Skip to main content
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology logoLink to Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
. 2022 Aug 3;7(4):1117–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.07.004

Production of (2S)-sakuranetin from (2S)-naringenin in Escherichia coli by strengthening methylation process and cell resistance

Qiumeng Sun a,b,c,d, Song Gao a,b,c,d, Shiqin Yu a,b,d, Pu Zheng b,∗∗, Jingwen Zhou a,b,c,d,
PMCID: PMC9399173  PMID: 36017331

Abstract

(2S)-Sakuranetin is a 7-O-methylflavonoid that has anticancer, antiviral, and antimicrobial activities. Methylation process is involved in biosynthesizing (2S)-sakuranetin from (2S)-naringenin, in which S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) serves as the methyl donor. In this study, after methyl donor and substrate inhibition were identified as limiting factors for (2S)-sakuranetin biosynthesis, an efficient (2S)-sakuranetin-producing strain was constructed by enhancing methyl donor supply and cell tolerance to (2S)-naringenin. Firstly, PfOMT3 from Perilla frutescens was selected as the optimal flavonoid 7-O-methyltransferase (F7-OMT) for the conversion of (2S)-naringenin to (2S)-sakuranetin. Then, the methylation process was upregulated by regulating pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP) content, key enzymes in methionine synthesis pathway, and the availability of ATP. Furthermore, genes that can enhance cell resistance to (2S)-naringenin were identified from molecular chaperones and sRNAs. Finally, by optimizing the fermentation process, 681.44 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained in 250-mL shake flasks. The titer of (2S)-sakuranetin reached 2642.38 mg/L in a 5-L bioreactor, which is the highest titer ever reported. This work demonstrates the importance of cofactor PLP in methylation process, and provides insights to biosynthesize other O-methylated flavonoids efficiently in E. coli.

Keywords: (2S)-Sakuranetin, Flavonoid 7-O-methyltransferases, Methylation, Cell tolerance, Metabolic engineering

Graphical abstract

Image 1

1. Introduction

(2S)-Sakuranetin (7-O-methylated (2S)-naringenin) is a 7-O-methylated flavonoid that is present in many plants, such as Oryza sativa [1], orange peel [2], and Piper lanceifolium Kunth [3]. It has been proved to have anti-inflammatory [4] (such as inhibiting 5ARII [5]), antimutation, anti-Helicobacter pylori [6], antidiabetic [7], antiviral (inhibiting viruses such as the influenza B/Lee/40 virus [8] and human rhinovirus 3 [9]), and anticonvulsant [10] properties. It can also exert protective effect on the brain, and can be used to treat Alzheimer's disease [11]. Considering the multiple biological effects of (2S)-sakuranetin, it has the potential to be used as nutraceutical or pharmaceutical agents.

(2S)-Sakuranetin is produced in plants in response to ambient pressures. For example, ultraviolet light or pest infection could activate 7-O-methyltransferase (7-OMT) in Oryza sativa to synthesize (2S)-sakuranetin [11]. Chemical synthesis and biosynthesis have been used for the synthesis of (2S)-sakuranetin. In a previous study, (2S)-sakuranetin was synthesized by chemically utilizing the regioselective deacetylation of naringenin triacetate [12]. However, this method is cumbersome and requires harsh reaction conditions. With the development of metabolic engineering and genetic engineering, (2S)-sakuranetin could be produced from (2S)-naringenin by flavonoid 7-O-methyltransferases (F7-OMTs) catalysis in E. coli. In a previous report, 40 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained by constructing a de novo biosynthesis pathway in E. coli [13]. 79 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was produced in a 2.5-L bioreactor by using an E. coliE. coli modular co-culture system [14].

F7-OMTs are S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent flavonoid methyltransferases that can transfer the methyl group from SAM to the 7-OH of flavonoids [6]. The limited supply of methyl donor in E. coli can restrict the accumulation of (2S)-sakuranetin. Previous studies focused on balancing the biosynthesis of (2S)-naringenin during the biosynthetic process of (2S)-sakuranetin, and there are no studies on strengthening the methylation of (2S)-naringenin to improve the production of (2S)-sakuranetin. In addition, flavonoids can interact with DNA, inhibit DNA gyrase [15] and damage the cytoplasmic membrane structure [16], which would interfere with the function of E. coli. Considering that microbes have developed certain mechanisms to adapt to environmental stress, various genetic strategies can be used to alleviate cell pressure, such as overexpression of molecular chaperones to refold the denatured proteins [17] and small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) to alleviate stress [18,19]. Overexpression of molecular chaperones or sRNAs related to E. coli stress response might enhance cell tolerance to flavonoids so as to relieve substrate inhibition.

In this study, methylation process and substrate tolerance were enhanced to obtain (2S)-sakuranetin from (2S)-naringenin efficiently. Firstly, the optimal F-7OMT was selected. Then key enzymes (MetA, CysE) and cofactors (NADPH, ATP) essential for SAM biosynthesis were regulated to promote the methylation reaction. Moreover, the availability of an indispensable cofactor in the transsulfuration pathway, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP), was enhanced to increase the production of (2S)-sakuranetin. Additionally, sRNA RpoS was identified to be effective in enhancing cell tolerance to (2S)-naringenin. Finally, via the combinatorial expression of genes that were beneficial for (2S)-sakuranetin accumulation, and the optimization of fermentation process, 681.44 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained in shake-flask scale. The titer of (2S)-sakuranetin reached 2642.38 mg/L when scaled up in a 5-L bioreactor.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Strains, plasmids, and genes

The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli JM109 was used for plasmid propagation. E. coli BL21(DE3) was used for protein expression. The genes (OsNOMT, GenBank accession no. AB692949.1; SaOMT2, GenBank accession no. BAC70093; PfOMT3, GenBank accession no. MT909556) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The pET-28a (+), pACYCDuet-1 and pCDFDuet-1 expression vectors were obtained from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). High-fidelity Phusion DNA polymerase from Vazyme (Nanjing, China) was used for amplification. Seamless cloning kit purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) was used for plasmid assembly. The process for plasmids construction and primers are listed in the Supplementary File and Table S1, respectively.

Table 1.

Strains used in the present study.

Strains Description Source
E. coli JM109 recA1, endA1, gyrA96, thi-1, hsdR17 (rk-mk+), e14-(mcrA-) supE44, relA1, Δ (lac-proAB)/F’[traD36, proAB+, lacIq,
lacZΔM15]
Sangon Biotech (Shanghai)
E. coli BL21 (DE3) F-ompT hsdSB (rB-mB-) gal dcmrne131(DE3) Sangon Biotech (Shanghai)
7-FOMT-1 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-OsNOMT This study
7-FOMT-2 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-SaOMT2 This study
7-FOMT-3 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS01 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pCDFDuet-metA-cysE, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS02 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-metK, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS03 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS04 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO-metK, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS07 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pACYCDuet-SNZ3, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS08 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pACYCDuet-RPS18B, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS09 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pACYCDuet-RFC4, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS10 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS11 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3 This study
NS14 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-POS5 This study
NS15 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-POS5, pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO This study
NS16 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-POS5, pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4 This study
NS17 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3, pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO, pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4 This study
NS18 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-POS5, pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO, pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4 This study
NS19 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpsL This study
NS20 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpsQ This study
NS21 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpsQHis31Pro This study
NS22 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-crp This study
NS23 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpoS This study
NS24 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-secB This study
NS25 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-nfuA This study
NS26 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-yajL This study
NS27 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-ycdy This study
NS28 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-proQ This study
NS29 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-nusB This study
NS30 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-acrR This study
NS31 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-asr This study
NS32 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpsQHis31Pro-rpoS This study
NS33 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-secB-rpoS This study
NS34 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpoS, pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO, pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4 This study
NS35 E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-secB-rpoS, pCDFDuet-metA-cysE-ydaO, pACYCDuet-SNZ3-RPS18B-RFC4 This study

2.2. Growth media and shake flask culture condition

The Luria–Bertani (LB) medium was used for culturing seed liquid. The Terrific Broth (TB) medium was used for (2S)-sakuranetin accumulation. Strains were cultured at 37 °C for 10 h in LB medium. Then a 2% (v/v) of LB strain culture was inoculated into the TB medium with shaking at 220 rpm. Isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 0.1 mM when OD600 reached 0.8–1, at which time the temperature was shifted from 37 °C to 25 °C. 350 mg/L of (2S)-naringenin was added after adding IPTG for 3 h and 13 h to a final concentration of 700 mg/L. The total fermentation time in shake-flask scale was 26 h.

2.3. Fermentation condition in bioreactor

Bioreactor fermentation was conducted in a 5-L glass bioreactor (T&J Bioengineering, Shanghai, China) containing 2.5 L of TB medium. The (2S)-naringenin was dissolved in methanol to a concentration of 50 g/L. The optimal strain was selected for scale-up culture in a 5-L bioreactor. Colonies from the culture plate were inoculated into LB liquid medium and incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 220 rpm for 10 h. Then, 4% (v/v) inoculum of seed culture was inoculated into a 5 L bioreactor containing 2.5 L of the TB medium. In the early stage, the fermentation temperature was kept at 37 °C and the rotating speed was 400 rpm. IPTG was added at a final concentration of 0.1 mM when the OD600 reached 6, at which time the temperature was shifted to 25 °C and the stirring speed was changed to the pattern of depending on dissolved oxygen content (40%). (2S)-Naringenin was fed in batches at 6.5 h, 12.5 h, 18.5 h, 21.5 h, 41.5 h, and 48 h to a final concentration of 4 g/L. 500 g/L of glycerol was fed at a speed of 8 mL/h after substrate was added, and 6 mM Mg2+ was added at 6.5 h. The pH was maintained at 7 ± 0.1 with 6 M NaOH during the fermentation.

2.4. Analytical methods

To quantitatively analyze the titer of (2S)-sakuranetin, a 500 μL fermentation sample was mixed with 500 μL methanol. Then, the supernatant was filtered using a 0.22-μm organic phase filter membrane after 12000g centrifugation for 5 min. The samples were detected by HPLC (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) equipped with a Thermo Fisher C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) at 290 nm. The mobile phase was as follows: A phase was water containing 0.1% TFA, and B phase was acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. The following procedure was used: 0–10 min, 10–60% B; 10–20 min, 40–80% B; 20–25 min, 80–10% B. The determination of the intracellular PLP level followed the procedure described by Cabo et al. [20].

2.5. Spot assays to assess E. coli substrate tolerance

E. coli only harboring PfOMT3 and E. coli harboring cell tolerance genes were cultured at 37 °C in TB medium with shaking at 220 rpm. IPTG was added to the medium at a final concentration of 0.1 mM when OD600 reached 0.8. After 10 h post-induction at 25 °C, seeds were diluted by gradient (10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5), and 2 μL of seeds dilution were spotted on solid LB plates containing (2S)-naringenin (200 mg/L, 300 mg/L or 400 mg/L). These LB plates were then incubated for 12 h at 37 °C.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of different sources of F7-OMTs on (2S)-sakuranetin production

Previous studies have confirmed that OsNOMT [21], SaOMT2 [22] and PfOMT3 [6] belong to the F7-OMTs family, and they have catalytic activity for converting (2S)-naringenin to (2S)-sakuranetin. In order to select the optimal F7-OMT, the production of (2S)-sakuranetin at different (2S)-naringenin concentrations with strains expressing F7-OMTs were compared. When 300 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added after cells were induced for 10 h at 25 °C, 26.76 mg/L, 44.54 mg/L and 58.95 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was achieved by strains harboring OsNOMT, SaOMT2 and PfOMT3, respectively (Fig. 2A), and PfOMT3 had better performance at other concentrations of (2S)-naringenin. Therefore, PfOMT3 was chosen for the following experiments. The strain expressing PfOMT3 is referred as strain 7-FOMT-3. (2S)-Sakuranetin titer of strain 7-FOMT-3 showed a decreasing trend with the increase of (2S)-naringenin concentrations, and (2S)-sakuranetin titer decreased sharply when (2S)-naringenin concentration exceeded 250 mg/L (Fig. 2B). To remove the adverse impact brought by high concentration of the substrate, 250 mg/L of (2S)-naringenin was added in methylation enhancement experiments.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of different sources of F7-OMTs on the titer of (2S)-sakuranetin.

(A) The (2S)-sakuranetin production of F7-OMTs under different concentrations of (2S)-naringenin. (B) Summary of the production of (2S)-sakuranetin with strain 7-FOMT-3 at different (2S)-naringenin concentrations. (C) LC-MS analysis of the fermentation simple. (D) LC-MS analysis of the (2S)-sakuranetin standard simple. SAK represents (2S)-sakuranetin; NAR represents (2S)-naringenin.

3.2. Regulation of methionine and ATP contents to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production

Methyl donor SAM is involved in the conversion of (2S)-naringenin to (2S)-sakuranetin (Fig. 1). Exogenously supply of methionine can enter into cells and improve the intracellular SAM availability [23]. To test the importance of methyl donor in the biosynthesis of (2S)-sakuranetin, 250 mg/L (2S)-naringenin and different concentrations of methionine were added after cells were induced for 10 h at 25 °C (Fig. 3A). When 1 g/L methionine was added, 129.21 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained after reaction for 10 h, which was 36.17% higher than that of the strain 7-FOMT-3. In order to enhance methionine production of E. coli, metA (encoding homoserine succinyltransferase) and cysE (encoding l-serine O-acetyltransferase) were overexpressed (strain NS01). (2S)-Sakuranetin titer of strain NS01 reached 142.59 mg/L without the addition of methionine, which was 50.26% higher than the strain 7-FOMT-3. When metK (encoding SAM synthetase) was overexpressed in strain NS01, 135.26 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained, a slight decrease compared with the strain NS01.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Biosynthesis pathway of (2S)-sakuranetin from (2S)-naringenin.

The biosynthesis pathway of (2S)-sakuranetin from (2S)-naringenin involves a methylation reaction, where SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) is used as the methyl donor. SAM biosynthesis involves methionine metabolism and the regeneration of cofactors ATP, NADPH, and PLP. Met represents l-Methionine; Hcys represents l-Homocysteine; SRH represents S-Ribosyl-l-homocysteine; SAH reprsents S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effects of methionine, ATP and NADPH on (2S)-sakuranetin production.

(A) (2S)-Sakuranetin titer at different methionine concentrations. (B) Effects of metA, cysE, ydaO and metK expression on (2S)-sakuranetin production. (C) Effect of POS5 expression on (2S)-sakuranetin production. SAK represents (2S)-sakuranetin; NAR represents (2S)-naringenin; Met represents methionine. ****P < 0.0001.

ATP is consumed in the conversion of methionine to SAM, and is an important cofactor in methionine biosynthesis pathway. ydaO, which can dynamically regulate ATP accumulation in bacteria, was heterologously expressed in strain NS01 and NS02, resulting in strain NS03 and NS04, respectively; the (2S)-sakuranetin titer increased by 62.38% and 124.45%, respectively, compared with the strain 7-FOMT-3 (Fig. 3B). NADPH is another important cofactor in the methionine biosynthesis pathway. The NADH kinase-encoding gene POS5 from S. cerevisiae was heterogeneously expressed in strain 7-FOMT-3 (resulting in strain NS14), improving the titer of (2S)-sakuranetin to 132.58 mg/L, which was 43.35% higher than that of the strain 7-FOMT-3 (Fig. 3C). These results suggested that the SAM pool is a limiting factor for the conversion of (2S)-naringenin to (2S)-sakuranetin. Regulating the levels of methionine and ATP are essential for (2S)-sakuranetin production.

3.3. Enhancement of PLP content to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production

PLP is known to be a cofactor in the transsulfuration pathway [24]. To verify whether an increased PLP level enhances (2S)-sakuranetin production, 250 mg/L (2S)-naringenin and different concentrations of PLP were added after cells were induced for 10 h at 25 °C. The result showed that 173.61 mg/L (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained when 90 μM PLP was added, which increased by 79.85% compared with the group without PLP (Fig. 4A). In order to enhance the supply of PLP in E. coli, SNZ3, which encodes PLP synthase in S. cerevisiae, was expressed in strain 7-FOMT-3; (2S)-sakuranetin titer reached 185.35 mg/L without the addition of PLP, which increased by 92.39% compared with strain 7-FOMT-3. In addition, RFC4 and RPS18B from S. cerevisiae [25] are also involved in PLP production. The (2S)-sakuranetin titer of strain NS06 (expressing RFC4 in strain 7-FOMT-3) and NS07 (expressing RPS18B in strain 7-FOMT-3) increased by 59.59% and 45.69%, respectively, compared with the strain 7-FOMT-3. Then SNZ3, RFC4 and RPS18B were co-expressed in strain 7-FOMT-3, resulting in strain NS11; the titer of (2S)-sakuranetin reached 260.45 mg/L, which was 170.34% higher than that of the strain 7-FOMT-3 (Fig. 4B), and the intracellular PLP level increased by 4.85-fold compared with strain 7-FOMT-3. Therefore, an increased PLP content is beneficial for (2S)-sakuranetin production.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of PLP on (2S)-sakuranetin production.

(A) Effects of different concentrations of PLP on (2S)-sakuranetin accumulation. (B) Effects of SNZ3, RFC4 and RPS18B expression on PLP and (2S)-sakuranetin titer. ****P < 0.0001. SNZ3 encoding pyridoxal-5′-phosphate synthase; RFC4 is a DNA binding protein; RPS18B is the component of the ribosomal subunit, which is homologous to E. coli ribosomal protein S13.

3.4. Effects of combinatorial expression of methylation-enhancing genes on (2S)-sakuranetin production

Genes that can upregulate methylation reaction were expressed by combination. To avoid the negative effect of high concentration of (2S)-naringenin and obtain a higher titer of (2S)-sakuranetin, (2S)-naringenin was added in batches (final concentration was 500 mg/L, 600 mg/L, and 700 mg/L, respectively), in which the half quantity of (2S)-naringenin was added after adding IPTG for 1 h, and another 50% of (2S)-naringenin was added after 10 h. The result showed that strain NS17 was the best to accumulate (2S)-sakuranetin, and 451.47 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained when added 500 mg/L (2S)-naringenin (Fig. 5). When POS5 was expressed with PfOMT3 (strain NS14), this could promote the production of (2S)-sakuranetin, but (2S)-sakuranetin titer decreased when POS5 was co-expressed with genes that enhanced the methylation reaction. Strain NS18 (expressing POS5 in NS17) accumulated only 191.56 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin when added 500 mg/L (2S)-naringenin, resulting in a 57.57% decrease compared with the strain NS17. Based on the (2S)-sakuranetin titer, genes combination in strain NS17 was the best for strengthening the methylation process.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Selecting the optimal genes combination for enhancing methylation process.

Effect of combinatorial expression of genes that can upregulate methylation reaction on (2S)-sakuranetin production. The (2S)-naringenin was added in batches.

3.5. Enhancement of strain substrate tolerance to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production

The (2S)-sakuranetin titer decreased with increasing (2S)-naringenin concentrations, which may due to the low tolerance of strain to (2S)-naringenin. Ribosomal subunits (RpsQ, RpsQHis31Pro, and RpsL [26]), molecular chaperones (SecB [27], Ycdy [28], Nfua [29], and Yajl [30]), sRNAs (RpoS [31], ProQ [32], NusB [33], AcrR [34], and Asr [35]), and the global regulatory transcription factor CRP [36], which can participate in cellular stress response, were expressed to select the most suitable gene to improve strain tolerance to (2S)-naringenin. (2S)-Naringenin was supplemented in batches to a final concentration of 400 mg/L, 500 mg/L and 600 mg/L (substrate was added as described in Section 3.4). The (2S)-sakuranetin titer with strain NS21, NS23 and NS24 was obviously increased at different (2S)-naringenin concentrations compared with the strain 7-FOMT-3 (Fig. 6A–C); when 500 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added, the production of (2S)-sakuranetin increased by 108.56%, 122.63%, and 104.26% compared with the strain 7-FOMT-3, respectively.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Improving substrate tolerance of strain to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production.

(A) Effects of overexpressing stress resistance genes on (2S)-sakuranetin production and cell growth when 400 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added. (B) Effects of overexpressing stress resistance genes on (2S)-sakuranetin production and cell growth when 500 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added. (C) Effects of overexpressing stress resistance genes on (2S)-sakuranetin production and cell growth when 600 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added. (D) Spot assay of strain tolerance ability to (2S)-naringenin. (E) The growth status and production of (2S)-sakuranetin when rpsQHis31Pro and secB were co-expressed with rpoS. ****P < 0.0001.

Strain NS21, NS23 and NS24 harbor plasmid pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpsQHis31Pro, pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpoS and pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-secB, respectively. Genes rpsQ, rpoS and secB can relieve cell pressure to a certain extent; the gene rpsQ can reduce protein mistranslation [37] and rpsQHis31Pro has been proven to have better stress tolerance [26], the gene secB can prevent protein aggregation [38] and promote normal transport of protein [39,40], and the gene rpoS can increase energy metabolism under stress [41] and regulate protein expression in normal state [42]. To evaluate intuitively the tolerance ability of strain containing rpsQHis31Pro, rpoS and secB to (2S)-naringenin, spot assay was conducted. Strain NS21, NS23 and NS24 all grew better than strain 7-FOMT-3 on solid LB plates containing (2S)-naringenin (Fig. 6D). Then, rpsQHis31Pro and secB were expressed with rpoS; however, the strain harboring the pET-28a (+)-PfOMT3-rpoS-rpsQHis31Pro plasmid (NS32) accumulated less (2S)-sakuranetin, resulting in a 36.62% and 40.62% decrease compared with strain NS21 and NS23, respectively, when added 500 mg/L (2S)-naringenin (Fig. 6E), which may due to the imbalance of cell metabolism. Therefore, the gene rpoS and the genes combination rpoS-secB were selected for expression with methylation-enhancing genes.

3.6. Fermentation process optimization to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production

The production of (2S)-sakuranetin was further improved when substrate tolerance enhancement genes rpoS, secB and methylation enhancement genes were co-expressed. The result showed strain NS34 accumulated the highest titer of (2S)-sakuranetin; 545.98 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained when 600 mg/L (2S)-naringenin was added (Fig. 7A), which was 95.43% higher than the optimal strain improving cell substrate tolerance alone, and was 131.71% higher than the optimal strain enhancing methylation process alone.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Fermentation process optimization to improve (2S)-sakuranetin production.

(A) The accumulation of (2S)-sakuranetin when rpoS and secB were co-expressed with methylation-strengthening genes. (B) Effects of different (2S)-naringenin addition time on the production of (2S)-sakuranetin. The final concentration of (2S)-naringenin was 700 mg/L. (C) Effects of different Mg2+

levels on the production of (2S)-sakuranetin. (2S)-Naringenin was first added after IPTG was added for 3 h, and different concentrations of Mg2+

were added at the same time. The final concentration of (2S)-naringenin was 700 mg/L. (D) Strain NS34 was fermented in a 5-L bioreactor, and (2S)-naringenin was added in batches to a final concentration of 4 g/L.

To determine the optimal substrate addition time point, (2S)-naringenin was first supplemented after IPTG was added for 1 h, 3 h, 5 h, 7 h and 9 h (final concentration was 700 mg/L), respectively. The result showed that the optimal substrate addition time was 3 h after the addition of IPTG (Fig. 7B). In addition, considering that Mg2+ can activate the leaving group (ATP and giving phosphate) in the biosynthesis of SAM [43] and that SAM synthetase requires Mg2+, different concentrations of Mg2+ were added. 681.44 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained when added 6 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 7C). Strain NS34 was used for scale-up culturing in a 5-L bioreactor, and 2642.38 mg/L of (2S)-sakuranetin was obtained at 70 h from 4 g/L (2S)-naringenin (Fig. 7D).

4. Discussion

Previous studies have revealed that E. coli has the ability to express SAM-dependent F7-OMTs. In this study, PfOMT3 was selected as the optimal F7-OMT to convert (2S)-naringenin to (2S)-sakuranetin. Given that exogenously supplied of methionine could improve (2S)-sakuranetin titer and that the conversion efficiency decreased with increasing concentration of (2S)-naringenin, methyl donor and cell tolerance to substrate were considered as limiting factors for (2S)-sakuranetin biosynthesis. Experiments were performed to upregulate methionine, cofactor ATP and PLP content to enhance methylation process, and to select the best molecular chaperone, sRNA or ribosomal subunits to improve strain tolerance to (2S)-naringenin. No previous studies have focused on enhancing the methylation process and improving the bacterial resistance to achieve the efficient synthesis of (2S)-sakuranetin.

The methyl donor SAM, biosynthesized from methionine and ATP by SAM synthetase (encoded by metK in E. coli), plays an important role in methylation process. As the direct precursor of SAM, methionine content was enhanced by upregulating key enzymes MetA [44] and CysE [45] in methionine biosynthesis pathway, and the production of (2S)-sakuranetin increased by 50.26% compared with strain 7-FOMT-3. (2S)-Sakuranetin titer decreased when metK was overexpressed, which may due to the overproduction of metK would consume large amount of ATP and cause a methionine deficiency [46], resulting in the imbalance of metabolic flux.

Methylation proceess was further upregulated by regulating ATP and NADPH contents, which are important cofactors for SAM biosynthesis. Previous studies proved that ydaO from B. subtilis can dynamically regulate ATP content in E. coli [47,48]. The accumulation of (2S)-sakuranetin increased by 162.38% in the ydaO-expressing strain compared with strain 7-FOMT-3. POS5 is known to be involved in NADPH regeneration in S. cerevisiae and can increase the intracellular NADPH availability in E. coli [49]. (2S)-Sakuranetin titer increased when POS5 was expressed in strain 7-FOMT-3. However, the titer of (2S)-sakuranetin decreased when POS5 was co-expressed with metA, cysE, ydaO, and the PLP biosynthesis genes. Considering that the disturbance of NADPH pool would trigger the redistribution of metabolic flux in E. coli [50], it was speculated that the redox and metabolic flux imbalance caused the decrease of (2S)-sakuranetin titer. In addition, the extreme metabolic burden of overexpression too many foreign genes may also result in the decline of (2S)-sakuranetin production.

Enzymes involved in the transsulfuration pathway utilize PLP as cofactor [51], whether the increase of PLP content could enhance the synthesis of (2S)-sakuranetin was explored. RFC4 and RPS18B are known can increase intracellular pyridoxine and pyridoxamine concentrations [25], and pyridoxine and pyridoxamine can be converted into PLP [52]. Given that genes involved in the transsulfuration pathway have a high homology between E. coli and S. cerevisiae [53], RPS18B and RFC4 from S. cerevisiae were heterologously expressed in E. coli. The (2S)-sakuranetin titer increased by 180.72% when SNZ3, RPS18B, and RFC4 were co-expressed compared with the strain 7-FOMT-3. This result provides a valuable insight to biosynthesize other methylated products in E. coli, and demonstrates the significance of PLP in methylation process.

Flavonoids are known to have antimicrobial properties; they can inhibit DNA gyrase [15], alter the cell membrane permeability, and change cellular morphology [54], which would affect the metabolism and function of cells. In addition, (2S)-sakuranetin titer decreased with increasing concentrations of (2S)-naringenin. Therefore, substrate resistance was considered as another limiting factor. Genes that can enhance cell tolerance to (2S)-naringenin were identified in this study. Strains expressing rpsQHis31Pro, rpoS, and secB showed better performance on (2S)-sakuranetin production and cell growth. The spot assay reflected more intuitively that RpsQHis31Pro, RpoS, and SecB protein could improve the (2S)-naringenin tolerance of host cells. This result provides an idea to alleviate cell stress in biosynthesizing other natural products with antibacterial effect in E. coli, and the selected genes may also be used to relieve cells pressure in the conversion of other flavonoids.

In conclusion, an efficient (2S)-sakuranetin-producing strain was constructed by F7-OMTs selection, methylation process enhancement, cell resistance improvement and fermentation process optimization. The titer of (2S)-sakuranetin reached 2642.38 mg/L in a 5-L bioreactor, which is the highest titer reported to date. Given that flavonoid O-methyltransferases (FOMTs) have substrate specificity [55], other valuable methylated flavonoids might be obtained efficiently based on selecting specific FOMTs and adopting strategy of this study.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qiumeng Sun: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Song Gao: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Shiqin Yu: Methodology, Supervision. Pu Zheng: Methodology, Supervision. Jingwen Zhou: Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they do not have any financial or commercial conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0904800), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21908078).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2022.07.004.

Contributor Information

Pu Zheng, Email: zhengpu@jiangnan.edu.cn.

Jingwen Zhou, Email: zhoujw1982@jiangnan.edu.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (23KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Park H.L., Yoo Y., Bhoo S.H., Lee T.H., Lee S.W., Cho M.H. Two chalcone synthase isozymes participate redundantly in UV-induced sakuranetin synthesis in rice. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21113777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shehata M.G., Awad T.S., Asker D., El Sohaimy S.A., Abd El-Aziz N.M., Youssef M.M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and UPLC-ESI-MS/MS polyphenolic profile of sweet orange peel extracts. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021;4:326–335. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Valarezo E., Benitez L., Palacio C., Aguilar S., Armijos C., Calva J., et al. Volatile and non-volatile metabolite study of endemic ecuadorian specie Piper lanceifolium Kunth. J Essent Oil Res. 2021;33:182–188. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2020.1848650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Santana F.P.R., da Silva R.C., Grecco S.D.S., Pinheiro A., Caperuto L.C., Arantes-Costa F.M., et al. Inhibition of MAPK and STAT3-SOCS3 by sakuranetin attenuated chronic allergic airway inflammation in mice. Mediat Inflamm. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/1356356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mando H., Hassan A., Moussa N. Flavonoids in Benign Prostate Hypertrophy: identification in herbal preparations and molecular docking approach. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2021;12:8307–8323. doi: 10.33263/briac126.83078323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park H.L., Lee J.C., Lee K., Lee J.M., Nam H.J., Bhoo S.H., et al. Biochemical characterization of a flavonoid O-methyltransferase from Perilla Leaves and its application in 7-methoxyflavonoid production. Molecules. 2020;25 doi: 10.3390/molecules25194455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jesus F., Goncalves A.C., Alves G., Silva L.R. Exploring the phenolic profile, antioxidant, antidiabetic and anti-hemolytic potential of Prunus avium vegetal parts. Food Res Int. 2019;116:600–610. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwon D.H., Ji J.H., Yim S.H., Kim B.S., Choi H.J. Suppression of influenza B virus replication by sakuranetin and mode of its action. Phytother Res. 2018;32:2475–2479. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Choi H.J. In vitro antiviral activity of sakuranetin against Human Rhinovirus 3. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017;8:415–420. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.6.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vicente-Silva W., Silva-Freitas F.R., Beserra-Filho J.I.A., Cardoso G.N., Silva-Martins S., Sarno T.A., et al. Sakuranetin exerts anticonvulsant effect in bicuculline-induced seizures. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2022 doi: 10.1111/fcp.12768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stompor M. A review on sources and pharmacological aspects of sakuranetin. Nutrients. 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/nu12020513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yamashita Y., Hanaya K., Shoji M., Sugai T. Simple synthesis of sakuranetin and selinone via a common intermediate, utilizing complementary regioselectivity in the deacetylation of naringenin triacetate. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2016;64:961–965. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim M.J., Kim B.G., Ahn J.H. Biosynthesis of bioactive O-methylated flavonoids in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:7195–7204. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang X.N., Li Z.H., Policarpio L., Koffas M.A.G., Zhang H.R. De novo biosynthesis of complex natural product sakuranetin using modular co-culture engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:4849–4861. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10576-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alhadrami H.A., Orfali R., Hamed A.A., Ghoneim M.M., Hassan H.M., Hassane A.S.I., et al. Flavonoid-coated gold nanoparticles as efficient antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria-evidence from in silico-supported in vitro studies. Antibiotics. 2021;10 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10080968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tagousop C.N., Tamokou J.D., Ekom S.E., Ngnokam D., Voutquenne-Nazabadioko L. Antimicrobial activities of flavonoid glycosides from Graptophyllum grandulosum and their mechanism of antibacterial action. BMC Compl Alternative Med. 2018;18:252. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2321-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahn Y.J., Im E. Heterologous expression of heat shock proteins confers stress tolerance in Escherichia coli, an industrial cell factory: a short review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;29 doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin Z.L., Li J.H., Yan X.F., Yang J.D., Li X.F., Chen P., et al. Engineering of the small noncoding RNA (sRNA) DsrA together with the sRNA chaperone Hfq enhances the acid tolerance of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02923-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen J.D., To L., de Mets F., Luo X., Majdalani N., Tai C.H., et al. A fluorescence-based genetic screen reveals diverse mechanisms silencing small RNA signaling in E. coli. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106964118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kimura M., Kanehira K., Yokoi K. Highly sensitive and simple liquid chromatographic determination in plasma of B6 vitamers, especially pyridoxal 5′-phosphate. J Chromatogr A. 1996;722:295–301. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00354-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cho M.H., Lee S.W. Phenolic phytoalexins in rice: biological functions and biosynthesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:29120–29133. doi: 10.3390/ijms161226152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cui H.Q., Song M.C., Ban Y.H., Jun S.Y., Kwon A.S., Lee J.Y., et al. High-yield production of multiple O-methylated phenylpropanoids by the engineered Escherichia coli-Streptomyces cocultivation system. Microb Cell Factories. 2019;18:67. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Darsandhari S., Dhakal D., Shrestha B., Lee S., Jung N., Jung H.J., et al. Biosynthesis of bioactive tamarixetin in recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2021;68:531–537. doi: 10.1002/bab.1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee D., Jeong S., Ahn J., Ha N.C., Kwon A.R. Crystal structure of bacterial cystathionine gamma-lyase in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway of Staphylococcus aureus. Crystals. 2019;9 doi: 10.3390/cryst9120656. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dong C., Schultz J.C., Liu W., Lian J.Z., Huang L., Xu Z.N., et al. Identification of novel metabolic engineering targets for S-adenosyl-L-methionine production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via genome-scale engineering. Metab Eng. 2021;66:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bennett R.K., Gregory G.J., Gonzalez J.E., Har J.R.G., Antoniewicz M.R., Papoutsakis E.T. Improving the methanol tolerance of an Escherichia coli methylotroph via adaptive laboratory evolution enhances synthetic methanol utilization. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.638426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu G.C., Wu A.N., Xiao L., Han R.Z., Ni Y. Enhancing butanol tolerance of Escherichia coli reveals hydrophobic interaction of multi-tasking chaperone SecB. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:164. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1507-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Redelberger D., Seduk F., Genest O., Mejean V., Leimkuhler S., Iobbi-Nivol C. YcdY protein of Escherichia coli, an atypical member of the TorD chaperone family. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:6512–6516. doi: 10.1128/JB.05927-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schumann S., Alpert C., Engst W., Loh G., Blaut M. Dextran sodium sulfate-induced inflammation alters the expression of proteins by intestinal Escherichia coli strains in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:1513–1522. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07340-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jin S.E., Jin J.E., Hwang W., Hong S.W. Photocatalytic antibacterial application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and self-assembled networks under dual UV irradiation for enhanced disinfection. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:1737–1751. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S192277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Battesti A., Majdalani N., Gottesman S. Stress sigma factor RpoS degradation and translation are sensitive to the state of central metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:5159–5164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504639112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang P., Mao D.Q., Gao H.H., Zheng L.Y., Chen Z.Y., Gao Y.T., et al. Colonization of gut microbiota by plasmid-carrying bacteria is facilitated by evolutionary adaptation to antibiotic treatment. ISME J. 2022;16:1284–1293. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01171-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singh N., Bubunenko M., Smith C., Abbott D.M., Stringer A.M., Shi R., et al. SuhB associates with Nus factors to facilitate 30S ribosome biogenesis in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2016;7 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00114-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee J.O., Cho K.S., Kim O.B. Overproduction of AcrR increases organic solvent tolerance mediated by modulation of SoxS regulon in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:8763–8773. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pei R., Zhang L.Z., Duan C., Gao M., Feng R., Jia Q., et al. Investigation of stress response genes in antimicrobial resistant pathogens sampled from five countries. Processes. 2021;9 doi: 10.3390/pr9060927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lempp M., Farke N., Kuntz M., Freibert S.A., Lill R., Link H. Systematic identification of metabolites controlling gene expression in E. coli. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4463. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12474-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haft R.J., Keating D.H., Schwaegler T., Schwalbach M.S., Vinokur J., Tremaine M., et al. Correcting direct effects of ethanol on translation and transcription machinery confers ethanol tolerance in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E2576–E2585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401853111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horowitz S., Koldewey P., Stull F., Bardwell J.C. Folding while bound to chaperones. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018;48:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sala A., Bordes P., Genevaux P. Multitasking SecB chaperones in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cranford-Smith T., Huber D. The way is the goal: how SecA transports proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang B.W., Guo Y.F., Xu Z.X., Tu R., Wang Q.H. Genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolic characterizations of Escherichia coli adapted to branched-chain higher alcohol tolerance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:4171–4184. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10507-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lago M., Monteil V., Douche T., Guglielmini J., Criscuolo A., Maufrais C., et al. Proteome remodelling by the stress sigma factor RpoS/σS in Salmonella: identification of small proteins and evidence for post-transcriptional regulation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02362-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Laurino P., Tawfik D.S. Spontaneous emergence of S-adenosylmethionine and the evolution of methylation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:343–345. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tang X.L., Chen L.J., Du X.Y., Zhang B., Liu Z.Q., Zheng Y.G. Regulation of homoserine O-succinyltransferase for efficient production of L-methionine in engineered Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2020;309:53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kunjapur A.M., Hyun J.C., Prather K.L. Deregulation of S-adenosylmethionine biosynthesis and regeneration improves methylation in the E. coli de novo vanillin biosynthesis pathway. Microb Cell Factories. 2016;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0459-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wei Y., Newman E.B. Studies on the role of the metK gene product of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1651–1656. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen Y.W., Zhou H.Y., Wang M., Tan T.W. Control of ATP concentration in Escherichia coli using an ATP-sensing riboswitch for enhanced S-adenosylmethionine production. RSC Adv. 2017;7:22409–22414. doi: 10.1039/c7ra02538f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen Y.W., Cao Y.T., Kong W.Z., Shi Y.Y., Cheng W.Q. Enhanced glutathione production by bifunctional enzyme coupling with ydaO-based ATP regulating system in Escherichia coli. J Funct Foods. 2020;75 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dong X.X., Chen X.L., Qian Y.Y., Wang Y.C., Wang L., Qiao W.H., et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli W3110 to produce L-Malate. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:656–664. doi: 10.1002/bit.26190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen Y.W., Xu D.B., Fan L.H., Zhang X., Tan T.W. Manipulating multi-system of NADPH regulation in Escherichia coli for enhanced S-adenosylmethionine production. RSC Adv. 2015;5:41103–41111. doi: 10.1039/c5ra02937f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ferla M.P., Patrick W.M. Bacterial methionine biosynthesis. Microbiology (Reading, U K) 2014;160:1571–1584. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.077826-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ito T., Downs D.M. Pyridoxal reductase, PdxI, is critical for salvage of pyridoxal in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2020;202 doi: 10.1128/JB.00056-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cherest H., Thomas D., Surdinkerjan Y. Cysteine biosynthesis in SaccharomycesCerevisiae occurs through the transsulfuration pathway which has been built up by enzyme recruitment. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5366–5374. doi: 10.1128/Jb.175.17.5366-5374.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Campos J.V.D., Assis O.B.G., Bernardes-Filho R. Atomic force microscopy evidences of bacterial cell damage caused by propolis extracts on E. coli and S. aureus. Food Sci Technol. 2020;40:55–61. doi: 10.1590/fst.32018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu X.J., Wang Y., Chen Y.Z., Xu S.T., Gong Q., Zhao C.N., et al. Characterization of a flavonoid 3'/5'/7-O-methyltransferase from Citrus reticulata and evaluation of the in vitro cytotoxicity of its methylated products. Molecules. 2020;25 doi: 10.3390/molecules25040858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (23KB, docx)

Articles from Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES