Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Sep 2;17(9):e0270764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270764

Incidental detection of paranasal sinuses abnormalities on CT imaging of the head in Saudi adult population

Ali Hassan A Ali 1,2, Omar O Serhan 3, Mohammed H Karrar Alsharif 1,4, Abubaker Y Elamin 4, Sameer Al-Ghamdi 5,*, Khaled K Aldossari 5, Naif Alrudian 6, Mansour Alajmi 5, Bader A Alhariqi 7, Mohammad Mokhatrish 8, Velmurugan Palanivel 9
Editor: Suresh kumar Subbiah10
PMCID: PMC9439242  PMID: 36054106

Abstract

The paranasal sinuses are hollowed, air-filled cavities surrounding the nasal cavity. Many pathological processes affect the sinuses, but inflammatory conditions are the commonest, even in asymptomatic patients who undergo head imaging for other indications showing one or more abnormalities of the sinuses. Our research aims to determine the prevalence of incidental paranasal sinuses abnormalities seen among patients who undergo head CT scanning. In addition, it provides baseline information for further investigations required. The study was designed to evaluate all patients who underwent head CT scanning for any reason unrelated to paranasal sinuses abnormalities. 1849 cases were selected and retrospectively analyzed from the elective and emergency CT in the last nine months, from August 2020 to April 2021. In order to meet the inclusion criteria, indications for imaging must not be sinus-related. The study was conducted on 1849 cases who had undergone head CT scans for pathology, 1204 (65%) were male and 645 (35%) were female. Abnormalities of the sinuses were found in about 617 (33%) of all patients, with a higher rate in males (22.23%) than females (11.14%). In addition, these abnormalities were found in younger patients at a higher rate than in middle and old ages 19.74%, 7.19%, and 6.44%, respectively. Our findings revealed that the prevalence of paranasal sinuses abnormalities in asymptomatic Saudi patients was high (33%). Most of the affected sinuses were the maxillary. The male patients were more affected than females in all findings.

Introduction

Paranasal sinuses are air-filled chambers that act as extensions of nasal cavities. They are named after the bones in which they are located: frontal, sphenoid, ethmoid & maxillary [1].

All are absent or rudimentary at birth. Start to develop in the first two years after birth. They enlarge, especially during the eruption of permanent teeth at puberty [2, 3].

Inflammatory disease is the most common among the pathologies involving the paranasal sinuses. Mild mucosal thickening, primarily within the maxillary and ethmoid sinuses, is common even in asymptomatic individuals. In contrast, acute sinusitis is characterized by the presence of air-fluid levels or foamy-appearing sinus secretions and is typically caused by a viral upper respiratory tract infection. On the other hand, in chronic sinusitis, changes include mucoperiosteal thickening and bony thickening of the sinuses’ wall [4].

Incidental findings are defined as findings that appear unrelated to the clinical indication for imaging purposes. The clinicians should understand the incidental findings and study head and neck anatomy to avoid misinterpretations [5].

Many studies showed that incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities are common findings on MRI images done for other problems. Among the commonly detected abnormalities, mucosal thickening involving the ethmoidal & maxillary sinuses is the highest. Up to 6mm thickness was seen in asymptomatic individuals. Hence, it is recommended that reporting such findings is unnecessary unless there are accompanying clinical symptoms [69].

Previous studies on various population subsets have reported the prevalence of sinus abnormalities to range from 16% to 60% [10, 11]. Another retrospective study carried out to determine the prevalence of abnormality in the paranasal sinuses in the British population having MRI scans for neurological signs & symptoms revealed that among 130 patients studied, 49.2% showed one or more abnormalities [8].

According to the American Academy of Allergy, the person suffering from sinusitis misses 4 to 6 workdays per year, and that directly affects the kingdom’s economy. Furthermore, regarding the social complications, sinusitis has a negative impact on the patient and family’s quality of life. This represents emotional distress, declining normal daily activities, and reduced attendance at school.

The information about sinusitis as a medical condition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is considered few. And all the above-mentioned factors highlight the importance of this research and its value since setting a medical protocol for the diagnosis through computed tomography imaging will help in the treatment of sinusitis and, on the other hand, will contribute to an active role in reducing the aforementioned problems in the Saudi adult population. In our research, we will obtain statistical data about sinusitis among the Saudi population, identify the commonest paranasal sinuses involved in sinusitis, establish the causes of sinusitis among the Saudi population, and determine if the genetic and environmental factors play a role in influencing sinusitis.

Negligence of diagnosis and treatment of sinusitis may lead to impairment or partial loss of sense of smell and a great effect on the patient quality of life. This condition may lead to emotional distress, a decline in normal daily activities, and reduced attendance at school or work.

The objective of the study is to determine the prevalence of incidental paranasal sinuses abnormalities seen among patients who undergo head CT scanning. In addition, it provides baseline information for further investigations required.

Methods

This Retrospective study was conducted in the department of radiology at King Khalid Hospital in Al-Kharj. The CT scan was performed at the department of radiology. All patients (males and females) who underwent head CT scanning for indications unrelated to paranasal sinuses abnormalities were included in this study.

Patients who have a clinical diagnosis of acute or chronic sinusitis and those with severe head and facial trauma were excluded. Young patients below 19 years and very old above 90 were also excluded from this study.

Ethical clearance was obtained and approved by the Institutional Review Board from Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University (2020/03/17094). The confidentiality of the participants was secured. The total sample population was 1850 patients undergoing CT scans. The patients were selected and retrospectively analyzed from the elective and emergency CT in the last nine months, from August 2020 to April 2021. In order to meet the inclusion criteria, indications for imaging must not be sinus-related.

Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging method of choice for conditions that affect the paranasal sinuses. All scans were performed on the same 16-detector CT scanner, the Light speed 16 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). High-resolution axial images were obtained with the patient in the supine position. [12, 13].

For CT image evaluations, proprietary software from the manufacturer (Alisa MS DICOM Viewer/1. 7. 4 and Aliza Medical Imaging and DICOM Viewer 2.3.3) were used to analyze the images.

CT soft copy images of patients who will do head CT will be collected by the radiologists; then, we will analyze any presence of paranasal sinuses abnormalities by the investigator and the advising senior consultant radiologist. The features of paranasal sinuses, bony erosion, wall thickening, calcification, and tissue invasion, will be noted. Demographic data and radiological features regarding ethmoid and frontal sinus opacification, maxillary sinus bony erosion, size, wall thickening, calcification, and tissue invasion were assessed. The other abnormalities such as fluid levels, complete sinus opacification & presence of polyp or retention cyst were also collected. All scans were reviewed by two radiologists under standard soft-tissue and bone windows.

Data Entry & Analysis: The anatomical location & type of paranasal sinuses abnormalities identified were coded. Then the quantitative data was entered & analyzed using the latest version of Statistical Package Software IBM SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL). By doing so, the frequency of each type of abnormality was calculated. It was also analyzed if there was any correlation between the variables.

We will also use a student t-test to achieve comparison of the mean age of patients with incidental findings. Other statistical evidence of associations on categorical variables will be computed from Chi-square tests of contingency. A P-value of <0.05 will be considered significant.

Results

Analyzing CT scans of 1849 cases made by radiologists for pathology, 1204 (65%) were male and 645 (35%) were female. The age ranged from 17 to 90 years, with a mean age of 45.16 ± 18.96 SD. Abnormalities in the sinuses were found in about 617 (33%) of all patients with a higher rate in males (22.23%) than females (11.14%). To some extent, these abnormalities were found in younger patients at a higher rate than in middle and old age, 19.74%, 7.19% and 6.44% respectively (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig 1. Distribution of the age groups.

Fig 1

Fig 2. Prevalence of the paranasal sinuses among the patients.

Fig 2

After assessing the CT scans, the data showed that the most frequently affected were maxillary sinuses, with a total (31.7%, n = 586) of all positive cases. unilateral maxillary antrum sinusitis was the most frequent pathologies (20.49%, n = 249) of all positive findings, maxillary polyps (Fig 3).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Patients brain CT scans show the incidental detection of paranasal sinuses abnormalities; (A) right maxillary antrum polyp, (B) bilateral maxillary polyp with retention cyst, (C) maxillary antrum polyp and right nasal air fluid level likely abscess, (D) right frontal sinusitis, (E) normal paranasal study, (F) right maxillary antrum mucosal thickening.

Bilateral maxillary antrum sinusitis and maxillary cyst were seen as positive but in lower percentage (11.89%, n = 144, 8.07%, n = 89, 7.82%, n = 95). Other sinuses were found to have a high percentage; partial ethmoiditis (16.3%, n = 198), sphenoidal sinusitis (13.9%, n = 195) frontal sinusitis (11.6%, n = 141) and nasal septum deviation (10.78%, n = 249) (Table 1).

Table 1. Shows the frequencies and percentage of the sociodemographic data as well as the pathological findings of the positive cases.

Frequencies (%)
Gender Male 411 (22.23%)
Female 206 (11.14%)
Age groups young 15–30 365 (19.74%)
middle age 31–50 133 (7.19%)
Elderly >51 119 (6.44%)
Partial Ethmoiditis 198 (10.71%)
Unilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis 249 (13.47%)
Bilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis 98 (5.3%)
Frontal Sinusitis 141 (7.63%)
Sphenoidal Sinusitis 159 (8.6%)
Nasal Septum Deviation 131 (7.08%)
Maxillary cyst 95 (5.14%)
Maxillary polyps 144 (7.79%)

The data shows that the male patients were more affected than females in all findings (Table 2) but only nasal septum findings showed a significant association between the males and females.

Table 2. Shows an association between gender and the types of paranasal sinusitis.

It represents the frequency (%), and yes/no indicates the presence/absence of the abnormality. For the positive findings section, the patient was considered positive if he/she expressed one or more abnormalities.

Male Female Chi-square Sig.
Positive Findings No 793 (42.89%) 439 (23.74%) .339
Yes 411 (22.23%) 206 (11.14%)
Paranasal Abnormality
Partial Ethmoiditis No 1079 (58.36%) 572 (30.94%) .535
Yes 125 (6.76%) 73 (3.95%)
Unilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis No 1035 (55.98%) 565 (30.56%) .327
Yes 169 (9.14%) 80 (4.33%)
Bilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis No 1143 (61.82%) 608 (32.88%) .540
Yes 61 (3.3%) 37 (2%)
Frontal Sinusitis No 1115 (60.3%) 593 (32.07%) .605
Yes 89 (4.81%) 52 (2.81%)
Sphenoidal Sinusitis No 1100 (59.49%) 590 (31.91%) .935
Yes 104 (5.62%) 55 (2.97%)
Nasal Septum Deviation No 1108 (59.92%) 610 (32.99%) .042*
Yes 96 (5.19%) 35 (1.89%)
Maxillary cyst No 1146 (61.98%) 608 (32.88%) .394
Yes 58 (3.14%) 37 (2%)
Maxillary polyps No 1105 (59.76%) 600 (32.45%) .341
Yes 99 (5.35%) 45 (2.43%)

*. The Chi-square statistic is significant at the .05 level.

The data also revealed that the young patients were the most affected among age groups (365 cases); the highest abnormality was found in unilateral maxillary antrum sinusitis and partial ethmoiditis 146 (7.9%) and 130 (7.03%), respectively (Table 3). The data also showed that there is a significant association between the age groups and frontal sinusitis (P-value 0.000) and nasal septum deviation (P-value 0.000).

Table 3. Shows the association between the age group and the types of paranasal sinusitis.

It represents the frequency (%), and yes/no indicates the presence/absence of the abnormality.

young middle age elderly Chi-square Sig.
Partial Ethmoiditis No 363 (19.63%) 363 (19.63%) 315 (17.04%) .141
Yes 130 (7.03%) 40 (2.16%) 28 (1.51%)
Unilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis No 350 (18.93%) 350 (18.93%) 293 (15.85%) .800
Yes 146 (7.9%) 53 (2.87%) 50 (2.7%)
Bilateral Maxillary Antrum Sinusitis No 389 (21.04%) 389 (21.04%) 327 (17.69%) .100
Yes 68 (3.68%) 14 (0.76%) 16 (0.87%)
Frontal Sinusitis No 372 (20.12%) 372 (20.12%) 300 (16.22%) .000*
Yes 67 (3.62%) 31 (1.68%) 43 (2.33%)
Sphenoidal Sinusitis No 373 (20.17%) 373 (20.17%) 318 (17.2%) .301
Yes 104 (5.62%) 30 (1.62%) 25 (1.35%)
Nasal Septum Deviation No 394 (21.31%) 394 (21.31%) 341 (18.44%) .000*
Yes 120 (6.49%) 9 (0.49%) 2 (0.11%)
Maxillary cyst No 380 (20.55%) 380 (20.55%) 332 (17.96%) .198
Yes 61 (3.3%) 23 (1.24%) 11 (0.59%)
Maxillary polyps No 381 (20.61%) 381 (20.61%) 311 (16.82%) .111
Yes 90 (4.87%) 22 (1.19%) 32 (1.73%)

*. The Chi-square statistic is highly significant at the .005 level.

Discussion

In reviewing the literature, morphological changes in paranasal sinus are common findings on head C.T and MRI 9. Our findings revealed that the prevalence of the paranasal sinuses is high at 33%. A comparison of the findings with those of other studies confirms that the percentage of asymptomatic patients who had sinus abnormality is high [1417].

The data shows that the young patients are the most affected by the asymptomatic sinuses’ abnormalities, and the males, to a great extent, are more affected than the females.

Our data also shows that the maxillary sinuses were the most affected with pathologies than ethmoidal, sphenoidal and frontal sinuses. This finding broadly supports the work of other studies in this area [18, 19].

Of all maxillary sinuses’ abnormalities, unilateral maxillary antrum sinusitis was the highest; although the maxillary cysts are common in the maxillary sinuses, it appears to be low in our findings (7.82%). and more frequently were the maxillary polyps (11.85); these findings are consistent with the literature [19].

A previous study on the maxillary sinuses of 1442 Saudi patients by Ali revealed that about 495 (34.33%) of the cases had positive results, with the majority of them being males [20].

On the other hand, a previous thesis was performed at Addis Ababa University on the incidental detection of paranasal sinuses abnormalities. They showed that mucosal thickening was the highest, followed by retention cysts. The least frequent abnormality was sinus opacity [19, 21, 22].

In accordance with the present results, previous studies have demonstrated that There was no significant relationship between paranasal sinus abnormalities and sex and age 9. With an exception to nasal septum deviation, which showed a significant association between the males and females as well as age groups. and there was also a highly significant correlation between the age groups and frontal sinusitis. All other findings revealed no clinical association.

Conclusion

Our findings revealed that the prevalence of paranasal sinuses abnormalities in asymptomatic Saudi patients was high at 33%. Most of the affected sinuses were the maxillary. The male patients were more affected than females in all findings. On the other hand, clinicians should be aware of the anatomical differences in incidental findings to reduce further unnecessary diagnostic evaluations and allow the selection of more appropriate treatment plans. It is also necessary for comprehensive health care for their patients.

For that reason, Careful observation is necessary during CT scans of the head. This led to early identification, management and follow up of sinus abnormalities.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, for its support and encouragement in conducting the research and publishing this project.

Data Availability

Concerning the data availability, no ethical or legal restrictions on sharing the data set is required, the supporting file contains no sensitive information. The data are owned by the authors, and they provide complete authority to the journal to delete, add and modify in line with the journal's policy. The link to the supporting file is available at this address: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mohamnedh.amid/paranasal-sinuses-abnormalities-ct-imaging-data.

Funding Statement

We thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince SattambinAbdulaziz University,Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, for its support, and this work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (Project No: 2020/03/17094).

References

  • 1.Frederic H. Martini, Michael J. Timmons, Robert B. Tallitsch; Human anatomy, 7th edition.
  • 2.Proctor DF, Chang JC. Comparative anatomy and physiology of the nasal cavity. In Nasal tumors in animals and man 2017 Nov 22 (pp. 1–34). CRC Press.
  • 3.Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy e-book: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020 Oct 1.
  • 4.William E. Brant, Clyde A. Halms, Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology 3rd edition, 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • 5.Avsever H, Gunduz K, Karakoç O, Akyol M, Orhan K. Incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomographic images: paranasal sinus findings and nasal septum variations. Oral radiology. 2018. Jan;34(1):40–8. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0283-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Normal value of mucosal thickness of paranasal sinuses, as seen on brain MRI, Journal of the Korean radiological society.1997, vol 36,(2): 195–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kristo A, Cross sectional survey of paranasal sinus magnetic resonance imaging findings in school children; acta pediatrica. 2003; 92(1): 34–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel K., et al. "Incidental paranasal sinus inflammatory changes in a British population." The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 110.7 (1996): 649–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hiari M. & Hiari M.A., Incidental paransal sinus inflammatory changes in a Jordanian population: Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, Vol. 4, No.2, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lim WK, Ram B, Fasulakis S, et al. Incidental magnetic resonance image sinus abnormalities in asymptomatic Australian children. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:969–72. doi: 10.1258/002221503322683858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nazri M., Bux S. I., Tengku-Kamalden T. F., Ng K. H., & Sun Z. (2013). Incidental detection of sinus mucosal abnormalities on CT and MRI imaging of the head. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 3(2), 82. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.03.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chaitanya CS, Raviteja A. Computed tomographic evaluation of diseases of paranasal sinuses. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2015;6(7):5081–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2014; 48:193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tarp B., et al. (2000). "The prevalence and significance of incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities on MRI." Rhinology 38(1): 33–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gordts F., et al. (1996). "Prevalence of paranasal sinus abnormalities on MRI in a non-ENT population." Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 50(3): 167–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maly P. V. and Sundgren P. C. (1995). "Changes in paranasal sinus abnormalities found incidentally on MRI." Neuroradiology 37(6): 471–474. doi: 10.1007/BF00600097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Flinn J., et al. (1994). "A prospective analysis of incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities on CT head scans." Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 19(4): 287–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01232.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta M. K., et al. (2014). "Incidental mucosal abnormalities of paranasal sinus in patients referred for MRI brain for suspected intracranial pathology in Eastern Nepal." Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 5(3): 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Demissie, M., 2014. Prevalence of Incidental Abnormalities on MRI Done for Patients with other CNS Problems in Private Diagnostic Centers in Addis Ababa (Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University).
  • 20.Ali AH, Serhan OO, Hamdi AA, Alotaibi FM, Alsomali AM, Alshammari AS, et al. Prevalence of maxillary sinus abnormalities in asymptomatic Saudi adult population. Science. 2021;25(113):1572–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Al-Zoubi I. A., Patil S. R., Kato I., Sugita Y., Maeda H., & Alam M. K. (2017). 3D CBCT assessment of incidental maxillary sinus abnormalities in a Saudi Arabian population. Journal of Hard Tissue Biology, 26(4), 369–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hussein A. O., Ahmed B. H., Omer M. A. A., Manafal M. F., & Elhaj A. B. (2014). Assessment of clinical, X-Ray and CT in diagnosis of paranasal sinus diseases. Int J of Sci Res, 3, 7–11. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Concerning the data availability, no ethical or legal restrictions on sharing the data set is required, the supporting file contains no sensitive information. The data are owned by the authors, and they provide complete authority to the journal to delete, add and modify in line with the journal's policy. The link to the supporting file is available at this address: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mohamnedh.amid/paranasal-sinuses-abnormalities-ct-imaging-data.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES