Abstract
Propionic acid (PA) is a major component of short-chain fatty acids produced by Bacteroidetes spp. Lysine propionylation is a novel type of protein regulatory posttranslational modification that is widespread in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as well as in cellular processes, it affects DNA binding affinity, protein stability, and enzyme activity. In this review of published literature, we provide evidence that the level of propionyl modification is influenced by the concentration of PA and the PA metabolic intermediate (propionyl-CoA) and discuss the possibility of PA affecting enteropathogenic bacterial virulence. The understanding of propionyl modification is helpful to better understand the mechanism of PA-producing Bacteroidetes affecting the virulence of pathogenic intestinal bacteria. It may provide novel choices for the prevention and treatment of pathogenic intestinal bacteria.
Keywords: Propionic acid, posttranslational modification, lysine propylation, propionyl-CoA, bacterial virulence
Introduction
Propionic acid (PA) is a major component of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). PA is produced by anaerobic bacteria (especially members of Bacteroides) that ferment sugars in the gut [1]. SCFAs are the main metabolite of anaerobic fermentation in the mammalian gut and are mainly composed of acetate, propionate, and butyrate in the human gut (molar ratio 60:20:20). Concentrations range from 7-20 mM in the ileum to 60 mM-150 mM in the large intestine, depending on the host diet and microbial community composition [2]. SCFAs are effectively absorbed by the intestinal mucosa, providing energy to intestinal cells, maintaining the acidic intestinal environment, promoting integrity of the epithelial barrier, and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory molecules [3,4]. In addition, SCFAs regulate the replication, colonization, and expression of virulence genes of intestinal pathogens (including Klebsiella, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and Salmonella) in vitro and in vivo [5-7].
Posttranslational modification (PTM) is an important molecular regulatory mechanism in all kingdoms of organisms [8-10]. Acylation of Nε-lysine residues is an important PTM in both Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes [11-13], which widely affects DNA binding affinity, protein-protein interactions, protein stability, enzyme activity, or protein localization [14-17]. With the development of posttranslational modified proteomics based on high throughput and sensitive mass spectrometry, many new PTMs such as short-chain lysine acylation have been identified. SCFA can be converted into homologous acyl-coenzyme A (CoAs) and then used directly as a cofactor in the acylation of certain proteins such as propionylation [18,19], malonylation [20], butyrylation [18], 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation [21,22], β-hydroxybutyrylation [23], crotonylation [24], succinylation [25-27], and glutarylation [28,29]. These findings give us a better understanding of PTM.
More than 60,000 acetylated and approximately 20,000 propionylated and succinylated gut microbial peptides were recently identified from human microbiome samples [26]. These findings indicate that acylation modification is common in intestinal microflora. At present, the most studied lysine acylation is acetylation. Protein acetylation participates in bacterial chemotaxis, metabolism, DNA replication, and other cellular processes. However, there is growing evidence that propionate in intestinal SCFAs and its intermediate, propionyl-CoA, are closely related to propionylation. Propionylation may also be involved in affecting the virulence of bacteria. In this review, we summarize the advances in knowledge of propionylation of bacterial proteins and its relationship to propionate and propionyl-CoA. We also discuss the potential of propionate as a propionylation-mediated virulence factor of intestinal pathogenic bacteria.
Overview of propionylation
Lysine is one of the 15 amino acid residues encoded by modified ribosomes [30]. The electron-rich and nucleophilic properties of the lysine side chain make it suitable for covalent PTM reactions with different substrates. Acetylation is the earliest and most comprehensively studied of all lysine acylation, which are mechanisms of acetylation that include regulation of transcriptional regulators of bacterial virulence, and roles of acetylation in biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance that have been previously reviewed in detail [31-34]. In bacteria, acetyl-metabolizing intermediates, such as acetylphosphates and acetyl-CoA, can perform enzymatic lysine acetylation by deenzymatic acetate metabolizing enzymes or by providing acetyl donors. Up to 40% of proteins can be acetylated due to both enzymatic and nonenzymatic acetylation mechanisms [35-38]. Acetylation demonstrated higher levels in microorganisms compared to other PTMs that regulate metabolic processes, such as phosphorylation [9]. So, microbes evolved an elegant mechanism for regulating cellular metabolism through acetylation [39]. In 2007, Zhao et al. first described data that found that propionyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA are the same high-energy molecule, with a structure close to that of acetyl-CoA. Here the novel post-translational modification involving propionylation of lysine residues were first reported [18].
Propionylation involves the addition of propionyl (CH3-CH2-CO-) supplied by propionyl-CoA to the epsilon amino group of the target lysine residue catalyzed by propionyl transferase, which changes the charge state of lysine from +1 to 0. Propionylation of lysine was first discovered in histone proteins [18]. Subsequently, propionylation of non-histone substrates in mammals was demonstrated [40]. Propionylation is a dynamic process in which propionyl is bound to the substrate protein by some p300/CBP acetyltransferases. In prokaryotes, Salmonella enterica and Bacillus subtilis Gcn-5-associated N-acetyltransferases Pat and AcuA can catalyze the propionylation of lysine at site 592 of propionyl-CoA synthetase PrpE from S. enterica [41]. The corresponding class of sirtuin deacetyltransferase of S. enterica CobB catalyzes the removal of propionyl modifications from PrpE under NAD (+) conditions. In bacteria, acetylphosphate (ACP) produced by acetyl-CoA can also chemically acetylate lysine residues [38,42,43] without enzyme catalysis. Similarly, high concentrations of propionyl-CoA induce non-enzymatic propionylation in vitro. However, non-enzymatic propionylation has less effect on protein activity (< 20%) than enzymatic propionylation involving acyltransferase AcuA [44]. This also reflects the differences in the mechanism and effects of propionylation via two different pathways [45] (Figure 1). Interestingly, the authors also found that human SIRT2 (hSirT2), SIRT3 (hSirT3) and bacteria T. maritima Sir2 (Sir2Tm) proteins were able to remove propionyl modifications within one hour, but human (hSirT1), human SIRT4 (hSirT4), and mouse SIRT1 (mSirT1) showed no depropionylase activity [41]. This study provided important guidance for subsequent propionation-related studies. By combining high-affinity anti-propionyl-lysine pan-antibodies with high-precision mass spectrometry (MS) analysis, propionylation of proteins has been established as being common in bacteria and fungi at different growth stages, with differences in propionylation levels in different species.
Figure 1.

Mechanisms of propionylation in Salmonella enterica. Propionylation can be catalyzed by lysine acyltransferase using propionyl-CoA as the propionyl donor, or non-enzymatically by propionyl-CoA. Some, but not all, propionylation can be reversed by lysine deacylase. Pat, AcuA: acylaed transferases; CobB, Sir2Tm: deacylated transferases; K, Lysine.
The consortium of propionylated proteins is often called the propionylome. For example, 121 propionyl sites were identified in 80 proteins at the intermediate exponential stage and 323 propionyl sites were identified in 163 proteins at the late stable stage in a proteomic study of Thermus thermophilus HB8, the number of sites and the degree of propionylation showed significant differences independent of protein abundance [46]. The proteome of T. rubrum was analyzed by propionylation in the conidia and mycelium stages. Seventy propionyl sites of 54 proteins were identified in conidia and 96 propionyl sites of 70 proteins were identified in mycelium. The propionyl sites of each protein were slightly more in mycelium than in conidia [47]. A protein propionylation test based on the results of propionylation of PCC 6803 (Synechocystis) under various stress conditions during the growth process suggested that propionylation was related to the stress response of Synechocystis [48]. In E. coli, propionylated proteomics analysis identified 956 propionylation (Kpr) sites in LB culture and 126 Kpr sites in M9 medium supplemented with 0.8% glucose. Following the addition of glucose to LB medium (0.8%), 166 Kpr sites were identified, indicating extensive substrate diversity [49] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characterization of propionylation of lysine residues of proteins
| Species | Kpr proteins | Kpr sites | Percentage of total proteins (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. rubrum | 115 | 157 | 1.1 | [47] |
| T. thermophilus | 183 | 361 | 8 | [46] |
| G. kaustophilus | 55 | 83 | 1.6 | [81] |
| E. coli | 603 | 1467 | 9.5 | [49] |
| Synechocystis | 68 | 111 | 1.9 | [48] |
| A. hydrophila | 59 | 98 | 1.4 | [82] |
| M. smegmatis | 18 | 19 | 0.3 | [83] |
Kpr: propionylation.
Propionate and propionyl-CoA can affect propionylation
Enzymatic acylation modification cannot occur in prokaryotes without the acylating transferases Pat [41] and AcuA [41], and the CobB deacylating transferase [41,49]. In addition, propionyl-CoA is needed as a propionyl source. Propionyl-CoA is the substrate of the propionylation reaction, and its concentration can directly affect the level of the reaction [47]. Propionyl-CoA is an intermediate product of PA metabolism and can be directly produced from PA by propionyl-CoA synthase (PrpE) and acetyl-CoA synthase (ACS) [50,51]. In the methyl citrate cycle, PA is first activated by PrpE to yield propionyl-CoA. Propionyl-CoA then condenses with oxalacetic acid, as catalyzed by methyl citrate synthase (PrpC), to form methyl 2-citrate. Methyl citrate dehydratase/hydratase (PrpD) then dehydrates methyl 2-citrate to produce methyl aconite. The latter is then cleaved by methyl isocitrate lyase (PrpB) to produce pyruvic acid and succinic acid. Interestingly, ACS, PrpE, PrpC, PrpD, and PrpB can be propionylated in the presence of PA [49]. The activities of PrpE and ACS are simultaneously controlled by acetylation and propionylation (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Simplified model of propionate catabolism in E. coli. Two enzymes involved in propionate metabolism (ACS and PrpE), as well as enzymes involved in the methylcitrate cycle (PrpC, PrpD, and PrpB), are propionylated in response to propionate treatment. TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle; ACS: acetyl-CoA synthase; PrpE: propionyl-CoA synthase; PrpC: methyl citrate synthase; PrpD: Methyl citrate dehydratase/hydratase; PrpB: methyl isocitrate lyase.
Increasing evidence indicates that PA and its intermediate, propionyl-CoA, are closely related to propionylation. Proteomics studies in E. coli have demonstrated the marked increases in the global propionylation level of lysine and the number of propionylation sites (increase of 713) [49] after propionate treatment. Among 69 proteins from PCC 6803 (Synechocystis), 111 lysine propionyl sites were identified [48]. A total of 157 propionyl sites were identified in 115 T. rubrum proteins. The level of propionyl modification was closely related to the concentration of propionyl-CoA and sodium propionate [47]. Similarly, the excess supply of propionyl-CoA during erythromycin production in Saccharpolyspora erythraea results in excess propionylation that affects erythromycin production [44,52]. The link between propionylated modification and propionate was revisited in a transcriptional activity study of phosphate regulator PhoP in S. erythraea. The authors reported that the addition of propionate increased the level of propionylated modification in PhoP cells, resulting in a loss of the response to phosphate [19].
There are related reports in eukaryotic cells. For example, propionate-induced acetylation and propionylation in SCFAs reportedly up-regulated MICA/B expression on colon cancer cells [53]. In another study, cells were similar to propionate as a model to study the increased propionylation of proteins [54]. These studies demonstrated that the propionylation of lysine occurs in a variety of proteins and affects a variety of biological functions. In particular, the propionylation of lysine contributes to the overall metabolic regulation and cellular stress response in mice [55]. This may be one of the mechanisms regulating cell metabolism and response to stress conditions in bacteria and mammals [46], and has important associations with propionate.
Effects of PA on bacterial virulence
PA is an abundant carbon source in nature and can be used as the only carbon source by many aerobic bacteria and some anaerobic bacteria. In contrast, the addition of propionate to growth media inhibits the growth of most microorganisms, even in the presence of other carbon sources, due to the accumulation of toxic metabolic intermediate propionate-CoA. Reflecting this, high concentrations of PA are widely used as an antimicrobial agent in food and agriculture. However, despite its widespread use, how propionate affects microbial growth remains unclear [56,57]. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium exposed to propionate reduces the expression of Salmonella pathogenic island 1 (SPI-1). The propionyl-CoA metabolic intermediate can modify and decrease the stability of HilD, affect the expression of invasion-related genes, and ultimately inhibit the invasion of Salmonella [58]. In addition, preincubation of S. enteritidis with propionate and butyrate can decrease epithelial cell invasion [59]. Infection rates of salmonella were reduced in a pig model of infection by adding a mixture of organic acids, including propionate, to their food [60]. Recent findings have demonstrated that propionate can directly affect bacterial virulence. Propionate produced by Bacteroides fragilis in the gut directly inhibited the growth of pathogens in vitro by disrupting intracellular pH homeostasis, to mediate the relationship between colonization resistance of S. Typhimurium [61]. Therefore, supplementing the diet with SCFAs, especially propionate, may be a promising intervention strategy to reduce Salmonella infection. Propionate produced by the host through the intestinal microflora may prevent local inflammation and tissue damage by controlling the host’s response to symbiosis [62].
PA is generally considered safe for human and animal use. However, a study that examined on the adherence of invasive E. coli (AIEC) demonstrated that PA positively regulated the virulence of strain LF82. Increased exposure to PA and increased intestinal concentrations in mice resulted in a more than 20-fold increase in persistence and increased the most prominent phenotypic features of AIEC, such as intestinal epithelial adhesion, invasion, and biofilm formation [63]. Another study reported that intestinal PA resulted in increased ethanolamine metabolism by AIEC. To overcome the toxic by-products associated with the use of ethanolamine, AIEC synthesized and then excreted bacterial microcompartments (MCPs). In addition, the use of a concentration of ethanolamine comparable to that in the human gut in the external environment of macrophages stimulated rapid proliferation of AIEC [64]. A recent report also described that S. Typhimurium can overcome propionate inhibition by using propionate as a carbon source for anaerobic respiration. Nitrate-dependent propionate metabolism by S. Typhimurium provided an inflammation-dependent colonization advantage [65]. Therefore, in addition to promoting colonization resistance, propionate from microbial populations may also contribute to colonization by intestinal pathogens during infection.
PA can affect bacterial virulence via propionylation
Acetylation has recently been widely reported to affect toxicity in a variety of ways, including intracellular survival [66,67], regulation of transcription factors [68-70], biofilm formation [71,72], interaction with the host [73,74], and antibiotic resistance [75,76]. In the genus Salmonella, propionate is involved in posttranslational modification of HilD via propionyl-CoA. Propionyl-CoA reduces the stability of HilD and affects the expression of invasion-related genes [58]. The stability and DNA binding ability of HilD are related to reversible acetylation [77,78]. However, these studies focused on the absence of Pat in the acyltransferase and ignoring both Pat and AcuA can act as propionyltransferases (AcuA has 5.5-times higher propionylating activity than Pat; [41]). Thus, it is likely that the post-translational modification related to HilD is also closely related to propionylation. PhoP has been shown in S. Typhimurium. In the presence of acetyl-CoA, the K201 and K88 sites were acetylated by acetyltransferase Pat and ACP respectively, which affected PhoP activity, and significantly decreased the ability of S. Typhimurium survive in macrophages [79,80]. In Saccharopolyspora erythraea, a propionate level of 20 mM enhances propionyl modification of PhoP and affects nucleic acid binding [19]. Similarly, in the presence of propionate, binding of PhoP to bind to nucleic acids was restored when the sites of PhoP K198 and K203 were mutated simultaneously to arginine to mimic non-propionylated modifications [19]. The environment of pathogenic intestinal bacteria naturally contains PA. It has been demonstrated that PA treatment can significantly enhance propionylation-related modification. Given the similarities between propionylation and acetylation, and the fact that both can be modified by acyltransferase, Pat, and CobB deacetyltransferase, the binding of nucleic acids by modified protein usually decreases. It is conceivable that propionate-enhanced propionyl-related modification can modulate the pathogenicity of intestinal bacteria.
Bacterial propionylated proteins are involved in metabolism
Propionylated proteins are involved in various metabolic processes and play an important role in metabolic regulation (Table 2).
Table 2.
The effect of propionylation on protein function
| Species | Kpr protein | Functional Kpr site | Function | Consequence of propionylation | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. enterica | PrpE | K592 | Activate propionate to propionyl-CoA | inhibits enzymatic activity | [41] |
| M. smegmatis | FadD35 | K519 | synthesizes CoA esters from short to long-chain fatty acids | inhibits enzymatic activity | [83] |
| Synechocystis | FbpI | K156, K336 | photosynthetic carbon fixation and gluconeogenesis | inhibits enzymatic activity | [48] |
| PsaD | K132 | associated with photosynthesis | decreased structural stability of PsaD | [48] | |
| A. hydrophila | MDH | K168 | Involved in glucose metabolism | inhibits enzymatic activity | [82] |
| S. erythraea | SACE_0337 SACE_4729 SACE_3848 | Multiple | Synthesis of propionyl-CoA | inhibits enzymatic activity | [44] |
| mmsA2 | K94 | synthesis of propionyl-CoA | inhibits enzymatic activity | [52] | |
| PhoP | K198, K203 | two-component system | inhibits DNA binding | [19] | |
| E. coli | ACS | K609 | rate-limiting enzyme in propionate metabolism | inhibits enzymatic activity | [49] |
Kpr: propionylation; PrpE: propionyl-CoA synthase; FbpI: bifunctional enzyme fructose-1,6/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase; PsaD: subunit II of photosystem I; MDH: malate dehydrogenase; ACS: acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase.
As mentioned above, propionylation is a ubiquitous protein modification involved in many cellular physiological processes. These include carbon source utilization, gluconeogenesis, two-component systems, and others.
Research strategies of propionylation
Propionylation is generally studied by combining proteomics with in vivo and in vitro techniques. In the past, mass spectrometry-based proteomics was used to identify and verify propionyl sites. With the refinement of the technology, stable isotope labeling can be used for quantitative propionyl group analysis of specific proteins and their sites. In this approach, proteins are deranged and digested with trypsin. Peptides were labeled by light or heavy stable isotope dimethyl reagents, Solutions of formaldehyde (CH2O, light-labeled) and deuterated formaldehyde (CD2O, heavy-labeled) are added to the peptide mixture of different groups [49]. Propionyl lysine peptides can be enriched by affinity chromatography with pan-anti-propionyl lysine antibody bound to agarose beads and analyzed by nanoscale high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Compared with the previously used mass spectrometry propionyl group analysis method, the refined method more directly compares the differences in levels of propionyl between the control and experimental groups. Western blot, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays based on propionylated antibody can be used to verify the difference of protein modification in different samples, such as control and experimental groups. In molecular biology examinations, the propionylation state can be simulated by site-directed mutagenesis of propionylation sites in vitro, using glutamine (Q) instead of neutralizing positive charge to simulate propionylation. The substitution of arginine (R) or alanine (A) with a simulated unpropionated state. (R) can maintain a positive charge while avoiding propionylation, instead, (A) only removes the charge [19,49]. These results can be validated in vivo and in vitro by a combination of phenotypic tests. In addition, the determination of the concentration of propionyl-CoA and analyses of propionyl transferase and depropionyl transferase mutants can also help to determine the mechanism of propionylation and the corresponding effects (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Strategies of propionylation research. Identification and quantification of lysine propionylation substrates can be achieved using quantitative proteomic analysis and the stable isotope dimethyl labeling method. Strains are cultured for protein extraction. After digestion, peptides are labeled by light or heavy stable isotope dimethyl reagents. Antibody to propionyl lysine is used for modified peptide enrichment. Samples are analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. In combination with phenotypic and molecular experimental data, the function of propionylated proteins is verified.
Challenges in propionylation research
Propionylation is a ubiquitous protein modification involved in many cellular physiological processes, such as carbon source utilization, gluconeogenesis, two-component systems, and others. This modification can inhibit the activity of many kinds of enzymes. However, whether propionylation can directly affect the virulence of bacteria in a manner like acetylation is unclear. This is worth exploring since the ubiquity and diversity of propionylation also means that it has more potential. In this context, the foregoing findings are helpful to provide a theoretical basis for studies of the pathogenicity and drug resistance of bacteria.
Conclusions
PA produced by the intestinal resident anaerobic Bacteroides spp. and propionyl-CoA, an intermediate metabolite of bacterial metabolism PA, affects a novel protein post-translational modification (PTM)-lysine propionylation (Kpr) in a concentration-dependent manner. This mechanism has a wide variety of substrates and can be dynamically regulated under different nutrient conditions. It can affect the metabolism of bacteria by regulating DNA binding affinity, changing protein stability and enzyme activity, and even affect the expression of virulence factors of enteric pathogenic bacteria. The study of propionylation of lysine provides a new opportunity to understand the mechanism by which PA-producing Bacteroides affects the virulence of enteric pathogens.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (20KJA310006), the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2021K209B), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642186), and the Program for Excellent Young Talents in Jiangsu University. English language editing for this manuscript was provided by International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CP, Macfarlane GT. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987;28:1221–1227. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.10.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:189–200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu P, Wang Y, Yang G, Zhang Q, Meng L, Xin Y, Jiang X. The role of short-chain fatty acids in intestinal barrier function, inflammation, oxidative stress, and colonic carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Res. 2021;165:105420. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sorbara MT, Dubin K, Littmann ER, Moody TU, Fontana E, Seok R, Leiner IM, Taur Y, Peled JU, van den Brink MRM, Litvak Y, Bäumler AJ, Chaubard JL, Pickard AJ, Cross JR, Pamer EG. Inhibiting antibiotic-resistant enterobacteriaceae by microbiota-mediated intracellular acidification. J Exp Med. 2019;216:84–98. doi: 10.1084/jem.20181639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lackraj T, Kim JI, Tran SL, Barnett Foster DE. Differential modulation of flagella expression in enterohaemorrhagic escherichia coli O157: H7 by intestinal short-chain fatty acid mixes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 2016;162:1761–1772. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lawhon SD, Maurer R, Suyemoto M, Altier C. Intestinal short-chain fatty acids alter salmonella typhimurium invasion gene expression and virulence through BarA/SirA. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46:1451–1464. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang X, Ning Z, Mayne J, Yang Y, Deeke SA, Walker K, Farnsworth CL, Stokes MP, Couture JF, Mack D, Stintzi A, Figeys D. Widespread protein lysine acetylation in gut microbiome and its alterations in patients with Crohn’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17916-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang W, Sun J, Cao H, Tian R, Cai L, Ding W, Qian PY. Post-translational modifications are enriched within protein functional groups important to bacterial adaptation within a deep-sea hydrothermal vent environment. Microbiome. 2016;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0194-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cheng K, Ning Z, Zhang X, Li L, Liao B, Mayne J, Figeys D. MetaLab 2.0 enables accurate post-translational modifications profiling in metaproteomics. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2020;31:1473–1482. doi: 10.1021/jasms.0c00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, Olsen JV, Mann M. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2009;325:834–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1175371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Q, Zhang Y, Yang C, Xiong H, Lin Y, Yao J, Li H, Xie L, Zhao W, Yao Y, Ning ZB, Zeng R, Xiong Y, Guan KL, Zhao S, Zhao GP. Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2010;327:1004–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1179687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Choudhary C, Weinert BT, Nishida Y, Verdin E, Mann M. The growing landscape of lysine acetylation links metabolism and cell signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:536–550. doi: 10.1038/nrm3841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.You D, Yao LL, Huang D, Escalante-Semerena JC, Ye BC. Acetyl coenzyme A synthetase is acetylated on multiple lysine residues by a protein acetyltransferase with a single Gcn5-type N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) domain in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:3169–3178. doi: 10.1128/JB.01961-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Glozak MA, Sengupta N, Zhang X, Seto E. Acetylation and deacetylation of non-histone proteins. Gene. 2005;363:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang XJ, Seto E. Lysine acetylation: codified crosstalk with other posttranslational modifications. Mol Cell. 2008;31:449–461. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiong Y, Guan KL. Mechanistic insights into the regulation of metabolic enzymes by acetylation. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:155–164. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201202056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen Y, Sprung R, Tang Y, Ball H, Sangras B, Kim SC, Falck JR, Peng J, Gu W, Zhao Y. Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:812–819. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700021-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Y, Li YX, Ye BC. Lysine propionylation modulates the transcriptional activity of phosphate regulator PhoP in saccharopolyspora erythraea. Mol Microbiol. 2018;110:648–661. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xie Z, Dai J, Dai L, Tan M, Cheng Z, Wu Y, Boeke JD, Zhao Y. Lysine succinylation and lysine malonylation in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:100–107. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dong H, Zhao Y, Bi C, Han Y, Zhang J, Bai X, Zhai G, Zhang H, Tian S, Hu D, Xu L, Zhang K. TmcA functions as a lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyryltransferase to regulate transcription. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:142–151. doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00906-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dai L, Peng C, Montellier E, Lu Z, Chen Y, Ishii H, Debernardi A, Buchou T, Rousseaux S, Jin F, Sabari BR, Deng Z, Allis CD, Ren B, Khochbin S, Zhao Y. Lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation is a widely distributed active histone mark. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:365–370. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie Z, Zhang D, Chung D, Tang Z, Huang H, Dai L, Qi S, Li J, Colak G, Chen Y, Xia C, Peng C, Ruan H, Kirkey M, Wang D, Jensen LM, Kwon OK, Lee S, Pletcher SD, Tan M, Lombard DB, White KP, Zhao H, Li J, Roeder RG, Yang X, Zhao Y. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation. Mol Cell. 2016;62:194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tan M, Luo H, Lee S, Jin F, Yang JS, Montellier E, Buchou T, Cheng Z, Rousseaux S, Rajagopal N, Lu Z, Ye Z, Zhu Q, Wysocka J, Ye Y, Khochbin S, Ren B, Zhao Y. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell. 2011;146:1016–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Z, Tan M, Xie Z, Dai L, Chen Y, Zhao Y. Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:58–63. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang X, Cheng K, Ning Z, Mayne J, Walker K, Chi H, Farnsworth CL, Lee K, Figeys D. Exploring the microbiome-wide lysine acetylation, succinylation, and propionylation in human gut microbiota. Anal Chem. 2021;93:6594–6598. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weinert Brian T, Schölz C, Wagner Sebastian A, Iesmantavicius V, Su D, Daniel Jeremy A, Choudhary C. Lysine succinylation is a frequently occurring modification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and extensively overlaps with acetylation. Cell Rep. 2013;4:842–851. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tan M, Peng C, Anderson KA, Chhoy P, Xie Z, Dai L, Park J, Chen Y, Huang H, Zhang Y, Ro J, Wagner GR, Green MF, Madsen AS, Schmiesing J, Peterson BS, Xu G, Ilkayeva OR, Muehlbauer MJ, Braulke T, Mühlhausen C, Backos DS, Olsen CA, McGuire PJ, Pletcher SD, Lombard DB, Hirschey MD, Zhao Y. Lysine glutarylation is a protein posttranslational modification regulated by SIRT5. Cell Metab. 2014;19:605–617. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Trefely S, Lovell CD, Snyder NW, Wellen KE. Compartmentalised acyl-CoA metabolism and roles in chromatin regulation. Mol Metab. 2020;38:100941. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Walsh CT, Garneau-Tsodikova S, Gatto GJ. Protein posttranslational modifications: the chemistry of proteome diversifications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005;44:7342–7372. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koo H, Choi E, Park S, Lee EJ, Lee JS. Pat- and Pta-mediated protein acetylation is required for horizontally-acquired virulence gene expression in Salmonella Typhimurium. J Microbiol. 2022;60:823–831. doi: 10.1007/s12275-022-2095-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.VanDrisse CM, Escalante-Semerena JC. Protein acetylation in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2019;73:111–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luu J, Carabetta VJ. Contribution of N(ε)-lysine acetylation towards regulation of bacterial pathogenesis. mSystems. 2021;6:e0042221. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00422-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ren J, Sang Y, Lu J, Yao YF. Protein acetylation and its role in bacterial virulence. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:768–779. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meng Q, Liu P, Wang J, Wang Y, Hou L, Gu W, Wang W. Systematic analysis of the lysine acetylome of the pathogenic bacterium Spiroplasma eriocheiris reveals acetylated proteins related to metabolism and helical structure. J Proteomics. 2016;148:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Christensen DG, Baumgartner JT, Xie X, Jew KM, Basisty N, Schilling B, Kuhn ML, Wolfe AJ. Mechanisms, detection, and relevance of protein acetylation in prokaryotes. mBio. 2019;10:e02708–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02708-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ren J, Sang Y, Qin R, Su Y, Cui Z, Mang Z, Li H, Lu S, Zhang J, Cheng S, Liu X, Li J, Lu J, Wu W, Zhao GP, Shao F, Yao YF. Metabolic intermediate acetyl phosphate modulates bacterial virulence via acetylation. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:55–69. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2018.1558963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Weinert BT, Iesmantavicius V, Wagner SA, Schölz C, Gummesson B, Beli P, Nyström T, Choudhary C. Acetyl-phosphate is a critical determinant of lysine acetylation in E. coli. Mol Cell. 2013;51:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Christensen DG, Xie X, Basisty N, Byrnes J, McSweeney S, Schilling B, Wolfe AJ. Post-translational protein acetylation: an elegant mechanism for bacteria to dynamically regulate metabolic functions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1604. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cheng Z, Tang Y, Chen Y, Kim S, Liu H, Li SS, Gu W, Zhao Y. Molecular characterization of propionyllysines in non-histone proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:45–52. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800224-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garrity J, Gardner JG, Hawse W, Wolberger C, Escalante-Semerena JC. N-lysine propionylation controls the activity of propionyl-CoA synthetase. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30239–30245. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704409200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weinert BT, Iesmantavicius V, Moustafa T, Schölz C, Wagner SA, Magnes C, Zechner R, Choudhary C. Acetylation dynamics and stoichiometry in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Syst Biol. 2014;10:716. doi: 10.1002/msb.134766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Baeza J, Smallegan MJ, Denu JM. Site-specific reactivity of nonenzymatic lysine acetylation. ACS Chem Biol. 2015;10:122–128. doi: 10.1021/cb500848p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.You D, Wang MM, Yin BC, Ye BC. Precursor supply for erythromycin biosynthesis: engineering of propionate assimilation pathway based on propionylation modification. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:371–380. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang MM, You D, Ye BC. Site-specific and kinetic characterization of enzymatic and nonenzymatic protein acetylation in bacteria. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13897-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Okanishi H, Kim K, Masui R, Kuramitsu S. Lysine propionylation is a prevalent post-translational modification in Thermus thermophilus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2382–2398. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.035659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xu X, Cao X, Yang J, Chen L, Liu B, Liu T, Jin Q. Proteome-wide identification of lysine propionylation in the conidial and mycelial stages of trichophyton rubrum. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang M, Huang H, Ge F. Lysine propionylation is a widespread post-translational modification involved in regulation of photosynthesis and metabolism in cyanobacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4792. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sun M, Xu J, Wu Z, Zhai L, Liu C, Cheng Z, Xu G, Tao S, Ye BC, Zhao Y, Tan M. Characterization of protein lysine propionylation in escherichia coli: global profiling, dynamic change, and enzymatic regulation. J Proteome Res. 2016;15:4696–4708. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dolan SK, Wijaya A, Geddis SM, Spring DR, Silva-Rocha R, Welch M. Loving the poison: the methylcitrate cycle and bacterial pathogenesis. Microbiology (Reading) 2018;164:251–259. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Palacios S, Starai VJ, Escalante-Semerena JC. Propionyl coenzyme a is a common intermediate in the 1,2-propanediol and propionate catabolic pathways needed for expression of the prpBCDE operon during growth of Salmonella enterica on 1,2-propanediol. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2802–2810. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.9.2802-2810.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu JY, Xu Y, Xu Z, Zhai LH, Ye Y, Zhao Y, Chu X, Tan M, Ye BC. Protein acylation is a general regulatory mechanism in biosynthetic pathway of Acyl-CoA-derived natural products. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25:984–995. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Høgh RI, Møller SH, Jepsen SD, Mellergaard M, Lund A, Pejtersen M, Fitzner E, Andresen L, Skov S. Metabolism of short-chain fatty acid propionate induces surface expression of NKG2D ligands on cancer cells. FASEB J. 2020;34:15531–15546. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000162R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lagerwaard B, van der Hoek MD, Hoeks J, Grevendonk L, Nieuwenhuizen AG, Keijer J, de Boer VCJ. Propionate hampers differentiation and modifies histone propionylation and acetylation in skeletal muscle cells. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021;196:111495. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fritz KS, Green MF, Petersen DR, Hirschey MD. Ethanol metabolism modifies hepatic protein acylation in mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muñoz-Elías EJ, Upton AM, Cherian J, McKinney JD. Role of the methylcitrate cycle in Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolism, intracellular growth, and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:1109–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Savvi S, Warner DF, Kana BD, McKinney JD, Mizrahi V, Dawes SS. Functional characterization of a vitamin B12-dependent methylmalonyl pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: implications for propionate metabolism during growth on fatty acids. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:3886–3895. doi: 10.1128/JB.01767-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hung CC, Garner CD, Slauch JM, Dwyer ZW, Lawhon SD, Frye JG, McClelland M, Ahmer BM, Altier C. The intestinal fatty acid propionate inhibits Salmonella invasion through the post-translational control of HilD. Mol Microbiol. 2013;87:1045–1060. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Pasmans F, Velge P, Bottreau E, Fievez V, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. Invasion of Salmonella enteritidis in avian intestinal epithelial cells in vitro is influenced by short-chain fatty acids. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;85:237–248. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00542-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Argüello H, Carvajal A, Costillas S, Rubio P. Effect of the addition of organic acids in drinking water or feed during part of the finishing period on the prevalence of Salmonella in finishing pigs. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:842–849. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jacobson A, Lam L, Rajendram M, Tamburini F, Honeycutt J, Pham T, Van Treuren W, Pruss K, Stabler SR, Lugo K, Bouley DM, Vilches-Moure JG, Smith M, Sonnenburg JL, Bhatt AS, Huang KC, Monack D. A gut commensal-produced metabolite mediates colonization resistance to Salmonella infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:296–307. e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ciarlo E, Heinonen T, Herderschee J, Fenwick C, Mombelli M, Le Roy D, Roger T. Impact of the microbial derived short chain fatty acid propionate on host susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37944. doi: 10.1038/srep37944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ormsby MJ, Johnson SA, Carpena N, Meikle LM, Goldstone RJ, McIntosh A, Wessel HM, Hulme HE, McConnachie CC, Connolly JPR, Roe AJ, Hasson C, Boyd J, Fitzgerald E, Gerasimidis K, Morrison D, Hold GL, Hansen R, Walker D, Smith DGE, Wall DM. Propionic acid promotes the virulent phenotype of Crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive escherichia coli. Cell Rep. 2020;30:2297–2305. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ormsby MJ, Logan M, Johnson SA, McIntosh A, Fallata G, Papadopoulou R, Papachristou E, Hold GL, Hansen R, Ijaz UZ, Russell RK, Gerasimidis K, Wall DM. Inflammation associated ethanolamine facilitates infection by Crohn’s disease-linked adherent-invasive Escherichia coli. EBioMedicine. 2019;43:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shelton CD, Yoo W, Shealy NG, Torres TP, Zieba JK, Calcutt MW, Foegeding NJ, Kim D, Kim J, Ryu S, Byndloss MX. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium uses anaerobic respiration to overcome propionate-mediated colonization resistance. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110180. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xie L, Wang X, Zeng J, Zhou M, Duan X, Li Q, Zhang Z, Luo H, Pang L, Li W, Liao G, Yu X, Li Y, Huang H, Xie J. Proteome-wide lysine acetylation profiling of the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;59:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liu F, Yang M, Wang X, Yang S, Gu J, Zhou J, Zhang XE, Deng J, Ge F. Acetylome analysis reveals diverse functions of lysine acetylation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:3352–3366. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.041962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Singh KK, Bhardwaj N, Sankhe GD, Udaykumar N, Singh R, Malhotra V, Saini DK. Acetylation of response regulator proteins, TcrX and MtrA in M. tuberculosis tunes their phosphotransfer ability and modulates two-component signaling crosstalk. J Mol Biol. 2019;431:777–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Singh KK, Athira PJ, Bhardwaj N, Singh DP, Watson U, Saini DK. Acetylation of response regulator protein MtrA in regulates its repressor activity. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:516315. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.516315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bi J, Gou Z, Zhou F, Chen Y, Gan J, Liu J, Wang H, Zhang X. Acetylation of lysine 182 inhibits the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosR to bind DNA and regulate gene expression during hypoxia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:108. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0112-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sun L, Yao Z, Guo Z, Zhang L, Wang Y, Mao R, Lin Y, Fu Y, Lin X. Comprehensive analysis of the lysine acetylome in reveals cross-talk between lysine acetylation and succinylation in LuxS. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:1229–1239. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1656549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yao Z, Guo Z, Wang Y, Li W, Fu Y, Lin Y, Lin W, Lin X. Integrated succinylome and metabolome profiling reveals crucial role of S-ribosylhomocysteine lyase in quorum sensing and metabolism of aeromonas hydrophila. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019;18:200–215. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gaviard C, Broutin I, Cosette P, Dé E, Jouenne T, Hardouin J. Lysine succinylation and acetylation in pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:2449–2459. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gaviard C, Cosette P, Jouenne T, Hardouin J. LasB and CbpD virulence factors of pseudomonas aeruginosa carry multiple post-translational modifications on their lysine residues. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:923–933. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li L, Wang W, Zhang R, Xu J, Wang R, Wang L, Zhao X, Li J. First acetyl-proteome profi ling of Salmonella Typhimurium revealed involvement of lysine acetylation in drug resistance. Vet Microbiol. 2018;226:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nandakumar M, Nathan C, Rhee KY. Isocitrate lyase mediates broad antibiotic tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4306. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sang Y, Ren J, Qin R, Liu S, Cui Z, Cheng S, Liu X, Lu J, Tao J, Yao YF. Acetylation regulating protein stability and DNA-binding ability of HilD, thus modulating Salmonella Typhimurium virulence. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:1018–1026. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hung CC, Eade CR, Altier C. The protein acyltransferase Pat post-transcriptionally controls HilD to repress Salmonella invasion. Mol Microbiol. 2016;102:121–136. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li J, Liu S, Su Y, Ren J, Sang Y, Ni J, Lu J, Yao YF, Monack D. Acetylation of PhoP K88 is involved in regulating Salmonella virulence. Infect Immun. 2021;89:e00588-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00588-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ren J, Sang Y, Tan Y, Tao J, Ni J, Liu S, Fan X, Zhao W, Lu J, Wu W, Yao YF. Acetylation of lysine 201 inhibits the DNA-binding ability of PhoP to regulate Salmonella virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005458. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Okanishi H, Kim K, Masui R, Kuramitsu S. Proteome-wide identification of lysine propionylation in thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria: Geobacillus kaustophilus, Thermus thermophilus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Rhodothermus marinus. Extremophiles. 2017;21:283–296. doi: 10.1007/s00792-016-0901-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Miao Y, Wang Y, Huang D, Lin X, Lin Z, Lin X. Profile of protein lysine propionylation in Aeromonas hydrophila and its role in enzymatic regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;562:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Xu JY, Zhao L, Xu Y, Li B, Zhai L, Tan M, Ye BC. Dynamic characterization of protein and posttranslational modification levels in mycobacterial cholesterol catabolism. mSystems. 2020;5:e00424-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00424-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

