Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2022 Jul 26;36(9):e24626. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24626

Genetic variants associated with metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease in western China

Shenling Liao 1, Kang An 2, Zhi Liu 1, He He 1, Zhenmei An 3, Qiaoli Su 2,, Shuangqing Li 2,
PMCID: PMC9459258  PMID: 35881683

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to confirm the association between some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in western China.

Methods

A total of 286 cases and 250 healthy controls were enrolled in our study. All samples were genotyped for patatin‐like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3) rs738409, transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) rs58542926, membrane‐bound O‐acyltransferase domain containing 7 (MBOAT7) rs641738, glucokinase regulator (GCKR) rs1260326 and rs780094, and GATA zinc finger domain containing 2A (GATAD2A) rs4808199. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the association between MAFLD and each SNP under different models. Multiple linear regression was used to find the association between SNPs and laboratory characteristics. Multifactor dimensionality reduction was applied to test SNP–SNP interactions.

Results

The recessive model and additive model of PNPLA3 rs738409 variant were related to MAFLD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.791 and 1.377, respectively, p = 0.038 and 0.027, respectively). However, after Benjamini‐Hochberg adjustment for multiple tests, all associations were no longer statistically significant. PNPLA3 rs738409 correlated with AST levels. GCKR rs780094 and rs1260326 negatively correlated with serum glucose but positively correlated with triglycerides in MAFLD. Based on MDR analysis, the best single‐locus and multilocus models for MAFLD risk were rs738409 and six‐locus models, respectively.

Conclusions

In the Han population in western China, no association was found between these SNPs and the risk of MAFLD. PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with aspartate aminotransferase levels in MAFLD patients. GCKR variants were associated with increased triglyceride levels and reduced serum fasting glucose in patients with MAFLD.

Keywords: GATAD2A, GCKR, MBOAT7, metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease, PNPLA3, TM6SF2


The study aimed to confirm the association between some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in western China. We found no association between these SNPs and the risk of MAFLD after Benjamini‐Hochberg adjustment. PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with the AST levels in MAFLD patients. GCKR variants were associated with increased triglycerides levels and reduced serum fasting glucose in patients with MAFLD. In addition, there was no synergistic SNP–SNP interaction between PNPLA3 rs738409 and other SNPs on MAFLD.

graphic file with name JCLA-36-e24626-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), formerly named nonalcoholic associated fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is increasing worldwide, and the global prevalence is 29.8% (95% confidence interval: 28.6%–31.1%). 1 MAFLD has become the most common chronic liver disease, characterized by steatosis and metabolic dysfunction. The diagnosis of MAFLD has changed from previous exclusionary diagnostic criteria to current positive criteria. 2 Studies using the diagnostic criteria for NAFLD and MAFLD separately in the same population reported that the updated definition of MAFLD did not significantly change the prevalence compared with NAFLD. 3 , 4 MAFLD is becoming a global economic burden and is a growing strain on healthcare systems for disease management. 5

There is growing evidence that genetics and environmental factors play fundamental roles in the development and progression of MAFLD. 6 The heritability of MAFLD has been confirmed with evidence from data from epidemiological, familial aggregation, and twin studies, with heritability estimates ranging from 20% to 70%. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 With the increasing number of studies on MAFLD susceptibility, progression based on genome‐wide association studies and large candidate gene studies, 11 , 12 , 13 several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have significantly contributed to the development of MAFLD, such as patatin‐like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3) rs738409, 11 , 12 transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) rs58542926, 14 , 15 membrane‐bound O‐acyltransferase domain containing 7 (MBOAT7) rs641738, 16 glucokinase regulator (GCKR) rs1260326 and rs780094, 17 and GATA zinc finger domain containing 2A (GATAD2A) rs4808199. 18

PNPLA3 rs738409 encodes PNPLA3 I148 M, which is a robust variant associated with MAFLD in multiple ethnicities. 19 , 20 It is currently considered that PNPLA3 I148 M promotes hepatic steatosis via lipid reprogramming characterized by triglyceride accumulation, polyunsaturated fatty acid depletion, and signature of transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation leading to inflammatory pathway activation. 21 , 22 TM6SF2 rs58542926 likely results in functional loss, VLDL secretion impairment, and hepatic steatosis fibrosis promotion. 23 MBOAT7 rs641738 is associated with higher triglyceride synthesis by a noncanonical phosphatidylinositol pathway. 24 GCKR rs1260326 and rs780094 regulate glucokinase and likely provide more substrates for lipogenesis. 25 GATAD2A rs4808199 is an intron variant that was reported to be associated with MAFLD in Japanese individuals, 18 but there have been few studies about the potential mechanism.

There is large interethnic variability in an individual's susceptibility to MAFLD. 26 , 27 , 28 The association between PNPLA3 rs738409 and MAFLD is robust. However, the association between TM6SF2 rs58542926, GCKR rs1260326, and rs780094 and MAFLD in the Chinese population is not consistent with Europeans. MBOAT7 rs641738 and GATAD2A rs4808199 lack investigation in the Chinese population. Therefore, we selected these six SNPs to explore the relationship between MAFLD in western China and investigate the association between SNPs and laboratory characteristics in MAFLD. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) is a wide method to analyze gene–gene interactions, which aims to reduce the complexity of multilocus information by pooling genotypes into high‐risk and low‐risk groups, thus reducing them to a one‐dimensional variable. 29 Additionally, we attempted to find SNP–SNP interactions in MAFLD using MDR analysis.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Subjects and data collection

We enrolled 286 cases and 250 healthy controls. Subjects were recruited from West China Hospital of Sichuan University from December 2019 to December 2020. All subjects were unrelated and ethnically Han Chinese. In terms of the diagnostic criteria of MAFLD, the international expert consensus statement states that, besides the evidence of hepatic steatosis, it also meets one of the following three criteria: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. 2 In the study, hepatic steatosis was supported by imaging evidence, such as abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or controlled attenuation parameter score. Overweight/obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m2 for Asians. Metabolic dysregulation was characterized by high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low HDL‐cholesterol, prediabetes, or receiving specific drug treatment for these metabolic disorders. Controls consisted of individuals from the health management department of the hospital without hepatic steatosis on imaging, and the sex and age were matched. All subjects with viral infections, drug‐induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis, total parenteral nutrition, or tumors were excluded, regardless of group. Our study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The data, including age, sex, BMI, medical history, and routine biochemical indexes, were obtained from the laboratory information system and hospital information system. Routine biochemical indexes included total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, albumin, globulin, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), glucose, urea, creatinine, serum uric acid, triglyceride (TG), cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT).

2.2. Specimen collection and SNP genotyping

For genomic DNA extraction, two milliliters of whole blood samples were collected with EDTA anticoagulant. The magnetic bead method was used to extract DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions (Danfeng Technology, Chengdu, China). Genotyping was performed using the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiplex ligase detection reaction (LDR) method. After concentration and purity measurements, 50 ng DNA template was used for PCR. Regarding quality control, 10% of samples were selected randomly and genotyped twice to ensure accuracy. Negative control was used for contamination detection and electrophoresis on the PCR products to observe whether the reaction was successful. The PCR primers were shown in Table S1, and PCR was carried out with the initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles for denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Information on the LDR reaction probe was shown in Table S2, and the LDR program was 95°C for 2 min and 40 cycles at 94°C for 15 s and 50°C for 25 s. The products were sequenced by PRISM 3730 (ABI, USA). All samples were genotyped for PNPLA3 rs738409, MBOAT7 rs641738, GATAD2A rs4808199, GCKR rs1260326, GCKR rs780094, and TM6SF2 rs58542926. HaploReg v4.1 (https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php) was used to annotate the potential functional role of these SNPs 30 (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Basic information of SNPs, including the frequencies of SNP genotypes, the p value of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium equation, and bioinformatics function annotations

SNP Genotypes Control group (n) p Case group (n) p HaploReg
PNPLA3 rs738409 C > G CC 105 0.912 91 0.732 Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, NHGRI/EBI GWAS hits, selected eQTL hits
CG 114 137
GG 30 56
TM6SF2 rs58542926 C > T CC 221 0.401 239 0.194 Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, selected eQTL hits
CT 25 35
TT 0 3
MBOAT7 rs641738 C > T CC 136 0.468 148 0.826 Promoter histone marks, enhancer histone marks, DNAse, proteins bound, Motifs changed, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits
CT 93 113
TT 20 23
GCKR rs780094 C > T CC 55 0.717 63 0.957 Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, proteins bound, Motifs changed, HGRI/EBI GWAS hits, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits
CT 121 142
TT 73 79
GCKR rs1260326 C > T CC 54 0.520 59 0.954 Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, HGRI/EBI GWAS hits, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits
CT 118 139
TT 76 83
GATAD2A rs4808199 G > A GG 153 0.852 171 0.051 Promoter histone marks, enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits
GA 85 91
AA 11 22

2.3. Statistical analysis

We used the Genetic Association Study (GAS) Power Calculator (http://csg.sph.umich.edu/abecasis/CaTS/gas_power_calculator/index.html) to calculate the sample size. For the parameter, the prevalence of MAFLD was approximately 30%, the disease allele frequency was the average variant allele frequency of our 6 studied SNPs (0.39), and the significance level was 0.008. The results showed that 250 cases (case: control = 1:1) could provide enough power (>0.8) to detect moderate genetic effects (genotype relative risk >1.4). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 21.0 statistical software (USA) and R software (version 4.0.5, Austria). The allele frequencies of all SNP genotypes obeyed the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) equation (p > 0.05, Table 1). The mean and standard deviation for normal data were presented, and the median and interquartile range for nonnormal data. The chi‐square test was conducted on sex variables, and the Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney U test were performed for quantitative variables. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the risk of MAFLD associated with each SNP under the dominant model, the recessive model, and the additive model after inputting age, sex, and BMI for adjustment. Then, we used multiple linear regression to look for the association between SNPs and laboratory indexes after inputting age, sex, and BMI for adjustment. SNP–SNP interactions were tested using MDR software version 3.0.2 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/mdr/). 31 Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Study population

In total, 286 cases and 250 healthy controls were screened. The characteristics of the study populations are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in the distribution of sex between MAFLD patients and controls. Globin, urea, creatine, cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients with MAFLD presented a higher BMI, elevated glucose, triglycerides (TGs), and serum uric acid levels.

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of the study populations. Data are presented as the median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation, and the Mann–Whitney U test or Student's t test was performed for quantitative variables

Variables Control MAFLD p
Sex (male%) 73.2% 75.0% 0.637
Age 49.00 (17.00) 51.00 (18.00) 0.075
BMI 23.95 (3.57) 27.12 (4.67) <0.001
Total bilirubin (μmol/L) 13.70 (8.62) 15.84 (7.71) <0.001
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L) 4.40 (3.07) 4.86 (2.27) <0.001
Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L) 9.32 (6.20) 10.90 (5.34) 0.002
Albumin (g/L) 47.40 (7.50) 49.05 (4.23) <0.001
Globulin (g/L) a 27.57 (3.26) 27.45 (4.87) 0.739
ALT (IU/L) 20.00 (14.00) 29.00 (29.00) <0.001
AST (IU/L) 18.00 (6.00) 21.00 (14.00) <0.001
Glucose (mmol/L) 5.47 (0.88) 6.13 (3.16) <0.001
Urea (mmol/L) 4.91 (2.13) 4.86 (1.60) 0.830
Creatinine (μmol/L) a 77.56 (17.35) 75.77 (15.06) 0.211
Serum uric acid (μmol/L) 316.00 (110.00) 350.50 (117.25) <0.001
TG (mmol/L) 1.29 (1.00) 2.03 (1.43) <0.001
CHOL (mmol/L) a 4.74 (1.05) 4.77 (1.16) 0.781
HDL‐C (mmol/L) 1.35 (0.50) 1.08 (0.44) <0.001
LDL‐C (mmol/L) a 2.97 (0.84) 3.06 (0.93) 0.218
ALP (IU/L) 75.00 (27.00) 75.00 (29.00) 0.564
GGT (IU/L) 26.00 (22.50) 36.00 (36.00) <0.001

Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CHOL, cholesterol; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

a

Normal data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables.

3.2. Association between genotypes and MAFLD

Six SNPs were genotyped, and the genotype distribution in MAFLD and controls was shown in Table 1. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between gene variants and MAFLD after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. The dominant model, recessive model, and additive model for each SNP were analyzed, and the results are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Association between the genetic model for each SNP and MAFLD. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between gene variants and MAFLD after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI

PNPLA3 rs738409 MBOAT7 rs641738 TM6SF2 rs58542926 GCKR rs780094 GCKR rs1260326 GATAD2A rs4808199
Dominant model CC vs. CG + GG CC vs. CT + TT CC vs. CT + TT CC vs. CT + TT CC vs. CT + TT GG vs. GA + AA
OR (95% CI) 1.397 (0.933, 2.093) 1.375 (0.926, 2.043) 1.088 (0.577, 2.501) 0.929 (0.582, 1.484) 1.015 (0.630, 1.636) 0.980 (0.655, 1.465)
p 0.104 0.114 0.795 0.758 0.951 0.92
adjust p a 0.388 0.388 0.951 0.951 0.951 0.951
Recessive model CC + CG vs. GG CT + CC vs. TT CT + CC vs. TT CT + CC vs. TT CT + CC vs. TT GA + GG vs. AA
OR (95% CI) 1.791 (1.032, 3.108) 1.156 (0.567, 2.354) 0.894 (0.578, 1.382) 0.942 (0.613, 1.445) 2.066 (0.880, 4.847)
p 0.038 0.69 0.614 0.783 0.095
adjust p 0.323 0.951 0.951 0.951 0.388
Additive model CC vs. CG vs. GG CC vs. CT vs. TT CC vs. CT vs. TT CC vs. CT vs. TT CC vs. CT vs. TT GG vs. GA vs. AA
OR (95% CI) 1.377 (1.037, 1.828) 1.244 (0.916, 1.690) 1.162 (0.636, 2.126) 0.932 (0.707, 1.228) 0.980 (0.744, 1292) 1.100 (0.796, 1.520)
p 0.027 0.163 0.625 0.616 0.887 0.564
adjust p 0.323 0.462 0.951 0.951 0.951 0.951
a

The adjusted p value was adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg.

The recessive model and additive model of the PNPLA3 rs738409 variant were potentially related to MAFLD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.791 and 1.377, respectively, p = 0.038 and 0.027, respectively). However, after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment for multiple tests, all associations were no longer statistically significant. As for TM6SF2 rs58542926 genotype TT, only three patients were identified, so the recessive model could not be analyzed. Other gene variants were not statistically correlated with MAFLD.

3.3. Association between genotypes and quantitative traits in MAFLD

Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between quantitative traits in the MAFLD group and genetic models after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. As shown in Table 4, PNPLA3 rs738409 correlated with AST levels. The T allele of GCKR rs1260326 and the T allele of GCKR rs780094 negatively correlated with serum glucose. However, the T allele of GCKR rs1260326 and the T allele of GCKR rs780094 positively correlated with triglycerides. In addition, there were no significant associations between other quantitative traits in MAFLD and gene variants.

TABLE 4.

The association between quantitative traits in the MAFLD group and genetic models after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI

Traits SNP B (95% CI) p Adjust p a
TG GCKR rs1260326 recessive model 0.649 (0.125, 1.173) 0.015 0.022
TG GCKR rs780094 recessive model 0.706 (0.178, 1.234) 0.009 0.022
GLU GCKR rs1260326 dominant model −1.217 (−2.004, −0.390) 0.004 0.022
GLU GCKR rs1260326 additive model −0.618 (−1.096, −0.140) 0.011 0.022
GLU GCKR rs780094 dominant model −0.892 (−1.699, −0.084) 0.031 0.031
AST PNPLA3 rs738409 recessive model 13.774 (2.404, 25.145) 0.018 0.022
a

The adjusted p value was adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg.

3.4. The impact of SNP–SNP interactions on MAFLD

The results of the optimal SNP model with different numbers of loci were displayed in Table 5. 31 As shown in the table, the single‐locus model (PNPLA3 rs738409) had the best testing balance accuracy (0.533), and the cross‐validation consistency was 10/10, making it the best single‐site model for the risk of MAFLD. Additionally, the six‐locus SNP model achieved good testing balance accuracy (0.511) and cross‐validation consistency (10/10). The entropy of SNP–SNP interactions were shown in Figure 1. MDR used entropy measurements to evaluate and visualize the interactions between variable combinations. The blue line and negative numbers indicated that there was likely redundantly in regulating the risk of MAFLD. The dendrogram (A) and circle graph (B) both showed that PNPLA3 rs738409 redundantly interacted with other SNPs. Most SNP–SNP interactions were negligible or neutral, except for the positive interaction effects of GCKR rs1260326 and GCKR rs780094. However, the positive interaction might be caused by linkage disequilibrium (R 2 > 0.8). In addition, SNP–SNP interactions evaluated by logistic regression analysis did not find statistically significant associations after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment (Table S3).

TABLE 5.

Summary of SNP–SNP interaction models detected by MDR

Model Training balance accuracy Testing balance accuracy Cross‐validation consistency p
rs738409 0.5512 0.5337 10/10 0.0146
rs58542926, rs738409 0.5660 0.5008 5/10 0.0007
rs1260326, rs4808199, rs738409 0.5960 0.4916 5/10 <0.0001
rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 0.6428 0.5188 9/10 <0.0001
rs58542926, rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 0.6677 0.5165 8/10 <0.0001
rs58542926, rs780094, rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 0.6795 0.5105 10/10 <0.0001

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The entropy of SNP–SNP interactions in the dendrogram (A) and circle graph (B). (A) Short lines represented stronger interactions, and long lines represented weaker interactions. (B) Entropy values of the SNPs were presented in the cells, showing the main independent effects. The connecting lines indicated pairwise interactive effects. Red and blue represented synergism, and redundancy, respectively. Negative percent entropy indicates redundancy, while positive percent entropy indicates synergism

4. DISCUSSION

MAFLD is a complex metabolic disorder in which the environment and susceptible genes interact. In mainland China, the prevalence of MAFLD varies from 19.18% to 36.41% in regions and provinces, and the prevalence is higher in ethnic minorities. 28 In our study, we assessed the association between SNPs and MAFLD and the effects of SNP–SNP interactions on MAFLD in the western Chinese Han population. Further, we found that SNPs were related to some quantitative traits in MAFLD.

In our study, the PNPLA3 G allele was the potential gene variant correlated with MAFLD, which was to be expected. However, possibly due to insufficient sample size, it was not statistically significant after correcting the p‐value. PNPLA3 rs738409 is a recognized genetic factor associated with MAFLD in various populations 13 , 32 , 33 , 34 and has been confirmed to be associated with the full spectrum of MAFLD. 11 PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, which was consistent with Luca Valenti et al.’s study. 35 Patients with PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype GG had a higher risk of liver damage. The PNPLA3 rs738409 variant was associated with triglyceride accumulation within the liver 36 and was related to lower free cholesterol and triglycerides. 37 In our study, the PNPLA3 rs738409 dominant model was not significantly associated with serum triglyceride concentrations (OR: −0.487, 95% CI: −0.990, 0.017, p: 0.058). This was consistent with Pirazzi et al., who reported that PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with reduced plasma TG levels in very obese individuals. 38

The TM6SF2 rs58542926 variant was also associated with a reduction in lipids in most VLDL. 37 , 39 PNPLA3 rs738409 and TM6SF2 rs58542926 both contributed to the reduced serum triglyceride levels and the decreased risk of cardiovascular disease. 40 , 41 However, no association of TM6SF2 rs58542926 with MAFLD and lipid metabolism indexes was observed in the present study, probably because the frequency of the TM6SF2 rs58542926 minor allele was too low. The minor allele (T) frequency of TM6SF2 rs58542926 in different studies was highly variable in the Chinese population, 42 , 43 so the association with MAFLD is controversial in the Chinese population.

GCKR encodes glucokinase regulatory protein regulating the activity of glucokinase and is involved in de novo lipogenesis. 44 GCKR variants were related to glucose levels, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. 15 And diabetes and fatty liver are often associated. 45 Some studies have identified that GCKR rs1260326 and GCKR rs780094 were significantly associated with MAFLD. 11 , 46 However, there was no correlation between the GCKR variants and the risk of MAFLD in the study. On the other hand, GCKR rs1260326 and GCKR rs780094 were associated with increased TG levels and reduced serum fasting glucose, which was also found in some studies. 47 , 48 It was redundant with PNPLA3 rs738409 in the SNP–SNP interaction, as PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with reduced serum TG concentration.

The MBOAT7 rs641738 variant was associated with reduced MBOAT7 mRNA expression in hepatocytes, and the deletion of MBOAT7 increased the accumulation of saturated triglycerides and enhanced lipogenesis. 49 MBOAT7 rs641738 was associated with increased hepatic fat, elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, and MAFLD severity in Caucasians, Hispanics, and African American ethnicities, whereas no consistent effect was observed in Asian populations. 16 , 50 Consistently, in the Chinese Han population, the association between MBOAT7 rs641738 and MAFLD was not observed, and the MBOAT7 rs641738 dominant model was not significantly associated with ALT (OR: 8.739, 95% CI: −0.618, 18.097, p: 0.067). We considered that MBOAT7 rs641738 was likely influenced by ethnicity in the development of MAFLD.

There have been few studies on the association of GATAD2A rs4808199 and MAFLD. Takahisa et al. and Arun Kumar et al. found that GATAD2A rs4808199 was significantly associated with MAFLD in genome‐wide association studies in the Japanese population. 18 , 51 In our study, a significant association of GATAD2A rs4808199 with MAFLD was not observed.

MDR is a nonparametric statistical tool for detecting gene–gene interactions or gene–environment interactions. With the employment of MDR analysis, we found that PNPLA3 rs738409 was a significant single‐locus model and was the best significant predictive model. TM6SF2 rs58542926 and PNPLA3 rs738409 were both associated with reduced serum triglyceride concentrations and a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, 40 , 41 , 52 and there was probably a synergistic interaction. Min Xu et al. found that there was an interaction between the PNPLA3 I148 M and TMS6F2 E167K variants in MAFLD, and patients with both variants had the highest odds ratio after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. 34 However, the present study observed a redundant interaction, likely due to fewer TM6SF2 rs58542926 CT or TT genotypes in populations. Rs1260326 and rs780094 are GCKR variants; a synergistic interaction was observed likely due to linkage disequilibrium.

Our study confirmed that the PNPLA3 rs738409 G allele was associated with liver damage in the Han population in western China. We found that there was a redundant interaction between PNPLA3 rs738409 and other SNPs, and PNPLA3 rs738409 was probably an independent risk factor among genetic factors. Meanwhile, there was no association between the other studied SNPs and MAFLD except that GCKR variants were associated with increased TG levels and reduced serum fasting glucose in patients with MAFLD.

As the number of known genetic variants associated with MAFLD increases, MAFLD relevant SNPs based on region and ethnicity could provide more accurate measures of MAFLD genetic susceptibility and possibly predict disease progression and regression. The construction of polygenic scores will help reclassify the disease to reflect functional consequences and thus improve clinical management, moreover, in addition to preventing and treating disease, as well as predicting adverse reactions to drugs. 7

There were some limitations in our study. First, the candidate SNPs were selected based on literature, there is probable subjective selection bias. Though we did not find the studied SNPs associated with MAFLD, there are other SNPs of the genes studied that may be associated, as well as other genes associated with MAFLD. Samples were not large enough because some significant associations were not observed. Patients from the hospital in Sichuan Province and the results might not represent all of western China. In the control group, subclinical MAFLD was probably included, which may cause bias in the study. In addition, MAFLD patients were accompanied with metabolic dysfunction, some SNPs might directly be associated with the metabolic factors, which are confounding factors for our study.

5. CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, no association was found between these SNPs and the risk of MAFLD in the Han population in western China. PNPLA3 rs738409 was associated with the AST level in MAFLD patients. GCKR variants were associated with increased TG levels and reduced serum fasting glucose in patients with MAFLD. In addition, there is no synergistic SNP–SNP interaction between PNPLA3 rs738409 and other SNPs studied in our research on MAFLD.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81902142) and the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 2018SZ0382 and No. 2019HXFH052).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Liao S, An K, Liu Z, et al. Genetic variants associated with metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease in western China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:e24626. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24626

Shenling Liao and Kang An, these authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co‐first authors.

Contributor Information

Qiaoli Su, Email: 2961774468@qq.com.

Shuangqing Li, Email: lsqhxjk@126.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Le MH, Yeo YH, Li X, et al. 2019 global NAFLD prevalence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73(1):202‐209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wai‐Sun Wong V, Lai‐Hung Wong G, Woo J, et al. Impact of the new definition of metabolic associated fatty liver disease on the epidemiology of the disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;19(10):2161‐2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lin S, Huang J, Wang M, et al. Comparison of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in real world. Liver Int. 2020;40(9):2082‐2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Eslam M, George J. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of NASH. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(3):394‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Eslam M, George J. Genetic contributions to NAFLD: leveraging shared genetics to uncover systems biology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(1):40‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schwimmer JB, Celedon MA, Lavine JE, et al. Heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(5):1585‐1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Palmer ND, Musani SK, Yerges‐Armstrong LM, et al. Characterization of European ancestry nonalcoholic fatty liver disease‐associated variants in individuals of African and Hispanic descent. Hepatology. 2013;58(3):966‐975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Loomba R, Schork N, Chen CH, et al. Heritability of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis based on a prospective twin study. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1784‐1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Anstee QM, Darlay R, Cockell S, et al. Genome‐wide association study of non‐alcoholic fatty liver and steatohepatitis in a histologically characterised cohort(☆). J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):505‐515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Park SL, Li Y, Sheng X, et al. Genome‐wide association study of liver fat: the multiethnic cohort adiposity phenotype study. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(8):1112‐1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Namjou B, Lingren T, Huang Y, et al. GWAS and enrichment analyses of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease identify new trait‐associated genes and pathways across eMERGE network. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Trepo E, Valenti L. Update on NAFLD genetics: from new variants to the clinic. J Hepatol. 2020;72(6):1196‐1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Martin K, Hatab A, Athwal VS, Jokl E, Piper HK. Genetic contribution to non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and prognostic implications. Curr Diab Rep. 2021;21(3):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Teo K, Abeysekera KWM, Adams L, et al. rs641738C>T near MBOAT7 is associated with liver fat, ALT and fibrosis in NAFLD: a meta‐analysis. J Hepatol. 2021;74(1):20‐30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Eslam M, Valenti L, Romeo S. Genetics and epigenetics of NAFLD and NASH: clinical impact. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):268‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kawaguchi T, Shima T, Mizuno M, et al. Risk estimation model for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Japanese using multiple genetic markers. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0185490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang J, Conti DV, Bogumil D, et al. Association of genetic risk score with NAFLD in an ethnically diverse cohort. Hepatol Commun. 2021;5(10):1689‐1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Salari N, Darvishi N, Mansouri K, et al. Association between PNPLA3 rs738409 polymorphism and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Banini BA, Kumar DP, Cazanave S, et al. Identification of a metabolic, transcriptomic, and molecular signature of Patatin‐like phospholipase domain containing 3‐mediated acceleration of steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2021;73(4):1290‐1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. BasuRay S, Smagris E, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. The PNPLA3 variant associated with fatty liver disease (I148M) accumulates on lipid droplets by evading ubiquitylation. Hepatology. 2017;66(4):1111‐1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Newberry EP, Hall Z, Xie Y, et al. Liver‐specific deletion of mouse Tm6sf2 promotes steatosis, fibrosis, and hepatocellular cancer. Hepatology. 2021;74(3):1203‐1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tanaka Y, Shimanaka Y, Caddeo A, et al. LPIAT1/MBOAT7 depletion increases triglyceride synthesis fueled by high phosphatidylinositol turnover. Gut. 2021;70(1):180‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Beer NL, Tribble ND, McCulloch LJ, et al. The P446L variant in GCKR associated with fasting plasma glucose and triglyceride levels exerts its effect through increased glucokinase activity in liver. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(21):4081‐4088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hernaez R, McLean J, Lazo M, et al. Association between variants in or near PNPLA3, GCKR, and PPP1R3B with ultrasound‐defined steatosis based on data from the third National Health and nutrition examination survey. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(9):1183‐90.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wagenknecht LE, Palmer ND, Bowden DW, et al. Association of PNPLA3 with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease in a minority cohort: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis family study. Liver Int. 2011;31(3):412‐416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wu Y, Zheng Q, Zou B, et al. The epidemiology of NAFLD in mainland China with analysis by adjusted gross regional domestic product: a meta‐analysis. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(2):259‐269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gola D, Mahachie John JM, van Steen K, König IR. A roadmap to multifactor dimensionality reduction methods. Brief Bioinform. 2016;17(2):293‐308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D930‐D934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH. Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene‐gene and gene‐environment interactions. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(3):376‐382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Unalp‐Arida A, Ruhl CE. Patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3 I148M and liver fat and fibrosis scores predict liver disease mortality in the U.S. Population Hepatology. 2020;71(3):820‐834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Niriella MA, Kasturiratne A, Pathmeswaran A, et al. Lean non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD): characteristics, metabolic outcomes and risk factors from a 7‐year prospective, community cohort study from Sri Lanka. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(3):314‐322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Xu M, Li Y, Zhang S, Wang X, Shen J, Zhang S. Interaction of TM6SF2 E167K and PNPLA3 I148M variants in NAFLD in Northeast China. Ann Hepatol. 2019;18(3):456‐460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Valenti L, Al‐Serri A, Daly AK, et al. Homozygosity for the patatin‐like phospholipase‐3/adiponutrin I148M polymorphism influences liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51(4):1209‐1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Carlsson B, Linden D, Brolen G, et al. Review article: the emerging role of genetics in precision medicine for patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(12):1305‐1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Xia M, Zeng H, Wang S, Tang H, Gao X. Insights into contribution of genetic variants towards the susceptibility of MAFLD revealed by the NMR‐based lipoprotein profiling. J Hepatol. 2021;74(4):974‐977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pirazzi C, Adiels M, Burza MA, et al. Patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing 3 (PNPLA3) I148M (rs738409) affects hepatic VLDL secretion in humans and in vitro. J Hepatol. 2012;57(6):1276‐1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Boren J, Adiels M, Bjornson E, et al. Effects of TM6SF2 E167K on hepatic lipid and very low‐density lipoprotein metabolism in humans. JCI. Insight. 2020;5(24):e144079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Meffert PJ, Repp KD, Volzke H, et al. The PNPLA3 SNP rs738409:G allele is associated with increased liver disease‐associated mortality but reduced overall mortality in a population‐based cohort. J Hepatol. 2018;68(4):858‐860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu DJ, Peloso GM, Yu H, et al. Exome‐wide association study of plasma lipids in >300,000 individuals. Nat Genet. 2017;49(12):1758‐1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Wong VW, Wong GL, Tse CH, Chan HL. Prevalence of the TM6SF2 variant and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese. J Hepatol. 2014;61(3):708‐709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wang X, Liu Z, Peng Z, Liu W. The TM6SF2 rs58542926 T allele is significantly associated with non‐ alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1438‐1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Brouwers M, Simons N, Stehouwer CDA, Isaacs A. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular disease: assessing the evidence for causality. Diabetologia. 2020;63(2):253‐260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Mantovani A, Targher G. Hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis and NASH: cause or consequence? J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):335‐352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Li J, Zhao Y, Zhang H, et al. Contribution of Rs780094 and Rs1260326 polymorphisms in GCKR gene to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta‐analysis involving 26,552 participants. Endocr Metab immune Disord drug. Targets. 2020;21:1696‐1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Vaxillaire M, Cavalcanti‐Proenca C, Dechaume A, et al. The common P446L polymorphism in GCKR inversely modulates fasting glucose and triglyceride levels and reduces type 2 diabetes risk in the DESIR prospective general French population. Diabetes. 2008;57(8):2253‐2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Lee GH, Phyo WW, Loo WM, et al. Validation of genetic variants associated with metabolic dysfunction‐ associated fatty liver disease in an ethnic Chinese population. World J Hepatol. 2020;12(12):1228‐1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Meroni M, Dongiovanni P, Longo M, et al. Mboat7 down‐regulation by hyper‐insulinemia induces fat accumulation in hepatocytes. EBioMedicine. 2020;52:102658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ismaiel A, Dumitrascu DL. Genetic predisposition in metabolic‐dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease and cardiovascular outcomes‐systematic review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(10):e13331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kumar A, Shalimar WGK, Gupta V, Sachdeva MP. Genetics of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian populations. J Genet. 2019;98:29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Dongiovanni P, Petta S, Maglio C, et al. Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 gene variant disentangles nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from cardiovascular disease. Hepatology. 2015;61(2):506‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES