Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
. 2015 Sep 25;82(3):281–284. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.05.007

Audiologic evaluations of children with mucopolysaccharidosis

Avaliação audiológica em crianças com mucopolissacaridose

Çağıl Gökdoğan a,, Şenay Altinyay a, Ozan Gökdoğan b, Hakan Tutar c, Bülent Gündüz a, İlyas Okur d, Leyla Tümer e, Yusuf Kemal Kemaloğlu c
PMCID: PMC9444605  PMID: 26601996

Abstract

Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidosis is a hereditary lysosomal storage disease, which develops due to a deficiency in the enzymes that play a role in the metabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAG). The incidence of mucopolysaccharidosis is 1/25,000, with autosomal recessive inheritance (except for MPS II). Mucopolysaccharidosis occurs in seven different types, each with a different congenital deficiency of lysosomal enzymes. In mucopolysaccharidosis patients, even though progression of clinical findings is not prominent, the disease advances and causes death at early ages. Facial dysmorphism, growth retardation, mental retardation, and skeletal or joint dysplasia are the most frequently found symptoms in these patients.

Objective

The purpose of our study is to present the types of hearing loss types and tympanometric findings of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis referred to our clinic with suspicion of hearing loss.

Methods

After otorhinolaryngological examination, 9 patients with different types of mucopolysaccharidosis, underwent to immittance and audiometric evaluations, performed according to their physical and mental abilities, and ages, in order to determine their hearing thresholds.

Results

The audiometric findings of the 9 patients followed with mucopolysaccharidosis were reported separately for each case.

Conclusion

Based on the high frequency of hearing loss in mucopolysaccharidosis patients, early and detailed audiological evaluations are highly desirable. Therefore, regular and systematic multidisciplinary evaluations are very important.

Keywords: Mucopolysaccharidosis, Hearing loss, Audiologic evaluation

Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) is a hereditary lysosomal storage disease, which develops due to the deficiency in the enzymes that play a role in the metabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAG). Progressive GAG accumulation causes advanced growth retardation, skeletal deformities, hearing loss, weak joint movement, and facial dysmorphism. In accordance with the deficiency of the known 11 enzymes, MPS has seven sub-types (MPS I, MPS II, MPS III, MPS IV, MPS VI, MPS VII, MPS IX). Although the incidence of MPS in accordance with its sub-types varies, a general incidence of 1/25,000 has been reported.1, 2, 3

In patients with MPS, hearing loss is observed due to various reasons. Conductive hearing loss (CHL) may develop due to recurrent upper respiratory tract infections and serous otitis media or bone chain deformities. Sensorineural hearing loss (SHL) is thought to be caused due to the accumulation of GAG in the cochlea, auditory nerve, and brain stem. In many patients, mixed-type hearing loss, along with the symptoms of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, can also be seen. In CHL related to middle ear effusion, while the ventilation tube implementation is frequently used as treatment, hearing aids are advised in SHL.4, 5, 6, 7 Early diagnosis of hearing losses carries great importance in terms of early intervention in MPS patients, as well as in all other patients.8, 9

The purpose of the present study was to present the hearing loss type, degree, and tympanometric findings of patients with MPS, who are directed to this clinic with the suspicion of hearing loss.

Methods

The nine patients who had been directed to this department with the suspicion of hearing loss, whose follow-up had been conducted after they have been diagnosed with MPS, were included in this study (Ethical Committee approval number: GÜKAEK-461). The otological examinations of the patients were performed by the otorhinolaryngologist. Information related to each patient's otorhinolaryngological complaints and treatments were compiled and middle ear infection, ear discharge, tinnitus, dizziness, tympanum problems, adenoidectomy, ear tube placement, and hearing aid usage were determined. After the otorhinolaryngological examination, the immitancemetric evaluations were conducted and tests which are appropriate for the patients’ ages, physical and mental efficiencies, and both air and bone conduction thresholds were determined at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz.

The hearing loss levels were determined by taking the average of pure tone air conduction thresholds, determined at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, in accordance with the intervals given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Degree of hearing loss (dB HL).

Degree of hearing loss Hearing loss range (dB HL)
Normal −10 to 15
Slight 16–25
Mild 26–40
Moderate 41–55
Moderately severe 56–70
Severe 71–90
Profound 90+

Hear loss was classified under three groups as conductive, mixed, and sensorineural. For CHL, while the bone hearing thresholds were present audiometrically (less than 20 dB), it has been accepted that; the average air-bone gap in 0.5, 1, 2 kHz to be more than 15 dB; in mixed type hearing losses, bone hearing thresholds to be 20 dB and over audiometrically and the average air-bone gap to be more than 15 dB in 0.5, 1, 2 kHz; in sensorineural hearing loss (SHL), the difference between the air and bone conduction thresholds to be less than 15 dB in average in 0.5, 1, 2 kHz.

In the tympanometrical evaluation, 225 Hz probe tone signals were used. The tympanogram types were evaluated in accordance with the values given in Table 2.

Table 2.

Tympanogram types (daPa).

Tympanogram type Pressure intervals (daPa)
Type A +50 to (−150)
Type B −400
Type C −150 to (−399)

Statistical analysis

For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used. For the age average and standard deviation (SD), descriptive statistics were developed.

Results

The age average of the total of nine patients with MPS, four female (44.44%) and five male (55.55%), was determined as 5.66 ± 2.73. There were three cases of MPS VI (33.33%), three cases of MPS I (33.33%), one case of MPS III (11.11%), and two cases of MPS IV (22.22%) that were diagnosed. Cases MÖ and EÖ are siblings; İK and İK 2 are twins. The other five patients are not related. The degree of hearing loss, its type, and tympanometrical findings are shown in Table 3. There were six ears with conductive hearing loss (33.33%) (HL one ear: slight; HL one ear: mild; HL two ears: moderate, and HL two ears: moderately severe); 12 ears with mixed hearing loss (66.66%) (HL two ears: mild; HL four ears: moderate, HL five ears: severe, and HL one ear: profound) were determined. There were 14 ears with Type B tympanogram (77.77%), three ears with Type C tympanogram (16.66%), and one ear with Type A tympanogram (5.55%). E.Ç., B.E.B., and MSE had a bilateral ventilation tube (VT) inserted. Although the other patients were advised regarding the VT application as well, it has not been carried out upon the wish of their families. With the exception of MÖ and BEB, although all patients were advised to use hearing aids, the families did not adopt the use of these devices and did not come regularly for follow-ups.

Table 3.

Audiometrical findings of patients with MPS.

Patient Agea Diagnosis Tympanometrical findings
Type of hearing loss
Degree of hearing loss
Right Left Right Left Right Left
9 MPS VI Type C Type A Conductive Conductive Slight Mild
4 MPS VI Type C Type C Mixed Mixed Moderate Moderate
İK 3 MPS I Type B Type B Mixed Mixed Severe Severe
İK2 3 MPS I Type B Type B Mixed Mixed Severe Severe
9 MPS VI Type B Type B Conductive Conductive Moderate Moderately severe
SD 8 MPS IV Type B Type B Mixed Mixed Moderate Mild
BEB 6 MPS I Type B Type B Conductive Conductive Moderate Moderately severe
MSE 7 MPS IV Type B Type B Mixed Mixed Moderate Moderate
YCE 2 MPS III Type B Type B Mixed Mixed Severe Profound
a

In years.

Discussion

In cases with MPS (Table 4), the initiation of treatment in early stages carries great importance in terms of the prognosis of the disease. However, due to the late appearance of the symptoms, the definite diagnosis range is 3–4 years of age. In the follow-up of the stages of the treatments of patients with MPS, the otolaryngologist and audiologists have a significant role in multidisciplinary teamwork. Recurrent serous otitis media and hearing loss that develops in individuals within this disease group are the reasons why better, long-term follow-ups should be done. Hearing loss can be seen in various types and degrees in MPS in general.10, 11, 12, 13 Overall, conductive hearing losses due to chronic effusion and eustachian tube dysfunction are seen more in patients with MPS; the incidence of SHL has not been determined very clearly.10

Table 4.

Air and bone conduction thresholds of patients with MPS (dB HL).

Patient Average air conduction thresholds (500–4000 Hz)
Average bone conduction thresholds (500–4000 Hz)
Right Left Right Left
22.5 26.25 6.25 6.25
65 57.5 30 30
İK 70a 35b
İK2 70a 45b
46.25 60 12.5 12.5
SD 47.5 38.75 18.75 22.5
BEB 51.25 56.25 15 15
MSE 43.75 45 18.75 18.75
YCE 81.25 90 22.5 22.5
a

The air conduction thresholds have been determined in free field.

b

The bone conduction thresholds have been determined in accordance with the speech recognition thresholds.

Although conductive and mixed-type hearing loss were observed in the cases of the present study, SHL compatible with literature has not been determined. In the studies conducted, it was stated that the incidence of mixed hearing loss is more, and that this fact is related with age. While conductive hearing loss is determined in early ages and in patients who are diagnosed earlier, it has been stated that mixed hearing loss can be observed, and that this rate is between 33% and 71% as age increases. In the present cases, degree of hearing loss was determined from slight to severe. This difference is considered to be due to GAG's excessive accumulation in the cochlear ducts, stria vascularis, and cochlear nerve, which prevents them from functioning efficiently.14 In the present cases, the incidence of Type B and C tympanogram was determined to be high, in accordance with the literature. According to Yu Lin et al., while this rate is stated to reach 70%, the incidence of Type B tympanogram was determined as 77.77% and the incidence of Type C tympanogram was determined as 16.66% in the present study, similarly. VT application is advised to cases with similar clinical findings in different clinics as well, just as in the present study. However, a majority of the cases in this study have hindered their treatments, due to their families’ rejection of the VT application. In cases for which hearing aids are advised, while socio-economical inadequacy creates hardships in coming to follow-ups and obtaining these aids, the fact that many live in different cities prevents continuity in follow-ups.

Conclusion

In cases with MPS, since the incidence of hearing loss is high, the hearing loss should be determined in early stages. After the diagnosis, the required treatments should be started promptly and thus quality of life should be increased. However, it is considered that this is only possible as a result of regular and systematic follow-ups and with multidisciplinary studies.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Please cite this article as: Gökdoğan Ç, Altinyay Ş, Gökdoğan O, Tutar H, Gündüz B, Okur İ, et al. Audiologic evaluations of children with mucopolysaccharidosis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82:281–4.

References

  • 1.Neufeld E.F., Muenzer J. In: The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th ed. Scriver C.R., Beaudet A.L., Sly W.S., Valle D., Childs B., Kinzler K.W., et al., editors. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2001. The mucopolysaccharidoses; pp. 3421–3452. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chuang C.K., Lin S.P. In: Neurochemistry of metabolic diseases – lysosomal storage diseases, phenylketonuria and Canavan disease. Surendran S., Aschner M., Bhatnagar M., editors. Transworld Research Network; Trivandrum, India: 2007. Neurochemical changes and therapeutical approaches in mucopolysaccharidoses; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tomatsu S., Fujii T., Fukushi M., Oguma T., Shimada T., Maeda M., et al. Newborn screening and diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidoses. Mol Genet Metab. 2013;110:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schleier E., Streubel H.G. Phoniatric aspects of children with mucopolysaccharidosis. Folia Phoniatr. 1976;28:65–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peck J.E. Hearing loss in Hunter's syndrome—mucopolysaccharidosis II. Ear Hear. 1984;5:243–246. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198407000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wold S.M., Derkay C.S., Darrow D.H., Proud V. Role of the pediatric otolaryngologist in diagnosis and management of children with mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hendriksz C.J., Al-Jawad M., Berger K.I., Hawley S.M., Lawrence R., Mc Ardle C., et al. Clinical overview and treatment options for non-skeletal manifestations of mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013;36:309–322. doi: 10.1007/s10545-012-9459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Napiontek U., Keilmann A. Hearing impairment in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;451:114. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keilmann A., Nakarat T., Bruce I.A., Molter D., Malm G., Investigators H.O.S. Hearing loss in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II: data from HOS—the Hunter Outcome Survey. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35:343–353. doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9378-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Simmons M.A., Bruce I.A., Penney S., Wraith E., Rothera M.P. Otorhinolaryngological manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:589–595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shinhar S.Y., Zablocki H., Madgy D.N. Airway management in mucopolysaccharide storage disorders. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:233–237. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bredenkamp J.K., Smith M.E., Dudley J.P., Williams J.C., Crumley R.L., Crockett D.M. Otolaryngologic manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101:472–478. doi: 10.1177/000348949210100605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peck J.E. Hearing loss in Hunter's syndrome—mucopolysaccharidosis II. Ear Hear. 1984;5:243–246. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198407000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Friedmann I., Spellacy E., Crow J., Watts R.W. Histopathological studies of the temporal bones in Hurler's disease (mucopolysaccharidosis IH) J Laryngol Otol. 1985;99:29–41. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100096250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES