Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorders in reproductive women with major medical and social burden.1 However, due to different diagnostic criteria and measurements, prevalence of PCOS varies greatly amongst populations and countries.2 Ethnic variations also contribute to the different prevalence in studies.3 Moreover, previous studies are mostly of a small-scale and only based on special cohort.2 In The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, Qiao and colleagues conducted two consecutive nationwide epidemiological surveys to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of PCOS in 2010 and 2020 using Rotterdam criteria in representative samples of reproductive women in China.4 Each survey was conducted by trained researchers via a face-to-face interview. In addition, they used the standardized ultrasound and blood tests in both surveys to enhance the data validity.
The study4 included 15,924 and 12,815 participants in the respective years, the largest nation-wide PCOS survey to date. They found that the prevalence of PCOS increased from 5.6% to 8.6% only within a decade among women aged 20–44 years. Although the prevalence and the rise are not as high as in Australia (Figure 1), as with diabetes, considering that at least 24 million women are estimated to have PCOS, it immediately raises alarms from China's key national health policies and strategies. However, general interest and research funding for PCOS remain very limited due to its high prevalence, overall health issues and high medical cost.5,6 More importantly, most of the women with PCOS received inadequate information and education, leading to major anxiety. Therefore, health care workers, researchers, policymakers, and clinicians should recognize this growing problem and value more resources to improve the health and life quality of women with PCOS and reduce the economic and social burden.
Figure 1.
Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in different populations and countries. Data are extracted from Davis SR2 and Qiao.4 Only diagnostic criteria by Rotterdam criteria are presented.
Qiao and colleagues found the increased prevalence was driven by a large proportion of non-hyperandrogenic subtypes,4 which was associated with moderate metabolic dysfunction.7 However, the percentage of women with overweight, obesity and hyperandrogenism in the study population with PCOS has increased significantly from 2010 to 2020.4 They also found that the prevalence of PCOS dropped sharply with age, 14.0–14.7% in women aged 20 to 29 years while 1.2% in women aged 45–49 years. Since the prevalence of PCOS is high in younger women, the risk of developing long-term morbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may increase later.8,9 Thereby, lifestyle interventions including healthy diet and regular physical activity should be emphasized as it can improve lipid profiles, abdominal adiposity and androgen status.10 Screening and diagnosis as preventative measures should also be implemented as early as possible. Further research is needed to investigate the trends in insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia and metabolic disorders, and to follow up the long-term health morbidities associated with PCOS in these younger women.
In summary, this work suggests that prevalence of PCOS in China increased significantly in 2020 compared with 10 years ago and women with PCOS have a more severe phenotype and comorbidity overall. It provides critical evidence to advance the development of new guidelines and polices for the prevention and management of PCOS. As a preservation measure, more education and early lifestyle modifications should also be prioritized. Future studies should consider the metabolic disorders in women with PCOS, as well as the long-term health morbidities to improve the long-term and overall health of women with PCOS.
Contributors
Xu Zheng wrote the original draft of the manuscript. Chi Chiu Wang reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Declaration of interests
All authors have no competing interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
No funding was received for this study.
References
- 1.Azziz R, Carmina E, Chen Z, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16057. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skiba MA, Islam RM, Bell RJ, Davis SR. Understanding variation in prevalence estimates of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:694–709. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim JJ, Choi YM. Phenotype and genotype of polycystic ovary syndrome in Asia: ethnic differences. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45:2330–2337. doi: 10.1111/jog.14132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang R, Li Q, Zhou Z, et al. Changes in the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in China over the past decade. Lancet Reg Health - Western Pac. 2022;25 doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brakta S, Lizneva D, Mykhalchenko K, et al. Perspectives on polycystic ovary syndrome: is polycystic ovary syndrome research underfunded? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:4421–4427. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Riestenberg C, Jagasia A, Markovic D, Buyalos RP, Azziz R. Health care-related economic burden of polycystic ovary syndrome in the United States: pregnancy-related and long-term health consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:575–585. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:270–284. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anagnostis P, Tarlatzis BC, Kauffman RP. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): long-term metabolic consequences. Metabolism. 2018;86:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wekker V, van Dammen L, Koning A, et al. Long-term cardiometabolic disease risk in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26:942–960. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kazemi M, Hadi A, Pierson RA, Lujan ME, Zello GA, Chilibeck PD. Effects of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load on cardiometabolic and reproductive profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:161–178. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]