Abstract
The association between differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT) has been reported in literature.
Aim: To evaluate the incidence of this association and to determine whether the CLT may influence on the early initial staging of DTC when associated with other variable risks.
Study design: Historical (retrospective) cohort.
Materials and Methods: Fifty two patients with DTC were evaluated from 1999 to 2009. They were divided into two groups. The first group had 35 patients with DTC without DLT; the second had 17 patients with CLT. Total thyroidectomy was the treatment chosen for all patients. Similarities shared in both groups such as age, gender, histological tumor type, tumor diameter, regional only or with distant metastases, extrathyroidal invasion, multifocality and presence of tumor capsule were considered. T-Student tests and Chi-square tests were applied to analyze the data.
Results: The incidence of DTC without CLT was higher that of DTC+CLT (p=0.0126). We noticed no statistic differences between the common variables analyzed.
Conclusions: CLT occurred in 33% of the patients with DCT. All cases of DTC were in the early stages.
Keywords: thyroidectomy, thyroiditis, thyroid neoplasms, neoplasm staging
INTRODUCTION
Thyroid cancer is responsible for about 1% of the new cases of diagnosed malignant diseases1; and is divided according to histological type into papilliferous, follicular, undifferentiated, a little differentiated and malignant lymphoma, among others2. papilliferous and the follicular carcinoma are also called thyroid differentiated carcinoma (TDC), although they have distinct clinical, histological and biological patterns3. They correspond to approximately 90% of the cases of malignant neoplasia of the thyroid1,4. When diagnosed early on, TDC is a tumor which is usually curable5. Studies point out that these cancers have a cure rate of approximately 80%, while 20% will have local recurrence and 5 to 10% will develop distant metastasis4.
Besides the classical form, the papilliferous cancers have distinct histological variants identified as: follicular, trabecular, insular, solid, of high cells, of columnar cells, diffuse sclerosing, oxyphilic, amongst others also reported in the literature2,6. These patterns, despite controversial and still not standardized, are not necessarily exclusive, since one single tumor may fit the description of multiple variants2. The majority has only morphological differences, and it does not always have significant prognostic value2. The follicular carcinoma is further divided according to invasion and growth patterns2,6. As to invasion, we know two forms: minimally invasive and broadly or largely invasive2,6. The growth pattern may vary from one well differentiated form to another which is not so well differentiated2,6.
The TDC patient may be classified into high, low and very low risk1. When analyzing the initial tumor, it is very important to know what is its likely prognosis7. In recent years, the search for factors which can influence prognosis has been a constant, since they impact directly on the identification of patients who have a more aggressive disease, as well as its treatment and follow up8. Multiple series of cases have been assessed and numerous staging classifications have been proposed taking into account risk and prognostic factors (TNM, EORTC, UICC/AJCC, AGES, AMES, MACIS, Clinical classification, Ohio)3,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Nonetheless, the relative impact of each one of these indicators is yet to be clearly defined.
Many reports have stressed the concurrence between chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT) and TDC, which has been pointed as a prognostic factor for this type of neoplasia17, 18, 19, 19, 20, 21. CLT is a disorder stemming from the fact that T suppressor lymphocytes are rendered incapable of destroying clones of lymphocytes sensitized by thyroid antigens, with consequent cytotoxicity mediated by natural killer cells and the interaction of T-Helper lymphocytes with lymphocytes B, producing antibodies against thyroid components2.
Studies have investigated the possible relationship between the chronic lymphocytic infiltrate expression and the degree of histological aggressiveness in thyroid tumors18,19,21,22. Notwithstanding, most of these papers assessed only the lymphocitic thyroid disease associated with well differentiated carcinoma in general, without investigating whether these lymphocytic infiltrates, when associated with the other risk factors, would be associated to low or high risk. The goal of the present paper was to establish the relative frequency of CLT in patients with TDC, and whether the CLT in a multivariate risk analysis could influence tumor staging and, indirectly, the prognosis of this disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We carried out a historical cohort study (retrospective), encompassing a period of 10 years - between July of 1999 and May of 2009, when we analyzed the pathology reports from the medical charts of 54 patients diagnosed with TDC who were submitted to total thyroidectomy, from whom we had the following data: gender, age upon diagnosis, tumor diameter, tumor capsule findings, thyroid invasion, multifocality, locoregional metastasis, histology pattern, chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis and distant metastasis; and these were the inclusion criteria for the present study. Two charts were excluded for not having complete data. The material utilized was obtained from files from the Private Clinic and the Pathology Lab.
These charts and reports were separated in two groups: the first with TDC diagnosis, and the second were those with TDC associated with CLT. All the patients were submitted to total thyroidectomy, with or without neck lymph node dissection, and radiotherapy. Neck dissection was indicated for those patients who had clinical signs of lymph node involvement, found in pre-op ultrasound exam or during surgery.
TDC diagnosis and that of its variants was based on the criteria defined by the World Health Organization in 2004, later modified2,6. CLT was defined as the presence of lymphocitic infiltrate, varying from islands in the tumor itself or around it, all the way to large infiltrates, also including germinative centers23. Patients with the classic Hashimoto's Thyroiditis (HT) were also included in the study as having lymphocitic thyroiditis.
The material obtained from the thyroidectomies was analyzed by 4 pathologists of the same team, by means of macroscopic and microscopic assessments. The later by means of paraffin block slides, in histologic cross-sections dyed by the hematoxylin-eosin technique, using the electronic microscope.
The distant metastasis variable was assessed after surgery by means of a full body scan with radioactive iodine.
Tumor staging (Table 1) and risk stratification (Table 2) were assessed in accordance with the classification from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) / Tumor Nodes Metastasis (TNM)24,25.
Table 1.
T (TUMOR) | N (LYMPH NODE METASTASES) | M (DISTANT METASTASES) |
---|---|---|
T1 £ 2 cm (T1a £ 1cm T1b 1-2 cm) | N0 absent | M0 absent |
T2 2-4 cm | N1a metastases at VI level | M1 distant metastases |
T3 > 4cm confined to the thyroid or with minimum extrathyroid invasion | N1b neck metastases (lateral) or in the upper mediastinum | |
T4a invading subcutaneous tissue, larynx, trachea, esophagus, or laryngeal recurrent | ||
T4b invading pre-vertebral fascia or involving the carotid or mediastinal vessels | ||
Tx unknown size without extrathyroid invasion | Nx lymph nodes not assessed | Mx not assessed |
TNM: Classification proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002).
Table 2.
Stage | < 45 years | 3 45 years |
---|---|---|
Papillary or follicular carcinoma | ||
I | Any T, any N, M0 | T1, N0, M0 |
II | Any T, any N, M1 | T2, N0, M0 |
III | - | T3, N0, M0 |
T1/T2/T3, N1a, M0 | ||
IV A | - | T4a, any N, M0 |
T1/T2/T3, N1b, M0 | ||
IV B | - | T4b, any N, M0 |
IV C | - | any T, any N, M1 |
Classification proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002).
Variables common to groups TDC and TDC + CLT were statistically analyzed in order to look for differences between them.
For database management, statistical calculations and to create the tables and graphs we used Microsoft Excel® version 2003. The t Student test was used in order to compare the groups as the quantitative variables age and tumor diameter. In order to associated the qualitative variables: gender, extrathyroid invasion, tumor capsule, multifocality, distant metastasis, locoregional metastasis, histological pattern and tumor staging we used the chi-squared test. In all the statistical tests we used the 5% (p<0,05) significance level.
This study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of the Institution, under protocol # 057/09.
RESULTS
All the charts were from patients with papilliferous carcinoma. Of these, 17 (33%) had TDC together with CLT, and 35 (67%) had TDC without CLT (p=0.01) (Table 3). We found no case of follicular carcinoma.
Table 3.
Presence of CLT (chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis) | Number of patients | % | CI (95%) |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 17 | 32,69 | (19,94 - 45,44) |
No | 35 | 67,31 | (54,56 - 80,06) |
Total | 52 | 100,00 |
(c2 = 6,23; gl = 1; p = 0,0126)
The ages varied between 14 and 80 years, with a mean of 45.9 years. There was one case of TDC in a 14-year-old girl. In the TDC+CLT group, the youngest patient was a 22 year-old woman. There was no significant difference between the groups as far as age is concerned (Table 4). In the TDC group, tumor diameter varied between 0.3 and 6 cm, in the TDC_CLT group, tumor size was smaller - 0.4 and 3.5 cm (p=0.8) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Group age(years) Diameter(cm) | |||
---|---|---|---|
N | Mean | Mean | |
TDC | 35 | 43;1 (14-80) | 1,4(0,3-6) |
TDC + CLT | 17 | 51;3(22-76) | 1,3(0,4-3,5) |
Total | 52 | 45;9(14-80) | 1,33(0,3-6) |
Age: (p = 0.1); Tumor diameter: (p = 0.8794). Comparison through the t Student test.
CLT: chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis; TDC: thyroid differentiated carcinoma; TDC+CLT: thyroid differentiated carcinoma associated with chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis.
The microcarcinoma (tumor smaller than 1cm), was most frequently found in the TDC+CLT group, when compared to the TDC group: 11 (64.7%) and 18 (51.4%), respectively (p=0.5) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Microcarcinoma | CLT | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | ||
No | 17 (48,6%) | 6 (35,3%) | 23 (44,2%) |
Yes | 18 (51,4%) | 11 (64,7%) | 29 (55,8%) |
Total | 35 (100,0%) | 17 (100,0%) | 52 (100,0% |
(c2 = 0,37; gl = 1; p = 0,54407)
The results from the multivariate analysis are depicted on Table 6.
Table 6.
Tumor variables | TDC n (%) | TDC + CLT n (%) | TOTAL n (%) | Comparing TDC with and without CLT (p)* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
£ 2 cm | 28 (80%) | 12 (70,6%) | 40 (76,9%) | 0,48878 | |
Tumor diameter | > 2 e £ 4 cm | 6 (17,1%) | 5 (29,4%) | 11 (21,2%) | |
> 4 cm | 1 (2,9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1,9%) | ||
Tumor capsule | Absent | 22 (62,9%) | 12 (70,6%) | 34 (65,4%) | 0,58253 |
Present | 13 (37,1%) | 5 (29,4%) | 18 (34,6%) | ||
Multifocality | No | 25 (71,4%) | 9 (52,9%) | 34 (65,4%) | 0,31548 |
Yes | 10 (28,6%) | 8 (47,1%) | 18 (34,6%) | ||
Extrathyroid invasion | No Yes | 29 (82,9%) 6 (17,1%) | 13 (76,5%) 4 (23,5%) | 42 (80,8%) 10 (19,2%) | 0,86257 |
Distant metastasis | No | 35 (100%) | 17 (100%) | 52 (100%) | - |
Yes | - | - | - | ||
Locoregional metastasis | No | 28 (80%) | 14 (82,4%) | 42 (80,8%) | 0,86257 |
Yes | 7 (20%) | 3 (17,7%) | 10 (19,2%) | ||
Papilliferous Classic | 25 (71,4%) | 14 (82,4%) | 39 (75%) | 0,60943 | |
Histology pattern | Papilliferous follicular variant | 9 (25,7%) | 3 (17,7%) | 12 (23,1%) | |
Papilliferous oxyphilic variant | 1 (2,9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1,9%) | ||
Patient variables | |||||
Gender | Females | 32 (91,4%) | 16 (94,1%) | 48 (92,3%) | 0,83105 |
Males | 3 (8,6%) | 1 (5,9%) | 4 (7,7%) | ||
Age in years | < 45 years | 17 (48,6%) | 4 (23,5%) | 21 (40,4%) | 0,15412 |
3 45 years | 18 (51,4%) | 13 (76,5%) | 31 (59,6%) |
*Association between the variables done through the chi-squared test. TDC: thyroid differentiated carcinoma. TDC + CLT: thyroid differentiated carcinoma associated with chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis.
The distribution by tumor diameter, within each group was: 28 cases (80%) smaller than or equal to 2 cm in the TDC group, and 12 (70.6%) in the TDC + CLT; 6 cases (17.1%) larger than 2cm and smaller than or equal to 4cm in the TDC group, and 5 (29.5%) in the TDC + CLT. There was only one case in which the tumor was larger than 4cm, it happened in the TDC group. There were no significant differences between patients in the TDC group in relation to the greater tumor diameter.
In the TDC and TDC+CLT groups there was a difference which was only proportional to the presence or absence of the capsule. In the TDC group, 37.1% of the patients had the capsule, while in the TDC+CLT group, 29.4% only had a capsule (p=0.5).
We can notice a predominance of multifocality in the TDC+CLT group, however such difference was not statistically significant.
In the patients with TDC+CLT, we noticed a higher frequency of extrathyroid invasion (17.1% vs. 23.5%), however with a lower rate of locoregional metastasis (17.7% vs. 20%). No patient in this sample had distant metastasis.
As to carcinoma distribution according to histology, 39 cases (75%) were classic TDC, and 13 cases were its variants. We also noticed a predominance of the follicular variant, 12 cases (23.1%), and there was only one case (1.9%) of the oxyphilic cells variant, which occurred in the TDC group (p=0.6) (Table 6).
There was a predominance of females, 48 cases (92.3%), and 4 cases (7.7%) of males. In the TDC group, 32 (91.4%) patients were females, and in the TDC+CLT, 16 (94.1%) were females and only 1(5.9%) patient was male (p=0.8).
In both groups the initial stages I and II were predominant, without considerable statistical difference (Table 7).
Table 7.
TDC with CLT (n = 17) | TDC without CLT (n = 35) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
TNM classification | |||
Stage I | 11 (26,8%) | 30 (73,2%) | |
Stage II | 2 (66,7%) | 1 (33,3%) | NS |
Stage III | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | |
Stage IV a | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) |
TDC: thyroid differentiated carcinoma; CLT: chronic lymphocitic thyroiditis, P = NS: statistically non-significant, TNM: Classification proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002).
DISCUSSION
Since its first publication, the TDC and CLT relation is controversial, and it has been largely discussed in the literature, with results varying between those which did not prove the association26 and others in which it is clear17, 18, 19, 20, 21,27. In many of these series, the papilliferous carcinoma was the predominant histological pattern, and this was also true in the present paper. In 32.69% of the cases there was an association between the CLT and the TDC, which coincides with data reported in the literature.
It is uncertain whether the coexisting thyroiditis could be the cause or consequence of the thyroid carcinoma, and whether it influences its staging and its prognosis indirectly.
It is believed that CLT induces the malignant transformation because it stimulates mitosis and follicular epithelium proliferation through cell necrosis, caused by the chronic infiltration of lymphocytes and hormonal thyroid stimulation, or by a partial disorganization of the antitumor autoimmune surveillance18. On the other hand, some authors consider the lymphocytic infiltration process as benign; thus inferring that CLT would not be a premalignant lesion, but rather an autoimmune mechanism involved in the TDC28. It has been reported that the TDC has a better prognosis when associated with the CLT29.
In this analysis we did not find significant differences between the TDC and TDC+CLT groups in relation to tumor diameter, although there are papers proving the CLT association to initial stage tumors30. Other authors also did not find significant associations comparing multifocality, age and gender between patients with and without lymphocytic infiltrates27. One study reported that 30% of the patients with thyroid papilliferous carcinoma had coexisting CLT. However, the better prognosis reported would be more related to a minimum protective effect, since it is more common to young female patients31. Papers have shown a lower incidence of distant metastasis and disease recurrence in patients with associated CLT29.
Better prognoses are: those microcarcinoma or encapsulated tumors: the classic and follicular variants are of medium prognosis and the high cells and column cells are those considered the worst prognosis8. Although the results were not statistically significant, in the present study we found 64.7% microcarcinomas in the TDC+CLT group vs. 51.4% in the TDC group.
Although the CLT and TDC association has been broadly proven in many papers, the following aspects remain uncertain:
-
1.
Do these two thyroid disorders share a common etiology?
-
2.
Does the CLT affect the TDC biological behavior?
-
3.
Do the chronic lymphocitic infiltrates represent a host immune response to the tumor or is it an isolate occurrence?
Studies with larger samples and with long term follow up are still necessary in order to clear up these issues.
Nonetheless, these authors believe that the TDC+CLT cases are of low risk and good prognosis, since most of these patients were staged as initial, implying a possible protective role of the lymphocitic infiltrate.
CONCLUSION
-
1.
CLT associated with the TDC happened in 17 (33%) of the 52 patients with differentiated carcinomas of the thyroid.
-
2.
The CLT did not influence tumor staging in patients with TDC.
-
3.
There were no statistical differences between the variables: age, gender, histology pattern, tumor diameter, locoregional or distant metastasis, extrathyroid invasion, multifocality, and the presence of tumor capsule in the groups with and without CLT.
-
4.
Considering the risk factors all together, most of the TDC+CLT cases were staged as initial.
Footnotes
Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System – Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on February 6, 2010; and accepted on April 12, 2010. cod. 6924
REFERENCES
- 1.Maia Ana Luiza, Ward Laura S., Carvalho Gisah A., Graf Hans, Maciel Rui M.B., Maciel Léa M., Zanini, et al. Nódulos de tireoide e câncer diferenciado de tireoide: consenso brasileiro. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2007 July;51(5):867–893. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302007000500027. [cited 2009 Oct 25]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chan JKC. In: Diagnostic histophalogy of tumors. 3rd ed. Fletcher CDM, editor. Churchill Livingstone; London: 2007. Tumors of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. pp. 997–1068.3. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cady B, Rossi R. An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 1988 Dec;104(6):947–953. PubMed PMID: 319 4846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Golbert Lenara, Wajner Simone Magagnin, Rocha Andreia Possatti da, Maia Ana Luiza, Gross Jorge Luiz. Carcinoma diferenciado de tireoide: avaliação inicial e acompanhamento. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2005 Oct;49(5):701–710. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302005000500010. [cited 2009 Oct 25]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302005000500010&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302005000500010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ward Laura S., Assumpção Lígia V.M. Câncer diferenciado da tiroide: fatores prognósticos e tratamento. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Feb;48(1):126–136. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302004000100014. [cited 2009 Nov 16]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302004000100014&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302004000100014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Delellis RA, Willians ED. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics-Tumors of Endocrine Organs. World Health Organization. Delellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C, editors. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon: 2004. Tumours of thryroid and parathyroid. pp. 49–134. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ward Laura S., Marrone Marilia, Camargo Rosalinda Y., Watanabe Tomoko, Tincani Alfio J., Matos Patricia S., et al. Câncer diferenciado da tiroide de baixo risco: revisão do estado atual da literatura e proposta de conduta. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2006 June;50(3):550–557. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302006000300019. [cited 2009 Oct 25]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302006000300019&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302006000300019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Medeiros-Neto Geraldo. Carcinoma papilífero da Tireoide: uma Hidra de sete cabeças? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2003 June;47(3):203–204. [cited 2009 Oct 25]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302003000300001&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302003000300001. [Google Scholar]
- 9.DeGroot LJ, Kaplan EL, McCormick M, Straus FH. Natural history, treatment, and course of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990 Aug;71(2):414–424. doi: 10.1210/jcem-71-2-414. PubMed PMID:2380337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mazzaferri EL, Kloos RT. Clinical review 128: Current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(4):1447–1463. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.4.7407. PubMed PMID:1129 7567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brierley JD, Panzarella T, Tsang RW, Gospodarowicz MK, OSullivan B. A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example. Cancer. 1997;79(12):2414–2423. Disponível em: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/73502966/PDFSTART. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Byar DP, Green SB, Dor P, Williams ED, Colon J, van Gilse HA, et al. A prognostic index for thyroid carcinoma. A study of the E.O.R.T.C. Thyroid Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer. 1979;15(8):1033–1041. doi: 10.1016/0014-2964(79)90291-3. PubMed PMID: 510341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hay ID, Grant CS, Taylor WF, McConahey WM. Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system. Surgery. 1987;102(6):1088–1095. PubMed PMID:3686348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Goellner JR, Ebersold JR, Grant CS. Predicting outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma: development of a reliable prognostic scoring system in a cohort of 1779 patients surgically treated at one institution during 1940 through 1989. Surgery. 1993;114(6):1050–1058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosário Pedro Weslley S., Barroso Álvaro Luís, Padrão Eduardo Lanza, Rezende Leonardo Lamego, Purisch Saulo. Estadiamento do carcinoma diferenciado de tireoide pela classificação AJCC/TNM. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2004;48(4):575–576. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302004000400021. [serial on the Internet]. Aug [cited 2009 Nov 09]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302004000400021&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302004000400021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosário Pedro Weslley S. do. Classificação do carcinoma diferenciado de tireoide baseada no prognóstico. Qual e quando usar?. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab [serial on the Internet]. 2004 June [cited 2009 Nov 08]; 48(3): 427-428. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302004000300017&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302004000300017. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Roberti Alexandre, Andrade Sobrinho Josias de, Denardin Odilon Victor Porto, Rapoport Abrão. Concomitância da tireoidite de Hashimoto e o carcinoma diferenciado da tireoide. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2006 Dec;33(6):345–349. [serial on the Internet]. [cited 2009 Nov 08]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912006000600003&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69912006000600003. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Olguín MS, Nebel E, Moloeznik L, Quiroga S, Chiganer G, García MG, et al. [Influence of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis on the prognostic outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma].Rev bras cir cabeça pescoço. Jul.-Set. 2008;37(3):132–136. Spanish.LILACS Id: 508201. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Loh KC, Greenspan FS, Dong F, Miller TR, Yeo PP. Influence of lymphocytic thyroiditis on the prognostic outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Feb;84(2):458–463. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.2.5443. PubMed PMID: 10022401. Disponível em: http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/2/458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maceri DR, Sullivan MJ, McClatchney KD. Autoimmune thyroiditis: pathophysiology and relationship to thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope. 1986 Jan;96(1):82–86. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198601000-00015. PubMed PMID:3484533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kashima K, Yokoyama S, Noguchi S, Murakami N, Yamashita H, Watanabe S, et al. Chronic thyroiditis as a favorable prognostic factor in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 1998 Mar;8(3):197–202. doi: 10.1089/thy.1998.8.197. PubMed PMID:9545105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Camboim D C, Figueirôa VMSM, Lima DNO, Abreu-e-Lima P, Abreu-e-Lima MCC. Carcinoma papilífero da tireoide associado à tireoidite de Hashimoto: frequência e aspectos histopatológicos. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2009;45(1):75–82. [serial on the Internet]. Feb [cited 2009 Nov 09]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442009000100012&lng=en. doi: 10.1590/S1676-24442009000100012. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ronald A, DeLellis MD. In: Patologia: Estrutural e Funcional. 6. ed. Robbins SL, Cotran Kumar, editors. Elsevier; Rio de Janeiro: 2005. O sistema endócrino. pp. 1003–1075. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz, Wittekind CH. International Union Against Cancer. 7th ed. Jhon Wiley & Sons; New Jersey: 2007. TNM Classification of Malignant Tummors. pp. 22–62. Head and Neck Tummors; [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer,.Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009 Nov;19(11):1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. PMID:19860577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Segal K, Ben-Bassat M, Avraham A, Har-El G, Sidi J. Hashimotos thyroiditis and carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Int Surg. 1985;70(3):205–209. PubMed PMID:3841752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Del Rio P, Cataldo S, Sommaruga L, Concione L, Arcuri MF, Sianesi M. The association between papillary carcinoma and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis modifies the prognosis of cancer? Minerva Endocrinol. 2008 Mar;33(1):1–5. PubMed PMID:18277374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tamimi DM. The association between chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and thyroid tumors. Int J Surg Pathol. 2002;10(2):141–146. doi: 10.1177/106689690201000207. PubMed PIMD:12075407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matsubayashi S, Kawai K, Matsumoto Y, Mukuta T, Morita T, Hirai K, et al. The correlation between papillary thyroid carcinoma and lymphocytic infiltration in the thyroid gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(12):3421–3424. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.12.8530576. PubMed PMID:8530576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schäffler A, Palitzsch KD, Seiffarth C, et al. Coexistent thyroiditis is associated with lower tumour stage in thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Clin Invest. 1998;28(10):838–844. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1998.00363.x. Disponível em: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119106450/PDFSTART. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kebebew E, Treseler PA, Ituarte PH, Clark OH. Coexisting chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and papillary thyroid cancer revisited. World J Surg. 2001 May;25(5):632–637. doi: 10.1007/s002680020165. PubMed PMID: 113 6999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]