Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2022 Aug 19;10:986511. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.986511

The SIRT1-HMGB1 axis: Therapeutic potential to ameliorate inflammatory responses and tumor occurrence

Lanyi Wei 1,2, Wenrui Zhang 1, Yueyang Li 1, Jinghui Zhai 1,*
PMCID: PMC9448523  PMID: 36081910

Abstract

Inflammation is a common complication of many chronic diseases. It includes inflammation of the parenchyma and vascular systems. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent histone deacetylase, which can directly participate in the suppression of inflammation. It can also regulate the activity of other proteins. Among them, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) signaling can be inhibited by deacetylating four lysine residues (55, 88, 90, and 177) in quiescent endothelial cells. HMGB1 is a ubiquitous nuclear protein, once translocated outside the cell, which can interact with various target cell receptors including the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, and TLR4 and stimulates the release of pro-inflammatory cyto-/chemokines. And SIRT1 has been reported to inhibit the activity of HMGB1. Both are related to the occurrence and development of inflammation and associated diseases but show an antagonistic relationship in controlling inflammation. Therefore, in this review, we introduce how this signaling axis regulates the emergence of inflammation-related responses and tumor occurrence, providing a new experimental perspective for future inflammation research. In addition, it explores diverse upstream regulators and some natural/synthetic activators of SIRT1 as a possible treatment for inflammatory responses and tumor occurrence which may encourage the development of new anti-inflammatory drugs. Meanwhile, this review also introduces the potential molecular mechanism of the SIRT1-HMGB1 pathway to improve inflammation, suggesting that SIRT1 and HMGB1 proteins may be potential targets for treating inflammation.

Keywords: sirtuin 1, high mobility group box 1, inflammation, tumor, neuroinflammation, hepatocyte inflammation

1 Introduction

Inflammation is an innate host defense mechanism to harmful stimuli and conditions, such as infection and tissue injury, and is an adaptive response that acts to reestablish homeostasis (Medzhitov, 2008). It involves the acute, chronic and resolution phases, which can respectively figure out the injury and initiate the healing process, lead to tissue damage and fibrosis and protect host tissue from chronic or excessive inflammation (Medzhitov, 2008). Acute inflammation mediates innate and humoral immunity, which is the body’s initial protective response, while chronic inflammation leads to the pathology of blood vessels and tissues and is related to various degenerative diseases including arthritis, atherosclerosis, autoimmune diseases, diabetes and cancer (Germolec et al., 2018; Ahmad et al., 2019; Panigrahy et al., 2021). At the cellular level, acute inflammation occurs when innate immune cells sense infectious elements or tissue damage, leading primarily to the recruitment and activation of neutrophils, while chronic inflammation is characterized by a variety of cell types such as neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and other immune cells (Pellico et al., 2017). Chronic inflammation is associated with the expression of chemokines, cytokines, and adhesion molecules, which in turn form positive feedback loops that enhance chronic inflammation (Zhang et al., 2018). Therefore, finding appropriate means to control chronic inflammation has always been a hot topic in current research. To reduce chronic inflammation and thus treat diseases caused or exacerbated by this process, a comprehensive understanding of the pathways and molecules involved in inflammation may provide essential information for innovative therapeutic targets.

Some reports have suggested a link between sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) regulation on inflammation (Zhang et al., 2020; Shih et al., 2021). SIRT1 is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent histone deacetylase, as a significant regulator of the transcriptional networks that adjust metabolism and stress responses, having a pivotal connection with human being health (Kemper et al., 2013). (Figure 1) HMGB1 is a transcription factor deacetylated by SIRT1. Deacetylated HMGB1 was restricted to translocation out of the nucleus (Zainal et al., 2017). HMGB1 is involved in various pathological and physiological processes. Under normal physiological conditions, nuclear protein HMGB1 is expressed in virtually all eukaryotic cells (Cottone et al., 2016) that protects the cell from apoptotic cell death, which is an integral part of the innate immune defense barrier of the human body (Gong et al., 2009). During tissue injury, HMGB1 is secreted by activated immune cells or passively released into the extracellular environment by dying or injured cells (Dai et al., 2018). It is a pocket-sized protein, comprising 215 amino acid residues. Structurally, the protein is divided into three areas: two tandem high mobility group box domains (A and B) isolated by a short flexible linker, and a 30 amino acid, acidic C-terminal tail (Sims et al., 2010). It binds to DNA to alter the physical structure of chromatin while simultaneously maintaining genome stability and has roles in DNA processing and repair, deficient mitochondria autophagy clearance and autophagy control (Andersson and Tracey, 2011). Apart from its role in sensing and coordinating the cellular stress response inside the cell, on its secretion it also has cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor vitality, collaboratively coordinating the inflammatory and immune response with other factors as a prototypic damage-associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP). HMGB1 activity is regulated by acetylation/deacetylation and methylation and its expression is promoted by serine phosphorylation (Bonaldi et al., 2003; Youn and Shin, 2006; Ito et al., 2007). Hyperacetylation of HMGB1 inhibits DNA binding, thus redirecting this protein to the cytoplasm for secretion (Lu et al., 2014). For example, ANG II can promote M1 macrophage polarization by upregulating the expression of HMGB1 and causing acetylation of HMGB1 and inducing HMGB1 transfer from the nucleus to cytoplasm and release by its dissociation from SIRT1 (Zhou et al., 2018). This data indicates the vital role of HMGB1 in maintaining inflammation. However, from a therapeutic perspective, silencing HMGB1 may cause the host cells to lose this protein’s key nuclear housekeeping functions. A better approach may be to improve the intracellular distribution of HMGB1 by stimulating the activity of SIRT1, thereby retaining HMGB1 in the nucleus (Le et al., 2019). This is greatly important in treating chronic diseases, especially inflammation and cancer. HMGB1 is usually actively secreted by macrophages or passively released from necrotic cells and acts as a proinflammatory mediator to induce chronic inflammation of macrophages based on the redox state causing the production of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) or chemical attractants (Goto et al., 2021). Chronic inflammation can induce cancer progression. HMGB1 is secreted by cancer cells and promotes tumor growth, invasion and metastasis by binding to a variety of cell surface receptors (including receptors for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and Toll-like receptors) (Goto et al., 2021). SIRT1 antagonizes macrophage inflammation and cancer induced by chronic inflammation by increasing SIRT1 activator NAD+ and inhibiting HMGB1 release (Yang et al., 2012). Therefore, SIRT1 and HMGB1 are believed to be important in improving chronic inflammatory degenerative diseases.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Molecular structure and biological function of SIRT1. (A) SIRT1 is composed of N-terminal, C-terminal and NAD+ dependent catalytic core region. The catalytic core region (C244-C512) is folded into two subdomains: Zn2+ binding ligands and Rossmann fold conformation. N-terminal contains SBD and C-terminal contains CTR. (B) SIRT1, mainly located in the nucleus, deacetylates related proteins and reduces cell apoptosis by inhibiting cellular oxidative stress, maintaining mitochondrial metabolic homeostasis, and promoting the repair of damaged DNA. SIRT1 activity is dependent on NAD+. The activation of SIRT1 is facilitated by increasing NAD+ levels at the cellular level, which can lead to deacetylation and modulated expression of many downstream targets. SIRT1 targets a variety of substrates and performs different functions. SIRT1 deacetylates inflammation-related transcription factor NF-κB, which attenuates NF-κB driven inflammation. In addition, SIRT1 protects endothelial cells against replicative senescence by deacetylating eNOS and downregulating PAI-1 expression. In the liver, SIRT1 deacetylates and activates the transcription factor FOXO1 to stimulate gluconeogenesis. Similarly, SIRT1 regulates lipid metabolism by modulating LXR via deacetylation of this molecular receptor. SIRT1, Sirtuin1; SBD, sirtuins-activating compounds binding domain; CTR, C-terminal regulatory segment; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; FOXO1, forkhead box O 1; LXR, liver X-receptor.

HMGB1 and SIRT1 signaling pathways are evolutionarily conserved, promoting the maintenance of homeostasis, and their interaction directly regulates inflammatory responses. Thus, this review aims to present the roles of SIRT1 and HMGB1 in inflammation, emphasizing the SIRT1-HMGB1 correlation and the resulting beneficial effects in the prevention of diseases involving inflammation.

2 Effect of SIRT1 on HMGB1

SIRT1 can directly inhibit the HMGB1 signal pathway to improve mammal metabolism and inflammation to maintain internal environment stability. In response to inflammatory signals, HMGB1 is hyperacetylated, resulting in its secretion from the nucleus and allowing its release from the cell. The mechanisms of signaling include lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tumor necrosis factor-α, which promote the acetylation-dependent dissociation of HMGB1 from SIRT1, thereby indirectly increasing HMGB1 binding to the protein chromosome region maintenance 1 (CRM1), resulting in HMGB1 translocation (Mai et al., 2005; Bernier et al., 2011; Kemper et al., 2013). Substrates availability, post-translational modifications and interaction with other proteins along with changes in its expression levels co-regulate the activity of SIRT1 (Jiang W. et al., 2018; Jalgaonkar et al., 2022). SIRT1 then physically interacts with multiple lysine residues of HMGB1 at the nuclear localization signal (NLS) site through its N-terminal lysine residues to deacetylate HMGB1, resulting in HMGB1 remaining in the nucleus and reducing its cytoplasmic translocation (Xu et al., 2014; Zainal et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2019).

3 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in inflammation

Many studies have shown that SIRT1 is a key to reducing the translocation of HMGB1 in inflammatory responses, thus improving inflammation. Therefore, in recent years, numerous activators of SIRT1 have been investigated as potential treatments and preventative agents for inflammation-related diseases. Candidate therapeutic agents that act via this mechanism are reviewed in this section, organized by the type of inflammation and by disease (Figure 2; Table 1).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Macrophage can be influenced by surrounding necrotic cells and promote the interaction between HMGB1 and its receptor RAGE mediated by TNF-α, releasing acetylated HMGB1 and enhancing inflammatory response. When macrophage is infected, C5a binding with its receptor C5aR2 induces upregulation of HMGB1 expression in cytosyl and transfer of HMGB1 from cytosyl to the cell membrane in the vesicle. HMGB1 in the cytoplasm can activate MyD88 through TLR and then activate downstream transcription factor NF-κB, make it transfer to the nucleus, and finally promote the release of TNF-α, IL-6 and other inflammatory factors. HMGB1, as a substrate of SIRT1, can be inhibited the release under the SIRT1 deacetylation, then improving inflammation. Thus, SIRT1 activators can be used as potential agents to control inflammation by increasing SIRT1 expression. HMGB1, High mobility group box 1; RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end-products; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; TLR, toll-like receptor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-6, interleukin-6.

TABLE 1.

Summary of direct and indirect SIRTI activators with therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases.

Therapy Cell types Inhibition of HMGB1 Activated transcription factor Main outcome Ref.
ω-3 PUFA Microglia Acetylation SIRT1 Produce neuroprotective effects for experimental traumatic brain injury Chen et al. (2017), Chen et al. (2018a), Chen et al. (2018b)
Oleanolic acid Brain injury cells in rats Transfer SIRT1 Play an anti-inflammatory role to alleviate early brain injury after subarachnoid haemorrhage Han et al. (2021)
Baicalin Microglia Release SIRT1 Reduce microglia-associated neuro inflammation and improved cute neurocognitive deficits in LPS-induced mice Li et al. (2020)
Aloin Human umbilical vein endothelial cells Release SIRT1 Treat severe vascular inflammatory diseases like sepsis and septic shock Yang et al. (2019)
Kaempferol Lung suffered I/R Release SIRT1 Improve the lung pathological injury and inhibit the release of inflammatory factors Yang et al. (2020a)
Chrysophanol Heart tissue Activation SIRT1 Attenuate DM-induced heart damage and inflammation of the heart Xue et al. (2019)
Polydatin HK-2 cells Release SIRT1 Attenuate rats’ renal tubular epithelial cell apoptosis, protect renal function and prolong survival in haemorrhagic shock rats Xu et al. (2019b)
Salvianolic acid B Hepatocytes Release SIRT1 Attenuate HFD-induced Meng et al. (2020)
Liver damage, hepatic steatosis, and inflammation
PKA Retinal endothelial Cells Translocation SIRT1 Reduce HMGB1-induced retinal inflammation Liu et al. (2018)
Resveratrol Microglia Release SIRT1 Exert neuroprotective effects by inhibiting the inflammatory response of microglia Le et al. (2019)
Murine macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells with LPS Expression SIRT1 Antagonize the inflammatory effects of LPS for anti-inflammation effects Yu et al. (2019), Nebbioso et al. (2020)
Salidroside LPS-treated macrophages Translocation SIRT1 Protect against sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality Lan et al. (2017)
Cilostazol RA fibroblasts Expression SIRT1 Inhibit HMVECs tube formation Kim et al. (2014)
Epac1 Retinal endothelial cells Acetylation SIRT1 Reduce key inflammatory cascades in the retina Jiang et al. (2018d)
Emodin Murine alveolar epithelial cell Expression SIRT1 Alleviate sepsis-induced lung injury Liu et al. (2022)
Melatonin Murine BV2 microglia cell Release SIRT1 Ameliorate lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial inflammation Chibaatar et al. (2021)
Oleanolic acid Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage rat model Translocation SIRT1 Alleviate early brain injury after subarachnoid haemorrhage Han et al. (2021)

ω-3 PUFA, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; DM, diabetes mellitus; HK-2, human proximal tubular epithelial-2; HFD, high-fat diet; PKA, protein kinase A; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; HMVECs, human microvascular endothelial cells; EPAC1, exchange protein activated by cAMP 1.

3.1 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in neuroinflammation

Neuroinflammation is a term used to describe the common immune responses of the central nervous system, which is the key to the pathological process of several acute and chronic brain diseases including delirium and Alzheimer’s disease (Lyman et al., 2014), primarily concerning the cells such as microglia and astrocytes. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), as a regulator of activation of hypothalamic microglia, can enhance the LPS-induced neuroinflammatory response of microglia (Lee et al., 2020). Neuroinflammation is activated in response to central nervous system injury to initiate repair mechanisms acutely. Although acute neuroinflammation is protective, chronic neuroinflammation is often considered harmful and damaging to nerve tissue. That is, chronic neuroinflammation can aggravate, spread, and prolong central nervous system injury (Corwin et al., 2018).

3.1.1 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be defined as the retardation of brain function, or other brain pathology diseases, triggered by external physical forces (Khellaf et al., 2019), resulting in death and disability in people with physical trauma (Vella et al., 2017), and presenting in various forms ranging from mild alterations of consciousness to a persistent comatose state and death. In the most severe form of TBI, the whole brain is affected by diffuse injury and swelling (Galgano et al., 2017). Neuroinflammation is an axiomatic physiological response to TBI. Similarly, neuroinflammation is the major cause of disability and death after TBI (Morganti et al., 2016; Tang et al., 2016). It has been shown to play a part in inducing secondary damage following brain injury that contributes to chronic neurodegeneration and neurological impairments associated with TBI (Kumar and Loane, 2012). Experimental models of TBI upon post-traumatic neuroinflammatory inhibition have been reported to improve neurological parameters (Paudel et al., 2020).

HMGB1 is among the first pro-inflammatory cytokines released following TBI, and has an initiating role in neuroinflammation, acting as the “master-switch” (Manivannan et al., 2021). Studies have shown that nucleocytoplasmic translocation and extracellular secretion of HMGB1 are increased after TBI, which activates the HMGB1/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)/P65 pathway and promotes the expression of pro-inflammatory factors (Chen et al., 2018a). Omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) have been shown to have neuroprotective properties that regulate signal transduction in brain cells, including monoamine regulation, and are involved in the modification of receptor properties or activation of receptor signal transduction (Agostoni et al., 2017). Chen et al. (2018a) demonstrated that the treatment with ω-3 PUFAs increased SIRT1 activity following TBI, thus inducing SIRT1 to interact directly with HMGB1 and inhibiting HMGB1 acetylation. These interactions were shown to inhibit HMGB1 nucleocytoplasmic translocation and extracellular release, preventing HMGB1-mediated activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway after TBI-induced microglial activating and thus suppressing the subsequent inflammation. Therefore, it can inhibit TBI-induced inflammation, and this inhibitory mechanism may be associated with microglial activation, resulting in neuroprotective effects. Overall, the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of ω-3 PUFAs demonstrated in this study show promise for the treatment of neuroinflammation.

3.1.2 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in cerebral ischemia

Cerebral ischemia occurs when a blood vessel is blocked by a thrombus or embolus [2], resulting in brain tissue damage, including cerebral infarction and neuronal cell death, which manifests clinically as ischemic stroke (Shin et al., 2020). Its result depends on how many neurons die from hypoxia in the ischemic area. After cerebral ischemia leads to brain damage and neuronal loss, it can also lead to neuroinflammation that lasts for months after stroke (Ahmed et al., 2016; Vay et al., 2018). Neuroinflammation is one of the major aspects of cerebral ischemia, and can adversely affect neurogenesis. Microglia, as the resident innate immune cells of the brain, is in charge of eliciting early and pronounced inflammatory response in the immature brain after hypoxic-ischemic (HI) insult, rather than infiltrating blood-derived macrophages (Kaur and Ling, 2009; Shankaran, 2012; Umekawa et al., 2015). Paradol, as a biotransforming metabolite of shogaol, can significantly reduce microglial activation, TNF-α and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, improve neuroinflammation and central nervous system disorders, achieving the purpose of treating cerebral ischemia (Subedi et al., 2021).

HMGB1 influences neuroinflammatory responses to cerebral ischemic injury, which conduces to the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia. It has been suggested that HMGB1 may work as a pro-inflammatory molecule, particularly through alarmin-driven inflammatory feedback mechanisms, further exacerbating the harm during cerebral ischemic injury (Singh et al., 2016). HI, insult induces reactivity in microglia, which actively release acetylated HMGB1 (Ac–HMGB1); this, in turn, motivates the TLR4/myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)/NF-κB signaling pathway in microglia, resulting in glial–neuronal neuroinflammation, consisting of the production of a mass of pro-inflammatory molecules and mediators including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. It has been suggested that the expression level of SIRT1 is declined in neonatal Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) (Carloni et al., 2017). SIRT1 is of great value for cognitive function, neuronal plasticity, and prevention of aging-related neuronal degeneration and cognitive decline (Ng et al., 2015). A key role for SIRT1 in neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia, via the deacetylation and inhibition of p53 and NF-κB-induced inflammatory reaction and apoptosis, has also been indicated (Hernández-Jiménez et al., 2013). Studies have shown that resveratrol (RES) improves neurological function and neuronal damage, inhibits inflammation and neuronal apoptosis, and protects neurons from cerebral ischemia (Park et al., 2019). Animal experiments have also shown that RES can play neuroprotective and antioxidant effects on apoptosis induced by cerebral ischemia rats by increasing SIRT1 expression (Meng et al., 2015). Upregulation of SIRT1 decreases the acetylation status of HMGB1, which in turn plays a key role in the cellular response to inflammation by deacetylation-mediated HMGB1 release (Lan et al., 2017). RES treatment directly increases the interaction between SIRT1 and HMGB1 by promoting the expression and activity of SIRT1, inhibiting acetylation of HMGB1, restraining the nucleocytoplasmic translocation and subsequent secretion of HMGB1 from microglial cells, and finally weakening the downstream inflammatory cascade such as TLR4 signaling pathway caused by this molecule, ameliorating brain injury and behavioral impairment attributing to HI insult (Le et al., 2019). Therefore, RES could be investigated as adjunctive therapy for neuroinflammation; however, further clinical research for this is required.

3.2 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in lung inflammation

Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) is a complex, inflammatory condition of the lung in the absence of infection, which involves rapid oxidative stress and subsequent responses by all cells in the lung. It ultimately leads to the breakdown of endothelial and epithelial barriers, resulting in life-threatening edema and defective gas exchange, which poses a huge threat to graft and recipient survival, resulting in ascending morbidity and mortality among lung transplant patients (Trulock et al., 2006). Innate immune cells are rapidly activated upon reperfusion, resulting in neutrophil influx, pulmonary edema and succeeding lung dysfunction (Sharma et al., 2007) via the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the activation of intricate inflammatory signaling pathways. Severe cases can cause direct tissue injury and augment pulmonary inflammation (Laubach and Sharma, 2016).

Total and extranuclear HMGB1 levels were both greatly increased after LIRI, causing lung injury in rats (Yang et al., 2020a). At the same time, HMGB1 expression can be increased in a variety of lung diseases, such as pneumonia (Ding et al., 2018), pulmonary fibrosis (Zhao et al., 2017), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Jiang et al., 2019). This suggests that excessive HMGB1 may produce tissue injury and organ dysfunction in the pathogenesis of many illnesses, with either sterile or infectious origins (Yang and Tracey, 2010). Extracellular HMGB1 is involved in promoting inflammation and oxidative stress by interacting with Toll receptors and RAGE to activate NF-κB (Bortolotto and Grilli, 2017). SIRT1-related pathways are also the core components of redox signaling pathways. The ability of SIRT1 to resist oxidative stress in vivo was first reported by Alcendor et al. (2007). Therefore, SIRT1 can inhibit HMGB1 expression by protecting cells from oxidative stress. Yang et al. (2020a) illuminated that dietary flavonoid kaempferol significantly upregulates SIRT1 expression in rat lungs of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), thereby reducing the expression level of HMGB1, inhibiting the release of inflammatory factors, decreasing the activity of NF-κB pathway, reducing malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase levels, and improving pathological injury. Therefore, kaempferol may protect against LIRI and act as an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress agent via the SIRT1/HMGB1 axis. Kaempferol may therefore be a useful therapeutic candidate in inflammation and infection of the lung.

3.3 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in arthritis

Arthritis is defined as inflammation of joints causing pain, swelling, and stiffness (Shrivastava and Pandey, 2013), used to be thought of as a life-long illness. Current treatments for arthritis have focused on disease control, and the cure still seems unreachable. Therefore, life-long therapy is required to inhibit the inflammatory process to effectively control further cartilage and bone damage (Zaninelli et al., 2021). Arthritis is the leading cause of disability in the United States (US) and other populations (Basu et al., 2018). Although the etiology and underlying mechanisms of arthritic conditions are complex, evidence suggests that the progression of this condition may be primarily driven by an increase in oxidative stress and inflammation (Geyer and Schönfeld, 2018). Among these conditions, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has the characteristic of uncontrolled proliferation of synovitis, and inflammatory synovitis, accompanied by neutrophil infiltration, fibroblast proliferation, and angiogenesis in patients with RA. Uncontrolled proliferation of the synovial lining results in microenvironmental variations, leading to the chronic production of low oxygen tension and pro-inflammatory cytokines. The normal cellular response to hypoxia is mediated by hypoxia response genes, including hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), such as HIF-1α and HIF-2α (Semenza, 2007). The HIF-1 signaling pathway is activated under hypoxia condition and subsequently induces downstream vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Notch signaling, which accelerates angiogenesis of articular cartilage. Therefore, it is a target for anti-angiogenic therapy in RA (Chen et al., 2019).

Extracellular HMGB1 takes a part of a coupling factor between hypoxia and inflammation in arthritis and localizes preferentially to regions of tissue hypoxia in arthritic lesions (Hamada et al., 2008). HMGB1 can be actively released by macrophages and passively secreted from necrotic cells. That is, molecules derived from exogenous pathogens stimulate the innate immune system to promote the active release of HMGB1. In the absence of invasion, ischemiaor cellular injury and hypoxia can motivate the passive release of HMGB1 (Andersson and Tracey, 2011), increasing extracellular HMGB1. Kim et al. (2014) confirmed that the signaling pathways associated with HMGB1-induced downstream molecule HIF-1 expression and VEGF release involve NF-κB activation in RA synovial fibroblasts (SF), which results in the disruption of bone deformation, articular cartilage and synovial proliferation, aggravating the pathogenesis in RA disease (Kaur et al., 2020). SIRT1 expression was found to be significantly decreased between 3 and 24 h after exposure to HMGB1 (Pullerits et al., 2003). SIRT1-induced deacetylation is involved in restraining HIF1 signaling. Cilostazol is a vasodilating antiplatelet drug, the effects of cilostazol mainly help to stimulate NO production, inhibit platelet aggregation, vasodilatation and enhance peripheral blood flow (Elrashidy and Hasan, 2021). Cilostazol can activate SIRT1, and therefore, induces dual effects in RA SFs: on one hand, it increases HIF-1a deacetylation by enhancing SIRT1 activity, thus blocking VEGF expression and leading to the suppression of synovial angiogenesis; on the other, it inhibits HMGB1 expression, thereby suppressing HIF-1a and VEGF expression. It has therefore been shown to have anti-angiogenic effects in vitro and in a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model. Cilostazol can be a potential candidate drug for preventing and treating arthritis.

3.4 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in hepatocyte inflammation

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the main cause of chronic liver disease and has become an increasingly serious public health problem on a global scale (Tarquini et al., 2010). Inflammatory reaction plays a key role in this disease. One-quarter of NAFLD patients are judged with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), where histological evidence shows not only the fatty accumulation of liver cells but also hepatocyte damage and death because of the long-term inflammatory response (Zhu et al., 2021). Both hepatocyte injury and liver inflammation are implicated in the pathogenesis of NASH, as damaged liver cells release inflammatory factors that induce inflammation, and as a result that downward spiral as inflammation further causes hepatocyte damage (Zhu et al., 2021). Abnormal immune responses and immune cell infiltration caused by various liver injuries (such as viral or parasitic infection, drug toxicity, alcoholism and metabolic diseases) can disrupt the immune state of the liver and lead to liver inflammation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent progenitor cells that can differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes, and have unique immunomodulatory effects on numerous effector immune cells such as T lymphocytes, B cells and natural killer cells (Liu et al., 2021a). MSCs are usually provided by isolating them and maintaining them in human liver tissue culture, called liver MSCs (Kholodenko et al., 2019). Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that MSC transplantation can reduce liver inflammation and thereby improve liver cell regeneration, which can help patients with liver injury through an immune-mediated pathway (de Miguel et al., 2019). Yang et al. (2021) also indicated that Mesenchymal stem cells-conditioned medium (MSC-CM) enhanced the biological functions of mitochondria, inhibited inflammation, and prevented cell apoptosis both in vivo and in vitro, which significantly improved NAFLD. These positive effects were closely related to the upregulation of SIRT1. SIRT1 has been reported to have anti-steatosis and anti-inflammatory movements in the pathogenesis of NAFLD (Meng et al., 2020). Therefore, these results suggest that SIRT1 may be closely related to the mechanism controlling hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NASH.

HMGB1, an inflammatory mediator, secreted by damaged liver cells, prolongs the inflammatory response, playing a key role in diverse pathogenic mechanisms in liver disease, such as inflammation, fibrosis, steatosis and tumorigenesis (Li et al., 2011; Gan et al., 2014; Vicentino et al., 2018). Liu et al. found that the translocation of HMGB1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus increased in acute liver failure (Wang et al., 2008; Liu and Yao, 2010); overexpression of HMGB1 in hepatocytes also particularly enhanced the risk of liver injury when sepsis happened (Xu et al., 2014). Recent studies have reported that HMGB1 levels are enhanced in NAFLD in both animal models and a clinical setting in humans and that inhibiting HMGB1 leads to a remarkable decrease in inflammatory responses in NAFLD (Li et al., 2011; Montes et al., 2015). Also, Rauh et al. (2013) indicated that HMGB1 was one of the main SIRT1 substrate candidates. Rabadi et al. (2015) have also demonstrated that the inflammation-induced suppression of SIRT1 inhibits HMGB1 deacetylation and promotes its nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and systemic secretion, therefore keeping inflammation. Meng et al. (2020) indicate that salvianolic acid B (SalB), can suppress the relocation and secretion of HMGB1 by upregulating SIRT1 in the liver parenchymal cells during NAFLD. Meanwhile, SIRT1-mediated deacetylation can result in the resveratrol-mediated suppression of HMGB1 nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translation in sepsis-induced liver injury (Xu et al., 2014). Therefore, the anti-inflammatory SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway may act as a typical pharmacological target to attenuate the progression of NAFLD for the development of new drugs.

3.5 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in inflammatory responses during pregnancy

Preeclampsia (PE), a pregnancy-specific disorder linked to inadequate maternal inflammation, oxidative stress, placental ischemia, vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and injury of the blood vessel (Feng et al., 2016a), can result in high maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality (Feng et al., 2016b). Pregnant woman with PE is prone to autoimmune diseases, maternal renal disease and metabolic syndromes. This aberrant inflammatory activation can also result in harmful pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth or miscarriage (Nadeau-Vallée et al., 2016). Recently, a growing number of researches suggest that PE possibly originates from poor placental development. The placenta protects the fetus from maternal immune responses owing to its biological barrier between the mother and the fetus. It has been believed that HMGB1 levels are enhanced in the syncytiotrophoblast of the placenta, and in the serum in both severe PE and early onset PE, the expression of serum cytokine and chemokine levels is also significantly elevated (Chen et al., 2016). This indicates that HMGB1 plays a crucial pathogenic role in PE. In this condition, excessive inflammation and oxidative stress can give rise to the dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells, triggering their death. Necrotic cells release HMGB1, further contributing to the inflammation, in a positive feedback loop (Yin et al., 2017). Yin et al. (2017) found that SIRT1 can inhibit HMGB1 release in cell models of PE and further suppress the pro-inflammatory effects of HMGB1. Increasing SIRT1 levels has been shown to improve inflammatory and stress responses and prevent vascular endothelial cells from death. Therefore, placental SIRT1 is likely protective against PE. The SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway may therefore be a potential therapeutic target for alleviating inappropriate inflammatory responses during pregnancy.

3.6 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in sepsis

Sepsis, infected with systemic signs of infection, is characterized as a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (Galtrey et al., 2015). The characteristics of sepsis are physiologic, biochemical and pathologic abnormalities induced by infection, also include dysfunctional blood coagulation, dysregulated inflammation, and multiple organ damage, and severe sepsis is characterized by sepsis plus sepsis-induced organ dysfunction or tissue hypoperfusion (Lan et al., 2017). The morbidity and mortality related to severe sepsis are enhanced and sepsis can lead to death in intensive care (Gentile and Moldawer, 2014). Sepsis has a biphasic inflammatory process: producing pro-inflammatory cytokines in the early phase, including TNF and interleukins, and the late phase is mediated by HMGB1 (Abraham et al., 2000). HMGB1 rearranges the actin cytoskeleton into a contractile phenotype through the downstream effector of late action, disrupting the endothelial cell barrier and increased mortality in sepsis (Galtrey et al., 2015). In addition, HMGB1 expression was found to be increased in septic acute kidney injury (AKI) mouse models, and serum HMGB1 levels were positively correlated with the severity of sepsis (Xu et al., 2020). Therefore, therapeutics targeting this protein may be a new method for targeting persistent inflammation in people with sepsis.

Extracellular HMGB1, a mediator of late sepsis, acts as a major mediator in both acute and chronic inflammation (Abraham et al., 2000). Nuclear-to-cytoplasmic HMGB1 translocation is increased in acute lung injury, and in this context, inhibiting HMGB1 secretion improves sepsis-induced organ injury and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (Wang et al., 2009). Accordingly, inhibition of HMGB1 translocation and/or secretion therapeutically may have a protective effect on acute lung injury induced by sepsis. Wei et al. (2019) found that SIRT1 activation resulted in deacetylation of HMGB1 and attenuation of its nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation, both in vivo and in vitro in a model of sepsis-associated AKI. Besides, the deacetylation of HMGB1 mediated by SIRT1 inhibited inflammation, attenuated renal function, and crucially lengthened survival time in septic mice. Activated SIRT1 has been shown to directly interact with HMGB1 by its NH2-terminal lysine residues 28–30, and then suppressing the secretion of HMGB1 and improving survival time in an experimental model of sepsis (Wei et al., 2019). On the contrary, inflammatory stimulation accelerates the acetylation of HMGB1 and promotes its secretion by eliciting its separation from SIRT1 (Wei et al., 2019). Lan et al. (2017) indicated that salidroside was found to prohibit the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) via SIRT1-mediated suppression of the NF-κB activation pathway in the early septic phase. In the late septic phase, salidroside also prevented acute lung injury via the SIRT1-mediated HMGB1 nucleocytoplasmic translocation pathway induced by sepsis. Salidroside has a bipartite curative effect, ameliorating both early and late phase inflammation associated with sepsis. Therefore, salidroside is expected as a therapeutic agent in a septic mouse model. Overall, this research demonstrates that salidroside may play a protective therapeutic role in attenuating the progression of sepsis via the anti-inflammatory SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway.

3.7 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in diabetes-related inflammation

Diabetes, a metabolic disease caused by defects in insulin secretion and/or action and characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, can facilitate atherosclerotic illness and improves the brain, heart and lower limb arteries (Mäkimattila et al., 1996). It has a series of features including hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, insulin deficiency, and varied pathologies in many organs, such as the liver, the nerves, and the glomeruli in the kidneys. The importance of the role of inflammation in diabetes and diabetic complications, particularly in the retina and myocardial injury, is becoming increasingly evident. Increasing patients and the defect of pretreatments with this condition demonstrates a pressing requirement for the progress of novel targeted agents for metabolic pathways resulting in diabetes and diabetic complications. Many signaling cascades have been shown to play a role in this condition; however, no therapeutic agents currently exist. Therefore, more additional targeted treatment still needs to be identified. Some research has indicated that the SIRT1-HMGB1 axis can play a major pathway for novel beneficial adjustment.

3.7.1 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in retinal complications

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as a frequent complication especially in type 2 diabetes, has been more and more associated with inflammation (Zhang et al., 2012). It is characterized by abnormal retinal neovascularization, endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation (Robinson et al., 2020). It has been reported that insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) is neuroprotective in the retina, reducing retinal inflammation induced by injury (Jiang Y. et al., 2018). It has also been shown that IGFBP3 reduces hepatic inflammatory response via the reduction in the activity of NF-κB and Janus kinase (JNK). Simultaneously, exchange protein activated by cAMP 1 (EPAC1), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, can prohibit inflammatory pathways, block retinal leukostasis, and decrease entire HMGB1 levels in retinal capillary endothelial cell (REC) (Jiang et al., 2017). HMGB1 can directly bring about apoptosis in REC and diabetic human and rat retinas (Mohammad et al., 2015). Lossing EPAC1 statistically greatly cuts down IGFBP3 levels in the retinal vasculature in the mouse. EPAC1 activates IGFBP3 to raise SIRT1, reducing the acetylation of HMGB1. High glucose levels were also shown to increase the acetylation of HMGB1 in RECs, and this effect was inhibited by the EPAC1 agonist (Jiang Y. et al., 2018). Protein kinase A (PKA) can also mediate reductions in cytoplasmic HMGB1 by increasing the activity of both IGFBP3 and SIRT1, which has a protective effect on the DR. Thus, SIRT1 and HMGB1 axis is a promising pathway for the development of a therapeutic intervention for vascular inflammation. Simultaneously resveratrol replenishes the expression of retinal SIRT1. Consequently, resveratrol could be considered a novel therapeutic candidate in the context of DR through the SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway.

3.7.2 SIRT1-HMGB1 axis in myocardial injury

Myocardial injury is another serious complication of diabetes, leading to the death of the myocardial cell (MC) and harming the prognosis of patients. Inflammatory cytokines promote the initiation and development of heart injury. HMGB1 has been shown to participate in varied pathophysiological signaling pathways caused by the physiological environment of diabetes, and perform various functions such as activating endothelial cells, expressing chemokine receptors, producing inflammatory factors, and promoting cardiomyocyte necrosis or necroptosis (Ghigo et al., 2014). Cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts can release HMGB1, and HMGB1 can, in turn, facilitate cardiac injury or cardiac fibrosis. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from heart injury can promote HMGB1 translocation from the nucleus to the cytosol, and then boost autophagic flux, suggesting that translocation of HMGB1 induces autophagy after long-term cellular stress. In addition, HMGB1 facilitates the recruitment of inflammatory cells, including macrophages and neutrophils, to the injured heart through chemokines [e.g., chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12)]/chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). After heart injury, macrophages in the cardiac resident migrate to external immune organs. Stressed cardiomyocytes or immune cells produce HMGB1 and angiotensin Ⅱ (ANG II), which can gather Ly6C + monocytes into the heart of injury and recombine the infiltrated monocytes into M1 macrophages. The recombined M1 macrophages can contribute to CD4 (+) T cell extension and cardiac injury (Lu et al., 2019). Besides, HMGB1 activates NF-κB to promote the expression of pro-inflammatory factors (Lotze and Tracey, 2005). SIRT1 reduces the production and activation of inflammatory cytokines, resulting from inhibiting NF-κB transcriptional activity through deacetylation of the p65 subunit. Xue et al. (2019) indicated as an anti-inflammatory drug, chrysophanol has a protective effect on heart damage induced by diabetes, suggesting that this drug may attenuate inflammatory responses through upregulation of SIRT1, resulting in downregulation of the HMGB1/NF-κB pathway. All this evidence indicates that chrysophanol can be a useful agent for the treatment of myocardial illness resulting from diabetes.

3.8 SIRT1 in HMGB1-mediated tumor occurrence

Globally, cancer incidence and mortality are on the rise (Xu et al., 2019a). Cancer is one of the principal causes of death worldwide in countries of all income levels (Jemal et al., 2011). In the United States, up to 25% of deaths in humans presently are distinctly related to cancer (Balachandran and Govindarajan, 2005). Cancer is typically treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, ionizing radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy. Recently, there have also been profound breakthroughs in cancer treatment including checkpoint blockade immunotherapies (Siegel et al., 2020). Though there have been many recent therapeutic advances in cancer treatment, it is still considered an incurable disease in many instances (Wang et al., 2018). Thus, more effective or adjunctive therapies are needed to prevent and treat these currently intractable cancers. Some potential anticancer drugs that act via the HMGB1 and SITR1 pathways have been identified. The following sections provide an overview of these drugs (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Summary of direct and indirect SIRTI activators with therapeutic potential in tumor occurrence.

Therapy Cell types Inhibition of HMGB1 Activated transcription factors Main outcome Ref.
Resveratrol Liver cell Overexpression and hyperacetylation SIRT1 Reduce liver damage after liver resection Yu et al. (2019)
Doxorubicin Ovarian cancer cell Expression or acetylation SIRT1 Suppress migration, invasion or angiogenesis of ovarian cancer cells Zhu et al. (2017), Jiang W. et al. (2018)
Emodin Osteosarcoma cell Acetylation SIRT1 Alleviate tumour angiogenesis Qu et al. (2015)

Traditional anti-inflammatory drugs have anti-cancer and anti-tumor properties. For example, numerous epidemiological studies have revealed that malignancy and cancer incidence are credibly reduced after using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for a long time, including aspirin, celecoxib, diclofenac, diflunisal, sulindac, and tolmetin (Khandia and Munjal, 2020). So cancer is closely related to inflammation. Chronic inflammation is involved in all stages of cancer development and the inflammatory tumor microenvironment is a hallmark of cancer. According to epidemiological and clinical estimation, about 25% of cancers are associated with chronic and acute inflammation (Wu et al., 2017). Therefore, our understanding of the pathological mechanisms of cancer can contribute to recognizing the link between cancer and inflammation. In 1863, Virchow hypothesized that the sites of cancer occurrence are triggered by chronic inflammation and that some classes of irritants enhance cell proliferation by eliciting tissue injury and inflammation (Balkwill and Mantovani, 2001). Indeed, it is now clear that sustained cell proliferation in an environment rich in inflammatory cells, growth factors, activated stroma, and DNA damage-promoting agents promotes and/or maintains neoplastic risk (Singh et al., 2019). The pro-tumor activity of inflammatory cells includes stimulating growth and survival factors secretion, spurring DNA damage, motivating angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, remodeling the extracellular matrix to facilitate invasion, disseminating tumor cells via lymphatic vessels and capillaries, and avoiding host defense mechanisms (Singh et al., 2019). Susceptibility to cancer and subsequent disease severity may be associated with functional polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokine genes; experimental genetic deletion or inhibition of these cytokines inhibits the development of cancer (Balkwill and Mantovani, 2001). Anti-inflammatory therapy is effective during the early neoplastic progression and malignant conversion stages of cancer development. For instance, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease can increase the neoplastic risk and this process is, reduced by the use of anti-inflammatory agents for colitis (Zappavigna et al., 2020). Also, the use of NSAIDs decreases the number and size of colonic polypsin in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis; similarly, aspirin has also been found to confer a protective effect on the colorectum in patients with Lynch syndrome (Park et al., 2014). Therefore, anti-inflammatory therapy may be a useful option for treating early-stage diseases and precancers.

3.8.1 SIRT1 in HMGB1-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or primary liver cancer, is one of the major causes of death related to cancer worldwide (Gravitz, 2014). Although great progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment, the treatment difficulty and morbidity of liver cancer are still high (Ferlay et al., 2010). Hepatectomy is the most commonly used and effective treatment for liver cancer in the clinic (Wang et al., 2013). However, this may change the structure and function of the liver, leading to liver failure (Jin et al., 2013). Accordingly, it is still important to develop new therapeutic methods to treat postoperative liver failure. HMGB1 is released by injured liver cells, which may prolong inflammatory responses and promote the progression of liver disease. SIRT1 levels in normal liver tissue are very low, but overexpression in liver cancer tissues and cell lines shows that SIRT1 has a key role in liver cancer (Portmann et al., 2013). Numerous in vivo and in vitro studies have also indicated the anti-tumor effects of resveratrol on the initiation and progression of cancer (Yu et al., 2019). Yu et al. (2019) found that HMGB1 expression and acetylation levels in a rat model of liver resection were enhanced and resveratrol could prohibit this effect. They also found that resveratrol treatment can also prohibit the downregulation of SIRT1 in liver tissues resulting from surgical resection. HMGB1, as a substrate of SIRT1, can be deacetylated by SIRT1. Therefore, RES has the potential to protect the liver from hepatectomy injury, which is closely related to the SIRT1-HMGB1 axis.

3.8.2 SIRT1 in HMGB1-mediated ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the second leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in women worldwide (Lheureux et al., 2019). Ovarian cancer is frequently not diagnosed until it is at an advanced stage owing to a lack of specific symptoms; late diagnosis renders it hard to treat (Stewart et al., 2019). Early studies have indicated that HGMB1 has a role in ovarian cancer pathogenesis. The expression of HMGB1 in tissues and serum of ovarian cancer patients was higher than that of benign tumor or normal control group (Wang et al., 2015). Seidu et al. (2017) showed that HMGB1 upregulation may facilitate migration and invasion in ovarian cancer. Jiang W. et al. (2018) found that the regulation of cell migration, invasion and angiogenesis by HMGB1 was governed by SIRT1. SIRT1 can improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer. Ding et al. proved that alisertib could inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and induce autophagy in ovarian cancer cells by increasing SIRT1 expression (Wang et al., 2019). Meanwhile, overexpression of SIRT1 can effectively inhibit the expression and acetylation of HMGB1, thus inhibiting the migration, invasion and angiogenesis of ovarian cancer (Jiang W. et al., 2018). The SIRT1/HMGB1 axis may therefore be a key therapeutic target for inhibiting ovarian cancer migration, thus attenuating the progression of this disease.

3.8.3 SIRT1 in HMGB1-mediated osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) originates from MSCs and is considered the most frequent malignant bone tumor (Liu et al., 2021b). It is characterized by osteoid tissue generation or immature bone formation, especially in adolescents (Spraker-Perlman et al., 2019). With the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the 1970s, disease prognosis improved from 17% to a 5-years survival rate of 60%–70%, but there has been no significant improvement since then. There is an urgent need for new and innovative treatment strategies to supplement traditional approaches to improve the prognosis of patients with OS (Liu et al., 2021b). Except for cell proliferation and invasion, OS is also characterized by angiogenesis (Mikulić et al., 2004). Qu et al. (2015) found that in nude mice bearing human OS xenograft tumors, HMGB1 administration significantly increased angiogenesis in the tumor tissue. Recent research has also shown that angiogenesis was inhibited by SIRT1 activation, which downregulated VEGF transcription and inhibited angiogenesis induced by HMGB1 (Kim et al., 2014). Emodin, as a compound, deacetylates HMGB1 and attenuates angiogenesis induced by HMGB1 in OS by increasing SIRT1 expression and its deacetylation activity (Qu et al., 2015). Therefore, the clinical application of emodin may constitute an effective treatment strategy for OS in the future by acting on the SIRT1-HMGB1 axis.

4 Summary

Inflammation includes diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, eye disorders, arthritis, obesity, autoimmune diseases, and inflammatory bowel reaction (Arulselvan et al., 2016). The inflammatory process includes dilating veins and arterioles, increased vascular permeability, and blood flowing into surrounding tissues by the extravasation of leukocytes (Henson et al., 1984). SIRT1 and HMGB1 directly interact with one another, forming a stable complex in cells (Hwang et al., 2015). It is of great significance in controlling the progress of inflammation. SIRT1 generates a principal function in controlling the growth and progression of inflammation, exerting anti-inflammatory effects mainly by inhibiting the transcription of inflammation-related gene HMGB1 (Zhang et al., 2010). In the process of oxidative stress and cell necrosis, the integrity of the plasma membrane is destroyed, conducing to the interaction between HMGB1 and its receptor (notably, the RAGE) to promote the release of acetylated HMGB1 from cells, and the extracellular HMGB1 enhances inflammatory and immune responses (Hofmann et al., 1999; Park et al., 2006; Venereau et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2020b). HMGB1, as a substrate of SIRT1, is deacetylated by SIRT1 and left in the nucleus to alleviate the symptoms of inflammation significantly.

SIRT1 and HMGB1 are ancient signaling pathways that regulate metabolically and inflammation in mammals by opposite control mechanisms. In recent years, several studies have found a close relationship between the two proteins: SIRT1 can prohibit HMGB1 signaling directly, promoting its deacetylation and reducing its cytoplasmic translocation (Rabadi et al., 2015), resulting in decreased inflammatory responses (Petrovič, 2014). In turn, the HMGB1 pathway suppresses its downstream targets, which inhibits SIRT1-mediated functions. Given that SIRT1 and HMGB1 signaling pathways have antagonistic effects, these pathways can control many metabolic and inflammatory switches physiologically related to maintaining cellular and organismal homeostasis. Understanding this interaction deeply may contribute to providing brand new and valuable clinical targets for treating cancer and other conditions involving inflammation.

Some anti-inflammatory agents, including ω-3 PUFAs, oleanolic acid, baicalin, aloin, kaempferol, chrysophanol, and polydatin suppress the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway through activating SIRT1 (Matsuzawa-Ishimoto et al., 2017), and can yield improvements in neuroinflammation, arthritis, hepatocyte inflammation, and complications resulting from diabetes. Other pharmaceuticals include antitumor drugs (e.g., resveratrol, doxorubicin, and emodin), which can enhance the efficacy of treatments for certain cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and OS. These drugs increase interaction between SIRT1 and HMGB1 directly by enhancing the expression and activity of SIRT1 and reducing HMGB1 acetylation, inhibiting the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and subsequent secretion of HMGB1 from cells, and attenuating the downstream inflammatory cascade. The involvement of many molecules in this process indicates that there are multiple options for novel therapeutic approaches yet to be identified, developed, and put into clinical practice. Currently, many studies have focused on mouse models, and clinical studies in humans are required to confirm the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety of potential therapies. The anti-inflammatory effects caused by these molecules make their protective effect on inflammation obvious. At the same time, the field involving HMGB1 to induce SIRT1 activation has not been widely explored. Further research is needed to understand the effect of HMGB1 on SIRT1 better. Taken together, the anti-inflammatory effects induced by these molecules provide theoretical support for further exploring inflammatory pathways. SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway offers a new therapeutic target for inflammatory diseases.

Author contributions

WLY participated in the data collection and writing of the article. ZWR and LYY participated in the drawing of tables and pictures. ZJH participated in the design of the subject.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 81903712), the Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province, China (20210101281JC), Youth Development Fund of the First Hospital of Jilin University (Grant number: JDYY11202038), the Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project of Jilin Province (Grant number: 2021080).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Abraham E., Arcaroli J., Carmody A., Wang H., Tracey K. (2000). HMG-1 as a mediator of acute lung inflammation. J. Immunol. 165 (6), 2950–2954. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.2950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agostoni C., Nobile M., Ciappolino V., Delvecchio G., Tesei A., Turolo S., et al. (2017). The role of omega-3 fatty acids in developmental psychopathology: A systematic review on early psychosis, autism, and ADHD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18 (12), 2608. 10.3390/ijms18122608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad I. M., Abdalla M. Y., Moore T. A., Bartenhagen L., Case A. J., Zimmerman M. C. (2019). Healthcare workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation exhibit altered levels of inflammatory cytokines and redox parameters. Antioxidants (Basel) 8 (1), E12. 10.3390/antiox8010012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed M. E., Tucker D., Dong Y., Lu Y., Zhao N., Wang R., et al. (2016). Methylene Blue promotes cortical neurogenesis and ameliorates behavioral deficit after photothrombotic stroke in rats. Neuroscience 336, 39–48. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alcendor R. R., Gao S., Zhai P., Zablocki D., Holle E., Yu X., et al. (2007). Sirt1 regulates aging and resistance to oxidative stress in the heart. Circ. Res. 100 (10), 1512–1521. 10.1161/01.RES.0000267723.65696.4a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersson U., Tracey K. J. (2011). HMGB1 is a therapeutic target for sterile inflammation and infection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29, 139–162. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arulselvan P., Fard M. T., Tan W. S., Gothai S., Fakurazi S., Norhaizan M. E., et al. (2016). Role of antioxidants and natural products in inflammation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 5276130. 10.1155/2016/5276130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Balachandran P., Govindarajan R. (2005). Cancer--an ayurvedic perspective. Pharmacol. Res. 51 (1), 19–30. 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Balkwill F., Mantovani A. (2001). Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet 357 (9255), 539–545. 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04046-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Basu A., Schell J., Scofield R. H. (2018). Dietary fruits and arthritis. Food Funct. 9 (1), 70–77. 10.1039/c7fo01435j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernier M., Paul R., Martin-Montalvo A., Scheibye-Knudsen M., Song S., He H., et al. (2011). Negative regulation of STAT3 protein-mediated cellular respiration by SIRT1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (22), 19270–19279. 10.1074/jbc.M110.200311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonaldi T., Talamo F., Scaffidi P., Ferrera D., Porto A., Bachi A., et al. (2003). Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein HMGB1 to redirect it towards secretion. EMBO J. 22 (20), 5551–5560. 10.1093/emboj/cdg516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bortolotto V., Grilli M. (2017). Every cloud has a silver lining: Proneurogenic effects of aβ oligomers and HMGB-1 via activation of the RAGE-NF-κb Axis. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 16 (10), 1066–1079. 10.2174/1871527315666160803153459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carloni S., Riparini G., Buonocore G., Balduini W. (2017). Rapid modulation of the silent information regulator 1 by melatonin after hypoxia-ischemia in the neonatal rat brain. J. Pineal Res. 63 (3), e12434. 10.1111/jpi.12434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Q., Yin Y., Wei J., Tong M., Shen F., Zhao M., et al. (2016). Increased expression of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in the cytoplasm of placental syncytiotrophoblast from preeclamptic placentae. Cytokine 85, 30–36. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen X., Chen C., Fan S., Wu S., Yang F., Fang Z., et al. (2018a). Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid attenuates the inflammatory response by modulating microglia polarization through SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of the HMGB1/NF-κB pathway following experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation 15 (1), 116. 10.1186/s12974-018-1151-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen X., Pan Z., Fang Z., Lin W., Wu S., Yang F., et al. (2018b). Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid attenuates traumatic brain injury-induced neuronal apoptosis by inducing autophagy through the upregulation of SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of Beclin-1. J. Neuroinflammation 15 (1), 310. 10.1186/s12974-018-1345-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen X., Wu S., Chen C., Xie B., Fang Z., Hu W., et al. (2017). Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation attenuates microglial-induced inflammation by inhibiting the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB pathway following experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation 14 (1), 143. 10.1186/s12974-017-0917-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen Y., Zhao B., Zhu Y., Zhao H., Ma C. (2019). HIF-1-VEGF-Notch mediates angiogenesis in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 11 (5), 2969–2982. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chibaatar E., Le K., Abdoulaye I. A., Wu S., Guo Y. (2021). Melatonin ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial inflammation via triggering SIRT1/HMGB1 signaling Axis. J. Mol. Neurosci. 71 (4), 691–701. 10.1007/s12031-020-01699-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Corwin C., Nikolopoulou A., Pan A. L., Nunez-Santos M., Vallabhajosula S., Serrano P., et al. (2018). Prostaglandin D2/J2 signaling pathway in a rat model of neuroinflammation displaying progressive parkinsonian-like pathology: Potential novel therapeutic targets. J. Neuroinflammation 15 (1), 272. 10.1186/s12974-018-1305-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cottone L., Capobianco A., Gualteroni C., Monno A., Raccagni I., Valtorta S., et al. (2016). Leukocytes recruited by tumor-derived HMGB1 sustain peritoneal carcinomatosis. Oncoimmunology 5 (5), e1122860. 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1122860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dai C., Xiao X., Li D., Tun S., Wang Y., Velkov T., et al. (2018). Chloroquine ameliorates carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in mice via the concomitant inhibition of inflammation and induction of apoptosis. Cell. Death Dis. 9 (12), 1164. 10.1038/s41419-018-1136-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Miguel M. P., Prieto I., Moratilla A., Arias J., Aller M. A. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells for liver regeneration in liver failure: From experimental models to clinical trials. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 3945672. 10.1155/2019/3945672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ding Y., Chu C., Li Y., Li G., Lei X., Zhou W., et al. (2018). High expression of HMGB1 in children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Infect. Dis. 18 (1), 439. 10.1186/s12879-018-3346-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Elrashidy R., Hasan R. (2021). Cilostazol preconditioning alleviates cyclophosphamide-induced cardiotoxicity in male rats: Mechanistic insights into SIRT1 signaling pathway. Life Sci. 266, 118822. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Feng J., Li S., Chen H. (2016). Tanshinone IIA inhibits myocardial remodeling induced by pressure overload via suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation: Possible role of silent information regulator 1. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 791, 632–639. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.09.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Feng Y., Xu J., Zhou Q., Wang R., Liu N., Wu Y., et al. (2016). Alpha-1 antitrypsin prevents the development of preeclampsia through suppression of oxidative stress. Front. Physiol. 7, 176. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ferlay J., Shin H., Bray F., Forman D., Mathers C., Parkin D. (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008. Int. J. Cancer 127 (12), 2893–2917. 10.1002/ijc.25516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Galgano M., Toshkezi G., Qiu X., Russell T., Chin L., Zhao L.-R. (2017). Traumatic brain injury: Current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Cell. Transpl. 26 (7), 1118–1130. 10.1177/0963689717714102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Galtrey E. J., Moss C., Cahill H. (2015). Usefulness of sepsis screening tools and education in recognising the burden of sepsis on hospital wards. Crit. Care 19, P3. 10.1186/cc14083 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gan L., Van Rooyen D., Koina M., McCuskey R., Teoh N., Farrell G. (2014). Hepatocyte free cholesterol lipotoxicity results from JNK1-mediated mitochondrial injury and is HMGB1 and TLR4-dependent. J. Hepatol. 61 (6), 1376–1384. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gentile L., Moldawer L. (2014). HMGB1 as a therapeutic target for sepsis: it's all in the timing. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 18 (3), 243–245. 10.1517/14728222.2014.883380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Germolec D. R., Shipkowski K. A., Frawley R. P., Evans E. (2018). Markers of inflammation. Methods Mol. Biol. 1803, 57–79. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8549-4_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Geyer M., Schönfeld C. (2018). Novel insights into the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 14 (2), 98–107. 10.2174/1573397113666170807122312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ghigo A., Franco I., Morello F., Hirsch E. (2014). Myocyte signalling in leucocyte recruitment to the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 102 (2), 270–280. 10.1093/cvr/cvu030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gong W., Li Y., Chao F., Huang G., He F. (2009). Amino acid residues 201-205 in C-terminal acidic tail region plays a crucial role in antibacterial activity of HMGB1. J. Biomed. Sci. 16 (1), 83. 10.1186/1423-0127-16-83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Goto K., Honda Y., Ikeda K., Takemoto K., Higaki T., Hayashi T., et al. (2021). Tumor heterogeneity evaluated by computed tomography detects muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma that is associated with inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 14251. 10.1038/s41598-021-93414-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gravitz L. (2014). Liver cancer. Nature 516 (7529), S1. 10.1038/516S1a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hamada T., Torikai M., Kuwazuru A., Tanaka M., Horai N., Fukuda T., et al. (2008). Extracellular high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 is a coupling factor for hypoxia and inflammation in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 58 (9), 2675–2685. 10.1002/art.23729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Han Y., Tong Z., Wang C., Li X., Liang G. (2021). Oleanolic acid exerts neuroprotective effects in subarachnoid hemorrhage rats through SIRT1-mediated HMGB1 deacetylation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 893, 173811. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Henson P. M., Larsen G. L., Henson J. E., Newman S. L., Musson R. A., Leslie C. C. (1984). Resolution of pulmonary inflammation. Fed. Proc. 43 (13), 2799–2806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hernández-Jiménez M., Hurtado O., Cuartero M., Ballesteros I., Moraga A., Pradillo J., et al. (2013). Silent information regulator 1 protects the brain against cerebral ischemic damage. Stroke 44 (8), 2333–2337. 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hofmann M. A., Drury S., Fu C., Qu W., Taguchi A., Lu Y., et al. (1999). RAGE mediates a novel proinflammatory axis: A central cell surface receptor for S100/calgranulin polypeptides. Cell. 97 (7), 889–901. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80801-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hwang J. S., Choi H. S., Ham S. A., Yoo T., Lee W. J., Paek K. S., et al. (2015). Deacetylation-mediated interaction of SIRT1-HMGB1 improves survival in a mouse model of endotoxemia. Sci. Rep. 5, 15971. 10.1038/srep15971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ito I., Fukazawa J., Yoshida M. (2007). Post-translational methylation of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) causes its cytoplasmic localization in neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (22), 16336–16344. 10.1074/jbc.M608467200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jalgaonkar M. P., Parmar U. M., Kulkarni Y. A., Oza M. J. (2022). SIRT1-FOXOs activity regulates diabetic complications. Pharmacol. Res. 175, 106014. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jemal A., Bray F., Center M. M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. (2011). Global cancer statistics. Ca. Cancer J. Clin. 61 (2), 69–90. 10.3322/caac.20107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jiang J. Q., Li C., Cui C. X., Ma Y. N., Zhao G. Q., Peng X. D., et al. (2019). Inhibition of LOX-1 alleviates the proinflammatory effects of high-mobility group box 1 in Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 12 (6), 898–903. 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.03 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jiang W., Jiang P., Yang R., Liu D. F. (2018). Functional role of SIRT1-induced HMGB1 expression and acetylation in migration, invasion and angiogenesis of ovarian cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22 (14), 4431–4439. 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jiang Y., Liu L., Curtiss E., Steinle J. (2017). βEpac1 blocks NLRP3 inflammasome to reduce IL-1 in retinal endothelial cells and mouse retinal vasculature. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2860956. 10.1155/2017/2860956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang Y., Liu L., Steinle J. J. (2018). Epac1 deacetylates HMGB1 through increased IGFBP-3 and SIRT1 levels in the retinal vasculature. Mol. Vis. 24, 727–732. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jiang Y., Liu L., Steinle J. J. (2018d). Epac1 deacetylates HMGB1 through increased IGFBP-3 and SIRT1 levels in the retinal vasculature. Molecular Vision 24, 727–732. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jin S., Fu Q., Wuyun G., Wuyun T. (2013). Management of post-hepatectomy complications. World J. Gastroenterol. 19 (44), 7983–7991. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kaur C., Ling E. (2009). Periventricular white matter damage in the hypoxic neonatal brain: Role of microglial cells. Prog. Neurobiol. 87 (4), 264–280. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kaur I., Behl T., Bungau S., Kumar A., Mehta V., Setia D., et al. (2020). Exploring the therapeutic promise of targeting HMGB1 in rheumatoid arthritis. Life Sci. 258, 118164. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kemper J., Choi S., Kim D. (2013). Sirtuin 1 deacetylase: A key regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism. Vitam. Horm. 91, 385–404. 10.1016/b978-0-12-407766-9.00016-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Khandia R., Munjal A. (2020). Interplay between inflammation and cancer. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 119, 199–245. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Khellaf A., Khan D. Z., Helmy A. (2019). Recent advances in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurol. 266 (11), 2878–2889. 10.1007/s00415-019-09541-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kholodenko I. V., Kurbatov L. K., Kholodenko R. V., Manukyan G. V., Yarygin K. N. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells in the adult human liver: Hype or hope? Cells 8 (10), E1127. 10.3390/cells8101127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim H. Y., Park S. Y., Lee S. W., Lee H. R., Lee W. S., Rhim B. Y., et al. (2014). Inhibition of HMGB1-induced angiogenesis by cilostazol via SIRT1 activation in synovial fibroblasts from rheumatoid arthritis. Plos One 9 (8), e104743. 10.1371/journal.pone.0104743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  62. Kumar A., Loane D. (2012). Neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Brain Behav. Immun. 26 (8), 1191–1201. 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lan K.-C., Chao S.-C., Wu H.-Y., Chiang C.-L., Wang C.-C., Liu S.-H., et al. (2017). Salidroside ameliorates sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality via downregulating NF-kappa B and HMGB1 pathways through the upregulation of SIRT1. Sci. Rep. 7, 12026. 10.1038/s41598-017-12285-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Laubach V. E., Sharma A. K. (2016). Mechanisms of lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Curr. Opin. Organ Transpl. 21 (3), 246–252. 10.1097/mot.0000000000000304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Le K., Chibaatar Daliv E., Wu S., Qian F., Ali A., Yu D., et al. (2019). SIRT1-regulated HMGB1 release is partially involved in TLR4 signal transduction: A possible anti-neuroinflammatory mechanism of resveratrol in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Int. Immunopharmacol. 75, 105779. 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee S., Kim S., Kang H.-Y., Lim H. R., Kwon Y., Jo M., et al. (2020). The overexpression of TDP-43 in astrocytes causes neurodegeneration via a PTP1B-mediated inflammatory response. J. Neuroinflammation 17 (1), 299. 10.1186/s12974-020-01963-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lheureux S., Braunstein M., Oza A. M. (2019). Epithelial ovarian cancer: Evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. Ca. Cancer J. Clin. 69 (4), 280–304. 10.3322/caac.21559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li L., Chen L., Hu L. (2011). Nuclear factor high-mobility group Box1 mediating the activation of toll-like receptor 4 signaling in hepatocytes in the early stage of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 1 (2), 123–124. 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60136-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li Y., Liu T., Li Y., Han D., Hong J., Yang N., et al. (2020). Baicalin ameliorates cognitive impairment and protects microglia from LPS-induced neuroinflammation via the SIRT1/HMGB1 pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 4751349. 10.1155/2020/4751349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu F. J., Gu T. J., Wei D. Y. (2022). Emodin alleviates sepsis-mediated lung injury via inhibition and reduction of NF-kB and HMGB1 pathways mediated by SIRT1. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 38 (3), 253–260. 10.1002/kjm2.12476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu L., Patel P., Steinle J. J. (2018). PKA regulates HMGB1 through activation of IGFBP-3 and SIRT1 in human retinal endothelial cells cultured in high glucose. Inflamm. Res. 67 (11-12), 1013–1019. 10.1007/s00011-018-1196-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu Q., Chen X., Liu C., Pan L., Kang X., Li Y., et al. (2021). Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate experimental immune-mediated liver injury via chitinase 3-like protein 1-mediated T cell suppression. Cell. Death Dis. 12 (3), 240. 10.1038/s41419-021-03524-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu Q., Yao Y. (2010). Inflammatory response and immune regulation of high mobility group box-1 protein in treatment of sepsis. World J. Emerg. Med. 1 (2), 93–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu Y., Huang N., Liao S., Rothzerg E., Yao F., Li Y., et al. (2021). Current research progress in targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy for osteosarcoma. Cell. Prolif. 54, e13102. 10.1111/cpr.13102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lotze M. T., Tracey K. J. (2005). High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): Nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5 (4), 331–342. 10.1038/nri1594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lu B., Antoine D., Kwan K., Lundbäck P., Wähämaa H., Schierbeck H., et al. (2014). JAK/STAT1 signaling promotes HMGB1 hyperacetylation and nuclear translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (8), 3068–3073. 10.1073/pnas.1316925111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lu H., Zhang Z., Barnie P. A., Su Z. (2019). Dual faced HMGB1 plays multiple roles in cardiomyocyte senescence and cardiac inflammatory injury. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 47, 74–82. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lyman M., Lloyd D. G., Ji X., Vizcaychipi M. P., Ma D. (2014). Neuroinflammation: The role and consequences. Neurosci. Res. 79, 1–12. 10.1016/j.neures.2013.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Mai A., Massa S., Lavu S., Pezzi R., Simeoni S., Ragno R., et al. (2005). Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of sirtinol analogues as class III histone/protein deacetylase (Sirtuin) inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 48 (24), 7789–7795. 10.1021/jm050100l [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mäkimattila S., Virkamäki A., Groop P. H., Cockcroft J., Utriainen T., Fagerudd J., et al. (1996). Chronic hyperglycemia impairs endothelial function and insulin sensitivity via different mechanisms in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation 94 (6), 1276–1282. 10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Manivannan S., Marei O., Elalfy O., Zaben M. (2021). Neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury - the complex role of HMGB1 and neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology 183, 108400. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Matsuzawa-Ishimoto Y., Shono Y., Gomez L., Hubbard-Lucey V., Cammer M., Neil J., et al. (2017). Autophagy protein ATG16L1 prevents necroptosis in the intestinal epithelium. J. Exp. Med. 214 (12), 3687–3705. 10.1084/jem.20170558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Medzhitov R. (2008). Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 454 (7203), 428–435. 10.1038/nature07201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Meng R., Feng B., Bi Y., Zhu D. (2020). Inhibition of high-mobility group box 1 release via up-regulation of SIRT1 improved hepatic insulin resistance. Diabetologia 63, S222. [Google Scholar]
  85. Meng Z., Li J., Zhao H., Liu H., Zhang G., Wang L., et al. (2015). Resveratrol relieves ischemia-induced oxidative stress in the hippocampus by activating SIRT1. Exp. Ther. Med. 10 (2), 525–530. 10.3892/etm.2015.2555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mikulić D., Ilić I., Cepulić M., Orlić D., Giljević J., Fattorini I., et al. (2004). Tumor angiogenesis and outcome in osteosarcoma. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 21 (7), 611–619. 10.1080/08880010490501015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mohammad G., Alam K., Nawaz M., Siddiquei M., Mousa A., Abu El-Asrar A. (2015). Mutual enhancement between high-mobility group box-1 and NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species mediates diabetes-induced upregulation of retinal apoptotic markers. J. Physiol. Biochem. 71 (3), 359–372. 10.1007/s13105-015-0416-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Montes V. N., Subramanian S., Goodspeed L., Wang S. A., Omer M., Bobik A., et al. (2015). Anti-HMGB1 antibody reduces weight gain in mice fed a high-fat diet. Nutr. Diabetes 5, e161. 10.1038/nutd.2015.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Morganti J. M., Riparip L.-K., Rosi S. (2016). Call off the dog(ma): M1/M2 polarization is concurrent following traumatic brain injury. PloS one 11 (1), e0148001. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Nadeau-Vallée M., Obari D., Palacios J., Brien M., Duval C., Chemtob S., et al. (2016). Sterile inflammation and pregnancy complications: A review. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 152 (6), R277–R292. 10.1530/rep-16-0453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Nebbioso M., Lambiase A., Armentano M., Tucciarone G., Bonfiglio V., Plateroti R., et al. (2020). The complex relationship between diabetic retinopathy and high-mobility group box: A review of molecular pathways and therapeutic strategies. Antioxidants (Basel, Switz. 9 (8), E666. 10.3390/antiox9080666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Ng F., Wijaya L., Tang B. (2015). SIRT1 in the brain-connections with aging-associated disorders and lifespan. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 64. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Panigrahy D., Gilligan M. M., Serhan C. N., Kashfi K. (2021). Resolution of inflammation: An organizing principle in biology and medicine. Pharmacol. Ther. 227, 107879. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Park D. J., Kang J. B., Shah F. A., Koh P. O. (2019). Resveratrol modulates the Akt/GSK-3β signaling pathway in a middle cerebral artery occlusion animal model. Lab. Anim. Res. 35, 18. 10.1186/s42826-019-0019-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Park J. H., McMillan D. C., Horgan P. G., Roxburgh C. S. (2014). The impact of anti-inflammatory agents on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 40 (1), 68–77. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Park J. S., Gamboni-Robertson F., He Q., Svetkauskaite D., Kim J. Y., Strassheim D., et al. (2006). High mobility group box 1 protein interacts with multiple Toll-like receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 290 (3), C917–C924. 10.1152/ajpcell.00401.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Paudel Y. N., Angelopoulou E., Piperi C., Othman I., Shaikh M. F. (2020). HMGB1-Mediated neuroinflammatory responses in brain injuries: Potential mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (13), E4609. 10.3390/ijms21134609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Pellico J., Lechuga-Vieco A. V., Almarza E., Hidalgo A., Mesa-Nuñez C., Fernández-Barahona I., et al. (2017). In vivo imaging of lung inflammation with neutrophil-specific (68)Ga nano-radiotracer. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 13242. 10.1038/s41598-017-12829-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Petrovič M. (2014). Sirt1, a negative regulator of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in diabetic retinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55 (9), 5661. 10.1167/iovs.14-14874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Portmann S., Fahrner R., Lechleiter A., Keogh A., Overney S., Laemmle A., et al. (2013). Antitumor effect of SIRT1 inhibition in human HCC tumor models in vitro and in vivo . Mol. Cancer Ther. 12 (4), 499–508. 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-12-0700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Pullerits R., Jonsson I., Verdrengh M., Bokarewa M., Andersson U., Erlandsson-Harris H., et al. (2003). High mobility group box chromosomal protein 1, a DNA binding cytokine, induces arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 48 (6), 1693–1700. 10.1002/art.11028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Qu W., Wang Y., Wu Q., Liu J., Hao D. (2015). Emodin inhibits HMGB1-induced tumor angiogenesis in human osteosarcoma by regulating SIRT1. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8 (9), 15054–15064. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Rabadi M., Xavier S., Vasko R., Kaur K., Goligorksy M., Ratliff B. (2015). High-mobility group box 1 is a novel deacetylation target of Sirtuin1. Kidney Int. 87 (1), 95–108. 10.1038/ki.2014.217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Rauh D., Fischer F., Gertz M., Lakshminarasimhan M., Bergbrede T., Aladini F., et al. (2013). An acetylome peptide microarray reveals specificities and deacetylation substrates for all human sirtuin isoforms. Nat. Commun. 4, 2327. 10.1038/ncomms3327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Robinson R., Srinivasan M., Shanmugam A., Ward A., Ganapathy V., Bloom J., et al. (2020). Interleukin-6 trans-signaling inhibition prevents oxidative stress in a mouse model of early diabetic retinopathy. Redox Biol. 34, 101574. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Semenza G. (2007). Vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and arteriogenesis: Mechanisms of blood vessel formation and remodeling. J. Cell. Biochem. 102 (4), 840–847. 10.1002/jcb.21523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Seidu R., Wu M., Su Z., Xu H. (2017). Paradoxical role of high mobility group box 1 in glioma: A suppressor or a promoter? Oncol. Rev. 11 (1), 325. 10.4081/oncol.2017.325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Shankaran S. (2012). Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and novel strategies for neuroprotection. Clin. Perinatol. 39 (4), 919–929. 10.1016/j.clp.2012.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Sharma A. K., Fernandez L. G., Awad A. S., Kron I. L., Laubach V. E. (2007). Proinflammatory response of alveolar epithelial cells is enhanced by alveolar macrophage-produced TNF-alpha during pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 293 (1), L105–L113. 10.1152/ajplung.00470.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Shih C. P., Kuo C. Y., Lin Y. Y., Lin Y. C., Chen H. K., Wang H., et al. (2021). Inhibition of cochlear HMGB1 expression attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation in an experimental murine model of noise-induced hearing loss. Cells 10 (4), 810. 10.3390/cells10040810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shin T. H., Lee D. Y., Basith S., Manavalan B., Paik M. J., Rybinnik I., et al. (2020). Metabolome changes in cerebral ischemia. Cells 9 (7), E1630. 10.3390/cells9071630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Shrivastava A. K., Pandey A. (2013). Inflammation and rheumatoid arthritis. J. Physiol. Biochem. 69 (2), 335–347. 10.1007/s13105-012-0216-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. (2020). Cancer statistics, 2020. Ca. Cancer J. Clin. 70 (1), 7–30. 10.3322/caac.21590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sims G. P., Rowe D. C., Rietdijk S. T., Herbst R., Coyle A. J. (2010). HMGB1 and RAGE in inflammation and cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 367–388. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Singh N., Baby D., Rajguru J. P., Patil P. B., Thakkannavar S. S., Pujari V. B. (2019). Inflammation and cancer. Ann. Afr. Med. 18 (3), 121–126. 10.4103/aam.aam_56_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Singh V., Roth S., Veltkamp R., Liesz A. (2016). HMGB1 as a key mediator of immune mechanisms in ischemic stroke. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 24 (12), 635–651. 10.1089/ars.2015.6397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Spraker-Perlman H., Barkauskas D., Krailo M., Meyers P., Schwartz C., Doski J., et al. (2019). Factors influencing survival after recurrence in osteosarcoma: A report from the children's oncology group. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 66 (1), e27444. 10.1002/pbc.27444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Stewart C., Ralyea C., Lockwood S. (2019). Ovarian cancer: An integrated review. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 35 (2), 151–156. 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Subedi L., Gaire B. P., Parveen A., Kim S.-Y. (2021). Nitric oxide as a target for phytochemicals in anti-neuroinflammatory prevention therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (9), 4771. 10.3390/ijms22094771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Tang W.-C., Hsu Y.-C., Wang C.-C., Hu C.-Y., Chio C.-C., Kuo J.-R. (2016). Early electroacupuncture treatment ameliorates neuroinflammation in rats with traumatic brain injury. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 16 (1), 470. 10.1186/s12906-016-1457-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Tarquini R., Lazzeri C., Boddi M., Marra F., Abbate R., Gensini G. (2010). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A new challenge for cardiologists. G. Ital. Cardiol. 11 (9), 660–669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Trulock E., Edwards L., Taylor D., Boucek M., Keck B., Hertz M., et al. (2006). Registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: Twenty-third official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report--2006. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 25 (8), 880–892. 10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Umekawa T., Osman A., Han W., Ikeda T., Blomgren K. (2015). Resident microglia, rather than blood-derived macrophages, contribute to the earlier and more pronounced inflammatory reaction in the immature compared with the adult hippocampus after hypoxia-ischemia. Glia 63 (12), 2220–2230. 10.1002/glia.22887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Vay S. U., Flitsch L. J., Rabenstein M., Rogall R., Blaschke S., Kleinhaus J., et al. (2018). The plasticity of primary microglia and their multifaceted effects on endogenous neural stem cells in vitro and in vivo . J. Neuroinflammation 15 (1), 226. 10.1186/s12974-018-1261-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Vella M. A., Crandall M. L., Patel M. B. (2017). Acute management of traumatic brain injury. Surg. Clin. North Am. 97 (5), 1015–1030. 10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Venereau E., Casalgrandi M., Schiraldi M., Antoine D., Cattaneo A., De Marchis F., et al. (2012). Mutually exclusive redox forms of HMGB1 promote cell recruitment or proinflammatory cytokine release. J. Exp. Med. 209 (9), 1519–1528. 10.1084/jem.20120189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Vicentino A., Carneiro V., Allonso D., Guilherme R., Benjamim C., Dos Santos H., et al. (2018). Emerging role of HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of schistosomiasis liver fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 9, 1979. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang H., Li Z., Sun Y., Xu Z., Han J., Song B., et al. (2015). Relationship between high-mobility group box 1 overexpression in ovarian cancer tissue and serum: A meta-analysis. Onco. Targets. Ther. 8, 3523–3531. 10.2147/ott.S93357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang H., Ward M., Sama A. (2009). Novel HMGB1-inhibiting therapeutic agents for experimental sepsis. Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 32 (4), 348–357. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181a551bd [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wang H., Zhu S., Zhou R., Li W., Sama A. (2008). Therapeutic potential of HMGB1-targeting agents in sepsis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 10, e32. 10.1017/s1462399408000884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Wang J. J., Lei K. F., Han F. (2018). Tumor microenvironment: Recent advances in various cancer treatments. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22 (12), 3855–3864. 10.26355/eurrev_201806_15270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang J., Kuo Y., Wang C., Chen C., Cheng Y., Hsu H., et al. (2013). Surgical resection improves the survival of selected hepatocellular carcinoma patients in Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C. Dig. Liver Dis. 45 (6), 510–515. 10.1016/j.dld.2012.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wang X., Gao Y., Tian N., Wang T., Shi Y., Xu J., et al. (2019). Astragaloside IV inhibits glucose-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of podocytes through autophagy enhancement via the SIRT-NF-κB p65 axis. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 323. 10.1038/s41598-018-36911-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wei S., Gao Y., Dai X., Fu W., Cai S., Fang H., et al. (2019). SIRT1-mediated HMGB1 deacetylation suppresses sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 316 (1), F20–F31. 10.1152/ajprenal.00119.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wu J., Zhao M., Wang Y., Wang Y., Zhu H., Zhao S., et al. (2017). N-(3-hydroxymethyl-β-carboline-1-yl-ethyl- 2-yl)-l-Phe: Development toward a nanoscaled antitumor drug capable of treating complicated thrombosis and inflammation. Drug Des. devel. Ther. 11, 225–239. 10.2147/DDDT.S123919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Xu C., Gao F., Wu J., Niu S., Li F., Jin L., et al. (2019). Biodegradable nanotheranostics with hyperthermia-induced bubble ability for ultrasound imaging-guided chemo-photothermal therapy. Int. J. Nanomedicine 14, 7141–7153. 10.2147/ijn.S213518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Xu Q., Yan P., Duan X.-J., Wu X., Chen X.-J., Luo M., et al. (2020). Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human cord blood mononuclear cells protect against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury in rat models. Exp. Ther. Med. 20 (6), 145. 10.3892/etm.2020.9274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Xu S., Zeng Z., Zhao M., Huang Q., Gao Y., Dai X., et al. (2019). Evidence for SIRT1 mediated HMGB1 release from kidney cells in the early stages of hemorrhagic shock. Front. Physiol. 10, 854. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Xu W., Lu Y., Yao J., Li Z., Chen Z., Wang G., et al. (2014). Novel role of resveratrol: Suppression of high-mobility group protein box 1 nucleocytoplasmic translocation by the upregulation of sirtuin 1 in sepsis-induced liver injury. Shock 42 (5), 440–447. 10.1097/shk.0000000000000225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Xue P., Zhao J., Zheng A., Li L., Chen H., Tu W., et al. (2019). Chrysophanol alleviates myocardial injury in diabetic db/db mice by regulating the SIRT1/HMGB1/NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Exp. Ther. Med. 18 (6), 4406–4412. 10.3892/etm.2019.8083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Yang C., Yang W., He Z., He H., Yang X., Lu Y., et al. (2020). Kaempferol improves lung ischemia-reperfusion injury via antiinflammation and antioxidative stress regulated by SIRT1/HMGB1/NF-kappa B Axis. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 1635. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Yang H., Lundbäck P., Ottosson L., Erlandsson-Harris H., Venereau E., Bianchi M., et al. (2020). Expression of Concern to: Redox modification of cysteine residues regulates the cytokine activity of high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1). Mol. Med. 26 (1), 18. 10.1186/s10020-020-0144-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Yang H., Tracey K. (2010). Targeting HMGB1 in inflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1799, 149–156. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Yang M., Cui Y., Song J., Cui C., Wang L., Liang K., et al. (2021). Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium improved mitochondrial function and alleviated inflammation and apoptosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by regulating SIRT1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 546, 74–82. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Yang S., Lee W., Lee B.-S., Lee C., Park E. K., Ku S.-K., et al. (2019). Aloin reduces HMGB1-mediated septic responses and improves survival in septic mice by activation of the SIRT1 and PI3K/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling Axis. Am. J. Chin. Med. 47 (3), 613–633. 10.1142/s0192415x19500320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Yang Z., Wang X., He Y., Qi L., Yu L., Xue B., et al. (2012). The full capacity of AICAR to reduce obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance requires myeloid SIRT1. PLoS One 7 (11), e49935. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Yin Y., Feng Y., Zhao H., Zhao Z., Yua H., Xu J., et al. (2017). SIRT1 inhibits releases of HMGB1 and HSP70 from human umbilical vein endothelial cells caused by IL-6 and the serum from a preeclampsia patient and protects the cells from death. Biomed. Pharmacother. 88, 449–458. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Youn J., Shin J. (2006). Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HMGB1 is regulated by phosphorylation that redirects it toward secretion. J. Immunol. 177 (11), 7889–7897. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Yu S., Zhou X., Xiang H., Wang S., Cui Z., Zhou J. (2019). Resveratrol reduced liver damage after liver resection in a rat model by upregulating sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and inhibiting the acetylation of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Med. Sci. Monit. 25, 3212–3220. 10.12659/msm.913937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Zainal N., Chang C. P., Cheng Y. L., Wu Y. W., Anderson R., Wan S. W., et al. (2017). Resveratrol treatment reveals a novel role for HMGB1 in regulation of the type 1 interferon response in dengue virus infection. Sci. Rep. 7, 42998. 10.1038/srep42998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zaninelli T., Fattori V., Verri W. (2021). Harnessing inflammation resolution in arthritis: Current understanding of specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators' contribution to arthritis physiopathology and future perspectives. Front. Physiol. 12, 729134. 10.3389/fphys.2021.729134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zappavigna S., Cossu A. M., Grimaldi A., Bocchetti M., Ferraro G. A., Nicoletti G. F., et al. (2020). Anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (7), E2605. 10.3390/ijms21072605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zhang Q., Guy K., Pagadala J., Jiang Y., Walker R., Liu L., et al. (2012). Compound 49b prevents diabetes-induced apoptosis through increased IGFBP-3 levels. Invest.Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53 (6), 3004–3013. 10.1167/iovs.11-8779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhang R., Chen H. Z., Liu J. J., Jia Y. Y., Zhang Z. Q., Yang R. F., et al. (2010). SIRT1 suppresses activator protein-1 transcriptional activity and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 285 (10), 7097–7110. 10.1074/jbc.M109.038604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhang X. H., Peng L., Zhang J., Dong Y. P., Wang C. J., Liu C., et al. (2020). Berberine ameliorates subarachnoid hemorrhage injury via induction of sirtuin 1 and inhibiting HMGB1/nf-κb pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 1073. 10.3389/fphar.2020.01073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zhang Y., Zhou Y., Sun G., Li K., Li Z., Su A., et al. (2018). Transcriptome profile in bursa of Fabricius reveals potential mode for stress-influenced immune function in chicken stress model. BMC Genomics 19 (1), 918. 10.1186/s12864-018-5333-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Zhao J., Ren Y., Qu Y., Jiang W., Lv C. (2017). Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of pulmonary rehabilitation mixture for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 3458. 10.1038/s41598-017-02774-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhou S., Lu H., Chen R., Tian Y., Jiang Y., Zhang S., et al. (2018). Angiotensin II enhances the acetylation and release of HMGB1 in RAW264.7 macrophage. Cell. Biol. Int. 42 (9), 1160–1169. 10.1002/cbin.10984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhu B., Chan S., Li J., Li K., Wu H., Cui K., et al. (2021). Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 742382. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.742382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhu J., Fu Y., Hu Z., Li W., Tang C., Fei H., et al. (2017). Activation of miR-34a-5p/Sirt1/p66shc pathway contributes to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 11879. 10.1038/s41598-017-12192-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES