Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1999 Nov;181(22):7140–7142. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.22.7140-7142.1999

An Improved Transposon for the Halophilic Archaeon Haloarcula hispanica

Wayne G Woods 1, Katrina Ngui 1, Michael L Dyall-Smith 1,*
PMCID: PMC94192  PMID: 10559183

Abstract

An improved transposon (ThD73) for Haloarcula hispanica is described. Based on the halobacterial insertion sequence ISH28, it showed little target sequence specificity but was biased toward a lower G+C content. Twenty randomly selected ThD73 mutants were analyzed, and the DNA flanking their insertions revealed several recognizable sequences, including two (unrelated) ISH elements.


Prokaryotic genome sequences can now be determined rapidly, but it is commonly found that about 20 to 25% of open reading frames (ORFs) cannot be assigned a likely function by bioinformatics studies alone. Efficient methods for generating and analyzing mutants are needed to determine gene function, and we have been developing transposons (for a review, see references 24) for this purpose in extremely halophilic archaea (halobacteria). Our previous haloarchaeal transposon, ThD28 (6) (Fig. 1), contained the Haloferax volcanii mevinolin resistance marker (Mevr) between two tandem copies of the Halobacterium salinarum insertion sequence, ISH28. ThD28 mutants of Haloarcula hispanica (9) contained insertions at different positions in the host chromosome, but these were unstable, as the tandem nature of the ISH elements and the presence of active transposase genes allowed further transposition and recombination events (6).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Maps of plasmids pMDS28, carrying the transposon ThD28 (previously described in reference 6), and pMDS73, carrying the improved transposon ThD73 (described in this study). ThD73 consists of a halobacterial mevinolin-simvastatin resistance gene (Mevr; accession no. M83531) (10) and the E. coli plasmid vector pUC19 (19), which includes parts of the lacZ and lacI genes, a pMB1 replicon, and an ampicillin resistance gene, Apr. These are flanked by ISH28 TIRs. The ISH28 transposase (Tpase) gene is located outside the transposon.

An improved transposon, ThD73, is shown in Fig. 1. Construction details can be obtained from the authors. It consisted of a haloarchaeal resistance marker (Mevr [10]), plasmid pUC19 (19) to allow recovery of the transposon (and flanking DNA) in Escherichia coli, and the terminal inverted repeat (TIR) sequences of ISH28 (18). The ISH28 transposase gene (without TIRs) was placed outside the transposon. The plasmid was unable to replicate in halobacteria, so simvastatin-resistant transformants should arise only if the transposon integrated into the host genome. Plasmid pMDS73 was introduced into H. hispanica cells with a polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation protocol (5) and simvastatin-resistant transformants were selected on solid medium. The transformation frequency was approximately 3 × 103 colonies per μg of plasmid DNA, similar to that of the previous transposon, ThD28 (6). A replicating plasmid (pWL102 [10]) routinely gave transformation frequencies of 104 transformants per μg.

To show that the transformants contained a copy of ThD73, 100 simvastatin-resistant colonies were patched onto nylon membranes and grown on selective medium; colony blots were prepared and probed with 32P-labeled pUC19 DNA (a component of ThD73). All colonies hybridized strongly, while wild-type H. hispanica did not (results not shown). To verify that the transposase gene (which was outside the transposon) had not been inserted, the same colony blot of 100 transformant colonies was probed with an internal NaeI-DraIII fragment of ISH28. This fragment was not present inside the transposon and, as expected, the colonies were all negative (data not shown). A positive control (a H. hispanica::ThD28 mutant, containing a complete ISH28) hybridized strongly.

Twenty randomly selected ThD73 mutants were grown in liquid culture, chromosomal DNA was extracted, and Southern blots were prepared. Hybridizations of these blots confirmed that the insertions were single copies, and that each one was at a different location in the 20 mutants (data not shown). The same DNA preparations were used to recover the transposons (as plasmids) back into E. coli. After digestion with MluI (which cuts outside the transposon), restriction fragments containing the inserted transposons were circularized (by ligation) and electroporated into E. coli DH5α. Ampicillin-resistant transformants were readily obtained for all chromosomal DNA preparations and cells were found to possess plasmids. Sequencing outward from the transposon ends into the flanking DNA gave, on average, about 500 bases of DNA sequence for each plasmid (Table 1). These were compared to the GenBank nucleotide sequence database by the BLAST suite of programs (1), and several flanking sequences showed significant nucleotide or predicted amino acid similarity to genes from halobacteria and other organisms (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Properties of the recovered plasmids

Plasmida Duplicated target sequence % G+Cb Accession no.c Similarity to known sequenced
pWW1 GTCTCATC 55 AF150937 H. salinarum pHH1 plasmid ORF H0337 (signal-transducing histidine kinase); AAC82814 (E = 1.2 × 10−6)
pWW2 AACGGTTT 54 AF150938 Conserved hypothetical protein in Pyrococcus horikoshii; BAA29456 (E = 0.005)
pWW3 ATCGGGAT 41 AF150939 ISH50; X01584, AF016485
pWW4 ATCTGATC 52 AF150940
pWW5 GTCTCATTC 46 AF150941
pWW6 AAATAATA 51 AF150942 H. salinarum pHH1 plasmid ORF H0761 (putative cell division control-related protein); AAC82854 (E = 2 × 10−6). Conserved hypothetical protein of Archaeoglobus fulgidus; AAB90352 (E = 2 × 10−4)
pWW7 AAATGAAG 51 AF150943
pWW8 CTCGGGAG 63 AF150944 Candida parapsilosis (mitochondrion) cytochrome c oxidase III; Q34214 (E = 4 × 10−8)
pWW9 GTTGAGTC 60 AF150945
pWW10 GGGAGAGGG 60 AF150946
pWW11 GACTTGTT 52 AF150947 ISH27, ISH51; X54432 (E = 8 × 10−65), X54433, X54434, X04389, AF016485
pWW12 GATCATTG 61 AF150948
pWW13 GACGGTAT 51 AF150949
pWW14 CTCCTGTT 53 AF150950 Archaeoglobus fulgidus, type II secretion system; AAB90245 (E = 0.001)
pWW15 CCTATTTC 54 AF150951 Dehydrogenase-oxidoreductase; S70672, D1031947 (E = 5 × 10−5)
pWW16 GTCTCGTC 46 AF150952
pWW17 CGTGCGTT 58 AF150953
pWW18 GTTGAATC 61 AF150954
pWW19 GTAAATAG 48 AF150955
pWW20 GGCAAATC 42 AF150956
a

Plasmids recovered in E. coli from the DNA of H. hispanica::ThD73 transformants. 

b

The percentage of guanine and cytosine content over the region sequenced (approximately 400 to 500 bp surrounding each target site). 

c

The GenBank accession number for each flanking sequence. 

d

Similarity to known sequences was determined by BLAST searches of the GenBank database. The names and accession numbers of significantly similar sequences are given. Expected values (E) of similarity are shown in parentheses. 

Target site duplications were usually 8 bp long (15) but two were 9 bp. They varied widely in sequence, although three target sites were similar (e.g., plasmids pWW1, -5, and -16) (Table 1). The percentages of G+C content of the flanking sequences also varied, from 41 to 63% (Table 1). Halobacteria have a high average G+C content in their DNA (about 62 to 68%), but in many cases this can be separated into two fractions termed FI (high G+C) and FII (low G+C) DNA, respectively. Haloarcula marismortui, a close relative of H. hispanica, has FI and FII DNA fractions of 62 and 55% G+C, respectively. The latter fraction usually represents 10 to 30% of the halobacterial genome and is a mixture of endogenous plasmids and genomic fragments (13, 14). The high G+C fraction is thought to possess most of the important genes (17) and to be relatively stable. The low G+C fraction is quite variable in size and arrangement and seems to contain the majority of insertion sequences (8, 16, 17). The selection pressure maintaining this peculiar distribution is not fully understood (14, 17). The large halobacterial plasmid pNRC100 shows several regions of relatively low percentages of G+C content that contain few genes or long ORFs but have multiple complete or partial ISH elements, suggesting that these regions probably represent favored target areas for ISH element insertion (12).

Two insertions occurred in or near (unrelated) ISH elements, which could reflect a preference either for low G+C DNA or for ISH elements themselves. In IS elements of Bacteria, target preferences for DNA targets with high or low percentages of G+C content, as well as for other IS elements, have all been observed (7, 11) but the nature of these selection preferences, in terms of DNA structure, is not known. The possible role of histone-like proteins has been discussed recently by Mahillon and Chandler (11).

Previous reports of ISH elements in halobacteria have usually analyzed insertions into specific genes, particularly genes with readily observable phenotypes such as bacteriorhodopsin (bop) or gas vesicle production (gvp) genes (13, 14). ISH28 was originally found as an insertion into the bop gene of Halobacterium salinarum (16). Other more general studies have used Southern blot hybridization to establish the distribution of different ISH elements in halobacteria (14). The present study is the first to follow insertions of a haloarchaeal transposon at the molecular level after its introduction into a halobacterial cell. Assuming that the target specificity of ThD73 is similar to that of ISH28, the results indicate that ISH28 is capable of integrating into a wide variety of target sites.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant to M.D.-S. W.G.W. was supported by a University of Melbourne Postgraduate Scholarship.

We thank W. F. Doolittle and V. Athanasopoulos for reading the manuscript and L. Trantifillou for technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schaffer A A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berg C M, Berg D E. Uses of transposable elements and maps of known insertions. In: Neidhardt F C, Ingraham J L, Low K B, Magasanik B, Schaechter M, Umbarger H E, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1987. pp. 1071–1109. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berg C M, Berg D E, Groisman E A. Transposable elements and the genetic engineering of bacteria. In: Berg D E, Howe M M, editors. Mobile DNA. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1989. pp. 879–925. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Camilli A, Portnoy D A, Youngman P. Insertional mutagenesis of Listeria monocytogenes with a novel Tn917 derivative that allows direct cloning of DNA flanking transposon insertions. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:3738–3744. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.3738-3744.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cline S W, Lam W L, Charlebois R L, Schalkwyk L C, Doolittle W F. Transformation methods for halophilic archaebacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1989;35:148–152. doi: 10.1139/m89-022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dyall-Smith M L, Doolittle W F. Construction of composite transposons for halophilic Archaea. Can J Microbiol. 1994;40:922–929. doi: 10.1139/m94-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hallet B, Rezsohazy R, Mahillon J, Delcour J. IS231A insertion specificity: consensus sequence and DNA bending at the target site. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14:131–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hofman J D, Schalkwyk L C, Doolittle W F. ISH51: a large, degenerate family of insertion sequence-like elements in the genome of the archaebacterium, Haloferax volcanii. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:6983–7000. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.17.6983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Juez G, Rodriguez-Valera F, Ventosa A, Kushner D J. Haloarcula hispanica spec. nov. and Haloferax gibbonsii spec. nov., two new species of extremely halophilic archaebacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1986;8:75–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lam W L, Doolittle W F. Shuttle vectors for the archaebacterium Halobacterium volcanii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:5478–5482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mahillon J, Chandler M. Insertion sequences. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:725–774. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.3.725-774.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ng W V, Ciufo S A, Smith T M, Bumgarner R E, Baskin D, Faust J, Hall B, Loretz C, Seto J, Slagel J, Hood L, DasSarma S. Snapshot of a large dynamic replicon in a halophilic archaeon: megaplasmid or minichromosome? Genome Res. 1998;8:1131–1141. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.11.1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pfeifer F. Insertion elements and genome organization of Halobacterium halobium. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1986;7:36–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pfeifer F. Genetics of halobacteria. In: Rodriguez-Valera F, editor. Halophilic bacteria. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1988. pp. 105–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pfeifer F, Ghahraman P. The halobacterial insertion element ISH28. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:5788. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pfeifer F, Boyer H, Betlach M. Restoration of bacterioopsin gene expression in a revertant of Halobacterium halobium. J Bacteriol. 1985;164:414–420. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.1.414-420.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schalkwyk L. Halobacterial genes and genomes. In: Kates M, Kushner D J, Matheson A T, editors. The biochemistry of the Archaea. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1993. pp. 467–496. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woods W, Dyall-Smith M. Revised nucleotide sequence of an archaeal insertion element (ISH28) reveals a putative transposase gene. Gene. 1996;182:219–220. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00533-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33:103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES