Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2022 Aug 24;9(8):220926. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220926

The oldest semi-aquatic beaver in the world and a new hypothesis for the evolution of locomotion in Castoridae

Jonathan J M Calede 1,
PMCID: PMC9399697  PMID: 36016911

Abstract

The North American rodent fossil record includes hundreds of species representing both an incredible taxonomic diversity and great ecological disparity. Although it is during the Oligocene that taxonomic diversity first peaks, it is not until the Miocene, almost 10 Myr later, that many ecologies, particularly locomotory ecologies, are recorded. Here, I present a new Oligocene-aged species of beaver from Montana, Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov., which represents the oldest semi-aquatic rodent in North America and the oldest amphibious beaver in the world, pushing the advent of semi-aquatic ecology in beavers by 7 Myr. I also provide morphological data supporting a terrestrial ecology for the sister taxon to Castoridae. Together with existing data, these findings lead to a new hypothesis for the evolutionary ecology of castorids whereby swimming was exapted from burrowing during the Oligocene. This evolution of semi-aquatic locomotion may have taken place in North America instead of Eurasia. It started in small beavers with gigantism achieved only much later. Indeed, body size evolution in castoroids follows a directional drift. Beavers obey Cope's rule, a selection for larger size over time that appears associated with semi-aquatic ecology and may well explain their low modern diversity.

Keywords: amphibious, Arikareean, astragalus, body size, exaptation, phylogenetic comparative methods

1. Introduction

The incredible taxonomic diversity of Rodentia, the most species-rich order of mammals, is associated with an amazing ecological disparity [14]. One aspect of this ecological range is found in locomotion; there are gliding, burrowing, cursorial, arboreal, terrestrial and semi-aquatic rodents [3,5]. Semi-aquatic ecology has evolved several times within Rodentia; semi-aquatic species exist within the families Cricetidae, Muridae, Echimyidae and Castoridae [5,6]. In North America, four extant native rodents are semi-aquatic. Three belong to the family Cricetidae, Ondatra zibethicus (the muskrat), Neofiber alleni (the round-tailed muskrat) and Oryzomys palustris (the marsh rice rat); one to the family Castoridae, Castor canadensis (the American beaver). All four of these taxa are first recorded in the fossil record during the Pleistocene [7]. The Cenozoic fossil record shows evidence for the presence of over 35 species of semi-aquatic rodents during the Miocene and Pliocene, particularly within the family Castoridae (=beavers) [7]. The oldest rodent species in North America whose postcranial morphology supports a semi-aquatic ecology, the beaver Monosaulax baileyi, is 18.8 Myr old [7,8]. The oldest semi-aquatic beaver in the world, Steneofiber eseri, dates back to the Miocene; it is 23 Myr old [9]. Based on taxonomic affinities, older beavers have been suggested to have been semi-aquatic [10,11], but no morphological evidence unequivocally supports these hypotheses. The timing and pattern of evolution of the semi-aquatic ecology found in extant beavers is particularly important to decipher because the fossil record of Castoridae shows that, for much of their early evolution in North America, many species were in fact burrowing [5,8,10]. Indeed, the subfamilies Palaeocastorinae and Migmacastorinae, which evolved in North America, include almost 20 species, some of which would dig very complex burrows [12]. Burrowing beavers are absent outside of North America [10], but there is no evidence for semi-aquatic beavers until the Miocene and the locomotion of many early beavers has either been considered equivocal or representative of a terrestrial ancestry [10]. The sister family to Castoridae, the Eutypomyidae also appear to have been terrestrial [10], although no rigorous analysis of their locomotion has ever been undertaken. Here, I present the first postcranial remains for the Oligocene-aged beaver Microtheriomys. These include the astragalus, an ankle bone that enables the rigorous test of the hypothesis that semi-aquatic castorids evolved during the Oligocene.

The morphology of ankle bones, including the astragalus, has made possible the study of mammalian locomotion [13]. The shape of ankle bones is associated with locomotion and habitat use in ungulates [14,15], carnivores [1618] and primates [19,20]. Numerous studies have also been undertaken in rodents, providing insights into the locomotory ecology of numerous clades through space and time [2127]. I expand upon this work and present a database of astragalar measurements for over 135 rodent species that enables the exploration of morphological proxies of locomotion using phylogenetic comparative methods. I use these data to infer locomotion in Microtheriomys. I also formally constrain the locomotion of the sister taxon to beavers, Eutypomyidae. These data provide the necessary information to explore the evolution of locomotion in Castoroidea. I test the hypothesis that an ancestrally terrestrial ecology gave rise to both burrowing (Palaeocastorinae) and semi-aquatic (including Castorinae, Castoroidinae and Anchitheriomyinae) beavers with similar morphological adaptations.

Existing data on castoroid rodents make possible an evaluation of the evolution of beaver body size through time and its possible associations with (i) the evolution of locomotion and (ii) changes in biodiversity within Castoridae. Indeed, aquatic locomotion has been demonstrated to lead to increased body size in several mammalian lineages [28]. It has also been suggested that increases in body size following Cope's rule can lead to decreased biodiversity [29]. I specifically test the hypothesis that castoroid body size follows a positive shift, which would support Cope's rule, associate patterns of increasing body size with the evolution of an amphibious ecology, and possibly explain the collapse of beaver diversity.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Stratigraphic context of Microtheriomys specimens

The fossil material described includes a specimen composed of several associated teeth, two astragali and partial bones (UMPC 947), which I describe as the holotype of a new species. Along with other isolated teeth, partial jaws and a crushed juvenile cranium, it was recovered from fluviolacustrine deposits of the lower unit of the Arikareean-aged Cabbage Patch beds (Renova Formation) in Montana. Another specimen (UWBM 108110) is from the middle unit of the beds. The age range for the new taxon is 29.92 ± 0.07 Ma to 27.05 ± 0.26 Ma [30].

2.2. Sampling and phylogeny

I included 343 rodent specimens in the training set of my analyses of rodent ecomorphology (table 1). Of these, 313 specimens represent 127 extant species from 104 genera and 28 families (=80% of rodent families). They include a wide range of body sizes (electronic supplementary material, S1), overlapping the size of Microtheriomys in all eight locomotory categories (table 1). The locomotion for these taxa was taken from prior analyses of rodent locomotion and natural history accounts, including data from congeneric species (electronic supplementary material, S1). I follow prior studies of rodent ecomorphology for the definitions of locomotor groups [5,8] in restricting semi-aquatic rodents to hind limb and tail paddlers (excluding for example the capybara, Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris, categorized instead as cursorial) [8,31]. Unlike a previous analysis of astragalar shape in rodents [21], I used a narrow ‘jumping rodent’ category restricted to ricochetal (i.e. bipedal saltatorial) animals, differentiated between semi-fossorial and fossorial taxa, and isolated gliding taxa from arboreal ones.

Table 1.

Distribution of the training set across locomotory categories.

locomotion extant rodents
fossil beavers
species specimens species specimens
arboreal 21 49
cursorial 6 18
fossorial 21 49 3 5
gliding 13 26
ricochetal 8 19
semi-aquatic 10 27 9 25
semi-fossorial 18 46
terrestrial 30 79

Extant castorids are known from only two species from a single genus (both included in the training set) and represent a small subset of the morphological disparity observed in the family [8,12]. To better represent the ecomorphologies and body sizes of beavers, I included 30 specimens of fossil castorids representing 12 species and eight genera in the training set (table 1). The a priori locomotion of these fossil taxa was taken from previous analyses (electronic supplementary material, S1).

In addition to the specimen of Microtheriomys from the Cabbage Patch beds of Montana (UMPC 947), I also analysed the paratype of Eutypomys thomsoni (AMNH 12255) [32,33]. Eutypomys is a member of the extinct family Eutypomyidae, the sister taxon to the family Castoridae [10,34] which is assumed to be terrestrial [10], but empirical support for this locomotion is lacking.

The phylogenetic framework used in the phylogenetically informed flexible discriminant function analysis (pFDA) (see below) was assembled from a time-calibrated tree of the extant species [35] and a time-calibrated supertree of beavers. For the extant dataset, I randomly selected 100 trees from a published selection of 1000 time-calibrated trees [36], pruned the trees to keep only the 313 tips with morphological data and randomly resolved all polytomies using the R package ape 5.3 [37]. For the fossils, I used a published phylogeny [10,38] and taxonomic data [34] to build a supertree of the beavers included in the training set (figure 2a). Microtheriomys was added to this tree based on its previously published taxonomic affinities [11]. I time-calibrated the supertree of fossil castorids using the R package strap 1.4 [39], first appearance data (FAD) and last appearance data from the supplementary information file of Samuels & Hopkins [7], and the ‘equal’ approach. The root length of 1.9 was chosen based on the difference between the FAD of Eutypomys thomsoni, the oldest ingroup taxon in the analysis (33.9 Ma) and the FAD (35.8 Ma) of the next oldest taxon within the outgroup to Castoroidea (Geomorpha + Eomyidae) [40]: Montanus bjorki [7]. The castorid supertree was then inserted in the phylogeny of extant rodents using ape. The tree used in the analyses is available in the electronic supplementary material.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Analysis of locomotory ecology of Microtheriomys and Eutypomys. (a) Supertree of Castoroidea used in the analysis with reconstructed ancestral character states displayed (labelled nodes described in text, likelihoods shown next to pie charts), (b) results of the canonical variate analysis of astragalar morphology, (c) distributions of posterior probabilities of each locomotion for both fossil taxa obtained from pFDA and (d) results of the pFDA. Percentage of correctly classified taxa based on jackknifed analyses shown in both (c,d). Colours correspond to locomotion or fossil taxon. Numbers associated with electronic supplementary material, S1. Triangles show eigenvectors. Abbreviations follow Ginot et al. [21].

2.3. Ankle morphology and locomotion

Morphological data for 43 specimens were taken directly from a prior study [21]. Five specimens were measured from published illustrations [27,40]. Data for the remaining 297 specimens were measured following published analyses [21]. Measurements were only collected from fully fused specimens using specimen photos and ImageJ 1.51 [41] or directly under a DinoLite AM7915MZT digital microscope to ensure the correct orientation of the specimen and the repeatability of the measurements. I did not include in the analyses the length of the neck of the astragalus because the measurement is difficult to replicate, retaining 15 measurements per specimen. All measurements were divided by the geometric mean (GM) for the specimen [42,43] and log transformed. Mean measurements were calculated for each species. Training set data were input into a jackknifed canonical variate analysis using the R package MASS 7.3-51.5. The two target fossils were added a posteriori to determine their likely locomotion.

I also used a pFDA to investigate the relationship between astragalar morphology and locomotion [3,4446]. This is because the long evolutionary history of rodents could have played an important role in shaping their ankle and the sample's distribution across the rodent tree is not random. I modified published scripts [3,44] and used the packages ape and mda in R to calculate Pagel's lambda for all 100 supertrees. These lambda values were input into the pFDA, iterated for all 100 trees. The posterior probabilities for the locomotion predictions for all 100 analyses for both Microtheriomys and Eutypomys enable locomotion inferences. I used the results of the pFDA and maximum-likelihood implemented in the R package ape 5.3 [37] to reconstruct ancestral character states for locomotion at the nodes for the entire sample for a single random tree. A single-tree analysis was sufficient because of the unique topology of the castorid phylogeny. There are no significant differences in the locomotory evolution scenarios within Castoridae across the 100 trees.

2.4. Body size

The body mass of fossil mammals can be assessed using a number of osteological and dental proxies [4749], including measurements of the astragalus [50] and toothrow length [51]. I used astragalus GM to compare the body size of Microtheriomys with 19 modern and fossil semi-aquatic taxa included in the locomotion analysis. Because fossil beaver astragali are rare, I also used published lower toothrow lengths (LTRL) to compare the body size of Microtheriomys with 75 extinct castorids with known locomotion and the two extant beavers [5,8,12,52]. When necessary, I used the relationship between upper and lower toothrow lengths to estimate LTRL [52]. LTRL was measured from three complete lower dentitions of adult specimens of Microtheriomys (UMPC 2482, KUVP 18171 and UWBM 108110) and calculated for the holotype (UMPC 947) by adding the lengths of the associated cheek teeth.

The mean LTRL of Eutypomys thomsoni was calculated from published values [33]. All proxies were log transformed prior to analyses. I used the published regression for non-muroid rodents under 5 kg to estimate the body mass of Microtheriomys [51]. The LTRL of all 16 castoroid taxa for which locomotion is known (or inferred herein) is used to reconstruct the evolution of body size in the clade using an ancestral character state reconstruction [53,54] and model fitting in the R package geiger 2.0.7.1 [55]. I tested five models of trait evolution (Brownian motion, early-burst, rate trend, directional drift and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck) and determined the best fit using Akaike weights. The analyses were run for a single random tree for the same reasons as the ancestral character state reconstruction of locomotion.

3. Systematic palaeontology

Class Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758 [56]

Order Rodentia Bowdich, 1821 [57]

Family Castoridae Hemprich, 1820 [58]

Subfamily Anchitheriomyinae Korth, 2001 [59]

Genus Microtheriomys Korth and Samuels 2015 [11]

Type species Microtheriomys brevirhinus Korth and Samuels, 2015, Arikareean 1; John Day Formation, Turtle Cove Member, Oregon.

3.1. New species

Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. (see figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Morphology of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. KUVP 18171 (paratype), dentary: (a) lateral view, (b) medial view; UMPC 947 (holotype), left astragalus: (c) anterior view, (d) plantar view, (e) lateral view, (f) medial view, (g) dorsal view; UWBM 97500, M1: (h) anterior view; (i) UWBM 101347, M1/2; UMPC 947 (holotype), select teeth: (j) RM2, (k) Lp4, (l) LM1; KUVP 18171 (paratype): (m) p4-m3; (n) UMPC 2260, m1-2; (o) UWBM 98741, M1-2. Bottom right scale is for all occlusal views.

3.2. Synonymy

Microtheriomys new species A (Calede 2020).

3.3. Etymology

Named for the Latin for joint (articulus) and for aquatic (aquaticus) to reflect the locomotory ecomorphology determined from the ankle bone of this animal.

3.4. Material

Holotype: UMPC 947 (figure 1), partial skeleton with isolated partial LP4, LM1 or M2, partial LM3, RM2, Lp4, Lm1 or m2, Lm3, R m1 or m2. Paratype: KUVP 18171 (figure 1), partial right dentary with I, dp4, m1-m3. Referred specimens: UMPC 2482, partial right dentary with i, p4-m2; KUVP 18842, partial left dentary with dp4, p4, and m2-3; UMPC 1484, left m1; UMPC 1487, left dp4; UMPC 1493, right m3; UMPC 1535, right P4; UMPC 1544, right p4; UMPC 2199, partial skull with left DP4-M2, partial right P4-M2, and partial left dentary with I, dp4-m3; UMPC 2213, right m1 or m2; UMPC 2259, partial left dentary with m1-2; UMPC 2260, partial left dentary with m1-2; UMPC 3028, right m1-3; UMPC 13212, m3; UWBM 97359, M3; UWBM 97500, partial maxilla with M1-2; UWBM 98741, partial maxilla with M1-2; UWBM 101347, M1 or M2; UWBM 108110, dentary with p4-m3, associated crushed skull and M1-2.

3.5. Locality and horizon

Lower and middle units of the Cabbage Patch beds, Renova Formation, Montana, USA; early Arikareean, Oligocene.

3.6. Diagnosis of species

Much smaller than Anchitheriomys, Oligotheriomys and Miotheriomys; only slightly smaller than M. brevirhinus; rostrum shorter than other anchitheriomyine genera; incisors with rugose enamel surface, but not ridged like M. brevirhinus, but unlike Anchitheriomys which bears ridges; P3 absent unlike in Agnotocastor and Oligotheriomys; cheek teeth unilaterally hypsodont and upper toothrows parallel to one another like in M. brevirhinus, but unlike Propalaeocastor; P4 much larger than M1-2 unlike in M. brevirhinus; cheekteeth lower crowned than M. brevirhinus; upper molars generally wider than long unlike M. brevirhinus; occlusal pattern of cheekteeth less complex than in M. brevirhinus.

3.7. Brief description of the fossils

Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. is a smaller beaver than M. brevirhinus. A crushed juvenile skull shows several characteristics of the genus including a short rostrum, parallel upper toothrows, and the absence of a P3. Additionally, the cheekteeth are unilaterally hypsodont and display a complex pattern of enamel lakes (=fossettes and fossettids; see electronic supplementary material for tooth nomenclature) (figure 1). The P4 is much larger than M1, to a greater extent than in Microtheriomys brevirhinus [11]. The shape of the upper cheekteeth varies across and even within specimens although they are generally wider than long, unlike in M. brevirhinus (electronic supplementary material, table S1). The DP4 greatly resembles the P4. The only difference between the two teeth, other than size and proportion, is in the connection of the parafossette with the mesoflexus in the DP4, which is absent in P4. The occlusal surface of the P4 of M. articulaquaticus sp. nov. differs from that of M. brevirhinus in the shape of the parafossette, which is more buccolingually elongated in M. brevirhinus, and a more complex distobuccal corner of the tooth in M. articulaquaticus sp. nov. The two species are similar in the morphologies of the anteroflexus, anterofossette and mesoflexus. The M1 is much wider than it is long (electronic supplementary material, table S1). There is little mesiodistal compression of the four main cusps (paracone, protocone, metacone and hypocone). The morphology of M2 is very similar to that of M1. In general, the morphologies of M1-2 in M. articulaquaticus sp. nov. is simpler than that of M. brevirhinus. The shape of the enamel lakes on the occlusal surface of M3 is very complex. The tooth bears a very large protocone.

The dentary is dorsoventrally shallow in both juvenile and adult specimens (figure 1). The root of the incisor terminates posteriorly to m3 and the diastema is short. The mandibular symphysis is strong and extends from the edge of the incisor alveolus posterior to a point ventral to the p4-m1 contact, including the digastric process. The mental foramen is single, round and small in the paratype, where it is located ventral to the anterior edge of p4 (figure 1). The masseteric fossa is dorsoventrally deep and ends ventral to m1. The coronoid process ascends posteriorly to m1. The lower incisor is relatively narrower in Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. than in M. brevirhinus (electronic supplementary material, table S2) and bears a faint ornamentation on the anterior surface. The dp4 is more mesiodistally elongated than in Microtheriomys brevirhinus (electronic supplementary material, figure S1); so is the p4 (electronic supplementary material, table S2). The lower molars tend to be squarer than in M. brevirhinus. The width is sometimes greater than the length, unlike in M. brevirhinus. The morphologies of m1 and m2 are very similar. The m3 differs from the anterior molars by a more buccolingually compressed talonid and broader metafossettid (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).

The caudal vertebrae are short and round in cross-section; just like in many other semi-aquatic fossil castorids [60], there is no evidence of flattening, unlike in Castor (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). The appendicular skeleton is represented by a partial proximal left radius, a partial distal right tibia, a complete left astragalus (figure 1), the body and fragmented neck and head of the right astragalus, a partial left calcaneus, a right navicular, partial left navicular, a right cuboid, an entocuneiform, and several metapodials and phalanges (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). The proximal left radius resembles greatly a miniaturized version of the radius of Castor [61]. The distal tibia also bears a strong resemblance to that of Castor. The depression for the head of the astragalus in the navicular is shallower than in Palaeocastor [38]. The astragalus of Microtheriomys resembles the astragali of semi-aquatic rodents like Castor and Procastoroides [38,60,61] in several characteristics: (i) both the medial and lateral trochlea are dorsoventrally short; the sulcus between them shallow, (ii) the body of the astragalus is wide because of a laterally expended astragalofibular facet and (iii) the lateral trochlea is anteroposteriorly shorter than the medial one. The shape of the head of the astragalus resembles that of Castor. The sustentacular and ectal facets are separated by a wide sulcus also as in Castor. The ectal facet of the astragalus of Microtheriomys is most similar to Dipoides and Eucastor malheurensis [60]. The sustentacular facet contacts the navicular facet and is mediolaterally wide as in many semi-aquatic castorids. The plantar process of the sustentacular facet [21], a characteristic of Castoridae is present, unlike in Palaeocastor [38]. Overall, the navicular of Microtheriomys resembles most that of Procastoroides. The calcaneus is only partially preserved. Overall, its shape is more alike those of Castor than Palaeocastor or castoroidine beavers [38,60,61]. The sustentacular facet resembles most closely the sustentacular facet of the calcaneus of Eucastor malheurensis [60]. The ectal facet differs little in shape from several other semi-aquatic beavers across both Castorinae and Castoroidinae [60]. The entocuneiform of Microtheriomys most closely resembles that of Dipoides whereas the cuboid is more similar to that of Castor or Eucastor [60]. The metatarsals resemble most those of Dipoides [62] or Procastoroides [60]. The distal phalanges resemble most those of Castor [60]. A detailed description of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. is provided in the electronic supplementary material.

4. Results of quantitative analyses

4.1. Ankle morphology and locomotion in extant rodents

A MANOVA demonstrates that the different locomotory modes differ significantly in morphospace occupation (F = 9.4799, p < 0.0001). ANOVAs and post hoc Tukey tests for individual axes show that semi-aquatic rodents differ significantly in morphospace occupation from all other locomotory categories studied across the first four axes of the CVA. The first two axes of the CVA represent a total of 72.8% of the variance (figure 2b). The first axis (CV1) is positively correlated with astragalus total width (ATW), and to a lesser extent astragalus total length (ATL), and negatively correlated with astragalus body width (ABW). CV1 distinguishes gliding and arboreal taxa at the positive end of the axis from species bound to a terrestrial substrate (fossorial, ricochetal, terrestrial, semi-fossorial, cursorial and semi-aquatic rodents) at the negative end. The second axis (CV2) is positively correlated with ATL and medial body height (MBH) and negatively correlated with lateral trochlear length (LTL). CV2 separates cursorial, fossorial, semi-aquatic and terrestrial taxa at the positive end of the axis from ricochetal, semi-fossorial and arboreal taxa at the negative end.

The CVA shows that species can be accurately classified a posteriori into locomotory categories 61% of the time (figure 2b). Three locomotory modes show particularly good classification rates: gliding, cursorial and ricochetal. Terrestrial, semi-fossorial and fossorial rodents show lower classification rates. The mean posterior classification rate is 7.6 times higher than the prior classification rate (median 4.5).

All one hundred iterations of the pFDA yielded a lambda of 0.1. There are very few differences between the one hundred iterations of the pFDA. The ordinations are similar; one of them is displayed in figure 2d. The first two axes of the pFDA represent a mean of 58.9% of the variance (range 58.7–59.1). The first axis (pFD1) is positively correlated with ATW, and to a lesser extent astragalus trochlear width and ectal facet width; it is negatively correlated with ABW. Similarly to CV1, pFD1 distinguishes gliding and arboreal taxa at the positive end of the axis from species bound to a terrestrial substrate at the negative end. Cursorial taxa have the most negative scores along pFD1. The second axis (pFD2) is positively correlated with LTL and negatively correlated with MBH and ABW. Fossorial taxa occupy the negative end of pFD2; cursorial taxa occupy the positive end of the axis. pFD3 (not figured, mean 18.39% of variance) differentiates gliding rodents from other taxa; pFD4 (mean 9.32% of variance) distinguishes ricochetal taxa and pFD5 (mean 6.96% of variance) distinguishes semi-aquatic taxa. pFD5 is positively correlated with LTL and negatively correlated with ABW and EL. Semi-aquatic taxa occupy the negative end of pFD5.

The pFDA accurately classifies 72.7% of the species studied a posteriori (figure 2d). Six locomotory modes have classification rates above 70%: gliding, ricochetal, cursorial, arboreal, semi-aquatic and fossorial. Terrestrial taxa have the lowest rate of correct a posteriori classification (56.7%). All classification rates are equal or higher in the pFDA than in the CVA. The mean posterior classification rate is 8.4 times higher than the prior classification rate (median 5.4).

4.2. Locomotory inferences of fossil taxa

Microtheriomys is classified by the CVA as semi-aquatic with a posterior probability of 85.6%. It is closest in morphospace to the extant Eurasian beaver, Castor fiber. The second highest posterior probability is for a fossorial locomotion with 12.0%. For Eutypomys, the highest posterior probability is for a terrestrial locomotion (80.2%), the second highest posterior probability is for a semi-fossoriality (9.2%).

The distribution of posterior probabilities across all one hundred pFDAs (figure 2c) supports a semi-aquatic locomotion for Microtheriomys (mean posterior probability: 60.1%); the second most probable locomotion inferred is fossoriality (mean posterior probability: 33.7%). A semi-aquatic locomotion is the most probable inference in all one hundred analyses. For Eutypomys, the highest posterior probability is for a terrestrial locomotion (mean 32.1%), the second highest posterior probability is for a ricochetal locomotion (22.5%). All one hundred analyses support terrestriality as the most probable locomotory ecology.

The ancestral character state reconstruction supports a semi-aquatic locomotion for the common ancestor of Anchitheriomyinae, Castorinae and Castoroidinae (node 1, figure 2a). The ancestor of Castoridae (node 2, figure 2a) is reconstructed as most likely fossorial. The ancestor of Castoroidea (node 3, figure 2a) is reconstructed as terrestrial.

4.3. Body size of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus

The astragalus of UMPC 947 is smaller than the median astragalus of all semi-aquatic rodents included in the locomotion analysis (figure 3a); it is also smaller than all other castorids included in the locomotion analysis. The largest semi-aquatic rodents included in the analyses are the extinct castorids Procastoroides and Castoroides; the smallest are the extant cricetids Oryzomys, Ichthyomys, Neofiber and Nectomys. Microtheriomys (LogGM: 0.60) is most similar in size to the extant rakali (or Australian water-rat) Hydromys chrysogaster (LogGM: 0.57; N = 3) and the extant muskrat Ondatra zibethicus (LogGM: 0.63; N = 3). About 32% of the semi-aquatic rodent species studied are smaller than Microtheriomys.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Body size analysis of Microtheriomys. (a) Frequency distribution of astragalus size (based on GM) across semi-aquatic rodents. The red arrow and line show the size of Microtheriomys. (b) Frequency distribution of the size (based on LTRL) of extant and extinct castorid taxa. Blue, yellow and brown arrows show the median size for each locomotory category. Red arrows indicate sizes of Microtheriomys specimens. Black lines denote density curves for semi-aquatic taxa in both (a,b). (c) Ancestral character state reconstruction of body size as log(LTRL) in Castoroidea. Scaled silhouettes of Castor (from Phylopic Public Domain Dedication 1.0 license) linked to select taxa denote relative size (as body mass in grams) for ease of comparison. Note the very large size of Castoroides. Abbreviations for clades: AB, amphibious beavers; Ca, Castorinae; Cn, Castoroidinae; Co, Castoroidea; Cs, Castoridae.

The three specimens of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. with complete toothrows or alveoli (KUVP 18171, UWBM 108110 and UMPC 2482) measure 14.17, 14.08 and 13.60 mm, respectively. These measurements correspond to body mass estimates ranging from 696 to 774 g. The holotype (UMPC 947) is estimated at a mass of 597 g based on a reconstructed LTRL of 12.82 mm. The logged median LTRL of Microtheriomys (1.14) is smaller than the median LTRL (1.32) of 59 semi-aquatic castorids (figure 3b). Only four species of semi-aquatic beavers (out of 64 studied) are smaller than Microtheriomys: Microdipoides eximius, and three species of the genus Monosaulax (M. progressus, M. typicus and M. valentinensis). Microtheriomys is larger than the median LTRL of fossorial castorids and the median LTRL of semi-fossorial castorids (the latter category is only represented by the genera Capacikala and Pseudopalaeocastor).

The common ancestors of all castoroids, all castorids, all semi-aquatic beavers and the common ancestor of castoroidines and castorines were all small animals (figure 3c). The ancestral character state reconstruction of body size provides evidence for the independent evolution of large size in both the Castorinae and the Castoroidinae. Gigantism is achieved independently in Castoroides and Procastoroides. The best-supported model of body size evolution is overwhelmingly directional drift (Akaike weights—directional drift: 0.975, trend: 0.011, Brownian motion: 0.009, Ornstein–Uhlenbeck: 0.002, early-burst: 0.003).

5. Discussion

The new fossil species described herein, its geological context and the comparative analysis of the morphology of its ankle bone (astragalus) demonstrate that the oldest semi-aquatic beaver in the world is Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov., which is first recorded ca 30 Ma in North America. Together with new data on Eutypomyidae, the sister taxon to the family Castoridae, this new fossil provides a unique opportunity to explore the evolution of locomotion in Castoridae and its links with body size evolution.

Broadly, the ecomorphological analyses provide evidence that astragalus morphology can be used to classify rodent species in the appropriate locomotory category, particularly in select locomotory modes with distinctive astragalar morphologies: gliding, cursoriality and ricochetal locomotion. Locomotory modes that require little specialization of the hindlimbs (e.g. terrestriality and fossoriality) show lower accurate classification rates. The expanded training set of my analysis shows a much greater accuracy in classifying taxa in their locomotory categories than previous work [21] and can be used to infer the ecology of a wide range of extinct rodent species across body masses, clades and locomotion (electronic supplementary material, S2). My analyses show that semi-aquatic rodents in general are characterized by an astragalus with a wide body, a short trochlea and a long ectal facet. The wide body is a consequence of an expanded astragalofibular facet, which serves as support for the distal end of the fibula, particularly during the eversion of the pes [24]. A relatively stable upper ankle joint facilitates swimming [63]. The short trochlear area of the lateral tibial facet is evidence of a stable cruropedal joint with limited anteroposterior movement [24], once again facilitating hindlimb paddling. In general, semi-aquatic rodents display asymmetrical trochleae and a craniomedially oriented astragalar neck and head, two characteristics consistent with swimming in rodents [25]. In Microtheriomys specifically, the deep groove for the calcaneofibular ligament is further evidence of a stable joint [24]. The long sustentacular facet would have enabled a fair degree of rotation between the astragalus and calcaneum; the wide sulcus between the ectal and sustentacular facets would have provided a strong ligament connection between the astragalus and calcaneus, stabilizing this movement of the ankle joint. The extended and strongly concave ectal facet, associated in some taxa like Microtheriomys and Castor with a long sustentacular facet contacting the navicular facet, would also facilitate the inversion and eversion of the pes [20] during swimming. The pFDA demonstrates that although the influence of evolutionary history on astragalar morphology is small, the consideration of phylogenetic relationships substantially improves the classification of taxa, particularly in ricochetal, fossorial and semi-aquatic taxa. This may be a product of the evolution of these specialized ecologies in a limited number of taxa across the tree. All analyses show strong support for a semi-aquatic ecology for Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. and a terrestrial ecology for Eutypomys thomsoni.

The sedimentology and fossil record of the six localities where Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. has been recovered support its amphibious ecology. At all localities where M. articulaquaticus sp. nov. has been found, abundant freshwater snails and frog remains are also present [6466]. At UWBM C1708, the lowest locality stratigraphically where the animal is recovered, abundant fish have also been recovered; the environment was ponded, at least periodically [64]. The sedimentology and palaeontology of UWBM C1707 suggest the presence of a high-energy river channel [64]. The sedimentology and taphonomy of MV6554, C1708 and C1721 support an aquatic environment with some current [30,67]. In general, the depositional environments of the lower Cabbage Patch, where most specimens of M. articulaquaticus sp. nov. have been recovered, likely represent water bodies in a forested mesic environment [64]. The single locality of the middle Cabbage Patch beds where Microtheriomys has been recovered (UWBM C1706) includes a very thick shell-rich diatomite deposit as well as reworked ash layers indicative of a large pond or lake.

Radioisotopic analyses of the Cabbage Patch beds demonstrate that the sediments encasing the oldest specimens of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus sp. nov. date to 29.92 ± 0.07 Ma [30]. The existence of a semi-aquatic rodent in North America at that time pushes back the first occurrence of this ecology on the continent by over 11 Myr to the start of the Arikareean North American Land Mammal Age. This time period is associated with immigration events from Eurasia, particularly in the western United States, where Microtheriomys is recorded [30].

Microtheriomys represents the oldest confirmed semi-aquatic castorid in the world. Prior to this analysis, the oldest semi-aquatic beaver was Steneofiber eseri from the early Miocene (approx. 23 Ma) of France [9]. Steneofiber was classified as semi-aquatic based on a specialized ungual phalanx. The usefulness of the astragalus in identifying both fossorial and semi-aquatic behaviours will facilitate the identification of the locomotory ecologies of other castorids across the world and therefore the analysis of locomotory evolution in the family.

The evolution of semi-aquatic locomotion in Castoridae has been associated with the evolution of woodcutting behaviour and dated to circa 24 Ma in the common ancestor of the extant beaver, Castor, and the extinct Dipoides [10,68,69]. Several lines of evidence including trace fossils, isotope data and ancient DNA have been used to support a scenario whereby a semi-aquatic ecology associated with woodcutting and a woody-plant diet evolved from a terrestrial/burrowing ancestor in the clade comprising Castorinae and Castoroidinae, dam building evolved in Castor, and the woody-plant diet was lost in Castoroides [68,70,71]. The presence of a semi-aquatic beaver during the Oligocene enables a revision of this paradigm. Indeed, my ancestral character state reconstruction of locomotion supports a better understanding of castorid evolution in which semi-aquatic locomotion evolved during the Oligocene several million years earlier in the common ancestor of Anchitheriomyinae, Castorinae and Castoroidinae. It is unknown whether Microtheriomys could engage in woodcutting. Future analyses of incisor microstructure will be necessary to rigorously test this aspect of ecology; the semi-flattened lower incisor of Microtheriomys, intermediate in shape between Dipoides and Castor, does not help resolve its woodcutting ability. However, the semi-aquatic locomotion of Microtheriomys could have evolved independently from woodcutting. Indeed, data from Castoroides demonstrate that the two ecologies can be decoupled [71] and the study of Dipoides shows that it was not as effective a woodcutter as the extant Castor [70]. Thus, woodcutting may have been perfected over time after the evolution of amphibious behaviour. The locomotory ecology of additional anchitheriomyines will have to be analysed to confirm the hypothesis laid out herein. However, already, Anchitheriomys tungurensis from the middle Miocene of China has been suggested to be semi-aquatic [11,72]. If all anchitheriomyines were semi-aquatic and the relatively poorly known fossil beaver Agnotocastor is indeed a junior synonym of Propalaeocastor, the oldest anchitheriomyine in the world would be P. galushai from the early Oligocene of North America [73]. This would suggest the evolution of amphibious beavers first in North America, early in the Oligocene, rather than in Eurasia during the Miocene as currently thought. Amphibious beavers could then have emigrated to Eurasia at the same time that numerous mammal taxa immigrated to North America during the Arikareean through Beringia [30]. Future phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses will be necessary to test this hypothesis.

My work supports the hypothesis that the evolution of the semi-aquatic ecology of beavers is an exaptation from the fossorial ecology of the common ancestor of Castoridae. Patterns of exaptation between burrowing and swimming have been identified or hypothesized in other mammalian clades [74,75]. The relative ease by which one mode of locomotion can evolve from the other is likely facilitated by their many similarities in associated morphology and biomechanics [76], including in Rodentia [5]. This evolutionary pattern may explain the second likely classification of fossoriality for Microtheriomys; the animal bears the morphology inherited from its ancestors while displaying evidence of divergence away from burrowing towards swimming. Alternatively, or concurrently, the second likely classification of fossoriality for Microtheriomys may reflect its ability to burrow retained from its ancestors; the extant Castor is indeed capable of extensive digging [12]. Additional fossils of the forelimb and/or skull of Microtheriomys will be necessary to further test this hypothesis. The evolutionary success of semi-aquatic beavers when their fossorial relatives were waning during the early to mid-Miocene [52] supports the hypothesis that the survival and success of the family were achieved through the exaptation of a morphology adapted to moving through dirt for locomotion through water as habitats were changing with increased heterogeneity [7]. Further analyses of morphological similarities and differences among semi-aquatic rodents across families may reveal important evidence for canalization and help constrain the processes of exaptation in Castoridae.

Extant semi-aquatic beavers are the second largest rodent in the world today; the largest extant rodent, the capybara, is amphibious; the largest beavers to have existed were semi-aquatic; the largest known rodents ever found had amphibious ecologies [8,31,77,78]. Yet, there is evidence for many small semi-aquatic beavers in the fossil record, including now Microtheriomys, the fifth smallest amphibious beaver to date. Interestingly, the previously oldest semi-aquatic North American beaver, Monosaulax, is also among the smallest five amphibious beavers; Eucastor tedi, another Miocene-aged amphibious beaver, is also small [52]. Together, these data suggest that the semi-aquatic ecology of Castoridae first evolved in small species with the gigantism of younger species evolving later. This is consistent with the pattern described above of an exaptation from fossoriality; burrowing beavers (Palaeocastorinae) are smaller than semi-aquatic ones. The ancestral character reconstruction and the model fitting analysis corroborate this inference. The directional drift followed by body size in castoroids supports the hypothesis that beavers followed Cope's rule, alike canids [79]. It may even be that the evolution of large body sizes drove beavers, like muskrats, another semi-aquatic rodent group, to their current low diversity of two extant species each (Castor fiber and C. canadensis, Neofiber alleni and Ondatra zibethicus, respectively) because of a possible inverse relationship between body mass and species diversity [29]. Future comparative phylogenetic analyses sampling a greater portion of the Castoridae will be necessary to rigorously test the hypothesis that the semi-aquatic locomotion of beavers acquired during the Oligocene played a role in the evolution of some of the largest rodent species in the world during the Pliocene and Pleistocene.

Acknowledgements

This work would not have been possible without the help and fieldwork of Donald Rasmussen who first recognized the existence of an unusual castorid in Montana and discovered the holotype of Microtheriomys articulaquaticus. Gregory Wilson Mantilla provided space, equipment, and mentorship during the initial stage of this research. Sam Price and Sam Hopkins shared their time-calibrated phylogenetic tree. Lars Schmitz assisted in coding. Josh Samuels, Samantha Hopkins, Winifred Kehl and members of the Chavez laboratory participated in critical discussions. Christian Harris assisted in initial data collection. Meg Daly, Bryan Carstens and Tamaki Yuri (The Ohio State Museum of Biological Diversity), Joshua Samuels and Chris Schierup (JODA), Samantha Hopkins and Edward Davis (UOMNH), Desui Miao and David Burnham (KUVP), Kallie Moore and George Stanley (UMPC), Amy Henrici, Matt Lamanna, Suzanne, McLaren and John Wible (CM), Roberta Muehlheim (CMNH), Judith Galkin and Marisa Surovy (AMNH), Kevin Padian and Patricia Holroyd (UCMP), Darrin Lunde, Amanda Milhouse and Dave DeMar Jr (USNM), Darrin Pagnac and Sally Shelton (SDSM), Josh Samuels (ETVP), Jim Dines, Vanessa Rhue and Sam McLeod (LACM), Verity Mathis and Richard C. Hulbert Jr (UF), Emily Imhoff (Cincinnati Museum of Natural History), Charles Kilpatrick (UVM), Ron Eng, Meredith Rivin, Regan Dunn, and Christian Sidor (UWBM) and Donald Rasmussen provided access to specimens. Landowners and ranchers in Granite and Powell counties, in particular the Radtke, Dingwall, Dutton and Morse ranches, allowed access to their land. Many undergraduate students helped recover, identify and curate specimens. Two anonymous reviewers provided constructive feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Data accessibility

The data used in the quantitative analyses of locomotion are included in the electronic supplementary material. Toothrow length data are provided in the text and publications cited. The nexus file for the supertree and the code used for the analyses are provided in the electronic supplementary material [80].

Conflict of interest declaration

The author has no competing interest to declare.

Funding

This study was funded by Sigma-Xi, University of Washington Burke Museum, Paleontological Society, University of Washington Department of Biology, American Philosophical Society, The Ohio State University College of Arts and Science, Northwest Association, Geological Society of America, The Ohio State University at Marion, Evolving Earth Foundation and the Tobacco Root Geological Society.

References

  • 1.Burgin CJ, Colella JP, Kahn PL, Upham NS. 2018. How many species of mammals are there? J. Mammal. 99, 1-14. ( 10.1093/jmammal/gyx147) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.D'Elía G, Fabre PH, Lessa EP. 2019. Rodent systematics in an age of discovery: recent advances and prospects. J. Mammal. 100, 852-871. ( 10.1093/jmammal/gyy179) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verde ALD, Fisher DO, Schweizer M. 2017. Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 160957. ( 10.1098/rsos.160957) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mammal Diversity Database. 2021. Mammal diversity database (Version 1.7). Zenodo. ( 10.5281/zenodo.4139722) [DOI]
  • 5.Calede JJM, Samuels JX, Chen M. 2019. Locomotory adaptations in entoptychine gophers (Rodentia: Geomyidae) and the mosaic evolution of fossoriality. J. Morphol. 280, 879-907. ( 10.1002/jmor.20990) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giarla TC, et al. 2021. Integrative taxonomy and phylogeography of Colomys and Nilopegamys (Rodentia: Murinae), semi-aquatic mice of Africa, with descriptions of two new species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 192, 206-235. ( 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa108) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Samuels JX, Hopkins SSB. 2017. The impacts of Cenozoic climate and habitat changes on small mammal diversity of North America. Glob. Planet. Change 149, 36-52. ( 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.12.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Samuels JX, Valkenburgh B. 2008. Skeletal indicators of locomotor adaptations in living and extinct rodents. J. Morphol. 1411, 1387-1411. ( 10.1002/jmor.10662) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hugueney M, Escuillié F. 1995. K-strategy and adaptative specialization in Steneofiber from Montaigu-le-Blin (dept. Allier, France; Lower Miocene, MN 2a, ±23 Ma): first evidence of fossil life-history strategies in castorid rodents. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 113, 217-225. ( 10.1016/0031-0182(95)00050-V) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rybczynski N. 2007. Castorid phylogenetics: implications for the evolution of swimming and tree-exploitation in beavers. J. Mamm. Evol. 14, 1-35. ( 10.1007/s10914-006-9017-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Korth WW, Samuels JX. 2015. New rodent material from the John Day Formation (Arikareean, middle Oligocene to early Miocene) of Oregon. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 83, 19-84. ( 10.2992/007.083.0102) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Samuels JX, Van Valkenburgh B. 2009. Craniodental adaptations for digging in extinct burrowing beavers. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 29, 254-268. ( 10.1080/02724634.2009.10010376) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shelley SL, Brusatte SL, Williamson TE. 2021. Quantitative assessment of tarsal morphology illuminates locomotor behaviour in Palaeocene mammals following the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20210393. ( 10.1098/rspb.2021.0393) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dunn RH, Avery JE. 2021. Ecomorphological variation in artiodactyl calcanei using 3D geometric morphometrics. Anat. Rec. 304, 1529-1540. ( 10.1002/ar.24544) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andrew BW. 2020. The morphology of the bovid calcaneus: function, phylogenetic signal, and allometric scaling. J. Mamm. Evol. 27, 111-121. ( 10.1007/s10914-018-9446-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Polly PD. 2010. Tiptoeing through the trophics: geographic variation in carnivoran locomotor ecomorphology in relation to environment. In Carnivoran evolution: new views on phylogeny, form and function (eds Goswami A, Friscia A), pp. 374-410. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ( 10.1017/CBO9781139193436.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Panciroli E, Janis C, Stockdale M, Martín-Serra A. 2017. Correlates between calcaneal morphology and locomotion in extant and extinct carnivorous mammals. J. Morphol. 278, 1333-1353. ( 10.1002/jmor.20716) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fournier M, Ladevèze S, Le Verger K, Fischer V, Speijer RP, Solé F. 2020. On the morphology of the astragalus and calcaneus of the amphicyonids (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Paleogene of Europe: implications for the ecology of the European bear-dogs. Geodiversitas 42, 305. ( 10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a18) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boyer DM, Yapuncich GS, Dunham NT, McNamara A, Shapiro LJ, Hieronymus TL, Young JW. 2019. My branch is your branch: talar morphology correlates with relative substrate size in platyrrhines at Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. J. Hum. Evol. 133, 23-31. ( 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chester SGB, Bloch JI, Boyer DM, Clemens WA. 2015. Oldest known euarchontan tarsals and affinities of Paleocene Purgatorius to Primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1487-1492. ( 10.1073/pnas.1421707112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ginot S, Hautier L, Marivaux L, Vianey-Liaud M. 2016. Ecomorphological analysis of the astragalo-calcaneal complex in rodents and inferences of locomotor behaviours in extinct rodent species. PeerJ 4, e2393. ( 10.7717/peerj.2393) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Candela AM, Muñoz NA, García-Esponda CM. 2017. The tarsal-metatarsal complex of caviomorph rodents: anatomy and functional-adaptive analysis. J. Morphol. 278, 828-847. ( 10.1002/jmor.20678) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boivin M, Ginot S, Marivaux L, Altamirano-Sierra AJ, Pujos F, Salas-Gismondi R, Tejada-Lara JV, Antoine PO. 2018. Tarsal morphology and locomotor adaptation of some late middle Eocene caviomorph rodents from Peruvian Amazonia reveal early ecological diversity. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 38, e1555164. ( 10.1080/02724634.2018.1555164) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fostowicz-Frelik L, Li Q, Ni X. 2018. Oldest ctenodactyloid tarsals from the Eocene of China and evolution of locomotor adaptations in early rodents. BMC Evol. Biol. 18, 150. ( 10.1186/s12862-018-1259-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kerber L, Candela AM, Ferreira JD, Pretto FA, Bubadué J, Negri FR. 2022. Postcranial morphology of the extinct rodent Neoepiblema (Rodentia: Chinchilloidea): insights into the paleobiology of neoepiblemids. J. Mamm. Evol. 29, 207-235. ( 10.1007/s10914-021-09567-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fostowicz-Frelik Ł, López-Torres S, Li Q. 2021. Tarsal morphology of ischyromyid rodents from the middle Eocene of China gives an insight into the group's diversity in Central Asia. Sci. Rep. 11, 11543. ( 10.1038/s41598-021-90796-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coster PM, Soe AN, Beard KC, Chaimanee Y, Sein C, Lazzari V, Jaeger JJ. 2018. Astragalus of Pondaungimys (Rodentia, Anomaluroidea) from the late middle Eocene Pondaung Formation, central Myanmar. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 38, e1552156. ( 10.1080/02724634.2018.1552156) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gearty W, McClain CR, Payne JL. 2018. Energetic tradeoffs control the size distribution of aquatic mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4194-4199. ( 10.1073/pnas.1712629115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin RA. 2019. Scaling of species diversity and body mass in mammals: Cope's rule and the evolutionary cost of large size. Hist. Biol. 31, 1242-1255. ( 10.1080/08912963.2018.1441294) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Calede JJM. 2020. Pattern and processes of the mammalian turnover of the Arikareean in the northern Rocky Mountains. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 40, e1767117. ( 10.1080/02724634.2020.1767117) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.García-Esponda CM, Candela AM. 2016. Hindlimb musculature of the largest living rodent Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Caviomorpha): adaptations to semiaquatic and terrestrial styles of life. J. Morphol. 277, 286-305. ( 10.1002/jmor.20495) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matthew WD. 1905. Notice of two new genera of mammals from the Oligocene of South Dakota. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 21, 21-26. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scott WB, Jepsen GL, Wood AE. 1937. The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene: Part II. Rodentia. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 28, 155-269. ( 10.2307/1005501) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jacobs LL. 2008. Castoroidea. In Evolution of tertiary mammals of North America, vol. 2 (eds Janis CM, Gunnell G, Uhen MD), pp. 391-405. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fabre PH, Hautier L, Dimitrov D, Douzery EJ. 2012. A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 88. ( 10.1186/1471-2148-12-88) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Price SA, Hopkins SSB. 2015. The macroevolutionary relationship between diet and body mass across mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 173-184. ( 10.1111/bij.12495) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Calede JJ. 2014. Skeletal morphology of Palaeocastor peninsulatus (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Fort Logan Formation of Montana (early Arikareean): ontogenetic and paleoecological interpretations. J. Mamm. Evol. 21, 223-241. ( 10.1007/s10914-013-9231-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bell MA, Lloyd GT. 2015. Strap: an R package for plotting phylogenies against stratigraphy and assessing their stratigraphic congruence. Palaeontology 58, 379-389. ( 10.1111/pala.12142) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Asher RJ, Smith MR, Rankin A, Emry RJ, Asher RJ. 2019. Congruence, fossils and the evolutionary tree of rodents and lagomorphs. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190387. ( 10.1098/rsos.190387) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671. ( 10.1038/nmeth.2089) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jungers WL, Falsetti AB, Wall CE. 1995. Shape, relative size, and size adjustments in morphometrics. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 38, 137-161. ( 10.1002/ajpa.1330380608) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Madar SI, Rose MD, Kelley J, MacLatchy L, Pilbeam D. 2002. New Sivapithecus postcranial specimens from the Siwaliks of Pakistan. J. Hum. Evol. 42, 705-752. ( 10.1006/jhev.2002.0554) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schmitz L, Motani R. 2011. Nocturnality in dinosaurs inferred from scleral ring and orbit morphology. Science 332, 705-708. ( 10.1126/science.1200043) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smith SM, Angielczyk KD, Schmitz L, Wang SC. 2018. Do bony orbit dimensions predict diel activity pattern in sciurid rodents? Anat. Rec. 301, 1774-1787. ( 10.1002/ar.23900) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kohli BA, Rowe RJ. 2019. Beyond guilds: the promise of continuous traits for mammalian functional diversity. J. Mammal. 100, 285-298. ( 10.1093/jmammal/gyz054) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Millien V, Bovy H. 2010. When teeth and bones disagree: body mass estimation of a giant extinct rodent. J. Mammal. 91, 11-18. ( 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-347R1.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hopkins SSB. 2018. Estimation of body size in fossil mammals. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reynolds PS. 2002. How big is a giant? The importance of method in estimating body size of extinct mammals. J. Mammal. 83, 321-332. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tsubamoto T. 2014. Estimating body mass from the astragalus in mammals. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 59, 259-265. ( 10.4202/app.2011.0067) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hopkins SSB. 2008. Reassessing the mass of exceptionally large rodents using toothrow length and area as proxies for body mass. J. Mammal. 89, 232-243. ( 10.1644/06-mamm-a-306.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hopkins SSB. 2007. Causes of lineage decline in the Aplodontidae: testing for the influence of physical and biological change. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 246, 331-353. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.10.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Revell LJ. 2014. Ancestral character estimation under the threshold model from quantitative genetics. Evolution 68, 743-759. ( 10.1111/evo.12300) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Revell LJ. 2012. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217-223. ( 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Harmon LJ, Weir JT, Brock CD, Glor RE, Challenger W. 2008. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24, 129-131. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Linneaus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum class, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Stockholm, Sweden: Laurentii Salvi. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bowdich TE. 1821. An analysis of the natural classifications of mammalia: for the use of students and travellers. Paris, France: J. Smith. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hemprich W. 1820. Grundriss der Naturgeschichte für höhere Lehranstalten Entworfen von Dr. W. Hemprich. Berlin, Germany: August Rucker. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Korth WW. 2001. A new species of Anchitheriomys (Rodentia, Castoridae) and a review of the anchitheriomyine beavers from North America. Paludicola 3, 51-55. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shotwell JA. 1970. Pliocene mammals of southeast Oregon and adjacent Idaho. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Oregon 17, 1-103. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lechner TS, Böhme M. 2020. Castor-like postcranial adaptation in an uppermost Miocene beaver from the Staniantsi Basin (NW Bulgaria). Foss. Impr. 76, 128-164. ( 10.37520/fi.2020.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wilson RW. 1934. A new species of Dipoides from the Pliocene of eastern Oregon. Contrib. Paleontol. III, 21-28.
  • 63.Salton JA, Szalay FS. 2004. The tarsal complex of Afro-Malagasy Tenrecoidea: a search for phylogenetically meaningful characters. J. Mamm. Evol. 11, 73-104. ( 10.1023/B:JOMM.0000041190.83655.1d) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Calede JJ. 2016. Comparative taphonomy of the mammalian remains from the Cabbage Patch beds of western Montana (Renova Formation, Arikareean): contrasting depositional environments and specimen preservation. Palaios 31, 497-515. ( 10.2110/palo.2015.072) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Henrici AC. 1994. Tephrodytes brassicarvalis, new genus and species (Anura: Pelodytidae), from the Arikareean Cabbage Patch beds of Montana, USA, and pelodytid-pelobatid relationships. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 63, 155-183 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pierce HG. 1993. The nonmarine mollusks of the late Oligocene-early Miocene Cabbage Patch fauna of western Montana. III. Aquatic mollusks and conclusions. J. Paleontol. 67, 980-983. ( 10.1017/s0022336000025294) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rasmussen DL. 1977. Geology and mammalian paleontology of the Oligocene-Miocene Cabbage Patch Formation, central-western Montana. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Plint T, Longstaffe FJ, Ballantyne A, Telka A, Rybczynski N. 2020. Evolution of woodcutting behaviour in Early Pliocene beaver driven by consumption of woody plants. Sci. Rep. 10, 13111. ( 10.1038/s41598-020-70164-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xenikoudakis G, Ahmed M, Harris JC, Wadleigh R, Paijmans JLA, Hartmann S, Barlow A, Lerner H, Hofreiter M. 2020. Ancient DNA reveals twenty million years of aquatic life in beavers. Curr. Biol. 30, R110-R111. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.041) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rybczynski N. 2008. Woodcutting behavior in beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia): estimating ecological performance in a modern and a fossil taxon. Paleobiology 34, 389-402. ( 10.1666/06085.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Plint T, Longstaffe FJ, Zazula G. 2019. Giant beaver palaeoecology inferred from stable isotopes. Sci. Rep. 9, 7179. ( 10.1038/s41598-019-43710-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stirton RA. 1934. A new species of Amblycastor from the Platybelodon beds, Tung Gur Formation, of Mongolia. Am. Mus. Nov. 694, 1-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Li L, Li Q, Lu X, Ni X. 2017. Morphology of an early Oligocene beaver Propalaeocastor irtyshensis and the status of the genus Propalaeocastor. PeerJ 5, e3311. ( 10.7717/peerj.3311) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ji Q, Luo ZX, Yuan CX, Tabrum AR. 2006. A swimming mammaliaform from the middle Jurassic and ecomorphological diversification of early mammals. Science 311, 1123-1127. ( 10.1126/science.1123026) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Beck RMD, Warburton NM, Archer M, Hand SJ, Aplin KP. 2016. Going underground: postcranial morphology of the early miocene marsupial mole Naraboryctes philcreaseri and the evolution of fossoriality in notoryctemorphians. Mem. Mus. Victoria 74, 151-171. ( 10.24199/j.mmv.2016.74.14) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Salton JA, Sargis EJ. 2008. Evolutionary morphology of the Tenrecoidea (Mammalia) forelimb skeleton. Mamm. Evol. Morphol. 11, 51-71. ( 10.1002/jmor.10697) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Blanco RE. 2008. The uncertainties of the largest fossil rodent. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1957-1958. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.0551) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sánchez-Villagra MR, Aguilera O, Horovitz I. 2003. The anatomy of the world's largest extinct rodent. Science 301, 1708-1710. ( 10.1126/science.1089332) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Balisi M, Casey C, van Valkenburgh B. 2018. Dietary specialization is linked to reduced species durations in North American fossil canids. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171861. ( 10.1098/rsos.171861) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Calede JJM. 2022. The oldest semi-aquatic beaver in the world and a new hypothesis for the evolution of locomotion in Castoridae. FigShare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6154283) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Mammal Diversity Database. 2021. Mammal diversity database (Version 1.7). Zenodo. ( 10.5281/zenodo.4139722) [DOI]
  2. Calede JJM. 2022. The oldest semi-aquatic beaver in the world and a new hypothesis for the evolution of locomotion in Castoridae. FigShare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6154283) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

The data used in the quantitative analyses of locomotion are included in the electronic supplementary material. Toothrow length data are provided in the text and publications cited. The nexus file for the supertree and the code used for the analyses are provided in the electronic supplementary material [80].


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES