Abstract
Background
Blastocystis sp. is one of the most common colonisers of the intestinal tract that demonstrate strong interaction with accompanying gut bacteria. Previously, the protozoan isolated from individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) showed altered phenotypic features suggesting that it can be triggered to become pathogenic. Previous studies reported altered gut microbiota and high prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in schizophrenia patients. However, the phenotypic characteristics of Blastocystis sp. isolated from individuals with SZ have yet to be described.
Methods
In this study, faecal samples from 50 patients with severe schizophrenia (SZ) and 100 non-schizophrenic (NS) individuals were screened for Blastocystis sp. infection. Positive isolates were subjected to genotypic and phenotypic characterization.
Results
We found that 12 out of 50 (24%) SZ and 5 out of 100 (5%) NS individuals were detected Blastocystis sp. positive using both in vitro culture and PCR method with no significant association to age and gender. Out of the 15 sequenced isolates, ST3 was the most prevalent subtype (66.7%) followed by ST1 (20%) and ST6 (13.3%). The isolates from SZ individuals demonstrated significant slower growth rate (34.9 ± 15.6 h) and larger range of cell diameter (3.3–140 µm). We detected higher amoebic forms and metronidazole resistance among SZ isolates with variation in cell surface glycoprotein where 98% of cells from SZ showed consistent medium to high binding affinity (+ 2 to + 3) to Concavalin A staining compared to NS isolates that demonstrated only 76% high lectin (+ 3) binding affinity. Cysteine and serine protease levels were predominantly found among SZ isolates. We also demonstrate the presence of metalloprotease in Blastocystis sp. especially among NS isolates. Introduction of solubilised antigens from SZ isolates increased the cell proliferation of HCT116 cells by two fold when compared to NS isolates.
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrated Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ individuals showed variation in phenotype specifically in morphology and drug resistance. The findings indicate that the gut environment (SZ and NS) and treatment of SZ could have influenced the phenotype of Blastocystis sp.
Graphical Abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-022-05418-0.
Keywords: Blastocystis, Schizophrenia, Amoebic, Metronidazole resistant
Background
Blastocystis sp. is the most prevalent gut protozoan found in stools. The prevalence of this microorganism is reported to be around 0.5–23% [1, 2] in developed nations whereas in third world countries the prevalence is around 22.1–100% [3, 4]. Blastocystis sp. is a polymorphic organism and predominantly exists as vacuolar, granular, amoebic, and cyst forms in the intestinal tract [5, 6]. It is commonly associated to non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms such as mild diarrhoea, flatulence, weight loss, and abdominal cramps. Infected individuals who do not manifest such symptoms are commonly known as asymptomatic carriers [7].
The controversy about whether Blastocystis sp. is a pathogen remains a debate. In the past decade, several studies have reported potential pathogenicity and virulence among certain subtypes of Blastocystis sp., specifically ST1 [8, 9], ST3 [10, 11],ST4 [12] and ST7 [13, 14]. The characteristics attributing to a microorganism being a pathogen include the type of surface protein [15], ultrastructural forms [16, 17], amoebic formation [18, 19], and protease activity [20, 21]. Although Blastocystis sp. from different microbial environment have shown morphological differences [22], this association remains inconclusive. There is a need to collect more data to establish a conclusive association.
Schizophrenia(SZ) is a neuropsychiatric disorder that affects 0.5–1% of the human population worldwide [23]. The incidence rate of SZ in Malaysia has been reported to be around 0.4% [24]. The aetiology of SZ is not well understood and is often attributed to multiple factors such as genetics and environment, leading to brain abnormality [25, 26]. Previously, parasitic infections such as Toxoplasma gondii have been established as a risk factor of SZ [27]. Lately, the focus has shifted towards the gut microbiome and its ability to affect the brain chemistry through the gut brain axis. The gut microbiome of SZ individuals has been reported to be different from that of healthy individuals with many studies reporting intestinal dysbiosis among SZ individuals [28]. While growing literature of NGS studies reported no differences of α-diversity among SZ individuals when compared to controls, there were significant differences in display in terms of β-diversity among SZ with different abundances of specific bacterial genera such as Prevotella and Bacteroides to name a few [29, 30]. Most recently, a study reported 55% prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection among hospitalised male schizophrenic patients in Iran [31] although the prevalence in the general population is only 3.33–23.6% [32]. The prevalence data of Blastocystis sp. in SZ patients in Malaysia are scarce. Moreover, the characteristics of Blastocystis sp. isolated from these patients with disparate gut microbiota profiles are yet to be characterised.
In this study, we investigated the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in chronic SZ patients in caring homes in urban Selangor, Malaysia, and evaluated the phenotypic and genotypic differences of Blastocystis sp. compared with NS individuals.
Methods
Cohort for sample collection
Participants were evaluated and diagnosed based on the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision DSMIV-TR (by a certified psychiatrist), and grouped based on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Patients that have taken any anti-protozoal and antibiotic medications 2 to 3 weeks prior to recruitment are excluded from the study. Ethical approval for collection of stool samples was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (20191226-8107), and Research Ethics Committee of the National University of Malaysia (UKM PPI/111/8/JEP-2020-725) according to the Declaration of Helsinki. A written consent was obtained from all the participants prior to sample collection. A series of questionnaires comprising questions of standard demographic questions as well as questions regarding presence of gastrointestinal symptoms was administered before the sample collection. A total of 50 stool samples were collected randomly from patients with chronic SZ (CGI 7) from four different caring homes located in Petaling Jaya, Selangor. All patients were out-patients of PPUM and PPUKM and were on antipsychotic drug treatment during the stool sample collection. In addition, a total of 100 stool samples were collected from volunteers with similar mean age group attending PPUM for a range of other illnesses and was used as an internal control, non-schizophrenic (NS). These volunteers were verified as having no history of schizophrenia illness/symptoms (CGI 0) or any drug usage by a series of questionnaires and patient medical files by their respective doctors.
Screening, isolation, and cultivation of Blastocystis sp.
Stool samples were screened for Blastocystis sp. infection using xenic culture method (XCD) involving in vitro culture in Jones medium [33] and conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. A pea-sized (≈250 mg) stool sample was cultured in Jones medium (JM) supplemented with 10% horse serum (Gibco Laboratories, Life Technologies, New York, USA) and incubated at 37 °C. The cultures that were positive for Blastocystis sp. were sub-cultured and maintained every 3 days for at least up to 1 month before analysing its phenotypic characteristics.
Faecal genomic DNA extraction and PCR screening
A pea-sized (≈250 mg) stool sample was subjected to DNA extraction using QIAamp Power Fecal Pro DNA kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. DNA extracted was quantified and analysed for purity using Nanodrop and agarose gel electrophoresis. A 20-μl reaction volume containing 18 μl of master mix from KAPA (ROCHE, Mannheim, Germany), 1 µl of template DNA, and 0.5 µl (10 µM) of forward and reverse primers, BL18SPPF1 5′–AGTAGTCATACGCTCGTCTCAAA–3’ and BL18SR2PP 5’–TCTTCGTTACCCGTTACTGC–3’, respectively, were used for the screening of Blastocystis sp., adapting the protocol from a previously established study [34]. The amplicons, ranging from 320–342 bp depending on the subtype, were sent for sequencing for further species confirmation.
DNA extraction for genetic analysis of Blastocystis sp. isolates
Day 3 cell culture sediment was washed thrice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and reconstituted to a final volume of 250 µl. Total DNA was extracted and purified using InstaGene Matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted DNA template was used for subtyping using conventional PCR with primers BhRDr 5’–GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG–3’ and RD5 5’–ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT–3’ to generate amplicons of the 600-bp region of the SSU-rRNA gene of Blastocystis sp. [35, 36]. Online tools (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_blastocystis_seqdef&page=sequenceQuery) were used to further assign the alleles. All the sequences generated from primer pair BhRDr and RD5 were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers ON564757-ON564771.
Growth profiling of Blastocystis sp.
Day 3 cultures of each Blastocystis sp. isolate were pooled and washed with 1× PBS. A total of 1 × 105 of Blastocystis sp. cells was inoculated in microcentrifuge tubes containing JM supplemented with 10% horse serum bringing the final volume to 1 ml and incubated at 37 °C up to 10 days. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Blastocystis sp. cells were enumerated based on morphology (vacuolar, granular, and amoeboid forms) for 10 days using a haemocytometer chamber (Improved Neubauer, Hausser Scientific, PA, USA) with 0.4% trypan blue dye exclusion (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Generation time (GT) was calculated for 24 h as described elsewhere [22]. A total of 100 cells were randomly picked from each field to measure the cell diameter.
FITC staining for surface carbohydrate quantification
All Blastocystis sp. isolates (SZ: n = 9, NS: n = 5) from Day 3 culture were subjected to surface carbohydrate quantification following the protocol from a previous study [11]. Cell sediments of day 3 were washed with PBS twice (900×g, 5 min) and then diluted to 50 µl containing 106 million cells. A volume of 50 µl of FITC-lectin solution (2 mg/ml Concanavalin A, Sigma, MO, USA) was added to the diluted cells and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged (900×g, 5 min) and washed twice with PBS. The pellet was reconstituted to a volume of 50 µl with PBS, and a volume of 10 µl was examine by epifluorescence microscopy (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) at × 400 magnification. One hundred cells were randomly selected for visual intensity of fluorescence using the scale of brightness (0, 1 +, 2 +, 3 +, where 0 indicates no fluorescence and 3 + indicates highest fluorescence).
Extraction of solubilised antigens from Blastocystis sp.
Purified Blastocystis sp. cells with negligible bacterial contamination were achieved using Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation, and the solubilised antigens were extracted using freeze-thaw cycles as described in previous studies [37, 38]. The cell pellet was subjected to 30 freeze-thaw cycles using liquid nitrogen (1 cycle consisted of 1 min submerged in liquid nitrogen followed by 1 min in water bath at 37 °C). The lysate was then left at 4 °C overnight, followed by filter sterilisation and protein quantification using Bradford Assay. Aliquoted solubilized antigens were stored at − 20 °C for future usage.
Quantification of proteases activity
Protease activity of Blastocystis sp. antigens was investigated using Azocasein Colorimetric Assay (1.5 mg/ml) as reported previously [21, 39]. The concentration of the solubilised antigen was standardised to 0.1 mg/ml. The antigens were incubated with Dithiothreitol (DTT) (2 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) at 37 °C for the activation of proteases for 10 min. One hundred microlitres of antigens was added to 100 µl of pre-heated azocasein solution and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped with 300 µl ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), followed by ice incubation (30 min) and centrifugation at 8000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was then treated with 500 µl of 500 mM NaOH followed by an absorbance reading at 440 nm (Infinite 200 Pro Nanoquant, Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland). All experiments were carried out in triplicates. Cell lysates inactivated in boiling water for 15 min were used as negative control, whereas trypsin (0.1 mg/ml) (Corning, MO, USA) was used as a positive control.
Inhibition assay to determine specific protease activity using protease inhibitor
Protease inhibition assay was carried out to investigate the type of the most prevalent protease present among Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ group according to previous studies [39, 40]. The protease activity of cysteine, serine, aspartic, and metalloprotease was measured using optimised concentration of protease inhibitors E-64 (0.1 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF) (1 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich), iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich), and EDTA (metalloprotease inhibitor) (1 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. A volume of 100 µl of antigens (0.1 mg/ml) with different protease inhibitors was incubated with azocasein (5 mg/ml) for 1 h at 37 °C. The resultant mixture was treated with trichloroacetic acid, ice incubation, and treatment of NaOH (500 mM) following the protocol from the previous section. Percentage of protease activity inhibition after the addition of different inhibitors was calculated using the formula: where P: protease activity of cell lysate without inhibitors, Pi: protease activity after addition specific inhibitor azocasein as a substrate.
Drug resistance studies
Three-day-old culture of Blastocystis sp. isolates was used for this subsection. Blastocystis sp. isolates were standardized to a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/ml in fresh Jones medium supplemented with 10% horse serum and range of metronidazole concentration (0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 mg/ml). The growth of the cells and the morphology (amoebic, vacuolar, and granular forms) were monitored and recorded daily for 10 days.
Colon cell culture proliferation studies
Effect of solubilised antigens from Blastocystis sp. on colon cancer cells (HCT116) was investigated as reported previously [37]. HCT110 cells were grown and maintained in full medium RPMI with L-glutamine (Corning) and antibiotics and supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco Laboratories, Life Technologies, NY, USA) [37, 41]. A total of 1000 cells were seeded into 100-μl growth medium in 96-well plates and incubated overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The next day, solubilised antigens (final concentration: 0.01 µg/ml) from each isolate were introduced to the cells in each well. Cell proliferation was calculated by carrying out MTT assay after additional 48 h treatment [42] using the following formula, where x = average OD of the wells of HCT116 cells after the treatment of solubilised antigen; c = average OD of the wells of HCT116 cells after the treatment of PBS + cell lysate wash.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPPS software (version 23, NY, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2019 (Redmond, WA, USA). The threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05.
Results
Blastocystis prevalence in schizophrenic patients
A prevalence of 24% (12/50) was detected among SZ by either xenic culture method (XCD) with Jones medium or PCR. Individually, among SZ samples, both methods reported a sensitivity of 83% (10/12) with each method unable to detect two different isolates, respectively. On the other hand, the NS cohort group demonstrated a total prevalence of 5% for both XCD and PCR. While there were significant differences (Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.0004) in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection between the SZ and NS, no association of age [Mann-Whitney U (17) = 25.500, Z = − 0.476, P = 0.646] and gender (Fisher’s exact test: P > 0.05) with Blastocystis sp. infection was observed during the statistical analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1). In our study, we did not observe any significant differences between sensitivity of XCD and PCR detection methods. Nevertheless, our results demonstrated that 100% sensitivity could be achieved when both methods were run in parallel.
All 12 SZ individuals that were positive for Blastocystis sp. did not exhibit or report any presence of gastrointestinal symptoms. On the other hand, all five NS individuals that were positive for Blastocystis sp. were isolated from symptomatic individuals with either non-specific gastrointestinal issues (abdominal pain, bloating, and nausea) or loose stool.
Genotypic analysis of Blastocystis sp. isolates from SZ and NS
Based on gene analysis of small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU-rRNA), a total of 15 Blastocystis sp. isolates were molecularly characterised revealing the presence of ST1 (20%, 3/15), ST3 (66.7%, 10/15), and ST6 (13.3%, 2/15). Out of the ten SZ isolates, eight were of subtype 3 with the exception of SZ6 and SZ10, which were subtype 1. As for the NS isolates, two out of five were of ST3 and ST6 each with NS1 belonging to ST1. Chi-square test: χ2 = 2.179, df = 2, P = 0.36 indicated there was no significant association between the subtype frequency and the cohort group (SZ or NS). We detected a few of different Blastocystis subtype alleles in our samples. ST3 isolates with alleles 34 accounted 90% of the samples whereas one isolate was with allele 36. Interestingly, the intra-subtype variation of ST3 was only observed in the SZ cohort group. Both the ST6 isolates from the NS cohort group are of different alleles (122 and 139). No intra-subtype variation was observed among the ST1 isolates as all of the isolates had allele 4. All the sequences have been deposited into the GenBank (accession number: ON564757-ON564771).
Growth profile
A total of 14 Blastocystis sp. isolates (SZ: n = 9, NS: n = 5) were studied for the growth profile and morphometry for 10 days (Figs. 1, 2 and Additional file 2: Table S2). Generally, NS isolates consistently demonstrated growth profile with high growth peaks whereas SZ isolates demonstrated a wider range of growth peaks with most having low growth peaks. One third of SZ isolates (SZ5, SZ6, and SZ7) recorded the highest peak out of all isolates put together, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.7 × 106 cells/ml. NS isolates grew rapidly when compared to SZ isolates [Mann-Whitney U (14) = 4, Z = − 2.467, p = 0.014] with an average generation time of 17.31 ± 5.4 h and have smaller cells with consistent diameter (3.3–34 µm). On the other hand, SZ isolates have a longer generation time of 34.9 ± 15.1 h. Generally, the diameters of the cells from SZ isolates were significantly greater [independent t test: t (12) = 2.578, P = 0.024] with the largest diameter around 140 µm (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). More amoebic forms [Mann-Whitney U (10) = 7, Z = − 3.408, P = 0.001) are also observed among SZ isolates after Day 3 when compared to NS isolates.
Lectin staining
Both SZ and NS isolates predominantly demonstrated high fluorescence intensity (AFU2 ± FU3 +) towards FITC-ConA (2 mg/ml) (Fig. 3 and Additional file 4: Table S3). However, NS isolates demonstrated a broader range of fluorescence intensity with most NS isolates (NS1–NS4) having slightly greater binding affinity than all SZ isolates. While no weak binding (AFU 0) was observed among SZ isolates, significant low lectin binding was observed among NS isolates, AFU 0 [Mann-Whitney U(14) = 9, Z = − 2.51, P = 0.012]) and AFU + 1 [Mann-Whitney U(14) = 6.5, Z = − 2.182, P = 0.029]. Agglutination of cells was observed in two NS isolates (NS3 and NS4) and two SZ isolates (SZ5 and SZ9) (Additional file 5: Fig. S2).
Drug resistance
All Blastocystis sp. isolates were treated with metronidazole at two different concentrations (1 mg/ml or 0.0001 mg/ml, Fig. 4). Overall, SZ isolates showed stronger resistance towards antibiotics as a higher cell count was observed even at higher metronidazole concentration of 1 mg/ml [independent t test: t (10) = 4.691, P = 0.0002] (Fig. 4a). In addition, the SZ isolates were able to sustain and proliferate beyond day 10 in all metronidazole treatments whereas most NS isolates die nearing day 10. At 0.001 mg/ml), both SZ and NS demonstrated no significant difference [independent t test: t (10) = 4.31, P = 0.345] against metronidazole resistance with maximum growth and decrease in average generation time in medium with 0.001 mg/ml metronidazole when compared to the control without antibiotic treatment. Treatment of metronidazole significantly increased the amoebic forms in SZ isolates. The percentage of amoebic form was more observed among SZ isolates compared to NS isolates (Fig. 4b). Mann-Whitney (U) test showed there was significant difference of the percentage of amoebic forms observed between SZ and NS after the treatment of metronidazole at both concentrations (1 mg/ml and 0.0001 mg/ml). There was an increment of 2–16% of amoebic forms during the treatment with metronidazole. The highest elevation of amoebic forms was observed during the treatment with 0.01 mg/ml metronidazole in SZ isolates [Mann-Whitney U (19) = 5, Z = − 3.514, P = 0.0004]. In addition, more granular forms were observed in both isolates after the metronidazole treatment.
Protease Activity of Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ and cell proliferation of HCT116 cell line
Protease activity using the azocasein assay was investigated among Blastocystis sp. from SZ individuals. In general, the total protease activity of Blastocystis sp. from SZ was lower than of isolates from NS (Fig. 5). A total of seven out of nine SZ isolates demonstrated high protease activity whereas around two thirds of NS isolates had high protease activity. Mann-Whitney U-test U (14) = 14.00, Z = − 1.133, P = 0.257, showed no significant difference of the total protease activity between SZ and NS. Protease inhibition assay indicated there was significant [ANOVA: F (3.35) = 3.196, P = 0.037] inhibition of protease activity among SZ isolates in particular by cysteine inhibitors such as E-64 and iodoacetamide suggesting predominance of cysteine protease (Fig. 6a). In contrast, high inhibition by EDTA in NS isolates suggests predominance of metalloprotease. Independent t-test analysis was carried out to investigate the significance difference of protease inhibition between SZ and NS cohort groups. There was significant difference of protease inhibition by PMSF [t-test: t (12) = 2.201, P = 0.044) and E-64 [t-test: t (12) = 2.546, P = 0. 037] between the two cohort groups. This suggests significantly higher activity of cysteine and serine protease in Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ individuals.
We attempted to investigate the effect on the cell proliferation of the HCT116 cancer cell line after the treatment of solubilised antigen (0.01 µg/ml) from Blastocystis sp. Our results (Figs. 7 and 8) demonstrated the cancer cell proliferation in average was elevated after the introduction of solubilised antigens from both cohort groups especially among SZ isolates.
Discussion
The gut microbiome is a consortium of trillions of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa such as Blastocystis sp. [43]. Colonisation by Blastocystis sp. has been associated to multiple gastrointestinal issues such as IBS [44, 45], ulcerative colitis [46], and colorectal cancer (CRC) [41, 47]. Studies in the past have reported phenotypic variation of Blastocystis sp. when isolated from different sources [22]. This has been attributed to variation in gut microbiome. Protozoa that were isolated from different gut microbiomes displays different phenotypic and genotypic traits and assessment of these variations is crucial in understanding patterns associated to pathogenic potential of a microorganism [48]. In this study, for the first time, we investigated the characteristics of Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ and NS individuals that reportedly had significant different gut microbial composition [49, 50]. A study investigating the gut microbiome of high-risk SZ individuals from China reported an increase of relative abundance of various taxa in particular among the order of Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, and Lactobacillales [51]. Another study compromising SZ patients under antipsychotic medications concurred with the findings and reported an increase of these taxa among SZ [52]. In addition, gut microbiome studies involving drug-naïve SZ patients before and after antipsychotic medication treatment reported that the medication caused further intestinal dysbiosis and can be used as a measure for severity of SZ [53, 54]. While the potential of antipsychotic medication-induced gut microbiota alteration in aiding the colonisation of Blastocystis sp. is still unknown, it cannot be ruled out entirely. It is possible that gut microbiota of treated SZ may have aided the colonisation of Blastocystis sp. and contributed to the morphological differences seen.
Blastocystis sp. infections among the mentally ill have been reported previously at a prevalence of 4–55% in Iranian individuals from caring homes and rehabilitation centres [47, 55]. Our study reports a Blastocystis sp. prevalence of 24% among chronic SZ patients consistent with the growing literature. A study from Iran reported the prevalence of ST3 among SZ patients [31]. Similarly, our results indicated ST3 to be the most prevalent subtype among both cohort groups especially in SZ isolates (66.7%). This difference could be explained by variation of subtype distribution according geographic locations where ST3 is found most predominantly in Southeast Asia [56] and specifically in Malaysia [3]. We have also observed ST6 (closely related to ST6 reference sequences from partridge and quail) in the NS samples. Infection with ST6 is rare among humans and could possibly reflect cases of zoonotic transmission as reported previously [57, 58].
In this study, the SZ individuals with Blastocystis sp. infection did not report or showcase any obvious gastrointestinal symptoms except for frequent constipation, which is common because of the consumption of antipsychotic drugs [59]. Individuals with schizophrenia are frequently reported to have reduced sensitivity to pain [60] and the exact reasons are likely multifactorial because of the complex aetiology of SZ. Developments of pre-frontal cortex, mediodorsal thalamus impairment, and alteration of dopamine or neurotransmitters were among the few factors that have been cited to play a role in reduced pain sensitivity [61]. Therefore, we presume that these factors could have resulted in impairment of sensing gastrointestinal pain and hence no symptoms were reported by SZ individuals. Moreover, post-autopsy studies on SZ individuals with higher rates of IBS, colitis, gastritis, and enteritis [62, 63] suggest the presence of gastroenterological-related damages that can go undetected because of reduced pain sensitivity. There are possibilities that symptoms such as abdominal pain were not detected as a result of reduced pain sensitivity. On the other hand, multiple studies have demonstrated various enteric protozoan infections without symptomatic disease [64, 65]. This may also possibly explain the lack of any gastrointestinal symptoms among SZ individuals.
In this investigation, six out of nine Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ individuals demonstrated slower growth rates and greater diameters, which is consistent with Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and IBS patients [18, 34]. We noticed that the remaining three SZ isolates demonstrated significantly high growth peaks with smaller diameters as commonly seen in asymptomatic isolates [66]. This suggests that the growth profile of SZ isolates demonstrates inconsistent growth peaks as seen in both symptomatic and asymptomatic isolates. The current findings are contradictory to other studies where Blastocystis sp. that are isolated from hosts with the same affliction tend to demonstrate a similar pattern of phenotypic characteristics [11, 22]. More studies are warranted to further shed light on the discrepancy in growth profile among SZ isolates. Nevertheless, SZ individuals being prone to developing IBS [67] raises the possibility that some of our subjects (SZ individuals with Blastocystis sp. infection) may also have undiagnosed IBS, therefore explaining the morphological similarity between most of the SZ Blastocystis sp. isolates and IBS isolates in our previous study [22].
Con-A FITC binding analysis revealed that most of the isolates from both cohort groups showed high to medium fluorescence intensity but greater consistency was seen in SZ isolates. This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting the abundance of surface carbohydrate on Blastocystis sp. [15, 68]. Surface glycoproteins such as lectin are crucial for the adherence to the intestinal lining [69] and interaction with gut bacteria [68] and have been reported to aid in the pathogenicity of microorganisms [70, 71]. Besides, Con-A FITC staining has been previously used to distinguish symptomatic (high fluorescence) from asymptomatic isolates (low fluorescence) [11, 18]. High and consistent fluorescence among SZ isolates indicates a rougher surface topology similar to symptomatic isolates such as Blastocystis sp. from IBS patients [22]. On the other hand, a wide variation of fluorescence among NS isolates implies NS5 (low fluorescence) behaves similarly to asymptomatic isolates whereas the remainder (high fluorescence) behaves similarly to symptomatic. The variation observed among NS isolates could be host dependent.
Metronidazole resistance in Blastocystis sp. has become increasingly prevalent [66]. In our study, cell growth of both NS and SZ isolates increased drastically at 0.001 mg/ml metronidazole treatment suggesting resistance forms as reported previously [66]. This shows that metronidazole should be carefully administered as an inappropriate concentration of the drug may result in resistance [72]. We also observed that Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ patients has greater ability to withstand high metronidazole concentrations in vitro. This indicates greater robustness in Blastocystis sp. cells when isolated from SZ individuals and it could be because these isolates have been pre-exposed to various medications and anti-psychotic drugs usually prescribed for SZ. Introduction of drugs alters the gut microbiome to withstand harsher environments [73]. Therefore, Blastocystis sp. isolated from this environment may have greater vigour in harsh environments as well. Studies have proven that IBS patients demonstrated 60% metronidazole resistance [74, 75] suggesting symptomatic isolates to be more resistant to metronidazole treatment. These findings once again indicate SZ isolates behave similarly to symptomatic isolates especially from IBS individuals. The viability of SZ isolates at a higher concentration of metronidazole indicates greater robustness and suggests increased risk of transmission and infectivity of Blastocystis sp. when isolated from these individuals.
Amoebic forms are often associated to pathogenic potential as they are mostly found in symptomatic isolates [21, 76], possess a sticky surface [19], and contain more proteases [39]. Higher prevalence of amoebic form has been reported in Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and patients with IBS [19, 76]. In the current study, amoebic morphological forms were more pronounced in SZ isolates especially during metronidazole treatment. Increase in amoebic forms among SZ isolates raises the potential of pathogenicity of these isolates. These parasitic cells, which also demonstrated a higher percentage of medium to high surface carbohydrate, suggest enhanced interaction with gut bacteria. Past studies have reported the ability of Blastocystis sp. to engulf gut bacteria [77] and influence microbial composition [78, 79]. A recent study has postulated that Blastocystis sp. is predacious against highly abundant bacterial taxa in the gut of asymptomatic individuals [80]. A detailed metagenomic analysis would shed light if a similar effect is seen in Blastocystis sp. infection among SZ individuals. Moreover, recent research demonstrated evidence on the use of probiotics/prebiotics to positively influence SZ patients [81]. Whether Blastocystis sp. could interfere such interventions in SZ patients is also obscure.
Our findings reported the total average protease activity of SZ isolates was lower than for NS isolates despite demonstrating higher amoebic forms. This is in contrast to a previous study linking amoebic forms and proteases [21]. Possible explanation to this observation could be due to the fact that in our study we saw much lower amoebic forms among SZ isolates. In vitro and in vivo studies have previously established that induction of stress enhanced the infectivity in Blastocystis sp. such as an upsurge in cyst counts, suppression of immune response, and imbalances of stress-mediated augmentation [82]. Similarly, the increase in amoebic forms could also be another response to environmental stress such as antipsychotic medications in order to survive harsh condition. Our findings further corroborate previous sentiments that the life cycle of Blastocystis sp. and predominance of certain forms (vacuolar, granular or amoebic) are host dependent and are greatly affected by the host gut microbial environment.
Proteases from Blastocystis sp. reportedly play various roles such as degrading mucosal IgA [83], disrupting tight junctions leading to increased intestinal permeability [84] and increased inflammation via IL8 mediation [13]. Cysteine protease is the predominant type frequently reported among Blastocystis sp. [85–87]. In this study, we noticed high presence of cysteine and serine protease activity among SZ isolates due to greater inhibition by iodoacetamide. These proteases aid the survival of protozoa and are crucial in degradation of gut protein such immunoglobulin, haemoglobin, and intestinal membrane and wall [88, 89]. Cysteine proteases acts as virulent factors as was seen predominantly in pathogenic strains of Entamoeba histolytica [90]. Although protease as a virulent factor is not established in Blastocystis sp., high levels are seen together with other phenotypic characteristics, elevating the possibilities of pathogenic-like qualities in SZ isolates. In addition, higher presence of metalloproteases was also observed in Blastocystis sp., specifically among NS isolates. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the observation indicates that predominance of a specific protease can be influenced by the source of isolation. Metalloproteases are reported to be crucial in modulating host immune response as well as pathogenesis in parasitic disease [91]. Whole-genome sequencing of Blastocystis revealed that the protozoan is also capable of producing metalloprotease apart from the 20 types of cysteine proteases [86, 92]. Metalloproteases have also been identified to be predominantly expressed among symptomatic Blastocystis sp. isolates from individuals with IBS [93].
We noticed that cancer cell proliferation was generally enhanced after the treatment with solubilised antigens from Blastocystis sp. cells. In our study solubilised antigens from Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ individuals promoted the cell proliferation two-fold higher. Generally, human-derived cysteine proteases and serine proteases have been linked to cell proliferation of cancer cells [94]. Coexpression of host-derived serine proteases such as trypsin and metalloproteases facilitates invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer [95]. Predominance of cysteine and serine proteases among the SZ Blastocystis sp. isolates was observed in this study and opportunistic infection of Blastocystis sp. in CRC was recently demonstrated [96]. Whether the protozoan-derived proteases could contribute to such cancer pathogenesis is unknown. Currently, it is only understood that Blastocystis sp. cysteine protease stimulates secretion of IL-8 indicating gut inflammation [97, 98]. However, more evidence on molecular mechanism of Blastocystis sp. protease activity in inflammation and immune regulation is required to associate this organism to cancer pathogenesis.
While the present study highlights unique traits of Blastocystis sp. when isolated from SZ individuals, it also implies the risks when the organism is transmitted to non-infected individuals as they possess characteristics (heightened amoebic forms and metronidazole resistance) suggesting greater infectivity and transmissibility. A study revealed that healthcare of SZ outpatients is often neglected and gastrointestinal-related problems need dire attention [99]. This study shows the need for the diagnosis and treatment of Blastocystis sp. in routine health screening procedures in SZ patients as uncertain tendencies of this organism cause symptomatic infection when it turns opportunistic, which should not be neglected. Furthermore, many SZ patients in Malaysia reside in mental institutions and nursing homes, where they live in close quarters with many other residents. These living conditions can easily facilitate the spread of Blastocystis sp. to a large number of other psychiatric patients if unchecked.
Conclusion
The present study reports variation in phenotypic characteristics among Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ patients. Our findings indicate Blastocystis sp. isolated from SZ individuals possess characteristics that are similar to symptomatic isolates with a higher number of amoebic forms and stronger resistance towards metronidazole treatment. These findings add to the growing literature showing that the physical properties of microorganisms such as Blastocystis sp. are greatly affected and altered by the gut micro-environment and the life cycle of the intestinal colonizer is host dependent. Our findings also highlight that it may be difficult to eradicate Blastocystis sp. isolates from individuals with harsh gut microbiomes such as those with SZ with metronidazole treatment. This indicates individuals with chronic SZ have a higher risk of transmission within a community especially in a caring home or health facilities. In addition, enhanced pathogenic-like qualities among SZ isolates increase the risk of aggravating cancer growth among SZ individuals with pre-existing colon/rectal cancer.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the staff of Department of Parasitology, Universiti Malaya, Department of Phycological Medicine, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Malaya (PPUM), Department of Psychiatry, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (PPUKM), and students/intern Miss Kavilasha Venugopal, Miss Sareh Kamran, and Mr. Barathen Pillai for their assistance during the sampling.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: FF, AR, and SK; Data curation: FF; Formal analysis: FF, AR, SK; Funding acquisition: SK; Investigation: FF; Methodology: FF; Project administration: FF & AR; Resources: JGS, BF & LWSC; Supervision: AR, CSR, & SK; Validation: AR & SK; Writing—original draft: FF; Writing—review & editing: AR, CSR, & SK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This is funded by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2019/SKK11/UM/01/2) from Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.
Availability of data and materials
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval for collection of stool samples was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (20191226–8107), and Research Ethics Committee of the National University of Malaysia (UKM PPI/111/8/JEP-2020–725) according to the Declaration of Helsinki. A written consent was obtained from all the participants or nearest kin prior to sample collection.
Consent for publications
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no conflict of interest. The authors do not have a commercial or other association that has a conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Freddy Franklin, Email: franklinf14@yahoo.com.
Arutchelvan Rajamanikam, Email: arun04@um.edu.my.
Chandramathi Samudi Raju, Email: chandramathi@um.edu.my.
Jesjeet Singh Gill, Email: jesjeet@um.edu.my.
Benedict Francis, Email: benedict@ummc.edu.my.
Luke Woon Sy-Cherng, Email: lukewoon@ukm.edu.my.
Suresh Kumar, Email: suresh@um.edu.my.
References
.
- 1.Wawrzyniak I, Poirier P, Viscogliosi E, Dionigia M, Texier C, Delbac F, et al. Blastocystis, an unrecognized parasite: an overview of pathogenesis and diagnosis. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013;1:167–178. doi: 10.1177/2049936113504754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.El Safadi D, Cian A, Nourrisson C, Pereira B, Morelle C, Bastien P, et al. Prevalence, risk factors for infection and subtype distribution of the intestinal parasite Blastocystis sp. from a large-scale multi-center study in France. Infect Dis. 2016;16:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1776-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nithyamathi K, Chandramathi S, Kumar SJ. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. infection among school children in Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0136709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abu-Madi M, Aly M, Behnke JM, Clark CG, Balkhy HJ. The distribution of Blastocystis subtypes in isolates from Qatar. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1071-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suresh K, Chong S, Howe J, Ho L, Ng G, Yap E, et al. Tubulovesicular elements in Blastocystis hominis from the caecum of experimentally-infected rats. Int J Parasitol. 1995;25:123–126. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)00074-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stenzel D, Boreham P. Blastocystis hominis revisited. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:563–584. doi: 10.1128/CMR.9.4.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Udkow MP, Markell EK. Blastocystis hominis: prevalence in asymptomatic versus symptomatic hosts. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:242–244. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.1.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kesuma Y, Firmansyah A, Bardosono S, Sari IP, Kurniawan A. Blastocystis ST-1 is associated with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea (IBS-D) in Indonesian adolescences. Parasit Epidemiol Control. 2019;6:e00112. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yan Y, Su S, Lai R, Liao H, Ye J, Li X, et al. Genetic variability of Blastocystis hominis isolates in China. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:597–601. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0186-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates identified in a Sydney population and pathogenic potential of Blastocystis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:335–343. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1746-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tan T, Suresh K, Smith H. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Blastocystis hominis isolates implicates subtype 3 as a subtype with pathogenic potential. Parasitol Res. 2008;104:85–93. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1163-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dominguez-Marquez M, Guna R, Muñoz C, Gómez-Muñoz MT, Borrás R. High prevalence of subtype 4 among isolates of Blastocystis hominis from symptomatic patients of a health district of Valencia (Spain) Parasitol Res. 2009;105:949–955. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1485-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu Z, Mirza H, Tan KSW. Intra-subtype variation in enteroadhesion accounts for differences in epithelial barrier disruption and is associated with metronidazole resistance in Blastocystis subtype-7. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yason JA, Liang YR, Png CW, Zhang Y, Tan KSW. Interactions between a pathogenic Blastocystis subtype and gut microbiota: in vitro and in vivo studies. Microbiome. 2019;7:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0644-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yason JA, Tan KSW. Membrane surface features of Blastocystis subtypes. Genes. 2018;9:417. doi: 10.3390/genes9080417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dunn L, Boreham P, Stenzel D. Ultrastructural variation of Blastocystis hominis stocks in culture. Int J Parasitol. 1989;19:43–56. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(89)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahmed MM, Habib FS, Saad GA, El Naggar HM. Surface ultrastructure, protein profile and zymography of Blastocystis species isolated from patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Parasit Dis. 2019;43:294–303. doi: 10.1007/s12639-019-01092-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tan T, Suresh K. Amoeboid form of Blastocystis hominis—a detailed ultrastructural insight. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:737–742. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0214-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tan T, Suresh K. Predominance of amoeboid forms of Blastocystis hominis in isolates from symptomatic patients. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:189–193. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abdel-Hameed DM, Hassanin OM. Proteaese activity of Blastocystis hominis subtype3 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Parasitol Res. 2011;109:321–327. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2259-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rajamanikam A, Govind SK. Amoebic forms of Blastocystis spp-evidence for a pathogenic role. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ragavan ND, Govind SK, Chye TT, Mahadeva S. Phenotypic variation in Blastocystis sp. ST3. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Charlson FJ, Ferrari AJ, Santomauro DF, Diminic S, Stockings E, Scott JG, et al. Global epidemiology and burden of schizophrenia: findings from the global burden of disease study. Schizophr Bull. 2016;2018:1195–1203. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chee K, Salina A. A review of schizophrenia research in malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2014;69:46–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM. Pharmacotherapy: a pathophysiologic approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Purcell SM, Moran JL, Fromer M, Ruderfer D, Solovieff N, Roussos P, et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature. 2014;506:185–190. doi: 10.1038/nature12975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brüne M, Theiss C. Commentary on: “Host-parasite interaction associated with major mental illness”. Why we need integrative explanations based on evolutionary theory. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:2–3. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0541-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Szeligowski T, Yun AL, Lennox BR, Burnet PW. The gut microbiome and schizophrenia: the current state of the field and clinical applications. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McGuinness A, Davis J, Dawson S, Loughman A, Collier F, O’Hely M, et al. A systematic review of gut microbiota composition in observational studies of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01456-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nocera A, Nasrallah HAJ. The association of the gut microbiota with clinical features in schizophrenia. Behav Sci. 2022;12:89. doi: 10.3390/bs12040089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sheikh S, Asghari A, Sadraei J, Pirestani M, Zare M. Blastocystis sp. subtype 9: as the first reported subtype in patients with schizophrenia in Iran. Compr Clin Med. 2020;2:633–639. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00285-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salehi R, Haghighi A, Stensvold CR, Kheirandish F, Azargashb E, Raeghi S, et al. Prevalence and subtype identification of Blastocystis isolated from humans in Ahvaz, Southwestern Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2017;10:235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suresh K, Ng G, Ho L, Yap E, Singh M. Differentiation of the various stages of Blastocystis hominis by acridine orange staining. Int J Parasitol. 1994;24:605–606. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90152-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Poirier P, Wawrzyniak I, Albert A, El Alaoui H, Delbac F, Livrelli V. Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Blastocystis parasites in human stool samples: prospective study of patients with hematological malignancies. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:975–983. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01392-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scicluna SM, Tawari B, Clark CG. DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. Protist. 2006;157:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Padukone S, Mandal J, Rajkumari N, Bhat BV, Swaminathan RP, Parija SC. Detection of Blastocystis in clinical stool specimens using three different methods and morphological examination in Jones' medium. Trop Parasitol. 2018;8:33. doi: 10.4103/tp.TP_4_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chandramathi S, Suresh K, Kuppusamy UR. Solubilized antigen of Blastocystis hominis facilitates the growth of human colorectal cancer cells, HCT116. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:941–945. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1764-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chan KH, Chandramathi S, Suresh K, Chua KH, Kuppusamy UR. Effects of symptomatic and asymptomatic isolates of Blastocystis hominis on colorectal cancer cell line, HCT116. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:2475–2480. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2788-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sio SW, Puthia MK, Lee AS, Lu J, Tan KSJ. Protease activity of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:126–130. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khan NA, Jarroll EL, Panjwani N, Cao Z, Paget TA. Proteases as markers for differentiation of pathogenic and nonpathogenic species of Acanthamoeba. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2858–2861. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.8.2858-2861.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kumarasamy V, Kuppusamy UR, Samudi C, Kumar S. Blastocystis sp. subtype 3 triggers higher proliferation of human colorectal cancer cells HCT116. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3551–3555. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3538-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ferrari M, Fornasiero MC, Isetta AM. MTT colorimetric assay for testing macrophage cytotoxic activity in vitro. J Immunol Methods. 1990;131:165–172. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(90)90187-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8:51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jimenez-Gonzalez DE, Martinez-Flores WA, Reyes-Gordillo J, Ramirez-Miranda ME, Arroyo-Escalante S, Romero-Valdovinos M, et al. Blastocystis infection is associated with irritable bowel syndrome in a Mexican patient population. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:1269–1275. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2626-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nourrisson C, Scanzi J, Pereira B, NkoudMongo C, Wawrzyniak I, Cian A, et al. Blastocystis is associated with decrease of fecal microbiota protective bacteria: comparative analysis between patients with irritable bowel syndrome and control subjects. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kök M, Çekin Y, Çekin AH, Uyar S, Harmandar F, Şahintürk Y. The role of Blastocystis hominis in the activation of ulcerative colitis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30:40. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mohamed AM, Ahmed MA, Ahmed SA, Al-Semany SA, Alghamdi SS, Zaglool DA, et al. Predominance and association risk of Blastocystis hominis subtype I in colorectal cancer: a case control study. Infect Agents Cancer. 2017;12:21. doi: 10.1186/s13027-017-0131-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Forsman A. Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:302–307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317745111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu R, Wu B, Liang J, He F, Gu W, Li K, et al. Altered gut microbiota and mucosal immunity in patients with schizophrenia. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;85:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu JC, Gorbovskaya I, Hahn MK, Müller DJ. The gut microbiome in schizophrenia and the potential benefits of prebiotic and probiotic treatment. Nutrients. 2021;13:1152. doi: 10.3390/nu13041152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.He Y, Kosciolek T, Tang J, Zhou Y, Li Z, Ma X, et al. Gut microbiome and magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis may support the membrane hypothesis. Eur Psychiatry. 2018;53:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zheng P, Zeng B, Liu M, Chen J, Pan J, Han Y, et al. The gut microbiome from patients with schizophrenia modulates the glutamate-glutamine-GABA cycle and schizophrenia-relevant behaviors in mice. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaau8317. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yuan X, Wang Y, Li X, Jiang J, Kang Y, Pang L, et al. Gut microbial biomarkers for the treatment response in first-episode, drug-naïve schizophrenia: a 24-week follow-up study. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01531-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ma X, Asif H, Dai L, He Y, Zheng W, Wang D, et al. Alteration of the gut microbiome in first-episode drug-naïve and chronic medicated schizophrenia correlate with regional brain volumes. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Saeidinia A, Tavakoli I, Naghipour MR, Rahmati B, Lahiji HG, Salkhori O, et al. Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis and other intestinal parasites among institutionalized mentally disabled individuals in Rasht, northern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2016;11:527. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ESU, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013;126:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stensvold CR, Clark CGJ. Molecular identification and subtype analysis of Blastocystis. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2016 doi: 10.1002/cpmc.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Süli T, Kozoderović G, Potkonjak A, Vidanović D, Tešović B, Vračar V, et al. Subtyping Blastocystis in pigs and humans revealed unusual avian-specific subtype ST6 in humans in Serbia. Zoonoses Public Health. 2021;68:544–548. doi: 10.1111/zph.12829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.De Hert M, Dockx L, Bernagie C, Peuskens B, Sweers K, Leucht S, et al. Prevalence and severity of antipsychotic related constipation in patients with schizophrenia: a retrospective descriptive study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:1–4. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Urban-Kowalczyk M, Pigońska J, Śmigielski J, treatment. Pain perception in schizophrenia: influence of neuropeptides, cognitive disorders, and negative symptoms. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2015;11:2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Stubbs B, Thompson T, Acaster S, Vancampfort D, Gaughran F, Correll CU. Decreased pain sensitivity among people with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of experimental pain induction studies. Pain. 2015;156:2121–2131. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gupta S, Masand PS, Kaplan D, Bhandary A, Hendricks S. The relationship between schizophrenia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) Schizophr Res. 1997;23:265–268. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(96)00099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Severance EG, Prandovszky E, Castiglione J, Yolken RH. Gastroenterology issues in schizophrenia: why the gut matters. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17:27. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0574-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huang DB, White AC. An updated review on Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2006;35:291–314. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2006.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bercu TE, Petri WA, Behm BW. Amebic colitis: new insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007;9:429–433. doi: 10.1007/s11894-007-0054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rajamanikam A, Hooi HS, Kudva M, Samudi C, Kumar S. Resistance towards metronidazole in Blastocystis sp.: A pathogenic consequence. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0212542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lee Y-T, Hu L-Y, Shen C-C, Huang M-W, Tsai S-J, Yang AC, et al. Risk of psychiatric disorders following irritable bowel syndrome: a nationwide population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zaman V, Howe J, Ng M, Goh T. Scanning electron microscopy of the surface coat of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 1999;85:974–976. doi: 10.1007/s004360050668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tan KS, Singh M, Yap EH. Recent advances in Blastocystis hominis research: hot spots in terra incognita. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:789–804. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00005-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jamerson M, da Rocha-Azevedo B, Cabral GA, Marciano-Cabral F. Pathogenic Naegleria fowleri and non-pathogenic Naegleria lovaniensis exhibit differential adhesion to, and invasion of, extracellular matrix proteins. Microbiology. 2012;158:791. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055020-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.González-Robles A, Chávez-Munguía B, Salazar-Villatoro L, Lagunes-Guillén A, Hernández-Ramírez VI, Talamas-Rohana P, et al. Surface coat differences between invasive Entamoeba histolytica and non-invasive Entamoeba dispar. Acta Protozool. 2015;54:3. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Roberts T, Bush S, Ellis J, Harkness J, Stark D. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Blastocystis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4417–4423. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04832-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Vila AV, Collij V, Sanna S, Sinha T, Imhann F, Bourgonje AR, et al. Impact of commonly used drugs on the composition and metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yakoob J, Jafri W, Jafri N, Islam M, Asim BM. In vitro susceptibility of Blastocystis hominis isolated from patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Br J Biomed Sci. 2004;61:75–77. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2004.11732647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Haresh K, Suresh K, Anuar AK, Saminathan SJ. Isolate resistance of Blastocystis hominis to metronidazole. Trop Med Int Health. 1999;4:274–277. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Katsarou-Katsari A, Vassalos CM, Tzanetou K, Spanakos G, Papadopoulou C, Vakalis N. Acute urticaria associated with amoeboid forms of Blastocystis sp. subtype 3. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88:80–81. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Singh M, Suresh K, Ho L, Ng G, Yap E. Elucidation of the life cycle of the intestinal protozoan Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res. 1995;81:446–450. doi: 10.1007/BF00931510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Billy V, Lhotská Z, Jirků M, Kadlecová O, Frgelecová L, Parfrey LW, et al. Blastocystis colonization alters the gut microbiome and in some cases, promotes faster recovery from induced colitis. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:646. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.641483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kodio A, Coulibaly D, Koné AK, Konaté S, Doumbo S, Guindo A, et al. Blastocystis colonization is associated with increased diversity and altered gut bacterial communities in healthy malian children. Microorganisms. 2019;7:649. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nieves-Ramírez M, Partida-Rodríguez O, Laforest-Lapointe I, Reynolds L, Brown E, Valdez-Salazar A, et al. Asymptomatic intestinal colonization with protist Blastocystis is strongly associated with distinct microbiome ecological patterns. Msystems. 2018;3:e00007–18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00007-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ng QX, Soh AYS, Venkatanarayanan N, Ho CYX, Lim DY, Yeo W. A systematic review of the effect of probiotic supplementation on schizophrenia symptoms. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;78:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000498862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chandramathi S, Suresh K, Sivanandam S, Kuppusamy UR. Stress exacerbates infectivity and pathogenicity of Blastocystis hominis: in vitro and in vivo evidences. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Puthia MK, Vaithilingam A, Lu J, Tan KS. Degradation of human secretory immunoglobulin A by Blastocystis. Parasitol Res. 2005;97:386–389. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-1461-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pontarollo G, Mann A, Brandão I, Malinarich F, Schöpf M, Reinhardt CJT. Protease-activated receptor signaling in intestinal permeability regulation. FEBS. 2020;287:645–658. doi: 10.1111/febs.15055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mirza H, Tan KS. Blastocystis exhibits inter-and intra-subtype variation in cysteine protease activity. Parasitol Res. 2009;104:355–361. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1203-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wawrzyniak I, Texier C, Poirier P, Viscogliosi E, Tan KS, Delbac F, et al. Characterization of two cysteine proteases secreted by Blastocystis ST7, a human intestinal parasite. Parasitol Int. 2012;61:437–442. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Karamati SA, Mirjalali H, Niyyati M, Yadegar A, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Haghighi A, et al. Association of Blastocystis ST6 with higher protease activity among symptomatic subjects. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02341-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Caffrey CR, Goupil L, Rebello KM, Dalton JP, Smith D. Cysteine proteases as digestive enzymes in parasitic helminths. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0005840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.O'Brien TC, Mackey ZB, Fetter RD, Choe Y, O'Donoghue AJ, Zhou M, et al. A parasite cysteine protease is key to host protein degradation and iron acquisition∗. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:28934–28943. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805824200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Reed S, Keene W, McKerrow J. Thiol proteinase expression and pathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2772–2777. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2772-2777.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.McKerrow JH, Caffrey C, Kelly B, Loke PN, Sajid M. Proteases in parasitic diseases. Annu Rev Pathol Mech. 2006;1:497–536. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Denoeud F, Roussel M, Noel B, Wawrzyniak I, Da Silva C, Diogon M, et al. Genome sequence of the stramenopile Blastocystis, a human anaerobic parasite. Genome Biol. 2011;12:1–16. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nagel R, Traub RJ, Kwan MM, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H. Blastocystis specific serum immunoglobulin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) versus healthy controls. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1069-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rakash S, Rana F, Rafiq S, Masood A, Amin S. Role of proteases in cancer: a review. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;7:90–101. doi: 10.5897/BMBR11.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Soreide K, Janssen E, Körner H, Baak J. Trypsin in colorectal cancer: molecular biological mechanisms of proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. J Pathol Clin Res. 2006;209:147–156. doi: 10.1002/path.1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sulżyc-Bielicka V, Kołodziejczyk L, Adamska M, Skotarczak B, Jaczewska S, Safranow K, et al. Colorectal cancer and Blastocystis sp. infection. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04681-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Long H, Handschack A, König W, Ambrosch A. Blastocystis hominis modulates immune responses and cytokine release in colonic epithelial cells. Parasitol Res. 2001;87:1029–1030. doi: 10.1007/s004360100494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kumarasamy V, Anbazhagan D, Subramaniyan V, Vellasamy S. Blastocystis sp., parasite associated with gastrointestinal disorders: an overview of its pathogenesis, immune modulation and therapeutic strategies. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24:3172–3175. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180807101536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Eskelinen S, Sailas E, Joutsenniemi K, Holi M, Koskela TH, Suvisaari J. Multiple physical healthcare needs among outpatients with schizophrenia: findings from a health examination study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:448–454. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1319497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dhurga DB, Suresh K, Tan TC. Granular formation during apoptosis in Blastocystis sp. exposed to metronidazole (MTZ) PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.