Abstract
CD4+ T cells are pivotal cells playing roles in the orchestration of humoral and cytotoxic immune responses. It is known that CD4+ T cell proliferation relies on autophagy, but identification of the autophagosomal cargo involved is missing. Here we create a transgenic mouse model, to enable direct mapping of the proteinaceous content of autophagosomes in primary cells by LC3 proximity labelling. Interleukin-7 receptor-α, a cytokine receptor mostly found in naïve and memory T cells, is reproducibly detected in autophagosomes of activated CD4+ T cells. Consistently, CD4+ T cells lacking autophagy show increased interleukin-7 receptor-α surface expression, while no defect in internalisation is observed. Mechanistically, excessive surface interleukin-7 receptor-α sequestrates the common gamma chain, impairing the interleukin-2 receptor assembly and downstream signalling crucial for T cell proliferation. This study shows that key autophagy substrates can be reliably identified in this mouse model and help mechanistically unravel autophagy’s contribution to healthy physiology and disease.
Subject terms: CD4-positive T cells, Protein-protein interaction networks, Autophagosomes, Cytokines
Autophagy is known to impact CD4+ T cell proliferation but the identity of autophagosomal components remain unclear. Here the authors leverage a transgenic mouse model to assess the autophagosomal compartment and identify interleukin-7 receptor-α as a key cargo in proliferating CD4+ T cells.
Introduction
Macroautophagy, hereafter as autophagy, is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic pathway that mediates the degradation of cellular components. Autophagy plays an essential role in the differentiation, homeostasis and renewal of many immune cells1. Among these immune populations is the CD4+ T cell, or helper T cell, which orchestrates both adaptive and innate immunity. To exert their helper function, CD4+ T cells need to be activated and differentiated into effector populations. The activity is finely tuned by three sequential signals: (1) T cell receptor (TCR) recognising their cognate antigen in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted manner, (2) costimulatory receptors activated by their ligands, and (3) cytokine-amplified differentiation and expansion2. Moreover, activated T cells undergo a dramatic shift in their proteome, which facilitates their functional and metabolic transition3. Autophagy has been shown to contribute to the expansion, differentiation and maintenance of CD4+ T cells, suggesting that autophagy can selectively degrade a spectrum of molecules to mediate these physiological processes4–6. The systematic identification of autophagosomal cargoes in CD4+ T cells will fill a gap in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of T cell activation and proliferation.
Traditional methods for mapping autophagosomal content are based on purifying autophagosomes with extensive cell fractionation and mass-spectrometry analysis. However, the results are compromised by contamination from other co-purified cellular compartments and by the low reproducibility caused by variation introduced during the differential centrifugation and extensive manipulation. Furthermore, the number of cells required often exceeds what can be obtained from primary material. To determine bona fide autophagosomal constituents, the proximity-dependent biotinylation approach provides a solution. It uses a modified ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) to transform biotin-phenols into short-lived reactive radicals, which can covalently tag proteins in close proximity7. When genetically fused to a protein of interest, the enzyme provides a snapshot of the local environment and maps the spatial proteome of subcellular compartments8. Le Guerroué et al.9 employed the technique to profile potential autophagosomal substrate proteins in HeLa cells through overexpressing APEX2 fused with human ATG8.
In this work, to extend its application to primary cells under different physiological contexts, we create a knock-in mouse model by introducing the APEX2 sequence into the endogenous Lc3b locus, an Atg8 homologue in mammalian cells. This model helps us to identify IL-7Rα as a major autophagy cargo in proliferating CD4+ T cells, thus revealing how autophagy contributes to CD4+ T cell expansion by modulating signal 3.
Results
Autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells show delayed proliferation
In a study by Ahmed et al. and our previous study, it was revealed that autophagy is crucial for the formation of memory CD8+ T cells10,11. We used a mouse model conditionally deleting Atg7, a key autophagy gene, in both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (CD4cre, Atg7flox/flox, hereafter as T-Atg7−/−). Using the same mouse model here, we addressed the role of autophagy in CD4+ T cells and found that the formation of CD4+ effector T cells was severely affected in two models of antigen exposure (Fig. 1a–d). We excluded the effects of autophagy deletion in antigen-presenting cells expressing CD4 by generating chimaera with bone marrow from wild-type littermate controls (CD45.1+) and T-Atg7−/− mice (CD45.2+) (Fig. 1a). Hosts were challenged with murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) after 7 weeks and MCMV-specific CD4+ T cells in both spleens and lungs were evaluated with MHC class II tetramers, on day 7–9, the peak time for effector T cell formation12. The number of CD45.2+ MCMV-specific T-Atg7−/− cells was significantly lower than that of CD45.1+ wild-type cells (spleens in Fig. 1b and lungs in Supplementary Fig. 1a).
To further confirm that autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells fail to expand upon antigenic stimulation, we bred the T-Atg7−/− mice with the OT-II T-cell receptor transgenic mouse model, where T cells specifically recognise an epitope spanning peptide residues 329–337 of ovalbumin (OVA)13. Neither CD4+ T cell lymphopenia nor increase of effector memory population (CD62L− CD44high) were observed in the spleens of naïve 6-week-old T-Atg7−/− OT-II mice (Supplementary Fig. 1b–c). We transferred either wild-type or T-Atg7−/− OT-II T cells of CD45.2+ background into CD45.1+ host mice. After 24 h, mice were challenged with recombinant H5 adenovirus expressing OVA (AdH5-OVA) to activate the OT-II T cells (Fig. 1c). On day 9, phenotyping of antigen-specific cells revealed that autophagy-deficiency significantly compromised effector T cell formation in both spleen and blood (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1d), which is consistent with our findings measuring endogenous T cell responses to MCMV.
To understand why antigen-specific CD4+ T cells show impaired expansion in vivo, we next dissected the dynamics of the TCR-mediated proliferation in autophagy-deficient cells. We activated wild-type and autophagy-deficient OT-II CD4+ T cells in vitro and assessed their proliferation profile. We observed a delay in proliferation of T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells compared with their wild-type counterparts on day 3 and day 7 (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1e). However, by day 10, autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells caught up and exhibited a similar profile to wild-type. In line with previous work, the upregulation of early activation markers is not significantly changed between autophagy-deficient and -proficient cells, indicating that the TCR-signalling is not affected (Supplementary Fig. 1f, g)14.
To rule out the preferential proliferation (and escape) of CD4+ T cells with incomplete Atg7 knockout, we tested Atg7 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR on day 7 in sorted T cells that had undergone a maximum number of detectable cell divisions (i.e. diluted the cell dye to the maximum). Indeed, Atg7 mRNA in proliferated CD4+ T cells from T-Atg7−/−; OT-II mice was undetectable (Supplementary Fig. 1h). Moreover, decreased expansion cannot be solely explained by increased cell death, since the percentages of CD4+ T cells did not differ significantly between wild-type and knockout cells on day 1 post activation, and it only displayed a significant but mild increase on day 3 (Supplementary Fig. 1i). Since the survival of activated T cells is modulated by multiple signalling pathways15,16, this also implies certain deficits in these pathways when cells are lacking autophagy. Our observation of delayed proliferation in response to antigen-stimulation confirms and extends the findings of other autophagy-knockout models that demonstrated an issue with CD4+ T cell expansion in response to non-specific stimulation14,17–20. Next, we aimed to identify the proteins that are selectively degraded by autophagy by using proximity labelling.
A mouse model based on the proximity biotinylation technique
Among the six mammalian ATG8 homologues, MAP1LC3B (LC3B) is the most widely used to detect autophagic flux. Furthermore, in the study by Le Guerroué et al., autophagosomal substrates labelled by LC3B-fused APEX2 displayed the highest reproducibility between biological samples among all six ATG8 homologues9. Therefore, we created a transgenic mouse model, knocking the sequence of APEX2 (AP2) and a flexible GS-linker into the endogenous Lc3b locus (Fig. 2a). In the presence of both biotin-phenol (BP) and hydroxyl-peroxide (H2O2), LC3B-fused AP2 transforms biotin-phenol into highly reactive radicals, which can further be covalently conjugated to proteins nearby (Fig. 2a). Then, these biotinylated proteins undergo affinity purification and mass spectrometry-based profiling. LC3B is expressed on the cytosolic and luminal side of autophagosomes but only on the cytosolic side of LC3-associated phagosomes21,22. To increase the chance of discovering targets on the luminal side of autophagosomes, homogenates extracted from the proximity-labelled cells, which contains intact autophagosomes and other organelles, were incubated with proteinase K (Prot K) (Fig. 2a). This allows Prot K to degrade the cytosolic proteins bound to LC3B, while those residing inside autophagosomes and other vesicles remained largely intact due to the protective effect of the membranes9.
Wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous mice are identified by genomic PCR (Supplementary Fig. 2a). We first confirmed that the LC3B-AP2 chimaeric protein is expressed. Cellular LC3B has two major isoforms – the free LC3B-I located in the cytosol and the membrane-bound LC3B-II. Immunoblotting of splenocytes showed bands around 44 kDa (LC3B: 17 kDa, AP2: 27 kDa) in heterozygotes and homozygotes with anti-LC3B staining, but not in wild-type cells (Fig. 2b). In wild-type and heterozygous splenocytes, LC3B was mostly expressed as non-fused to AP2. As expected, the lipid-conjugated form of LC3B-AP2 (LC3B-II-AP2) and non-fused LC3B-II accumulated when cells were treated with bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), an inhibitor preventing the lysosomal degradation of LC3 in autophagosomes. These results confirm that LC3B-fused AP2 is targeted to autophagosomes and undergoes lysosomal degradation, as expected from a functional LC3B protein. Next, we determined the enzymatic activity of AP2. After 30 min BP pre-incubation and 1 min H2O2 treatment, mouse splenocytes were lysed and analysed by western blotting with streptavidin. Cellular lysates from homozygote mice (two copies of Lc3b-AP2) treated with BP and H2O2 showed the strongest bands spanning from 11 kDa to 200 kDa, whereas negative controls in which we omitted BP or H2O2, or cell lysates from mice that do not express LC3B-AP2, showed only weak biotin bands (Supplementary Fig. 2b).
To optimise the protocol of autophagosomal protein purification, we immortalised mouse embryonic fibroblasts (imMEFs) extracted from Lc3b-AP2 embryos by transfecting them with lentivirus expressing SV40 antigens. In the imMEFs, as expected, we observed the co-localisation of biotinylated proteins with AP2 and LAMP1, a lysosomal marker (Fig. 2c), further confirming the autophagosomal enrichment of LC3B-AP2. Biotin largely co-localises with AP2 (Pearson’s coefficient over 0.8; Supplementary Fig. 2c) which indicates proteins labelled with biotin are proximal to AP2 enzymes. In contrast, since not all autophagosomes are fused with lysosomes at once, biotin was only partially co-localised with LAMP1 (Supplementary Fig. 2c, Pearson’s coefficient around 0.3). As expected, when imMEFs were treated with BafA1, the colocalisation between these two molecules was significantly decreased. In addition, the LC3B-AP2 chimaeric protein generated electron microscope-dense autophagosomal structures when cells were subjected to 3,3-diaminobenzidine labelling and H2O2 pulsing, which were more prominent with BafA1-treatment (Fig. 2d). To further validate that the LC3B-AP2 chimaeric protein is indeed located on the autophagosomal inner membrane, thus labelling luminal proteins, we performed Prot K protection assays. Homogenates from proximity-biotinylated imMEFs were incubated with Prot K and/or Triton-X, a detergent that breaks all membrane structures. p62, an autophagy cargo receptor protein, and LC3-AP2 (and their proximity-biotinylated proteins) are located both inside and outside of autophagosomes. Prot K can only digest the proteins outside the autophagosomes, having no access to the inside ones which are protected by the intact double-membrane structure. Therefore, and similar to previous observations in LC3B-AP2 overexpression systems in vitro9,23, the sample treated with only Prot K partially preserved p62, LC3-AP2 and biotinylated bands compared to untreated or Triton-X treated control, while the cytosolic tail of the transmembrane protein ATG9A was completely degraded (Fig. 2e). By contrast, adding both Prot K and Triton-X removed all proteins. Together, these results indicate the correct localisation of LC3B-AP2 proteins in autophagosomes and the protective effect of the autophagosomal membranes to Prot K.
To test whether our mouse model can indeed help identify autophagy substrates, we next performed quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Lc3b-AP2 imMEFs (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Cells were treated or not with BafA1 and four biological replicates were included in each group. After excluding Prot K-resistant candidates found when cells were treated with MS-compatible detergent RAPIGest, we reproducibly identified a total of 352 proteins specifically protected from Prot K treatment (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Data 1)23. Among the Prot K-protected proteins, 43 proteins were significantly increased upon BafA1 treatment (Fig. 2g). Gene ontology analysis revealed that the identified proteins belong to the category of proteins that are usually enriched in autophagosomes and other cytoplasmic vesicles, where the membrane-bound LC3B is mainly located (Supplementary Fig. 2e)24. As expected, most of the proteins identified under basal conditions include autophagic receptors (p62/SQSTM1, NBR1, NCOA4, CALCOCO1 and TAX1BP1), autophagy regulators interacting with LC3 (NEDD4), autophagy substrates (KEAP1, FTH1) and another ATG8 homologue (GABARAPL2). Taken together, these observations support the reliability of our mouse model, which can be used as a tool to specifically identify autophagosomal cargoes.
To determine the minimum cell number to detect autophagosomal cargo effectively, we performed a cell titration experiment with cell numbers ranging from 0.125 to 8 million. Although two autophagic receptors, TAX1BP1 and p62/SQSTM1, could be consistently identified as BafA1-sensitive candidates in all conditions, the total number of proteins being significantly upregulated by BafA1 showed a sharp decrease when less than 1 million imMEFs were used (Supplementary Fig. 2f). These data indicate that a greater cell number potentially yields more candidates when using the LC3B-AP2 labelling system.
IL-7Rα is detected in LC3-containing vesicles in activated CD4+ T cells
Aiming to better understand the underlying causes of the observed delayed proliferation in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells, we decided to apply the LC3B-AP2 labelling system to investigate the autophagosomal degradome in autophagy-proficient proliferative CD4+ T cells. For that, we used activated CD4+ T cells isolated from Lc3b-AP2 mice. The proliferative state of CD4+ T cells allowed us to obtain a large number of fully activated CD25+ cells, which, based on the results obtained from imMEFs, contributes to the identification of higher numbers of autophagosomal candidates (Supplementary Fig. 3a). In addition, we could determine that the autophagic flux was highest on days 2 and 3 (Supplementary Fig. 3b), indicating these are appropriate time points to evaluate the role of autophagy in CD4+ T cell proliferation. Finally, we identified an accumulation of LC3B-II-AP2 protein in BafA1-treated cells 3 days post-activation (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Thus, we decided to activate CD4+ T cells in vitro for 3 days, using anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads, prior to performing proximity labelling.
Again, the mass-spectrometry analysis showed high reproducibility between each biological replicate (Fig. 3a). Among 112 Prot K-protected and streptavidin-enriched proteins, seven candidates were significantly upregulated by BafA1-treatment (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Data 2). Of these candidates, interleukin-7 receptor-α (IL-7Rα) showed the highest fold change robustly among all biological replicates (4.67-fold increase, p = 0.033, Fig. 3c). Moreover, IL-7Rα was found to be significantly upregulated (p = 0.0089) in a repeat experiment, and a meta-analysis combining the two experiments found that IL-7Rα was the only protein that was significant after multiple testing correction (meta-analysed p = 0.00087, Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected q value = 0.0315, Supplementary Fig. 3d and Supplementary Data 3). Therefore, we decided to further investigate this protein. IL-7Rα is highly expressed on naive T cells, and TCR/CD28-mediated signalling induces its downregulation25. This is in line with our data suggesting that IL-7Rα is degraded in an LC3B+ compartment during T cell activation.
IL-7Rα is a subunit of the heterodimeric cytokine receptor IL-7R, and its signalling is crucial for peripheral T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation26. It is constantly internalised and recycled through membrane-enveloped organelles and therefore may be found in LC3-containing compartments other than autophagosomes27,28. To ensure that IL-7Rα is found in bona fide autophagosomes, we performed immunostaining of IL-7Rα with LC3 or WIPI2, an early autophagosomal marker. We observed co-localisation of IL-7Rα with both molecules when cells are either activated or not (Fig. 3d), and the co-localisation is increased upon BafA1 treatment (Fig. 3e, f). Therefore, we confirmed that IL-7Rα was indeed localised in the autophagosomal compartment.
IL-7Rα accumulation in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells is due to impaired autophagy
To validate whether lack of autophagy impairs the degradation of IL-7Rα, we measured IL-7Rα expression level in CD4+ T cells freshly isolated from the spleen of T-Atg7−/− mice by flow cytometry. IL-7Rα was upregulated both at the surface and at whole-cell level in naïve T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3g). By contrast, no significant changes in effector T cells were observed. To make sure this is an autophagy-related effect and not an Atg7-specific effect, we further confirmed this result by deleting Atg16l1, another autophagy gene, specifically in T cells (Supplementary Fig. 3e). The increased expression of IL-7Rα protein was not due to enhanced transcription of Il7ra as indicated by the qRT-PCR performed on different days after activation (Supplementary Fig. 3f). It is worth noting that both surface and whole-cell levels of IL-7Rα remained higher in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells after one day of activation, while the difference disappeared on day 3 (Supplementary Fig. 3g).
Previous studies showed that key autophagy genes, like Atg7 and Atg5, control the internalisation of surface receptors29,30. To address whether the accumulation of IL-7Rα in autophagy-knockout CD4+ T cells is caused by decreased internalisation, we measured the amount of IL-7Rα binding to the biotin-conjugated antibody at the cell surface over time. We confirmed that the surface level of IL-7Rα was generally higher in T-Atg7−/− naïve CD4+ T cells in comparison to their wild-type counterparts, but could not observe any differences in the rate of receptor internalisation, represented by the percentage of internally trafficked IL-7Rα (Supplementary Fig. 3h). Moreover, surface and intracellular protein levels of IL-7Rα were significantly increased in wild-type naïve CD4+ T cells when treated with SBI-0206965 (Supplementary Fig. 3i), an ULK1/2 inhibitor blocking the initiation phase of autophagy31, and 3-methyladenine (3-MA; Supplementary Fig. 3j), a PI3K inhibitor blocking the nucleation phase of autophagy32. This further confirms that IL-7Rα is degraded through classical autophagy. Therefore, we ruled out the possibility that the surface accumulation of IL-7Rα is due to impaired internalisation.
Excessive IL-7Rα on autophagy-deficient T cell surface impairs IL-2R assembly and signalling
While we confirmed that the accumulation of IL-7Rα in CD4+ T cells is autophagy-dependent, the molecular basis of how it leads to impaired proliferation remained elusive. Both IL-7R and IL-2R share a common gamma-chain (γc) to transduce downstream signalling33. IL-7R (heterodimer comprised of γc and IL-7Rα) is highly expressed on naïve T cells and is co-expressed with the low-affinity IL-2R (heterodimer comprised of γc and IL-2Rβ). During TCR-mediated activation, IL-7Rα is downregulated from the cell surface and IL-2Rα (also known as CD25) takes over to form high-affinity IL-2R (heterotrimer comprised of γc, IL-2Rα and IL-2Rβ). When binding to IL-2, high-affinity IL-2R mediates persistent and robust downstream signalling, which is crucial for the proliferation of CD4+ T cells34. It has been reported in regulatory T cells that γc has limited availability and pre-associates with excessive IL-7Rα independently of IL-7, which impedes IL-2R signalling35,36. Therefore, we hypothesised that excessive IL-7Rα expression leads to delayed proliferation of T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells by a similar mechanism (Fig. 4a).
To test whether IL-2R signalling is impaired in CD4+ T cells lacking autophagy, we measured the level of phosphorylated Stat5 (pStat5), the classical downstream transducer of IL-2 signalling. As naïve T cells respond poorly to IL-2, we hypothesised that IL-2 signalling contributes to T cell activation mainly after high-affinity IL-2R is expressed37. We observed an upregulated expression of IL-2Rα 24 h after TCR-mediated activation (Supplementary Fig. 3a), while IL-7Rα remained accumulated on the cell surface of autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells at the same time point (Supplementary Fig. 4a). To determine whether accumulated IL-7Rα impacts on IL-2-driven signalling, we incubated activated CD4+ T cells with different doses of IL-2 (Fig. 4b). Corroborating our initial hypothesis, pStat5 level was higher in presence of increased concentrations of IL-2 in wild-type CD4+ T cells, whereas IL-2R signalling in T-Atg7−/− T cells was refractory to the administration of IL-2 (Fig. 4c). Importantly, this was not due to different expression of IL-2R, as we found no significant differences in the expression of its three subunits between T-Atg7−/− and wild-type T cells (Supplementary Fig. 4a) on day 1 post activation. However, due to the impaired IL-2 signalling, the expression levels of IL-2Rα, controlled by IL-2 signalling, were significantly decreased in T-Atg7−/− T cells on day 3 post activation (Supplementary Fig. 4b).
To further confirm whether the assembly of these cytokine receptors is impaired in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells, we measured the co-localisation of γc with either IL-7Rα or IL-2Rα. Since IL-2 signalling is polarised at the immunological synapse, we incubated the activated T cells on supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) containing ICAM1 and anti-CD3 proteins, in the presence of IL-238. We then visualised the receptor subunits at the immunological synapse (Fig. 4d, left). As expected, we found a significantly lower colocalisation of IL-2Rα and γc in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4d, right), indicating that the formation of IL-2R complex was indeed impaired in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells at the immunological synapse. However, we did not see any significant differences in the co-localisation of γc with IL-7Rα (Supplementary Fig. 4c). To evaluate whether IL-7Rα sequestration happened outside the immunological synapse, we performed confocal analysis of whole cell volumes, where we could observe that γc-IL-7Rα co-localisation is indeed higher in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4e). Moreover, c-MYC and mTORC1, two direct downstream targets of IL-2 signalling pathway which govern T cell metabolism39,40, displayed a significant decrease in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells during activation (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). This may also contribute to their delayed proliferation upon antigen stimulation. Taken together, our results suggest that autophagy plays a key role in CD4+ T cell activation, by degrading IL-7Rα, which releases γc and promotes its assembly in high-affinity IL-2R, a signalling receptor that is essential for T cell proliferation.
Discussion
In this study, we dissected the molecular mechanism of autophagy in the antigen-induced proliferation of CD4+ T cells. Using a powerful mouse model based on the proximity biotinylation technique, we demonstrate that autophagic degradation of IL-7Rα plays a crucial role in T cell activation, since it can competitively inhibit IL-2R signalling through sequestration of the limited amount of γc. Thus, we identified autophagy’s role in the transition of cytokine signalling, from IL-7R-mediated homeostasis in naïve T cells to IL-2R-mediated expansion in effector T cells. This research not only provides proof-of-principle application of the Lc3b-AP2 mouse model but also fills a key gap in our knowledge of CD4+ T cell activation.
We observed that IL-7Rα levels were higher in autophagy-deficient naïve CD4+ T cells, while the difference disappears on day 3 post-activation. In effector T cells, the expression of IL-7Rα is transcriptionally inhibited, thus stopping the production of new IL-7Rα41. Moreover, previous studies indicated that IL-7Rα can be degraded through both lysosome- and proteasome-mediated pathways in naïve T cells27,28. It suggests that other compensatory pathways for degradation of excessive IL-7Rα might take place. During T cell activation, genes of proteasome subunits are upregulated, which may contribute to the compensatory degradation of IL-7Rα in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells42. Other pathways compensating gradually for the loss of autophagy in T-Atg7−/− CD4+ T cells could be the explanation for why the cells eventually catch up on their proliferation in vitro, and why IL-7R is not upregulated in the T-Atg7−/− effector CD4+ T population.
According to iLIR, a web resource that allows the prediction of Atg8-family interacting proteins, the murine IL-7Rα contains a LIR domain in its intracellular domain from amino acid 399 to 404 (PVYQDL). Therefore, it is possible that IL-7Rα is recruited to autophagosomes through direct interaction with LC3, either after its internalisation through the endosomal pathway or on its way to the plasma membrane.
Our observation of accumulated IL-7Rα in both Atg7- and Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells is in contrast to a report in T cells lacking Vps34, a PI3-kinase involved in the initiation of autophagy43. In this study, McLeod et al. describe that Vps34-deficient CD4+ T cells downregulate the surface expression of IL-7Rα. However, the autophagic flux in that model is not impaired and the lower level of surface IL-7Rα was proposed to be due to a deficit in the retromer pathway mediated by Vps34. By contrast, another study in which a bone marrow chimaera model was generated to exclude the effect of lymphopenia, IL-7Rα expression is higher in Vps34-deficient CD4+ T cells compared to autophagy-proficient cells, further corroborates our findings, which were also made in a non-lymphopenic environment44.
Moreover, autophagy may contribute to the differentiation and memory formation of CD4+ T cells through modifying common gamma chain cytokine signalling (IL-2/IL-15). IL-2 signalling is antagonistic to Th17 differentiation since it suppresses the expression of IL-6Rβ (or gp130)45,46. Consistent with a previous study which shows an expansion of IL-17-producing cells in LckCre, Atg7flox/flox mice47, the decreased IL-2 signalling in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells may facilitate its differentiation into Th17. Also, as Gros et al. showed in their recent study, the formation of memory CD4+ T cells is impaired without autophagy5. An IL-2 or IL-15 signalling-dependent mechanism might also contribute to this phenotype, since IL-2 has been shown to be essential for CD4+ T-cell memory formation and IL-15 for memory maintenance48,49. Additionally, autophagy has been shown to be more important in the effector expansion of CD4+ rather than CD8+ T cells, while in CD8+ T cells, the defects appeared only later during the effector-to-memory cell transition phase, which also negatively impacts the secondary anti-viral response to the same pathogen10,11,50.
It is known that proteins firstly described for their function in autophagy can perform diverse other functions51. Indeed, the autophagy machinery also participates in cellular processes other than classical macroautophagy, such as endosomal microautophagy (eMA), and in particular, LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) and LC3-associated endocytosis (LANDO), where lipidated LC3 is expressed on the cytosolic surface of vesicles24. However, any proteins associated with these vesicles would be excluded from our analysis, as LC3 would be located towards the cytosol, and our protocol specifically enriches for autophagosomal luminal proteins. Another pathway to be considered is the LC3-dependent extracellular vesicle loading and secretion (LDELS), where lipid-conjugated LC3s reside in the lumen of extracellular vesicles52. In fact, using a pulse-chase proximity labelling strategy, the LC3-dependent secretome of extracellular vesicles was recently profiled in vitro52. Interestingly, we found a putative target potentially involved in this pathway. Rab8b, a small Rab GTPase indispensable for exocytic trafficking of post-Golgi vesicles to the plasma membrane was revealed as a putative cargo in the LC3 compartment in activated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3b, c)53. In addition to this role, the protein has also been suggested to be co-localised with LC3 to mediate autophagy-based secretion and autophagosome maturation54,55. In summary, since membrane-bound LC3 is prevalent in degradative and non-degradative vesicles, the Lc3b-AP2 mouse model is not only a powerful technique to reveal macroautophagic cargo but may also identify other cargoes when BafA1 is replaced with different specific inhibitors. In addition, this model will be useful to explore the cytosolic subproteome of LC3 under physiological conditions when the Prot K treatment is left out.
Two other molecules, CDKN1B/p27Kip, a cell cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, and PTPN1, a protein tyrosine phosphatase, were shown to be removed by autophagy during the early activation of naïve CD4+ T cells and Th1 cells respectively32,56. CDKN1B/p27Kip1 was found upregulated by Jia et al. using whole-cell proteomics of autophagy-knockout T cells56. Further validation showed that the autophagy-mediated degradation of CDKN1B is a prerequisite for the proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells. Proteomics and western blots have been widely used to indirectly map autophagosomal content from autophagy-deficient T cells. However, these techniques cannot exclude that cells without autophagy may have synthesised these as new proteins. By purifying autophagosomes with extensive subfractionation from activated Th1 cells, Mocholi et al. showed that autophagy degrades PTPN132. It is possible that we did not identify either of these proteins due to the duration of activation. Both studies used T cells activated for no longer than 24 h, while we activated cells for three days to maximise autophagy levels and cell numbers.
The Lc3b-AP2 mouse model overcomes the obstacles of previous methods and facilitates the identification of transient binding partners and subcellular structures. One caveat of the method is the biased detection of the proteome. Proteins embedded in large complexes, or with very few electron-rich amino acid residues exposed at the surface, have a lower chance to be tagged by the biotin-phenol radicals, which limits the use of this method to detect certain types of proteins. In our study, activated primary CD4+ T cells show greater biological and technical variation than imMEFs. This is most likely due to the high amount of systemic variation in immune development and variation induced by activation/ expansion in T cells, which made this pilot study particularly challenging. In addition, T cells are smaller in size with little cytoplasm compared to imMEFs. As a result, a large number of T cells were required to map autophagy-regulated proteins. However, this pilot study has proven that it is possible to detect abundant proteins (such as IL-7Rα) targeted for autophagic degradation in T cells. Identifying less abundant proteins targeted by the autophagosome in T cells will require further optimisation and more repeats. This is not necessarily true for other primary cell types. Therefore, our model, together with other murine models based on this technique, indicates their broader application for the study of proteins in organelles in primary cells and in vivo57–62.
Overall, it is likely that autophagy is required to selectively degrade a spectrum of molecules at different time points to lift the brake on T cell proliferation, which is finely tuned by multiple signalling pathways. An autophagic programme will also be key to remodelling the cell and providing energy, nutrients and building blocks for protein synthesis and for the generation of the daughter cells.
Methods
Mice
Atg7flox/flox mice (from M Komatsu) and CD4cre mice (from Adeline Hajjar) were crossed to obtain CD4cre Atg7−/− mice (T-Atg7−/−) on a C57BL/6 background. All mice were 6–8 weeks of age at the start of each experiment and were matched in age. Both genders are included CD4cre Atg7+/+ littermates were used as wild-type controls (wild-type). C57BL/6 SJL CD45.1 mice for bone marrow chimaera and T cell adoptive transfer were purchased from Charles River, UK. OT-II mice were crossed with CD4cre Atg7−/− mice. CD4cre Atg16l1−/− mice were from Kevin Maloy. Lc3b-APEX2 (Lc3b-AP2) mice were generated by Cyagen, by constitutively knocking in an APEX-tag and a GGGGSGGGGGS-linker into the exon 1 of the mouse Map1lc3b allele.
All mice were held in Biological Support Unit at the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology. All mice were under specific pathogen-free level maintenance at 24 °C, 50% humidity and a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. Mice were kept in individually ventilated cages, with ad libitum access to autoclaved water and irradiated food pellets. Cages were changed once weekly, and the health status of the mice was monitored based on body weight, coat and behaviour. Littermates from both sexes were randomly assigned to experimental groups. The exact number of the mice used for the experiments are indicated for each experiment in the figure legends. Animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional policies, British federal regulations, and were approved by the UK Home Office (project license PPL 30/3388).
Genotyping
The identification of the mouse genotypes was performed on mouse ear clips. The ear tissue was lysed with 200 µl 50 mM NaOH at 95 °C for 30 min. After adding 25 µl 1 M Tris-base buffer (pH = 8) for neutrolisation, vortex the mixture and centrifuge 5 min at 16,000×g at 4 °C (max speed). The supernatant was used for conducting PCR or stored at −20 °C.
The PCR reactions were performed with MyTaq Red Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA). Primers for the Lc3b-APEX2, CD4cre, Atg7flox, and Atg16l1flox transgenes were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Viral vectors and lentivirus production
P-Lenti CMV/TO SV40 small + Large T (w612-1) was a gift from Eric Campeau (Addgene plasmid # 22298). For packaging the virus, HEK293T cells were transfected with vector and replication-incompetent lentiviral packaging constructs, harvested after 48-hour post-transfection, and viral supernatants filtered through a 0.45 µM cellulose acetate filter.
Cell line generation
The mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were generated according to published protocols63. In brief, Lc3b-AP2 homozygous embryos were separated from female uteri on E13.5. After removing the head above eyes and red organs (heart and liver), the rest of the embryos were minced and subjected to 0.25% Trypsin (Sigma) digestion, with intermittent pipetting up and down. Digestion was terminated by MEF culture media (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 2% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mM l-Glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich). Single cells and clusters were transferred onto the T25 flask and incubated with MEF culture media overnight. After replacing the old media and removing the debris, cells were passaged until reaching confluency. To immortalise the Lc3b-AP2 cell line, MEFs were re-seeded to 6-well plates and transduced with the supernatant of the lentivirus expressing SV40 small and large T antigens overnight. Monoclonal immortalised MEFs were selected through dilution cloning and over 10 rounds of passaging.
Bone marrow chimaera
Bone marrow (BM) chimaeras were generated similarly as described before10. After erythrocyte lysis, BM cells extracted from a single 8-week-old wild-type or T-Atg7−/− (both CD45.2) were 1:1 mixed with C57BL/6 SJL mouse (CD45.1) in a total volume of 200 µl PBS, with 3 × 106 cells each. The mixture was injected intravenously into C57BL/6 SJL CD45.1 recipients 2 h after being lethally irradiated (450 cGy twice, 4 h apart). Followed by an 8-week reconstitution, BM chimaeras were immunised with 1 × 106 PFU MCMV (Smith strain ATCC:VR194).
T-cell adoptive transfer
For adoptive transfer, 2 × 104 purified splenic OT-II T cells from CD45.2 wild-type or T-Atg7−/− mice were intravenously injected into C57BL/6 SJL CD45.1 recipients. After 24 h, recipient mice were immunised with 1 × 106 IU recombinant adenovirus H5-ovalbumin (abm).
CD4+ T Cell isolation
Total CD4+ T cells were purified with EasySep Mouse T Cell Isolation Kit (Stemcell Technology). Total splenocytes suspended in MACS buffer (2% FBS in DPBS) were incubated with rat serum and isolation cocktail for 10 min at room temperature, then incubated with Streptavidin RapidSpheres for 2.5 min. After topped up to 2.5 ml, tubes were placed into the magnet and incubated at room temperature for 2.5 min. Purified CD4+ T cells were transferred to new tubes for further analysis.
CD4+ T cell in vitro activation
T cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 Medium (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 2% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mM l-Glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich). For antigen-induced activation, total splenocytes isolated from OT-II mouse spleens were cultured with OVA 323–339 peptide (1 mg/ml, InvivoGen) and recombinant murine IL-2 (20 ng/ml, PeproTech). For anti-CD3/CD28-induced activation, CD4+ T cells were stimulated with Dynabeads Mouse T-Activator CD3/CD28 (Gibco) and recombinant murine IL-2 (20 ng/ml, PeproTech), following manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative PCR analysis
Total RNA isolated using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74134) underwent reverse transcription with the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher, 4387406). Predegisned Taqman probes (Thermo Fisher, Atg7: Mm00512209_m1; Il7ra: Mm00434295_m1; Gapdh: Mm99999915_g1), TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (4369016, Thermo Fisher) and the ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher) were used for quantitative PCR. ΔΔCt method was used for the quantification of target mRNAs expression using Gapdh as the reference gene.
Flow cytometry
The following antibodies were used for flow cytometry (dilution in brackets) – from BioLegend: anti-CD4 BV605 GK1.5 (1:400), anti-CD3 AF700 17A2 (1:200), anti-CD25 PerCP-Cy5.5 PC61 (1:200), anti-CD62L APC-Cy7 MEL-14 (1:400), anti-CD69 PE-Cy7 H1.2F3 (1:400), anti-CD127 (IL-7Rα) PE A7R34 (1:200 for surface staining, 1:100 for intracellular staining), anti-CD45.2 FITC 104 (1:100); from BD Biosciences: anti-CD122 (IL-2Rβ) BV650 5H4 (1:200), anti-CD132 (γc) BV650 TUGm2 (1:200); from eBioscience: anti-TCRVα2 APC B20.1 (1:400), anti-CD44 PE-Cy7 IM7 (1:200), anti-CD8a FITC 53-6.7 (1:400), anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235, S236) APC cupk43k (1:50); from Cell Signalling: anti-phospho-Stat5 (Tyr694) AF647 C71E5 (1:100), anti-c-Myc D84C12 (1:200); from Luminex: anti-LC3 FITC 4E12 (1:20).
To assess the surface receptor level, cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and incubated for 20 min at 4 °C in the dark, with cold PBS containing Fc block (0.125 g/ml Biolegend) and antibodies. After washing with cold PBS, cells were fixed for 10 min at room temperature with 2% Paraformaldehyde and analysed using LSRFortessa™ X-20 Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences), LSR II Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and Flowjo software (Tree Star). For intracellular staining of IL-7Rα, cells were fixed with Fixation Buffer (BioLegend) in the dark for 20 min at room temperature after surface staining, then permeabilised with Intracellular Staining Perm Wash Buffer (BioLegend) and incubated with anti-IL-7Rα antibody 1:100 diluted in Perm/Wash Buffer in the dark for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were extensively washed with Perm/Wash buffer and resuspended with FACS buffer for further flow cytometry analysis.
To measure cell proliferation profile in vitro, cells isolated from mouse spleens were stained with CellTrace Violet (5 µM, Invitrogen) for 20 min at room temperature in dark. After extensive washing, cells were counted and seeded for activation.
To identify viable cells, cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Stain Kit (1:400, Invitrogen) or LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR Stain Kit (1:1,000, Invitrogen) diluted with PBS at 4 °C for 20 min.
Tetramer staining was performed similarly as previously described10. In brief, before surface staining, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml tetramer in PBS at 37 °C for 30 min. Peptide sequences for MCMV tetramers were as follows: m45 985HGIRNASFI993, H-2Db-restricted; m38 316SSPPMFRV323, H-2Kb-restricted; IE3 416RALEYKNL423, H-2Kb-restricted. MHC-Class I monomers were stored at −80 °C. Tetramers were made with biotinylated monomers with PE- or APC-conjugated Streptavidin to achieve 1:1 ratio with biotin binding sites, then added in 1/10th volumes waiting 10 min between additions. Tetramerized complexes were then stored at 4 °C.
To assess the phospho-Stat5 level, cells were fixed with pre-heated 2% PFA for 15 min at 37 °C after the live-dead staining, permeabilised with pre-cooled 90% methanol for more than 4 h and stained overnight with the phospho-Stat5 antibody diluted with 0.5% BSA in PBS at 4 °C.
To measure the autophagic flux, cells were treated with bafilomycin A1 (10 nM) or DMSO for 2 h before staining. We adapted the Guava Autophagy LC3 Antibody-based Detection Kit (Luminex) as follows: After surface staining, cells were washed once with Assay Buffer. After permeabilization with 0.05% Saponin, cells were spun immediately and incubated with anti-LC3 (FITC) antibody (1:20 diluted in Assay Buffer) at room temperature for 30 min in dark. After extensive washing with Assay Buffer, cells were fixed with 2% PFA and underwent flow cytometry analysis. Autophagic flux was calculated as LC3-II mean fluorescence intensity of (BafA1-Vehicle)/Vehicle.
IL-7Rα internalisation assay
IL-7Rα internalisation assay was performed similar as described before30. In brief, CD4+ T cells were purified from the spleens of wild-type or T-Atg7−/− mice. After incubation with biotin-conjugated anti-IL-7Rα antibody (BioLegend, A7R34) 1:50 diluted in DPBS on ice for 30 min, cells were extensively washed and fractionated into the following groups (5 × 106 cells/group): 90 min on ice, 90, 60 and 30 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After incubation, cells were stained with AF647-Streptavidin (BioLegend, 1:1000), anti-CD4 BV605 GK1.5 (BioLegend, 1:400), anti-CD44 BV785 IM7 (BioLegend, 1:400), LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua (Invitrogen) stain for 20 min on ice and fixed with 2% PFA. The % internalised IL-7Rα is calculated as the Eq. (1) (MFI: mean fluorescence intensity):
1 |
Western blots
Cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed using RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and PhosSTOP (Roche). Total protein concentration in supernatant after spinning down the debris was quantified by BCA Assay (Thermo Fisher). Samples were added with 4x Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad) and boiled at 100 °C for 5 min, with 20–30 µg protein per sample for SDS-PAGE analysis. 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Protein Gels (Bio-Rad) with Tris/Glycine/SDS running buffer (Bio-Rad) was used. PVDF membrane (Millipore) transferred with protein were blocked with 5% skimmed milk-TBST. Membranes were incubated overnight with the following primary antibodies diluted in 1% skimmed milk: LC3B (2775, Cell Signalling, 1:1000), APEX (IgG2A) (custom made, Regina Feederle, 1:200), GAPDH (MAB374, Millipore, 1:10,000), β-actin (3700, Cell Signaling, 1:5,000), ATG9A (ab108338, Abcam, 1:1,000), followed by 1 h room incubation at room temperature with secondary antibodies diluted in 1% milk with 0.01% SDS: IRDye 680LT Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) (Licor, 1:7,500), IRDye 680LT Goat anti-Rat IgG (H + L) (Licor, 1:10,000) and IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (Licor, 1:10,000). Biotinylated proteins were detected by IRDye 680RD Streptavidin (Licor, 1:1000) diluted in 1% milk with 0.01% SDS. Membranes were imaged with the Odyssey CLx Imaging System (Licor). Data were analysed using Image Studio Lite (Licor).
Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy
For intracellular staining of imMEFs, cells were seeded on coverslips in tissue culture plates. After reaching 70% confluency, proximity-labelled imMEFs were washed with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Invitrogen) for 10 min, then permeabilised with 0.5% Triton X for 15 min and blocked with PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature.
For intracellular staining of purified CD4+ T lymphocytes, cells were washed in PBS and transferred on PolyL-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) treated coverslips, followed by incubation for 30 min at 37 °C. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, then blocked in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.01% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature.
For surface staining of purified CD4+ T lymphocytes, activated cells were washed in PBS and transferred on PolyL-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) treated coverslips, followed by incubation for 30 min at 37 °C. After cytokine treatment for 15 min, cells were washed and stained with antibodies at 4 °C for 20 min and fixed with 2% PFA.
All antibodies for immunofluorescence stain are as follows: FITC-LAMP1 (121605, BioLegend, 1:100), WIPI2 (SAB4200399, Sigma, manually conjugated with AF568, 1:100), AF647-Streptavidin (405237, BioLegend, 1:1,000), LC3 (PM036, MBL International, manually conjugated with AF488, 1:100), APEX2 (IgG2A, custom made from Regina Feederle, manually conjugated with AF568, 1:200), IL-7Rα (135002, BioLegend, manually conjugated with AF488, 1:100), IL-2Rα (154202, BioLegend, manually conjugated with AF568, 1:100), γc (132307, BioLegend, manually conjugated with AF647, 1:100).
After staining with antibodies for 45 min at room temperature and washed, samples were stained with DAPI (1 µg/ml, Thermo Fisher), mounted to slides with SlowFade Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen) and imaged with Zeiss LSM 980 confocal microscope 63x oil immersion-lens (Zeiss). Data were analysed with ZEN Blue (Zeiss) and ImageJ software. Pearson correlation coefficients were obtained using JACoP pug-in64.
Supported lipid bilayer preparation and use
Glass coverslips were plasma cleaned and mounted onto six-channel chambers (Ibidi). SLB were prepared as previously described65, using 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[(N-(5-amino-1-carboxypentyl) iminodiacetic acid) succinyl]-Ni (NTA-lipids, Avanti Polar Lipids), biotinylated 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (biotinyl cap PE-lipids, Avanti Polar Lipids) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC-lipids, Avanti Polar Lipids). Channels in Ibidi chamber were covered with liposome mixture and after a 20 min incubation at room temperature, they were washed and blocked with 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 μM NiSO4 for 20 min. After incubation with 10 µg/ml streptavidin, bilayers were incubated with mono-biotinylated 2c11 (anti-mouse CD3 antibody) and his-tagged mouse ICAM1-AF405, to reach a molecular density of 200 molecules/µm2. Channels were washed and cells were added on the bilayer and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min before fixation with 4% PFA. Next, samples were permeabilized with 0.1% Saponin for 10 min and blocked with 100 mM Gly 3% BSA for 30 min. Finally, samples were incubated with primary antibodies in 1% BSA.
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and image analysis
Imaging was performed on an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope equipped with a TIRF module. The instrument was equipped with an Olympus UApON 150 × 1.45 NA objective, 4-line illumination system (405, 488, 561 and 640 nm laser) and Photomertrics Evolve delta EMCCD camera. Image analysis and visualisation was performed using ImageJ software. Pearson correlation coefficients were obtained using JACoP plug-in64.
Electron microscopy
Lc3b-AP2-expressing imMEFs were grown on aclar sheets (Science Services), supplemented with 4.83 µM Hemin chloride (ROTH) for 16 h and treated with 200 nM BafA1 (Biomol) for 2 h before fixation. Cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM-grade, Science Services) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4; CB) for 30 min. Fixation and the following processing steps were carried out on ice. After washes in CB, endogenous peroxidases were blocked in 20 mM glycine (Sigma) in CB for 5 min and cells washed in CB. 1x diaminobenzidine (DAB) in CB with 2 mM calcium chloride was prepared from a 10x DAB stock (Sigma) in hydrochloric acid (Sigma) and added to the cells for 5 min without and for another 40 min with 10 mM H2O2 (Sigma). After washes in CB, cells were postfixed in reduced osmium (1.15% osmium tetroxide, Science Services; 1.5% potassium ferricyanide, Sigma) for 30 min, washed in CB and water and incubated over-night in 0.5% aqueous uranylacetate (ScienceServices). Dehydration was accomplished using a graded series of ice-cold ethanol. Cell monolayers were infiltrated in epon (Serva) and cured for 48 h at 60 °C. Cells were ultrathin sectioned at 50 nm on formvar-coated copper grids (Plano). TEM images were acquired on a JEM 1400plus (JEOL) using the TEMCenter and Shotmeister software packages (JEOL) and analysed in Fiji.
Proximity labelling
The proximity labelling based on AP2 peroxidase was performed as described before9. After 30 min biotin-phenol (500 µM, Iris Biotech) treatment at 37 °C, cells were supplemented with H2O2 (1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 min and immediately quenched three times with cold quenching solution (10 mM sodium ascorbate, 5 mM Trolox and 1 mM sodium azide in DPBS). After 3 times more wash with PBS, the dry pellets of the harvested cells were flash frozen and stored at −80 °C.
Proteinase K digestion
All steps were performed as previously described at 4 °C or on ice unless specified66. The pellets of labelled cells were washed and resuspended in Homogenisation Buffer I (10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES-KOH and 1 mM DTT adjusted to pH 7.5). After incubating on overhead shaker for 20 min, cell suspension was homogenised with a tight-fitting pestle in Dounce homogeniser (Scientific Laboratory Supplies) with 70 strikes and balances with 1/5 volume of Homogenisation Buffer II (375 mM KCl, 22.5 mM MgCl2, 220 mM HEPES-KOH and 0.5 mM DTT adjusted to pH 7.5). After centrifugation with 600x g for 10 min, clear supernatant containing autophagosomes were transferred to new tubes. For Proteinase K protection assay, supernatant was equally divided into four portions, added with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Merck) and/or 30 µg/mL proteinase K (Roche), or nothing. Following 30 min incubation at 37 °C, PMSF (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) was administrated to inhibit the proteinase K activity. For mass spectrometry, samples were subjected to 100 µg/mL proteinase K digestion for 1 h at 37 °C followed by PMSF treatment. For control samples 0.1% RAPIGestTM was additionally added to the proteinase K digest. Membrane-protected material was enriched by centrifugation at 17,000x g for 15 min.
Streptavidin-pulldown and on-beads peptide digestion
The pellets of membrane-protected material were lysed with RIPA buffer containing quenchers (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1x cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), 1x PhosSTOP (Roche), 10 mM sodium ascorbate, 1 mM Trolox and 1 mM sodium azide), sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min. The supernatant was incubated with Streptavidin-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight, which was balanced with RIPA buffer containing quenchers. After 3x wash with RIPA buffer and 3x wash with 3 M Urea dissolved in 50 mM NH4HCO3, beads were incubated TCEP (5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) at 55 °C for 30 min and shaken at 1000×rpm. Samples were alkylated with IAA (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 20 min and shaken at 1000x rpm, further quenched by DTT (20 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) and washed 2x with 2 M Urea dissolved in 50 mM NH4HCO3. After overnight incubation with trypsin (1 µg/20 µl beads, Promega), supernatants were collected, plus 2x washes with 2 M Urea buffer. The samples were acidified with trifluoroacetic acid (1%) and underwent vacuum centrifugation to decrease the volume. After being desalted on C18 stage tips (Thermo Scientific), peptides were reconstituted with 0.5% acetic acid for mass spectrometry analysis.
Mass spectrometry data analysis
Proteomics data have been generated using a Q-Exactive and Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (both Thermo Fisher). Detailed methodology is available with the mass spectrometry proteomics data as deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE67 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD033733. MaxQuant (Andromeda)68 (version 1.6.10.43) were used for peak detection and quantification of proteins based on RAW data. MS spectra were referred to the manually annotated UniProt Mus musculus proteome (retrieved 30/03/2020), using the parameters as follows: full tryptic specificity, allowing two missed cleavage sites, modifications included carbamidomethyl (C) and the variable modification to acetylation (protein N terminus) and oxidation (M), and filtered with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01. Analysis of label-free quantification intensities of proteins were log2-transformed with Python programming (Version 3.7.6). Missing values were replaced by random values from a distribution of a quarter of the width, and −1.8 units of the original sample distributions. Proteins without greater-than-background values in both replicates for at least one condition were removed. Volcano plots were generated using GraphPad Prism software (Version 8.2.1). The log2(BafA1:DMSO) fold change of each protein is plotted on x versus the log10(p-value) of each protein plotted on y. Gene ontology analysis was performed with g:Profiler.
Statistics and reproducibility
Data were displayed as mean ± SEM in bar graphs. p values were determined by two-tailed Student’s t test with GraphPad Prism software (Version 8.2.1), with p values displayed in the figures. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Sample size was determined by the authors based on power calculations. The exact n numbers used in each experiment are indicated in the figure legends. Each experiment was repeated at least twice independently with similar results. Regarding data exclusion, statistical analyses of confocal microscopy exclude apoptotic and dead cells with abnormal nuclear staining as pre-established. Regarding randomisation, recipient mice were randomly assigned to groups at the start of each experiment. In experiments using cells from mice, both sexes of littermates with different genotypes were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. In experiments using cell lines, different plates of cells with same confluency were randomly treated with drugs or vehicle. Blind analysis was carried out during the software analysis step in all experiments, including flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, quantitative PCR, proteomics and western blotting. Mouse injections were done blindly by the animal facility staff with no knowledge of genotypes or phenotypes.
For meta-analysis, proteins that were detected in both MS studies were meta-analysed using a Z-score meta-analysis weighted by the square root of sample size (n = 8 for the first experiment, n = 6 for the second), and the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to identify significantly differential abundant proteins with FDR < 0.05.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Jonathan Webber for assistance in flow cytometry and cell sorting, Ryan Beveridge in producing lentivirus, Helena Coker for assistance in confocal microscopy, Najmeeyah Brown, Patricia Moreira and Daniel Andrew for assistance in mouse colony management. We thank Michael L. Dustin, Mark Coles, Ricardo Fernandes, Raymond Moniz and Anish Suri for scientific discussions. This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust Investigator award 103830/Z/14/Z and 220784/Z/20/Z to A.K.S., Versus Arthritis grants 22617 to G.A., Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) within the frameworks of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy – ID 390857198) and the Collaborative Research Center 1177 (ID 259130777) to C.B., the Wellcome Trust Investigator award 208750/Z/17/Z to L.J., the Kennedy-Chinese Scholarship Council PhD studentship to D.Z., the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 893676) to M.B., the Cue Biopharma Post-doctoral Fellowship, KTRR Cell Dynamics Platform and Wellcome 100262Z/12/Z to J.C. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Source data
Author contributions
D.Z., G.A., C.B., D.P., and A.K.S. conceptualised the study. D.Z., S.Z., C.B., R.F., L.J., and A.K.S. devised the methodology. D.Z., G.A., M.B., S.Z., J.C., D.P. S.S., M.S., S.S.H., and X.G. carried out the experiments. D.Z., G.A., J.C., S.S.H., L.J., and A.K.S. analysed and/or interpreted the experimental data. D.Z. and A.K.S. wrote the original draft. M.B., G.A., J.C., C.B., and A.K.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript. L.J., C.B., G.A., and A.K.S. provided the supervision.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry data generated in this study have been deposited in the Proteomics Identifications database under accession code PXD033733. UniProt Mus musculus proteome was downloaded from Uniprot database retrieved on 30/03/2020 [https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000000589]. The raw numbers for charts and graphs are available in the Source Data file whenever possible. Source data are provided within this manuscript. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Source code69 for analysing mass spectrometry data is available at: https://github.com/dzhou93/proximity_labelling_pipeline/commit/2e825476556087ae0cff51310556adb278a83d77. The repository is public and open to collaborative continuous development.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Christian Behrends, Ghada Alsaleh, Anna Katharina Simon.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-32718-x.
References
- 1.Clarke AJ, Simon AK. Autophagy in the renewal, differentiation and homeostasis of immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:170–183. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0095-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sckisel GD, et al. Out-of-sequence signal 3 paralyzes primary CD4(+) T-cell-dependent immunity. Immunity. 2015;43:240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Howden AJM, et al. Quantitative analysis of T cell proteomes and environmental sensors during T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:1542–1554. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0495-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dowling SD, Macian F. Autophagy and T cell metabolism. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murera D, et al. CD4 T cell autophagy is integral to memory maintenance. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23993-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jacquin E, Apetoh L. Cell-intrinsic roles for autophagy in modulating CD4 T cell functions. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1023. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lam SS, et al. Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:51–54. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gingras AC, Abe KT, Raught B. Getting to know the neighborhood: using proximity-dependent biotinylation to characterize protein complexes and map organelles. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019;48:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Le Guerroue F, et al. Autophagosomal content profiling reveals an LC3C-dependent piecemeal mitophagy pathway. Mol. Cell. 2017;68:786–796 e786. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Puleston, D. J. et al. Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8(+) T cell formation. Elife10.7554/eLife.03706 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Xu X, et al. Autophagy is essential for effector CD8(+) T cell survival and memory formation. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:1152–1161. doi: 10.1038/ni.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Strutt TM, McKinstry KK, Kuang Y, Bradley LM, Swain SL. Memory CD4+ T-cell-mediated protection depends on secondary effectors that are distinct from and superior to primary effectors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E2551–E2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205894109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR. Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA-based alpha- and beta-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1998;76:34–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1998.00709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pua HH, Dzhagalov I, Chuck M, Mizushima N, He YW. A critical role for the autophagy gene Atg5 in T cell survival and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:25–31. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vella AT, Dow S, Potter TA, Kappler J, Marrack P. Cytokine-induced survival of activated T cells in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3810–3815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhan Y, Carrington EM, Zhang Y, Heinzel S, Lew AM. Life and death of activated T cells: how are they different from naive T cells? Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1809. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stephenson LM, et al. Identification of Atg5-dependent transcriptional changes and increases in mitochondrial mass in Atg5-deficient T lymphocytes. Autophagy. 2009;5:625–635. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.5.8133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hubbard VM, et al. Macroautophagy regulates energy metabolism during effector T cell activation. J. Immunol. 2010;185:7349–7357. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jia W, He YW. Temporal regulation of intracellular organelle homeostasis in T lymphocytes by autophagy. J. Immunol. 2011;186:5313–5322. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parekh VV, et al. Impaired autophagy, defective T cell homeostasis, and a wasting syndrome in mice with a T cell-specific deletion of Vps34. J. Immunol. 2013;190:5086–5101. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martinez J, et al. Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and autophagy proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:893–906. doi: 10.1038/ncb3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 22.Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(Suppl 2):1542–1552. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zellner S, Schifferer M, Behrends C. Systematically defining selective autophagy receptor-specific cargo using autophagosome content profiling. Mol. Cell. 2021;81:1337–1354 e1338. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leidal AM, Debnath J. Emerging roles for the autophagy machinery in extracellular vesicle biogenesis and secretion. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;3:377–386. doi: 10.1096/fba.2020-00138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alves NL, van Leeuwen EM, Derks IA, van Lier RA. Differential regulation of human IL-7 receptor alpha expression by IL-7 and TCR signaling. J. Immunol. 2008;180:5201–5210. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Surh CD, Sprent J. Homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Immunity. 2008;29:848–862. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Henriques CM, Rino J, Nibbs RJ, Graham GJ, Barata JT. IL-7 induces rapid clathrin-mediated internalization and JAK3-dependent degradation of IL-7Ralpha in T cells. Blood. 2010;115:3269–3277. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-246876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Faller EM, Ghazawi FM, Cavar M, MacPherson PA. IL-7 induces clathrin-mediated endocytosis of CD127 and subsequent degradation by the proteasome in primary human CD8 T cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016;94:196–207. doi: 10.1038/icb.2015.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Loi M, et al. Macroautophagy proteins control MHC class I levels on dendritic cells and shape anti-viral CD8(+) T cell responses. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1076–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Keller CW, et al. The autophagy machinery restrains iNKT cell activation through CD1D1 internalization. Autophagy. 2017;13:1025–1036. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1297907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Alsaleh, G. et al. Autophagy in T cells from aged donors is maintained by spermidine and correlates with function and vaccine responses. Elife10.7554/eLife.57950 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Mocholi E, et al. Autophagy is a tolerance-avoidance mechanism that modulates TCR-mediated signaling and cell metabolism to prevent induction of T cell anergy. Cell Rep. 2018;24:1136–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leonard WJ, Lin JX, O’Shea JJ. The gammac family of cytokines: basic biology to therapeutic ramifications. Immunity. 2019;50:832–850. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ross SH, Cantrell DA. Signaling and function of interleukin-2 in T lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018;36:411–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Waickman AT, et al. The cytokine receptor IL-7ralpha impairs IL-2 receptor signaling and constrains the in vitro differentiation of Foxp3(+) Treg cells. iScience. 2020;23:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cantrell DA, Smith KA. The interleukin-2 T-cell system: a new cell growth model. Science. 1984;224:1312–1316. doi: 10.1126/science.6427923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li C, Park JH. Assessing IL-2-induced STAT5 phosphorylation in fixed, permeabilized Foxp3(+) Treg cells by multiparameter flow cytometry. STAR Protoc. 2020;1:100195. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sabatos CA, et al. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity. 2008;29:238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Preston GC, et al. Single cell tuning of Myc expression by antigen receptor signal strength and interleukin-2 in T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 2015;34:2008–2024. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marchingo, J. M., Sinclair, L. V., Howden, A. J. & Cantrell, D. A. Quantitative analysis of how Myc controls T cell proteomes and metabolic pathways during T cell activation. Elife10.7554/eLife.53725 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Dooms H, Wolslegel K, Lin P, Abbas AK. Interleukin-2 enhances CD4+ T cell memory by promoting the generation of IL-7R alpha-expressing cells. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:547–557. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arata Y, et al. Defective induction of the proteasome associated with T-cell receptor signaling underlies T-cell senescence. Genes Cells. 2019;24:801–813. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McLeod IX, Zhou X, Li QJ, Wang F, He YW. The class III kinase Vps34 promotes T lymphocyte survival through regulating IL-7Ralpha surface expression. J. Immunol. 2011;187:5051–5061. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Willinger T, Flavell RA. Canonical autophagy dependent on the class III phosphoinositide-3 kinase Vps34 is required for naive T-cell homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:8670–8675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205305109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Laurence A, et al. Interleukin-2 signaling via STAT5 constrains T helper 17 cell generation. Immunity. 2007;26:371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang XP, et al. Opposing regulation of the locus encoding IL-17 through direct, reciprocal actions of STAT3 and STAT5. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:247–254. doi: 10.1038/ni.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Amersfoort J, et al. Defective autophagy in T cells impairs the development of diet-induced hepatic steatosis and atherosclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2937. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McKinstry KK, et al. Effector CD4 T-cell transition to memory requires late cognate interactions that induce autocrine IL-2. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5377. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Purton JF, et al. Antiviral CD4+ memory T cells are IL-15 dependent. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:951–961. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schlie K, et al. Survival of effector CD8+ T cells during influenza infection is dependent on autophagy. J. Immunol. 2015;194:4277–4286. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lindqvist, L. M., Simon, A. K. & Baehrecke, E. H. Current questions and possible controversies in autophagy. Cell Death Discov.10.1038/cddiscovery.2015.36 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Leidal AM, et al. The LC3-conjugation machinery specifies the loading of RNA-binding proteins into extracellular vesicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:187–199. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0450-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huber LA, et al. Rab8, a small GTPase involved in vesicular traffic between the TGN and the basolateral plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1993;123:35–45. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dupont N, et al. Autophagy-based unconventional secretory pathway for extracellular delivery of IL-1beta. EMBO J. 2011;30:4701–4711. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Szatmari Z, Sass M. The autophagic roles of Rab small GTPases and their upstream regulators: a review. Autophagy. 2014;10:1154–1166. doi: 10.4161/auto.29395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jia W, et al. Autophagy regulates T lymphocyte proliferation through selective degradation of the cell-cycle inhibitor CDKN1B/p27Kip1. Autophagy. 2015;11:2335–2345. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1110666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dingar D, et al. BioID identifies novel c-MYC interacting partners in cultured cells and xenograft tumors. J. Proteom. 2015;118:95–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Uezu A, et al. Identification of an elaborate complex mediating postsynaptic inhibition. Science. 2016;353:1123–1129. doi: 10.1126/science.aag0821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Liu G, et al. Mechanism of adrenergic CaV1.2 stimulation revealed by proximity proteomics. Nature. 2020;577:695–700. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1947-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rudolph F, et al. Deconstructing sarcomeric structure-function relations in titin-BioID knock-in mice. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16929-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kim KE, et al. Dynamic tracking and identification of tissue-specific secretory proteins in the circulation of live mice. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5204. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25546-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Feng W, et al. Identifying the cardiac dyad proteome in vivo by a BioID2 knock-in strategy. Circulation. 2020;141:940–942. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Durkin, M. E., Qian, X., Popescu, N. C. & Lowy, D. R. Isolation of Mouse Embryo Fibroblasts. Bio Protoc.10.21769/bioprotoc.908 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Bolte S, Cordelieres FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 2006;224:213–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Choudhuri K, et al. Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse. Nature. 2014;507:118–123. doi: 10.1038/nature12951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zellner S, Nalbach K, Behrends C. Autophagosome content profiling using proximity biotinylation proteomics coupled to protease digestion in mammalian cells. STAR Protoc. 2021;2:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhou D, et al. Mapping autophagosome contents identifies interleukin-7 receptor-alpha as a key cargo modulating CD4+ T cell proliferation. Github. 2022 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6792680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The mass spectrometry data generated in this study have been deposited in the Proteomics Identifications database under accession code PXD033733. UniProt Mus musculus proteome was downloaded from Uniprot database retrieved on 30/03/2020 [https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000000589]. The raw numbers for charts and graphs are available in the Source Data file whenever possible. Source data are provided within this manuscript. Source data are provided with this paper.
Source code69 for analysing mass spectrometry data is available at: https://github.com/dzhou93/proximity_labelling_pipeline/commit/2e825476556087ae0cff51310556adb278a83d77. The repository is public and open to collaborative continuous development.