Effective innate immune response in natural HIV-1 controllers. Can mimicking lead to novel preventive and cure strategies against HIV-1?

Purpose of review

HIV-1 controller individuals represents a model that can be useful for the development of novel vaccines and therapies. Initial studies pointed to the involvement of improved adaptive immunity, however, new emerging evidence suggests the contribution of innate cells to effective antiviral responses in spontaneous controllers. Therefore, understanding the alterations on innate cell subsets might be crucial to develop new effective therapeutic strategies.

Recent findings

Among different innate immune cells, dendritic cell (DC) and natural killer (NK) cell are essential for effective antiviral responses. DC from controllers display improved innate detection of HIV-1 transcripts, higher induction of interferons, higher antigen presenting capacities and increased metabolism and higher capacities to induce polyfunctional CD8⁺ T-cell responses. Such properties have been mimicked by Toll-like receptor ligands and applied to DC-based immunotherapies in humans and in animal models. NK cells from controllers display higher expression of activating receptors promoting increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and natural cytotoxicity activities. Neutralizing antibodies in combination with interleukin-15 superagonist or interferon-α can increase ADCC and cytotoxicity in NK cells from HIV-1 progressors.

Summary

Mimicking DC and NK cell innate profiles in controllers has become a promising strategy to step forward a novel efficient immunotherapy against the HIV-1 infection.

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous immune control of HIV-1 infection occurs in rare and heterogenous populations of infected individuals, which are capable of controlling viral replication in plasma to low (viremic controllers; VC) or undetectable (elite controllers; EC) and represents a proof-of-concept that can be useful for the development of future vaccines and therapies. Initial studies pointed to the involvement of improved adaptive immunity activated by protective polymorphic Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-B alleles, effective cytotoxic and polyfunctional CD8⁺ T cells capable of eliminating infected cells, and intrinsic resistance of CD4⁺ T cells to HIV-1 [1–7]. However, during the last few years, new emerging evidence suggests the contribution of innate immune cells to immune control in HIV-1 controllers. Innate immune cells comprise a heterogeneous group of cell subsets, such as myeloid cells and natural killer (NK) cells, that are critical to induce antiviral responses [8,9]. 

Box 1.

no caption available

INNATE IMMUNE RESPONSE IN NATURAL HIV-1 CONTROLLERS

Myeloid cells possess multiple pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLR), RIG-I-like receptors (RLR), C type lectin receptors (CLR), intracellular DNA and RNA sensors and inflammasome components that are capable of recognizing conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [10,11]. Recognition of PAMPs by these PRRs activates a complex network of signaling pathways leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and type I and III interferons (IFNs), finally stimulation of other innate cells and modulating the adaptive immune response [12]. Progressive HIV-1 infection leads to immune dysfunction affecting both the adaptive but also the innate fraction, even in the presence of antiretroviral treatment [13,14]. However, different innate responses mediated by myeloid cells and NK cells have been detected in HIV-1 controllers [15]. In addition, HIV-1 controllers have been considered a model to develop new effective immunotherapies and vaccines to prevent or eradicate HIV-1 infection. Here, we will review the most recent advances on the understanding of altered molecular and cellular mechanisms of innate immune responses in HIV-1 controllers, specially focusing on dendritic cells and NK cells and how they can be modulated to mimic HIV-1 controllers for new preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Role of dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen presenting cells which mediate both activation and polarization of T lymphocytes, therefore playing a critical role in specific adaptive immunity [10,16–18]. DCs can be subdivided into conventional (cDC) and plasmacytoid (pDC) dendritic cells, according to their function. cDC comprise CD1c⁺ and CD141⁺ subsets, which display different abilities to stimulate CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, respectively. A reduction of cDC frequencies present in blood correlate with HIV-1 disease progression, however, frequencies are preserved in EC even in comparison to people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) on antiretroviral treatment [11,19]. Interestingly, circulating cDC from EC display higher capacities of antigen presentation associated with higher expression of activating immunomodulatory receptors such as Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor subfamily B (LILRB1) and LILRB3 [20]. Previous studies reported that improved detection of HIV-1 transcripts by the Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase pathway in cDC which might contribute to activation of CD8⁺ T cells in HIV-1 controllers [5,21]. Subsequent transcriptional studies at the single-cell level identified an activation state of circulating cDC from EC characterized by high interferon gene expression signatures regulated by TANK-Binding Kinase 1, co-expression of high levels of CD64 and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and superior functional capacities to activate polyfunctional HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cell responses [6]. Of note, LN CD1c⁺ cDC expressing PD-L1⁺ were also shown to modulate HIV-1 transcription in CD4⁺ T cells in lymph node of treated aviremic HIV-infected individuals [22], which may be also relevant for immune control, but their role in lymphoid tissue from EC has not been investigated in detail. Interestingly, a recent study identified the upregulation of a long coding RNA in DC from peripheral blood as the key element associated to the immunometabolic induction after TLR3 stimulation, suggesting that differences from EC to normal progressors could be influenced by epigenetic changes leading to trained DCs [23^▪▪,24]. In addition, a mass cytometry analysis identified a subpopulation of circulating CD1c⁺ cDC highly enriched in EC that was characterized by co-expression of high levels of HLA-DR and the inhibitory Fc receptor CD32b [19]. Interestingly, CD1c+cDC from peripheral blood can also promote effective humoral responses against HIV-1 and the induction of broadly neutralizing antibodies in viremic controllers (VC) thanks to higher abilities to secrete IL-6 and IL-12 [17]. Therefore, improved host-restriction of HIV-1 replication and increased innate activation of CD1c⁺ cDC, which seems to be associated with improved activation of protective CD8⁺ T-cell responses (Fig. 1). In contrast, although peripheral blood CD141⁺ cDC were initially reported to be more resistant to HIV-1 infection [25], their potential contribution to natural control of HIV-1 has not been explored.

FIGURE 1.

Schematic representation of main features of innate cells from HIV-1 controllers. Graphical representation of the main phenotypical characteristics and functional responses identified on plasmacytoid dendritic cells (in blue), conventional dendritic cells (purple) and natural killer cells (red) from HIV-1 controllers.

On the other hand, pDC are very effective secreting high levels of type I IFNs and are critical to induce immune responses to viral infections [11,19]. Reduced frequencies of pDC present in blood also correlates with HIV-1 disease progression and in in PLWH on antiretroviral treatment, and are also enriched in EC [11,19,26]. Furthermore, a specific pDC subpopulation co-expressing high levels of LILRA4 and LILRB4 negatively correlating with blood viral load was enriched in EC compared to progressor individuals with primary HIV-1 infection, in agreement with previous in vitro experiments that showed that pDC from EC displayed higher abilities to inhibit HIV-1 production by infected cells [19,27]. Interestingly, a recent study described higher proportions of pDC expressing the tissue homing marker CCR7 in blood of EC [26]. Moreover, a rhesus macaque model showed a negative correlation between frequencies of pDC and percentage of pDC synthesizing IFN-α, and the percentage of NK cells, CD4⁺ T cells and CD8⁺ T cells expressing interleukin (IL)-17 [28]. To summarize, DC, and particularly CD1c⁺ cDC, may play an essential role in the HIV-1 control in EC as they modulate the specific adaptive immune response towards a more effective phenotype (Fig. 1).

Natural killer cells

NK cells are crucial due to their cytotoxic capacity of elimination of virus-infected cells as well as their ability to modulate immune responses through cytokine production [29]. Different NK cell subsets are defined according to their CD56 and CD16 expression. CD56 dim CD16 bright NKs are characterized by high cytotoxic capacities mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). On the other hand, the CD56 bright CD16 dim NK cell subpopulation is responsible for immunomodulatory functions [30,31]. Finally, CD56 negative NK cells have been linked to memory-like NK cells responses but in HIV-1 infection this subset is characterized by dysfunctional cytotoxic activity and positively correlates with disease progression [32]. In fact, lack of expression of NKG2C, a marker associated with memory NK, has been associated with lower HIV-1 viral load set point [33]. In addition, recent studies in rhesus macaques described the existence of adaptive NK cells against the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), pointing to the possibility to generate HIV-specific trained NK cells as a therapy [21,34]. Therefore, the role of adaptive memory-like NK cells in natural control of HIV-1 remains unclear. A recent study comparing distribution of the distinct NK cell subpopulations in EC versus viremic, PLWH on Antiretroviral therapy (ART) and HIV-negative controls, described similar proportions of cytotoxic CD56 dim CD16⁺ subpopulation in EC and HIV-negative individuals, whereas viremic PLWH displayed lower proportions of this NK cell subset. Within this population, a subpopulation characterized by CD11b⁺ CD57⁻ CD161⁺ Siglec-7⁺, was significantly enriched in EC, and displayed higher expression of IFN-γ after IL-12/IL-18 stimulation and also higher ADCC activity in vitro to a target cell line [35]. In this regard, a study identified higher levels of plasma HIV-1 Env-specific and Vpu epitope-specific antibodies in EC compared to viremic individuals, which were capable of mediating activation and granzyme B production in an NK cell line, suggesting higher effectiveness of ADCC mediated by Env and Vpu epitope [36]. And another study identified that plasma HIV-1 gp140 antibodies present in long-term nonprogressors PLWH increased ADDC activity of NK cells from HIV-1-negative donors against reactivated latently HIV-infected cells [37]. Furthermore, NK cells express both activating and inhibitory receptors, and the proportion of ligands of one or another on the target cell determines the fate of the NK cell response. Inhibitory receptors repress cytotoxic activity of NK cells against target cells. However, downregulation of the class I HLA in the target cell can activate cytotoxic function in NK cells. In this regard, killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) are expressed on the surface of NK cells and can regulate activating or inhibitory signals through binding to class I HLA molecules. One study identified higher expression of HLA-C C2, which has been associated to control of viremia and slower disease progression, and their 2DS KIR receptor ligands in peripheral blood from EC but not long term nonprogressors [38]. In addition, two different studies identified higher expression of NKG2D on circulating NK cells from EC, compared to PLWH, and less downregulation of NKG2D ligands by HIV-1 Nef, which leads to increased susceptibility of CD4⁺ infected cells to ADCC [39,40^▪]. On the contrary, higher expression NKp46 activating receptor has been reported in circulating NK cells from EC [21]. Finally, interaction between protective HLA-B∗57 and KIR3DL1 and KIR3DS1 in EC can suppress viral replication [21,41^▪]. HLA-B∗57 has also been reported to play a role in viral control by CD8⁺ T cells, and although no evidence of synergy has yet been found, it highlights the importance of NK cells responses on EC to maintain viral control. Furthermore, lymph node CXCR5⁺ NK cells from this macaque model, which correlated with plasma viral load, exhibited higher expression of Fcγ receptors, pointing to higher ADCC functionality not only in blood but also in tissue, in combination with enhances IL-12 and IL-15 signaling [42^▪▪]. In conclusion, NK cells seem to play a significant role restraining HIV-1 progression in controllers independently of protective adaptive immune responses (Fig. 1).

POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR NOVEL HIV-1 CURE STRATEGIES

Previous tested immunotherapies against HIV-1 did not efficiently prevent viral rebound after treatment interruption [43,44], pointing to the need to module and fine-tune innate immune cells contributing to antiviral responses such as DCs and NK cells to mimic antiviral immunity in controllers [15,21,45,46]. Due to the important contribution of innate responses in natural viral control in EC, recent strategies have tried to mimic the enhanced antiviral function of DC and NK cell states in preventive and therapeutic purposes by either inducing an EC-like trained immunity state or by other alternative strategies [47]. DC have been used as a tool to induce cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells for immunotherapeutic approaches in cancer and vaccines to approach HIV-1 prevention and eradication [48].

Some strategies have focused on inducing high levels of IFN-pathways by using TLR or intracellular sensor agonist [49,50]. For example, TLR7 has been the most extensively used agonist as it could lead to the production of IFN-α through IRF7 activation or other pro-inflammatory cytokines through nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation [51]. In a SHIV-infected monkey study by Borducchi et al.[52] delayed viral rebound was described when bNAbs were administered together with a TLR7 agonist. Although another nonhuman primate vaccine model using the TLR7 agonist did not prevent viral rebound despite inducing immune responses against the vaccine [53]. Studies using a TLR 7/8 agonist in combination with HIV-1 Env peptides in a nonhuman primate model described increased magnitude and durability of the HIV-1-specific antibody response [54]. However, these previous studies administered the TLR agonist systemically instead of targeting DCs. Stunnenberg et al.[55^▪] used a TLR7/8 agonist in combination with abortive HIV-1 RNA in order to stimulate DCs. This led to enhanced adaptive responsiveness through T helper 1 responses and increased IFN-γ production by CD8⁺ T cells in vitro. In addition, a TLR7 agonist, in combination with a TLR9 agonist, improved antigen presentation and increased lymph node homing markers on pDC in an HCV model [56].

Moreover, additional TLR agonists have also shown promising results. An HIV-1 Env vaccine directed to the CD40 receptor of antigen presenting cells and in combination with a TLR9 adjuvant in a humanized mouse model, displayed higher immunoglobulin G (IgG) production together with more structured architecture in the spleen, containing both B and Tfh-like cells expressing PD-1 and BCL-6 [57]. Cheng et al.[58] also directed the vaccination against CD40+ cells using poly (I:C) as TLR3 agonist and a combination of peptides from HIV-1 Gag, Nef and Pol, and described less HIV-1 reservoir in lymphoid tissue and delayed viral rebound. Furthermore, the use of the TLR3 agonist in combination with a STING agonist and HIV-1 Gag peptides to activate DC ex vivo potentiate the acquisition of EC-like functional profiles and their ability to increase polyfunctional HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses in lymphoid tissues in humanized BLT mice and reduced depletion of CD4⁺ T cells after infection with HIV-1 [59]. In addition, TLR3 also increased responsiveness of CD141⁺ cDC against the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus in a rhesus macaque model [60].

In the context of chronic HIV-1 infection, antigen presentation by unstimulated DC has not been effective and therefore strategies boosting innate cells specifically using adjuvants directed to TLRs have been developed [49,50]. Consistent with previous studies, exhausted CD8⁺ T cells might remain dysfunctional after DC-vaccination and functional restoration might require additional modulation such as the use of checkpoint receptor blockade. In this sense, in vitro restoration of polyfunctional HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T cell from PLWH on ART after treatment with autologous DC primed with TLR3 agonist in and STING agonist is determined by treatment duration and the co-expression of different PD1, TIGIT and TIM3 checkpoint receptors and reduced mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis. In this study, authors were able to improve response to autologous DCs by combining with checkpoint receptor blockade and a glycolysis promoting drug [61]. Finally, a recent study in nonhuman primates using TLR4 agonist formulated with saponin described higher induction of responses in the lymph nodes due to its capacity to enter draining lymph nodes [62].

NK cells can be activated through cytokines in the environment or directly by some TLR agonists, and its ADCC activity can be promoted by the presence of neutralizing antibodies [63]. Several studies have described that the stimulation of NK cells with IL-15 improves ADCC activity, natural cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production in vitro in PLWH on antiretroviral therapy [64,65]. An in vivo model studying the efficacy of a broadly neutralizing construct specific for both CD4 and HIV-1 gp120 co-receptor binding sites evaluated the ADCC activity comparing mice infected and injected with total PBMCs or mice infected and injected with PBMCs where CD56⁺ fraction had been depleted. The study described a dramatic increase on the cytotoxic function against infected cells in just 1 day after receiving the treatment. Moreover, efficacy of the construct increased when combined with an IL-15 superagonist [66^▪]. A different strategy using IFN-α to prestimulate NK cells described increased NK-mediated clearance of HIV-infected cells by ADDC using either broadly neutralizing targeting gp120 or naturally occurring antibodies. Furthermore, activated NK cells expressing NKp46 and NKG2D increased direct cytotoxicity in this strategy dependently of MHC-I downregulation [67]. Another study used IFN-α to stimulate NK cells in vitro, and described an increase in the cytokine secretion, the polyfunctionality, the degranulation and the cytotoxic potential of NK cells from PLWH, therefore, mimicking the viral suppressive capacity of NK cells from EC. Moreover, IFN-α induced the release of cytokines by NK which in its turn leaded to a global cytokine response of CD8⁺ T cells from PLWH, meaning that strategies aiming to improve CD8+ T cell function and NK function are not exclusive [68]. Finally, a different strategy to potentiate ADCC from NK cells is the use of nanoparticles conjugated with IgG antibodies specific for HIV-1 gp120 and human CD16. This strategy triggered a potent ADCC cytotoxic response against HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells and efficiently reduced latently infected cells after viral reactivation in vitro[69]. In addition, CD155 expression by T cells combined with NKG2D expression on NK cells has been described to increase cytotoxic capacities to eliminate HIV-infected cells in vitro[70]. On the other hand, blockade of the inhibitory checkpoint inhibitory receptor TIGIT on NK cells, which is the ligand of CD155, increases NK cell activity against HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells in PWH in vitro[71].

CONCLUSION

Together, mimicking DC and NK cell activation states in controllers has become a promising strategy to step forward a novel efficient immunotherapy against the HIV-1 infection.

Acknowledgements

Graphical schematic representations were created with BioRender.com.

Financial support and sponsorship

E.M.G. was supported by the Ramón y Cajal Program (RYC2018-024374-I), the MINECO/FEDER RETOS program (RTI2018-097485-A-I00), Comunidad de Madrid Talento Program (2017-T1/BMD-5396), Gilead becas de investigación (GLD19/00168), by Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBERINF) de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CB21/13/00107), La Caixa Banking Foundation (H20-00218) and by REDINCOV grant from Fundació La Marató TV3. M.C.M. was supported by La Caixa Banking Foundation (H20-00218) and Gilead becas de investigación (GLD19/00168).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

• ▪ of special interest

• ▪▪ of outstanding interest