Abstract
Lactate is a key metabolite produced from glycolytic metabolism of glucose molecules, yet it also serves as a primary carbon fuel source for many cell types. In the tumor-immune microenvironment, effect of lactate on cancer and immune cells can be highly complex and hard to decipher, which is further confounded by acidic protons, a co-product of glycolysis. Here we show that lactate is able to increase stemness of CD8+ T cells and augments anti-tumor immunity. Subcutaneous administration of sodium lactate but not glucose to mice bearing transplanted MC38 tumors results in CD8+ T cell-dependent tumor growth inhibition. Single cell transcriptomics analysis reveals increased proportion of stem-like TCF-1-expressing CD8+ T cells among intra-tumoral CD3+ cells, a phenotype validated by in vitro lactate treatment of T cells. Mechanistically, lactate inhibits histone deacetylase activity, which results in increased acetylation at H3K27 of the Tcf7 super enhancer locus, leading to increased Tcf7 gene expression. CD8+ T cells in vitro pre-treated with lactate efficiently inhibit tumor growth upon adoptive transfer to tumor-bearing mice. Our results provide evidence for an intrinsic role of lactate in anti-tumor immunity independent of the pH-dependent effect of lactic acid, and might advance cancer immune therapy.
Subject terms: Tumour immunology, Immunotherapy, Lymphocyte activation, Cancer metabolism
Lactic acid from glycolytic metabolism of cancer cells has been associated with immune suppressive functions. Here authors show that lactate, when depart from the acidic protons, inhibits histone deacetylases in CD8 + T cells, which turns them into potent anti-tumour immune cells.
Introduction
Extensive efforts have recently been dedicated to the investigation of metabolites and metabolic processes in the regulation of immune functions1–3. Various metabolites (e.g., glucose, fatty acid, amino acid) coordinate with immune signaling pathways to control immune cell function and differentiation4–8. Metabolic reprogramming is emerging as a new therapeutic principle to augment immune functions and immunotherapy outcomes9,10.
Lactate has historically been known as a metabolic waste product from fermentation of carbohydrates or anaerobic glycolysis in skeletal muscles during exercise11,12. Over a century ago, Otto Warburg noted cancer cells rapidly produce lactic acid even in the presence of oxygen, a process known as aerobic glycolysis13,14. The immune suppressive functions have been reported for lactic acid in glycolytic tumors15–17. Recent studies in human lung cancer patients show lactate can be used as an energy source by the cancer cells18,19. Further reports demonstrate lactate can overtake glucose as a primary carbon fuel source for a majority of tissues including immune organs20,21.
The effect of lactate on CD8+ T cell immune functions is not well understood with immune suppressive functions reported for lactic acid in glycolytic tumors19–21. In this study, we investigate the effect of sodium lactate, apart from its acidic counterpart, on immune functions. Contrary to the immune suppressive effect of lactic acid, we uncover an immune protective role of sodium lactate through the boosting of stem-like CD8+ T cells in cancer treatment. This discovery sheds new light on metabolic reprogramming of immune functions and differentiates the role of lactate and tumor acidity on antitumor immunity.
Results
Lactate promotes antitumor immunity through CD8+ T cells in multiple tumor models
To elucidate the effect of lactate on anti-tumor immune response, we treated tumor bearing mice with subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of sodium lactate solution (1.68 g/kg, pH 7.4, Fig. 1a. All future references to lactate refer to sodium lactate unless otherwise specified). Glucose solution (5 g/kg, pH 7.4) was used as a control. Both injections were prepared as physiologically isotonic solutions. In the MC38 colon cancer model, lactate treatment suppressed tumor growth significantly, while in contrast, glucose had minimal effect (Fig. 1b). The immune cell dependence was tested on three major immune cell populations (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and macrophages) in tumor microenvironment. Lactate treatment shows no effect on the tumor growth in Rag1−/− mice, indicating that T cells are necessary for the lactate-induced tumor growth inhibition (Fig. 1c). Depletion of CD8+ T cells abolished the antitumor effect of lactate (Fig. 1d). In contrast, the anti-tumor efficacy of lactate was not affected by the blockings of CD4+ T cells or macrophages (Fig. 1e, f). These results clarify that lactate promotes anti-tumor immunity through CD8+ T cells.
While lactate shows potent tumor growth inhibition in multiple animal cohorts and tumor models, no complete response was achieved with single agent treatment (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1 a, b). To further explore a more potent antitumor effect for mechanistic study and potential clinical application, we employed two immunotherapy regimens, which consist of anti-PD-1 as an example of checkpoint blockade therapy or PC7A nanovaccine for T cell therapy22 in three murine tumor models. Glucose solution was used as a control (Fig. 2a).
In the MC38 model, lactate treatment significantly improved the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy with slower tumor growth and prolonged survival (Fig. 2b). Combination of lactate and anti-PD-1 treatment resulted in tumor-free outcomes in 50% of mice while all mice were lost in other groups before day 60. In contrast, glucose failed to improve the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-PD-1 (Fig. 2b). A delayed initial treatment (from day14) was also tested. Lactate shows similar anti-tumor efficacy and benefits the anti-PD1 therapy (Supplementary Fig. 1c). In the TC-1 tumor model which is transfected with human papilloma virus (HPV) E6/7 proteins, we observed a similar boosting effect of lactate on anti-PD-1 efficacy whereas glucose showed no effect (Fig. 2c). We used E743–62-PC7A nanovaccine (Vax) which primes an E7-specific CD8+ T cell response in the TC-1 tumor model22. Lactate treatment significantly improved the anti-tumor efficacy of the nanovaccine. In contrast, glucose injection abolished the anti-tumor efficacy of the nanovaccine (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 1b). In the B16F10 melanoma model, lactate treatment also significantly improved the efficacy of anti-PD-1 while glucose had a slight opposite effect (Fig. 2d). Similar to single agent therapy, the efficacy of combination therapy is dependent on CD8+ T cells but not on CD4+ T cells or macrophages (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 1d). Overall, these data suggest that lactate boosts anti-tumor immunity through CD8+ T cells in vivo.
Lactate treatment increases tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells
To elucidate the T cell immune microenvironment of lactate-augmented anti-tumor immunity, we analyzed CD3+ T cells from MC38 tumors and tumor draining lymph nodes (DLNs) using single cell RNA sequencing analysis (sc-RNAseq, 10x genomics platform) after treatment by anti-PD-1 alone or combined with lactate (Fig. 3a). A delayed initial treatment (from day 14) was used to make sure we collect sufficient tumor tissue for downstream analysis. Overall, 21,826 single CD3+ T cells from both treatment conditions were subjected to the following analysis. First, we performed unsupervised graph-based clustering analysis with Seurat23 to define major phenotypic T cell populations, which revealed 21 clusters and were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) algorithm (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Using well-established marker genes (e.g., Cd8a, Pdcd1, Cd4, Foxp3, Ctla4, etc.), we identified 11 CD8+ T cell, 7 CD4+ helper T cell (CD4+ Th), and 3 CD4+ regulatory T cell (CD4+ Treg) clusters (Fig. 3 b, c and Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 1 for cell count in each cluster).
Lactate treatment significantly increased the total number of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Data 1). Gene set enrichment analysis of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells showed that lactate treatment induced a significant upregulation of T cell function and signaling related genes (e.g., Fasl, Gzmb, Prf1, Il2ra, Ifngr1, Il7r and Ccl3) and pathways (e.g., JAK-STAT and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 3). Selected genes (Ccl3, Il7r, Gzmb) elevated by lactate treatment in the single cell analysis were further verified in OT-I T cells in cell culture by qPCR analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4). Flow cytometry analysis validated the increased CD8+ T cell infiltration in MC38 tumors following lactate treatment (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, lactate treatment significantly reduced the percentage of apoptotic CD8+ T cells as gated by cleaved Caspase 3 (Fig. 3f).
The 11 CD8+ T cell clusters follow a typical differentiation process from naïve to exhausted states observed during anti-tumor immune response (Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 1, see Supplementary Data 2 for marker gene list). Among them, we identified 2 naïve T cell clusters (CD8-1 and CD8-2), 2 stem-like (pre-exhausted) T cell clusters (CD8-5 and CD8-6), 4 exhausted T cell clusters (CD8-7 through CD8-10) and 3 cell clusters in intermediate status (CD8-3, CD8-4 and CD8-11). Chi-square analysis (shown as ratio of observed to expected cell numbers, RO/E) revealed that lactate treatment led to a consistent increase in cell numbers in stem-like T cell clusters in tumor while exhausted clusters responded differentially (Supplementary Fig. 2b and Supplementary Data 1).
Lactate treatment increases stem-like CD8+ T cell population in MC38 tumors
To further investigate the effect of lactate on different CD8+ T cell subtypes, we analyzed the differentiation trajectory of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells using pseudotime analysis by Monocle 2 (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5a)24. The trajectory was divided into 7 states with unsupervised clustering, which begins with a stem-like state 1 and differentiates into exhausted states. Stem-like CD8+ T cells in state 1 have high abundance of stem-like genes (Tcf7, Il7r, Cxcr3) and low abundance of effector genes (Ifng, Gzmb, Gzmc, Gzmf) and exhaustion genes (Lag3, Pdcd1, Havcr2, Entpd1) (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 5b, c and Supplementary Data 3).
We observed that lactate treatment resulted in the most significant increase in the number of stem-like CD8+ T cells (state 1) over all other T cell states (Fig. 4c). We used flow cytometry to confirm the increase in the number of tumor infiltrating stem-like T cells (Fig. 4d) and elevated expression of the TCF-1 protein in the total population of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4 e, f, histograms and controls are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6a) in response to lactate treatment. Collectively, these results show that lactate treatment increased the number of stem-like T cells and elevated the expression of Tcf7/TCF-1 in CD8+ T cells in vivo.
Lactate increases TCF-1 expression and reduces apoptosis of CD8+ T cells during ex vivo expansion
To elucidate the effect of lactate on CD8+ T cells, we first investigated whether lactate impacts the ex vivo culture of CD8+ T cells derived from mouse splenocytes or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). OT-I splenocytes were obtained from C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J (OT-I transgenic) mice and stimulated with OVA peptide (OVAp, SIINFEKL) and IL-2 for two days, followed by cell culture with anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and IL-2 (Fig. 5a). The dose of lactate for in vitro T cell culture was set to 40 mM to mimic the lactate concentration in tumor interstitial fluid (TIF) (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Lactate treatment significantly increased the number of TCF-1hiCXCR3hi cells and mean fluorescent intensity of TCF-1 in CD8+ T cells compared to control condition (RPMI medium containing 2 mM lactate, Fig. 5 b, c and Supplementary 6c). Increased TCF-1 expression by lactate was also observed in memory T cells cultured with IL-15 (Supplementary 6d)25. In CD44hi CD62Lhi central memory T cells, sodium lactate treatment led to a 26% increase of TCF-1 expression on day 8 of the culture. Similarly, in IL-2 induced effector T cells, sodium lactate treatment leads to a 30% increase of TCF-1 expression on day 8 of the culture. Comparable to our in vivo observation (Fig. 3f), lactate treatment during ex vivo expansion reduced the percentage of apoptotic CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5d, e). Of note, by examining the co-staining of TCF-1 and active caspase 3, apoptotic CD8+ T cells were enriched in the low TCF-1 expressing population (Fig. 5d). This result is consistent with reports of Bcl2 induction by Tcf7 upregulation, which inhibits apoptosis26–28. Finally, we quantified the mRNA expressions for genes of interest during the T cell expansion by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Lactate treatment significantly increased the expression level of Tcf7 mRNA, while insignificant differences were observed with activation/exhaustion related genes including Pdcd1, Lag3 and Ifng and metabolism related genes including Acss1, Acss2, Hif1a, Ldha and Ldhb (Fig. 5f).
To study the lactate effect on human CD8+ T cells, we employed PBMCs isolated from human cord blood. PBMCs were cultured in lactate-augmented (40 mM) or control RPMI medium with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 modified microbeads and IL-2 for 8 days (Fig. 5g). Similar to the results from OT-I CD8+ T cells, lactate treatment significantly increased the TCF-1hiCXCR3hi cell population and the mean florescent intensity of TCF-1 protein in human CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5h, i and Supplementary Fig. 6c). In contrast, lactic acid, the conjugated acid form of lactate, resulted in significant CD8+ T cells death in vitro at 40 mM in RPMI medium (pH = 4.6) and reduced the induction effect of lactate on TCF-1 expression at pH 6.9 (Supplementary Fig. 6e, f).
Lactate induces T cell stemness through epigenetic regulation
Besides its newly uncovered role as a primary carbon fuel source, lactate has additional functions as an agonist to G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling and as an inhibitor to histone deacetylase (HDAC). As a carbon fuel source, lactate is converted to pyruvate by lactate dehydrogenase B and further fuels the TCA cycle19,20. As a GPCR agonist (e.g., GPR81), lactate regulates multiple biological processes through the secondary messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP)29,30. Also, lactate has been reported as an HDAC inhibitor with an IC50 of 40 mM31. The increase of TCF-1 expression in CD8+ T cells may arise from lactate augmented metabolites (e.g., pyruvate, amino acids), lactate-mediated GPCR signaling or HDAC inhibition (Fig. 6a).
To investigate the biochemical mechanism, we first measured the abundance of ∼200 common metabolites in CD8+ T cells (OT-I) cultured with lactate-augmented (40 mM) or control RPMI medium (Fig. 6b). Lactate treatment boosted central carbon metabolism, including a variety of metabolites in glucose/lactate, amino acid, nucleotide and lipid metabolisms (Fig. 6b, c and Supplementary Data 4). The increased abundance of lactate, pyruvate, TCA cycle intermediates and multiple amino acids correlates with lactate influx, conversion to pyruvate and subsequent utilization in the TCA cycle as shown by the stable isotope tracing study (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Data 5). In regards to the GPCR signaling pathway, lactate treatment increased cAMP levels in the T cells.
We next examined the expression of TCF-1 in the CD8+ T cells as a function of selected metabolites or a GPR81 agonist (Fig. 6d, e). Increasing glucose concentration from 10 to 25 mM in RPMI medium showed no effect on TCF-1 expression. Pyruvate (0-20 mM), the direct metabolite downstream of lactate conversion in cells, did not cause increase of TCF-1. Acetate, another monocarboxylate species that can be synthesized from pyruvate and fuel TCA cycle through acetyl-CoA, also had little effect. Lactate augmented amino acids, including essential amino acids (e.g., Methionine and Leucine) and nonessential amino acids (e.g., Glycine and Alanine), also did not increase TCF-1 expression. A GPR81 ligand, 3-chloro-5-hydroxybenzoic acid (3Cl-5OH-BA), which stimulates cAMP production similar to lactate-induced effect30,32, didn’t increase TCF-1. These results indicate lactate mediated HDAC inhibition as a potential driver for increased T cell stemness.
Lactate has been reported as an endogenous chemical inhibitor (IC50 = 40 mM) of HDAC that links the metabolic state of cells to gene transcription31. To further corroborate the role of HDAC inhibition on T cell stemness, OT-I CD8+ T cells were treated with known HDAC inhibitors including trichostatin A (TSA), D-lactate (all other lactates refer to L-lactate unless noted otherwise), or butyrate. Flow cytometry and qPCR analyses showed elevated TCF-1 expressions similar to the treatment outcome by 40 mM lactate (Fig. 6d, e). Epigenomic profiling identified acetylation of H3K27 at the Tcf7 super enhancer site correlates with the naïve and central memory identity of CD8+ T cells33. Western blot of lactate treated CD8+ T cells showed 3.5-fold increase of acetylation at the H3K27 site (Fig. 6f). Cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT&RUN) PCR analysis further confirmed significant H3K27ac enrichment at the Tcf7 super enhance locus in the lactate treated CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6g).
Collectively, these results indicate that lactate directly induces CD8+ T cell stemness through epigenetic regulation of cell identity.
Adoptive transfer of lactate-pretreated CD8+ T cells achieves potent tumor growth inhibition in vivo
Recent studies have linked TCF-1 expressing stem-like CD8+ T cells, which retain polyfunctionality and persistence of cytotoxic function, as the key T cell subsets which respond to adoptive cell transfer therapy, anti-PD-1 and vaccination therapy34–40. To investigate whether lactate-induced TCF-1 expressing CD8+ T cells can improve tumor therapy, we harvested and intravenously injected OVA-specific CD8+ T cells into MC38-OVA tumor bearing mice (Fig. 7a). OVA-specific T cells pretreated with lactate ex vivo demonstrated significantly improved tumor growth inhibition over those cultured in control RPMI medium (Fig. 7b). To further investigate the effect of transferred vs. endogenous OVA-specific CD8+ T cells on antitumor efficacy, we employed OVA tetramer+ CD8+ T cells from CD45.2 expressing donors (OT-I mice) and transferred them to CD45.1 expressing tumor bearing mice (Fig. 7c). Seven days after cell transfer, we analyzed the number of host (CD45.1+) and donor (CD45.2+) CD8+ T cells in tumors by flow cytometry. Lactate pretreatment significantly expanded CD45.2+ tetramer+ CD8+ T cells to a larger clonal size over those from control RPMI medium (Fig. 7 d, e). In contrast, the number of endogenous CD45.1+ tetramer+ CD8+ T cells showed no significant difference after transfer of CD45.2+ T cells with and without lactate pretreatment (Fig. 7d, f).
These data support that lactate-pretreated CD8+ T cells, which have high TCF-1 expression, show improved anti-tumor immune response in vivo.
Discussion
In this study, we report a mechanistic link between lactate, CD8+ T cell stemness and improved outcome of cancer immunotherapy. Recent studies show lactate overtakes glucose as the primary fuel source of most tissues20,21. The effect of lactate on antitumor immunity is not well understood with immune suppressive functions reported for lactic acid15–17. Our side-by-side comparison between subcutaneous administration of high dose sodium lactate versus glucose revealed an immune protective role of lactate (Figs. 1 and 2). We theorize the underappreciated immune protective role of lactate is caused by the dominant immunosuppressive effect of tumor acidity. In the highly glycolytic and poorly vascularized microenvironment of solid tumors, glucose is preferentially converted to lactic acids by the cancer cells, which are then secreted to the extracellular environment through monocarboxylate transporters41–43. The accumulating lactic acids lead to elevated concentrations of lactate and tumor acidity. Using an in vitro T cell culture model, we and others show significant CD8+ T cell death induced by 40 mM lactic acid in the RPMI medium (pH = 4.6) (Supplementary Fig. 6e) or hydrochloric acid (pH = 5.8)16, while 40 mM sodium lactate in the RPMI medium (pH = 7.4) protected CD8+ T cell viability (Fig. 5d, e). At mildly acidic pH (6.9), addition of 40 mM lactate while maintaining medium pH increased TCF-1 expressions in CD8+ T cells. However, lowering the medium pH from 7.4 to 6.9 was sufficient to abolish the lactate-induced increase of T cell stemness observed at pH 7.4 (Supplementary Fig. 6f), further corroborating that environmental acidity can override lactate effect in the elevation of T cell stemness. In in vivo animal studies, sodium lactate treatment increased the lactate dose without elevating tumor acidity, which led to the increased stemness of CD8+ T cells and tumor growth inhibition (Figs. 1 and 2). Lactate-mediated antitumor efficacy is largely driven by the CD8+ T cells in the MC38 tumors as shown by the abrogated effect in mice with CD8+ T cell depletion (Fig. 1d).
Lactate has broad physiological functions in carbon metabolism, cell signaling and epigenetic regulation20,29–31,44. Our mechanistic studies reveal lactate-mediated HDAC inhibition is primarily responsible for increased stemness of CD8+ T cells. In contrast, glucose, lactate-augmented metabolites (e.g., pyruvate, various amino acids) or GPCR signaling (e.g., GPR81 agonist) did not appear to contribute to the T cell stemness. Known HDAC inhibitors (e.g., TSA, butyrate) also increased T cell stemness in the current experimental conditions (Fig. 6d, e). However, prolonged exposure at elevated concentrations of these agents resulted in decreased viability of T cells (Supplementary Fig. 8). In contrast, ex vivo expansion of CD8+ T cells under high lactate concentrations reduced cell apoptosis over prolonged culture (Fig. 5). In vivo administration of high dose sodium lactate further demonstrates the safety of lactate therapy as indicated by minimal changes of blood pH and body weight (Supplementary Fig. 9).
As a common metabolite, lactate can be utilized by many cell types and will have pleiotropic effects in a context dependent manner. Brown et al reported that tumor cell-derived lactatic acid activates GPR81 in dendritic cells and prevents presentation of tumor-specific antigens to other immune cells45. Raychaudhuri et al. found intratumoral lactate attenuates type I interferon production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells leading to a tolerogenic phenotype46. Feng et al. reported tumor cell-derived lacate induces upregulation of immune checkpoint PD-L1 in human lung cancer cells47. Previous studies also show that tumor-derived lactic acid fuels regulatory T cells and induces M2 polarization of macrophages17,48,49. Many of these studies relied on tumor-derived lactic acid or knockout models of lactate dehydrogenase A or monocarboxylate transporter, which include the convoluted effects from lactate, tumor acidity and altered cancer cell metabolism. It is conceivable that lactate may also exert opposite effect on these cell populations compared to lactic acid. The delineation of the lactate versus lactic acid effects on other immune cell types is worthy of further investigations.
Endogenous lactate is largely produced during intense exercise. Consistent with our discovery, Johnson et al reported that lactate is a potential mediator for exercise-induced immune protection50. In the clinic, lactate is widely used as Ringer’s lactate or Hartmann’s solution with well-documented safety profile for fluid resuscitation and for reducing metabolic acidosis. The current Ringer’s formulation or a modified solution with increased lactate concentration may protect CD8+ T cell functions during immunotherapy in cancer patients. As a more direct implementation of lactate into the clinical workflow, the inclusion of lactate in ex vivo T cell expansion may benefit chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy.
In summary, results from this study revealed the unusual immune protective role of lactate in antitumor immunity. Single cell transcriptomics and flow cytometry analysis show an increased subpopulation of stem-like TCF-1-expressing CD8+ T cells upon lactate treatment, which is further confirmed by ex vivo culture of CD8+ T cells from mouse splenocytes and human PBMCs. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by lactate is responsible for the increased TCF-1 expression on the CD8+ T cells. Lactate has the potential to augment the therapeutic outcomes of immune checkpoint blockade, T cell vaccine and adoptive T cell transfer therapy.
Methods
Reagents
The details of reagents used are provide in Supplementary Data 6.
Mice
Male and female (6–10 week) C57BL/6 J(Strain #:000664), NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid/J(Strain #:001303), C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J (Strain #:003831), B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J (Strain #:002216), B6.SJL-PtprcaPepcb/BoyJ (Strain #:002014) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. All mice were maintained in specific pathogen free animal facility with controlled temperature (68–79 oF), humidity (30–70%), and light/dark cycle (lights between 6 am and 6 pm). Mice were euthanized at the end of the experiment with CO2 asphyxiation with cervical dislocation as a physical secondary assurance method. All animal experiments were performed with ethical compliance and approval from Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Cells
Murine melanoma B16F10 and colon adenocarcinoma MC38 cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). TC-1 cells were kindly provided by Dr. T. C. Wu at John Hopkins University. MC38-OVA cells were made by lentiviral transduction of OVA gene. All cancer cell lines were routinely tested using e-Myco mycoplasma PCR Detection kit (Bulldog Bio Inc) and cultured in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 U/mL streptomycin and 1×GlutaMax under 5% CO2 at 37 oC. Immune cells from mouse or human were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplied with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 20 mM HEPES, 50 μM 2-Mercaptoethanol and 1 × GlutaMax.
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Human cord blood samples were obtained from University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Parkland Hospital according to the regulation and the use approval of human cord blood in compliance with UTSW Human Investigation Committe protocol (STU 112010-047). The procedure is approved through a protocol exempt from informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of UTSW and the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were purified from cord blood by Ficoll-Paque Plus according to the manufacturer’s manual.
Tumor growth and treatment
C57BL/6 J mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 MC38 tumor cells, or 1.5 × 105 TC-1 tumor cells or 1.5 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells on the right flank on day 0. Same volume (2 mL) of isotonic sodium lactate (150 mM, pH 7.4) or glucose solution (278 mM, pH 7.4) was administered subcutaneously under the dorsal skin near the neck. For MC38 model, animals were intraperitoneally (i.p.) treated with anti-PD-1 (10 mg/kg, day 7 and 10) in combination with glucose or sodium lactate (s.c., 5 g/kg or 1.68 g/kg, respectively) daily, beginning on day 8. For TC-1 tumor model, animals were treated with anti-PD-1 (i.p. 10 mg/kg, day 11 and 14) or PC7A vaccine (s.c. 0.5 μg E7 peptide, day 11 and 16) in combination with glucose or sodium lactate (s.c., 5 g/kg or 1.68 g/kg, respectively) daily, beginning on day 12. For B16F10 tumor model, animals were treated with anti-PD-1 (i.p. 10 mg/kg, day 5 and 8) in combination with glucose or sodium lactate (s.c., 5 g/kg or 1.68 g/kg, respectively) daily, beginning on day 6. For immune cell depletion assay, anti-CD8 antibodies, anti-CD4 antibodies or anti-NK1.1 were administrated every three days during the treatment (i.p. 10 mg/kg). For single cell analysis and in vivo flow cytometry analysis in MC38 tumor model, animals were intraperitoneally (i.p.) treated with anti-PD-1 (10 mg/kg, day 14 and 17) in combination with or without sodium lactate (s.c., 1.68 g/kg) daily, beginning on day 15. Tumor and tumor draining lymph nodes were collected on day 20 for analysis. Tumor volumes were measured with a caliper by the length (L), width (W) and height (H) and calculated as tumor volume = L×W×H/2. Animals were considered dead when tumor volume reached > 1500 mm3. Tumor free C57BL/6 J mice were used for body weight study in Supplementary Fig. 7b.
Lactate concentration in tumor interstitial fluid
Tumor interstitial fluid was collected from freshly resected MC38 tumor. Specimens were centrifuged against a 70 μm cell strainer at 4 °C for 5 min at 300 g. Flow-through tissue interstitial fluid was centrifuged at 4 °C for 5 min at 500 g. Supernatant were flash-frozen and stored at −80 °C before batch analysis. The lactate concentration was determined with lactate assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, MAK064) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Lactate Concentration in plasma
Mouse blood (1 mL) was collected from lactate treated mice at different time points (0, 0.1, 0.5, 2, 10, and 24 h after lactate injection) using K3 EDTA blood collection tubes. Cells were removed from plasma by centrifugation for 10 mins at 2000 g at 4 oC. Lactate concentration in plasma was measured by BioProfile® FLEX2 (Nova Biomedical). Tumor free C57BL/6 J mice were used for this set of experiment.
pH in blood
Mouse blood (1 mL) was collected from lactate treated mice at different time points (0, 0.1, 2, 10, and 24 h after lactate injection) to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The pH was measured immediately after collection with pH meter (Mettler Toledo AG). Tumor free C57BL/6 J mice were used for this set of experiment.
Single cell RNA sequencing
For single cell RNAseq analysis, we treated 10 mice under each treatment condition (i.e., anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1+Lactate). We isolated the tumor and a single draining lymph node from each mouse, then pooled cells from each tissue type and proceeded with library preparation. Four pooled libraries (tumor T cells from anti-PD-1 treatment; tumor T cells from anti-PD-1+Lactate treatment; lymph node cells from anti-PD-1 treatment; lymph node cells from anti-PD-1+Lactate treatment, Data_file_S1) were sequenced and analyzed. Tumor-infiltrating CD3+ T cells were obtained by microbeads enrichment and flow sorting. Briefly, CD45+ cells from tumors were isolated with Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi) and purified with Dead Cell Removal Kit (Miltenyi) and CD45 (TIL) MicroBeads (Miltenyi) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified cells were further sorted for live CD45+CD3+ population on BD Aria II SORP sorter. Tumor draining lymph node cells were flow sorted for live CD45+ population. Isolated cells from each tissue type and each treatment condition were pooled and proceeded with library preparation individually. Cells were barcoded with Chromium Single Cell 5’ Library & Gel Bead Kit (10x Genomics). Library construction was performed following the protocol of Chromium Single Cell 5’ Library Construction Kit. Libraries were pooled with Chromium i7 Multiplex Kit. The final pooled libraries were sequenced on NovaSeq S4 platform (Novogene).
Analysis of single cell RNA sequencing data
Sequencing reads were aligned to mouse genome (mm10) and unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) were counted for each gene using Cell Ranger 3.0.1 (10x Genomics) The R software (3.6.1) package Seurat (version 3.0.1) was used for further analysis. Cells with a high or low proportion of detected genes (>2 × median absolute deviations) and those with a high proportion of mitochondrial genes (>15%) were removed. Cells were divided into clusters with graph-based clustering using the Seurat function Find Clusters at resolution 0.8. Marker genes for each cell cluster were calculated with Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with log10 (fold change) > 0.1. Monocle 2 (version 2.10.1) was used to estimate a pseudo-temporal path of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cell differentiation. Monocle object was formed by Monocle implemented newCellDataSet function with lowerDetectionLimit = 0.5. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified by Limma (3.40.5) R package with an absolute log2 fold change (FC) > 0.05 and q < 0.0151. Pathway enrichment was performed on ranked DEG lists with GSEA using KEGG under gene size 15 and FDR 0.05.
Ex vivo culture of activated CD8+ T cells
For mouse studies, single cell suspensions from lymph nodes and spleens of C57BL/6-Tg (TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J transgenic mice were activated with SIINFEKL peptide (1 μg/mL) and hIL-2 (50 IU/mL). 48 h post activation, CD8+ T cells were further cultured with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. For human studies, human PBMCs were activated and cultured with Dynabeads™ Human T-Activator CD3/CD28 according to manufacturer’s instruction. T cells were passaged every 48 h.
Flow cytometry analysis
Single cell suspensions were obtained from cell culture or mouse tissues. Mouse tumors were dissociated by Collagenase (1 mg/mL) and DNAse I (0.2 mg/mL) and lymph nodes were dissociated with 70 μm cell strainer. For each single cell suspension, Fc receptor was blocked with anti-FcγIII/II (clone 2.4G2) for 20 min, followed by staining with selective antibodies of cell surface markers and live/dead dyes. Intracellular markers including active caspase 3 and TCF-1 were stained after cell permeabilization with True-Nuclear transcription factor buffer set (BioLegend). Data were collected on BD LSR Fortessa or Beckman CytoFLEX flow cytometer and analyzed by FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR) software. Gating strategies were listed in Supplementary Fig. 10.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Total RNA from T cells was extracted with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit and reversed transcribed with iScript-gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR was performed with QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and different primer sets on CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The levels of gene expression were determined with delta-delta Ct method using β-actin as the internal control.
Metabolomics analysis
Metabolites were extracted from cultured CD8+ T cells with 80/20 methanol/water after 3 cycles of freeze-thaw. Data acquisition was performed by reverse-phase chromatography on a 1290 UHPLC liquid chromatography (LC) system interfaced to a high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF mass spectrometer (MS) (Agilent Technologies, CA). Analytes were separated on an Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 column (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm, Waters, MA) at room temperature. Mobile phase A composition was 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B composition was 0.1% formic acid in 100% acetonitrile. The LC gradient was 0 min: 1% B; 5 min: 5% B; 15 min: 99% B; 23 min: 99% B; 24 min: 1% B; 25 min: 1% B. The flow rate was 250 μL/min. The sample injection volume was 5 μL. The MS was operated in both positive and negative (ESI + and ESI-) modes. ESI source conditions were set as follows: dry gas temperature 225 °C and flow 18 L/min, fragmentor voltage 175 V, sheath gas temperature 350 °C and flow 12 L/min, nozzle voltage 500 V, and capillary voltage +3500 V in positive mode and −3500 V in negative. The instrument was set to acquire over the full m/z range of 40–1700 in both modes, with the MS acquisition rate of 1 spectrum/s in profile format. Raw data were processed using Profinder B.08.00 SP3 software (Agilent Technologies, CA) with an in-house database containing retention time and accurate mass information on 600 standards from Mass Spectrometry Metabolite Library (IROA Technologies, MA) which was created under the same analysis conditions. The in-house database matching parameters were: mass tolerance 10 ppm; retention time tolerance 0.5 min. Peak integration result was manually curated in Profinder for improved consistency and exported as a spreadsheet. Data were filtered and analyzed with Metaboanalyst 5.0 and plotted with R 4.0.1. Cut-off for significant change was set to FDR 0.1, fold change 1.5.
Stable isotope labeling
Activated CD8+ T cells from OT-1 mice were rinsed in PBS, then cultured with medium containing the isotopically labeled glucose or lactate for 8 h. For analysis of intracellular metabolites by GC-MS, 2 × 106 cells were rinsed in ice-cold normal saline and lysed with three freeze-thaw cycles in cold 80% methanol. The lysates were centrifuged to remove precipitated protein, and the supernatants with an internal control (10 ul of sodium 2-oxobutyrate) were evaporated, then re-suspended in 40 ul anhydrous pyridine at 70 oC for 15 min. The samples were added to GC/MS autoinjector vials containing 70 ul of N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) derivatization reagent and incubated at 70 oC for 1 h. The samples were analyzed using either an Agilent 6890 or 7890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5973 N or 5975 C Mass Selective Detector, respectively. The mass isotopologues were corrected for natural abundance.
Immunoblot analysis
Total protein from T cells was extracted with SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 U/mL universal nuclease added protease inhibitor) and quantified with BCA assay (23227, Thermo Fisher). Protein was denatured with Laemmli protein sample buffer with 10% 2-mercaptoethanol by incubating at 95 oC for 10 min. Same amount of denatured protein were subjected to electrophoresis using the standard SDS-PAGE method with 4–15% gel (4568086, Bio-Rad) and then wet-transferred to a 0.45 μm polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk, membrane was incubated for 2 h with primary antibodies (1:1,000 dilution with 5% BSA in TBST) at room temperature and for 1 h at room temperature with fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10000 dilution with 5% non-fat milk in TBST). Blots were imaged with Licor Odyssey and analyzed with Image Studio Lite.
CUT&RUN (Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease) PCR
CUT&RUN was performed with CUT&RUN Assay Kit (Cell Signaling Technology #86652) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells from OT-1 mice were captured by Concanavalin A-coated magnetic beads (10 μL per million cells) at room temperature for 5 min with rotation. Captured cells were permeabilized in 100 μL Antibody Binding Buffer (+ Spermidine + Protease inhibitor cocktail + digitonin). After permeabilization, 2 μL H3K27ac antibody or 5 μL IgG were added to each reaction for antibody binding (4 oC, 6 h, with rotation). After 3 times of washing, cells were incubated with Protein A and Protein G-fused Micrococcal Nuclease (pAG-MNase) at 4 oC for 1 h with rotation. By adding cold CaCl2, pAG-MNase were activated and antibody-associated protein-DNA complex was released at 4 oC for 30 min. Stop solution was then added to the reaction followed by 30 min additional incubation at 37 oC. The released DNA was purified using spin columns (Cell Signaling Technology #86652). Tcf7 super enhancer were quantified with qPCR. The levels of H3K27ac enrichment of Tcf7 super enhancer were determined with by ratio to IgG sample after normalization to Cd3e.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.3. Two-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the tumor growth data, logrank test was used to analyze mice survival data, unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to analyze other data unless specified. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Ralph DeBerardinis for discussions on metabolomic analysis, Zhaohui Wang, Gang Huang and Zachary Bennett for the helpful discussions on animal experiments. We thank Drs. Jianfeng Ye and Hongyi Zhang for suggestions on sc-RNAseq library preparation and data analysis. Metabolomics analysis was performed by the Metabolomics Facility at the Children’s Research Institute of UT Southwestern Medical Center. We thank the following fundings for the support of this work: National Institutes of Health grant R01CA216839 (J.G.). National Institutes of Health grant U01CA218422 (J.G.). Mendelson-Young endowment in cancer therapeutics(J.G.). We acknowledge NIH P01 HD087150 for cord blood collection (Dr. Ruth Ann Word).
Source data
Author contributions
J.G. and Q.F designed the study. Q.F., Z.L., T.H., J.C., J.Wang, S.L., W.L., Z.S., and J.S. performed the experiments. X.Y., Q.F., and J.S. analyzed the multi-omics data. J.G., Y.-X.F., B.L., B.S. supervised the study. Q.F. wrote the original manuscript. J.G., J.Wilhelm, Y.-X.F., B.L., B.S. edited the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper. The single cell RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited to Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.4387066). https://zenodo.org/record/4387066#.Ytl1uoTMKUk Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Custom code was not generated for this manuscript. The following publicly available pipelines were utilized for analysis: raw sequencing data were processed using the 10X Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline (https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/tutorials/gex-analysis-nature-publication), standard preprocessing and quality control of scRNA-seq data was based on Seurat Guided tutorials (https://satijalab.org/seurat/articles/pbmc3k_tutorial.html), and Monocle2 was used to determine the single-cell pseduotime trajectory (http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/monocle-release/tutorials/).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Qiang Feng, Zhida Liu, Xuexin Yu.
Contributor Information
Baran D. Sumer, Email: Baran.Sumer@UTSouthwestern.edu
Bo Li, Email: Bo.Li@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Yang-Xin Fu, Email: Yang-Xin.Fu@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Jinming Gao, Email: Jinming.Gao@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-32521-8.
References
- 1.Pearce EL, Pearce EJ. Metabolic pathways in immune cell activation and quiescence. Immunity. 2013;38:633–643. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jung J, Zeng H, Horng T. Metabolism as a guiding force for immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:85–93. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0217-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.O’Neill LAJ, Kishton RJ, Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:553–565. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang CH, et al. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2013;153:1239–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang C, et al. CD5L/AIM regulates lipid biosynthesis and restrains Th17 cell pathogenicity. Cell. 2015;163:1413–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O’Sullivan D, et al. Memory CD8(+) T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development. Immunity. 2014;41:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leone RD, et al. Glutamine blockade induces divergent metabolic programs to overcome tumor immune evasion. Science. 2019;366:1013–1021. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson MO, et al. Distinct regulation of Th17 and Th1 cell differentiation by glutaminase-dependent metabolism. Cell. 2018;175:1780–1795. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patel CH, Leone RD, Horton MR, Powell JD. Targeting metabolism to regulate immune responses in autoimmunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:669–688. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang RN, Green DR. Metabolic checkpoints in activated T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:907–915. doi: 10.1038/ni.2386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jorfeldt L, Juhlindannfelt A, Karlsson J. Lactate release in relation to tissue lactate in human skeletal-muscle during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1978;44:350–352. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.3.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kandler O. Carbohydrate-metabolism in lactic-acid bacteria. Antonie Van. Leeuwenhoek. 1983;49:209–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00399499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. Ueber den stoffwechsel von tumoren im körper. Klin. Wochenschr. 1926;5:829–832. doi: 10.1007/BF01726240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Warburg O. The metabolism of carcinoma cells. J. Cancer Res. 1925;9:148–163. doi: 10.1158/jcr.1925.148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fischer K, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109:3812–3819. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brand A, et al. LDHA-associated lactic acid production blunts tumor immunosurveillance by T and NK cells. Cell Metab. 2016;24:657–671. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Watson MJ, et al. Metabolic support of tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells by lactic acid. Nature. 2021;591:645–651. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03045-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hensley CT, et al. Metabolic heterogeneity in human lung tumors. Cell. 2016;164:681–694. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Faubert B, et al. Lactate metabolism in human lung tumors. Cell. 2017;171:358–371. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hui S, et al. Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature. 2017;551:115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature24057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hui S, et al. Quantitative fluxomics of circulating metabolites. Cell Metab. 2020;32:676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luo M, et al. A STING-activating nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12:648–654. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–420. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qiu X, et al. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:309–315. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim, M. V., Ouyang, W., Liao, W., Zhang, M. Q. & Li, M. O. Murine In vitro Memory T Cell Differentiation. Bio Protoc.4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Chen Z, et al. TCF-1-centered transcriptional network drives an effector versus exhausted CD8 T cell-fate decision. Immunity. 2019;51:840–855. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gautam S, et al. The transcription factor c-Myb regulates CD8(+) T cell stemness and antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:337–349. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0311-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou XY, et al. Differentiation and Persistence of Memory CD8(+) T Cells Depend on T Cell Factor 1. Immunity. 2010;33:229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ahmed K, et al. An autocrine lactate loop mediates insulin-dependent inhibition of lipolysis through GPR81. Cell Metab. 2010;11:311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vardjan N, et al. Enhancement of Astroglial Aerobic Glycolysis by Extracellular Lactate-Mediated Increase in cAMP. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018;11:148. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Latham T, et al. Lactate, a product of glycolytic metabolism, inhibits histone deacetylase activity and promotes changes in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4794–4803. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dvorak CA, et al. Identification of hydroxybenzoic acids as selective lactate receptor (GPR81) agonists with antilipolytic effects. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:637–639. doi: 10.1021/ml3000676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He B, et al. CD8+ T cells utilize highly dynamic enhancer repertoires and regulatory circuitry in response to infections. Immunity. 2016;45:1341–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sade-Feldman M, et al. Defining T cell states associated with response to checkpoint immunotherapy in melanoma. Cell. 2018;175:998–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Siddiqui I, et al. Intratumoral Tcf1(+)PD-1(+)CD8(+) T cells with stem-like properties promote tumor control in response to vaccination and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Immunity. 2019;50:195–211. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kurtulus S, et al. Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy Induces Dynamic Changes in PD-1(-)CD8(+) Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells. Immunity. 2019;50:181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kamphorst AO, et al. Proliferation of PD-1+CD8 T cells in peripheral blood after PD-1-targeted therapy in lung cancer patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:4993–4998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705327114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Im SJ, et al. Defining CD8(+) T cells that provide the proliferative burst after PD-1 therapy. Nature. 2016;537:417–421. doi: 10.1038/nature19330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Krishna S, et al. Stem-like CD8 T cells mediate response of adoptive cell immunotherapy against human cancer. Science. 2020;370:1328–1334. doi: 10.1126/science.abb9847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vodnala, S. K. et al. T cell stemness and dysfunction in tumors are triggered by a common mechanism. Science363, eaau0135 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:325–337. doi: 10.1038/nrc3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Poole RC, Halestrap AP. Transport of lactate and other monocarboxylates across mammalian plasma-membranes. Am. J. Physiol. 1993;264:C761–C782. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.4.C761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reinfeld BI, et al. Cell-programmed nutrient partitioning in the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 2021;593:282–288. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03442-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brooks GA. The science and translation of lactate shuttle theory. Cell Metab. 2018;27:757–785. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brown TP, et al. The lactate receptor GPR81 promotes breast cancer growth via a paracrine mechanism involving antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2020;39:3292–3304. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1216-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Raychaudhuri D, et al. Lactate induces pro-tumor reprogramming in intratumoral plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1878. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Feng J, et al. Tumor cell-derived lactate induces TAZ-dependent upregulation of PD-L1 through GPR81 in human lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 2017;36:5829–5839. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kumagai S, et al. Lactic acid promotes PD-1 expression in regulatory T cells in highly glycolytic tumor microenvironments. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:201–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ohashi T, et al. M2-like macrophage polarization in high lactic acid-producing head and neck cancer. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1128–1134. doi: 10.1111/cas.13244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rundqvist, H. et al. Cytotoxic T-cells mediate exercise-induced reductions in tumor growth. Elife9, e59996 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Ritchie ME, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper. The single cell RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited to Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.4387066). https://zenodo.org/record/4387066#.Ytl1uoTMKUk Source data are provided with this paper.
Custom code was not generated for this manuscript. The following publicly available pipelines were utilized for analysis: raw sequencing data were processed using the 10X Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline (https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/tutorials/gex-analysis-nature-publication), standard preprocessing and quality control of scRNA-seq data was based on Seurat Guided tutorials (https://satijalab.org/seurat/articles/pbmc3k_tutorial.html), and Monocle2 was used to determine the single-cell pseduotime trajectory (http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/monocle-release/tutorials/).