Abstract
Aggregation of alpha-synuclein (α-Syn) drives Parkinson’s disease (PD), although the initial stages of self-assembly and structural conversion have not been directly observed inside neurons. In this study, we tracked the intracellular conformational states of α-Syn using a single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) biosensor, and we show here that α-Syn converts from a monomeric state into two distinct oligomeric states in neurons in a concentration-dependent and sequence-specific manner. Three-dimensional FRET-correlative light and electron microscopy (FRET-CLEM) revealed that intracellular seeding events occur preferentially on membrane surfaces, especially at mitochondrial membranes. The mitochondrial lipid cardiolipin triggers rapid oligomerization of A53T α-Syn, and cardiolipin is sequestered within aggregating lipid–protein complexes. Mitochondrial aggregates impair complex I activity and increase mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which accelerates the oligomerization of A53T α-Syn and causes permeabilization of mitochondrial membranes and cell death. These processes were also observed in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)–derived neurons harboring A53T mutations from patients with PD. Our study highlights a mechanism of de novo α-Syn oligomerization at mitochondrial membranes and subsequent neuronal toxicity.
Subject terms: Parkinson's disease, Biophysics, Mitochondria
This study tracked the initial self-assembly, oligomerization and structural conversion of α-synuclein inside neurons. Early seeding events occur on mitochondrial membranes, where oligomerization induces mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal loss.
Main
The presence of aggregates rich in α-Syn is a hallmark of synucleinopathies, a subset of neurodegenerative diseases that encompasses PD, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and multiple system atrophy (MSA)1–5. The α-Syn protein plays a central role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Genetic studies have confirmed that mutations and multiplications of the gene SNCA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6622) on chromosome 4q21–23, encoding α-Syn, cause early-onset familial PD1,6–8, with widespread deposition of α-Syn aggregates in the brain. α-Syn is an intrinsically disordered protein and, during pathology, undergoes a conformational change to β-sheet-rich structures including oligomers, protofibrils and insoluble fibrils that finally accumulate in Lewy bodies (LBs) (reviewed in ref. 9). Although it is the insoluble end‐stage species of protein aggregation that has traditionally defined disease, it is the soluble intermediate oligomers that are markedly toxic, inducing aberrant calcium signaling, generating ROS, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal cell death2,10–13. Early dynamic processes in the formation of α-Syn oligomers are difficult to investigate due to their intrinsically transient, heterogeneous nature and low abundance (reviewed in ref. 14). To overcome this, single-molecule fluorescence methods have been developed to observe protein interactions and conformations, which broadly rely on the detection of transfer of excitation energy between two fluorophores when sufficiently close (reviewed in ref. 15). Employing smFRET, we previously tracked α-Syn aggregation in vitro, distinguished different structural groups of oligomers formed during aggregation and compared the kinetics of oligomer formation of SNCA mutations, highlighting the increased propensity for A53T α-Syn to form cytotoxic oligomers16,17. However, it has not yet been possible to capture and characterize the early dynamic process of aggregation inside the native human environment and determine its effects on cellular homeostasis.
In this study, we integrated sensitive biophysical approaches—a FRET biosensor, smFRET and three-dimensional (3D) FRET-CLEM—to precisely track the kinetics of α-Syn aggregation and to visualize the early oligomerization events inside neurons. Here we show how early seeding events on lipid membranes trigger aggregation, and we reveal a mechanism by which mutant α-Syn aggregates in mitochondria and alters mitochondrial function, which leads ultimately to toxicity.
Results
Measuring oligomerization using a FRET biosensor
For visualization of α-Syn, fluorescent labels were introduced at an alanine-to-cysteine mutation at residue 90 (A90C), which is located at the periphery of the structure proposed to be highly organized in the fibrillar form and has negligible effects on both the aggregation and toxicity of α-Syn10,18. Two populations of fluorescently tagged α-Syn, one labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (α-Syn-AF488) and the second with Alexa Fluor 594 (α-Syn-AF594) (Fig. 1ai,aii), were mixed and added to neurons, and the intracellular accumulation of α-Syn was visualized by measuring the intensity of AF594 α-Syn within the cells using direct excitation with 594-nm irradiation (Fig. 1bi,ci and Extended Data Fig. 1ai,aii). This direct excitation signal gives a measure of the total α-Syn, regardless of its aggregation state. The formation of oligomers was visualized via the presence of signal from the acceptor fluorophore (AF549) after excitation of the donor fluorophore with 488-nm irradiation, which occurs as energy is non-radiatively transferred from AF488 to AF594. We refer to this as the FRET signal (Extended Data Fig. 1b), and it can only occur when the fluorophores are in close proximity (<10 nm), as is the case within aggregates.
We first applied 500 nM oligomeric α-Syn (containing ~1% oligomer and ~99% monomer) to primary neurons: uptake of α-Syn resulted in a direct excitation signal (total α-Syn) and a FRET signal (oligomer formation), which both increased in intensity over time, reflecting the continual uptake of α-Syn and subsequent aggregation inside cells (Fig. 1bi,bii).
The kinetics of aggregation are dependent on α-Syn concentration: application of a range of initial concentrations of 5–50 nM oligomeric α-Syn induced oligomerization in a time-dependent and concentration-dependent manner (Extended Data Fig. 1ci). To verify that the intracellular FRET signal is a biosensor of aggregate formation, we confirmed that the FRET signal co-localized with an ATTO425-labeled aptamer specific to β-sheet-rich aggregates (Extended Data Fig. 1di,diii)19 and with a conformation-specific antibody (Extended Data Fig. 1dii,diii)12.
Next, we tested whether the application of α-Syn monomers alone (in the absence of oligomers) resulted in self-assembly and oligomer formation. After an initial lag phase, the FRET signal intensity increased (Fig. 1ci,cii). Oligomerization of the monomer occurred in a time-dependent and concentration-dependent manner (Extended Data Fig. 1cii). Within 3 hours, 500 nM monomer induced a FRET signal (oligomer formation), whereas 50 nM induced a FRET signal by 48 hours. We treated cells with 500 nM A53T, A30P, E46K or wild-type (WT) α-Syn monomers and measured both the total α-Syn and oligomer formation at different timepoints. Total α-Syn uptake and the FRET signal increased for WT and all mutants, showing a time-dependent increase in aggregate formation (Fig. 1di,dii and Extended Data Fig. 2ai,aii). Of note, A53T showed the greatest increase in both direct excitation signal and intracellular FRET signal over time, indicating increased uptake and oligomerization compared to the other mutations (Fig. 1di,dii). Oligomerization is concentration dependent for A53T α-Syn (Extended Data Fig. 2b). The formation of aggregates was further confirmed using an α-Syn oligomer-specific ELISA (Extended Data Fig. 2c).
Structural conversion measured by FRET efficiency
smFRET measurements can identify the in vitro structural conversion from less toxic, loosely associated ‘Type-A’ oligomers into toxic, proteinase-K-resistant, β-sheet-rich ‘Type-B’ oligomers18. Taking advantage of the intracellular FRET signal detected here, we determined whether distinct FRET populations of oligomers could form within neurons by calculating the FRET efficiency (E) of the aggregates within the cells (Equation 1 and Methods).
FRET efficiency histograms were generated from the intracellular aggregates after a short 3-hour incubation with WT 500 nM α-Syn monomer. The histograms were globally fit to two Gaussian distributions and integrated to obtain the number of converted oligomers in each sample (Fig. 1ei–eiii). The FRET efficiency increased over time for WT α-Syn, showing that the protein can oligomerize and structurally convert inside cells. At early timepoints (3 hours and 3 days), only the population of low-FRET-efficiency (centered at E = 0.24) oligomers were present. After 3 days, a second population of higher-FRET-efficiency oligomers (centered at E = 0.48) appeared. Assembly from monomer to oligomer occurred rapidly with a short lag phase (<3 hours), whereas conversion to a high-FRET oligomer occurred over days. Short incubation with A53T, A30P and E46K mutants (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 2d) revealed a similar structural conversion in cells.
A53T shows accelerated oligomerization and reduced lag phase
To measure the FRET efficiencies of individual oligomers formed in cells, we used single-molecule confocal microscopy on cell lysates (Fig. 1gi)18. We detected both low-FRET-efficiency and high-FRET-efficiency oligomers with a range of different sizes as shown in the two-dimensional (2D) contour plots (Fig. 1gii). Fitting of the resultant FRET efficiency histograms (Extended Data Fig. 3a) allowed the small (dimeric), Type-A and Type-B oligomers to be quantified (Fig. 1giii; the fitting errors are shown in Extended Data Fig. 3b). To determine the systematic error in separating two different FRET populations using this approach, we analyzed mixtures of two different dual-labeled DNA duplexes that had different FRET efficiencies (see section in Methods and Extended Data Fig. 2ei,eii).
A53T-oligomer-treated cells (1% oligomer and 99% monomer) exhibited rapid assembly to form oligomeric species of increasing size over 24 hours. A53T-monomer-treated cells also exhibited rapid assembly into small oligomeric species at 0–30 minutes, which increased in size over 24 hours. Self-assembly and the early steps of aggregation were observed in A30P-treated cells, although less than A53T-treated cells (Fig. 1gii,giii and Extended Data Fig. 3a,b). We confirmed that the rapid assembly of oligomeric species is formed inside cells after intracellular uptake, as aggregate levels were negligible in the media and high in the cell lysates as measured by the fraction of coincident events (Extended Data Fig. 3ci,cii) and by ELISA (Extended Data Fig. 3di,dii).
We used total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to image the oligomers (Fig. 1hi and Extended Data Fig. 3e). As each α-Syn monomer carries a single dye molecule, there is a stepwise decrease in intensity as each one photobleaches upon irradiation. By counting the number of these photobleaching steps, the number of monomers per oligomer can be determined (Fig. 1hi,hii) in lysates after the addition of A53T or A30P monomer and oligomer. Histograms showing the number of monomers per oligomer were generated (Fig. 1hiii and Extended Data Fig. 3ei–eiii). These size distributions (Fig. 1hiii) correlated well with those measured using single-molecule confocal microscopy; approximately half of the population of oligomers contained two monomers, whereas the rest contained 4–10 monomers. Due to simultaneous photobleaching of multiple fluorophores, larger oligomers could not be distinguished using this method.
Structural conversion from Type-A to Type-B oligomers is associated with increased resistance to proteinase K degradation. We tested the effect of increasing concentrations of proteinase K on A53T aggregates in vitro and showed that the Type-A oligomers formed at early timepoints are sensitive to low concentrations of proteinase K, whereas the Type-B and larger oligomers are more resistant to proteinase K degradation, requiring higher concentrations (Extended Data Fig. 3fi,fii).
In addition to the added labeled α-Syn, cells also contain unlabeled, endogenous α-Syn. To test the effect of this on our FRET sensor, we aggregated 70 μM labeled (1:1 equimolar ratio of AF488 and AF594) α-Syn either in the absence or presence of 7 μM unlabeled WT α-Syn and characterized the aggregates using both single-molecule confocal and TIRF microscopy. Both the FRET and size distribution were unaffected by the presence of unlabeled α-Syn (Extended Data Fig. 4ai–4iii). We subsequently investigated whether different concentrations of endogenous (unlabeled) α-Syn would affect the FRET biosensor in human cells by applying AF488-labeled and AF594-labeled α-Syn to an isogenic series of iPSC lines with a range of SNCA alleles: SNCA null, SNCA 2 alleles and SNCA 4 alleles (Extended Data Fig. 4bi,bii). smFRET analysis of the size and FRET distribution of the labeled α-Syn aggregates in lysates, as well as the FRET in cell microscopy (Extended Data Fig. 4c,d), confirmed that there was a negligible effect of the endogenous α-Syn on the FRET signal.
Taken together, intracellular FRET, smFRET and TIRF microscopy can detect the initial stages of self-assembly, oligomer formation and structural conversion to proteinase-K-resistant Type-B oligomers inside cells. Aggregation inside cells is concentration and time dependent, and there is a reduced lag phase inside cells. Finally, there is an increased rate of oligomerization for A53T compared to WT and other mutants due, in part, to enhanced uptake and increased intracellular concentration of A53T.
Oligomer formation occurs in ‘hotspots’ at varied cell locations
To study the ultrastructural location of A53T oligomer formation in cells, we combined FRET imaging of labeled α-Syn with serial section electron microscopy (EM) and with focused ion beam milling combined with scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) at 5-nm voxel resolution in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)–derived neurons (Fig. 2a). We applied AF488-A53T α-Syn and AF594-A53T α-Syn monomer and oligomer to neurons, generated FRET signal heat intensity maps of aggregate formation (Fig. 2bi,bii and Extended Data Fig. 5a–c) and then tracked the same cells for EM.
Integrated spatial information was obtained by aligning using a nuclear marker only. At 3-hour and 24-hour incubation, FRET-FIB-SEM shows that oligomer formation occurs in a range of localizations in the cell that encompass nucleus, mitochondria and cytosol (Fig. 2c,d and Extended Data Fig. 5a). After 7 days, the FRET signal, combined with serial section EM, showed that the maturing aggregates (7 days; Fig. 2e) expand to occupy regions of the cell that encompass several different organelles as well as the cytoplasm in between organelles. Error maps using nucleus alignment confirm an overall error of 20–141 nm (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c)20. To improve confidence in the localization, we adopted organellar alignment of light and EM images using a genetically modified construct to visualize mitochondria (mitoGFP) and integrated the mito-GFP and AF-594 α-Syn fluorescence with the EM images. We show co-localization of α-Syn and mitoGFP fluorescence in mitochondria and degradative pathways for mitochondrial components—for example, autophagosome-like structures—using both FIB-SEM (Fig. 2f) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 2g). Error maps for mitochondria-aligned CLEM reveal the accuracy of 20–134 nm (Extended Data Fig. 6d,e).
Aggregation hotspots form in cellular spaces crowded with organelles and then mature in a stereotypical manner into an aggregate that contains highly ordered aggregates at the center and loosely ordered protein in the rim. Early aggregation of A53T occurs in multiple locations within the cell, which act as a ‘seed’ for aggregation, including nuclear membrane, mitochondria and vesicles. Multiple seeding events in human cells may contribute to the reduced lag phase of aggregation.
Cardiolipin accelerates the oligomerization of A53T
α-Syn was observed in the FRET-CLEM data in association with mitochondria. Cardiolipin (CL) constitutes 10–20% of the mitochondrial membrane21,22, and so we investigated the interaction between α-Syn and CL-containing 100-nm-sized lipid vesicles (Extended Data Fig. 7ai,aii). Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy showed that α-Syn first adopts an α-helical conformation in the presence of CL-containing vesicles, as previously reported (Fig. 3ai)23. This change depends on the CL content in the vesicles and the lipid:protein molar ratio. With higher CL content and a higher lipid:protein molar ratio, we detected an increase in the α-helical structure (Fig. 3ai). Over time, CD spectroscopy (40% CL liposomes; 8:1 lipid:protein ratio) revealed a transition from α-helix to a mixture of protein structures (Fig. 3aii). Centrifugation and CD analysis of the pellet showed significant β-sheet content, as evidenced by a minimum at 210–220 nm (ref. 24). These data confirm that α-Syn interacts with CL and forms secondary structures (α-helical) initially but, over time, can acquire β-sheet-rich content.
Next, we followed the formation of amyloid structure using the amyloid-binding dye thioflavin-T (ThT). A53T monomer exhibited rapid aggregation, with an absence of the lag phase observed as a sharp increase in the ThT fluorescence (Fig. 3bi,bii) in the presence of CL liposomes (40–100% CL, with phosphatidylcholine (PC), which alone does not induce aggregation (Extended Data Fig. 7b,c; 8:1 lipid:protein ratio)). A long and variable lag phase was observed in 40–100% CL and WT α-Syn (Fig. 3biii,biv). Single aggregate visualization by enhancement (SAVE) imaging with ThT (Fig. 3ci) showed that, in 15% or 40% CL (8:1 lipid:protein), aggregates formed over 10 days of incubation (Fig. 3cii,ciii). Forty percent CL led to the formation of large fibrillar aggregates after 10 days. Using biotinylated CL (100% CL, 8:1 lipid:protein ratio), we simultaneously visualized CL using Alexa Fluor 647 (AF647)–tagged streptavidin and aggregates using ThT, showing that amyloid fibrils contained CL, the percentage coincidence between ThT and CL using A53T monomer was 84% (95% confidence interval (CI), 73%, 106%), and using control (non-biotinylated lipid) it was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.3%, 3.5%) (Fig. 3di,dii). Our SAVE imaging data show that the interaction of A53T α-Syn and lipid vesicles results not only in extraction of CL but also in the incorporation of CL into the amyloid fibrils. We then studied the morphology of the fibrils formed in the presence of CL (8:1 lipid:protein ratio) by TEM and found that fibrils generated are markedly different from those formed in the absence of CL, showing helical periodicity along the length of fibrils and a greater number of protofilaments (Fig. 3ei,eii). Thus, CL vesicles may promote the lateral association of α-Syn protofilaments, which is consistent with the hierarchical self-assembly model of amyloid fibrils25.
Inside cells, we visualized endogenous CL using a fluorescent probe, nonyl acridine orange (NAO; Biotium, 70012), which co-localized with another mitochondrial indicator, tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) (Extended Data Fig. 7d). Control iPSC-derived neurons were treated with 1 uM AF488-A53T α-Syn or AF488-A30P α-Syn monomers for 48 hours. AF594 A53T α-Syn co-localizes with endogenous CL increasingly over time (Fig. 4a) and to a lesser degree than AF594 A30P a-Syn (Fig. 4b). We used super-resolution microscopy (aptamer DNA-PAINT to detect α-Syn aggregates and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM)26) to show the presence of aggregates at the mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 7e). To capture aggregate formation by both the externally applied α-Syn and the endogenous α-Syn, we used the dye amytracker, which binds specifically to β-sheet structures of amyloid aggregates. iPSC-derived neurons treated with WT oligomer exhibited increased aggregate formation (labeled with amytracker) in SNCA-A53T cells compared to isogenic control (iso-CTRL) and increased co-localization of those aggregates with CL (Extended Data Fig. 7fi–fiii).
Taken together, these data suggest that CL can rapidly trigger the aggregation of A53T, and CL is then incorporated into the aggregating structure of α-Syn, which may further accelerate the aggregation process.
A53T impairs mitochondrial bioenergetics and induces mitochondrial dysfunction
We investigated the functional consequence of A53T and WT α-Syn monomers applied exogenously to primary rodent neurons. Autofluorescence of complex I substrate NADH was used to measure cellular redox state and complex I function. We found that 500 nM A53T induced an increase in NADH fluorescence (119 ± 2.48%; Fig. 5ai and Extended Data Fig. 8ai), suggesting an inhibition of complex I function similar to the effect of oligomeric α-Syn27. A53T-induced complex I inhibition was associated with mitochondrial depolarization (120.4 ± 2.6%; Fig. 5bi and Extended Data Fig. 8aii), measured using rhodamine 123 fluorescence. NADH fluorescence could be partially restored by pre-incubation of cells with substrates for complex I (5 mM pyruvate) or complex II (membrane-permeable analog of succinate-dimethyl succinate (5 mM DMsuccinate)), showing that respiratory chain function could be rescued (108.9 ± 3.48% by pyruvate, 110 ± 0.5%; Fig. 5aii and Extended Data Fig. 8ai) and that improvements in the respiratory chain function also restore the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) (107 ± 0.88% by DMsuccinate; Fig. 5bii and Extended Data Fig. 8aii). A53T reduced Δψm, measured by TMRM, after 30 mininutes (76.1 ± 3.1%), whereas Δψm was unchanged in WT monomer-treated cells (108.25 ± 6.30%; Fig. 5c). We investigated the decreased Δψm by testing its sensitivity to complex I and V inhibition. In healthy mitochondria in WT-treated cells, Δψm is maintained predominantly through the action of complex I–dependent respiration (reduction by 59.8 ± 4.04% in Δψm after rotenone but only 0.43 ± 0.25% reduction by the complex V inhibitor oligomycin). However, A53T-treated cells exhibited only 22.4 ± 2.94% reduction of Δψm after complex I inhibition but 40.3 ± 6.85% reduction by complex V (Fig. 5di–diii). Therefore, in cells exposed to the A53T mutant, the Δψm cannot be maintained sufficiently through respiration and must use complex V (in reverse mode as an ATPase) to maintain it. A53T-treated cells exhibited significantly reduced ATP production than WT-treated cells (Fig. 5eiii and Extended Data Fig. 8b).
We found that 500 nM A53T increased the rate of superoxide production in contrast to WT (Fig. 5fi,fii). The generation of cytosolic ROS was dependent on the concentration of applied monomer (Extended Data Fig. 8c). We investigated the source of the A53T-induced ROS using a range of inhibitors: mito-TEMPO or mitoQ (mitochondria-targeted antioxidants); Trolox (a water-soluble analog of vitamin E); and diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI) or 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzolsulfonylfluorid-hydrochloride (AEBSF) (inhibitors of NADPH oxidase (NOX)). Mitochondrial ROS (mROS) scavengers effectively blocked A53T-induced ROS, suggesting that mROS may be a major source of excess ROS (Fig. 5fiii), with additional activation of NADPH oxidase. A53T monomer induced higher levels of mROS (176.6 ± 9.3% of basal) compared to WT (113.8 ± 4.4% of basal) (Fig. 5gi–giii). Time-lapse imaging of mitochondria within cells reveals the kinetics of uptake and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by A53T monomer application (Extended Data Fig. 8di,dii).
A53T α-Syn induces mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening
We previously showed that early opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) mediates α-Syn oligomer-induced cell toxicity12. To test whether A53T α-Syn affects mPTP opening, cells were loaded with TMRM and the cytosolic calcium dye Fluo-4, followed by stepwise application of ferutinin, an inducer of mPTP opening by mitochondrial calcium overload28 (reviewed in ref. 29). A53T α-Syn lowered the threshold of mPTP opening (Fig. 6aiv). The latency to mPTP opening (rapid loss of TMRM fluorescence) after a high concentration of ferutinin was also reduced (Fig. 6bii–biv), and we observed that caspase 3–dependent apoptosis was induced in all cells that exhibited mPTP opening.
We measured mPTP opening in isolated mitochondria of permeabilized cells. Cells were loaded with Rhod-5N and permeabilized with 40 µM digitonin in pseudo-intracellular solution30. Application of A53T monomers induced a rapid loss of Rhod-5N as the PTP opened and the dye left the mitochondria (ROI 1; Fig. 6ci,cii), resulting in increased Rhod-5N fluorescence in the cytoplasm (extra-mitochondrial region, ROI 2; Fig. 6ci,ciii). The number of mitochondria that exhibited mPTP opening within 15 minutes was higher in the A53T-treated mitochondria compared to WT (Fig. 6civ), in line with the results from the whole cell model.
mPTP opening requires the structural conformation of α-Syn to a β-sheet-rich oligomer12. Therefore, A53T monomers, in contact with mitochondrial membrane, rapidly form oligomeric species that are able to open the mPTP and induce apoptosis and cell toxicity.
A53T-induced mROS accelerates oligomerization and cell death
A53T α-Syn generates mROS, and we investigated whether mROS alters aggregation. Oligomer formation (FRET signal) was measured after co-treating with Trolox or mito-TEMPO, a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant. As seen in Fig. 6di–div, the application of 100 μM Trolox reduced uptake of the A53T monomer into cells (Fig. 6div), reducing intracellular FRET intensity (Fig. 6dii), but with no effect on structural conversion (FRET efficiency)(Fig. 6diii). In contrast, the mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant mito-TEMPO resulted in a significant reduction in both FRET intensity (Fig. 6dii) and efficiency (Fig. 6diii) with preservation of the donor intensity (that is, preservation of uptake into cells but reduced oligomerization). Thus, generation of mROS is a key factor in the intracellular oligomerization of the A53T α-Syn, and scavenging mROS modulates the formation of aggregates. A53T monomer treatment caused increased cell death (Fig. 6ei,eii) after 48 hours, and A53T-induced cell death was effectively inhibited by mito-TEMPO (Fig. 6fi,fii).
These results suggest that impaired respiration and generation of mROS act synergistically with CL to drive the intracellular oligomerization of the A53T monomer and contribute to neuronal death.
Cellular phenotypes in SNCA-A53T hiPSC-derived neurons
SNCA-A53T mutation results in early-onset disease with synucleinopathy in cortical and midbrain structures. We generated cortical neurons from hiPSCs from two patients carrying the A53T mutation (SNCA-A53T), an iso-CTRL and two healthy volunteers (CTRL), characterized in Extended Data Figs. 9 and 10. To measure endogenous oligomer formation in these lines, cell lysates were applied to an ultra-sensitive assay (single vesicle-based membrane permeabilization assay) that measures the ability of an aggregate to permeabilize membranes and induce calcium influx. The SNCA-A53T iPSC-derived neurons accumulate (Fig. 7bi) and secrete higher numbers of endogenous oligomeric species (Fig. 7bii), with permeabilizing capability, compared to control neurons. Endogenous aggregates are higher in cell lysates from SNCA-A53T compared to iso-CTRL using aptamer DNA PAINT13(Extended Data Fig. 10bi,bii).
We evaluated seeding and oligomerization in the SNCA-A53T neurons by measuring the FRET signal after adding AF488-A53T α-Syn and AF594-A53T α-Syn monomer to neurons. SNCA-A53T neurons showed both higher intracellular FRET signal (Fig. 7ci,cii) and total α-Syn uptake (Fig. 7ciii) compared to control cells, showing that the endogenous background of A53T α-Syn results in more rapid uptake and oligomerization of externally applied A53T α-Syn. SNCA-A53T neurons exhibit abnormal mitochondrial function, similarly to that observed upon a direct application of the A53T α-Syn: a reduction in Δψm (Fig. 7di,dii), higher production of mROS (Fig. 7ei,eii), complex I inhibition (Fig. 7fi–fiii and Extended Data Fig. 10e) and early PTP opening (Fig. 7gi–giv and Extended Data Fig. 10f). Lastly, the A53T neurons exhibited increased basal cell death that was prevented with 0.1 µM mito-TEMPO (Fig. 7hi,hii).
Cortical neurons derived from SNCA A53T patients with PD display higher levels of oligomer formation, associated with bioenergetic defects and oxidative stress. This results in accelerated seeding, oligomerization, PTP opening and cell death.
Discussion
Precise characterization of the dynamic process of protein aggregation within human cells is a major challenge, leaving the mechanisms that trigger the initial stages of self-assembly and early aggregation in disease largely unknown. Our study integrated high-resolution biophysical approaches with hiPSC biology to comprehensively characterize the spatial and temporal features of protein aggregation in the intracellular environment. The A53T mutation drives the formation of the oligomeric structure, and, because the kinetics are accelerated compared to WT, this provided a tractable system to study the mechanism of structural conversion from monomers to oligomers and their toxic consequences (Fig. 8). Here we show that seeding on the membranes is the major driver in human neurons. Webelieve that the importance of this work lies in trying to understand how seeding occurs at the start of the disease process (before fibril formation).
The kinetics of α-Syn aggregation has emerged largely from in vitro experiments10,16,17,31. Aggregation commences with a lag phase due to the difficulty of monomers assembling to form oligomers alone (primary nucleation), followed by a rapid growth phase in which conversion is accelerated due to the relative ease of adding monomers to existing seeds, or oligomers, to form protofilaments and fibrils (elongation). Single-molecule fluorescence methods, including single-molecule confocal measurements of FRET efficiencies, have been used to precisely determine the structure of protein assemblies in in vitro systems. Type-A oligomers have low FRET efficiency, whereas β-sheet-structured, compact, Type-B oligomers have close stacking of fluorophores and high FRET efficiencies. In its original implementation, Cremades et al.10 showed that the Type-B oligomers (displaying a high FRET efficiency) were more resistant to proteinase K digestion and were also more cytotoxic than the Type-A (low FRET efficiency) oligomers. In a follow-up paper, Chen et al.32 were able to purify subtypes of oligomers, which they characterized using an array of biophysical techniques, including atomic force microscopy (AFM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), cryo-EM and CD spectroscopy, and also showed that the FRET efficiency readout was able to discriminate between the subtypes of oligomers.
Traditionally, kinetic models of aggregation do not consider the complexity of the cellular environment, with the presence of cellular organelles, lipid surfaces, altered pH and protein degradation systems15,33. In this study, we applied both in-cell FRET and smFRET to directly detect and characterize the kinetics of formation, interconversion and accumulation of oligomers from the monomeric state in the native human cellular environment. smFRET was able to provide estimations of the size (deduced from fluorescence intensities) and structural group (deduced from FRET efficiencies) for each individual oligomeric species detected10,34. Inside human neurons, the monomeric population begins to rapidly self-assemble. We observed two distinct populations - amorphous oligomers, termed Type-A oligomers (characterized by low FRET efficiency), which were loosely packed and the first to form. These progressed to form Type-B oligomers (characterized by higher FRET efficiency), which were more compact and had a higher-order β-sheet structure over days. The kinetics of self-assembly and oligomer formation were dependent on the initial concentration of monomer, the time inside the cells and the sequence of the protein, in keeping with the known critical factors that affect aggregation in vitro.
The A53T mutation alters the kinetics of intracellular aggregation, with abolition of the lag phase, resulting in immediate self-assembly into small oligomers and rapid accumulation of more Type-B oligomers, in line with data2,17. The kinetic profile of aggregation in cells is likely due to the abundant protein–lipid interactions inside the cell. α-Syn is disordered in solution but can adopt an α-helical conformation upon binding to lipid membranes. The interaction of α-Syn with lipids at membrane surfaces can trigger the conversion of α-Syn from its soluble state into an aggregated state, enhance the rate of nucleation and significantly reduce the lag phase35. Lipid-induced generation of fibrils is highly sensitive to the specific sequence of the protein, particularly the region encompassing the residues 46–51, and the rate of lipid-induced aggregation is significantly higher in A53T compared to WT protein36. Our data suggest that human neurons, rich in multiple membrane surfaces and organelle interfaces, trigger the aggregation of A53T by stimulating primary nucleation and that the lipid–protein interaction is heavily dependent on the sequence of the protein, with A53T enhancing the lipid interaction.
CLEM is an integrated approach that closes the spatial and temporal resolution gap between light microscopy observations and EM, by enabling the overlay of fluorescence and electron microscopy images from the same cell. This allowed us to complement dynamic information from live cell imaging with high‐resolution ultrastructural information, providing unique data on the location of a fluorescently labeled molecule within the ultrastructural context of a cell37. We observed, first, a stereotypical evolution of an aggregate forming with a dense central core of high FRET intensity, surrounded by a rim of lower FRET intensity, throughout the neuronal soma and processes. Second, we observed that aggregation was heterogeneous in location, occurring in multiple hotspots throughout the cell body but often in crowded cellular environments rich in organelles, including membrane surfaces from the nucleus, plasma membrane, Golgi and mitochondria. We then performed 3D CLEM using a mitochondrial marker to align the mitochondria in fluorescence and electron microscopy. This overlay revealed clear localization of the donor A53T a-Syn monomer to the mitochondria. The increase in aggregation kinetics of α-Syn inside the cell was related to multi-focal seeding events occurring at different membrane surfaces, accelerating primary and secondary nucleation processes. Thus, multiple seeding events throughout the human neuron may occur, involving key organelles such as the mitochondria.
Mitochondrial dysfunction and synucleinopathy interact in the pathogenesis of PD38,39. α-Syn has been shown to selectively bind to mitochondrial membranes12,40–42 and may play a physiological role in mitochondrial function, mediating maintenance of mitochondrial fission, complex I activity and calcium signaling (reviewed in refs. 43,44). In in vivo models, overexpression of human α-Syn A53T, specifically in dopaminergic neurons, led to the formation of mitochondrial inclusions, which preceded neuronal loss45. Mitochondrial membranes are made up of a range of different phospholipids, although CLs are specific phospholipids of the mitochondria, comprising about 20% of the inner mitochondrial membrane phospholipids mass, where it maintains the structural and functional integrity of proteins involved in the mitochondrial function46. Previous work has provided key observations, namely that (1) in vitro, α-Syn directly binds47 CL and fragments CL-containing artificial membranes; and (2) SNCA-mutant neurons display fragmented mitochondria, and CL translocation to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) in A53T SNCA-mutant neurons binds mutant α-Syn and facilitates the folding of α-Syn to an α-helix23.
Here, we reveal two key mechanisms by which mitochondria seeds the aggregation of α-Syn. We show that (1) A53T α-Syn binds CL inside and outside cells; (2) CL is a potent trigger for the rapid aggregation of A53T α-Syn to form fibrils, without a lag phase in vitro; and (3) during CL-induced aggregation, the CL is sequestered within the protein aggregate as it forms, and this lipid–protein co-assembly could act as a reactant for further surface-induced elongation. Previous studies using nuclear magnetic resonance and cryo-EM highlight how lipids co-assemble with α-Syn molecules, implying strong lipid–protein interactions48. These findings contribute to the growing understanding of the biogenesis of an LB. LBs have been shown to have complex compositions and organizations: they contain fibrillar α-Syn as well as non-proteinaceous material (lipids) and membranous organelles49. Previous work50 adopting CLEM imaging of inclusions generated by seeding with pre-formed fibrils shows enrichment of lipids that are specific for mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus membranes. Our work suggests that, in the absence of fibrillar seeds, the lipid membranes within the cell act as the seed for aggregation, and, critically, this can be achieved by several membrane surfaces, including CL in mitochondria. Self-assembly and primary nucleation starts at a (CL-containing) membrane surface and sequesters the lipid within it as the aggregate grows into a mature structure.
In addition to providing the lipid seed for aggregation, mitochondria are a critical source of ROS. A53T α-Syn inhibits complex I–dependent respiration, impairs ATP production and depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane, leading to an increase in generation of ROS. The oxidative environment, in turn, promotes further oligomerization of A53T monomers in neurons. Inhibition of mROS formation can suppress A53T oligomerization and abolish A53T-induced toxicity. Therefore, inside cells, the effect of mROS is bi-directional and self-amplifying: mROS promotes oligomerization of α-Syn, and oligomer formation impairs complex I function and induces further mROS generation, driving the aggregation reaction.
The final common pathway of A53T within the mitochondria is the altered permeability of the OMM. We previously reported that WT α-Syn oligomers of the Type-B structure are located at the mitochondrial membrane and can generate the production of free radicals, which induce local oxidation events in mitochondrial lipids, resulting in mitochondrial lipid and protein peroxidation; together, these events lead to mitochondrial membrane permeabilization12. In this study, we show that the application of A53T monomers to isolated mitochondria or whole cells induces rapid permeability transition of the mitochondrial membrane, similarly to the effect of the WT α-Syn Type-B oligomer. These data, taken together with the CL-induced aggregation, raise the hypothesis that A53T contacts CL, triggering oligomer formation and conversion to Type-B oligomers. This results in oligomer-induced impaired respiratory chain function and reduced ATP production, oligomer-induced mROS production and oligomer-induced mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Together, these effects predispose mitochondria to the early opening of the PTP and activation of caspase 3–dependent apoptosis.
hiPSC-derived neurons bearing SNCA-A53T mutation model the effect of the aggregation of endogenous α-Syn in disease51–53. In agreement with our findings that A53T α-Syn exhibits increased oligomerization, we identified higher levels of oligomers in the SNCA-A53T neurons. Increased aggregation in SNCA-A53T was associated with impaired respiration, depolarized mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidative stress. The A53T cellular environment, with intracellular aggregates and oxidative stress together, resulted in accelerated oligomerization of exogenously added α-Syn. Finally, the presence of A53T oligomers was sufficient to induce early opening of the mPTP and result in cell death. Removal of one of the major drivers of mPTP and oligomerization, mROS, was able to prevent the cellular pathology in the SNCA-A53T model, thereby supporting our hypothesis that the mitochondria is a key mediator of α-Syn pathology.
Methods
Human recombinant α-Syn
Aggregation of human recombinant α-Syn
Monomeric WT and mutant (A53T, A30P and E46K) α-Syn was purified from Escherichia coli, as previously described in ref. 55. Monomeric WT and mutant (A53T, A30P and E46K) α-Syn was labeled with either maleimide-modified AF488 or AF594 dyes (Invitrogen) via the cysteine thiol moiety, as previously reported56. The effect of the tag on the aggregation kinetics, and the kinetics of mutant-labeled α-Syn, have been described previously10. The protocol for generating α-Syn oligomers is similar to that described previously18. In brief, a 70 μM solution made up of equimolar concentrations of AF488-labeled and AF594-labeled α-Syn was prepared in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 100 mM NaCl. The buffer was freshly prepared before each experiment and passed through a 0.02-μm syringe filter (Anotop, Whatman) to remove insoluble contaminants. The aggregation mixture was incubated at 37 °C with orbital shaking at 200 r.p.m., and timepoints were taken at 0 hours, 24 hours and 7 days.
Cell culture
Primary rat cortical co-culture is described in the Supplementary Methods. hiPSCs were derived from donors who had given signed informed consent for the derivation of hiPSC lines from skin biopsies as part of the European Union Innovative Medicines Initiative–funded program StemBANCC and reprogrammed. Controls 1 and 2 were derived by StemBANCC from an unaffected volunteer, and control 3 was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. hiPSCs were generated from familial patients with PD carrying a point mutation in SNCA (A53T point mutation). The presence of mutations was confirmed by a Sanger sequence (GENEWIZ). The iso-CTRL line of SNCA A53T was generated using CRISPR–Cas9 editing by Applied StemCell (project ID: C1729). Neural induction and differentiation were performed using a modified, published protocol57.
Immunohistochemistry
Standard immunocytochemistry was performed for the antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 5. For aptamer staining, see the Supplementary Methods.
Live cell imaging
Live cell imaging was performed using an epi-fluorescence inverted microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Retiga, QImaging) or confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710 or 880 with an integrated META detection system).
Superoxide production: Cells were washed and loaded with 2 uM dihydroethidium (HEt, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the recording buffer. The ratio of the fluorescence intensity, resulting from its oxidized/reduced forms, was quantified, and the rate of ROS production was determined by dividing the gradient of the HEt ratio after application of recombinant α-Syn against the basal gradient. mROS was assessed using MitoTracker Red CM-H2XRos dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific)—a reduced non-fluorescent version of MitoTracker Red that is fluorescent upon oxidation within mitochondria, which accumulates in mitochondria upon oxidation. The rate of increase in red fluorescence for each cell was analyzed as the production of mROS. Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm): Cells were loaded with 25 nM TMRM (Thermo Fisher Scientific), a lipophilic cationic dye that accumulates within mitochondria in inverse proportion to Δψm according to the Nernst equation, in the recording buffer for 40 minjtes at room temperature. [Ca2+]c imaging was performed using Fura-2 AM, which is a ratiometric dye with a high affinity for Ca2+, or the Fluo-4 AM calcium indicator. NADH autofluorescence was measured as described in refs. 58,59 using an epi-fluorescence inverted microscope with excitation at a wavelength of 360 nm within 455-nm emission. The total NADH pool was calculated by subtracting the minimal autofluorescence (by 1 μM FCCP) from the maximal signal (by 1 mM NaCN). The NADH redox state was expressed as the ratio between the maximal and minimal reduction. ATP was measured by transfecting cells with the mitochondrial-targeted ATP indicator AT1.03 (ref. 60), allowing visualization of the dynamics of ATP. The ratio between yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) and cyan fluorescence protein (CFP) was measured after the application of each monomer sample. mPTP opening: Cells were loaded with 25 nM TMRM and either 5 μM NucView 488 (Biotium) or 5 μM Fluo-4 AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The threshold of mPTP opening was measured as the timepoint at which rapid loss of TMRM fluorescence occurred after applying ferutinin or α-Syn samples. Cell death assay: Cell death was detected using propidium iodide (PI, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or SYTOX Green (SYTOX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to count the total number of cells. Detection of aggregates: Aggregates were detected using a fluorescent amyloidogenic marker, Amytracker 540 (Ebba Biotech). Visualization of CL in cells: CL inside cells was detected using 10-N-NAO, a fluorescent reporter of CL (Biotium61).
Intracellular FRET measurement: AF488-labeled and AF594-labeled α-Syn was applied to cells cultured in 8-ibidi chambers (cat. no. IB-80826). After a range of incubation times, cells were washed twice and replaced with HBSS. Controls including either AF488-only or AF594-only labeled treated cells were also measured under the same conditions. As a measure of total α-Syn, the AF594-labeled α-Syn was directly excited, and its intensity was measured (the AF488 was not used for this, because its intensity is also affected by the FRET process). As a measure of aggregated species, AF488 was excited by 488-nm irradiation, and emission was detected from AF594 (584–660 nm).
Intracellular FRET efficiency was calculated using a custom-written script in Igor Pro (WaveMetrics). In brief, after subtraction of the autofluorescence, the images were thresholded using the directly excited AF594 channel. The FRET efficiency for each voxel containing AF594 intensity was then calculated according to Equations 1–3 (refs. 18,62).
1 |
where ID and IA are the modified intensities in the donor and acceptor channels with donor excitation only:
2 |
3 |
where D and A are the intensities from the donor and acceptor channels with donor excitation only, respectively; AD and AA are the instrument-specific autofluorescence in the donor and acceptor channels, measured in the absence of fluorophores; and C is the instrument-specific cross-talk from the donor to acceptor channel. The cross-talk from acceptor to donor channel is negligible.
To determine structural conversion (Fig. 1f), the FRET efficiencies from each timepoint and each α-Syn variant (WT, A53T, A30P and E46K) were binned into histograms (bin width = 0.05) and were globally fit to two Gaussian distributions (Igor Pro, WaveMetrics) (shared x-center and x-width). These were then integrated, and the fraction converted was defined as the area under the higher FRET efficiency peak divided by the total area. To determine the effect of the fitting error on the overall calculation of the populations, the errors were propagated for one dataset and are represented in Extended Data Figs. 2d and 3a.
To analyze the effects of different treatments on α-Syn oligomerization, we presented the mean intracellular FRET efficiency for each cell (Fig. 6diii). To estimate the CIs, we bootstrapped the single-cell data (using scipy.stats.bootstrap (version 1.7.3) in Python 3.9 using 9,999 resamples).
Single-molecule confocal microscopy
Cells were treated with AF488-labeled and AF594-labeled monomers and incubated for various timepoints. Then, the lysates were collected using a lysis buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X and 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0)) and analyzed using single-molecule confocal microscopy18. The samples were first diluted to concentrations ~50 pM before being loaded into a 200-μl gel-loading tip (Life Technologies) attached to the inlet port of a microfluidic channel (25 μm in height, 100 μm in width and 1 cm in length) mounted onto the single-molecule confocal microscope. The confocal volume was focused 10 μm into the center of the channel, and the solution was passed through the channel at an average velocity of 2 cm s−1 by applying a negative pressure, which was generated using a syringe pump attached to the outlet port via Fine Bore Polyethylene Tubing (0.38 mm inner diameter, 1.09 mm outer diameter; Smiths Medical). After the appearance of single-molecule bursts corresponding to labeled α-Syn passing through the confocal volume, the sample was measured for 600 seconds.
The confocal microscope is similar to those used previously18 (Supplementary Methods). The data were analyzed using custom-written scripts written in Igor Pro (WaveMetrics). Coincident events were those that had at least 10 photon counts bin−1 in each channel. After accounting for autofluorescence and cross-talk (Equations 1–3), the FRET efficiency (Equation 1) and approximate size of each oligomer (Equation 4) were calculated from the intensities in each channel:
4 |
where γ is the experimentally determined gamma factor, corresponding to the relative detection efficiencies of the two dyes by the instrumentation and their quantum yields, and Imonomer is the average monomer brightness, calculated from the average of the non-coincident donor channel bursts intensities. As described in ref. 10, the size was estimated using the total fluorescence intensity and equated to the number of AF488 fluorophores present (because this is the only fluorophore directly excited). The term ‘apparent size’ is used because it is not possible to accurately determine sizes with high accuracy using single-molecule confocal microscopy (due to the stochastic nature of excitation and emission and the varied paths that the molecules can take through the excitation volume).
Oligomers were divided into three groups depending on their approximate size, as previously published17,18. The smallest oligomers we detect correspond to apparent dimers, and the remaining oligomers are classified as medium in size (up to 20 monomer units per oligomer). The division into Type-A and Type-B oligomers was made by globally fitting the medium-sized oligomer FRET efficiency histograms (shared x-center and x-width for all timepoints and treatments) to two Gaussian distributions (Type-A has a lower FRET efficiency than Type-B). The global fitting ensures that the same populations are identified from each dataset. To determine the effect of the fitting error on the overall calculation of the populations, the errors were propagated for one dataset and are represented in Extended Data Figs. 2d and 3a.
The fraction of coincidence was calculated by dividing the number of coincident events by the total number of events having counts above 10 photons bin−1 in the AF488 channel. For comparison, for a dual-labeled DNA sample in which ~100% of the molecules should be able to undergo FRET, the coincidence is ~0.10 under these experimental conditions62.
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy: labeled α-Syn imaging
The dual-labeled α-Syn samples were diluted to nanomolar concentrations to facilitate single-molecule imaging63. Samples were then added to a cover slide on the inside of the chamber and incubated for at least 30 minutes before being washed with 20-nm filtered buffer (20 mM Tris and 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.1). Imaging was performed using a home-built, bespoke single-molecule TIRF microscope, as described previously64,65. Fluorophore-labeled samples were illuminated with a 488-nm laser (∼50 W cm–2), and the intensity of the emission from AF488 was measured over a time period of 10 seconds and recorded as a TIFF stack. Only those species that also had intensity resulting from AF594 due to FRET were analyzed. All image processing was performed using ImageJ.
Single-molecule localization microscopy in cells
iPSC-derived cortical neurons were grown on glass-coated ibidi chambers, fixed and permeabilized, followed by non-specific blocking for 2 hours at room temperature. The samples were then incubated with 100 nM of the aptamer, and neurons were washed and incubated with a primary Tomm20 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-17764). Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) was performed on a Nanoimager super-resolution microscope (Oxford Nanoimaging) equipped with an Olympus 1.4 NA ×100 oil immersion super apochromatic objective. SMLM performed on the Nanoimager was partly analyzed using the Oxford Nanoimaging–developed online software, CODI.
CLEM
Cells were plated and grown in 35-mm gridded glass-bottom dishes (P35G-1.5-14-CGRD, MatTek). Cells were fixed and then washed in 0.1 M PB, and confocal images using Zeiss LSM 880 (×63/1.4 oil DIC UV-VIS-IR M27 objective) were acquired from the area of interest (LD LCI Plan-Apochromat ×25/0.8 Imm Korr DIC M27 objective for tiling scan). Samples were then post-fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 30 minutes and stained in 1% reduced osmium (1% osmium/1.5% potassium ferricyanide) at 4 °C for 1 hour, followed by 1% tannic acid for 45 minutes at room temperature, before quenching in 1% sodium sulfate at room temperature for 5 minutes and washing in double-distilled water (3 ×5 minutes). The glass coverslip was dehydrated, embedded in Durcupan (44610-1EA, Sigma-Aldrich) and polymerized at 65 °C for 48 hours. The glass coverslip was removed from the resin by submerging in liquid nitrogen, and the cells of interest were relocated using the alphanumeric grid imprinted on the surface of the resin block. The block was trimmed to the cell of interest and serial sectioned at a thickness of 70 nm using a UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) and a diamond knife (Diatome) and collected onto 2 ×1-mm copper slot grids with a formvar support film (G089, TAAB Laboratories Equipment). Sections were post-stained using Reynold’s lead citrate and 1% uranyl acetate. Serial images of the cell were then acquired using a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai Spirit BioTwin, Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 120 keV.
Correlative light and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy
Cells were cultured, fixed and imaged using confocal microscopy as described above. For post-fixation and staining, a modified version of the National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research method was used66. Cells were post-fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 30 minutes and stained in 1% reduced osmium (1% osmium/1.5% potassium ferricyanide) at 4 °C for 1 hour. Cells were then treated with 1% thiocarbohydrazide (TCH) for 20 minutes at room temperature, followed by 2% osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4 °C in 1% uranyl acetate. The next day, cells were stained en bloc with lead aspartate (pH 5.5) at 60 °C for 30 minutes. The glass coverslip was then removed from the MatTek dish and underwent graded dehydration in ethanol (25%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100%, 5 minutes per step), followed by embedding in Durcupan and polymerization at 65 °C for 48 hours. The coverslips were subsequently removed from the resin block using liquid nitrogen, and the cells were relocated using grid coordinates. Areas of 3 × 3 grid squares in size with the cell of interest located at the center were then trimmed out using a razor blade, removed from the resin block67 and mounted on a 12.7-mm SEM pin stub (10-002012-100, Labtech) using silver paint (AGG3691, Agar Scientific). After mounting, each sample was sputter coated with a 10-nm layer of platinum (Q150S, Quorum Technologies). Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB SEM) was carried out using a Crossbeam 540 FIB SEM with Atlas 5 for 3D tomography acquisition (Zeiss).
Dynamic light scattering
Liposomes were prepared (Supplementary Methods), and the size distribution of lipid vesicles was determined by an ALV/CGS-3 platform-based goniometer system (ALV). This instrument was equipped with a 22-mW HeNe laser with a wavelength of 633 nm, and backscattered light was detected at an angle of 90° at room temperature. Lipid vesicle stock solutions were diluted to 150 µM in a filtered 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), transferred into a glass test tube and placed in the measurement cell. Three measurements were performed for the sample for 30 seconds at room temperature, and average values were used for analyzing the data.
Aggregation assay
ThT fluorescence time course measurements were performed in 96-well microliter plates using FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech) with excitation and emission wavelengths set to 450 nm and 485 nm. Then, 50 µM protein samples were incubated in the presence and absence of lipid vesicles (400 µM) with 20 µM ThT in 25 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4). Each sample well contained 100 µl of the reaction mixture, and spontaneous aggregation was induced by incubation at 37 °C without shaking. A minimum of three trials were performed to ensure its reproducibility.
CD spectroscopy
A Jasco J-810 spectrometer was used for CD measurements. Samples containing 10 µM WT α-Syn alone and in the presence of CL (80 µM and 160 µM) were prepared in a 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and measured immediately after mixing. Experiments were performed at 25 °C using a quartz glass cell with 1-mm path length. The samples were recorded from 190 nm to 260 nm wavelength with a total of three scans for each sample.
TEM
Selected fibril samples from 96-well plates were diluted to 3 µM in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). An aliquot (7 μl) of diluted sample was placed onto carbon support film 300 mesh, 3-mm copper grids (TAAB Laboratories Equipment), and allowed for 3 minutes and blot dried. The TEM grids were subsequently stained using 7 μl of 1% uranyl acetate for 3 minutes, followed by blot drying. Samples were imaged on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Tecnai F20 electron microscope (200 kV, field emission gun) equipped with an 8k × 8k CMOS camera (TVIPS F816).
TIRF microscopy: CL imaging
Biotinylated liposomes were prepared as described previously62. Imaging was performed in a home-built total internal reflection microscope, as described previously68. Amyloid fibrils prepared in the presence of biotin-conjugated CL were incubated with 1 nM AF647-streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 5 mM ThT (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Images were recorded for 50 frames from the red channel (AF647 emission) with 641-nm illumination, followed by the green channel (ThT emission) with 488-nm illumination. The images generated from AF647-streptavidin and SAVE imaging with ThT were analyzed using ImageJ and a custom-written script in Igor Pro (WaveMetrics). The percentage coincidence was determined from the number of coincident aggregates and the total number of aggregates detected. The mean and standard deviations were calculated across the image sets.
Statistical analysis
Origin 2020 (MicroCal, https://www.originlab.com/2020; RRID: SCR_014212) software was employed for the statistical analysis and exponential curve fitting. An assessment of the normality of data was performed using Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality tests. Statistical tests were performed using unpaired two-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA corrected with Tukey’s honest significant difference post hoc test. Experimental data are shown as data points ± s.e.m. or s.d., and P value was set at 0.05. Sample sizes for experiments were selected to capture technical variation, including numbers of cell/field of view and coverslips, and biological variation, including numbers of the animal batch for primary co-culture and independent inductions and clones or patient lines for hiPSC-derived neurons. Sample sizes were not predetermined but are similar to those reported in previous publications12,69,70. F-statistics were used to estimate variance within each group. Data collection was randomized, and the collection and analysis were performed blinded to the conditions of the experiments. No data points were excluded from the analyses. For live imaging experiments in human neurons, application of standard controls was used to determine the dynamic range of the signal measured (the maximum and minimum signal). The data are normalized to the maximum and minimum, and the same experimental conditions were used to compare two states—that is, control versus A53T mutant. In the absence of a known standard in these experiments, comparisons across different conditions and cell lines are relative only to each other within this experimental paradigm.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41593-022-01140-3.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Wellcome/Medical Research Council (MRC) Parkinson’s Disease Consortium grant (WT089698) and the National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. S.G. was supported by Wellcome (100172/Z/12/2) and is an MRC Senior Clinical Fellow (MR/T008199/1). This work was supported by Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s (grant no: ASAP-000509), the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. A.B., E.F. and A.V. were supported by a grant of the Russian Federation Government (grant no. 075-15-2019-1877). This work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (CC0102, CC0199), the UK Medical Research Council (CC0102, CC0199), and the Wellcome Trust (CC0102, CC0199). The single-molecule instruments used in this study were supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute, UCB Biopharmaceuticals, Alzheimer’s Research UK (ARUK-EG2018B-004) and a kind donation from Dr. Jim Love. M.H. and A.C. were supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the MRC through the Centre for Doctoral Training in Optical Medical Imaging (grant no. EP/L016559/1), the Rosetrees Trust and the Scottish Funding Council (H14052/SIRL ID: 691). K.J. is funded via the BBSRCEastBIO doctoral training programme (BB/M010996/1). T.K. was supported by a Parkinson’s UK Senior Fellowship.
Extended data
Source data
Author contributions
M.L.C. and S.G. conceived the study; S.G., M.H.H., L.C. and A.Y.A were responsible for the methods used. M.L.C., A.C., B.P.S., C.M., A.V.B., S.D., C.J.P., D.A., G.S.V., W.Z., J.R.E., A.I.W., Z.S.Z. and A.Y.V. performed experiments for this study; M.R., E.I.F., P.R.A., N.E., K.M., K.J., L.T., D.L., P.G., D.C., D.K. and T.K. provided resources needed for experiments; A.C. and B.P.S. equally contributed as a second author; M.L.C. wrote an original draft of the manuscript; S.G., D.A., A.Y.A and M.H.H. reviewed and edited the manuscript; and S.G acquired funding for this study. All authors commented on the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Neuroscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
Imaging and tabular datasets used in this study are available and have been deposited in Zenodo (locations are listed in Supplementary Table 4). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Code used in this study has been deposited in relevant repositories (Supplementary Table 4).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Andrey Y. Abramov, Mathew H. Horrocks, Sonia Gandhi.
Change history
10/19/2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41593-022-01206-2
Contributor Information
Andrey Y. Abramov, Email: a.abramov@ucl.ac.uk
Mathew H. Horrocks, Email: mathew.horrocks@ed.ac.uk
Sonia Gandhi, Email: sonia.gandhi@ucl.ac.uk.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41593-022-01140-3.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41593-022-01140-3.
References
- 1.Chartier-Harlin MC, et al. α-synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2004;364:1167–1169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17103-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Conway KA, et al. Acceleration of oligomerization, not fibrillization, is a shared property of both α-synuclein mutations linked to early-onset Parkinson’s disease: implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:571–576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eliezer D, et al. Conformational properties of α-synuclein in its free and lipid-associated states. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;307:1061–1073. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spillantini MG, et al. α-Synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature. 1997;388:839–840. doi: 10.1038/42166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weinreb PH, et al. NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry. 1996;35:13709–13715. doi: 10.1021/bi961799n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lesage S, et al. G51D α-synuclein mutation causes a novel Parkinsonian–pyramidal syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:459–471. doi: 10.1002/ana.23894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Polymeropoulos MH, et al. Mutation in the α-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science. 1997;276:2045–2047. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Singleton AB, et al. α-Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2003;302:841. doi: 10.1126/science.1090278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Choi ML, Gandhi S. Crucial role of protein oligomerization in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. FEBS J. 2018;285:3631–3644. doi: 10.1111/febs.14587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cremades N, et al. Direct observation of the interconversion of normal and toxic forms of α-synuclein. Cell. 2012;149:1048–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Danzer KM, et al. Different species of α-synuclein oligomers induce calcium influx and seeding. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:9220–9232. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2617-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ludtmann MHR, et al. α-synuclein oligomers interact with ATP synthase and open the permeability transition pore in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04422-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Whiten DR, et al. Nanoscopic characterisation of individual endogenous protein aggregates in human neuronal cells. ChemBioChem. 2018;19:2033–2038. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201800209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lorenzen N, Otzen DE. Oligomers of α-synuclein: picking the culprit in the line-up. Essays Biochem. 2014;56:137–148. doi: 10.1042/bse0560137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Birol M, Melo AM. Untangling the conformational polymorphism of disordered proteins associated with neurodegeneration at the single-molecule level. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019;12:309. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iljina M, et al. Kinetic model of the aggregation of α-synuclein provides insights into prion-like spreading. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E1206–E1215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524128113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tosatto L, et al. Single-molecule FRET studies on alpha-synuclein oligomerization of Parkinson’s disease genetically related mutants. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16696. doi: 10.1038/srep16696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Horrocks MH, et al. Fast flow microfluidics and single-molecule fluorescence for the rapid characterization of α-synuclein oligomers. Anal. Chem. 2015;87:8818–8826. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tsukakoshi K, et al. Selection of DNA aptamers that recognize α-synuclein oligomers using a competitive screening method. Anal. Chem. 2012;84:5542–5547. doi: 10.1021/ac300330g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Paul-Gilloteaux P, et al. eC-CLEM: flexible multidimensional registration software for correlative microscopies. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:102–103. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ahmadi Rastegar D, et al. Parkinson’s progression prediction using machine learning and serum cytokines. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019;5:14. doi: 10.1038/s41531-019-0086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horvath SE, Daum G. Lipids of mitochondria. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013;52:590–614. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ryan T, et al. Cardiolipin exposure on the outer mitochondrial membrane modulates α-synuclein. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:817. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03241-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sreerama N, Woody RW. Structural composition of betaI- and betaII-proteins. Protein Sci. 2003;12:384–388. doi: 10.1110/ps.0235003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adamcik J, et al. Understanding amyloid aggregation by statistical analysis of atomic force microscopy images. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:423–428. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) Nat. Methods. 2006;3:793–795. doi: 10.1038/nmeth929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reeve AK, et al. Aggregated α-synuclein and complex I deficiency: exploration of their relationship in differentiated neurons. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1820. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zamaraeva MV, et al. Ionophoretic properties of ferutinin. Cell Calcium. 1997;22:235–241. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(97)90062-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abramov AY, Duchen MR. Measurements of threshold of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening in intact and permeabilized cells by flash photolysis of caged calcium. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;793:299–309. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-328-8_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gandhi S, et al. PINK1-associated Parkinson’s disease is caused by neuronal vulnerability to calcium-induced cell death. Mol. Cell. 2009;33:627–638. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Iljina M, et al. Arachidonic acid mediates the formation of abundant α-helical multimers of α-synuclein. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33928. doi: 10.1038/srep33928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen SW, et al. Structural characterization of toxic oligomers that are kinetically trapped during α-synuclein fibril formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E1994–E2003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421204112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miraglia, F. et al. Alpha-synuclein FRET biosensors reveal early alpha-synuclein aggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Life (Basel)10, 147 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Hochreiter B, et al. Advanced FRET normalization allows quantitative analysis of protein interactions including stoichiometries and relative affinities in living cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:8233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44650-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Flagmeier P, et al. Ultrasensitive measurement of Ca2+ influx into lipid vesicles induced by protein aggregates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017;56:7750–7754. doi: 10.1002/anie.201700966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Flagmeier P, et al. Mutations associated with familial Parkinson’s disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of α-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:10328–10333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604645113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Anderson KL, et al. Marker-free method for accurate alignment between correlated light, cryo-light, and electron cryo-microscopy data using sample support features. J. Struct. Biol. 2018;201:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Park JS, Davis RL, Sue CM. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: new mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2018;18:21. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0829-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Betarbet R, et al. Intersecting pathways to neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease: effects of the pesticide rotenone on DJ-1, α-synuclein, and the ubiquitin–proteasome system. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006;22:404–420. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chinta SJ, et al. Mitochondrial α-synuclein accumulation impairs complex I function in dopaminergic neurons and results in increased mitophagy in vivo. Neurosci. Lett. 2010;486:235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guardia-Laguarta C, et al. α-synuclein is localized to mitochondria-associated ER membranes. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:249–259. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2507-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shavali S, et al. Mitochondrial localization of α-synuclein protein in α-synuclein overexpressing cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;439:125–128. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bernal-Conde LD, et al. Alpha-synuclein physiology and pathology: a perspective on cellular structures and organelles. Front. Neurosci. 2019;13:1399. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vicario M, et al. The close encounter between α-synuclein and mitochondria. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:388. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen L, et al. A53T human α-synuclein overexpression in transgenic mice induces pervasive mitochondria macroautophagy defects preceding dopamine neuron degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:890–905. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0089-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahmadpour, S. T. et al. Cardiolipin, the mitochondrial signature lipid: implication in cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 8031 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Nakamura K, et al. Direct membrane association drives mitochondrial fission by the Parkinson disease-associated protein α-synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:20710–20726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.213538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Galvagnion C, et al. Lipid dynamics and phase transition within α-synuclein amyloid fibrils. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10:7872–7877. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shahmoradian SH, et al. Lewy pathology in Parkinson’s disease consists of crowded organelles and lipid membranes. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:1099–1109. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0423-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mahul-Mellier AL, et al. The process of Lewy body formation, rather than simply α-synuclein fibrillization, is one of the major drivers of neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:4971–4982. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913904117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hu D, et al. Alpha-synuclein suppresses mitochondrial protease ClpP to trigger mitochondrial oxidative damage and neurotoxicity. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;137:939–960. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-01993-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ryan SD, et al. Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson’s model shows nitrosative stress-induced dysfunction in MEF2-PGC1α transcription. Cell. 2013;155:1351–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zambon F, et al. Cellular α-synuclein pathology is associated with bioenergetic dysfunction in Parkinson’s iPSC-derived dopamine neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019;28:2001–2013. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rueden CT, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hoyer W, et al. Dependence of α-synuclein aggregate morphology on solution conditions. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;322:383–393. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00775-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thirunavukkuarasu S, Jares-Erijman EA, Jovin TM. Multiparametric fluorescence detection of early stages in the amyloid protein aggregation of pyrene-labeled α-synuclein. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;378:1064–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shi Y, Kirwan P, Livesey FJ. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks. Nat. Protoc. 2012;7:1836–1846. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abramov AY, et al. Targeted polyphosphatase expression alters mitochondrial metabolism and inhibits calcium-dependent cell death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:18091–18096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708959104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bartolomé F, Abramov AY. Measurement of mitochondrial NADH and FAD autofluorescence in live cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1264:263–270. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2257-4_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Imamura H, et al. Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based genetically encoded indicators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:15651–15656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904764106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Maltsev AS, Ying J, Bax A. Impact of N-terminal acetylation of α-synuclein on its random coil and lipid binding properties. Biochemistry. 2012;51:5004–5013. doi: 10.1021/bi300642h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Horrocks MH, et al. Single-molecule imaging of individual amyloid protein aggregates in human biofluids. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016;7:399–406. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dresser, L. et al. Amyloid-β oligomerization monitored by single-molecule stepwise photobleaching. Methods193, 80–95 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Benson S, et al. SCOTfluors: small, conjugatable, orthogonal, and tunable fluorophores for in vivo imaging of cell metabolism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019;58:6911–6915. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pérez-Pi I, et al. α-synuclein–confocal nanoscanning (ASYN-CONA), a bead-based assay for detecting early-stage α-synuclein aggregation. Anal. Chem. 2019;91:5582–5590. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Deerinck T, et al. Enhancing serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to enable high resolution 3-D nanohistology of cells and tissues. Microsc. Microanal. 2010;16:1138–1139. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Russell MR, et al. 3D correlative light and electron microscopy of cultured cells using serial blockface scanning electron microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 2017;130:278–291. doi: 10.1242/jcs.188433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Janeczek AA, et al. PEGylated liposomes associate with Wnt3A protein and expand putative stem cells in human bone marrow populations. Nanomed. (Lond.) 2017;12:845–863. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hughes C, et al. Beta amyloid aggregates induce sensitised TLR4 signalling causing long-term potentiation deficit and rat neuronal cell death. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:79. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0792-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Angelova PR, et al. Alpha synuclein aggregation drives ferroptosis: an interplay of iron, calcium and lipid peroxidation. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:2781–2796. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0542-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Imaging and tabular datasets used in this study are available and have been deposited in Zenodo (locations are listed in Supplementary Table 4). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code used in this study has been deposited in relevant repositories (Supplementary Table 4).