LNA oligonucleotide mediates an anti‐inflammatory effect in autoimmune myocarditis via targeting lactate dehydrogenase B

Mariella Bockstahler; Christian Salbach; Anna‐Maria Müller; Andrea Kübler; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Norbert Frey; Ziya Kaya

doi:10.1111/imm.13421

. 2021 Oct 13;165(2):158–170. doi: 10.1111/imm.13421

LNA oligonucleotide mediates an anti‐inflammatory effect in autoimmune myocarditis via targeting lactate dehydrogenase B

Mariella Bockstahler ^1,², Christian Salbach ^1,², Anna‐Maria Müller ^1,², Andrea Kübler ^1,², Oliver J Müller ³, Hugo A Katus ^1,², Norbert Frey ^1,², Ziya Kaya ^1,^2,^✉

PMCID: PMC9426621 PMID: 34606637

Abstract

Treatment of myocarditis is often limited to symptomatic treatment due to unknown pathomechanisms. In order to identify new therapeutic approaches, the contribution of locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides (LNA ASOs) in autoimmune myocarditis was investigated. Hence, A/J mice were immunized with cardiac troponin I (TnI) to induce experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) and treated with LNA ASOs. The results showed an unexpected anti‐inflammatory effect for one administered LNA ASO MB_1114 by reducing cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. The target sequence of MB_1114 was identified as lactate dehydrogenase B (mLDHB). For further analysis, mice received mLdhb‐specific GapmeR during induction of EAM. Here, mice receiving the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR showed increased protein levels of cardiac mLDHB and a reduced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. The effect of increased cardiac mLDHB protein level was associated with a downregulation of genes of reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐associated proteins, indicating a reduction in ROS. Here, the suppression of murine pro‐apoptotic Bcl‐2‐associated X protein (mBax) was also observed. In our study, an unexpected anti‐inflammatory effect of LNA ASO MB_1114 and mLdhb‐specific GapmeR during induction of EAM could be demonstrated in vivo. This effect was associated with increased protein levels of cardiac mLDHB, mBax suppression and reduced ROS activation. Thus, LDHB and LNA ASOs may be considered as a promising target for directed therapy of myocarditis. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to clarify the mechanism of action of anti‐inflammatory LDHB‐triggered effects.

Keywords: experimental autoimmune myocarditis, inflammation, lactate dehydrogenase B, troponin I

In experimental autoimmune myocarditis mouse model, an administered locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotide targeted against lactate dehydrogenase B mediated reduced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. This effect might be triggered by a decreased ROS activation mediated via a LDHB‐associated suppression of protein levels of pro‐apoptotic mBax.

graphic file with name IMM-165-158-g001.jpg

Abbreviations

5’UTR: 5’‐untranslated region
Afog: Acid fuchsin orange G‐stain
ASO: Antisense oligonucleotide
CFA and PBS control: Control
CFA: Complete Freund's adjuvant
DCM: Dilated cardiomyopathy
EAM: Experimental autoimmune myocarditis
GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase
HE: Haematoxylin and eosin
hsTnT: High‐sensitive troponin T
IL‐17: Interleukin‐17
IL‐1α: Interleukin‐1 alpha
IL‐1β: Interleukin‐1 beta
IL‐2: Interleukin‐2
IL‐6: Interleukin‐6
LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase
LNA Ctrl.: LNA ASO control
LNA ASOs: Locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides
mBax: Murine Bcl‐2‐associated X protein
mLDHA: Murine lactate dehydrogenase A
mLDHB: Murine lactate dehydrogenase B
mNox2: Murine NADPH oxidase 2
mp47 phox: Murine NADPH oxidase cytosolic protein p47phox
mp67 phox: Murine NADPH oxidase cytosolic protein p67phox
mSod2: Murine superoxide dismutase 2
mtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA
mUcp2: Murine uncoupling protein 2
NADPH: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
ROS: Reactive oxygen species
SMARTer RACE: Switching Mechanism At 5′‐end of RNA Transcript Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends
TLR: Toll‐like receptor
TNF‐α: Tumour necrosis factor alpha
TnI: Troponin I

INTRODUCTION

Particularly in young patients, myocarditis represents a leading cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death [1, 2]. Myocarditis is characterized by inflammatory infiltration of the myocardium and subsequent necrosis of cardiomyocytes [3, 4]. In 10–20%, myocarditis may progress to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) [3, 4]. Due to unknown pathomechanism leading from myocarditis to DCM, therapeutic regimes for myocarditis patients and subsequent DCM are generally restricted to heart failure treatment [5, 6]. Mechanistically, cell damage induced by cardiac inflammation in terms of myocarditis may trigger autoimmune reactions leading to an unregulated chronic autoimmune response and subsequently heart failure [7, 8].

In order to study mechanisms leading from myocarditis to DCM and to investigate underlying principles of an autoimmune response in myocarditis, our group developed a mouse model of troponin I (TnI)‐induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) [9].

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are short synthetic single‐stranded DNA/RNA‐like oligonucleotides, which are designed to selectively bind RNA (Watson–Crick pairing) to regulate protein expression [10]. Here, protein expression is regulated by affecting processing or translation of target RNA or by activation of RNase H and subsequent degradation of target RNA [10, 11]. Due to their potential to modify protein expression, ASOs are currently used to treat diseases such as hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis [12]. In order to use ASOs as therapeutic agents, they are modified to achieve better bioavailability and higher target RNA specificity [13]. For this purpose, DNA nucleotides of ASOs are replaced with locked nucleic acid (LNA) nucleotides [14]. Here, GapmeRs, made of LNA bases flanking a central DNA sequence, provide a potent target mRNA inhibition. Mechanistically, GapmeRs form DNA‐RNA hybrids after binding their target RNA. These DNA‐RNA hybrids are recognized by RNase H catalysing RNA cleavage [13].

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an important tetrameric metabolic enzyme that catalyses the interconversion of lactate and pyruvate. LDH is composed of non‐identical subunits (H‐(LDHB) and M‐(LDHA)) encoded by the LDHB and LDHA gene, respectively [15, 16]. Through combination of these subunits, five isoenzymes (A4, A3B1, A2B2, A1B3 and B4) with tissue‐specific distribution are formed [17]. Isoenzyme combinations containing LDHB are predominantly found in heart tissue, whereas combinations containing LDHA are particularly located in anaerobic tissues [18].

In our study, we were able to demonstrate an anti‐inflammatory effect of LNA ASOs during EAM induction in vivo mediated via increased protein levels of cardiac mLDHB and subsequent pro‐apoptotic Bcl‐2‐associated X protein (mBax) suppression, as well as downregulation of genes of reactive oxygen species (ROS)‐associated proteins, indicating a reduction in ROS. Thus, LNA ASOs and LDHB may be a promising therapeutic approach for targeted treatment in autoimmune myocarditis.

METHODS

Mice

A/J mice were obtained from Envigo (Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK). For all experiments, 5‐to 7‐week‐old female mice were used. Mice were maintained at the animal facility unit of the University of Heidelberg, Germany. This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the German Animal Welfare Act, which is based on the Directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Directive 2010/63/EU). The local Animal Care and Use Committee Karlsruhe approved all procedures involving the use and care of animals.

Experimental autoimmune myocarditis

To induce EAM, mice were subcutaneously immunized with an emulsion of murine cardiac TnI and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), which was supplemented with 5mg/mL of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). For animal experiments, 120µg TnI was used. For the experiments with LNA ASOs, A/J mice were immunized with TnI on days 0, 7 and 14 and received 5mg/kg of the LNA ASO mmu‐miR‐21a‐5p, LNA ASO mmu‐miR‐146b‐5p, MB_1114 ASO or LNA ASO control (Exiqon) intraperitoneally (i.p.) 5 times in total (one injection per week). Furthermore, for analysis of the effect of MB_1114, A/J mice were immunized with Control (CFA+PBS) (for a detailed experimental setting, see Methods S1, Figure S1 and Figure S2 and Table S1). For the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR experiment, mice were immunized on days 0 and 7 with TnI or Control and received 10mg/kg of the ASOs (Exiqon) i.p. 6 times in total (for a detailed experimental setting, see Methods S1, Figure S3 and Table S1). Murine cardiac TnI was provided and prepared as already described [19, 20, 21]. On day 28, mice were anaesthetized by i.p. injection of 120mg/kg ketamine and 16mg/kg xylazine and blood was taken from facial vein for measurement of high‐sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) serum level. Afterwards, mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Hearts were explanted, cut longitudinal vertical to septum and snap‐frozen or fixed in 10% formalin for further analyses.

Western blotting

For Western blot analysis, proteins of frozen heart tissues were extracted as described and separated on 12% NuPage Bis‐Tris gels [21, 22]. Afterwards, proteins were transferred, and membranes were blocked as previously described [22]. Membranes were incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight and corresponding secondary antibody (Table S2 and Table S3). Protein bands were detected using chemiluminescence. Quantitative analysis was performed using ImageJ or FluorChem Q software. GAPDH served as a loading control. The mean of at least 3 technical replicates per sample is depicted in the graphs.

Measurement of hsTnT

Measurement of hsTnT serum level was performed as previously described [22]. For the measurement, serum was diluted 1:10. Measured hsTnT serum levels were normalized against the mean hsTnT level of the Ctrl. B./Control group.

Measurement of cardiac ROS level

For determination of cardiac ROS levels, DCFH‐DiOxyQ assay was used (described in Methods S1, see also Figure S4).

Histopathology

Explanted hearts were fixed in formalin and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Heart sections (3–5μm) were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) or with acid fuchsin orange G‐stain (Afog) to assess the grade of inflammation and fibrosis, using standard staining protocols and reagents. HE‐ and Afog‐stained sections were analysed using light microscopy. Histopathological evaluation was carried out by two independent examiners, who were blinded to the treatment and immunization status of the respective groups. Inflammation and fibrosis were assessed in percentage of the examined heart section as previously described [22].

Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Measurement of qPCR was performed as previously described using 25ng of cDNA [21, 22]. L32 was used as reference gene. The relative expression represents the mean of 3 technical replicates. Primer sequences used for qPCR analysis are shown in Table S4.

Target identification and verification of LNA ASO MB_1114

To identify the mRNA target of LNA ASO MB_1114, Switching Mechanism At 5′‐end of RNA Transcript (SMARTer) Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) was performed (detailed methods in the Methods S1 and in Table S5). Sequence of SMARTer RACE PCR product was determined using TOPO‐TA cloning and sequencing (detailed methods in the Methods S1).

Cytokines

For analysis of cytokine levels in splenocytes, the spleen was explanted. Cytokine levels from spleen homogenate after TnI stimulation were measured for murine IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐2, IL‐17, and TNF‐α as previously described [23].

Statistical analysis

Results are shown as mean ±standard error of the mean (SEM) and plotted as individual points. To determine whether samples within one group are normally distributed, the D’Agostino–Pearson test was used. For the comparison of more than two normally distributed groups, two‐way ANOVA with a conservative Bonferroni post hoc test was used to control the type I error rate. To compare groups with a single control group, one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test was used. Treatment (MB_1114 vs. LNA control vs. solvent Ctrl. or GapmeR vs. Ctrl. B) and the immunization (TnI vs. Control) were tested as independent variables. Differences between two parametric groups were analysed using the unpaired t‐test. To compare two non‐parametric groups, the Mann–Whitney test was performed. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001, and ****P < 0·0001. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA).

RESULTS

LNA ASO MB_1114 showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in TnI‐induced EAM

In order to identify new therapeutic approaches in EAM, the contribution of miRNAs in EAM was examined. For that purpose, A/J mice immunized with TnI for EAM induction received LNA ASOs directed against mmu‐miR‐21a‐5p and mmu‐miR‐146b‐5p, as well as scrambled LNA ASO control (MB_1114) or solvent Ctrl. 5 times in total (once a week). However, not the miR‐specific LNA ASOs, but the treatment with MB_1114, showed an unexpected anti‐inflammatory effect on EAM (Figure 1a, Figure S5). In order to examine the sequence‐specific effect of the discovered anti‐inflammatory LNA ASO MB_1114, the initial experiment was repeated using MB_1114, solvent Ctrl. and another scrambled LNA ASO control (LNA Ctrl.). Furthermore, some mice were immunized with CFA+PBS (control) in addition to the i.p. injections with LNA ASOs and solvent Ctrl. This repetition of the initial experiment showed the same results. Accordingly, the consolidated results of the two experiments showed a significant reduction in inflammation and fibrosis for MB_1114‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice compared to TnI‐immunized mice treated with LNA Ctrl. or solvent Ctrl., respectively (Figure 1b,c,d). These changes could not be observed for Control‐immunized mice (Figure 1b,c,d). To characterize cardiac damage, hsTnT serum level was measured on day 28. The results showed no significant difference in hsTnT serum level in TnI‐immunized and MB_1114‐treated mice compared with LNA Ctrl.‐treated mice (Figure 1e). Taken together, the results showed a significant anti‐inflammatory effect of MB_1114‐treated mice.

LNA ASO MB_1114 triggered an increase in mLDHB protein level potentially mediating anti‐inflammatory in vivo effects

Due to the optimized design of LNA ASOs leading to improved hybridization of modified ASOs to complementary RNA [24], we assumed that the target of the LNA ASO MB_1114 was a RNA. To identify the RNA target sequence of LNA ASO MB_1114, a 5’ SMARTer RACE PCR was performed. The BLAST search of the generated PCR product revealed mLdhb as the RNA target sequence of MB_1114 (Figure S6). Due to the substance class of MB_1114 as LNA ASO, we expected an inhibition of mLdhb mRNA translation mediated via steric hindrance of the translation machinery [25]. Hence, the influence of MB_1114 on mLDHB protein level was analysed and correlated to inflammation and fibrosis. Contrary to our expectation, the Western blot analysis showed a significantly increased mLDHB protein level in TnI‐immunized mice treated with MB_1114 compared to LNA Ctrl.‐ and solvent Ctrl.‐treated mice (Figure 2a). These effects could not be observed in the Control‐immunized mice. To exclude potential effects of MB_1114 on mLdha through high sequence homology of 74%, Western blot analysis was performed. The results showed no effect of MB_1114 on mLDHA protein level (Figure 2b). However, in general, mice immunized with TnI showed a significantly lower mLDHA protein level compared to Control‐immunized mice. These results indicated that LNA ASO MB_1114 could mediate its anti‐inflammatory effect via increased protein levels of mLDHB.

LNA ASO MB_1114 triggered an increased mLDHB protein level potentially mediating anti‐inflammatory *in vivo* effects. (a) Heart tissue was analysed by Western blot and fold increase in cardiac murine LDHB (mLDHB) of mice immunized with TnI or Control and treated with LNA ASO MB_1114 (n = 19), LNA Ctrl. (n = 10) or solvent Ctrl. (n = 19) normalized against GAPDH expression of TnI‐immunized mice treated with solvent Ctrl. Representative Western blot images of mLDHB protein expression. (b) Western blot analysis of cardiac murine LDHA (mLDHA) protein of different groups normalized against GAPDH expression of TnI‐immunized mice. Representative Western blot images of mLDHA protein expression. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001 and ****P < 0·0001

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice

As MB_1114, primarily designed as an LNA ASO miRNA inhibitor, stimulated the expression of its identified target mLDHB, we investigated whether the administration of a specific mLDHB ASO was also able to cause the same anti‐inflammatory effect. Thus, a specific anti‐mLdhb LNA GapmeR (GapmeR) was designed, validated (Figure 7) and administered to A/J mice during EAM. An unspecific GapmeR control (Ctrl. B) was used as inhibitor control. Mice were immunized with TnI to induce an EAM or with CFA+PBS (Control), and effects of mLdhb‐specific GapmeR in EAM mice were analysed. Here, we observed a significant lower inflammation and fibrosis in cardiac tissue of GapmeR‐treated mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated mice, both groups immunized with TnI (Figure S3A,B,C, Figure S8). Furthermore, our results showed a significantly lower hsTnT serum level between GapmeR‐ and Ctrl. B‐treated mice both immunized with TnI (Figure 3d). Heart weight/body weight ratios were significantly lower in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice than in Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice (Figure 3e). Furthermore, a successful delivery of LNA ASOs in heart tissue was detected (Figure S9). Our results showed an mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐mediated anti‐inflammatory in vivo effect.

*mLdhb*‐specific GapmeR‐treated mice showed reduced protein levels of mBax. Western blot analysis of cardiac mBax protein normalized against GAPDH and the mBax protein level of Control‐immunized mice treated with Ctrl. B. Representative Western blot images of mBax. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by *P < 0·05 and **P < 0·01

*mLdhb*‐specific GapmeR showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice. (a, b) Inflammation and fibrosis of A/J mice, immunized with TnI or Control and treated with GapmeR (n = 9/group) or Ctrl. B (n = 9/group). (c) Representative macroscopic pictures (column 1) and histopathological exterminations of HE‐stained (columns 2, 3) and Afog‐stained (columns 4, 5) heart sections. (d) hsTnT levels in serum of immunized mice treated with GapmeR and Ctrl. B. (e) Heart weight/body weight ratio of examined groups. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001 and ****P < 0·0001

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR triggered increased mLDHB protein levels during anti‐inflammatory effects in vivo

To determine whether the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR increased the expression of cardiac mLDHB levels, the cardiac protein levels were analysed. Similar to the experiment with MB_1114, we were able to show a significant increase in mLDHB protein level in EAM mice treated with GapmeR compared to Ctrl. B (Figure 4a). In contrast to that, no significant difference in the mLdhb mRNA levels could be observed for these two groups (Figure S10). Furthermore, no difference in cardiac mLDHA protein expression was observed between the various groups (Figure 4b). These results supported our hypothesis of a regulatory mechanism, which is induced by the LNA ASO‐mediated inhibition of mLdhb mRNA translation leading to enhanced translation efficiency.

*mLdhb*‐specific GapmeR‐triggered increased levels of cardiac mLDHB protein expression. (a) Western blot analysis of cardiac murine LDHB (mLDHB) protein expression of A/J mice immunized with TnI or Control and treated with GapmeR (n = 9/group) or Ctrl. B (n = 9/group). mLDHB protein expression was normalized against GAPDH in TnI‐immunized mice treated with Ctrl. B. Representative Western blot images of mLDHB. (b) Western Blot analysis of cardiac murine LDHA (mLDHA) protein level. Protein expression was normalized against GAPDH of Control‐immunized mice treated with Ctrl. B. Representative Western blot images of mLDHA. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by ***P < 0·001 and ****P < 0·0001

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokines in EAM mice

To study the effect of mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration on pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory stimuli, we analysed the expression of various cytokines of supernatant of stimulated splenocytes and in cardiac tissue. The supernatant of TnI‐stimulated spleen cell homogenate explanted from TnI/ASO treated mice showed a significant reduction in pro‐inflammatory cytokines mIL‐1β, mIL‐6 and mIL‐2, as well as a reduction in mIL‐17 and mTNF‐α in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized animals (Figure 5a–e). Additionally, cardiac levels of mIL‐1α mRNA showed a downregulation of cardiac mIl‐1α mRNA levels in TnI‐immunized and GapmeR‐treated mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice (Figure 5f). Furthermore, a successful delivery of LNA ASOs in spleen tissue was detected (Figure S9). These results indicated a mLdhb‐specific GapmeR caused reduction in pro‐inflammatory cytokines in EAM mice.

*mLdhb*‐specific GapmeR administration reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokines and led to reduced cardiac *mIL*‐1α levels in EAM mice. Cytokine levels from supernatant of TnI‐stimulated spleen cell homogenate. (a) mIL‐1β, (b) mIL‐6, (c) mTNF‐α, (d) mIL‐2 and (e) mIL‐17 were analysed using ELISA. Myocardial mRNA expression of (f) *mIl*‐1α was analysed by qPCR from mice, immunized with TnI or Control and treated with GapmeR (n = 9/group) or Ctrl. B (n = 9/group). qPCR data were normalized against mL32 in Control‐immunized mice treated with Ctrl. B. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001 and ****P < 0·0001

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered anti‐inflammatory effect in A/J mice led to a reduced activation of ROS and mBax suppression

To elucidate potential mechanisms involved in anti‐inflammatory effects observed in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized animals, we first examined the role of cardiac ROS levels, as well as mRNA levels of ROS‐associated proteins such as mp47 phox, mp67 phox, mNox2, mUcp2 and mSod2 in TnI‐induced EAM. Here, an upregulation of cardiac ROS levels, as well as an upregulation of cardiac mRNA levels of ROS‐associated proteins such as mp47 phox, mp67 phox, mNox2 and mUcp2 in TnI‐induced EAM mice, was observed, whereas cardiac mSod2 mRNA levels were downregulated (Figure S11). These results revealed the importance of ROS‐associated proteins in TnI‐induced EAM model.

In a next step, we investigated the mRNA levels of ROS‐associated proteins, which we previously identified to be important in our EAM model, in GapmeR‐ or Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐ or Control‐immunized A/J mice. Here, a significant downregulation of cardiac mRNA levels from ROS‐associated proteins mp47 phox, mp67 phox, mNox2 and mUcp2 in GapmeR/TnI‐treated compared with Ctrl. B/TnI‐treated mice was observed, indicating a GapmeR‐mediated reduction in ROS (Figure 6a–d). These results suggested that GapmeR‐treated mice seemed to show less ROS activation despite TnI immunization. In accordance with these results, significantly higher cardiac mSod2 mRNA levels in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice were observed (Figure 6e). Taken together, these results indicated a downregulation of ROS in mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice.

*mLdhb*‐specific GapmeR‐treated mice showed reduced cardiac levels of ROS‐associated proteins. qPCR analysis of ROS‐associated proteins. (a) *mp47 phox*, (b) *mp67 phox*, (c) *mNox2*, (d) *mUcp2* and (e) *mSod2* in hearts of mice immunized with TnI or Control and treated with GapmeR (n = 9/group) or Ctrl. B (n = 9/group). mRNA levels were normalized against mL32 and the corresponding mRNA expression level of Control‐immunized mice treated with Ctrl. B. Data are displayed as mean ±SEM. Statistical analysis of comparison between groups was performed using two‐way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Values of P < 0·05 were considered statistically significant and marked by *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01 and ***P < 0·001

To gain better insights into mechanisms involved in mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐mediated upregulation of mLDHB protein expression and subsequent anti‐inflammatory mechanisms observed in our study, we examined the expression of pro‐apoptotic protein mBax, as mBax was described by Sheibani et al. to be suppressed by LDHB protein and by Wu et al. to be linked with TnI autoantibodies [26, 27]. Here, we observed a significant downregulation of mBax protein levels in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice (Figure 7). These results indicated a potential mechanism of mLDHB, which may be mediated via mBax protein suppression followed by potential ROS reduction in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice.

DISCUSSION

Underlying mechanisms leading from myocarditis to DCM are not fully understood so far. Therapies to reduce the progress from myocarditis to DCM are currently limited to heart failure treatment [5, 6]. Thus, our team focused on identifying potential therapeutic approaches for new targeted therapies in myocarditis using a TnI‐based EAM mouse model [9]. One substance class, which is already under investigation for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, is ASOs [28]. In our study, we demonstrated for the first time that LNA ASOs have an anti‐inflammatory effect during EAM induction in vivo. This is potentially induced by increased mLDHB protein levels and probably subsequent reduced ROS activation mediated via a suppression of protein levels of pro‐apoptotic mBax during TnI‐induced EAM. Hence, LNA ASOs directed against L dhb seem to be a promising substance class for targeted treatment of myocarditis. Nevertheless, exact evidence for the mechanism of action of LDHB‐mediated anti‐inflammatory activity is still lacking. Furthermore, off‐target effects mediated by LNA ASOs might also contribute to the anti‐inflammatory effect observed in our study.

LNA ASO MB_1114 showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice

In this study, we observed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice treated with LNA ASO MB_1114, which was primarily designed as a scrambled LNA ASO control. The results showed reduced signs of inflammation, fibrosis and cardiac damage. Due to the sequence‐specific anti‐inflammatory off‐target effect of MB_1114, we hypothesized the anti‐inflammatory potential of this LNA ASO not to be ascribed to unspecific phosphorothioate backbone interactions. However, it was already described that the phosphorothioate backbone directly contributes to sequence‐dependent off‐target effects of LNA ASOs. These effects showed higher potency with phosphorothioate backbone compared with a phosphodiesterase one [29]. Thus, the phosphorothioate backbone seems to support but not mediate the sequence‐dependent effect of MB_1114.

LNA ASO MB_1114 triggered an increase in mLDHB protein level potentially mediating anti‐inflammatory in vivo effects

Our results point to a MB_1114‐induced post‐transcriptional mechanism regulating the cardiac mLDHB protein expression. Hence, we postulate that binding of LNA ASO MB_1114 to the mLdhb mRNA indeed could sterically inhibit the mRNA translation. However, the inhibition may be counteracted via enhanced translation efficiency of the accessible mLdhb mRNA. Schwanhäusser et al. demonstrated that the cellular abundance of proteins is predominantly controlled at the level of translation [30]. Another mechanism potentially involved in LNA‐triggered upregulation of mLDHB protein levels might be the phenomenon of genetic compensation. This mechanism, which might be responsible for observed unintended upregulation, is caused by a development of tolerance against LNA ASOs and subsequent upregulation of the target mRNA. Liang et al. described a mechanism where LNA ASOs increase the pre‐mRNA levels of their target mRNA [31]. These pre‐mRNAs might afterwards travel back to nucleus and trigger the proposed genetic compensation mechanism proposed by El‐Brolosy et al. [32]. However, in our study we could not observe an upregulation of mLdhb mRNA levels in GapmeR‐treated compared to Ctrl. B‐treated mice. Hence, such a feedback mechanism might be an interesting hypothesis, but lacks evidence in our study. Therefore, we hypothesized an enhanced translation efficiency to be responsible for the observed boost in mLDHB protein levels. Moreover, this regulatory mechanism seems to play a role only in EAM mice. Accordingly, no effect of LNA ASO could be observed in Control‐immunized and MB_1114‐treated mice. Therefore, MB_1114 seems to show only an effect in diseased mice predestinating the LNA ASO as an ideal therapeutic agent. However, further investigations will be necessary to reveal the precise regulatory mechanism by which MB_1114 mediates its effect.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR showed an anti‐inflammatory effect on EAM

Similar to the experiments with MB_1114, mice treated with the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR in addition to TnI immunization showed reduced signs of inflammation, fibrosis, cardiac damage and better heart weight/body weight ratio. These observations confirmed our hypothesis that LNA ASO MB_1114 seems to mediate its anti‐inflammatory effect via mLDHB. A correlation between mLDHB level and immune reaction was already described by Ratter et al. They showed that the change in LDHB expression upon stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro correlated significantly with immune cell function [33]. This observation in addition to our results refers to a yet unknown role of mLDHB in inflammatory processes.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered increased mLDHB protein levels during anti‐inflammatory effects in vivo

To determine whether the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR similar to LNA ASO MB_1114 led to an enhanced cardiac mLDHB expression, the cardiac protein expression was analysed. Similar to the experiment with MB_1114, we were able to show a significant increase in cardiac mLDHB protein levels in EAM mice treated with GapmeR compared with Ctrl. B. To explain why the mLDHB protein increased by GapmeR was only seen in EAM mice but not in control mice, we determined the cardiac concentration of GapmeR and Ctrl. B in TnI‐ and Control‐immunized mice. The analyses showed that the cardiac GapmeR concentration of GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice seems to be higher than the cardiac GapmeR concentration of GapmeR‐treated and Control‐immunized mice. Thus, the mLDHB protein increase in the GapmeR/TnI group could be based on the higher cardiac GapmeR concentration. The enhanced cardiac uptake of GapmeR might be explained by an inflammation‐induced enhanced permeability of endothelial cells. Accordingly, TNF‐α, which was more highly expressed in TnI‐immunized compared with Control‐immunized mice, seems to increase the permeability of endothelial monolayers to lower weight solutes and macromolecules [34]. Considering this hypothesis, the increased cardiac concentration of ASOs in TnI‐immunized mice should also be detectable for Ctrl. B. However, for Ctrl. B, no difference in ASO concentration was observed between TnI‐ and Control‐immunized mice. These inconsistent results could be based on the small number of mice in each group. To prove the hypothesis of increased uptake mediated via inflammation and leading to enhanced mLDHB expression, a further study with a larger group size would be required.

In contrast to mLDHB, no difference in cardiac mLDHA protein level was observed between the various groups. These results support our hypothesis of a regulatory mechanism, which is induced by the LNA ASO‐mediated inhibition of mLdhb mRNA translation leading to enhanced translation efficiency. A regulated negative feedback mechanism was already verified for the transcription of LDHA. Zhang et al. could demonstrate that an inhibition of LDHA led to a negative feedback overexpressing c‐Myc, which in turn induced LDHA expression [35]. This observation suggests that there might exist yet unknown feedback loops for LDHB expression as well. Taken together, these results seem to support our hypothesis of an anti‐inflammatory role of mLDHB in the TnI‐induced EAM. Despite evidence collected and discussed, it is still unexpected that the mLdhb GapmeR did not decrease mLdhb mRNA but increased mLDHB protein levels. As discussed, we collected data supporting the hypothesis of an enhancing translation efficiency mediated by mLdhb‐specific LNA ASO. However, the possibility of unspecific off‐target effects mediated by LNA GapmeR could not definitely be ruled out and thus might also be an explanation for our results [36, 37]. In particular, it is not clear whether the mLDHB protein increase in heart tissue is a direct result of GapmeR in the heart or mediated via downstream events of the GapmeR in other tissues.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration caused reduction in pro‐inflammatory cytokines in EAM mice

To study the effect of mLDHB on pro‐inflammatory stimuli, we analysed the expression of various cytokines in TnI‐stimulated spleen cell homogenate and in heart tissue. Here, we could observe a reduction in pro‐inflammatory cytokines mIL‐1β, mIL‐6, mTNF‐α, mIL‐2 and mIL‐17 in the GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized group compared to the group immunized with TnI and treated with Ctrl. B. IL‐1β and TNF‐α are early pro‐inflammatory cytokines, which seem to be necessary to induce the transition from infectious to autoimmune myocarditis. Additionally, IL‐6 and IL‐17, late pro‐inflammatory cytokines, are crucial in the progression from autoimmune myocarditis to fibrotic dilated cardiomyopathy [38]. Moreover, the protection against EAM in Lewis rats can be ascribed to splenocytes secreting reduced levels of IL‐2 [39]. The cardiac expression of mIl‐1α was also decreased in the TnI‐immunized GapmeR group compared with the Ctrl. B‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice. Due to their importance for the induction and progression of an EAM, the decreased expression of all these pro‐inflammatory cytokines could explain reduced inflammation, fibrosis and cardiac damage observed for the GapmeR group. Therefore, the decreased levels of these cytokines seem to be responsible for the better disease outcome in the GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized group. However, the possibility cannot be ruled out that other organs such as kidney, liver or spleen, which also showed successful ASO delivery, are also involved in the downstream anti‐inflammatory effects. Thus, further studies are necessary to analyse the involvement of these organs.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered anti‐inflammatory effect in A/J mice led to reduced activation of ROS and mBax suppression

The expression of the analysed pro‐inflammatory cytokines during myosin‐mediated EAM seems to be induced via Toll‐like receptor (TLR) 4 activation and enhanced via ROS formation. Hence, Wu et al. demonstrated in their study that TLR4 activation mediates inflammation and cytokine expression via ROS production. ROS in turn led to subsequent mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage and release, which promotes apoptosis of cardiomyocytes [40]. Additionally, a connection between ROS generation and LDHB could be observed in cancer cells [41]. Due to these discoveries and to elucidate the influence of LDHB on ROS generation, we first analysed the contribution of ROS and the role of mLDHB in TnI‐induced EAM. Here, a significant increase in ROS and significantly elevated transcriptional levels of ROS‐associated proteins could be observed in TnI‐immunized mice. These proteins are NADPH oxidase Nox2 and components of Nox (mp47 phox, mp67 phox), which produces ROS, as well as Ucp2, a negative regulator of mitochondrial ROS production induced by ROS [42, 43, 44]. Furthermore, the transcription of Sod2, which catalyses the conversion of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, was significantly reduced in EAM mice [45]. These observations confirmed the results of Wu et al. Thus, ROS generation seems to play an important role in the induction and progression of TnI‐induced EAM.

Contrary to that, our results did not show any significant difference in mLDHB expression between TnI‐ and Control‐immunized mice. These results suggest that mLDHB does not negatively affect disease progression and therefore contradict the findings of Ratter et al., who postulated an interaction between LDHB and immune cell function [33].

To analyse the influence of mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration and subsequent elevated mLDHB protein levels on ROS, the transcriptional levels of ROS‐associated proteins in GapmeR‐ and Ctrl. B‐treated mice were determined. The studies showed a significant reduction of mp47 phox, mp67 phox, Nox2 and Ucp2 transcription level in GapmeR‐treated EAM mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated animals. Furthermore, significantly increased transcription could be observed for Sod2. According to these results, the GapmeR‐mediated mLDHB protein levels might lead to a reduction in cardiac ROS in EAM. First indications on how mLDHB could mediate its positive effect on ROS are provided by Sheibani et al. They identified LDHB as a novel Bax suppressor preventing apoptosis in yeast [27]. Bax, which is a pro‐apoptotic effector protein, promotes mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization by pore formation leading to the release of pro‐apoptotic factors. Furthermore, Bax triggers the release of mtDNA causing a pro‐inflammatory type of cell death [46]. According to the results of Wu et al., the release of mtDNA could be responsible for the manifestation of an EAM by binding to TLR 9 and triggering the production of further pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β, TNF‐α and IL‐6, as well as ROS [40]. Additionally, Oka et al. also demonstrated that released mitochondrial DNA leads to TLR 9‐mediated inflammatory responses in cardiomyocytes and is able to induce myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in vivo [47]. To investigate whether increased mLDHB expression in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice could lead to a mBax suppression and therefore potentially resulting in lower ROS activation, we analysed the cardiac mBax expression in GapmeR and Ctrl. B‐treated mice. The results showed a significantly reduced cardiac mBax protein expression in GapmeR‐treated and TnI‐immunized mice compared with Ctrl. B‐treated animals. These results point to an anti‐inflammatory effect of the mLdhb‐specific GapmeR mediating a mBax suppression potentially via mLDHB overexpression. However, further investigations are necessary to confirm the mLDHB‐Bax‐ROS axis in the EAM model.

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

Except for funding in part by DZHK B20‐016 and DFG KA 1797/8‐1, 9‐1, the authors declare no direct conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Mariella Bockstahler, Christian Salbach, Anna‐Maria Müller and Andrea Kübler performed the experiments; Mariella Bockstahler and Christian Salbach analysed the data; Mariella Bockstahler, Christian Salbach, Anna‐Maria Müller and Ziya Kaya designed the study; and Mariella Bockstahler, Christian Salbach and Anna‐Maria Müller wrote the paper.

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.7MB, docx)}

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Center for Model System and Comparative Pathology (Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany) and the Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT Heidelberg, Germany) for staining and virtual microscopy; G. Pfitzer (Institute of Physiology, University Hospital Köln, Germany) for donation of troponin I; and Renate Öttl, Anne‐Maria Suhr and Patricia Raczek for technical assistance. Open access funding enabled and organized by ProjektDEAL.

Bockstahler M, Salbach C, Müller A‐M, Kübler A, Müller OJ, Katus HA, et al. LNA oligonucleotide mediates an anti‐inflammatory effect in autoimmune myocarditis via target of lactate dehydrogenase B. Immunology. 2022;165:158–170. 10.1111/imm.13421

The first authors Mariella Bockstahler and Christian Salbach contributed equally to the study (joint first authorship).

Funding information

This study was funded in part by DZHK B20‐016 and DFG KA 1797/8‐1, 9‐1 to Ziya Kaya.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The corresponding author had full access to all data in the study and took responsibility for its integrity and data analysis.

REFERENCES

1. Leuschner F, Katus HA, Kaya Z. Autoimmune myocarditis: past, present and future. J Autoimmun. 2009;33(3–4):282–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Basso C, Calabrese F, Corrado D, Thiene G. Postmortem diagnosis in sudden cardiac death victims: macroscopic, microscopic and molecular findings. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(2):290–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(19):1388–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Caforio ALP, Malipiero G, Marcolongo R, Iliceto S. Myocarditis: a clinical overview. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(7):63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno‐Blanes J, Felix SB, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636–48. 48a–48d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Caforio AL, Marcolongo R, Jahns R, Fu M, Felix SB, Iliceto S. Immune‐mediated and autoimmune myocarditis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(6):715–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Rose NR. Myocarditis: infection versus autoimmunity. J Clin Immunol. 2009;29(6):730–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Rose NR. Viral damage or ‘molecular mimicry'‐placing the blame in myocarditis. Nat Med. 2000;6(6):631–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Goser S, Andrassy M, Buss SJ, Leuschner F, Volz CH, Ottl R, et al. Cardiac troponin I but not cardiac troponin T induces severe autoimmune inflammation in the myocardium. Circulation. 2006;114(16):1693–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Geary RS, Norris D, Yu R, Bennett CF. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and cell uptake of antisense oligonucleotides. Advan Drug Delivery Rev. 2015;87:46–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Bennett CF, Swayze EE. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:259–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Mathew V, Wang AK. Inotersen: new promise for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:1515–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Hagedorn PH, Persson R, Funder ED, Albæk N, Diemer SL, Hansen DJ, et al. Locked nucleic acid: modality, diversity, and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2018;23(1):101–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Braasch DA, Corey DR. Locked nucleic acid (LNA): fine‐tuning the recognition of DNA and RNA. Chem Biol. 2001;8(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Pineda JR, Callender R, Schwartz SD. Ligand binding and protein dynamics in lactate dehydrogenase. Biophys J. 2007;93(5):1474–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Read JA, Winter VJ, Eszes CM, Sessions RB, Brady RL. Structural basis for altered activity of M‐ and H‐isozyme forms of human lactate dehydrogenase. Proteins. 2001;43(2):175–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Markert CL, Shaklee JB, Whitt GS. Evolution of a gene. Multiple genes for LDH isozymes provide a model of the evolution of gene structure, function and regulation. Science. 1975;189(4197):102–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Mirebeau‐Prunier D, Le Pennec S, Jacques C, Fontaine JF, Gueguen N, Boutet‐Bouzamondo N, et al. Estrogen‐related receptor alpha modulates lactate dehydrogenase activity in thyroid tumors. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Al‐Hillawi E, Minchin SD, Trayer IP. Overexpression of human cardiac troponin‐I and troponin‐C in Escherichia coli and their purification and characterisation. Two point mutations allow high‐level expression of troponin‐I. Eur J Biochem. 1994;225(3):1195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Kruger M, Pfitzer G, Stehle R. Expression and purification of human cardiac troponin subunits and their functional incorporation into isolated cardiac mouse myofibrils. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003;786(1–2):287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Bangert A, Andrassy M, Muller AM, Bockstahler M, Fischer A, Volz CH, et al. Critical role of RAGE and HMGB1 in inflammatory heart disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(2):E155–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Fischer A, Bockstahler M, Muller AM, Stroikova V, Leib C, Pfitzer G, et al. FN14 signaling plays a pathogenic role in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. J Cardiac Fail. 2019;25(8):674–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Kaya Z, Goser S, Buss SJ, Leuschner F, Ottl R, Li J, et al. Identification of cardiac troponin I sequence motifs leading to heart failure by induction of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis. Circulation. 2008;118(20):2063–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Thorpe C, Epple S, Woods B, El‐Sagheer AH, Brown T. Synthesis and biophysical properties of carbamate‐locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides with potential antisense applications. Org Biomol Chem. 2019;17(21):5341–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Chery J. RNA therapeutics: RNAi and antisense mechanisms and clinical applications. Postdoc J. 2016;4(7):35–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Wu Y, Qin YH, Liu Y, Zhu L, Zhao XX, Liu YY, et al. Cardiac troponin I autoantibody induces myocardial dysfunction by PTEN signaling activation. EBioMedicine. 2019;47:329–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Sheibani S, Jones NK, Eid R, Gharib N, Arab NT, Titorenko V, et al. Inhibition of stress mediated cell death by human lactate dehydrogenase B in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(5):fov032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Di Fusco D, Dinallo V, Marafini I, Figliuzzi MM, Romano B, Monteleone G. Antisense oligonucleotide: basic concepts and therapeutic application in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Sarvestani ST, Stunden HJ, Behlke MA, Forster SC, McCoy CE, Tate MD, et al. Sequence‐dependent off‐target inhibition of TLR7/8 sensing by synthetic microRNA inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(2):1177–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473(7347):337–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Liang XH, Nichols JG, De Hoyos CL, Crooke ST. Some ASOs that bind in the coding region of mRNAs and induce RNase H1 cleavage can cause increases in the pre‐mRNAs that may blunt total activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(17):9840–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. El‐Brolosy MA, Kontarakis Z, Rossi A, Kuenne C, Gunther S, Fukuda N, et al. Genetic compensation triggered by mutant mRNA degradation. Nature. 2019;568(7751):193–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Ratter JM, Rooijackers HMM, Hooiveld GJ, Hijmans AGM, de Galan BE, Tack CJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of lactate on metabolism and cytokine production of human primary PBMCs and monocytes. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Ammann P, Pfisterer M, Fehr T, Rickli H. Raised cardiac troponins. BMJ. 2004;328(7447):1028–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wang X, Gan L, Yu G, Chen Y, et al. Inhibition of LDH‐A by lentivirus‐mediated small interfering RNA suppresses intestinal‐type gastric cancer tumorigenicity through the downregulation of Oct4. Cancer Lett. 2012;321(1):45–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Hagedorn PH, Pontoppidan M, Bisgaard TS, Berrera M, Dieckmann A, Ebeling M, et al. Identifying and avoiding off‐target effects of RNase H‐dependent antisense oligonucleotides in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(11):5366–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Kasuya T, Hori S, Watanabe A, Nakajima M, Gahara Y, Rokushima M, et al. Ribonuclease H1‐dependent hepatotoxicity caused by locked nucleic acid‐modified gapmer antisense oligonucleotides. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Rose NR. Critical cytokine pathways to cardiac inflammation. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(10):705–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Li Y, Heuser JS, Kosanke SD, Hemric M, Cunningham MW. Protection against experimental autoimmune myocarditis is mediated by interleukin‐10‐producing T cells that are controlled by dendritic cells. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(1):5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Wu B, Ni H, Li J, Zhuang X, Zhang J, Qi Z, et al. The impact of circulating mitochondrial DNA on cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial injury after TLR4 activation in experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(2):713–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Wu H, Wang Y, Ying M, Hu X. Lactate dehydrogenases amplify reactive oxygen species in cancer cells in response to oxidative stimuli. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6 (1):242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Panday A, Sahoo MK, Osorio D, Batra S. NADPH oxidases: an overview from structure to innate immunity‐associated pathologies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12(1):5–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Tian XY, Ma S, Tse G, Wong WT, Huang Y. Uncoupling protein 2 in cardiovascular health and disease. Front Physiol. 2018;9(1060):1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Mailloux RJ, Harper ME. Uncoupling proteins and the control of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(6):1106–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Wang Y, Branicky R, Noe A, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutases: Dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(6):1915–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Pena‐Blanco A, Garcia‐Saez AJ. Bax, Bak and beyond ‐ mitochondrial performance in apoptosis. FEBS J. 2018;285(3):416–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Oka T, Hikoso S, Yamaguchi O, Taneike M, Takeda T, Tamai T, et al. Mitochondrial DNA that escapes from autophagy causes inflammation and heart failure. Nature. 2012;485(7397):251–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.7MB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

[imm13421-bib-0001] 1. Leuschner F, Katus HA, Kaya Z. Autoimmune myocarditis: past, present and future. J Autoimmun. 2009;33(3–4):282–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0002] 2. Basso C, Calabrese F, Corrado D, Thiene G. Postmortem diagnosis in sudden cardiac death victims: macroscopic, microscopic and molecular findings. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(2):290–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0003] 3. Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(19):1388–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0004] 4. Caforio ALP, Malipiero G, Marcolongo R, Iliceto S. Myocarditis: a clinical overview. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(7):63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0005] 5. Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno‐Blanes J, Felix SB, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636–48. 48a–48d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0006] 6. Caforio AL, Marcolongo R, Jahns R, Fu M, Felix SB, Iliceto S. Immune‐mediated and autoimmune myocarditis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(6):715–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0007] 7. Rose NR. Myocarditis: infection versus autoimmunity. J Clin Immunol. 2009;29(6):730–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0008] 8. Rose NR. Viral damage or ‘molecular mimicry'‐placing the blame in myocarditis. Nat Med. 2000;6(6):631–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0009] 9. Goser S, Andrassy M, Buss SJ, Leuschner F, Volz CH, Ottl R, et al. Cardiac troponin I but not cardiac troponin T induces severe autoimmune inflammation in the myocardium. Circulation. 2006;114(16):1693–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0010] 10. Geary RS, Norris D, Yu R, Bennett CF. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and cell uptake of antisense oligonucleotides. Advan Drug Delivery Rev. 2015;87:46–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0011] 11. Bennett CF, Swayze EE. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:259–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0012] 12. Mathew V, Wang AK. Inotersen: new promise for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:1515–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0013] 13. Hagedorn PH, Persson R, Funder ED, Albæk N, Diemer SL, Hansen DJ, et al. Locked nucleic acid: modality, diversity, and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2018;23(1):101–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0014] 14. Braasch DA, Corey DR. Locked nucleic acid (LNA): fine‐tuning the recognition of DNA and RNA. Chem Biol. 2001;8(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0015] 15. Pineda JR, Callender R, Schwartz SD. Ligand binding and protein dynamics in lactate dehydrogenase. Biophys J. 2007;93(5):1474–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0016] 16. Read JA, Winter VJ, Eszes CM, Sessions RB, Brady RL. Structural basis for altered activity of M‐ and H‐isozyme forms of human lactate dehydrogenase. Proteins. 2001;43(2):175–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0017] 17. Markert CL, Shaklee JB, Whitt GS. Evolution of a gene. Multiple genes for LDH isozymes provide a model of the evolution of gene structure, function and regulation. Science. 1975;189(4197):102–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0018] 18. Mirebeau‐Prunier D, Le Pennec S, Jacques C, Fontaine JF, Gueguen N, Boutet‐Bouzamondo N, et al. Estrogen‐related receptor alpha modulates lactate dehydrogenase activity in thyroid tumors. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0019] 19. Al‐Hillawi E, Minchin SD, Trayer IP. Overexpression of human cardiac troponin‐I and troponin‐C in Escherichia coli and their purification and characterisation. Two point mutations allow high‐level expression of troponin‐I. Eur J Biochem. 1994;225(3):1195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0020] 20. Kruger M, Pfitzer G, Stehle R. Expression and purification of human cardiac troponin subunits and their functional incorporation into isolated cardiac mouse myofibrils. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003;786(1–2):287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0021] 21. Bangert A, Andrassy M, Muller AM, Bockstahler M, Fischer A, Volz CH, et al. Critical role of RAGE and HMGB1 in inflammatory heart disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(2):E155–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0022] 22. Fischer A, Bockstahler M, Muller AM, Stroikova V, Leib C, Pfitzer G, et al. FN14 signaling plays a pathogenic role in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. J Cardiac Fail. 2019;25(8):674–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0023] 23. Kaya Z, Goser S, Buss SJ, Leuschner F, Ottl R, Li J, et al. Identification of cardiac troponin I sequence motifs leading to heart failure by induction of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis. Circulation. 2008;118(20):2063–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0024] 24. Thorpe C, Epple S, Woods B, El‐Sagheer AH, Brown T. Synthesis and biophysical properties of carbamate‐locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides with potential antisense applications. Org Biomol Chem. 2019;17(21):5341–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0025] 25. Chery J. RNA therapeutics: RNAi and antisense mechanisms and clinical applications. Postdoc J. 2016;4(7):35–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0026] 26. Wu Y, Qin YH, Liu Y, Zhu L, Zhao XX, Liu YY, et al. Cardiac troponin I autoantibody induces myocardial dysfunction by PTEN signaling activation. EBioMedicine. 2019;47:329–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0027] 27. Sheibani S, Jones NK, Eid R, Gharib N, Arab NT, Titorenko V, et al. Inhibition of stress mediated cell death by human lactate dehydrogenase B in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(5):fov032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0028] 28. Di Fusco D, Dinallo V, Marafini I, Figliuzzi MM, Romano B, Monteleone G. Antisense oligonucleotide: basic concepts and therapeutic application in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0029] 29. Sarvestani ST, Stunden HJ, Behlke MA, Forster SC, McCoy CE, Tate MD, et al. Sequence‐dependent off‐target inhibition of TLR7/8 sensing by synthetic microRNA inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(2):1177–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0030] 30. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473(7347):337–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0031] 31. Liang XH, Nichols JG, De Hoyos CL, Crooke ST. Some ASOs that bind in the coding region of mRNAs and induce RNase H1 cleavage can cause increases in the pre‐mRNAs that may blunt total activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(17):9840–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0032] 32. El‐Brolosy MA, Kontarakis Z, Rossi A, Kuenne C, Gunther S, Fukuda N, et al. Genetic compensation triggered by mutant mRNA degradation. Nature. 2019;568(7751):193–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0033] 33. Ratter JM, Rooijackers HMM, Hooiveld GJ, Hijmans AGM, de Galan BE, Tack CJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of lactate on metabolism and cytokine production of human primary PBMCs and monocytes. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0034] 34. Ammann P, Pfisterer M, Fehr T, Rickli H. Raised cardiac troponins. BMJ. 2004;328(7447):1028–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0035] 35. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wang X, Gan L, Yu G, Chen Y, et al. Inhibition of LDH‐A by lentivirus‐mediated small interfering RNA suppresses intestinal‐type gastric cancer tumorigenicity through the downregulation of Oct4. Cancer Lett. 2012;321(1):45–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0036] 36. Hagedorn PH, Pontoppidan M, Bisgaard TS, Berrera M, Dieckmann A, Ebeling M, et al. Identifying and avoiding off‐target effects of RNase H‐dependent antisense oligonucleotides in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(11):5366–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0037] 37. Kasuya T, Hori S, Watanabe A, Nakajima M, Gahara Y, Rokushima M, et al. Ribonuclease H1‐dependent hepatotoxicity caused by locked nucleic acid‐modified gapmer antisense oligonucleotides. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0038] 38. Rose NR. Critical cytokine pathways to cardiac inflammation. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(10):705–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0039] 39. Li Y, Heuser JS, Kosanke SD, Hemric M, Cunningham MW. Protection against experimental autoimmune myocarditis is mediated by interleukin‐10‐producing T cells that are controlled by dendritic cells. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(1):5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0040] 40. Wu B, Ni H, Li J, Zhuang X, Zhang J, Qi Z, et al. The impact of circulating mitochondrial DNA on cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial injury after TLR4 activation in experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(2):713–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0041] 41. Wu H, Wang Y, Ying M, Hu X. Lactate dehydrogenases amplify reactive oxygen species in cancer cells in response to oxidative stimuli. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6 (1):242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0042] 42. Panday A, Sahoo MK, Osorio D, Batra S. NADPH oxidases: an overview from structure to innate immunity‐associated pathologies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12(1):5–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0043] 43. Tian XY, Ma S, Tse G, Wong WT, Huang Y. Uncoupling protein 2 in cardiovascular health and disease. Front Physiol. 2018;9(1060):1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0044] 44. Mailloux RJ, Harper ME. Uncoupling proteins and the control of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(6):1106–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0045] 45. Wang Y, Branicky R, Noe A, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutases: Dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(6):1915–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0046] 46. Pena‐Blanco A, Garcia‐Saez AJ. Bax, Bak and beyond ‐ mitochondrial performance in apoptosis. FEBS J. 2018;285(3):416–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[imm13421-bib-0047] 47. Oka T, Hikoso S, Yamaguchi O, Taneike M, Takeda T, Tamai T, et al. Mitochondrial DNA that escapes from autophagy causes inflammation and heart failure. Nature. 2012;485(7397):251–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

LNA oligonucleotide mediates an anti‐inflammatory effect in autoimmune myocarditis via targeting lactate dehydrogenase B

Mariella Bockstahler

Christian Salbach

Anna‐Maria Müller

Andrea Kübler

Oliver J Müller

Hugo A Katus

Norbert Frey

Ziya Kaya

Abstract

Abbreviations

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

Mice

Experimental autoimmune myocarditis

Western blotting

Measurement of hsTnT

Measurement of cardiac ROS level

Histopathology

Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Target identification and verification of LNA ASO MB_1114

Cytokines

Statistical analysis

RESULTS

LNA ASO MB_1114 showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in TnI‐induced EAM

FIGURE 1.

LNA ASO MB_1114 triggered an increase in mLDHB protein level potentially mediating anti‐inflammatory in vivo effects

FIGURE 2.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 3.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR triggered increased mLDHB protein levels during anti‐inflammatory effects in vivo

FIGURE 4.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokines in EAM mice

FIGURE 5.

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered anti‐inflammatory effect in A/J mice led to a reduced activation of ROS and mBax suppression

FIGURE 6.

DISCUSSION

LNA ASO MB_1114 showed an anti‐inflammatory effect in EAM mice

LNA ASO MB_1114 triggered an increase in mLDHB protein level potentially mediating anti‐inflammatory in vivo effects

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR showed an anti‐inflammatory effect on EAM

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered increased mLDHB protein levels during anti‐inflammatory effects in vivo

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR administration caused reduction in pro‐inflammatory cytokines in EAM mice

mLdhb‐specific GapmeR‐triggered anti‐inflammatory effect in A/J mice led to reduced activation of ROS and mBax suppression

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Supporting information

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

REFERENCES

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases