Abstract
In vivo surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) imaging allows non-invasive visualization of tumors for intraoperative guidance and clinical diagnostics. However, the in vivo utility of SERS is greatly hampered by the strong optical scattering and autofluorescence background of biological tissues and the lack of highly active plasmonic nanostructures. Herein, we report a class of porous nanostructures comprising a cubic AuAg alloy nanoshell and numerous nanopores. Such porous nanostructures exhibit excellent near-infrared II plasmonic properties tunable in a broad spectral range by varying the pore features while maintaining a small dimension. We demonstrate their exceptional near-infrared II SERS performance varying with the porous properties. Additionally, near-infrared II SERS probes created with porous cubic AuAg nanoshells are demonstrated with remarkable capability for in vivo visualization of sub-millimeter microtumors in a living mouse model. Our near-infrared II SERS probes hold great potentials for precise demarcation of tumor margins and identification of microscopic tumors.
Subject terms: Nanophotonics and plasmonics, Biomedical materials, Nanofabrication and nanopatterning, Cancer imaging
In vivo surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) imaging allows non-invasive visualization of tumours for biomedical applications. Here, the authors report porous cubic AuAg alloy nanoshells exhibiting plasmonic properties and porosity-dependant SERS in the second window of the near-infrared for in vivo tumour detection.
Introduction
In vivo optical imaging using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) probes has attracted considerable attentions for effective surgical operation and therapeutic monitoring of tumors in living subjects1–3. SERS imaging exploits unique vibrational spectroscopic fingerprints of Raman molecules massively amplified by plasmonic nanostructures for specific tumor identification4,5. It offers great advantages over in vivo fluorescence imaging in terms of ultrahigh sensitivity, high spectral specificity, powerful multiplexing capability, and improved photostability4,6. Therefore, SERS imaging could be an ideal optical technique for tumor margin delineation in vivo, especially for identification of microtumors and satellite tumor foci, which provides complementary information to those clinically available whole-body imaging modalities, for instance, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography7,8. A SERS probe is typically created with conjugated Raman molecules decorated onto plasmonic Au or Ag substrates, sometimes with an additional protective outer layer (e.g., silica, polymers, proteins)4,9. The performance of SERS probes largely relies on the plasmonic substrate and Raman molecules. The local electromagnetic field enhancement at hot spots of plasmonic nanostructures could lead to a SERS enhancement of >1010 10–13. The much better chemical stability and biocompatibility of Au over Ag make Au a preferrable choice for in vivo biomedical applications. To boost the SERS performance, considerable efforts have been devoted to creating Au nanostructures with sharp tips, nanogaps, and rough surface14,15. However, a major bottleneck of in vivo SERS biomedical applications is the plasmonic substrates for creation of SERS probes mostly with plasmon absorption in the visible-near-infrared I region (visible: 400–700 nm; NIR-I: 700–900 nm), in which only limited tissue penetration depth can be obtained due to the strong optical absorption, scattering and autofluorescence of biological tissues16–20.
Comparably, near-infrared II (NIR-II, 1000–1700 nm) SERS imaging could afford higher spatial resolution and higher detection sensitivity owing to the further reduction of tissue scattering and autofluorescence at NIR-II wavelengths16,20,21. In vivo SERS applications require plasmonic materials with small dimensions (typically < 100 nm) and high SERS enhancement. Shifting plasmon absorption into the NIR-II region is often realized by increasing the total dimension and surface roughness of anisotropic Au nanostructures such as nanorods, nanostars, nanoflowers, nanoshells (NSs), and hollow nanocages22–26. However, these strategies usually produce NIR-II plasmonic nanostructures with a size of >200 nm at least in one dimension, consequently leading to inefficient tumor accumulation. In addition, considering the 1/λ4-dependence of Raman signal on the laser wavelength, Raman intensity is intrinsically weak when the NIR-II (usually 1064 nm) laser is used27, so that the plasmonic substrate with a relatively large enhancement factor is of paramount importance for NIR-II SERS imaging of high brightness. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop NIR-II plasmonic substrates with appropriate particulate size (50–100 nm) and large near-field enhancement for in vivo NIR-II SERS applications. Hollow and porous Au nanostructures show great promise as multifunctional platforms owing to their distinctive plasmonic properties tunable across the visible-near-infrared range28,29. These porous Au nanostructures present built-in hot spots of high density for large near-field enhancement, whose plasmon resonance wavelengths can be effectively tuned by varying the pore size and number, porosity, and composition while maintaining the constant total dimensions. Au nanocages with hollow interiors display the plasmon tunability up to 1200 nm30; however, the galvanic replacement reaction between the Ag nanocubes (NCs) as the sacrificial template and HAuCl4 usually leads to the etching of the sharp corners, compromising the SERS enhancement. The plasmon absorption of Au NSs with hollow interiors could be also pushed into the NIR region by tailoring the geometry, but currently limited to the NIR-I region31. In addition, the dealloying process has been utilized for the fabrication of porous Au nanostructures, but it only produced porous structures with plasmon absorption limited in the visible region32–34. Our recent work developed a class of Au@Au-Ag dot-in-cubic nanoframe structures with excellent NIR-II plasmonic properties, which exhibits remarkable spectral tunability by the edge length and wall pore size35. Inspired by this work, we speculate that manipulation of the pore size and number on a Au NS could be an effective way to develop NIR-II plasmonic materials with superior plasmonic properties for in vivo SERS imaging.
Herein, we report a type of porous cubic (pc)-AuAg NSs with hollow interiors, whose plasmonic properties can be effectively tuned over the NIR range through simply controlling the pore features in the NS. The pc-AuAg NSs are prepared by the galvanic replacement reaction and Au/Ag co-deposition on the Ag NCs as the sacrificial template, followed by subsequent etching with H2O2. The pore size and number can be controllably adjusted by the HAuCl4 amount added, thereby allowing the modulation of the plasmonic properties over a broad spectral range in the NIR-II biowindow. The pc-AuAg NSs display superior NIR-II plasmonic properties for in vivo SERS imaging owing to the high-density hot spots from the nanopores. We demonstrate non-invasive and highly accurate NIR-II SERS visualization of macro- and microtumors in living mice using the pc-AuAg NS-based SERS probes with the NIR-II excitation. Therefore, this study establishes a route to porous plasmonic nanostructures with high-density nanopores, tunable plasmonic properties, and superior NIR-II SERS activity for in vivo SERS biomedical applications.
Results and discussion
Synthesis and characterization of pc-AuAg NSs
We first followed the published protocol to synthesize Ag NCs by a polyol route (Fig. 1a)30. Then, the conformal overgrowth of a Au shell on the Ag NC was performed with the rapid injection of HAuCl4 into an aqueous suspension of Ag NCs containing hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC), NaOH and L-ascorbic acid (H2Asc). The galvanic replacement reaction between Ag NCs and Au3+ takes place preferably at the corners and on the side faces of Ag NCs, leading to the etching of Ag atoms at these locations35–37. The subsequent reaction of Ag+ ions with OH¯ leads to the formation of Ag2O domains at the corners and partially on side faces, and the Au/Ag co-deposition via the reduction with HAsc¯ forms a conformal AuAg alloy overlayer, preventing the further etching of Ag atoms from the underlying Ag NCs. We can see from the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images in Fig. 1b the preservation of cubic morphology of Ag@Au NCs with truncated corners with the addition of 0.4 mL of 1.0 mM HAuCl4, the edge length of which increases to 55.6 (±4.3) nm from 51.0 (±3.8) nm of Ag NCs (Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, both scanning transmission electron microscopy image (STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping clearly verify conformal coating of a thin Au nanoshell on each Ag NC (Fig. 1f). The satellite light contrast on the side faces of Ag@Au NCs evidently indicates the partial carving of Ag atoms from the side faces via the galvanic replacement reaction (Fig. 1b, d). As shown in Fig. 1d, the appearance of pores on the side faces also provides potent evidence for the carving of Ag atoms from the side faces. Finally, H2O2 was added to the suspension of Ag@Au NCs to etch away the Ag NC core and Ag2O domains of the nanoshell, forming the porous hollow nanoshells36. The TEM and SEM images obviously display the pores at the corners and on the side faces after the treatment with H2O2 (Fig. 1c, e). The EDS elemental mapping further supports the porous nanostructure of a AuAg alloy NS with hollow interior (Fig. 1g). The produced pc-AuAg NSs have a similar edge length to their corresponding Ag@Au NCs (Supplementary Fig. 1). The Au:Ag atomic ratio in the pc-AuAg NSs is 0.82 determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The above results unambiguously demonstrate the successful synthesis of pc-AuAg NSs in this work. We must point out that the rapid injection of HAuCl4 is critical for the formation of surface pores because enough Au3+ ions are required to etch the Ag atoms from the corners and side faces of Ag NCs, accompanying with the formation of Ag2O domains that are eventually removed away for the nanoshell pore generation. Otherwise, the slow titration of HAuCl4 will produce pores exclusively at the corners rather than on the side faces, which was previously reported in the literature37.
The synthesis of the pc-AuAg NSs was also followed using UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy. The Ag NCs and Ag@Au NCs synthesized with 0.4 mL of 1.0 mM HAuCl4 exhibit strong plasmon bands at 434 nm and 481 nm, visually seen in light-yellow and bright orange colors, respectively (Fig. 1h). After reaction with H2O2, the plasmon band of the resulting pc-AuAg NSs undergoes a significant redshift to 1070 nm in the NIR-II region, appearing in a dark blue color in the aqueous suspension. The hollow structure and numerous pores of the nanoshell collectively contribute to the remarkable NIR-II plasmon absorption of pc-AuAg NSs. The synthetic philosophy of the pc-AuAg NSs is primarily based on the rapid galvanic replacement reaction and the simultaneous deposition of Au/Ag atoms using Ag NCs as the sacrificial template in the presence of CTAC, NaOH, and H2Asc (Fig. 1i). The etching of the internal Ag NC core and Ag2O domains produces porous AuAg NSs with nanopores at the corners and on the side faces, forming electromagnetic hot spots for NIR-II plasmon absorption.
We argue that the HAuCl4 amount could be an effective parameter to tailor the porous properties of pc-AuAg NSs. Thus, we next examined the effects of the HAuCl4 amount on the synthesis of pc-AuAg NSs. Figure 2 shows the TEM and SEM images of the resulting structures synthesized with varied volumes of 1.0 mM HAuCl4 before and after etching with H2O2. We can see the cubic morphology with truncated corners for all these Ag@Au NCs synthesized with different volumes of HAuCl4. After etching with H2O2, fewer pores were generated in the pc-AuAg NSs synthesized at a volume of 1.2 mL HAuCl4; however, more pores in the pc-AuAg NSs show up with a decrease of the volume of HAuCl4. At a volume of 0.1 mL HAuCl4, large-sized pores can be seen in the resulting pc-AuAg NSs, which may originate from the merging of pores in close proximity to each other. These pc-AuAg NSs have a similar cubic morphology and edge length to their original Ag@Au NCs, except for hollow interior and additional pores in the nanoshell (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). Our rationale is that an increase in the HAuCl4 amount would form a thicker AuAg alloy overlayer completely covering on the Ag NC surface, and the AuAg alloy layer can survive the H2O2 etching process, so that fewer pores can be seen in the resulting pc-AuAg NSs. In contrast, a low amount of HAuCl4 only would lead to partial surface coverage of the Ag NCs with the AuAg layer, as a consequence forming more pores after H2O2 treatment. Therefore, the present approach enables the flexible tuning of pores of pc-AuAg NSs through simply varying the HAuCl4 amount.
Optical properties and SERS performance of pc-AuAg NSs
We next monitored the evolution of the optical properties of Ag@Au NCs and pc-AuAg NSs with the addition of various amounts of HAuCl4. As shown in Fig. 3a, the plasmon resonance wavelength of Ag@Au NCs is gradually redshifted to 530 nm from 434 nm of Ag NCs with the volume of 1.0 mM HAuCl4 increasing from 0 to 1.2 mL. In addition, the intensity of the plasmon band shows an initial decrease and then an increase with a continuous addition of HAuCl4. The change of the plasmon band of Ag@Au NCs could be attributed to the deposition of a thin Au overlayer on the Ag NC surface, which yields pure Au NC-like plasmon features. The initial decrease in the plasmon intensity may be due to the Ag dissolution from Ag NCs and the relatively weaker plasmon activity of the deposited Au layer compared with Ag, and the subsequent increase in the plasmon intensity could be attributed to the co-deposition of Au/Ag atoms via reduction with HAsc¯. After H2O2 etching, pc-AuAg NSs were formed through the removal of the Ag NC core and Ag2O domains, and the plasmon resonance wavelength progressively red-shifts from 787 to 1540 nm as the volume of 1.0 mM HAuCl4 decreases from 1.2 to 0.1 mL (Fig. 3b). We conclude that an increase in the pore size and number causes the red-shifting of the plasmon band of pc-AuAg NSs. Thus, the addition of few amounts of HAuCl4 could produce pc-AuAg NSs with NIR-II plasmonic properties.
To better understand the plasmonic properties of pc-AuAg NSs, the numerical finite-element analysis was conducted based on the COMSOL Multiphysics software to calculate the optical extinction spectra and near-field distribution of pc-AuAg NSs with varied pore sizes and number of the nanoshell, as depicted in Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4. For simplification, the geometric model was created with a pure Au NS of an edge length of 56 nm that has hollow interior and slightly truncated corners. The pc-Au NSs display pore size- and number-dependent plasmonic properties in terms of intensity and plasmon resonance wavelength. The plasmon resonance wavelength of the pc-Au NSs can be easily tuned into the NIR-II region upon increasing the pore size and number. It is clearly seen that the local near-field at the NIR-II resonance wavelength is significantly intensified in the pores of the pc-Au NSs, yielding high-density hot spots for electromagnetic enhancement of SERS. The above results demonstrate that pc-AuAg NSs display excellent plasmonic properties in the NIR-II region tunable through simply varying the pore features while maintaining a small total size suitable for in vivo biomedical applications.
Figure 4 shows the NIR-II SERS performance of pc-AuAg NSs of various plasmon resonance wavelengths. The SERS measurements were carried out at varied concentrations of pc-AuAg NSs with the resonant Raman reporter IR-1061 dye and the non-resonant Raman reporter p-nitrothiophenol (p-NTP), respectively. The SERS intensity of IR-1061 dye-encoded pc-AuAg NSs under the NIR-II (1064 nm) laser is significantly higher than the non-resonant p-NTP-encoded pc-AuAg NSs under either 1064 or 785 nm laser (Supplementary Fig. 5). The analytical NIR-II SERS enhancement factor (EF) was calculated for quantitative comparison of SERS performance of these samples27,38,39. With IR-1061 dye as the resonant Raman reporter, the estimated NIR-II SERS EF of these pc-AuAg NSs exhibits a concentration dependence typically in a range of ~0.1–9.5 × 105; the NIR-II SERS EF first increases and then decreases with the increasing plasmon resonance wavelength. The pc-AuAg NSs with the 945 nm plasmon resonance wavelength (denoted as pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm) have the highest NIR-II SERS EF, while the lowest SERS EF for pc-AuAg NSs with the 1540 nm plasmon resonance wavelength. The maximum NIR-II SERS enhancement takes place at a plasmon resonance wavelength blue-shifting from the laser excitation wavelength (1064 nm) used for the present SERS measurement, which is attributed to the antagonistic interplay between optical extinction and near-field enhancement in SERS enhancement, consistent with our previous reports40,41. Then, the limit of detection (LOD) of NIR-II SERS detection was estimated using pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm (Supplementary Fig. 6). Agarose phantoms were made with pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm of various concentrations and 1.0 μM IR-1061 dye, which were subjected to the NIR-II SERS measurement. Elevated brightness of the SERS images of these agarose phantoms was observed as the concentration of pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm increases. The intensity of the 1557 cm−1 SERS band is linearly proportional to the concentration of pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm, with a linear regression equation: y = 59.0x − 45.1 (R2 = 0.988). The LOD is determined to be 2.14 μg/mL, computed according to the IUPAC definition of LOD = 3σ/s, where σ and s represent the standard deviation of the blank measurement (n = 42) and the slope of the linear regression equation obtained above, respectively42. Thus, all these experimental data verify the exceptional NIR-II SERS activity of pc-AuAg NSs tunable by changing the pore size and number of the nanoshell, presenting great potential for in vivo SERS bioimaging.
NIR-II SERS imaging of multicellular tumor spheroids
We next explored the potential of pc-AuAg NSs for in vivo NIR-II SERS imaging of microtumors. In the following experiments, the pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm were used to construct the NIR-II SERS probe because of the superior NIR-II SERS activity. The as-synthesized pc-AuAg NSs were first treated in an aqueous solution of 0.15 wt% poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) to replace the original surface CTAC, yielding PSS-modified pc-AuAg NSs charged negatively (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). As seen in Supplementary Fig. 9, Fourier-transform infrared spectra show the disappearance of -C-N- stretching bands at 920–950 cm−1 and the appearance of the -SO3- bands at 1010 and 1040 cm−1, confirming the complete replacement of CTAC with PSS on the surface of pc-AuAg NSs43,44. A NIR-II SERS probe was made with IR-1061 dye-encoded pc-AuAg NSs-945 nm encapsulated with a polyethyleneimine (PEI) outer layer and subsequently modified with hyaluronic acid (HA) endowing the active targeting ability toward CD44 receptor on the cell membrane of 4T1 cells45, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 7. After polyethyleneimine coating, the zeta potential shifts to +19.6 (±0.4) mV from −19.7 (±0.38) mV of IR-1061 dye encoded porous NSs, and the further modification with HA renders the NIR-II SERS probes with negative zeta potential of −12.5 (±0.9) mV (Supplementary Fig. 8). This negative surface charge endows the present NIR-II SERS probe with resistance to non-specific protein adsorption and prolonging body systemic circulation46. Significantly, we observed negligible degradation of SERS signal of the NIR-II SERS probe over a 60 min continuous exposure to the 1064 nm laser at a power of 80.1 mW, indicating the superior photostability (Fig. 5b). We then assessed the in vitro cytotoxicity using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay against 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells and L-02 human normal liver cells, respectively. The results show that both 4T1 and L-02 cells maintain cell viabilities of >89% even at a concentration of NIR-II SERS probes up to 200 μg/mL, indicating excellent in vitro biocompatibility (Supplementary Fig. 10).
Subsequently, we mimicked microtumors using multicellular tumor spheroids (MTSs) made through culturing cell clusters in cell culture medium, as illustrated in Fig. 5c47,48. Calcein-AM/propidium iodide/Hoechst 33342 co-stained experiments confirm the live cells in the MTSs with negligible dead cells observed even at the center of the MTS (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 11). After incubation with NIR-II SERS probes (50 μg/mL), these MTSs were subjected to the NIR-II SERS imaging in vitro. All these MTSs exhibit high SERS intensity over the entire tumor area, and the contour of the NIR-II SERS images can perfectly follow the shape of the MTSs (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 12). We also conducted the control experiment using IR-1061-encoded pc-AuAg NSs modified with poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether thiol (mPEG-SH) (mPEG-modified NIR-II SERS probes). Only weak SERS signal was seen in the MTS after incubation with mPEG-modified NIR-II SERS probes, indicating the specific uptake of our present NIR-II SERS probes by 4T1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 13). Then, we performed in vivo SERS imaging using our NIR-II SERS probes, in which three MTSs of different sizes (153, 278, and 444 μm) were intradermally (i.d.) implanted at a 2 mm depth beneath the skin of a living mouse. Figure 5f clearly verifies the successful NIR-II SERS imaging of the three MTSs in the living mouse. Further, we observe strong background (e.g., optical scattering, autofluorescence) signal from the skin and its intrinsic Raman bands in a living mouse with 785 nm laser excitation (Supplementary Fig. 14), and verify that the combination of pc-AuAg NSs and IR-1061 dye possesses superior SERS performance under 1064 nm laser than those conventional plasmonic materials such as Au nanorods under either 785 or 1064 nm laser (Supplementary Fig. 15).
In vivo NIR-II SERS imaging of tumors in a mouse model
It has been demonstrated that our NIR-II SERS probes display excellent performance for in vivo SERS imaging of microtumors. Thus, we further studied in vivo SERS imaging of tumors in a tumor-bearing mouse model. As shown in Fig. 6a, the 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model was established through inoculating 4T1 tumor cells (4 × 106 cells) into the right sub-dermal dorsal area of the female mice with the tumor growth to approximate 150 mm3, followed by intravenous administration of NIR-II SERS probes (n = 3). Ex vivo NIR-II SERS imaging was first conducted on the tumor excised from the tumor-bearing mouse at 12 h post-administration. We can see from Fig. 6b that the resected tumor exhibits intense yet quite uniform SERS signal over the entire tumor, and the SERS image can depict clear demarcation of the resected tumor. Significant CD44 overexpression on the cell membrane of 4T1 breast cancer cells has been previously confirmed and extensively employed for the development of targeting drug delivery systems45,49–51. The effective tumor accumulation of NIR-II SERS probes may be attributed to the combination of the passive enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the active targeting of CD44 overexpressed on the 4T1 tumor cells1,45,51,52. We further examined the suitability of our NIR-II SERS probes for in vivo NIR-II SERS imaging of a tumor in a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse. Figure 6c presents the SERS measurement of the tumor directly in a tumor-bearing mouse. The in vivo SERS image detects strong SERS signal at the tumor sites (points 1 and 2) while negligible outside the tumor (point 3). Moreover, our results showed that the in vivo NIR-II SERS image could delineate the boundary between the tumor and the surrounding healthy tissue. The time-dependent retention of the NIR-II SERS probes in the tumor was further investigated by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. It can be seen that the content of the NIR-II SERS probes in the tumor declines over time (Supplementary Fig. 16), suggesting that the NIR-II SERS imaging of the tumor should be done at the first two days after intravenous administration. Further, hematology and serum biochemistry experiments were carried out to examine whether our NIR-II SERS probes have significant systemic toxicity. Healthy mice were intravenously administrated with NIR-II SERS probes or PBS as the control, and the blood was collected at 24 h post-administration. As shown in Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18, no significant change is observed for all these blood biochemical indices. In addition, histological analysis of major organs (heart, liver, lung, spleen, and kidney) shows no obvious pathological changes and necrosis in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after treatment with NIR-II SERS probes (Supplementary Fig. 19). The experimental results confirm that the present NIR-II SERS probes exhibit excellent biosafety with no obvious adverse effects on the liver/kidney functions and the immune response. The results clearly show that the pc-AuAg NSs are highly promising for in vivo SERS application with excellent plasmonic properties and SERS performance both in the NIR-II biowindow.
In summary, this work has successfully developed a class of NIR-II plasmonic porous nanostructures comprising a cubic AuAg alloy NS and high-density nanopores. The effective combination of the galvanic replacement reaction, Au/Ag co-deposition simultaneously at the corners and side faces of the Ag NC sacrificial template, and the subsequent H2O2 etching results in the formation of pc-AuAg NSs. The developed pc-AuAg NSs exhibit excellent NIR-II plasmonic properties tunable in a broad spectral range through simply varying the porous properties (i.e., size, number) while maintaining a small total size. We experimentally and theoretically demonstrated the porous property-dependent NIR-II SERS performance. We simplified the geometric model with fixed edge length, circular pore, and pure Au composition for numerical simulations of extinction spectra and near-field distribution through varying the pore diameter and number. In practice, pc-AuAg NSs synthesized experimentally have AuAg alloy composition with varied geometric shape, pore size, and pore shape. Although the simplification of geometric model could affect the position of plasmon resonance wavelength and the plasmon strength, it would not change the trend over pore size and number. Subsequently, we created the NIR-II SERS probe using the pc-AuAg NSs with optimal plasmonic properties. It is demonstrated that our NIR-II SERS probes exhibit remarkable capability for in vivo SERS visualization of microtumors in animals. This NIR-II SERS probe could also delineate the tumor margin directly in a living mouse model following the intravenous administration. The non-invasive SERS imaging capability of our NIR-II SERS probes in living animals opens up an opportunity to intraoperative guidance of complete tumor resection and longitudinal monitoring of cancer therapeutic response6–8,53. We find that the tumor accumulation of NIR-II SERS probes declines over prolonging time following intravenous administration, so that longitudinal SERS imaging should be performed prior to metabolic elimination of NIR-II SERS probes from the tumors. The further modification of NIR-II SERS probes with functional biological substances such as cell membrane and exosomes could improve the tumor accumulation and prolong the tumor retention for dynamic monitoring of a tumor in a living subject for treatment assessment54,55. We also envision that the pc-AuAg NSs could offer a potential multifunctional platform, e.g., NIR-II photothermal agents, drug carriers, and multi-modal imaging contrast agents, for cancer theranostics35,56.
Methods
Animals and cell lines
Female Balb/c mice (four weeks, 13–16 g) were ordered from Changzhou Cavens Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. This research complies with all relevant ethical regulations. All procedures of animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Central South University (Protocol No. 2020sydw0724).
Both 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells and L-02 human normal liver cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator in culture medium that is composed of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in DMEM.
Synthesis of pc-AuAg NSs
First, Ag nanocubes (NCs) were synthesized according to a polyol process previously developed by Xia’s group30. Then, pc-AuAg NSs were synthesized with Ag NCs as the sacrificial template. In a typical protocol, 1 mL of 100 mM L-ascorbic acid (H2Asc) aqueous solution was injected into 4 mL of 100 mM CTAC aqueous solution together with the addition of 1 mL of 200 mM NaOH aqueous solution under vigorously magnetic stirring. Afterward, 0.3 mL of aqueous solution of as-synthesized Ag NCs with the concentration of 0.74 mg/mL was added into the reaction mixture, immediately followed by the rapid injection of various volumes of 1.0 mM HAuCl4 aqueous solution. The reaction continued for 10 min, followed by the dropwise addition of 500 µL of H2O2 (3.0 vol%). The reaction mixture was kept still overnight at room temperature. The resulting products were purified by centrifugation at 4500 × g for 15 min and washing with ultrapure water. The pellets were pc-AuAg NSs with various porous structures, depending on the amount of HAuCl4 added. These pc-AuAg NSs were finally re-dispersed in ultrapure water for the following use, whose concentrations were determined by ICP-OES.
Fabrication of NIR-II SERS probes
To synthesize the NIR-II SERS probes, the as-synthesized pc-AuAg NSs were centrifuged at 5900 × g for 15 min, followed by incubation for 2 h in 0.15 wt% PSS. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 5900 × g for another 15 min, and the precipitate was re-dispersed in 0.15 wt% PSS. The above process was repeated three times to produce PSS-modified pc-AuAg NSs. 10 mL of aqueous suspension of PSS-modified pc-AuAg NSs was then added with 1 μM IR-1061 dye as the resonant Raman reporter. The reaction mixture was subsequently incubated for 6 h, and then purified successively by centrifugation at 5900 × g for 15 min and washing with ultrapure water. The precipitate was re-dispersed into 10 mL ultrapure water, and then added with 100 μL of 1 mg/mL PEI under magnetic stirring. After 15 min incubation, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 5900 × g and re-dispersed in 10 mL of ultrapure water, followed by the addition of 100 μL of 10 mg/mL HA. The reaction continued for 4 h, and the reaction mixture was then centrifuged at 5900 × g for 15 min. The resultant precipitate was IR-1061 encoded pc-AuAg NSs encapsulated in a PEI overlayer with HA modification (called NIR-II SERS probes hereafter), which were dispersed in ultrapure water for storage at 4 °C.
Numerical simulations of plasmonic properties
Calculations of optical extinction spectra and three-dimensional (3D) near-field distribution were performed by finite element method using a commercial software package COMSOL Multiphysics 5.5. To simplify the calculation, the geometric model of the pc-AuAg NS was created with a pure Au NS with hollow interior and truncated corners. The calculated domain was delimited by the perfectly matched layers. The dimensional parameters (i.e., edge length, shell thickness) were set according to the statistical results from the TEM image. The dielectric properties of Au were taken from the data of Johnson and Chirsty57. The surrounding medium was water with a refractive index of 1.33. Optical extinction spectra were calculated in the wavelength range of 300–2000 nm, and the mesh size in the 3D simulation space was set to be 2.8–38.5 nm with finer levels in the nanostructure and surrounding medium domains. The plane wave excitation source was polarized along the z-axis, and propagated along the x axis with the magnitude of electric field of 1 V/m.
In vitro cytotoxicity
Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) viability assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of NIR-II SERS probes against 4T1 and L-02 cells, respectively. Typically, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 8 × 103 cells/well (n = 3) and after 24 h incubation the culture medium was replaced with fresh culture medium containing NIR-II SERS probes of various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL). Control experiments were performed without NIR-II SERS probes as well. After incubation for another 24 h, the cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4) and then cell viability was examined by CCK-8 assay. Specifically, 100 µL of DMEM was added to each well followed by the addition of 10 µL of CCK-8 solution. The absorbance at 450 nm of each well was measured on a Tecan Spark Microplate Reader with the background absorbance of culture medium subtracted.
Growth of multicellular tumor spheroids
The multicellular tumor spheroids (MTSs) of various sizes were made using 4T1 cells according to the well-established protocol previously reported in the literature47,48. First, 5 μL of 2.0 wt% agarose-containing DMEM medium pre-sterilized at 120 °C was added to a microcentrifuge tube. Once the agarose-containing DMEM medium was solidified, 100 μL of 4T1 cell-containing culture medium at varied cell concentrations was added. The cell clusters were collected through centrifugation at 160 × g for 10 min and incubation for 24 h, and then transferred to an agarose-coated 96-well plate pre-added with culture medium. The cell clusters were cultured and grown for two more days to achieve MTSs of various sizes. A series of MTSs of various sizes (86.4, 128.9, 171.4, 215.8, 260.0, 370.0, and 449.5 μm in diameter) were made through varying the initial cell concentration.
NIR-II SERS measurements
Raman spectroscopy was carried out on a Renishaw inVia Qontor confocal Raman microscope system equipped with an Andor InGaAs linear array detector and a ×5 (N.A. = 0.12) or ×50 (N.A. = 0.5) long working distance objective lens. A 1064 nm-Nd:YAG laser was employed in conjugation with holographic gratings of 830 lines/mm. All SERS spectra were processed and background-corrected using the Renishaw WiRE 5.3 software. To evaluate the NIR-II SERS performance of pc-AuAg NSs of various plasmon resonance wavelengths, pc-AuAg NSs of various concentrations were magnetically stirred with the resonant Raman reporter (IR-1061 dye, 1.0 μM) in aqueous suspensions. The mixture was then subjected to the SERS measurement with a 1064 nm laser at a power of 7.85 mW on the sample and integration time of 2 s, unless otherwise noted. Forty SERS spectra from different locations were averaged to represent the SERS signal for quantitative analysis. The analytical SERS enhancement factor (EF) was estimated by the following formula27,38,39:
1 |
where ISERS and IRaman represent the SERS intensity and spontaneous Raman intensity at 1557 cm−1 of IR-1061 dye, respectively; CSERS and CRaman are the concentrations of IR-1061 dye in the presence and absence of pc-AuAg NSs, respectively.
To conduct in vitro NIR-II SERS imaging of MTSs, 4T1 MTSs of various sizes were incubated in culture medium containing 50 μg/mL NIR-II SERS probes. After 12 h incubation, the MTSs were washed with fresh DMEM medium, which were then subjected to NIR-II SERS imaging measurements with a ×50 objective lens and a step size of 20 μm (laser power: 3.1 mW; integration time: 0.5 s). All SERS images were created by using a DCLS algorithm in the WiRE 5.3 software.
For in vivo studies of implanted MTSs, the 4T1 MTSs of different sizes obtained above were first incubated in DMEM medium containing 50 μg/mL NIR-II SERS probes for 12 h, and then washed with fresh DMEM medium. Afterward, the treated MTSs were implanted into a living mouse at a 2 mm depth beneath the skin, which was then subjected to the NIR-II SERS measurements using a ×5 objective lens at the laser power of 7.4 mW and integration time of 1 s.
For ex vivo and in vivo studies, subcutaneous 4T1 tumor xenograft models were established by inoculating 4 × 106 4T1 cells in 50 μL PBS into the right sub-dermal dorsal area of female Balb/c mice. Once the tumor grew to ~150 mm3, the mice were then used for animal experiments. Specifically, 200 μL of 2 mg/mL NIR-II SERS probes in PBS was intravenously administrated into 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 3). The tumor was resected at 12 h post-administration from the treated mouse for the NIR-II SERS imaging measurement with the laser power of 25.6 mW at the sample and integration time of 2 s, and a step size of 750 μm. Furthermore, in vivo NIR-II SERS imaging of the tumor in living mice was carried out in 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse at 12 h post-administration under the same condition as that for the ex vivo study.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 51871246 (M.L.) and No. 81702603 (C.Z.)), Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Department No. 2017XK2027 (M.L.), Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province No. tsqn201812135 (C.Z.) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. 2021T140408 (C.Z.), No. 2021M691934 (C.Z.).
Source data
Author contributions
L.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the data with contributions to the manuscript revision. R.J. performed the microtumor-related/cell-related experiments and assisted with animal studies. B.S. and Y.L. assisted with animal studies and theoretical analysis of plasmonic properties. C.Z. assisted with animal studies and the manuscript preparation. M.L. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the paper.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, its Supplementary Information or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-32975-w.
References
- 1.Smith BR, Gambhir SS. Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:901–986. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kircher MF, et al. A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat. Med. 2012;18:829–834. doi: 10.1038/nm.2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Laing S, Jamieson LE, Faulds K, Graham D. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for in vivo biosensing. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017;1:1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41570-017-0060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shan B, Pu Y, Chen Y, Liao M, Li M. Novel SERS labels: rational design, functional integration and biomedical applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;371:11–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Langer J, et al. Present and future of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano. 2019;14:28–117. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harmsen S, et al. Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanostars for high-precision cancer imaging. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:271ra7. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wen Y, Truong VX, Li M. Real-time intraoperative surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy-guided thermosurgical eradication of residual microtumors in orthotopic breast cancer. Nano Lett. 2021;21:3066–3074. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qiu Y, et al. Intraoperative detection and eradication of residual microtumors with gap-enhanced Raman tags. ACS Nano. 2018;12:7974–7985. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang Y, Yan B, Chen L. SERS tags: novel optical nanoprobes for bioanalysis. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:1391–1428. doi: 10.1021/cr300120g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fang Y, Seong NH, Dlott DD. Measurement of the distribution of site enhancements in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science. 2008;321:388–392. doi: 10.1126/science.1159499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nie S, Emory SR. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science. 1997;275:1102–1106. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kneipp K, et al. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;78:1667. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blackie EJ, Le Ru EC, Etchegoin PG. Single-molecule surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of nonresonant molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:14466–14472. doi: 10.1021/ja905319w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Su Y, et al. Plasmon near-field coupling of bimetallic nanostars and a hierarchical bimetallic SERS “hot field”: toward ultrasensitive simultaneous detection of multiple cardiorenal syndrome biomarkers. Anal. Chem. 2018;91:864–872. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Álvarez-Puebla RA. Effects of the excitation wavelength on the SERS spectrum. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:857–866. doi: 10.1021/jz201625j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lane LA, Xue R, Nie S. Emergence of two near-infrared windows for in vivo and intraoperative SERS. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2018;45:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang H, Li M. Near-infrared II thermoplasmonics of cuprous selenide multilayer nanoshells: the role of the plasmonic core. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:4928–4935. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hang Y, Boryczka J, Wu N. Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: a review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51:329–375. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00621D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Melancon MP, Zhou MIN, Li C. Cancer theranostics with near-infrared light-activatable multimodal nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011;44:947–956. doi: 10.1021/ar200022e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhong Y, et al. In vivo molecular imaging for immunotherapy using ultra-bright near-infrared-IIb rare-earth nanoparticles. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:1322–1331. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0262-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yin C, et al. Organic semiconducting macromolecular dyes for NIR‐II photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2104650. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202104650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Q, Hu Y, Guo S, Goebl J, Yin Y. Seeded growth of uniform Ag nanoplates with high aspect ratio and widely tunable surface plasmon bands. Nano Lett. 2010;10:5037–5042. doi: 10.1021/nl1032233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vijayaraghavan P, Liu CH, Vankayala R, Chiang CS, Hwang KC. Designing multi‐branched gold nanoechinus for NIR light activated dual modal photodynamic and photothermal therapy in the second biological window. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:6689–6695. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duan Y, Liu B. Recent advances of optical imaging in the second near‐infrared window. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1802394. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mayer M, et al. Controlled living nanowire growth: precise control over the morphology and optical properties of AgAuAg bimetallic nanowires. Nano Lett. 2015;15:5427–5437. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.He R, et al. Facile synthesis of pentacle gold–copper alloy nanocrystals and their plasmonic and catalytic properties. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:1–10. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Le Ru, E. & Etchegoin, P. Principles of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: and Related Plasmonic Effects (Elsevier, 2008).
- 28.Cho EC, Cobley CM, Rycenga M, Xia Y. Fine tuning the optical properties of Au–Ag nanocages by selectively etching Ag with oxygen and a water-soluble thiol. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:6317–6320. doi: 10.1039/b901817d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu K, et al. Porous Au–Ag nanospheres with high-density and highly accessible hotspots for SERS analysis. Nano Lett. 2016;16:3675–3681. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Skrabalak SE, Au L, Li X, Xia Y. Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes and Au nanocages. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:2182–2190. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ayala-Orozco C, et al. Au nanomatryoshkas as efficient near-infrared photothermal transducers for cancer treatment: benchmarking against nanoshells. ACS Nano. 2014;8:6372–6381. doi: 10.1021/nn501871d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Awada C, Dab C, Grimaldi MG, Alshoaibi A, Ruffino F. High optical enhancement in Au/Ag alloys and porous Au using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy technique. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:4714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84093-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simone G, Abdalla S. Ag/Au alloy entangled in a protein matrix: a plasmonic substrate coupling surface plasmons and molecular chirality. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;526:146711. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang L, Patskovsky S, Gauthier‐Soumis B, Meunier M. Porous Au–Ag nanoparticles from galvanic replacement applied as single-particle SERS probe for quantitative monitoring. Small. 2022;18:2105209. doi: 10.1002/smll.202105209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shan B, Li L, Zhao Y, Wang H, Li M. Near‐infrared II plasmonic Au@Au-Ag dot-in-cubic nanoframes for in vivo surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic detection and photoacoustic imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2103186. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202103186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun X, et al. Gold-based cubic nanoboxes with well-defined openings at the corners and ultrathin walls less than two nanometers thick. ACS Nano. 2016;10:8019–8025. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ahn J, Wang D, Ding Y, Zhang J, Qin D. Site-selective carving and co-deposition: transformation of Ag nanocubes into concave nanocrystals encased by Au–Ag alloy frames. ACS Nano. 2018;12:298–307. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b06353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Le Ru,EC, Blackie E, Meyer M, Etchegoin PG. Surface enhanced Raman scattering enhancement factors: a comprehensive study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111:13794–13803. doi: 10.1021/jp0687908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pan X, et al. A graphene oxide-gold nanostar hybrid based-paper biosensor for label-free SERS detection of serum bilirubin for diagnosis of jaundice. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;145:111713. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li M, Kang JW, Dasari RR, Barman I. Shedding light on the extinction-enhancement duality in gold nanostar-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:14115–14119. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li J, Lin H, Zhang X, Li M. Seed shape-controlled, facet-selective growth of superspiky gold nanocrystals for biosensing applications. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021;9:8694–8704. doi: 10.1039/D1TC02083H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mocak J, Bond AM, Mitchell S, Scollary G. A statistical overview of standard (IUPAC and ACS) and new procedures for determining the limits of detection and quantification: application to voltammetric and stripping techniques (technical report) Pure Appl. Chem. 1997;69:297–328. doi: 10.1351/pac199769020297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mehtala JG, et al. Citrate-stabilized gold nanorods. Langmuir. 2014;30:13727–13730. doi: 10.1021/la5029542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yu J, Sims JE, Sun L. In situ synthesis of polyelectrolyte/layered double hydroxide intercalation compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 2017;52:6647–6655. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-0900-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Luo S, et al. IR780‐loaded hyaluronic acid@gossypol–Fe (III)–EGCG infinite coordination polymer nanoparticles for highly efficient tumor photothermal/coordinated dual drugs synergistic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2100954. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202100954. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pelaz B, et al. Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake. ACS Nano. 2015;9:6996–7008. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li Y, et al. Tumor-specific multiple stimuli-activated dendrimeric nanoassemblies with metabolic blockade surmount chemotherapy resistance. ACS Nano. 2017;11:416–429. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b06161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zheng X, et al. Tunable hydrophile–lipophile balance for manipulating structural stability and tumor retention of amphiphilic nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1901586. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Choi KY, Saravanakumar G, Park JH, Park K. Hyaluronic acid-based nanocarriers for intracellular targeting: interfacial interactions with proteins in cancer. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2012;99:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li K, et al. Mulberry-like dual-drug complicated nanocarriers assembled with apogossypolone amphiphilic starch micelles and doxorubicin hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for tumor combination and targeted therapy. Biomaterials. 2015;39:131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gao X, et al. Engineering of a Hollow‐structured Cu2-xS nano-homojunction platform for near infrared-triggered infected wound healing and cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2106700. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202106700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sun W, et al. A nano “immune-guide” recruiting lymphocytes and modulating the ratio of macrophages from different origins to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2009116. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202009116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu JH, et al. Noninvasive and highly multiplexed five-color tumor imaging of multicore near-infrared resonant surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticles in vivo. ACS Nano. 2021;15:19956–19969. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c07470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang Q, et al. Neutrophil membrane-coated nanoparticles inhibit synovial inflammation and alleviate joint damage in inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13:1182–1190. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nam GH, et al. Emerging prospects of exosomes for cancer treatment: from conventional therapy to immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2002440. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang J, et al. A porous Au@Rh bimetallic core–shell nanostructure as an H2O2‐driven oxygenerator to alleviate tumor hypoxia for simultaneous bimodal imaging and enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2001862. doi: 10.1002/adma.202001862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Johnson PB, Christy RW. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1972;6:4370. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, its Supplementary Information or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.