Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2022 Aug 13;8(8):e10182. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10182

Health-related quality of life and associated factors among type 2 diabetic adult patients in Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

Tewodros Eshete Wonde a,, Tessema Reta Ayene b, Nurilign Abebe Moges c, Yibelu Bazezew d
PMCID: PMC9403364  PMID: 36033286

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a multifaceted concept that is strongly impacted by Type II diabetes in developing countries. The majority of studies indicate diabetes mellitus prevalence without looking at people's quality of life.

This study was conducted using an Institution-based cross-sectional design in Debre Markos Referral Hospital from March 03 to March 31, 2020. We evaluated HRQOL using the WHO quality of life BREF and data were obtained through face-to-face interviews. We used a systematic random sampling technique to select study participants. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.1 and exported to STATA version 14.0. Candidates for multivariable analysis were variables with a P-value less than 0.25 in the bivariable analysis and P-value less than 0.05 were considered to declare a statistically significant association. The final model was tested for its goodness of fit using Hosmer and Lemeshow's statistics.

The analysis included a total of 368 adult individuals with type II diabetes and 206 (56%) had a good HRQOL. Being male (AOR = 4.28, 95%CI:2.36, 7.78), having duration of disease of more than 59 months (AOR = 2.93, 95%CI:1.61, 5.34), doing a physical exercise (AOR = 2.33,95%CI:1.34, 4.05) and got counseling (AOR = 3.33; 95%CI:1.82, 5.94) were directly associated with good HRQOL whereas the presence of diabetic complications (AOR = 0.46, 95%CI:0.26, 0.80), comorbidity (AOR = 0.45; 95%CI:0.25, 0.84) and drinking alcohol (AOR = 0.27, 95%CI:0.16, 0.48) had an inverse relationship with good HRQOL.

More than half of type 2 diabetic adult patients had a good HRQOL. Being male, drinking alcohol, getting counseling, doing physical exercise, absence of diabetic complications, and comorbidity and long duration of disease were predictors of good HRQOL. Therefore, avoiding drinking alcohol and promoting physical exercise and counseling should be encouraged.

Keywords: Quality of life, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Debre markos


Quality of life; type 2 diabetes mellitus; Debre Markos.

1. Introduction

The International Diabetes Federation reported that the estimated global prevalence of diabetes in 2019 was 9.3 percent, with about 463 million adults living with diabetes whose health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is not well quantified, and two out of every three adult diabetic patients living in urban, accounting for 310.3 million of people [1, 2]. The impact of many phenomena on HRQOL is a major concern worldwide [3, 4]. According to the World Health Organization (1998), HRQOL refers to “an individual's perception of his/her position within the culture and value system in which they live with the individual's expectations, concerns, goals, and standards.” Even though diabetic patients cannot obtain a complete cure for chronic type II diabetes mellitus, the outcome of diabetes care is to make the patient's HRQOL better [5]. HRQOL is a multifaceted concept incorporating an individual's subjective perception of physical and emotional function and social well-being; looking for HRQOL after a diagnosis of type II diabetes is used to detect problems [4, 6]. Health-related quality of life has evolved to include aspects of life that affect perceived physical or mental health and is used as a response variable to follow the burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) [7]. HRQOL is an intellectual concept consisting of positive and negative aspects of an individual's life [8], and it is one of the key metrics that really should be utilized to evaluate the success of the prevention and control of non-communicable chronic illnesses [9]. Health-related quality of life indicates the physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains of the health state and is impacted by the person's expectations, beliefs, experiences, and perceptions [10, 11].

Healthcare professionals and researchers utilize HRQOL to pinpoint elements and components of type 2 DM patients' disease outcomes [12]. Physical factors, such as the difficulty to carry out physical activities due to type 2 DM-related complications, and psychological aspects, such as frustration due to high blood glucose levels, have all been part of HRQOL in diabetic patients. An individual with type 2 DM typically has a worse HRQOL than a person of a comparable age without type 2 DM, and a rise in complications is associated with lower HRQOL. Therefore, a measure of HRQOL is needed to evaluate patients' health states and add to the clinical data to obtain better diabetic outcomes [13, 14]. The Sub-Saharan African region is one of the regions also suffering from the global epidemic of HRQOL where minimal studies are conducted; for instance, a study conducted in Jimma, Ethiopia, investigated good HRQOL to be around sixty-seven percent, and plenty of work recommended to be conducted [16]. Due to predictors such older age, illness duration, high fasting blood sugar, and poor physical health domain, every elements of HRQOL of individuals with type 2 DM are impaired [16, 17]. In addition, various factors, such as comorbidity and low socioeconomic status, have consistently deteriorated type 2 diabetic patients' HRQOL. Furthermore, chronic and acute complications that may arise in the future impact the patients' HRQOL [18, 19].

Despite the fact that initiatives for diabetes mellitus management, prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and care have been implemented in Ethiopia, little emphasis has been placed on factors affecting diabetic patients' HRQOL [20, 21]. Diabetes-related HRQOL deficiencies are commonly linked to the disease itself, its stringent treatment regimens, including food, and its associated comorbidities. Living with DM has financial, social, and psychological impedes. However, the patient is encouraged to have an everyday life [15, 22]. The patient's HRQOL is directly influenced by type II DM and has significant public health dimensions that can collectively or individually be deteriorated, including physical, environmental, psychological, and social health domains [23]. Like other chronic diseases, diabetes can reduce the HRQOL of patients, and they need lifesaving and lifelong treatments, daily monitoring of blood glucose levels, and careful eating habit to improve their HRQOL [24, 25].

Studies done in United Arab Emirates and India indicated that all over the four HRQOL domains among type II diabetic patients were mean values greater than 50 percent [15, 26]. However, the mean value of HRQOL is different among the four domains (physical, environmental, psychological, and social health domains). For example, a study in India found the maximum mean value of HRQOL in the physical health domain (55.26 ± 9.09) and the minimum mean value in the social health domain (40.64 ± 13.49) [27]. In another study conducted in Kenya, the minimum mean of HRQOL was estimated in the environmental health domain and the maximum mean in the social health domain [7, 28].

In Ethiopia, a study conducted at Jimma indicated that the highest percentage (57%) of poor HRQOL was found in the general health domain, followed by the physical health domain (36%), and the highest good quality of life was found in bodily pain dimensions [16]. Studies conducted in Mizan Tepi, Ethiopia, showed that, respondents scored highest (53.68 ± 17.50) in the social domain of the four HRQOL domains and in other studies conducted in Bahir Dar and Mizan Tepi, the minimum and maximum mean scores of HRQOL was found in the physical and social domain, respectively [17, 29]. Besides that, according to a study conducted in Nekemte, Ethiopia, the mean score of the HRQOL was found to be highest (63.19 ± 34.36) in the physical health domain and lowest in the general health domain [30]. Furthermore, a much higher HRQOL magnitude was reported among urban residents than in the rural population in Ethiopia [20]. This finding suggests that lifestyle change among the urban population is fueling the observed rise in DM deterioration of HRQOL [2, 31].

Findings in Greece, Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland), Turkey, China, and Bangladesh indicated that assessing HRQOL in Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an important thing that needs to be assessed and was associated with age, marital status and education [32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. The study conducted in Saudi indicated the existence of a significant association between HRQOL, gender, and economic status, and both factors were found to be significantly associated with the majority of the domains of HRQOL [37]. The finding in India also showed that gender being female negatively affected all of the domains of the WHOQOL-BREF [23]. Findings in Rwanda showed that residence was a significant predictor of HRQOL [38]. The study previously carried out in Mizan Tepi, Ethiopia, recommended a variety of factors that are likely to have an impact on the participants' HRQOL. For instance: trauma, loss of relatives due to death, and other factors may contribute to impaired HRQOL" [17]. Studies conducted previously assessed that the pattern of relationships between socio-demographic and diabetes mellitus-related medical characteristics of patients had affected several dimensions of HRQOL such as physical function, daily activities, overall health, and satisfaction with diabetes treatment [39, 40].

Studies conducted in Botswana, India, and the Arab Emirates indicated that increased physical exercise had contributed to better HRQOL for diabetic patients [41, 42, 43]. Findings in Nigeria and Uganda showed that depression due to smoking was a significant predictor of poor quality of life [44, 45]. Findings from studies conducted in Bahir Dar, Gondar, and Nekemte, indicated that smoking, alcohol drinking, and feeling stigmatized were statistically significant variables for HRQOL, respectively [29, 30, 46]. Findings in Addis Ababa showed that the living status of diabetic patients who engaged in drinking was an essential predictor of HRQOL [47]. According to a Canadian study, insulin use, the duration of diabetes and complications from the disease are all factors that affect HRQOL ratings. The duration of diabetes is also linked to worse HRQOL scores [48]. Scientific studies in Asia revealed an association between HRQOL and fasting blood sugar. It negatively affected all of the domains of the WHOQOL-BREF; however, the impact was most substantial for the physical health domain and psychological domain and weaker for the domain of social relationships and environment domain [23]. Prevention or delay of onset of multiple clinical symptoms was carried out through better management of diabetes and may help improve the HRQOL [49]. According to the 7th edition of the Summary international journal of non-communicable diseases and diabetes research and clinical practice issued by the International Diabetic Federation (IDF), Type 2 diabetes is one of the world's most significant health threats and is attributed to changes in lifestyle that result in reduced physical activity and obesity, and it can lead to an increase in cardiovascular risk, lowering HRQOL and life expectancy over time [50, 51, 52]. According to the study conducted in Jimma, Ethiopia found the presence of substantial impairments in respondents' general health and has concluded that having several comorbid conditions have a significant role in the prediction of impaired HRQOL [16]. The HRQOL was also found significantly related to fasting blood sugar and body mass index [16, 29, 39].

Most studies so far conducted on type 2 diabetes mellitus investigated the magnitude of the disease and its distribution throughout the world. Studies conducted in Ethiopia are mainly targeted at the prevalence of diabetes mellitus which estimates the burden of disease on type 2 diabetic adult patients incomplete unless their HRQOL is quantified. Health professionals still mostly focus on treatment only without specific guidelines on HRQOL and are unaware of the social, physical, psychological, and environmental impact on individuals with type 2 diabetes' life quality in terms of health. In chronic diabetic patients, a complete cure cannot be obtained without holistic intervention with the ultimate objective of increasing the patient's QOL. Therefore, knowing the predictors and detecting risk factors of QOL among type 2-diabetic patients is crucial and these variables may then be targeted for prevention.

Furthermore, identifying factors that influence HRQOL would provide data for health professionals, policymakers, program planning bodies, and other governmental and non-governmental organizations to make informed decisions in maximizing efforts to improve the life quality of diabetic patients in the country and study area. Thus, this study aimed to assess the HRQOL and its determinants among type 2 diabetic adult patients attending Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

2. Methods and materials

2.1. Study design and period

An institutional-based cross-sectional research was conducted from March 03, 2020, to March 31st, 2020 in Debre Markos Referral Hospital (DMRH) among type 2 diabetic adult patients.

2.2. Study area and population

Debre Markos Referral Hospital (DMRH) is located in East Gojjam Administrative Zone, Amhara National Regional State, which is 300 km (Km) far from Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. There are about 798 type 2 diabetic adult patients currently on follow-up in the chronic diseases outpatient department (OPD) in Debre Markos Referral Hospital. All of the diabetic patients have a follow-up period of once per month.

2.3. Sample size determination

The required sample size for the first objective was determined by using single population proportion formula with basic assumptions of 95% confidence interval, 5% margin of error, and 67% estimated proportion of good health-related quality of life from a previous study [16]. Hence, the following formula was used for sample size calculation for the first objective:

n=zα22×P×(1P)d2=(1.96)2×0.67(10.67)(1.05)2=340

Assumptions:

n = number of participants to be interviewed

Z = 95% confidence interval, whose Z score value is 1.96

P = Proportion of good health-related quality of life which was (67%) [16]

d = the margin of error taken as 5%

For the second objective, the sample size was calculated by considering independent variables, which were found to be significantly associated with HRQOL in studies conducted in different areas. The sample size was computed by using EPI Info version 7.2 with the assumptions of a 95% confidence interval and power to be 80%. Finally, the first objective was preferable, considering the non-response rate to be 10% and adding 340 + 34 = 374 participants. We chose study participants using a systematic random sampling technique.

2.4. Data collection instruments, procedure, and data quality control

An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect primary data, and medical record registration was used to take secondary data variables like comorbidity, fasting blood sugar, duration of patients with DM, and diabetic complications were collected from the secondary source. Socio-demographic variables were used by adapting the questionnaire from other studies conducted before. The wealth index was measured using adopted questionnaires from the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS 2016) by assuming the income level of participants in urban and rural differently [53]. The questionnaire for assessing HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients was adopted from a validated instrument of the short form of the World health organization quality of life questionnaire, whose Amharic version has been validated and cross-culturally checked to be used in Ethiopia with four domains and 26 items [54]. The four domain scores represent a person's perception of their quality of life in each of the domains. WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-items instrument consisting of four domains: physical health domain (seven items), psychological health domain (six items), social relationships domain (three items), and environmental health domain (eight items). Two questions measure the perception of the overall life quality and general health of individual participants [55]. Four BSC nurse interviewers and two health professional supervisors were trained before the data collection date, collected the data using the structured questionnaire, and interviewed the patients as soon as they exited the diabetic room. The interviewing process took in a ventilated place to make the safety of participants more comfortable.

The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was utilized, and its reliability and validity was evaluated in Ethiopia [17, 54]. Hence, the questionnaire (found as a supplementary file) was adapted from these sources. Prior to the actual data collection, pretest of the questionnaire was conducted on 5% of the sample size at Dejen Primary Hospital, and the reliability of the questionnaire was checked by calculating Cronbach's alpha to be 0.95. The principal investigator provided training for data collectors and supervisors for two days. Supervisors double-checked questionnaires for completeness at the completion of every data collection day. The principal investigator regularly met with data collectors and supervisors to discuss the procedure.

2.5. Data management and analysis strategy

After coding and checking for completeness, data were entered into the computer using Epidata version 3.1 and were exported to STATA version 14.0. The data were re-coded and cleaned for missing. WHOQOL-BREF scores on a Likert scale of 1–5 were scaled in a positive direction. The scoring of three negatively phrased questions was reversed (Q3, Q4, and Q26), thus transforming them into positively phrased questions. Then, the mean was calculated for each specific domain and multiplied by 4, and transformed to 0–100 to make it comparable with the WHOQOL-100 tool where the WHOQOL-BREF tool has been extracted. HRQOL was assessed by adding the mean score of the respondents and dividing the total sum of the score by the number of items in the tool. Categorization was done using the mean score. Mean scores of more than 3 were categorized as good and Poor HRQOL was defined as having a score of less than or equal to three [56].

The data were statistically described using tables, graphs, and median with interquartile range (IQR) for the skewed distribution of variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to get the association between the outcome variable and various independent variables. The wealth index was analyzed by taking 15 questions from EDHS 2016.

Participants in the study were from both urban and rural areas. The determination of their household wealth index took this difference into account as the variables (assets) used to measure wealth may vary for urban and rural dwellers. A separate analysis of participants from the urban and rural residence was done. Finally, merging them, a wealth index with five quintiles was generated using principal component analysis. Bivariable binary logistic regression analysis was first conducted for each potentially explanatory variable. Those variables whose p-value was less than 0.25 in the bivariable binary logistic regression analysis were then analyzed further using multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Stepwise backward elimination was used for variable selection. Statistical significance of association was decided using a P-value of less than 0.05 and Strength of association was interpreted using the adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and P-value. Data were checked for multicollinearity with the Variance Inflation Factor. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test was checked for model fitness of the model and finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the curve was computed.

2.6. Ethical approval and consent to participate

This work has been approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of Debre Markos University College of Health Sciences with (HSCS/R/C/S/PG/18/03/12). Permission was received from the Debre Markos Referral Hospital administration and the study participants provided their written consent. Throughout the data collection procedure, the confidentiality of the data was protected. In this study, participation was entirely voluntary and participants had the option to stop participating at any time, even after the interview had begun. They also had a right to choose not to answer any individual question or all of the questions in the questionnaire provided.

3. Results

3.1. Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus

Among 374 interviewed type 2 diabetic adult patients, 368 were included in the final analysis with a 98.4% response rate. The study finding showed that two hundred thirty-six (64.1%) of the study participants were females and from the study participants, about 310 (84.2%) were aged above forty years with median and interquartile range (IQR) of 58 (45–68). Most study participants 336 (91.3%) were followers of orthodox Christianity. The majority 254 (69%) of the participants were married and about 274 (74.5%) were living in urban. Likewise, 118 (32.1%) of the study participants were richer when they were categorized in five quintiles of wealth index, and a few 74 (20.1%), were poorest (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio demographic characteristics of type 2 diabetic adult patients in DMRH, 2020 (N = 368).

Variable Number Percentage (%)
Sex
Female 236 64.1
Male 132 35.9
Age group
≥40 years 310 84.2
29–39 years 50 13.6
18–28 years 8 2.2
Educational status
No formal education 140 38.1
Primary School 91 24.7
Secondary School 39 10.6
College and above 98 26.6
Religion
Orthodox 336 91.3
Muslim 30 8.2
Protestant 2 0.5
Marital Status
Married 254 69.0
Widowed 49 13.3
Single 36 9.8
Divorced 20 5.4
Separated 9 2.5
Residence
Urban 274 74.5
Rural 94 25.5
Occupation
Merchant 134 36.4
Farmer 89 24.2
Government employer 88 23.9
House wife 53 14.4
Daily labor 4 1.1
Physical exercise
No 195 52.9
Yes 173 47.1
Alcohol drinking
No 188 51.1
Yes 180 48.9
Counseling
No 231 62.8
Yes 137 37.2
Wealth index
Poorest 74 20.1
Poor 74 20.1
Medium 77 20.9
Richer 118 32.1
Richest 25 6.8
Living status
With family 306 83.2
Alone 62 16.8
Smoking cigarettes
Not at all 341 92.7
Every day 14 3.8
Some days 13 3.5
Enrollment of CBHI
No 320 87.0
Yes 48 13.0

3.2. Medically related factors of type 2 diabetic adult patients

Among the participants, 155 (42.1%) experienced complications from diabetes, and 127 (34.5%) also had other known chronic diseases. Among all the respondents assessed, most patients 221 (60.1%) had been with DM for 59 months or less with a median duration and interquartile range (IQR) of 47 (24–72) months. The majority, 240 (65.2%), of the respondents were overweight and most of the study participants 261 (70.9%) had no family history of diabetes mellitus (Table 2).

Table 2.

Medical characteristics of type 2 diabetic adult patients in DMRH, 2020 (N = 368).

Variable Number Percentage (%)
Diabetic Complications
No 213 57.9
Yes 155 42.1
Confirmed co morbidity
No 241 65.5
Yes 127 34.5
Duration of diabetes mellitus since diagnosis
59 months or less 221 60.1
Greater than 59 months 147 39.9
Body Mass Index
Underweight 2 0.6
Normal 87 23.6
Overweight 240 65.2
Obese 39 10.6
Fasting blood sugar
126–199 mg/dl 187 50.8
≥200 mg/dl 181 49.2
Physical trauma
No 196 53.3
Yes 172 46.7
Family history
No 261 70.9
Yes 107 29.1
Drug regimen
Oral anti diabetic medication 257 69.8
Injection and oral anti-diabetic 111 30.2

3.3. Mean score of HRQOL's domain among type 2 diabetic adult patients

Among the respondents involved, about 206 (56%) had the mean above 50% with good HRQOL. The mean score (mean ± SD) of the overall perception of HRQOL and general health status of type 2 diabetic adult patients in Debre Markos Referral Hospital was obtained to be 44.8 ± 13.5 and 43.8 ± 14.6 respectively. From the four domains, the highest mean was scored in the environmental domain (53.6 ± 16.9) and the lowest was in the psychological domain (50.1 ± 13.0). Physical and social domains of HRQOL scored the mean of 52.3 ± 11.5 and 51.6 ± 20.3 respectively. Overall reliability of the whole WHOQOL-BREF tool was computed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Mean scores of domains of HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients in DMRH, 2020 (N = 368).

Domain of HRQOL Number of observations Cronbach's alpha Mean Standard deviation Minimum Maximum
Physical domain 368 0.75 52.3 11.5 28.6 89.3
Psychological domain 368 0.66 50.1 13.0 20.8 91.7
Social domain 368 0.72 51.6 20.3 0 100
Environmental domain 368 0.82 53.6 16.9 21.9 93.8

3.4. Factors associated with HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients

The study showed that sex, educational status, occupational status, loss of family, physical exercise, alcohol drinking, counseling, diabetic complications, comorbidity, family history, fasting blood sugar, residence, religion, BMI, and duration of DM were significantly associated with HRQOL at p-value less than 0.25 and were candidates for multivariable logistic regression analysis. However, variables like trauma, marital status, living status, enrollment of CBHI, wealth index, and drug regimen were just not found to be significantly associated to quality of life in terms of health. Finally, those variables which were not significantly associated with HRQOL at a p-value less than 0.05 have automatically been removed in backward elimination from the model. Multivariable logistic regression of study participants showed that sex, physical exercise, drinking alcohol, counseling, diabetic complications; comorbidity, and duration of disease were significantly associated with HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients at p-value less than 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test was checked for model fitness of a logistic regression and probability chi-square value was found to be greater than 0.05, indicating the fitted logistic model. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to assess the accuracy of prediction, an area under the curve was computed to be 87%, which indicates an excellent test.

Those patients who did physical exercise are 2.3 times more likely to have a good HRQOL than patients who did not perform the physical exercise (AOR = 2.33, 95%CI: 1.34, 4.05). Patients who got counseling had 3.3 times more likely to have a HRQOL as compared to those patients who did not get counseling (AOR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.82, 5.94). Comorbid patients had 55% less likely to have a good HRQOL as compared to those patients who had no comorbidity (AOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.84). Those patients who had been with the disease for more than 59 months had 2.9 times more likely to have a good quality of life as compared to patients who had been with the disease for less than or equal to 59 months (AOR = 2.93, 95%CI: 1.61, 5.34). Patients who developed diabetic complications had 54% less likely to have a good health-related quality of life as compared to patients who did not develop diabetic complications (AOR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.26, 0.80). Being male was 4.3 times more likely to have a good health-related quality of life as compared to female respondents (AOR = 4.28, 95%CI: 2.36, 7.78). Those patients who were engaged in drinking alcohol had 73% less likely to have a good HRQOL than patients who were not engaged in drinking alcohol (AOR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.16, 0.48) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Factors associated with HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients in DMRH, 2020 (N = 368).

Variables HRQOL
COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) P- value
Good Poor
Exercise
Yes 125 48 3.67 (2.37, 5.68) 2.33 (1.34, 4.05) 0.003
No 81 114 1 1
Counseling
Yes 106 31 4.48 (2.78, 7.22) 3.33 (1.82, 5.94) <0.001
No 100 131 1 1
Co morbidity
Yes 42 85 0.23 (0.15, 0.37) 0.45 (0.25, 0.84) 0.011
No 164 77 1 1
Duration of DM
>59 months 105 42 2.97 (1.90, 4.64) 2.93 (1.61, 5.34) <0.001
≤59 months 101 120 1 1
DM complication
Yes 66 89 0.39 (0.25, 0.59) 0.46 (0.26, 0.80) 0.006
No 140 73 1 1
Sex
Male 106 26 5.54 (3.36, 9.15) 4.28 (2.36, 7.78) <0.001
Female 100 136 1 1
Alcohol drinking
Yes 58 122 0.13 (0.08, 0.21) 0.27 (0.16, 0.48) <0.001
No 148 40 1 1

4. Discussion

In this study, 56% of respondents had a good HRQOL mean scores (95%CI: 50.9, 61.1). This result agrees with other studies conducted in Ethiopia [17, 29, 57]. However, the study conducted in Jimma had 67% of good HRQOL, which is higher than the result of this study [16]. This difference might be because of variation in study time and the difference in the composition of study subjects. Most of the study subjects were males in the study conducted in Jimma, whereas in this study, females were high in the number whose HRQOL had been more deteriorated as compared to males, and this might have contributed to the reduction of overall HRQOL of this study compared to the study conducted in Jimma. In contrast to this, a study conducted in Botswana showed that 42.5% of the study participants had a good HRQOL which is lower than the result of this study [41]. This discrepancy of findings might be due to the study area and the variation of tool used to measure the outcome variable, the measurement tool used in the study conducted in Botswana was Short Form-12 (SF-12).

Being male was directly associated with good HRQOL and had a better HRQOL. This finding is align with studies conducted at Jimma, Greece, Saudi Arabia, and India [16, 23, 37, 58]. This may be due to the worse situation of female patients concerning the disease and the extra responsibility of females related to pregnancy and lactating. However, the studies conducted in Botswana and Bangladesh showed that the HRQOL of males was lower than the HRQOL of females, which may be due to variation in the study area.

Drinking alcohol was inversely associated with good HRQOL and significantly diminished quality of life. This finding is agrees with studies conducted in Switzerland, Gondar, and Thailand [46, 59, 60]. This may be due to the economic impact on those respondents who drank alcohol and the possibility of exposure to different concurrent diseases related to drinking alcohol [61].

Likewise, doing physical exercise was a significant factor that improved the HRQOL of diabetic adult patients in this study area. This study is congruent with the studies conducted in Nigeria, Gondar-Ethiopia, San Diego-California, and Canada [46, 62, 63, 64]. This could be because physical activity activates numerous brain chemicals which leave someone happier, more relaxed, less anxious, feel better, boost confidence and improve self-esteem, improve energy levels, and promotes better sleep and exercise can make muscles more relaxed making the patient happy [31, 61]. In addition, counseling was directly related to good HRQOL. This may be because those patients who got counseling can easily follow the procedures and pieces of advice provided by the health care providers accordingly and attain a better physical, emotional and mental satisfaction leading to the betterment of all dimensions of HRQOL of type 2 diabetic adult patients [61].

The presence of diabetic complications decreased good HRQOL. This result is consistent with the studies conducted in Nekemte, Mizan Tepi, Addis Ababa, Gondar, Singapore, and Palestine [17, 30, 46, 47, 65, 66]. This may be due to an increase in renal, eye, neural and other complications of diabetes mellitus, which impose additional pain and negative load on those patients who developed any diabetic complications and make them dependent on multiple drugs for an extended period which might have negative consequences that lower diabetes individuals' HRQOL [67].

The presence of comorbidity was negatively related with good HRQOL. This result is compatible with studies undertaken at Jimma, Nekemte, Mizan Tepi, Mexico, Iran, Malaysia, and Bahir Dar [16, 17, 29, 30, 68, 69, 70]. This might be because of the reason that those comorbid patients had an additional disease for which they were being treated and which might push them to invest extra money needed and to afford these drugs, pain, and worry reducing their overall HRQOL. This may also be brought on by many chronic conditions that affect diabetic patients, as well as potential drug interactions and side effects from various medications that might negatively impact every element of life's quality in terms of health [67].

Moreover, the duration of months in which patients stayed with DM for more than 59 months was found to be a significant factor that improves the quality of life. This result is consistent with the studies conducted in Nigeria and Nepal [44, 71]. This could be because patients who have had the disease for a long time have had more opportunities to learn how to manage it, which helps them live an improved HRQOL. In addition, longer disease duration may have allowed patients to learn more about the medications used for therapy and gained encouragement from their family members to change their lifestyles. This is in contrast to patients with shorter disease duration. However, the study conducted in Singapore showed a contrast to this result [23]. This might be related to disparities in study areas and lifestyles.

Medical-related factors like BMI, drug regimen, and fasting blood sugar were just not found to be significantly associated to quality of life in terms of health. However, these variables were significantly associated with studies conducted in Nekemte [30]. This discrepancy might be related to the small sample size (only 215 participants) included in the Nekemte study and the difference in the measurement tool used. Using a standardized and cross-culturally validated WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, which was validated in Ethiopia, was one of our study's strengths. This study's limitation is being a cross-sectional design that might be prone to the chicken-egg dilemma. Besides, no comparison was made between types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.

5. Conclusion

More than half (56%) of adult type 2 diabetic patients had a good health-related quality of life scores in this study. Being male, avoiding drinking alcohol, getting counseling, and doing physical exercises are significantly associated with good health related quality of life. Furthermore, absence of diabetic complications, absence of comorbidity, and duration of disease for more than 59 months were also found to be predictors of good health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetic adult patients.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Tewodros Eshete Wonde: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Tessema Reta Ayene: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Nurilign Abebe Moges and Yibelu Bazezew: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Debre Markos Referral Hospital Administrative bodies, data collectors, supervisors, and study participants.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the supplementary data related to this article:

Appendix
mmc1.docx (63.7KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Yuen L., et al. 2019. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Projections of the Prevalence of Hyperglycaemia in Pregnancy in 2019 and beyond: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas; p. 107841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Atlas D.J.I.D.A. International Diabetes Federation, International diabetes federation; 2015. 7th Edn. Brussels, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck J., et al. Vol. 44. 2018. 2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support; pp. 35–50. (1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perwitasari D.A., Urbayatun S.J.S.O. Vol. 6. 2016. Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Indonesia. (2): p. 2158244016643748. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ogurtsova K., et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hapunda G., et al. Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging for Zambian adolescents: qualitative data on stress, coping with stress and quality of care and life. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2015;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0013-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Genga E., et al. Vol. 4. 2014. Assessment of the Perceived Quality of Life of Non Insulin Dependent Diabetic Patients Attending the Diabetes Clinic in Kenyatta National Hospital; pp. 15–21. (3) [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aghakoochak A., et al. Quality of life in diabetic patients: a case-control study. Iran. J. Diab. Obes. 2014;6(1):28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho N., et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018;138:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.da Rocha Fernandes J., et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas estimates of 2014 global health expenditures on diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2016;117:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Linnenkamp U., et al. The IDF Diabetes Atlas methodology for estimating global prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;103(2):186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramachandran A., Snehalatha C., Ma R.C.W. Diabetes in south-east Asia: an update. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;103(2):231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Unwin N., Gan D., Whiting D. The IDF Diabetes Atlas: providing evidence, raising awareness and promoting action. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010;87(1):2–3. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Daher A.M., AlMashoor S.A.H., Winn T. Glycaemic control and quality of life among ethnically diverse Malaysian diabetic patients. Qual. Life Res. 2015;24(4):951–958. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0830-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bani-Issa W. Evaluation of the health-related quality of life of Emirati people with diabetes: integration of sociodemographic and disease-related variables. JEMHJ. 2011;17(11) doi: 10.26719/2011.17.11.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muze M., et al. Vol. 8. 2014. Health Related Quality of Life and its Associated Factors Among Diabetic Patients Attending Diabetes Clinic in Jimma university Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia; p. 2. 2017. (751) [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gebremedhin T., et al. Vol. 7. 2019. Health-related Quality of Life and its Associated Factors Among Adult Patients with Type II Diabetes Attending Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia; p. e000577. (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumar R., Krishan P., Jhajj R. Health-related quality of life and factors affecting it in type-2 diabetic nephropathy patients: a cross sectional observational study. JRIMS. 2016;4(5):1511–1517. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vancampfort D., et al. Vol. 32. 2015. Type 2 Diabetes in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: a Meta-analysis of Prevalence Estimates and Predictors; pp. 763–773. (10) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bishu K.G., et al. 2019. Diabetes in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Complications, and Cost; p. 100132. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Porojan M., Poantă L., Fodor D. Health-related quality of life of diabetic patients. Environment. 2009;47(4):409–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Genga E., et al. Assessment of the perceived quality of life of non insulin dependent diabetic patients attending the Diabetes Clinic in Kenyatta National Hospital. IOSR J. Pharm. 2014;4(3):15–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jain V., Shivkumar S., Gupta O. Health-related quality of life (hr-qol) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2014;6(2):96. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.127752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zysberg L. Diabetic management and emotional intelligence—an emerging direction in current research. J Endocrinol Diab. 2016;3:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Delamater A.M., et al. Psychological care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2014;15(S20):232–244. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Somappa H.K., Venkatesha M., Prasad R. Vol. 3. 2014. Quality of Life Assessment Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Tertiary centre; pp. 415–417. (4) [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Patel B., et al. Vol. 34. 2014. Health Related Quality of Life in Type-2 Diabetic Patients in Western India Using World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF and Appraisal of Diabetes Scale; pp. 100–107. (2) [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Muchukota S., et al. 2018. ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF DIABETIC FOOT PATIENTS IN COMPARISON WITH NON DIABETIC FOOT PATIENTS AND ROLE OF CLINICAL PHARMACIST IN PATIENT COUNSELLING–A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reba K., et al. Vol. 11. 2018. Health-related Quality of Life of Patients with Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, North West Ethiopia: a Cross-Sectional Study; p. 544. (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Feyisa B.R., Yilma M.T., Tolessa B.E.J.m. 2019. Predictors of Health Related Quality of Life Among Diabetic Patients on Follow up at Nekemte Specialized Hospital, Western Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study; p. 19013516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.NON-COMMUNICABLE O . 2016. NATIONAL STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN (NSAP) FOR PREVENTION & CONTROL OF NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN ETHIOPIA. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Papadopoulos A.A., et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life in type II diabetic patients in Greece. BMC Publ. Health. 2007;7(1):186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wändell P.E. Quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus an overview of research in primary health care in the Nordic countries. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 2005;23(2):68–74. doi: 10.1080/02813430510015296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Akinci F., et al. Vol. 79. 2008. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Turkey; pp. 117–123. (1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lou P., et al. Vol. 107. 2015. Association of Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Cross-Sectional Study in China; pp. 69–76. (1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saleh F., et al. Vol. 8. 2015. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life of Bangladeshi Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using the EQ-5D: a Cross-Sectional Study; p. 497. (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al Hayek A.A., et al. Vol. 38. 2014. Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life Among Saudi Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Cross-Sectional Survey; pp. 220–229. (3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gakuba A. University of Rwanda; 2016. Diabetes Mellitus Control and Quality of Life in Adolescent in Rwanda. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hannula V., et al. Vol. 92. 2014. Health-related Quality of Life–Using the 15D Instrument–Of Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes since Childhood. Population-based Oulu Cohort Study of Diabetic Retinopathy; pp. 205–208. (3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wändell P.E. Quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus an overview of research in primary health care in the Nordic countries. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 2005;23:68–74. doi: 10.1080/02813430510015296. (2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rwegerera G.M., et al. Vol. 54. 2018. Health-related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Botswana; pp. 111–118. (2) [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Al-Shehri F.S. Quality of life among Saudi diabetics. J. Diabetes Mellitus. 2014;4(3):225. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Al-Shehri A.H., et al. Vol. 28. 2008. Health-related Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetic Patients; pp. 352–360. (5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abubakar K.S. Assessment of health related quality of life of type II diabetes mellitus patients attending general out patient clinic of the JOS university teaching hospital. JOS. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Akena D., et al. Vol. 174. 2015. The Association between Depression, Quality of Life, and the Health Care Expenditure of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Uganda; pp. 7–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Andualem Yalew Aschalew, M.Y.a.A.M. Vol. 18. 2020. Health-related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital; p. 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Degu H., et al. Vol. 14. 2019. Is Health Related Quality of Life Influenced by Diabetic Neuropathic Pain Among Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Ethiopia? p. e0211449. (2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thommasen H.V., Zhang W. Health-related quality of life and type 2 diabetes: a study of people living in the Bella Coola Valley. JBCMJ. 2006;48(6):272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Simon P., et al. Vol. 12. 2019. Quality of Life in Diabetics with Different Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study with Patients Visiting a Hospital on an Outpatient Basis; p. 195. (4) [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Atlas D. seventh ed. International Diabetes Federation; Brussels, Belgium: 2015. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: a summary. Int. J. Noncommun. Dis. 2016;1(1):3. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Peer N., et al. Diabetes in the Africa region: an update. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;103(2):197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Central Statistical Agency Addis Ababa E . 2016. Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Reba K., Birhane B.W., Gutema H. Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of the world health organization’s quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) in patients with diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Felege Hiwot referral Hospital, Ethiopia. JODR. 2019:2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/3513159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.WHOQOL-BREF . 1997. Health Related Quality of Life WHO Questionnaire. Updated 1/10/2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Akinyemi O., et al. Quality of life and associated factors among adults in a community in South West Nigeria. Ann. Ib. Postgrad. Med. 2012;10(2):34–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Feyisa B.R., Yilma M.T., Tolessa B.E. Predictors of health-related quality of life among patients with diabetes on follow-up at Nekemte specialised Hospital, Western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e036106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Papadopoulos A.A., et al. Vol. 7. 2007. Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Type II Diabetic Patients in Greece; p. 186. (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Daeppen J.-B.,F.M., Sanchez N., Rahhali N., Bineau S., Bertholet N. Quality of life depends on the drinking pattern in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;4(49):457–465. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vichitkunakorn P.G.A., Assanangkornchai S. Is "light alcohol drinking" associated with the health-related quality of life (HRQOL)?: a population-based nested case-control design. ASEAN J. Psychiatry. 2018;19(1):105–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA M.O.H. 2016. Guidelines on Clinical and Programmatic Management of Major Non Communicable Diseases; p. 220. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Imayama I P.R., Courneya K.S., Johnson J.A. Determinants of quality of life in type 2 diabetes population: the inclusion of personality. Qual Life. 2011;20(4):551–558. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9772-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Adeniyi A O.O., Oguntola D., Adeleye J. Interrelationship among physical activity, quality of life, clinical and sociodemographic characteristics in a sample of Nigerian patients with type 2 diabetes. Afr. J. Physiother. Rehabil. Sci. 2015;1–2(7):2–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kaplan R.M., Hs, Wilson D.K., Wallace J.P. Effects of diet and exercise interventions on control and quality of life in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1987;4(2):220–228. doi: 10.1007/BF02596443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Quah JH L.N., Ng W.Y., How C.H., Tay E.G. Health-related quality of life is associated with diabetic complications, but not with short-term diabetic control in primary care. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore. 2011;40(6):276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Eljedi A M.R., Kraemer A., Laaser U. 2006. Health-related Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients and Controls without Diabetes in Refugee Camps in the Gaza Strip: a Cross-Sectional Study; p. 268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.federation, I.d. 2019. IDF DIABETES ATLAS: Ninth Edition; p. 176. pdf2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Doubova SV M.-L.D., Pérez-Cuevas R. Linking quality of healthcare and health-related quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes: an evaluative study in Mexican family practice. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2013;25:664–672. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chew B.-H., et al. Vol. 13. 2015. Negative Effects of Diabetes–Related Distress on Health-Related Quality of Life: an Evaluation Among the Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Three Primary Healthcare Clinics in Malaysia; p. 187. (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Didarloo A A.M. Health-related quality of life and its determinants among women with diabetes mellitus: a crosssectional analysis. Nurs. Midwif. Stud. 2016;5:e.28937. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal28937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mishra S.R., SA, Bhandari P.M. Depression and health-related quality of life among patients with type-II DiabetesMellitus : a cross-sectional study in Nepal. PLoS One. 2015;74:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix
mmc1.docx (63.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES