Abstract
Background:
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the most aggressive tumors with a poor prognosis, indicating the need for the identification of a novel prognostic biomarker for risk stratifications. Recent genome-wide association studies have demonstrated common genetic variants in a region on chromosome 9p21 associated with an increased risk of different malignancies.
Methods:
In the present study, we explore the possible relationship between genetic variant, rs10811661, and gene expression of CDKN2B in 75 pancreatic cancer patients, and 188 healthy individuals. DNAs were extracted and genotyping and gene expression were performed by TaqMan real-time PCR and RT-PCR, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between risk and genotypes, while the significant prognostic variables in the univariate analysis were included in multivariate analyses.
Results:
The patients with PDAC had a higher frequency of a TT genotype for rs10811661 than the control group. Also, PDAC patients with dominant genetic model, (TT + TC), was associated with increased risk of developing PDAC (OR= 14.71, 95% CI [1.96-110.35], p= 0.009). Moreover, patients with CC genotype had a higher expression of CDKN2B, in comparison with TT genotype.
Conclusion:
Our findings demonstrated that CDKN2A/B was associated with the risk of developing PDAC, supporting further investigations in the larger and multicenter setting to validate the potential value of this gene as an emerging marker for PDAC.
Key Words: CDKN2A/B, Rs10811661, Pancreatic cancer, Prognostic biomarker
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer is among the aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, its 5-year survival rate is about 3-15% (1, 2). The most common malignant neoplasm of the pancreas is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is usually used interchangeably (3). The poor prognosis of PDAC is due to a number of variables, including a lack of appropriate markers for early detection, rapid progression, and the paucity of effective treatment options. Early detection of pancreatic cancer patients is one of the most substantial challenges which can meaningfully lower mortality and increase surveillance (4, 5). Several factors have a role in the various types of pancreatic cancer, while tumor suppressors and oncogenes mutations are the most prevalent. Germline mutations in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, STK11/LKB, p16/CDKN2A, PALB2, ATM, and DNA mismatch repair genes have been linked to pancreatic cancers (6). However, frequencies of these mutations do not match with the bulk of genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors CDKN2A (ENSG00000147889) and CDKN2B (ENSG00000147883) exhibited essential role in various disorders. The CDKN2A gene is located on the human genome's chromosome 9 (p21.3) (7). Research has linked CDKN2A/B rs10811661 to an increased risk of numerous malignancies, including breast cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and colorectal cancer (8-12). The CDKN2A gene encodes two proteins: INK4 family member p16 or p16INK4a and ARF tumor suppressor or p14arf (13). CDKN2A activity prevents cancer and may speed up the aging process. Uncontrolled cell proliferation caused by the loss of CDKN2A activity due to inhibition, deletion, mutation, or promoter methylation has been observed in a variety of malignancies.
An increased risk of pancreatic cancer has been discovered in several families with inherited melanoma syndromes. Pathogenic mutations in the CDKN2A gene increase the lifetime risk of cutaneous melanoma by 70% and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by 20% (14-16). Carriers might be enrolled in a pancreatic cancer surveillance program because of their elevated PDAC risk (17). Ghiorzo et al. by analyzing CDKN2A mutations in 225 Italian patients with pancreatic cancer, reported that a significant subset of familial pancreatic cancer families may carry CDKN2A mutations (18). Campa et al. examined 13 polymorphisms of theCDKN2A gene and found that the A allele of rs3217992 SNP has the strongest association with an increased risk of PDAC (6). Recently, Overbeek et al. revealed that pathogenic CDKN2A mutations impacting the p16INK4a protein, including c.67G>C, are associated with a higher PDAC risk (15). Regarding theoretical evidence and lack of studies, we aimed to discover the relationship between CDKN2A/B- rs10811661 SNP and PDAC and evaluate the prognostic role of the rs10811661 SNP in PDAC.
Materials and Methods
Patients
In this study, 75 pancreatic cancer patients and 188 age-matched healthy controls from Imam Reza and Sina hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC.1400.709). The guidelines of the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee were used to obtain Informed consent from all the participants. Patient samples were obtained with a confirmed histological diagnosis and with locally advanced or metastatic PC during May/2006-August/2020. The healthy control group was obtained as part of the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorders (MASHAD) cohort study (27). These individuals had no family history of stroke, cancer, myocardial infarction, infectious disease, and diabetes mellitus.
Genotyping
The genomic DNA was extracted from samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. The NanoDrop®1000Detector (NanoDropTechnologies, Wilmington, DE) was used to determine the concentration and purity of DNAs. Genotype analysis of CDKN2A/B-rs10811661 polymorphism was carried out using the Taqman-® probes-based assay; polymerase chain reactions were carried out in a total volume of 12.5 μL, using 10 ng of DNA in the TaqMan® Universal Master Mix with specific primers and probes (C90179210 and C79005710; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The allelic content of the samples was assessed using an ABIPRISM-7500 analyzer with SDS version 2.0 software.
RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from PDACs using total RNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Parstous, Tehran, Iran). RNA was evaluated by a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (BioTek, USA EPOCH). cDNA was synthesized using a cDNA synthesis kit (Parstous, Tehran, Iran). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using specific primer for CDKN2A/B (Macrogene Co., Seoul, South Korea). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR green master mix (Parstous Co. Tehran, Iran), and performed by ABI-PRISM StepOne instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene expression data were normalized to GAPDH, using a standard curve of cDNAs purchased from Quantitative PCR Human Reference RNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) (18).
Statistical analysis
We used SPSS-20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for statistical analysis. The mean and standard deviations were utilized for continuous variables, whereas frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables in the descriptive statistics of patients with PDAC. The Pearson χ distribution was used to measure deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of the CDKN2A/B rs10811661 polymorphism genotype and allele frequencies. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between PDAC risk and genotypes in dominant, recessive, and co-dominant genetic models. The odds ratio and its related 95 % confidence interval were used to show PDAC risk estimations. For categorical variables, Pearson's chi-square test was used, and Student's t tests were used to analyze the connection between CDKN2A/B rs10811661 polymorphism and clinical pathological characteristics. The statistical significance level of p was 0.05.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients
Sixty-nine patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled in the current study. The control group consists of 148 age and sex-matched subjects. Table 1 shows the demographic, clinical, and genetic features of the population. The case group consists of 35 (50.7%) males and 34 (49.3) females, with a mean age of 61.46 ± 11.69 years. According to tumor size, no patients were categorized in the T1 stage (cancer cells invaded the submucosa). In 51.5% of patients, cancer cells invaded the muscularis propria (T2), in 38.2% of cases, cancer cells invaded the adventitia (T3), and the tumor depth in 10.3% of participants was at T4 status, meaning cancer cells invaded contiguous structures. Moreover, in 62% of patients, the cancer progressed to one or two adjacent lymph nodes (N1), whereas distant lymph nodes or other tissue progression was seen in 13% of patients (M1) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinicopathological characteristics of the study groups, means±SD or N (%).
Characteristic | Patients (%) |
---|---|
Age | 61.46±11.69 |
Sex | |
Female | 34 (49.3%) |
Male | 35 (50.7%) |
TNM classification | |
Stage I-II | 36 (52%) |
Stage III-IV | 33 (48%) |
Tumor size | |
T1 | 0 (0%) |
T2 | 35 (51.5%) |
T3 | 26 (38.2%) |
T4 | 7 (10.3%) |
Nodal status (N1) | |
Yes | 43 (62%) |
No | 26 (38%) |
Distant metastasis (M1) | |
Yes | 9 (13%) |
No | 60 (87%) |
Grade | |
Poor-differentiated | 0 (0%) |
Moderated-differentiated | 3 (4.4%) |
Well-differentiated | 8 (11.6%) |
Undifferentiated | 58 (84%) |
Genetic variant and PDAC
Allele and genotype frequencies of rs10811661 polymorphisms are shown in table 2, which was consistent with the HWE (p= 0.09). For rs10811661, minor allele frequencies for T and C alleles were 0.34. In the PDAC group, the frequencies of TT, TC, and CC genotypes for rs10811661 were 75.4%, 23.2%, and 1.4%, respectively, while in the control group, they were 33%, 47.4%, and 19.6%, respectively (Table 2). Hence, we assumed the T allele as a risk allele for further analysis. Under three different genetic models, binary logistic regression analysis of the rs10811661 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer demonstrated a link between PDAC and the rs10811661 polymorphism (Table 3). Using dominant genetic model, the genetic variant (TT + TC) was found to be highly associated with an increased risk of developing PDAC (OR= 14.71, 95% CI [1.96-110.35], p= 0.009). Also, cases with CC genotype were associated with lower expression of CDKN2A/B (Fig. 1).
Table 2.
Allele and genotype frequencies of rs10811661 polymorphisms.
Gene | SNP | Major/minor allele | Major allele homozygote (%) | Heterozygote (%) | Minor allele homozygote (%) | MAF | HWE (p-Value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | rs10811661 | T/C Control (n= 148) | 101 (46.5%)Case (n= 69) | 86 (39.6%) Total (n= 217) | 30 (13.8%) | 0.34 | 0.09 |
TT | 49 (33%) | 52 (75.4%) | 101 (46.5%) | ||||
TC | 70 (47.4%) | 16 (23.2) | 86 (39.6%) | ||||
CC | 29 (19.6%) | 1 (1.4) | 30 (13.8%) |
Abbreviations: HWE: Hardy Wienberg equilibrium; MAF: minor allele frequency; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Fig. 1.
A-B) CDKN2A/B gene expression in PDAC cases and (C) survival analysis in different genetic models.
Table 3.
Binary logistic regression analysis of rs10811661 polymorphism and pancreatic cancer under different genetic models.
Models | Genotype | Case n (%) | Control n (%) | OR (95%CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allele | T | 120 (87%) | 168 (56.7%) | ||
C | 18 (13%) | 128 (43.3%) | |||
Dominant | TT + TC | 68 (98.5%) | 119 (80.4%) | 14.71 (1.96-110.35) | 0.009 |
CC | 1 (1.5%) | 29 (19.6%) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Recessive | TC + CC | 17 (24.6%) | 99 (67%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.000 |
TT | 52 (75.4%) | 49 (33%) | 4.65 (2.48-8.75) | ||
Co-dominant | TT + CC | 53 (76.8%) | 78 (52.7%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 0.005 |
TC | 16 (23.2%) | 70 (47.3%) | 2.49 (1.31-4.75) |
Discussion
Our data illustrated that CDKN2A/B was related with risk of developing PDAC, which is in line with previous observations (15, 19, 20). Previous studies identified a number of CDKN2A/B genetic variations correlated with the risk of multiple cancers. They hypothesized that this region is involved in various types of cancer. The mechanism of this gene's contribution to the cell cycle helps explain the probable link between its actions and PDAC. Genetic variants in the region have also been linked to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, implying that the 9p21.3 region may play a role as a genetic link between the two diseases (6). Previous studies reported a positive correlation between CDKN2B-rs10811661 and impaired pancreatic beta cell function and diabetes (21-23). Overexpression of CDKN2A/2B has been found in clinical and experimental investigations to inhibit pancreatic island proliferation and lead to diabetes, whereas its suppression leads to cell proliferation and cancer (24).
The CDKN2A gene produces two proteins: p16INK4a, a member of the INK4 family, and p14arf, a tumor suppressor. P16 has been found in a variety of tissues, including the pancreas. p16INK4a mutations appear to be a primary source of Rb pathway dysfunction in a range of human cancers. The p16INK4a tumour suppressor gene produces a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that binds to CDK4 and CDK6, preventing them from coupling with d-type cyclins and thereby initiating Rb phosphorylation. As a result, it's thought that p16INK4a's dysfunction leads to uncontrolled cell cycle progression and neoplastic transformation (25). p14ARF operates as a tumor suppressor by neutralizing MDM2-mediated p53 degradation (26-28).
Furthermore, inactivation of CDKN2A by methylation or ANRIL can inhibit the activity of tumor suppressor genes. ANRIL controls cell proliferation and senescence indirectly by three methylations of lysine 27 in chromosome 9P21 (3meH3K27). ANRIL is a 3.8 kb lncRNA that is transcribed in the opposite way as the p15/CDKN2Bp16/CDKN2Ap14/ARF gene cluster and has been linked to the recruitment of EZH2 (PRC2) and CBX7 (PRC1) complexes to certain loci (29-31). The rs10811661 SNP affects ANRIL expression, which can influence CDKN2A expression and lead to cell hyper-proliferation (32).
Previously, Campa et al. showed that among 13 SNPs in the 9p21.3 region, only rs3217992 was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing PDAC (6). The rs3217992 SNP is located in a miRNA target region (miR-138-2-3p). It may affect CDKN2B by interfering with miRNA-mRNA interactions (33). A recent meta-analysis of 45 case-control studies concluded that COX-2-765, HIF-1 rs11549467, and TP53 rs9895829 additive genetic models, as well as dominant gene models of DR rs2228570, CTLA-4 rs231775, and MTHFR rs1801133, are associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Among 12 CDKN2A/B SNPs, only the co dominance model of CDKN2A/B rs2518719 could predict the risk of pancreatic cancer, based on Thakkinstian's algorithm (34).
In conclusion, our data showed that CDKN2B was associated with increased risk developing PDAC, indicating the need for further investigations in larger populations and functional studies to confirm the potential value of the emerging marker for PDAC.
Acknowledgements
This study was support by grant from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS).
References
- 1.Arnold M, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Andersson TML, Myklebust TÅ, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. . Lancet Oncol. . 2019;20(11):1493–1505. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. . CA Cancer J Clin. . 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhillon J, Betancourt M. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Monogr Clin Cytol. . 2020;26:74–91. doi: 10.1159/000455736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pereira SP, Oldfield L, Ney A, Hart PA, Keane MG, Pandol SJ, et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer. . Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):698–710. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30416-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brand RE, Lerch MM, Rubinstein WS, Neoptolemos JP, Whitcomb DC, Hruban RH, et al. Advances in counselling and surveillance of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer. . Gut. 2007;56(10):1460–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.108456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Campa D, Pastore M, Gentiluomo M, Talar-Wojnarowska R, Kupcinskas J, Malecka-Panas E, et al. Functional single nucleotide polymorphisms within the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B region affect pancreatic cancer risk. Oncotarget. 2016;7(35):57011–57020. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guo G, Chmielecki J, Goparaju C, Heguy A, Dolgalev I, Carbone M, et al. Whole-exome sequencing reveals frequent genetic alterations in BAP1, NF2, CDKN2A, and CUL1 in malignant pleural mesothelioma. . Cancer Res. . 2015;75(2):264–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hesari A, Maleksabet A, Tirkani AN, et al. Evaluation of the two polymorphisms rs1801133 in MTHFR and rs10811661 in CDKN2A/B in breast cancer. . J Cell Biochem. . 2019;120:2090–2097. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.ShahidSales S, Mehramiz M, Ghasemi F, Aledavood A, Shamsi M, Hassanian SM, et al. A genetic variant in CDKN2A/B gene is associated with the increased risk of breast cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. . 32;1:e22190. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rahmani F, Avan A, Amerizadeh F, Ferns GA, Talebian S, Shahidsales S. The association of a genetic variant in CDKN2A/B gene and the risk of colorectal cancer. . EXCLI J. . 2020;19:1316–1321. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghobadi N, Mehramiz M, ShahidSales S, Rezaei Brojerdi A, Anvari K, Khazaei M, et al. A genetic variant in CDKN2A/2B locus was associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. . Journal of Cellular Physiology. . 2019;234(4):5070–6. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vijayakrishnan J, Henrion M, Moorman AV, Fiege B, Kumar R, da Silva Filho MI, et al. The 9p21.3 risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is explained by a rare high-impact variant in CDKN2A. . Sci Rep. . 2015;5:15065. doi: 10.1038/srep15065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rezaee M, Akbari H, Momeni-Moghaddam MA, Moazzen F, Salehi S, et al. Association of C677T (rs1081133) and A1298C (rs1801131) Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Variants with Breast Cancer Susceptibility Among Asians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . Biochem Genet. . 2021;59(2):367–97. doi: 10.1007/s10528-020-10020-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, Bergman W, Bishop JN, Bressac-de Paillerets B. Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. . J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(12):894–903. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.12.894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Overbeek KA, Rodríguez-Girondo MD, Wagner A, van der Stoep N, van den Akker PC, Oosterwijk JC, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations for pancreatic cancer risk in Dutch melanoma families with pathogenic CDKN2A variants. . J Med Genet. 2021;58(4):264–269. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Struewing JP, Hussussian CJ, Ranade K, Zametkin DP, et al. Increased risk of pancreatic cancer in melanoma-prone kindreds with p16INK4 mutations. N Engl J Med. . 1995;333(15):970–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510123331504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R, Syngal S, Del Chiaro M, Bartsch DK, et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. . Gut. 2020;69(1):7–17. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghiorzo P, Fornarini G, Sciallero S, Battistuzzi L, Belli F, Bernard L, et al. CDKN2A is the main susceptibility gene in Italian pancreatic cancer families. . J Med Genet. 2012;49(3):164–70. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghiorzo P, Fornarini G, Sciallero S, Battistuzzi L, Belli F, Bernard L, et al. CDKN2A is the main susceptibility gene in Italian pancreatic cancer families. . J Med Genet. 2012;49(3):164–70. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Biankin AV, Waddell N, Kassahn KS, Gingras MC, Muthuswamy LB, Johns AL, et al. Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes. . Nature. . 2012;491:399–405. doi: 10.1038/nature11547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grarup N, Rose CS, Andersson EA, Andersen G, Nielsen AL, Albrechtsen A, et al. Studies of association of variants near the HHEX, CDKN2A/B, and IGF2BP2 genes with type 2 diabetes and impaired insulin release in 10,705 Danish subjects: validation and extension of genome-wide association studies. . Diabetes. . 2007;56(12):3105–11. doi: 10.2337/db07-0856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horikoshi M, Hara K, Ito C, Shojima N, Nagai R, Ueki K, et al. Variations in the HHEX gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population. . Diabetologia. . 2007;50(12):2461–6. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0827-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cauchi S, Meyre D, Durand E, Marre M, Hadjadj S, Proença C, et al. Post genome-wide association studies of novel genes associated with type 2 diabetes show gene-gene interaction and high predictive value. . PloS one. . 2008;3(5):e2031;3(5):e2031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tarnowski M, Malinowski D, Safranow K, Dziedziejko V, Pawlik A. CDC123/CAMK1D gene rs12779790 polymorphism and rs10811661 polymorphism upstream of the CDKN2A/2B gene in women with gestational diabetes. . J Perinatol. . 2017;37(4):345–348. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sherr CJ. Cancer cell cycles. . Science. . 1996;274(5293):1672–7. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pomerantz J, Schreiber-Agus N, Liégeois NJ, Silverman A, Alland L, Chin L, et al. The Ink4a tumor suppressor gene product, p19Arf, interacts with MDM2 and neutralizes MDM2's inhibition of p53. Cell. 1998;92(6):713–23. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81400-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stott FJ, Bates S, James MC, McConnell BB, Starborg M, Brookes S, et al. The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14(ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2. EMBO J. . 1998;17(17):5001–14. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Klump B, Hsieh CJ, Nehls O, Dette S, Holzmann K, Kiesslich R, et al. Methylation status of p14ARF and p16INK4a as detected in pancreatic secretions. Br J Cancer. . 2003;88(2):217–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yap KL, Li S, Muñoz-Cabello AM, Raguz S, Zeng L, Mujtaba S, et al. Molecular interplay of the noncoding RNA ANRIL and methylated histone H3 lysine 27 by polycomb CBX7 in transcriptional silencing of INK4a. . Mol Cell. . 2010;38(5):662–674. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Popov N, Gil J. Epigenetic regulation of the INK4b-ARF-INK4a locus: in sickness and in health. Epigenetics. . 2010;5(8):685–690. doi: 10.4161/epi.5.8.12996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.ShahidSales S, Mehramiz M, Ghasemi F, Aledavood A, Shamsi M, Hassanian SM, et al. A genetic variant in CDKN2A/B gene is associated with the increased risk of breast cancer. . J Clin Lab Anal. . 2018;32(1):e22190. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kong Y, Sharma RB, Ly S, Stamateris RE, Jesdale WM, Alonso LC. CDKN2A/B T2D Genome-Wide Association Study Risk SNPs Impact Locus Gene Expression and Proliferation in Human Islets. . Diabetes. 2018;67(5):872–884. doi: 10.2337/db17-1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ghanbari M, Franco OH, Looper HWJd, Hofman A, Erkeland SJ, Dehghan A. Genetic Variations in MicroRNA-Binding Sites Affect MicroRNA-Mediated Regulation of Several Genes Associated with Cardio-metabolic Phenotypes. . Circ Cardiovasc Genet. . 2015;8(3):473–86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ye Z-M, Li L-J, Luo M-B, Qing H-Y, Zheng J-H, Zhang C, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Aging (Albany NY). . 2020;12(24):25256–25274. doi: 10.18632/aging.104128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]