Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different Selenium (Se) sources on growth performance, intestinal function and antioxidant status of weaned piglets. A total of 300 weaned pigs were randomly allocated to 5 treatment groups with 5 replicates of 12 pigs/pen. The control group was corn-soybean basal diet without any additional Se supplement. The experimental diets were supplemented with 0.3 mg/kg of Se from sodium selenite (SS), Se-enriched yeast (SEY), Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia (SEC) and 0.3+0.3 mg/kg of Se from SEY and SEC, respectively. The trial lasted for 4 weeks. The results showed that diets supplementation with SEY, SEC or SEY+SEC could improve average daily gain and reduce feed/gain ratio during the entire study. Compared with the control group, SEC or SEY+SEC improved intestinal morphology, indicated by greater villus height and villus height/ crypt depth ratio. In addition, SEC or SEY+SEC also increased maltase and lactase activities as well as tight junction protein expression. Different Se sources decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and improved superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in serum. In the jejunum, SEY or SEC reduced MDA concentration and increased total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) compared with the control group. Moreover, SEY+SEC increased the antioxidant parameters including SOD and T-AOC in the jejunum. Dietary SEY or SEC supplementation significantly increased the mRNA expression of selenoproteins including thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1), selenoprotein I (SELENOI), selenoprotein S (SELENOS), and selenoprotein P (SELENOP) in the jejunum. In conclusion, organic Se sources, especially Cardamine violifolia, improve growth performance, potentially by regulating intestinal function, antioxidant capacity and selenoprotein expression in piglets.
Keywords: Cardamine violifolia, piglets, Selenium, growth performance, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, selenoprotein
Introduction
Weaning is the most significant event in the life of pigs as they are subject to constant nutritional, psychological and environmental stresses during weaning, which can result in enormous economic losses to the swine industry. During the weanling period, stresses usually result in the perturbations in host physiology, and mucosal immune function with subsequent reduction in feed intake, occurrence of post-weaning diarrhea, and growth reduction in piglets (1). These metabolic disorders, induced by weanling stress, are associated with inflammatory response, and impairment of redox balance and intestinal health (2, 3). This is why there is a wide range of interests in the field of swine science and production in developing both management and feeding strategies to enhance intestinal health in weanling piglet.
Selenium (Se), an essential trace element, acts as a feedstuff additive that is widely used in animal production. Se exerts various functions such as anti-oxidation, immunity, growth, and thyroid hormone metabolism (4). The function of Se is mainly derived from its presence in selenocysteine, which constitute the active site of various selenoproteins (5). Growing evidence suggest that Se deficiency has been associated with poor immunity, various tissue damage as well as an increased risk of mortality in piglets (6, 7). Recently, many studies have shown that dietary Se supplementation alleviates immune stress, oxidative stress and heat stress in pigs (8–10). These clues suggest that Se may play an important role in attenuating weaning stress of piglets. The current recommendation of Se in swine diets is 0.30 mg/kg (NRC, 2012). Traditionally, Se is generally supplemented to pig diets as sodium selenite, an inorganic form. However, there has been increasing interest in organic Se such as Se-enriched yeast and Se-enriched plant in recent years because of its higher absorption and biological effectiveness and lower environmental pollution in animal production (11–13). Organic Se has also been reported to have higher antioxidant activity, whereas the inorganic form may act as a prooxidant and have toxic effects particularly at high levels (14).
Cardamine violifolia is a Se-tolerant species native to the highly seleniferous region of Enshi, China. It can accumulate Se content exceeding 700 mg/kg dry weight in the leaves and about 85% in the form of Se-enriched proteins. Cardamine violifolia has higher organic Se content than Se-enriched yeast, Se-enriched peanuts, or other Se-enriched products (15). Moreover, it has an edible history of several 100 years and is enriched in various nutrients, especially abundant proteins, vitamin C, and minerals. Emerging studies have shown that Cardamine violifolia exerts various beneficial effects, such as anti-oxidation, anti-fatigue, weight loss and anti-aging in brain (16–19). For example, Cardamine violifolia prevented high fat diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders by ameliorating oxidative stress and inflammation (17). The edibility and Se-enriching ability of Cardamine violifolia display it as a potential source of Se supplementation for animal production. Currently, few studies had been conducted to explore the effect of Cardamine violifolia on growth performance and health status of weaned piglets.
In this study, we evaluated the effects of different Se sources on growth performance, intestinal function, and antioxidant capacity in weaned piglets. We showed that organic Se sources, especially Cardamine violifolia improved growth performance and health status in piglets after 4 weeks feeding. The mechanism of organic Se-promoting growth was to improve digestive and barrier function of small intestine, as well as antioxidant capacity in the body. This study could provide novel insights into the application of Cardamine violifolia for livestock industry.
Materials and methods
Experimental design and sample collection
All animal experiments and procedures were approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Wuhan Polytechnic University. A total of 300 weaned pigs (Duroc × Large White × Landrace; barrows; 9.70 ± 1.72 kg initial body weight; 35 ± 1 d of age), were randomly allocated to 5 treatment groups with 5 replicates of 12 pigs/pen (6 barrows and 6 gilts). Experimental diets were formulated to provide nutrient composition above NRC (2012) recommendation diets (Table 1). The control group was fed a Se-deficient basal diet. The experimental treatments were supplemented with 0.3mg Se/kg feed from sodium selenite (SS), Se-enriched yeast (SEY), Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia (SEC), and SEY+SEC (0.3+0.3mg Se/kg) in the basal diet, respectively. The actual level of Se in the diet of each group is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Feed and water were provided ad libitum during the study. The weight and feed intake were measured on day 1, 14, and 28 for calculation of average daily gain, average daily feed intake, and the feed/gain ratio. Dried Cardamine violifolia powder (1,430 mg/kg total Se content) was obtained from Enshi Se-Run Material Engineering Technology Co. (Enshi, China).
Table 1.
Ingredient composition of diets (as-fed basis)1.
| Items | Content (g/kg) |
|---|---|
| Ingredients | |
| Maize | 584.0 |
| Soybean meal (44%CP) | 222.7 |
| Fermented soybean | 115.8 |
| Fish meal | 19.5 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 17.3 |
| Fat powder | 9.6 |
| Sugar | 6.6 |
| Limestone | 6.2 |
| Whey power | 6.0 |
| Salt | 4.8 |
| L-Lysine, HCL (78.8% Lysine) | 3.8 |
| Acidifier2 | 2.0 |
| DL-Methionine (99 % Methionine) | 0.7 |
| Vitamin and mineral premix3 | 1.0 |
| Nutrient composition | |
| Digestible energy4 (MJ kg−1) | 13.5 |
| Crude protein5 | 202 |
| Calcium5 | 9.0 |
| Total phosphorus5 | 7.0 |
| Total lysine4 | 13.0 |
| Total methionine + cysteine4 | 7.0 |
1The basal diet was formulated in accordance with NRC (2012) requirements for all nutrients.
2A compound acidifier including lactic acid and phosphoric acid, provided by Shanghai Aodeng Biotechnology Company, Shanghai, China.
3Vitamin and mineral premix provided the following amounts per kg of complete diet: retinol acetate, 2,700 μg; cholecalciferol, 62.5 μg; DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, 20 mg; menadione, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 18 mg; riboflavin, 4 mg; niacin, 40 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; choline chloride, 400 mg; folic acid, 700 mg; thiamin, 1.5 mg; pyridoxine, 3 mg; biotin, 100 mg; Zn, 80 mg (ZnSO4·7H2O); Mn, 20 mg (MnSO4·5H2O); Fe, 83 mg (FeSO4·H2O); Cu, 25 mg (CuSO4·5H2O); I, 0.48 mg (KI); Se, 0.30 mg (sodium selenite, Se-enriched yeast or Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia).
4Calculated.
5Analyzed.
On day 14 and 28, blood samples were collected into heparinized vacuum tubes. The samples were then centrifuged to separate plasma and stored at −80 °C for analysis. After 28-day feeding trial, 6 pigs were selected from each group and were slaughtered with sodium pentobarbital (80 mg kg/ BW). The abdomen was immediately opened. The jejunum was removed, and flushed with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The 3-cm long segment of intestine was harvested from the mid-jejunum. About 10-cm middle portions of jejunum were opened longitudinally and cleaned with PBS. Mucosal samples were collected by scratching with a glass slide from the connective tissue, and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until further analysis.
Intestinal histology
Jejunal samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution and then embedded in paraffin. Three cross sections (5 μm) of each intestinal segment were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Ten well-oriented, intact villi and their associated crypts from each segment were used to measure villus height and crypt depth using a light microscope equipped with a calibrated eyepiece graticule (BioScan Optimetric, BioScan Inc., Edmonds, WA, USA). The ratio of villus height and crypt depth was calculated.
Serum and intestinal antioxidant enzymes
Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in serum and intestinal mucosa were determined using the commercial kits (T-AOC, A015-1; SOD, A001-1; MDA, A003-1) obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's procedures. Total protein concentration in intestinal mucosa was measured according to the instructions of the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime, Beijing, China). T-AOC and SOD activity were expressed as units per milliliter (U/mL) in serum and units per milligram (U/mg) of total protein in the jejunum, respectively. MDA concentration was expressed as nanomole per milliliter (nmol/mL) in serum and nanomole per milligram (nmol/mg) of total protein in the jejunum, respectively.
Intestinal mucosal disaccharidase activities
The activities of lactase, sucrose, and maltase in intestinal mucosa were measured according to the method of Liu et al. (20) using a glucose kit (lactase, #082-1; sucrose, #082-2; maltase, #082-3) purchased form Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Enzyme activity was expressed as U/mg protein in the jejunum.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from jejunal mucosa using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed with PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA eraser (TaKaRa, #RR047A) for quantitative RT-PCR with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNase H Plus) qPCR kit (TaKaRa, #RR420A) and 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The relative mRNA abundance of the target genes was standardized with β-actin as the invariant control and was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCT method of Livak and Schmittgen. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table 2.
Statistical analysis
All data were subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) appropriate for a factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design. The differences among group means were compared using least significant difference (LSD) multiple comparison based on the variance derived from ANOVA. Pen was used as the experimental unit for the performance data, whereas individual pig data were used as the experimental unit for intestinal morphology and enzyme-specific activity. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Results
Growth performance
The data of growth performance are presented in Table 2. After 4 weeks feeding trial, final body weight of all Se supplemented groups was significantly higher compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, SS group displayed higher average daily gain and lower feed/gain ratio during weeks 1–2 (P < 0.05); SEY supplementation significantly decreased feed/gain ratio during weeks 1–2 (P < 0.05) and increased average daily gain over the entire study (P < 0.05); Diets supplemented with SEC or SEY+SEC significantly increased average daily gain and decreased feed/gain ratio during weeks 3–4 and over the entire study (P < 0.05). Moreover, the feed/gain ratio of SEC group was significantly lower compared with other four groups (P < 0.05). No difference was observed in average daily feed intake and diarrhea rate among the treatments.
Table 2.
Effects of different Se sources on growth performance of weaned piglets1.
| Item | Diets 2 | SEM3 | P values4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ctrl | SS | SEY | SEC | SEY+SEC | |||
| 1 day BW5(kg) | 9.71 | 9.71 | 9.69 | 9.67 | 9.71 | 0.02 | 0.367 |
| 14 day BW(kg) | 13.80b | 14.31a | 14.06ab | 14.44a | 14.32a | 0.16 | 0.066 |
| 28 day BW(kg) | 20.11b | 20.81a | 20.91a | 21.15a | 21.21a | 0.18 | 0.005 |
| Weeks 1–2 | |||||||
| ADG5(g/d) | 302b | 334a | 317ab | 336a | 321ab | 9.20 | 0.101 |
| ADFI5(g/d) | 595 | 614 | 589 | 577 | 603 | 0.02 | 0.623 |
| Feed/gain ratio(g/g) | 1.99a | 1.84bc | 1.87b | 1.72c | 1.88ab | 0.04 | 0.004 |
| Weeks 3–4 | |||||||
| ADG(g/d) | 459b | 458b | 483ab | 492a | 496a | 10.64 | 0.054 |
| ADFI(g/d) | 793 | 793 | 810 | 776 | 804 | 0.02 | 0.732 |
| Feed/gain ratio(g/g) | 1.72a | 1.74a | 1.68ab | 1.57c | 1.61bc | 0.03 | 0.005 |
| Weeks 1–4 | |||||||
| ADG(g/d) | 381b | 395ab | 399a | 410a | 409a | 6.75 | 0.049 |
| ADFI(g/d) | 690 | 699 | 694 | 671 | 699 | 0.01 | 0.656 |
| Feed/gain ratio(g/g) | 1.82a | 1.77ab | 1.74ab | 1.63c | 1.70bc | 0.02 | 0.001 |
| Diarrhea rate(%) | 3.72 | 4.24 | 4.03 | 4.46 | 2.95 | 0.49 | 0.28 |
1Data are means of 5 replicate pens of 12 pigs each replicate.
2Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
3Standard error of the mean.
4Probability for contrast of 5 treatments by LSD's Multiple Comparison. a, b, cMeans within a row with different letters were significantly different compared to the other groups (P < 0.05).
5BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake.
Intestinal morphology
As shown in Figure 1, dietary SEC or SEY+SEC supplementation significantly increased villus height and the ratio of villus height: crypt depth (P < 0.05) compared with the control group in the jejunum (Figures 1A,B,D). Compared with the control group, SEY group also displayed higher the ratio of villus height: crypt depth (P < 0.05) in the jejunum (Figures 1A,D), whereas there was no difference between SS group and control group (Figures 1A,D). Supplementation with different Se sources exerted no effect on crypt depth in the jejunum (Figures 1A,C).
Figure 1.
Effects of different Se sources on jejunal morphology in piglets. (A) The histopathology of jejunum by H&E staining, Scale bar, 100 μm; (B–D) The villus height (B), crypt depth (C), and villus height/ crypt depth ratio (D) in the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 4–6. a, bMeans without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
Intestinal digestive enzyme activity
As shown in Figure 2, dietary SEC or SEY+SEC supplementation significantly increased maltase and lactase activities (P < 0.05) compared with the control group (Figures 2A,B), but did not affect sucrase activity in the jejunum (Figure 2C). SS or SEY has no effect on maltase, lactase, and sucrase activities in the jejunum (Figures 2A–C).
Figure 2.
Effects of different Se sources on the disaccharidase activities of jejunum in piglets. (A–C) The activity of maltase (A), lactase (B), and sucrase (C) in the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. a, b, cMeans without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
Intestinal tight junction protein expression
As shown in Figure 3, dietary SEC supplementation significantly increased the mRNA expression of claudin-1 and ZO-1 (P < 0.05) compared with the control group in the jejunum (Figures 3A,C); SEY enhanced the mRNA expression of occludin (P < 0.05) (Figure 3B); SS or SEY+SEC has no effect on claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1 mRNA expression in the jejunum (Figures 3A–C).
Figure 3.
Effects of different Se sources on tight junction protein mRNA expression in the jejunum. (A–C) The mRNA expression of claudin-1 (A), occludin (B), and ZO-1 (C) in the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. a, b, cMeans without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
Serum and jejunal antioxidant parameters
As shown in Figure 4, supplementation with different Se sources significantly reduced MDA concentration (P < 0.05) and increased SOD activity (P < 0.05) in serum of piglets compared with the control group (Figures 4A,B), while did not affect T-AOC (Figure 4C). Interestingly, SOD activity of SEC group in serum was also higher than that of SEY group (Figure 4B). In jejunal mucosa, dietary SEY supplementation significantly reduced MDA concentration (P < 0.05) and increased SOD activity and T-AOC (P < 0.05) compared with the control group (Figures 4D–F); SEC group also had lower MDA concentration (P < 0.05) and higher T-AOC (P < 0.05) in the jejunum (Figures 4D,F). SEY+SEC supplementation significantly increased SOD activity and T-AOC (P < 0.05) in the jejunum (Figures 4E,F). However, no difference was observed in these antioxidant parameters between SS group and the control group in the jejunum (Figures 4D–F).
Figure 4.
Effects of different Se sources on the antioxidant parameters in serum and jejunum. (A–C) MDA concentration (A), SOD activity (B) and T-AOC (C) in serum; (D–F) MDA concentration (D), SOD activity (E), and T-AOC (F) in the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. a, b, cMeans without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
Intestinal selenoprotein mRNA expression
As shown in Figure 5, SS group had higher mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidase 1(GPX1), selenoprotein I (SELENOI) and selenoprotein P (SELENOP) (P < 0.05) compared with the control group in the jejunum (Figures 5A,E,H,M). Dietary SEY supplementation significantly increased the mRNA expression of thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1), SELENOI, selenoprotein S (SELENOS) and SELENOP (P < 0.05) compared with the control group (Figures 5F,H,I). The mRNA expression of GPX3, TXNRD1, SELENOI, SELENOS, selenoprotein O (SELENOO) and SELENOP were higher (P < 0.05) in SEC group than that of control group in the jejunum (Figures 5C,F,H–J,M). However, dietary SEY+SEC supplementation significantly decreased the mRNA expression of iodothyronine deiodinase 1 (DIO1) (P < 0.05) in the jejunum (Figure 5D). Supplementation with different Se sources did not affect the mRNA expression of GPX2, TXNRD2, selenoprotein X (SELENOX), selenophosphate synthetase 2 (SEPHS2) and selenoprotein N (SELENON), compared with the control group (Figures 5B,G,K,L,N).
Figure 5.
Effects of different Se sources on the mRNA expression of selenoproteinss in the jejunum. (A–N) The mRNA expression of selenoproteins, including glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), GPX2, GPX3, iodothyronine deiodinase 1 (DIO1), DIO2, thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1), TXNRD2, selenoprotein I (SELENOI), selenoprotein S (SELENOS), selenoprotein O (SELENOO), selenoprotein X (SELENOX), selenophosphate synthetase 2 (SEPHS2), selenoprotein P (SELENOP) and selenoprotein N (SELENON) in the jejunum. Values are means ± SEM, n = 6. a, b, cMeans without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Ctrl, control group; SS, sodium selenite; SEY, Se-enriched yeast, SEC, Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia; SEY+SEC, Se-enriched yeast + Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia.
Discussion
Se, as a component of some antioxidant enzymes and proteins involved in the subsequent scavenge progress, participates in antioxidant system regulation. Previous studies in pigs revealed that Se deficiency from marginal to moderate led to growth retardation, immunity disorder, gastrointestinal impairment, and oxidative stress (21–23). In our study, the effects of different Se sources on growth performance of weaned piglets were assessed. Supplementation with different Se sources has beneficial effects on growth performance, including increased body weight gain and decreased feed/gain ratio after 4 weeks feeding. These data confirm that Se is an essential trace element in pig nutrition. More importantly, the feed/gain ratio of SEC group was significantly lower than that of SS or SEY group, indicating that SEC had better growth promotion effects compared with other Se sources. The possible explanation is that Cardamine violifolia contains not only organic Se but also other nutrients, such as soluble sugars, amino acids and sulfo-compounds, which are generally beneficial for animal health. It was worth noting that no difference was observed in growth performance of weaned piglets between SEC and SEC+SEY group, suggesting no synergistic combination effect between Cardamine violifolia and Se-enriched yeast. The data suggest that the form of Se has a greater impact on growth performance of piglets than the level of Se once Se meets adequate recommendations.
Villus height and crypt depth are commonly used as key indicators for evaluating intestinal integrity (20). Small intestine has a typical villus-crypt architecture, which plays critical roles in nutrient digestion and absorption. Our findings showed that villus height and villi height/ crypt depth ratio were significantly increased in SEC or SEY+SEC groups compared with the control group and SS group. Consistent with our findings, Yu et al. (17) reported that Se-enriched peptides from Cardamine violifolia significantly improved intestinal morphology, indicated by greater villus height and villus height/ crypt depth ratio. Se-enriched yeast also increased the ratio of villus height/crypt depth in small intestine, suggesting that organic Se had better roles in promoting intestinal development than inorganic Se. In addition, the activities of jejunal digestive enzymes including maltase and lactase were increased in SEC or SEY+SEC group. These data suggest that SEC promotes intestinal mucosal maturation and digestive function. Intestinal tight junctions are the key barriers that prevent the penetration by luminal bacteria and dietary allergens into the mucosa. In our study, SEY or SEC supplementation enhanced protein expression of occludin and claudin-1 in the jejunum, whereas SS had no effect. Yang et al. (24) reported that Se-enriched yeast also increased the expression of these tight junction genes, and antagonized intestinal barrier injury caused by ochratoxin A in broilers. Similarly, Se-enriched peptides from Cardamine violifolia were reported to upregulate ZO-1 and occludin expression in the ileum, and restored high fat diet-induced barrier permeability in mice (17). These data demonstrate that organic Se sources, especially Cardamine violifolia, improve growth performance by maintaining intestinal health in weaned piglets.
Redox imbalance is strongly correlated with animal growth and health (23, 25–27). It is widely accepted that proper Se intake can enhance antioxidant capacity in pigs (22, 28, 29). Antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, are the vital component of antioxidant defense systems involved in scavenging reactive oxygen species and maintaining the redox equilibrium. MDA is a metabolite produced by lipid peroxidation and widely used as an indicator of oxidative stress (30). In the present study, regardless of sources, Se supplementation significantly reduced MDA concentration and increased SOD activity in serum, declaring that Se supplementation suppressed lipid peroxidation and promoted the antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, SEY or SEC group showed lower MDA concentration and higher SOD activity compared with the control group in the jejunum. Our results are in line with the previous study that SEY supplementation has the potential effects on ameliorating the deleterious impacts of oxidative stress injury (8). Recently, Se-enriched peptides from Cardamine violifolia is reported to ameliorate oxidative stress in the hippocampus of D-galactose-induced aging rats (18). Notably, SOD activity of SEY or SEY+SEC group was higher than that of SS group in the jejunum. Similarly, Cao et al. (28) showed that diets supplemented with selenomethionine (an organic Se) was more effective than sodium selenite to decrease MDA concentration in serum and organs. Together, these data suggest that organic Se has better antioxidant properties than its inorganic forms (31).
Se exhibits its antioxidant functions through its incorporation into selenoproteins, of which 25 have been identified in pigs (32). In our study, mRNA expression of 14 major selenoproteins was determined in the jejunum of weaned piglets. GPX is the first identified selenoprotein, which is involved in the catabolism of peroxides (9). Our data showed that GPX1 expression in SS group and GPX3 expression in SEC group were upregulated compared with the control group in the jejunum. However, dietary Se sources did not affect GPX2 mRNA expression. In fact, GPX2, which is abundant in the intestine, has been shown to be protective against oxidative stress during inflammation (33). Liu et al. (34) found that when the dietary Se level increased the GPX2 mRNA and GPX activities increased linearly in the intestine of pigs. The possible explanation is that the differences of Se sources and the duration of treatment lead to differences in GPX2 expression. DIO1 is a plasma membrane protein, and plays an important role in inflammation and immunity (35). Our data showed that the gene expression of DIO1 was decreased in SEY+SEC group, suggested that high level of Se in diets may reduce immunity in the body. TXNRD catalyzes the NADPH dependent reduction of thioredoxin and therefore plays an important role in antioxidant defense and redox regulation (36). In this study, the mRNA expression of TXNRD1 was increased in the jejunum by SEY or SEC supplement, but the mRNA expression of TXNRD2 was unchanged. Previous study also showed that TXNRD1 reduced the oxidative stress during inflammatory bowel disease as well as inhibited intestinal inflammation (37). Other selenoprotein genes, including SELENOI, SELENOS, and SELENON, are endoplasmic reticulum proteins that seem to be involved in redox balance and the unfolded protein response (38). Our data showed that the gene expression of SELENOI and SELENOS were increased in SEY or SEC group. Ding et al. (39) showed that maternal 2-hydroxy-4-methylselenobutanoic acid supplementation significantly upregulated mRNA level of SELENOS in the jejunum of newborn and weaned piglets compared with the control group. Collectively, changes in selenoprotein genes induced by organic Se may enhance the antioxidant capacity in the intestine, and thus improve the growth performance of piglets.
Conclusions
The present study demonstrates that Se-enriched Cardamine violifolia has better growth promotion effect than sodium selenite or Se-enriched yeast in the diet of weaned pigs. The supplementation of Cardamine violifolia in weaned pig diet can improve growth performance, intestinal function, antioxidant capacity, and selenoprotein expression at the level of 0.3 mg/kg. These results will also provide scientific evidences for the development of antioxidant drugs in the future as well as the application of Cardamine violifolia in piglets.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Wuhan Polytechnic University.
Author contributions
DW and YL designed the study, wrote the manuscript, and acquired funding. YZ, QC, YK, JF, QG, and XC conducted animal trial. XX, HZ, and SC analyzed the parameters and data. DW, XC, and YL read and approved the final version. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was financially funded by the Project of Innovative Research Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2019CFA015), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32102566), and the Hubei Province's Key Project of Research and Development Plan (No. 2020BBA043).
Conflict of interest
Authors YZ, QG, and XC were employed by Enshi Se-Run Material Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.964766/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Upadhaya S, Kim I. The impact of weaning stress on gut health and the mechanistic aspects of several feed additives contributing to improved gut health function in weanling piglets-a review. Animals. (2021) 11:2418. 10.3390/ani11082418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moeser A, Pohl C, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. (2017) 3:313–21. 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wijtten P, van der Meulen J, Verstegen M. Intestinal barrier function and absorption in pigs after weaning: a review. Br J Nutr. (2011) 105:967–81. 10.1017/S0007114510005660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Méplan C, Hughes D. The role of selenium in health and disease: emerging and recurring trends. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1049. 10.3390/nu12041049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gopalakrishna R, Gundimeda U, Zhou S, Zung K, Forell K, Holmgren A. Imbalance in protein thiol redox regulation and cancer-preventive efficacy of selenium. React Oxyg Species. (2016) 2:272–89. 10.20455/ros.2016.851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lei X, Dann H, Ross D, Cheng W, Combs G, Roneker K. Dietary selenium supplementation is required to support full expression of three selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidases in various tissues of weanling pigs. J Nutr. (1998) 128:130–35. 10.1093/jn/128.1.130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li S, Sun W, Zhang K, Zhu J, Jia X, Guo X, et al. Selenium deficiency induces spleen pathological changes in pigs by decreasing selenoprotein expression, evoking oxidative stress, and activating inflammation and apoptosis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2021) 12:65. 10.1186/s40104-021-00587-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu L, Chen D, Yu B, Luo Y, Huang Z, Zheng P, et al. Influences of selenium-enriched yeast on growth performance, immune function, and antioxidant capacity in weaned pigs exposure to oxidative stress. Biomed Res Int. (2021) 2021:5533210. 10.1155/2021/5533210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.He Y, Liu Y, Tang J, Jia G, Liu G, Tian G, et al. Selenium exerts protective effects against heat stress-induced barrier disruption and inflammation response in jejunum of growing pigs. J Sci Food Agric. (2022) 102:496–04. 10.1002/jsfa.11377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun L, Pi D, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhu L, Qi D, et al. Response of Selenium and Selenogenome in immune tissues to LPS-induced inflammatory reactions in pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2017) 177:90–6. 10.1007/s12011-016-0863-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahan DC, Cline TR. Effects of dietary levels of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenide as selenium sources fed. J Anim Sci. (1999) 77:2172. 10.2527/1999.7782172x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mahan DC, Azain M, Crenshaw TD, Cromwell GL, Dove CR, Kim SW, et al. Supplementation of organic and inorganic selenium to diets using grains grown in various regions of the United States with differing natural Se concentrations and fed to grower–finisher swine. J Anim Sci. (2014) 92:4991–97. 10.2527/jas.2014-7735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jang YD, Choi HB, Durosoy S, Schlegel P, Kim YY. Comparison of bioavailability of organic selenium sources in finishing pigs. Asian-Austral J Anim. (2010) 23:931–36. 10.5713/ajas.2010.90619 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seko Y, Saito Y, Kitahara J, Imura N. Active oxygen generation by the reaction of selenite with reduced glutathione in vitro. Se Biol Med. (1989) 70–3. 10.1007/978-3-642-74421-1_14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu KY, Tian XL, Qin ZG, Pan SY, Xu X. Anti-motor fatigue activity of selenium-containing protein from Cardamine hupingshanensis. Food Sci. (2015) 36:09. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhu S, Yang W, Lin Y, Du C, Cong X. Antioxidant and anti-fatigue activities of selenium-enriched peptides isolated from Cardamine violifolia protein hydrolysate. J Funct Foods. (2021) 79:104412. 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu T, Guo J, Zhu S, Li M, Zhu Z, Cheng S, et al. Protective effects of selenium-enriched peptides from Cardamine violifolia against high-fat diet induced obesity and its associated metabolic disorders in mice. RSC Adv. (2020) 10:31411–24. 10.1039/D0RA04209A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu T, Guo J, Zhu S, Zhang X, Zhu Z, Cheng S, et al. Protective effects of selenium-enriched peptides from Cardamine violifolia on D-galactose-induced brain aging by alleviating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuron apoptosis. J Funct Foods. (2020) 75:104277. 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104277 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhu S, Du C, Yu T, Cong X, Liu Y, Chen S, et al. Antioxidant activity of selenium-enriched peptides from the protein hydrolysate of Cardamine violifolia. J Food Sci. (2019) 84:3504–11. 10.1111/1750-3841.14843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu Y, Chen F, Odle J, Lin X, Jacobi S, Zhu H, et al. Fish oil enhances intestinal integrity and inhibits TLR4 and NOD2 signaling pathways in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. J Nutr. (2012) 142:2017–24. 10.3945/jn.112.164947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang R, Guo R, Liu Q, Li G, Sun B, Huang X. Selenium deficiency via the TLR4/TRIF/NF-κB signaling pathway leading to inflammatory injury in chicken spleen. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2021) 199:693–02. 10.1007/s12011-020-02173-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li S, Zhao Q, Zhang K, Sun W, Jia X, Yang Y, et al. Se deficiency induces renal pathological changes by regulating selenoprotein expression, disrupting redox balance, and activating inflammation. Metallomics. (2020) 12:1576–84. 10.1039/d0mt00165a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tang C, Li S, Zhang K, Li J, Han Y, Zhan T, et al. Selenium deficiency-induced redox imbalance leads to metabolic reprogramming and inflammation in the liver. Redox Biol. (2020) 36:101519. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang S, Li L, Yu L, Sun L, Li K, Tong C, et al. Selenium-enriched yeast reduces caecal pathological injuries and intervenes changes of the diversity of caecal microbiota caused by Ochratoxin-A in broilers. Food Chem Toxicol. (2020) 137:111139. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Corino C, Prost M, Pizzi B, Rossi R. Dietary plant extracts improve the antioxidant reserves in weaned piglets. Antioxidants. (2021) 10:702. 10.3390/antiox10050702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xiang X, Deng Z, Wang Y, Sun H, Wang L, Han Y, et al. Organic acids improve growth performance with potential regulation of redox homeostasis, immunity, and microflora in intestines of weaned piglets. Antioxidants. (2021) 10:1665. 10.3390/antiox10111665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen Y, Zhang H, Ji S, Jia P, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. Resveratrol and its derivative pterostilbene attenuate oxidative stress-induced intestinal injury by improving mitochondrial redox homeostasis and function via SIRT1 signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. (2021) 177:1–14. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cao J, Guo F, Zhang L, Dong B, Gong L. Effects of dietary Selenomethionine supplementation on growth performance, antioxidant status, plasma selenium concentration, and immune function in weaning pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2014) 5:46. 10.1186/2049-1891-5-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sun W, Zhu J, Li S, Tang C, Zhao Q, Zhang J. Selenium supplementation protects against oxidative stress-induced cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest through activation of PI3K/AKT. Metallomics. (2020) 12: 1965–78. 10.1039/d0mt00225a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gawe S, Wardas M, Niedworok E, Wardas P. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiad Lek. (2004) 57:453–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao X, Zhao Q, Chen H, Xiong H. Distribution and effects of natural selenium in soybean proteins and its protective role in soybean β-conglycinin (7S globulins) under AAPH-induced oxidative stress. Food Chem. (2019) 272:201–9. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kryukov G, Castellano S, Novoselov S, Lobanov A, Zehtab O, Guigó R, et al. Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes. Science. (2003) 300:1439–43. 10.1126/science.1083516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Te Velde A A, Pronk I, de Kort F, Stokkers P. Glutathione peroxidase 2 and aquaporin 8 as new markers for colonic inflammation in experimental colitis and inflammatory bowel diseases: an important role for H2O2? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2008) 20:555–60. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f45751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu F, Cottrell J, Furness J, Rivera L, Kelly F, Wijesiriwardana U, et al. Selenium and vitamin E together improve intestinal epithelial barrier function and alleviate oxidative stress in heat-stressed pigs. Exp Physiol. (2016) 101:801–10. 10.1113/EP085746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang Z, Rose A, Hoffmann P. The role of selenium in inflammation and immunity: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2012) 16:705–43. 10.1089/ars.2011.4145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun Q, Wu Y, Zappacosta F, Jeang K, Lee B, Hatfield D, et al. Redox regulation of cell signaling by selenocysteine in mammalian thioredoxin reductases. J Biol Chem. (1999) 274:24522–30. 10.1074/jbc.274.35.245229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Narayan V, Kudva A, Prabhu K. Reduction of tetrathionate by mammalian thioredoxin reductase. Biochemistry. (2015) 54:5121–24. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y, Roh Y, Han S, Park I, Lee H, Ok Y, et al. Role of selenoproteins in redox regulation of signaling and the antioxidant system: a review. Antioxidants. (2020) 9:383. 10.3390/antiox9050383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ding D, Mou D, Zhu H, Jiang X, Che L, Fang Z, et al. Maternal organic Selenium supplementation relieves intestinal endoplasmic reticulum stress in piglets by enhancing the expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 and Selenoprotein S. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:900421. 10.3389/fnut.2022.900421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.





