anti-polyhistidine antibody (Sigma) at 1:3000 dilution (conjugated with horseradish peroxidase), a mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (Takara) at 1:20,000 dilution, or a mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma) at 1:2500 dilution, with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody at 1:4000 dilution. The proteins were visualized using a ChemiDoc-It2 Imaging System (UVP), after triple membrane washing with TBST.
Bulk Fluorescence Measurements
Cells corresponding to 0.5 mL of culture were harvested and resuspended in 100 μL of PBS. The cell suspension was then transferred to a black 96-well plate, and after fluorophore excitation at 488 nm, fluorescence was measured at 510 nm using a TECAN SAFIRE or a Cytation 5 (BioTek) plate reader.
Fluorescence Analysis by Flow Cytometry
∼107 cells were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS, and after fluorophore excitation at 488 nm, the fluorescence of 50,000 cells was measured at 530/30 nm using a CyFlow ML flow cytometer (Partec). Data were analyzed with FlowJo 7.6.2.
Membrane Extraction, Purification and Quantification of H. turkmenica Deltarhodopsin
The procedure followed to extract HtdR from bacterial cultures has been described previously.13 Briefly, HtdR was overexpressed in E. coli MC1061 cells (wild type), SuptoxR and SuproxR2.2 cells. Pellets derived from each culture were resuspended in 7.5 mL of cold lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 15% glycerol, 2 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.5) and lysed by brief sonication steps on ice. Total cell lysates were incubated with 2.5% (w/v) DDM (Glycon Biochemicals) and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) by rotation at 180 rpm for 24 h at 4 °C in the dark to extract HtdR. The samples were then ultracentrifuged using a Beckman 70-Ti rotor at 42,000 rpm (130,000 g) at 4 °C for 1 h. If after the centrifugation the pellet was colorless and all the purple-colored HtdR were successfully extracted, the supernatant was collected and analyzed by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm.
HtdR purification was performed by IMAC using an ÄKTA start system (GE Healthcare) with a 5 mL HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 25 mL of equilibration buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.1% (w/v) DDM, pH 8). The DDM-extracted fraction was loaded onto the column, washed initially with 75 mL of equilibration buffer and then with 7.5 mL of the same buffer containing 100 mM imidazole. The protein was eluted from the column with 10 mL of elution buffer (200 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.1% (w/v) DDM, pH 8). The eluate was concentrated to 600 μL using an Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit with a cutoff at 10 kDa (Merck Millipore). The IMAC eluate was purified further by SEC using a Superdex 200 column on an ÄKTA pure system (GE Healthcare), equilibrated with PBS (pH 7.4) by the addition of 0.1% (w/v) DDM. Quantification of purified protein was performed by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm using a Cytation 5 plate reader (BioTek) and by estimating the final concentration based on HtdR’s extinction coefficient [ε280 = 2.15(mg/mL)−1·cm–1].
Fluorescence SEC
BR2-GFP was expressed in 1 L cultures as described above. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 7.5 mL of PBS and lysed by brief sonication steps on ice. Total cell lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 30 min, the supernatant was collected and then ultracentrifuged using a 70-Ti rotor at 42,000 rpm (130,000 g) at 4 °C for 1 h. The membrane pellet was collected and solubilized in 8.5 mL of solubilization buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 400 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1.5% (w/v) DDM, 0.12 mM PMSF) under rotation at 180 rpm at 4 °C for 1 h. The solubilized membrane pellet was then analyzed by SEC using a Superdex 200 column on an ÄKTA pure system (GE Healthcare) paired with a RF-20A fluorescent detector (Shimadzu). The column equilibration buffer contained 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 400 mM NaCl, and 0.05% (w/v) DDM. The resulting fractions corresponding to fluorescent peaks were analyzed further by native PAGE/in-gel fluorescence and PAGE/western blotting.
Statistical Analysis
Graphs were prepared using Prism 7.00 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). Statistical analyses were performed using Prism and Microsoft Office 2007 Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) software packages. Mean values were compared using unpaired t tests. Data in all assays correspond to the mean values of at least three independent experiments, each one performed in three replicates. Error bars denote ±standard error of mean. Differences in the values among different samples were considered as statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Mark P. Stevens (University of Edinburgh) for providing genomic DNA of S. enterica subsp. Enterica serovar Dublin str. SD3246; Harry L. T. Mobley (University of Michigan) for genomic DNA of P. mirabilis, and Vivi Miriagou (Hellenic Pasteur Institute) for genomic DNA of K. pneumoniae 1001, E. gergoviae 5227A, P. stuartii strain ATCC 33672, S. marcescens subsp. Marcescens Db11, E. cloacae subsp. Cloacae ATCC 13047 and A. baumanni. We also thank Anastasia P. Galanopoulou for the construction of the pASKCLRN1-EGFP vector. This work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under the HFRI PhD Fellowship grant (Fellowship Number: 961). This research was also supported by funds provided by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014-2020” in the context of the project “Development of second-generation specialized bacterial strains for high-level recombinant membrane protein production” (MIS code 5050546), as well as by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Project “ProMiDis”; grant agreement no 819934). Finally, we acknowledge support by the project “Synthetic Biology: From omics technologies to genomic engineering (OMIC-ENGINE)” (MIS 5002636), which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infra-structure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014- 2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).
Glossary
Abbreviations
- MP
membrane protein
- aTc
anhydrotetracycline
- GPCR
G-protein-coupled receptor
- BR2
bradykinin receptor 2
- CB1
central cannabinoid receptor
- CB2
peripheral cannabinoid receptor
- CLRN1
tetraspan-like membrane protein clarin-1
- MscL
large conductance mechanosensitive ion channel
- MdfA
multidrug efflux transporter
- HtdR
Haloterrigena turkmenica deltarhodopsin
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- EGFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
- SDS–PAGE
sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- IMAC
immobilized metal affinity chromatography
- SEC
size-exclusion chromatography
- DDM
n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside
- PMSF
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
- LB
Luria–Bertani
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- OD
optical density
- TBST
Tris-buffered saline + 0.1% Tween-20
- EcRraA
E. coli RraA
- PmRraA
P. mirabilis RraA
- PsRraA
P. stuartii RraA
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00598.
Sequence comparison of the tested RraA proteins with the E. coli RraA of SuptoxR; FSEC profile of BR2-GFP expressed in SuptoxR2.1; co-expression of various RraA homologues enhances bacterial recombinant production of the E. coli MdfA and the M. tuberculosis MscL; and second-generation E. coli SuptoxR strains increase the production of isolated and folded recombinant MPs (PDF)
Author Contributions
G.S. conceived, designed the research, and coordinated the project. E.V., A.G., C.K., M.M., and A.M.S. carried out the research. E.V., F.N.K., and G.S. secured funding and analyzed the data. G.S. and E.V. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- von Heijne G. The membrane protein universe: what’s out there and why bother?. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 261, 543–557. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner S.; Bader M. L.; Drew D.; de Gier J.-W. Rationalizing membrane protein overexpression. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 364–371. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yildirim M. A.; Goh K. I.; Cusick M. E.; Barabási A. L.; Vidal M. Drug-target network. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1119. 10.1038/nbt1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Errasti-Murugarren E.; Bartoccioni P.; Palacin M. Membrane Protein Stabilization Strategies for Structural and Functional Studies. Membranes 2021, 11, 115. 10.3390/membranes11020155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter E. P.; Beis K.; Cameron A. D.; Iwata S. Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 581–586. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarramegna V.; Talmont F.; Demange P.; Milon A. Heterologous expression of G-protein-coupled receptors: comparison of expression systems from the standpoint of large-scale production and purification. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 1529–1546. 10.1007/s00018-003-3168-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makino T.; Skretas G.; Georgiou G. Strain engineering for improved expression of recombinant proteins in bacteria. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10, 32. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dilworth M. V.; Piel M. S.; Bettaney K. E.; Ma P.; Luo J.; Sharples D.; Poyner D. R.; Gross S. R.; Moncoq K.; Henderson P. J. F.; Miroux B.; Bill R. M. Microbial expression systems for membrane proteins. Methods 2018, 147, 3–39. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner S.; Baars L.; Ytterberg A. J.; Klussmeier A.; Wagner C. S.; Nord O.; Nygren P.-Å.; van Wijk K. J.; de Gier J.-W. Consequences of membrane protein overexpression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1527–1550. 10.1074/mcp.m600431-mcp200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gubellini F.; Verdon G.; Karpowich N. K.; Luff J. D.; Boël G.; Gauthier N.; Handelman S. K.; Ades S. E.; Hunt J. F. Physiological response to membrane protein overexpression in E. coli. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M111.007930. 10.1074/mcp.M111.007930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miroux B.; Walker J. E. Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 260, 289–298. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gialama D.; Kostelidou K.; Michou M.; Delivoria D. C.; Kolisis F. N.; Skretas G. Development of Escherichia coli Strains That Withstand Membrane Protein-Induced Toxicity and Achieve High-Level Recombinant Membrane Protein Production. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 284–300. 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michou M.; Kapsalis C.; Pliotas C.; Skretas G. Optimization of Recombinant Membrane Protein Production in the Engineered Escherichia coli Strains SuptoxD and SuptoxR. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 1631–1641. 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gialama D.; Delivoria D. C.; Michou M.; Giannakopoulou A.; Skretas G. Functional Requirements for DjlA- and RraA-Mediated Enhancement of Recombinant Membrane Protein Production in the Engineered Escherichia coli Strains SuptoxD and SuptoxR. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 1800–1816. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee K.; Zhan X.; Gao J.; Qiu J.; Feng Y.; Meganathan R.; Cohen S. N.; Georgiou G. RraA. a protein inhibitor of RNase E activity that globally modulates RNA abundance in E. coli. Cell 2003, 114, 623–634. 10.1016/j.cell.2003.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Link A. J.; Skretas G.; Strauch E.-M.; Chari N. S.; Georgiou G. Efficient production of membrane-integrated and detergent-soluble G protein-coupled receptors in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 2008, 17, 1857–1863. 10.1110/ps.035980.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drew D. E.; von Heijne G.; Nordlund P.; de Gier J.-W. L. Green fluorescent protein as an indicator to monitor membrane protein overexpression in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2001, 507, 220–224. 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02980-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skretas G.; Georgiou G. Genetic analysis of G protein-coupled receptor expression in Escherichia coli: inhibitory role of DnaJ on the membrane integration of the human central cannabinoid receptor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102, 357–367. 10.1002/bit.22097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skretas G.; Georgiou G. Simple genetic selection protocol for isolation of overexpressed genes that enhance accumulation of membrane-integrated human G protein-coupled receptors in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5852–5859. 10.1128/aem.00963-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skretas G.; Makino T.; Varadarajan N.; Pogson M.; Georgiou G. Multi-copy genes that enhance the yield of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 591–602. 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michou M.; Stergios A.; Skretas G. SuptoxD2.0: A second-generation engineered Escherichia coli strain achieving further enhanced levels of recombinant membrane protein production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020, 117, 2434–2445. 10.1002/bit.27378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michou M.; Delivoria D. C.; Skretas G. High-level Production of Recombinant Membrane Proteins Using the Engineered Escherichia coli Strains SuptoxD and SuptoxR. Bio-Protoc. 2020, 10, e3710 10.21769/BioProtoc.3710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner S.; Klepsch M. M.; Schlegel S.; Appel A.; Draheim R.; Tarry M.; Högbom M.; van Wijk K. J.; Slotboom D. J.; Persson J. O.; et al. Tuning Escherichia coli for membrane protein overexpression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 14371–14376. 10.1073/pnas.0804090105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlegel S.; Löfblom J.; Lee C.; Hjelm A.; Klepsch M.; Strous M.; Drew D.; Slotboom D. J.; de Gier J.-W. Optimizing membrane protein overexpression in the Escherichia coli strain Lemo21(DE3). J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 423, 648–659. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daley D. O.; Rapp M.; Granseth E.; Melén K.; Drew D.; von Heijne G. Global topology analysis of the Escherichia coli inner membrane proteome. Science 2005, 308, 1321–1323. 10.1126/science.1109730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim S. K.; Lee D.-H.; Kim O. C.; Kim J. F.; Yoon S. H. Tunable Control of an Escherichia coli Expression System for the Overproduction of Membrane Proteins by Titrated Expression of a Mutant lac Repressor. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 1766–1773. 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angius F.; Ilioaia O.; Amrani A.; Suisse A.; Rosset L.; Legrand A.; Abou-Hamdan A.; Uzan M.; Zito F.; Miroux B. A novel regulation mechanism of the T7 RNA polymerase based expression system improves overproduction and folding of membrane proteins. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8572. 10.1038/s41598-018-26668-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drew D.; Lerch M.; Kunji E.; Slotboom D.-J.; de Gier J.-W. Optimization of membrane protein overexpression and purification using GFP fusions. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 303–313. 10.1038/nmeth0406-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geertsma E. R.; Groeneveld M.; Slotboom D.-J.; Poolman B. Quality control of overexpressed membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 5722–5727. 10.1073/pnas.0802190105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawate T.; Gouaux E. Fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography for precrystallization screening of integral membrane proteins. Structure 2006, 14, 673–681. 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamo N.; Hashiba T.; Kikukawa T.; Araiso T.; Ihara K.; Nara T. A light-driven proton pump from Haloterrigena turkmenica: functional expression in Escherichia coli membrane and coupling with a H+ co-transporter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 341, 285–290. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hochbaum D. R.; Zhao Y.; Farhi S. L.; Klapoetke N.; Werley C. A.; Kapoor V.; Zou P.; Kralj J. M.; Maclaurin D.; Smedemark-Margulies N.; et al. All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 825–833. 10.1038/nmeth.3000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nannenga B. L.; Baneyx F. Enhanced expression of membrane proteins in E. coli with a P(BAD) promoter mutant: synergies with chaperone pathway engineering strategies. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10, 105. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altschul S. F.; Gish W.; Miller W.; Myers E. W.; Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guzman L. M.; Belin D.; Carson M. J.; Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4121–4130. 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pullinger G. D.; Dziva F.; Charleston B.; Wallis T. S.; Stevens M. P. Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin-specific sequences by subtractive hybridization and analysis of their role in intestinal colonization and systemic translocation in cattle. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 5310–5321. 10.1128/iai.00960-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones B. D.; Lockatell C. V.; Johnson D. E.; Warren J. W.; Mobley H. L. Construction of a urease-negative mutant of Proteus mirabilis: analysis of virulence in a mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 1120–1123. 10.1128/iai.58.4.1120-1123.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




