Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0273345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273345

Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional study

Tamrat Anbesaw 1,*, Betelhem Fekadu 1
Editor: Sharada Prasad Wasti2
PMCID: PMC9397869  PMID: 35998120

Abstract

Background

Depression is the most common psychiatric condition among older adults, and it goes unnoticed by individuals themselves and is under-diagnosed by clinicians due to the misconception that these are normal parts of aging. However, the problem is not properly addressed in Ethiopia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of depression among the older adults in Bahir Dar city.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 423 older adults in Bahir Dar city. A simple random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Depression was assessed using a 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore the potential determinants of depression among the participants.

Results

The prevalence of depression among older adults was found to be 57.9% (95% CI: 53.2–62.6). This study showed that educational status with grades 5-8th (AOR: 5.72, 95% CI: 2.87–11.34), and 9-12th grade (AOR: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.59–7.41), income <2004 ETB (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.07), cognitive impairments (AOR: 3.54, 95% CI: 2.16–5.81), family history of mental illness (AOR:3.06, 95% CI: 1.03–9.04), and poor quality of life (AOR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.74–4.46) were significantly associated with depression.

Conclusion

The prevalence of depression among older adults was found to be huge. Having low educational status, low monthly income, cognitive impairments, family history of mental illness, and poor quality of life were associated with depression. Therefore, raising community awareness of mental health, increasing social participation, providing supportive counseling and routine screening of depressive symptoms are essential in combating depression among Bahir-Dar city older adults.

Introduction

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), depression is a common psychiatric condition usually characterized by sadness, lack of interest, guilt or low self-esteem, disturbed sleep or food, exhaustion, and poor attention for at least two weeks [1]. Depression is the most frequent mental health disorder in the world, and it is a serious public health concern because it affects so many people including older adults [2, 3]. It has a prevalence rate of 10 to 55% [4].

Depression in older adults often goes untreated because people typically think that it is a normal component of the aging process and a natural reaction to chronic diseases, loss, and social conversion [2]. Depressive disorders afflict 10 to 20% of older individuals globally, affecting over 300 million people in 2015 as reported by WHO [5]. In addition to that, the aging population is on the rise in many countries of the world. By 2050, it is anticipated that 80% of the world older adults would live in low and middle-income nations, with the number of individuals aged 60 and above reaching 390 million [6]. When compared to their younger counterparts, older persons are more likely to face significant challenges in terms of financial loss, reliance on others, social deprivation, loss of self-worth, and functional limitations. They also have physical and mental health issues [7].

According to numerous studies showed, the prevalence of depression in older adults (aged 60 and above) in Chitradurga was 60% [8], while in Womberma District, Ethiopia, it was 45%. [9] South Africa 40% [10], North Indians 9.5% [11], Vietnam 6.9% [12], Egypt 44.4% [13], Malaysia systematic 16.5% [3], Singapore [14] 13.4%, Ethiopia (Harer) 28.5% [15], Ambo 41.8%, Chinese tertiary hospital 32.8% [16], Tanzania 21.2% [17], Greece 58.5% [18], systematic review conducted in Asian countries 38.6% [19] and Thailand 18.5% [20]. Suicide risk is higher among older adults when they are depressed. Suicide is the most common complication of depression, killing an estimated one million individuals each year [5]. The usage of health services by older adults increases as a result of depression, putting additional strain on the already overburdened healthcare system.

Genetic susceptibility, chronic disease and disability, pain, frustration with limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), personality traits (dependent, anxious, or avoidant), and adverse life events (separation, divorce, bereavement, poverty, social isolation) are all factors that increase depression risk in older adults, according to the WHO [7]. Also, many studies have shown a link between depression and various risk factors such as being a woman, living in a city, insomnia, older adults who are dependent on others, life stressors, lack of a spouse, lack of formal education, lower income, substance abuse, stressful life events, poor social support, more disability, lower life satisfaction, cognitive decline, employment status, and medical comorbidities [911, 13, 15, 16, 2022].

Understanding the epidemiology of depression in older persons is crucial to lessen the harmful impact of depression on daily functioning and quality of life (QOL) [5]. Depression is largely ignored in healthcare strategy and planning in most underdeveloped nations, and mental health services receive only a small amount of funding [19]. In primary care settings, it is both underdiagnosed and undertreated. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the burden of depression among the older adults in Ethiopia has not been adequately investigated, particularly among those living in Bahir Dar city. This gap may contribute to poor or inconsistent mental health care at the community level. As a result, this research was carried out to estimate the prevalence of depression in the older adults and to investigate the epidemiological factors that contribute to it.

Method and materials

Study design, study area and period

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Bahir Dar city administration, which is located 565 km from Addis Ababa in North West of Ethiopia; the capital of Amhara regional state from June 1 to 30, 2020. According to the 2016–17 city administration report, the total population of Bahir Dar city administration is 266, 952; 124,396 males and 142,555 females. The city has nine sub-cities with 66,628 households. Among these, the age group of 60 years and above is estimated to be 11,034 (5003 male, and 6031 females). Those older adults are Shimbit (1670), Tana (1043), Fasilo (1200), Sefene selam (287), Gishabay (522), Shum ambo (417), Belay Zeleke (1591), and Ginbot-20 (4304). The health care service is provided by two specialized hospitals, one specialized and four primary private hospitals. There are also eleven health centers in Bahir Dar city administration. Information is taken from Bahir Dar city municipality.

Study population, inclusion, and exclusion criteria

All individuals older adults in the city aged 60 and above and residents of the city for at least six months were included, while older adults people who were severely ill, unable to communicate, and older adults with education below fifth grade were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling technique

The sample size was calculated using the single population proportion formula with the assumption of a prevalence (P) of depression of 47.5% from a previous study [23] with a confidence limit of 5%. As a result, n = 384, with no requirement for a correction factor because the population size is more than ten thousand. The ultimate sample size was 423 after adding a 10% non-response rate. The Bahir Dar city administration urban division has nine sub-cities, one of which (Hidar 11) was excluded from the report due to insufficient data. Based on the population size, the final sample size was distributed proportionally to eight sub-cities. Participants included Shimbit (64), Tana (40), Fasilo (46), Sefene Selam (11), Gish Abay (20), Shum Abbo (16), Belay Zeleke (61), and Gimbot Haya (165). The sample frame (households with respective old ages) was obtained from health extension workers, and each household was then randomly selected using the lottery method. If more than one member fulfilled the criteria in one household one was selected using the lottery method. If no participants in the selected household fulfilled the criteria the next household was selected.

Operational definition

Older adults

Are those aged is 60 and above [24].

Neurocognitive impairment

The MMSE score of ≤ 22 for those who attended less than eighth grade, ≤ 24 for those who attended grade nine to twelve, and ≤ 26 for those college/university graduates out of a total score of 30 [25].

Quality of life

Using WHOQOL-BREF 26-item index; a higher score denotes a higher quality of life [26].

The multidimensional scale of perceived social support scale

Any mean scale score ranging from 1 to 2.9 is considered as low, 3 to 5 moderate social support, and 5.1 to 7 as high social support [27].

Activities

Using Katz’s indicator of daily life independence, a total score of six shows independence, four suggests moderate independence, and two or less implies dependence [28].

Nutritional status

was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment with the score ranged from 0–14 interpreted as (0–7) as malnourished, (8–11) at risk for malnutrition, and (12–14) as normal nutritional status [29].

Current substance use

Within the last three months, you have used at least one of a certain substance for non-medical purposes (alcohol, khat, tobacco, others) [30].

Ever use of a substance

Using at least one of any specific substances for a non-medical purpose at least once in a lifetime (alcohol, khat, tobacco, others [30].

Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST)

An overall total score of 3 indicates hazardous alcohol consumption [31].

Income

Using the World Bank poverty line cut point those who have an average monthly income of less than 2004 ETB (1.9 USD/day) taking 1$ = 35.16 ETB were taken as low income [32].

Data collection tool

A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to assess the sociodemographic factors, clinical related factors, behavioral and psychosocial factors. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) item was used to determine whether elderly people had depression or not. GDS-15 has undergone rigorous testing and validation in low- and middle-income countries including India and Nepal [33, 34].

The Royal College of Physicians, the British Geriatric Society, and the Royal College of General Practitioners all recommended this geriatric depression scale for screening depression in older adults [35]. A cutoff value of more than or equal to five was used to define depression [36]. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of GDS-15 in this study was 0.86. Cognition status using standardized mini-mental state examination (MMSE) with a cut-off point as follows, no cognitive impairment (24–30), mild cognitive impairment (18–23), severe cognitive impairment (0–17) (39). It has been validated in Ethiopia for those with a formal education grade of fifth or higher, with different cut-off points depending on their level of education [25]. The specificity and sensitivity of MMSE were 77.8% and 78.7% respectively [37]. WHOQOL-BREF was used to assess the quality of life. It has four domains; physical, psychological, social, and environmental factors. It has internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > = 0.7) and has been translated into nine languages [26]. The six-question mini-nutritional assessment short form has been validated in Ethiopia. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.65, with 80.1 percent sensitivity and 72.5 percent specificity (54). Katz’s index of daily life independence consists of six questions, each worth one point. Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.83, with strong test-retest and inter-rater reliability [38]. History of mental illness presence of chronic medical illness, and substance-related factors were assessed with yes/no questions, but alcohol drinking was assessed by using FAST.

Data collection procedure

Data was collected through face-to-face interviews by trained data collectors. The data were collected from study participants by face-to-face interviews from house to house. The questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated into the local language (which is Amharic) by a language translator and translated back to English to ensure its understandability and consistency before the actual data collection. The training was given for the supervisor and data collectors by the principal investigator for two days duration on the methods of data collection and the detail of the questionnaire. Data were collected by four psychiatric nurses who currently work in health centers and was supervised by Masters of Sciences degree holder in mental health. A pretest was conducted on 21(5%) to check the understandability of the questionnaires. The collected data were reviewed and checked for completeness before data entry.

Data analysis

The completed questionnaire was manually checked for completeness. Data were coded and entered into Epi data version 4.6 and, then exported to SPSS- 26 version for analysis. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to explain the population concerning the relevant variables. The bivariate logistic analysis was done to determine the association between the outcome and explanatory variables. Variables with p less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were entered into multivariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to control for possible confounding effects and to determine the presence of a statistically significant association between independent variables and outcome variables. The model of fitness was checked by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant and the strength of the association was presented by an odds ratio of 95% C.I.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Bahir Dar University. Study participants were informed about the procedure, the significance of the study, risks, and benefits associated with the study. Written Informed consent was obtained from participants who participated in the study. Each respondent was informed about the objective of the study and all data obtained from them was kept confidential by using code instead of any personal identifier which was used only for the study. The information was not disseminated without the respondent’s permission. The information provided by the participants was exclusively utilized for the study. Those older adults who reported depression were immediately referred to mental health facilities for further evaluation and management.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

A total of 423 older adult individuals participated in this study (100% of response rate). The mean age (SD) of the participants was 66.01(±5.88), 58.9% were males. The majority of the participants 52.2% had a spouse. Almost two-thirds of the participants 66.6% were Orthodox Christian followers and the majority 86.3% were Amhara in their ethnicity. Regarding educational level, 61.5% were from grade five to eight. Around one-third, 36.6% were housewives followed by retired 27.0%. From the participants, 62.9% participants reported that their average monthly income was ≥2004 ETB, and 63.6% were living with their family (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 423) Percent (%)
Age in years 60–64 191 45.1
65–69 127 30.0
70–74 69 16.3
75–79 18 4.3
80 and above 18 4.3
Sex Female 174 41.1
Male 249 58.9
Marital status Has spouse 221 52.2
No spouse 202 47.8
Religion Orthodox 282 66.6
Muslim 117 27.7
Protestant 16 3.80
Catholic 8 1.90
Ethnicity Amhara 365 86.3
Oromo 14 3.3
Tigre 27 6.4
Gurage 17 4
Educational status 5-8th grade 260 61.5
9-12th grade 99 23.4
College and above 64 15.1
Occupational status Governmental employee 17 4.0
Merchant 105 24.8
Housewife 155 36.6
Retired 114 27.0
Others* 32 7.6
Monthly income <2004ETB 157 37.1
≥2004 ETB 266 62.9
Current living condition Alone 92 21.7
Relative 62 14.7
Family 269 63.6

Key: * Farmer, Jobless.

Clinical and substance-related factors of the participants

According to this study finding, 42.1% of respondents had neurocognitive impairment. More than half, 51.1% of participants had a comorbid medical illness, such as hypertension 30.7%, HIV/AIDS 6.1%, cardiac 5.9%, diabetes 18%, and others 2.6%. Of the participants, 46.8% currently used medication and 8.0% had reported a family history of mental illness. Among the respondent, 11.8% of the respondents had a history of head trauma and 53.4% were normal nutritional status (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of older adults people in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 423) Percent (%)
Cognitive impairments Yes 178 42.1
No 245 57.9
History of chronic medical illness Yes 216 51.1
No 207 48.9
Hypertension Yes 130 30.7
No 87 20.6
HIV/AIDS Yes 26 6.1
No 192 45.4
Cardiac Yes 25 5.9
No 192 45.4
Diabetes Yes 76 18.0
No 141 33.3
Others* Yes 11 2.6
No 207 48.9
Medication currently in use Yes 198 46.8
No 225 53.2
Family history of mental illness Yes 34 8.0
No 389 92.0
History of head trauma Yes 50 11.8
No 373 88.2
Nutritional status Malnourished 32 7.6
Risk 165 39
Normal 226 53.4

Others*: Epilepsy.

Regarding the use of the substance, about 9.7% of them were hazardous alcohol users. Of the participants, 8% and 2.4% were using khat and cigarettes within the past three months respectively (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Ever and current substance use among older adults people in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Fig 1

Psychosocial characteristics of respondents

Regarding the psychosocial factors of respondents around 47.5% of them had poor quality of life. From the participant, 13.0%, 13.2%, and 13.5% had low family social support, low friend social support, and low other social support respectively (Table 3).

Table 3. Psychosocial characteristics of older adults people in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 423) Percent (%)
The activity of daily living Dependent 9 2.1
Moderate 14 3.3
Independent 400 94.6
Quality of life Poor quality 201 47.5
Good quality 222 52.5
Family social support Low support 55 13.0
Moderate support 136 32.2
High support 232 54.8
Friend social support Low support 56 13.2
Moderate support 213 50.4
High support 154 36.4
Significant other social support Low support 57 13.5
Moderate support 150 35.5
High support 216 51.1

Prevalence of depression and associated factors among older adults people

In this study, the overall prevalence of depression among older adults people in Bahir Dar city was 57.9% (95% CI: 53.2,62.6) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Prevalence of depression in older adults people in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Fig 2

Factors such as marital status, educational status, occupational status, monthly income, current living condition, cognitive impairment, history of chronic medical illness, medication currently in use, family history of mental illness, and quality of life were significantly correlated (P < 0.25) in bi-variable analysis. Among these, variables such as educational status, income, cognitive impairment, family history of mental illness, and poor quality of life were significantly associated with depression in multivariable analysis.

Older adults whose educational status was grades 5-8th were nearly six times (AOR: 5.72, 95% CI: 2.87–11.34), and 9-12th grade were 3.44 times (AOR: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.59–7.41) more likely to develop depression compared to college and above. Older adults with a monthly income of <2004 ETB were nearly 2 times more likely to have depression as compared to participants with an income of <2004 ETB (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.07). Older adults who had cognitive impairments were 3.54 times more likely to develop depression compared with their counterparts (AOR: 3.54, 95% CI: 2.16–5.81), and, who had a family history of mental illness were also three times more likely to have depression compared to those who had no family history of mental illness (AOR:3.06, 95% CI: 1.03–9.04). Finally, older adults with poor quality of life were 2.78 times more likely to develop depression compared to good quality of life (AOR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.74–4.46) (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis results of depression in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 423).

Variables Category Depression COR(95%C.I) AOR(95%C.I) P-values
Yes(n) No(n)
Marital status No spouse 145(71.8%) 57(28.2%) 3.08(2.05,4.62) 1.49(0.92,2.44) 0.108
Has spouse 100(45.2%) 121(54.8%) 1 1
Educational status 5-8th grade 176(67.7%) 84(32.3%) 5.79(3.14,10.69) 5.72(2.87,11.34) <0.001 *
9-12th grade 52(52.5%) 47(47.5%) 3.06(1.55,6.04) 3.44(1.59,7.41) 0.002 *
College and above 17(26.6%) 47(73.4%) 1 1
Occupational status Government employee 6(35.3%) 11(64.7%) 1 1
Merchant 52(49.5%) 53(50.5%) 1.79 (0.62, 5.22) 0.96(0.25,3.66) 0.949
Housewife 100(64.5%) 55(35.5%) 3.333(1.170,9.50) 1.33(0.35,5.04) 0.669
Retired 61(53.5%) 53(46.5%) 2.11(0.73, 6.09) 1.41(0.37,5.28) 0.612
Others** 26(81.3%) 6(18.8%) 7.94(2.09, 30.13) 1.71(0.34,8.63) 0.516
Monthly income <2004ETB 112(71.3%) 45(28.7%) 2.49(1.63,3.79) 1.89(1.16,3.07) 0.01 *
≥2004 ETB 133(50.0%) 133(50.0%) 1 1
Current living condition Alone 65(70.7%) 27(29.3%) 2.22(1.33, 3.69) 0.83(0.39,1.75) 0.634
Relative 40(64.5%) 22(35.5%) 1.67(0.94, 2.97) 0.46(0.21,1.03) 0.061
Family 140(52.0%) 129(48.0%) 1 1
Cognitive impairment Yes 140(78.7%) 38(21.3%) 4.91(3.16,7.62) 3.54(2.16,5.81) <0.001 *
No 105(42.9%) 140(57.1%) 1 1
History of chronic medical illness Yes 139(64.4%) 77(35.6%) 1.72(1.16,2.54) 1.17(0.74,1.86) 0.492
No 106(51.2%) 101(48.8%) 1 1
Medication currently in use Yes 130(65.7%) 68(34.3%) 1.83(1.23,2.71) 1.04(0.36,3.02) 0.943
No 115(51.1%) 115(51.1%) 1 1
Family history of mental illness Yes 29(85.3%) 5(14.7%) 4.64(1.76,12.25) 3.06(1.03,9.04) 0.043 *
No 216(55.5%) 173(44.5%) 1 1
Quality of life Poor quality 153(76.1%) 48(23.9%) 4.50(2.96,6.85) 2.78(1.74,4.46) <0.001 *
Good quality 92(41.4%) 130(58.6%) 1 1

*Statistically significant at P-value < 0.05, COR, Crude odds Ratio, AOR, Adjusted odds Ratio, 1 = reference category, Chi square = 8, Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit 0.42, degrees of freedom = 8 and,

** Farmer, Jobless.

Discussion

The high prevalence of depression in this study 57.9% [95% CI: 53.2% − 62.6%], may be the indicative of a high burden due to depression among older adults in the community. The finding was congruent with that of a community-based cross-sectional study done in Chitradurga, India (60%) [8], Heraklion, Greece (58.5%) [18], Portugal (61.4%) [39], and India (53.75%) [40]. This result was lower than those found in studies in Greece (84.3%) [41], Vietnam (66.9%) [12], urban, India (75.5%) [42], and Beni Suef, Egypt (89.7%) [43]. This disparity in prevalence could be related to differences in the tools employed to measure depression. For instance, in urban India, the 30-item GDS is used to screen for depression, whereas in Vietnam, the Zung self-rating depression scale is used to screen for depression [12]. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in the prevalence of depression among older adults could be explained by differences in study design, sampling procedure, socioeconomic-demographic characteristics, geographical location, and cultural differences.

However, this study finding was higher than study done in North Indian (9.5%) [11], Malaysian (16.5%) [3], Tanzania 21.2% [17], a systematic review conducted in China (38.6%) [19], Thailand (18.5%) [20], Ambo, Ethiopia (41.8%) [21], Singapore 13.4% [14], China 32.8% [16], and Womberma district, Ethiopia (45%) [9]. This variation might be due to social-cultural, economic disparities, and the heterogeneity in the classification of depression, i.e., they utilized a GDS-15 score of 6 and above to define depression, which could lead to an underestimating of depression prevalence in Chinan [19]. Another probable reason is the difference in assessment technique; in Singapore, depression was assessed using the Geriatric Mental State (GMS) instrument [14]. Whereas, in our study, depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale item 15 (GDS-15) tool. Additionally, the disparity could be due to a difference in the study participants; in Ambo, the majority of the participants were males, which was found to be less likely to be depressed than females in the study [21]. Furthermore, according to some studies, people in developed countries have easier access to mental health care and support before they experience problems.

Regarding the associated factors, older adults whose educational status grades 5-8th were nearly 6 times and 9-12th grades were 3.44 times more likely to develop depression compared to college and above. This finding was in agreement with different studies in Ethiopia (Harer) [15], Malaysia [3], India (Punjab) [22], Egypt [44], and Thailand [20]. Depressive symptoms are linked to educational attainment, and depression can be influenced by a variety of socioeconomic factors. In lower levels of educational achievement, there is no simple strategy to improve the health and economic success of a nation.

Older adults with a monthly income <2004 ETB were nearly 2 times more likely to have depression as compared to participants with an income of ≥2004 ETB. Similar to a finding of different studies reported in Asia (Myanma) [45], North Indians [11], and Portugal [46]. This is the finding that low-income people have more difficult getting healthy services and care, which has been associated with higher levels of depression. McCall and colleagues’ findings in the United States supported prior studies that connected low income to a higher prevalence of depression [47].

Older adults who had cognitive impairments were 3.54 times more likely to develop depression compared with their counterparts. This was supported by the study conducted in Ethiopia (Harer) [15] and Chinese tertiary hospitals [16]. According to Ismail’s meta-analysis, depression is common among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with a pooled prevalence of 32% [48]. Depression can result from problems with attention and working memory, as well as changes in sleep patterns and social isolation due to cognitive impairment [49]. Furthermore, MCI shares some of the same characteristics as late-life depression in terms of brain structure changes [50].

A family history of mental illness was also a predictor of depression. When compared to respondents who did not have a family history of mental illness, those populations who had a family history of mental illness were three times more likely to be depressed. This could be explained by the fact that mental illness is inherited, that families are stigmatized, and that there are various types of burdens on family members in terms of financial expenses and providing care for the patient, as well as the offspring may be stressed and worried about their parent’s health condition, all of which could increase the risk of depression [51].

Finally, older adults with poor quality of life were 2.78 times more likely to develop depression compared to good quality of life. This matches research from North Indians [11], Chinese tertiary hospitals [16], and Portugal [46]. Our findings show that older people with depression are more likely to report poor quality of life. In a review article comprising 74 studies, Sivertsen and colleagues came to the same conclusion, finding that depressed older adults had a lower global quality of life than non-depressed older adults. They went on to say that this link remained constant throughout time and was irrespective of how the quality of life was measured [52].

Limitations

The limitation of our study is the use of the GDS scale to measure depressive symptoms rather than formal interviews for diagnosing depression, which is thought to be more appropriate for identification and less sensitive to somatic symptoms that could lead to the overestimation of depression. Other limitations include, some of the reports were based on prior events, which can lead to recall bias. Variables like alcohol use, khat chewing, and other substances are more sensitive issues that might lead to social desirability bias. Also, the generalizability of the study might be limited for those who had formal education since the tool (MMSE) is adapted based on the educational level in this setup. In addition, Since income was assessed using the World Bank poverty line, it has limitations such as simple and does not take into account indebtedness, health, education, housing, or public service access. And it does not always fully reflect the differences in subsistence costs between countries. Finally, because of the nature of the cross-sectional study design, it is impossible to establish cause and effect linkages.

Conclusion

The study conducted in Bahir Dar city shows that more than half of the older adults are suffering from depressive symptoms. An older adult having low educational status, low income, cognitive impairments, a family history of mental illness, and a poor quality of life were all found to be significant predictors of depression in older adults. Because geriatric depression is sometimes unrecognized by clinicians and depressive symptoms are often attributed to the aging process, we recommend that clinicians regularly screen depressive symptoms using standard assessment tools in health care settings and the community. It is preferable to place a greater emphasis on the risk groups identified by this finding.

Supporting information

S1 File

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Bahir Dar university department of psychiatry. Also, we want to thank participants and data collectors for their willingness to be part of the study.

Abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval

DSM 5

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th text revision

ETB

Ethiopian birr

GDS

Geriatric Depression Scale

HADS

Hospital anxiety and depression scale

HIV/AIDS

Human immune deficiency syndrome

KM

Kilometer

OR

Odds ratio

SPSS

Statistical Packaging for Social Science

USA

United States of American

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Bahir-Dar University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Diagnostic A. statistical manual of mental disorders fifth edition DSM-5. Edisi ke-5 Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association. 2013.
  • 2.Nair SS, Hiremath S, Ramesh P, Nair SS. Depression among geriatrics: Prevalence and associated factors. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2013;5(8):110–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vanoh D, Shahar S, Yahya HM, Hamid TA. Prevalence and determinants of depressive disorders among community-dwelling older adults: findings from the towards useful aging study. International Journal of Gerontology. 2016;10(2):81–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roh HW, Hong CH, Lee Y, Oh BH, Lee KS, Chang KJ, et al. Participation in physical, social, and religious activity and risk of depression in the elderly: a community-based three-year longitudinal study in Korea. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0132838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Depression W. Other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017:1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cheng S-T, Siankam B. The impacts of the HIV/AIDS pandemic and socioeconomic development on the living arrangements of older persons in sub-Saharan Africa: A country-level analysis. American journal of community psychology. 2009;44(1):136–47. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9243-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Organization WH. Mental health: depression in Europe. 2012.
  • 8.BKA AM, NG MR. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and depression among elderly population in urban Chitradurga. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Holistic Health. 2020;6(1):22–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mulat N, Gutema H, Wassie GT. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among elderly people in Womberma District, north-west, Ethiopia. BMC psychiatry. 2021;21(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Padayachey U, Ramlall S, Chipps J. Depression in older adults: prevalence and risk factors in a primary health care sample. South African family practice. 2017;59(2):61–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharma K, Gupta A, Sharma RC, Mahajan N, Mahajan A, Sharma D, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for depression in elderly North Indians. Journal of Geriatric Mental Health. 2016;3(2):158. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dao A, Nguyen VT, Nguyen HV, Nguyen LT. Factors associated with depression among the elderly living in urban Vietnam. BioMed research international. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/2370284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El-Gilany A-H, Elkhawaga GO, Sarraf BB. Depression and its associated factors among elderly: A community-based study in Egypt. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2018;77:103–7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Sambasivam R, Vaingankar JA, Picco L, Pang S, et al. Prevalence of depression among older adults-results from the well-being of the Singapore elderly study. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2016;45(4):123–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Girma M, Hailu M, Wakwoya A, Yohannis Z, Ebrahim J. Geriatric depression in Ethiopia: prevalence and associated factors. J Psychiatry. 2016;20(1):1000400. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zou C, Chen S, Shen J, Zheng X, Wang L, Guan L, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms among elderly inpatients of a Chinese tertiary hospital. Clinical interventions in aging. 2018;13:1755. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S170346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mlaki DA, Asmal L, Paddick SM, Gray WK, Dotchin C, Walker R. Prevalence and associated factors of depression among older adults in rural Tanzania. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021;36(10):1559–66. doi: 10.1002/gps.5584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kleisiaris C, Maniou M, Papathanasiou I, Sfiniadaki A, Collaku E, Koutsoumpa C, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms in an elderly population and their relation to life situations in home care. Health Science Journal. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang H-H, Jiang Y-Y, Rao W-W, Zhang Q-E, Qin M-Z, Ng CH, et al. Prevalence of depression among empty-nest elderly in China: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020;11:608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Charoensakulchai S, Usawachoke S, Kongbangpor W, Thanavirun P, Mitsiriswat A, Pinijnai O, et al. Prevalence and associated factors influencing depression in older adults living in rural Thailand: a cross‐sectional study. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2019;19(12):1248–53. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mirkena Y, Reta MM, Haile K, Nassir Z, Sisay MM. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among older adults at ambo town, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goyal A, Kajal K. Prevalence of depression in elderly population in the southern part of Punjab. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2014;3(4):359. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.148109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Assil S, Zeidan Z. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among elderly Sudanese: a household survey in Khartoum State. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 19 (5), 435–440, 2013. 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Habte E, Tekle T. Cognitive Functioning among Elders with Symptoms of Depression: The Case of Two Selected Institutionalized Care Centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Health Science Journal. 2018;12(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seid et al. Population norms for the mini-mental state examination in Ethiopia. Ethiopian medical journal. 2011;49(3). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.da Rocha NS P M B D, Fleck MP. The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF. Value in Health. 2012;15(3):449–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang M, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhang L, Feng D. Prevalence of psychological distress and the effects of resilience and perceived social support among Chinese college students: Does gender make a difference? Psychiatry Research. 2018;267:409–13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wallace M, Shelkey M. Katz index of independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Urol Nurs. 2007;27(1):93–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hailemariam H, Singh P, Fekadu T. Evaluation of mini nutrition assessment (MNA) tool among community dwelling elderly in urban community of Hawassa city, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Nutrition. 2016;2(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McRee B, Babor TF, Lynch ML, Vendetti JA. Reliability and validity of a two-question version of the World Health Organization’s alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test: The ASSIST-FC. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2018;79(4):649–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hodgson R, Alwyn T, John B, Thom B, Smith A. The FAST alcohol screening test. Alcohol and alcoholism. 2002;37(1):61–6. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/37.1.61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bank W. Decline of global extreme poverty continues but has slowed. Accessed on. 2019;28.
  • 33.Sarkar S, Kattimani S, Roy G, Premarajan K, Sarkar S. Validation of the Tamil version of short form Geriatric Depression Scale-15. Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. 2015;6(03):442–1446. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.158800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gautam R, Houde S. Geriatric depression scale for community-dwelling older adults in Nepal. Asian j gerontol Geriatr. 2011;6(2):93–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of psychiatric research. 1982;17(1):37–49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  • 37.folstein MF S.E AND McHugh P.R. mini-mental statue: A practical method for grading the cognitive state o patients for the clinician. journal of psychiatry research. 1975;12(3):189–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Azad A, Mohammadinezhad T, Taghizadeh G, Lajevardi L. Clinical assessment of activities of daily living in acute stroke: Validation of the Persian version of Katz Index. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2017;31:30. doi: 10.18869/mjiri.31.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leal MCC, Apóstolo JLA, Mendes AMdOC, Marques APdO. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and associated factors among institutionalized elderly. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2014;27:208–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goud AA, Nikhade NS. Prevalence of depression in older adults living in old age home. IAIM. 2015;2(11):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Babatsikou F, Konsolaki E, Notara V, Kouri M, Zyga S, Koutis C. Depression in the elderly: a descriptive study of Urban and Semi-Urban Greek population. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017;10(3):1286–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Buvneshkumar M, John K, Logaraj M. A study on prevalence of depression and associated risk factors among elderly in a rural block of Tamil Nadu. Indian journal of public health. 2018;62(2):89. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_33_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ekram M ES , Hany H ED , Eman ET , Al Shymaa M L . Depression among elderly in Beni Suef city [Upper Egypt]. 2009.
  • 44.Odejimi O, Tadros G, Sabry N. A systematic review of the prevalence of mental and neurocognitive disorders amongst older adults’ populace in Egypt. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2020;27(1):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cho SM, Saw YM, Saw TN, Than TM, Khaing M, Khine AT, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression among the community-dwelling elderly in Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory, Myanmar. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sousa RDd, Rodrigues AM, Gregório MJ, Branco JDC, Gouveia MJ, Canhão H, et al. Anxiety and depression in the Portuguese older adults: Prevalence and associated factors. Frontiers in Medicine. 2017;4:196. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.McCall NT, Parks P, Smith K, Pope G, Griggs M. The prevalence of major depression or dysthymia among aged Medicare Fee‐for‐Service beneficiaries. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2002;17(6):557–65. doi: 10.1002/gps.642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ismail Z, Elbayoumi H, Fischer CE, Hogan DB, Millikin CP, Schweizer T, et al. Prevalence of depression in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry. 2017;74(1):58–67. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Steffens DC, Potter G. Geriatric depression and cognitive impairment. Psychological medicine. 2008;38(2):163–75. doi: 10.1017/S003329170700102X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lebedeva AK, Westman E, Borza T, Beyer MK, Engedal K, Aarsland D, et al. MRI-based classification models in prediction of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in late-life depression. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2017;9:13. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sadock BJ. Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sivertsen H, Bjørkløf GH, Engedal K, Selbæk G, Helvik A-S. Depression and quality of life in older persons: a review. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2015;40(5–6):311–39. doi: 10.1159/000437299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Sharada Prasad Wasti

20 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-38673Prevalence of depression and associated factors among elderly in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional studyPLOS ONE

Dear Tamrat Anbesaw,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

This study has the potential to provide the invaluable prevalence of depression and its associated factors among older adults in Ethiopia, but authors should carefully address all comments provided by reviewers as per the below instruction for further review.  In addition to the reviewer's suggestions please remove abstract lines 35-40 big bracket [ ] and only keep small bracket and follow in discussion line 301 too. Submit manuscript with full proofread. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 6, 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. 

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D., MSc, MHCM, MA.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

 [The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.]

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:  

[NO authors have competing interests.]

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now 

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. 

Address all below comments and suggestions:

Reviewer #1: The authors determined the prevalence and associated factors of depression among 423 older adults in Bahir Dar city. Depression was assessed by 15-point Geriatric Depression Scale, where older adults scoring five or more where classified as being depressed. Cognitive impairment, quality of life and income were assessed by MMSE, WHOQOL-BREF 26-item index and World Bank poverty line cutoff respectively. The prevalence of depression was found to 57.9 %. The authors found that depression was associated with cognitive impairment, poor quality of life and low income.

This study has a potential to provide invaluable epidemiological data for depression among the older adults in Ethiopia, provided the following issues are addressed.

Main Issues

1. Prevalence calculation.

The authors did not explain how the prevalence of depression among older adults was calculated. The data for the total population of older adults aged 60 years and above in Bahir Dar City is not provided. The total number of households in Bahir Dar city is not provided either. It is not clear how the 423 subjects were obtained. The 423 older adults who participated in this study may not be representative of the older adults in Bahir Dar City. The study findings (particularly the prevalence) cannot therefore be generalized to the older adults in Bahir Dar City. This is hardly addressed in the discussion.

2. Validation of Assessment Tools

The authors did not state whether GDS has been validated in Ethiopia and whether they used validated versions of GDS. The limitations of assessing income using World Bank Poverty line cut-offs are not appreciated. The limitations of MMSE in assessing cognitive impairment are not addressed. The authors did not state whether older adults who were illiterate or had level of education below fifth grade were excluded from the study.

Other issues

Title.

The title needs to be reframed as the study population is not representative of the older adults in Bahir Dar City.

Abstract

Line 27 Depression is unnoticed by clinicians due to natural aging process. This needs to be reviewed. There are several factors for under-diagnosis of depression in older adults, apart from issues related to aging.

Line 29 …elderly in Bahir Dar city residents?

Line 35 use older adults instead of elders

Lines 43, 44 consider restating the concluding statement to reflect your findings. Emotional care, mental health care, what is the difference?

INTRODUCTION

Lines 52, 53. The statements are incompatible with what the authors are studying.

Line 56 re-check whether WHO information on depression includes two weeks

Lines 56, 57, 58 repetition of information

Lines 61,62 consider reframing the statement.

Line 65 aged 60 and up??

Lines 69 to 77. Consider rearranging this paragraph. The magnitude of depression in older adults should appear before the consequences of depression. The authors should be specific regarding the age group the prevalence estimates of depression refer to.

Line 83 consider reframing this statement…..elderly people who are reliant on others vs dependence on others, reliance on others??

Methods and materials

Line 113, 114 What is the total population of older adults aged 60 years and over in Bahir Dar City? Unless this is known it will be impossible to estimate the prevalence of depression among older adults in Bahir Dar City that can be generalized to the whole population of older adults in Bahir Dar City.

Line 119 Which information was taken from Bahir Dar City Municipality?

Line 124 All old age residents?? Consider correcting this statement.

Line 126 All old age population?? Same as in Line 124

Line 128 Consider correcting this sentence.

Line 133, 134 consider reframing the statements. Was the sample size estimated using Epi info 7 Stat Calc software or single population proportion formula?

Line 141 Which population size are you referring to here; the total population or the population of older adults aged 60 and over?

Line 142 Clarify how the final sample size was distributed proportionally among the eight sub-cities.

Line 144 sample frame? od ages? Correct.

Line 151 Limitations of MMSE should be addressed

Line 156 Has this instrument been validated in Ethiopia?

Line 170 The limitations of assessing income using this method should be addressed.

Line 176 Has GDS been validated in Ethiopia ? Which version of GDS was used? Validated or original version?

Line 182 What about the older adults with education below fifth grade, and those who could neither read nor write? Were they excluded from the study? The limitations of using MMSE to assess cognition should be appreciated. How was dementia distinguished from depression in this study?

Lines 200,201.202 , 204 Consider correcting these statements. What is MSc?

Lines 202, 203,204 Was the GDS translated into the local language(Hamharic)?

Lines s 207, 2008,209. Consider correcting these statements.

Line 222 How was the confidence interval of the prevalence calculated?

Line 235 How about the older adults with level of education below the fifth grade and those who could neither read nor write? Were they excluded from the study?

Line 265 correct this statement.

Line 271 Show how the prevalence of depression was calculated. How was the confidence interval calculated?

Lines 283 to 292 Consider correcting the statements with 3.44 times, 2.78 times etc.

Line 313 to 328 Consider summarizing this paragraph.

Line 334 Low education may limit the development of therapies to alleviate the disease burden of depression. Can older adults develop therapies for depression? Please consider correcting this statement.

Lines 339 to 342 Consider correcting the statements.

Line 343 correct 3.54 times

Line 349 limitations of MMSE in assessing cognitive impairment should be addressed.

Line 352 populations who had family history of mental illness? Consider correcting this.

Line s 376 to 382 Correct the statements.eg we recommend

that clinicians regularly screening depressive symptoms using standard studies in the elderly

Line 399 What about the older adults who were illiterate? Were they excluded from the study? Were there older adults who were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment? How many older adults had severe cognitive impairment per MMSE?

Line 404 Any time during the procedure?

Lines 404 ,405 correct the statements.

Typos and Grammatical errors

There several typos and grammatical errors in this manuscript apart from those highlighted . These should to be corrected

Reviewer #2: The authors have presented findings which adds to current literature on depression. Overall the methods chosen were appropriate and the results support the conclusions. However, the authors need to improve on the language of the manuscript.

**********

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0273345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273345.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


2 Feb 2022

Response to reviewer’s

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D., MSc, MHCM, MA, Academic Editor, PLOS ONE.

Thank you very much for giving us the golden chance to revise our manuscript “Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional study.

We would also like to thank the reviewers for their detailed reviews and for providing us with helpful suggestions that will strengthen our manuscript and knowledge. We have gone through the comments and tried to include the responses to all the comments and suggestions. Also, we addressed questions raised by the academic editor.

Comments by editor and reviewers

This study has the potential to provide the invaluable prevalence of depression and its associated factors among older adults in Ethiopia, but authors should carefully address all comments provided by reviewers as per the below instruction for further review.

Response: We tried to revise and incorporate carefully based on the editor and reviewers' feedback.

In addition to the reviewer's suggestions please remove abstract lines 35-40 big bracket [ ] and only keep small bracket and follow in discussion line 301 too. Submit manuscript with full proofread.

Response: We removed it from the manuscript as recommended.

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Response: We prepared it as recommended.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter

Response: We amended it in the revised cover letter.

Journal Requirements

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: We try to put the manuscript to meet PLOS ONE's style requirements.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

[The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.]

Response: This study was funded by Bahir-Dar University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

Response: We received only financial support and we received only financial support from our institution Bahir-Dar University.

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

Response: We rewrite it as “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

Response: Corresponding Author

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Response: We amended it as per comment.

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We revised and sent the cover letter.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:

[NO authors have competing interests.]

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."

Response: Corrected as recommended.

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We revised and sent the cover letter.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

Response: Comment accepted and amended.

Comments by reviewers

Reviewer 1

The authors determined the prevalence and associated factors of depression among 423 older adults in Bahir Dar city. Depression was assessed by 15-point Geriatric Depression Scale, where older adults scoring five or more where classified as being depressed. Cognitive impairment, quality of life and income were assessed by MMSE, WHOQOL-BREF 26-item index and World Bank poverty line cutoff respectively. The prevalence of depression was found to 57.9 %. The authors found that depression was associated with cognitive impairment, poor quality of life and low income.

This study has a potential to provide invaluable epidemiological data for depression among the older adults in Ethiopia, provided the following issues are addressed.

Main Issues

1. Prevalence calculation.

The authors did not explain how the prevalence of depression among older adults was calculated. The data for the total population of older adults aged 60 years and above in Bahir Dar City is not provided. The total number of households in Bahir Dar city is not provided either. It is not clear how the 423 subjects were obtained. The 423 older adults who participated in this study may not be representative of the older adults in Bahir Dar City. The study findings (particularly the prevalence) cannot therefore be generalized to the older adults in Bahir Dar City. This is hardly addressed in the discussion.

Response: We explained in detail in the next questions in the method sections.

-Calculating prevalence: The prevalence of depression among older adults is calculated by measuring the presence of depression in a sample of the population selected randomly, then dividing the number of older adults that have depression by the number of people in whom it was measured. Prevalence is often expressed as a percentage.

Simply,

Prevalence= (Total cases)/(Total population) x 100, P=245/423 x 100 = 57.9%

-The technique of how we addressed the participants is that “Among these, the age group of 60 years and above is estimated to be 11,034 (5003 male, and 6031 females). Those older adults are estimated Shimbit (1670), Tana (1043), Fasilo (1200), Sefene selam (287), Gishabay (522), Shum ambo (417), Belay Zeleke (1591), and Ginbot-20 (4304)”. From the above total older adults we allocated proportionally and from this, Shimbit (64), Tana (40), Fasilo (46), Sefene Selam (11), Gish Abay (20), Shum Abbo (16), Belay Zeleke (61), and Gimbot Haya (165) were included in this study.”

-We tried to represent the older adult population in Bahir-Dar city administration using probability sampling techniques. We discussed clearly in sampling technique.

2. Validation of Assessment Tools

The authors did not state whether GDS has been validated in Ethiopia and whether they used validated versions of GDS. The limitations of assessing income using World Bank Poverty line cut-offs are not appreciated. The limitations of MMSE in assessing cognitive impairment are not addressed. The authors did not state whether older adults who were illiterate or had level of education below fifth grade were excluded from the study.

Response: Thank you for your very critical and constructive comments! Geriatric Depression Scale item 15 (GDS-15) was used to assess the presence of depression among older adults. Even if the tool hasn’t been validated in Ethiopia we use extensively validated in low and middle-income countries such as India, Nepal, other Asian and African countries with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 89%. Also, various studies conducted in Ethiopia use this instrument to assess depression. The validity and reliability of the tool have been supported through both clinical practice and research. In addition, we conducted a pretest and its internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) in this study was 0.86. Finally, we do have a plan to conduct a validation study for the future.

-Regarding the World Bank poverty line cut-offs; It is simplistic and does not reflect indebtedness, health, education, housing, or access to public services. Also, it does not always accurately represent the different costs of subsistence from country to country. Difficulty to assess each item found in the household, despite this limitation many developing country studies use this assessment way. It's better to assess the wealth index using PCA for future researchers. W put it in the limitation section. Thank you for your very supportive comment. we incorporate in the limitation section.

-Regarding MMSE, One important limitation of MMSE is that it cannot be administered to illiterate subjects as 2 of its items involve reading and writing. Also, the limitation is the inclusion of a task requiring paper and pencil (copying a drawing). Furthermore, difficulty in identifying mild cognitive impairment. We excluded older adults with education below fifth grade and we revised in the exclusion criteria accordingly.

Other issues

Title.

The title needs to be reframed as the study population is not representative of the older adults in Bahir Dar City.

Response: It represents the older adults population in B.dar city. We put it clearly in the method section how we did allocate it.

Abstract

Line 27 Depression is unnoticed by clinicians due to natural aging process. This needs to be reviewed. There are several factors for under-diagnosis of depression in older adults, apart from issues related to aging.

Response: We paraphrased it accordingly. Several studies showed, depression among the elderly were unnoticed by the individuals themselves and were also underdiagnosed by healthcare professionals due to the misconception that these are a natural aspect of the aging process and a natural reaction to chronic diseases, loss, and social conversion. It could negatively aggravate several aspects at the individual, household, national, and international level.

NB: In the clinical setting, older adults with depression have similar manifestations to dementia (we call it pseudodementia), this is considered as an age-related problem and it is ignored by the patient itself, even parents, and underdiagnosed by clinicians. Hence, we rephrase as “Depression is the most common psychiatric condition among older adults, and it goes unnoticed by individuals themselves and is under-diagnosed by clinicians due to the misconception that these are normal parts of aging.”

Line 29 …elderly in Bahir Dar city residents?

Response: We corrected it accordingly. The study represents depression among the elder people Bahir-Dar city. We corrected as” older adults in Bahir Dar city”

Line 35 use older adults instead of elders

Response: Thank you, we corrected it as recommended throughout the manuscript.

Lines 43, 44 consider restating the concluding statement to reflect your findings. Emotional care, mental health care, what is the difference?

Response: Thank you, we revised and added some additional ideas and we rewrite as “The prevalence of depression among older adults was found to be huge. Educational status, monthly income, cognitive impairments, family history of mental illness, and poor quality of life were associated with depression. To fulfill the demands of the city's growing older population, elderly care, mental health care, and social security services should be strengthened. Also, raising community awareness of mental health, increasing social participation, and providing supportive counseling are essential in combating depression among Bahir-Dar city older adults”. See the main document.

INTRODUCTION

Lines 52, 53. The statements are incompatible with what the authors are studying.

Response: We removed it.

Line 56 re-check whether WHO information on depression includes two weeks

Response: Thank you! we changed it according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Lines 56, 57, 58 repetition of information

Response: We revised it!

Lines 61,62 consider reframing the statement.

Response: Revised, We paraphrased as “Depression in older adults often goes untreated because people typically think that it is a normal component of the aging process and a natural reaction to chronic diseases, loss, and social conversion”. See in the main document.

Line 65 aged 60 and up??

Response: We change to “aged 60 and above.”

Lines 69 to 77. Consider rearranging this paragraph. The magnitude of depression in older adults should appear before the consequences of depression. The authors should be specific regarding the age group the prevalence estimates of depression refer to.?? See ambo study pop/n

Response: Thank you! We rearranged it as you recommended. And, we specify age group, older adults: are those aged is 60 and above.

Line 83 consider reframing this statement…..elderly people who are reliant on others vs dependence on others, reliance on others??

Response: We corrected as by saying “older adults who are dependent on others”

Methods and materials

Line 113, 114 What is the total population of older adults aged 60 years and over in Bahir Dar City? Unless this is known it will be impossible to estimate the prevalence of depression among older adults in Bahir Dar City that can be generalized to the whole population of older adults in Bahir Dar City.

Response: Thank you. We mentioned the total number of the older adult population. The study reported here is to investigate the prevalence of depression among the age group of 60 years and above, as measured by GDS-15, among 11,034 (5003 male and 6031 females) older adults in a city.

Line 119 Which information was taken from Bahir Dar City Municipality?

Response: For example The total population, the number of sub-cities, health care services including health centers is provided in the Bahir Dar city administration.

Line 124 All old age residents?? Consider correcting this statement.

Response: We corrected it as “All older adults who live in Bahir Dar city administration.”

Line 126 All old age population?? Same as in Line 124

Response We also corrected it as “Older adults aged 60 years and above who were available in Bahir Dar city administration during the study period.” See in the document.

Line 128 Consider correcting this sentence.

Response: We amended it accordingly.

Line 133, 134 consider reframing the statements. Was the sample size estimated using Epi info 7 Stat Calc software or single population proportion formula?

Response: Corrected it as “The sample size was calculated using the single population proportion formula with the assumption of a prevalence (P) of depression of 47.5 % from a previous study with a confidence limit of 5%. As a result, n=384, with no requirement for a correction factor because the population size is more than ten thousand. The ultimate sample size was 423 after adding a 10% non-response rate”. See the main document.

Line 141 Which population size are you referring to here; the total population or the population of older adults aged 60 and over?

Response: Thank you for critical view. We put the total older adult population which was 11,034. See the main document.

Line 142 Clarify how the final sample size was distributed proportionally among the eight sub-cities.

Response: We revised it as “Among these, the age group of 60 years and above is estimated to be 11,034 (5003 male, and 6031 females). Those older adults are Shimbit (1670), Tana (1043), Fasilo (1200), Sefene selam (287), Gishabay (522), Shum ambo (417), Belay Zeleke (1591), and Ginbot-20 (4304)”. From the above total older adults we allocated proportionally and from this, Shimbit (64), Tana (40), Fasilo (46), Sefene Selam (11), Gish Abay (20), Shum Abbo (16), Belay Zeleke (61), and Gimbot Haya (165) were included in this study.

Line 144 sample frame? od ages? Correct.

Response: Thank you, corrected.

Line 151 Limitations of MMSE should be addressed

Response: Thank you! We added some limitations of MMSE in the section on limitations

For example: “The generalizability of the study might be limited for those who had formal education since the tool (MMSE) is adapted based on the educational level in this setup.”

Line 156 Has this instrument been validated in Ethiopia?

Response: The revised Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) was employed to evaluate social support. It was developed by Zimet et al.,1988. And identifies three sources of support (friends, family, and significant others). The tool was widely used among old age, pregnant mothers, and other populations and has been validated in one African country (Cronbach's alpha = 0.916) (Stewart et al., 2014). In the Ethiopian context, the tool has not been validated yet and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.81 in the current study.

Line 170 The limitations of assessing income using this method should be addressed.

Response: It is simplistic and does not reflect indebtedness, health, education, housing, or access to public services. Also, it does not always accurately represent the different costs of subsistence from country to country. Difficulty to assess each item found in the household, despite this limitation many developing country studies use this assessment way. It's better to assess the wealth index using PCA for future researchers. W put it in the limitation section. Thank you for your very supportive comment.

Line 176 Has GDS been validated in Ethiopia? Which version of GDS was used? Validated or original version?

Response: Geriatric Depression Scale item 15 (GDS-15) was used to assess the presence of depression among older adults. Even if the tool hasn’t been validated in Ethiopia we use extensively validated in low and middle-income countries such as India, Nepal, other Asian and African countries with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 89%. Also, various studies conducted in Ethiopia use this instrument to assess depression. The validity and reliability of the tool have been supported through both clinical practice and research. In addition, we conducted a pretest and its internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) in this study was 0.86. Finally, we do have a plan to conduct a validation study for the future.

Line 182 What about the older adults with education below fifth grade, and those who could neither read nor write? Were they excluded from the study? The limitations of using MMSE to assess cognition should be appreciated. How was dementia distinguished from depression in this study?

Response: Yes! we excluded older adults with education below fifth grade and we revised in the exclusion criteria accordingly. One important limitation of MMSE is that it cannot be administered to illiterate subjects as 2 of its items involve reading and writing. Also, the limitation is the inclusion of a task requiring paper and pencil (copying a drawing). Furthermore, difficulty in identifying mild cognitive impairment. Whereas, Depression vs dementia. We put this as a limitation because of the nature of the cross-sectional study design, it is impossible to establish cause and effect linkages.

Lines 200,201.202 , 204 Consider correcting these statements. What is MSc?

Response: MSc means in this context, Masters of Sciences degree holder in mental health. And we amended it as “The data were collected from study participants by face-to-face interviews from house to house. The questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated into the local language (which is Amharic) by a language translator and translated back to English to ensure its understandability and consistency before the actual data collection. The training was given for supervisor and data collectors by the principal investigator for two days duration on the methods of data collection and the detail of the questionnaire. Data were collected by four psychiatric nurses who currently work in health centers and was supervised by Masters of Sciences degree holder in mental health”.

Lines 202, 203,204 Was the GDS translated into the local language(Amharic)?

Response: The questionnaires were prepared in English and then translate into the local language Amharic, and back-translated to English by an independent person to ensure its understandability and consistency.

Lines s 207, 2008,209. Consider correcting these statements.

Response: We revised it as recommended.

Line 222 How was the confidence interval of the prevalence calculated?

Response: Using SPSS we perform bootstrapping, In short, Go to Analyze-descriptive statistics- frequencies-drag the variable (DV) to the variable box – perform bootstrap with 95% CI. Finally, the results show the prevalence in yes/no with 95% CI (upper and lower limit). In this study, the overall prevalence of depression among elderly people in Bahir Dar city was with CI 272 57.9 % (95% CI: 53.2,62.6)

Line 235 How about the older adults with a level of education below the fifth grade and those who could neither read nor write? Were they excluded from the study?

Response: Thank you for your critical view. They were excluded from the study. And we corrected the exclusion criteria. Again, thank you, dear reviewer!

Line 265 correct this statement.

Response: We corrected it as “ Low parental relationships support, low friend social support, and low other social support were found in 55 (13.1%), 56 (13.2%), and 57 (13.5%) of the participants, respectively”.

Line 271 shows how the prevalence of depression was calculated. How was the confidence interval calculated?

Response: We explained in the above response. The prevalence of depression among older adults is calculated by measuring the presence of depression in a sample of the population selected randomly, then dividing the number of older adults that have depression by the number of people in whom it was measured. Prevalence is often expressed as a percentage.

Simply,

Prevalence= (Total cases)/(Total population) x 100, P=245/423 x 100 = 57.9

Or, Using software analysis (SPSS), we did a simple descriptive analysis for prevalence. Additionally, see the SPSS output below (see below tables).

-Descriptive analysis for depression prevalence

Depression prevalence

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid NO 178 42.1 42.1 42.1

YES 245 57.9 57.9 100.0

Total 423 100.0 100.0

CI FOR DEPRESSION

Depression catagory

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Bootstrap for Percenta

Bias Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Valid NO 178 42.1 42.1 42.1 .0 2.4 37.4 46.8

YES 245 57.9 57.9 100.0 .0 2.4 53.2 62.6

Total 423 100.0 100.0 .0 .0 100.0 100.0

a. Unless otherwise noted, bootstrap results are based on 10000 bootstrap samples

Lines 283 to 292 Consider correcting the statements with 3.44 times, 2.78 times etc.

Response: We corrected it as needed.

Line 313 to 328 Consider summarizing this paragraph.

Response: We revised and rewite it again as you recommend.

Line 334 Low education may limit the development of therapies to alleviate the disease burden of depression. Can older adults develop therapies for depression? Please consider correcting this statement.

Response: Revised.

Lines 339 to 342 Consider correcting the statements.

Response: We revised it accordingly. We rewrite it as “This is the finding that low-income people have a harder time getting healthy services and care, which has been associated with higher levels of depression. McCall and colleagues' findings in the United States supported prior studies that connected low income to a higher prevalence of depression.”

Line 343 correct 3.54 times

Response: We think it is better to write it as “Older adults who had cognitive impairments were 3.54 times more likely to develop depression compared with their counterparts.”

Line 349 limitations of MMSE in assessing cognitive impairment should be addressed.

Response: We tried to incorporate the limitation in the limitations section.

Line 352 populations who had family history of mental illness? Consider correcting this.

Response: We replaced it with “older adults”.

Line s 376 to 382 Correct the statements .eg we recommend that clinicians regularly screening depressive symptoms using standard studies in the elderly

Response: We revised it accordingly. See the conclusion section in the main document.

Line 399 What about the older adults who were illiterate? Were they excluded from the study? Were there older adults who were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment? How many older adults had severe cognitive impairment per MMSE?

Response: We excluded older adults with education below fifth grade and we revised the exclusion criteria accordingly. Almost all those elder adults who had severe NCD using MMSE score 17, which is near to moderate. All older adults in this study provided informed consent and were answered questionnaires.

MMSE level

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Mild 246 58.2 58.2 58.2

moderate 169 40.0 40.0 98.1

severe 8 1.9 1.9 100.0

Total 423 100.0 100.0

Line 404 Any time during the procedure?

Response: We revised it.

Lines 404, 405 correct the statements.

Response: We corrected as needed. “ The information was not disseminated without the respondent's permission. The information provided by the participants was exclusively utilized for the study. Those older adults who reported depression were immediately referred to mental health facilities for further evaluation and management.”

Typos and Grammatical errors

There several typos and grammatical errors in this manuscript apart from those highlighted . These should to be corrected

Response: We tried to assess errors like incomplete sentences, grammatical and language errors from the title up to a discussion of the manuscript. In addition to that the name of the professional that edit our manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar service that provided: Mr. Demise Arega (BA, MA in TEEFL) from Wollo University at Department of language and literature

Email: demisarega13@gmail.com

Reviewer 2

The authors have presented findings which adds to current literature on depression. Overall the methods chosen were appropriate and the results support the conclusions. However, the authors need to improve on the language of the manuscript.

Response: Thank you, dear reviewer, it helps to do more for the future. And we tried to assess errors like incomplete sentences, grammatical and language errors from the title up to a discussion of the manuscript. In addition to that the name of the professional that edit our manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar service that provided: Mr. Demise Arega (BA, MA in TEEFL) from Wollo University at Department of language and literature

Email: demisarega13@gmail.com

Sincerely,

Tamrat Anbesaw, January/2022

Attachment

Submitted filename: renamed_cec0b.docx

Decision Letter 1

Sharada Prasad Wasti

21 Jun 2022

PONE-D-21-38673R1Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr.Tamrat,

Thank you for resubmitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please review your paper and make the manuscript clear and reader-friendly with following concerns wit hother reviewers comments:

1. Abstract results section line 34 CI 53.2, 62.6 should be consistent with other CIs

2. Make an abstract conclusion very specific based on your findings and provide pragmatic suggestions which are very vague now. Provide at least 5 appropriate keywords.

3. Line 74 writes in word one instead of 1 million.

4. In the methods and materials section starts with the research design followed by the study population (remove line 122) and merges the study population with inclusion and exclusion criteria, study sites, sample size, and sampling techniques,..

5. line 207 removes processing and keeps only data analysis

6. Line 219 writes down Ethical consideration

7. Line 245 Results

8. Line 247-258 presents very key findings in only % and refer to Table 1 for details.

9. Present mean/median age with SD or IQR

10. Review table 1 educational status variables and present constantly i.e 5-8th vs 9-12th

11. Table 1 presents the mean/median monthly income with SD/IQR

12. Line 261-267 review findings and present key findings with % and recommend Table 2 for the details.

13. Review the lines 271-273 as per above.

14. Line 285 headings and 290 should merge and start with prevalence instead of separate headings and also make consistent terminology of the figure headings older adults instead of elderly

15. Line 280 - 307 present only key findings

16. Line 307 correct error is showing not sure what is written.Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D., MSc, MHCM, MA.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Authors,

Thank you for your thorough review and resubmission. Our reviewer has provided the following minor comments to readdress for this manuscript.

Main Issues not addressed by the authors:

1. Prevalence calculation.

The authors have stated that they calculated the prevalence of depression as follows:

Prevalence= (Total cases)/ (Total population) x 100, P=245/423 x 100 = 57.9%

This is prevalence of depression among the older adults screened for depression in Bahir Dar City not the prevalence of depression among older adults in Bahir Dar City.

The authors stated that the total population of older adults aged 60 years and above in Bahir Dar City is 11,034 (5003 male and 6031 females). The correct approach would be estimating the number of cases of depression in each sub-city, adding the cases and then diving by the total population ( 11,034).

2. Informed consent.

In their response to reviewers’ comments, the authors stated that almost all older adults had severe cognitive impairment. However in the manuscript only 42% had cognitive impairment. It is not clear if these older adults with severe cognitive impairment had capacity to provide a valid informed consent. This should be clarified.

3. Abstract

The conclusion does not reflect what the authors have studied. For example the study did not look at supportive therapy for treatment of depression in this population.

4. Other issues.

There are several grammatical errors in this manuscript. Eg lines 172-176. These should to be corrected.

Line ‘hard time’, use scholastic language

Line 5 and 6, empty space

Lines 11-19, empty space

Lines 47 -49, empty space

Lines 96-105 , empty space

Line 206, empty space

Lines 229-244 empty space

Lines 282- 284 empty space

Lines 308- 311 empty space

Lines 318, 395, 405, 438-440 empty space

References

Several references eg no 17, 29, 32 are incorrectly cited. This should be corrected.

Correct all above suggestions and submit for the further proceed it.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Main Issues not addressed by the authors

1. Prevalence calculation.

The authors have stated that they calculated the prevalence of depression as follows:

Prevalence= (Total cases)/ (Total population) x 100, P=245/423 x 100 = 57.9%

This is prevalence of depression among the older adults screened for depression in Bahir Dar City not the prevalence of depression among older adults in Bahir Dar City.

The authors stated that the total population of older adults aged 60 years and above in Bahir Dar City is 11,034 (5003 male and 6031 females). The correct approach would be estimating the number of cases of depression in each sub-city, adding the cases and then diving by the total population ( 11,034).

2. Informed consent.

In their response to reviewers’ comments, the authors stated that almost all older adults had severe cognitive impairment. However in the manuscript only 42% had cognitive impairment. It is not clear if these older adults with severe cognitive impairment had capacity to provide a valid informed consent. This should be clarified.

3. Abstract

The conclusion does not reflect what the authors have studied. For example the study did not look at supportive therapy for treatment of depression in this population.

4. Other issues.

There are several grammatical errors in this manuscript. Eg lines 172-176. These should to be corrected.

Line ‘hard time’, use scholastic language

Line 5 and 6, empty space

Lines 11-19, empty space

Lines 47 -49, empty space

Lines 96-105 , empty space

Line 206, empty space

Lines 229-244 empty space

Lines 282- 284 empty space

Lines 308- 311 empty space

Lines 318, 395, 405, 438-440 empty space

References

Several references eg no 17, 29, 32 are incorrectly cited. This should be corrected.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Damas Andrea Mlaki

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0273345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273345.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


22 Jun 2022

Response to editor and reviewers

Please review your paper and make the manuscript clear and reader-friendly with following concerns with other reviewers comments:

1. Abstract results section line 34 CI 53.2, 62.6 should be consistent with other Cis

Response: We corrected as recommended.

2. Make an abstract conclusion very specific based on your findings and provide pragmatic suggestions which are very vague now. Provide at least 5 appropriate keywords.

Response: We revised it extensively. See the manuscript. Thank you dear editor to give achance to see the manuscript again.

3. Line 74 writes in word one instead of 1 million.

Response: Corrected.

4. In the methods and materials section starts with the research design followed by the study population (remove line 122) and merges the study population with inclusion and exclusion criteria, study sites, sample size, and sampling techniques,..

Response: We corrected it as per your recommendation.

5. line 207 removes processing and keeps only data analysis

Response: Thank you, we corrected as per a recommendation.

6. Line 219 writes down Ethical consideration

Response: We revised it accordingly.

7. Line 245 Results

Response: We corrected it.

8. Line 247-258 presents very key findings in only % and refer to Table 1 for details.

Response:We corrected it.

9. Present mean/median age with SD or IQR

Response: We present it as recommended.

10. Review table 1 educational status variables and present constantly i.e 5-8th vs 9-12th

Response: Thank you, we corrected it.

11. Table 1 presents the mean/median monthly income with SD/IQR

Response: Thank you, we corrected it as per recommendation.

12. Line 261-267 review findings and present key findings with % and recommend Table 2 for the details.

Response: Thank you, we revised it.

13. Review the lines 271-273 as per above.

Response: Again we thank you, and revised as you recommended.

14. Line 285 headings and 290 should merge and start with prevalence instead of separate headings and also make consistent terminology of the figure headings older adults instead of elderly

Response: We revised it as per your recommendation. See the revised manuscript.

15. Line 280 - 307 present only key findings

Response: Thank you, dear editor, in this we tried to show the important points. If specific things to be revised we are welcome.

16. Line 307 correct error is showing not sure what is written.

Response: In line 307, we found this value (AOR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.74–4.46), which was written correctly in table 4. If any issues again we are welcome to revise it.

Response to reviewers

1. Prevalence calculation.

The authors have stated that they calculated the prevalence of depression as follows:

Prevalence= (Total cases)/ (Total population) x 100, P=245/423 x 100 = 57.9%

This is prevalence of depression among the older adults screened for depression in Bahir Dar City not the prevalence of depression among older adults in Bahir Dar City.

The authors stated that the total population of older adults aged 60 years and above in Bahir Dar City is 11,034 (5003 male and 6031 females). The correct approach would be estimating the number of cases of depression in each sub-city, adding the cases and then diving by the total population ( 11,034).

Response: Thank you dear reviewer.

Prevalence is calculated as follows;

1. To estimate prevalence, researchers randomly select a sample (smaller group) from the entire population they want to describe.

2. For a representative sample, prevalence is the number of people in the sample with the characteristic of interest, divided by the total number of people in the sample.

-If we calculate by including the total population (11,034), we are saying we didn’t need a sample size calculation. Analysis should be conducted based on collected data or sample size included in the study (423). So we put it as it is.

2. Informed consent.

In their response to reviewers’ comments, the authors stated that almost all older adults had severe cognitive impairment. However, in the manuscript only 42% had cognitive impairment. It is not clear if these older adults with severe cognitive impairment had capacity to provide a valid informed consent. This should be clarified.

Response: Thank you, dear reviewer. Previously we respond only 8(1.9%) had severe cognitive impairment. Informed (written) consent was obtained from each study participant. The study participants were also provided with information about the objectives and expected outcomes of the study. Information obtained from individual participants was kept secure and confidential. We had given time to ask questions repeatedly for better thinking, understanding, and responding to the questions.

3. Abstract

The conclusion does not reflect what the authors have studied. For example, the study did not look at supportive therapy for the treatment of depression in this population.

Response: We revised it accordingly as per your recommendation. Again, thank you!

4. Other issues.

There are several grammatical errors in this manuscript. Eg lines 172-176. These should to be corrected.

Response: We revised it accordingly. See the main manuscript.

Line ‘hard time’, use scholastic language

Response: Dear reviewer, thank you for your recommendation to revise it. We replaced it with “more difficult”

Line 5 and 6, empty space

Lines 11-19, empty space

Lines 47 -49, empty space

Lines 96-105 , empty space

Line 206, empty space

Lines 229-244 empty space

Lines 282- 284 empty space

Lines 308- 311 empty space

Lines 318, 395, 405, 438-440 empty space

Response: We corrected all empty spaces.

-References

Several references eg no 17, 29, 32 are incorrectly cited. This should be corrected.

Response: We corrected it as per recommendation.

Regards,

Tamrat Anbesaw( Corresponding Author)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Sharada Prasad Wasti

25 Jul 2022

PONE-D-21-38673R2Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional studyPLOS ONE

Dear Tamrat Anbesaw,

Thank you for your corrected version whch looks perfect. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a minor revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Could you please remove line 94 and 95 Source Population and All older adults who live in Bahir Dar city administration which you have talked in line 83.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript for the final decision.

Kind regards,

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

 

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0273345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273345.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


27 Jul 2022

Dear Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D., Academic Editor, thank you dear Editor for giving a chance to revise it again. We have seen the manuscript critically and revised as per recommendation.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to editor and reviewers revised.docx

Decision Letter 3

Sharada Prasad Wasti

8 Aug 2022

Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional study

PONE-D-21-38673R3

Dear Tamrat Anbesaw,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Ph.D., MSc, MHCM, MA.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Sharada Prasad Wasti

11 Aug 2022

PONE-D-21-38673R3

Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Anbesaw:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sharada Prasad Wasti

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (XLS)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: renamed_cec0b.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to editor and reviewers revised.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES