Skip to main content
ChemistryOpen logoLink to ChemistryOpen
. 2022 Aug 25;11(8):e202200097. doi: 10.1002/open.202200097

An Efficient Method for the Preparation of Sulfonamides from Sodium Sulfinates and Amines

Haiying Tian 1, Ruiyan Li 1, Fang Guo 2, Xiuling Chen 2,
PMCID: PMC9405518  PMID: 36005567

Abstract

Sulfonamides have a special role on medicine due to their broad biological activities, as bacterial infections, diabetes mellitus, oedema, hypertension prevention and treatment. In addition, sulfonamides are also useful in herbicides and pesticides. Herein, we communicate an efficient strategy for the preparation of sulfonamides via NH4I‐mediated amination of sodium sulfinates. This new method provides a general and environmentally friendly access to sulfonamide compounds and tolerates a wide range of functional groups.

Keywords: sulfonamides, sodium sulfinates, NH4I, green protocols, metal-free


Sulfonamides have a special role on medicine due to their broad biological activities, as bacterial infections, diabetes mellitus, oedema, hypertension prevention and treatment. In addition, sulfonamides are also useful in herbicides and pesticides. Herein, we communicate an efficient strategy for the preparation of sulfonamides via NH4I‐mediated amination of sodium sulfinates. This new method provides a general and environmentally friendly access to sulfonamide compounds and tolerates a wide range of functional groups.

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g017.jpg

Introduction

Containing S−N bonds compounds are a class of important structural motifs, which are of crucial relevance for biological activities, pesticide activities and material properties.[ 1 , 2 ] Among all S−N compounds, sulfonamides are an important functional group in pharmaceutical interesting molecules and biologically active compounds.[ 3 , 4 ] Some have proved to be useful as antibacterial, anticancer, antitumor, anti‐inflammatory and HIV protease inhibitory activities.[ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] In additional, sulfonamides are served as amine protecting group due to their easy deprotection under mild conditions.[ 9 , 10 ] So, it is important to develop efficient method for the synthesis of sulfonamides. Conventional procedures for preparation of sulfonamides depend on the corrosive sulfonyl chlorides with amines in the presence of strong base or add acylating catalyst (i. e., DMAP) to the system.[ 11 , 12 ] Recently, many novel routes for the synthesis of sulfonamides are developed.[ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] Metal catalyzed coupling reactions of sulfonamides and sodium sulfinates with organohalides or boronic acids provide an efficient system for the construction of sulfonamides.[ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] An attractive protocol for the synthesis of sulfonamides from oxidative coupling thiols or sulfinate salts with amines has also been reported. [13] Currently, many improvements are focused on iodine‐mediated or iodine‐catalyzed reactions and transformation due to iodine is cheap, readily available and eco‐friendly.[ 39 , 40 , 41 ] I2‐mediated sodium sulfinates with amines reactions provide an efficient method to build up sulfonamides.[ 25 , 26 ] Incorporation of sulfur dioxide unit into molecules reaction has emerged as an effective tool for the formation of sulfonamide. Using this strategy, N‐aminosulfonamides are synthesized via metal‐catalyzed coupling aryl iodides, boronic acids, with sulfur dioxide, or DABCO.[ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] Although great progress has been achieved on the synthesis of sulfonamides,[ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ] some drawbacks still exist in the current methods, such as toxic metal catalysts, harsh reaction conditions or additional additives are contained in the reaction system and limit its synthetic utility.

Herein we report an efficient NH4I‐mediated reaction of sodium sulfinates and amines for preparation of sulfonamides (Scheme 1). This method shows good substrate scope (primary amines, secondary amines and imidazole, pyrazole, benzimidazole, indazole) and provides a variety of sulfonamide products in reasonable to excellent yields. As an alternative method to produce sulfonamides, the protocol has great applicability.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The route to the synthesis of sulfonamides.

Results and Discussion

Initially, the substrates of sodium p‐toluenesulfinate (1 a) and n‐propylamine (2 a) were carried out in the presence of NH4I for optimization of the reaction conditions and the results are compiled in Table 1. The sulfonamide 3 a was obtained in 20 % yield in ethyl acetate (Table 1, entry 1). Encouraged by the result, various solvents (Table 1, entries 2–11) were screened and CH3CN was as a viable alternative to other solvents, the sulfonamide 3 a was afforded in 85 % yield (Table 1, entry 11). The reaction was sensitive to temperature, for example only trace 3 a was observed when the reaction was performed at 25 °C (Table 1, entry 12). Screening a range of additives NH4Cl, PhI(OAc)2, NaI, KI and I2, the results revealed that other reagents were ineffective for this transformation (Table 1, entries 13–17), the reaction was not proceeded in the absence of NH4I (Table 1, entry 18). Thus, the optimized conditions for this amination sodium sulfinates for the preparation of sulfonamides were summarized as follows: 1 a (0.20 mmol), 2 a (0.30 mmol), NH4I (0.2 mmol) in CH3CN (2 mL) at 80 °C for 12 h.

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g013.jpg

Entry

Solvent

Additive

Yield of 3 a [b]

1

Ethyl acetate

NH4I

20

2

C2H5OH

NH4I

trace

3

THF

NH4I

25

4

1,4‐dioxane

NH4I

trace

5

DMF

NH4I

trace

6

DCE

NH4I

45

7

CH2Cl2

NH4I

20

8

Toluene

NH4I

55

9

CCl4

NH4I

45

10

n‐hexane

NH4I

40

11

CH3CN

NH4I

85

12[c]

CH3CN

NH4I

trace

13

CH3CN

NH4Cl

trace

14

CH3CN

PhI(OAc)2

40

15

CH3CN

NaI

56

16

CH3CN

KI

62

17

CH3CN

I2

55

18

CH3CN

trace

[a] Reaction conditions: 1 a (0.2 mmol), 2 a (0.3 mmol), additive (0.2 mmol), solvent (2 mL), 80 °C, under air in Schlenk tube for 12 h. [b] GC yield. [c] 25 °C.

The substrate scope of the present amination sodium sulfinates for the preparation of sulfonamides was further investigated and the results are summarized in Table 2. As shown, sodium p‐toluenesulfinate 1 a reacted readily with both primary amines and secondary amines, furnishing the corresponding sulfonamides from moderate to excellent yields. For primary amines, n‐propylamine (2 a), n‐butylamine (2 b), iso‐butylamine (2 c), iso‐propylamine (2 d) reacted readily with sodium p‐toluenesulfinate to give the corresponding sulfonamides 3 a3 d in moderate yields (Table 2, entries 1–4). While, tert‐butylamine (2 e) was less efficiently and the yield of 3 e was decreased to 45 % (Table 2, entry 5). It was worth mentioning that benzylamine 2 f could be effective to afford the corresponding sulfonamide in 75 % yield (Table 2, entry 6). Secondary animes and cyclic amines such as diethylamine 2 g, di‐n‐propylamine 2 h, di‐n‐butylamine 2 i, pyrrolidine 2 j, piperidine 2 k, morpholine 2 l, furnished the corresponding sulfonamides in moderate yields (Table 2, entries 7–12). We further investigated the scope of substrates of anilines in this reaction, the results showed that poorly nucleophilic anilines 2 m2 q were utilized as the substrates and gave the sulfonamides 3 m3 q in moderate yields (Table 2, entries 13–17).

Table 2.

Substrate scope of amines.[a]

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g005.jpg

Entry

Amines

Products

Yield[b]

1

2 a

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g010.jpg

3 a, 74 %

2

2 b

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g023.jpg

3 b, 71 %

3

2 c

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g025.jpg

3 c, 70 %

4

2 d

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g003.jpg

3 d, 60 %

5

2 e

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g029.jpg

3 e, 45 %

6

2 f

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g014.jpg

3 f, 75 %

7

2 g

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g019.jpg

3 g, 82 %

8

2 h

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g024.jpg

3 h, 65 %

9

2 i

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g022.jpg

3 i, 60 %

10

2 j

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g004.jpg

3 j, 78 %

11

2 k

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g002.jpg

3 k, 70 %

12[c]

2 l

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g012.jpg

3 l, 60 %

13

2 m

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g020.jpg

3 m, 63 %

14

2 n

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g011.jpg

3 n, 60 %

15

2 o

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g006.jpg

3 o, 66 %

16

2 p

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g021.jpg

3 p, 62 %

17

2 q

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g027.jpg

3 q, 60 %

[a] Reaction conditions: 1 a (0.2 mmol), 2 a2 q (0.3 mmol), NH4I (0.2 mmol), CH3CN (2 mL), 80 °C, under air in Schlenk tube for 12 h. [b] isolated yield.

The scope of substrates with a variety of sodium sulfinates was also investigated in this reaction. As illustrated in Table 3, the sodium sulfinates substrates without substituent or with electron‐donating and electron‐withdrawing groups in the para‐position were found to be well‐tolerated, such as methyl (Table 3, entry 1), chloro (Table 3, entry 3) and nitro (Table 3, entry 4) substituted sulfonamides were obtained under the optimal reaction conditions. Especially, 2‐naphthyl sodium sulfinate 1 e also reacted smoothly, and the corresponding sulfonamide 3 u was acquired in 68 % yield (Table 3, entry 5).

Table 3.

Substrate scope of sodium sulfinates.[a]

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g009.jpg

Entry

Sodium sulfinate

Products

Yield[b]

1

1 a

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g007.jpg

3 a, 75 %

2

1 b

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g001.jpg

3 r, 77 %

3

1 c

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g018.jpg

3 s, 73 %

4

1 d

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g028.jpg

3 t, 73 %

5

1 e

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g015.jpg

3 u, 68 %

[a] Reaction conditions: sodium sulfinates 1 a1 e (0.2 mmol), 2 a (0.3 mmol), NH4I (0.2 mmol), CH3CN (2 mL), 80 °C, under air in Schlenk tube for 12 h. [b] isolated yield.

To aid understanding of the reaction mechanism, the free radical quencher TEMPO (2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐1‐oxyl) was added to the reaction system, only trace of 3 a was detected, the result showed that that a free radical process was involved in the present reaction [Eq. 1].

graphic file with name OPEN-11-e202200097-g026.jpg

Based on the above experimental results and referring to the previous reports,[ 22 , 24 ] a possible reaction pathway was proposed and is shown in Scheme 2. The reaction between iodine (NH4I) and sodium sulfinate could lead to in situ formation of sulfonyl iodide intermediate, sulfonyl radical was produced by decomposition of sulfonyl iodide intermediate. [24] Sulfonamide was formed via path A (displacement of iodide by the amine) or path B (radical substitution to S−N bond formation).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Plausible mechanism for the amination sodium sulfinates for the synthesis of sulfonamides.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a simple and effective method for the synthesis of sulfonamides through NH4I‐mediated sodium sulfinates and amines. This attractive and facile synthetic route has high functional groups tolerance to both aromatic and aliphatic amines and provides a variety of sulfonamide products in reasonable to excellent yields. As an alternative method to produce sulfonamides, the protocol has great applicability.

Experimental Section

Unless otherwise noted, all reagents were obtained from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Sodium sulfinates (0.2 mmol), amines (0.3 mmol), NH4I (0.2 mmol), were placed in a Schlenk tube (25 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h, the reactions were monitored by GC and TLC. Then, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, washed with saturated NaCl solution. The crude product was extracted with ethyl acetate three times. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel and eluted with petroleum to afford the analytically pure products.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

Financial support by Scientific and Technology Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (2020L0596 ), the doctoral program of Jinzhong University.

H. Tian, R. Li, F. Guo, X. Chen, ChemistryOpen 2022, 11, e202200097.

Data Availability Statement

Research data are not shared.

References

  • 1. Huang Z., Lin Z., Huang J., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 36, 863–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Masereel B., Rolin S., Abbate F., Scozzafava A., Supuran C. T., J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 312–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Supuran C. T., Casini A., Scozzafava A., Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 535–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ganguly A. K., Alluri S. S., Caroccia D., Biswas D., Wang C. H., Kang E., Zhang Y., McPhail A. T., Carroll S. S., Burlein C., Munshi V., Orth P., Strickland C., J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7176–7183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pandya R., Murashima T., Tedeschi L., Barrett A. G. M., J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8274–8276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fan H., Xu G., Chen Y., Jiang Z., Zhang S., Yang Y., Ji R., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 1137–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Guianvarc′h D., Duca M., Boukarim C., Kraus-Berthier L., Léonce S., Pierré A., Pfeiffer B., Renard P., Arimondo P. B., Monneret C., Dauzonne D., J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2365–2374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mariusz M., Zbigniew K., Waldemar W., Mariangela C., Claudiu T. S., Vladimir K., Zofia U. L., Przemyslaw K., Bioorg. Bio. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yuan W., Fearon K., Gelb M. H., J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 906–910. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fritz S. P., Mumtaz A., Yar M., McGarrigle E. M., Aggarwal V. K., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 17, 3156–3164. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Scully F. E., Bowdring K., J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 5077–5081. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jiang H., Tang X., Xu Z., Wang H., Han K., Yang X., Zhou Y., Feng Y., Yu X., Gui Q., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 2715–2720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Qin S., Luo Y., Sun Y., Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151167–151172. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ma D., Cai Q., Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kantam M. L., Neelima B., Reddy C. V., Neeraja V., J. Mol. Catal. A 2006, 249, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pan C., Cheng J., Wu H., Ding J., Liu M., Synth. Commun. 2009, 39, 2082–2092. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kim J. Y., Park S. H., Ryu J., Cho S. H., Kim S. H., Chang S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9110–9113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Thirunavukkarasu V. S., Raghuvanshi K., Ackermann L., Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3286–3289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Moon S. Y., Nam J., Rathwel K., Kim W. S., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 338–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. You C., Yao F., Yan T., Cai M., RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 43605–43612. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tang X., Huang L., Qi C., Wu X., Wu W., Jiang H., Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6102–6104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wei W., Liu C., Yang D., Wen J., You J., Wang H., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 987–992. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhao J., Xu J., Chen J., Wang X., He M., RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 64698–64701. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Buathongjan C., Beukeaw D., Yotphan S., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 7, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yang K., Ke M., Lin Y., Song Q., Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1395–1399. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pan X., Gao J., Liu J., Lai J., Jiang H., Yuan G., Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Feng J., Wu X., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 6951–6954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Emmett E. J., Willis M. C., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4, 589–680. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zheng D. Q., An Y. Y., Li Z. H., Wu J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2451–2454; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 2483–2486. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Liu N. W., Liang S., Manolikakes G., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1308–1319. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ye S. Q., Wu J. A., Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10037–10039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nguyen B., Emmett E. J., Willis M. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16372–16373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Deeming A. S., Russell C. J., Willis M. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 747–750; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 757–760. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhu H., Shen Y., Deng Q., Huang C., Tu T., Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 706–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wolff N., Char J., Frogneux X., Cantat T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 5616–5619; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 5708–5711. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Du B., Wang Y., Sha W., Qian P., Mei H., Han J., Pan Y., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chung L. G. Y., Ramalingam B., Loh G., Chen A., Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 24, 546–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Deeming A. S., Russell C. J., Willis M. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1168–1171; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 1184–1187. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yuan Z., Zhang S., Teng F., Jin X., Sheng W., Gui Q., ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103355. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhu S., Wang B., Tan M., Qian X., Ying S., Liu Y., Li C., Jin Z., Jiang H., Gui Q., Organic Chem. 2022, 19, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jiang H., Shen H., Li C., Jin Z., Shang Y., Chen Y., Yi M., Du J., Gui Q., Synthesis 2022, 54, 2669–2676. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sheykhan M., Khani S., Abbasnia M., Shaabanzadeh S., Joafshan M., Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5940–5948. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Yang B., Lian C., ue Y. G., Liu D., Wei L., Ding Y., Zheng X., Lu K., Qiu D., Zhao X., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 8150–8154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chow S. Y., Stevens M. Y., Odell L. R., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 2681–2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Casewit C., Roberts J. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2364–2368. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Davies T. Q., Tilby M. J., Skolc D., Hall A., Willis M. C., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 9495–9499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kwon Y., Song J., Lee H., Kim E−Y., Lee K., Lee S. K., Kim S., J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7749–7762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mondal S., Malakar S., Tertrahedron 2020, 76, 131662. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tsai A. S., Curto J. M., Rocke B. N., Dechert-Schmitt A. R., Ingle G. K., Mascitti V., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 508–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Das T. C., Quadri S. A., Farooqui M., Chemistry &Biology Interface 2018, 8, 194–204. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

Research data are not shared.


Articles from ChemistryOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES