Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nanoscale Advances logoLink to Nanoscale Advances
. 2021 Aug 31;3(22):6330–6341. doi: 10.1039/d1na00514f

Controllable synthesis and electrocatalytic applications of atomically precise gold nanoclusters

Qingyi Zhu 1, Xiaoxiao Huang 1, Yunchu Zeng 1, Kai Sun 1, Linlin Zhou 1, Yuying Liu 1, Liang Luo 1, Shubo Tian 1,✉, Xiaoming Sun 1
PMCID: PMC9417523  PMID: 36133485

Abstract

Nanoclusters are composed of metal atoms and ligands with sizes up to 2–3 nm. Due to their stability and unique structure, gold nanoclusters with precise atomic numbers have been widely studied. Until now, atomically precise gold nanoclusters have been synthesised by various methods. Common ones include the Brust–Schiffrin method and the size-focusing method. With more detailed research on gold nanoclusters, more novel methods have been adopted to synthesise atomically precise gold nanoclusters, such as anti-galvanic reduction, ligand-exchange reactions from metal nanoclusters, the seed growth method, and so on. Besides, the nanoclusters also have many unique properties in electrochemical catalyses, such as the ORR, OER, etc., which are helpful for the development of the energy and environment. In this review, the synthesis methods and electrochemical applications of atomically accurate gold nanoclusters in recent years are introduced.

The main synthesis methods and electrocatalytic applications of atomically precise gold nanoclusters are summarized and critically reviewed. The synthesis methods of gold nanoclusters were classified and discussed, and their applications in electrochemistry were introduced.graphic file with name d1na00514f-ga.jpg

1. Introduction

In recent years, metal nanoclusters (NCs) have attracted great interest and have been explored increasingly as a newly developing class of materials. NCs are molecular compounds that combine inorganic and organic components. With their sizes reaching 2–3 nm, they fill the size gap between single atoms and nanoparticles (Fig. 1).1–3 Due to NCs being highly monodisperse, stable, and structurally well-defined, gold nanoclusters (Au NCs) were among the most popular in atomically precise metal NCs.4 The research of atomically precise Au NCs is vital for developing various types of nanoclusters and their practical applications.5 With the deepening of atomically precise Au NC research, the mechanism of the reaction and the relationship between the nanoclusters with ligands protecting the core and the properties of materials are easier to understand.6 Generally, it is denoted as Aux(L)y, where x represents the number of Au atoms, and y is the number of ligands protecting the gold core (L).4 Until now, there have been many reports on the synthesis, and applications of atom-precise Au NCs. Scientists have synthesised dozens of atomically precise Au NCs; commonly encountered ones are Au15(SR)13,7 Au22(SR)18,8 Au25(SR)18,7 Au38(SR)24,9 and Au102(SR)44.10 In addition, they also synthesised atomically precise alloy nanoclusters containing Au atoms, such as [Au10Ag2(2-pyC Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C)3(dppy)6](BF4)5,11 [Au13Cu2(DPPP)3(SPy)6]+,12 and so on. Since the electrons of Au atoms are limited to exist at discrete energy levels, atomically precise Au NCs show various electronic and optical properties,13 such as strong optical properties,14,15 magnetism,16 and high electrocatalytic reactivity.17

Fig. 1. Size scale from single atoms to nanocrystals.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Controllable synthesis of metal nanoclusters has been in development for a long time after Brust et al. first synthesised Au NCs in 1994,18 and new controllable synthesis methods are still being discovered. Since the first atomically precise metal nanoclusters, Au102(SR)44, have been synthesised, more and more Au NCs of atomically precise sizes have been reported, and some of their structures have been determined by X-ray crystallography.19,20 Because of the strong affinity to the Au core, thiol derivatives are always used as ligands to stabilize nanoclusters.13 In order to pursue better performance and applications of the nanoclusters, researchers used controllable synthesis to synthesize atomically precise Au NCs. For example, the size of Au NCs can be adjusted by the ligand exchange method. Jin group's reported that Au28(TBBT)20 could be synthesised by reacting pure [Au25(PET)18]−TOA+ with excess TBBT (TBBT = 4-tert-butylbenzenethiolate).21 Moreover, Au NCs can be alloyed by anti-galvanic reduction.22 Until now, various synthetic methods and routes have been applied to prepare atomically precise Au NCs successfully.13

Atomically precise Au NCs have been applied for electrocatalytic applications. Electrocatalysis focuses on preventing environmental problems consisting of fossil fuel consumption and global warming. To solve environmental problems and achieve energy regeneration and conversion, it is necessary to improve the reaction efficiency of fuel cell reactions, such as the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and so on.23 Due to Au NCs having a discrete electronic structure (Fig. 2), it is particular to obtain some novel properties like HOMO–LUMO electronic transition. The unique electronic structures of Au NCs make them efficient electrochemical catalysts.24,25 Increasing or decreasing one atom of Au NCs often leads to a change in their properties. Hence it is better to clarify the number of Au atoms and ligand types that would be better applied in various electrochemical applications.26 According to the variety of structures of nanoclusters, atomically precise Au NCs exhibit different excellent electrochemical properties.

Fig. 2. Geometric and electronic structure of nanoscale metal materials. Reproduced with permission.25 Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

This review mainly discusses the controllable synthesis and electrochemical catalytic applications of atomically precise Au NCs. Because of their stability, atomically precise Au NCs are widely studied. Until now, more and more atomically precise Au NCs have been synthesised by various methods. A review of these methods will help us to synthesise the desired Au NCs, and provide ideas for developing new nanoclusters in the future. In addition, atomically precise Au NCs are applied in electrocatalysis, which offers new insights and methods for solving energy and environmental problems.

2. Controllable synthesis methods

2.1. Bottom-up method

On the nanometer scale, small units such as atoms, molecules, and nanoparticles are self-assembled through weak or strong interactions to form relatively large and complex structural systems, which is called the bottom-up method. The Brust–Schiffrin method is a typical bottom-up method, which was derived from the synthesis of thiol-protected Au NCs by Brust and co-workers in 1994.18 Subsequently, the development of Au NC synthesis is rapid; many researchers have employed this method and carried out various modifications on the Brust–Schiffrin methods. It has become the most typical method to synthesise atomically precise Au NCs.

There are two kinds of systems for the Brust–Schiffrin method, the two-phase system and the one-phase system.13 Among them, the two-phase system is the most widely used. There are two steps in the two-phase system. In step 1, both the Au(iii) precursor and the reducing agent like NaBH4 are transferred from the aqueous to the organic phase, and then in step 2, the Au(iii) precursor is reduced by the reducing agent and combined with protecting ligands to obtain Au NCs (Fig. 3).13,27 In the one-phase system, the Au(iii) precursor and the reducing agent are in a polar solvent. Brust et al. first synthesised Au NCs by a one-phase method; thereafter atomically precise Au NCs were synthesised in a one-phase system.28 Das et al. synthesised [Au23(c-C6)16]− following the one-phase method. The synthesis involved the sodium borohydride (NaBH4) reduction of gold salt, using cyclohexanethiol as the ligand and methanol as the solvent.29

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the two-phase synthesis of Au NCs. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

After the Brust–Schiffrin method was established, more researchers came up with many modified versions to synthesise atomically precise Au NCs. Toikkanen et al. reported monolayer-protected Au38(SR)24 nanoclusters. Due to the optimization of the Brust–Schiffrin two-phase synthesis method, Au38(SR)24 was fully passivated by the thiol ligands. Based on its stability in the overmuch thiol monolayer, thiol-protected Au38 is obtained by controlling the synthesis temperature, and the reduction time resulted in a higher proportion of Au38(SR)24 with a uniform core diameter.30 Dou et al. studied the roles of TOAB (TOAB = tetraoctylammonium bromide) in the two-phase Brust–Schiffrin methods, and then they varied the amount of TOAB to control the size of atomically precise Au NCs at the atomic level, such as Au18(PhSe)14, Au25(PhSe)18, Au23(PhSe)16, and Au31(PhSe)20.27 Furthermore, Yang and Chen successfully synthesised Au11Cl3(PPh3)7 after slight modification of the Brust–Schiffrin method;31 these nanoclusters exhibit excellent semiconductor electronic properties, and they also observed photoluminescence in the visible range.

2.2. Size-focusing methodology

Controlling the size of nanoclusters with atomic precision has been a significant challenge in molecular chemistry. With the development of research in this field, recent studies have increased the probability of preparing atomically precise Au nanoparticles. The size-focusing method is a precise method to design a series of atomic nanoclusters that span the size regimes (Fig. 4),32 which control the size by adjusting reaction conditions. Interestingly, it is based on “survival of the fittest”.32,33 In addition, Jin et al. summarised two critical points about the size-focusing method: one is utilizing the different stabilities of various sized Aun(SR)m, and another is having an appropriate size distribution of the Aun(SR)m mixture for size-focusing.32

Fig. 4. Scale of the size-focusing methodology. Reproduced with permission.32 Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Even today, there are many kinds of research studies for atomically precise Au NCs synthesised with different atomic numbers. For instance, Das et al. reported a cyclohexanethiolate-capped [Au23(SR)16]− nanocluster, and they prepared pure [Au23(c-C6)16]− nanoclusters via the size-focusing method.29 Qian et al. synthesised a [Au25(PPh3)10(SC2H4Ph)5Cl2]2+ nanocluster by size-focusing conversion; in the presence of phenylethanethiol, polydisperse gold nanoparticles capped by phosphine, and then monodisperse [Au25(PPh3)10(SC2H4Ph)5Cl2]2+ nanoclusters were obtained.34 In this work, they identified the crystal structure of [Au25(PPh3)10(SC2H4Ph)5Cl2]2+ nanoclusters and an important side-product [Au2(PR3)2(SC2H4Ph)]+ formed in the size focusing process, the transformation process is more explicit. Liu et al. utilized theoretical prediction to synthesise Au36(SR)24 nanoclusters;35 two isomers Au36(DMBT)24-1D and Au36(DMBT)24-2D in Au36(SR)24 were synthesised using a two-step size-focusing method, and DMBT was selected as the protecting ligand. In addition, other atomically precise Au NCs such as Au38,36 Au64,37 and Au99 (ref. 38) can also be synthesised by the size-focusing method. It can also be applied in Au–M alloy nanoclusters. For example, Qian et al. produced the mixture of Pt1Au24(SC2H4Ph)18 and Au25(SC2H4Ph)18via a size-focusing process first,39 and Pt1Au24(SC2H4Ph)18 was obtained by further separation and purification (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Procedure for Pt1Au24(SR)18 synthesis. Reproduced with permission.39 Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

2.3. Reduction method

The reduction method is a general method to obtain target products. In the synthesis of atomically precise Au NCs, common reducing agents are carbon monoxide (CO), NaBH4, ascorbic acid, etc.

CO is a great reducing agent for Au NC synthesis, and it can produce a gentle reduction environment for the Au ions.40 Xie and co-workers first utilized CO as a gaseous reducing agent to reduce Au ions in 2012. They followed the growth process of Au25(SR)18 and found that CO provided a milder reduction environment as compared to NaBH4.40 In addition, they used CO to control the reduction, and presented a one-pot synthesis method to produce various discrete-size Au NCs with different thiol ligands such as Au10–12, Au15, Au18, and Au25.7 In that work, Au3+ and glutathione were mixed to obtain Au(i)–SG complexes, then NaOH was added to adjust pH, and CO was then bubbled to transform Au(i) into Au(0). It was found that different pH results in a different number of gold atoms in the product (Fig. 6). In 2014, Xie and co-workers explained the growth mechanism in a CO gaseous reduction environment.41 It followed a two-stage, bottom-up formation and growth process. The first stage is kinetically controlled growth with CO, and the second stage is thermodynamically held size-focusing growth. Xie's group did much related work for the synthesis of atomically precise Au NCs by CO reduction. For instance, they reported a reversible process for the transformation between [Au25SR18]− and [Au25SR19]0, using oxidative etching and CO reduction.42 In addition, Hwang et al. also generated Au25 with different ligands by CO reduction.43 It implies that this method has a wide range of applications, producing nanoclusters with different numbers of gold atoms and different ligands. Alloy nanoclusters also can be generated by CO reduction. Xie and co-workers reported the synthesis of thiolate-protected (AuAg)18 nanoclusters by adopting the CO-reduction method;44 these AuAg nanoclusters show great optical and electrical properties.

Fig. 6. Size-controlled synthesis of aqueous nanoclusters through pH control. Reproduced with permission.7 Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Since Brust et al. synthesised the first Au nanoparticles,18 NaBH4 is considered the classic reductant. It was adopted by most researchers in the later synthesis of atomically precise Au NCs. For example, [Au25(SNap)18]−[TOA]+ (SNap = 1-naphthalenethiolate and TOA = tetraoctylammonium), was synthesised by Jin et al.,45 and is an aromatic-thiolate-protected Au NC. In this reaction, after NaBH4 was added to the solution, the solution turned dark, which showed that Au(i) had reduced to Au(0). In addition, Jin's group also synthesised different sized Au NCs selectively by a controlled reduction method,46 where the reduction agent used was NaBH4. They have identified that NaBH4 plays a vital role in the size control of the nanocluster. Through tuning the speed of NaBH4 addition during the step of Au(i) reduction to nanoclusters, different size Au NCs such as Au20(SC2H4Ph)16, Au24(SC2H4Ph)20, Au39(SC2H4Ph)29, and Au40(SC2H4Ph)30 could be synthesised. Therefore, NaBH4 can participate in the synthesis of nanoclusters with different precise Au atoms, such as Au8,47 Au10,48 Au13,49 Au18,50 Au25,51 Au44(PhC Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C)28,52 and Au8Ag3.53

Other reducing agents also can be applied to synthesise atomically precise Au NCs. For example, ascorbic acid is a mild biological reductant,54 Martinez's group demonstrated the synthesis of Au13 and Au17 by using ascorbic acid as a reducing agent. They prepared Au NCs by using poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers as templates, and produced Au NCs which are stable in a pH range of 6–8. Koyakutty et al. reported fluorescent Au25 nanoclusters synthesised by a controlled reduction process.55 They used ascorbic acid to reduce Au+ and stabilised nanoclusters by utilizing bovine serum albumin (BSA). Besides ascorbic acid, histidine is another green reducing agent; Chen et al. synthesised Au10 nanoclusters, which are water-soluble and monodispersed;56 in this reaction, histidine was used both as a reducing agent and a protecting ligand. They found that the product Au10 nanoclusters had excellent biocompatibility, which had the potential to be applied as future biosensors. Moreover, Me3NBH3 (ref. 57) and meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid58 also exhibited mild reducing ability, and they were also used to synthesise atomically precise Au NCs.

2.4. Inducement method

The inducement method is a method to synthesise nanoclusters by condition control. The conditions include but not limited to metal addition and heating. The specific methods are described below.

The method of ligand-exchange reactions from metal nanoclusters is one of the inducement methods. It involves introducing new ligands onto original nanoclusters to obtain another new nanocluster,59 where new properties and functions can be obtained, such as optical properties.60,61 Negishi et al. reported the first comparison between two Au25 nanoclusters with different ligands in 2011.62 They found that [Au25(SeC8H17)18]− and [Au25(SC8H17)18]− have similar geometric structures, but different properties. In recent years, there have already been many studies on the ligand exchange reactions of Au NCs. They not only research the exchange sites deeply,59 but also propose a clear associative mechanism.63 The method of ligand-exchange reactions from metal nanoclusters has become a relatively mature method.

Ligand-exchange reactions can control the size of nanoclusters which are difficult to synthesise. In ligand–exchange reactions, there are three kinds of reactions.65 In the first kind of reaction, the nanoclusters' size decreased. Song et al. reported the size transformation from [Au25(SePh)18]− to [Au23(SePh)16]− by a ligand-exchange reaction, where NaBH4 removed two units of “Au-SePh”.64 [Au23(SePh)16]− also can be transformed into [Au25(PET)18]− nanoclusters (PET = SCH2CH2Ph) with excess PET (Fig. 7). In the second kind of reaction, the nanoclusters' size increased. Wang et al. reported the transformation of [Au25(SR)18]0 into Au28(SR)21 with a chiral ligand (S-2-phenylpropane-1-thiol).64 In the third kind of reaction, there are ligands exchanged without size change. For instance, Thomas W. Ni et al. presented Au25(PET)16(pBBT)2 (pBBT = p-bromobenzenethiol) from the ligand exchange reaction of Au25(PET)18 with pBBT.63 Stefan Knoppe et al. reported the ligand exchange reaction for Au38(2-PET)24 and Au40(2-PET)24 (2-PET = 2-phenylethanethiol) nanoclusters; the ligand exchange reaction occurred between Au38(2-PET)24/Au40(2-PET)24 and enantiopure BINAS (BINAS = 1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-dithiol), and new nanoclusters were obtained.66 In addition, this method is also applicable to synthesise alloy Au NCs with precise atoms. Niihori et al. changed phenylethanethiolate-protected Au25 nanoclusters into alloy nanoclusters by incorporating Ag or Cu.67 Using octanethiol (C8H17SH) as the exchange ligand, they synthesised Au25−xMx(SC2H4Ph)18 (M = Au, Ag, Cu, or Pd).

Fig. 7. Conversion from [Au25(SePh)18]− to [Au23(SePh)16]−, and the asprepared [Au23(SePh)16]− nanoclusters converted into [Au25(PET)18]− and [Au25(PET)18−x(SePh)x]− with excess PET under different conditions. Reproduced with permission.64 Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Precursor- or ligand-induced etching of metal nanoparticles is another inducement method. Since the formation process of nanoclusters is dynamically balanced, it is crucial to control the growth and etching process of nanocluster formation. It is a good method to prepare atomically precise Au NCs with well-controlled properties of nanoparticles by precursor- or ligand-induced etching of metal nanoparticles.13,51

There are two kinds of methods to etch metal nanoparticles, one is the precursor-induced etching of metal nanoparticles; for example, Zhou et al. reported an etching strategy for synthesising Au8 nanoclusters where the precursors are gold nanoparticles,68 and the etching process was performed by employing amino acids and peptides as etching agents. Au8 was characterised by photoluminescence, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, etc.; Au8 also shows vast potential in biological imaging and sensors.

Another method is the ligand-induced etching of metal nanoparticles. Atomically precise Au NCs can be synthesised using the etching capacity of some ligands. Due to the stabilization of nanoclusters in solution, surface atoms of the metallic nanoparticles will be removed to form more stable nanoclusters.69 For instance, Xie's group reported a strategy to synthesise Au25 nanoclusters using a NaBH4 reduction method.51 Au25 NCs formed by decreasing the reduction ability of NaBH4 and increasing the etching ability of free thiolate ligands to balance the reversible reaction (Fig. 8). Duan et al. reported a ligand-induced etching process to prepare water-soluble metal nanoclusters Au8.70 They used multivalent coordinating polymers like polyethylenimine to etch preformed colloidal gold nanocrystals, and then atomically precise Au NCs were obtained by reducing agents such as NaBH4. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) data indicated that the nanocluster is Au8. Chen et al. reported the ligand-induced etching process to transform gold nanoparticles into organic-soluble Au8,71 which is different from Duan's method. This illustrates the wide applicability of the ligand-etching method. In addition, Bain et al. utilised a core-etching process to synthesise luminescent Au NCs,72 Au6 and Au8, from Au nanoparticles with excess glutathione ligand. The mixture of Au6(SG)4, Au8(SG)4, Au6(SG)2, and Au8(SG)2 nanoclusters was shown by mass spectrometric analysis and gel electrophoresis.

Fig. 8. NaOH-mediated NaBH4 reduction method for the synthesis of Au25 NCs. Reproduced with permission.51 Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

An electrochemical reaction occurs when the potential difference between two metals exists; at the same time, the anode with a high potential is oxidized, which is known as the galvanic reaction (GR). However, Wu's group discovered a phenomenon in 2012 which suggests that metal ions can be reduced by less reactive metals.73 It is clear from the electrochemical potential that the activity of gold is less than that of silver, but they found that Ag ions were reduced by Au25(SC2H4Ph)18, and the silver atoms replaced several gold atoms in Au25. This is contrary to electrochemical theory. Therefore they named this reaction anti-galvanic reduction (AGR). AGR, which is the opposite of GR,73 is a general method to prepare alloyed nanoclusters, and it can be used to tune nanoclusters' compositions, structures, and properties.74

Ever since Wu and co-workers discovered this reaction, plenty of alloyed nanoclusters have been prepared by using this method. According to the type of alloyed atomically precise nanocluster, they divided the methods into three modes;74 the first one is introducing heteroatoms on existing atomically precise Au NCs. For example, Au25Ag2(SC2H4Ph)18 is synthesised by adding two silver atoms on the precursor nanoclusters Au25(SC2H4Ph)18.75 The second one is replacing gold atoms of the precursor nanoclusters with heteroatoms, while maintaining the same number of total atoms. Wu's group revealed that Au24 Cd and Au24Hg were also produced successfully via AGR with metal thiolate complexes of Cd(ii) and Hg(ii) (Fig. 9).76 The third one is introducing heteroatoms which change the number of metal atoms and the structure of nanoclusters to form new precise Au NCs. Wu's group presented a two-phase AGR method to tailor different kinds of Au NCs. For instance, they doped Cd into Au44(TBBT)28 to produce Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 nanoclusters;77 Au25(SCH2CH2Ph)18 can be transformed into [Au13Cd2(PPh3)6(SC2H4Ph)6(NO3)2]2Cd(NO3)4.78 In addition, Zhu's group reported that Cd1Au24(SR)18 and Hg1Au24(SR)18 can be obtained with complexes of CdII and HgII by a metal exchange method.79

Fig. 9. Synthesis of Au24Cd1 and Au24Hg1 nanoclusters by the AGR method. Reproduced with permission.76 Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

The seed-mediated growth method always occurs in nanoparticle synthesis, but is challenging to apply in nanocluster synthesis. Researchers extended precise reaction routes to synthesise atomically precise nanoclusters in nanochemistry with extensive research in the precise nanoclusters field. In 2006, Tsukuda et al. synthesised a series of Au NCs ranging from 1.3 to 10 nm by seed-mediated growth. Seed nanoclusters were produced by reducing AuCl− with NaBH4 in poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP),80 and then a series of size-selective Au NCs are prepared by reducing AuCl− with Na2SO3 in the presence of the seed nanocluster solution. Xie's group prepared Au44 from pure Au25 nanoclusters by the seed-mediated growth method (Fig. 10) and proposed its mechanism. They came up with a mechanism containing three steps.81 Firstly, the seed nanocluster Au25 accumulates according to kinetics, where Au25 was synthesised by the CO reduction method. Secondly, the size of Au25 increased, and thirdly, Au44 is obtained by the size-focusing method, which is thermodynamically controlled. Comparing Fig. 10b, d and Fig. 10c, e, in which the characteristic peaks corresponding to Au25 and Au44 are observed, indicated that Au44 was produced. Similarly, they also synthesised Au38(SR)24 based on the mechanism of the seed-mediated growth method. The above results suggest that the seed-mediated growth method for nanocluster synthesis overcame the bottleneck in precisely customizing structural attributes.

Fig. 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the size growth reaction from [Au25(SR)18]− to [Au44(SR)26]2− (yellow, Au; purple, S). (b and c) Ultraviolet-visible absorption and (d and e) electrospray ionization mass spectrometry spectra of (b and d) [Au25(SR)18]− and (c and e) [Au44(SR)26]2−. Reproduced with permission.81 Copyright 2017 Nature Publishing group.

Fig. 10

Open in a new tab

The thermal transformation method is always applied to produce nanoclusters with high thermal stability. Jin's group indicated that pure Au38(SC2H4Ph)24 nanoclusters can be separated from a distribution of Au NCs, by thermal thiol etching for ∼30 h.82 First they obtained a mix of Au25(SC2H4Ph)18 and Au38(SC2H4Ph)24via the size-focusing method from the crude product, and then the crude product was isolated. Au25(SC2H4Ph)18 nanoclusters were produced after aging at room temperature. However, Au38(SC2H4Ph)24 nanoclusters were obtained by another approach, where the crude product was further subjected to thermal thiol etching in a toluene solution.

Pure Au38(SC2H4Ph)24 nanoclusters could be obtained. It is indicated that these two kinds of nanoclusters can be synthesised in different environments. On this basis, Jin et al. synthesised Au38(SR)24 with different ligands via the thermal transformation method.36 In this work, a crude mixture containing glutathionate-capped Aun(SG)m nanoclusters was subjected to the thermal thiol exchange process, which led to the exchange of SG to SC12H25 in a two-phase system. Finally, the polydisperse nanoclusters converted to Au38(SC12H25)24 nanoclusters with high purity.

In addition, other different atomically precise Au NCs can also be produced by the thermal transformation method. For example, Jin's group found that Au38(SCH2CH2Ph)24 can also be transformed into Au36(SPh-tBu)24 by reacting with HSPh-tBu at 80 °C.83 They also synthesised Au28(TBBT)20 nanoclusters, [Au25(PET)18]−TOA+ by reacting with excess TBBT thiolate at 80 °C.21 After several hours, the Au25(PET)18 nanoclusters were converted to Au28(TBBT)20 in high yield with almost no by-products.

2.5. Template-based synthesis methods

The template-based synthesis method is an essential method for the synthesis of nanomaterials and is also the most widely used method in nanomaterial research, especially for the preparation of nanomaterials with specific properties. With a precise number of atoms and overall molecular composition, atomically precise Au NCs have unique atomic packing. They have particular structure patterns so that the nanoclusters exhibit different properties, such as catalytic activity.84 Thus, template-based synthesis methods can design the atomically precise Au NCs according to the performance requirements.

Until now, many macromolecules such as dendrimers, peptides, and proteins have been chosen as templates. According to different properties and applications, the atomically precise Au NCs are synthesised in unique ways.13 Tsukamoto et al. worked on a series of new atomically precise nanoclusters composed of five elements (Ga1In1Au3Bi2Sn6),85 which adopted the template-based synthesis method. The phenylazomethine dendrimer is used as a macromolecular template, and the size and composition of the alloyed nanoclusters can be precisely controlled by controlling the metal precursor complexes. Lv et al. first reported self-assembling tripeptides as reducing soft templates to synthesise atomically precise Au NCs, and the resulting fluorescent Au NCs on the soft template were applied to bio-imaging.86 Three tripeptides are self-assembled to form soft templates with different morphologies using cryogenic treatment. The size of Au NCs is determined by the distribution of the –SH sites on the template. Landman's group utilised proteins to obtain Au25+, Au38+ and Au102+.84 These atomically precise Au NCs can be electronically stabilised in the protein, forming electronic closed-shell structures, which enhanced the stability of the Au NCs. Generally speaking, template-based synthesis methods allow different templates to be easily combined with Au NCs at the sub-nanometre scale to create new materials for actual needs.

3. Electrocatalytic applications

With “carbon-neutral” trends on the rise, hydrogen energy will occupy an important position in the future due to its renewable and efficient characteristics. Fuel cells convert chemical energy of fuels into electrical energy. Advantages of fuel cells include unlimited sources of reactants and no environmental pollution. Due to the rapid depletion of fossil fuel consumption, fuel cell technology has become an alternative technology for efficient energy conversion and storage.87,88 At present, electrocatalytic applications of atomically precise Au NCs include but are not limited to the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR), and nitrogen reduction reaction (N2RR).

3.1. ORR

The ORR is a four- or two-electron reaction, at the cathode of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, where oxygen is reduced by the reaction with protons and electrons to produce water (1/2O2 + 2H+ + 2e− → H2O).87,89 In general, platinum-based catalysts are chosen to achieve excellent fuel cell performance; however, Pt is expensive.87 Recently, research has showed that Au NCs could also exhibit good performance in the ORR. For example, Chen et al. used Au25, Au38, and Au144 nanoclusters to prepare porous carbon-supported gold nanoparticles.88 They found that the nanoparticles prepared with Au25 nanoclusters exhibited the best activity, with the positive onset potential at +0.95 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and electron transfer at potentials from +0.50 to +0.80 V is high. In addition, they also prepared porous carbon nanosheets based on p-mercaptobenzoic acid-functionalized Au NCs, Au102(p-MBA)44,90 and used this catalyst to test the performance of the ORR. 30% Au mass loading was found to be optimal, as manifested by the onset potential at +0.96 V and diffusion-limited currents (at +0.55 V) reached 4.20 mA cm−2 for Au CNs-30% (Fig. 11). The performance of both catalysts were comparable to that of commercial Pt/C. Chakraborty's group also investigated the ORR of Au28, Au36, Au133, and Au279.91 They found that Au36(SCH2CH2Ph)24 is the most active molecule for the ORR, as shown by the over-potential of 160 mV and quantitatively yielding the 4e− reduced product OH−. These above results demonstrated that the materials based on precise atomically Au NCs can be high-efficiency ORR catalysts.

Fig. 11. RRDE voltammogram measurements of AuCNS-10%, AuCNS-20%, AuCNS-30%, and AuCNS-40%, in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at 2500 rpm. Reproduced with permission.90 Copyright 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 11

Open in a new tab

3.2. OER

Nowadays, research on electrochemical catalysts for the OER with good stability, efficiency and low cost is a top concern in industry.92 At present, noble metals such as ruthenium (Ru), iridium (Ir), and platinum (Pt) are the most common OER catalysts.93 What is exciting is that Au NCs with particular atoms also possess excellent properties. Negishi's group found that [Au24Pd(PET)18]0 can act as a OER catalyst with high potential. These findings provide guidelines to design Aun(L)m nanoclusters as highly active OER catalysts.94

Su et al. proposed to load Au13 in Ni120P50 for the OER test.95 The results of the OER test were compared with that of Au nanoparticles which were loaded on Ni12P5. It is found that the OER performance of Au13@Ni120P50 is better than that of Ni12P5 (001) supported by Au. The kinetic energy barrier of Au13@Ni120P50 is 2.18 eV, which is lower than the 3.168 eV of Ni12P5 (001) supported by bulk Au. The lower thermodynamic overpotential and kinetic energy barrier confer Au13@Ni120P50 a significant position as an OER electrocatalyst. Jin's group constructed Aun/CoSe2 composites for electrocatalytic water oxidation,96 where Aun represents Au25(SR)18, Au144(SR)60, and Au333(SR)79 nanoclusters (where R = –CH2CH2Ph); they found that the OER activity and durability of the Aun/CoSe2 composites in the alkaline electrolyte are high, and the overpotential of Au25/CoSe2 was found to be 0.43 V at 10 mA cm−2 which is better than that of CoSe2 (0.52 V). The results exhibited that Au NCs can be utilised to improve the catalytic performance for the OER. In summary, atomically precise Au NCs can be used to develop highly efficient nanocatalysis for the OER.97

3.3. HER

The HER is an ideal pathway to produce hydrogen. It has the advantages of abundant raw materials and no pollution to the environment. So far, researchers have reported a number of HER catalysts with excellent performance, even some performance exceeding that of commercially available Pt/C catalysts.98–100

However, there is much to be explained about the interaction between hydrogen and metals for these catalysts. Atomically precise Au NCs provide an ideal template for the mechanism of the HER reaction. Jiang et al. studied the interaction of hydrogen with [Au25(SR)18]q and single atom doped bimetallic [MAu24(SR)18]q (M = Pt, Pd, Ag, Cu, Hg or Cd).101 They found that hydrogen behaves like a metal in nanoclusters and contributes its 1s electrons to the number of superatomic free electrons. Doping other metals can increase the HER performance. For instance, Lee's group doped Pt and Pd atoms into stable Au NCs to control the catalysts' electronic structure and catalytic activity.102,103 The results showed that the doped Au NCs have a higher catalytic current and TOF, which decreases in the order of PtAu24 > PdAu24 > Au25. The same trend was also observed in Au38 nanoclusters (Pt2Au36 > Pd2Au36 > Au38). DFT calculations revealed that the metal doping significantly decreases the hydrogen adsorption free energy (ΔGH), which indicates the critical role of dopants.

In addition, to improve the performance of the catalysts, Au NCs with precise atoms can also be combined with other materials. For example, Jin's team built a new nanocomposite Au25/MoS2.104 Compared to MoS2 nanosheets, Au25/MoS2 has enhanced HER activity, as revealed by a smaller onset potential of 0.20 V (vs. RHE) and a higher current density of 59.3 mA cm−2 at a potential of 0.4 V. Zhu's group modified MoS2 with Au2Pd6 nanoclusters.105 Significantly enhanced HER activity was also observed with a 91 mV positive shift of the onset potential and 31% decrease of the Tafel slope. According to the above analysis, we find that Au NCs are not only used as HER catalysts but also, more importantly, as an ideal template due their well-defined structure and precise composition for researching the relationship between the structure and activity.

3.4. CO2RR

The increase in CO2 emission has led to the worsening of environmental pollution. The CO2RR, as a route of electrocatalysis, can reduce CO2 emissions by converting CO2 to other valuable chemicals and fuels.107 It has been reported that Au-based materials show high selectivity towards CO formation because the *CO intermediates on gold are relatively weak.108 Hence, atomically precise Au NCs have been studied extensively on the CO2RR and show excellent performance.

Jin's group studied the interaction between CO2 and Au25,109 and revealed a reversible Au25–CO2 interaction through spectroscopic and electrochemical methods. Au25 was found to have promoted the conversion of CO2 to CO within 90 mV of the formal potential, which showed that Au25 is superior to Au nanoparticles and bulk Au by 200–300 mV. Zhu et al. reported the CO2RR of three Aun nanoclusters, Au9, Au11, and Au36.110 After subjecting the three nanoclusters to the CO2RR, different target products were produced. Methane was produced with Au9, ethanol with Au11, and formic acid with Au36. As the selectivity of these products exceeded 80%, it showed that there are three kinds of reaction pathways for atomically Au NCs of different sizes. The results revealed that the catalytic performances of Au9, Au11, and Au36 are atomically dependent. Therefore they can selectively choose the reaction pathways towards C1 or C2 products. In addition, Lee et al. discovered that Au25, Au38, and Au144 nanoclusters exhibited size-dependent activities for the CO2RR,111 and the selectivity for CO production exceeded 90%. They revealed that dethiolated Au sites are the active sites, and CO2RR activity was determined by the number of active sites on the surface of the nanoclusters. This finding provides insights into the electrocatalysis field, and atomically accurate nanoclusters will become a powerful model for developing properly designed catalysts for the CO2RR.

Similarly, alloy nanoclusters also play an essential role in the CO2RR. For instance, Wu's group prepared Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 (TBBT = 4-tert-butylbenzenethiolate) nanoclusters by tailoring Au44(TBBT)28 precisely,106 before testing and comparing the CO2RR performance. The onset potential of Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 is much lower than those of the Au44(TBBT)28 and Au NPs. The Faradaic efficiencies of Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 increased to 96% at −0.57 V for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO (Fig. 12a and b), and the results showed that the partial current density of CO for Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 is more negative than that of the Au44(TBBT)28 nanocluster and the Au NPs (Fig. 12c and d) showed that the electrocatalytic durability of Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 is superior to that of other materials. Most importantly, the results confirm that the CO2RR ability of Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 is superior. Cd doped Au NCs show good performance, and other metals such as Ag,112 Pd,113 and Pt114 doped Au NCs also show great performances on the CO2RR.

Fig. 12. (a) LSV curves of Au47Cd2(TBBT)31, Au44(TBBT)28 and the ca.1.5 nm Au NPs in an Ar-saturated (dotted line) and a CO2-saturated (full line) 0.5 m KHCO3 solution; inset: enlarged LSV curves from @0.1 V to @0.6 V. (b) CO faradaic efficiency for the catalysts examined with different applied potentials. (c) The corresponding CO partial current density. (d) The stability test conducted at @0.57 V for Au47Cd2(TBBT)31 and Au44 and at @0.67 V for the Au NPs. Reproduced with permission.106 Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH.

Fig. 12

Open in a new tab

3.5. N2RR

Ammonia (NH3) plays a vital role in industry and agriculture. However, the traditional industrial Haber–Bosch process is still the main way to synthesis NH3, which releases many greenhouse gases and consumes a large amount of energy.115 The N2RR is believed to be a better process to produce NH3. It has great advantages such as mild reaction conditions, low facility demand and environmental friendliness.116 In recent years, Au NCs and modified Au NCs showed excellent performance on the N2RR.

Ding's group prepared a Au25–Cys–M catalyst containing transition metal ions such as Mo6+, Fe3+, Co2+, and Ni2+ decorated on Au25 nanoclusters via thiol bridging.117 The catalyst was applied for the N2RR, and it was found that it exhibited the highest faradaic efficiency (26.5%) and NH3 yield (34.5 μg h−1 mgcat−1) in 0.1 M HCl solution. The results revealed that the Au25–Cys–Mo catalyst could efficiently reduce N2 to NH3, and the synthesis provides new insight into precise fabrication of efficient N2RR electrocatalysts. Jiang et al. embedded Au NCs on TiO2,118 and showed that N2RR performance is much higher than the current best performance for N2 fixation. The new catalyst had high and stable production yield (NH3: 21.4μg h−1 mgcat−1, faradaic efficiency: 8.11%) and good selectivity is achieved at 0.2 V versus RHE (Fig. 13). In addition, Lu's group reported a strategy to synthesise atomically precise alloy nanoclusters,119 where Au4Pt2 nanoclusters were supported on defective graphene with high activity for the N2RR. Studies have shown that the active site for N2 fixation is interfacial between the substrate and Au4Pt2(SR)6 nanoclusters. In conclusion, these results provide valuable insight into the catalysis of the N2RR, and the promising electrochemical performance of Au NCs lead to good prospects for the N2RR.

Fig. 13. (a) Yield rate of NH3 at a potential of −0.2 V versus RHE; (b) yield of NH3 (olive) and faradaic efficiency (red) against the catalytic temperature under atmospheric pressure at −0.2 V versus RHE; (c) yield of NH3 (olive) and faradaic efficiency (red) against the catalytic temperature under a N2 flow rate at −0.2 V versus RHE; error bars in (b) and (c) represent the standard deviations of three independent measurements of the same sample; (d) proposed pathway for the NH3 synthesis using the Au/TiO2. catalyst. Reproduced with permission.118 Copyright 2017 WILEY-VCH.

Fig. 13

Open in a new tab

4. Outlook and conclusions

In summary, atomically precise Au NCs have been studied extensively for their particular properties. They can be synthesised in various ways and applied in different electrochemical catalytic reactions to alleviate environmental and energy problems. However, more research work remains to be pursued in this field. Research and innovative synthesis methods continue to be explored for the precise number of atoms in Au NCs. For example, atomically precise Au NCs also can be produced by thermal transition and acid corrosion, which open up the potential for new electrocatalytic applications such as nitrate reduction, the sulfur dioxide oxidation reaction (SO2OR), urea oxidation, and other oxidation reactions,120 which will exert a profound effect on chemical and energy issues.

Due to the complexity and diversity of the electrochemical reactions, the electrocatalytic fundamentals based on Au NCs are worth unravelling. Understanding the adsorption, desorption, activation, and deactivation behaviours in the catalytic process of Au NCs will better clarify the catalytic mechanisms. In addition, the origin of the catalytically active sites is still required. The correlation between the size/composition and performance at the atomic level and the catalytic kinetic and dynamic mechanisms are still the research foci.

Finally, in situ characterization studies such as ESI-MS, HAADF-STEM, X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can monitor the dynamics of gold nanoclusters in real time. They can promote the understanding of the electrocatalytic reaction process of gold nanoclusters. A further study on the electrocatalytic mechanism of gold nanoclusters will make a big contribution to the development of precise atomically gold nanoclusters.

Author contributions

Q. Zhu conducted and wrote the paper. X. Huang, Y. Zeng, K. Sun, L. Zhou, Y. Liu and L. Luo finished parts of writing of the paper. S. Tian and X. Sun conceived and designed the paper. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22101015), the National Key Research and Development Project (grant no. 2018YFB1502401 and 2018YFA0702002), the Long-Term Subsidy Mechanism from the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education of China, the Newton Advanced Fellowship award (NAF\R1\191294), and the Fundamental Research Funds of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (buctrc202107).

Notes and references

  1. Chai O. J. H. Liu Z. Chen T. Xie J. Nanoscale. 2019;11:20437–20448. doi: 10.1039/C9NR07272A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jin R. Nanoscale. 2015;7:1549–1565. doi: 10.1039/C4NR05794E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jin R. Nanoscale. 2010;2:343–362. doi: 10.1039/B9NR00160C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sudheeshkumar V. Sulaiman K. O. Scott R. W. J. Nanoscale Adv. 2020;2:55–69. doi: 10.1039/C9NA00549H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang S. Yu H. Zhu M. Sci. China: Chem. 2015;59:206–208. doi: 10.1007/s11426-015-5484-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jin R. Zeng C. Zhou M. Chen Y. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:10346–10413. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu Y. Chen X. Yao Q. Yu Y. Yan N. Xie J. Chem. Mater. 2013;25:946–952. doi: 10.1021/cm304098x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pyo K. Thanthirige V. D. Yoon S. Y. Ramakrishna G. Lee D. Nanoscale. 2016;8:20008–20016. doi: 10.1039/C6NR07660B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Y. Burgi T. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3:2710–2727. doi: 10.1039/D1NA00178G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levi-Kalisman Y. Jadzinsky P. D. Kalisman N. Tsunoyama H. Tsukuda T. Bushnell D. A. Kornberg R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2976–2982. doi: 10.1021/ja109131w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lei Z. Guan Z. J. Pei X. L. Yuan S. F. Wan X. K. Zhang J. Y. Wang Q. M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2016;22:11156–11160. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng G. Malola S. Yan J. Han Y. Yuan P. Zhao C. Yuan X. Lin S. Tang Z. Teo B. K. Hakkinen H. Zheng N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:3421–3425. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu Y. Chen W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:3594–3623. doi: 10.1039/C2CS15325D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang B. Wu H. Zhao L. Chem. Commun. 2021;57:5770–5773. doi: 10.1039/D1CC01162F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shen H. Xiang S. Xu Z. Liu C. Li X. Sun C. Lin S. Teo B. K. Zheng N. Nano Res. 2020;13:1908–1911. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2685-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Antonello S. Perera N. V. Ruzzi M. Gascon J. A. Maran F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:15585–15594. doi: 10.1021/ja407887d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar B. Kawawaki T. Shimizu N. Imai Y. Suzuki D. Hossain S. Nair L. V. Negishi Y. Nanoscale. 2020;12:9969–9979. doi: 10.1039/D0NR00702A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brust M. Walker M. Bethell D. Schiffrin D. J. Whyman R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994:801–802. doi: 10.1039/C39940000801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tian S. Liao L. Yuan J. Yao C. Chen J. Yang J. Wu Z. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:9873–9876. doi: 10.1039/C6CC02698B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. He X. Gao C. Y. Wang M. X. Zhao L. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:10877–10879. doi: 10.1039/C2CC36250C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeng C. Li T. Das A. Rosi N. L. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10011–10013. doi: 10.1021/ja404058q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tian S. Yao C. Liao L. Xia N. Wu Z. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:11773–11776. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03267A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawawaki T. Negishi Y. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:238. doi: 10.3390/nano10020238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li C. Chai O. J. H. Yao Q. Liu Z. Wang L. Wang H. Xie J. Mater. Horiz. 2021;8:1657–1682. doi: 10.1039/D0MH01947J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu L. Corma A. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:4981–5079. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang X. Li Y. Zhu M. Jin R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49:6443–6514. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00633H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dou X. Wang X. Qian S. Liu N. Yuan X. Nanoscale. 2020;12:19855–19860. doi: 10.1039/D0NR04439C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Brust M. Fink J. Bethell D. Schiffrin D. J. Kiely C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995:1655–1656. doi: 10.1039/C39950001655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Das A. Li T. Nobusada K. Zeng C. Rosi N. L. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:18264–18267. doi: 10.1021/ja409177s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toikkanen O. Ruiz V. Rönnholm G. Kalkkinen N. Liljeroth P. Quinn B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:11049–11055. doi: 10.1021/ja802317t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang Y. Chen S. Nano Lett. 2003;3:75–79. doi: 10.1021/nl025809j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jin R. Qian H. Wu Z. Zhu Y. Zhu M. Mohanty A. Garg N. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010;1:2903–2910. doi: 10.1021/jz100944k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu D. Du W. Chen S. Kang X. Chen A. Zhen Y. Jin S. Hu D. Wang S. Zhu M. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:778. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21131-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Qian H. Eckenhoff W. T. Bier M. E. Pintauer T. Jin R. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50:10735–10739. doi: 10.1021/ic2012292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu X. Xu W. W. Huang X. Wang E. Cai X. Zhao Y. Li J. Xiao M. Zhang C. Gao Y. Ding W. Zhu Y. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17132-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Qian H. Zhu Y. Jin R. ACS Nano. 2009;3:3795–3803. doi: 10.1021/nn901137h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zeng C. Chen Y. Li G. Jin R. Chem. Mater. 2014;26:2635–2641. doi: 10.1021/cm500139t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu C. Lin J. Shi Y. Li G. Nanoscale. 2015;7:5987–5990. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00543D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Qian H. Jiang D. E. Li G. Gayathri C. Das A. Gil R. R. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:16159–16162. doi: 10.1021/ja307657a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yu Y. Luo Z. Yu Y. Lee J. Y. Xie J. ACS Nano. 2012;6:7920–7927. doi: 10.1021/nn3023206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Luo Z. Nachammai V. Zhang B. Yan N. Leong D. T. Jiang D. E. Xie J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:10577–10580. doi: 10.1021/ja505429f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cao Y. Fung V. Yao Q. Chen T. Zang S. Jiang D. E. Xie J. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5498. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19327-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hwang G. B. Wu G. Shin J. Panariello L. Sebastian V. Karu K. Allan E. Gavriilidis A. Parkin I. P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:49021–49029. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c07691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yu Y. Yao Q. Chen T. Lim G. X. Xie J. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:22096–22102. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Li G. Abroshan H. Liu C. Zhuo S. Li Z. Xie Y. Kim H. J. Rosi N. L. Jin R. ACS Nano. 2016;10:7998–8005. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Meng X. Liu Z. Zhu M. Jin R. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012;7:277. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li S. H. Liu X. Hu W. Chen M. Zhu Y. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2020;124:6061–6067. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c03366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Briant C. E. Hall K. P. Wheeler A. C. Mingos D. M. P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984:248–250. doi: 10.1039/C39840000248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shichibu Y. Suzuki K. Konishi K. Nanoscale. 2012;4:4125–4129. doi: 10.1039/C2NR30675A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang S. S. Senanayake R. D. Zhao Q. Q. Su H. F. Aikens C. M. Wang X. P. Tung C. H. Sun D. Zheng L. S. Dalton Trans. 2019;48:3635–3640. doi: 10.1039/C9DT00042A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yuan X. Zhang B. Luo Z. Yao Q. Leong D. T. Yan N. Xie J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:4623–4627. doi: 10.1002/anie.201311177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wan X. K. Guan Z. J. Wang Q. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:11494–11497. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Qin Z. Zhao D. Zhao L. Xiao Q. Wu T. Zhang J. Wan C. Li G. Nanoscale Adv. 2019;1:2529–2536. doi: 10.1039/C9NA00234K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Bao Y. Zhong C. Vu D. Temirov J. Dyer R. Martinez J. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111:12194–12198. doi: 10.1021/jp071727d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Retnakumari A. Setua S. Menon D. Ravindran P. Muhammed H. Pradeep T. Nair S. Koyakutty M. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:055103. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/5/055103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang X. Shi M. Zhou R. Chen X. Chen H. Nanoscale. 2011;3:2596–2601. doi: 10.1039/C1NR10287G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Bertorelle F. Russier-Antoine I. Comby-Zerbino C. Chirot F. Dugourd P. Brevet P. F. Antoine R. ACS Omega. 2018;3:15635–15642. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wei Z. Jiang W. Bai Z. Lian Z. Wang Z. Song F. Eur. Phys. J. D. 2017;71:237. doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2017-80040-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hossain S. Kurashige W. Wakayama S. Kumar B. Nair L. V. Niihori Y. Negishi Y. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:25861–25869. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wu Z. Jin R. Nano Lett. 2010;10:2568–2573. doi: 10.1021/nl101225f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Malola S. Lehtovaara L. Knoppe S. Hu K. J. Palmer R. E. Burgi T. Hakkinen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:19560–19563. doi: 10.1021/ja309619n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Negishi Y. Kurashige W. Kamimura U. Langmuir. 2011;27:12289–12292. doi: 10.1021/la203301p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ni T. W. Tofanelli M. A. Phillips B. D. Ackerson C. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:6500–6502. doi: 10.1021/ic5010819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Song Y. Abroshan H. Chai J. Kang X. Kim H. J. Zhu M. Jin R. Chem. Mater. 2017;29:3055–3061. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang Y. Nieto-Ortega B. Burgi T. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:14914–14917. doi: 10.1039/C9CC08872E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Knoppe S. Dharmaratne A. C. Schreiner E. Dass A. Bürgi T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:16783–16789. doi: 10.1021/ja104641x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Niihori Y. Eguro M. Kato A. Sharma S. Kumar B. Kurashige W. Nobusada K. Negishi Y. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:14301–14309. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhou R. Shi M. Chen X. Wang M. Chen H. Chemistry. 2009;15:4944–4951. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Habeeb Muhammed M. A. Ramesh S. Sinha S. S. Pal S. K. Pradeep T. Nano Res. 2010;1:333–340. doi: 10.1007/s12274-008-8035-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Duan H. Nie S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:2412–2413. doi: 10.1021/ja067727t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Guo W. Yuan J. Wang E. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:3076–3078. doi: 10.1039/C2CC17155D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Bain D. Maity S. Debnath T. Das A. K. Patra A. Mater. Res. Express. 2019;6:124004. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5c8b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wu Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:2934–2938. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu M. Wang P. Yan N. Chai X. He L. Zhao Y. Xia N. Yao C. Li J. Deng H. Zhu Y. Pei Y. Wu Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:4500–4504. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yao C. Chen J. Li M. B. Liu L. Yang J. Wu Z. Nano Lett. 2015;15:1281–1287. doi: 10.1021/nl504477t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Yao C. Lin Y. J. Yuan J. Liao L. Zhu M. Weng L. H. Yang J. Wu Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:15350–15353. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhuang S. Chen D. Liao L. Zhao Y. Xia N. Zhang W. Wang C. Yang J. Wu Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:3073–3077. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li M.-B. Tian S.-K. Wu Z. Chin. J. Chem. 2017;35:567–571. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201600526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang S. Song Y. Jin S. Liu X. Zhang J. Pei Y. Meng X. Chen M. Li P. Zhu M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:4018–4021. doi: 10.1021/ja511635g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tsunoyama H. Sakurai H. Tsukuda T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006;429:528–532. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.08.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yao Q. Yuan X. Fung V. Yu Y. Leong D. T. Jiang D. E. Xie J. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:927. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00970-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Qian H. Liu C. Jin R. Sci. China: Chem. 2012;55:2359–2365. doi: 10.1007/s11426-012-4669-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zeng C. Qian H. Li T. Li G. Rosi N. L. Yoon B. Barnett R. N. Whetten R. L. Landman U. Jin R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:13114–13118. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Baksi A. Pradeep T. Yoon B. Yannouleas C. Landman U. Chemphyschem. 2013;14:1272–1282. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201200927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tsukamoto T. Kambe T. Nakao A. Imaoka T. Yamamoto K. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3873. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06422-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lv P. Qiu L. Zhao C. Fang G. Liu J. Wang S. ChemNanoMat. 2018:158–162. doi: 10.1002/cnma.201800527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Shao M. Chang Q. Dodelet J. P. Chenitz R. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:3594–3657. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang L. Tang Z. Yan W. Yang H. Wang Q. Chen S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:20635–20641. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b02223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lu Y. Jiang Y. Gao X. Chen W. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:8464–8467. doi: 10.1039/C4CC01841A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang Q. Wang L. Tang Z. Wang F. Yan W. Yang H. Zhou W. Li L. Kang X. Chen S. Nanoscale. 2016;8:6629–6635. doi: 10.1039/C6NR00400H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sumner L. Sakthivel N. A. Schrock H. Artyushkova K. Dass A. Chakraborty S. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122:24809–24817. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07962. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Cai C. Han S. Wang Q. Gu M. ACS Nano. 2019;13:8865–8871. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhou Y. Zeng H. C. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:29348–29357. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kawawaki T. Ebina A. Hosokawa Y. Ozaki S. Suzuki D. Hossain S. Negishi Y. Small. 2021;17:2005328. doi: 10.1002/smll.202005328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang Y. Gao P. Wang X. Huo J. Li L. Zhang Y. Volinsky A. A. Qian P. Su Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:14545–14556. doi: 10.1039/C8CP00784E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhao S. Jin R. Abroshan H. Zeng C. Zhang H. House S. D. Gottlieb E. Kim H. J. Yang J. C. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:1077–1080. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Youk S. Hwang J. Lee S. Kim M. S. Lee J. Small Methods. 2018;3:1800293. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhuang Z. Wang Y. Xu C. Q. Liu S. Chen C. Peng Q. Zhuang Z. Xiao H. Pan Y. Lu S. Yu R. Cheong W. C. Cao X. Wu K. Sun K. Wang Y. Wang D. Li J. Li Y. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12885-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Liu S. Hu Z. Wu Y. Zhang J. Zhang Y. Cui B. Liu C. Hu S. Zhao N. Han X. Cao A. Chen Y. Deng Y. Hu W. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2006034. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Gu Y. Wu A. Jiao Y. Zheng H. Wang X. Xie Y. Wang L. Tian C. Fu H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:6673–6681. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Kwak K. Choi W. Tang Q. Kim M. Lee Y. Jiang D. E. Lee D. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14723. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Choi W. Hu G. Kwak K. Kim M. Jiang D.-e. Choi J.-P. Lee D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:44645–44653. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Hu G. Tang Q. Lee D. Wu Z. Jiang D.-e. Chem. Mater. 2017;29:4840–4847. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhao S. Jin R. Song Y. Zhang H. House S. D. Yang J. C. Jin R. Small. 2017;13:1701519. doi: 10.1002/smll.201701519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Du Y. Xiang J. Ni K. Yun Y. Sun G. Yuan X. Sheng H. Zhu Y. Zhu M. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018;5:2948–2954. doi: 10.1039/C8QI00697K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhuang S. Chen D. Liao L. Zhao Y. Xia N. Zhang W. Wang C. Yang J. Wu Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:3073–3077. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Austin N. Zhao S. McKone J. R. Jin R. Mpourmpakis G. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;8:3795–3805. doi: 10.1039/C8CY01099D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Li S. Nagarajan A. V. Alfonso D. R. Sun M. Kauffman D. R. Mpourmpakis G. Jin R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:6351–6356. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Kauffman D. R. Alfonso D. Matranga C. Qian H. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:10237–10243. doi: 10.1021/ja303259q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Yang D. Pei W. Zhou S. Zhao J. Ding W. Zhu Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:1919–1924. doi: 10.1002/anie.201913635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Seong H. Efremov V. Park G. Kim H. Yoo J. S. Lee D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:14563–14570. doi: 10.1002/anie.202102887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhao S. Jin R. Jin R. ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3:452–462. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Li S. Alfonso D. Nagarajan A. V. House S. D. Yang J. C. Kauffman D. R. Mpourmpakis G. Jin R. ACS Catal. 2020;10:12011–12016. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kwak K. Lee D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52:12–22. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Liu Y. Huang L. Zhu X. Fang Y. Dong S. Nanoscale. 2020;12:1811–1816. doi: 10.1039/C9NR08788E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Chen C. Liang C. Xu J. Wei J. Li X. Zheng Y. Li J. Tang H. Li J. Electrochim. Acta. 2020;335:135708. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Tan Y. Yan L. Huang C. Zhang W. Qi H. Kang L. Pan X. Zhong Y. Hu Y. Ding Y. Small. 2021;17:2100372. doi: 10.1002/smll.202100372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shi M. M. Bao D. Wulan B. R. Li Y. H. Zhang Y. F. Yan J. M. Jiang Q. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1606550. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Yao C. Guo N. Xi S. Xu C. Q. Liu W. Zhao X. Li J. Fang H. Su J. Chen Z. Yan H. Qiu Z. Lyu P. Chen C. Xu H. Peng X. Li X. Liu B. Su C. Pennycook S. J. Sun C. J. Li J. Zhang C. Du Y. Lu J. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18080-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Tian S. Cao Y. Chen T. Zang S. Xie J. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:1163–1174. doi: 10.1039/C9CC08215H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nanoscale Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES