Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0273717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273717

Sex differences in saliva-based DNA methylation changes and environmental stressor in young African American adults

Forough Saadatmand 1,#, Muneer Abbas 2,#, Victor Apprey 3, Krishma Tailor 3, Bernard Kwabi-Addo 3,*
Editor: Saurabh Agarwal4
PMCID: PMC9447871  PMID: 36067197

Abstract

Background

Low socioeconomic status neighborhood exposure to stress and violence may be sources of negative stimuli that poses significant health risks for children, adolescents and throughout the life course of an individual. The study aims to investigate if aberrant epigenetic DNA methylation changes may be a potential mechanism for regulating neighborhood exposures and health outcomes.

Methods

Exposure to environmental stressors identified in 98 young African American (AA) adults aged 18–25 years old from the Washington D.C., area were used in the study. We correlated the association between stress markers; cortisol, CRP, IgG, IGA, IgM, and self-reported exposure to violence and stress, with quantitative DNA methylation changes in a panel of gene-specific loci using saliva DNA.

Results

In all participants studied, the exposure to violence was significant and negatively correlated with DNA methylation of MST1R loci (p = 0.032; r = -0.971) and nominally significant with NR3C1 loci (p = 0.053; r = -0.948). In addition, we observed significant and negative correlation of DNA methylation changes of LINE1 (p = 0.044; r = -0.248); NR3C1 (p = 0.017; r = -0.186); MSTR1 (p = 0.022; r = -0.192); and DRD2 (p = 0.056; r = -0.184; albeit nominal significant correlation) with IgA expression. On the other hand, we observed a significant and position correlation of DNA methylation changes in DRD2 (p = 0.037; r = 0.184) with IgG expression. When participants were stratified by sex, we observed in AA young male adults, significant DNA methylation changes of MST1R (p< 0.05) and association with exposure to violence and IgG level. We also observed significant DNA methylation levels of DRD2 (p< 0.05) and association with IgA, IgG, and cortisol level. Furthermore, we observed significant DNA methylation changes of NR3C1 (p< 0.05) with stress, IgA, and IgG in the male participants only. On the other hand, we only observed significant and a positive association of IgG with DNA methylation levels of ESR1 (p = 0.041) in the young AA female participants.

Conclusion

Our preliminary observation of significant DNA methylation changes in neuronal and immune genes in saliva samples supports our recently published genome-wide DNA methylations changes in blood samples from young AA male adults indicating that saliva offers a non-invasive means for DNA methylation prediction of exposure to environmental stressors in a gender-specific manner.

Introduction

Low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods may be a source of negative and stressful stimuli that pose significant health risks for children, adolescents, and the life course of individuals. Such low SES neighborhoods face a greater likelihood of exposure to ambient hazards. The exposure–disease paradigm has long suggested that differential “vulnerability” may modify the effects of toxicants on biological systems. There is physiological evidence to show that chronic exposure to neighborhood stressors including noise, violence, and poverty may disrupt endocrine signaling in the Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal axis (HPA) and the sympathetic nervous systems [13]. In the long term, these disruptions can contribute to the development of metabolic disorders [4] and chronic diseases Some studies suggest that families and individuals in low SES communities are exposed to unique chronic stressors that are highly correlated with cortisol expression levels [2, 5]. Furthermore, psychosocial stressors, such as exposure to interpersonal and community violence, may impact immune function [6]. Repeated episodes of acute or chronic psychological stress could induce an acute phase response and chronic inflammatory response(s) leading to many chronic diseases such as insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, hypertension, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II and metabolic disorders [7]. For instance, racial and ethnic minorities that reside in low SES suffer disproportionately high rates of chronic disease morbidity and mortality from hypertension [8]. Furthermore, minority children and youth living in segregated neighborhoods tend to have higher rates of mortality, morbidity, and health risk factors compared with white neighborhoods, even after accounting for economic and other characteristics [9] and this underscores the lifetime health disparities among US minority populations. Exposure to acute stressors may result in higher cortisol, which may have negative metabolic health outcomes and conversely, exposure to chronic stressors may result in lower cortisol secretion which may increase inflammation and negative health risks. Psychosocial stress can lead to acute and chronic changes in the functioning of body systems (e.g., immune) consequently, leading to poor health outcomes. One concept suggests the long-term effects of chronic disease risk due to physical and social exposures during gestation, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood and later adult life (e.g., pollutants, allergens, and stress) [10]. Thus, what the growing fetus gets exposed to in utero environment can prime its own immune system toward asthma and atopy, contributing to related disorders in the offspring.

A cumulative risk model suggests that psychosocial experiences related to childhood poverty and associated adversities accumulating over a mother’s life (e.g., family violence) might have lasting effects on maternal psychological functioning [11] and stress responses [12], which, in turn, might affect the developing infant. While cortisol is central in maintaining homeostasis during acute stress [13], exposure to chronic stressors can result in dysregulation of the HPA axis through either hyper- or hypo-cortisolism [1416] and this may increase the risks for hypertension, insulin resistance, neuronal damage, immune disorders, mental health disorders, and disrupt the ability to deliver cortisol to sites of inflammation within the body [1417]. Perceived adverse neighborhood environment conditions as a type of chronic psychosocial stress have also been associated with obesity [1820] and cardiovascular diseases [20]. In our previous studies, we have observed that young men and women exposed to violence experienced depression and sleep disturbance [21].

Stress is a response of the central nervous system (CNS) to environmental stimuli perceived as a threat to homeostasis. The stress response involves a complex network of mechanisms essential for survival, mediated by neurotransmitters, peptide hormones, and endocrine hormones from the enteric nervous system (ENS), a branch of the autonomic nervous system that among other functions affects the production of interleukins (ILs). These molecules in turn modulate the humoral and cellular components of the intestinal immune system. The ENS contains both vagal and spinal sensory neurons, which play an essential role in the transference of information from the CNS to ENS and vice versa [22]. Gut homeostasis results from neuroimmune modulation by anti- and pro-inflammatory ILs, neurotransmitters, and endocrine hormones, all of which influence the generation of intestinal secretory immunoglobulins (Igs). Immunoglobins in turn affects intestinal inflammation and permeability, which are essential factors in the functional integrity of the gut under stress conditions. Studies indicate that neurotransmitters such as HTR7, and upon release, results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from immune cells, such as microglial cells, dendritic cells, and monocytes [23, 24]. Cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), are involved in the production of a variety of blood biomarkers, including cortisol, the major stress hormone [25, 26]. Cortisol in turn, is involved in the regulation of several biological processes, such as cellular metabolism and immune function [25]. During stress response, cortisol concentration is increased resulting in a shift towards an inflammatory and humoral immune response [27].

The immune system depends on Igs which are composed of five classes that includes immunoglobulin A, G, and M (IgA, IgG, and IgM). Previous work by Hoffman et al. [28] has shown that serum immunoglobulins are part of the adaptive immune system whereby IgM provides a rapid immune response required for tissue homeostasis, whereas IgG and IgA are long-lasting high-affinity antibodies, and mainly provides mucosal immunity. Immunoglobulin measurements are used for the diagnosis and monitoring of various diseases, including primary immunodeficiencies and autoimmune diseases. Aging is associated with an increased ratio of memory to naive B-cells [29], which may lead to lower IgM and higher IgA and IgG levels in older compared to younger individuals [30]. Furthermore, previous population-based studies have demonstrated lower IgG [31, 32] and IgM [31], but higher IgA [31, 32] levels in men compared to women. Among others, body mass index (BMI) and lifestyle-related factors such as alcohol consumption and smoking may impact serum immunoglobulin levels as well [33, 34]. Older age and male sex are associated with higher IgA, but lower IgM, and urges investigation of age- and sex-specific reference ranges of immunoglobulins. Other determinants of the association of Igs and ethnicity, diet, lifestyle, and cardio-metabolic factors is reviewed by Khan et al. [35].

Growing evidence suggests that epigenetic changes are a key mechanism whereby environmental stressors interact with the genome leading to stable changes in DNA structure, gene expression, and behavior. A recent review by Giurgescu et al. [36], that investigated differential DNA methylation changes in inflammation-related candidates’ genes, neighborhood environmental exposures, and increased risk for cardiovascular diseases reported association of neighborhood socioeconomic status, social environment, and crime with either global or gene-specific DNA methylation and one study found a significant association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and social environment with DNA methylation in inflammation-related candidate genes. Another review by Park et al. [37], aimed at evaluating the relationship between stress-associated epigenetic changes and depression identified the following genes to be correlated with depression: NRC31, SLCA4, BDNF, FKBP5, SKA2, OXTR, LINGO3, POU3F1, and ITGB1. More specifically, epigenetic changes in glucocorticoid signaling (e.g., NR3C1, FKBP5), serotonergic signaling (e.g., SLC6A4), and neurotrophin (e.g., BDNF) genes appear to be the most promising therapeutic targets to explore for psychotropic treatments as epigenetic DNA methylation is reversible.

Recently, we have carried out genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in blood collected from African American young adult males living in the Washington D.C area and identified that exposure to environmental violence significantly correlated with differential DNA methylation changes in genes associated with the central nervous system and immune functions [38]. In the present study we wanted to examine the association between exposure to violence, stress-related biomarkers and gene-specific DNA methylation changes in saliva samples from young African American adults in Washington D.C. Our rational wasto investigate select genes that play roles as regulators of HPA axis and previously reported to undergo differential methylation in response to different environmental stressors namely, FKBP5, NR3C1 and DRD2 and sex steroidal hormone ESR1 as well as MST1R that is responsive to physiological stress and LINE1 gene which is a global methylation marker. We hypothesize that DNA methylation changes may be related to the expression of stress-related genes in response to environmental exposures and this may be identified in non-invasive biospecimen including saliva.

Materials and methods

Patient sample

A subset of patient population from a study entitled Biological and Social Correlates of Drug Use in African American Emerging Adults (BADU) was used in this study. The BADU study consisted of 557 African American young adults, ages 18–25 (Female = 274, Male = 283) who were recruited from socioeconomically disadvantaged Wards (7 and 8) of Washington, DC. This cross-sectional study was conducted between 2010 and 2012 to explore the effects of genetic markers for alcohol and depression, violence exposure, and drug use in young African Americans. A subset (Female = 50; Male = 48) of this study population was identified using t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) on the top 50 factors of the dataset, and the top 50 individuals with high Exposure to Violence (ETV) (Female = 25, Male = 25) and the bottom 48 individuals with no or exceptionally low ETV (Female = 25, Male = 23). Participants consented to and contributed blood and saliva samples for the studies. Approximately 2ml of the participant’s saliva was deposited (spit) directly into an Oragene DNA (DNA Genotek Inc. Kanata ON, Canada) collection tube which contained DNA preservative. Consent was obtained from each participant in the study, and approval from Howard University’s Institutional Review Board was obtained (Approval number: IRB-16-MED-03). Participants received $75 for their participation in this study.

Bioassay analysis of BADU specimen

Serum levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM were measured in blood samples and cortisol levels was measured in saliva from participants. Briefly, IgM, IgG and IgA were quantified from eluted DBS samples by standard sandwich ELISA methodology (Human IgG, IgM, and IgA ELISA Ready-SET-Go!® Kits, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA; Tecan GENios Pro Reader platform, Tecan, San Jose, CA, USA) as described by [39]. Saliva (25uL) was used to measure cortisol level using a commercially available, high sensitivity, competitive amino assay (Salimetrics, State College, PA) and according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol [40]. For accurate ELISA bioassays, assays were done in duplicates.

Genomic DNA extraction from saliva: DNA was manually isolated from saliva using the prepIT•L2P protocol, as per the manufacturer’s instructions (DNA Genotek). Total DNA samples from saliva were quantified using the Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Bisulfite modification and DNA methylation analysis

Quantitative DNA methylation analysis- High molecular weight genomic DNA extracted from saliva was modified using sodium bisulfite treatment [41]. Briefly, genomic DNA (2 μg) was denatured in 0.3 mol/L NaOH at 37°C for 15 minutes; sodium bisulfite and hydroquinone were added to final concentrations of 3.1 mol/L and 0.5 mmol/L, respectively. The reaction was incubated at 50°C for 16 hours and desalted using Wizard DNA purification resin (Promega) according to the instruction of the manufacturer. Bisulfite modification was completed by DNA desulfonation in 0.3 mol/L NaOH at 37°C for 15 minutes. Modified DNA was precipitated with ethanol, washed in 70% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer. The PCR primers were designed to assay the methylation status of CpGs within 0.5 kb from the transcription start site. The CpG islands interrogated were previously described; ESR1 and LINE1 [42], MST1R [43], DRD2 [44] and newly designed CpG island assays for NR3C1 (chromosomal location chr5: 143,404,044–143,404,076): Forward primer sequence Biotin- 5’AATTTTTTAGGAAAAAGGGTGG-3’; Reverse primer 5’- AACCCCTTTCCAAATAACACACTTC-3’; Sequencing primer 5’- AACTCCCCAATAAATCTAAAAC-3’ and FKBP5 (chromosomal location chr6:35,558,486–35,558,567): Forward primer 5’- GGATTTGTAGTTGGGATAATAATTTGG-3’; Reverse primer Biotin 5’-TCTTACCTCCAACACTACTACTAAAA-3’ and Sequencing primer 5’- GGAGTTATAGTGTAGGTTT-3’ based on bisulfite modified sequence information. The complete list of primer information for all genes studied and the pyrosequencing assay conditions are shown in S1 Table. The integrity of the PCR product was verified on 1.5% agarose gels with ethidium bromide staining. The PCR product was immobilized on streptavidin-Sepharose beads (Amersham), washed, and denatured, and the biotinylated strands were released into annealing buffer containing the sequencing primer. Pyrosequencing was done using the PSQ HS96 Gold SNP Reagents on a PSQ 96HS machine (Qiagen). Bisulfite-converted DNA from saliva of participants and blank reactions, with water substituted for DNA, served as a negative control, and bisulfite-converted SssI methylase—treated saliva DNA served as a positive control. Each bisulfite PCR and pyrosequencing reaction were done in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

The methylation index at each gene promoter and for each sample was calculated as the average value of mC/ (mC + C; mC is methylated cytosine and C is unmethylated cytosine) for all examined CpG sites in the gene and expressed as the percentage of methylation. Statistical significance was judged by either Fisher T-test, Mann-Whitney t test or Pearson correlation. The Mann-Whitney t-test was used to compare DNA methylation changes in participant cases. The Pearson correlation test was used to determine the correlation between DNA methylation changes versus cortisol/IgA/IgG/IgM/Stress/or Exposure to violence (ETV) in participants. The R software was used for the Mann-Whitney and Pearson correlation analysis. Data analysis was done using SPSS for Windows (version 18.0, SPSS) for the logistic regression. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The present study is to interrogate the role of DNA methylation changes in a subset of patient population from a study entitled Biological and Social Correlates of Drug Use in African American Emerging Adults (BADU; [21]). The BADU study also collected data on stress as well as markers of stress (e.g., cortisol) and the immune system (IgA and IgG).

We assessed the promoter methylation status in saliva DNA samples extracted from 98 young African American adults (Female = 50, Male = 48; 18–25 years old). There is no statistical difference between the number (%) difference between females and males or age, studied in this study cohort (Demographic/clinical description and characteristics of participants is shown in S2 Table). We analyzed a total of 6 genes: ESR1, DRD2, LINE1, MST1R, that we have previously demonstrated to be differentially methylated in prostate and breast cancers [4244]. We have included in this study 2 new methylated assays; NR3C1 and FKBP5 which have been reported to demonstrated differential methylation in response to stress and violence [4547]. These genes were selected based on their potential role in immune signaling, sex steroidal signaling pathways and neurotransmission. All genes are representatives of a variety of cellular pathways involved in HPA. We used pyrosequencing assays to analyze the methylation status of these genes in the saliva DNA samples from the young African American adults consisting of 50 females and 48 males. For each gene investigated, the percentage (%) of methylation at the specific gene promoter locus was measured and compared between the female and male samples (Fig 1). Overall, we observed low % methylation for ESR1, DRD2, NR3C1 and intermediate % methylation levels for LINE1 and MST1R, whereas we observed high % methylation level for FKBP5. When the methylation levels were stratified by sex, five of the six genes (ESRI, LINE1, MST1R, DRD2, NR3C1) did not show any significant difference in % methylation level between the males and females whereas FKBP5 was significantly higher in the female samples compared to the male samples (p = 0.0158; data shown in S1 Fig). To explore the correlation of the saliva DNA methylation changes with immune function, we examined the methylation status with IgA and IgG biomarkers (Fig 2). We observed a significant and negative correlation between DNA methylation changes and IgA for the LINE1 repetitive element (p = 0.044; r = -0.248), MST1R (p = 0.022; r = -0.192), NR3C1 (p = 0.017; r = -0.186) and a nominally significant and negative correlation of DRD2 (p = 0.062; r = -0.184) DNA methylation changes with IgA level. On the other hand, we observed a significant and positive correlation for DRD2 (p = 0.037; r = 0.184), NR3C1 (p = 0.002; r = 0.291) and a nominally significant DNA methylation of ESR1 (p = 0.061; r = 0.188) and IgG. Next, we analyzed DNA methylation changes and self-reported exposure to violence (ETV) or neighborhood stress (Fig 3). We observed a significant and negative correlation of ETV for MST1R methylation (p = 0.032) and nominally significant NR3C1 methylation (p = 0.053) whereas we did not detect an association of DNA methylation changes for the other genes and exposure to violence. Out of the six genes that were analyzed, we only observed a nominally significant and negative correlation between MST1R (p = 0.057) with neighborhood stress. Finally, we were interested to ascertain gender differences in DNA methylation levels and correlation with IgA, IgG, Stress, ETV and saliva cortisol levels (Table 1). For males, we observed a significant and negative correlation of DNA methylation of NR3C1 with IgA (p = 0.031), IgG (p = 0.001), and stress (p = 0.043). We also observed a nominally significant and negative correlation of DNA methylation of MST1R with IgA (p = 0.061), and exposure to violence (p = 0.016), whereas we observed positive correlation of DNA methylation in MST1R with IgG (p = 0.038). Furthermore, in males, we observed significant and negative correlation of DRD2 methylation with IgA (p = 0.013) and positive correlation of DRD2 with IgG (p = 0.017) and saliva cortisol level (p = 0.029). For female samples, we only observed significant and positive correlation of DNA methylation for ESR1 and IgG (p = 0.041). Our data demonstrate differential and gender-specific DNA methylation changes in saliva and exposure to environmental stressors in the young AA adults studied.

Fig 1. A heat map of DNA methylation.

Fig 1

The percentage of DNA methylation levels at promoter CpG Island were analyzed in bisulfite-modified genomic DNA extracted from saliva from 98 African American young adults (Females = 50, Males = 48; Age 18–25 years old) using pyrosequencing. Top graph is samples from males and bottom is samples from females. Percentage (%) scale is shown to the right and samples are arranged by age from top to the bottom.

Fig 2. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis and correlation with Immune markers.

Fig 2

The percentage of DNA methylation levels at promoter CpG island were compared with serum IgA (A) and IgG (B) levels. Y axis, percentage of methylated cytosines in the samples as obtained from pyrosequencing. X axis, IgA, or IgG serum levels. P value is indicated for each gene (Mann-Whitney T-test).

Fig 3. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis and correlation with self-reported exposure to violence and stress.

Fig 3

The percentage of DNA methylation levels at promoter CpG island were compared with exposure to violence (A) and stress level (B). Y axis, percentage of methylated cytosines in the samples as obtained from pyrosequencing. X axis, exposure to violence (0 = no exposure; 1 = exposure to violence) or stress (0 = no stress, 1 = stress). P value is indicated for genes that shows significance and nominal significance (p <0.05; Mann-Whitney T-test).

Table 1. The DNA methylation analysis of genes and correlation with biomarkers in both males and females are shown.

Male Dependent variable Biomarker Beta Std. Error Sig. Female Dependent variable Biomarker Beta Std. Error Sig
NR3C1 IgA -.008 .004 0.031 NR3C1 IgA -.003 0.005 .538
IgG .005 .001 0.001 IgG .001 .002 .609
Cortisol -.003 .134 .985 Cortisol .124 .129 .347
ETV -.863 .693 .219 ETV -.029 .535 .958
Stress -1.969 .946 .043 Stress -.505 .713 .871
MST1R IgA -.040 .021 .061 MST1R IgA -.018 0.018 .326
IgG .015 .007 0.038 IgG .001 .008 .924
Cortisol .481 .742 .521 Cortisol .379 .441 .400
ETV -8.486 3.372 .016 ETV -.587 2.622 .824
Stress -8.002 4.628 .091 Stress -6.132 3.448 .083
DRD2 IgA -.053 .020 .013 DRD2 IgA .004 .019 .821
IgG .017 .007 .017 IgG -.010 .008 .262
Cortisol 1.651 .727 .029 Cortisol -.605 .618 .341
ETV -5.716 3.795 .139 ETV 1.238 4.399 .780
Stress -3.576 5.173 .493 Stress 2.580 5.544 .575
ESR1 IgA -.001 .002 .522 ESR1 IgA -.002 .002 .342
IgG .001 .001 .269 IgG .002 .001 0.041
Cortisol .043 .062 .499 Cortisol .068 .044 .138
ETV -.022 .290 .940 ETV .151 .287 .601
Stress -.377 .396 .347 Stress -.485 .364 .189
LINE1 IgA -.018 .006 .003 LINE1 IgA .003 .010 .801
IgG .000 .002 .846 IgG .00007 .004 .985
Cortisol .261 .199 .197 Cortisol .177 .244 .476
ETV -.519 1.103 .640 ETV 1.096 1.211 .370
Stress 1.286 1.507 .398 Stress .111 1.612 .946
FKBP5 IgA -.010 .030 .740 FKBP5 IgA .022 .031 .483
IgG .002 .010 .802 IgG -.012 .013 .358
Cortisol .997 1.060 .353 Cortisol -.786 .749 .306
ETV -3.787 4.555 .410 ETV 2.923 2.802 .303
Stress -9.263 6.222 .144 Stress -1.618 3.730 .667

Statistical significance (Sig.), Standard (Std.) errors and beta values are shown.

Discussion

Early life stresses in humans (i.e. maltreatment, violence exposure, loss of a loved one) can trigger changes in epigenetic program of acquired behavioral traits via alterations in expressions of genes involved in the HPA axis that can even result in altered transgenerational transmission of altered behaviors [48]. This study sought to explore whether social/environmental stressors such as exposure to interpersonal and community violence as measured by immune, neurotransmitter, and stress biomarkers cause detectable changes in saliva DNA methylation in young African American adults. In this study, we evaluated the promoter-specific DNA methylation of several genes that are key regulators of the HPA axis such as FKBP5 [49] and NR3C1, a glucocorticoid receptor gene, that plays a role in adaptation to stress [50]. The dopaminergic system, of which dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) is closely associated with locomotion, reward, and memory [51] was analyzed as stress directly influences several fundamental behaviors and phenomena including locomotor activity, sexual activity, appetite, drugs or abuse via the dopaminergic system [52]. In addition, we investigated estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) whose transcriptional activity has been identified as a potential candidate for the enduring and sex-specific effects of chronic adolescent stress exposure [53]. In addition, we investigated the methylation status of LINE1, a repetitive element, a global methylation marker. It has been shown that LINE-1 transposition may play a role in differentiation of neurons during brain development as LINE-1 retrotransposition has been identified during adult neurogenesis in the human hippocampus and differential methylation patterns of LINE1 that might be involved in response to stress and resilience (Review by Misiak et al. [54]). Finally, we investigated DNA methylation status of a receptor tyrosine kinase, RON (MST1R) whose signaling is altered in response to physiological stress (e.g., serum starvation) [55]. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation changes shows low methylation levels for ESR1 and NR3C1 and high methylation levels for LINE1, MST1R, DRD2 and FKBP5 in both the female and male participants. There was no age or sex-dependent methylation in five out of the six promoter methylation loci. Only promoter FKBP5 showed significantly higher methylation level in male participants compared to the female participants, suggesting that differential dysregulation of FKBP5 could alter immune response to stress in males and the female participants.

In this study, we observed a significant and a negative correlation between LINE1 and IgA levels only in the male participants suggesting that DNA methylation of LINE1 might play a role in stress response mediated by the biomarkers of the immune function, IgA specifically in males. The DNA methylation of ESR1 was significant and positively correlated with IgG in the female participants only, demonstrating that sex-specific effects of stress exposure via IgG are more pronounced in females than in males. The methylation of DRD2 showed a significant and negative correlation with IgA and significant positive correlation with IgG in only male participants. In addition, we observed significant positive correlation of DRD2 methylation with saliva cortisol expression levels only in the male participants demonstrating pronounced effects of DRD2 methylation in response to stressors in male participants. The DNA methylation of MST1R showed significant and a negative correlation with IgA in male participants only and could also be an indicator for physiological stressors. The DNA methylation level of NR3C1 showed a negative correlation with IgA and stress only in the male participants. On the other hand, we observed a positive correlation between NR3C1 DNA methylation and IgG levels only in the male participants demonstrating a role for NR3C1 methylation and adaptation to stress in the male participants. Finally, we observed that in males, DNA methylation of FKBP5 was significant and negatively correlated with IgA, IgG, and stress suggesting that FKBP5 methylation was predictor for stress markers through IgA, IgG, and exposure to stress. Overall, we observed that with the exception of ESRI methylation, which was significantly associated with IgG level in females, DNA methylation of the other five genes studied was not significantly associated with female sensitivity to environmental stressors, whereas the methylation of these genes was significantly associated with male sensitivity to environmental stressors. The data indicates a link between DNA methylation changes and immunoglobulins that may in part capture immune adaptation and exposure to environmental stressors.

Our observation of significant and differential DNA methylation in a panel of genes with biological roles in neuronal and immune signals using saliva samples from young AA male adults supports our recent genome-wide DNA methylation analysis [38] in blood samples from a subset of the young AA male adults which demonstrated differential methylated genes with biological functions enriched in central nervous and immune signaling pathways. The genome-wide analysis did not include female samples, so we are not able to make any comparison with our current observation. Thus, saliva offers a non-invasive means for DNA methylation prediction of exposure to environmental stressors.

Future work should evaluate changes in DNA methylation changes of other genes that may be more sensitive in female participants, perhaps genes that are important players in the estrogen signaling pathway. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the young female cohort in our studies has buffers that modulate their stress levels which cannot be identified by the markers studied here and this will require additional studies of environmental exposure and other socio-demographic, social, and psychosocial factors or other physiological markers.

Limitations

This study is a preliminary observation and is a cross-sectional study, therefore it needs validation in a large cohort to confirm the associations with the determinants in our cohort.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The percentage of DNA methylation levels at promoter CpG Island were analyzed in bisulfite-modified genomic DNA extracted from saliva from 98 African American young adults (Females = 50, Males = 48; Age 18–25 years old) using pyrosequencing.

Methylation levels stratified by sex shows significant difference between males and females for FKBP5 (p = 0.015; Fisher T-test).

(JPG)

S1 Table. The complete list of primer information for all genes studied and the pyrosequencing assay conditions.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Demographic and/or clinical description and characteristics of participants used in study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Howard University Hospital Clinical Research Unit for sample collection and the National Human Genome Center at Howard University for making these samples available for this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the following: 1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 2U54MD007597 2. The “Biological and Social Correlates of Drug Use in African American Adults” (BADU) dataset was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities under grant #5P20MD000198 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chen E, Paterson LQ. Neighborhood, family, and subjective socioeconomic status: How do they relate to adolescent health? Health Psychol. 2006;25(6):704–14. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.704 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Evans GW, Lercher P, Meis M, Ising H, Kofler WW. Community noise exposure and stress in children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;109(3):1023–7. doi: 10.1121/1.1340642 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(2):309–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Diez Roux AV, Jacobs DR, Kiefe CI, Coronary Artery Risk Developoment in Young Adults S. Neighborhood characteristics and components of the insulin resistance syndrome in young adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):1976–82. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1976 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen S, Schwartz JE, Epel E, Kirschbaum C, Sidney S, Seeman T. Socioeconomic status, race, and diurnal cortisol decline in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Psychosom Med. 2006;68(1):41–50. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000195967.51768.ea . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Connor TM, O’Halloran DJ, Shanahan F. The stress response and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: from molecule to melancholia. QJM. 2000;93(6):323–33. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/93.6.323 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Black PH. The inflammatory response is an integral part of the stress response: Implications for atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, type II diabetes and metabolic syndrome X. Brain Behav Immun. 2003;17(5):350–64. doi: 10.1016/s0889-1591(03)00048-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Puckrein GA, Egan BM, Howard G. Social and Medical Determinants of Cardiometabolic Health: The Big Picture. Ethn Dis. 2015;25(4):521–4. Epub 20151105. doi: 10.18865/ed.25.4.521 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4671441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kotecki JA, Gennuso KP, Givens ML, Kindig DA. Separate and Sick: Residential Segregation and the Health of Children and Youth in Metropolitan Statistical Areas. J Urban Health. 2019;96(2):149–58. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-00330-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6458219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(2):285–93. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clark C, Caldwell T, Power C, Stansfeld SA. Does the influence of childhood adversity on psychopathology persist across the lifecourse? A 45-year prospective epidemiologic study. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(5):385–94. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wright RJ, Enlow MB. Maternal stress and perinatal programming in the expression of atopy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2008;4(5):535–8. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.4.5.535 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2762209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kyrou I, Chrousos GP, Tsigos C. Stress, visceral obesity, and metabolic complications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1083:77–110. doi: 10.1196/annals.1367.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bevans K, Cerbone A, Overstreet S. Relations between recurrent trauma exposure and recent life stress and salivary cortisol among children. Dev Psychopathol. 2008;20(1):257–72. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000126 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qi D, Rodrigues B. Glucocorticoids produce whole body insulin resistance with changes in cardiac metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;292(3):E654–67. Epub 20061031. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00453.2006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsuru J, Akiyoshi J, Tanaka Y, Matsushita H, Hanada H, Kodama K, et al. Social support and enhanced suppression of adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol responses to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and thyrotropin-releasing hormone tests in patients with major depressive disorder. Biol Psychol. 2008;78(2):159–63. Epub 20080215. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.02.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hucklebridge FH, Clow A, Abeyguneratne T, Huezo-Diaz P, Evans P. The awakening cortisol response and blood glucose levels. Life Sci. 1999;64(11):931–7. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00019-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scott KA, Melhorn SJ, Sakai RR. Effects of Chronic Social Stress on Obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2012;1(1):16–25. doi: 10.1007/s13679-011-0006-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3428710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Powell-Wiley TM, Ayers CR, de Lemos JA, Lakoski SG, Vega GL, Grundy S, et al. Relationship between perceptions about neighborhood environment and prevalent obesity: data from the Dallas Heart Study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(1):E14–21. doi: 10.1002/oby.20012 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3602329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Diez Roux AV, Mujahid MS, Hirsch JA, Moore K, Moore LV. The Impact of Neighborhoods on CV Risk. Glob Heart. 2016;11(3):353–63. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.002 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5098701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saadatmand F, Harrison R, Bronson J, Crouse D, Jackson M. Gender Differences and the Impact of Exposure to Violence on Depressive Symptoms and Sleep Habits among Young African American Adults. J Family Strengths. 2017;17(1). ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6168193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.de Jonge WJ. The Gut’s Little Brain in Control of Intestinal Immunity. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2013;2013:630159. Epub 20130404. doi: 10.1155/2013/630159 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3649343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Muller T, Durk T, Blumenthal B, Grimm M, Cicko S, Panther E, et al. 5-hydroxytryptamine modulates migration, cytokine and chemokine release and T-cell priming capacity of dendritic cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6453. Epub 20090731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006453 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2714071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mahe C, Loetscher E, Dev KK, Bobirnac I, Otten U, Schoeffter P. Serotonin 5-HT7 receptors coupled to induction of interleukin-6 in human microglial MC-3 cells. Neuropharmacology. 2005;49(1):40–7. Epub 20050329. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.01.025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maeda K, Mehta H, Drevets DA, Coggeshall KM. IL-6 increases B-cell IgG production in a feed-forward proinflammatory mechanism to skew hematopoiesis and elevate myeloid production. Blood. 2010;115(23):4699–706. Epub 20100329. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230631 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3790945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.de Kloet ER, Joels M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(6):463–75. doi: 10.1038/nrn1683 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Straub RH, Schuld A, Mullington J, Haack M, Scholmerich J, Pollmacher T. The endotoxin-induced increase of cytokines is followed by an increase of cortisol relative to dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in healthy male subjects. J Endocrinol. 2002;175(2):467–74. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1750467 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoffman W, Lakkis FG, Chalasani G. B Cells, Antibodies, and More. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(1):137–54. Epub 20151223. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09430915 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4702236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Agarwal S, Busse PJ. Innate and adaptive immunosenescence. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104(3):183–90; quiz 90–2, 210. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2009.11.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Listi F, Candore G, Modica MA, Russo M, Di Lorenzo G, Esposito-Pellitteri M, et al. A study of serum immunoglobulin levels in elderly persons that provides new insights into B cell immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1089:487–95. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cassidy JT, Nordby GL, Dodge HJ. Biologic variation of human serum immunoglobulin concentrations: sex-age specific effects. J Chronic Dis. 1974;27(11–12):507–16. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(74)90026-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Obiandu C, Okerengwo AA, Dapper DV. Levels of serum immunoglobulins in apparently healthy children and adults in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2013;28(1):23–7. Epub 20130630. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alende R, Gude F, Campos J, Rey J, Meijide LM, et al. Serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151(1):42–50. Epub 20071115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03545.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2276914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McMillan SA, Douglas JP, Archbold GP, McCrum EE, Evans AE. Effect of low to moderate levels of smoking and alcohol consumption on serum immunoglobulin concentrations. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50(10):819–22. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.10.819 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC500261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan SR, Chaker L, Ikram MA, Peeters RP, van Hagen PM, Dalm V. Determinants and Reference Ranges of Serum Immunoglobulins in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals: a Population-Based Study. J Clin Immunol. 2021;41(8):1902–14. Epub 20210910. doi: 10.1007/s10875-021-01120-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8604889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Giurgescu C, Nowak AL, Gillespie S, Nolan TS, Anderson CM, Ford JL, et al. Neighborhood Environment and DNA Methylation: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Risk. J Urban Health. 2019;96(Suppl 1):23–34. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-00341-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6430282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Park C, Rosenblat JD, Brietzke E, Pan Z, Lee Y, Cao B, et al. Stress, epigenetics and depression: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;102:139–52. Epub 20190418. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saadatmand F, Gurdziel K, Jackson L, Kwabi-Addo B, Ruden DM. DNA methylation and exposure to violence among African American young adult males. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021;14:100247. Epub 20210329. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100247 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8474503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yel L, Rabbat CJ, Cunningham-Rundles C, Orange JS, Torgerson TR, Verbsky JW, et al. A Novel Targeted Screening Tool for Hypogammaglobulinemia: Measurement of Serum Immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgA) Levels from Dried Blood Spots (Ig-DBS Assay). J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(6):573–82. Epub 20150816. doi: 10.1007/s10875-015-0184-y ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4572045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lucas T, Wegner R, Pierce J, Lumley MA, Laurent HK, Granger DA. Perceived Discrimination, Racial Identity, and Multisystem Stress Response to Social Evaluative Threat Among African American Men and Women. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(3):293–305. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000406 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5374002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kwabi-Addo B, Wang S, Chung W, Jelinek J, Patierno SR, Wang BD, et al. Identification of differentially methylated genes in normal prostate tissues from African American and Caucasian men. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(14):3539–47. Epub 20100706. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3342 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang S, Dorsey TH, Terunuma A, Kittles RA, Ambs S, Kwabi-Addo B. Relationship between tumor DNA methylation status and patient characteristics in African-American and European-American women with breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37928. Epub 20120531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037928 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3365111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Devaney JM, Wang S, Furbert-Harris P, Apprey V, Ittmann M, Wang BD, et al. Genome-wide differentially methylated genes in prostate cancer tissues from African-American and Caucasian men. Epigenetics. 2015;10(4):319–28. Epub 20150411. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1022019 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4622564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moses-Fynn E, Tang W, Beyene D, Apprey V, Copeland R, Kanaan Y, et al. Correlating blood-based DNA methylation markers and prostate cancer risk in African-American men. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203322. Epub 20180911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203322 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6133349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wadji DL, Tandon T, Ketcha Wanda GJM, Wicky C, Dentz A, Hasler G, et al. Child maltreatment and NR3C1 exon 1F methylation, link with deregulated hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and psychopathology: A systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2021;122:105304. Epub 20210903. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105304 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schechter DS, Moser DA, Aue T, Gex-Fabry M, Pointet VC, Cordero MI, et al. Maternal PTSD and corresponding neural activity mediate effects of child exposure to violence on child PTSD symptoms. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181066. Epub 20170802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181066 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5540394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Parade SH, Parent J, Rabemananjara K, Seifer R, Marsit CJ, Yang BZ, et al. Change in FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) methylation over time among preschoolers with adversity. Dev Psychopathol. 2017;29(5):1627–34. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001286 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5720139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stenz L, Schechter DS, Serpa SR, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Intergenerational Transmission of DNA Methylation Signatures Associated with Early Life Stress. Curr Genomics. 2018;19(8):665–75. doi: 10.2174/1389202919666171229145656 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6225454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beach SRH, Ong ML, Lei MK, Carter SE, Simons RL, Gibbons FX, et al. Methylation of FKBP5 is associated with accelerated DNA methylation ageing and cardiometabolic risk: replication in young-adult and middle-aged Black Americans. Epigenetics. 2021:1–21. Epub 20211006. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2021.1980688 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang TY, Labonte B, Wen XL, Turecki G, Meaney MJ. Epigenetic mechanisms for the early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression in rodents and humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(1):111–23. Epub 20120912. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.149 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3521971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 1998;78(1):189–225. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pani L, Porcella A, Gessa GL. The role of stress in the pathophysiology of the dopaminergic system. Mol Psychiatry. 2000;5(1):14–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000589 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rowson SA, Bekhbat M, Kelly SD, Binder EB, Hyer MM, Shaw G, et al. Chronic adolescent stress sex-specifically alters the hippocampal transcriptome in adulthood. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(7):1207–15. Epub 20190123. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0321-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6785712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Misiak B, Szmida E, Karpinski P, Loska O, Sasiadek MM, Frydecka D. Lower LINE-1 methylation in first-episode schizophrenia patients with the history of childhood trauma. Epigenomics. 2015;7(8):1275–85. Epub 20150727. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.68 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu HS, Hsu PY, Lai MD, Chang HY, Ho CL, Cheng HL, et al. An unusual function of RON receptor tyrosine kinase as a transcriptional regulator in cooperation with EGFR in human cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(8):1456–64. Epub 20100524. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq100 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2915629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Saurabh Agarwal

24 May 2022

PONE-D-22-11625Correlating Saliva-based DNA Methylation Changes and Environmental Stressor in Young African American AdultsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kwabi-Addo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Saurabh Agarwal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.1.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“This work was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 2U54MD007597. The “Biological and Social Correlates of Drug Use in African American Adults” (BADU) dataset was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities under grant #5P20MD000198. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“This study was supported by the following:

1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 2U54MD007597

2. The “Biological and Social Correlates of Drug Use in African American Adults” (BADU) dataset was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities under grant #5P20MD000198

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

4. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

6. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709436/

-https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.664526/full

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This was a small but important investigation of DNA methylation of 5 candidate genes and LINE1 repeats, sex stratified, in relation to IgG, IgA, and cortisol levels as well as exposure to violence. The authors identify a significant inverse association with exposure to violence and MST1R methylation specifically in males. Other significant associations were observed between Ig levels or cortisol levels and one or more candidate genes, mostly in males. While these results are potentially novel and important to the field, a number of moderate to minor concerns should be address.

1. Despite sex differences in the effects of exposure to violence being profound in the results, the abstract does not describe the results of sex stratified analyses at all. The Results section of the abstract should be rewritten to better focus on the most significant findings with and without sex stratification. The significant association of MST1R methylation inversely associated with ETV in males would be one to especially highlight in the abstract for its novelty. The authors should also consider adding the finding of sex differences to the title.

2. Figure 1 legend mentions a p value by Fisher’s T-test, but there are no apparent p values or need for statistical testing from the figure, which is described as a heat map of DNA methylation levels at each gene locus.

3. In several places in the text, figures, and Table 1, p values >0.05 are described as significant. The authors can describe these as “nominally significant” or “trending” but the word “significant” should be reserved for p values <0.05. If the authors wish to highlight trends that approached significance in the figures and table, they should use a different designation/color from those that are <0.05.

4. There is some missing or confusing information in the Methods:

a. It is unclear from the methods when the blood was collected. Were blood and saliva collected from the original BADU cohort for antibody and cortisol measurements? If so, has that data been described previously for the larger cohort? Was there a new Oragene kit saliva collection for the 98 participants selected for DNA methylation, or was that done on archived saliva?

b. The PCR conditions should be given for the pyrosequencing assays, particularly the number of cycles.

c. A table providing the number of CpGs covered and their position relative to the transcription start site of each gene in the pyrosequencing analyses would be helpful. Including the full gene name and/or function in this table would also be helpful.

5. References should be provided to support this sentence: “We have included in this study 2 new methylated assays; NR3C1 and FKBP5 which have been reported to demonstrated differential methylation in response to stress and violence.”

6. Throughout the text, consider replacing “direct correlation” with “positive correlation” for clarity.

7. The manuscript should be edited for grammar and punctuation.

8. In Table 1, the label “cortisol” should replace “stress” to be more specific about what was measured.

Reviewer #2: -reference 8 is a study om internet use and does not appear to be an appropriate reference to substantiate the statement of line 66-67

-reference 9 is almost 20 years old. is there a more current epidemiological study that could be cited?

-given your previous work in this population with DNAm, it would be good to compare and contrast in the discussion the findings here versus those in the EWAS.

-Were the bioassay ELISAs performed in duplicate to estimate CV%?

-thank you for providing specifics on the biotin, sequencing primer and choromosomal locations for primer sets. Can you provide the Sequence to analyze for the PSQ assay so that others can replicate?

-can you provide the mean with SD for each CpG site as well as your regional averaged CpG methylation for each gene and LINE-1? This will help readers understand the levels of methylation in your measurement across the CpG collectively and individually.

-as this is a candidate gene study, it should be relatively easy to understand the rationale for your gene selection. This is in the introduction to a certain extent but the introduction does name many more genes you did not look at. How did you come to your final list of candidate genes for analysis?

-although this study utilizes a previously existing set of samples for analysis, can you provide a brief table or narrative of the major demographics/clinical characteristics for this sample set?

-should there be a consideration of false positives with so many statistical tests? I don't necessarily think you have to do bonferroni correction but a consideration would be good in the discussion.

-limitations should also state the cross-sectional nature, lack of control group and potential for other genes or other areas within the selected genes to show associations not found.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Janine LaSalle

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0273717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273717.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Jul 2022

Here is our response to comments raised by reviewer 1:

1. Despite sex differences in the effects of exposure to violence being profound in the results, the abstract does not describe the results of sex stratified analyses at all. The Results section of the abstract should be rewritten to better focus on the most significant findings with and without sex stratification. The significant association of MST1R methylation inversely associated with ETV in males would be one to especially highlight in the abstract for its novelty. The authors should also consider adding the finding of sex differences to the title.

Response: we have revised our title; the new title is “Sex Differences in Saliva-based DNA Methylation Changes and Environmental Stressor in Young African American Adults”. We have re-written the results section in the abstract to emphasize the significant differences in the correlation between environmental stressors and DNA methylation changes in participants stratified and non-stratified by sex.

2. Figure 1 legend mentions a p value by Fisher’s T-test, but there are no apparent p values or need for statistical testing from the figure, which is described as a heat map of DNA methylation levels at each gene locus.

Response: We include supplementary figure S1 that shows significant DNA methylation changes for FKBP5 when stratified by sex and the p value.

3. In several places in the text, figures, and Table 1, p values >0.05 are described as significant. The authors can describe these as “nominally significant” or “trending” but the word “significant” should be reserved for p values <0.05. If the authors wish to highlight trends that approached significance in the figures and table, they should use a different designation/color from those that are <0.05.

Response: This has been corrected to show in places where the p values are > 0.05 as nominally significant.

4. There is some missing or confusing information in the Methods:

a. It is unclear from the methods when the blood was collected. Were blood and saliva collected from the original BADU cohort for antibody and cortisol measurements? If so, has that data been described previously for the larger cohort? Was there a new Oragene kit saliva collection for the 98 participants selected for DNA methylation, or was that done on archived saliva? b. The PCR conditions should be given for the pyrosequencing assays, particularly the number of cycles. c. A table providing the number of CpGs covered and their position relative to the transcription start site of each gene in the pyrosequencing analyses would be helpful. Including the full gene name and/or function in this table would also be helpful.

Response: We indicate in the materials and methods that blood and saliva were collected from the participants at the same time. We have removed confusion about the Oragene kit as the same oragene kit was used on all samples. We indicate in the material and method section that the pyrosequencing assay conditions are provided in supplementary Table S1.

5. References should be provided to support this sentence: “We have included in this study 3 new methylated assays; NR3C1 and FKBP5 which have been reported to demonstrated differential methylation in response to stress and violence.”

Response: We have provided references to support this statement (line 247).

6. Throughout the text, consider replacing “direct correlation” with “positive correlation” for clarity.

Response: We have replaced direct and inverse correlations to positive and negative correlations respectively

7. The manuscript should be edited for grammar and punctuation.

Response: We have been careful to edit this revised manuscript.

8. In Table 1, the label “cortisol” should replace “stress” to be more specific about what was measured.

Response: In this study we measured stress as self-reported experience such as exposure to interpersonal and community violence and stress markers (e.g., cortisol) as two separate entities as reported in Table 1 and figure 3.

Here is our response to comments raised by reviewer 2:

• reference 8 is a study om internet use and does not appear to be an appropriate reference to substantiate the statement of line 66-67

Response: we have corrected this erroneous reference with the appropriate reference (line 71)

• reference 9 is almost 20 years old. is there a more current epidemiological study that could be cited?

Response: this is corrected and replaced with a 2017 reference (line 73).

• given your previous work in this population with DNAm, it would be good to compare and contrast in the discussion the findings here versus those in the EWAS.

Response: We have included a paragraph in the discussion that our observation of significant and differential DNA methylation in a panel of genes with biological roles in neuronal and immune signals using saliva samples from young AA male adults supports our recent genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in blood samples from a subset of the young AA male adults. Thus, saliva offers a non-invasive means for DNA methylation prediction of exposures to environmental stressors.

• Were the bioassay ELISAs performed in duplicate to estimate CV%?

Response: we indicate in the materials and methods section that for accurate ELISA bioassays, assays were done in duplicates.

• thank you for providing specifics on the biotin, sequencing primer and choromosomal locations for primer sets. Can you provide the Sequence to analyze for the PSQ assay so that others can replicate?

Response: Both reviewer 1 and this reviewer made the same comment and we now provide the the primer information and pyrosequencing assay condition for all genes studied in supplementary table S1.

• can you provide the mean with SD for each CpG site as well as your regional averaged CpG methylation for each gene and LINE-1? This will help readers understand the levels of methylation in your measurement across the CpG collectively and individually.

Response: Pyrosequencing is a robust sequencing analysis that quantify CpG (as Cytocine/thymine polymorphism) and computed as the average % DNA methylation based on the number of CpG sites analyzed.

• as this is a candidate gene study, it should be relatively easy to understand the rationale for your gene selection. This is in the introduction to a certain extent but the introduction does name many more genes you did not look at. How did you come to your final list of candidate genes for analysis?

Response: We emphasize our rational to investigate selected genes that play roles as regulators of HPA axis and previously reported to undergo differential methylation in response to different environmental stressors namely, FKBP5, NR3C1 and DRD2 and sex steroidal hormone ESR1 as well as MST1R that is responsive to physiological stress and LINE1 gene which is a global methylation marker in the introduction section (line 153-157) and also in the discussion.

• although this study utilizes a previously existing set of samples for analysis, can you provide a brief table or narrative of the major demographics/clinical characteristics for this sample set?

Response: we provide descriptive characteristics of participants demographics and socioeconomics status as supplementary Table S2 (line 242-243).

• limitations should also state the cross-sectional nature, lack of control group and potential for other genes or other areas within the selected genes to show associations not found.

Response: we include the cross-sectional nature of our study as a limitation and therefore study needs validation in a large cohort to confirm the associations with the determinants in our cohort.

Decision Letter 1

Saurabh Agarwal

12 Aug 2022

Sex Differences in Saliva-based DNA Methylation Changes and Environmental Stressor in Young African American Adults

PONE-D-22-11625R1

Dear Dr. Kwabi-Addo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Saurabh Agarwal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authors have done a satisfactory job answering critiques and revising their paper. I do not have any further comments to provide.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Saurabh Agarwal

26 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-11625R1

Sex Differences in Saliva-based DNA Methylation Changes and Environmental Stressor in Young African American Adults.

Dear Dr. Kwabi-addo:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Saurabh Agarwal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The percentage of DNA methylation levels at promoter CpG Island were analyzed in bisulfite-modified genomic DNA extracted from saliva from 98 African American young adults (Females = 50, Males = 48; Age 18–25 years old) using pyrosequencing.

    Methylation levels stratified by sex shows significant difference between males and females for FKBP5 (p = 0.015; Fisher T-test).

    (JPG)

    S1 Table. The complete list of primer information for all genes studied and the pyrosequencing assay conditions.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Demographic and/or clinical description and characteristics of participants used in study.

    (DOCX)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES