Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0267335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267335

Time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city

Haruka Kato 1,*, Atsushi Takizawa 1
Editor: Ghaffar Ali2
PMCID: PMC9436136  PMID: 36048758

Abstract

Control of human mobility is one of the most effective measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the imposition of emergency restrictions had significant negative impacts on citizens’ daily lives. As vaccination progresses, we need to consider more effective measures to control the spread of the infection. The research question of this study is as follows: Does the control of home range correlate with a reduction in the number of infected people during the COVID-19 pandemic? This study aims to clarify the correlation between home range and the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ibaraki City. Home ranges are analyzed by the Minimum Convex Polygon method using mobile phone GPS location history data. We analyzed the time series cross-correlation between home range lengths and the number of infected people. Results reveal a slight positive correlation between home range and the number of infected people after one week during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding home range length, the cross-correlation coefficient is 0.4030 even at a lag level of six weeks, which has the most significant coefficient. Thus, a decrease in the home range is a weak factor correlated with a reduction in the number of infected people. This study makes a significant contribution to the literature by evaluating key public health challenges from the perspective of controliing the spread of the COVID-19 infectuion. Its findings has implications for policy makers, practitioners, and urban scientists seeking to promote urban sustainability.

Introduction

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically changed our daily lives. The rapid increase in the number of infected people risks causing a breakdown of the medical system. Control of human mobility is considered one of the most effective measures to prevent the rapid spread of COVID-19 [1]. For example, in the Osaka metropolitan area, states of emergency have been declared four times since January 2020 [2], with more substantial restrictions imposed on the activities of people living in areas closer to the city center [3]. The Subcommittee on Novel Coronavirus Disease Control in Japan requested citizens to reduce human mobility by 50% during this time [4]. However, the imposition of emergency restrictions had significant negative impacts on the daily lives of citizens. For example, excessive restrictions caused a deterioration of mental health [5]. As vaccination progresses, we need to consider more effective measures to control the spread of the infection.

The research question of this study is as follows: Does the control of home range correlate with a reduction in the number of infected people during the COVID-19 pandemic? In other words, this study verifies the possibility of predicting the number of infected people based on the control of human mobility. In particular, it is difficult to predict the number of infected people in suburban cities because of their high human mobility. Therefore, this study focuses on the aspect of home range in human mobility. Home range is defined as the areas that individuals traverse in the course of their daily activities, such as working and shopping [6]. Home range is an essential indicator for policymakers to assess and facilitate the achievement of the daily mobility activities of residents. For example, the “Location Optimization Plan” [7] is a policy that aims to maintain the home range around transit stations in Japan. Understanding the time series cross-correlation between home range and the number of infected people would support policymakers to develop policies for controlling the spread of the COVID-19 infection.

Purpose

This study aims to clarify the time series cross-correlation between home range and the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city. Home ranges were analyzed by the Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) method using mobile phone GPS location history (LH) data. LH data includes location history data collected from individual devices, unlike area-based data such as Google mobility reports [8].

In this study, the pandemic period was set from January 2020 to July 2021. In Japan, the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in January 2020. From April to May 2020, the first state of emergency was declared for all prefectures. In 2021, states of emergency were declared repeatedly, mainly in Osaka prefectures, from January to February, April to June. After July 2021, vaccination progress in Japan. Therefore, the analysis period, from January 2020 to July 2021, is thought to be the COVID-19 pandemic period in Japan. A timeseries analysis was conducted using panel data of every Wednesday from April 2020 to July 2021, a time frame where four waves of the pandemic were witnessed in Japan. This study analyzed the time series cross-correlation between the home range lengths and the number of infected people.

The case study research was conducted in Ibaraki City, which is a typical suburban city in the Osaka metropolitan area. Fig 1 shows the location of Ibaraki City, which has a population of approximately 280,000, and an area of 10 km east-west and 17 km north-south [9]. The map in Fig 1 was the open-source Arc GIS PRO and complied with the copyright [10]. Due to the city’s extensive train network, residents can commute in about 30 min to Osaka City or Kyoto City. Fig 1 shows the distance from the central area of Ibaraki City, where the Ibaraki City Government Hall is located. Osaka Station, located in the central area of Osaka, is 15 km away from the central area of Ibaraki City. This distance helps us understand the home range extent.

Fig 1. Locations of Osaka Prefecture and Ibaraki City.

Fig 1

The thin lines indicate the location of Osaka Prefecture, and the thick lines indicate the location of Ibaraki City. The red point is the central area of Ibaraki City, where the Ibaraki City Government Hall is located. The red dotted circles indicate the distance from the center of Ibaraki City. The distances are 5 km, 10 km, 15 km, and 20 km.

In Ibaraki City, home range decreased by approximately 50% during the first state of emergency [11]. In addition, dense clusters of people were formed in the parks as well as in the stations during the period [12]. The frequency of walking and bicycle trips increased during the period [13]. These studies suggest that the home range had decreased to a neighborhood scale due to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ibaraki City.

Literature review

Many studies analyzed the factors associated with the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2. For example, it was reported that the risk of infections was correlated with chronic exposure to various outdoor air pollution [14]. One effective policy for redusing the airpolusion is to reduce the human mobility related to the transportation infrastructure [15,16]. During the lockdown restricting human mobility, it was found to reduce air pollution in some cities [17,18]. Therefore, the originality of this study is to focus on human mobility to estimate the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2.

For the analysis of human mobility, many studies used mobile phone data. Regarding mobile phone data, GPS location history data is the state-of-the-art technology that has started to gain attention in the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, many studies focused on Wuhan, where the first infected person was identified. In the early stages of the pandemic, the spatial distribution of the number of infected people was found to explain the movement of the population from Wuhan between January 1 and January 24, 2020 [19]. After January 24, 2020, findings suggested that the lockdown reduced the number of COVID-19 cases in Wuhan by limiting human mobility within the city [20]. Based on these results, simulations to determine the feasibility of measures for the successful control and containment of the COVID-19 pandemic showed the necessity of restricting human mobility by 20%-40%, using the case of Shenzhen in China [21]. In the United States, human mobility was severely restricted during the early stages of the pandemic [22]. Using mobile phone data across the United States from January 1 to April 20, 2020, it was found that COVID-19 transmission correlated strongly with mobility patterns [23]. In addition, based on mobile phone data from March 1 to June 9, 2020, a positive correlation was found between the number of infected people and mobility inflow at the country level in the United States [24]. Compared to these studies, the originality of this study is to clarify the time series cross-correlation between human mobility and the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Regarding the time series cross-correlation, it was found that the restriction of human mobility has a time lag effect on the growth rates of COVID-19 cases [25]. In China, human mobility is strongly correlated with COVID-19 cases, with lags of 10 days and a correlation coefficient of 0.68 from January 17 to February 19, 2020 [26]. In Indonesia, human mobility is also correlated with COVID-19 cases with lags of 7–14 days and a correlation coefficient of about 0.50 from March 1 to July 31, 2020 [27]. In the European context, the spread of COVID-19 was positively correlated with the number of people staying in each area and with human mobility between March 1 to June 6, 2020, at lag levels of one, two, and three weeks [28]. This could be attributed to the fact that in Europe, lockdowns generally affect long-distance travel behavior [28]. In addition, between January 1 and April 15, 2020, it was found that the estimated adequate reproduction number of COVID-19 correlated strongly with human mobility (or social contact) in Tokyo, Japan [29]. The changes in human mobility pertaining to nightlife spaces were more significantly associated with the number of COVID-19 cases [30]. Those studies indicate that the number of infected people correlated with human mobility during the early stages of the pandemic.

The novelty of this study is to analyze the time series cross-correlation during the pandemic, which is from every Wednesday from April 2020 to July 2021. In Japan, the state of emergency was called a “soft lockdown” [31] because the Japanese government did not restrict the activities of individuals [32]. Therefore, most citizens could at least go out in a limited capacity even under the state of emergency. That suggests that home range might correlate slightly with the spread of the infection. This study will allow policymakers to develop policies for controlling the infection during the COVID-19 pandemic in the medium to long term.

Materials and methods

Location history data

The study used LH data collected by Agoop Corporation. Agoop Corporation collected the LH data by obtaining consent from users, who contracted with a specific mobile phone carrier company or installed specific applications [33]. All participants were provided with information regarding the type of data collected, purpose of use and provision to third parties, and a privacy policy [34]. That means that informed consent was obtained from all subjects based on the privacy policy. However, the consent is not written paper because it is digital data using mobile phone. Additionally, the subjects can stop sending their human mobility data anytime by changing their mobile phones’ settings. Agoop Corporation provides anonymized LH data for research purposes. Due to the availability of high-quality data in a Japanese context, many studies utilized LH data relating to the spread of COVID-19 [1012]. This research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Graduate School of Life Science, Osaka City University (No.21-40). Additionally, all methods were carried out in accordance with “Guidelines for the Use of Device Location Data,” a common regulation for location data analysis in Japan [35]. The guideline prohibits using GPS data for any purpose that involves identifying individual users to protect the privacy of users’ GPS location history.

Depending on the mobile phone type, the LH data were collected in the form of logs approximately every 15 min, and the LH data were obtained from mobile phones with users’ consent. In Ibaraki City, the number of logs was approximately 1,600,000 per day, and the number of users was approximately 12,000, indicating that 5% of the residents of Ibaraki City was adequate for analyzing the home range of residents.

The variables in the LH data used in this study were user ID, year, month, day, hour, minutes, and latitude and longitude. The user IDs are anonymized 96-digit alphanumeric codes, the permanent ID assigned to each device, and enable panel data analysis.

Time series cross-correlation

This study used a time series analysis method to analyze the cross-correlation between home range length and the number of infected people. The time-series cross-correlation allows us to understand the similarity of data in a time series and the lag of the period. In this study, the lag was set to eight weeks, considering that the duration between the date of exposure and onset of symptoms is usually a few weeks [36].

The analysis period was from April 2020 to July 2021, during which Japan experienced four waves, and a state of emergency was imposed four times in Ibaraki City. On April 7, 2020, when a state of emergency was declared in all prefectures, the Japanese government requested people to stay at home. Following the end of this state of emergency, the Japanese government attempted to recover the economy through various measures such as the “Go-To Travel” campaign for the hotel and restaurant industries [37]. However, by the winter of 2020, the number of infected people had gradually increased [38]. A second state of emergency was subsequently declared from January 14 to February 28, 2021. The Japanese government also developed priority preventive measures before the next emergency declaration [2]. These priority preventive measures were in effect from April 5 to June 24, 2021, and a third state of emergency was declared from April 25 to June 20, 2021. A second set of priority preventive measures was introduced from June 21 to August 1, 2021, and a fourth state of emergency was declared from August 2 to September 30, 2021. While vaccination for healthcare workers began in February 2021 [2], vaccination for older people and adults in Ibaraki City began in May 2021. This study focuses on the period between April 2020 and July 2021, prior to the fourth emergency declaration, shortly after the beginning of the vaccination campaign.

Home range length

This study followed the method of the authors’ previous study [11]. Home range length was analyzed using the MCP method, which analyzes zones that connect the outermost observation points [39]. The advantage of this method is its simplicity and intuitive use.

Using the MCP method, this study analyzed two types of home range lengths (HR-lengths): HR-length (Farthest Distance) and HR-length (Total Travel Distance). HR-length (Farthest Distance) is the distance to the farthest point moved from the home. The home was estimated by the starting home point after 0:00. The HR-length (Farthest Distance) allows us to understand the extent of the area traveled. HR-length (Total Travel Distance) is the total distance covered every day in the time period under consideration. Since the data are acquired every 15 min, the actual HR-length (Total Travel Distance) cannot be calculated. However, the HR-length (Total Travel Distance) allows us to estimate the total travel distance. The HR-length (Total Travel Distance) was used as an indicator in a previous study [29].

The analysis process is summarized in Fig 2. The map in Fig 2 was the open-source Arc GIS PRO and complied with the copyright [10]. Changes in HR-length (Farthest Distance) and HR-length (Total Travel Distance) during the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed. In addition, these two HR-lengths were analyzed the cross-correlation with the number of people infected.

Fig 2. Analysis process to analyze the home range.

Fig 2

The upper figure is a 3D spatiotemporal map, and the lower figure is 2D. In process 1, the personal space-time paths between 0:00 to 23:59 h were drawn. In process 2, the home range distance for each mobile phone user is calculated from the latitude and longitude difference between the starting home point and the farthest point moved from the home after 0:00 h. The home was estimated by the starting home point after 0:00. In process 3, the distance of the mobile phone user is averaged to calculate the HR-length (Farthest Distance) and HR-length (Total Travel Distance) of every day. The space-time paths are the imaginary paths of 50 people.

The study analyzed LH data in Ibaraki City. However, this data included the logs of people who only passed through Ibaraki City, such as people commuting from Tokyo to Osaka by express. Therefore, to isolate the data of people living in Ibaraki City, the study extracted user IDs of the first log located in Ibaraki City after 0:00 h of every day. The study then analyzed the user ID data that appeared for more than two days in the analyzed period. The intent of the study was to analyze the user IDs of individuals living in Ibaraki City, not those just passing through it. With respect to the LH data of the user ID, this study analyzed the home range from 0:00 to 23:59 h.

This study analyzed the change in home range based on the LH data from every Wednesday, considering the home range changes that occurred between weekdays and holidays [11]. On weekdays, people are involved in steady-state activities such as work. Wednesday was chosen because suitable for analyzing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Wednesday was chosen as the most appropriate day of the week to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic for a number of reasons. Wednesday is the weekday with the fewest holidays from April 2020 to July 2020: only May 6, 2020, and May 5, 2021, were holidays. Furthermore, December 30, 2020, marked the beginning of the year-end vacation. Moreover, on December 30, many people tend to be off work and school during the year-end vacations.

Number of infected people

This study analyzed the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Ibaraki City. Data published on the webpage of the Ibaraki City Government was used for the purpose of the study [40]. The number of people infected was calculated as the total number of people infected each week from Monday to Sunday. Since many hospitals are closed on Sundays, this calculation method was deemed appropriate for use in the Japanese context.

Results

Change of home range length

Fig 3 shows the box-plot diagrams of weekly changes in HR-length (Farthest Distance) and HR-length (Total Travel Distance) from April 2020 to July 2021; Fig 4 shows the bar-graphs of monthly changes in HR-length (Farthest Distance) and HR-length (Total Travel Distance) from April 2020 to July 2021. In both figures, weekly and monthly data followed similar trends. In particular, the home range showed a significant decrease every week from April to May 2020, when the first state of emergency was declared. This result was verified by previous research [1113]. However, since June 2020, the home range has gradually increased. It was found that the HR-length decreased significantly only from April to May 2020, when the first emergency declaration was issued, but thereafter, travel to Ibaraki City and Osaka City did not change significantly.

Fig 3. Weekly change of HR-length.

Fig 3

The upper graph shows the weekly changes in HR-length (Farthest Distance). The lower graph shows the weekly changes in HR-length (Total Travel Distance). Green periods are during the state of emergency, and yellow-green periods are during the priority prevention measures. The box-plot diagrams do not depict the outliers.

Fig 4. Monthly Change of HR-length.

Fig 4

The upper graph shows the monthly changes in HR-length (Farthest Distance). The lower graph shows the HR-length (Total Travel Distance). The figures shows the average and 95% intervals of the HR-length in a time series. Besides, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test indicates significant differences in the average values for each month. Green periods are during the state of emergency, and yellow-green periods are during the priority prevention measures.

Figs 3 and 4 depict that there are no significant changes except on December 31, 2020, and May 5, 2021, which were national holidays, and July 21, 2021, right before the Tokyo Olympics 2020 were held. The home range was found to have decreased during those periods when priority preventive measures were in effect, while the home range tended to increase during emergency periods. The results also suggest that citizens had changed their mobility behavior before the government declared a state of emergency.

Change in the number of infected people

Fig 5 illustrates a bar graph of weekly changes in the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Ibaraki City between March 29, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Fig 5 shows that Ibaraki City has experienced four increases and decreases in the number of infected people. The first wave lasted from April to May 2020, the second from July to September 2020, the third from December 2020 to February 2021, and the fourth from March to June 2021. The fifth wave began in July 2021. Each wave lasted progressively longer than the preceding one.

Fig 5. Weekly change of the number of infected people between March 29, 2020, and July 31, 2021.

Fig 5

Osaka Prefecture experienced four waves during this time. Green periods are during the state of emergency, and yellow-green periods are during the priority prevention measures.

States of emergency were declared for the first, third, and fourth waves. Following each declaration of emergency, the number of infected people decreased significantly. In particular, the number of infected people decreased to zero from May 17–23, 2020, at which time the first emergency declaration was lifted; to five people from February 21–27, 2021, when the second emergency declaration was lifted; and to 13 people from June 13–19, 2021, when the third emergency declaration was lifted. This suggests that the declaration of a state of emergency effectively led to a decrease in the number of infected people.

Cross-correlation of home range length and infected people

Fig 6 presents the time series cross-correlation of home range length and number of infected people. It was found that the number of infected people was slightly more correlated with HR-length (Total Travel Distance) than HR-length (Farthest Distance). In addition, over the lag level of zero weeks, HR-length and the number of infected people are positively correlated. The results indicate that a decrease in HR-length leads to a decline in the number of infected people. However, there was only a slightly positive cross-correlation between HR-length and the number of infected people. Specifically, the cross-correlation coefficient (CCC) of HR-length (Total Travel Distance) (CCC Total Travel Distance) is 0.1546 at the lag level of zero weeks. As the lag increases, CCC Total Travel Distance also increases, and CCC Total Travel Distance exceeds 0.2 after a lag level of one week. However, even at the lag level of six weeks, the largest CCC, the CCC Total Travel Distance is 0.4030. Similarly, the cross-correlation coefficient of HR-length (Farthest Distance) (CCC Farthest Distance) is 0.1345 at the lag level of zero weeks, and 0.3950 at the lag level of six weeks, which has the largest CCC.

Fig 6. Cross-correlation of home range lengths and the number of infected people.

Fig 6

CCC Total Travel Distance is HR-length (Total Travel Distance). CCC Farthest Distance is HR-length (Farthest Distance). In cross-correlation, the lag was set to eight weeks.

To summarize these results, home range was found to be slightly positively correlated with the number of infected people after six weeks, with the highest correlation coefficient being 0.40. This means that changing the home range correlates with a decrease in the number of infected people, but it is not a strong correlation.

Discussion and conclusion

In conclusion, this study clarifies a slight positive correlation between home range and the number of infected people after one week during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ibaraki City. The positive correlations validated the results of previous studies [24,28]. In addition, prior research that analyzed the early-stage period clarified a strong correlation [23,29]. The result of this study was significant because it clarifies the slight positive correlation between home range and the number of infected people in the COVID-19 pandemic.

It was found that the number of infected people was slightly more correlated with HR-length (Total Travel Distance) than HR-length (Farthest Distance). Controlling travel distance is more effective than controlling the tendency to go out farther. With regard to HR-length (Total Travel Distance), the CCC was found to be 0.4030 even at a lag level of six weeks, which had the most significant coefficient. The result differed from previous studies that clarified the strong coefficient during the early stage of the pandemic [2527]. Besides, it was inexplicable at a lag level of six weeks. The reason for this is the length of the incubation period of SARS-CoV-2; it takes approximately one–two weeks from the date of infection for the first symptoms to appear [36]. Specifically, after the emergency declaration was issued, the number of infected people decreased significantly in approximately one–two weeks. However, the home range had decreased even before the emergency declaration was issued, and the decrease was not significant. This might be the reason for the low correlation coefficient. That result was also found that the COVID-19 cases were slightly compensated for positive indirect effects through human mobility [41]. The novelty of the present study is that decrease in the home range is a weak factor correlated with a reduction in the number of infected people.

The conclusions suggest that we need to take some measures other than restricting the home range for decreasing in the number of infected people; for instance, restrictions imposed under the state of emergency in the Osaka Prefecture, which applied to the residents of Ibaraki City during this period. Citizens were required to refrain from not only non-urgent outings but also from drinking alcohol in a group on the street or in a park; the operation of restaurants after 8:00 p.m. was also suspended, and large-scale events were prohibited [42]. Restrictions with regard to wearing face masks might also have had an impact on the rate of infection. For example, as the home range expands, one factor influencing the spread of infection might be an increase in the number of situations in which people remove their masks, such as while eating lunch and smoking [43]. In addition, during the third emergency declaration, household infections had become a significant problem, which was associated with sharing a bedroom and speaking with an index case individual for 30 min or longer [44].

Based on these results, it is possible to improve current measures for an emergency declaration. For instance, instead of controlling human mobility, the number of infected people could be effectively reduced by the imposition of mask mandates, reducing the opening hours of restaurants, and increasing the use of hotel facilities for medical treatment. These measures would also make it possible for people to fulfill their work and study commitments while taking steps to protect themselves from infection.

The limitation of this study is that we analyzed only the indicator of home range in Ibaraki City. It is necessary to analyze not only the distance traveled using LH data, but also the place of stay using area-based data. The analysis might provide a higher correlation coefficient. Further, due to privacy issues, the discrepancies between samples of the number of infected people and human mobility pose a research challenge. Therefore, it is also necessary to analyze the actual number of infected people and the distance they travel. Moreover, we analyzed data from Ibaraki City, a suburban city, but human mobility in central cities should also be considered in determining the significant factors influencing infection spread. In the future, it is necessary to study different types of cities to examine the correlation between home range and the number of infected people in a Japanese context, such as Osaka City, the more metropolitan capital of the Osaka Prefecture. In addition, for urban sustainability, it is essential to study the other factors that correlate with the number of infected cases, such as air pollution, using existing and upcoming biomass measurement missions.

Data Availability

The data of the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 is available from references of website of Ibaraki City Government. The link of the website is the following (in Japanese): https://www.city.ibaraki.osaka.jp/kikou/kenkoi/kenkou/menu/2covid19.html. On the other hand, the GPS Location History data (LH data) cannot be shared publicly because of mobile phone users’ confidentiality and the legal restrictions with authors and Agoop corporation. However, researchers can use the LH data, if they contract with the Agoop Corpolation Institutional Data Access (contact via ESRI Japan) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The contact information link is the following E-mail address: gisinfo@esrij.com (ESRI Japan, Customer Support Service)

Funding Statement

Funded studies H.K., 21K14318, JSPS KAKENHI, https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-21K14318/ H.K., 220201, Dai-ichi Life Foundation, http://group.dai-ichi-life.co.jp/d-housing/boshu.html T.A., 2102C, International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, https://www.iatss.or.jp/en/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Li Y, Li MM, Rice MG, Zhang HY, Sha DX, Li M, et al. The impact of policy measures on human mobility, COVID-19 cases, and mortality in the US: A spatiotemporal perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Japanese Cabinet. Secretariat (office for COVID-19 and other emerging infectious disease control). Change Restrictions Lift State Emerg. [Cited 2021 December 25]. https://corona.go.jp/en/emergency/.
  • 3.Jiang YQ, Huang X, Li ZL. Spatiotemporal patterns of human mobility and its association with land use types during COVID-19 in New York City. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10050344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prime minister of Japan and His cabinet. [COVID-19] Press Conference by the Prime Minister regarding the Novel Coronavirus; 2021. [Cited 2021 December 31]. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/99_suga/statement/202108/_00009.html.
  • 5.Gao JL, Zheng PP, Jia YN, Chen H, Mao YM, Chen SH, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLOS ONE. 2020;15: e0231924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burt WH. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal. 1943;24: 346–352. doi: 10.2307/1374834 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kato H. How Does the location of urban facilities affect the forecasted population change in the Osaka metropolitan fringe area? Sustainability. 2020;13: 110. doi: 10.3390/su13010110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Google. Google COVID-19 community mobility reports. [cited 2021 June 25]. https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/.
  • 9.Ibaraki open data. Population/Households [in Japanese]; 2021. [Cited 2021 December 25]. http://opendata.city.ibaraki.osaka.jp/group/jinko.
  • 10.ArcGIS REST Services Directory [cited 2020 June 29]. https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer11.
  • 11.Kato H, Takizawa A, Matsushita D. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on home range in a suburban city in the Osaka metropolitan area. Sustainability. 2021;13: 11. doi: 10.3390/su13168974 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kato H. Development of a spatio-temporal analysis method to support the prevention of COVID-19 infection: Space-time kernel density estimation using GPS location history data BT—Urban informatics and future cities. In: Geertman SCM, Pettit C, Goodspeed R, Staffans A, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 51–67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76059-5_4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kato H, Matsushita D. Changes in walkable streets during the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city in the Osaka metropolitan area. Sustainability. 2021;13: 20. doi: 10.3390/su13137442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marquès M, Domingo JL. Positive association between outdoor air pollution and the incidence and severity of COVID-19. A review of the recent scientific evidences. Environ Res. 2022;203: 111930. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ali G, Abbas S, Qamer FM, Irteza SM. Environmental spatial heterogeneity of the impacts of COVID-19 on the top-20 metropolitan cities of Asia-Pacific. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 20339. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99546-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abbas S, Ali G, Qamer FM, Irteza SM. Associations of air pollution concentrations and energy production dynamics in Pakistan during lockdown. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29: 35036–35047. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18071-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ali G, Abbas S, Qamer FM, Wong MS, Rasul G, Irteza SM, et al. Environmental impacts of shifts in energy, emissions, and urban heat island during the COVID-19 lockdown across Pakistan. J Clean Prod. 2021;291: 125806. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ju MJ, Oh J, Choi Y-H. Changes in air pollution levels after COVID-19 outbreak in Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2021;750: 141521. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jia JSS, Lu X, Yuan Y, Xu G, Jia JM, Christakis NA. Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China. Nature. 2020;582: 389–394. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2284-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kraemer MUG, Yang CH, Gutierrez B, Wu CH, Klein B, Pigott DM, et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368: 493–497. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou Y, Xu RZ, Hu DS, Yue Y, Li QQ, Xia JZ. Effects of human mobility restrictions on the spread of COVID-19. In: Shenzhen, China: a modelling study using mobile phone data. Lancet. Digit Heal. 2020;2: E417–E424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee MH, Zhao J, Sun QQ, Pan YX, Zhou WY, Xiong CF, et al. Human mobility trends during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. PLOS ONE. 2020;15: e0241468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Badr HS, Du HR, Marshall M, Dong ES, Squire MM, Gardner LM. Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: A mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20: 1247–1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xiong CF, Hu SH, Yang MF, Luo WY, Zhang L. Mobile device data reveal the dynamics in a positive relationship between human mobility and COVID-19 infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117: 27087–27089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010836117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang S, Liu Y, Hu T. Examining the Change of Human Mobility Adherent to Social Restriction Policies and Its Effect on COVID-19 Cases in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17: 7930. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xi W, Pei T, Liu Q, Song C, Liu Y, Chen X, et al. Quantifying the Time-Lag Effects of Human Mobility on the COVID-19 Transmission: A Multi-City Study in China. IEEE Access. 2020;8: 216752–216761. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wijayanto AW, Wulansari IY. Human Mobility Patterns and Its Cross-Correlation with the COVID-19 Transmission in Jakarta, Indonesia. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1863: 012017. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao WY, Zhu Y, Xie J, Zheng Z, Luo H, Ooi OC. The moderating effect of solar radiation on the association between human mobility and COVID-19 infection in Europe. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29: 828–835. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15738-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yabe T, Tsubouchi K, Fujiwara N, Wada T, Sekimoto Y, Ukkusuri SV. Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 18053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75033-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nagata S, Nakaya T, Adachi Y, Inamori T, Nakamura K, Arima D, et al. Mobility change and COVID-19 in Japan: Mobile data analysis of locations of infection. J Epidemiol. 2021;31: 387–391. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.The Japan times. The Coronavirus Jpn’s Constitution. 2020. [cited 2021 June 1]. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/04/14/commentary/japan-commentary/coronavirus-japans-constitution/.
  • 32.Japanese law translation. Outline of the act partially amending the act on special measures against novel influenza, etc., and other relevant acts. [cited 2022 March 31]. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/outline/30/210621192151_905R207.pdf.
  • 33.Agoop Corporation. Homepage. [cited 2021 April 12]. https://www.agoop.co.jp/en/.
  • 34.Agoop. Privacy policy. [cited 2021 December 11]. https://www.agoop.co.jp/appslib/walkcoin/.
  • 35.Japan L. Guidelines for the use of device location data [in Japanese]. [cited 2021 April 12]. https://www.lbmajapan.com/guideline.
  • 36.Li Q, Guan XH, Wu P, Wang XY, Zhou L, Tong YQ, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382: 1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Japan Tourism Agency. Go to travel campaign [in Japanese]. [cited 2021 September 9]. https://biz.goto.jata-net.or.jp/.
  • 38.Anzai A, Nishiura H. “Go To Travel” campaign and travel-associated coronavirus Disease 2019 cases: A descriptive analysis, July-August 2020. J Clin Med. 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Anderson DJ. The home range: A new nonparametric-estimation technique. Ecology. 1982;63: 103–112. doi: 10.2307/1937036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ibaraki City Government. Outbreaks of new coronavirus in Ibaraki city [in Japanese]. [cited 2021 December 28]. https://www.city.ibaraki.osaka.jp/kikou/kenkoi/kenkou/menu/2covid19.html.
  • 41.Damette O, Mathonnat C, Goutte S. Meteorological factors against COVID-19 and the role of human mobility. Troccoli A, editor. PLoS One. 2021;16: e0252405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Osaka Prefecture. Requests based on the emergency measure. [cited 2021 December 3]. https://www.pref.osaka.lg.jp/attach/38112/00417026/quasi_Emergency_measures0127-0220.pdf.
  • 43.Chin WCB, Bouffanais R. Spatial super-spreaders and super-susceptibles in human movement networks. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 18642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75697-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ng OT, Marimuthu K, Koh V, Pang J, Linn KZ, Sun J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21: 333–343. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30833-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ghaffar Ali

28 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-09773Time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the medium term of COVID-19 Pandemic in a suburban cityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. KATO,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 12 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ghaffar Ali, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

“NO”

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 2 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

   a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of to Figures 1 and 2 publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

   b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study titled "Time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the medium term of COVID-19 Pandemic in a suburban city", is an interesting study where the author attempt to investigate the link between home range and COVID-19 infections. My comments are as below:

1) There are a lot of studies published on this topic in recent times, the author needs to explain how this study is different from others.

2) Discussion section should be in more detail, and the author needs to compare the findings with other studies.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript unveils the time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the medium-term of the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city. The article is in good shape and could be accepted for possible publication after addressing the comments given below:

Title:

The “medium-term” may not be suitable in the title, which may put reader to guess about the term.

Abstract: Could have been written better. Also include and elaborate the approach. The first sentence should be broken into 2-3 clear sentences. SBM – write in full when appeared first in the abstract and introduction.

Introduction:

The introduction is very good; the authors demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the published literature and highlight the importance and background to carry out this investigation. Generally, it is reasonable, to follow the current pattern, which is more clear, but it might be good to follow the stat of the art format for the introduction. Then, elaborate the objectives with focus before jumping on the description of sessions.

Also include some regional and local studies on the impact of covid-19 on mobility and its associated impact other environmental indicators for instance air pollution, it has been noted the different mobility patterns and measures across the Asia. Some references are given below which could be considered.

Figure 1 should be move in the Location History Data.

Materials and Methods

Methods are technically strong and well explained.

Figures’ captions are good and self-explanatory.

Results:

Results are described in detail.

Line 177 Section 3.1 in not mentioned in the manuscript – probable formatting issues.

Figures’ captions are good and self-explanatory.

Discussion

Authors have combined Discussion with Conclusion which is not a usual practice but could be acceptable. It would be good to add relevance and prospective of the current study for wider area coverage using existing and upcoming biomass measurement missions.

Conclusion

No Comments.

Figure 1 – Please add a proper study area map with location of Japan and the study area in index maps.

 "Changes in air pollution levels after COVID-19 outbreak in Korea." Science of the Total Environment 750 (2021): 141521.

 Associations of air pollution concentrations and energy production dynamics in Pakistan during lockdown. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18071-4

 Environmental Impacts of Shifts in Energy, Emissions, and Urban Heat Island during the COVID-19 Lockdown Across Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 125806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125806

 "Positive association between outdoor air pollution and the incidence and severity of COVID-19. A review of the recent scientific evidences." Environmental Research (2021): 111930.

 Environmental Spatial Heterogeneity of the Impacts of COVI-19 on the Top-20 Metropolitan Cities of Asia-Pacific. Nature Scientific Reports, 11, 20339.  2021

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0267335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267335.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Jul 2022

Dear Reviewers and Editor

We appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on strengthening our manuscript. Thus, it is with great pleasure that we re-submit our article for further consideration. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have graciously provided. We also hope that our edits and the responses we provide below satisfy the issue and concern you have noted. We want you to check the revised manuscript and response letter.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Ghaffar Ali

12 Aug 2022

Time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city

PONE-D-22-09773R1

Dear Dr. KATO,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ghaffar Ali, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I am happy with the revised version of the manuscript. The authors have addressed all the comments and suggestions.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sulaman Muhammad

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Ghaffar Ali

22 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-09773R1

Time series cross-correlation between home range and number of infected people during the COVID-19 pandemic in a suburban city

Dear Dr. Kato:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Ghaffar Ali

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    The data of the number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 is available from references of website of Ibaraki City Government. The link of the website is the following (in Japanese): https://www.city.ibaraki.osaka.jp/kikou/kenkoi/kenkou/menu/2covid19.html. On the other hand, the GPS Location History data (LH data) cannot be shared publicly because of mobile phone users’ confidentiality and the legal restrictions with authors and Agoop corporation. However, researchers can use the LH data, if they contract with the Agoop Corpolation Institutional Data Access (contact via ESRI Japan) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The contact information link is the following E-mail address: gisinfo@esrij.com (ESRI Japan, Customer Support Service)


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES