Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 May 6;61(28):e202202637. doi: 10.1002/anie.202202637

Realizing 1,1‐Dehydration of Secondary Alcohols to Carbenes: Pyrrolidin‐2‐ols as a Source of Cyclic (Alkyl)(Amino)Carbenes

Ayan Das 1, Benedict J Elvers 2, Mithilesh Kumar Nayak 1, Nicolas Chrysochos 1, Srinivas Anga 1, Amar Kumar 1, D Krishna Rao 1, Tharangattu N Narayanan 1,, Carola Schulzke 2,, Cem B Yildiz 3,, Anukul Jana 1,
PMCID: PMC9400972  PMID: 35362643

Abstract

Herein we report secondary pyrrolidin‐2‐ols as a source of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAAC) for the synthesis of CAAC‐CuI‐complexes and cyclic thiones when reacted with CuI‐salts and elemental sulfur, respectively, under reductive elimination of water from the carbon(IV)‐center. This result demonstrates a convenient and facile access to CAAC‐based CuI‐salts, which are well known catalysts for different organic transformations. It further establishes secondary alcohols to be a viable source of carbenes—realizing after 185 years Dumas’ dream who tried to prepare the parent carbene (CH2) by 1,1‐dehydration of methanol. Addressed is also the reactivity of water towards CAACs, which proceeds through an oxidative addition of the O−H bond to the carbon(II)‐center. This emphasizes the ability of carbon‐compounds to mimic the reactivity of transition‐metal complexes: reversible oxidative addition and reductive elimination of the O−H bond to/from the C(II)/C(IV)‐centre.

Keywords: 1,1-Dehydration; Carbenes; Dehydrogenation; Elimination; Hydrated Carbenes


The thermal dehydration of secondary alcohols to carbenes and reverse back‐hydration are showcased. The in situ generation of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes through the thermal 1,1‐dehydration of secondary pyrrolidin‐2‐ol alcohols was realized and utilized for various purposes such as the synthesis of transition metal‐carbene complexes. This methodology opens a door for further consideration of various secondary alcohols as sources of carbenes.

graphic file with name ANIE-61-0-g009.jpg

Introduction

Retrosynthetically, a dehydration of primary and secondary alcohols I can be envisioned as leading either to typically reactive carbenes II (1,1‐dehydrohydroxylation) or to more stable alkenes III (1,2‐dehydrohydroxylation) (Scheme 1). Along this line, in 1835 Dumas attempted to synthesize the parent carbene (:CH2) by a 1,1‐dehydration of methanol IV. [1] Subsequently, after the isolation of (phosphino)(silyl)carbenes by Bertrand et al. in 1989 [2] and N‐heterocyclic carbenes by Arduengo et al. in 1991, [3] various kinds of carbenes such as imidazole‐2‐ylidene based N‐heterocyclic carbene V, [4] imidazolidine‐2‐ylidene based N‐heterocyclic carbene VI, [5] and cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC) VII [6] were reported based on different precursors and different synthetic routes (Scheme 1). Such species have become ubiquitous in different research areas ranging from advanced synthetic chemistry to materials. [7] Generally, carbenes (including examples given above) are mostly sensitive and decompose in the presence of air and moisture. [8] The first air stable carbene was reported in 1997 by Arduengo et al. [9] The synthesis of carbene‐metal complexes under wet/moist conditions was established. [10] Similarly, it is known that free carbenes can form in situ in the course of organocatalytic reactions even without operating under strictly inert conditions. [11] Further reports have emphasized their versatility and effectiveness in various organocatalytic transformations. [12] Notably, there are no reports available to date for the formation of carbenes from their alcohol precursors.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Chemical structures of IXI.

Herein we report pyrrolidin‐2‐ol VIII, i.e. a secondary alcohol, used as the direct source of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC) [13] in the synthesis of CAAC‐copper(I)‐complexes IX and of cyclic thione X (Scheme 1). The reactions proceed through thermal 1,1‐dehydrations and demonstrate, thereby, the successful formation of carbenes from alcohols via the release of water.

The synthesis of CAAC‐copper(I)‐complexes was addressed first. CAAC‐metal complexes IX derived from “hydrated CAAC” pyrrolidin‐2‐ol VIII provide a convenient access to various catalytic properties, [14] functionalization to other targeted CuI‐complexes, [15] and transmetalation to other transition metal complexes. [16] Previously, a CAAC‐CuCl species was also synthesized by the reaction of a corresponding conjugate acid of CAAC and Cu2O, in which water is eliminated in the course of the reaction. [14b] The more typical approach is the synthesis with free CAAC or in situ generated CAAC and CuCl. [14a] Since pyrrolidin‐2‐ol can be considered as hydrated CAAC, the reaction of a CAAC with water was investigated accordingly. It turns out that water for CAAC becomes a friend, instead of acting as foe as is commonly found for other carbenes. [8] The observed hydrated products, in fact, are even utilizable as an immediate source of CAACs via back reaction. Moreover, it was discovered that simple heating of VIII without any catalyst or in presence of PdCl2 results in a dehydrogenation yielding the CAAC‐based ketone XI (Scheme 1). Furthermore, to expand the substrate scope, other secondary cyclic‐amino alcohols were considered and established as sources of carbenes by thermal 1,1‐dehydration.

Results and Discussion

In this study, three pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 1Me /1Et /1Cy were investigated as a source of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs) via 1,1‐dehydration. 1Me /1Et /1Cy were obtained from the alkaline hydrolysis (aqueous KOH solution) of pyrrolinium cations 2Me /2Et /2Cy  [ 6 , 17 ] in very good yields (Scheme 2). [18] The exclusive formation of pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 1Me /1Et /1Cy indicates the aqueous KOH hydrolysis reaction to proceed through hydroxide addition to the 2‐H‐pyrrolinium cations 2Me /2Et /2Cy , without the formation of free CAACs as in a pathway under deprotonation (see below). 1H NMR spectra confirmed the formation of CAAC‐based alcohols 1Me /1Et /1Cy with the presence of two doublets at δ=4.84/4.89/4.75 and 1.56/1.55/1.51 ppm, respectively, for the N−C−H and O−H resonances with coupling constants of 3 J (1H, 1H)=6.9/6.9/6.6 Hz. Compounds 1Me /1Et /1Cy can be considered as hydrated products of CAACs 3Me /3Et /3Cy . Notably, reactions of CAACs with water or with any alcohol are unreported as of yet. [19] Reactions of CAACs are known, though, which involve different X−H bonds (X=H, B, N, Si, P) [20] XII or the B−C bond [21] in a variety of molecules which proceeded through (reversible) oxidative additions [22] to the carbon(II)‐center. In general, the reactions of water versus related compounds are strikingly different. [23] The classical example is water vs. ammonia reactivity towards metallic sodium. In the first case, this leads to the formation of NaOH along the evolution of dihydrogen gas, whereas in the latter case, ammonia acts as a solvent facilitating the transfer of electrons from metallic sodium to the solution or a substrate; this results in many modular chemical transformations such as the Birch reduction. [24]

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of 1 and reaction of 3 with H2O (Dip=2,6‐ i Pr2C6H3) (Inserts: (reversible) oxidative addition to CAAC by different E−H bonds towards XII (right) and chemical structures of XIII and XIV (left – bottom)).

Consequently, we have reacted CAACs 3Me /3Et /3Cy with equivalent amounts of degassed water to test their respective reactivity (Scheme 2). [18] The 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures support the formation of alcohols 1Me /1Et /1Cy and ethers 4Me [25]/4Et /4Cy as hydrated CAACs, while the later were the major products. Compounds 4Me /4Et /4Cy can be described as the product of a double oxidative addition of both water O−H bonds onto the two carbon(II)‐centers of two CAAC molecules. Such type of double O−H bond activation of water was previously reported for silylenes, i.e. the heavier analogues of carbenes. [26]

In order to obtain exclusively 1Me /1Et /1Cy from the activation of only one O−H bond of water, we reacted 3Me /3Et /3Cy with an excess (10 equiv) of water. However, in that case also two products 1Me /1Et /1Cy and 4Me /4Et /4Cy were obtained; the later still being the major product as in the 1 : 1 reaction. Due to distinct solubilities of 1Me /1Et /1Cy and 4Me /4Et /4Cy , it was possible to isolate the pure compounds 4Me /4Et /4Cy from the crude reaction mixtures. The 1H NMR spectra of these CAAC‐based ethers exhibit singlets at δ=4.69, 4.63, and 4.70 ppm, respectively, for the C−H resonance.

Notably, 1H NMR spectra of all crude reaction mixtures indicate the complete absence of the potential ring‐opened products 5Me /5Et /5Cy , analogues of XIII and XIV which were observed in the case of N‐heterocyclic carbenes V and VI.[ 8b , 8d ] A computational investigation at the B3LYP‐D3(BJ)/6‐311G(d,p) level of theory suggests that the calculated relative energy for the ring‐opened product 5Me is higher in energy by 9.7 kcal mol−1 compared to that of 1Me . Solid‐state molecular structure determinations of 1Me /1Et /1Cy confirm the presence of terminal hydroxide groups (Figure 1 and Figures S102, S103). Also the formation of 4Et and 4Cy is evidenced by solid‐state molecular structure determination (Figures S104, S105).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular structures of 1Me (left) and 4Et‐Me (right). All H atoms except for C1‐H, C2‐H and O1‐H are omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level.

The formation of 4Me /4Et /4Cy could generally result from a simultaneous and/or stepwise activation of both O−H bonds of water bound to the carbon(II)‐centre of the CAAC. To support the stepwise pathway, 1Me /1Et /1Cy was reacted with 3Me /3Et /3Cy which led to the formation of 4Me /4Et /4Cy in a very good yield (Scheme 3). Additionally, 1Et was reacted with 3Me which gave indeed the heteroleptic ether 4Et‐Me (Scheme 3). [18] The formation of 4Et‐Me is evidenced by the presence of two singlets at δ=4.75 and 4.73 ppm in its 1H NMR spectrum. Moreover, the solid‐state molecular structure of 4Et‐Me on the basis of single crystal X‐ray diffraction data unambiguously confirms its formation (Figure 1). These observations insinuate that CAACs are prone to oxidatively add the O−H bonds of alcohols in a similar manner and that this method even bears potential for the synthesis of hindered dialkyl ethers. [27]

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Reactions of 1 and 3 (Dip=2,6‐ i Pr2C6H3).

To address the probable hydration mechanism accompanying CAAC, we considered the reaction of 3Me with one, two, and three water molecules at the B3LYP‐D3(BJ)/6‐311G(d,p) level of theory (Figures S112–S114). [18] In all cases we found the formation of a hydrogen‐bonded structure as the initial intermediate. The next step in case of one and two water molecules is the concerted insertion of the carbenic carbon of 3Me into the O−H bond. Notably, for three water molecules the second step leads to the optimization of a pyrrolinium‐hydroxide type structure, which could not be observed in case of one or two water molecules. The computational calculations indicate that reaction pathways are different for the hydration of CAAC with different stoichiometric amounts of water, resembling the hydrolysis of imidazole‐2‐ylidenes. [8a]

Compounds 1Me /1Et /1Cy are well stable in the open atmosphere and melted (M.P.: 84 °C, 72 °C, and 80 °C, respectively) without any indication of dehydration or decomposition. This was also investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The determined onset/end point of decomposition temperatures are 161/204, 181/219, and 202/237 °C along with gradual weight losses up to 97.2, 100.0, and 100.0 %, respectively, for 1Me /1Et /1Cy at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under N2 atmosphere (Table S3 and Figure S86). [18] We were not able to observe the sudden elimination of small molecules such as H2O in a step wise manner, not even at lower heating rates (1 °C/min and 0.1 °C/min) (Figure S87). It was then tested whether a reversion of the hydration could be enforced by reductive elimination of water from these pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 1Me /1Et /1Cy in presence of free‐CAAC/carbene trapping reagents. [28] To address this, first the reaction of 1Me /1Et /1Cy with copper(I)‐halides was studied, as the CAAC‐CuI‐complexes are known for their catalytic ability in a variety of organic chemical transformations. [14] Moreover, CAAC‐CuI‐halides are known for functionalizations on the CuI‐center to other CAAC‐CuI‐complexes [15] and metathesis (transmetalation) reactions with other transition metal complexes. [16] The heating of 1 : 1 mixtures of 1Me /1Et /1Cy and CuI‐X (X=Cl, Br and I), without any solvents at 200 °C leads to CAAC‐CuX complexes 6R‐X in fair to good yield (Scheme 4, Table 1).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reductive dehydration of 1R in presence of CuI‐halides (Dip=2,6‐ i Pr2C6H3).

Table 1.

Yields [%] of CAAC‐CuI‐complexes and CAAC‐thione.

Compounds/Reagents

CuCl

CuBr[a]

CuI[b]

S8

1Me

58

98

1Et

53

48

56

99

1Cy

75

57

56

98

[a] The reaction of 1Me and CuBr did not give a satisfactory yield. [b] The reaction of 1Me and CuI did not allow isolating the desired product.

In case of the 1Cy plus CuCl reaction, the isolated yield of 6Cy‐Cl is with 75 % as good as in the previously reported preparation using isolated CAAC 3Cy and CuCl.[ 14b , 15h ] Currently, we are optimizing the synthetic procedure for CAAC‐CuIX to reach excellent to quantitative yields by avoiding the formation of the conjugated acid of 3R . This result shows that for the synthesis of CAAC‐CuI‐salts there is no need for isolated CAACs or in situ generated CAACs (by the deprotonation of pyrrolinium cation); the secondary alcohol pyrrolidin‐2‐ol can be used as a feedstock starting material instead. In the course of the reaction the ring‐opened species (see below), a regioisomer of the initially formed CAAC, and pyrrolinium salts can be observed [29] as minor side products. Both of these side products can be recycled for the synthesis of pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 1Me /1Et /1Cy . All CAAC‐CuX complexes 6R‐X were characterized by solution state NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, we also determined the solid‐state molecular structures of 6Et‐I , 6Cy‐Br , and 6Cy‐I complexes (Figure 2 and Figure S106) to unambiguously confirm their formation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Molecular structures of 6Et‐I (left) and 6Cy‐Br (right). All H atoms are omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level.

After utilizing pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 1Me /1Et /1Cy as the source of CAACs for the synthesis of CAAC‐Cu‐halides, they were also reacted with elemental sulfur [30] without any solvent at 200 °C (Scheme 5). The 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures upon dissolving in CDCl3 show the exclusive formation of thiones 7Me /7Et /7Cy . It was possible to isolate these thiones almost quantitatively (Table 1). Carrying out these experiments in an open atmosphere (air) or under inert gas conditions (N2) did not change the reactions’ outcome. Previously, 7Cy was isolated from the corresponding isolated CAAC in 58 % yield under inert atmosphere using dry and degassed solvents. [31] Formation of 7Me /7Et /7Cy was confirmed by NMR‐spectroscopy as well as solid‐state molecular structure determination (Figure 3 and Figure S107).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Reductive dehydration of 1R in presence of sulfur (Dip=2,6‐ i Pr2C6H3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Molecular structures of 7Me (left) and 7Et (right). All H atoms are omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level.

Consequently, the potential thermal dehydration of 1Me /1Et /1Cy was studied without any free‐CAAC trapping external reagents, by heating at 200 °C in open air as well as under N2 atmosphere conditions (Scheme 6). [32] In all cases we observed the formation of 8Me /8Et /8Cy , the ring‐opened regioisomers of CAAC [33] and a very small amount of 9Me /9Et /9Cy , a C−H activated regioisomer of CAAC (the Me‐analogue was previously known to be thermally accessible from CAAC 3Me [34]) along with CAAC‐based ketone 10Me [8d] /10Et /10Cy [8d] through dehydrogenation [35] (isolated yield: 10Me =31 %, 10Et =30 %, and 10Cy =33 %). [36] The product ratio remains the same irrespective of the atmosphere (open or inert). This can be considered indirect evidence that dehydrogenation of alcohol 1R leads to ketone 10R . Without direct proof, e.g. through 18O labelling studies, it is impossible, though, to entirely rule out a potential reaction of in situ generated 3R with adventitious sources of oxygen which could also lead to the ketone. The reaction of 1Me /1Et /1Cy with PdCl2 under inert atmosphere at 200 °C, results in the facile formation of 10Me /10Et /10Cy . In this case the yields for 10Me /10Et /10Cy are much better (isolated yield: 10Me =79 %, 10Et =72 %, and 10Cy =62 %) compared to experiments in absence of PdCl2 and otherwise similar reaction conditions. Notably, this observation contrasts those for the CuX reactions (Scheme 4) under similar conditions. PdCl2 apparently supports the dehydrogenation whereas CuX prefers coordination. This finding is along the line of well‐known PdII‐catalyzed aerobic oxidations of primary and secondary alcohols to aldehydes and ketones, respectively. [37] The formation of 10Me and 10Et was confirmed by molecular structure determination (Figure 4).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Thermal heating of 1Me /1Et /1Cy without and with PdCl2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Molecular structures of 10Me (left) and 10Et (right). All H atoms are omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level.

Further, to explore the ability of electronically distinct pyrrolidin‐2‐ols to similarly serve as source of carbenes through thermal dehydration, secondary alcohols 11 and 14 were investigated. These two pyrrolidin‐2‐ols could be synthesized in very good yields. The reactions of 11 and 14 with elemental sulfur, without any solvent at 200 °C lead to thiones 13 [38] and 16, [39] respectively, in very good yields (Scheme 7). These two reactions validate pyrrolidin‐2‐ols 11 and 14 as sources of benz‐annulated cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (indol‐2‐ylidene) 12 [40] and cyclic (amino)(aryl)carbene 15. [39] In the course of the reactions no side products were observed. Also, carrying out these experiments in an open atmosphere (air) or under inert gas conditions (N2) did not change the reactions’ outcome.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Reductive dehydration of 11 and 14 in presence of sulfur (Dip=2,6‐ i Pr2C6H3).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we established the 1,1‐dehydrohydroxylation (1,1‐dehydration) of pyrrolidin‐2‐ols, the secondary alcohols, as a source of cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs) for the synthesis of CAAC‐CuI‐complexes and cyclic thiones when reacted with CuI‐salts and elemental sulfur, respectively, under the reductive elimination of water from the carbon(IV)‐center. This validates alcohols as a source of carbenes—realizing after 185 years Dumas’ dream who tried to prepare the parent carbene (:CH2) by the 1,1‐dehydration of methanol. [1] In addition, the reactions of water with CAACs were studied and verified, which proceed through an addition of the O−H bond to the carbon(II)‐center. This emphasizes the ability of carbon‐compounds to mimic the reactivity of transition‐metal complexes: reversible oxidative addition and reductive elimination of O−H bonds to or from CII/CIV‐centres. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that further research efforts can develop (water‐) protected CAACs [41] towards useful, broad, and convenient sources of CAACs similar to various protected precursor‐derivatives of carbenes in different reactions including convenient access of various CAAC‐based catalysts. [42] As a proof‐of‐principle other secondary amino‐alcohols could be confirmed as sources of carbenes by the formation of cyclic thiones derived thereof. The secondary alcohols’ potentially general efficacy as carbene sources is going to be explored further. Finally, it was proven that CAAC‐based alcohols provide facile access to CAAC‐based ketones through their dehydrogenation by simple heating or heating in presence of PdCl2. All these results demonstrate pyrrolidin‐2‐ols/hydrated CAACs to be potential reagents for various applications from sources of carbene to possibly even a convenient source/storage form of molecular hydrogen. The results shared herein can be expected to stimulate further investigations under consideration of a broader variety of secondary alcohols as general source of carbenes for various purposes and even as direct sources of free carbenes. Currently, we continue focusing the research activity in this direction.

Conflict of interest

We are working to file a patent on this work.

1.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge generous intramural funds at TIFR Hyderabad, India from the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under Project Identification Number RTI 4007, SERB (CRG/2019/003415), India for external research grant, and support of National High‐Field NMR facility of TIFR Hyderabad, India. The numerical calculations reported in this paper were partially performed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA resources). We are grateful to the reviewers for their critical insights to improve the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Dedicated to all TIFR Hyderabad COVID-19 frontline helpers.

A. Das, B. J. Elvers, M. K. Nayak, N. Chrysochos, S. Anga, A. Kumar, D. K. Rao, T. N. Narayanan, C. Schulzke, C. B. Yildiz, A. Jana, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202202637; Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202202637.

Contributor Information

Prof. Tharangattu N. Narayanan, Email: tnn@tifrh.res.in.

Prof. Dr. Carola Schulzke, Email: carola.schulzke@uni-greifswald.de.

Prof. Cem B. Yildiz, Email: cemburakyildiz@aksaray.edu.tr.

Dr. Anukul Jana, Email: ajana@tifrh.res.in.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.

References

  • 1. Dumas J. B., Peligot E., Ann. Chim. Phys. 1835, 58, 5–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. 
  • 2a. Igau A., Grützmacher H., Baceiredo A., Bertrand G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6463–6466; [Google Scholar]
  • 2b. Igau A., Baceiredo A., Trinquier G., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 621–622; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1989, 101, 617–618. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. A. J. Arduengo  III , Harlow R. L., Kline M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 361–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. A. J. Arduengo  III , Dias H. V. R., Harlow R. L., Kline M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530–5534. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yamaguchi Y., Oda R., Sado K., Kobayashi K., Minato M., Ito T., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 991–997. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lavallo V., Präsang C., Donnadieu B., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5705–5709; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5851–5855. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Selected reviews:
  • 7a. A. J. Arduengo  III , Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 913–921; [Google Scholar]
  • 7b. Bourissou D., Guerret O., Gabbaï F. P., Bertrand G., Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 39–92; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7c. Vivancos A., Segarra C., Albrecht M., Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9493–9586; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7d. Jazzar R., Soleilhavoup M., Bertrand G., Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 4141–4168; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7e. Zhukhovitskiy A. V., MacLeod M. J., Johnson J. A., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11503–11532; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7f. Smith C. A., Narouz M. R., Lummis P. A., Singh I., Nazemi A., Li C.-H., Crudden C. M., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4986–5056; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7g. Flanigan D. M., Romanov-Michailidis F., White N. A., Rovis T., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9307–9387; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7h. Hopkinson M. N., Richter C., Schedler M., Glorius F., Nature 2014, 510, 485–496; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7i. Mercs L., Albrecht M., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1903–1912; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7j. Visbal R., Gimeno M. C., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3551–3574; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7k. Soleilhavoup M., Bertrand G., Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 256–266; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7l. Roy S., Mondal K. C., Roesky H. W., Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 357–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. 
  • 8a. Hollóczki O., Terleczky P., Szieberth D., Mourgas G., Gudat D., Nyulászi L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 780–789; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8b. Dhara D., Das S., Kalita P., Maity A., Pati S. K., Scheschkewitz D., Chandrasekhar V., Jana A., Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 993–997; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8c. Bonnette F., Kato T., Destarac M., Mignani G., Cossío F. P., Baceiredo A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8632–8635; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 8786–8789; [Google Scholar]
  • 8d. Tang J., Gao X. J., Tang H., Zeng X., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1584–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. A. J. Arduengo  III , Davidson F., Dias H. V. R., Goerlich J. R., Khasnis D., Marshall W. J., Prakasha T. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12742–12749. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Selected references:
  • 10a. Zinser C. M., Warren K. G., Nahra F., Al-Majid A., Barakat A., Islam M. S., Nolan S. P., Cazin C. S. J., Organometallics 2019, 38, 2812–2817; [Google Scholar]
  • 10b. Collado A., Gómez-Suárez A., Martin A. R., Slawin A. M. Z., Nolan S. P., Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5541–5543; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10c. Liu Y., Scattolin T., Gobbo A., Beliš M., Hecke K. V., Nolan S. P., Cazin C. S. J., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, e202100840; [Google Scholar]
  • 10d. Tzouras N. V., Nahra F., Falivene L., Cavallo L., Saab M., Hecke K. V., Collado A., Collett C. J., Smith A. D., Cazin C. S. J., Nolan S. P., Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 4515–4519; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10e. Yaşar S., Şahin C., Arslan M., Özdemir İ., J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 776, 107–112; [Google Scholar]
  • 10f. Moncada A. I., Khan M. A., Slaughter L. M., Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1399–1403; [Google Scholar]
  • 10g. O'Brien C. J., Kantchev E. A. B., Valente C., Hadei N., Chass G. A., Lough A., Hopkinson A. C., Organ M. G., Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4743–4748; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10h. Nahra F., Tzouras N. V., Collado A., Nolan S. P., Nat. Protoc. 2021, 16, 1476–1493; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10i. Fèvre M., Pinaud J., Leteneur A., Gnanou Y., Vignolle J., Taton D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6776–6784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. 
  • 11a. Geng H., Chen X., Gui J., Zhang Y., Shen Z., Qian P., Chen J., Zhang S., Wang W., Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 1071–1077; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11b. Devi E. S., Pavithra T., Tamilselvi A., Nagarajan S., Sridharan V., Maheswari C. U., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 3576–3580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Selected reviews:
  • 12a. Enders D., Balensiefer T., Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 534–541; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12b. Marion N., González S. D., Nolan S. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2988–3000; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 3046–3058. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Melaimi M., Jazzar R., Soleilhavoup M., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10046–10068; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 10180–10203. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. 
  • 14a. Jin L., Romero E. A., Melaimi M., Bertrand G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15696–15698; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14b. Bidal Y. D., Lesieur M., Melaimi M., Nahra F., Cordes D. B., Arachchige K. S. A., Salwin A. M. Z., Bertrand G., Cazin C. S. J., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 3155–3161; [Google Scholar]
  • 14c. Xu S., Zhang X., Xiong W., Li W., Ma W., Hu X., Wu Y., Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 2132–2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. 
  • 15a. Romanov A. S., Chotard F., Rashid J., Bochmann M., Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 15445–15454; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15b. Peltier J. L., Soleilhavoup M., Martin D., Jazzar R., Bertrand G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 16479–16485; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15c.D. S. Weinberger, N. A. S. K., K. C. Mondal, M. Melaimi, G. Bertrand, A. C. Stückl, H. W. Roesky, B. Dittrich, S. Demeshko, B. Schwederski, W. Kaim, P. Jerabek, G. Frenking, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6235–6238; [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15d. Jin L., Tolentino D. R., Melaimi M., Bertrand G., Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500304; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15e. Braunschweig H., Ewing W. C., Kramer T., Mattock J. D., Vargas A., Werner C., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12347–12356; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15f. Gernert M., Müller U., Haehnel M., Pflaum J., Steffen A., Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2206–2216; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15g. Romanov A. S., Becker C. R., James C. E., Di D., Credgington D., Linnolahti M., Bochmann M., Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 4625–4637; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15h. Hu X., Soleilhavoup M., Melaimi M., Chu J., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6008–6011; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6106–6109; [Google Scholar]
  • 15i. Hamze R., Jazzar R., Soleilhavoup M., Djurovich P. I., Bertrand G., Thompson M. E., Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 9008–9011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bidal Y. D., Santoro O., Melaimi M., Cordes D. B., Slawin A. M. Z., Bertrand G., Cazin C. S. J., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 9404–9409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhou L., Zhang D., Hu J., Wu Y., Geng J., Hu X., Organometallics 2021, 40, 2643–2650. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.See the Supporting Information for the experimental details, analytical data, NMR spectra, X-ray crystallographic details and details of theoretical calculation. Deposition Numbers 2086635 (for 1 Me ), 2086636 (for 1 Et ), 2122028 (for 1 Cy ), 2086637 (for 4 Et ), 2122029 (for 4 Cy ), 2086638 (for 4 Et-Me ), 2122030 (for 6 Cy-Br ), 2122031 (for 6 Et-I ), 2122032 (for 6 Cy-I ), 2086639 (for 7 Me ), 2122033 (for 7 Et ), 2122034 (for 7 Cy ), 2086641 (for 10 Me ), 2122035 (for 10 Et ), 2122036 (for 11), 2122037 (for 14), and 2086640 (for 17 Me ) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.
  • 19.Previously the formation of water adducts of acyclic- and cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbenes was mentioned during the activation of hydrogen studies. Please see Ref. [20a].
  • 20. 
  • 20a. Frey G. D., Lavallo V., Donnadieu B., Schoeller W. W., Bertrand G., Science 2007, 316, 439–441; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20b. Frey G. D., Masuda J. D., Donnadieu B., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9444–9447; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 9634–9637; [Google Scholar]
  • 20c. Zhukhovitskiy A. V., Mavros M. G., Queeney K. T., Wu T., Voorhis T. V., Johnson J. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8639–8652; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20d. Würtemberger-Pietsch S., Schneider H., Marder T. B., Radius U., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 13032–13036; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20e. Oldroyd N. L., Chitnis S. S., Annibale V. T., Arz M. I., Sparkes H. A., Manners I., Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1370; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20f. Tolentino R. D., Neale S. E., Isaac C. J., Macgregor S. A., Whittlesey M. K., Jazzar R., Bertrand G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9823–9826; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20g. Kieser J. M., Kinney Z. J., Gaffen J. R., Evariste S., Harrison A. M., Rheingold A. L., Protasiewicz J. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12055–12063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Eichhorn A. F., Fuchs S., Flock M., Marder T. B., Radius U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10209–10213; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 10343–10347. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chu T., Nikonov G. I., Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3608–3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. 
  • 23a. Roesky H. W., Walawalkar M. G., Murugavel R., Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 201–211; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23b. Moerdyk J. P., Blake G. A., Chase D. T., Bielawski C. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18798–18801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. 
  • 24a. Birch A. J., J. Chem. Soc. 1944, 430–436; [Google Scholar]
  • 24b. Birch A. J., J. Chem. Soc. 1947, 1642–1648; [Google Scholar]
  • 24c. Birch A. J., J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 1551–1556; [Google Scholar]
  • 24d. Birch A. J., Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1950, 4, 69–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Previously the formation and molecular structure of 4Me was mentioned during the acylic germylones synthesis, see: Li Y., Mondal K. C., Roesky H. W., Zhu H., Stollberg P., Irmer R. H., Stalke D., Andrada D. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12422–12428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. 
  • 26a. Haaf M., Schmiedl A., Schmedake T. A., Powell D. R., Millevolte A. J., Denk M., West R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12714–12719; [Google Scholar]
  • 26b. Li W., Hill N. J., Tomasik A. C., Bikzhanova G., West R., Organometallics 2006, 25, 3802–3805; [Google Scholar]
  • 26c. Lutters D., Severin C., Schmidtmann M., Müller T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6061–6067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Xiang J., Shang M., Kawamata Y., Lundberg H., Reisberg S. H., Chen M., Mykhailiuk P., Beutner G., Collins M. R., Davies A., Bel M. D., Gallego G. M., Spangler J. E., Starr J., Yang S., Blackmond D. G., Baran P. S., Nature 2019, 573, 398–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. 
  • 28a. Sultane P. R., Ahumada G., Janssen-Müller D., Bielawski C. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16320–16325; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 16466–16471; [Google Scholar]
  • 28b. Gildner M. B., Hudnall T. W., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12300–12303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jazzar R., Dewhurst R. D., Bourg J. B., Donnadieu B., Canac Y., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2899–2902; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 2957–2960. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.To extend the scope with other chalcogens, the reaction of 1Me with Se performed which leads to the exclusive formation of corresponding selenone 17Me , please see the Supporting Information for the details.
  • 31. Tretiakov M., Shermolovich Y. G., Singh A. P., Samuel P. P., Roesky H. W., Niepötter B., Visscher A., Stalke D., Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 12940–12946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.In a similar reaction condition the heating of 4Me leads to the exclusive formation of 8Me , please see the Supporting Information for the details.
  • 33. Paul U. S. D., Radius U., Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 3993–4009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Turner Z. R., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 11461–11468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. 
  • 35a. Balaraman E., Khaskin E., Leitus G., Milstein D., Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 122–125; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35b. Alberico E., Lennox A. J. J., Vogt L. K., Jiao H., Baumann W., Drexler H. J., Nielsen M., Spannenberg A., Checinski M. P., Junge H., Beller M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14890–14904; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35c. Sueki S., Matsuyama M., Watanabe A., Kanemaki A., Katakawa K., Anada M., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 4878–4885; [Google Scholar]
  • 35d. P. J. Bonitatibus, Jr. , Chakraborty S., Dohertya M. D., Siclovan O., Jones W. D., Soloveichik G. L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1687–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.The preparation of 1Me-D2 is challenging, therefore to address the possible reaction mechanisms we have considered the heating of 4Me-D2 at 235 °C. This leads to the formation of 8Me-H/D, with the imine hydrogen as a mixture of H and D isotopes (N=C−H/D), 9Me , and 10Me . This observation is in contrast to that of non-deuterated analogue 4Me where the heating exclusively leads to dehydrated product 8Me . This strikingly distinct behaviour (higher thermal stability (not being dehydrated at 200 °C) and formation of different products upon heating), of 4Me-D2 with respect to the corresponding non-deuterated compound 4Me is most likely due to the isotope effect. However, the results also suggest that the dehydration of hydrated CAAC 1Me and 4Me are following more than only one pathway. This is, hence, along the lines of recently reported three concomitant C−C dissociation pathways of carbene-based molecules, which also reflect the isotope effects on the mode of bond-activation.[43]
  • 37. 
  • 37a. Steinhoff B. A., Fix S. R., Stahl S. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 766–767; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37b. Schultz M. J., Park C. C., Sigman M. S., Chem. Commun. 2002, 3034–3035; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37c. Le Bras J., Muzart J., Catalysts 2020, 10, 111; [Google Scholar]
  • 37d. Chung K., Banik S. M., Crisci A. G. D., Pearson D. M., Blake T. R., Olsson J. V., Ingram A. J., Zare R. N., Waymouth R. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7593–7602; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37e. ten Brink G. J., Arends I. W. C. E., Sheldon R. A., Science 2000, 287, 1636–1639; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37f. Nishimura T., Onoue T., Ohe K., Uemura S., J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6750–6755; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37g. Kakiuchi N., Maeda Y., Nishimura T., Uemura S., J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6620–6625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang C., Liu L., Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. 
  • 39a. Rao B., Tang H., Zeng X., Liu L. L., Melaimi M., Bertrand G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14915–14919; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 15128–15132; [Google Scholar]
  • 39b. Lorkowski J., Krahfuβ M., Kubicki M., Radius U., Pietraszuk C., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 11365–11374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kim H., Kim M., Song H., Lee E., Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 3849–3854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.To extend the scope beyond secondary alcohol as a source of carbene as well as to showcase the major hydrated product of CAAC as a source of CAAC, the reaction of CAAC-based ether 4Me with S8 performed which leads to the exclusive formation of corresponding thione 7Me , please see the Supporting Information for the details.
  • 42. 
  • 42a. Wang G., Rühling A., Amirjalayer S., Knor M., Ernst J. B., Richter C., Gao H. J., Timmer A., Gao H. Y., Doltsinis N. L., Glorius F., Fuchs H., Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 152–156; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42b. Trnka T. M., Morgan J. P., Sanford M. S., Wilhelm T. E., Scholl M., Choi T. L., Ding S., Day M. W., Grubbs R. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2546–2558; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42c. Naumann S., Buchmeiser M. R., Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 2466–2479; [Google Scholar]
  • 42d. Blum A. P., Ritter T., Grubbs R. H., Organometallics 2007, 26, 2122–2124. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. 
  • 43a. Nixon R., Bo G. D., Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 826–831; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43b. Nixon R., Bo G. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3033–3036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES