Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2022 Aug 19;10:986412. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.986412

Radiolabeling of functional oligonucleotides for molecular imaging

Dunfang Liu 1,2, Qian Xia 1,2,*, Ding Ding 1,*, Weihong Tan 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC9449898  PMID: 36091456

Abstract

Molecular imaging has greatly advanced basic biology and translational medicine through visualization and quantification of molecular events in a cellular context and living organisms. Nuclear medicine, including positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission tomography (SPECT), is one of the most representative molecular imaging modalities which is widely used in clinical theranostics. Recently, numerous molecular imaging agents have been developed to improve the quality and expand the applicable diseases of molecular imaging. Based on the choice of specific imaging agents, molecular imaging is capable of studying tumor biological activities, detecting tumor metastasis, and imaging Alzheimer’s disease-related amyloid proteins. Among these imaging agents, functional oligonucleotides-based imaging probes are becoming increasingly important due to their unique features. Antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA, and aptamers are privileged molecular tools in precision medicine for cancer diagnosis and treatment. These chemically synthesized oligonucleotides without batch-to-batch variations are flexible to incorporate with other molecules without affecting their functionalities. Therefore, through the combination of oligonucleotides with radioisotopes, a series of molecular imaging agents were developed in the past decades to achieve highly sensitive and accurate biomedical imaging modalities for clinical theranostic. Due to the nature of oligonucleotides, the strategies of oligonucleotide radiolabeling are different from conventional small molecular tracers, and the radiolabeling strategy with rational design is highly correlated to the imaging quality. In this review, we summarize recent advancements in functional oligonucleotide radiolabeling strategies and respective molecular imaging applications. Meanwhile, challenges and future development insights of functional oligonucleotide-based radiopharmaceuticals are discussed in the end.

Keywords: functional oligonucleotides, radiolabeling, radiopharmaceutical, molecular imaging, precision medecine

Introduction

Molecular imaging is an emerging technique that allows in situ visualization, characterization, and investigation of molecular biological processes in humans or other living systems (Massoud and Gambhir, 2003; Cherry, 2004). As the most representative clinical molecular imaging modalities, positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) realized noninvasive and real-time evaluation of disease-related biomarkers that laid a solid foundation not only in precision medicine but also in the study of biomarkers biological processes such as metabolism, hypoxia, proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis (Luker and Piwnica-Worms, 2001; Pimlott and Sutherland, 2011; Derlin et al., 2018). Recently, taking advantage of targeting ligands such as antibodies and small molecules, receptors-overexpressed cells or tissues of lesions can be visualized and evaluated via PET imaging which facilitated the prediction of responses to targeted therapy and immune therapy (Wei et al., 2020). However, these targeting ligands suffered from several obstacles which hindered their further development. The large molecular weights (around 150 kD) of antibodies led to a prolonged blood half-life which adversely affected the target-to-background [T/B] ratio of imaging. Besides, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET imaging is a kind of passive targeting that only reflect disease sites’ metabolism behaviors but the distribution of certain biomarkers.

To further improve the quality of molecular imaging, it is essential to develop novel imaging probes integrated with other functional molecular tools. Recent approaches demonstrated oligonucleotides possess fascinating biological functions beyond natural genetic materials. Through the precise hybridization process, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) are capable of mediating cellular biological processes, and further achieving therapeutic purposes (Bennett, 2019; Hu et al., 2020). In addition, aptamer, which is a piece of DNA or RNA fragment, could interact with biomolecules or cell surface receptors specifically through the folding of conformation (Moutsiopoulou et al., 2019). Taking advantage of these unique features, these functional oligonucleotides were widely utilized in precision medicine for therapy, diagnosis, and imaging (Tavitian, 2003; Geary et al., 2015; Ding et al., 2020). Among these applications, novel radiopharmaceuticals based on functional oligonucleotide are of great interest due to the extraordinary advantages they provided. Oligonucleotides are fully chemical synthesized enabling readily large-scale production and strict quality control (Khvorova and Watts, 2017). Easy modification with a variety of chelators and precisely controlled conjugation sites make oligonucleotide a desirable radiolabeling platform for radiopharmaceutical developments with unlimited diversity. From the perspective of imaging, the general low MW of oligonucleotide facilitated fast clearance of the imaging probe once it accomplished imaging duty, greatly minimizing the radiation injuries to patients and the public.

To date, the majority of oligonucleotide-based molecular imaging applications could be briefly categorized into three categories and illustrated in scheme 1. 1) Imaging of specific oligonucleotides for the monitoring of ASO therapy (Bennett et al., 2019). ASO treatment relies on the complementary hybridization of an antisense oligonucleotide with a target oncogene mRNA sequence. Consequently, the radiolabeling antisense oligonucleotide is theoretically straightforward to realize noninvasive imaging of oncogene expression in vivo and predicts the responses of gene therapy. 2) Gene radiotherapy, which radiolabels oligonucleotides with therapeutic radionuclides, can effectively deliver considerable amounts of radionuclides into disease sites for therapy and reduce side effects on normal organs and tissues at the same time (Eckburg et al., 2020). 3) Aptamer-guided targeting imaging of disease-related biomarkers (Filippi et al., 2020). With the help of aptamers’ superior specific binding capacity, the combination of aptamers with radionuclides successfully realized targeted cancer theranostics (Song et al., 2022). To give a comprehensive landscape of functional oligonucleotides-based molecular imaging, herein, we review recently reported oligonucleotides radiolabeling strategies and highlight respective applications. Meanwhile, the future challenges and perspectives of oligonucleotides-based molecular imaging are also discussed in the end.

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

Radiolabeling of functional oligonucleotides and its molecular imaging applications.

Radiolabeling strategies of oligonucleotides

After decades of development, most strategies developed for antibodies, proteins, and peptides radiolabeling are well-established and can be applied to oligonucleotides directly. Moreover, chemically synthesized oligonucleotides provide diverse choices for the design of specific radiolabeling strategies. It is easy to introduce radiolabeling chelators or conjugation sites at any positions of oligonucleotides based on the requirements of radionuclides. In contrast to antibodies and proteins which may contain multiple potential labeling sites dispersed throughout their amino acid sequence, oligonucleotides can be radiolabeled at the predefined positions with precisely controlled amounts. Herein, we summarize recent oligonucleotide radiolabeling strategies and respective applications based on the species of labeled radionuclides.

Radiometals

Transition metal radioisotope Technetium-99m (99mTc, T 1/2 = 6.02 h) is one of the most used radionuclides in SPECT diagnostics due to its splendid physical properties. Present radiolabeling strategies of the oligonucleotide with 99mTc could be roughly divided into either direct or indirect methods. The directly radiolabeling of 99mTc without any chelating agent seems to be more favorable because of the time and labor-saving labeling process. In 2014, the direct 99mTc-labeling of oligonucleotide aptamers was reported by Correa et al. (Correa et al., 2014). Two oligonucleotide aptamers, with and without the primary amine group, were selected and radiolabeled with 99mTcO4 in the presence of stannous chloride as a reducing agent. Both oligonucleotide aptamers’ radiolabeling showed high radiochemical efficiencies and considerable in vitro stability and were further applied to carcinoembryonic antigen level evaluation. In addition, several direct radiolabeling approaches of oligonucleotide aptamers were reported by others with high radiolabeling efficiency (Charlton et al., 1997; dos Santos et al., 2015; de Sousa Lacerda et al., 2017). On the other hand, indirect 99mTc labeling strategies of oligonucleotide relied on the chelators which were similar to antibodies and peptides (Hicke et al., 2006; Borbas et al., 2007; Varmira et al., 2014). Since 99mTc is a metal isotope, the chelator molecule needs to be attached via a linker to avoid steric hindrances. The chelating agents such as Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3), Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and Tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (DOTA), usually donates lone pairs of electrons to reduced 99mTc to generate coordination bonds. In 2006, Wang et al. detailed reported 99mTc radiolabeling strategies of biomolecules via MAG3 chelator (Wang et al., 2006). Besides, the cyclic anhydride DTPA has been widely used to radiolabel amine derivatized oligonucleotides with 99mTc (Liu et al., 2009). Moreover, DOTA, which is a macrocyclic bifunctional chelating agent, binds to trivalent metals such as Indium (In3+), Yttrium (Y3+) rapidly under mild conditions and possesses better radiolabeling efficiencies in comparison with acyclic ligands, such as DTPA. It can be readily modified into a bifunctional chelating agent by the derivatization of one of the carboxylates (Schlesinger et al., 2009). In 2012, Ren et al. reported the 99mTc radiolabeling of human tumor telomerase reverse transcriptase hTERT antisense oligonucleotide through a bifunctional chelator DOTA. In this approach, the ASO sequence was conjugated with DOTA-NHS at the 3′-end amine with more than 85% radiochemical purity (Ren et al., 2012).

Aside from 99mTc, radiometals including 64Cu, 68Ga, 111In, and others were also frequently used for oligonucleotide radiolabeling (Table 1). Gallium-68 (68Ga, T1/2 = 1.1 h) is a highly promising positronium radionuclide that can be readily produced from 68Ge/68Ga generators. Typical 68Ga radiolabeling was realized through coordination chemistry between the Ga3+ and respective chelators such as DOTA. Recently, the Gallium (III) complex of (1,4,7-triazanonane-1,4,7-triyl) triacetic acid (NOTA) has been demonstrated thermodynamically more stable than DOTA, and radiolabeling via NOTA can be realized in room temperature under mild conditions with most biomolecules (Price and Orvig, 2014). For example, Gijs et al. successfully conjugated p-SCN-Bn-NOTA with aptamer and radiolabeled with 68Ga (Gijs et al., 2016). The main advantage of these bioconjugation approaches is that there is only one binding site for the chelator. Copper-64 (64Cu, T1/2 = 12.7 h) radiates both β decay and positron emission, produced by medical cyclotrons with highly specific activity (Bass et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2008; Anderson and Ferdani, 2009). Because 64Cu undergoes β emission in addition to β+ emission, it is a promising theranostic radionuclide. In a recent study, Rockey et al. reported a 64Cu radiolabel oligonucleotide aptamer which binds to prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) specifically. Different chelators were investigated in this study including DOTA via the NHS ester, NOTA and PTCA via the 2-S-(4-Isothiocyanatobenzyl (p-SCN-Bn), and 1,8-Diamino-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo [6,6,6]-eicosane (diAmSar) via a disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) linker (Rockey et al., 2011). Besides, Li et al. reported the labeling of AS1411 aptamer with 64Cu for micro PET/CT study by conjugating four different chelators (Li et al., 2014). Nowadays, Zirconium-89 (89Zr, T1/2 = 78.4 h) has drawn increasing attention because of its fitting emission energy properties and long half-life. Due to its long half-life, it is currently used mainly for labelling biomolecules with long blood half-life, e.g., mAb. Desferrioxamine is the most used chelator for 89Zr radiolabeling which is usually conjugated to the biomolecule prior to the radiolabeling reaction (Meijs et al., 1992). The three hydroxamates and two additional anions or water molecules stabilize the Zr4+ ion through the generation of an octadentate structural complex in the desferrioxamine complex (Baroncelli and Grossi, 1965). Because of the oligonucleotide fast clearance nature in physiological milieu, 89Zr radiolabeled oligonucleotide without modification for PET imaging applications are still rare. Integrating oligonucleotides such as aptamers with nanomaterials or nanostructures might be able to take advantage of the aptamer’s targeting ability and mediate the blood half-life as well. In 2018, Fletcher et al. reported targeting functionalization of hyperbranched polymers with vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) targeted aptamer, and successfully applied for triple-negative breast cancer PET imaging (Fletcher et al., 2018).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of common nuclear medicine radionuclides and current methods of radiolabeling radioisotope to oligonucleotides.

Isotope T1/2 Mode of decay (%) Common production methods Oligonucleotides functionalization Radiolabeling strategy Conjugation method References
99mTc 6 h IT (γ89) 99Mo/99mTc generator 5′ Hexylamine Direct radiolabeling (TCEP as reducing agent) None Charlton et al. (1997)
None or 5′ hexylamine Direct radiolabeling (stannous chloride as reducing agent) None Correa et al. (2014)
5′ Amine Labeling via chelator (MetCyc, MAG3) N-Acylation Borbas et al. (2007)
5′ Hexylamine Labeling via chelator (HYNIC, EDDA) N-Acylation Varmira et al. (2014)
3′ Amine Labeling via chelator (DOTA) N-Acylation Ren et al. (2012)
68Ga 68.3 min β+ (89) 68Ge/68Ga generator 5′ Dodecylamine Labeling via chelator (DOTA, NOTA, PCTA, diAmSar) N-Acylation Gijs et al. (2016)
EC (11) 68Zn (p,n)68Ga
64Cu 12.7 h β+ (17.9) 64Ni(p,n)64Cu 5′ Dodecylamine Labeling via chelator (DOTA, NOTA, PCTA, diAmSar) N-Acylation Rockey et al. (2011)
β (39) EC (43) 64Ni(d,2n)64Cu 68Zn (p,α)64Cu 3′ Amine Labeling via chelator (DOTA, DOTA-Bn, NOTA-Bn, TE2A) N-Acylation Li et al. (2014)
89Zr 78.4 h β+ (22.8) 89Y (p,n)89Zr 5′ DBCO Labeling via chelator (DFO) Alkyne-azide cycloaddition Fletcher et al. (2018)
EC (77)
90Y 64.1 h β (100) 89Y (n,γ)90Y 5′ Thiol Labeling via chelator (DOTA) S-Acylation Schlesinger et al. (2009)
177Lu 6.7 d β (100) 176 Yb(n,γ)177 Yb 5′ Hexylamine Labeling via chelator (DTPA) N-Acylation Fathi et al. (2015)
188Re 16.9 h β (72) 188W/188Re generator 3′Amine- Labeling via chelator (MAG3) N-Acylation Liu et al. (2003)
γ (15)
18F 110 min β+ (97) 18O (p,n)18F 5′ Hexylamine Labeling via 4-([18F]Fluoromethyl) phenyl isothiocyanate N-Alkylation Hedberg and Léngstroma, (1997)
EC (3) 5′ Thiol Labeling via n-(4-[18F ]fluorobenzyl)-2-bromoacetamide, a-bromo-α'-[18F]fluoro-m-xylene S-Alkylation de Vries et al. (2003)
5′ Alkyne Labeling via 18F-fluorobenzyl azide Alkyne-azide cycloaddition Jacobson et al. (2015a)
5′ Amine Labeling via 18F-SFB N-Alkylation Jacobson et al. (2015b)
125I 59.5 d EC (100) 124Xe (n,γ)125Xe 5′ Hexylamine Labeling via PMPITC N-Alkylation Dewanjee et al. (1991)
5′ Tyramine Direct labeling None Cammilleri et al. (1996)
5′ tributyl-stannylbenzamide Direct labeling None Reed et al. (1997)
5′ pyrimidine Direct labeling None Takafuji et al. (2011)
76Br 16.2 h β+ (57) 76Se (p,n)76Br 3′ Phosphoro-thioate monoester Direct labeling None Kühnast et al. (2000)

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) delivers radioactive atoms to disease sites for therapeutic purposes, hosting several advantages over existing therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic radioisotopes such as Yttrium-90 (90Y, T1/2 = 64.1 h), Lutetium-177 (177Lu, T1/2 = 6.7 days), and Rhenium-188 (188Re, T1/2 = 16.9 h) were successfully incorporated with oligonucleotides for novel radiopharmaceutical developments as well. In 2009, Schlesinger et al. labeled l-RNAs with 90Y through DOTA-based maleimide reagents. Radiolabeling conditions and parameters were optimized in this approach (Schlesinger et al., 2009). 177Lu is a medium energy β emitter, which deposits its energy within a short range in tissues (maximum 2 mm). This property decreases the injuries to normal tissues and makes 177Lu well suited for the treatment of disseminated metastatic cancer (Das and Banerjee, 2016). Fathi et al. utilized fully phosphorothioate substitution and 2′-O-methoxy modified type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor siRNA for 177Lu radiolabeling through p-SCN-Bn-DTPA chelator, and realized effective downregulation of the IGF-1R mRNA and proteins levels (Fathi et al., 2015). As another potential therapeutic radioisotope, 188Re can be utilized for theranostic which simultaneously realizes imaging and therapeutic goals. Liu et al. investigated a method of labeling oligonucleotide analog morpholino oligomers (MORFs) with 188Re for tumor pretargeting investigations (Liu et al., 2003). They found that the MAG3 chelator for post-conjugation labeling of morpholino hosting stable labeling with specific radioactivity was sufficiently high for radiotherapeutic applications without further purification.

Radiohalogens

Fluorine-18 (18F, T1/2 = 110 min) is a well-known PET imaging radiopharmaceutical that possesses the most favorable physical properties for nuclear imaging. It is widely accepted that the development of 18F-FDG was the milestone of modern PET imaging history. As the most representative PET imaging agent, FDG acted a critical role in the field of cancer diagnostics such as the location of the primary tumor, and small metastasis. The possibility of incorporating 18F into functional oligonucleotide was first attempted by Hedberg and Léngstroma in 1997. In this study, one-step synthesis of radiolabeling precursor ([18F]fluoromethyl)phenyl isothiocyanate) was developed, and further 18F labeling of the oligonucleotide at 5′-end was achieved through a hexylamine linker (Hedberg and Léngstroma, 1997). Besides, oligonucleotides can be radiolabeled at 5′-end using [(18F)fluoromethyl]phenyl isothiocyanate. In 2003, de Vries et al. reported the radiolabeling of ASO using different alkylating agents and found n-[4-(18F)fluorobenzyl]-2-bromoacetamide and a-bromo -α'-[18F ]fluoro-m-xylene to be the most promising one with simple labeling procedures and high yields (de Vries et al., 2003). Alternatively, oligonucleotide can be radiolabeled with 18F through click chemistry. Radiolabeling of an SGC8 aptamer that targets PTK-7 protein receptor was realized using an alkynyl modified SGC8 aptamer and 18F-benzylazide via click chemistry (Jacobson et al., 2015a). The SGC8 aptamer was modified at the 5′-end with a terminal hexynyl group and the automated radiochemical synthesis of 18F-fluorobenzyl azide was achieved using an aromatic fluoride substitution on a spirocyclic hypervalent iodine (III) precursor. Further in vivo targeted PET imaging of tumor-bearing mice demonstrated the superiorities of aptamer-guided radiopharmaceuticals. In another approach, 2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl 4-(fluoro-18F) benzoate (18F-SFB) as a precursor of 18F was used to react with a primary amine-functionalized oligonucleotide. In 2015, Jacobson et al. reported 18F radiolabeling of a single-stranded DNA aptamer containing 70 nucleotides (Tenascin-C targeted aptamer) using 18F-SFB (Jacobson et al., 2015b). Radio-synthesis of 18F-SFB was performed in three automated steps using a 2-reaction-vial module (Jacobson et al., 2010), and the conjugation of 18F-SFB with the aptamer is carried out in basic sodium phosphate buffer, which results in low but usable yields. Additionally, aptamers or aptamer-containing oligonucleotide sequences can be hybridized to radiolabeled complementary sequences according to Watson and Crick base-pairing interactions. In 2016, Park et al. reported the development of the complementary oligonucleotide (cODN) hybridization-based aptamer conjugation approach for aptamer-based molecular imaging. The cODN was prelabeled with 18F and hybridized with a complementary sequence containing the AS1411 aptamer sequence in an aqueous buffer (Park et al., 2016).

Iodine-125 (125I, T1/2 = 59.5 days) is a radioisotope of iodine that is clinically ubiquitous in nuclear medicine imaging and brachytherapy for prostate cancer, uveal melanomas, and brain tumors. Because of its relatively long half-life and low-energy photons emission, 125I was also extensively used in the area of oligonucleotide-based radiotherapy and imaging. Conventional 125I radiolabeling is often accompanied by the use of prosthetic groups, Dewanjee et al. developed a new strategy of radioiodination by the conjugation of oligonucleotides with p-methoxyphenyl isothiocyanate (PMPITC) and optimized the radioiodination conditions. A 25-mer actin mRNA probe was modified by conjugation with the addition of aminohexyl (AH) group at the 5′-end and radioiodinated afterward for hybridization studies (Dewanjee et al., 1991). Besides, Cammilleri et al. developed a method allowing specific and stable radiolabeling of the ASO with 125I via a 5′-end grafted tyramine group. This transforming growth factor a targeted ASO probe provided information on the biodistribution of intratumoral administrated ASO (Cammilleri et al., 1996). In 1997, Reed et al. chemically modified oligonucleotide 5′-end with tributylstannylbenzamide and realized rapid and efficient radioiodination (Reed et al., 1997). This work developed a general and carrier-free strategy for oligonucleotides radioiodination. Recently, Takafuji et al. successfully radioiodinated a nucleolin-targeted AS1411 aptamer with 125I through the pyrimidine iodination in the presence of TlCl3 and realized in vivo tumor-targeted accumulation (Takafuji et al., 2011). As an artificially synthesized polymer oligonucleotide analog, peptide nucleic acid was radioiodinated by Adriana et al. (Tovar-Salazar et al., 2007). In this approach, a predesigned prosthetic group that incorporated both a radioiodinatable tyrosine and a triphenylphosphonium (TPP) moiety was synthesized, and the resultant 125I-labeled PNA probe was used for mRNA detection of the Lcn2 gene in Northern blotting. Bromine-76 (76Br, T1/2 = 16.2 h) is a positron-emitting isotope possessing a long half-life which allows long time organ kinetics studies. As part of the radiohalogens-based PET imaging, 76Br is also used to radiolabel oligonucleotide through noncarrier method (Kühnast et al., 2000).

Perspective

Recent developments of oligonucleotide-based radiopharmaceuticals have proved the feasibility to be a potential imaging agent for targeted molecular imaging. Compared with conventional mAb targeting ligands, fully chemical synthesized oligonucleotide enables harsh labeling conditions which greatly extended the range of labeling radioisotopes and imaging modalities. The radiolabeling of functional oligonucleotides could be roughly categorized into either direct or indirect fashions, and each of them possesses its own merits and demerits as we summarized in Table 1. Basically, the choice of radiolabeling strategy is determined by the radionuclides. As represented by radiohalogans, radiolabeling of oligonucleotides was realized through a simple substitution reaction with low-cost and high reproducibility. Most importantly, in some special scenarios, the absence of chelators might be helpful to maintain the conformations of oligonucleotides which are highly associated with their functions. Indirect radiolabeling with chelators such as DOTA, DTPA is popular in radiometals. Radiolabeling oligonucleotides via chelators such as DOTA realized either 68Ga or 177Ru labeling that could be potentially utilized for cancer theranostic. In sum, rationally choosing radiolabeling strategies based on the demands of radionuclides is essential to the fabrication of functional oligonucleotides-based radiopharmaceuticals.

To date, functional oligonucleotide-based radiopharmaceuticals achieved a series of successes in the field of biomedicine. In the beginning, these radiolabeled probes were used for quantitative detection of diseases related biomarkers in vitro. Nowadays, along with the emergence of targeted PET imaging, functional oligonucleotides-based radiopharmaceuticals were widely used to achieve noninvasive evaluations of biomarkers in vivo, which is critical to precision medicine. It should be recognized that though functional oligonucleotide-based biomedical applications are promising, the clinic translation is still slow. Stability and specificity in the harsh physiological milieu largely hindered functional oligonucleotide further translation. Therefore, oligonucleotide-based molecular imaging should devote more efforts to the improvement of imaging agents’ in vivo specificity through chemical modifications or integration with nanomaterials.

In conclusion, this review summarizes recent progress of oligonucleotides-based radiopharmaceuticals in molecular imaging. A comprehensive of up-to-date oligonucleotides radiolabeling strategies is presented based on the type of radionuclides. Functional oligonucleotides-based molecular imaging applications including ASO, siRNA, and aptamer are highlighted. In the end, we make a perspective to discuss the challenges and opportunities of future oligonucleotides-based radiopharmaceuticals, and we hope this review could shed light on the future direction of functional oligonucleotides-based radiopharmaceuticals for both diagnostics and therapeutics.

Author contributions

DL and DD wrote the manuscript. DD, QX, and WT reviewed and edited manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2020YFA0909000), National Science Foundation of China (No. 91953000, No. 2182781), Shanghai Sailing Program, Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (No. 21YF1425700), and Innovative research team of high-level local universities in Shanghai, China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Anderson C. J., Ferdani R. (2009). Copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging of cancer: advances in preclinical and clinical research. Cancer biother. Radiopharm. 24 (4), 379–393. 10.1089/cbr.2009.0674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. J., Wadas T. J., Wong E. H., Weisman G. R. (2008). Cross-bridged macrocyclic chelators for stable complexation of copper radionuclides for PET imaging. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 52 (2), 185–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baroncelli F., Grossi G. (1965). The complexing power of hydroxamic acids and its effect on the behaviour of organic extractants in the reprocessing of irradiated fuels—I the complexes between benzohydroxamic acid and zirconium, iron (III) and uranium (VI). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 27 (5), 1085–1092. 10.1016/0022-1902(65)80420-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bass L. A., Wang M., Welch M. J., Anderson C. J. (2000). In vivo transchelation of copper-64 from TETA-octreotide to superoxide dismutase in rat liver. Bioconjug. Chem. 11 (4), 527–532. 10.1021/bc990167l [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett C. F., Krainer A. R., Cleveland D. W. (2019). Antisense oligonucleotide therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 385–406. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett C. F. (2019). Therapeutic antisense oligonucleotides are coming of age. Annu. Rev. Med. 70, 307–321. 10.1146/annurev-med-041217-010829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borbas K. E., Ferreira C. S. M., Perkins A., Bruce J. I., Missailidis S. (2007). Design and synthesis of mono- and multimeric targeted radiopharmaceuticals based on novel cyclen ligands coupled to anti-MUC1 aptamers for the diagnostic imaging and targeted radiotherapy of cancer. Bioconjug. Chem. 18 (4), 1205–1212. 10.1021/bc0700741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cammilleri S., Sangrajrang S., Perdereau B., Brixy F., Calvo F., Bazin H., et al. (1996). Biodistribution of iodine-125 tyramine transforming growth factor α antisense oligonucleotide in athymic mice with a human mammary tumour xenograft following intratumoral injection. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 23 (4), 448–452. 10.1007/BF01247375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlton J., Sennello J., Smith D. (1997). In vivo imaging of inflammation using an aptamer inhibitor of human neutrophil elastase. Chem. Biol. 4 (11), 809–816. 10.1016/s1074-5521(97)90114-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cherry S. R. (2004). In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics. Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (3), R13–R48. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/3/r01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Correa C. R., Barros A. L. B. d., Ferreira C. d. A., Goes A. M. d., Cardoso V. N., Andrade A. S. R. d. (2014). Aptamers directly radiolabeled with technetium-99m as a potential agent capable of identifying carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in tumor cells T84. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (8), 1998–2001. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.02.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Das T., Banerjee S. (2016). Theranostic applications of lutetium-177 in radionuclide therapy. Curr. Radiopharm. 9 (1), 94–101. 10.2174/1874471008666150313114644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Sousa Lacerda C. M., Ferreira I. M., Dos Santos S. R., de Barros A. L. B., Fernandes S. O., Cardoso V. N., et al. (2017). (1→3)-β-D-glucan aptamers labeled with technetium-99m: Biodistribution and imaging in experimental models of bacterial and fungal infection. Nucl. Med. Biol. 46, 19–24. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vries E. F. J., Vroegh J., Elsinga P. H., Vaalburg W. (2003). Evaluation of fluorine-18-labeled alkylating agents as potential synthons for the labeling of oligonucleotides. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 58 (4), 469–476. 10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00022-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Derlin T., Grünwald V., Steinbach J., Wester H.-J., Ross T. L. (2018). Molecular imaging in oncology using positron emission tomography. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 115 (11), 175–181. 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewanjee M. K., Ghafouripour A. K., Werner R. K., Serafini A. N., Sfakianakis G. N. (1991). Development of sensitive radioiodinated anti-sense oligonucleotide probes by conjugation techniques. Bioconjug. Chem. 2 (4), 195–200. 10.1021/bc00010a001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding D., Yang C., Lv C., Li J., Tan W. (2020). Improving tumor accumulation of aptamers by prolonged blood circulation. Anal. Chem. 92 (5), 4108–4114. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. dos Santos S. R., Rodrigues Corrêa C., Branco de Barros A. L., Serakides R., Fernandes S. O., Cardoso V. N., et al. (2015). Identification of Staphylococcus aureus infection by aptamers directly radiolabeled with technetium-99m. Nucl. Med. Biol. 42 (3), 292–298. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckburg A., Dein J., Berei J., Schrank Z., Puri N. (2020). Oligonucleotides and microRNAs targeting telomerase subunits in cancer therapy. Cancers 12 (9), 2337. 10.3390/cancers12092337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fathi M., Yavari K., Taghikhani M., Ghannadi Maragheh M. (2015). Synthesis of a stabilized 177Lu–siRNA complex and evaluation of its stability and RNAi activity. Nucl. Med. Commun. 36 (6), 636–645. 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Filippi L., Bagni O., Nervi C. (2020). Aptamer-based technology for radionuclide targeted imaging and therapy: a promising weapon against cancer. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 17 (8), 751–758. 10.1080/17434440.2020.1796633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fletcher N. L., Houston Z. H., Simpson J. D., Veedu R. N., Thurecht K. J. (2018). Designed multifunctional polymeric nanomedicines: long-term biodistribution and tumour accumulation of aptamer-targeted nanomaterials. Chem. Commun. Camb. U. K.) 54 (82), 11538–11541. 10.1039/c8cc05831h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Geary R. S., Norris D., Yu R., Bennett C. F. (2015). Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and cell uptake of antisense oligonucleotides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 87, 46–51. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gijs M., Dammicco S., Warnier C., Aerts A., Impens N. R. E. N., D'Huyvetter M., et al. (2016). Gallium-68-labelled NOTA-oligonucleotides: an optimized method for their preparation. J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm. 59 (2), 63–71. 10.1002/jlcr.3363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hedberg E., Léngstroma B., Olsen C. E., Rassing B. R., Rosendahl C. N. (1997). Synthesis of 4-([18F]Fluoromethyl)phenyl isothiocyanate and its use in labelling oligonucleotides. Acta Chem. Scand. 51, 1236–1240. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.51-1236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hicke B. J., Stephens A. W., Gould T., Chang Y.-F., Lynott C. K., Heil J., et al. (2006). Tumor targeting by an aptamer. J. Nucl. Med. 47 (4), 668–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu B., Zhong L., Weng Y., Peng L., Huang Y., Zhao Y., et al. (2020). Therapeutic siRNA: state of the art. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 5 (1), 101. 10.1038/s41392-020-0207-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jacobson O., Weiss I. D., Kiesewetter D. O., Farber J. M., Chen X. (2010). PET of tumor CXCR4 expression with 4-18F-T140. J. Nucl. Med. 51 (11), 1796–1804. 10.2967/jnumed.110.079418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacobson O., Weiss I. D., Wang L., Wang Z., Yang X., Dewhurst A., et al. (2015a). 18F-Labeled single-stranded DNA aptamer for PET imaging of protein tyrosine kinase-7 expression. J. Nucl. Med. 56 (11), 1780–1785. 10.2967/jnumed.115.160960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacobson O., Yan X., Niu G., Weiss I. D., Ma Y., Szajek L. P., et al. (2015b). PET imaging of tenascin-C with a radiolabeled single-stranded DNA aptamer. J. Nucl. Med. 56 (4), 616–621. 10.2967/jnumed.114.149484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Khvorova A., Watts J. K. (2017). The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 35 (3), 238–248. 10.1038/nbt.3765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kühnast B., Dollé F., Terrazzino S., Rousseau B., Loc'h C., Vaufrey F., et al. (2000). General method to label antisense oligonucleotides with radioactive halogens for pharmacological and imaging studies. Bioconjug. Chem. 11 (5), 627–636. 10.1021/bc990183i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li J., Zheng H., Bates P. J., Malik T., Li X.-F., Trent J. O., et al. (2014). Aptamer imaging with Cu-64 labeled AS1411: Preliminary assessment in lung cancer. Nucl. Med. Biol. 41 (2), 179–185. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu C.-b., Liu G.-z., Liu N., Zhang Y. u.-m., He J., Rusckowski M., et al. (2003). Radiolabeling morpholinos with 90Y, 111In, 188Re and 99mTc. Nucl. Med. Biol. 30 (2), 207–214. 10.1016/S0969-8051(02)00389-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu G., Cheng D., Dou S., Chen X., Liang M., Pretorius P. H., et al. (2009). Replacing 99mTc with 111In improves MORF/cMORF pretargeting by reducing intestinal accumulation. Mol. Imaging Biol. 11 (5), 303–307. 10.1007/s11307-009-0209-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Luker G. D., Piwnica-Worms D. (2001). Molecular imaging in vivo with PET and SPECT. Acad. Radiol. 8 (1), 4–14. 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80738-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Massoud T. F., Gambhir S. S. (2003). Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev. 17 (5), 545–580. 10.1101/gad.1047403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meijs W. E., Herscheid J. D., Haisma H. J., Pinedo H. M. (1992). Evaluation of desferal as a bifunctional chelating agent for labeling antibodies with Zr-89. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. 43 (12), 1443–1447. 10.1016/0883-2889(92)90170-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moutsiopoulou A., Broyles D., Dikici E., Daunert S., Deo S. K. (2019). Molecular aptamer beacons and their applications in sensing, imaging, and diagnostics. Small 15 (35), e1902248. 10.1002/smll.201902248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Park J. Y., Lee T. S., Song I. H., Cho Y. L., Chae J. R., Yun M., et al. (2016). Hybridization-based aptamer labeling using complementary oligonucleotide platform for PET and optical imaging. Biomaterials 100, 143–151. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pimlott S. L., Sutherland A. (2011). Molecular tracers for the PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (1), 149–162. 10.1039/b922628c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Price E. W., Orvig C. (2014). Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (1), 260–290. 10.1039/c3cs60304k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reed M. W., Panyutin I. G., Hamlin D., Lucas D. D., Wilbur D. S. (1997). Synthesis of 125I-labeled oligonucleotides from tributylstannylbenzamide conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 8 (2), 238–243. 10.1021/bc970016n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ren B. X., Yang F., Zhu G. H., Huang Z. X., Ai H., Xia R., et al. (2012). Magnetic resonance tumor targeting imaging using gadolinium labeled human telomerase reverse transcriptase antisense probes. Cancer Sci. 103 (8), 1434–1439. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02316.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rockey W. M., Huang L., Kloepping K. C., Baumhover N. J., Giangrande P. H., Schultz M. K. (2011). Synthesis and radiolabeling of chelator–RNA aptamer bioconjugates with copper-64 for targeted molecular imaging. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 19 (13), 4080–4090. 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schlesinger J., Fischer C., Koezle I., Vonhoff S., Klussmann S., Bergmann R., et al. (2009). Radiosynthesis of new [90Y]-DOTA-Based maleimide reagents suitable for the prelabeling of thiol-bearing l-oligonucleotides and peptides. Bioconjug. Chem. 20 (7), 1340–1348. 10.1021/bc900095k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Song W., Song Y., Li Q., Fan C., Lan X., Jiang D. (2022). Advances in aptamer-based nuclear imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 49, 2544–2559. 10.1007/s00259-022-05782-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Takafuji Y., Jo J.-i., Tabata Y. (2011). Simple PEG modification of DNA aptamer based on copper ion coordination for tumor targeting. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 22 (9), 1179–1195. 10.1163/092050610X501713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tavitian B. (2003). In vivo imaging with oligonucleotides for diagnosis and drug development. Gut 52, iv40–iv47. 10.1136/gut.52.suppl_4.iv40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tovar-Salazar A., Dhawan J., Lovejoy A., Alison Liu Q., Gifford A. N. (2007). Preparation of radioiodinated peptide nucleic acids with high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 360 (1), 92–98. 10.1016/j.ab.2006.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Varmira K., Hosseinimehr S. J., Noaparast Z., Abedi S. M. (2014). An improved radiolabelled RNA aptamer molecule for HER2 imaging in cancers. J. Drug Target. 22 (2), 116–122. 10.3109/1061186X.2013.839688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang Y., Liu G., Hnatowich D. J. (2006). Methods for MAG3 conjugation and 99mTc radiolabeling of biomolecules. Nat. Protoc. 1 (3), 1477–1480. 10.1038/nprot.2006.262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wei W., Rosenkrans Z. T., Liu J., Huang G., Luo Q.-Y., Cai W. (2020). ImmunoPET: Concept, design, and applications. Chem. Rev. 120 (8), 3787–3851. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES