Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0268052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268052

A retrospective molecular investigation of selected pigeon viruses between 2018–2021 in Turkey

Ismail Sahindokuyucu 1,2, Zafer Yazici 3, Gerald Barry 4,*
Editor: Simon Clegg5
PMCID: PMC9423643  PMID: 36037167

Abstract

A recent first detection of pigeon aviadenovirus-1 and pigeon circovirus co-infection associated with Young Pigeon Disease Syndrome (YPDS) in a pigeon flock in Turkey, prompted a study focused on documenting the distribution of Pigeon aviadenovirus (PiAdV-1 and PiAdV-2), Pigeon circovirus (PiCV), Columbid alphaherpesvirus 1 (pigeon herpesvirus (PiHV)) and Fowl aviadenovirus (FAdV) in the country. These viruses were selected as they are associated with severe disease in pigeons across the world. A total of 192 cloacal swabs were collected from young (<1 year old) pigeons from 16 different private pigeon flocks across Turkey, between 2018 and 2021 as part of routine diagnostic sampling. PiCV genetic material was the most frequently detected 4/16 (25%), PiAdV-1 and CoHV-1 DNA were both found in one flock each, while neither PiAdV-2 and FAdV were detected in any of the studied pigeon flocks. PiCV and PiHV genetic material were both detected in the same pigeon flock’s cloacal samples as a co-infection with the identification of PiHV being a first in Turkey.

Introduction

The common viral infections in young pigeons under 1 year old; are herpesviruses, adenoviruses and circoviruses. Viral infections of pigeons, particularly under the age of 1 year old, are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Young Pigeon Disease Syndrome (YPDS) a multifactorial disease, in which virus infections can play a role, is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in the 3rd to 20th week of life. Clinically, signs tend to be quite non-specific with anorexia, depression, ruffled feathers, vomiting, diarrhoea, polyuria and a fluid filled crop being common [1].

Recently, a Pigeon aviadenovirus (PiAdV-1), Pigeon circovirus (PiCV) co-infection was documented in a Turkish pigeon flock, resulting in a loss of appetence, diarrhoea and high mortality rates [2]. It is possible that multiple infections in a flock could lead to increased disease burden in pigeons with increased potential for spillover infections. Pigeons are known transmitters of Newcastle Disease virus to chickens for example and spillover infections in wildlife have also been documented [3].

Columbid herpesvirus type 1, also known as pigeon herpesvirus (PiHV), is a member of the Herpesviridae family, and classified in the Mardivirus genus [4]. PiHV is regularly detected in pigeons worldwide, and is associated with depression, rhinitis, anorexia or conjunctivitis [5, 6]. PiCV is a member of the genus Circovirus in the family Circoviridae, and pigeon infection was first documented in Canada in 1986 [7]. This virus is commonly associated with pigeons suffering from YPDS [1]. Pigeon aviadenovirus 1 and -2 (PiAdV-1 and -2) are members of the genus Aviadenovirus within the family Adenoviridae [8, 9]. Fowl aviadenoviruses (FadV) have been previously isolated from both healthy and diseased pigeons [1014]. It is not uncommon for viruses to be present and not cause disease. Bovine coronavirus, for example, can be present in the upper respiratory tract of healthy and diseased cattle. This does not mean the virus can’t be associated with disease but implies that other factors contribute to disease manifestation, be that co-infections with other pathogens or factors that induce stress in the animals [15, 16]. These viruses can also have a major economic impact if they enter commercially important flocks of pigeons and other birds such as chickens. Fowl adenovirus for example causes major disease outbreaks in chicken flocks globally and wild birds including pigeons have potential to spread these viruses and repeatedly re-introduce them into chicken flocks that are not completely biosecure [17, 18]. Understanding the overall virome in a species enhances the ability to understand disease risk and manage it more effectively if it occurs, which is the motivation behind this study.

A select panel of viruses (PiCV, PiHV, PiAdV-1 and -2, and FadV) were chosen as they are the most common viruses of young pigeons, especially under the age of 1-year-old and have been previously associated with YPDS [1, 12, 19]. Cloacal swabs taken from fancy pigeons were collected and tested for the presence of this panel of viruses, with confirmatory sequencing carried out to confirm the identifications.

Materials and methods

Sampling

As part of routine diagnostics, to determine the cause of disease in flocks, 192 cloacal swabs from 16 different pigeon flocks were collected by sampling 12 randomly selected sick pigeons per flock (aged between 2 and 11 months of age) as part of routine diagnostics. The flocks were distributed across the Aegean part of Turkey and samples were collected between 2018 and 2021. All flocks had a history of dark green watery diarrhoea, inappetence and vomiting as well as sudden incidences of mortality (between 5 and 35% mortality). Samples were obtained from Izmir (10 flocks), Manisa (4 flocks) and Usak (2 flocks) provinces. Every flock was evaluated as one sample (12 cloacal swabs were pooled as one sample). Swabs were immersed in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, Thermo Fisher Scientifc), vortexed and stored at -20°C until further analysis could take place.

DNA extraction and PCR

Swabs were defrosted on ice, trimmed using clean sterile scissors, vortexed again (1 minute) and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min. The supernatants were then collected for screening by PCR.

Total DNA was extracted from 200 μl aliquots of prepared supernatants using a High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted samples were stored at -20°C until PCR was performed.

The PCRs for PiAdV-1, PiAdV-2, PiHV, PiCV and FAdV were carried out in total volumes of 50 μl containing 10 μl of DNA, 0.8 μM of each primer, and PCR master mix (Xpert Fast Hotstart-Grisp, Portugal). The PCRs for PiAdV-1, PiAdV-2 and FAdV were carried out in a thermocycler (Techne, UK) with an initial denaturation at 9500B0030C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 seconds, 58°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCRs for PiCV and PiHV were carried out in the same thermocycler at the same time with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 seconds, 62°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, with a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR amplicons were visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis and then purified according to the manufacturer’s protocol (ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent, USA), before Sanger sequencing. All primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Information about the primers used in this study.

Viruses Target gene Primer names Sequence (5’–3’) product size (bp) Reference Numbers
FAdV hexon Hexon A CAARTTCAGRCAGACGGT 897 Meulemans et al. (2001)
Hexon B TAGTGATGMCGSGACATCAT
PiAdV-1 fiber-2 PiAdV-1 F1-s ATCAACTACGACAACGAAGGC 967 Raue et al. (2002)
PiAdV-1 F2-as CGGTAGAGTTACGGGGAAATT
PiAdV-2 hexon PiAdV-2 Hex-3-F GTAACATGAGCGTGCTGTTTG 643 Teske et al. (2017)
PiAdV-2 Hex-3-R CTGAGAAACGAAACCCGAATTG
PiHV Polymerase PiHV-s GGGACGCTCTGATTAAGGAAT 242 Raue et al. (2005)
PiHV-as CTTGGTGATCAGCAGCAGCTTG
PiCV Capsid PiCV2-s TTGAAAGGTTTTCAGCCTGGC 325 Freick et al. (2008)
PiCV2-as AGGAGACGAAGGACACGCCTC

The supernatants obtained from cloacal swabs were also inoculated into the chorioallantoic cavity of 10-day-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs according to the protocol of the Villegas Laboratory Manual [20]. The eggs were incubated at 37°C for 5 days and the allantoic fluid was then removed and inoculated into a fresh egg. This process was repeated until each supernatant was passaged through 5 eggs. After each passage, the supernatants were added to a haemaggluttination assay to test for the presence of viruses such as Avian influenza and Newcastle disease virus. Each passage was also tested by PCR as described above.

Haemmagluttination assay

Supernatants were aliquoted into 96-well plates with cone-shaped wells and 2-fold serial dilutions were made using sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Chicken red blood cells were aliquoted into each well and mixed gently by shaking. The blood cells were allowed to settle and the pattern was observed. Positive wells were wells where the red blood did not settle at the bottom of the well.

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The PiAdV-1, PiCV and PiHV PCR amplicons were Sanger sequenced in both forward and reverse directions, using the same PCR primers as were used to amplify the products. Sequences, phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA version X (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 10.1.8) software (The Biodesign Institute, Arizona, USA). The sequence data were then compared to most similar genome sequences and reference strains of aviadenovirus, herpesvirus and circovirus species from different countries which are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and their phylogenetic relationships were investigated. Phylogenetic trees were built using the neighbour-joining method with the T-92 (Tamura-3 parameter) [21] for pigeon aviadenoviruses and pigeon herpesvirus, K2 (Kimura-2 parameter with gamma distributed) (Kimura, 1980) for pigeon circovirus with substitution model using the maximum-likelihood statistical method in MEGA X, respectively (1000 Bootstrap resamples performed) [22].

Ethical statement

All samples were collected by veterinary professionals and analysed for diagnostic purposes, with the approval of the animal’s owners.

Results

PCR screening results

In this study, a total of 16 pigeon flocks were analysed. The flocks were selected because of their widespread distribution and because breeders had reported that birds in each flock had clinical signs associated with YPDS and mortality in the flocks ranged from 5% to 35%. 4 out of 16 flocks (25%) tested positive for the presence of PiCV DNA, 1 out of 16 flocks (6.25%) tested positive for the presence of PiHV DNA and 1 out of 16 flocks (6.25%) tested positive for the presence of PiAdV-1 DNA. Of these positives, one flock had evidence of a co-infection of PiCV and PiHV as DNA fragments from both viruses were detected. FAdV and PiAdV-2 were not detected by PCR. Haemagglutination assays testing for the presence of viruses that could cause haemagglutination such as avian influenza or Newcastle Disease virus were negative.

The amplified fragments of the PiAdV-1 fiber-2 gene, the PiHV polymerase gene and the PiCV capsid gene were Sanger sequenced and BLASTed against the NCBI database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to compare these sequences with the genomes of aviadenovirus, herpesvirus and circovirus of pigeons. The PiCV fragments, now labelled, TR/PCV1, TR/PCV2, TR/PCV3 and TR/PCV4, matched most closely with isolates, KX108784 (China), MF664483 (Brazil), MT130538 (Turkey) and MK994767 (Poland) respectively (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequence of the PiCV capsid gene (325 bp).

Fig 1

The tree shows circovirus species which affect fowl. The tree shows the names and GenBank accession numbers of each isolate. The PiCV isolates from this study are indicated by a red dot.

The PiAdV-1 sequence, now designated TR/PADV1, was found to be closely related to a previously sequenced PiAdV-A strain called TR/SKPA20 (Turkey, 99.46% similar) and another called P18-05523-66 (Australia, 98.82% similar) and while it was 98.5% similar to IDA4 (Netherlands) at the amino acid level (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequence of the PiAdV-1 fiber-2 gene (967 bp).

Fig 2

The tree shows adenovirus species which affect fowl. The tree shows the names and GenBank accession numbers of each isolate. The PiAdV isolate from this study is indicated by a red dot.

The PiHV sequence, now designated TR/PHV1, was found to be most closely related to strains previously isolated in China (KX589235) with 98.77% and Thailand (KM010015) with 98.76% similarity at the amino acid level (Fig 3). The nucleotide sequences of the field isolates presented here (TR/PCV1, TR/PCV2, TR/PCV3, TR/PCV4, TR/PADV1 and TR/PHV1) have been submitted to the NCBI-GenBank database under the following accession numbers: (MZ694938, MZ694939, MZ694940, MZ694941, MZ694937 and MZ694942).

Fig 3. Phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequence of the PiHV polymerase gene (242 bp).

Fig 3

The tree shows herpesvirus species which affect fowl. The tree shows the names and GenBank accession numbers of each isolate. The PiHV isolate from this study is indicated by a red dot.

Discussion

This study describes a molecular retrospective survey for the detection of selected pigeon DNA viruses; PiHV, FAdV, PiCV and PiAdV. These viruses were selected as they are the most important viruses of young pigeons and have been regularly associated with YPDS, a major disease in young pigeons [1, 12, 19].

PiHV, FAdV, PiCV and PiAdV infections are clinically indistinguishable in pigeons, and reliable diagnostic tests are needed to identify these viruses correctly. PCR is the most common diagnostic test for each; PiHV by targeting regions of the DNA polymerase gene [1, 4, 23], the 12 serotypes of FAdV by amplifying a conserved pedestral region of the hexon gene [24, 25], PiCV by detecting the capsid gene [1, 26] or highly conserved genomic regions [27], and PiAdV by detecting the fiber-2 and hexon gene [9, 28]. In this study, a combination of PCR and Sanger sequencing was used to confirm each positive result.

Adenoviruses have been previously documented to infect pigeons with younger birds less than 1-year-old appearing to be particularly vulnerable to disease [2]. FAdV serotypes, for example, have also been identified from diseased pigeons but interestingly have also been found in healthy pigeons, indicating that other factors may also contribute to disease manifestation [10, 12, 29]. PiAdV-1 although similar to FAdV, has been identified, and distinguished from the 12 FAdV serotypes by cross-neutralization assays [29]. These tests were subsequently supported by genome sequencing, confirming PiAdV-1 as a new species in the genus Aviadenovirus [30]. It is not surprising to identify it among the flocks that were tested, although the prevalence (1 out of 16 flocks) suggests that it is not creating a major burden of infection in the fancy pigeon populations of Turkey.

In general, circovirus infections in birds are associated with immunosuppression, feather disorders and low weight. Immunosuppressive viruses tend to exacerbate the impact of other infections and can be major contributors to polymicrobial associated conditions such as YPDS. PiCV is believed to cause immunosuppression in pigeons through increased apoptosis in B lymphocytes and this is likely to facilitate secondary infections or amplification of pathogens that are already present [31]. Viral and bacterial co-infections may aggravate the clinical picture of other infections especially in pigeon lofts. This situation has also been shown for other avian and mammalian species with Bovine respiratory disease being a perfect example where multiple bacteria and viruses are associated, and likely exacerbate each others impact [32, 33]. A number of PiCV prevalence studies have been carried out in different parts of the world although none to date in Turkey. Initially, prevalence studies based on histological analysis of tissue samples from diseased birds revealed relatively low (less than 50%) prevalences in populations but with increased use of molecular methods with increased sensitivity the virus was regularly found in almost all birds that were tested and was also commonly found in apparently health birds. Diseased young birds less than 1-year-old were most likely to be infected, with one study in Poland showing 100% of birds tested to be infected with PiCV [34]. Work in China similarly identified PiCV DNA in 80.7% of diseased birds that were tested and 63.4% of asymptomatic birds that were tested [35]. In this study, the prevalence of PiCV (25%) among clinically affected pigeon flocks is lower than in these and many other studies. It is unclear why this might be the case, but, because genetically the birds in Turkey are similar to birds globally, there is unlikely to be an inherent resistance to this virus and therefore suggests PiCV infection is likely to increase over time and may lead to an increase in the burden of disease in the future [3639].

PiHV is frequently found in raptors as well as pigeons. A study in the UK suggested that PiHV prevalence ranges from 4.9% within the Strigidae to 8.8% in the Accipititridae family [40]. Seroprevalence data from the same report identified antibodies against PiHV in 8.2% of free-ranging owls. This suggests that this herpesvirus has the ability to infect a number of different species of bird and therefore is likely to be able to move between species quite readily. In this study, according to the BLAST analysis of the polymerase gene of TR/PHV1, the virus material identified is very similar to that previously found in raptors suggesting that cross species transmission is happening in Turkey. This is the first identification of this virus in Turkey and transmission from migratory birds can not be ruled out as a possible source. This may occur through close physical contact or potentially through shared food sources or habitat linked fomite transmission. This should be a biosecurity consideration for owners of pigeons going forward.

In this study, we have identified the presence of PiAdV-1, PiCV and PiHV DNA in pigeon flocks in Turkey, including one flock where both PiCV and PiHV DNA were found suggestive of a co-infection. These findings act as a first prevalence study in Turkey for these viruses and suggest that they are contributing to the infectious burden of pigeons and possibly other birds in this region, although follow up pathogenicity studies are required in the future to clarify their importance for disease. This study contributes to increased knowledge of the virome of pigeons in Turkey and should inform the biosecurity approaches of owners.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Bahtiyar Yilmaz from Letgen, Biotechnology for technical support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript The nucleotide sequences of the field isolates presented here (TR/PCV1, TR/PCV2, TR/PCV3, TR/PCV4, TR/PADV1 and TR/PHV1) have been submitted to the NCBI-GenBank database under the following accession numbers: (MZ694938, MZ694939, MZ694940, MZ694941, MZ694937 and MZ694942).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Raue R, Schmidt V, Freick M, Reinhardt B, Johne R, Kamphausen L, et al. A disease complex associated with pigeon circovirus infection, young pigeon disease syndrome. Avian Pathol. 2005;34: 418–425. doi: 10.1080/03079450500267825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sahindokuyucu I, Turkmen MB, Sumer T, Elhag AE, Alcigir ME, Yazici Z, et al. First detection and molecular characterisation of a pigeon aviadenovirus A and pigeon circovirus co-infection associated with Young Pigeon Disease Syndrome (YPDS) in Turkish pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Vet Med Sci. 2022;8: 139–149. doi: 10.1002/vms3.662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ellakany HF, Elbestawy AR, Abd El-Hamid HS, Zedan RE, Gado AR, Taha AE, et al. Role of Pigeons in the Transmission of Avian Avulavirus (Newcastle Disease-Genotype VIId) to Chickens. Animals (Basel). 2019;9. doi: 10.3390/ani9060338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ehlers B, Borchers K, Grund C, Frölich K, Ludwig H, Buhk HJ. Detection of new DNA polymerase genes of known and potentially novel herpesviruses by PCR with degenerate and deoxyinosine-substituted primers. Virus Genes. 1999;18: 211–220. doi: 10.1023/a:1008064118057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Graham DL, Mare CJ, Ward FP, Peckham MC. Inclusion body disease (herpesvirus infection) of falcons (IBDF). J Wildl Dis. 1975;11: 83–91. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-11.1.83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Phalen DN, Alvarado C, Grillo V, Mason P, Dobson E, Holz P. Prevalence of Columbid herpesvirus infection in feral pigeons from New South Wales and Victoria, Australia, with spillover into a wild powerful owl (Ninox Struena). J Wildl Dis. 2017;53: 543–551. doi: 10.7589/2016-07-158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Woods LW, Latimer KS, Niagro FD, Riddell C, Crowley AM, Anderson ML, et al. A retrospective study of circovirus infection in pigeons: nine cases (1986–1993). J Vet Diagn Invest. 1994;6: 156–164. doi: 10.1177/104063879400600205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marek A, Kaján GL, Kosiol C, Harrach B, Schlötterer C, Hess M. Complete genome sequences of pigeon adenovirus 1 and duck adenovirus 2 extend the number of species within the genus Aviadenovirus. Virology. 2014;462–463: 107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.04.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raue R, Hafez HM, Hess M. A fiber gene-based polymerase chain reaction for specific detection of pigeon adenovirus. Avian Pathol. 2002;31: 95–99. doi: 10.1080/03079450120106660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McFerran JB, Connor TJ, McCracken RM. Isolation of adenoviruses and reoviruses from avian species other than domestic fowl. Avian Dis. 1976;20: 519–524. doi: 10.2307/1589384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McFerran JB, McCracken RM, Connor TJ, Evans RT. Isolation of viruses from clinical outbreaks of inclusion body hepatitis. Avian Pathol. 1976;5: 315–24. doi: 10.1080/03079457608418201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goryo M, Ueda Y, Umemura T, Haruna A, Itakura C. Inclusion body hepatitis due to adenovirus in pigeons. Avian Pathol. 1988;17: 391–401. doi: 10.1080/03079458808436457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Freick M, Müller H, Raue R. Rapid detection of pigeon herpesvirus, fowl adenovirus and pigeon circovirus in young racing pigeons by multiplex PCR. Journal of Virological Methods. 2008;148: 226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Niczyporuk JS, Kozdruń W, Czekaj H, Styś-Fijoł N, Piekarska K. Detection of fowl adenovirus D strains in wild birds in Poland by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). BMC Veterinary Research. 2020;16. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-2271-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gomez DE, Arroyo LG, Poljak Z, Viel L, Weese JS. Detection of Bovine Coronavirus in Healthy and Diarrheic Dairy Calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2017;31: 1884–1891. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vlasova AN, Saif LJ. Bovine Coronavirus and the Associated Diseases. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8: 643220. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.643220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shen Z, Xiang B, Li S, Ren X, Hong Y, Liao J, et al. Genetic characterization of fowl adenovirus serotype 4 isolates in Southern China reveals potential cross-species transmission. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2019;75: 103928. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schachner A, Matos M, Grafl B, Hess M. Fowl adenovirus-induced diseases and strategies for their control–a review on the current global situation. 2017;47: 111–126. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2017.1385724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takase K, Yoshinaga N, Egashira T, Uchimura T, Yamamoto M. Avian adenovirus isolated from pigeons affected with inclusion body hepatitis. Nippon juigaku zasshi The Japanese journal of veterinary science. 1990;52: 207–215. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.52.207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Villegas P. Laboratory manual, avian virus diseases. College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1992;9: 678–687. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35: 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vandevanter DR, Warrener P, Bennett L, Schultz ER, Coulter S, Garber RL, et al. Detection and analysis of diverse herpesviral species by consensus primer PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34: 1666–1671. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.7.1666-1671.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raue R, Hess M. Hexon based PCRs combined with restriction enzyme analysis for rapid detection and differentiation of fowl adenoviruses and egg drop syndrome virus. J Virol Methods. 1998;73: 211–217. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(98)00065-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meulemans G, Boschmans M, van den Berg TP, Decaesstecker M. Polymerase chain reaction combined with restriction enzyme analysis for detection and differentiation of fowl adenoviruses. Avian Pathol. 2001;30: 655–660. doi: 10.1080/03079450120092143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taras L, Kubíček O, Juranová R, Jurajda V. The First Demonstration of Pigeon Circovirus Infection in the Czech Republic Based on Histological Testing and Nested PCR. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2003;72: 577–582. doi: 10.2754/AVB200372040577 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Todd D, Duchatel JP, Bustin JC, Scullion FT, Scullion MG, Scott ANJ, et al. Detection of pigeon circovirus in cloacal swabs: Implications for diagnosis, epidemiology and control. Veterinary Record. 2006;159: 314–317. doi: 10.1136/vr.159.10.314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Teske L, Rubbenstroth D, Meixner M, Liere K, Bartels H, Rautenschlein S. Identification of a novel aviadenovirus, designated pigeon adenovirus 2 in domestic pigeons (Columba livia). Virus Res. 2017;227: 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hess M, Prusas C, Monreal G. Growth analysis of adenoviruses isolated from pigeons in chicken cells and serological characterization of the isolates. Avian Pathol. 1998;27: 196–9. doi: 10.1080/03079459808419323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marek A, Günes A, Schulz E, Hess M. Classification of fowl adenoviruses by use of phylogenetic analysis and high-resolution melting-curve analysis of the hexon L1 gene region. Journal of Virological Methods. 2010;170: 147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stenzel T, Dziewulska D, Tykałowski B, Koncicki A. The Clinical Infection with Pigeon Circovirus (PiCV) Leads to Lymphocyte B Apoptosis But Has No Effect on Lymphocyte T Subpopulation. Pathogens. 2020;9: 1–12. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chai J, Capik SF, Kegley B, Richeson JT, Powell JG, Zhao J. Bovine respiratory microbiota of feedlot cattle and its association with disease. Vet Res. 2022;53. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-01020-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Makoschey B, Berge AC. Review on bovine respiratory syncytial virus and bovine parainfluenza—usual suspects in bovine respiratory disease—a narrative review. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02935-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stenzel TA, Pestka D, Tykałowski B, Śmiałek M, Koncicki A. Epidemiological investigation of selected pigeon viral infections in Poland. Vet Rec. 2012;171: 562. doi: 10.1136/vr.100932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang Z, Lu C, Wang Y, Wang S, Dai D, Chen Z, et al. Molecular characterization and epidemiological investigation of Pigeon circovirus isolated in eastern China. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011;23: 665–672. doi: 10.1177/1040638711407878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Duchatel JP, Todd D, Smyth JA, Bustin JC, Vindevogel H. Observations on detection, excretion and transmission of pigeon circovirus in adult, young and embryonic pigeons. Avian Pathology. 2006;35: 30–34. doi: 10.1080/03079450500465692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gough RE, Drury SE. Circovirus-like particles in the bursae of young racing pigeons. Vet Rec. 1996;138: 167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Coletti M, Franciosini MP, Asdrubali G, Passamonti F. Atrophy of the primary lymphoid organs of meat pigeons in Italy associated with circoviruslike particles in the bursa of Fabricius. Avian Diseases. 2000;44: 454–459. doi: 10.2307/1592562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shivaprasad HL, Chin RP, Jeffrey JS, Latimer KS, Nordhausen RW, Niagro FD, et al. Particles resembling circovirus in the bursa of Fabricius of pigeons. Avian Dis. 1994;38: 635–641. doi: 10.2307/1592091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zsivanovits P, Forbes NA, Zvonar LT, Williams MR, Lierz M, Prusas C, et al. Investigation into the seroprevalence of falcon herpesvirus antibodies in raptors in the UK using virus neutralization tests and different herpesvirus isolates. Avian Pathol. 2004;33: 599–604. doi: 10.1080/03079450400013113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript The nucleotide sequences of the field isolates presented here (TR/PCV1, TR/PCV2, TR/PCV3, TR/PCV4, TR/PADV1 and TR/PHV1) have been submitted to the NCBI-GenBank database under the following accession numbers: (MZ694938, MZ694939, MZ694940, MZ694941, MZ694937 and MZ694942).


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES