Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1999 Aug;181(16):5042–5050. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.16.5042-5050.1999

Sensing of Nitrogen Limitation by Bacillus subtilis: Comparison to Enteric Bacteria

Ping Hu 1,, Terrance Leighton 2, Galina Ishkhanova 1, Sydney Kustu 1,*
PMCID: PMC93994  PMID: 10438777

Abstract

Previous studies showed that Salmonella typhimurium apparently senses external nitrogen limitation as a decrease in the concentration of the internal glutamine pool. To determine whether the inverse relationship observed between doubling time and the glutamine pool size in enteric bacteria was also seen in phylogenetically distant organisms, we studied this correlation in Bacillus subtilis, a gram-positive, sporulating bacterium. We measured the sizes of the glutamine and glutamate pools for cells grown in batch culture on different nitrogen sources that yielded a range of doubling times, for cells grown in ammonia-limited continuous culture, and for mutant strains (glnA) in which the catalytic activity of glutamine synthetase was lowered. Although the glutamine pool size of B. subtilis clearly decreased under certain conditions of nitrogen limitation, particularly in continuous culture, the inverse relationship seen between glutamine pool size and doubling time in enteric bacteria was far less obvious in B. subtilis. To rule out the possibility that differences were due to the fact that B. subtilis has only a single pathway for ammonia assimilation, we disrupted the gene (gdh) that encodes the biosynthetic glutamate dehydrogenase in Salmonella. Studies of the S. typhimurium gdh strain in ammonia-limited continuous culture and of gdh glnA double-mutant strains indicated that decreases in the glutamine pool remained profound in strains with a single pathway for ammonia assimilation. Simple working hypotheses to account for the results with B. subtilis are that this organism refills an initially low glutamine pool by diminishing the utilization of glutamine for biosynthetic reactions and/or replenishes the pool by means of macromolecular degradation.


How cells perceive and respond to nutrient limitation are basic questions in microbial physiology. We have posed the first question with respect to nitrogen limitation in enteric bacteria because nitrogen metabolism has a number of simplifying features. Among the important simplifications is that most compounds derive nitrogen by secondary transfers from only two central intermediates, the amino acids glutamate and glutamine. Because a decrease in growth rate is the most direct indication of nutrient limitation, we examined the correlation between nitrogen-limited growth and the pool sizes of these two central intermediates in Salmonella typhimurium. The results indicated that Salmonella apparently perceives extracellular nitrogen limitation as a decrease in the intracellular concentration of the glutamine pool (21). Similar results were obtained for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (35a), and hence the conclusion appears to generalize for enteric bacteria.

To investigate whether lowering the intracellular glutamine pool was a general response to nitrogen limitation in the bacteria, we assessed this response in Bacillus subtilis. B. subtilis, a low-GC gram-positive bacterium, is phylogenetically distant from the proteobacteria (20), the group to which enteric bacteria belong, and has the capacity to sporulate under certain conditions of nutrient deprivation including nitrogen limitation (6, 34, 35). In addition, B. subtilis differs from enteric bacteria in at least two other important regards. First, it has only a single pathway for assimilation of ammonia into glutamate, the so-called glutamine synthase (GS)/glutamate synthase (GOGAT) cycle (Fig. 1), whereas enteric bacteria have this pathway and an additional one, the reductive amination of 2-oxoglutarate catalyzed by biosynthetic glutamate dehydrogenase (7, 21, 36). Second, regulation of GS in B. subtilis is very different from that in enteric bacteria. Transcription of the glnA gene of B. subtilis, which encodes GS, is controlled negatively by the products of the glnR and tnrA genes, and GS is not known to be posttranslationally modified (10, 12, 37, 49). By contrast, transcription of the glnA gene of enteric bacteria is controlled by the positive regulatory element NtrC in conjunction with the ς54 holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase, and GS is covalently modified by adenylylation (21, 45). The signals that control the function of the GlnR and TnrA repressors of B. subtilis have not been identified (12, 36, 37, 49). Although it has been postulated that both glnA transcription and covalent modification of GS in enteric bacteria are controlled by a ratio of glutamine to 2-oxoglutarate, in vivo evidence for this is limited (30, 44).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Pathways for assimilation of ammonia in B. subtilis (only pathway A) and enteric bacteria (pathways A and B). (A) GS/GOGAT cycle. One mole of ammonia is assimilated into glutamate for each turn of the cycle (heavy arrows). A portion of the glutamine is withdrawn for biosynthesis. Because GS has a high affinity for ammonia and ATP hydrolysis is coupled to glutamate synthesis, this pathway operates efficiently even at low ammonia concentrations. (B) Biosynthetic glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) pathway. Because GDH has a relatively low affinity for ammonia and the reaction it catalyzes is reversible, this pathway operates efficiently only at high ammonia concentrations. GS catalyzes synthesis of glutamine from the glutamate generated by GDH (not shown).

To achieve nitrogen limitation in B. subtilis, we grew it on poor nitrogen sources in batch culture and in ammonia-limited continuous culture, as we had done previously for enteric bacteria (21). We made use of a wild-type strain of B. subtilis 168 that grows well on minimal medium in the absence of glutamate or tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and a minimal medium that allows good growth of this strain in the absence of such supplements (34, 35). In addition, we studied glnA mutant strains that required glutamine for optimal growth on ammonia to see whether we could detect a decrease in their internal glutamine pools. Such strains of S. typhimurium simulate nitrogen limitation internally even when grown on high concentrations of ammonia. In the aggregate, our results indicate that B. subtilis initially depletes its glutamine pool upon nitrogen limitation but seems to have a mechanism(s) for refilling it. Apparently as a consequence of the latter, the clear correlation observed between the size of the glutamine pool and growth rate in enteric bacteria is far less obvious in B. subtilis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth conditions for B. subtilis and S. typhimurium.

The minimal medium (34, 35) was modified from Neidhardt medium (32) to optimize growth of B. subtilis. The important modifications were (i) increasing the morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer from 40 to 80 mM and raising the initial pH to 7.6 to provide more buffering capacity; (ii) setting the concentrations of magnesium and manganese to 0.4 and 0.1 mM, respectively, those suggested by Hageman et al. (18); (iii) decreasing the calcium concentration to 0.14 mM, 10% of that suggested by Hageman et al. (18); and (iv) removing NaCl. The B. subtilis strain fails to use either MOPS or Tricine as carbon or nitrogen source (25a), and consequently this medium serves well for our purposes.

S. typhimurium was grown on the MOPS medium of Neidhardt et al. (32) at 37°C, and B. subtilis was grown on modified MOPS medium (34, 35) at the same temperature. Minimal media were supplemented with glucose or glycerol (0.2 to 0.4%) as the carbon source and the nitrogen sources indicated (at 10 mM total nitrogen). They were supplemented with glutamine (5 mM) and/or other amino acids as necessary to satisfy auxotrophies. Cultures used as inocula were grown to the late exponential phase on the same medium. Luria broth (LB), nutrient broth, or tryptose blood agar base agar plates (Difco) were used for routine maintenance purposes; when required, the following antibiotics were added at the concentrations indicated: chloramphenicol, 10 μg/ml; ampicillin, 100 μg/ml; kanamycin, 25 μg/ml; and tetracycline, 10 μg/ml.

Upshift of B. subtilis cells from nitrogen limitation to sufficiency.

B. subtilis cells were grown on minimal medium with glucose or glycerol (0.2%) as the carbon source and N-acetylglucosamine (10 mM) as the sole nitrogen source. When the cells had entered early exponential phase (optical density at 650 nm [OD650] of 0.1 to 0.2), NH4Cl, or arginine was added to a final concentration of 10 mM (NH4Cl) or 2.5 or 5 mM (arginine). As the cultures continued to grow, samples were taken for analysis.

Growth in ammonia-limited continuous culture.

A New Brunswick Scientific BioFloC30 chemostat with a culture volume of 325 ml was used for continuous culture. The reservoir medium contained 0.2% glucose as the carbon source and 2 mM NH4Cl as the nitrogen source. These concentrations were similar to those used by Dawes and Mandelstam (6) for ammonia-limited continuous cultures of B. subtilis, and the excess of glucose over NH4Cl, which minimizes autolytic tendencies (22), was similar to that used by Pierce et al. (34, 35) in ammonia-limited batch cultures. An exponential-phase culture of B. subtilis (OD650 of ∼0.8; 180 ml) grown in the same medium with 10 mM NH4Cl was used to inoculate the chemostat. The culture was aerated rapidly with stirring at >500 rpm and maintained constant pH. Dilution rates were adjusted as shown in Table 3. Samples were taken to determine (i) optical density of the culture; (ii) amount of ammonia remaining in the medium (Ammoniak kit [Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.]); detection limit, (∼20 μM); (iii) β-galactosidase activity; and (iv) glutamate and glutamine pool sizes. The samples were stored at −80°C until they were analyzed.

TABLE 3.

Residual ammonia, pool sizes, and glnRAp-lacZ expression of B. subtilisa grown in ammonia-limited continuous cultureb

Sample Intervalc (h) Dilution rated (h−1) OD650 Ammoniae (mM) Pool size (nmol/mg [dry wt])
β-Galactosidase sp act (Miller units)
Glutamate Glutamine
1 2.5 0.72 0.28 1.0 280 22 770
2 6 0.35 1.0 290 24 660
3 18 0.36 0.9 260 20 700
4 3 0.63 0.48 0.6 300 25 710
5 5.5 0.58 0.1 270 22 990
6 8 0.61 <0.02 330 2.9 4,760
7 16 0.57 0.58 <0.02 350 7.5 4,760
8 18.5 0.57 <0.02 330 8.4 4,840
9 22.5 0.57 <0.02 540 13 4,820
10 17 0.72 0.41 0.6 280 25 810
11 20.5 0.40 0.7 280 24 770
12 24 0.41 0.6 260 21 810
13 18 0.68 0.46 0.4 280 25 820
14 21.5 0.55 0.1 300 29 2,830
15 18 0.37 0.57 <0.02 390 6.9 4,090
16 21.5 0.58 <0.02 390 6.4 4,040
a

Wild-type strain B23, which carries a glnRAp-lacZ transcriptional fusion at the amyE locus. 

b

The carbon source was glucose, and the chemostat was inoculated with 180 ml of culture in mid-exponential phase as described in Materials and Methods. 

c

Time that the culture had been at a particular rate before the sample was taken. 

d

Dilution rates of 0.72, 0.63, 0.57, 0.68, and 0.37 h−1 correspond to doubling times of 57, 66, 73, 61 and 112 min, respectively. 

e

Residual ammonia in the medium. 

To determine the percentage of spores in chemostat cultures, fresh samples were diluted with LB medium and spread on LB or tryptose blood agar base agar plates for cell counts. Samples were also heated at 80°C for 20 min or extracted with chloroform and then diluted and spread to determine the number of spores. In addition to this quantitative method for assessing sporulation, samples were examined microscopically for the appearance of refractility. Refractile spores were seen microscopically when the incidence of sporulation was 0.5% or higher but not when the incidence was ≤0.1%.

The S. typhimurium gdh strain SK3121 (Table 1) was grown in ammonia-limited continuous culture as described previously (21).

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used

Strain Relevant genotype Source Parent
Reference
Recipient Donor
B. subtilis
 168 Wild type trp+ T. Leighton 35
 1A626 hisA82::Tn917 trpC2 Bacillus subtilis Genetic Stock Center 48
 1A174 glnA (G243S) ilvC1 pheA1 trpC2 Bacillus subtilis Genetic Stock Center 8
 B13 glnA (P306H) hisA82::Tn917 B278a This study
 B23 amyE::[Φ(glnRAp-lacZ)-Camr] 168b This study
 B28 glnA (P306H) hisA82::Tn917 amyE::[Φ(glnRAp-lacZ)-Camr] B13c B23 This study
 B32 glnA (P306H) amyE::[Φ(glnRAp-lacZ)-Camr] B28c B23 This study
 B40 glnA (G243S, Y308C) ilvC1 pheA1 trpC2 1A174d This study
 B134 ΔglnA14::Spcr 168e This study
 B169 glnA (G243S, Y308C) B134c B40 This study
 B275 glnA (G243S) B134c 1A174 This study
 B276 glnA (G243S, Y308C) amyE::[Φ(glnRAp-lacZ)-Camr] B169 B23 This study
 B277 glnA (G243S) amyE::[Φ(glnRAp-lacZ)-Camr] B275c B23 This study
 B278 hisA82::Tn917 168f 1A626 This study
S. typhimurium
 SK711 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 (Tetr)g 28
 SK2979 Wild type 21
 SK2980 Δ(glnA-ntrB-ntrC)60 21
 SK2983 glnA85 21
 SK2986 glnA88 21
 SK3041 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZYA)] 21
 SK3080 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 SK2979h SK711 This study
 SK3094 gdh-51 Δ(glnA-ntrB-ntrC)60 zch-1463::Tn10 SK2980h SK711 This study
 SK3117 glnA424 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZ)] 21
 SK3121 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZ)] SK3080i SK3041 This study
 SK3131 glnA424 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 SK3094i SK3117 This study
 SK3146 glnA53 glnA425 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 Spontaneous mutationj This study
 SK3154 glnA53 glnA425 SK2980i SK3146 This study
 SK3157 glnA53 glnA425 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZ)] SK3146i SK3041 This study
 SK3160 glnA53 glnA425 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZ)] SK3154i SK3041 This study
 SK3163 glnA424 gdh-51 zch-1463::Tn10 putPA1303::[Kanr-Φ(glnA′-′lacZ)] SK3131 SK3041 This study
a

Spontaneous mutation; selection for growth on minimal salts agar plates with d-histidine as the sole histidine source. 

b

Integration. The promoter region of the B. subtilis glnRA operon necessary for regulation (−104 to +55) was cloned into plasmid pDH32 (a B. subtilis integration vector with a promoterless lacZ gene). The resulting plasmid was linearized and transformed into B. subtilis 168 cells with selection for chloramphenicol resistance. The glnRAp-lacZ fusion was integrated at the amyE locus and was transferred to other strains by chromosomal transformation. 

c

Chromosomal transformation with selection for Camr, His+, or growth on NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source. 

d

Spontaneous selection was for growth on minimal salts agar plates with NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source. 

e

Integration. Plasmid pGln14 (2, 49), which carries the B. subtilis glnA gene with its EcoRI fragment replaced by a spectinomycin resistance cassette, was linearized and transformed into B. subtilis 168 cells with selection for spectinomycin resistance. The disrupted glnA gene was integrated into the chromosome by homologous recombination. 

f

Transduction with phage PBS1. 

g

The gdh-51 allele is 90% linked by P22-mediated transduction to zch-1463::Tn10

h

P22-mediated transduction with selection for tetracycline resistance. Candidates were used as donors to strain SK3062 (ΔgltB824), and transductants were screened for glutamate auxotrophy. If the candidate carried the gdh-51 mutation, 90% of the transductants were glutamate auxotrophs, because both pathways for synthesis of glutamate were inactivated. 

i

Phage P22-mediated transduction with selection for Kanr or growth on NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source. 

j

SK3095 (glnA53 gdh-51) was used as the parent strain, selecting for growth on minimal salts agar plates with NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source. 

Plasmid and strain constructions.

Plasmid pSF14, which carries the glnR and glnA genes of B. subtilis and the region upstream of the transcriptional start site necessary for nitrogen regulation (14, 17, 40), was provided by H. J. Schreier. Plasmid pHJS57, which carries just the glnA gene of B. subtilis (37), was a gift from A. L. Sonenshein. Genetic manipulations of B. subtilis were performed as described by Harwood and Cutting (19).

The promoter for the glnRA operon of B. subtilis was subcloned from pSF14 to pDH32, a B. subtilis integration vector with a promoterless lacZ gene, in the following several steps. The DraI-SacI fragment from pSF14, which begins at position −84 with respect to the glnR transcriptional start and carries the promoter and part of the glnR gene, was cloned into the HincII-SacI sites of a pBluescript II SK vector (Stratagene) to yield pGH1. The XhoI-SacI fragment from pGH1, which carries the entire glnR promoter insert, was then cloned into the SalI and SacI sites of pTZ19 to yield pGH2, and the HindIII-EcoRI fragment from pGH2 that carries the glnR promoter insert was recloned into pBluescript to yield pGH3. Plasmid pGH3 was digested with HpaI, which cleaves at position +75 with respect to the glnR transcriptional start (55 bp downstream of the translational start), and SmaI; the larger fragment was religated to delete the portion of glnR after position +75 (plasmid pGH4). The BamHI-KpnI fragment of pGH4, which carries the glnR promoter insert (positions −84 to +75), was cloned into pTZ19 to yield pGH5. The EcoRI-BamHI fragment of pGH5, which carries the glnR promoter insert, was then cloned into pDH32, which carries only EcoRI and BamHI as cloning sites, to yield the requisite lacZ fusion (plasmid pGH6). Finally, pGH6 was linearized with ScaI and transformed into B. subtilis to yield a glnRA promoter (glnRAp)-lacZ transcriptional fusion integrated at the amyE locus (16, 47). In this cloning, the DraI and HpaI sites were in the glnRAp insert whereas all other sites were in the vectors.

Integration of a Salmonella glnA-lacZ fusion at the put locus of S. typhimurium has been described elsewhere (21). This fusion was transferred to other strains by phage P22-mediated transduction. Plasmid pGln14, which carries ΔglnA14::Spcr (2), was obtained from Susan Fisher and was used to construct strain B134, which carries the deletion-insertion on the chromosome (Table 1, footnote e).

Isolation and growth of leaky glnA mutants.

Isolation of leaky glnA mutants of B. subtilis (Table 1) was accomplished in two steps: (i) isolation of glutamine auxotrophic strains and (ii) selection of revertant strains that could grow with NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source in the absence of glutamine.

We first attempted to isolate leaky glnA mutant strains of B. subtilis by the positive selection procedure of Kustu and McKereghan (25), which was initially used in S. typhimurium and was then successfully employed to isolate glutamine auxotrophs of B. subtilis (7). Selection is for growth on d-histidine as the histidine source in a strain carrying a stable lesion in the histidine biosynthetic operon. The nitrogen source is NH4Cl. In Salmonella, the selection is known to be based on the fact that a decrease in the glutamine pool leads to physiological derepression of a transport system for d-histidine and that transport rather than racemization limits use of d-histidine to satisfy histidine auxotrophy (24, 25). To employ the selection in B. subtilis, we first introduced the hisA82::Tn917 lesion into our wild-type strain by phage PBS1-mediated transduction from donor strain 1A626 (Table 1), with selection for erythromycin resistance. The resulting strain, B278, was then used as the parental strain for selection of spontaneous d-histidine utilizers. Of the small colonies picked after 3 days of incubation, 12 grew normally on minimal medium containing l-histidine when it was supplemented with glutamine. Of these 12, only 1 had a lesion in glnA (see below). This strain, B13, was a glutamine auxotroph (that is, it did not grow detectably on NH4Cl in liquid culture in the absence of glutamine or of glutamate or a source of glutamate such as proline); since glutamine is the obligatory precursor of glutamate in B. subtilis (Fig. 1), glutamate spares the glutamine requirement. The lesion in B13 was localized to glnA by three means: (i) it could be transferred to strain B134 (ΔglnA14::Spcr) by transformation to growth on proline plus NH4Cl, and other growth phenotypes (Table 6) were also inherited; (ii) it could be complemented by plasmid pHJS57, which carries just glnA; and (iii) it was cloned, and the sequence change in glnA was determined. (Nine of the twelve strains that grew optimally with glutamine also grew optimally with glutamate. Based on Western blotting for glutamine synthetase, at least three or four of these were not derepressed for glnA expression, and hence these nine strains were not studied further. Two of the twelve strains that grew optimally with glutamine were glutamine auxotrophs with lesions in glnR [apparently glnR* lesions] [37, 39].)

TABLE 6.

Growth, glutamine pool sizes, and glnRAp-lacZ expression of B. subtilis glnA mutants

Carbon source Straina Nitrogen source(s)b Doubling time (min) Avgc glutamine pool size (nmol/mg [dry wt]) ± error β-Galactosidased (U/ml/OD650) No. of experiments
Glucose B23 (wild type) Glutamine + NH4Cl 48 155 2
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 45 6,000 1
B277 (G243S) 48 7,000 2
B32 (P306H) 49 5,700 2
B23 (wild type) Glutamine 48 130 2
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 48 5,300 2
B277 (G243S) 48 6,500 2
B32 (P306H) 48 5,400 2
B23 (wild type) Proline + NH4Cl 48 30 ± 4 670 3
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 60 11 ± 2 7,500 3
B277 (G243S) 120 2.8 ± 1 6,000 3
B32 (P306H) 160 3.0 ± 1 620 3
B23 (wild type) Proline 60 13 ± 3 3,300 2
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 70 4 ± 1 6,500 2
B277 (G243S) 165 2.5 ± 2 4,800 2
B32 (P306H) No growth
B23 (wild type) NH4Cl 65 25 ± 5c 800 4
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 125 40 ± 6c 4,300 8
B277 (G243S) No growth
B32 (P306H) No growth
Glycerol B23 (wild type) Proline + NH4Cl 48 35 ± 3 700 1
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 59 12 ± 2 7,000 2
B277 (G243S) 130 3.5 ± 1 6,000 1
B32 (P306H) 150 2 ± 1 750 1
B23 (wild type) Proline 60 12 ± 3 3,400 1
B276 (G243S, Y308C) 65 4 ± 1 6,500 2
B277 (G243S) 180 2.5 ± 1 2,700 1
B32 (P306H) No growth
a

All strains carried a glnRAp-lacZ transcriptional fusion at the amyE locus. 

b

Cultures were grown with glucose or glycerol as the carbon source and the indicated nitrogen source(s). Inocula were grown with the indicated nitrogen sources plus glutamine (5 mM). 

c

Average of three determinations made during exponential growth. Pools of glutamate for strains B23 and B276 grown with NH4Cl alone were 290 and 273 nmol/mg (dry weight), respectively. The glutamate pool for cells grown with proline is not reported because these cells excrete glutamate. 

d

Differential rate. 

From the glutamine auxotrophs B13 and 1A174 (8) and the glutamine auxotroph SK3095 (glnA53 gdh-51 zch-1453::Tn10) of S. typhimurium, we selected partial revertants that could grow on ammonia, which included leaky glnA mutant strains. The lesions in strains 1A174 and B40, which was derived from 1A174, were localized to glnA by the three means described above. The glnA region of all mutant strains of B. subtilis was cloned by PCR, and its sequence was determined to identify mutations. For strains B32, B277, and B276, mutations resulted in the following amino acid substitutions in GS: P306H, G243S, and both G243S and Y308H, respectively (19a). The GS activities of these strains in crude cell extracts with Mg2+ as the divalent cation were <0.005, <0.005, and 0.018 μmol/min/mg of protein, respectively, whereas that of the wild-type strain was 0.022 μmol/min/mg of protein (19a).

Determination of enzyme activities.

GS activities of wild-type and mutant strains of B. subtilis were determined as described by Dean et al. (8) except that cells were broken by sonication and the assay temperature was 37°C. β-Galactosidase activity was determined by the method of Miller (29), and protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (4). Polyclonal antiserum directed against B. subtilis GS was obtained from A. L. Sonenshein.

Measurement of amino acid pool size (no-harvest protocol).

All strains used to measure amino acid pools were histidine prototrophs. Cell suspension (0.2 volume) was added directly to ice-cold methanol (0.8 volume) so that the cell membrane would be disrupted immediately with minimum disturbance of prior physiological state (21). Aspartic acid and α-aminoadipic acid were added as internal standards to correct for losses during subsequent manipulations. Generally, α-aminoadipic acid was used for calculations, because the aspartate pool of B. subtilis was substantial in some cases. After lyophilization, samples were stored at −80°C and were then prepared for analysis as described elsewhere (21). Amino acids were derivatized with o-phthaldialdehyde, and derivatives were separated on a reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography column (4.6 by 100 mm; C18; Rainin model 80-OPA-C3), using the conditions described previously (21). Amounts of amino acids were determined by fluorescence; the limit of detection is 2 to 3 pmol (26).

To check for the presence of amino acids in media, cell suspensions were rapidly filtered (0.2-μm-pore-size Millipore filters), and the first medium to be collected was analyzed. Glutamate was detected in the culture medium when cells were grown on proline as the nitrogen source, presumably due to leakage or excretion. No significant amount of glutamine was observed in the culture medium under these conditions, and little of either amino acid was detected in the medium when cells were grown on any of the other nitrogen sources used.

Errors for the glutamate and glutamine pool concentrations in Tables 2, 5, and 6 are the maximum difference between individual values for an experiment and the average value that is presented. Values were determined for cells at three points during exponential growth (OD650 of between 0.12 and 0.75). Errors for the glutamate pool concentration were rounded up to the nearest 5, whereas those for the glutamine pool concentration were rounded up to the nearest unit.

TABLE 2.

Growth, pool sizes, and glnRAp-lacZ expression of B. subtilisa batch cultures on different nitrogen sources

Carbon source Nitrogen sourceb Doubling time (min) Mean pool size (nmol/mg [dry wt] ± error)
β-Galactosidasec (U/ml/OD650)
Glutamate Glutamine
0.2% glucose Glutamine 45 110
Arginine 48 520d 72d 360
Ammonium chloride 62 360 ± 20 27 ± 1 790
Proline 72 e 22 ± 4 3,220
GABA 74 400 ± 20 24 ± 2 3,630
Urea 84 370 ± 20 29 ± 3 3,570
0.2% glycerol Glutamine 48 150
Arginine 48 390d 53d 420
Ammonium chloride 60 290 ± 30 20 ± 1 810
Proline 74 19 ± 3 3,000
GABA 75 400 ± 20 18 ± 2 3,280
Urea 80 320 ± 20 16–36f 3,120–1,090f
N-Acetylglucosamine 395 130 ± 5 21 ± 1 550
a

Wild-type strain B23, which carries a glnRAp-lacZ transcriptional fusion at the amyE locus. 

b

Concentrations of the nitrogen sources: glutamine, arginine, and urea, 5 mM; ammonium chloride, proline, N-acetylglucosamine, and GABA, 10 mM. 

c

Slope of β-galactosidase activity versus optical density of the culture, which is the differential rate of synthesis of β-galactosidase from glnRAp

d

Value for cells at an OD650 of 0.7 and the lowest of the three values observed during exponential growth. Pool concentration progressively declined for cells at an OD650 of between 0.1 and 0.9. 

e

—, Cells excreted glutamate to the medium when grown on 10 mM proline as the sole nitrogen source. 

f

The glutamine pool of the samples increased during growth, and thus we report a range. Similarly, the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis decreased over the range indicated.  

TABLE 5.

Growth, pool sizes, and glnA-lacZ expression of S. typhimurium glnA and glnA gdh mutants

Straina Relevant genotype Doubling time (min)b Avgc pool size (nmol/mg [dry wt]) ± error
β-Galactosidased (U/ml/OD650)
Glutamate Glutamine
SK3041 Wild type 48 69 ± 5 12 ± 1  5,600
SK3117 glnA424 60 62 ± 5 5 ± 1 26,000
SK3160 glnA425glnA53 72 70 ± 5 4.5 ± 1 28,000
SK2983 glnA85 105 61 ± 5 1 ± 1 22,000e
SK2986 glnA88 131 59 ± 5 0.6 ± 1 27,000e
SK3121 gdh-51 60 62 ± 5 12 ± 2  8,500
SK3163 glnA424 gdh-51 96 58 ± 5 <0.5 25,000
SK3157 glnA425 glnA53 gdh-51 300 33 ± 5 <0.5 20,000
a

All strains carried a glnA-lacZ fusion at the put locus. 

b

Cultures were grown with glucose as the sole carbon source and NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source. 

c

Average of three determinations made during exponential growth. 

d

Differential rate. 

e

Value determined by Ikeda et al. (21). 

RESULTS

Glutamine pools of B. subtilis grown on different nitrogen sources in batch culture.

As we had for S. typhimurium (21), we used two criteria for nitrogen-limited growth of B. subtilis: first, that the doubling time of the culture was longer than that on glutamine or arginine, the optimal nitrogen sources for Bacillus; and second, that glnA expression was elevated (12, 36). We took the latter as an indication that slowing of growth was due to nitrogen limitation rather than another limitation or an inhibitory effect of which we were unaware. B. subtilis B23, a derivative of wild-type strain 168 carrying a fusion of the glnRA promoter to lacZ (glnRAp-lacZ) at the amyE locus, was grown on modified MOPS medium (35) with glucose or glycerol (0.2%) as the carbon source and glutamine, arginine, NH4Cl, proline, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), urea, or N-acetylglucosamine (10 to 20 mM nitrogen) as the nitrogen source (13). Glutamine and arginine, the best nitrogen sources for B. subtilis, yielded doubling times of ∼48 min on both carbon sources (Table 2); ammonia, GABA, proline, and urea yielded doubling times of ∼60 to 85 min. Commensurate with doubling times, expression from glnRAp was higher on the other nitrogen sources than on glutamine and arginine. N-Acetylglucosamine, which could be catabolized only with glycerol as the carbon source, yielded a doubling time of 395 min, but expression from glnRAp (550 U) was almost as low as that on arginine (420 U) and was well below that on proline, GABA, or urea (≥3,000 U in each case). The latter provided the first indication that N-acetylglucosamine was not simply a limiting nitrogen source.

As described previously (21) (see also Materials and Methods), samples were removed from each culture at three times during exponential growth (OD650 of 0.12 to 0.75) and assayed for glutamate and glutamine pools. The data were averaged and are presented as single points in Table 2. The glutamate pool size was very high with arginine as the nitrogen source (520 or 390 nmol/mg [dry weight] with glucose or glycerol, respectively, as the carbon source). Although the pool size decreased somewhat with ammonia as the nitrogen source (360 or 290 nmol/mg [dry weight] with glucose or glycerol, respectively, as the carbon source), it increased again with proline (data not shown) and remained at least as high with GABA or urea as it was with ammonia. Because doubling times on proline, GABA, and urea were longer than on ammonia and glnA expression was higher, nitrogen limitation did not appear to correlate with a decrease in the glutamate pool size. The glutamate pool was markedly lower on N-acetylglucosamine than on other nitrogen sources (130 nmol/mg [dry weight]).

Although the glutamine pool was more than 2.5-fold lower on ammonia than on arginine (increase in doubling time of ∼13 min), there was no further decrease in this pool on other poor nitrogen sources including N-acetylglucosamine. Hence, nitrogen limitation did not appear to correlate with a drop in the glutamine pool.

Having observed two peculiarities in the behavior of cells grown on N-acetylglucosamine as the nitrogen source (low expression from glnRAp and a low glutamate pool) we wanted to test further whether N-acetylglucosamine was simply a limiting nitrogen source or whether it inhibited growth on better nitrogen sources such as arginine or ammonia (21). When cells were grown on N-acetylglucosamine, addition of arginine or NH4Cl did not result in an increase in the growth rate for more than 2 h. Moreover, even when the cells had fully adapted to the presence of both nitrogen sources, the doubling time on a mixture of arginine (2.5 or 5 mM) and N-acetylglucosamine (5 mM) or of NH4Cl (5 mM) and N-acetylglucosamine (5 mM) was 60 or 70 min, respectively, whereas the corresponding doubling time in the absence of N-acetylglucosamine was 48 or 60 min. Thus, N-acetylglucosamine appeared to inhibit growth on the two preferred nitrogen sources.

Glutamine pools of B. subtilis in ammonia-limited continuous culture.

To overcome potential complications of using different compounds to achieve nitrogen limitation, including the complication that most yielded carbon skeletons as well as ammonia or other nitrogen-containing intermediates, we turned to the use of ammonia-limited continuous culture. When the dilution rate of an ammonia-limited chemostat was decreased sufficiently for B. subtilis to deplete ammonia from the medium completely (Table 3, sample 6), the glutamine pool dropped sevenfold and glnRAp-lacZ expression was elevated about sixfold. (There was no decrease in the glutamate pool.) However, surprisingly, when the dilution rate was decreased slightly more (samples 7 to 9), the glutamine pool rose to about half of the maximum value seen in the chemostat, despite the fact that residual ammonia in the medium remained undetectable and glnRAp-lacZ expression remained maximal. When the culture was cycled by again increasing the dilution rate (samples 10 to 12), all parameters returned to those characteristic of nitrogen sufficiency (samples 1 to 3). Upon a second decrease in the dilution rate (samples 15 and 16), ammonia was depleted from the medium, glnRAp-lacZ expression rose to the maximum value seen in the chemostat, and the glutamine pool again dropped, although only some fourfold. Thus, the glutamine pool decreased to a value between the lowest and highest values seen when the dilution rate was decreased the first time.

To observe the largest decrease in the glutamine pool upon the first lowering of the dilution rate of the culture (sevenfold in the experiment above), a sample had to be taken before the culture had adapted. In the two experiments performed, the decrease in the pool size was smaller once the culture had adapted to the low dilution rate. In a single experiment in which the culture was started at a low dilution rate and allowed to adapt, we saw no change in pools or glnRAp-lacZ expression when the dilution rate was increased. We have no explanation for this. Even after 40 h at the lowest dilution rate used (0.37), the degree of sporulation was <3% (see Materials and Methods), comparable to values reported by Dawes and Mandelstam at this dilution rate (6). At high dilution rates, the degree of sporulation was <0.1% (data not shown).

To eliminate the possibility that the unexpected instability of the glutamine pool in B. subtilis at low dilution rates was due to the fact that it had only a single pathway for ammonia assimilation, we examined the behavior of a gdh mutant strain of S. typhimurium, SK3121, in an ammonia-limited chemostat. As was true for wild-type S. typhimurium (21), the glutamine pool decreased >10-fold at dilution rates low enough to result in depletion of ammonia from the medium (Table 4, samples 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 11). The glutamate pool decreased <1.6-fold under these conditions, and glnA expression was maximal. By contrast to the case for B. subtilis, the glutamine pool remained low (below our limit of reliable detection) until the dilution rate was increased. Thus, results for the gdh mutant strain of Salmonella provided no evidence for fluctuation of the glutamine pool at low dilution rates in an organism employing only the GOGAT cycle for ammonia assimilation. We note parenthetically that glnA expression decreased little in the gdh mutant strain of Salmonella at high dilution rates, a result different from that for the wild-type strain (21). As observed by others (27, 41, 42, 46), both glutamine and glutamate pools of S. typhimurium were markedly lower than those of B. subtilis even under conditions of ammonia sufficiency.

TABLE 4.

Residual ammonia, pool sizes, and glnA-lacZ expression of an S. typhimurium gdh mutant straina grown in ammonia-limited continuous cultureb

Sample Intervalc (h) Dilution rated (h−1) Ammoniae (mM) OD650 Pool size (nmol/mg [dry wt])
β-Galactosidase sp act (Miller units)
Glutamate Glutamine
1 20 0.37 <0.02 0.45 32 <0.5 20,200
2 42 <0.02 0.41 45 <0.5 20,800
3 22 0.6 0.4 0.36 51 7.2 12,300
4 44 0.3 0.41 49 6.2 9,800
5 22 0.67 0.9 0.26 47 6.4 10,800
6 44 1.2 0.25 50 6.1 10,700
7 18 0.56 0.3 0.27 43 6.5 16,700
8 22 0.42 <0.02 0.44 40 <0.5 19,200
9 44 <0.02 0.45 42 <0.5 20,400
10 22 0.37 <0.02 0.50 41 <0.5 19,800
11 40 <0.02 0.50 40 <0.5 19,100
a

Strain SK3121, which carries a glnA-lacZ fusion at the put locus. 

b

About 40 ml of culture in early exponential phase was inoculated into the chemostat as described in reference 21. The carbon source was glucose. 

c

Time that the culture had been at a particular dilution rate before the sample was taken. 

d

Dilution rates of 0.37, 0.6, 0.67, 0.56, and 0.42 h−1 correspond to doubling times of 112, 69, 62, 74, and 99 min, respectively. 

e

Residual ammonia in the medium. 

Glutamine pools in glnA mutant strains of B. subtilis.

Leaky glnA mutant strains (glutamine bradytrophs) of S. typhimurium are able to grow on ammonia as the sole nitrogen source but grow optimally only when glutamine is added (21, 25). When they are grown on ammonia alone, their internal glutamine pools are low and glnA expression is maximal. The growth behavior of such mutant strains allowed us to calibrate growth rate as a function of glutamine pool size and thereby demonstrate that decreases in the glutamine pool observed in wild-type Salmonella under nitrogen-limiting conditions were, in fact, sufficient to account for slow growth (21).

Growth defects in the four Salmonella glnA mutant strains and the accompanying decreases in the glutamine pool, but not the glutamate pool, are documented in Table 5. When the gdh-51 lesion (28) was present in these strains and hence they had only the GOGAT cycle for synthesis of glutamate, their growth rates on ammonia were dramatically lower (Table 5) and, in fact, two of the strains failed to grow (i.e., they became outright glutamine auxotrophs). For the two glnA gdh strains of Salmonella that retained the ability to grow on ammonia, glutamine pools were very low (Table 5). The glutamate pool in these strains decreased <2-fold even at a doubling time as long as 300 min.

We made comparable measurements for leaky glnA mutant strains of B. subtilis, which also have only the GOGAT cycle for ammonia assimilation. These strains grew as rapidly as the congenic wild type on glutamine as the nitrogen source or on glutamine and NH4Cl as nitrogen sources (Table 6). As had been observed previously for other glnA strains of B. subtilis (12, 36), glnRAp-lacZ expression was very high for these strains (5,300 to 7,000 U/ml/OD650) when they were grown on glutamine or glutamine and NH4Cl as nitrogen sources, whereas expression in the wild-type strain was minimal under these conditions (∼140 U/ml/OD650).

All three of the glnA mutant strains could grow on ammonia if proline was also provided as a source of glutamate with glucose or glycerol as the carbon source (Table 6). However, all of the mutant strains grew more slowly than the wild type on ammonia plus proline (doubling times of 60 to 160 min), whereas the wild type retained its optimal growth rate (doubling time of 48 min). All three mutant strains had lower glutamine pools than did the wild type, and the two faster-growing strains, B276 (G243S, Y308C) and B277 (G243S), expressed glnRAp-lacZ at very high levels (6,000 to 7,500 U/ml/OD650). The slowest-growing mutant strain, B32 (P306H), expressed glnRAp-lacZ at about the same level as the wild type on this mixture of nitrogen sources (∼700 U/ml/OD650). The low glnRAp-lacZ expression in strain B32 was reminiscent of that in the wild-type strain grown on N-acetylglucosamine as the sole nitrogen source (Table 2), and we can only speculate that it may be related to slow growth (doubling time of 150 min or longer).

The two mutant strains that grew fastest on ammonia plus proline, B276 and B277, could also grow on proline as the sole nitrogen source. Again, their doubling times were longer than that of the wild-type strain on proline and their glutamine pools were lower than that of the wild type. Expression of glnRAp-lacZ was high in all of the strains including the wild type.

Only the mutant strain that grew fastest on proline, B276, was also able to grow on ammonia as the sole nitrogen source. Surprisingly, its glutamine pool was greater than that of the wild-type strain despite its low growth rate (doubling time of ∼125 min). Expression of glnRAp-lacZ was clearly greater than that in the wild-type strain (4,300 U/ml/OD650 for the mutant versus 800 for the wild type). Both the glutamine pool and glnRAp-lacZ expression are reminiscent of those in the wild-type strain as it adapted to low dilution rates in an ammonia-limited chemostat (Table 3, samples 7 to 9 and samples 5 and 16). Results of a number of additional experiments, in which growth and washing of cultures used as inocula were varied, indicated (data not shown) (i) that the glutamine pool size of B276 was at least as high as that of B23 (wild type) with NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source (NH4Cl also used as sole nitrogen source for inocula); (ii) that the glutamine pool size of B276 could be up to four- to fivefold higher than that of B23 when cultures used for inocula were supplemented with glutamine (5 mM), whether or not they were subsequently washed; (iii) that the glutamate pool size of B276 was normal (see also Table 6, footnote c); and (iv) that glnRAp-lacZ expression in B276 was much greater than that in B23.

DISCUSSION

Despite a number of peculiarities in its responses, B. subtilis, like S. typhimurium, appears to perceive external nitrogen limitation as internal glutamine limitation, at least initially. The clearest evidence for this conclusion came from measurements of pool sizes of glutamate and glutamine for a wild-type strain of B. subtilis 168 grown in an ammonia-limited chemostat (Table 3). (Unlike the case for wild-type S. typhimurium (21), pools of this strain grown on different nitrogen sources in batch culture were not readily interpretable [Table 2 and Results].) Upon initial depletion of ammonia from the medium in an ammonia-limited chemostat (low dilution rate), wild-type B. subtilis decreased its glutamine pool 7.5-fold but did not decrease its glutamate pool. Unexpectedly, the glutamine pool was partially refilled with time, although glnRAp-lacZ expression remained maximal. On a subsequent cycle of ammonia depletion (cycling through high and then low dilution rates) the glutamine pool was again decreased, but only ∼4-fold. Two simple hypotheses that might account for partial refilling of an initially low glutamine pool are (i) that B. subtilis decreases utilization of glutamine for biosynthetic reactions and thereby propagates a single primary limitation into several secondary limitations and (ii) that Bacillus increases degradation of nitrogen-containing compounds, e.g., by proteolysis (3, 23, 31, 33). These hypotheses remain to be tested. Whether replenishment of the glutamine pool is related to the fact that Bacillus can sporulate upon nutrient limitation (6, 34, 35) is not clear, but it cannot be accounted for simply by massive sporulation in the chemostat because sporulation remained <3% even at the lowest dilution rate used.

Both wild-type S. typhimurium and a gdh mutant strain deplete their internal glutamine pools abruptly when ammonia is exhausted from the medium in an ammonia-limited chemostat (Table 4) (21). By contrast to the case for Bacillus, the pool remains low for as long as external ammonia remains undetectable, i.e., for as long as the low dilution rate required for complete depletion of ammonia is maintained. As is usually the case, cycling of the culture through a high and then a low dilution rate yielded exactly the same results as were obtained the first time. Since the gdh mutant strain has only one pathway for ammonia assimilation—the GOGAT cycle—as does B. subtilis, results with the Salmonella gdh strain indicate that the peculiar replenishment of the glutamine pool observed in Bacillus is not a consequence of its having only a single pathway for ammonia assimilation and glutamate synthesis.

The capacity of B. subtilis to modulate its glutamine pool in ways not seen in S. typhimurium or other enteric bacteria (35b) was apparently manifested in a leaky glnA mutant strain as well as the wild-type strain (Table 6). Although the three leaky glnA strains of Bacillus that we tested did deplete their glutamine pools in predictable ways when grown on a combination of ammonia and proline as nitrogen sources or on proline alone, the one strain able to grow on ammonia in the absence of other supplements, B276, had a higher glutamine pool than the wild type on this nitrogen source despite its long doubling time. We note in this connection that the leaky glnA strains generally showed both depletion of their internal glutamine pool concentrations and elevation of glnA expression when they were grown in the presence of an external source of glutamate, i.e., proline. Apparent replenishment of the glutamine pool in B276 occurred when this strain was grown on ammonia as sole nitrogen source, as it did in the wild-type strain in an ammonia-limited chemostat (Table 3). Whether this unexpected behavior in the absence of an external source of glutamate is related to the fact that most strains of B. subtilis require glutamate, or an amino acid such as proline that yields glutamate readily, to grow well in defined minimal medium (1, 6, 11, 34, 35) is unclear, as is the basis for the growth stimulation by glutamate.

In both B. subtilis and S. typhimurium, the glnA gene, which encodes GS, is transcribed at high levels when the glutamine pool is low. However, it is clear that a low glutamine pool is not required for high levels of glnA expression (e.g., results for wild-type B. subtilis grown on GABA or urea in batch culture [Table 2]), glnA mutant strain B276 grown on ammonia in batch culture [Table 6], and a Salmonella gdh mutant strain grown under ammonia-sufficient conditions in the chemostat [Table 4]). Schreier et al. (42), Deshpande et al. (9), and Fisher and Sonenshein (15) have all reported that glnA expression in B. subtilis can be high independent of a drop in the glutamine pool (12, 36). Potential roles of other metabolites in controlling glnA transcription in both Bacillus and Salmonella remain to be elucidated, as do the roles of GS itself and the TnrA product in B. subtilis (5, 12, 36, 38, 43, 49).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to Susan Fisher, Hal Schreier, and Linc Sonenshein for gifts of materials and advice.

This work was supported by NIH grant GM38361 to S.K.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aronson J N, Doerner J F, Akers E W, Borris D P, Mani M, editors. γ-Aminobutyric acid pathway of glutamate metabolism by Bacillus thuringiensis. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Atkinson M R, Fisher S H. Identification of genes and gene products whose expression is activated during nitrogen-limited growth in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:23–27. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.1.23-27.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bernlohr R W. 18Oxygen probes of protein turnover, amino acid transport, and protein synthesis in Bacillus licheniformis. J Biol Chem. 1972;247:4893–4899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown S W, Sonenshein A L. Autogenous regulation of the Bacillus subtilis glnRA operon. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2450–2454. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2450-2454.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dawes I W, Mandelstam J. Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis in continuous culture. J Bacteriol. 1970;103:529–535. doi: 10.1128/jb.103.3.529-535.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dean D R, Aronson A I. Selection of Bacillus subtilis mutants impaired in ammonia assimilation. J Bacteriol. 1980;141:985–988. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.985-988.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dean D R, Hoch J A, Aronson A I. Alteration of the Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase results in overproduction of the enzyme. J Bacteriol. 1977;131:981–987. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.3.981-987.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deshpande K L, Katze J R, Kane J F. Effect of glutamine on enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1981;145:768–774. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.768-774.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deuel T F, Ginsburg A, Yeh H, Shelton E, Stadtman E R. Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase. Purification and physical characterization. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:5195–5205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Donnellan J E, Jr, Nags E H, Levinson H S. Chemically defined synthetic media for sporulation and for germination and growth of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1964;87:332–336. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.2.332-336.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fisher S H. Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la difference! Mol Microbiol. 1999;32:223–232. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fisher S H. Utilization of amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds. In: Sonenshein A L, Hoch J A, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1993. pp. 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fisher S H, Rosenkrantz M S, Sonenshein A L. Glutamine synthetase gene of Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1984;32:427–438. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fisher S H, Sonenshein A L. Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase mutants pleiotropically altered in glucose catabolite repression. J Bacteriol. 1984;157:612–621. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.2.612-621.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grandoni J A, Fulmer S B, Brizzio V, Zahler S A, Calvo J M. Regions of the Bacillus subtilis ilv-leu operon involved in regulation by leucine. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:7581–7593. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.23.7581-7593.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gutowski J C, Schreier H J. Interaction of the Bacillus subtilis glnRA repressor with operator and promoter sequences in vivo. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:671–681. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.3.671-681.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hageman J H, Shankweiler G W, Wall P R, Franich K, McCowan G W, Cauble S M, Grajeda J, Quinones C. Single, chemically defined sporulation medium for Bacillus subtilis: growth, sporulation, and extracellular protease production. J Bacteriol. 1984;160:438–441. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.1.438-441.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harwood C R, Cutting S M. Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 19a.Hu, P. Unpublished data.
  • 20.Hugenholtz P, Pitulle C, Hershberger K L, Pace N R. Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:366–376. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.2.366-376.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ikeda T P, Shauger A E, Kustu S. Salmonella typhimurium apparently perceives external nitrogen limitation as internal glutamine limitation. J Mol Biol. 1996;259:589–607. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jolliffe L K, Doyle R J, Streips U N. The energized membrane and cellular autolysis in Bacillus subtilis. Cell. 1981;25:753–763. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90183-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koch A L. Quantitative aspects of cellular turnover. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 1991;60:175–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00430364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kustu S G, McFarland N C, Hui S P, Esmon B, Ames G F-L. Nitrogen control in Salmonella typhimurium: co-regulation of synthesis of glutamine synthetase and amino acid transport systems. J Bacteriol. 1979;138:218–234. doi: 10.1128/jb.138.1.218-234.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kustu S G, McKereghan K. Mutations affecting glutamine synthetase activity in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1975;122:1006–1016. doi: 10.1128/jb.122.3.1006-1016.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25a.Leighton, T. Personal communication.
  • 26.Lindroth P, Mopper K. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of subpicomole amounts of amino acids by precolumn fluorescence with o-phthaldialdehyde. Anal Chem. 1979;51:1667–1674. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meers J L, Tempest D W, Brown C M. ‘Glutamine(amide):2-oxoglutarate amino transferase oxido-reductase (NADP)’, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of glutamate by some bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1970;64:187–194. doi: 10.1099/00221287-64-2-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller E S, Brenchley J E. Cloning and characterization of gdhA, the structural gene for glutamate dehydrogenase of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1984;157:171–178. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.1.171-178.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972. pp. 352–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mura U, Chock P B, Stadtman E R. Allosteric regulation of the state of adenylylation of glutamine synthetase in permeabilized cell preparations of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:13022–13029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nath K, Koch A L. Protein degradation in Escherichia coli. II. Strain differences in the degradation of protein and nucleic acid resulting from starvation. J Biol Chem. 1971;246:6956–6967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Neidhardt F C, Bloch P L, Smith D F. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1974;119:736–747. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.3.736-747.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.O’Hara M B, Hageman J H. Energy and calcium ion dependence of proteolysis during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis cells. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:4161–4170. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4161-4170.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pierce J A. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pierce J A, Robertson C R, Leighton T J. Physiological and genetic strategies for enhanced subtilisin production by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol Prog. 1992;8:211–218. doi: 10.1021/bp00015a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35a.Schmitz, R., and S. Kustu. Unpublished data.
  • 35b.Schmitz, R., L. He, and S. Kustu. Unpublished data.
  • 36.Schreier H J. Biosynthesis of glutamine and glutamate and the assimilation of ammonia. In: Sonenshein A L, Hoch J A, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1993. pp. 281–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schreier H J, Brown S W, Hirschi K D, Nomellini J F, Sonenshein A L. Regulation of Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase gene expression by the product of the glnR gene. J Mol Biol. 1989;210:51–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90290-8. . (Erratum, 226:571, 1992.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schreier H J, Fisher S H, Sonenshein A L. Regulation of expression from the glnA promoter of Bacillus subtilis requires the glnA gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:3375–3379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schreier H J, Rostkowski C A. Bacillus subtilis glnR mutants defective in regulation. Gene. 1995;161:51–56. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00238-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schreier H J, Rostkowski C A, Nomellini J F, Hirschi K D. Identification of DNA sequences involved in regulating Bacillus subtilis glnRA expression by the nitrogen source. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:241–253. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schreier H J, Smith T M, Bernlohr R W. Regulation of nitrogen catabolic enzymes in Bacillus spp. J Bacteriol. 1982;151:971–975. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.2.971-975.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schreier H J, Smith T M, Donohue T J, Bernlohr R W. Regulation of nitrogen metabolism and sporulation in Bacillus licheniformis. In: Levinson H, Sonenshein A L, Tipper D J, editors. Sporulation and germination. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1981. pp. 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schreier H J, Sonenshein A L. Altered regulation of the glnA gene in glutamine synthetase mutants of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1986;167:35–43. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.35-43.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Senior P J. Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella aerogenes: studies with the continuous-culture technique. J Bacteriol. 1975;123:407–418. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.2.407-418.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stadtman E R, Mura U, Chock P B, Rhee S G. The interconvertible enzyme cascade that regulates glutamine synthetase activity. In: Mora J, Palacios R, editors. Glutamine: metabolism, enzymology, and regulation. New York, N.Y: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tempest D W, Meers J L, Brown C M. Influence of environment on the content and composition of microbial free amino acid pools. J Gen Microbiol. 1970;64:171–185. doi: 10.1099/00221287-64-2-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Turner R J, Lu Y, Switzer R L. Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis pyrimidine biosynthetic (pyr) gene cluster by an autogenous transcriptional attenuation mechanism. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:3708–3722. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.12.3708-3722.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vandeyar M A, Zahler S A. Chromosomal insertions of Tn917 in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1986;167:530–534. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.2.530-534.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wray L J, Ferson A E, Rohrer K, Fisher S H. TnrA, a transcription factor required for global nitrogen regulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8841–8845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES