Skip to main content
EMBO Reports logoLink to EMBO Reports
. 2022 Jul 8;23(9):e54677. doi: 10.15252/embr.202254677

IL‐21 has a critical role in establishing germinal centers by amplifying early B cell proliferation

Alexandra R Dvorscek 1, Craig I McKenzie 1, Marcus J Robinson 1, Zhoujie Ding 1, Catherine Pitt 1, Kristy O'Donnell 1, Dimitra Zotos 1, Robert Brink 2,3, David M Tarlinton 1, Isaak Quast 1,
PMCID: PMC9442303  PMID: 35801309

Abstract

The proliferation and differentiation of antigen‐specific B cells, including the generation of germinal centers (GC), are prerequisites for long‐lasting, antibody‐mediated immune protection. Affinity for antigen determines B cell recruitment, proliferation, differentiation, and competitiveness in the response, largely through determining access to T cell help. However, how T cell‐derived signals contribute to these outcomes is incompletely understood. Here, we report how the signature cytokine of follicular helper T cells, IL‐21, acts as a key regulator of the initial B cell response by accelerating cell cycle progression and the rate of cycle entry, increasing their contribution to the ensuing GC. This effect occurs over a wide range of initial B cell receptor affinities and correlates with elevated AKT and S6 phosphorylation. Moreover, the resultant increased proliferation can explain the IL‐21‐mediated promotion of plasma cell differentiation. Collectively, our data establish that IL‐21 acts from the outset of a T cell‐dependent immune response to increase cell cycle progression and fuel cyclic re‐entry of B cells, thereby regulating the initial GC size and early plasma cell output.

Keywords: B cells, cell cycle, germinal center, IL‐21, plasma cells

Subject Categories: Cell Cycle, Immunology, Signal Transduction


The cytokine IL‐21 is integral to protective humoral immunity. IL‐21 acts on B cells from the outset of an adaptive immune response to promote their expansion and contribution to the ensuing germinal center reaction.

graphic file with name EMBR-23-e54677-g001.jpg

Introduction

The functionality of T cell‐dependent (TD) B cell responses, which underlie almost all vaccine success, relies on germinal centers (GC). GC are specialized, transient structures located within follicles of secondary lymphoid organs. Here, B cells mutate the genes encoding their antigen receptor (B cell receptor—BCR) with those gaining higher affinity for antigen being selected by their interaction with T follicular helper (Tfh) cells to differentiate into antibody‐secreting plasma cells, long‐lived memory B cells or to undergo further rounds of proliferation and BCR diversification (Zotos & Tarlinton, 2012; Mesin et al, 2016). Within GC, Tfh cell‐derived signals are considered to control B cell proliferation and selection (Allen et al, 2007; Qi et al, 2008; Gitlin et al, 2015; Zaretsky et al, 2017), while during the initial phase of the response, B cell intrinsic determinants such as BCR affinity and avidity govern response participation (Shih et al, 2002; Kato et al, 2020). BCR ligation triggers a signaling cascade that influences B cell fate in an antigen affinity‐dependent manner (Kim et al, 2006; Liu et al, 2010) including survival, proliferation, and differentiation (reviewed in (Niiro & Clark, 2002)). In addition, naïve B cells capture antigen from the surface of antigen‐presenting cells using pulling forces, with the BCR affinity determining the efficiency of this process and thus the access to T cell help (Schwickert et al, 2011; Spillane & Tolar, 2017). The outcome of cognate T:B interaction is then dependent on the expression of co‐stimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, and the duration of the T:B interactions (Qi et al, 2008; Zaretsky et al, 2017). T cell‐derived cytokines such as IL‐4, IL‐10, IL‐13, and IL‐21 can also modulate human and mouse B cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation and thus potentially influence GC initiation (Snapper et al, 1988; Ford et al, 1999; Wagner et al, 2000; Tangye et al, 2003; Ozaki et al, 2004; Good et al, 2006; Robinson et al, 2019). One of these cytokines, IL‐21, is produced by follicular helper T cells shortly after the initiation of a TD B cell response and then gradually increases in amount until GC reach maturity (Chtanova et al, 2004; Luthje et al, 2012; Gonzalez et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2018). The outcome of IL‐21 signaling in B cells in vitro is multiple and context‐dependent, including co‐stimulation, growth arrest, or apoptosis (Jin et al, 2004) as well as promoting plasma cell differentiation and supporting antibody class switching (Ozaki et al, 2004; Pene et al, 2004). While IL‐21 has a key role in maintaining GC (Linterman et al, 2010; Zotos et al, 2010, 2021), whether any of its multiple activities contribute to naïve B cell activation and recruitment into the TD B cell response in vivo is unresolved. This prompted us to investigate the role of IL‐21 during TD B cell response initiation.

Results

To study the involvement of IL‐21 in initiating TD B cell responses, we developed an experimental system with defined cognate T and B cell partners. WT or Il21r −/− mice were crossed with mice that carried a knock‐in rearranged BCR specific for hen egg lysozyme (BCR‐HEL), known as SWHEL mice (Phan et al, 2003; Brink et al, 2015). Additionally, these mice were crossed with eGFP transgenic mice and all WT or Il21r −/− SWHEL mice used in this study were RAG1‐deficient, preventing endogenous BCR rearrangement during development and thus unintended B cell activation. In the resultant B cell donor mice, essentially all B cells were specific for HEL (Fig EV1A) and expressed eGFP (Fig EV1B). Donor CD4 T cells were derived from mice transgenic for the alpha and beta chains of a CD4 restricted T cell receptor (TCR) specific for ovalbumin, known as OTII (Barnden et al, 1998), and carried a GFP knock‐in at the Il21 locus (Il21 Gfp/+), allowing for analysis of Il21 transcription via GFP fluorescence (Luthje et al, 2012). As an antigen, we generated a recombinant protein of HEL fused with the I‐Ab‐restricted 12‐mer peptide recognized by OTII T cells (Robertson et al, 2000), referred to as HELWTOVApep. To study the role of affinity, we introduced 2 or 3 mutations in the sequence encoding HEL, referred to as HEL2XOVApep and HEL3XOVApep, resulting in a SWHEL BCR affinity series of 2 × 1010 M−1 (HELWT), 8 × 107 M−1 (HEL2x), and ~ 1 × 107 M−1 (HEL3X) (Paus et al, 2006; Chan et al, 2012) (Fig EV1C).

Figure EV1. SWHEL B cells characterization and flow cytometry gating strategy for Figs 1, 2, 3 .

Figure EV1

  • A–C
    Representative analysis of splenic lymphocytes from a SWHEL mouse by flow cytometry showing HEL2XOVApep binding (A), eGFP expression (B) and HEL‐OVApep variant binding to SWHEL B cells (C).
  • D
    Exemplary electronic gating strategy for Fig 1B–E to identify WT (GFP) and Il21r −/− (GFP+) SWHEL B cells.
  • E
    Exemplary electronic gating strategy for Figs 2B and D, and 3C. SWHEL B cells were identified by CTV and HEL2XOVApep antigen‐binding. eGFP was used to distinguish WT and Il21r −/− cells. Blue gates were used for analysis in Fig 1I and red gates for Fig 3C.

IL‐21 promotes B cell expansion from the outset of a TD immune response by increasing cell cycle speed and rate of entry

Having established an experimental system, we investigated the role of IL‐21 in the response to a moderate affinity antigen, HEL2XOVApep. CD45.2 WT and Il21r −/−, cell‐trace violet (CTV) labeled SWHEL B cells (5 × 104 of each) were co‐transferred with 5 × 104 Il21 Gfp/+ OTII T cells into CD45.1 congenic recipients and immunized ip with alum‐adsorbed HEL2XOVApep (Fig 1A). This setup allowed the identification and analysis of WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells within the same recipient mouse (Fig EV1D). All SWHEL B cells had started to proliferate at day 3.5 post‐immunization, but by day 4.5 the expansion of Il21r −/− B cells was reduced significantly compared with their WT counterparts in the same mouse (Fig 1B). Cell division analysis by CTV dye dilution revealed that over time, Il21r −/− B cells were progressively and increasingly disadvantaged, being less likely to enter into subsequent divisions as indicated by an increasing proportion of Il21r −/− cells not further diluting CTV (Fig 1C and D). IL‐21 has been implicated in regulating B cell homeostasis by increasing apoptosis in the absence of CD40 signaling in in vitro experiments (Mehta et al, 2003). To assess whether IL‐21 regulated apoptosis during early B cell expansion in vivo, we analyzed each CTV peak of WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells on day 3.5 post‐HEL2xOVApep immunization for the presence of active caspase 3, indicative of the onset of apoptosis. Active caspase 3‐positive cells, although rare, were at a similar frequency within each division peak of WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells (Fig 1E), in line with previous reports (Gonzalez et al, 2018).

Figure 1. IL‐21 promotes early B cell expansion.

Figure 1

  • A
    Experimental setup to study the role of IL‐21R in early B cell expansion. WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells were transferred together with OTII T cells into recipient mice followed by ip immunization with alum adjuvanted HEL2xOVApep.
  • B
    Flow cytometry analysis of WT to Il21r −/− splenic SWHEL B cells over time.
  • C
    WT to Il21r −/− SWHEL B cell ratio within CTV division peaks.
  • D
    Representative flow cytometry plot of SWHEL B cell CTV profile on day 3.5.
  • E
    Rate of apoptosis measured by detecting active caspase 3 by flow cytometry across CTV division peaks.

Data information: Data in (B) are representative of 8–9 biological replicates (n = 8–9) pooled from two independent experiments with statistical analysis by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐test. **P ≤ 0.01; ****P ≤ 0.0001. Data in (C–E) show concatenated data from 4–5 biological replicates (n = 4–5) and are representative for two independent experiments.

With cell death an unlikely cause for the reduced representation of Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells, we investigated whether IL‐21 influenced cell cycle progression. To assess this, S phase cells were time‐stamped by incorporation of the DNA nucleoside analog 5‐bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine (BrdU), which has a short bioavailability with most labeling occurring within 30 min to 1 h of injection (Matiasova et al, 2014). To track the subsequent progression through the cell cycle, we analyzed the cells' DNA content at various time points thereafter, an approach that has been used to dissect cell cycle progression of T cells (Kretschmer et al, 2020). Accordingly, cells in active DNA synthesis on day 3.5 post‐HEL2xOVApep immunization were labeled with BrdU (Fig 2A) and analyzed 4, 10, and 12 h thereafter. In most instances, a higher proportion of WT SWHEL B cells incorporated BrdU compared with Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells in the same animal, confirming that IL‐21 increased cell cycle activity (Fig 2B). To determine whether IL‐21 enhanced the rate of cell cycle entry, the speed of cell cycle transition or a combination of both, DNA content of BrdU+ cells 4, 10‐ and 12‐h post‐BrdU injection was measured by co‐staining ex vivo with 7‐Aminoactinomycin D (7‐AAD). Rapidly proliferating B cells have been measured to complete a cell cycle within 8–12 h of initiation (Dowling et al, 2014) with S phase comprising 5–6 h (Gitlin et al, 2015), correlating closely with total cell cycle time (Dowling et al, 2014). Therefore, assessing the proportion of BrdU+ cells that had completed cell division (i.e. had 2N DNA content) 4 h after BrdU injection allowed us to determine the relative speed of S phase completion and to do so independently of the rate of cell cycle re‐entry, as only cells that had completed one S phase were analyzed (Fig 2C, left). This revealed that the proportion of BrdU+ cells with 2N DNA content, indicative of the cells having progressed from S to G1 within 4 h, was significantly higher in WT than Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells, indicating more rapid cell cycle progression (Fig 2D). Ten‐hour post‐BrdU injection, twice the time required to complete S phase, a 2N DNA content in BrdU+ cells identified cells that had divided once but not re‐entered S phase in a subsequent cell cycle (Fig 2C, right). The reduced proportion of BrdU+ cells with a 2N DNA content for WT SWHEL B cells compared with Il21r −/− B cells indicated a greater fraction of WT SWHEL B cells had re‐entered division after 10 h, resulting in more cells in S/G2 (Fig 2D). After 12 h, enough time for some cells to have completed 2 rounds of division, 2N DNA content of BrdU+ cells in both genotypes was proportionately similar (Fig 2D).

Figure 2. IL‐21 increases cell cycle speed and rate of re‐entry.

Figure 2

  • A
    Experimental setup to study cell cycle progression of SWHEL B cells using BrdU injection.
  • B
    Flow cytometry analysis showing WT to Il21r −/− SWHEL B cell ratio of cells that have been in S phase and thus incorporated BrdU.
  • C
    Schematic depiction of BrdU and DNA content (7‐AAD) analysis by flow cytometry. At 4 h, BrdU‐positive cells with 2N DNA content mark those that have finished the cell cycle, whereas at 10 h 2N DNA content identifies cells that have not yet entered the subsequent cell cycle.
  • D
    Ratio of the proportion of BrdU‐positive WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells with 2N DNA content 4‐, 10‐, and 12‐h post‐BrdU pulse on day 3.5 post‐immunization.

Data information: Data are representative of 5–7 biological replicates (n = 5–7) from two independent experiments. Statistical analysis by one‐sample t‐test. *P ≤ 0.05.

The reduced re‐entry of cycling Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells seen 10 h after the BrdU pulse could be due to increased S phase duration and concomitantly increased cell cycle duration, giving the cells less time from completion to re‐entry (Dowling et al, 2014). Equally or additionally, the rate of cell cycle re‐entry could be reduced, with the time spent in G1 prolonged, in the absence of IL‐21. To investigate whether IL‐21 influenced the rate of cell cycle initiation, we developed an experimental system in which endogenous IL‐21 production and signaling were abrogated (Il21 and Il21r double‐deficient recipient mice and Il21 −/− OTII T cells) allowing IL‐21 to be provided as a pulse that acted only on the transferred B cells (Fig 3A). On day 3.5 post‐cell transfer and immunization, 2 μg of recombinant IL‐21 or saline was injected iv. Following this, BrdU was injected 1 h afterward to label and exclude cells that had already initiated a cell cycle at the time of IL‐21 injection. Consequently, cells that were subsequently BrdU were presumed to be in G1 at the time of IL‐21 injection. Ten hours after IL‐21 injection, the DNA content of BrdU cells was analyzed, with cells having > 2N DNA content being those that had entered S phase approximately 2–5 h following IL‐21 or saline injection (Fig 3B). This time point was chosen to allow time for B cells to respond to IL‐21 stimulation, complete G1, and enter S phase. To determine the rate of cell cycle entry independent of the extent of cell proliferation by WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells over time, the proportion of BrdU cells that had entered S phase (DNA content by 7‐AAD > 2N) was determined for both genotypes (Fig EV1E) and the ratio within each mouse calculated. In the absence of IL‐21 injection, the ratio of WT to Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells that had entered cell division was randomly distributed. In contrast, following IL‐21 administration, BrdU cells with > 2N DNA content, and thus in S/G2, were more frequent among WT cells in all but one mouse (Fig 3C). This suggested that promotion of cell cycle entry, in addition to increased S phase speed, was a direct consequence of IL‐21 signaling in B cells.

Figure 3. IL‐21 directly promotes cell cycle entry.

Figure 3

  • A
    Experimental setup to study the immediate consequences of an in vivo IL‐21 pulse on SWHEL B cell proliferation.
  • B
    Schematic depiction of BrdU and 7‐AAD analysis by flow cytometry. Cells that had not already been in or were about to enter S phase at the time of IL‐21 treatment were identified as being BrdU negative. > 2N DNA content among BrdU negative cells marked those that have entered the cell cycle following saline or IL‐21 treatment.
  • C
    Rate of de novo cell cycle entry 10‐h post in vivo IL‐21 (2 μg) or saline pulse. The ratio of WT to Il21r −/− cells not in S/G2 at the time of pulse (BrdU cells) and containing >2N DNA content 10 h after pulse is shown.

Data information: Data are representative of 10–12 biological replicates (n = 10–12) from two independent experiments. Statistical analysis by one‐sample t‐test. *P ≤ 0.05.

IL‐21 synergizes with BCR and CD40 to promote AKT and S6 phosphorylation

IL‐21 alone does not initiate B cell proliferation, but B cell proliferation occurs in the absence of IL‐21, indicating that IL‐21 amplifies rather than initiates mitogenic signals such as those downstream of BCR and CD40 stimulation. Phosphorylation and activation of AKT, a key event downstream of both BCR and CD40 ligation, can lead to the phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) with the subsequent activation of S6‐kinase (S6K) (Luo et al, 2018), which in turn regulates key mediators of cell proliferation including phosphorylation of S6 (p‐S6). Importantly, IL‐21R signaling has been shown to result in AKT phosphorylation (p‐AKT) at serine 473 (S473) in cell lines and CD8 T cells (Zeng et al, 2007). To explore the possibility that IL‐21 promoted the cell cycle via enhancing AKT and S6‐phosphoryation, we incubated splenocytes ex vivo with or without 20 ng IL‐21 for 3 h in the presence of agonistic anti‐CD40, also for 3 h, or BCR stimulation using biotinylated anti‐Igκ/λ followed by streptavidin‐mediated cross‐linking for the last minute of incubation. Phosphoflow analysis of naïve B cells (Fig EV2A) showed incubation with IL‐21 increased AKT phosphorylation at S473, which was further increased by concurrent stimulation through BCR or CD40 (Fig 4A and B). IL‐21R dependency was confirmed with B cells from Il21r −/− mice, which retained AKT phosphorylation in response to BCR or CD40 stimulation but were unaffected by exposure to IL‐21 (Fig 4A and B). Phosphorylation of S6 was minimally induced following BCR stimulation and more so following CD40 ligation but potently increased by the presence of IL‐21 (Fig 4C). p‐S6 amounts were distributed bimodally with the frequency of p‐S6‐positive cells increased by exposure to IL‐21, and further again by the addition of BCR or CD40 signals (Fig 4D), effects that also required IL‐21R expression (Fig 4C and D). In addition to increasing the proportion of p‐S6‐positive cells, IL‐21 increased the median amount of p‐S6 among p‐S6‐positive cells (Fig 4E). To address the kinetics of signaling, B cells stimulated by BCR ligation for 1, 5, 15, and 30 min were analyzed. Maximal amounts of p‐AKT were reached after 1 min and of p‐S6 after 15 min, with IL‐21 additively amplifying the phosphorylation of both molecules (Fig EV2B–D). We next asked if the timing of BCR stimulation influenced the impact of IL‐21 on AKT and S6 phosphorylation. BCR engagement as a first event in naïve B cell activation was mimicked by first incubating naïve B cells with biotinylated anti‐Igκ/λ for 20 min followed by avidin cross‐linking for 30 min, after which IL‐21 was added (for 1.5 h) followed by anti‐CD40 30 min later (for the final hour) to simulate the ensuing encounter of T cell‐derived signals. In this setting, 2 h of BCR stimulation alone showed minimal effect on both p‐AKT and p‐S6 (Fig EV2E–G) while the addition of IL‐21 and anti‐CD40 again additively increased p‐AKT (Fig EV2E) and the proportion of cells with phosphorylated S6 (Fig EV2F). The amount of p‐S6 among the p‐S6‐positive cells was similar across all conditions (Fig EV2G). Thus, the effect of IL‐21 on B cell activation is largely independent of the order in which signaling events occur.

Figure EV2. Flow cytometry gating strategy for Fig 4 and phosphoflow analysis.

Figure EV2

  • A
    Exemplary electronic gating strategy as applied in Fig 4 to identify naïve B cells following in vitro culture and phosphoflow staining.
  • B–D
    Phosphoflow analysis of naïve WT B cells following in vitro culture for 3 h with or without IL‐21 (20 ng/ml) and with or without biotinylated anti‐Igκ + anti‐Igλ for the final 20 min followed by avidin‐mediated BCR cross‐linking for the time indicated. Median p‐AKT fluorescence intensity (B), the proportion of p‐S6‐positive cells (C) and (D) their median p‐S6 fluorescence intensity are shown.
  • E–G
    Phosphoflow analysis of naïve WT B cells following in vitro culture for 20 min with or without anti‐Igκ + anti‐Igλ followed by 30 min avidin‐mediated BCR cross‐linking. IL‐21 and anti‐CD40 were added for the final 1.5 or 1 h, respectively. Median p‐AKT fluorescence intensity (E), the proportion of p‐S6‐positive cells (F), and their median p‐S6 fluorescence intensity (G) are shown.

Data information: Data in (B–D) are pooled from four biological replicates (n = 4) showing mean ± SD. Data in (E–G) show six biological replicates (n = 6). Statistical analysis by two‐way ANOVA (B‐D) or one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐test (E–G). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Figure 4. IL‐21 synergizes with BCR and CD40 to promote AKT and S6 phosphorylation.

Figure 4

  • A–E
    Phosphoflow analysis of naïve WT or Il21r −/− B cells following in vitro culture for 3 h with or without IL‐21 (20 ng/ml) and/or in the presence of BCR cross‐linking (biotinylated anti‐Igκ + anti‐Igλ and avidin‐mediated cross‐linking) or agonistic anti‐CD40. (A) Exemplary p‐AKT (S473) staining and (B) quantification of p‐AKT median fluorescence intensity (MedFI). (C) Exemplary p‐S6 (Ser235/236) staining and (D) quantification of frequency of p‐S6‐positive cells and (E) p‐S6 median fluorescence intensity (MedFI) of p‐S6‐positive cells.
  • F, G
    In vitro cell culture of CTV labeled SWHEL B cells with or without IL‐21 (20 ng/ml) and anti‐CD40 for 3 days and analysis by flow cytometry. (F) Exemplary CTV division peaks. (G) Quantification of the proportion SWHEL B that had divided and thus diluted CTV.

Data information: Data are representative of 4 biological replicates (n = 4). Statistical analysis by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐test (D), t‐test (B, E) or two‐way ANOVA with correction for multiple comparisons using Šidák method (G). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001.

T cell help via CD40 ligation is essential for TD immune responses in vivo (Kawabe et al, 1994), and B cell access to T cell help—and thus CD40 signaling—is determined in large part by BCR affinity (Schwickert et al, 2011; Woodruff et al, 2018). The additive effect of IL‐21 on B cell signaling suggested that IL‐21 could have influenced this relationship by adjusting the minimal CD40 signaling threshold and/or by amplifying the response to CD40 ligation. To test this, we cultured CTV labeled naïve SWHEL B cells alone or with 10, 1, or 0.1 μg anti‐CD40 and in the presence or absence of IL‐21 (20 ng/ml) and then analyzed CTV dilution 3 days later. As expected, the initiation of proliferation was dependent on CD40 signaling in a dose‐dependent manner (Fig 4F and G). Addition of IL‐21 increased the extent of CTV dilution such that at the lowest concentration of anti‐CD40, CTV dilution occurred only in the presence of IL‐21 (Fig 4F and G). Collectively, these results indicated that IL‐21 amplified BCR and CD40 signaling and had lowered the minimal requirement for cell cycle initiation.

IL‐21 amplifies B cell participation in the GC across a wide range of initial BCR affinities

The increased initiation and expedited progression through division in response to IL‐21 and the amplification of p‐S6 signaling suggested a role for IL‐21 in the recruitment of B cells into GC responses. Moreover, with T cell help to B cells being determined by the BCR affinity‐dependent efficiency of antigen capture and presentation in the context of MHC‐II (Schwickert et al, 2011; Woodruff et al, 2018), the increased cell cycle initiation at low anti‐CD40 concentrations in the presence of IL‐21 in vitro suggested that IL‐21 may influence the entry and continued participation of B cells in a BCR affinity‐dependent manner. To investigate the contribution of IL‐21 and BCR affinity to B cell recruitment in vivo, we immunized mice with HELWT‐, HEL2X‐, or HEL3XOVApep adsorbed on 45 μg alum adjuvant and analyzed the SWHEL B and OTII T cell response 4.5‐day post‐immunization (Fig 5A). For the lowest affinity antigen (HEL3xOVApep), we also included a group receiving 90 μg of alum to further boost the response. The number of Il21 Gfp/+ OTII cells that differentiated into CXCR5+ PD‐1hi Tfh cells (Fig EV3A) was largely independent of the HEL‐OVApep variant used with a statistically non‐significant tendency toward higher cell numbers if 90 μg adjuvant was used (Fig 5B). Similarly, the proportion of Il21 Gfp/+ OTII Tfh cells expressing GFP, and thus transcribing the Il21 locus, was comparable (Fig 5C). Thus, early Tfh cell differentiation and IL‐21 production were largely independent of the HEL‐OVApep antigen variant used, effectively creating an experimental system in which the presence or absence of IL‐21 signaling to B cells, BCR affinity and adjuvant dose were the only variables. Cell division was monitored by CTV dye dilution of SWHEL B cells, done using spectral cytometry that increased resolution to 11 divisions (Figs 5D and EV3B and C). SWHEL B cells proliferated less in the absence than in the presence of IL‐21R signaling and HEL3XOVApep immunization only resulted in some detectable CTV dilution if 90 μg alum was used (Fig 5D). While we intended to assess the role of IL‐21 in B cell response participation by comparing the number of WT and IL‐21R‐deficient SWHEL B cells that remained undivided, few events were obtained and the number varied between mice too much to allow for accurate comparison. To quantify the distribution of rare antigen‐specific B cells early during the response, we therefore pooled CTV peaks 0–4, 5–8, and 9–11+ as undivided/minimally proliferative, moderately proliferative, and highly proliferative cells, respectively. The number of cells in early peaks was largely unchanged between WT and IL‐21R‐deficient B cells, but a significantly higher proportion of WT SWHEL B cells were present in peaks 9–11+ following HELWTOVApep and HEL2xOVApep immunization (Fig 5E). In contrast, HEL3xOVApep immunization resulted in very few mice containing B cells that had undergone more than 8 divisions. In agreement with results in Fig 1, these data indicated that the magnitude of the proliferation deficit caused by IL‐21R deficiency increased the more the cells divided. To assess whether IL‐21 influenced the phenotype of responding B cells, we analyzed CD38, IgD, and FAS expression, all known to be dynamically regulated during early B cell activation (Robinson et al, 2020). As shown in Fig 5F, WT and IL‐21R‐deficient B cells had a highly similar expression profile that was also closely associated with the extent of CTV dilution. CD38 and IgD expression were lost gradually upon consecutive cell divisions, while FAS expression increased (Fig 5F). Early plasma cell differentiation was infrequent, occurred only upon HELWTOVApep immunization, and was again comparable between WT and IL‐21R‐deficient cells (Fig 5G). Thus, IL‐21 promoted early B cell proliferation without affecting their differentiation.

Figure 5. IL‐21 amplifies B cell recruitment into the GC.

Figure 5

  • A
    Experimental setup to study affinity‐dependent effects of IL‐21 on B cell recruitment.
  • B, C
    Analysis of splenic OTII Tfh cells by flow cytometry. (B) Tfh cell count and (C) proportion of Il21 Gfp/+ OTII Tfh cells transcribing the Il21 locus and thus expressing GFP.
  • D–G
    Analysis of splenic WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells by flow cytometry. (D) CTV profile of SWHEL B cells in response to immunization with HEL‐OVApep variants and (E) absolute SWHEL B cell count in pooled CTV division peaks (0–4, 5–8, 9–11+). (F) Cell surface expression (median fluorescence intensity, MedFI) of CD38, IgD, and FAS across individual CTV division peaks. (G) Representative flow cytometry dot‐plot of plasma cell differentiation indicated by CD138 expression.

Data information: Data are representative of 5–6 biological replicates (n = 5–6) from two independent experiments. (D), (F), and (G) show concatenated data representative of 3–5 biological replicates. Statistical analysis by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐test (B, C). Data in (E) were analyzed after log transformation using multiple paired t‐tests and P‐values corrected for multiple comparisons using Holm–Šídák method. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01.

Figure EV3. Flow cytometry gating strategy for Fig 5 .

Figure EV3

  • A
    Exemplary electronic gating strategy for Fig 5B and C. OTII T cells were identified based on their co‐expression of TCR Vα2 and β5 and Tfh cells by co‐expression of PD‐1 and CXCR5.
  • B
    Gating strategy for Fig 5D–G. Gates 1–4 were activated in SpectroFlo software after which CD45.2‐positive cells were exported for analysis using FlowJo.
  • C
    Proliferation analysis by CTV dilution. WT or Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells from individual mice were concatenated into one file per experiment. CTV division peaks were then identified using FlowJo's Proliferation tool by first identifying peaks 0–7 and then 8–11+. Gray bars indicate gate used to set the initial peak (0 or 4). For statistical analysis in Fig 5E, the resultant electronic gates for each CTV division were then applied to individual mice.

To assess the extent to which the observed effects translated into differences in established GC, we repeated these experiments, this time analyzing on day 7 post‐immunization. In contrast to day 4.5, SWHEL B cells were now readily detectable in all immunization conditions and showed the canonical FAS+ GL7+ GC B cell phenotype (Fig EV4A and B). In response to HELWTOVApep immunization, the proportion of Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells with a GC phenotype was significantly reduced compared with WT, with all other immunizations showing the same trend (Fig 6A). Compared with WT, the absolute number of IL‐21R‐deficient GC B cells was reduced upon immunization with each HEL‐OVApep antigen variant (Fig 6B), with the difference most pronounced upon HELWTOVApep immunization (Fig 6C). The expansion deficit of IL‐21R‐deficient GC B cells was also reflected in an over‐representation of cells with the CD86+ CXCR4low GC light zone (LZ), centrocyte phenotype (Victora et al, 2010) (Fig EV4C and D), as previously reported (Collins & Speck, 2015; Zotos et al, 2021). SWHEL PC differentiation, identified by CD98 and CD138 expression (Fig EV4A), was only consistently detected in HELWT‐ and HEL2x‐OVApep immunized mice and the representation of WT and IL‐21R‐deficient SWHEL cells among PC mirrored that within GC (Fig 6D and E). In fact, SWHEL GC B cell and SWHEL PC numbers were closely correlated independent of genotype or affinity for the immunizing antigen (Fig 6F), arguing against IL‐21 directly promoting PC differentiation, at least at this stage of the response. Collectively, these data revealed IL‐21 as crucial in establishing the initial GC size and demonstrated that promotion of continued proliferation, not differentiation, was the dominant effect of IL‐21 at this stage of the response.

Figure EV4. Flow cytometry gating strategy and additional data for Fig 6 .

Figure EV4

  • A
    Gating strategy for Fig 6. Initial gating in SpectroFlo software as shown in Fig EV3, after which CD45.2‐positive cells were exported for subsequent analysis in FlowJo. Red gates indicate gates to identify plasma cells.
  • B–D
    Additional data for Fig 6 showing SWHEL B cells analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Exemplary expression of FAS and GL7 on total SWHEL B cells. (C) Exemplary CD86 and CXCR4 expression on WT or Il21r −/− SWHEL GC B cells showing gates to identify LZ cells. (D) Quantification of frequency of light zone GC B cells.

Data information: Data in (D) were pooled from two independent experiments (n = 6–10 biological replicates) with statistical analysis by multiple paired t‐tests with P‐values corrected for multiple comparisons using Holm–Šídák method. ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Figure 6. High‐ and low‐affinity B cell responses are amplified by IL‐21.

Figure 6

Experimental setup as in Fig 5A but analysis on day 7 post‐immunization and without CTV labeling of SWHEL B cells.
  • A–E
    Analysis of splenic SWHEL B cells and PC by flow cytometry. (A) Proportion of SWHEL B cells with a FAS+ GL7+ GC phenotype, (B) SWHEL GC B cell count, and (C) representation of IL‐21R‐deficient cells among total SWHEL GC B cells. (D) CD98+ CD138+ SWHEL PC count and (E) representation of IL‐21R‐deficient cells among total SWHEL PC.
  • F
    Correlation of SWHEL GC B cell and PC count.

Data information: Data are representative of 6–10 biological replicates (n = 6–10) from two independent experiments. Data in (B), (D), and (F) were analyzed after log transformation with statistical analysis by multiple paired t‐tests (A, B, D) and P‐values corrected for multiple comparisons using Holm–Šídák method or one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐test (C) or t‐test (E). Analysis in (F) using Pearson correlation coefficient. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Discussion

The results reported here show IL‐21R signaling to be a crucial component of early B cell activation during TD B cell responses, promoting B cell expansion by increasing the speed of cell cycle transition and the rate of entry and re‐entry into the cell cycle. These effects correlate with IL‐21 and T cell help additively promoting two key events in triggering cell division, phosphorylation of AKT and S6. Signaling via JAK–STAT, in particular STAT3, is activated downstream of the IL‐21R, and IL‐21R deficiency leads to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis in the context of CD40 ligation of human B cells (Avery et al, 2010). Furthermore, IL‐21R signaling results in PI3K and MAPK activation and promotes cell division by inducing S6 phosphorylation (reviewed Leonard & Wan, 2016) and IL‐21 was reported to promote GC B cell proliferation by sustaining the c‐MYC target AP4 (Chou et al, 2016). BCR and CD40 employ PI3K and NF‐kB pathways to transduce activating signals in B cells that, depending on duration and magnitude, can also lead to the phosphorylation of S6 (Luo et al, 2018). While surprisingly little is known about the specific function of S6 in B cells, both AKT and S6 are part of the mTOR signaling network, a key regulator of cell metabolism and proliferation (reviewed Limon & Fruman, 2012). In addition, B cell proliferation, particularly in response to BCR signaling, is highly sensitive to rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor that also inhibits S6 phosphorylation (Wicker et al, 1990; Kay et al, 1991). Thus, we consider it likely that the convergence of proliferation‐inducing pathways on p‐S6 allows IL‐21 to amplify the B cell response by increasing the basal p‐S6 amount, thereby facilitating B cell activation and proliferation in conjunction with BCR or CD40 signaling.

BCR signaling in naïve B cells is increased compared with GC B cells (Khalil et al, 2012), especially through NF‐kB activation (Nowosad et al, 2016; Luo et al, 2018). As a result, the strength of BCR signaling, determined by the affinity for antigen (Liu et al, 2010), can strongly influence naïve B cell activation. The initiation of the cell cycle in naïve B cells in vivo is a multi‐step process in which BCR signaling changes the metabolic state of the cell but is, by itself, insufficient to initiate the cell cycle with the subsequent, timely receipt of T cell help inducing proliferation (Akkaya et al, 2018). Antigen affinity may, therefore, regulate B cell response initiation via BCR signaling by determining the efficiency of antigen uptake and thus access to T cell help (Schwickert et al, 2011). However, the magnitude and breadth of a B cell response is also related to the inflammatory stimuli delivered by vaccination or infection. The production of cytokines by CD4 T cells is one way by which information about the nature of an infection is conveyed to B cells, resulting, for example, in differential antibody isotype class‐switch recombination (Snapper et al, 1988; McIntyre et al, 1993; Reinhardt et al, 2009). The results presented here reveal an additional way by which T cells regulate B cell responses, namely IL‐21‐mediated modulation of naïve B cell proliferation. Our in vitro experiments, while not directly assessing BCR affinity‐dependent signaling, imply that the in vivo consequences of IL‐21 on early B cell activation are—at least in part—a result of the additive nature of BCR, CD40, and IL‐21R on AKT and S6 phosphorylation. In support of this, p‐S6 was found to be highly enriched in GC B cells expressing c‐MYC (Ersching et al, 2017), a population of cells about to enter cell division as a consequence of receiving T cell help (Finkin et al, 2019).

IL‐21 production by CD4 T cells is induced by IL‐6 (Suto et al, 2008; Dienz et al, 2009) and calcium signaling via NFAT (Kim et al, 2005; Mehta et al, 2005) and thus is in response to inflammatory signaling with a STAT3‐dependent autocrine loop stabilizing its production (Caprioli et al, 2008). In light of its potent role in B cell activation reported here, this enables IL‐21 to fine‐tune B cell responses in relation to the immunological properties of the immunogen. Equally, excessive IL‐21 production could result in the potentially detrimental lowering of BCR or CD40 signaling thresholds and/or exaggerated B cell expansion and thus predispose to autoimmunity. This could provide a mechanistic explanation for the association of polymorphisms in Il21 and Il21r (Sawalha et al, 2008; Webb et al, 2009) and increased IL‐21 production (Dolff et al, 2011) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

While IL‐21 has long been reported to promote PC differentiation (Ozaki et al, 2004; Ettinger et al, 2005; Avery et al, 2010; Zotos et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2018), this association is complicated by PC differentiation being tightly coupled to the extent of cell division (Scharer et al, 2018). Based on the close correlation of GC B cells and PC numbers irrespective of IL‐21R expression revealed here, we now suggest that IL‐21's primary role in promoting antibody production and PC differentiation is by initiating and sustaining B cell proliferation rather than altering the balance in the bifurcation between GC B cell and PC fates. Although we only investigated the early stage of the GC response and did not address the role of IL‐21 in the affinity‐dependent selection of long‐lived PC (Paus et al, 2006), it seems likely that IL‐21 could also affect this process. We would expect this effect to be indirect, via its impact on proliferation changing both the size and duration of the GC response (Zotos et al, 2010) and the extent of affinity maturation, which is also related to cell division (Gitlin et al, 2014). We had previously found that while the proportion of antigen‐specific B cells undergoing cell division was significantly reduced in Il21r −/− mice from day 5 post‐immunization (Zotos et al, 2021), their absolute numbers were comparable to WT mice until day 7 (Zotos et al, 2010, 2021). These earlier studies investigated an endogenous response to a T cell‐dependent antigen with a high B cell precursor frequency (Weisel et al, 2016) and the ability to recruit B cells over several days. As a result, rare, antigen‐specific B cell numbers early during the response are likely reflecting both recruitment and rate of expansion and the former may compensate for the latter if antigen and T cell help are readily available. In contrast, the adoptive transfer system used in this study effectively has a single wave of WT and Il21r −/− SWHEL B cells that are in direct competition within the same immune response and have known, identical starting frequencies and antigen affinities. These factors, in combination with increase in experimental resolution, likely explain the earlier and more pronounced effect of IL‐21 on antigen‐specific B cell numbers reported here. Collectively, our findings that IL‐21 increased the speed of passage through and frequency of entry into the cell cycle and promoted GC B cell accumulation over a large range of BCR affinities together with its previously reported roles in maintaining GC (Linterman et al, 2010; Zotos et al, 2010) and the LZ/DZ ratio (Collins & Speck, 2015; Zotos et al, 2021) are all indicative of the key role of IL‐21 in the initiation of a TD immune response being to promote the proliferation of pre‐GC and GC B cells. We previously described the role of IL‐21 in GC LZ B cell proliferation (Zotos et al, 2021) while another study showed that the cyclic re‐entry of LZ GC B cells could still occur when MHC‐II or T cells had recently been deleted (Long et al, 2022). These results, with those presented here, suggest to us that the lingering presence of IL‐21 may sustain GC B cell proliferation following its initiation by cell contact‐mediated mitogenic signals.

In summary, by increasing both cell cycle initiation and speed, IL‐21 modulates the breadth and magnitude of GC initiation and PC output. These results provide a novel mechanism by which IL‐21 influences immune responses including those to vaccination and infection as well as a potential involvement in autoimmunity.

Materials and Methods

Mice, cell transfer and immunization

SWHEL mice (VH10tarIgH, Vκ10‐κ Tg) (Phan et al, 2003) were crossed with Rag1 −/− (L. Corcoran, WEHI, Australia) and Il21r −/− mice (W. Leonard, NIH, USA). OTII mice (Barnden et al, 1998) (W. Heath, University of Melbourne, Australia) were crossed with Il21 Gfp knock‐in mice (Luthje et al, 2012) to obtain IL‐21‐GFP reporter mice (Il21 Gfp/+) or IL‐21‐deficient mice (Il21 Gfp/Gfp, referred to as Il21 −/− ). All mice were bred under specific pathogen‐free (SPF) conditions within the Monash Animal Research Platform, and experimental mice were housed under SPF conditions within the Alfred Alliance Monash Intensive Care Unit. The ARA Animal Ethics Committee (Application E/1787/2018/M) approved all animal studies. Male and female mice were used throughout the study, and experimental groups were matched based on age and gender. For adoptive cell transfers, spleens of OTII and SWHEL mice were passed through a 70 μM mesh, red blood cells lysed, and the frequency of T and B cells determined by flow cytometry. Additionally, B cells were depleted from OTII splenocytes by magnetic sorting using CD45R (B220) MicroBeads according to manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec cat. 130‐049‐501). For experiments involving cell division analysis, SWHEL B cells were labeled with CTV (Thermo Fisher cat. C34557) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Per recipient mouse, a mix of 1 × 105 SWHEL B cells (50% WT, 50% Il21r −/−) and 5 × 104 OTII T cells was then transferred iv and mice were immunized ip with 50 μg HELWTOVApep, HEL2XOVApep, or HEL3XOVApep adsorbed on 45 or 90 μg alum adjuvant (Alhydrogel, InvivoGen cat. 21645‐51‐2).

HEL‐OVApep protein production

The nucleic acid sequence of HELWT, HEL2X (HEL with D101R and R73E mutations (Brink et al, 2008)) or HEL3X (HEL with D101R, R73E, and R21Q mutations (Brink et al, 2008)) fused to OVA217‐345 and a deka‐HIS tag was cloned into the pcDNA3.1 plasmid. Expi293 or HEK293E cells were transfected using polyethyleneimine (PEI) following culture for 5 days. TALON Superflow Metal Affinity Resin (Takarabio cat. 635506) was used to purify the recombinant HEL‐OVApep proteins. After dialysis against PBS, and concentration to 0.8–1.2 mg/ml (Amicon Ultra‐15 Centrifugal Filter Units, Merck cat. UFC901024), the final proteins were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining, aliquoted and frozen at −80°C.

Flow cytometry

Spleens were isolated and passed through a 70 μM mesh to generate a single cell suspension. Following red blood cell lysis, up to 5 × 107 cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies (Table 1) to cell surface proteins diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA (Bovogen) and 0.1% NaN3 (Sigma) (staining buffer) and in the presence of FcγR blocking antibody (clone 2.4G2, WEHI Antibody Facility) and 1% rat serum on ice for 30 min. In experiments where antigen‐binding was analyzed, cells were first incubated with 400 ng/ml biotinylated HELWTOVApep, HEL2XOVApep, or HEL3XOVApep in staining buffer on ice for 30 min, then washed once, and then incubated with monoclonal antibodies and fluorochrome‐conjugated streptavidin. Dead cells were excluded using Fixable Viability Dye eFluor™ 780 (eBioscience, cat. 65‐0865‐14) or FluoroGold (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CAS 223769‐64‐0). Cells were analyzed using BD LSR Fortessa X‐20, BD LSR‐II or Cytek Aurora flow cytometers. The data were analyzed with FlowJo (BD) and SpectroFlo (Cytek) software.

Table 1.

Fluorochrome or biotin‐conjugated reagents for flow cytometry.

Antibody or lectin Source Identifier
Active Caspase 3‐BV650 (clone C92‐605) BD Biosciences 564096
B220‐BV421 (clone RA3‐B62) BD Biosciences 562922
B220‐PerCP‐Cy5.5 (clone RA3‐B62) BD Biosciences 551960
BrdU‐AF647 (clone 3D4) BD Biosciences 560209
CD16/32 (clone 2.4G2) WEHI Antibody Facility N/A
CD4‐BV510 (clone RM4‐5) BioLegend 100559
CD4‐A680 (clone GK1.5) WEHI Antibody Facility N/A
CD4‐PerCP‐Cy5.5 (clone RM4‐5) BD Biosciences 550954
CD19‐BUV737 (clone 1D3) BD Biosciences 612781
CD45.1‐APC‐eFluor780 (clone A20) Invitrogen 47053‐82
CD45.1‐ PerCP‐Cy5.5 (clone A20) eBioscience 45‐0453‐80
CD45.2‐BV786 (clone 104) BD Biosciences 563686
CD98‐BV711 BD Biosciences 745466
CD98‐PE (clone RL388) BioLegend 128208
CD138‐BV650 (clone281‐2) BD Biosciences 564068
CXCR5‐Biotin (clone 2G8) BD Biosciences 551960
FAS‐BUV395 (clone Jo2) BD Biosciences 740254
GL7‐PE (clone GL7) BD Biosciences 561530
IgD‐BV711 (clone 11‐26c.2a) BD Biosciences 564275
IgD‐BV421 (clone 11‐26c.2a) BD Biosciences 744291
p‐AKT (S473)‐PE (clone M89‐61) BD Biosciences 561671
PD‐1‐PE (clone J43) BD Biosciences 551892
PNA‐FITC Vector Laboratories FL‐1071
p‐S6 (Ser235/236)‐PE‐Cy7 (clone D57.2.2E) Cell Signaling 34411S
Streptavidin‐A647 Invitrogen 84E2‐1
Streptavidin‐PE‐Cy7 eBioscience 25‐4317‐82
Streptavidin‐BV650 BD Biosciences 563855
Streptavidin‐BV786 BD Biosciences 563858
TCR‐Vα2‐APC (clone B20.1) WEHI Antibody Facility N/A
TCR‐Vβ5.1, 5.2‐PE‐Cy7 (clone MR9‐4) BioLegend 139508

List of antibodies, streptavidins and PNA used for flow cytometry.

BrdU incorporation and 7‐AAD staining

For in vivo BrdU incorporation, mice were injected ip with 200 μl of 10 mg/ml 5‐bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine (BrdU, BD cat. 559619). Mice were culled by cervical dislocation at the time point indicated in the individual experimental setup, spleens were harvested, and 6 × 107 cells stained with monoclonal antibodies against cell surface molecules as described above. After washing with FACS buffer, cells were suspended in 200 μl BD Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD cat. 554722) and incubated for 15 min on ice followed by washing with 2 ml BD Perm/Wash. If staining for active caspase 3 was done, the cells were then incubated for 30 min with anti‐active caspase 3 in BD Perm/Wash (BD cat. 554723). Next, cells were suspended in 150 μl BD Permeabilization Buffer Plus (BD cat. 561651) on ice for 10 min followed by washing with 2 ml BD Perm/Wash. Cells were fixed again with 150 μl BD Cytofix/Cytoperm on ice for 5 min followed by washing with 2 ml BD Perm/Wash. To increase BrdU accessibility for monoclonal antibodies, DNAse digest was performed. Per sample, a mix of 60 μl DNAse1 stock (1 mg/ml in ddH2O, Sigma, Cat. D4513) and 140 μl PBS was freshly prepared, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After washing with 1 ml BD Perm/Wash, cells were incubated at room temperature with fluorochrome‐labeled anti‐BrdU diluted in BD Perm/Wash for 30 min. After a final wash with 2 ml BD Perm/Wash, cells were either resuspended in 1 ml FACS buffer or incubated with 20 μl 7‐AAD for 5 min followed by the addition of 1 ml FACS buffer and acquired as described above.

In vitro cell culture, stimulation, and phosphoflow staining

For phosphoflow analysis, splenocytes were isolated from male or female C57Bl/6 and Il21r −/− mice and 3 × 106 cells used per stimulation condition. Cells were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in RPMI media supplemented with or without recombinant mouse IL‐21 (20 ng/ml, Peprotech cat. 210‐21‐100). Cells were stimulated with either anti‐Igκ and anti‐Igλ or anti‐CD40. For anti‐Igκ and anti‐Igλ stimulation, biotinylated rat anti‐Igκ (100 ng/ml; clone 187.1, WEHI Antibody Facility) and anti‐Igλ (100 ng/ml; clone JC5, WEHI Antibody Facility) were added during the final 15 min of the 3 h incubation, followed by the addition of avidin (10 μg/ml) for 1 min (Fig 4) or as indicated (Fig EV2B–G). For anti‐CD40 stimulation, cells were incubated with anti‐CD40 (20 ng/ml; clone 1C10, WEHI Antibody Facility) throughout the 3‐h culture period (Fig 4) or for the final hour of incubation (Fig EV2E–G). Stimulation was stopped by fixation and permeabilization with the BD phosphoflow staining reagents (BD cat. 558049 and 558050) as per manufacturer's instructions. Cells were stained for flow cytometry with anti‐p‐AKT, anti‐p‐S6, anti‐B220, anti‐IgD, and PNA (see Table 1 for further details). Experiments shown in Figs 4 and EV2B–G used a different aliquot of anti‐p‐S6, which showed variation in maximal overall staining intensity. Flow cytometry was performed on a LSRFortessa X20 flow cytometer (BD) or a Cytek Aurora (experiments shown in Figs 5 and 6). Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo 10 software (BD). For in vitro cell culture of SWHEL B cells, 1 × 106 splenocytes from a Rag −/− SWHEL mouse were incubated per well of a 96‐well U‐bottom plate in RPMI media supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, 1 μg/ml HELWTOVApep, IL‐4 (10 ng/ml) and additional stimuli as indicated.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 or 9 (GraphPad). Mice failing to respond to immunization, as evidenced by failure to expand adoptively transferred B cells, were excluded from analysis. No blinding was done. Absolute cell numbers were calculated based on total spleen count and proportional representation in flow cytometry with electronic gates containing <5 events excluded from analysis. In experiments where the expansion of WT and Il21r −/− B cells was studied within the same animal, cell counts were corrected for any deviation of a 1:1 ratio at the time of transfer.

Data availability

No primary datasets have been generated or deposited.

Author contributions

Alexandra R Dvorscek: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; visualization; writing—review & editing. Craig I McKenzie: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; visualization; writing—review & editing. Marcus J Robinson: Investigation; methodology; writing—review & editing. Zhoujie Ding: Investigation; writing—review & editing. Catherine Pitt: Investigation; writing—review & editing. Kristy O’Donnell: Investigation; writing—review & editing. Dimitra Zotos: Funding acquisition; investigation; methodology. Robert Brink: Methodology; resources; writing—review & editing. David M Tarlinton: Funding acquisition; methodology; resources; supervision; writing—review & editing. Isaak Quast: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; supervision; visualization; writing—original draft; writing—review & editing.

Disclosure and competing interests statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Expanded View Figures PDF

Acknowledgements

We thank Lynn M. Corcoran, William R. Heath, Warren J. Leonard, and Stephen L. Nutt for providing mouse strains. We thank the Alfred Alliance Monash Intensive Care Unit and Monash Animal Research Platform for animal husbandry and Stephanie Jansen for assistance with intravenous injections. The authors acknowledge the contributions of AMREPflow, ARAFlowCore, Noelene Quinsey from the Monash Protein Production Unit; Tim Adams, Tam Pham, Tram Phan, and George Lovercz from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO). The graphical abstract and synopsis image were created with BioRender.com (A.R.D. license agreement nr. GS2427RDMR). A.R.D. was supported by a Monash University Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend and Z.D. by a Swedish International Postdoctoral Fellowship (2016‐06659) provided by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådt). D.M.T. was funded by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia Investigator Award (APP1175411), I.Q. by an Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship (P2ZHP3_164964) and an Advanced Postdoc Mobility Fellowship (P300PA_177893) provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation and a Peter Doherty Early Career Fellowship (APP1145136) provided by NHMRC Australia. This work was supported by NHMRC Project Grant APP1146617 awarded to D.M.T., D.Z., and I.Q., Monash Platform Access grants PAG17‐0207 awarded to D.Z., I.Q., and D.M.T. and PAG18‐0409 awarded to I.Q. and D.Z., NHMRC Ideas Grants APP1185294 awarded to M.J.R. and I.Q. and APP2002393 awarded to I.Q. Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

References

  1. Akkaya M, Traba J, Roesler AS, Miozzo P, Akkaya B, Theall BP, Sohn H, Pena M, Smelkinson M, Kabat J et al (2018) Second signals rescue B cells from activation‐induced mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Nat Immunol 19: 871–884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen CD, Okada T, Tang HL, Cyster JG (2007) Imaging of germinal center selection events during affinity maturation. Science 315: 528–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avery DT, Deenick EK, Ma CS, Suryani S, Simpson N, Chew GY, Chan TD, Palendira U, Bustamante J, Boisson‐Dupuis S et al (2010) B cell‐intrinsic signaling through IL‐21 receptor and STAT3 is required for establishing long‐lived antibody responses in humans. J Exp Med 207: 155–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR (1998) Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA‐based alpha‐ and beta‐chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. Immunol Cell Biol 76: 34–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brink R, Paus D, Bourne K, Hermes JR, Gardam S, Phan TG, Chan TD (2015) The SW(HEL) system for high‐resolution analysis of in vivo antigen‐specific T‐dependent B cell responses. Methods Mol Biol 1291: 103–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brink R, Phan TG, Paus D, Chan TD (2008) Visualizing the effects of antigen affinity on T‐dependent B‐cell differentiation. Immunol Cell Biol 86: 31–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caprioli F, Sarra M, Caruso R, Stolfi C, Fina D, Sica G, MacDonald TT, Pallone F, Monteleone G (2008) Autocrine regulation of IL‐21 production in human T lymphocytes. J Immunol 180: 1800–1807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan TD, Wood K, Hermes JR, Butt D, Jolly CJ, Basten A, Brink R (2012) Elimination of germinal‐center‐derived self‐reactive B cells is governed by the location and concentration of self‐antigen. Immunity 37: 893–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chou C, Verbaro DJ, Tonc E, Holmgren M, Cella M, Colonna M, Bhattacharya D, Egawa T (2016) The transcription factor AP4 mediates resolution of chronic viral infection through amplification of germinal center B cell responses. Immunity 45: 570–582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chtanova T, Tangye SG, Newton R, Frank N, Hodge MR, Rolph MS, Mackay CR (2004) T follicular helper cells express a distinctive transcriptional profile, reflecting their role as non‐Th1/Th2 effector cells that provide help for B cells. J Immunol 173: 68–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins CM, Speck SH (2015) Interleukin 21 signaling in B cells is required for efficient establishment of murine gammaherpesvirus latency. PLoS Pathog 11: e1004831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dienz O, Eaton SM, Bond JP, Neveu W, Moquin D, Noubade R, Briso EM, Charland C, Leonard WJ, Ciliberto G et al (2009) The induction of antibody production by IL‐6 is indirectly mediated by IL‐21 produced by CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med 206: 69–78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolff S, Abdulahad WH, Westra J, Doornbos‐van der Meer B, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG, Bijl M (2011) Increase in IL‐21 producing T‐cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 13: R157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dowling MR, Kan A, Heinzel S, Zhou JH, Marchingo JM, Wellard CJ, Markham JF, Hodgkin PD (2014) Stretched cell cycle model for proliferating lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 6377–6382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ersching J, Efeyan A, Mesin L, Jacobsen JT, Pasqual G, Grabiner BC, Dominguez‐Sola D, Sabatini DM, Victora GD (2017) Germinal center selection and affinity maturation require dynamic regulation of mTORC1 kinase. Immunity 46: 1045–1058.e6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ettinger R, Sims GP, Fairhurst AM, Robbins R, da Silva YS, Spolski R, Leonard WJ, Lipsky PE (2005) IL‐21 induces differentiation of human naive and memory B cells into antibody‐secreting plasma cells. J Immunol 175: 7867–7879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Finkin S, Hartweger H, Oliveira TY, Kara EE, Nussenzweig MC (2019) Protein amounts of the MYC transcription factor determine germinal center B cell division capacity. Immunity 51: 324–336.e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ford D, Sheehan C, Girasole C, Priester R, Kouttab N, Tigges J, King TC, Luciani A, Morgan JW, Maizel AL (1999) The human B cell response to IL‐13 is dependent on cellular phenotype as well as mode of activation. J Immunol 163: 3185–3193 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gitlin AD, Mayer CT, Oliveira TY, Shulman Z, Jones MJ, Koren A, Nussenzweig MC (2015) HUMORAL IMMUNITY. T cell help controls the speed of the cell cycle in germinal center B cells. Science 349: 643–646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gitlin AD, Shulman Z, Nussenzweig MC (2014) Clonal selection in the germinal Centre by regulated proliferation and hypermutation. Nature 509: 637–640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonzalez DG, Cote CM, Patel JR, Smith CB, Zhang Y, Nickerson KM, Zhang T, Kerfoot SM, Haberman AM (2018) Nonredundant roles of IL‐21 and IL‐4 in the phased initiation of germinal center B cells and subsequent self‐renewal transitions. J Immunol 201: 3569–3579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Good KL, Bryant VL, Tangye SG (2006) Kinetics of human B cell behavior and amplification of proliferative responses following stimulation with IL‐21. J Immunol 177: 5236–5247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin H, Carrio R, Yu A, Malek TR (2004) Distinct activation signals determine whether IL‐21 induces B cell costimulation, growth arrest, or Bim‐dependent apoptosis. J Immunol 173: 657–665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kato Y, Abbott RK, Freeman BL, Haupt S, Groschel B, Silva M, Menis S, Irvine DJ, Schief WR, Crotty S (2020) Multifaceted effects of antigen valency on B cell response composition and differentiation in vivo . Immunity 53: 548–563.e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kawabe T, Naka T, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Fujiwara H, Suematsu S, Yoshida N, Kishimoto T, Kikutani H (1994) The immune responses in CD40‐deficient mice: Impaired immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. Immunity 1: 167–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kay JE, Kromwel L, Doe SE, Denyer M (1991) Inhibition of T and B lymphocyte proliferation by rapamycin. Immunology 72: 544–549 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Khalil AM, Cambier JC, Shlomchik MJ (2012) B cell receptor signal transduction in the GC is short‐circuited by high phosphatase activity. Science 336: 1178–1181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim HP, Korn LL, Gamero AM, Leonard WJ (2005) Calcium‐dependent activation of interleukin‐21 gene expression in T cells. J Biol Chem 280: 25291–25297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim YM, Pan JY, Korbel GA, Peperzak V, Boes M, Ploegh HL (2006) Monovalent ligation of the B cell receptor induces receptor activation but fails to promote antigen presentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 3327–3332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kretschmer L, Flossdorf M, Mir J, Cho YL, Plambeck M, Treise I, Toska A, Heinzel S, Schiemann M, Busch DH et al (2020) Differential expansion of T central memory precursor and effector subsets is regulated by division speed. Nat Commun 11: 113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leonard WJ, Wan CK (2016) IL‐21 signaling in immunity. F1000Res 5: 224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Limon JJ, Fruman DA (2012) Akt and mTOR in B cell activation and differentiation. Front Immunol 3: 228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Linterman MA, Beaton L, Yu D, Ramiscal RR, Srivastava M, Hogan JJ, Verma NK, Smyth MJ, Rigby RJ, Vinuesa CG (2010) IL‐21 acts directly on B cells to regulate Bcl‐6 expression and germinal center responses. J Exp Med 207: 353–363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu W, Meckel T, Tolar P, Sohn HW, Pierce SK (2010) Antigen affinity discrimination is an intrinsic function of the B cell receptor. J Exp Med 207: 1095–1111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Long Z, Phillips B, Radtke D, Meyer‐Hermann M, Bannard O (2022) Competition for refueling rather than cyclic reentry initiation evident in germinal centers. Sci Immunol 7: eabm0775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Luo W, Weisel F, Shlomchik MJ (2018) B cell receptor and CD40 signaling are rewired for synergistic induction of the c‐Myc transcription factor in germinal center B cells. Immunity 48: 313–326.e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Luthje K, Kallies A, Shimohakamada Y, Belz GT, Light A, Tarlinton DM, Nutt SL (2012) The development and fate of follicular helper T cells defined by an IL‐21 reporter mouse. Nat Immunol 13: 491–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Matiasova A, Sevc J, Mikes J, Jendzelovsky R, Daxnerova Z, Fedorocko P (2014) Flow cytometric determination of 5‐bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine pharmacokinetics in blood serum after intraperitoneal administration to rats and mice. Histochem Cell Biol 142: 703–712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McIntyre TM, Klinman DR, Rothman P, Lugo M, Dasch JR, Mond JJ, Snapper CM (1993) Transforming growth factor beta 1 selectivity stimulates immunoglobulin G2b secretion by lipopolysaccharide‐activated murine B cells. J Exp Med 177: 1031–1037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mehta DS, Wurster AL, Weinmann AS, Grusby MJ (2005) NFATc2 and T‐bet contribute to T‐helper‐cell‐subset‐specific regulation of IL‐21 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 2016–2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mehta DS, Wurster AL, Whitters MJ, Young DA, Collins M, Grusby MJ (2003) IL‐21 induces the apoptosis of resting and activated primary B cells. J Immunol 170: 4111–4118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mesin L, Ersching J, Victora GD (2016) Germinal center B cell dynamics. Immunity 45: 471–482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Niiro H, Clark EA (2002) Regulation of B‐cell fate by antigen‐receptor signals. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 945–956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nowosad CR, Spillane KM, Tolar P (2016) Germinal center B cells recognize antigen through a specialized immune synapse architecture. Nat Immunol 17: 870–877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ozaki K, Spolski R, Ettinger R, Kim HP, Wang G, Qi CF, Hwu P, Shaffer DJ, Akilesh S, Roopenian DC et al (2004) Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL‐21, a novel inducer of Blimp‐1 and Bcl‐6. J Immunol 173: 5361–5371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Paus D, Phan TG, Chan TD, Gardam S, Basten A, Brink R (2006) Antigen recognition strength regulates the choice between extrafollicular plasma cell and germinal center B cell differentiation. J Exp Med 203: 1081–1091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pene J, Gauchat JF, Lecart S, Drouet E, Guglielmi P, Boulay V, Delwail A, Foster D, Lecron JC, Yssel H (2004) Cutting edge: IL‐21 is a switch factor for the production of IgG1 and IgG3 by human B cells. J Immunol 172: 5154–5157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Phan TG, Amesbury M, Gardam S, Crosbie J, Hasbold J, Hodgkin PD, Basten A, Brink R (2003) B cell receptor‐independent stimuli trigger immunoglobulin (Ig) class switch recombination and production of IgG autoantibodies by anergic self‐reactive B cells. J Exp Med 197: 845–860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Qi H, Cannons JL, Klauschen F, Schwartzberg PL, Germain RN (2008) SAP‐controlled T‐B cell interactions underlie germinal Centre formation. Nature 455: 764–769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Reinhardt RL, Liang HE, Locksley RM (2009) Cytokine‐secreting follicular T cells shape the antibody repertoire. Nat Immunol 10: 385–393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Robertson JM, Jensen PE, Evavold BD (2000) DO11.10 and OT‐II T cells recognize a C‐terminal ovalbumin 323‐339 epitope. J Immunol 164: 4706–4712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Robinson MJ, Ding Z, Pitt C, Brodie EJ, Quast I, Tarlinton DM, Zotos D (2020) The amount of BCL6 in B cells shortly after antigen engagement determines their representation in subsequent germinal centers. Cell Rep 30: 1530–1541.e4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson MJ, Pitt C, Brodie EJ, Valk AM, O'Donnell K, Nitschke L, Jones S, Tarlinton DM (2019) BAFF, IL‐4 and IL‐21 separably program germinal center‐like phenotype acquisition, BCL6 expression, proliferation and survival of CD40L‐activated B cells in vitro . Immunol Cell Biol 97: 826–839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sawalha AH, Kaufman KM, Kelly JA, Adler AJ, Aberle T, Kilpatrick J, Wakeland EK, Li QZ, Wandstrat AE, Karp DR et al (2008) Genetic association of interleukin‐21 polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 458–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scharer CD, Barwick BG, Guo M, Bally APR, Boss JM (2018) Plasma cell differentiation is controlled by multiple cell division‐coupled epigenetic programs. Nat Commun 9: 1698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schwickert TA, Victora GD, Fooksman DR, Kamphorst AO, Mugnier MR, Gitlin AD, Dustin ML, Nussenzweig MC (2011) A dynamic T cell‐limited checkpoint regulates affinity‐dependent B cell entry into the germinal center. J Exp Med 208: 1243–1252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shih TA, Meffre E, Roederer M, Nussenzweig MC (2002) Role of BCR affinity in T cell dependent antibody responses in vivo . Nat Immunol 3: 570–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Snapper CM, Finkelman FD, Stefany D, Conrad DH, Paul WE (1988) IL‐4 induces co‐expression of intrinsic membrane IgG1 and IgE by murine B cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 141: 489–498 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Spillane KM, Tolar P (2017) B cell antigen extraction is regulated by physical properties of antigen‐presenting cells. J Cell Biol 216: 217–230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Suto A, Kashiwakuma D, Kagami S, Hirose K, Watanabe N, Yokote K, Saito Y, Nakayama T, Grusby MJ, Iwamoto I et al (2008) Development and characterization of IL‐21‐producing CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med 205: 1369–1379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tangye SG, Avery DT, Hodgkin PD (2003) A division‐linked mechanism for the rapid generation of Ig‐secreting cells from human memory B cells. J Immunol 170: 261–269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Victora GD, Schwickert TA, Fooksman DR, Kamphorst AO, Meyer‐Hermann M, Dustin ML, Nussenzweig MC (2010) Germinal center dynamics revealed by multiphoton microscopy with a photoactivatable fluorescent reporter. Cell 143: 592–605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wagner EF, Hanna N, Fast LD, Kouttab N, Shank PR, Vazquez A, Sharma S (2000) Novel diversity in IL‐4‐mediated responses in resting human naive B cells versus germinal center/memory B cells. J Immunol 165: 5573–5579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang S, Wang J, Kumar V, Karnell JL, Naiman B, Gross PS, Rahman S, Zerrouki K, Hanna R, Morehouse C et al (2018) IL‐21 drives expansion and plasma cell differentiation of autoreactive CD11c(hi)T‐bet(+) B cells in SLE. Nat Commun 9: 1758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Webb R, Merrill JT, Kelly JA, Sestak A, Kaufman KM, Langefeld CD, Ziegler J, Kimberly RP, Edberg JC, Ramsey‐Goldman R et al (2009) A polymorphism within IL21R confers risk for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 60: 2402–2407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Weisel FJ, Zuccarino‐Catania GV, Chikina M, Shlomchik MJ (2016) A temporal switch in the germinal center determines differential output of memory B and plasma cells. Immunity 44: 116–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wicker LS, Boltz RC Jr, Matt V, Nichols EA, Peterson LB, Sigal NH (1990) Suppression of B cell activation by cyclosporin a, FK506 and rapamycin. Eur J Immunol 20: 2277–2283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Woodruff MC, Kim EH, Luo W, Pulendran B (2018) B cell competition for restricted T cell help suppresses rare‐epitope responses. Cell Rep 25: 321–327.e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zaretsky I, Atrakchi O, Mazor RD, Stoler‐Barak L, Biram A, Feigelson SW, Gitlin AD, Engelhardt B, Shulman Z (2017) ICAMs support B cell interactions with T follicular helper cells and promote clonal selection. J Exp Med 214: 3435–3448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zeng R, Spolski R, Casas E, Zhu W, Levy DE, Leonard WJ (2007) The molecular basis of IL‐21‐mediated proliferation. Blood 109: 4135–4142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Y, Tech L, George LA, Acs A, Durrett RE, Hess H, Walker LSK, Tarlinton DM, Fletcher AL, Hauser AE et al (2018) Plasma cell output from germinal centers is regulated by signals from Tfh and stromal cells. J Exp Med 215: 1227–1243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zotos D, Coquet JM, Zhang Y, Light A, D'Costa K, Kallies A, Corcoran LM, Godfrey DI, Toellner KM, Smyth MJ et al (2010) IL‐21 regulates germinal center B cell differentiation and proliferation through a B cell‐intrinsic mechanism. J Exp Med 207: 365–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zotos D, Quast I, Li‐Wai‐Suen CSN, McKenzie CI, Robinson MJ, Kan A, Smyth GK, Hodgkin PD, Tarlinton DM (2021) The concerted change in the distribution of cell cycle phases and zone composition in germinal centers is regulated by IL‐21. Nat Commun 12: 7160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zotos D, Tarlinton DM (2012) Determining germinal Centre B cell fate. Trends Immunol 33: 281–288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Expanded View Figures PDF

    Data Availability Statement

    No primary datasets have been generated or deposited.


    Articles from EMBO Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

    RESOURCES