Abstract
Congenital aniridia is a pan ocular disorder characterized by partial or total loss of iris tissue as the defining feature. Classic aniridia, however, has a spectrum of ocular findings, including foveal hypoplasia, optic nerve hypoplasia, nystagmus, late-onset cataract, glaucoma, and keratopathy. The latter three are reasons for further visual compromise in such patients. This entity is often due to mutations in the PAX6 (Paired box protein Pax-6) gene. Recently, aniridia-like phenotypes have been reported due to non-PAX6 mutations as in PITX2, FOXC1, FOXD3, TRIM44, and CYP1B1 as well wherein there is an overlap of aniridia, such as iris defects with congenital glaucoma or anterior segment dysgenesis. In this review, we describe the various clinical features of classic aniridia, the comorbidities and their management, the mutation spectrum of the genes involved, genotype-phenotype correlation of PAX6 and non-PAX6 mutations, and the genetic testing plan. The various systemic associations and their implications in screening and genetic testing have been discussed. Finally, the future course of aniridia treatment in the form of drugs (such as ataluren) and targeted gene therapy has been discussed.
Keywords: Aniridia, genetics, genotype, mutation, PAX6, phenotype
Congenital aniridia (OMIM 106201) is a rare bilateral pan-ocular genetic disorder that affects different parts of the eye presenting at birth. It was first described by Barrata in 1918.[1] As the name suggests, it is characterized by a partial or complete absence of the iris. However, the disease manifestations extend to almost every part of the eye, including the cornea, anterior chamber angle, lens, fovea, and optic nerve.[2,3] Some of its features are present since birth, such as the foveal hypoplasia and gonio-dysgenesis, while other features such as cataract, glaucoma, and keratopathy develop over time. It has a global prevalence of approximately one in 40,000–100,000 live births.[3,4,5] In the vast majority of the cases, it is caused by a loss of function mutation in the PAX6 gene either inherited or acquired sporadically. Through this review article, we summarize the clinical features, the concepts of management of comorbidities, and the molecular and genetic basis of congenital aniridia.
Clinical Features
The ocular manifestations of aniridia involve almost every part of the globe [Fig. 1].
Figure 1.
The various ocular manifestations in congenital aniridia
Visual acuity
Visual acuity is highly variable in patients with aniridia, ranging from 20/60 in patients who do not have nystagmus to 20/100–20/200 in most who have it.[3] The visual dysfunction is not determined by the degree of absence of the iris tissue and rather depends on the secondary ocular features such as foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus, limbal stem cell deficiency, corneal opacity, cataract, and glaucoma. Red-green color vision defect is seen in around 60% of aniridia patients.[6]
Iris abnormalities
The degree of absence of iris tissue can be highly variable, ranging from minimal loss wherein it may resemble isolated iris hypoplasia to the total absence of iris tissue. Even in the complete absence of the iris, a thin stump of iris tissue can be visualized on careful gonioscopy [Fig. 2a]. Histopathological evaluation reveals some iris tissue in most cases.[7] Different family members may have different nature of involvement of the iris owing to variable expression of the disease.[8] The milder forms may just lead to abnormal shape of the pupil or corectopia. The iris abnormality per se does not lead to visual loss but may lead to photophobia, loss of depth of focus, and cosmetic concerns. Small iris tissue defects can be opposed using 10-0 polypropylene sutures, while larger defects need some form of iris prosthesis. Currently, there are three types of iris prosthesis [Fig. 3].[9,10] The capsular tension ring-based (CTR) devices (aniridia rings and aniridia segments (Morcher GMBH, Stuttgart, Germany)) can be implanted in the capsular bag during the cataract surgery through the same phacoemulsification wound.[11,12] Two aniridia rings have to be implanted and aligned to create the complete artificial iris [Fig. 4]. A single aniridia segment may be sufficient for a localized area of the defect. A device with two orthogonal segments (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) with a flexible joint is also available and requires a larger incision for implantation.[13] The second type of iris prosthesis is the combined iris–lens implant. This comprises a large 10-mm polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) diaphragm with a central optical zone and a black periphery. It has curved haptics and a fixation loop for sulcus fixation. The disadvantages of these lenses are that they are rigid, require a large wound for insertion, and cannot be implanted in the bag. Both the combined iris–lens implant and the capsular tension ring-based implants are commonly available in black color and give an artificial appearance. The ring-based implants are also susceptible to fracture and may migrate into the sulcus if the capsular bag is compromised.[12] The third type of iris prosthesis is the hydrophobic silicone elastomer iris diaphragm (Artificiallaris (HumanOptics, Germany)). It was approved by US FDA in 2018 (CustomFlex™ artificial iris).[14,15] It can be customized to match the color of the remaining iris or the iris of the other eye, providing excellent cosmesis. It is flexible and can be implanted via a small incision. It can be implanted within the bag or sutured to the sulcus. In aphakic cases, the IOL can be sutured to the back of the prosthesis and the combined device can then be sutured to the sulcus. It may be possible to place the prosthesis in the ciliary sulcus without suture fixation, depending on the amount of iris stump available.[15] The artificial iris diaphragm is recommended to be used in aphakic or pseudophakic eyes. Their use in phakic eyes should be avoided to prevent complications such as cataract and corneal decompensation.[9] All types of prosthetic iris devices may be associated with intraoperative complications such as capsular tear or hyphema and postoperative complications such as new-onset glaucoma, progression of preexisting glaucoma, prolonged inflammation, migration of the implant, and progression of the corneal epithelial disease.[9,10] The use of colored contact lenses to prevent glare has been described in traumatic aniridia;[16] however, their use is limited in congenital aniridia due to the presence of aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK). A smart contact lens with artificial iris based on guest–host liquid crystal cells has been studied recently in terms of optical quality in aniridia patients and has been shown to improve vision and reduce retinal illumination.[17] This scleral contact lens entirely spares the limbus and may be a good option for patients who are predisposed to limbal stem cell deficiency.
Figure 2.
(a) shows the gonioscopic view of anterior chamber angle in a patient with total aniridia. Few goniosynechiae (arrow) and the stump of iris tissue can be seen (*). (b) shows the gonioscopic view of the anterior chamber angle showing extensive goniosynechia. Schlemm’s canal (≠) can be seen. (c) shows the anterior segment of a child with aniridia with congenital-onset glaucoma. Buphthalmos and Haab’s striae can be seen. The tube of glaucoma drainage device can be noted (#)
Figure 3.
The various types of iris prosthetic devices. (a) shows the dual capsular tension ring implant. (b) shows the foldable silicone elastomer iris diaphragm. (c) shows the orthogonal segment device with a hinge joint. (d) shows the aniridia non-foldable intraocular lens implant. (e) shows the iris segment capsular tension ring implant
Figure 4.
Intraoperative photographs of cataract surgery in aniridia with implantation of dual aniridia rings. (a) is after the implantation of the first ring in the bag, and (b) is after the implantation of both the rings. The interdigitating fans are aligned to create the pseudo iris. (c) shows the status after implantation of intraocular lens
Retinal abnormalities
Varying degrees of foveal hypoplasia have been reported to be the most common ophthalmological finding following iris hypoplasia (81%–91%).[18,19,20,21] Clinically, foveal hypoplasia appears as the absence of the foveal pit and absence of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) [Fig. 5a and b]. The absence of FAZ may be detected in fundus autofluorescence (FAF) as the absence of the central hypofluorescent spot.[22] Landsend et al. (2019) found that the mean intensity of the FAF in macula versus fovea was close to 1 in most aniridia patients.[22] They also reported that 86% of aniridia patients may have a hypopigmented fundus. This can be attributed to the role of PAX6 in retinal pigment epithelium differentiation.[23] Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can reveal thickening of the central macula and absence of foveal contour [Fig. 5c and d]. The degree of foveal hypoplasia as determined by the structural grading on OCT has been shown to be a predictor of visual acuity in children.[24,25] Fig. 6 shows the Leicester Grading System for Foveal Hypoplasia.[24] Specifically, the presence of outer segment (OS) lengthening correlates with a better best-corrected visual acuity in congenital aniridia.[25] The pattern of foveal differentiation in aniridia leads to an overall increase in central macular thickness, while the outer segment, outer nuclear layer, and Henle’s layer are thinner.[25] The subfoveal and parafoveal choroidal thickness has also been found to be reduced in aniridia as compared to control eyes.[26] Recently, OCT angiography in a 7-year-old child revealed the absence of FAZ and dipping of vessels from the superficial vascular complex to the deep vascular complex.[27] Further studies may reveal the importance of retinal microvascular development in the pathogenesis of aniridia. Both multifocal and full-field electroretinography (ERG) have been shown to be affected in the majority of aniridia patients.[28] The amplitudes of the three inner rings are reduced while those of the two outer rings are increased in multifocal ERG. The higher amplitude in outer rings correlates with poorer visual acuity. In the full-field ERG, the amplitude remains unaffected, but the latency of scotopic and photopic b wave, scotopic a wave, and 30-Hz flicker have been found to be prolonged as compared to controls.
Figure 5.
Foveal hypoplasia in aniridia. (a) is the fundus photograph showing loss of foveal pit and absence of foveal avascular zone (arrow). (b) is the red-free image of the same patient showing the absence of the dark spot of the fovea. (c and d) are respectively the optical coherence tomography of the right and left eye of the patient with aniridia showing grade 4 foveal hypoplasia
Figure 6.
The grades of foveal hypoplasia based on optical coherence tomography of the macula
Corneal abnormalities
Corneal changes in aniridia are collectively defined under the term AAK. It is characterized by the gradual development of corneal pannus, limbal stem cell deficiency, and progressive opacification of the cornea from the periphery to the center. AAK is age-dependent and can occur as early as 2 years of age, and is probably the second most common clinical feature following foveal hypoplasia with a prevalence reaching up to 90%.[19,21,29,30,31] The affected individuals experience chronic irritation and photophobia apart from the visual loss due to AAK. Occasionally, central corneal opacities, which unlike AAK are present since birth, may be seen in children with aniridia.[31]
AAK is secondary to a breakdown of the limbal stem cell niche, impaired wound healing, and neural deterioration.[32] The clear central cornea is replaced with the mixed conjunctivo-corneal phenotype in the early grades of AAK and the conjunctival phenotype in the later grades. This manifests clinically as an invading pannus over the cornea. The mean subbasal corneal nerve fiber density is reduced, especially in the PAX6 aniridia, with an increased rate of nerve fiber degeneration. This leads to a loss in corneal sensations and compromised healing. The nerve fiber degeneration results in inflammation. The pro-inflammatory corneal surface is also enhanced by the presence of elevated inflammatory cytokines in the tear film.[32]
The clinical grading of AAK is mainly based on the extent of the corneal opacity and degree of vascularization [Table 1, Fig. 7].[33] The AAK is more severe in PAX6 mutations compared to non-PAX6 mutations.[18,34] The central corneal thickness (CCT) is also increased, especially in eyes with significant pannus.[32] However, CCT may be raised to the range of 600–700 microns even in the early grades of AAK despite a clear cornea and normal to increased endothelial cell density.
Table 1.
Clinical grading of aniridia-associated keratopathy
Description | |
---|---|
Grade 0 | Intact limbal border without conjunctival tissue or vessels crossing the limbus |
Grade 1 | Limbal border is compromised, with vessels and conjunctival tissue crossing the border but remaining within approximately one mm from the limbus. Invasion can be localized to one region of the limbus, with other areas of the limbus remaining intact. |
Grade 2 | Conjunctival tissue with vessels invades the peripheral and mid-peripheral cornea, but at least the central 2-3 mm of the cornea is spared and remains transparent. |
Grade 3 | Conjunctival tissue invades the central cornea, affecting the central visual axis, and typically the entire corneal surface is covered by a translucent, vascularized pannus. |
Grade 4 | The ocular surface is opaque and vascularized with a thick pannus, typically of irregular thickness. |
Figure 7.
Clinical photographs of various grades of aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK). (a) shows grade 1 AAK wherein the limbus is compromised with the invasion of conjunctival pannus (arrow). (b) is a retro illumination photograph highlighting the pannus (*). It also shows a posterior polar lenticular opacity (#). (c) shows grade 2 AAK wherein the conjunctival pannus extends centrally but spares the visual axis. (d) shows grade 3 AAK wherein the corneal scarring and conjunctival invasion extends to the central part of the cornea. Note the dull sheen of the corneal surface
The management of AAK is determined by its severity. In the early stages, supportive treatment includes preservative-free lubricants. In a study, autologous serum has been shown to stabilize the tear film and reduce corneal epithelial metaplasia.[35] When the keratopathy affects the visual axis, penetrating keratoplasty has been performed but with unsatisfactory outcomes owing to the underlying limbal stem cell deficiency. Recurrence rates from 64% to 85% have been reported.[36,37] Thus, attempts to restore or improve the limbal stem cell niche have been attempted. The various techniques include amniotic membrane grafting,[38] limbal allografting,[39] keratolimbal allografting,[40] cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation,[41] cultivated oral mucosa epithelial transplantation,[42] and a combination of limbal allograft and amniotic membrane transplantation.[43] Most techniques result in stabilizing the ocular surface and halting the progression of the AAK to some extent. Keratoplasty when performed after limbal stem cell augmentation may have a better outcome, especially when combined with systemic immunosuppression.[40] As the disease is progressive, most surgical procedures fail in due course of time. Keratoprosthesis is an option for end-stage AAK with limited success.[44,45,46] However, various complications such as failure of the prosthesis, formation of a retroprosthetic membrane, glaucoma, and choroidal detachment have been reported.[44,45,46] Patients operated for AAK need very long-term monitoring due to the progressive nature of the disease.
Lenticular abnormalities
Lens abnormalities are frequently associated with aniridia, and cataract is the most common association seen. They are reported to be seen in 40%–82% of aniridia patients, and the common morphological types are posterior polar, posterior subcapsular, and total cataract.[19,21,29,30] Other associated lens abnormalities that have been reported include lens subluxation, microspherophakia, lens coloboma, and posterior lenticonus. Cataracts may develop at any age and are usually progressive. Accelerated cataractogenesis is known to occur in the second decade of life, and the median age of presentation is 14 years.[19,47] The sequence of typical lenticular changes in aniridia is illustrated in Fig. 8 a–d. Often, vascularization from the remnant iris tissue is seen on the surface of the cataractous lens. Other morphological types of cataract that are reported frequently include nuclear cataract, mature cataract with subcapsular edema, and hypermature dehydrated cataract. Anterior polar opacity has been reported least frequently.[47] Common types of lenticular abnormalities in aniridia are depicted in Fig. 8 e–h.
Figure 8.
The lenticular abnormalities in aniridia. (a-d) show the typical sequence of cataractogenesis in aniridia starting from posterior polar cataract with radial spokes in the posterior subcapsular area (a), extension of opacities to form a midperipheral ring (b), total cataract (c), and hypermature cataract (d). Figure e shows aniridia and near-total cataract. (f) shows a superiorly subluxated lens with straightening of the inferior border. (g) shows inferior lens coloboma (arrow) and radial lenticular opacities (*). (e) shows a clear microspherophakic lens
Structurally, the anterior capsule of the cataractous lens is very fragile due to either absence or reduction in basement membrane constituents of the lens capsule, which adds to the challenges during surgery.[48,49] Aniridia associated with cataract results from heterozygous mutation of the PAX6 gene in 90% of cases. Over 60 identified mutations throughout the length of PAX6 genes are associated with aniridia and cataract.[50]
Challenges while doing cataract surgery in aniridia include poor ocular surface, corneal opacification, friable capsule, and reconstruction of the iris and pupil. If corneal transparency is not sufficient for a safe cataract surgery, limbal stem cell transplantation is the best initial approach. Capsulorhexis should be performed with utmost care using modern techniques such as dispersive viscoelastic, capsular staining, and aiming for a smaller capsular opening diameter. Some surgeons prefer a larger capsular opening due to the profibrotic nature of congenital aniridia along with the implantation of iris prostheses to prevent rhexis contraction.[51] The use of CTR has considerably reduced the chances of postoperative lens dislocation, posterior capsular/visual axis opacification, and anterior capsule fibrosis. A posterior capsulorhexis with anterior vitrectomy may be considered in young children in view of the high incidence of visual axis opacification and difficulty in doing YAG laser capsulotomy later due to the associated nystagmus. The other issue in conjunction with cataract surgery is the reconstruction of an optic aperture. This can be achieved using various artificial iris implants as mentioned above.
Complications following cataract surgery in aniridia include postoperative uveitis[19] and development of glaucoma[19,52] in 42%–50% of cases. The complications can lead to endothelial cell loss, progression of corneal epithelial disorders, and persistent damage to limbal stem cells, leading to worsening of keratopathy.[52,53] Contraction of capsular bag may lead to the displacement of iris implants, which in turn can contribute to persistent inflammation and increase in IOP.[53] Incidence of cystoid macular edema is about 18% in these eyes following cataract surgery.[52]
Glaucoma in association with aniridia
Glaucoma in aniridia occurs in 20%–70% of cases.[21,29,32,47,54] Patients generally develop glaucoma in late childhood or early adulthood due to progressive anatomical changes in the drainage angle.[55] The prevalence of glaucoma below 10 years of age is around 15%. Congenital glaucoma with or without buphthalmos is rarely seen [Fig. 2c].[55] Several mechanisms have been described in the development of glaucoma such as maldevelopment of the anterior chamber angle [Fig. 2b], absent Schlemm’s canal, and obscuration of the angle with a shapeless, homogenous avascular tissue.[2,55,56] Usually, the angle remains open in infancy. Progressive changes result in the anterior rotation of the rudimentary iris stump and occlusion of the trabecular meshwork (TM). In advanced glaucoma, the entire TM may be covered by the iris.
Glaucoma in patients with aniridia is often resistant to conventional medical and surgical treatment. The worst visual outcomes are associated with familial aniridia, higher IOP at baseline, and in patients undergoing multiple ocular surgeries.[57] Medical therapy remains the first line of treatment. Topical beta-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and prostaglandin analogs can be used. Some eyes may respond to pilocarpine in early glaucoma as it increases the aqueous outflow through unobstructed trabecular meshwork by contracting the ciliary muscle.[2,55] However, most patients eventually require surgical therapy, and all surgical modalities have been attempted. In a study by Sihota et al. (2021),[58] medical management was effective in 34.28% of eyes and 65.72% required surgery. Prophylactic goniotomy has been found to be effective in preventing glaucoma in aniridia by Walton et al. (1986).[59] A modified goniosurgical technique involving treatment of approximately 200 degrees of the angle to avoid the development of glaucoma with 89% success has also been reported.[60] The technique involves detaching the abnormal tissue between the iris and the TM without incising the TM with no reported surgical complications. However, therapeutic goniotomy seems to be of limited value in advanced cases.[2,56,59] The outcomes of trabeculotomy in aniridic glaucoma are conflicting. A study by Adachi et al. (1997)[61] reported a higher success rate with a qualified success of 83% with one or two trabeculotomy procedures over a mean follow-up period of 9.5 years in early glaucoma and children with open angles on gonioscopy in the first year of life. However, others reported trabeculotomy failure.[56] Trabeculectomy has also shown inconsistent results. Some propose trabeculectomy with mitomyin C (MMC) as a reasonable option,[2] while some reports showed poor outcomes.[56,61] Sihota et al. (2021)[58] proposed the use of MMC both under the scleral flap and subconjunctivally and the use of releasable sutures to prevent postoperative complications to achieve better results. The lower success in aniridic glaucoma may be related to the limbal pannus and poor ocular surface.[20] The limbus-based conjunctival flap can be preferred in these eyes to prevent injury to the remaining limbal stem cells.[62]
Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) have been found to be effective for treating glaucoma associated with aniridia.[2,56] Wiggins and Tomey (1992) reported a success rate of 83% in five out of six eyes that received Molteno implants after multiple intraocular surgeries.[56] A study comparing trabeculectomy with Aurolab aqueous drainage devices in aniridic glaucoma showed that the latter achieved greater IOP reduction at 6 months follow-up, but the success was not sustained at 4 years follow-up.[62] Complications such as flat anterior chamber, hypotony, and tube lens touch can be associated with the implantation of GDDs.[2,20] Cyclodestructive procedures may be performed in refractory cases with some success.[2,63,64] High rates of complications in aniridic eyes have been reported, especially after cyclocryotherapy.[63] However, cyclophotocoagulation with diode laser was found to be effective and safe in children with refractory pediatric glaucoma, including aniridia.[64]
Optic Nerve abnormalities
Optic nerve hypoplasia is seen in 2%–30% of cases in various studies.[18,21,22,65] Some studies have found its association with worse grades of foveal hypoplasia, suggesting that one may influence the development of another.[22] Other optic nerve anomalies apart from glaucomatous optic atrophy are optic nerve aplasia, optic disc pallor, optic disc pit, and morning glory disc.[21,66,67]
Other abnormalities
Nystagmus often accompanies the retinal pathology and is seen in 55%–73% of cases.[21,29,30] Whenever present, it contributes toward visual morbidity. The most common type of refractive error noted is myopia.[30] A study where the authors followed up children with aniridia for 3 years noted a myopic shift in 67%, a hyperopic shift in 33%, and an overall increase in astigmatism in 70%.[29] Other rare clinical manifestations include meibomian gland dysfunction and blepharoptosis.[21,68]
Systemic Associations
Multisystemic manifestations in aniridia are well-known [Fig. 9].[69] Among the sensory developmental defects, anosmia or hyposmia have been observed in aniridic individuals showing PAX6 haploinsufficiency.[70] There has also been a study indicating hearing and sound perception deficit accompanying PAX6-related visual defects.[71] Neurological abnormalities such as autism and intellectual disability have been described in several case reports; however, development delay is rare.[69,72] An association of PAX6 mutations with the absence of the pineal gland and unilateral polymicrogyria contributing to the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders such as epilepsy and learning disability has also been studied in animal models.[72] Another unique case highlighting an association between aniridia and bone malformations in the form of absence of the patella was also reported in 1975.[73]
Figure 9.
The various systemic abnormalities associated with aniridia. Multisystemic manifestations co-occurring with aniridia, such as Wilms tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and mental retardation (WAGR) syndrome features, neurological abnormalities, and obesity are depicted. Rarer phenotypes such as anosmia, auditory defects, diabetes, and absence of patella have also been indicated
Among the syndromic associations, the most important association of classical aniridia is known to be WAGR syndrome (Wilms tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and mental retardation; OMIM 194072).[74] Around 30% of individuals suffering from sporadic aniridia are likely to develop syndromic features of WAGR.[75] Up to 70% of cases of WAGR syndrome carry a risk of developing a pediatric nephroblastoma called Wilms tumor by 4–7 years of age.[75] These tumors tend to be bilateral, have a predilection for the male sex, and occur at a younger age when they occur with aniridia. Any child with sporadic aniridia needs to be screened with serial renal ultrasound till 5–7 years of age. Obesity in patients with WAGR and non-WAGR related aniridia has also been reported in some studies.[75]
The other common syndrome associated with aniridia is called Gillespie syndrome (OMIM 206700). It is characterized by a triad of partial aniridia, non-progressive cerebellar ataxia, and intellectual disability.[76] This syndrome presents with partial aniridia due to aplasia of the iris sphincter and a scalloped margin of the iris remnant. Related genetic mutations have recently been identified in the ITPR1 gene, an inosine triphosphate receptor with calcium channel activity. Truncation mutations in the heterozygous cell system of the ITPR1 gene showed irregular function which encompasses the IP3-binding domain and varying lengths of the modulatory domain, thus causing the Gillespie syndrome phenotype.[77] Other rare syndromic associations are Aicardi–Goutières syndrome, Duane syndrome, and megalocornea, which have been reported through isolated reports in the literature.[78,79,80]
Molecular Basis of Aniridia
Aniridia, as an isolated malformation, is an autosomal dominant disorder occurring in the majority due to deleterious mutations in the PAX6 gene (~90% of the cases).[81] Approximately 60%–70% of cases are familial, and 30%–40% of cases are sporadic.[72] Large inter-family and intra-family variability is observed for the disorder. Mutations in other genes such as FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXD3, and TRIM44 have been found to be linked with aniridia.[18,82,83] While mutations in four genes—FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, and FOXD3—may lead to both partial and complete aniridia phenotypes, mutations in the TRIM44 gene have been shown to be associated with total aniridia.[18] Features of WAGR syndrome occur due to a contiguous gene deletion on the short arm of chromosome 11 (11p13 region) encompassing the PAX6 and the adjacent WT1 gene,[75] a transcription factor. Its mutations have been associated with the increased risk of developing Wilms tumor in children and end-stage kidney disease in adults.[74] WAGR syndrome phenotype can be explained by the two “hit” inactivation of PAX6 and WT1 in the somatic cells of the kidneys. Complete absence or loss of functional WT1 protein causes tumorigenesis. However, the likelihood of developing Wilms tumor reduces significantly in a patient >8 years of age.[75]
Role of PAX6 in aniridia
The PAX6 gene, containing 14 exons, was the first homeobox gene to be correlated with the pathogenesis of congenital aniridia.[3] It is expressed in the forebrain, gut, early developed eye structures, ventral spinal cord, and endocrine pancreas.[84] It is a crucial transcription factor involved in neurogenesis and oculogenesis.[5] PAX6 coding and non-coding regions are found to be highly conserved across different species as is identified for mice and Fugu fish by sequence analysis.[85] PAX6 contains three major domains for DNA binding, namely a paired domain, a homeodomain, and a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain [Fig. 10].[86] During development, PAX6 interacts with other transcription factors and development regulators such as PAX2 and SOX2 to produce structural proteins such as crystallins.[87]
Figure 10.
PAX6 gene on chromosome region 11p3. Adjacent genes WT1 and BDNF causing WAGR syndrome and obesity phenotype respectively have also been denoted. The PAX6 gene has 14 exons and contains three major domains for DNA binding, namely a paired domain, a homeodomain, and a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain
Mutations in PAX6 linked with aniridia
Mutations in the PAX6 gene are recorded in an online database “The Human PAX6 Mutation Database” (http://pax6.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/). This database was last updated in June 2017 and harbors 491 unique mutations from 1067 patients. Mutations in the PAX6 gene are highly penetrant. While two-thirds of cases with aniridia are due to loss of function mutations in one copy of PAX6, one-third of cases occur due to chromosomal rearrangements.[3] Mutations in the PAX6 gene may fall in one of the following categories: splice site mutations, frameshift mutations, nonsense mutations, insertions and deletions, and introducing premature termination codons (PTC) resulting in haploinsufficiency.[5,30,75] This phenomenon in aniridia phenotype can be attributed to degraded abnormal mRNA being produced by mutated codons as opposed to prematurely truncated short proteins by a process called nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.[74]
C-terminal extension (CTE) mutations in PAX6 cause the reading frame to continue protein-coding into the 3’ untranslated region and leads to gain-of-function and severe aniridic phenotype.[3]
Compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations are largely considered inviable to the fetus.[75] Chromosomal aberrations such as deletions, translocations, and inversions encompassing complete or part of the PAX6 gene can lead to isolated aniridia features.[88] When conserved transcriptional regulatory elements located in the intronic region adjacent to the PAX6 gene are also included in the chromosome irregularity, classical aniridia can be expected.[3]
While aniridic PAX6 mutations are mostly due to the formation of truncating protein, missense mutations in PAX6 are also known to cause non-aniridia phenotypes such as microphthalmia, microcornea, foveal hypoplasia, ocular coloboma, keratitis, congenital cataract, Gillespie syndrome, Peters anomaly, and morning glory disc anomaly.[75,76,77,78]
Genotype-phenotype correlations
Although a definitive genotype-phenotype correlation is not established in PAX6 mutations, several authors have suggested specific correlations in their studied cohorts. Hingorani et al. (2009)[84] analyzed a cohort of 43 PAX6 mutation-positive patients for phenotypic correlation. The results divided the findings into three main categories: amino acid substitution mutations, loss of protein expression mutations, and CTE mutations. The overall inference indicated that milder iris abnormalities and defects were noted in amino acid substitution mutations, whereas severely affected individuals were either a part of CTE mutation or a loss of protein expression mutations [Table 2].
Table 2.
Genotype-phenotype correlation between different mutations in PAX6 with disease severity in aniridia and its comparison with phenotypes observed in the Indian population
Type of Mutation | Common Phenotype Association[83] | Rare Phenotype Association[83] | Phenotype Association in Indian population[89] |
---|---|---|---|
Loss of function Mutation | Foveal Hypoplasia | Partial iris absence | Aniridia |
Premature truncation | Nystagmus | Full iris with abnormal architecture | Nystagmus |
codon mutation; | Complete absence of Iris | Cataract | |
Frameshift deletions | Cataract | Ectopia Lentis | |
Glaucoma | Ptosis | ||
Optic Nerve Dysplasia | Microcornea | ||
Visual Acuity: Perception of light to 20/80 | |||
Missense Mutations | Partial iris absence | Foveal hypoplasia | Cataract |
Full irides with abnormal architecture | No glaucoma | Macular hypoplasia | |
Cataracts | No severe optic nerve | Ectopic coloboma | |
Visual Acuity: 20/30 to 20/250 | malformations | Glaucoma | |
C-terminal Extension | Foveal hypoplasia | Exudative vascular retinopathy | |
Mutations | Keratopathy | Glaucoma | |
Cataracts | |||
Myopia | |||
Mild iris anomalies | |||
Visual Acuity: 20/80 to finger counting |
Another genotype-phenotype correlation analysis for PAX6 mutations was performed by Yokoi et al. (2016)[88] by examining five families with multiple affected members. They reported partial differences in the phenotype of family members harboring the same mutation. This phenotypic heterogeneity was observed for corneal opacity, glaucoma, foveal hypoplasia, and cataracts. This can be attributed to the epigenetic interaction of PAX6 with other downstream genes. However, no heterogeneity was observed between eyes of the same patient irrespective of maternal or paternal inheritance of mutated allele, signifying similar PAX6 regulation in both eyes.[88]
In a recent study, Vasilyeva et al. (2021)[89] analyzed the phenotypic correlation of variable genotypes in 155 aniridia patients linked with PAX6 alterations. Their study revealed that patients with 3’-cis-regulatory region deletions had a milder aniridia phenotype without foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus, or keratopathy. This can be attributed to residual promoter function and partial production of PAX6 protein by the mutant allele as no complex genomic rearrangements were observed in this regulatory deletion.[89]
Case reports and cumulative review articles studying the Indian population have mostly been published from South India and shed light on common mutations and their phenotypes in this population group. A study by Neethirajan et al. (2004)[90] examined the genetic mutations in the PAX6 gene in 28 members with aniridia from six families against controls from the general population. Three novel point mutations in the coding region of PAX6 were identified. Their correlation to patient phenotype was similar to previous reports from other parts of the world suggesting loss of function mutations causing classic aniridia phenotypes.[90] Specific phenotypic variability with mutations was noted. For example, a proband with c. 715ins5 mutation had sclerocornea with nystagmus. Foveal hypoplasia was observed in aniridic patients with c. 482C>A and c.1201delA mutations. A case with c. 901delA revealed ptosis, microcornea with dislocated cataractous lens, while another with IVS9-12C>T showed peripheral corneal pannus with bullous keratopathy and corneal ectasia.[90]
A comparative analysis of mutations and observations has been reported by Neethirajan et al. (2009)[91] in the Indian population [Table 2]. Similar findings were identified across different ethnic groups. However, a high prevalence of frameshift mutations was noted due to frequent consanguineous marriages in India among different religious groups.[88] The authors also observed intra-familial variability for severity of aniridia among members carrying the same mutation and hypothesized the role of upstream and downstream genes from PAX6 and their pleiotropic effect.[91]
Role of other genes in aniridia
Non-partial as well as complete aniridia has also been reported due to mutations in FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXD3, and TRIM44 genes [Table 3].[92,93,94]
Table 3.
Non-PAX6 mutations associated with aniridia
Gene | Location | Function | Phenotype along with classic aniridia |
---|---|---|---|
FOXC1 | 6p25 | Eye development | Anterior segment malformation |
Dandy-Walker malformation | |||
Redundant umbilical skin tags | |||
Hypodontia | |||
Malar hypoplasia | |||
Glaucoma | |||
PITX2 | 4q25 | Developmental pathways including left-right signaling | Axenfeld-Reiger phenotype |
Severe iris hypoplasia[90] | |||
CYP1B1 | 2p21 | Oxidative biochemical reactions | Primary congenital glaucoma[93] |
Anterior chamber development | |||
FOXD3 | 1p31.3 | Development and migration of neural crest cells | Classic aniridia[62] |
Formation of melanocytes | Vitiligo[91] | ||
Maintenance and self-renewal of stem cells[62] | |||
TRIM44 | 11p13 | Ubiquitin E3 ligase | Classic aniridia[18] |
Molecular diagnosis of aniridia
Molecular diagnosis of aniridia becomes of vital importance for children <8 years of age to rule out the possibility of occurrence of the lethal condition, “Wilms tumor.”[95] Even in the absence of genetic testing, all children diagnosed with aniridia should undergo a renal ultrasound for the same reason as mentioned above. The WT1 gene located in the proximity of PAX6 is likely to be altered with small deletions or chromosomal aberrations that lead to sporadic aniridia, hence increasing the risk for WAGR syndrome. However, in the presence of a positive family history of aniridia and in absence of a history of renal neoplasia, it is less likely that the WT1 gene is mutated.[95]
For young children, chromosomal aberration analysis using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or high-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) should be performed to identify known gene duplication/deletion and copy number variations associated with WAGR syndrome.[74,75,95] Chromosomal breakpoints can be detected using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) to spot rearrangements disrupting the PAX6 gene.[95] However, in sporadic cases of aniridia, mutation analysis by sequencing the PAX6 gene via next-generation sequencing or PCR-based Sanger sequencing can identify mutations in nearly 85% of cases.[95]
On occasion, despite strong clinical indication, a mutation in PAX6 remains unidentified. This can be due to limitations of selected experimental methodology and probe distribution to detect alterations in upstream or downstream regulatory elements and deep introns.[95] Secondary reasons can be attributed to the phenotypic overlap with other ocular disorders caused by mutations in genes such as FOXC1, FOXE3, FOXD3, CYP1B1, PITX2, and PITX3.[95] A targeted sequencing panel with high coverage and read depths for these mentioned genes can be used for the detection of mutations.
Future directions
Genetic defects in PAX6 causing haploinsufficiency prove to be a model for gene-targeted therapy. In a study by Roux et al. (2018),[96] the authors created a successful cellular model for PAX6 mutation-positive patients with aniridia-related keratopathy by the introduction of a pathogenic mutation into limbal stem cells by using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technique. Reduced expression of PAX6 in heterozygous mutants was observed, and on introduction of recombinant PAX6 protein, the rescue of disease phenotype could be observed in the cell culture model. This suggested that administration of wild-type PAX6 can be an encouraging therapeutic approach for aniridia-related keratopathy.[96]
From the topical treatment perspective, it was realized a decade ago that most mutations in PAX6 causing aniridia are due to PTCs. Thus, a mechanism to override the PTCs by altering the termination process and thereby functionally suppressing the nonsense mutation had therapeutic potential. In principle, the nonsense suppression occurs during mRNA translation, in which a near-cognate aminoacyl tRNA is inserted into the polypeptide, thus replacing the stop codon.[97] This misreading was recognized in animal models as an off-target effect of aminoglycoside antibiotics. However, due to the toxic character of aminoglycosides, a small-molecule chemical analog called Ataluren, PTC124 is now being widely studied.[97] It has been shown to generate a full-length functional protein that reverses the developmental defect following postnatal drug administration in PAX6 mouse models for aniridia. The use of this drug has progressed to a phase-II randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study and has shown successful clinical applications for other diseases.[98,99,100]
Conclusion
Based on the current understanding of aniridia, its pathology, and treatment options, the malformation remains visually debilitating. However, the future points toward developing a better understanding of the epigenetic factors, upstream, downstream regulators, and role of other genes such as TRIM44 in the pathogenesis of the disorder.[18] Molecular genetics revelations would pave way for better identification and therapy options for classical aniridia and its extraocular associations.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank the clinical photography department at Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital (New Delhi), LV Prasad Eye Institute (Hyderabad), Sankara Netralaya (Chennai), Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, and Post-graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (Rohtak) for providing clinical images for this manuscript.
References
- 1.Barrata G. Observazionipratichesulle principal:Malattiedegliorchi, Milano 1818 Tomo 2, 349 as cited by Jungke C:Veber den angeborrenmangel der iris. J ChirAugen-Heilkunde (Berlin) 1821;2:677. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nelson LB, Spaeth GL, Nowinski TS, Margo CE, Jackson L. Aniridia. A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:621–42. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90184-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:1011–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shaw MW, Falls HF, Neel JV. Congenital aniridia. Am J Hum Genet. 1960;12:389–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kokotas H, Petersen M. Clinical and molecular aspects of aniridia. Clin Genet. 2010;77:409–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pedersen HR, Hagen LA, Landsend ECS, Gilson SJ, Utheim ØA, Utheim TP, et al. Color vision in aniridia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:2142–52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Margo CE. Congenital aniridia:A histopathologic study of the anterior segment in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1983;20:192–8. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19830901-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hamming NA, Miller MT, Rabb M. Unusual variant of familial aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1986;23:195–200. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19860701-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weissbart SB, Ayres BD. Management of aniridia and iris defects:An update on iris prosthesis options. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:244–9. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Srinivasan S, Ting DS, Snyder ME, Prasad S, Koch HR. Prosthetic iris devices. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49:6–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olson MD, Masket S, Miller KM. Interim results of a compassionate-use clinical trial of Morcher iris diaphragm implantation:Report 1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1674–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mavrikakis I, Mavrikakis E, Syam PP, Bell J, Casey JH, Casswell AG, et al. Surgical management of iris defects with prosthetic iris devices. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:205–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Khng C, Snyder ME. Iris reconstruction with a multipiece endocapsular prosthesis in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2051–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mayer CS, Baur ID, Storr J, Khoramnia R. Bilateral Artificial Iris implantation in patients with bilateral iris defects. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2021;22:101108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fernández-López E, Pascual FP, Pérez-López M, Quevedo AM, Martínez CP. Sutureless artificial iris after phacoemulsification in congenital aniridia. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(4 Suppl 1):S36–9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Azizi RS. Cosmetic contact lens fit for traumatic aniridia. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1996;23:72–5. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vásquez Quintero A, Pérez-Merino P, Fernández García AI, De Smet H. Smart contact lens:A promising therapeutic tool in aniridia. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.oftale.2021.01.004. S0365-6691(21) 00029-0. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2021.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Samant M, Chauhan BK, Lathrop KL, Nischal KK. Congenital aniridia:Etiology, manifestations and management. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11:135–44. doi: 10.1586/17469899.2016.1152182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park SH, Park YG, Lee MY, Kim MS. Clinical features of Korean patients with congenital aniridia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24:291–6. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2010.24.5.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee H, Meyers K, Lanigan B, O'Keefe M. Complications and visual prognosis in children with aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010;47:205–10. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20090818-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Singh B, Mohamed A, Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Mandal AK, Jalali S, et al. Clinical manifestations of congenital aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014;51:59–62. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20131223-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Landsend ECS, Pedersen HR, Utheim ØA, Rueegg CS, Baraas RC, Lagali N, et al. Characteristics and utility of fundus autofluorescence in congenital aniridia using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:4120–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-26994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martínez-Morales JR, Rodrigo I, Bovolenta P. Eye development:A view from the retina pigmented epithelium. Bioessays. 2004;26:766–77. doi: 10.1002/bies.20064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rufai SR, Thomas MG, Purohit R, Bunce C, Lee H, Proudlock FA, et al. Can structural grading of foveal hypoplasia predict future vision in infantile nystagmus?:A longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Casas-Llera P, Siverio A, Esquivel G, Bautista C, Alió JL. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography foveal morphology as a prognostic factor for vision performance in congenital aniridia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30:58–65. doi: 10.1177/1120672118818352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen H, Wu X, Li X, Chen J, Lin Z, Chen W, et al. Analysis of choroidal thickness in children with congenital aniridia. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45:1292–7. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1736309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Therattil A, Naranjo A, Hsu ST, Kelly MP, Freedman SF, Dubovy SR, et al. Clinicopathologic correlation of aniridia:Optical coherence tomography angiography and histopathologic observations. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;20:100919. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dangremond T, Wang K, Helms M, Bhattarai S, Pfeifer W, Drack AV. Correlation between electroretinography, foveal anatomy and visual acuity in aniridia due to PAX6 mutations. Doc Ophthalmol. 2021;143:283–95. doi: 10.1007/s10633-021-09844-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Yu YS. Congenital aniridia:Long-term clinical course, visual outcome, and prognostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28:479–85. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ugalahi MO, Ibukun FA, Olusanya BA, Baiyeroju AM. Congenital aniridia:Clinical profile of children seen at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, South-West Nigeria. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;13 doi: 10.1177/25158414211019513. 25158414211019513. doi:10.1177/25158414211019513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee HK, Kim MK, Oh JY. Corneal abnormalities in congenital aniridia:Congenital central corneal opacity versus aniridia-associated keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;185:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Landsend ECS, Lagali N, Utheim TP. Congenital aniridia - A comprehensive review of clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66:1031–50. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Deng SX, Borderie V, Chan CC, Dana R, Figueiredo FC, Gomes JA, et al. International limbal stem cell deficiency working group. Global consensus on definition, classification, diagnosis, and staging of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea. 2019;38:364–75. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lagali N, Wowra B, Fries FN, Latta L, Moslemani K, Utheim TP, et al. PAX6 mutational status determines aniridia-associated keratopathy phenotype. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:273–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.López-García JS, Rivas L, García-Lozano I, Murube J. Autologous serum eyedrops in the treatment of aniridic keratopathy. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:262–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kremer I, Rajpal RK, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:317–20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73581-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tiller AM, Odenthal MT, Verbraak FD, Gortzak-Moorstein N. The influence of keratoplasty on visual prognosis in aniridia:A historical review of one large family. Cornea. 2003;22:105–10. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.López-García JS, Rivas L, García-Lozano I. Trasplante de membranaamnióticaeneltratamiento de la insuficiencia limbal moderada de pacientes con aniridia congénita [Moderate limbal deficiency in patients with congenital aniridia treated with amniotic membrane transplantation] Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:517–23. doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912005000900005. Spanish. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tan DT, Ficker LA, Buckley RJ. Limbal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:29–36. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30737-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS. Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft:A limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:125–30. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01451-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Levis HJ, Blows P, Doré CJ, Vernon A, et al. Three-year outcomes of cultured limbal epithelial allografts in aniridia and Stevens-Johnson syndrome evaluated using the Clinical Outcome Assessment in Surgical Trials assessment tool. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3:265–75. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nakamura T, Endo K, Cooper LJ, Fullwood NJ, Tanifuji N, Tsuzuki M, et al. The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:106–16. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.López-García JS, Rivas L, García-Lozano I. Tratamiento de la insuficiencia limbal grave mediantecirugíacombinada de trasplante de limbo y trasplante de membranaamniótica [Severe limbal deficiency treated by combined limbal allograft and amniotic membrane transplantation] Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:405–12. doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912005000700005. Spanish. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hassanaly SI, Talajic JC, Harissi-Dagher M. Outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation in aniridia patients at the University of Montreal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:270–6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shah KJ, Cheung AY, Holland EJ. Intermediate-term and long-term outcomes with the boston type 1 keratoprosthesis in aniridia. Cornea. 2018;37:11–4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yazdanpanah G, Bohm KJ, Hassan OM, Karas FI, Elhusseiny AM, Nonpassopon M, et al. Management of congenital aniridia-associated keratopathy:Long-term outcomes from a tertiary referral center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;210:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Edén U, Lagali N, Dellby A, Utheim TP, Riise R, Chen X, et al. Cataract development in Norwegian patients with congenital aniridia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e165–7. doi: 10.1111/aos.12225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hou ZQ, Hao YS, Wang W, Ma ZZ, Zhong YF, Song SJ. Clinical pathological study of the anterior lens capsule abnormalities in familial congenital aniridia with cataract. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2005;37:494–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schneider S, Osher RH, Burk SE, Lutz TB, Montione R. Thinning of the anterior capsule associated with congenital aniridia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:523–5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01602-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brown A, McKie M, Van Heyningen V, Prosser J. The human PAX6 mutation database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:259–64. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.1.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Neuhann IM, Neuhann TF. Cataract surgery and aniridia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:60–4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328333ea49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Reinhard T, Engelhardt S, Sundmacher R. Black diaphragm aniridia intraocular lens for congenital aniridia:Long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:375–81. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gonzalez-Salinas R, Pena-Guani F. Combined cataract phacoemulsification and aniridia endocapsular rings implantation in a patient with bilateral congenital aniridia and cataract:A case report. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016;30:64–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Netland PA, Scott ML, Boyle JW, 4 th, Lauderdale JD. Ocular and systemic findings in a survey of aniridia subjects. J AAPOS. 2011;15:562–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Grant WM, Walton DS. Progressive changes in the angle in congenital aniridia, with development of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;78:842–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90308-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wiggins RE, Tomey KF. The results of glaucoma surgery in aniridia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:503–5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080160081036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jain A, Gupta S, James MK, Dutta P, Gupta V. Aniridic glaucoma:Long-term visual outcomes and phenotypic associations. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:539–42. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sihota R, Selvan H, Azmira K, Dada T, Sharma A, Gupta A, et al. Improving long-term intraocular pressure and visual outcomes in eyes with aniridic glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:3749–55. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Walton DS. Aniridic glaucoma:The results of goniosurgery to prevent and treat this problem. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:59–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen TC, Walton DS. Goniosurgery for prevention of aniridic glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1144–8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.9.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Adachi M, Dickens CJ, Hetherington J, Jr, Hoskins HD, Iwach AG, Wong PC, et al. Clinical experience of trabeculotomy for the surgical treatment of aniridic glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:2121–5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30041-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Durai I, Pallamparthy S, Puthuran GV, Wijesinghe HK, Uduman MS, Krishnadas SR, et al. Outcomes of glaucoma drainage device implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in glaucoma secondary to aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;227:173–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wagle NS, Freedman SF, Buckley EG, Davis JS, Biglan AW. Long-term outcome of cyclocryotherapy for refractory pediatric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1921–6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91042-9. discussion 1926-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kirwan JF, Shah P, Khaw PT. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation:Role in the management of refractory pediatric glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:316–23. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00898-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McCulley TJ, Mayer K, Dahr SS, Simpson J, Holland EJ. Aniridia and optic nerve hypoplasia. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:762–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ginsberg J, Bove KE, Cuesta MG. Aplasia of the optic nerve with aniridia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1980;12:433–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Traboulsi EI, Jurdi-Nuwayhid F, Torbey NS, Frangieh GT. Aniridia, atypical iris defects, optic pit and the morning glory disc anomaly in a family. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1986;7:131–5. doi: 10.3109/13816818609076122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Peter NM, Leyland M, Mudhar HS, Lowndes J, Owen KR, Stewart H. PAX6 mutation in association with ptosis, cataract, iris hypoplasia, corneal opacification and diabetes:A new variant of familial aniridia? Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41:835–41. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hu P, Meng L, Ma D, Qiao F, Wang Y, Zhou J, et al. A novel 11p13 microdeletion encompassing PAX6 in a Chinese Han family with aniridia, ptosis and mental retardation. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:3. doi: 10.1186/s13039-015-0110-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sisodiya SM, Free SL, Williamson KA, Mitchell TN, Willis C, Stevens JM, et al. PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet. 2001;28:214–6. doi: 10.1038/90042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bamiou DE, Free SL, Sisodiya SM, Chong WK, Musiek F, Williamson KA, et al. Auditory interhemispheric transfer deficits, hearing difficulties, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in children with congenital aniridia due to PAX6 mutations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:463–9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lee HJ, Colby KA. A review of the clinical and genetic aspects of aniridia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2013;28:306–12. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.825293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mirkinson AE, Mirkinson NK. A familial syndrome of aniridia and absence of the patella. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1975;11:129–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wawrocka A, Krawczynski MR. The genetics of aniridia - simple things become complicated. J Appl Genet. 2018;59:151–9. doi: 10.1007/s13353-017-0426-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Grønskov K, Olsen JH, Sand A, Pedersen W, Carlsen N, BakJylling AM, et al. Population-based risk estimates of Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia. A comprehensive mutation screening procedure of PAX6 identifies 80% of mutations in aniridia. Hum Genet. 2001;109:11–8. doi: 10.1007/s004390100529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hall HN, Williamson KA, FitzPatrick DR. The genetic architecture of aniridia and Gillespie syndrome. Hum Genet. 2019;138:881–98. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1934-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gerber S, Alzayady KJ, Burglen L, Brémond-Gignac D, Marchesin V, Roche O, et al. Recessive and dominant De Novo ITPR1 mutations cause Gillespie syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98:971–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Musalem HM, Dirar QS, Al-Hazzaa SAF, Al Zoba AA, El-Mansoury J. Unusual association of aniridia with Aicardi-Goutières syndrome-related congenital glaucoma in a tertiary care center. Am J Case Rep. 2018;19:500–4. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.908036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Khan AO, Aldahmesh M. Bilateral Duane syndrome and bilateral aniridia. J AAPOS. 2006;10:273–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lipsky SN, Salim S. Concurrent presentation of aniridia and megalocornea without glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2011;15:297–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.McEntagart M, Williamson KA, Rainger JK, Wheeler A, Seawright A, De Baere E, et al. A restricted repertoire of De Novo mutations in ITPR1 cause Gillespie syndrome with evidence for dominant-negative effect. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98:981–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Robinson DO, Howarth RJ, Williamson KA, van Heyningen V, Beal SJ, Crolla JA. Genetic analysis of chromosome 11p13 and the PAX6 gene in a series of 125 casesreferred with aniridia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:558–69. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhang X, Wang P, Li S, Xiao X, Guo X, Zhang Q. Mutation spectrum of PAX6 in Chinese patients with aniridia. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2139–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hingorani M, Williamson KA, Moore AT, van Heyningen V. Detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of 43 individuals with PAX6 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2581–90. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tyas DA, Simpson TI, Carr CB, Kleinjan DA, van Heyningen V, Mason JO, et al. Functional conservation of Pax6 regulatory elements in humans and mice demonstrated with a novel transgenic reporter mouse. BMC Dev Biol. 2006;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-6-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Inoue M, Kamachi Y, Matsunami H, Imada K, Uchikawa M, Kondoh H. PAX6 and SOX2-dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N-3 involved in embryonic visual system development. Genes Cells. 2007;12:1049–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Khajavi M, Inoue K, Lupski JR. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay modulates clinical outcome of genetic disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:1074–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Yokoi T, Nishina S, Fukami M, Ogata T, Hosono K, Hotta Y, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation of PAX6 gene mutations in aniridia. Hum Genome Var. 2016;3:15052. doi: 10.1038/hgv.2015.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Vasilyeva TA, Marakhonov AV, Voskresenskaya AA, Kadyshev VV, Käsmann-Kellner B, Sukhanova NV, et al. Analysis of genotype-phenotype correlations in PAX6-associated aniridia. J Med Genet. 2021;58:270–4. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Neethirajan G, Krishnadas SR, Vijayalakshmi P, Shashikant S, Sundaresan P. PAX6 gene variations associated with aniridia in south India. BMC Med Genet. 2004;5:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-5-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Neethirajan G, Solomon A, Krishnadas SR, Vijayalakshmi P, Sundaresan P. Genotype/phenotype association in Indian congenital aniridia. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:513–7. doi: 10.1007/s12098-009-0075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Baum L, Pang CP, Fan DS, Poon PM, Leung YF, Chua JK, et al. Run-on mutation and three novel nonsense mutations identified in the PAX6 gene in patients with aniridia. Hum Mutat. 1999;14:272–3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)14:3<272::AID-HUMU21>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Doshi M, Marcus C, Bejjani BA, Edward DP. Immunolocalization of CYP1B1 in normal, human, fetal and adult eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Schunter JA, Löffler D, Wiesner T, Kovacs P, Badenhoop K, Aust G, et al. Anovel FoxD3 variant is associated with vitiligo and elevated thyroid auto-antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E1335–42. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Redeker EJ, de Visser AS, Bergen AA, Mannens MM. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) enhances the molecular diagnosis of aniridia and related disorders. Mol Vis. 2008;14:836–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Roux LN, Petit I, Domart R, Concordet JP, Qu J, Zhou H, et al. Modeling of aniridia-related keratopathy by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of human limbal epithelial cells and rescue by recombinant PAX6 protein. Stem Cells. 2018;36:1421–9. doi: 10.1002/stem.2858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sermet-Gaudelus I, Boeck KD, Casimir GJ, Vermeulen F, Leal T, Mogenet A, et al. Ataluren (PTC124) induces cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein expression and activity in children with nonsense mutation cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:1262–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0137OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Bushby K, Finkel R, Wong B, Barohn R, Campbell C, Comi GP, et al. Ataluren treatment of patients with nonsense mutation dystrophinopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2014;50:477–87. doi: 10.1002/mus.24332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kerem E, Konstan MW, De Boeck K, Accurso FJ, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Wilschanski M, et al. Ataluren for the treatment of nonsense-mutation cystic fibrosis:A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:539–47. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70100-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wilschanski M, Miller LL, Shoseyov D, Blau H, Rivlin J, Aviram M, et al. Chronic ataluren (PTC124) treatment of nonsense mutation cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:59–69. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00120910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]